20050676 Ver 2 - Little River_226_Closeout2016 - 4/18/2016

Little River
DMS Project No. 226
USACE Action ID# SAW -2005-0078
DWQ Project # 05-0676
Close -Out Report
Project Type: Stream and Wetland Enhancement and Preservation
Project Setting & Classifications
XY: 35.223562, -79.240977
County
Moore
General Location
Vass
Basin:
Cape Fear
Physiographic Region:
Coastal Plain
Ecoregion:
Southeastern Plains
USGS Hydro Unit:
03030004-070050
NCDWQ Sub -basin:
03-03-14
Wetland Classification
Riparian Riverine
Thermal Regime:
Warm
Trout Water:
No
Monitoring Year 4
12-2014
Proiect Performers
12-2015
Source Agency:
NC DMS
Designer:
BLWI/Stantec
Monitoring Firm
Stantec; LMG
Channel Remediation
N/A
Plant Remediation
N/A
Stewards
NC DEQ
Accepted by Stewardship
Yes
Little River Close -Out Report
DMS# 226
Overall Prosect Activities and Timeline
Milestone
Month -Year
Project Instituted
02-2003
Permitted
03-2009
Construction Completed
01-2011
As -built survey
02-2011
Monitoring Year -1
12-2011
Monitoring Year -2
12-2012
Monitoring Year 3
12-2013
Monitoring Year 4
12-2014
Monitoring Year 5
12-2015
Closeout Submission
03-2016
Page 1 of 17

Project Setting and Background Summary
The 125 -acre Little River project site is located along the Little River near Vass, NC (Moore County). The project
is within a larger tract owned by J.J. Barnes and his family, who actively manage the area for desired wildlife
habitat. Prior to mitigation activities, the project site was a jurisdictional wetland largely planted as a loblolly
pine plantation, with smaller areas of open fields and established riparian hardwoods along the Little River. The
site was clearcut and re -planted in 2001 by the landowner before the project inception.
In 2003, the site was acquired by the State of NC for wetland restoration and enhancement, which included
removal of all young pine trees. In 2007, a Restoration Plan was prepared that included stream preservation and
wetland preservation, enhancement, and restoration. Due to agency stream stability concerns, the site wasn't
permitted until 2009 and required additional Forestry Best Management Practices for construction. During
construction planning, EEP and the IRT continued to have concern over potential damage during restoration
tree removal in what was described as an overall "stable system" and pines were nearly 10 years old, making
site prep a significant challenge.
Following a 2010 IRT meeting and site visit, a revised Project Strategy was developed and outlined in a
Memorandum, which replaced timbering with a prescribed fire to suppress pines and understory planting of
climax hardwoods (Appendix Q. To enhance wetlands and streams, the site was burned in December of 2010,
which removed undesirable understory vegetation. Fifty-five acres of wetlands and stream buffer were then
planted in January of 2011 with native hardwood vegetation. The conversion of the pine plantation and
associated riparian areas to hardwood species will greatly improve the wildlife habitat on the property and
improve the aquatic species diversity and abundance in the streams on site.
Goals and Objectives
As described in the Restoration Plan, the overall goal for the Little River Stream and Wetland Enhancement Site
is to preserve and enhance a natural floodplain system that exhibits desired functions appropriate to the existing
geomorphic setting of the site. The main functions of this system are nutrient processing, aquatic and terrestrial
habitat, and floodwater storage.
Specific project objectives developed in the Revised Project Strategy include:
Preservation of 210 linear feet of perennial stream channel, 39.3 acres of bottomland hardwood
wetlands along the Little River, and 9.3 acres of successional wetlands.
Enhancement of 3,593 linear feet of perennial stream channels and 54.8 acres of bottomland hardwood
wetlands with partial removal of undesired vegetation via burning to promote desired species growth
and planting of this area with specific native climax species to enhance natural habitat.
Prosect Success Criteria
The Revised Project Strategy eliminated earthwork and tree removal and chipping. Although there were
groundwater gauges installed on site as a relic from the original Restoration Plan, there were no hydrologic
modifications to the site and the data is provided in Appendix E for informational purposes only. Staff from
DMS conducted 3 vegetative transects in 2015 near the grassy field data to provide additional vegetative data;
results showed the project has ample vegetative density of hardwood species (Appendix E).
Mitigation
Feature
Success Criteria
Stream & Wetland
Stream Morphology
Visual inspections, photo stations, and a crest gauge
Enhancement
provided evidence of flow, stability, and vegetation.
Vegetation
Pine plantation area: success at 150 planted stems per
acre. Site met for 11 out of 12 plots; average planted
density was 239; average with volunteers was 2,478.
Grassy field area: success at 260 planted stems per
acre. Site met for 1 out of 3 plots; averaged planted
density was 310; average with volunteers was 2,158.
Stream & Wetland
Protective
No specific criterion established. JD signed in 2009.
Preservation
Mechanism
Little River Close -Out Report
DMS# 226 Page 2 of 17

Table 1. ASSET TABLE
Restoration
Segment/Reach
Pre —
Construction
(ac/If)
Mitigation
Approach
Watershed
Acreage
(Acres)
As -Built and
MY5
If/ac
Mitigation
Ratio
Mitigation
Units
(SMU/WMU)
STREAM
Mitigation
Wetland Units
Wetland Units
(WMU)
Riparian Buffer
Nutrient Offset
Units (SMU)
Reach 1
1,726
Ell
335
1,726
2.5:1
690.4
Reach 2
1,867
Ell
335
1,867
2.5:1
746.8
Reach 3
210
P
335
210
10:1
21
WETLAND
Wetland 1
47.8
E
47.8
2.5:1
19.12
Wetland 2
7.0
E
7.0
2:1
3.5
Wetland 3
39.4
P
39.4
5:1
7.88
Wetland 4
9.3
P
9.3
5:1
1.86
Table 2. MITIGATION
UNIT TOTALS
Stream
Riparian
Non -riparian
Total Wetland
Mitigation
Wetland Units
Wetland Units
(WMU)
Riparian Buffer
Nutrient Offset
Units (SMU)
1458.2
32.36
N/A
32.36
N/A
N/A
Little River Close -Out Report
DMS# 226 Page 3 of 17

S
N
urassy:rieiura.rea T–
Figure 1. Asset Reach and Location Map
Little River Stream and Wetland Enhancement
DMS# 226
Moore County, North Carolina
February 2016
* Reference well
+ Precipitation gauge
4, Groundwater monitoring wel._
Wetland enhancement
Crest gauge
Wetland preservation
• Photo stations (S = Stream, V = Vag)
Uplands
Vegetation monitoring plots (VP 1-16)
Easement boundary
Existing streams
Property boundary
Existing ditches
_ _ Mowed path
Stream enhancement
'\. Stream preservation
— Beaver dam (old)
t
k::
Wetland 3
/* South Proiect Wetlands i
Vegetation Monitoring Counts (in Year 5) MVp12
L
Meets 5 -yr success criterion Does not meet 5 -yr success criterion
Little River C
DMS# 226 Page 4 of 17

Figure 2. Topographic Map of Project Area
4r7
r�j
_7A
7.
-a- Ak -
h A
(200
am
SCALE 1" = 2,000'
Little River Close -Out Report
DIVIS# 226
V 11
Figure 3. Soil Survey of Project Area
AeB
eD
3hD
keB
GhB
KaA
SCALE 1" = 1,000'
Page 5 of 17

Table 3. Bankfull verification.
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
(2011)
(2012)
(2013)
(2014)
(2015)
2/2/11
2/7/12
2/20/13
2/3/14
3/10/15
(300 st/ac)
3/22/12
5/8/13
5/6/14
5/14/15
445
9/24/12
7/25/13
12/4/14
7/8/15
7
12/18/12
12/17/13
Field Area
243
Table 4. Planting Plan
Type
Area
(ac)
Total
Seedlings
Planting
Density
Species Planted
Common Name
Latin Name
Pine
46
13,800
12' x 12'
Quercus lyrata
Overcup Oak
Plantation
Planted
stems
(300 st/ac)
Q. laurifolia
Laurel Oak
Area
485
445
445
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Nyssa biflora
Green Ash
Black Tupelo
Grassy
7
4,200
8' x 8'
Field Area
243
stems
(600 st/ ac)
Ilex glabra
Inkberry
971
202
1,133
3
Cyrilla racemiflora
Swamp Titi
445
364
1,781
243
Lindera benzoin
Spicebush
2,023
Average
391
391
Aronia arbutifolia
Red chokeberry
Table 5. Vegetation History: Stems/Acre Planted and Total with Volunteers for Grassy Field Area (excluding
pines).
The success criterion for the grassy field area is the survival of 260 planted woody stems per acre at the end of the five-year
monitoring period
Table 6. Vegetation History: Stems/Acre Planted and Total with Volunteers for Pine Plantation Area
(excluding pines).
Year 0
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Plot #
Planted
Planted
Planted
Planted
Total
Planted
F Total
Planted
Total
1
485
485
445
445
2,711
485
2,104
486
3,318
2
243
243
243
202
2,428
202
971
202
1,133
3
445
445
445
364
1,781
243
1,214
243
2,023
Average
391
391
378
337
2,307
310
1,430
310
2,158
The success criterion for the grassy field area is the survival of 260 planted woody stems per acre at the end of the five-year
monitoring period
Table 6. Vegetation History: Stems/Acre Planted and Total with Volunteers for Pine Plantation Area
(excluding pines).
4
Year 0
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Plot #
Planted
I Planted
I Planted
I Planted
Total
I PlantedTotal
162
I Planted
Total 11
4
202
202
202
283
2,630
283
1,619
283
1,457
5
324
324
243
162
2,266
202
1,255
202
1,862
6
485
486
405
324
1,902
202
971
202
1,416
7
243
243
243
243
3,237
243
1,214
243
1,700
8
768
648
648
567
3,278
445
1,781
445
2,590
9
162
202
162
162
7,851
162
8,984
162
3,642
10
243
243
202
283
3,440
283
2,671
283
1.983
11
324
328
243
243
2,590
202
850
202
1,942
12
283
162
81
81
3,642
81
1,902
40
3,359
13
162
121
121
202
2,671
243
1,497
243
2,307
14
202
202
202
283
3,521
283
2,550
283
3,440
15
324
324
324
283
3,237
202
2,388
202
2,550
16
364
324
324
324
5,261
324
3,885
324
3,966
Average
314
293
262
265
3,240
243
2,241
239
2,478
Success criterion for the pine plantation is the survival of 150 planted woody stems per acre at the end of the five-year monitoring
period.
Little River Close -Out Report
DMS# 226 Page 6 of 17

DMS Recommendations and Conclusions
Based on mean stem densities, the project has met the stated success criteria for the
enhancement and preservation of characteristic stream and wetlands. Although three of the
vegetation plots did not meet the stated vegetation success criteria, all plots are dense with
volunteers from the target climax hardwood community, which eliminated the need for a
supplemental planting. The activities conducted on this site provided an enhancement and
preservation uplift by accelerating climax community succession and improving species diversity
and root mass. These improvements lend themselves to improved productivity, floodwater
storage, nutrient cycling, carbon storage, and aquatic and terrestrial habitat.
DMS recommends closure of the Little River Stream and Wetland Enhancement Site with 1,458.2
SMUs and 32.36 WMUs.
Contingencies
None
Little River Close -Out Report
DMS# 226 Page 7 of 17

Pre -Construction Photos (September 2007)
Reach 1
Reach 2 (facing downstream)
Reach 3 (facing downstream)
Typical View of Pine Plantation
Bottomland Hardwood Preservation Area
Little River Close -Out Report
DMS# 226
Bottomland Hardwood Preservation Area
Page 8 of 17

Post -Construction Photos
Baseline (February 2011)
1p
Reach 2 facing downstream
Reach 1
rpt .
r L
i � 1
r
y+6
Reach 3 (facing downstream)
VP1 (Grassy Area)
VP2 (Grassy Area)
t.
r.
VP9 (Pine Plantation Area)
VP10 (Pine Plantation Area)
Little River Close -Out Report
DMS# 226 Page 9 of 17

`�v �,�'°�� 1 �;- s rt N��� ^tri pper_ � I1p �t �t�`��FY ���1af� I ',
4 t `v! h I �` � ��I� � e,y`j a I ,
V pry _ -�; � � f.. '� �` "{. itic � _ _ �
_.� �,,
r� �
h . 1 "'999 i :� ii
t i � 2� 9 � ,
y� ���� 1. IY u
I P i � � T �
r
��
r� /RR((.
�`�//, ,� � p �
-%�`'f" A���T _ �-- - v.. '—'&fir
-!
'Y"' � � �
.,r lids ._. {* r
� > S
' i^nom �;- � `�` .. +� #'�,..f nP �
""�, , ;R. � ` � , "moi` � � � � ''
i � � .j'
.�a � r
� a � ��. Y _
,#�'� i � a �" � �Y' - ,3,�
h I; I � �s.
p, L � � h � 4MC:P,..N� N .. .y .. Y 1 s�
.�
._.,r� t
Y _ j .. .r �. ♦ �e'�
••
q «.
� "r� � '- � / r �+�
r
iY'Y ti' 1 '� L° "� i 1 e
3T b T� � }� �:'I:
� ��� � , - .
r r�
��
.�
aw �a �� fy �� � �-�
�� � fr-.. �.:.
=�r
_�
R
h �Qi �. s"' '"f� ''f1'Pti
i`W da q .1,.' { s
�- _ ,;

�en't"�y�� �� �R�n;{'sky � C s��l C' f :/ , ' �. �a - } yt _� _• '�• ~d '
Vv
iC
!r. S
1--.AIP
Fri • �s�l' � \' � � ��¢{�+ �' �� � y . J r q�
"mob �' • f � TIS 1:
E _ i
. � rte,• � ...
}
OL, S • h
1
.11 1 wt��
'-'� � 1 i•J i" -ice T � � 'ti� �Jr•`
yrs i-
i -
_W_ %_Rs

APPENDIX A- Watershed Planning Summary
Watershed Characteristic Overview
The Little River stream and wetland restoration project is located in Moore County, southeast of
the town of Vass in the Cape Fear River Basin. It is located within HUC 03030004070050, the
Lower Little River watershed, which is listed as a Targeted Local Watershed (TLW) in the 2009
Cape Fear River Basin Restoration Priorities (RBRP) plan. Currently, DMS has two other
projects in this TLW, Blue Mitigation Site and Sandhill Area Land Trust.
The 2009 RBRP indicates that the TLW is 34% agricultural and 56% forested with 6% of the
streams on the 303d List. In addition, 97% of the waters are considered either High Quality
Waters (HQWs) or Outstanding Resource Waters (ORWs) and 3% of the watershed is protected
as Conservation Area. The 2009 RBRP prioritized this watershed due to the extensive amount of
HQW and the presence of 303d listed streams; preservation is recommended for this TLW. The
project itself is located within a water supply watershed and is approximately 3 miles upstream
of the Fort Bragg Central Section Natural Heritage Natural Area, and approximately 5.5 miles
upstream of the Fort Bragg Little River Section Natural Heritage Natural Area, both of which are
rated as Exceptional (the highest rating).
Links to Watershed Goals and Objectives
The Little River project addresses watershed priorities for improving habitat and species
diversity through enhancement and preservation of over 3,8001f of stream and over 100 acres of
wetland within a water supply watershed upstream of state designated Natural Heritage Natural
Areas. Prior to construction, the project consisted of managed loblolly pine plantation with little
vegetative diversity. The constructed project incorporates diverse vegetation to support a wide
variety of riparian and aquatic species while protecting existing hydrology and water quality
functions, including floodwater storage and nutrient management.
In addition to the Little River project, there are two other DMS projects in this TLW, Blue
Mitigation Site which is a stream and wetland preservation site in Long Term Management and
Sandhill Area Land Trust (SALT) which is a wetland restoration, enhancement and preservation
site in Year 5 Monitoring. There is also one Clean Water Management Trust Fund site, a
wastewater project in this watershed.

2016 DMS Project Closeout: Little River
�J
J Cranes
f. f Creek LWF
i
" Whi
FIl�Gj �J
l � r
i
Bu Mitigation Site
Sou1t �m
1
Legend
DMS Projects i f�
y CWMTF Projects
County Boundary
NHDH Waterbody / ���
Lit#le Rimmer
® Streams "`���•••1
® 14 -Digit Hydrologic Unit ��?i
Target Local Watershedsj, SALT
(San drill Area Lari st)
Local Watershed Plans
Municipal Bounaries 0 0.75 1.5 3 . .1
Miles I
r

APPENDIX 6 — Land Ownership and Protection
The site protection instrument for this mitigation project includes the following document(s),
available at the specified County Register of Deeds office, and is linked to the property portfolio
at http://ncdenr.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-
public/Mitigation%20Services/Document%20Management%20Library/Property/Property%20P
ortfolio/226 LittleRiver PD 2003.pdf
Project
Name County Grantor Property Rights Deed/Page Plat/Page Area
J.J. Cab 10/Slide
Little River Moore J Bar Ranch Barnes Conservation Easement 3923/67 346 117
Long-term stewardship of this property is managed by the NC DEQ Stewardship Program.
Little River Close -Out Report
DMS# 226 Page 17 of 20

Transfer Illustration: Little River IMS # 226

APPENDIX C - Permits
Action ID. SAW -2005-00758
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
County: Moore
USGS Quad: Niagara
GENERAL PERMIT (REGIONAL AND NATIONWIDE) VERIFICATION
Authorized Agent: North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program
Attn to: Mr. Lin Xu
Address: 1652 Mail Service Center RECEIV,_1
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 MAH 1 7 L W i
Telephone No.: [phone]
NC ECOSYSTEM
ENHANCEMENTPROGRAM
RECEIVED
MAR a 2009
NC ECOSYSTEM
ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM
Size and location of property (water body, road name/number, town, etc.): Property is known as the Little River
Wetland Restoration Proiect, a 135 acre site located approximately 3 5 miles southeast of Vass along Lobelia Road
(NC Hwy 690). adjacent to the Little River, Moore County North Carolina
Description of projects area and activity: This Nationwide permit provide authorization to: (1) restore 23 acres of
wetland hydrology by means of plugging an existing drainage ditch; (2) enhance 48 acres of wetlands by removing
stands of loblolly pines and planting native bottomland hardwood (BLH) species; (3) preserve 4,433 If of perennial
stream channels, 40 acres of BLH wetlands and 9.5 acres of successional wetlands Plans will fall in accordance
with the final Little River Wetland Enhancement Restoration Plan dated September 28 2007 and the October 28
2008 Addendum letter of Best Management Practices from Santec Consulting Services Inc
Applicable Law: N Section 404 (Clean Water Act, 33 USC 1344)
❑ Section 10 (Rivers and Harbors Act, 33 USC 403)
Authorization: Regional General Permit Number: 27
Nationwide Permit Number:
Your work is authorized by the above referenced permit provided it is accomplished in strict accordance with the attached
conditions and your submitted plans. Any violation of the attached conditions or deviation from your submitted plans may
sub*ect the permittee to a stop work order, a restoration order and/or appropriate legal action
This verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below unless the nationwide authorization is modified,
suspended or revoked. If, prior to the expiration date identified below, the nationwide permit authorization is reissued and/or
modified, this verification will remain valid until the expiration date identified below, provided it complies with all requirements of
the modified nationwide permit. If the nationwide permit authorization expires or is suspended, revoked, or is modified, such that the
activity would no longer comply with the terms and conditions of the nationwide permit, activities which have commenced (i.e., are
under construction) or are under contract to commence in reliance upon the nationwide permit, will remain authorized provided the
activity is completed within twelve months of the date of the nationwide permit's expiration, modification or revocation, unless
discretionary authority has been exercised on a case-by-case basis to modify, suspend or revoke the authorization.
Activities subject to Section 404 (as indicated above) may also require an individual Section 401 Water Quality Certification. You
should contact the NC Division of Water Quality (telephone [phone]) to determine Section 401 requirements.
For activities occurring within the twenty coastal counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (LAMA),
prior to beginning work you must contact the N.C. Division of Coastal Management.
This Department of the Army verification does not relieve the permittee of the responsibility to obtain any other required Federal,
State or local approvals/permits.
If there are any questions regarding this verification, any of the conditions of the Permit, or the Corps of Engineers regulatory
program, please contact Emily Hughes at [phone].
Corps Regulatory Official Date: 3/13/2009
Expiration Date of Verification: 3/13/2011

The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we continue to do so,
please complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at our website at http://reeulatorv.usacesurvev.com to complete the surrey
online.
Determination of Jurisdiction:
❑ Based on preliminary information, there appear to be waters of the US including wetlands within the above described project area.
This preliminary- determination is not an appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process
( Reference 33 CFR Part 331).
❑ There are Navigable'Waters of the United States within the above described project area subject to the permit requirements of
Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Unless there is a change in the law or our
published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this
notification.
® There are waters of the US and/or wetlands within the above described project area subject to the permit requirements of Section
404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this
determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ The jurisdictional areas within the above described project area have been identified under a previous action. Please reference
jurisdictional determination issued . Action ID
Basis of Jurisdictional Determination: This site contains several waterbodies that exhibit an ordinary hiah water mark and are
considered unnamed tributaries to the Little River and the Little River itself, a 1Vavi2able Water of the U.S. This site also
exhibits wetland criteria as described in the 1987 Corps Wetland Delineation Manual and is adiacent to the unnamed
tributaries to the Little River and to the Little River itself. This determination is based on information submitted by the EEP
and a site visit by Jennifer Frye on February 8, 2006 and Emily Hughes on January 9.2009.
Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations.)
Attached to this verification is an approved jurisdictional determination. If you are not in agreement with that approved jurisdictional
determination, you can make an administrative appeal under 33 CFR 331. Enclosed you will find a Notification of Appeal Process
(NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this determination you must submit a completed RFA
form to the following address:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division
Attn: Emily Hughes, Project Manager,
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
69 Darlington Ave.
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403-1398
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps; the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for appeal
under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the District Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP. Should you
decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by 5/13/09.
**It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the District Office if you do not object to the determination in this correspondence.**
Corps Regulatory Official: 59e--
Date
3/13/2009
Expiration Date 3/13/2014
SURVEY PLATS, FIELD SKETCH, WETLAND DELINEATION FOR -MS, PROJECT PLANS, ETC., 'Vii; ST BE
ATTACHED TO THE FILE COPY OF THIS FORM, IF REQUIRED OR AVAILABLE.
Copy Furnished:

Action ID Number: SAW -2005-00759 County: Moore
Permittee: North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program
Date Verification Issued: 3/13/09
Project Manager: Emily Hughes
Upon completion of the activity authorized by this permit and any mitigation
required by the permit, sign this certification and return it to the following address:
US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
69 DARLINGTON AVE.
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28403-1398
Please note that your permitted activity is subject to a compliance inspection by a U.
S. Army Corps of Engineers representative. If you fail to comply with this permit
you are subject to permit suspension, modification, or revocation.
I hereby certify that the work authorized by the above referenced permit has been
completed in accordance with the terms and condition of the said permit, and
required mitigation was completed in accordance with the permit conditions.
Signature of Permittee
Date

CESAW-RG-W
MEMORANN'DUM FOR RECORD
DATE: 3/13/09
SUBJECT: Consideration of Compensatory Mitigation and Potential Impacts to Endangered
Species, Cultural Resources and Essential Fish Habitat.
1. Action ID. SAW -2005-00759
2. Project Name and Location: Little River Wetland Restoration Project, a 135 acre site
located approximate1v 3.5 miles southeast of Vass, alonp- Lobelia Road (NC Hwy 690),
adiacent to the Little River, Moore Count,, North Carolina.
3. Mitigation [Section 404(b)(1) Guidelines].
a. Has applicant avoided and minimized impacts to the maximum practicable extent?
YES
If NO, Explain:
b. Is compensatory mitigation necessary? No
Explain: Project goal is to restore and enhance wetlands on site.
4. Endangered Species (Section 7 of the ESA).
a. Will any threatened or endangered species or their critical habitats be affected by this
project? NO
If YES, describe steps taken to address concerns:
5. Cultural Resources (Section 106 of the'_VHPA).
a. Will any Cultural Resources be impacted by this project? NO
b. If YES, describe steps taken to address concerns:
6. Essential Fish Habitat (50 CFR Part 600, Magnuson -Stevens Act).
a. Is this a project that "may adversely affect essential fish habitat"? NO
b. If YES, describe steps taken to address concerns:
Corps Regulatory Official: /

NOTIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OPTIf,ls',AND PROCESS AND
REQU._F.S'I' .FQI APPE.A1
Applicant: NC EEP
File Number: SAW-2005-
100759
Date: 3/13/09
Attached is:
See Section below
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of
permission)
A
PROFFERED PERMIT Standard Permit or Letter ofpermission)
B
PERMIT DENIAL
C
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
D
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
E
SECTION I' The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above
decision. Additional information may be found at httn//www.usacearmv.mil/net/functions/cw/cecwo/reg or
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature
on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the
permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit.
OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request that the
permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district engineer. Your
objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will forfeit your right to appeal
the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your objections and may: (a) modify the
permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your objections, or (c) not modify the permit
having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After evaluating your objections, the district engineer
will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature
on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the
permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit.
APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you
may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form
and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of
this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer
within 60 days of the date of this notice.

D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or
provide new information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the date of
this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers Administrative
Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form must be received by
the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the
preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed), by
contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new information for further consideration by the Corps to
reevaluate the JD.
SECTION II , RE VEST FOR APPAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN NCITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your objections to an
initial proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to this form to clarify where your reasons or
objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps memorandum for the
record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the review officer has determined is needed to clarify
the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps may add new information or analyses to the record. However, you may
provide additional information to clarify the location of information that is already in the administrative record
POINT �F T + R ?UEST O IS_OR IF 3 „SON
,r
If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may also
appeal process you may contact: contact:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division Mr. Mike Bell, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
Attn: Emily Hughes, Project Manager, CES AD -ET -CO -R
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office L.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
69 Darlington Ave. 60 Forsyth Street, Room 9M15
Wiltnington, North Carolina 28403-1398 Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government
consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15 day notice
of anv site investigation, and will have the opportunity to participate in all site investigations.
Date:
J
Telephone number:
Signature of a pellant or agent.
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits and approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form
to:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Attn: Emily Hughes, Project Manager,
Wilmington Regulatory Field Office, 69 Darlington Ave., Wilmington, North Carolina 28403-1398
For Permit denials and Proffered Permits send this form to:
Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Mike Bell,
Administrative Appeal Officer, CESAD-ET-CO-R, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 9-NI15, Atlanta, Georgia
30303-8801

Stantec Consulting Services Inc.
801 Jones Franklin Road Suite 300
Raleigh NC 27606
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
stantec
October 28, 2008
File: SCO Project Number D07062S — Moore County, North Carolina
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Ecosystem Enhancement Program
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652
Attention: Tracy Morris
Reference: Little River Wetland Enhancement Restoration Plan -Addendum
Dear Tracy:
A final restoration plan for the Little River Wetland Enhancement project was submitted to you on
September 28, 2007. A subsequent review of this final document by various state and federal
agencies has prompted the need for an addendum to the report. Following recommendations from
the North Carolina Division of Forestry Resources (DFR), it was suggested that various Best
Management Practices (BMP's) be implemented during the construction of the wetland restoration
project in order to protect the values and functions of the wetlands both onsite and offsite. This
letter will serve as an addendum to the final restoration plan as described above. The following
BMP's have been recommended by DFR to stay consistent with site preparation activities normally
carried out during silvicultural activities within wetland areas. The manner in which these BMPs
should be implemented is briefly described as well.
1) Position shear blades or rakes at or near the soil surface and windrow, pile, and otherwise move
logs and logging debris by methods that minimize dragging or pushing through the soil to minimize
soil disturbance associated with shearing, raking, and moving trees, stumps, brush, and other
unwanted vegetation; EEP will require the contractor to minimize soil disturbance by complying with
this BMP.
2) Conduct activities in such a manner as to avoid excessive soil compaction and maintain soil tilth,
such as avoiding driving on wet soil and using the lightest equipment necessary; Vegetation
removal will be conducted during the growing season to maximize working under drier conditions.
3) Prevent disposal or storage of logs or logging debris in streamside management zones -- defined
areas adjacent to streams, lakes, and other waterbodies -- to protect water quality; EEP will require
the contractor to move debris and choose staging sites away from surface wafer areas onsite.
4) Maintain the natural contour of the site and ensure that activities do not immediately or gradually
convert the wetland to a non -wetland. This project does not require grading in wetlands and will not
convert wetlands to non -wetlands.
5) Conduct activities with appropriate water management mechanisms to minimize off-site water
quality impacts. EEP will require the installation of silt fencing where necessary, avoiding equipment
maintenance near any surface water, and avoiding unnecessary disturbance of onsite streams.

October 28, 2008
Page 2 of 2
Reference: Little River Wetland Enhancement Restoration Plan -Addendum
6) Work during dry soil times. EEP will require work during the growing season.
7) Use appropriate harvesting equipment, methods and/or techniques that minimize significant
alterations to soil structure. EEP will prohibit using equipment with heavy axle loads and driving on
wet soil. Track -type tractors and 4WD tractors with properly inflated radial tires will be
recommended to minimize soil compaction.
8) Consider ceasing operations or choosing a better harvest method if a single pass of equipment
produces ruts deeper than 6 inches across a significant area of the site beyond primary skid trails
and decks. Vegetation removal will be monitored and vehicle paths altered as necessary to ensure
rutting does not occur.
9) Avoid crossing streams. If unavoidable, portable bridgemats are a preferred method for crossing
streams and ditches. Stream crossings will be avoided to the maximum extent practicable (not to
exceed four crossings over the entire site). Portable bridgemats will be implemented at the
crossings.
Please consider the above listed .BMP's as an addendum to the final report. If you ,have any
questions regarding this issue, please feel free to call me at the number listed below.
Sincerely,
STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES INC.
Amber Coleman, LSS, PWS
Scientist
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

F WAIF
`O�0 9Q(r Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
r North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
November 30, 2007
DWQ Project # 05-0676, Ver. 2
Mr. Lin Xu Moore County
NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program
1652 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1652
Subject Property: Little River Wetland Enhancement and Restoration
Little River [030614,18-23-(10.7), WSII, HQW]
Approval of 401 Water Quality Certification with Additional Conditions
Dear Mr. Xu:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to place fill
within or otherwise impact 48 acres of 404/wetland as described in your application dated November 5,
2007, and received by the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) on July 12, 2007, to construct the proposed
stream and wetland restoration at the site. After reviewing your application, we have decided that the
impacts are covered by General Water Quality Certification Number(s) 3689 (GC3689). The
Certification(s) allows you to use Nationwide Permit(s) NW27 when issued by the US Army Corps of
Engineers (USACE). In addition, you should obtain or otherwise comply with any other required federal,
state or local permits before you go ahead with your project including (but not limited to) Erosion and
Sediment Control, and Non -discharge regulations. Also, this approval to proceed with your proposed
impacts or to conduct impacts to waters as depicted in your application shall expire upon
expiration of the 404 or CAMA Permit.
This approval is for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If you change your
project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application. If the property is sold,
the new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for
complying with all conditions. If total fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre of
wetland or 150 linear feet of stream, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A
NCAC 21-1.0506 (h). This approval requires you to follow the conditions listed in the attached
certification and any additional conditions listed below.
I A:w'NED
The Additional Conditions of the Certification are:
Oft. 4 _ 2007
Impacts Approved
The following impacts are hereby approved as long as all of the other specific and
conditions of this Certification (or Isolated Wetland Permit) are met. No other impac€"are "
approved including incidental impacts:
Type of Impact Amount Approved Units Plan Location or Reference
404/Wetland 48 (acres) I PCN page 8 of 13
401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Phone: [phone] / FAX [phone] / Internet: http,,//h2o.eiir.state.nc.us/ncwctlands
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper

NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program
Page 2 of 3
November 30, 2007
2. No Waste, Spoil, Solids, or Fill of Any Kind
No waste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands, waters, or riparian areas beyond
the footprint of the impacts depicted in the Pre -Construction Notification. All construction
activities, including the design, installation, operation, and maintenance of sediment and erosion
control Best Management Practices, shall be performed so that no violations of state water quality
standards, statutes, or rules occur.
3. Erosion and sediment control practices must be in full compliance with all specifications governing
the proper design, installation and operation and maintenance of such Best Management Practices in
order to protect surface waters standards:
a. The erosion and sediment control measures for the project must be designed, installed,
operated, and maintained in accordance with the most recent version of the North Carolina
Sediment and Erosion Control Planning and Design Manual.
b. The design, installation, operation, and maintenance of the sediment and erosion control
measures must be such that they equal, or exceed, the requirements specified in the most
recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Manual. The devices
shall be maintained on all construction sites; borrow sites, and waste pile (spoil) projects,
including contractor -owned or leased borrow pits associated with the project.
c. Sufficient materials required for stabilization and!or repair of erosion control measures and
stormwater routing and treatment shall be on site at all times.
4. Sediment and Erosion Control Measures
Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters to the maximum
extent practicable. If placement of sediment and erosion control devices in wetlands and waters is
unavoidable, they shall be removed and the natural grade restored within six months of the date that
the Division of Land Resources has released the project;
5. Protective Fencing
The outside buffer, wetland or water boundary and along the construction corridor within these
boundaries approved under this authorization shall be clearly marked with orange warning fencing
(or similar high visibility material) for the areas that have been approved to infringe within the
buffer, wetland or water prior to any land disturbing;
6. Wetland Enhancement and Restoration Plans
You have our approval for your proposed final wetland enhancement and restoration at the site.
The wetland enhancement and restoration at the site must be constructed, maintained, and
monitored according to the plans approved by this Office. Any repairs or adjustments to the site
must be made according to the approved plans or must receive written approval from this Office to
make the repairs or adjustments. The restored and enhanced wetland, must be preserved in
perpetuity by use of a conservation easement or other similar mechanism as part of the approved
plans.

NC Ecosystem Enhancement Program
Page 3 of 3
November 30, 2007
7. Certificate of Completion
Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or applicable
Buffer Rules, and any subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to return the attached
certificate of completion to the 401 Oversight/Express Review Permitting Unit, North Carolina
Division of Water Quality, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699-1650.
Violations of any condition herein set forth may result in revocation of this Certification and may result in
criminal and/or civil penalties. The authorization to proceed with your proposed impacts or to conduct
impacts to waters as depicted in your application and as authorized by this Certification, shall expire upon
expiration of the 404 or CAMA Permit.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this Certification (associated with the approved wetland or
stream impacts), you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date that
you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which conforms to Chapter 150B of
the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center,
Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a
hearing.
Any disputes over determinations regarding this Authorization Certificate (associated with the approved
buffer impacts) shall be referred in writing to the Director for a decision. The Director's decision is
subject to review as provided in Articles 3 and 4 of G.S. 150B.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water
Act. If you have any questions, please telephone Cyndi Karoly or Ian McMillan at 919-733-1786.
Sincerely,
VJO
Coleen H. Sullins
Division of Water Quality
CHSlijm
Enclosures: GC3689
Certificate of Completion
cc: USACE Wilmington Regulatory Field Office
Ken Averitte, DWQ Fayetteville Regional Office
DLR Fayetteville Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
Filename: 050676 Ver2LittleRiverWetl andEnhancementAndRestoration(Moore)401

VAM
mrt
C3
oneeREavmk U"
D 8
f _ _._.r—
r L i
r J76�
• � I
E — •QI '• i i Tm-
4
0� �i i 6 f
`51 I
SHEETS C'R
COVERAGE
AREA I nem 4m,t
I I
I._---- --- --,
FOR NOTES AND CERTIFICATIONS PERTAINING TO THIS SURVEY
SEE SHEET 9 OF 9.
, C„�n qWETLAND DELINEATION FOR
qR6” LITTLE RIVER RESTORATION SITE
=�'• 9 = CONSERVATION EASEMENT
SEAL = J -BAR RANCH, INC.
L-4449
3 `•. - LITTLE RIVER TOANSffiP, MOORE COUNTY
•� NEAR VASS, NORTH CAROLINA
'r DECKER 11, 2008 / 1-=400'
prepared by
i 1
JOIN MCLEAN LAND SURVEYING
LAURTNBUROy NORTII CAROLINA
4K 400' 200' 0' 400' 800'
SHEET 1 OF
LITTT.ERTVER02.DWG
LEGEND
SURVEY NOTES
(UNLESS OTHERWISE DENOTED)
• EXISTING IRON STAKE
RATIO OF PRECISKIN:
■ EXISTING CONCRETE MONUMENT
1/7,500+
O SET IRON STAKE
E3 SET CONCRETE MONUMENT
A
AREA DETERMINED BY
SET P.K. NAIL
COORDINATE METHOD
A EXISTING P.K. NAIL
-W- EXISTING WATER LINE
EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT
NOT INTENDED TO BE
EXISTING WATER VALVE
PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE
WITH NCGS 47-30
® EXISTING WATER METER
AS AMENDED
ITE
EXISTING SANITARY SEWER LINE
® EXISTING S/WRARY SEWER MANHOLE
LEGAL REFERENCE:
0 EXISHNG SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT
PLAT CABINET 10, SLIDE 348
® EXISTING CABLE TELEVISION PEDESTAL
TI EXISNNG TELEPHONE PEDESTAL
DEED BOOK 2225. PAGE 90
0 EXISTING POWER STUBOUi
® EXISTING POWER BOX
SKETCH
Yi EXISTING UTILITY POLE
-OU- EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITY LINE
mrt
C3
oneeREavmk U"
D 8
f _ _._.r—
r L i
r J76�
• � I
E — •QI '• i i Tm-
4
0� �i i 6 f
`51 I
SHEETS C'R
COVERAGE
AREA I nem 4m,t
I I
I._---- --- --,
FOR NOTES AND CERTIFICATIONS PERTAINING TO THIS SURVEY
SEE SHEET 9 OF 9.
, C„�n qWETLAND DELINEATION FOR
qR6” LITTLE RIVER RESTORATION SITE
=�'• 9 = CONSERVATION EASEMENT
SEAL = J -BAR RANCH, INC.
L-4449
3 `•. - LITTLE RIVER TOANSffiP, MOORE COUNTY
•� NEAR VASS, NORTH CAROLINA
'r DECKER 11, 2008 / 1-=400'
prepared by
i 1
JOIN MCLEAN LAND SURVEYING
LAURTNBUROy NORTII CAROLINA
4K 400' 200' 0' 400' 800'
SHEET 1 OF
LITTT.ERTVER02.DWG

LEGEND SURVEY NOTES
f (UNLESS OTHERWISE DENOTED)
• EXISTING IRON STAKE RATID OF PRECISION:
■ EXISTING CONCRETE MONUMENT 1/7,500+
✓tics G SET IRON STAKE
*y
13 SET CONCRETE MONUMENT AREA DETERMINED BY
0 SET P.K. NAIL COORDINATE METHOD
A EXISTING P.K. NAL
-W`- EXISTING WATER UNE NOT INTENDED TO BE
L` EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE
N EXISTING WATER VALVE WITH NCGS 47-70
S EXISTING WATER METER AS AMENDED -55- EXISTING SANITARY SEWER UNE
EXISTING SANRAR.Y SEWER MANHOLE LEGAL REFERENCE:
0 EXISTING SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT PLAT CABINET 10, SLIDE 344
© EXISTING GABLE TELEVISION PEOERTAL DEED BOOK 2225, PAGE 90
M EXISTING TELEPHONE PEDESTAL
® EXISnNG POWER sTUBOUT
® EXISTING POWER BOX
OCATION SKETCH Y1 E)aSnNG U IUTY POLE
-0U- EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITY UNE
I %
17
Wooded i I _
Wooded •; Wooed
1r-13 I
l Woode
4
•i y I
4 �
lr-U\
•`
1 _ 6
'\\•
IRON PIPE I1r-uk
N. 537087,640' /
E' 1sze788.770'
- �.. Conservation Easement Umi. t _ ,,.,---..��
.............•----
Wooded
Ir -0B6 �
�Ir-99a
� I i
r -O
Ir -07%t
Wooded\ •
WETLAND
BOUcTYPNDARY
4\\Wooded,
) .1
�I
--i
1r-05 lr
.. .. FOR NOTES AND CERTIFICATIONS PERTAINING TO THIS SURVEY .. ..
' Wooded SEE SHEET 9 OF 9,
a
i
WETLAND DELINEATION FOR
LITTLE RIVER RESTORATION
SITE
`.o�IleARo�.,,
ti -
='4
•4�= CONSERVATION EASEMENT
=_-INC.444
L-J—BAR RANCH,
4�4e
LTTTLE RIVER TOWNSHIP, MOORE COUNTY
NEAR VASS, NORTH CAROLINA
DECEMBER 11, 2008 / 1"=100'
prepared by
2I �Oq JOHN MCLEAN LAND SURVEYING
LAURINBURO, NORTH CAROLINA
imm. so' o' ,00' 200'
LRK
U2K:
SHEET 2 00,9
FN: UTILERIVER02.DWG

J L / LEGEND SURVEY NOTES
(UNLESS OTHERWISE DENOTED)
• EXISTING IRON STAKE RA7OF PREGSION_
■ EXISTING CONCRETE MONUMENT 7/7,. 500+
I;ISS O SET IRON STAKE
o SET CONCRETE MONUMENT AREA DETERMINED By
SET P.K. NAIL COORDINATE METHOD
EXISTING P.K. NAIL
-W- EXISTING WATER UNE NOT INTENDED TO BE
EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE
I pQ EXISTING WATER VALVE WITH NCOS 47-30
j ® EXISTING WATER METER AS AMENDED
i SITE 1a5- EXISTING SANTTAR( SEWER UNE
"�t•"^+.,�,�� ® EXISTING SANITARY SHYER MANHOLE LEGAL RFFEERENCE:
0 EXISTING SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT PLAT CABINET 10. SLIDE 346
® EXISTING CABLE TELEVISION PEDESTAL DEED BOOK 2225, PAGE 90
El EXISTING TELEPHONE PEDESTAL
® EXISTING POWER SREBOUT
M EXISTING POWER BOX
LOCATTON SKETCH
)3L EXISTING UTILITY POLE
-0U- EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITY UNE
FOR NOTES AND CERITFICATIONS PERTXNMIG TO THIS SURVEY i
I SEE SHEET 9 OF 9.
iWooded
Ik
d
DIr-19
�\�
Wooded �; Wooded
1r-20 ;1 1 j
Wooded '� j• \`�G'e
1x-44
/1r-lOnl /1x435
i I Ir -42
Wooded 6WI 770'
IRON PIPE
I
I '� "-"-• �/E 19277269 970'
ry-......� / ... - _ .�ons¢rvation E9.ie6nxa alit
It
ILI
Wooded WL7003 WETLAND
't-- — UPLAND ` VL7004
XVL6007 K' / \� i
jWL7ooz
1r-2967 0 �WL6006 VL00f
/ 4 _ _ --------
SHEET
_ SHEET 8
_ _ . I II SHEET 4
......
_.3.__ _ — —._ —. _, ._.—._ —. _._.—._._._._.I
1r-26 / lr-28 ' — — — I _
- lr 27 / �'L6005 I I I
�N .iCA++..
p
R '
SEAL
= L-444,,9
��e
o C� j(•
1 — bl1-
JMM
LRK:
FN: LrrrLERNIER02.DWG
WETLAND DEU NEAT'ION F'OR
LITTLE RIVER RESTORATION SITE
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
d—BAR RANCH, INC.
LITTLE RIVER TOWNSHIP, MOORE COUNTY
NEAR VASS, NORTH CAROLINA
DECEMBER 11, 2008 / 1"=100'
prepared by
JOHN MCLEAN LAND SURVEYING
LAUMBURG, NORTH CAROLINA
100' 50' 0' 100' 200'
SHEET 3 009

/ [ /
LEGEND
SURVEY NOTES
(UNLESS OTHERWISE DENOTED)
+may
EXISTING IRON STAKE
RA710 OF PRECISION.
■ EXISTING CONCRETE MONUMENT
1/7,500+
0 SET IRON STAKE
q�
"oJ
13 SET CONCRETE MONUMENT
AREA DETERMINED BY
�.
A SET P.K. NAIL
COORDINATE METHOD
A EXISTING PX NAIL
-W- EXISTING WATER LINE
L( EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT
NOT INTENDED TO BE
PREPARED
f
D4 EXISTING WATER VALVE
IN ACCORDANCE
WrrH NCGS 47-30
® EXISTING WATER METER
AS AMENDED
ffE
-�"+-e,�•,,_,4
E STING SANITARY SEWER LINE
® EA705RNG SANffMMANY SEWER MANHOLE
@
LEGAL REFERENCE
O EXISTING SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT
© EXISTING CABLE TELEVISION PEDESTAL
PLAT. CABINET 10, SLIDE 346
D® BOOK 2225, PAGE 90
M EXISTING TELEPHONE PEDESTAL
® EXISTING POWER STUBOUT
® EXISTING POWER BOX
LOCATION SKETCH
tL EXISTING UTRTIY POLE
-OU- EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITY LINE
A-23
! Wac
/
— — — . SHEET 3 —
VL6004
41
WLI.007 II
\ I11I
BOUND I
- I 1111\
(TYPICAL)
-1JL6003
X6002 Tree (tVFQWL1WWu
bio VL1009 VmO\.� I
! I �Wuml
I De4F Stand ,fX -
I
WL6001
I
-� WL1O13
.\ VL5006 WLIOM-4 as /
—A1C VL5005 0 I /.L1014 -
1
Wooded 1 .yd �
31a WLlm5.l
WLS004� I a I I
/ 11 WL1016 VL200ft,,n i
, I 'VL2001 �
1r-61 VL500—'� m l
VL5002 WL1m7
VL1004 VL10119
� I 1 YL2006 � \r-62 ' ood "
WL2o sLy l
\ d .003 CO20—SHEET s
J------- --—
WLI002 VL1022 I WL3004
r-
VLIODI VLM21 -'A- _
163 \ VL1023,WL1025 VL3003
� I VL1024 �\ I
\� 1r-74 WL3002
y;\I VL
Ir- 1026 VL30UL
\. FMoaded .. .. .✓ 7*WL1027
lr-^73\ \ �
W-72-
1111.— (r-67�� Ir71`
+1� lr-se
WETLAND
- I 1 VL4002„
, 0` \ CAR
61*
SEAL =
L-4449
4f,
i
T"'i �zi •09
JMM
LRK:
FTI: Lfr1LERNER02.DWG
i FOR NOTES AND CERTIFICARONS PERTABIING TO THIS SURVEY
I SEE SHEET.9 OF 9.
WETLAND DELINEATION FOR
LITTLE RIVER RESTORATION SITE
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
J -BAR RANCH; INC.
LITTLE RIVER TOWNSHIP, MOORE COUNTY
NEAR VASS, NORTH CAROLINA
DECEMBER 11, 2008 / 1"=100'
prepared by
JOHN MCLEAN LAND SURVEYNG
I AURINBURQ, NORTH CAROLINA
100' 50' 0' 100' 200'
SHEET 4 OFq
u-

Wft
LOCATION SKETCH
VL1 21 1022
V< 023�-- ML1025
V11024 �
1r-74
.. .. .. .. .. .✓11 I VL1026
Iooded ^ VL1027
1-73
� 1r-75
— — Ir 67` 1-71
I lr-
lr6B�
Ir -69
LEGEND
SURVEY NOTES
(UNLESS OTHERWISE DENOTED)
I .— L.— — —-1•—•—.�Ir=56 —
• E)OSTING IRON STARE
RATIO OF PRECISION:
■ EXISTING CONCRETE MONUMENT
1/7,5DO+
O SET IRON STAKE
O SET CONCRETE MONUMENT
AREA DETERMINED BY
O SET P.K. NAIL
COORDINATE METHOD
EXISTING P.K. {JAIL
� I
-W- EXISTING WATER LINE
EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT
NOT INTENDED TO BE
DG EXISTING WATER VALVE
PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE
® EXISTING WATER METER
WITH NCGS 47-30
AS AMENDED
-SS- EXISTING SANITARY SEWER LINE
® EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE
LEGAL REFERENCE
O EXISTING SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT
PLAT CABINET 10, SLIDE 346
© EXISTING CABLE TELEVISION PEDESTAL
DEED BOOK 2225, PAGE 90
m EXISTING TELEPHONE PEDESTAL
e EXISTING POWER SIUBDUT
® EXISTING POWER BOX
EXISTING UTILITY POLE
-0U- EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITY UNE
VL3004 I
WL3003 I
d
VL3002 i w
VL3001 I �
I I
I © I
I I
I I
�\k,wv.
_W WAND
1G- VL4003
VI- 002
FOR NOTES AND CERnnCATIONS PERTAMMG TO THIS SURVEY
SEE SHEET 9 OF 9.-
'1�11CARp''•'.,�
SIN
- SEAL =
L-4449 =
N -ft
7 i-a�-o9
UTTLERIVER02.DWG
co^ � notion f as0jhent (m t
t /
,+ / WLBQ11
V.A_8013 W
12
Wooded
WETLAND DELINEATION FOR
i�I T TIE RIVER RESTORATION SITE
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
J -BAR RANCH, INC.
LITTLE RIVE$ TOIINSHIP, MOORE COUNTY
NEAR VASS. NORTH CAROLINA
DECEIVER 11, 2008 / 1"=100'
prepared by
JOHN MCLEAN LAND SURVEYING
LMHUNBURG, NORTTi CAROLINA
100' 50' 0' 100' 200'
SHEET 5 OFIA
�r�
I .— L.— — —-1•—•—.�Ir=56 —
1r-52
1 I
� I .
� I
I454
f!WETLAND
j
.
BOUNDARY
(TYPICAL)
FOR NOTES AND CERnnCATIONS PERTAMMG TO THIS SURVEY
SEE SHEET 9 OF 9.-
'1�11CARp''•'.,�
SIN
- SEAL =
L-4449 =
N -ft
7 i-a�-o9
UTTLERIVER02.DWG
co^ � notion f as0jhent (m t
t /
,+ / WLBQ11
V.A_8013 W
12
Wooded
WETLAND DELINEATION FOR
i�I T TIE RIVER RESTORATION SITE
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
J -BAR RANCH, INC.
LITTLE RIVE$ TOIINSHIP, MOORE COUNTY
NEAR VASS. NORTH CAROLINA
DECEIVER 11, 2008 / 1"=100'
prepared by
JOHN MCLEAN LAND SURVEYING
LMHUNBURG, NORTTi CAROLINA
100' 50' 0' 100' 200'
SHEET 5 OFIA

I
I vL9006
VLeW4� W�08 05 \fWLSM7
� / r
I
VL8001 / r
r
i u � — — VL8003 y
I \ / WLEIM
11 /�WLe9a9 WETLAND
BOUNDARY
1
WLS014 /
_ _ I SHEET—
wLeo10
// I p/-�WL9007
WL3003 1 / �✓�`�O \
I I VL9006r
J2 f w WI -8011X I
/ WL9001
WL3001 I m * // I I
VL9013
i VL9012 I / .I.
fl / WL9002
I I /
Wooded /
Ir -50
X-- WET VL4003I I { / VL9003
X WL4002 UP�O' 4
�4004
WL4001 /
WL9004
/-ii-CT
JMM
LRK:
FN: LITTLERIVERD2.DWG
WETLAND DELINEATION FOR
LITTLE RIVER RESTORATION SITE
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
J—BAR RANCH, INC.
LITTLE RIVER TOWNSHIP. MOORE COUNTY
NEAR VASS, NORTH CAROLINA
DECEMBER 11, 2006 / 1"=100'
prepared by
JOHN MCLEAN LAND SURVEYING
LAURINBURG, NORTH CAROLINA
100' 50' 0' 100' 200'
SHEET 6 OFIA
0
LEGEND
SURVEY NOTES
(UNLE5.4 O'iHERWISE DENOTED)
• EXISRNG IRON STAKE
RATIO OF PRECISION:
■ EXISTING CONCRETE MONUMENT
1/7.500+
VAs
O SET IRON STAKE
`�.
E3 SET CONCRETE MONUMENT
AREA DETERMINED EIY
4 SET P.K. NAIL
COORDINATE METHOD
A Ex1STING P.K. NAIL
--W�- EXISTING WATER UNE
CE EXISRNG FIRE HYDRANT
NOT INTENDED TO BE
1
M EXISTING WATER VALVE
PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE
WITH NCGS 47-30
I
® EJOSDNG WATER METER
AS AMENDED
ITE
3S- EXISTING SANITARY SEWER UNE
'
® EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE
LEGAL REFERENCE
O EXISTING SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT
PIAT CABINET 10, SLIDE 348
® EXISTING CABLE TELEVISION PEDESTAL
DEED BOOK 2225, PAGE 90
m EXISTING TELEPHONE PEDESTAL
® EXISTING POWER STUBOUT
® EXISTING POWER SDX
LOCATION SKETCH
tZ EXISTING UTILITY POLE
-0U- EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITY LINE
FOR NOTES AND CERTIFICATIONS PERTAINING TO THIS SURVEY WL10005
------'—'I I I SEE SHEET of 9.ti
r
�6
VL10004� UL�
r
Exis�Ing DiLehel
d Stye
I l
"
I
VL10001
{
•GL�O1W2
I
V�0003
a I
fl I
I
I
I vL9006
VLeW4� W�08 05 \fWLSM7
� / r
I
VL8001 / r
r
i u � — — VL8003 y
I \ / WLEIM
11 /�WLe9a9 WETLAND
BOUNDARY
1
WLS014 /
_ _ I SHEET—
wLeo10
// I p/-�WL9007
WL3003 1 / �✓�`�O \
I I VL9006r
J2 f w WI -8011X I
/ WL9001
WL3001 I m * // I I
VL9013
i VL9012 I / .I.
fl / WL9002
I I /
Wooded /
Ir -50
X-- WET VL4003I I { / VL9003
X WL4002 UP�O' 4
�4004
WL4001 /
WL9004
/-ii-CT
JMM
LRK:
FN: LITTLERIVERD2.DWG
WETLAND DELINEATION FOR
LITTLE RIVER RESTORATION SITE
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
J—BAR RANCH, INC.
LITTLE RIVER TOWNSHIP. MOORE COUNTY
NEAR VASS, NORTH CAROLINA
DECEMBER 11, 2006 / 1"=100'
prepared by
JOHN MCLEAN LAND SURVEYING
LAURINBURG, NORTH CAROLINA
100' 50' 0' 100' 200'
SHEET 6 OFIA
0

YASS
I
1
Sin
•
LO ATION SKETCH)cL
LEGEND
(UNLESS OTHERWISE DENOTED)
• EXISTING IRON STAKE
■ EXISTING CONCRETE MONUMENT
0 SET IRON STAKE
0 SET CONCRETE MONUMENT
A SET P.K. NAL
A EXISTING P_K. NAL
-W- EXISTING WATER LINE
EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT
DQ E)=NG WATER VALVE
® EXISTING WATER METER
-SS- EXISTING SANITARY SEWER LINE
@ DaSIING SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE
0 EXISTING SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT
© EXISTING CABLE TELEVISION PEDESTAL
M F7WNG TELEPHONE PEDESTAL
® Das'nNG POWER SIUBOUT
® EXISTING POWER BOX
DD571NG unm POLE
-OU- EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITY LINE
SURVEY NOTES
RATIO OF PRECISION;
1/7,500+
AREA DETERMINED BY
COORDINATE METHOD
NOT INTENDED TO BE
PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE
WITH NCGS 47-30
AS AMENDED
LEGAL REFERENCE
PLAT CABINET 10, SLIDE 346
DEED BOOK 999 , PANE 90
IRON PIPE N: 537358.4.10•
E; 1929638.520'
mit• ...................
OSn.Eo=em�!!L.-
Cg�ryptio
VfCh
N_
Penlie
Fjci9Gn9
•
o
ypT�
FOR NOTES AND CERTIFICOMONS PERTAINING TO THIS SURVEY
SEE SHEET 9 OF S.
L
Z
ff
I
VL12W4
S
l
ice\
1
W 005
y6OQ%'� all
1
WL72003
Wooded
1'*\IW3
WR'
1
•i
\a( / X,1
U009
WGal
WL3.1007
VLI1005 /
WL11G4 �X\
\ VL111310; t1
//
/ A.
- X Wooded
Ir-87
•l
/ lr-B5 /
1x-86
1
1r-B4 /
•1
V LIIO02 \
vuloo1 / 0-83
Nr-BI
WETLAND DELINEATION FOR
�oA,1CARj5
LITTLE RIVER RESTORATION SITE
-;�o ���ss,• �
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
S4
L-4449 _-
J—BAR RANCH, INC.
r'•
LITTLE RIVER TOWNSHIP, MOORE COUNTY
NEAR VASS, NORTH CAROLINA
DECEMBER 11. 2006 / 1"=100'
prepared by
r- at -oq
JOHN MCLEAN LAND SURVEYING
LAURINBURG, NORTH CAROLINA
MM
K:
,00• so' o• ,00• zoo' SHEET 7 OF
FN: UTTLERIVER02.DWG
1�3

WOW
SKETCH
LEGEND
SURVEY NOTES
SUNLESS OTHERWISE DENOTED)
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
• EXISDNG IRON STAKE
RATIO OF PRECISION:
■ EXISTING CONCRETE MONUMENT
1/7,500+
0 SET IRON STAKE
NEAR VASS, NORTH CAROLINA
13 SET CONCRETE MONUMENT
AREA DETERMINED BY
0 SET P.K. NAIL
COORDINATE METHOD
A EXISTING P.K. NAIL
JOHN MCLEAN LAND SURVEYING
-W- EXISTING WATER LINE
NOT INTENDED TO BE
EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT
PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE
DQ EXISNING WATER VALVE
WITH NCGS 47-30
® EXISDNG WATER METER
AS AMENDED
-SS- EXISTING SANTTARY SEWER UNE
® EXISTING SANRAw SEWER MANHOLE
LEGAL REFERENCE
O EXISDNG SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT
PLAT CABINET 10. SLIDE 34
IM EXISTING CABLE TELEVISION PEDESTAL
DEED BOOK 2225, PAGE 90
M EXISTING TELEPHONE PEDESTAL
® EXISTING POWER STUBOUT
® EXISTING POWER BOX
i3L EXISTING UTILITY POLE
-OU- EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITY LONE ..
FOR NOTES AND CERTIFlCATIONS PERGINING TO THIS SURVEY
1
SEE SHEET 9 OF 9.
Ii
}%
;I Wooded
Wooded
I
Wooded
I l� Wooded // Cons°rvob°n men-nt Lir't.
601
I 1I1 r.. _ I� 1 /f `/ •t"�ei Ouch -
_ Wooded i X90 �aT 2 / etin9Penm
W501
I .asdsX
I vsD6
Existing Qltched Stream Chon
I
I
I�
I�
SHEET 6
WETLAND DELINEATION FOR
,10NRo<,,, LITTLE RIVER RESTORATION SITE
a2 TD SGL
CONSERVATION EASEMENT
-44 —
L-a44s -
J—BAR RANCH, INC.
`,.
LITTLE RIDER TOWNSHIP, MOORE COUNTY
s
NEAR VASS, NORTH CAROLINA
JANUARY 21, 2009 / 1"=100'
prepared by
2(-04
JOHN MCLEAN LAND SURVEYING
L.AURINBURG, NORTH CAROLINA
M
K-
100' 50' 0' i 00' 200'
' LITTLERNER02.DWG
SHEET S OF 9
m

LEGEND SURVEY NOTES
(UNLESS OTHERWISE DENOTED)
• EXISTING IRON STAKE RATIO OF PRECISION:
1 EXISTING CONCRETE MONUMENT 1/7,500+
toss
0 SET IRON STAKE
�S
13 SET CONCRETE MONUMENT AREA DETERMINED BY
A SET P.K. NNL COORDINATE METHOD
A EXISTING P.K. NAIL
-W- EXISTING WATER UNE NOT INTENDED TO BE
EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE
I
N EXISTING WATER VALVE WITH NCGS 47-30
1
® EXISTING WATER METER AS AMENDED
ITE
-SS- EXISTING SANITARY SEWER UNE
® EOSTING SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE LEGAL REFERENCE.-
EFERENCEO
0EXISTING SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT PLAT CABINET 10, SLIDE 348
(0 EXISTING CABLE TELEVISION PEDESTAL DEED BOOK 2225, PAGE 90
M EXISTING TELEPHONE PEDESTAL
® EXISTING POWER STUBOIA
® COSTING POWER BOX
)2k EXISTING UTILITY POLE
LOCATION S=CH
-0U_ EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITY LINE
ECPN
N
WL
536750.570
192772
19 1. r`
WL6006
53fi69 21
192 1
10005
g r_ 1927010.692
800
662.74
92 1& I
1
Ir- b B 4 92
WL600436541.
76 .9
WL11001
9
-
r535776.971 19271(Y7.184
WL6
8
192 1 1.
1 1 Ir- ,Ol 1 2
.3
19 1
111
2919 .224 w 01536930.922 1027969.572
W16016
.1
192 9.515
WL11G04
6878.78
19 1.838 w 53892.18 8
WL5006
81.063
192 G6 .
WL7 005
$ 634.6 4
1 29 .990 ---w-60-3- 689 .891 9 fl.fl4
WL5005
6 . 1
1 2 119.
WL aQ
202
19 9416. 7 w G453688 .662 1928128.588
W 4
1
_9
t
WLSO03
611 0
192 1 7.
WL11
4
1 2956 w 08 7
WL5002
536106.008
1927115.
WL17009
8 .41
­19-19-6W.220w507 536 23.089 1
WL5001
6
92 09 . 9
WL110 0
1 .
1 29 0-44= w B536940.7-61 1928263M-49-
26324
WL1001
5990.428
1927724.
1 1
536714.638
14. 8
19294221 w 8966. 91 1928278,091
WL1002
536014..90-0
9 7196.114
537017.241. 1828 98
WLTUO-r-8046.
O
-120-.8
19 7224.7
192 1.826 w 1 9.234 8 822 .1
WL1004
5T6
19 0 219.6 6
WL7200i
73-9-9 00-0 42
19 w601 2 1.898 1
WL1005
5 6287.180
192 6.996
WL120 3
­-5-36-9-44-UT
9.988 w
WL1006
53w4.5ag
192 .398
WL1200
.992
__63_74_BI.7ff
1929 64. w6035 928 9
WLIC07
536488.695
192 71.84
Ir -19___
92 w 19 .863
WL1008.899
1927 6.517
Ir -19
5M458 9 .4
1 2 w6 5 .01 1023Y4-0-299-
WL1CO9
536419.046
1927 03.606
Ir -2
5 .463
1927043.072 w 1
WL1010
538406.188
1927489.993
Ir -16a
537595.752
1926889.49-6 w5
WL1011
536 .880
19275 9.53(1
r-1fib
53 628.063
1926838,530 w O1 _53T101 .893 19 41.
WL1012
536356.761
19 .359
Ir -15
.8
1926802.448 _____w 02 537122-978 1928 1.822
WL1013
3 3O.
1-9-094T996-
Ir -1 a
10 . 96
19 6934. w703 9. 58 78 .104
1014
5 6279.
Ir-1Ob
3
---19-2-69-0-9.61 ___-_F04_ 66.61
WL1015 ____5_3_6_173__8T2
536T19 1-01
19 484.26
___1_9_274-r5_.8_48
Ir-
894.15
192 1 .BfiB w705 53 51. 62t9 82 9. 25
WL1016
Ir-
. 0 5
---F§-270-74.617 w 6 1.085 T 81BB.
WL1017
5361-31.203
19 7454.3
Ir -4
044.821
1927051.346 w70 126.9 2 1 28798.250
W 001
536142.219
1927507.595 1
Ir -43
WL2002
53BI59.+4-7
192 53 .107
1r-44
537163.3780
WL2003
536137.789
192 56 .428
--l-92-75-61-95-0
Ir-
49.819
1927675-643__ NOTE THESE MAPS PREPARED TO SHOW WETLAND LOCATIONS
4
536091.4TI
Ir -51
53569 431
19 684. ONLY AND NOT BE CONSIDERED A BOUNDARY SURVEY.
WL2005
5 80 0.2 8
1BZ75 .8 7
Ir -52
fit .41
1 2 BOUNDARY LIMITS OF CONSERVATION FASEAENT TAKEN
WL2006
535118.140
1927524.2
Ir-
0. 9
1927592. 9 FROM PLAT RECORDED AT PLAT CABINET 10, SLIDE 346.
L7 1 B
53611
192741 .825
Ir- 4
2 .
ALL COORDINATES SHOWN WERE LOCATED BY USING
WL1019
538106. 1
1
Ir-
.9 8
19 8 MAPPING GRADE THIMBLE GPS RECEIVERS
WL1020
6
Z .94
Ir- fi
8 2.Bfi0
192 9 4. 9 POST -PROCESSED USING TRIMBLE PATHFINDER
WL7021
99 1
19 7
Ir -88
535793.476
192 454.969 SOFTWARE AND BY CONVENTIONAL TOTAL STATION.
WL10 2
.0
192 351.
Ir -B7
-53-5,19T-294
--1-92-9461-.994- PORTION OF DATA USED IS FROM PREVIOUS WORK
WL1023
5j5gT7.301
1927384.413
Ir -82
5 6401.0 2
1929 1. PERFORMED BY FROM BLUE LAND, WATER,
WL102
535955.224
1 .610
1-83
536429. 40
1929 9. 3 INFRASTRUCTURE AND "I" JOHN MCLEAN PARTICIPATED
WL1025
5359 8.508
1927480.880
Ir -84
53847 .44fi9
9 .296 IN THE FIELD WORK TO OBTAIN THE DATA USED OF
WL1026
535908.876
ITUMT.512r-
8 70. 0
1 BLUE LAND, WATER, INFRASTRUCTURE
WLI 027
5 69.44
1927 14.414
Ir -86
10.5___192_9_7_0_7_§W_COORDINATES
LOCATED BY GPS ARE NC GRID
WL3001
5,35912 00
19 617.819
Ir-
.007
1929 0.4 0 HAD 83 AND THE POINTS PROVIDED BY BLUE: LAND.
W 02
.20
19 62 4
Ir- 1
536131.249
19269 81 WATER, INFRASTRUCTURE THAT COULD BE VERIFIED BY
W 00-,3
5 880.185
1_92_7_65_3_.,D7_9
Ir-
5 606. 8
192 0 GPS WERE WITHIN THE SUB -METER ACCURACY
W 004
538008.00
. 40
535977.590
192 .619 STANDARD.
WL4001
fi
9
Ir -65
535832.519
19271N'B8 TOTAL WETLAND ACREAGE - 106.91*
WL4002
41.059
1927751.45
Ir -64
535M.237
1927124,256 MAP REVISED ON 1-21-09 TO ADD WETLAND POINTS
WL400
5 3.856
19 1
Ir- 8
535801.437
192 5. 37 SHOWN ON SHEET 8 MAKING MAP A TOTAL OF 9
WL4004
535709.1 9
1927872.761
Ir-
10.9
1927403. 3 SHEETS.
W 012
535880.062
1928084.163--1r-
5
1. 2
192 498.91
WLS013
53 98.446
1928040.900
1r-
99.766
1
WL80143fi
48. fit
1 28008.955
Ir -7Y-
5,35876.987
192 .644
WL8001
53 619.19
1 964.
Ir-
535932.761
19 4
WLBW2
536169.6
1 28068.770
Ir- 1
535812.139
192 51 .
WLBOO
53620 .029
1 .92
Ir -535003.647192
560.
WLBG04
536253.T39'
92821
Ir- 9
5 .4 1
192 1.010
WL8005
5 62 7. 50
1928 .823
Ir 1
537045.765
1926110.448
WL8006
536293.215
19 . 29
Ir -0
9 2.102
7926191.91
WL8007
53626 I.WT
1928 .12
Ir-
36930. 2
t 26. 38
WLBOOB
536180.846
1928369.01
4
6898.22
--1-9-2608-6-75-4
54
WL8009
5361 8.242
1928280.103
r-- 5
3682 .8 ---192-64-74-.-925
THIS CERTIFIES THAT THIS COPY OF THIS PLAT ACCURATELY
WL8010
602.3
192 15.4 B
_19_28_1_4_5_.5Y4_ ___l
r-05
_r=57_
682 .321
7 Z 35.974 DEPICTS THE BOUNDARY OF THE JURISDICTION OF SECTION
WL6011
359 4.115
6 2 .040
1 2661 .8 =9 404 OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT AS DETERMINED BY THE
W000
.192
128
Ir-
9 9.0 B
192 4. 98 UNDERSIGNED ON THIS DATE. UNLESS THERE IS A CHANGE
WL9006
.4
19 6.461
Ir- a
536985.982
1926718.535 IN THE TAW OR OUR PUBUSHED REGULATIONS, THIS
L90G7
538 1.1 9
B
Ir-
___537Tl2.597
-192979334-5 DETERMINATION OF SECTION 404 JURISDICTION MAY BE
WL9001
5359,34.907
19284 5.003
Ir -11
637175.931
1 64. RELIED UPON FOR A PERIOD NOT TO EXCEED FIVE YEARS
WL9002
55868.010
192 .139
Ir -1
5372 2. 80
1 2 3.31 FROM THIS DATE. THI ERRMINATION WAS MADE UTILIZING
WL 003
35764329
192 . 0
Ir -1
5 7 29.908
192 08. THE 1987 CORPS 0 INFERS WETLWOS DELINEATION
L9004
5 5688.607
1928297.81
Ir -14
----5-37-4-45-.87-1
1926802.704 QUAL
WL7D01 1
WL 002
536714-31219
1 2
19 6 206
1927511.808
Ir -1-6379-29.1
Ir -21
5
19 9 . REGULATORY OFFICIAL
1926867.2
W 003
6814.3 1
19 64.909
Ir -2
3 299.9 2
192 ETRE
004
6 1 .1
19 12.0 4
Ir-
.1
1926 71.94 DATE
WL100018
WL 000
13.676
536488.2
192844.10
792 75.929
Ir -24
Ir
F7,25-
B 8 1
----5-36-576-.056
1926801.551
USAGE ACTION ID -
1926884.399alph
WL1G003
53646 .570
2
1 8 .6 7
II_ 636605.532
1926931.007
WETLAND
DELINEATION FOR
,%"`N11oARo"'%
LITTLE
RIVER
RESTORATION SITE
4''•
=
CONSERVATION
EASEMENT
= SEAL.
J -BAR RANCH,
INC.
L -444e
-
LITTLE RIVER TOWNSHIP, MOORE COUNTY
NEAR VASS, NORTH CAROLINA
DECEMBER 11, 2008 / 1"=100'
prep -d by
-0�
JOHN MCLEAN LAND SURVEYING
LAURTNBURG,NORT7T CAROLINA
JMM
,00'
so'
o'
,00' 200' SHEET 9 OF 9
LRK:
FN: UTLERIVER02.DWG

APPENDIX D - Debit Ledgers
Mitigation Project
Little River
DMS IMS ID
226
River Basin
CAPE FEAR
Cataloging Unit
03030004
Applied Credit Ratios: 1:1 1.5:1 2.5:1 10:1 1:1 3:1 2.42291:1 5:1 1:1 3:1 2:1 5:1 1:1 3:1 2:1 5:1
Intormation trom DMS Debit Ledger dated 04/15/2016
C C
E
M £
E E
E
C
£
=O
�
RC oC C C = Q
mO0m
`E o o EE
A ON d
U
m`
N
L
=
N
jO N O O Vp
2 E
CM
NN
L0=
q
.
R
_
-
d N
O N O O N M L M=`
N NN
d
=
W
c
W
a
=
W
-
z� z z= z a o� o o c o a
W U U U W U
Beginning Balance (feet and acres)
3,593.00
210.00
1
54.80
48.70
Beginning Balance (mitigation credits)
1,437.20
21.001
22.62
9.740
NCDOT Pre -DMS Debits (feet and acres): Not Applicable
DMS Debits (feet and acres):
DWR Permit No
USACE Action IDs Impact Project Name
NCDOT TIP R-2238 - Widening
1999-0339
1993-02820 NC 87, Cumberland Cc
1,690.00
NCDOT TIP U-2520 - Cliffdale &
2000-0400
2002-00640 Reilly Road, Cumberland Co
8.350
NCDOT TIP U-3312 - Black &
2002-0228
1998-01948 Decker Road, Cumberland Cc
2.835
1995-0102
Bailey Farms
1.500
1997-1020
Buckhead Creek Subdivision
0.500
1999-0922
1998-20937 Lemon Springs Quarry
18.705
2000-0053 / NCDOT TIP U-2911 - Lake Valley
2003-0890
2003-01297 Drive, Cumberland Cc
0.824
NCDOT TIP R-2417 - Sanford
2000-1432
2002-20899 Bypass, Lee County
1
1,886.501
1
2.91
32.250
2003-1183
2003-01091 Cumberland Towers
1.950
NCDOT TIP B-4139 - Bridge 106
over Black River on SR 1780,
2003-0788
2001-00215 Harnett County
2.050
Harnett/Fuquay Regional
2003-1159
2003-01310 Wastewater Plant
0.010
Southview Subdivision, Section VI
2004-0239
2004-00169 & VII
0.01
1.495
2005-20380/
2005-0467
2005-20414 Windsor Tract
0.025
1999-0239
2006-20193-292 Green Oaks Parkway
1.72
Green Oaks Parkway Second
2005-0150
2008-00129 Request
16.50
2005-2031
2006-00250 Lindsey Oaks
0.90
2005-0345
2005-00246 Cape Fear Crossing Subdivision
0.75
2006-1151
2010-01848 Salem Village
210.00
2009-1346
2008-00967 New Hill Place
1.40
0.286
Southwest Judd Parkway
2011-02004 Extension
0.284
NCDOT ILF Credit Purchase
24.738
Remaining Balance (feet and acres)
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Remaining Balance (mitigation credits)
0.001
0.000
0.000
Intormation trom DMS Debit Ledger dated 04/15/2016

Mitigation Project Little River (Purchase)
DMS IMS ID 226
River Basin CAPE FEAR
Cataloging Unit 03030004
Comment: This ledger shows the debits for the amount of mitigation that the NCDOT ILF Program purchased from the Statewide ILF Program.
The beginning balance represents the amount purchased and not the total mitigation credits available on the site.
1:1 1.51 2.5:1 5:1 1:1 3:1 2.42291:1 5:1 1:1 3:1 2:1 5:1 1:1 3:1 2:1 5:1
Information from DMS Debit Ledger dated 04/1S/2016
d
O
CO
C
=
c
E
o
o
C
v
O
Cd
'a
O
di0
O
0
c
m
V
Z
is
E
U
W
f'
o
O
U
N
d
U
L
d
v
r
m
v
v
U
r
v
v
C
U
c
r
c
✓Oi
O.
t
N
c
w
0
E
w
w
E
m
1°
°'
w
fnO.
y
O.
a
O
O
2
a
q
O
y�
N
y
2
Z
Z
O
U
U
00
U
O
U
Beginning Balance (square feet)
24.738
Beginning Balance (mitigation credits)
10.21
NCDOT Pre -DMS Debits (feet and acres):
DMS Debits (feet and acres):
DWR Permits USACE Action IDs Impact Project Name
Remaining Balance (feet and acres)
24.738
Remaining Balance (mitigation credits)
10.21
Information from DMS Debit Ledger dated 04/1S/2016

APPENDIX E - ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Little River Close -Out Report
DMS# 226 Page 20 of 20

Little River IMS # 226:
2015 Vegetation Transects in Grassy Field Area (stems/acre)
.._. .- .._"._...
_...
- -
-
-
-
-
.
AL
V.
M.
_._.
.------ :.:.::::
.:_._.
... :.:.::::
.:_:_. ..:.::::.
:_._.
:.:.::::
_.. .
_._.
Vegetation Transects 2015
:-:::: a�cr :
:-:::: :.,�r.
:-:::: :.,
. „
-_ - Wetland Preservation
Wetland Enhancementicr
.;-:....._..
;-?...
;::....
:::
_ .;-:....•_••.
Cllr
:: '-:....... ..
..""
Uplands
.....
: _..4�
::..._..4�+ .
-;..
U.
c ..._:...
�r
--- _":_
: fir..:_._. ••.�. �----
: ��lu..:_._. ••.�. �----_--
fir..:_:_. ••.�. �------
�6cr..:_:_. •.�. �----_--
Flu..:_._. ••.�. �----_--
Flu
_.
_....
.._._.._..
Flc ::...
.._._.._.. ..._.
.._._.._.. ..._.
.._._.._..
.._._.._.. ..._.
.._._.._.. ..._.
_._.._.
W E
-.CV)CO....
:.:,:.. :::__l
4-:=: ..:.:_:_
? `._.7JCr
0 62.5 125
250
_. .`::::_:
.
_. .
Feet �._..� ..._".

Summary of groundwater gauge results for Years 1 through 5.
Gauge
Max Consecutive Days During Growing Season and (%)
Year 1
(2011)
Year 2
(2012)
Year 3
(2013)
Year 4
(2014)
Year 5
(2015)
Mean
1
17(7%)
9(4%)
42(18%)
42(18%)
18(8%)
26(11%)
2
2(1%)
4(2%)
24(10%)
13(6%)
7(3%)
10(5%)
3
28(12%)
25(11%)
139(63%)
50(22%)
50(22%)
58(24%)
4
0*
23(10%)
138(60%)
50(22%)
51(22%)
65(28%)
Reference
54(23%)
52(22%)
139(63%)
49(21%)
51(22%)
69(30%)
*Gauge malfunctioned for first half of 2011
No hydrology success criteria was established for site. Jurisdictional determination was
established.
Rainfall data for project area in comparison to historic averages.
Rainfall Data for Project Area
60
50
40
30
20 —.
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Annual Rainfall (in) 30th Percentile 70th Percentile
*Rainfall from on-site rain gauge.
**30th and 701h percentiles from WETS tables. Calculated with data from 1971-2000.

North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
Date: 5,1-/2/07 Project: Gf- f e, A" Ve Latitude:
Evaluator:Go( (.iQ �� Site: -Lyda"4 ' J � Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent 30 County: A"O Ire Other
if >_19 or perennial if >_30 J e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 10
Absent
Weak
Moderate,:.
Strong.
11. Continuous bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: riffle -pool sequence
0
1
2 1
3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting
0
1
1:2�
3
5. Active/relic floodplain
0
t
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Braided channel
0
1
2
3
8. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
9a. Natural levees
FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75;BL
1
2
3
10. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
11. Grade controls
12. Natural valley or drainageway
0
0
0.5
0.5
1
1
1.5
1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.
No �0
Yes = 3
man-,uauO V,WnGJ GIO IIVL IOLOV, JOO UIJL.UJJIUI W II I LL IdIlUd1
B. Hvdroloov (Subtotal = V 1
14. Groundwater flow/discharge
0
1'
2
3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or
Water in channel - dry or growing season
0
1
1
3
16. Leaflitter
1.5
9)
0.5
0
17. Sediment on plants or debris
V0.6
1
1
1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines)
0
0.5
1
1.5
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present?
0
No = 0
Yes -Cl -5)
1.5
C. Biologv (Subtotal = -I )
20 . Fibrous roots in channel
3
1
0
21". Rooted plants in channel
3
2
1
0
22. Crayfish
0
:5
1
1.5
23. Bivalves
0
1
2
3
24. Fish
0
0.V
1
1.5
25. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
0.5
1
1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton
0
1
2
3
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria bacteria/fungus
M
0.5
1
1.5
29 °. Wetland plants in streambed
FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75;BL
= 1•: - SAV = 2.0; Other = 0
I LO111J LV d1IU L I luu o ul l Eim pOJOI IGC ui upidim planta, nem za rocu5e5 on ine presence oT aquatic or wetlano plants.
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.) Sketch:

APPENDIX D - Debit Ledgers
Sfv'Pa w A
USACE AID# DWQ 4_ Site # (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment: Q / // /
1. Applicant's name: fVG �E 10 2. Evaluator's name: / Col ­e
3. Date of evaluation: 7I;lO % 4. Time of evaluation:
5. Name of stream: (4 T 6. River basin: C"Pe' �6eay-
7. Approximate drainage area:
9. Length of reach evaluated: l2�ot�
11. Site coordinates (if known):. prefer in decimal degrees.
Latitude (ex. 34.872312):
S. Stream order:
10. County: rMiaa/ 2
12. Subdivision name (if any):
Longitude (ex. —77.556611
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIs Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying streams) loqation):
_0�f IVG 6'90 , Lrt�1� �� vp,-�J-��r A04mee� lffSfoe-u 7y;%�-. 5/'to-
14. Proposed channel work (if any): n �/ /A
15. Recent weather conditions:
16. Site conditions at time of vi
W
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: _Section 10 _Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
-Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed.. (I-IV)
18. is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water.surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YE NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil.Suryey`L CES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: % Residential _% Commercial % Industrial _% Agricultural
td-eS rf q�p
% Forested 2% Cleared / Logge� Other
22.
( )
22. Bankfull width: 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 1' {
24. Channel slope down center of stream: ✓ Flat (0 to 29/6) _Gentle (2 to 4%) _Moderate (4 to 10%) _Steep .(> 10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight /Occasional bends _Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored .using.the.'saine ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief' description of how to review• the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under. evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or. weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the,
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the -Stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate. form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score.of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reversy): 6✓
Comments: ��^_'i�_ �� pgre 7ilk . r.Y+ ®1 polff Cdhtali� iOff/%,
f �Ji/IG'Dlnyf.� ,'e�,vr _-t'd l.%✓•s O I/r�... rte.. ri��., ,-f,��,.
Evaluator's Signature Date 7y! 7
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental. pi'ofessionaIs in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
* These characteristics are not assessed ir coastal streams.
F)
Channel sinuosity
ECOREGION POINT
RANEE y
#
CHARACTERISTICS
extensive channelization = 0; natural meander =maxpoints)
SC(.
Coastal Piedmo¢t.
hlGogt>itaiaa
0-5
0-4
t
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5.
0-4
0
no flow or saturation = 0; stron flow = max oints)
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA
0-4
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0 —5
0 5:m =
j
extensive alteration = 0; no alteration =. maxpoints)
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0-4
3
Riparian zone.
0-6
0- 4
0
(no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max pointsl
13
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0-5
0.— 5
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points)
f J
! .
(extensive discharges = 0• no discharges = maxpoints)
W
14
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0 — 4
5
Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
0 - 4
2
U(no
discharge = 0; springs, see s, wetlands etc. = max oints
15
impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0=4
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
-0-4
0 2
(no floodplain = 0, extensive floodplain = maXpoints)
16
Presence or riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
0-3
0-5
�.
Entrenchment [floodplain access
0-5
0 — 4
(no riffles/ripples or pools = 0• well-developed = maxpoints)
(deeply entrenched = 0; fre went flooding= max hints
d
1
-
0— 6
0— 6
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
— 6
4
I (little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)
inn wetlnnrie = n- Inrae ndinrent wetlnnrlc = mar nnintal
PA
-
Canopy coverage over streambed
0 — 5
* These characteristics are not assessed ir coastal streams.
F)
Channel sinuosity
extensive channelization = 0; natural meander =maxpoints)
l0
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4.
extensive deposition= 0; little or no sediment = maxpoints)
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA
0-4
0 �5.:
fine homogenous = 0• lai a diverse sizes = maxpoints)
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0-4
0-5.`.
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = maxpoints)
13
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0-5
0.— 5
S
severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points)
! .
W
14
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0 — 4
0-5
2
H
no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)
15
impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0=4
0-5
(substantial impact =0; no evidence = maxpoints)
f
16
Presence or riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
0-3
0-5
G-6
z
i
(no riffles/ripples or pools = 0• well-developed = maxpoints)
d
1
Habitat complexity
0— 6
0— 6
0— 6
I (little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)
PA
Is
Canopy coverage over streambed
0 — 5
0-5
0 — 5.
i
no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = maxpoints)
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0 —'4
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max)
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0 — 5 .
0 — 5
1
no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
' 2l
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4'
Z
O(no
evidence= 0; common, numerous types = maxpoints)
O
22
Presence of fish
0— 4
0— 4
0— 4
no evidence = 0• common, numerous es = max points)
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0-5
[�
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence =max points)
j
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enteron first page)
* These characteristics are not assessed ir coastal streams.
F)

North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form; Version 3.1
Date: tf/y 1 617 Project: / f Latitude:
Evaluator:P /d/fie Site: e� RaL ngitude:
Pe v C
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent 1QS f w County: ook p Other
if >>_19 or perennial if ?30 e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomor nolo (Subtotal= 1 "1 )
Absent
°Weak -
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuous bed and bank
0
1
2
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0.5
2. Sinuosity
0
1
1 1
3
3. In -channel structure: riffle -pool sequence
0
1
0
3
4. Soil texture or stream substrate sorting
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relic floodplain
0
(IT
2
3
6_ Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Braided channel
0
1
2
3
8. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
a
3
9a. Natural levees
FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1-5SAV
1
2
3
10. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
11. Grade controls
0
.5
1
1.5
12. Natural valley or drainageway
0
0.
1
1.5
13. Second or greater order channel on existing
USGS or NRCS map or other documented
evidence.
No
Yes= 3
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = 1
14. Groundwater flow/discharge 0 4
2
3
15. Water in channel and > 48 hrs since rain, or 0 1
Water in channel - dry or growing season
0
3
16. Leaflitter 1.5 1
0.5
0
17. Sediment on plants or debris 0.5
1
1.5
18. Organic debris lines or piles (Wrack lines) 0 (0.y
1 1
1.5
19. Hydric soils (redoximorphic features) present? No = 0
Yes
1.5
C. Bioloav (Subtotal = I's )
20b . Fibrous roots in channel
3
2
1
0
210. Rooted plants in channel
3
2
1
0
22. Crayfish
0
0:
1
1.5
23. Bivalves
0
1
2
3
24. Fish
0
1
1.5
25. Amphibians
0
0.5
f
1.5
26. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0.5
1
1.5
27. Filamentous algae; periphyton
0
1:
2
3
28. Iron oxidizing bacteria bacteria/fungus
0.5
1
1.5
29 Zetland plants in streambed
FAC = 0.5; FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1-5SAV
-=2.0, Other = 0
•--•• - _ - , - .,.., Fnw - - uF ... I. F--, ucm ca i .atla Vrl 111C PFU5Cf1(:e of aquatic or Welland piants.
Notes: (use back side of this form for additional notes.) Sketch:

USACE AID#
5tveg04Z3
DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET .
Aaf..
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment: Q
1. Applicant's name:(/ 10 2. Evaluator's name: r r �d ���' !/
3. Date of evaluation: 7 / 4. Time of evaluation: 1 ��: r✓I
S. Name of stream: (o L t�l e �el vF/' 6. River basin• 4:� `i J e-
�B� % •.
7. Approximate drainage area: 8. Stream order: r "
9. Length of reach evaluated: 10. County:QOI'-�
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees.
Latitude (ex. 34.872312):
12. Subdivision name (if any):
Longitude (ex. –77.556611);
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluati n (note nearby r ads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) logation):� .
% - -a ; r�Qs-F��Af,*®,'J
14. Proposed channel work (if
15. Recent weather conditions:
16. Site conditions at time of
l7. Identify any special waterway classifications known: _Section 10 Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries, Habitat
_Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters — Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed_ (I-I.V)
18. is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES 19 If yes, estimate the water.surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO 20. Does channel appear on�USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: % Residential _% Commercial % industrial % Agricultural
2�% Forested 00% Cleared / Logged _% Other
22. Bankfull width: 5-ff 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank):
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2%) _Gentle (2 to 4%) _Moderate (4 to 10%) _Steep.(>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight (%Occasional bends _Frequent meander _Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored .using the:saine ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief' description of how to review. the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach tinder. evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or. weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the "stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate. "form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality. qr
Total Score (from reverse): 1 Comments:
Evaluator's Signature /' &"IN` Date � "
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental.peofessionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change = version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT `'WORKSHEET
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.
#
CHARACTERISTICS
ECO REGION.TONT. RANEE
SQRE..
Coastal Piedmont (VlougtAnn
'S°<..
z
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = max points
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0<
extensive alteration = 0• no alteration =. maxpoints)
3
Riparian zone .
0—.6
0=4
0 S
(no buffer = 0; cont i uous, wide buffer = max points)
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-50`=4
0 4
(extensive discharges = 0• no discharges = max points)
aGroundwater
discharge
2
Uno
discharge = 0; springs, see s, wetlands, etc. = maxpoints)
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0-4'
0 2
(no floodplain = 0, extensive floodplain = max points)
Entrenchment /floodplain access
0—'
0-4
0 .2
a+
(deeply entrenched = 0; fre hent flooding = max hints)
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands {
0-6
0-4
0 .� 2.
no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = max oints {
9 i
Channel sinuosity
0 - 5
0.-4 .
0 - 3:...:.: `
extensive channelization = 0• natural meander = max oints)
10
Sediment input
0-5
0.— 4
0 ' -4
(extensive deposition— 0; little or no sediment = maxpoints)
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate.
NA*
Q-4
0 5.^
Fine homogenous = 0• lai a diverse sizes = max oints)
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0 — 4.
0 5. `
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max oints)
.
13
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0 — 5
O=5
a(severe
erosion = 0, no erosion, stable banks = max oints)
�
14
Root depth and density on banks
0— 3
'
0-4
0-5
(no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0 — 5
0-4
0 - 5
I
(substantial impact =0; no evidence = max oints)
16
` Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
0-3
0 5
(no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-developed = maxpoints)
.0-6
17
Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6
( little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = maxpoints)
M
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
(no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = maxpoints)
0-5
0-5
0-5 .
l9
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0 — 4
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max)
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0 —5
0-5.
no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = maxpoints)
21Presence
of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4,
Z
O
' no evidence= 0; common, numerous types = maxpoints)
{ O
22
Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
2 I
no evidence = 0; common, numerous es = max oints)
23
of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0-5
!�
I!
IEvidence
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

MEMORANDUM
TO: Todd Tugwell, Chair
Interagency Review Team
FROM: Tracy Stapleton, Project Manager
THROUGH: Jeff Schaffer, Eastern WPPI Supervisor and Marc Recktenwald, WPPI Manager
RE: Second Follow Up on Project Strategy
Little River (IMS #226)
Cape Fear 03030004
DATE: 19 January 2011
This memo serves as an update of the restoration approach for the subject project, and to seek approval of the monitoring and
credit strategy for this project.
As you may recall, the Little River project is located near Vass in Moore County, in CF 04 (Figure 1). It is a WRP-originated
project that originally proposed a large amount of stream restoration. In 2001 the site was timbered, streams channelized, soil
bedded and loblolly pines planted in much of the floodplain wetlands by the owners for silviculture. The conservation easement
was purchased by EEP in 2003. During design development visits to the site with agency staff and a change in design firm delayed
and changed the restoration strategy at the site. In 2009, Stantec finalized plans to enhance the bedded pine plantation wetlands
by removing pines and re -planting. Concerns at EEP continued, though, including bringing large equipment into the site, and
disturbing the recovering soils. After another site visit with agencies, and internal discussion, EEP decided to plant a small
portion of the site, below existing pines, for enhancement of the stream and wetlands and comparison of bottomland hardwood
community development in planted and unplanted portions of the pine plantation.
Wetland Communit type
Acres
Wetland pine plantation
48
Wetland grassy fields
7
BLH preservation
49
Total
104
Warm Stream
Linear ft
Channel A
1726
Channel B
1867
Total
3593
As discussed in the June 2010 IRT meeting, an approach being considered for restoration was to contract for burning of the site
to clear the existing underbrush for bareroot planting. EEP contracted with ASIS to burn the site in December 2010. The burning
was successful in opening up the understory at the site. Therefore EEP is changing its restoration approach and the resulting
credits from the approach's implemententation. EEP will now plant all 55 acres of wetland and stream buffer (pine plantation and
grassy fields) with bare roots of climax community species. The pine plantation, including stream buffer, will be planted at a rate
of 300 stems per acre, with a target of 150 planted stems per acre at Year 5. These bare roots will mimic the understory
development of these species, at a lower density than other wetland enhancement projects because of the high density of pines
forming a canopy above them. We anticipate more closely mimicking a jump-started successional community by bringing in
climax species to the nine year old loblolly stand. The grassy fields will be planted at a rate of 600 stems per acre
Most of EEP's wetland enhancement projects invovle planting bare roots in a jurisdictional wetland barren of woody stems. For
these projects, the ratio of 2:1 has been set by agreements that establish EEP policy. For this project, we propose 2.5: 1 credit in
pine plantation areas because of the lower density of planted woody stems. In the grassy fields, we anticipate 2:1 credit. This
would result in approximately 19.2 credits from the pine plantation, 3.5 credits from the grassy field area, and 9.8 credits from the
preservation area. The total anticipated wetland credits from this site are 32.5 riparian wetland mitigation units, all of which are
restoration equivalent credits. Stream credits total 1437 credits, attributed to Enhancement II of 3593 linear feet of stream
through planting.

Summary Table of Little River Proposed Mitigation
Type
Acres/If
Ratio
Total Credits
Riparian Wetland Enh
(pineplantation)
48
2.5:1
19.2
Riparian Wetland Enh
(grassy field
7
2:1
3.5
Riparian Wetland Pres
49
5:1
9.8
Stream Enh 2
3593
2.5:1
1,437.2
Monitoring
In the pine plantation wetlands, monitoring will include 8 CVS monitoring plots. Success will be met if 150 planted woody stems
per acre are surviving in year 5 of monitoring in the pine plantation area, while 260 planted woody stems per acre must be
surviving after 5 years of monitoring in the grassy field area. This lower density in the plantation area is a result of the loblolly pine
presence and abundance. The grassy field area will have 2 CVS vegetation plots. In addition, five monitoring wells will be re-
installed to collect hydrology data about the site.
The stream portion of the site will be equipped with a crest gage, photo points, and 6 CVS vegetation plots. Stream buffer plots,
because they are within the planted pine plantation, will also have a stem density requirement of 150 planted woody stems per
acre surviving in year 5 of monitoring to meet success.
If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at 715-1658.
References
Parker, G.R. and W. T. Swank. Tree Species Response to Clear -cutting a Southern Appalachian Watershed, 1982: Coweeta Hydrologic
Laboratory, US Forest Service. North Carolina, USA.
Cain, Michael D. and Michael G. Shelton. Secondary forest succession following reproduction cutting on the Upper Coastal Plain of southeastern
Arkansas, USA, 2000: USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Monticello, Arkansas.

Figure 1.0 Project Vicinity Map and Directions
f
Vass
Little Rlypi Vleld ty Map
(SP@ also Rgure 10.1) if
Local Roads
I -NV Major Roads
1"V Railroads.
County Bouridary
Streams
Municipality
Site Boundary , J-40
e,
Off Unry
Directions to Little River project site: From Raleigh follow US I South approximately 50 miles to Vass. Take
the NC 690 exit and follow NC 690 east for approximately 2.3 miles. Turn right into project site.

Figure 2.0 Project Vegetative Communities
SuccessionalWeband
Grassy Field
Prol erty Boundary
Projed area
Figure 10.5 Vegetative Communities
Bedded Pine Plantation
— SUeamsiDitches
Little River Wetland Enhancement
O Botiornland Hardwood Forest
Moore County, NC
July 2407
a MO 4GO W3
-_
�','iA4'+II`rll
+
Grassy Field
Y --'
i;-
SuccessionalWeband
Grassy Field
Prol erty Boundary
Projed area
Figure 10.5 Vegetative Communities
Bedded Pine Plantation
— SUeamsiDitches
Little River Wetland Enhancement
O Botiornland Hardwood Forest
Moore County, NC
July 2407
a MO 4GO W3
,2D3 Feet
31tu5Ce=
�','iA4'+II`rll