20030503 Ver 1_Mitigation Report_20160523

Little Beaver Creek
DMS ID # 221
USACE ACTION ID # 2003-20912
DWQ 401# 030503
CLOSEOUT REPORT: Stream & Wetland
Project Setting & Classifications
Meeting XY Coordinates: 35.695199, -78.924713
County
Wake
General Location
Apex/New Hill
Basin:
Cape Fear
Physiographic Region:
Piedmont
Ecore ion:
Triassic Basin
USGS Hydro Unit:
03030002
NCDWQ Sub -basin:
03-06-05
Wetland Classification
Riparian Riverine
Thermal Regime:
Warm
Trout Water:
No
Project Performers
June -2012
Source Agency:
DMS (WRP)
Provider:
NA
Designer:
Earth Tech
Monitoring Firm:
The Catena Group
Channel Remediation
Design:
Ward Consulting
Engineering, PC
Channel & Plant
Remediation Contractor:
NorthState
Environmental
Approved for transfer to
Stewardship:
Yes
Stewards:
NCDEQ
Project Activities and Timeline
Milestone
Month -Year
Project Instituted
Sep -2001
Permitted
June -2003
Construction Completed
Feb -2007
As -built survey
Feb -2007
Monitoring Year -1
Nov -2007
Monitoring Year -2
Dec -2008
Monitoring Year 3
May -2010
Beaver removal
May -2011
Beaver removal
June -2012
Site Repairs
May 2013
Supplemental Planting
May 2013
Monitoring Year 4
May 2014
Beaver removal
Aug -2014
Monitoring Year 5
June -2015
Beaver removal
Aug -2015
Beaver removal
April -2016
Closeout Submission
June 2016

Project Setting and Background Summary
The Little Beaver Creek project site is located southwest of Apex in Wake County, North Carolina. The project is fully
contained within the property of two landowners. The conservation easement totals 5 1.1 acres. The project area contains
the majority of Little Beaver Creek's floodplain. The watershed is approximately 1. 11 square miles (711 Acres). Areas of
hydric soils are common along the flat, narrow drainage ways of this watershed. Few intact wetland communities are
present, however, as a result of alterations to accommodate agricultural and residential land uses.
The main factor in the degradation and impairment for Little Beaver Creek appeared to be cattle farming. Cattle activity
destroyed the natural riparian vegetation that once bordered the stream. The lack of vegetation on the highly erodible soils
led to increased erosion along the entire reach.
Construction began in July 2005. Due to Hurricane Katrina in August 2005 and contractual issues there was a delay in the
completion of the construction until 2006, which prevented planting until the dormant 2006/2007. Tropical storm Alberto
caused damage in June 2006, which required repair. Collectively, this caused planting to be delayed until February 2007
the official end of construction.
The March 2003 Mitigation (Restoration) Plan did not provide specifics regarding the proposed stream and wetland assets
for this project. The January 2007 Mitigation Report (baseline document) was the first documentation of the assets at
3,712 linear feet of restored stream, 1,513 linear feet of preserved stream, 4.9 acres of restored wetlands and 0.9 acres of
enhanced wetlands. Succeeding monitoring reports showed the same assets for stream restoration and preservation but the
wetland assets were reduced to 2.4 acres of wetland restoration. In preparation for closeout DMS staff adjusted the type
and amount of wetland assets proposed for closeout of the site, based on the work done at the site and subsequent review
of the site and monitoring data, to what are depicted in the Asset Table. Standard monitoring activities were suspended
between 2010 and 2013 as DMS assessed various repair/remediation strategies.
Between January 14 and May 6, 2013, spot repairs were made to the stream channel, unwanted/invasive plants were
treated, pine and sweet gum saplings were thinned and supplemental planting was conducted. The channel repair included
direct work on approximately 400 feet of channel within reaches 2 and 3a and was primarily focused on the removal of
poorly sized, failing structures from the original construction. This involved spot reshaping and grading to reduce bank
heights and slopes and to substitute constructed riffles and lifts for the poorly constructed structures. Thinning of pine and
sweet gum saplings was done in the outer 40 feet of the 50 -foot stream buffer in an attempt to improve species diversity.
No thinning was done within the 10 feet immediately adjacent to the stream to avoid incurring any potential
destabilization of the streambanks. All areas where repair and thinning activities occurred were replanted with native
hardwoods and supplemental planting was done throughout the easement focusing on the first 50 feet from top of bank
and areas with sparse woody stem growth. A total of 7,395 woody stems were installed as part of this effort. For more
information about the repairs, please see the remediation map in this report and 2013 Supplemental Monitoring Report
(Appendix F) in the MY 5 Report.
Beaver management was conducted by APHIS in 2011, 2012, 2014, 2015 and 2016.
Goals and Objectives:
• Restore 4,609 linear feet of Little Beaver Creek (as measured along the centerline) and 951 linear feet of
unnamed tributaries to Little Beaver Creek.
• Provide a stable stream channel that neither aggrades nor degrades while maintaining its dimension, pattern,
and profile with the capacity to transport its watershed's water and sediment load.
• Improve water quality and reduce erosion by stabilizing the stream banks.
• Reconnect the stream to its floodplain.
• Improve aquatic habitat with the use of natural material stabilization structures such as root wads, rock
vanes, woody debris, and a riparian buffer.
• Provide aesthetic value, wildlife habitat, and bank stability through the creation or enhancement of a
nparian zone.
• Restore characteristic hydrologic regime to disturbed wetlands.
• Restore characteristic plant communities and animal habitat to disturbed wetlands.
• Increase the capacity of disturbed wetlands to perform characteristic functions such as flood storage,
biogeochemical cycling, runoff attenuation, and maintenance of plant and animal habitat and species
diversity.

Success Criterion
Success Criteria
Measured Parameter
Criteria Met
10 cross sections:
Yes - The majority of Little Beaver
Stream Channel Stability:
5 riffle & 5 pool
Creek, Reaches 1, 2 and
• Cross-sections
3 are in stable condition with some
• Longitudinal profile
longitudinal profiles by reach
isolated bank scour areas, three
Measurements should show little
structures with some piping. The
change from the as -built cross-
portion of Little Beaver Creek below
sections and profile; pool/riffle
station 38+00 to the culvert at the end
of the restored reach is stable and
spacing should remain constant;
well vegetated. Two tributaries
pools should not be filling in or
located on the project site tie into the
riffles starting to change to pools
north bank of Little Beaver Creek.
Tributary 1 is exhibiting some very
minor bank scour but remains in
stable condition. Tributary 2 is very
stable with vegetation that has
established throughout the channel
bed and banks.
Stream Hydrology:
Document visual evidence of bankfull
Yes — Visual observation showed
• Documentation of at least
events.
bankfull events occurred between
two bankfull events during
2006 and 2014.
the monitoring period.
Bankfull events must occur
during separate monitoring
years.
8 gauges
Yes — In MY5, only 4 of 8 gauges
Wetland Hydroloav:
met hydrological requirements (3, 6,
• 5 - 12.5% success for all
7, & 8). The gauges that did not meet
wetland assets
hydrological success (2, 4, 5 & 9) are
located in areas where DMS is not
requesting wetland credits.
8 vegetation plots.
Yes — 7 of 8 veg. plots surveyed in
Vegetation:
MY 5 met and/or exceeded the 260
• Minimum of 260 planted
planted stems per acre. Only veg.
stems per acre in year 5
plot 2 failed to meet the planted stem
criteria (12 1) but when including
volunteers, the density is 6,435 stems
per ac. The average stem density for
the site is 556 planted/12,581 total
including volunteers.

Asset Table:
Total Mitigation Credits
Stream
Riparian
Wetland
M igation Credits
Buffer
3,884
0.61
Stream
Riparian
Wetland
Non -Riparian
Wetland
Buffer
Nitrogen Phosphorus
Nutrient Offset Nutrient Offset
R
RE
R
RE R RE
Totals
3,721
163*
0.211
0.40
Project Components
Project
Component -or-
Reach ID
Stationing/
Location
Existing
Footage/
Acreage
Approach (P>L
PII; etc)
Restoration -or
Restoration
Equivalent
Restoration
Footage or
Acreage
Nlitigation
Ratio
LBC Wetlands
Reach 1 & 2
SEE CCPV
NA
Creation
R
0.64
3:1
LBC Wetlands
Reach 1 & 2
SEE CCPV
1.98
Preservation
RE
1.98
5:1
LBC Reach 1
10+00 to 19+91
991
PI & PII
R
991
1:1
LBC Reach 2
19+91 to 33+00
1,318
PH
R
1,318
1:1
LBC Reach 3a
33+00 to 40+32
732
PII
R
732
1:1
LBC Reach 3b
48+00 to 63+13
1,631
Preservation
RE
1,631 *
10:1
Tributary 1
10+00 to 13+81
381
PH
R
381
1:1
Tributary 2
10+00 to 12+06
206
PH
R
206
1:1
Tributary 3
10+00 to 10+93
93
PII
R
93
1:1
Component Summation
Restoration
Level
Stream Oinear
feet)
Riparian Wetland (acres)
Non -Riparian
Wetland
(acres)
Buffer (square
feet)
Upland (acres)
Riverine
Non-Riverine
Restoration
3,721
Enhancement
Enhancement I
Enhancement H
Creation
0.64
Preservation
1,631x
1.98
HQPres ervation
BNIP Elements
Element
Location Purpose/Function
Notes
*Stream preservation credits have been adjusted to account for the 100 ft. utility easement at the downstream end of the
project (50% credit)
BMP Elements:
BR = Bioretention Cell; SF = Sand Filter; SW = Stormwater Wetland; WDP = Wet Dentention Pond; DDP = Dry Detention Pond;
FS = Filter Strip; S = Greassed Swale; LS = Level Spreder; NI = Natural Infiltration Area; FB = Forested Buffer
Total Mitigation Credits
Stream
Riparian
Wetland
Non -Riparian
Wetland
Buffer
3,884
0.61

0 200 400 800 1,200 1,600 N
Feet W-*,
* , E
S.

Topographic Map
SO4PCE: USGS Quadrangle: hFew dill; NC, 1974, Photorevlsed 198f1, Phptoinspected.4983
Directions: From Raleigh take US 64 west of the NC 55
interchange to Kelly Rd. Take Kelly Rd. south to the intersection
with Old US 1. Take Old US1 right approximately 1.3 miles to
Humie Olive Rd (on right). Take Humie Olive Rd approximately 1.5
miles to Olive Farm Rd. (on left). Take Olive Farm Rd. to end at
culvert and this is the project area.}\ r,
Watershed Area
1.1 Square Miles
fi
{ v-
_ ,r �. ��� I ` ■ � ` f' �- 'ice` ..�,' ♦ .'� I 'i %�`
*fes
16
P r ter♦ a � ✓ '�_"'+ �
Jt;,
ilia Pj
". 5w, df r� �. _- � '4-V� .��--- J C�=:I I � .'4J � • ` 11 ,1
Ma tech®U GSTo o ra hicSe esT^", CMa t \ 7' 933 3.
p P 9 p' p-
;j
Copyright 20.01 Moptech �' l ✓ i' is A fr AN
t FRANKLIN N
�+—ea W E Y
CHATHAM S��VVV--fff�
5
0 1,000 2,000 4,000 �p
JOHNS ON Feet 31 I1 I�Clt
reoeeaan
FIGURE 1
Site Location Map
Little Beaver Creek
Wake County, North Carolina
January 2007

Soils Map
2 9c2
Ali slog we BO
MC2
CIE2
Vit, W9 I' N
IWY
tB2 WSC-;2
W02 I CTC2
w1pr-2 Cr 'tel�B2
M=
WSC2 V4'602
Cre
�EW,
..52 1 r — 11 11
- Wsc CrC2 2
ftC2 2
CrC-2
Watershed Are
We Jf Z- - -
Square Miles
CfB2
r Ile
Q,82
C�92
mw1 CrC2
rC2
CrC2
INS m al
jsitJ.
MA
Gra :%102
Legend
rc2
G!cz AfA
■ Au
cm
cm
ICA CrW: CrC. Cry, QrE
Gr8; Gr62, Grr-: GwU; COD
GIP
CrE Vff!13, PA132; WC; WG2; NUD2-
E% B2; Mq1,; MgC2
r F CrOp %,.,SE Wwwon
x
7r'R 1. -&G2
e= Cid 4—
Nv " w
JrE
ME
THAIl
w1 LE JOHNSTCHN
W42118pl& WoOT06on Prligro nL
FIGURE 6
soil -S
Little Beaver Creek
Wake County, North Carolina

LZZ 'ON 133rObd d333N
Iq
19 w
;E066Z5000#O3S
touj
C}unoo aMeM C�v
og1 QuO
SMlVd3M M33HO U3nd38 311111
W
Will N
AN
gp� �3
oS aV
og� o z
�wW a s o
�3 rz 3a L J
ti= 5.4=0 0 g P3PsEa; 3 0
"Soml-
I f llt> >�11� > $ �l
I I
I I
el
all!
_
I€ aiF�
0�-
� P
�1€ ��-
MT
i -- -
arm—
En
ow �Q wo a fi� �J
w�
�a �� a� w F •ate -- - —�=
Q4 0
Clt
06 qti E. En Z do
w 5�
Fw Baa 5 ti� ROAn as E,xw wNNN
©
Q 0.,2 o w1 ftM ; qa g 8
Z .rc6e} ko 16w
N Z
Eta O
M" m y SFill
AlF-
N
Al.8
.d a o

7 ni
�ZZ 'ON 103f Obd d330N
E066Z5000#03S
ON `Alunoo aMeM
SUIVd38 M33HO M3nd38 31111l
0
0
x
CN^Vi Inti
T
L N
�TVZo
N d a U L i' N
•
oa �NVN
U y M N O\
mCM N i�
� a
rn
VJ
O
x a o i i v a
www aria
O
X
�
vJ
W
U
Q
Z
F
Z
Qo
E]
CL
u
ILL—_-- RSA➢ cGRAVGG) ---� �\`�
i
I
i
I
Wo6 ee mN

O
4 wz) C9 am
7 - - - - - �
O E N
4 m+
4 No
�s� v
N L +' O
+ a M
u
a 3
a
my
01
o
O
s
�n
a
o o
Cp
t bd S Ox
`app£ Shi
� Lr.
Cpl QgP%
Jb
c � j
O +
�.i. (7 .04 mM1
q
ab by
&
ry
s
bZZ 'ON 103rO8d d330N
�W
b N
C 4
U c
` wo
OR
S066Z5000#OOS
ami
5W
e
10
.e�
it5�
�N ��3 �1 M uno a e
R
<�
'
m> `�
�� O
w
99''"ZA373
SMIbd3M M33HO U3nd38 3-1111-1E�'�.�
A$�.
g
�
K
Q�
M
O
4 wz) C9 am
7 - - - - - �
O E N
4 m+
4 No
�s� v
N L +' O
+ a M
u
a 3
a
my
r
ry
O
s
�n
a
o o
Cp
t bd S Ox
`app£ Shi
� Lr.
Cpl QgP%
Jb
c � j
O +
�.i. (7 .04 mM1
q
ab by
66"09Z a 1373
WK-YISYH
99'OW-A373
99+CZ -YIS SH
2 �
Zd�a
w
/S"9LZ�A373
-
ry
/S+OC - US UH
s
�n
U c
c � j
a o 0
&
ry
s
d o r y m
J > N
UCNS�
/S"9LZ�A373
-
/S+OC - US UH
"
�W
b N
C 4
U c
@ S
ami
e
i
a
99''"ZA373
-
DPW -Y1SYH
.VIN

---------�z
U
�ZZ 'ON 103f Obd d330N
w
E066Z5000#OOS
Jw
.c10ON
`Alunoo a)ieM
p
�$
Q� O
SUlVd3U X13380 83AV38 31111l
i�''�
---------�z

6LZZ-9LL(6L6) :x^d 9L40-91L(6L6) :G04d l� oU.
909LZ 0� 4 !oa 3%<s^a3
1
VNI-08VO HAJON AlNf1OO a)I`dM
�s-
x $
•
£Ol-Hl al!^9 P^IB lol! 00 BZLZ
,,,.NN. ,,
– S
� � m
No
0
_
m
Z
z
o
�e
w o-6ad lu2waoun4u3 —1-4-3 – ou!Iao0 41,.N h
. �2y'
as a> f, ?
•,9'� 3
Md-ld JNIlNb'-ld
E066Z5000 #GI OOS
o
U
w
g
N
69E9-OL9 (6l6) Xtld 6909-919LZ ON'461a1etl
9390-OL9 (6 16) 601 e11n5'Ptl svoj x15 99E9
ON 3SN3011 Wtlld
•3•d Isnauitud tupinsuo3 pzeAMX
–
o
4 w
w
a
w€fiZ-O
m
A
�s-
x $
•
– S
� � m
No
0
_
m
Z
z
o
�e
�b
g
i c
z o o s
o oo
–
–
Yea
�xGry
`�
:... •3
%il.
A
x $
•
– S
� � m
No
0
_
m
Z
z
o
g
z o o s
o oo

:xoj
£Ol-Hl al!^S 'P^IB IP0o0 9ZLZ ��
ww6wd luawaou°yu3 wa;sls 3 - oupao0 441-N
65£S-OLS(6W Xtl3£909-SWIl ON'161-PH
9ZS0-OLS (616) 40L apnS'PH sVoj x!S 99£9 � -
6W-0ON3SN3011HHI3 f
•j•d `s mui�u� �upinsuo3 p reM
Y
E
c
a
W rl1
O Z zjwol
N J W d
w �9AWx H (g E: 2dF
ygoha
g� u� � uN'i z� =w
QLL i Sa
�o=�& F a _
FMFOE U_NNWIP © =o pia
LL z 2 J J 7 2 1 0 IL Z F
W O W Q W
} V~i r�A wNKpV W �9,z U
q } T
�W`o°w wm
W I Z N W l W F f a p N Q Z I Q F W W 4
m ZW[yiJ yW S 7j' � Z
UV acY zt[�i Y�LL�my ai iz urZ �FZ
�r�i uNi' Dda yyiy rppa -3w 2R
fNwaoa�yw�zgw��¢Fa°'�w
�CZQa��ONa��O q'p pWiwLL°��O�nnm7W
a W�Qn�00zp�z��4�C7m�N�ONawO
�4pe;'e;vv,^^��a���Z2pW ❑�z�vj2 F-OQVFIUN
�Nk-m Ci Will�OaS!Cg1-�.N [�W{iW ZZ WLSSd�7
a6[W9wo l�`iSW IVzffiT,J
N7daDu�[76ma0.a441-[L
I
W
O
m F
Oz
c zD�JF
mug
a
Uj* w ui va z
E p U)
z0
N QL1-F
ooSz
wa
W FZ-z
0 NZ h-
O H �M
�• pp?(�,1F �tR
a 5� �QWQ
. w
t -
Y O
o z
N
VNIIOUVO HiHON `AlNnoo a)I`dM
-
.,w3NNAj'
S�-1GVi (INV SgiON NV -Id !DNIlMd-ld
ul
°
=
E066Z5000 #GI OOS
A
m
S�II`ddB�l )I���IJ l:Iin`di8 11111
4
a
3 s
x
o
I
W
O
m F
Oz
c zD�JF
mug
a
Uj* w ui va z
E p U)
z0
N QL1-F
ooSz
wa
W FZ-z
0 NZ h-
O H �M
�• pp?(�,1F �tR
a 5� �QWQ
. w
t -
Y O
o z
N
v
=
I
W
O
m F
Oz
c zD�JF
mug
a
Uj* w ui va z
E p U)
z0
N QL1-F
ooSz
wa
W FZ-z
0 NZ h-
O H �M
�• pp?(�,1F �tR
a 5� �QWQ
. w
t -
Y O
o z
N

Stream Morphology Data: Cross sections, Longitudinal Profiles, and Morphology Table
Little Beaver Creek 2015
Cross Section 1 - Riffle - Sta. 11+25
297.00
296.00
295.00
294.00
A
0
293.00
m
Wl-
292.00
w
291.00
290.00
289.00
288.00
0.00 20.00
40.00
60.00
80.00 100.00
120.00
140.00 160.00
180.00
200.00
Distance (feet)
-2015 MY5
-2014 MY4
-2010 MY3 -2009 MY2 -2008 MYl -As-Built
- Baseline Bankfull Monitoring Datum
- Flood Prone Area
Little Beaver Creek 2015
Cross Section 2 - Pool - Sta. 14+85
292.00
291.00
290.00
e
289.00
0
'C
288.00
-
t
W
287.00
286.00
285.00
0.00 20.00
40.00
60.00 80.00 100.00
120.00 140.00
160.00
180.00
Distance (feet)
-2015 MY5
-2014 MY4
-2010 MY3 -2009 Mv2 -2008 MYl -As-Bull[
- Baseline Bankfull Monitoring Datum
- Flood Prone Area
Little Beaver Creek 2015
Cross Section 3 - Riffle - Sta. 21+16
289.00
288.00
287.00
286.00
e
.y'
m
285.00
t
- - -
- -
w
284.00
283.00
282.00
281.00
0.00 20.00
40.00
60.00 80.00 100.00
120.00 140.00
160.00
180.00
Distance (feet)
-2015 MY5
-2014 MY4
-2010 MY3 -2009 MY2 -2008 MYl -As-Built
- Baseline Bankfull Monitoring Datum
- Flood Prone Area
Little Beaver Creek 2015
Cross Section 4 - Pool - Sta. 25+40
287.00
286.00
285.00
284.00
-
o-
'L
283.00
W
282.00
AV Z-
281.00
280.00
0.00 20.00
40.00
60.00 80.00
100.00 120.00
140.00
160.00
Distance (feet)
-2015 MY5
-2014 MY4
-2010 MY3 -2009 MY2 -2008 MYl -As-Built
- Baseline Bankfull Monitoring Datum
- Flood Prone Area
Little Beaver Creek 2015
Cross Section 5 - Riffle - Sta. 29+68
285.00
284.00
283.00
282.00
281.00
280.00
W
279.00
278.00
277.00
276.00
0.00 20.00
40.00
60.00 80.00
100.00 120.00
140.00
160.00
Distance (feet)
--2015 MY5
-2014 MY4
-2010 MY3 -2009 MY2 -2008 MYl -As-Built
- Baseline Bankfull Monitoring Datum
- Flood Prone Area

Little Beaver Creek 2015
Cross Section 6 - Riffle - Sta. 33+28
283.00
282.00
281.00
280.00
m
279.00
W
278.00
277.00
276.00
275.00
0.00 20.00
40.00
60.00
80.00 100.00 120.00 140.00 160.00 180.00
200.00
220.00
Distance (feet)
+-2015 MY5
-2014 MY4
-2010 MY3 -2009 MY2 -2008 MYI -As-Built - Baseline Bankfull Monitoring Datum
- Flood Prone Area
Little Beaver Creek 2015
Cross Section 7 - Pool - Sta. 36+03
282.00
281.00
280.00
279.00
278.00
e
0
m
277.00
276.00
275.00
W
274.00
273.00
272.00
271.00
0.00 20.00
40.00
60.00
80.00 100.00 120.00 140.00 160.00 180.00
200.00
220.00
Distance (feet)
2015 MY5
-2014 MY4
-2010 MY3 -2009 MY2 -2008 MYl -As-Built - Baseline BankfuB Monitoring Datum
- Flood Prone Area
Little Beaver Creek 2015
Cross Section 8 - Riffle - Sta. 38+95
279.00
278.00
277.00
276.00
All
c
275.00
0
A
274.00
w
273.00
272.00
271.00
270.00
0.00 20.00
40.00
60.00 80.00 100.00 120.00
140.00
160.00
Distance (feet)
2015 MY5
-2014 MY4
-2010 MY3 -2009 MY2 -2008 MYI-As-Bn>7t - Baseline Bankfu0 Monitoring Datum
- Flood Prone Area
Little Beaver Creek 2015
Cross Section Tl - Pool - Tributary 1 - Sta. 11+63
292.00
291.00
290.00
d
289.00
______________
_____
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
a
•a°
285.00
287.00
286.00
285.00
284.00
0.00 20.00
40.00
60.00 80.00 100.00 120.00
140.00
160.00
Distance (feet)
2015 MY5
-2014 MY4
-2010 MY3 -2009 MY2 -2008 MYl -As-Built - Baseline Bankfull Monitoring Datum
- Flood Prone Area
Little Beaver Creek 2015
Cross Section T2 - Pool - Tributary 1 - Sta. 12+89
291.00
290.00
289.00
F
288.00
L
287.00
286.00
285.00
284.00
0.00 20.00
40.00
60.00 80.00 100.00 120.00
140.00
160.00
Distance (feet)
2015 MY5
-2014 MY4
-2010 MY3 -2009 MY2 -2008 WI -As-Built - Baseline BankfuB Monitoring Datum - Flood Prone Area

295
290
285
d
v
c
0
d
LU
280
275
Little Beaver Creek
Longitudinal Profile
Reach 1: Station 10+00-19+90
270 +-
10+00
288
286
284
282
d
w
p 280
a
LU
278
276
274
272
19+50 20+50 21+50 22+50 23+50 24+50 25+50 26+50 27+50 28+50 29+50 30+50 31+50 32+50
Station (feet)
BTW MY5 —TW MY4 TW MY3 TW MY2 TW MY1 —TW MYO - • - Water Surface MY5 — • • Bankfull MY5
11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00 15+00 16+00 17+00 18+00 19+00 20+00
Station (feet)
tTW MY5 —TW MY4 TW MY3 TW MY2 TW MY1 TW MYO - • - Water Surface MY5 — • •Bankfull MY5
Little Beaver Creek
Longitudinal Profile
Reach 2: Station 19+91-33+00
n
+
a
o0
c
N
N
o
�
R
v
N
6
N
N
N
�
N
O
o
Q
u
U
C
C
y
C
C
V
�
U
O
U
d
d
- _ . -
)
— . —
M
N
270 +-
10+00
288
286
284
282
d
w
p 280
a
LU
278
276
274
272
19+50 20+50 21+50 22+50 23+50 24+50 25+50 26+50 27+50 28+50 29+50 30+50 31+50 32+50
Station (feet)
BTW MY5 —TW MY4 TW MY3 TW MY2 TW MY1 —TW MYO - • - Water Surface MY5 — • • Bankfull MY5
11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00 15+00 16+00 17+00 18+00 19+00 20+00
Station (feet)
tTW MY5 —TW MY4 TW MY3 TW MY2 TW MY1 TW MYO - • - Water Surface MY5 — • •Bankfull MY5
Little Beaver Creek
Longitudinal Profile
Reach 2: Station 19+91-33+00
33+50
a
o0
N
N
rn
N
R
6
6
N
N
N
Q
C
C
C
C
V
U
U
d
d
)
M
N
tI
O
_
O
O
V
U
+�
l
33+50

284
282
280
278
d
w
p 276
m
W
274
272
270
268
33+00
Little Beaver Creek
Longitudinal Profile
Reach 3A: Station 33+01-40+54
N
M
M
0
y
io
c
35+00
36+00 37+00
O
tD
M
tC
N
r
c
O1
W
M
N
to
m
c
—TW MY5
N
u)
O
U
TW MY3 TW MY2 TW MY1
TW MYO — - Water Surface 2015 — -Bankfull MY5
U
UI
N
w
w
O
U
N
V
w
N
w
w
O
UAaIlk
N
C
U
m;
�
w
w
0
0
v
v
ti
-------------
290
289
288
287
d
v
`0 286
.2
d
LU
285
284
283
282
10+00
34+00
35+00
36+00 37+00
38+00 39+00 40+00 41+00
Station (feet)
—TW MY5
—TW MY4
TW MY3 TW MY2 TW MY1
TW MYO — - Water Surface 2015 — -Bankfull MY5
Little Beaver Creek
Longitudinal Profile
Tributary 1: Station 10+00-13+85
11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00
Station (feet)
BTW MY5 —TW MY4 TW MY3 TW MY2 TW MY1 TW MYO - - -MY5 Water Surface - - -MY5 Bankfull
v
N
N
N
C
U
m;
�
w
w
0
0
v
v
ti
-------------
11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00
Station (feet)
BTW MY5 —TW MY4 TW MY3 TW MY2 TW MY1 TW MYO - - -MY5 Water Surface - - -MY5 Bankfull

Little Beaver Creek
Longitudinal Profile
Tributary 2: Station 10+00.12+00
282
281.5
281
r 280.5
m
'------------------
r---------------
-
----------
d
w 280
279.5
279
278.5
10+00 11+00 12+00
Station (feet)
—TW MY5 mTW MY4 TW MY3 TW MY2 TW MY1 TW MYO - - -Water Surface MY5 - - Bankfull MY5

Hydrology Data: Verification of Bankfull Events Table, Historic Vs. Average Rainfall Graph, Wetland
Gauge Data
Verification of Bankfull Events
Date of Data Collection
Date of Occurrence
Method
2006
June 14, 2006
Visual
September 18, 2008
September 7, 2008
Visual (i.e. wrack lines)
April 1, 2014
March 2014
Observation of wrack
lines in the floodplain
January 12, 2014
January 12, 2014
Visual Observation
Wetland Hydrology Criteria Attainment
Project ID (IMS):221(Little Beaver Creek)
Groundwater Gauee Summary Table
►J
Monitoring Gauge Number
Project Component
2007
Max Consecutive Hydroperiod: Saturation within 12 Inches of Soil Surface
(Percent of Growing Season - March 26 -Nov 11 - 230 Days)
2008 2009 1 2010 1 2011 1 2012 1 2013 1 2014 1
2015
Mean
Min
Max
Gage_201d
NA
<5%
<5%
Gages Moved to New Locations in Early 2010
Gage_301d NA <5% <5%
Gage_40ld NA 7.4 <5%
Gage_501d NA 8.3 <5%
Gage_2New
Gage_3New
Gage_4New
Gage_5New
Wetlands-RelicFloodplain
Wetlands-RelicChannel
Wetlands -Preservation
Wetlands-RelicFloodplain
Were Not Established Until 2010
0.0
10.0
0.0
1.7
1.71 0.01 0.4
0.4
0.5 0.0 1.7
Gages Not Maintained by
Consultant During Project
Repair Period
17.3 21.2
19.3 17.3 21.2
3.5 5.2
4.3 3.5 5.2
9.5
milla E"
Gage_6
Wetlands -Preservation
12.21
25.01 15.2
10.8
7.81 3.51 9.1
17.3
20.8
12.1 3.5 20.8
Gage_?
Wetlands -Preservation
>12.51
33.01 35.1
18.0
Same
50.6
28.6
38.1 28.6 50.6
Gage 8* Wetlands -Preservation >12.5 33.0 42.9 13.0
4.8 11.3
19.6 4.8 42.9
Gage_9
Wetlands-RelicFloodplain
1 <5%1
5.61 6.51
2.21
2.61 2.21 2.21
3.0
Annual Total Precipitation
1 34.01
48.51 45.311
451
40.51 45.761 46.351
55.21
55.731
1
30th percentile Precipitation
1 39.41
39.41 39.41
39.41
39.41 39.41 39.41
39.41
39.41
1
70th percentile Precipitation
1 46.21
46.21 46.21
46.21
46.21 46.21 46.21
46.21
46.21
1
* - Gage replaced and moved slightly by consultant in 2014
Successful Gages - Represents areas for which credit is being sought
Unsuccessful Gages- No credit being sought in these areas

Vegetation Data:
Post Repair (2013)
Scientific Name
Baseline
MYO
Total per Species
(live stakes)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Total per Species
(bare rooticontainer)
Annual Means
Alnus serrulata
Tag alder
250
Silky w illow
Amelanchier arborea
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species
Type
MY5 (2014)
PnoLSIP-all T
Red chokebarry
MY4 (2013)
PnoLS P -all T
P I
MY3 (2009)
PnoLS P -all T
Paw Paw
MY2 (2008)
PnoLS P -all T
545
Acer rubrum
red maple
Tree
55
Carya glabra
100
1,152
Sycamore
2
Buttonbush
240
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Comus amomum
Silky dogwood
15
Acer rubrum var. rubrum
red maple
Tree
300
162 2,471
5
Flowering dogwood
1,152
355
Diospyros virginiana
Persimmon
72
American persimmon
Euonymus americana
235
Alnus serrulata
hazel alder
Shrub
2
2
2
3
3
3
Ilex verticillata
Winterberry
130
205
Juglans nigra
Arrelanchier arborea
common serviceberry
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
400
I VP -8
Nyssa sylvatica
Blackgum
548
VP -14
Aronia arbutifolia
Red Chokeberry
Shrub
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
Aronia prunifolia
Quercus rubra
Northern red oak
1
1
1
1
1
1
Sambucus canadensis
Elderberry
0
1,420
Viburnum nudum
Possum -haw
Baccharis halimifolia
eastern baccharis
Shrub
TOTAL
13,860
3
3
7
2
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
8
8
8
9
9
9
6
6
Carpinus caroliniana
American hornbeam
Tree
1
94
Carpinus caroliniana var. carolin Coastal American Hombee Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
1
1
1
Carya
hickory
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Cornusflorida
flowering dogwood
Tree
3
3
3
2
2
2
Corylus americana
American hazelnut
Shrub
4
4
5
4
4
4
Diospyros virginiana
common persimmon
Tree
6
6
14
5
5
5
4
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
32
32
39
32
32
36
35
35
38
33
33
35
Hamamelis virginiana
American w itchhazel
Tree
1
1
1
5
5
5
Hamamelis virginiana var. virgini American w itchhazel
Tree
11
11
11
11
11
ill
10
10
10
6
6
6
Hypericum
St. Johnswort
Shrub
1
9
Ilex decidua var. decidua
Possum -haw
shrub
1
1
1
3
3
3
Ilex opaca
American holly
Tree
1
Juniperus virginiana var. virginiai eastern redcedar
Tree
Liquidambarstyraciflua
sweetgum
Tree
1945
1449
1764
3476.3
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
12
1
1
2
Liriodendron tulipifera var. tulipif Tulip -tree, Yellow Poplar, Tree
1
1
1
6
1
11
Morella cerifera
wax myrtle
shrub
8
8
12
81
8
9
11
11
11
10
10
11
Nyssa sylvatica
blackgum
Tree
35
1
2
Rnus taeda
loblolly pine
Tree
172
219
350
160
Ranera
planertree
Tree
3
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
6
2
1
Platanus occidentalis var. occidE Sycamore, Plane -tree
Tree
6
6
6
6
6
6
1
1
11
9
Prunus serotina
black cherry
Tree
1
2
Prunus serotina var. serotina
black cherry
Tree
2
Quercus
oak
Tree
3
33
Quercus alba
white oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Quercus lyrata
overcup oak
Tree
5
5
6
5
5
6
8
8
8
6
6
6
Quercus nigra
w ater oak
Tree
15
71
44
28
Quercus phellos
willow oak
Tree
6
6
17
6
6
7
1
1
2
2
2
4
Rhus
sumac
shrub
1
Rhus copallinumvar. copallinum flameleaf sumac
shrub
3
3
Rosa multiflora
multiflora rose
Exotic
1
Salix nigra
black w illow
Tree
Sambucus canadensis
Common Elderberry
Shrub
1
Ulmus
elm
Tree
22
10
Ulmus alata
winged elm
Tree
1
Ulmus rubra
slippery elm
Tree
3
3
48
31
3
3
4
2
Unknow n
Shrub/Tree
Vaccinium
blueberry
Shrub
1
Viburnum
Iviburnum
shrub
1
1
1
1
1
1
Viburnum nudum
1possumhaw
Shrub
9
9
9
9
91
9
11
11
1
11
1
1
Stem count 110 110
size (ares) 8
size (ACRES) 0.20
Species count 201 201
Stems per ACRE 556.441 556.441
2487
34
12581
115 1151 1807 751 751
8 8
0.20 0.20
22 22 31 11 111
581.74 581.74 9140.8 379.391379.391
2378
27
12029
701
11T
354.11
70 4181.3
8
0.20
11 33
354.11 21152
Post Repair (2013)
Scientific Name
Baseline
MYO
Total per Species
(live stakes)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Total per Species
(bare rooticontainer)
Total per Species
(live stakes)
Alnus serrulata
Tag alder
250
Silky w illow
Amelanchier arborea
Downy serviceberry
1,152
Salix nigra
Aronia arbutifolia
Red chokebarry
90
P I
Asimina triloba
Paw Paw
440
545
Carpinus caroliniana
Ironwood
1,592
55
Carya glabra
Rgnut hickory
1,152
Sycamore
Cephalanthus occidentalis
Buttonbush
240
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Comus amomum
Silky dogwood
0
1,420
Cornus amomum
Silky dogwood
300
162 2,471
Cornus Florida
Flowering dogwood
1,152
355
Diospyros virginiana
Persimmon
548
American persimmon
Euonymus americana
Straw berry bush
200
Alnus serrulata
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Green ash
988
Hamamelis virginiana
Witch hazel
1,152
Ilex verticillata
Winterberry
130
205
Juglans nigra
Black walnut
548
Red chokeberry
Lindera benzoin
Spice bush
250
Viburnum nudum
Myrica cerifera
Wax rrryrtle
400
I VP -8
Nyssa sylvatica
Blackgum
548
VP -14
Quercus lyrata
Overcup oak
220
220
Quercus michauxii
Sw anp chestnut oak
220
Ironw ood
Quercus nigra
Water oak
770
Ilex verticillata
Quercus phellos
Willow oak
770
20,639
Quercus rubra
Northern red oak
548
2,854
Salix nigra
Black w illow
0
710
Sambucus canadensis
Elderberry
0
1,420
Viburnum nudum
Possum -haw
200
1 4,613
486 1 22,420
TOTAL
13,860
2,130
Post Repair (2013)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Total per Species
(bare rooticontainer)
Total per Species
(live stakes)
Total per Species
(whips in brush toe)
Cephalanthus occidentalis
Buttonbush
545
400
Salix sericea
Silky w illow
VP -8
545
VP -10
Salix nigra
Black w illow
545
P I
Sambucus canadensis
Elderberry
45
545
100
Cornus amomum
Silky dogwood
55
545
300
Platanus occidentalis
Sycamore
380
81
1221
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Green ash
375
40 1,701
1,0131
Linodendron tulipfera
Tulip poplar
355
162 2,471
1,499 6,237
Betula nigra
River birch
355
81 2,833
1,0121
Diospyros virginiana
American persimmon
305
81 7,042
1211 8,175
Alnus serrulata
Tag alder
305
Ulmus rubral
Red elm
335
Corylus americana
Hazelnut
205
Aroma arbutifolia
Red chokeberry
25
Viburnum nudum
Possum -haw
355
VP -7
I VP -8
Quercus phellos
Willow oak
220
VP -14
Hamamelis virginiana
Witch hazel
220
P
T
Carpinus caroliniana
Ironw ood
260
P T
P T
Ilex verticillata
Winterberry
40
1,295
20,639
Rosa palustris
ISwamp rose
35
2,854
486 1 11,655
567 2,590
TOTAL
3870
2725
800
Vegetation Plot Densities - Stems/Acre Pre -Repair
VP -2
VP -5
VP -7
VP -8
VP -9
VP -10
VP -11
VP -14
P T I
P I
T
P I T
P I T
P T
P T
P T
P T
2007(MY1)
162
1,0531
1
7291
2031
81
1221
446
203
2008 (MY2)
40 1,701
1,0131
7,7361
5671 8,910
1621 2,349
162 2,471
1,499 6,237
1,661 7,736
162 286
2009 (MY3)
81 2,833
1,0121
4,5731
8501 4,573
2021 6,151
81 7,042
1211 8,175
526 6,596
162 1,174
Vegetation Plot Densities - Stems/Acre Post Repair 2013
VP -2
VP -5 I
VP -7
I VP -8
VP -9
VP -10
VP -11
VP -14
P T
P
T
P
T
P
T
P T
P T
P T
P T
2013 (MY4)
162 6,435
1,295
20,639
850
20,922
405
2,854
486 1 11,655
567 2,590
486 6,232
405 1,700
2014 (MY5)
121 1 6,435 1
1,214 1
30,149 1
850
1 14,285
1 364
1 4,613
486 1 22,420
526 1 4,087
445 1 16,471
445 2,185

DMS Recommendation and Conclusion
The project includes an expansive easement with buffer widths ranging from 80 to 500 feet along the vast
majority of its length. The majority of the cross sections exhibited little change or changes that indicate channel
stability. Areas identified for wetland preservation or creation exhibited characteristics and measured
hydrology that support their status as wetlands and their mitigation level. The project also includes wetland
features that are non -credited. Four overbank events were documented and it is very likely this is an absolute
minimum. The project has met all of its success criteria and is recommended for regulatory closure with the
assets specified in table 1.
Contingencies
None

Pre -Construction Photos:

Appendix A: Watershed Planning Summary - Little Beaver Creek
Watershed Characteristic Overview
Little Beaver Creek is a stream and wetland restoration and preservation project located in Wake County,
southwest of the Town of Apex in the Cape Fear River Basin. It is located within HUC 03030002060160, the
Beaver Creek watershed, which was identified as a Targeted Local Watershed (TLW) in the 2009 Cape Fear
River Basin Restoration Priorities Plan (RBRP). This project is located within the Lower New Hope watershed.
Currently, DMS has no other projects in this TLW.
The Beaver Creek watershed is 16% agricultural, 66% forested and 3% impervious. In addition, the majority of
this watershed is designated as a Water Supply Watershed by NCDWR. According to the 2009 RBRP,
improving water quality flowing to Jordan Lake is the highest priority in the Cape Fear 03030002 Catalog Unit.
Little Beaver Creek drains directly into Jordan Lake which is designated as a Nutrient Sensitive Water Supply
Watershed by the NCDWR and the Little Beaver Creek project is approximately 3.5 miles upstream of the lake.
Much of the land in this watershed has been protected by the Army Corps of Engineers as a consequence of the
creation of Jordan Lake. Apex has successfully protected over 120 acres of floodplain with help from CWMTF.
Continued preservation efforts and stormwater treatment are recommended to limit NPS pollution from this HU
to Jordan Lake.
Links to Watershed Goals and Objectives
Priorities of the Little Beaver Creek stream and wetland project include contributing to improved water quality
and reduced streambank erosion onsite as well as re-establishing floodplain connectivity and wetland
hydrology. Historically the site was impacted largely by cattle activity and the implementation of this project
resulted in 3,721 if of stream restoration and 1,631 if of stream preservation as well as 2.62 acres of wetland
restoration/preservation. The establishment of riparian buffer and wetland vegetation will increase filtration of
inputs prior to entering the stream and also provide habitat improvements and the additional stabilization of the
stream banks reduce direct sediment inputs and improve floodplain connectivity. These project improvements
will contribute towards improving the downstream water quality condition of Jordan Lake.
Watershed Summary
In addition to the Little Beaver Creek project, there is one agricultural BMP, a livestock exclusion site, located
within this watershed based upon DSWC data as of 2014.
2016 DMS Project Closeout: Little Beaver Creek
t� f
J
Lis -64-
/ j 1
-•� 1/ � -.,�' ,r Apex
` PE FEA
4
t.�
+ Little Beaver Creek
Legend
yy 201E Closeout Project
0 DMS Projects % Middle Cape Fear _
Agricultural BMPs /Kenneth and
Parker Creeks LWP
Cataloging Unit -
Target Local Watersheds r /7
Local Watershed Plans !..
Municipal Bounaries
County Boundary 0 0.75 1.5 3
X9125

Appendix B: Property Ownership & Protection
The site protection instrument for this mitigation project includes the following document(s), available
at the specified County Register of Deeds office, and is linked to the property portfolio at:
http://ncdenr.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/Mitigation Services/Document Management
Library/Property/Property Portfolio/221 Little BeaverCreek PD 2002.pdf
Project Name IMS County Grantor Property Rights Deed/Page Plat/Page Area
Little Beaver Creek 221 wake Robert and Elizabeth Olive CE 6a9332/G2670 Exhibit 48.4
a09639/Ga550 Exhibit
Long-term stewardship of this property is managed by the NC DEQ Stewardship Program.

APPENDIX C - Permits 0 10
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS FILE C
Wilmington DistrictjS
Action ID: 200320912 County: Wake
GENERAL PERMIT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VERIFICATION
Applicant
N.C. Wetlands Restoration Program
Attn: Chem Smith
Address 1619 Mail Service Center
NC 27699-1619
Telephone Number 919-715-3466
Size and Location of Property (waterbodv, Hi2hway name/number, town, etc.): The site for the
proposed stream restoration is on Olive Farm Road, south of its intersection with Humie Olive Road,
south of Apex, Wake County, North Carolina.
Description of Activity: This permit authorizes the placement of in -stream structures associated the
restoration of approximately 5560 linear feet of Little Beaver Creek and its unnamed tributary in the
Neuse River Basin.
Applicable Law: X Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1344) only.
Section 10 (River and Harbor Act of 1899) only.
Authorization: Regional General Permit Number
27 Nationwide Permit Number
Any violation of the conditions of the Regional General or Nationwide Permit referenced above may
subject the permittee to a stop work order, a restoration order, and/or appropriate legal action.
This Department of the Army Regional General Permit or Nationwide Permit verification does not
relieve the permittee of the responsibility to obtain any other required Federal, State, or local
approvals/permits. The permittee may need to contact appropriate State and local agencies before
beginning work. If you have any questions regarding the Corps of Engineers regulatory program,
please contact Andrea Wade at telephone number (919) 876 - 8441 extension 31.
Regulatory Project Manager Signatu
Date i ane 9, 2003 Expiration Date June 9, 2005
SURVEY PLATS, FIELD SKETCH, WETLAND DELINEATION FORM, ETC., MUST BE ATTACHED
TO THE FILE COPY OF THIS FORM, IF REQUIRED OR AVAILABLE.

of WA Michael F. Easley
Governor
r William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
> Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan Klimek, PE
Division of Water Quality
April 25, 2003
Mr. Ron Ferrell
Wetlands Restoration Program
1619 MSC
Raleigh, NC 27699-1619
Subject: Stream Restoration/Enhancement
Little Beaver Creek
Wake County, NC
DWQ# 030503
Dear Mr. Ferrell:
This Office is in receipt of the revised plans for the stream restoration and enhancement project of
approximately 4609 feet of Little Beaver Creek and 951 feet of unnamed tributaries in the Cape Fear River
Basin submitted to this Office on April 21, 2003. DWQ Staff reviewed the plans and determined that stream
restoration and/or enhancement would be achieved.
The stream impacts associated with the project may proceed without written approval from the Division. Please
be advised that seven copies of a complete, formal application and a $475.00 fee is required for projects
intended for compensatory mitigation credit (see General Certification No. 3399, issued March 2003). Any
request for mitigation credit shall be addressed under separate cover.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Mr. Todd St. John at [phone].
R. Dorney
nds Unit Supervis r
cc: Mr. Todd St. John, Wetlan
Cherri Smith, WRP
Raleigh Regional Office
File
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)

Mitigation Project Little Beaver Creek
DMS IMS ID 226
River Basin CAPE FEAR
Cataloging Unit 03030002
Applied Credit Ratios: 1:1 1.5:1 2.5:1 10:1 1:1 3:1 2:1 5:1 1:1 3:1 2:1 5:1 1:1 3:1 2:1 5:1
Information from DMS Debit Ledger dated OS/19/2016
C
E
W
L
E E
W
C
O
E
C
0
m
C.
a
K U
O
C
C C
O
E
$
z W
C
O
RE
.o
O
z
C c
E
o-
O_
z c
W
C O
,p O
z
O
.0u
o ix o
U U
E
0
o
U W
02
Ow`
a'
o
U
Beginning Balance (feet and acres)
3,721.00
1,631.00
0.64
1.98
Beginning Balance (mitigation credits)
3,721.00
163.101
0.213
0.396
NCDOT Pre -DMS Debits (feet and acres): Not Applicable
DMS Debits (feet and acres):
DWR Permit No USACE Action IDs Impact Project Name
NCDOT TIP 1-2402 -1-85
Greensboro Bypass, Guilford
1998-0349 1995-02886 County
2,461.80
1.165
2002-0866 2002-21454 Henson Forest Subdivision
109.00
NCDOT TIP U-2905 - Western
Alamance Loop, Alamance
2001-0046 1997-00836 County
68.40
1,490.00
2002-0740 2002-20332 Briarmeade
298.00
2006-20774/
2006-0616 2006-20775 The Parks at Meadowview
250.00
2000-0695 1999-20006 Brook Pine
169.00
2006-0357 2005-20146 Autumn Trace
234.00
2006-1838 2006-41842-219 Cedar Mountain
85.00
2005-0688 2005-21057-201 East Alamance Quarry
36.80
1997-0729 1997-08149 Kit Creek
0.03
1999-0578 1999-20910 Hope Valley Farms
0.61
Burlington - Alamance Regional
2005-1711 2003-20418 Airport Runway 24 E
0.815
Remaining Balance (feet and acres)
9.00
141.00
1 0.001
0.00
Remaining Balance (mitigation credits)
9.00
0.00
1
1 0.0001
0.000
Information from DMS Debit Ledger dated OS/19/2016