20080217 Ver 1_Application_20080201

++~M
b~ s~P
~. 1.u
0 prr ~~
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY
GOVERNOR
January 17, 2008
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
010 ~~
/, ~0~
F~V
O ~ D
h. ~~~8
,y~SAT""~q~ ~~Y
"``~'
W. LYNDO TIPPETT
SECRETARY
P.O. Box 1890 O
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890 ®2i ~ 7
ATTN: Mr. Richard Spencer
NCDOT Coordinator
Dear Sir:
Subject: Notification for Nationwide Permit 14 (Minor Road Crossing)
NCDENR 401 WQC 3704
Culvert Replacement SR-1320 Columbus County
State Project Number: 6C.024072
The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) has scheduled to grade, drain, base
and pave SR-1320 (Hilburn Rd), in Columbus County. Total project length is 1.112 miles. The
roadway will be widened from 16 feet to 20 feet and stabilized grass shoulders (6 foot) will be
provided. This project will require the replacement of three (3) wet cross-lines as shown below:
Cross
ing # 1
ing #2
ing #3
Roadway Station ~ Existing Culvert
Sta. 13+58
Sta. 18+31
Sta. 39+30
30 LF 36" RCP
28 LF 48" CMP
30 LF 36" CMP
New stream impacts = 681inear feet
Proposed Culvert
52 LF 48" RCP
52 LF 48" RCP
52 LF 36" RCP
Construction of this project will require impacts to waters of the United States in the Lumber
River Basin. Crossing #1-3 will convey UT's to Gum Swamp (C;Sw) located in 03040206
hydrologic unit, and subbasin (03-07-57)
Crossing #1 conveys an UT to Gum Swamp. The UT is a perennial channel that has a bottom
width of two (2) feet. Drainage consists primarily of runoff from several agricultural/forested
areas. The existing 30 LF 36" RCP has signs of deterioration and end section damage. The
culvert will be replaced with a 52 LF 48" RCP. The increase in size and length will accommodate
aquatic life movements (10 inch pipe bury) and provide a more efficient culvert entrance.
P. O. Box 1150, Fayetteville, NC 28302-1150 -Telephone [phone]- Fax [phone]

Crossing #2 conveys drainage from a collection of agricultural ditches/forested wetlands. The
UT to Gum Swamp is a man-made canal that possesses little slope. The current culvert is very
short, 281inear feet and is located within a curve of the road. In order to provide for minimum
safety, the culvert will be extended. This channel is perennial with a bottom width of 4 feet. The
existing 28 LF 48" CMP has signs of deterioration and end section damage. The culvert will be
replaced with a 52 LF 48" RCP.
Crossing #3 conveys drainage from several interconnected agricultural ditches. The UT is an
intermittent channel that has a bottom width of about two (2) feet. This channel has experienced
human-manipulation. Hydrology was noted upstream/downstream of the culvert. The existing 30
LF 36" CMP is very short along this section. In order to provide for safety, a 52 LF 36" RCP will
be installed.
RESOURCE STATUS
In general, there will be minor impacts proposed as a result of replacing the culvert along SR-
1320 (Hilburn Rd.) in Columbus County. Sixty-eight (68) linear feet of stream impacts are
expected. A Nationwide Permit #14 / NCDENR 401 WQC 3704 is required for the project.
Endangered Species: Plants and animals with Federal classification of Endangered (E) or
Threatened (T) are protected under provisions of Section 7 and Section 9 of the Endangered
Species Act of 1973, as amended. As of January 29, 2004, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
lists five federally protected species for Columbus County.
Federally PrntectPrl C„Priae f.,r n„~,,...,t.,.,, r,..._~.

SCIENTIFIC NAME
COMMON NAME v uaa~
STATUS
Acipenser brevirostrum Shortnose Sturgeon E
Picoides borealis Red-cockaded woodpecker E
Menidia extensa Waccamaw Silverside T
Thalictrum cooleyi Cooley's meadowrue E
Lysimachia
as erulae olia Rough-leaved loosestife E
"E" denotes endangered (a species that is in danger of extinction throughout
all or a significant portion of its range).
T(S/A)- Threatened due to similarity of appearance, a species that is threatened
Due to similarity of appearance with other rare species and is listed for its
Protection. These species are not biologically endangered or threatened and
Are not subject to Section 7 consultation.
A biological conclusion of "No Effect" was reached for all species during the June 20, 2007
survey for protected species. Protected species were not identified, nor, was the general habitat
for each species identified.

REGULATORY APPROVALS
Application is hereby made for a Department of the Army Nationwide Permit 14 / NCDENR 401
WQC 3704 as required by the above-described activities.
The National Register was reviewed in addition to conducting a field view of the project for
significant historic features.
The project impacts are minor in nature and should not remove or degrade existing water quality
uses. Pipe sizes proposed should address most flooding concerns, but they will not eliminate the
potential to flood.
Attached is a Preconstruction Notification Form, plan sheets, marked county road map, quad
location map and photographs.
If you should have any questions, or, need additional information please contact James J. Rerko,
PWS at [phone].
incerel ,
~ ~ws
f~
James J. Rerko, PWS
Division 6 Environmental Officer
ATTACHMENTS
Cc: Brian Wrenn, Division of Water Quality (7 copies)
Ken Averitte, Division of Water Quality (1 copy)
Terry Gibson, P.E., Division Engineer
H. L. "Drew" Cox P.E., District Engineer
Ken Clark, County Maintenance Engineer

Office Use Only: Form Version May 2002
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No. 2 0 0 8 0 2 1 7
iTr___._ __,___
~_= u..y Ya. ~,.,u,~..«.,~ ~~ „~~ appiicaoie ~o ims project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
I. Processing
Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ^ Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
^ Section 10 Permit ^ Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NWP #14
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ^
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here: ^
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ^
II. Applicant Information
Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Greg Burns, P E /NCDOT/Div 6/Acting Division Engineer
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 1150
Fayetteville, NC 28302
Telephone Number: 910-437-2611 Fax Number: 910-486-1959
E-mail Address: gburnsna,dot.state.nc.us
2. AgendConsultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: James J. Rerko PWS
Company Affiliation: NCDOT/Div 6/Division Environmental Officer
Mailing Address: Same
Telephone Number: 910-437-0208 Fax Number: 910-486-1959
E-mail Address: iirerko(a,dot.state.nc.us
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
Page 1 of 8

and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project:_ SR-1320 (Hilburn Rd )
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): 6C.024072
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN):
4. Location
County: Columbus Nearest Town: Tabor Citv
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number):
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.):__ Interstate 95 south, to Hwv 74
east. Take Hwy. 701 south towards Tabor City Travel 9 5 miles +/ south of Whiteville,
turn right on to SR-1320.
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): Crossing #1 (78.781441-34 201729)
Crossing #2 (78.78065-34 200617), Crossing #3 (78 77610 34 19813)
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres): 8.09 Acres +/-
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): Gum Swamp (C;Sw)
8. River Basin: Lumber River
(Note -this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc us/admin/rnaps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: Existing 20 foot dirt road with maintenance limits 60
foot in width. Surrounding land use is agriculturaVresidential
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used. In
bringing SR-1320 (Hilburn Rd) up to current standards, i e 20 foot paving with 6 foot
stabilized shoulders and 3:1 side slopes within a 60 foot right-of-way, NCDOT must
impact upon 68 linear feet of UT to Gum Swamp The existing culverts are severely
deteriorated with ~omt failures and must be replaced Impacts were minimized as much
Page 2 of 8

as possible; 3:1 side slopes are required due to the sandy material found in the area and
the inability to stabilize such material The culverts will be replaced utilizing a track
hoe excavator. While front-end loaders place material Eventually, a motor grader will
finish grade the proiect prior to paving
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: By Statue, NCDOT is required to pave all
unpaved secondary roads. To ensure that the roadway meets current safety standards,
the road_will be paved to a width of 20 feet, 6 foot grass shoulders will be installed on
each side and 3:1 side slopes will be provided within the 60 foot right of way
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
Project reviewed by Richard Spencer (USACEI and Ken Averitte (NCDENR DWO
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
None
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. `JVetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: Remove and replace existing
culverts along SR-1320 (Hilburn Rd), which is necessary to provide the minimum
current safety standards.
Page 3 of 8

2. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres Located within
100-year Floodplain**
es/no Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet
Type of Wetland***
N/A

* r .,..., ..,.. _,_
~_~~ ~a~== „~=yam, ,cya, a,c,y a„u ,uenury temporary impacts. Impacts mclude, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodpiain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at htta://www.fema.g_ov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.0 acre
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0.0 acre
3. Individually list all interriiittent and perennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
linear feet
Stream Name** Average Width
of Stream
Before Im act Perennial or
Intermittent?
leases eci )
Crossing #1 Culvert 22 UT to Gum Swamp 2 ft. Perennial
Crossing #2 Culvert 24 UT to Gum Swamp 4 ft. Perennial
Crossing #3 Culvert 22 UT to Gum Swamp Z ft. Intermittent

•-•~_ ~ ===.ra.,= ,cYa=a,c,y auu ,ucn„iy ,emporary impacts. impacts mclude, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.uses.eov. Several Internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.tonozone.com,
www.ma~quest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 68 LF
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below:
Page 4 of 8

Open Water Impact
Site Number

(indicate on ma)
T e of Im act*
~ p Area of
Im act
p
(acres
Name of Waterbody
if a hcable
( pp ) Type of Waterbody

(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
ba ,ocean, etc.
N/A

i,is~ eacn impact separareiy ana iaent~ty temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
5. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ^ uplands ^ stream ^ wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
The existing culverts are severely deteriorated and must be replaced The proposed
culverts have been lengthened a cumulative 68 linear feet to meet current safety standards
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
Page 5 of 8

including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide html.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
Mitigation is not required for this nroiect
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at httn://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index htm. If use of
the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): 0.0 LF
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): 0.0 FtZ
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0.0 ac
Amount ofNon-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0.0 ac
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0.0 ac
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federal/state) land?
Page 6 of 8

Yes ® No ^
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ^ No
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ^ No ^
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ^ No ® If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(s uare feet) Multiplier Required
Miti ation
1 3
2 1.5
Total
c.ui,c ~ cxienus out ~u ieet perpenaicuiar xrom near banK of channel; Gone 2 extends an
additiona120 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration /Enhancement, Preservation or
Page 7 of 8

If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration /Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0260.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss Stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
An erosion and sedimentation control elan will be incorporated into the construction plan
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ^ No
Is this anafter-the-fact permit application?
Yes ^ No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).

-Z9-o~
Applicant/Agent's ignature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 8 of 8

25' OF EXISTING
18" RCP (DRIVEWAY PIPE)
t~
~,,~~~J', ROSA LEE NORRIS
.o ~~ ~~;\
a' ~ '~<~'. ~. 15' OF EXISTING
`~'~~~~ ~ 15" RCP (DRIVEWAY PIPE)
~ ~ ~o .
•~
~~ `,` ~P~
y \ ~
i
IRIS F. McPHERSON l' ,~ ~~ "~
,~-~,--
1 l
.\
,~ ,~t
';
~y t,
~~
PROPOSED 52 LF \ ~ ~~,
t ~~ ,
0 F 4 8" RCP y ~' '~ ~~~
'-~ilii0" BURY '~ ~~~;.
,~ `,P
<' : ~~
moo, '~
' : '.
IRIS AND BETTY C. MCPHERSON
STATION 13+58
PLAN VIEW OF
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION
SITE # I
Sono 1320
2/28/07
SCALE - I" = 50'
~ v r iwrv~w I+VIVJ I RUI.i l IVIV.UC~II UO/ I I/LUU/ Ul:5y:3L F'M

2.35' EXISTING COVER AT CL CL ELEV. OVER PIPE = 49.94'
- 52.17'
60 50.31' 49.91' 50.98' 60'
50' ~_ CL RD_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _~ CL RD _ 50'
40' -------- pB ----- ------------- - --_ ---- -DB - ----_-_ --~
4 0'
89.34' 49.59'
47.91' 47.12' OUTLET g7.65'
46.67' 49.40' 50.11'
EXISTING 36" RCP INVERT ELEV. = 44.34'
I ( I
I
39+40 39+00 38+50 38+10 37+50 37+00
EXISTING PIPE PROFILE
Sono 1320
SITE # I
I" = 30'
FXIRTIN(, DR~1C11 C .a.... !1C/•1 .1 Ml~A7 AA.GA.AA n..

*'~ [ "wry .'*+~.' .. ~..- ~ „~
...
~..~.
~.
-,~
~~
u - v ~
F. F ~ ~`
v
~ r
' yi, r: r 1 ' `may !~y^ ^` l~y^~f fir!

~ ~-
~ ~1~
`
o RODNEY C. LEE
~
~
_ ~ 579/963
i r 1
b ~
~ G ~
Z ~
~
10~ OF EXISTING
IRIS F. McPHERSON ~
~ 12 RCP
585/308 ~'~
~ O
~•

STREAM _;.
~
_
~---- ~.
r
-- ~
~ s
TRF
q
~
PROPOSED 52 LF ~ ~
~~
OF 48' RCP ; :.._
w ~~
W/10' BURY oN ~j STATION 18+31
~.

RANDY L. HILBURN a

743/482
~ RICKY lK. HILBURN
~ 745/420
r
PLAN VIEW OF
PROPOSED PIPE
SITE # 2
Sono 1320
6/5/07
SCALE - I" = 50'

60'
50'
PROPOSED 52 LF
OF 48" RCP
40' - ---- ---
45.41' /
45.82' 46.02'
PROPOSED NEW INVERT
INLET = 45.57'
100
50
0
EXISTING 28' OF 48" CMP
60'
50'
---- ---- - 40'
46.49'
~. 45.82' 45.51'
`46.08'
PROPOSED NEW INVERT
OUTLET = 45.28'
50 100
PROPOSED PIPE CONSTRUCTION
Sono 1320
SITE # 2
I" = 30'
~orlnnc+rr~ r,~r,r ..... •..T
• •... .....w ~ n ~ vv~w ~ iwv ~ wig .Ut~ll VV/ I 1/GVV! VL. 1.7. I / I"'M
PROP. NEW CL

t'~S117I~
J 'it'^.... ':T '. ..
D~~v+rn~~r~am

PROPOSED 52 LF
OF 36" RCP ~~
RICKY W. HILBURN ~ ~~
W/6" BURY ~
_ / RICKY W. HILBURN
~.~ ~
S.R,. j32~ ,,,, / 60,
. R.
0 ~ ~,
...
_.
-~.~.
..~ .
_..~ .
._ ~~
_.~
' _.~
-_~
~~.. -.~
~`
-_ _ Ro.
BUN ._
SHERRY G. WILLIAMSON
34' OF EXISITING
18' RCP (DRIVEWAY PIPE)
STATION 39+30
SHERRY G. WILLIAMSON
PLAN VIEW OF
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION
SITE # 3
Sono 1320
3/5/07
SCALE - I" = 50'
r v rrtvrvxv ~.vlvJ I Kul. 1 IVIV.agfl Ub/9lf1UU! UZ:44:49 I'M

'~XISTING 30' OF 36" CMP
60'
50' STREAM
48.06' 46.E
48.70'
45060' INVERT INLET
100
50
0
EXISTING STREAM
Sono 1320
SITE # 3
I" = 30'
60'
50'
__________ __ STREAM
44.36'
45.68' 45.34'
45024' INVERT OUTLET
50
PROFILE
100
XISTING STREAM PR(~FII F rinn nR~1 v~nn~ n~•~.,•~n o~~

r g Y t. :'
k. ~, ;,.
'M f
_ -~ a
.~ ~ 4
~ _ a-p.r"'rte"~S7Tr` ^..t ,r.,.y.~
. :..... I
---~, --
H".:.~" :~, ~ 7'.. r >."s ` ~ !~~!~ta~'~ Jet. .•. 3 _
~~t~wr,~.:.,a'.~ ..rr' , r
' P.,:: :.
~s Y41!~.r~r ~ !r ^~... r.
~ 1 + r

Copyright (C) 1998, Maptech, Inc

`_ .. _y
,,,r ~ ~ ~~Ir '1p~ ~~r Y
L °,
r ~* 1
~ ti f
.~~ ~
tl.
~,+ * ~',ti
than - ~ }l -~ - ,J~' `". ~ ~0
~ ~
• . ,,, • ., ,i3 `~~,
,~ ma'r' •
P~
+, ~ ~ :.
~ ~.
~~ .
1
_ ~ -,~ ~,._~.,ff
=-~: •
~.: - ' h ~-
- Crossing #1 - ~~~-~ ~- - -
~.---
`~~, - ,~~
~.~~ -~
. __ ~ r- Crossing #3
- ,.
~.
4
e - ~~' -
~~ rr `~' - --- __
~. ~` -
I
~~., ~ ~
,~ ~ ~ - ~.
i ~ y1 {~ ~ r
,_ k~ . ~ .~
~' ~ •± f`3
~ -" -- f,
_ .~' 1.. 1
J
` +
i
i . 1
/''~ ~ ly, _4 I
~ :~
f ~~
Name: TABOR CITY EAST Location: 034.2005630° N 078.7784814° W
Date: 1/29/2008 Caption: SR 1320 Columbus County
Scale: 1 inch equals 1000 feet
Copyright {C) 1998, Maptech, Inc.