NC0038377_App F Mayo Kd Addendum 02-02-2016_20160229

UNC CHARLOTTE
Addendum to Soil Sorption Evaluation
Mayo Steam Electric Plant
Person County, NC
Prepared for:
Synterra
148 River Road Suite 220
Greenville SC 29601
Investigators:
William G. Langley, Ph.D., P.E.
Dongwook Kim, Ph.D.
UNC Charlotte / Lee College of Engineering
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
EPIC Building 3252
9201 University City Blvd.
Charlotte, NC 28223
February 2, 2016

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 Background.........................................................................................................................1
2 Results................................................................................................................................1
3 Comments and Recommendations..................................................................................... 1
4 References......................................................................................................................... 3

TABLES
Table 1.
Arsenic
Table 2.
Boron
Table 3.
Chromium
Table 4.
Cobalt
Table 5.
Thallium
Table 6.
Vanadium
FIGURES
(See Tables 1-6 for figure numbers)

Background
This addendum provides three sorption isotherm equations for batch data analyzed and initially
reported in the Soil Sorption Evaluation for Mayo Steam Electric Plant (Langley and Oza 2015).
The isotherm model equations are:
Linear: S = KdC
Linear with So > 0: S = KdC + So
Freundlich: S = KfC'm
where S is the constituent concentration on soil (ug/g), Kd is the linear sorption coefficient (ml/g),
C is the constituent concentration in water (ug/1), So is the soil concentration at C = 0, n is the
unitless Freundlich exponent, and Kf is the Freundlich constant (I'/nug('-'/n)/g). The parameters
Kd, So, Kf, and n are estimated using linear regressions on the sorption data. The parameter So
represents that portion of constituent concentration on the soil that is sorbed irreversibly.
2 Results
Results are provided in Tables 1 through 6 by constituent and sample. The results include
parameter estimates and indicators of the goodness -of -fit of the resulting model equations to the
sorption data.
3 Comments and Recommendations
In addition to the general comments and qualifiers offered in the original report, the following
comments and recommendations are provided.
For the fate and transport model, the range of sorption estimates (maximum and minimum)
should be used as the upper and lower limits for selecting a calibrated value that is consistent
with measured constituents.
For a specific constituent and sample, the isotherm model with the minimum chi-square value
best represents the lab data in its arithmetic form.
Linear isotherms with So < 0 are considered not applicable because they imply negative soil
concentrations (S) as constituent concentration (C) approaches zero.
For linear isotherms with So > 0, the y-intercept So is assumed to represent irreversible sorption
as opposed to previous exposure to the constituent in the field which is manifested as a
negative -sloping or irregular isotherm as would have been noted in the original report.

Freundlich isotherms with n < 1 are considered not applicable because they are not concave
downward (Freundlich 1924).
For constituents not considered for Mayo, sorption values may be transferable from other sites
with similar geochemical settings, or may be estimated using site -specific data from the
Comprehensive Site Assessment in a geochemical model.
2

4 References
Freundlich H. 1924. The Elements of Colloidal Chemistry, translated by George Barger. Dutton
and Company Publishers: New York, NY, pp. 58-61.
Langley, W.G. and Oz, Shubhashini. Soil Sorption Evaluation for Mayo Steam Electric Plant,
UNC-Charlotte, October 2015.
Ho, Yuh-Shan, Wen-Ta Chiu, and Chung -Chi Wang. "Regression analysis for the sorption
isotherms of basic dyes on sugarcane dust." Bioresource technology 96.11 (2005): 1285-1291.
Matott, L. Shawn, IsoFit Documentation and User's Guide Version 1.2, State University of New
York at Buffalo Department of Civil, Structural and Environmental Engineering Version 1.2,
updated 01 /18/07.
3

Table 1 Arsenic
No.
data points
Linear Isotherm, So = 0
Linear isotherm, So > 0
Freundlich isotherm
Trial A
Trial B
Trial A
Trial B
Trial A
Trial B
Well ID
Trial A
Trial B
Kd
R z
z
Kd
R z
z
Kd
So
R z
z
Kd
S.
o
R z
z
Kr
1 /n
R z
z
Kr
1 /n
R z
z
Fig. Nos.
1/g
-
Ng/g
1/g
-
Ng/g
1/g
Ng/g
Ng/g
1/g
Ng/g
Ng/g
(c)
Ng/g
(c)
-
-
Ng/g
ABMW-2
5
5
0.166
0.984
0.527
0.172
0.998
0.142
(d)
(d)
(e)
0.200
0.944
0.966
0.180
1,2
ABMW - 2 BR
5
5
0.006
0.985
0.095
0.007
0.987
0.101
(d)
(d)
0.006 0.992 1 0.944 0.098
(e)
3,4
MW - 3 BR
5
5
0.010
0.740
3.348
0.009
0.723
3.534
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
5,6
MW - 5 BR
5
5
0.004
0.865
0.788
0.003
0.955
0.234
(d)
(d)
(e)
0.004 0.973 1 0.620 0.254
7,8
MW - 8 BR
5
5
0.517
0.954
1.126
0.533
0.933
1.918
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
9,10
MW - 12 BR (50)
5
5
0.607
0.974
1.723
0.576
0.970
2.267
0.535
0.857
0.983
0.357
0.503
0.937
0.982
0.370
1.072
0.804
0.991
0.128
1.110
0.778
0.990
0.115
11,12
MW - 12 BR (88.5)
3
3
1.795
0.998
0.068
1.638
0.994
0.232
1.693
0.429
0.999
0.017
1.483
0.730
0.996
0.045
2.028
0.927
0.999
0.008
2.056
0.871
0.996
0.019
13,14
MW - 13 BR
5
5
0.092
0.911
1.997
0.034
0.963
0.676
(d)
0.028
0.333
0.979
0.062
(e)
0.117
0.703
0.996
0.011
15,16
MW - 16 BR (36.5)
5
5
1 0.070
0.909
1 1.703
0.092
0.981
0.736
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
17,18
MW - 16 BR (54)
5
5
0.008
0.978
0.222
0.009
0.922
0.761
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
19,20
SB - 7
2
2
4.269
0.999
0.022
5.681
0.964
0.652
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
21,22
Linear So=O
Linear So>0
Freundlich
Kd
Kd
So
Kr
1/n
Maximum
5.681
1.693
0.937
2.056
0.992
Minimum
0.003
0.028
0.333
0.004
0.703
Median
0.092
0.535
0.730
0.636
0.899
Notes
a. Coefficient of determination (R2)indicates goodness of fit of individual isotherm to its linear regression (Ho et al. 2005).
b. Minimum chi-square (X2) indicates best fit of three isotherms in arithmetic form (Ho et al. 2005, Ng et al. 2002).
c. units: 1(1 ")pg('-'/")/g
d. Not applicable for So<0 or Kd<0 from linear regression.
e. Not applicable for (1/n)>1 or Kf<0 from Freundlich regression (Matott 2007).
f. For all C<MDL (method detection limit), estimate a minimum Kd using C = MDL at lowest soil -to -solution ratio.
a. Isotherm data not available.

Table 2 Boron
No.
data points
Linear Isotherm, So = 0
Linear isotherm, So > 0
Freundlich isotherm
Trial A
Trial B
Trial A
Trial B
Trial A
Trial B
Well ID
Trial A
Trial B
Kd
2
R
2
Kd
2
R
2
Kd
So
2
R
2
Kd
So
2
R
2
Kf
1/n
2
R
2
Kf
1/n
2
R
2
Fig. Nos.
1/g
-
Ng/g
1/g
-
Ng/g
I/g
ug/g
ug/g
1/g
Ng/g
I -
Ng/g
(c)
Ng/g
(c)
Ng/g
ABMW - 2
4
4
0.001
0.990
0.015
0.001
0.933
0.121
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
23,24
ABMW - 2 BR
3
2
0.000
0.528
0.152
0.001
0.835
0.105
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
25,26
MW - 3 BR
4
4
0.001
0.785
0.293
0.001
0.941
0.068
(d)
(d)
0.031 0.336 1 0.001 1 0.354
(e)
27,28
MW - 5 BR
2
2
0.001
0.789
0.138
0.000
0.914
0.031
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
29,30
MW -8 BR
5
5
0.002
0.785
0.949
0.002
0.910
0.300
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
31,32
MW - 12 BR (50)
5
4
0.001
0.942
0.108
0.001
0.789
0.366
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
33,34
MW - 12 BR (88.5)
5
5
0.001
0.902
0.261
0.002
0.648
1.667
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
35,36
MW - 13 BR
3
5
0.000
0.974
0.012
0.001
0.818
0.326
(d)
(d)
0.002 0.675 1 0.013 0.012
(e)
37,38
MW - 16 BR (36.5)
3
4
1 0.001
0.974
1 0.029
0.000
0.825
0.121
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
39,40
MW - 16 BR (54)
2
0
0.000
0.907
1 0.012
(g)
(d)
(g)
(e)
(g)
41,-
SB - 7
0
0
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
-I-
Linear So=O
Linear Sp>O
Freundlich
Kd
Kd
So
K,
1/n
Maximum
0.002
0.031
0.675
Minimum
0.000
0.002
0.336
Median
0.001
0.017
0.506
Notes
a. Coefficient of determination (R2)indicates goodness of fit of individual isotherm to its linear regression (Ho et al. 2005).
b. Minimum chi-square (X2) indicates best fit of three isotherms in arithmetic form (Ho et al. 2005).
c. units: lo/n)pg(1-vn)/g
d. Not applicable for So<0 or Kd<0 from linear regression.
e. Not applicable for (1/n)>1 or Kf<0 from Freundlich regression (Matott 2007).
f. For all C<MDL (method detection limit), estimate a minimum Kd using C = MDL at lowest soil -to -solution ratio.
g. Isotherm data not available.

Table 3 Chromium
No.
data points
Linear Isotherm, So = 0
Linear isotherm, So > 0
Freundlich isotherm
Trial A
Trial B
Trial A
Trial B
Trial A
Trial B
Well ID
Trial A
Trial B
Kd
2
R
2
Kd
2
R
2
Kd
So
2
R
2
Kd
So
2
R
2
Kf
1/n
2
R
2
Kf
1/n
2
R
2
Fig. Nos.
1/g
-
Ng/g
1/g
-
Ng/g
I/g
ug/g
ug/g
1/g
Ng/g
Ng/g
(c)
Ng/g
(c)
-
Ng/g
ABMW - 2
4
4
0.032
0.833
0.102
0.047
0.822
0.178
(d)
(d)
(e)
0.048
0.785
0.176
0.257
42,43
ABMW - 2 BR
0
0
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
MW - 3 BR
0
0
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
MW - 5 BR
0
0
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
MW - 8 BR
0
0
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
MW - 12 BR (50)
1
1
0.003 (f)
0.003 (f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
44,45
MW - 12 BR (88.5)
0
0
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
MW - 13 BR
4
4
0.011 0.811 1 0.059
0.013 0.916 0.023
(d)
0.011 0.013
1 0.550 0.020
(e)
0.021 0.725
1 0.616 0.022
46,47
MW - 16 BR (36.5)
0
0
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
MW - 16 BR (54)
1
0
0.418
(f)
(g)
(f)
(g)
(f)
(g)
48,-
SB - 7
3
3
0.006
0.927 0.020
0.006 0.812 1 0.059
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
49,50
Linear So=O
Linear Sp>O
Freundlich
Kd
Kd
So
K,
1/n
Maximum
0.418
0.011
0.013
0.048
0.785
Minimum
0.0027
0.011
0.013
0.021
0.725
Median
0.011
0.011
0.013
0.034
0.755
Notes
a. Coefficient of determination (R2)indicates goodness of fit of individual isotherm to its linear regression (Ho et al. 2005).
b. Minimum chi-square (X2) indicates best fit of three isotherms in arithmetic form (Ho et al. 2005).
c. units: lo/n)pg(1-vn)/g
d. Not applicable for So<0 or Kd<0 from linear regression.
e. Not applicable for (1/n)>1 or Kf<0 from Freundlich regression (Matott 2007).
f. For all C<MDL (method detection limit), estimate a minimum Kd using C = MDL at lowest soil -to -solution ratio.
g. Isotherm data not available.

Table 4 Cobalt
No.
data points
Linear Isotherm, So = 0
Linear isotherm, So > 0
Freundlich isotherm
Trial A
Trial B
Trial A
Trial B
Trial A
Trial B
Well ID
Trial A
Trial B
Kd
2
R
2
Kd
2
R
2
Kd
So
2
R
2
Kd
So
2
R
2
Kf
1/n
2
R
2
Kf
1/n
2
R
2
Fig. Nos.
1/g
-
Ng/g
1/g
-
Ng/g
1/g
ug/g
-
Pg/g
1/g
Ng/g
-
Ng/g
(c)
-
-
Ng/g
(c)
-
Ng/g
ABMW-2
3
3
0.770
0.868
1.753
1.691
0.980
0.605
0.685
0.478
0.549
1.425
1.552
0.408
0.940
0.445
1.289
0.648
0.703
1.710
1.848
0.918
0.809
0.487
51,52
ABMW - 2 BR
2
0
1.732
0.990
0.201
(g)
1.420
0.896
1.000
0.000
(g)
2.315
0.740
1.000
0.000
(9)
53,-
MW - 3 BR
0
0
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
-
MW - 5 BR
1
0
6.552
(f)
(g)
(f)
(g)
(f)
(g)
54,-
MW - 8 BR
4
0
0.909
0.884
1.731
(g)
(d)
(g)
(e)
(g)
55,-
MW - 12 BR (50)
5
5
0.066
0.999
0.020
0.069
0.996
0.054
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
56,57
MW - 12 BR (88.5)
3
3
2.226
0.972
0.497
2.256
0.953
0.716
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
58,59
MW - 13 BR
4
4
0.839
0.877
1.114
1.528
0.700
7.245
(d)
1.481 0.154 0.218 7.269
(e)
1.352 0.940 0.439 9.470
60,61
MW - 16 BR (36.5)
0
0
1 (g)
(g)
(d)
(g)
(e)
(g)
MW - 16 BR (54)
1
0
6.552
(f)
(g)
(f)
(g)
(f)
(g)
62,-
SB - 7
1 4
3
0.908
0.897 1 1.828
1.277 0.999 0.021
(d)
1.256 0.072
1 0.997 0.023
0.955 0.838 1 0.551 1 2.281
(e)
63,64
Linear So=O
Linear Sp>O
Freundlich
Kd
Kd
So
K,
1/n
Maximum
6.552
1.552
0.896
2.315
0.940
Minimum
0.0658
0.6853
0.072
0.955
0.648
Median
1.402
1.420
0.408
1.352
0.838
Notes
a. Coefficient of determination (R2)indicates goodness of fit of individual isotherm to its linear regression (Ho et al. 2005).
b. Minimum chi-square (X2) indicates best fit of three isotherms in arithmetic form (Ho et al. 2005).
c. units: lo/n)pg(1-vn)/g
d. Not applicable for So<0 or Kd<0 from linear regression.
e. Not applicable for (1/n)>1 or Kf<0 from Freundlich regression (Matott 2007).
f. For all C<MDL (method detection limit), estimate a minimum Kd using C = MDL at lowest soil -to -solution ratio.
g. Isotherm data not available.

Table 5 Thallium
No.
data points
Linear Isotherm, So = 0
Linear isotherm, So > 0
Freundlich isotherm
Trial A
Trial B
Trial A
Trial B
Trial A
Trial B
Well ID
Trial A
Trial B
Kd
2
R
2
Kd
2
R
2
Kd
So
2
R
2
Kd
So
2
R
2
Kf
1/n
2
R
2
Kf
1/n
2
R
2
Fig. Nos.
1/g
-
Ng/g
1/g
-
Ng/g
1/g
ug/g
ug/g
1/g
ug/g
-
Ng/g
(c)
Ng/g
(c)
-
-
Ng/g
ABMW - 2
5
3
1.634
0.999
0.107
1.673
0.990
0.674
(d)
1.615
0.335
0.968
0.423
(e)
2.397
0.763
0.940
0.549
65,66
ABMW - 2 BR
5
5
0.509
0.987
0.897
0.570
0.982
1.155
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
67,68
MW - 3 BR
4
4
0.884
0.912
3.141
1.073
0.891
2.231
(d)
(d)
0.750 0.973 1 0.430 4.215
1.164 0.829 1 0.626 3.251
69,70
MW -5 BR
5
5
0.901
0.786
5.680
1.442
0.936
2.811
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
71,72
MW - 8 BR
5
4
2.242
0.860
3.674
2.272
0.972
0.996
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
73,74
MW - 12 BR (50)
2
2
2.860
0.992
0.274
0.803
0.911
10.698
2.374 1.360 1 1.000 0.000
0.505 3.229 1 1.000 0.000
3.734 0.756 1 1.000 0.000
3.734 0.364 1 1.000 0.000
75,76
MW - 12 BR (88.5)
4
4
1.726
0.997
0.151
1.793
0.997
0.191
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
77,78
MW - 13 BR
2
3
4.656
0.858
4.651
0.145
1 0.974
0.029
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
79,80
MW - 16 BR (36.5)
5
5
0.455
0.952
1 1.351
0.698
0.943
1 1.699
(d)
(d)
(e)
0.791
0.833
0.784
2.577
81,82
MW - 16 BR (54)
5
5
0.330
0.986
2.043
0.347
0.989
2.127
0.310 0.501 1 0.975 0.660
0.325 0.522 1 0.983 0.425
0.780 0.700 1 0.907 1.230
0.852
0.690
1 0.948
0.940
83,84
SB - 7
5
5
1.210
0.988
0.433
1.419
0.982
0.704
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
85,86
Linear So=O
Linear So>O
Freundlich
Kd
Kd
So
K,
1/n
Maximum
4.656
2.374
3.229
3.734
0.973
Minimum
0.145
0.310
0.335
0.750
0.364
Median
1.141
0.505
0.522
1.008
0.759
Notes
a. Coefficient of determination (R2)indicates goodness of fit of individual isotherm to its linear regression (Ho et al. 2005).
b. Minimum chi-square (X2) indicates best fit of three isotherms in arithmetic form (Ho et al. 2005).
c. units: lo/n)pg(1-vn)/g
d. Not applicable for So<0 or Kd<0 from linear regression.
e. Not applicable for (1/n)>1 or Kf<0 from Freundlich regression (Matott 2007).
f. For all C<MDL (method detection limit), estimate a minimum Kd using C = MDL at lowest soil -to -solution ratio.
g. Isotherm data not available.

Table 6 Vanadium
No.
data points
Linear Isotherm, So = 0
Linear isotherm, So > 0
Freundlich isotherm
Trial A
Trial B
Trial A
Trial B
Trial A
Trial B
Well ID
Trial A
Trial B
Kd
2
R
2
Kd
2
R
2
Kd
So
2
R
2
Kd
So
2
R
2
Kf
1/n
2
R
2
Kf
1/n
2
R
2
Fig. Nos.
1/g
-
Ng/g
1/g
-
Ng/g
I/g
ug/g
ug/g
I/g
Ng/g
Ng/g
(c)
Ng/g
(c)
Ng/g
ABMW - 2
5
5
0.051
0.885
1.035
0.057
0.905
1 0.963
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
87,88
ABMW - 2 BR
5
0
0.038
0.984
0.115
(g)
0.038 0.004 1 0.954 0.116
(g)
(e)
(g)
89,-
MW - 3 BR
5
5
0.004
0.591
1.741
0.005 0.685 1.223
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
90,91
MW - 5 BR
0
0
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
-
MW - 8 BR
4
0
0.388
0.983
0.195
(g)
(d)
(g)
(e)
(g)
92,-
MW - 12 BR (50)
3
3
0.618
0.971
0.588
0.558
0.952
1.205
0.509 0.565 1 0.971 0.129
0.440 1 0.699
0.957 1 0.188
0.959 0.768 1 0.939 1 0.105
0.811 1 0.821
1 0.827 1 0.381
93,94
MW - 12 BR (88.5)
5
5
0.600
0.942
0.744
0.517
0.899
1.133
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
95,96
MW - 13 BR
5
5
0.052
0.990
0.116
0.057
0.995
0.076
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
97,98
MW - 16 BR (36.5)
0
4
(g)
0.040
0.925
0.500
(g)
(d)
(g)
0.042 1 0.944 1 0.695 1 0.644
-,99
MW - 16 BR (54)
5
5
1 0.002
0.864
0.186
0.002
0.776
0.377
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
100,101
SB - 7
2
1
1 2.179
0.978
0.172
4.050
(f)
(d)
(f)
(e)
(f)
102,103
Linear So=O
Linear So>O
Freundlich
Kd
Kd
So
K,
1/n
Maximum
4.050
0.509
0.699
0.959
0.944
Minimum
0.002
0.038
0.004
0.042
0.768
Median
0.057
0.440
0.565
0.811
0.821
Notes
a. Coefficient of determination (R2)indicates goodness of fit of individual isotherm to its linear regression (Ho et al. 2005).
b. Minimum chi-square (X2) indicates best fit of three isotherms in arithmetic form (Ho et al. 2005).
c. units: lo/n)pg(1-vn)/g
d. Not applicable for So<0 or Kd<0 from linear regression.
e. Not applicable for (1/n)>1 or Kf<0 from Freundlich regression (Matott 2007).
f. For all C<MDL (method detection limit), estimate a minimum Kd using C = MDL at lowest soil -to -solution ratio.
g. Isotherm data not available.

12
10
8
6
CO
4
Figure 1. Arsenic Isotherms for ABMW — 2
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
C (ug/1)
9 Trial - A linear So=O

12
10
8
_0)
6
U)
4
Figure 2. Arsenic Isotherms for ABMW — 2
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O Freundlich

3.0
2.5
2.0
U)
1.0
Figure 3. Arsenic Isotherms for ABMW — 2 BR
•
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O Freundlich

3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
Figure 4. Arsenic Isotherms for ABMW — 2 BR
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O

6
5
4
=' 3
2
X
Figure 5. Arsenic Isotherms for MW — 3 BR
•
•
•
0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O

Figure 6. Arsenic Isotherms for MW — 3 BR
n.
5
4
0)
am' 3
•
2 �
1
0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O

Figure 7. Arsenic Isotherms for MW — 5 BR
2.5
•
2.0
S' 1.5
1.0 •
0.5 •
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O

Figure 8. Arsenic Isotherms for MW — 5 BR
3.0
2.5
2.0
•
1.5
cn •
1.0
• • •
0.5
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O Freundlich

12
10
8
_0)
6
U)
4
Figure 9. Arsenic Isotherms for MW — 8 BR
0 3 6 9 12 15 18
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O

12
10
8
6
4
Figure 10. Arsenic Isotherms for MW — 8 BR
0 3 6 9 12 15 18
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O

12
10
8
_0)
6
4
Figure 11. Arsenic Isotherms for MW — 12 BR (50)
0 3 6 9 12 15 18
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

12
10
8
0)
6
4
Figure 12. Arsenic Isotherms for MW — 12 BR (50)
0 3 6 9 12 15 18
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

16
14
12
�10
8
C/) 6
4
2
0
Figure 13. Arsenic Isotherms for MW — 12 BR (88.5)
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

16
14
12
—10
0)
8
C/) 6
4
2
0
Figure 14. Arsenic Isotherms for MW — 12 BR (88.5)
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

9
8
7
6
5
U 4
3
2
1
0
Figure 15. Arsenic Isotherms for MW — 13 BR
•
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O

4.0
3.5
3.0
2.5
2.0
U) 1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
Figure 16. Arsenic Isotherms for MW — 13 BR
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Figure 17. Arsenic Isotherms for MW — 16 BR (36.5)
•
0 20 40 60 80 100
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O

10
9
8
7
6
5
C/) 4
3
2
1
0
Figure 18. Arsenic Isotherms for MW — 16 BR (36.5)
0 20 40 60 80 100
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O

4.0
3.5
3.0
2.5
2.0
C/) 1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
Figure 19. Arsenic Isotherms for MW — 16 BR (54)
0 60 120 180 240 300 360
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O

4.0
3.5
3.0
2.5
2.0
U) 1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
Figure 20. Arsenic Isotherms for MW — 16 BR (54)
0 60 120 180 240 300 360
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O

18
16
14
12
10
� 8
6
4
2
0
Figure 21. Arsenic Isotherms for SB — 7
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O

18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
Figure 22. Arsenic Isotherms for SB — 7
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O

Figure 23. Boron Isotherms for ABMW — 2
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5 •
0.4
•
C/) 0.3
WN
0.1
1 1'
0 90 180 270 360 450 540
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear SO=O

0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0)
°' 0.4
C/) 0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
Figure 24. Boron Isotherms for ABMW — 2
90 180 270 360 450 540
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear SO=O

0.20
0.18
0.16
0.14
0.12
0.10
CO 0.08
0.06
0.04
0.02
0.00
Figure 25. Boron Isotherms for ABMW — 2 BR
•
•
v •
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear SO=O

0.50
0.45
0.40
0.35
0.30
0.25
U) 0.20
0.15
0.10
0.05
0.00
Figure 26. Boron Isotherms for ABMW — 2 BR
•
•
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear SO=O

Figure 27. Boron Isotherms for MW — 3 BR
0.7
1•
0.5 •
0.4
U) 0.3
0.2 •
0.1
M
•
0 60 120 180 240 300 360 420 480
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear SO=O Freundlich

Figure 28. Boron Isotherms for MW — 3 BR
0.7
1•
0.5
0.4
U) 0.3 •
0.2 •
0.1
60 120 180 240 300 360 420 480
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear SO=O

0.50
0.45
0.40
0.35
0.30
°' 0.25
U) 0.20
0.15
0.10
0.05
0.00
Figure 29. Boron Isotherms for MW — 5 BR
•
•
100 200 300 400 500
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear SO=O

0.30
0.25
0.20
°' 0.15
0.10
0.05
me
Figure 30. Boron Isotherms for MW — 5 BR
•
100 200 300 400 500
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear SO=O

Figure 31. Boron Isotherms for MW — 8 BR
1.8
1.6
1.4
1.2
1.0
U) 0.8
0.6
•
•
0.4
0.2 •
0.0
0 100 200 300 400 500
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear SO=O

Figure 32. Boron Isotherms for MW — 8 BR
1.8
1.6
1.4
1.2
1.0
0.8 •
0.6
•
0.4 •
•
0.2
0.0
0 100 200 300 400 500
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear SO=O

Figure 33. Boron Isotherms for MW — 12 BR (50)
0.s
0.7
0.6
0.5 •
0.4
U) 0.3 • •
•
0.2
0.1
0 100 200 300 400 500
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear SO=O

0.s
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
U) 0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
Figure 34. Boron Isotherms for MW — 12 BR (50)
•
•
0 100 200 300 400 500
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear SO=O

1.0
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
U) 0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
Figure 35. Boron Isotherms for MW — 12 BR (88.5)
100 200 300 400 500
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear SO=O

Figure 36. Boron Isotherms for MW — 12 BR (88.5)
1.8
1.6
•
1.4
1.2
_' 1.0
� 0.8 •
0.6
0.4
0.2 •
0.0
0 100 200 300 400 500
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear SO=O

Figure 37. Boron Isotherms for MW — 13 BR
0.30
0.25
0.20
•
0.15
CO •
0.10
0.05
we]
0 100 200 300 400 500
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear SO=O Freundlich

Figure 38. Boron Isotherms for MW — 13 BR
0.50
0.45 • •
0.40
0.35
0.30
0.25
U) 0.20 •
0.15 • •
0.10
0.05
0.00
0 100 200 300 400 500
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear SO=O

0.50
0.45
0.40
0.35
0.30
°' 0.25
U) 0.20
0.15
0.10
0.05
0.00
Figure 39. Boron Isotherms for MW — 16 BR (36.5)
0 100 200 300 400 500
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear SO=O

0.50
0.45
0.40
0.35
0.30
0.25
U) 0.20
0.15
0.10
0.05
0.00
Figure 40. Boron Isotherms for MW — 16 BR (36.5)
•
•
•
•
0 100 200 300 400 500
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear SO=O

0.10
0.09
0.08
0.07
0.06
0.05
U) 0.04
0.03
0.02
0.01
0.00
Figure 41. Boron Isotherms for MW — 16 BR (54)
•
•
0 100 200 300 400 500
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear SO=O

0.40
0.35
0.30
0.25
0.20
0.15
0.10
0.05
0.00
Figure 42. Chromium Isotherms for ABMW — 2
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O

0.40
0.35
0.30
0.25
c'' 0.20
U) 0.15
0.10
0.05
0.00
Figure 43. Chromium Isotherms for ABMW — 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O

0.006
c/) 0.004
0.002
0.000
Figure 44. Chromium Isotherms for MW — 12 BR (50)
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O

0.010
0.008
0.006
CO 0.004
0.002
0.000
Figure 45. Chromium Isotherms for MW — 12 BR (50)
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O

Figure 46. Chromium Isotherms for MW — 13 BR
0.20
0.18
0.16
0.14
0.12 •
0.10
U) 0.08
0.06 •
0.04 • •
0.02
0.00
0 2 4 6 8 10
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O

0.20
0.18
0.16
0.14
0.12
0.10
C/) 0.08
0.06
0.04
0.02
0.00
Figure 47. Chromium Isotherms for MW — 13 BR
0 2 4 6 8 10
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
U) 0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
Figure 48. Chromium Isotherms for MW — 16 BR (54)
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O

Figure 49. Chromium Isotherms for SIB — 7
0.20
0.18
0.16
0.14
0.12
0.10
0.08
0.06
0.04
•
0.02
0.00
0 5 10 15 20
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O

0.20
0.18
0.16
0.14
0.12
0.10
c/) 0.08
0.06
0.04
0.02
0.00
Figure 50. Chromium Isotherms for SIB — 7
0 5 10 15 20
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O

7
6
5
�4
03
2
1
0
Figure 51. Cobalt Isotherms for ABMW — 2
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

M
Figure 52. Cobalt Isotherms for ABMW — 2
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0
• Trial - B linear So=O
4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0
C (ug/1)
linear So>0 Freundlich
M

8
7
6
— 5
°' 4
U) 3
2
0
Figure 53. Cobalt Isotherms for ABMW — 2 BR
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

7
6
5
�4
U) 3
2
U
Figure 54. Cobalt Isotherms for MW — 5 BR
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O

6
5
4
0' 3
W
2
9
Figure 55. Cobalt Isotherms for MW — 8 BR
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O

9
4
°' 3
U)
2
w
Figure 56. Cobalt Isotherms for MW — 12 BR (50)
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O

i
4
3
Z
2
w
Figure 57. Cobalt Isotherms for MW — 12 BR (50)
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O

8
7
6
—5
_0)
°' 4
U) 3
2
U
Figure 58. Cobalt Isotherms for MW — 12 BR (88.5)
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O

8
6
�5
0' 4
c/) 3
2
U
Figure 59. Cobalt Isotherms for MW — 12 BR (88.5)
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O

Figure 60. Cobalt Isotherms for MW — 13 BR
8
7
6
5
4
U) 3
2
1
0 -
0.0 0.5
•
0
•
1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O
3.0 3.5 4.0

Figure 61. Cobalt Isotherms for MW — 13 BR
12
10 •
8
0)
6
CD
4
'"
•
2
•
0 .-
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

7
6
5
�4
3
2
0
Figure 62. Cobalt Isotherms for MW — 16 BR (54)
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O

Figure 63. Cobalt Isotherms for SIB — 7
8
7
6 •
— 5
_0)
4
U) 3
2
0
•
•
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O Freundlich

6
�5
cn 4
U) 3
2
U
Figure 64. Cobalt Isotherms for SB — 7
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O linear So>O

14
12
iN'
U) 6
4
2
lJ
Figure 65. Thallium Isotherms for ABMW — 2
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O

14
12
10
o> 8
6
4
2
0
Figure 66. Thallium Isotherms for ABMW — 2
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

18
16
14
12
10
U) 8
6
4
2
0
Figure 67. Thallium Isotherms for ABMW — 2 BR
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O

Figure 68. Thallium Isotherms for ABMW — 2 BR
5 10 15 20 25 30
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O

12
10
8
0)
-' 6
M
Figure 69. Thallium Isotherms for MW — 3 BR
•
2 4 6 8 10
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O Freundlich

12
10
°' 6
M
Figure 70. Thallium Isotherms for MW — 3 BR
2 4 6 8 10
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O Freundlich

18
16
14
12
&10
U 8
6
4
2
0
Figure 71. Thallium Isotherms for MW — 5 BR
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O

18
16
14
12
0110
U) 8
6
4
2
0
Figure 72. Thallium Isotherms for MW — 5 BR
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O

12
10
8
6
4
2
0
0
Figure 73. Thallium Isotherms for MW — 8 BR
1 2 3 4 5
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O

12
10
6
CO
Figure 74. Thallium Isotherms for MW — 8 BR
1 2 3 4 5
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O

12
10
8
6
U)
4
2
0
Figure 75. Thallium Isotherms for MW — 12 BR (50)
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

12
10
8
6
U)
4
2
0
Figure 76. Thallium Isotherms for MW — 12 BR (50)
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

14
12
10
8
cn 6
4
2
0
Figure 77. Thallium Isotherms for MW — 12 BR (88.5)
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O

14
12
10
8
cn 6
4
2
0
Figure 78. Thallium Isotherms for MW — 12 BR (88.5)
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O

14
12
10
v> 8
U) 6
4
2
0
Figure 79. Thallium Isotherms for MW — 13 BR
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0
C (ug/1)
Trial - A linear So=O

0.50
0.45
0.40
0.35
0.30
0.25
U) 0.20
0.15
0.10
0.05
0.00
Figure 80. Thallium Isotherms for MW — 13 BR
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O

10
9
8
7
6
5
U) 4
3
2
1
0
Figure 81. Thallium Isotherms for MW — 16 BR (36.5)
0 5 10 15 20
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O

10
9
8
7
6
5
U) 4
3
2
1
0
Figure 82. Thallium Isotherms for MW — 16 BR (36.5)
0 5 10 15 20
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O Freundlich

16
14
12
�10
8
C/) 6
4
2
0
Figure 83. Thallium Isotherms for MW — 16 BR (54)
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

16
14
12
�10
8
U) 6
4
2
0
Figure 84. Thallium Isotherms for MW — 16 BR (54)
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

14
12
10
8
U) 6
4
2
0
Figure 85. Thallium Isotherms for SB — 7
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
C (ug/1)
e Trial - A linear So=O

14
12
10
ME.
6
n
N
Figure 86. Thallium Isotherms for SB — 7
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O

Figure 87. Vanadium Isotherms for ABMW — 2
4.0
3.5
3.0
2.5
2.0
U) 1.5
1.0
•
0.5 • 0
•
•
0 10 20 30 40 50
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O

4.0
3.5
3.0
2.5
2.0
U) 1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
Figure 88. Vanadium Isotherms for ABMW — 2
10 20 30 40 50
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O

2.0
1.8
1.6
1.4
1.2
1311.0
U) 0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
Figure 89. Vanadium Isotherms for ABMW — 2 BR
0 10 20 30 40 50
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O

Figure 90. Vanadium Isotherms for MW — 3 BR
1.4
1.2
1.0
0.8
0)
U) 0.6 •
0.4
•
0.2 • •
•
0 30 60 90 120 150
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O

1.4
1.2
1.0
0.8
U) 0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
Figure 91. Vanadium Isotherms for MW — 3 BR
30 60 90 120 150
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O

3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
U)
1.0
Figure 92. Vanadium Isotherms for MW — 8 BR
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O
0

5.0
4.5
4.0
3.5
3.0
2.5
U) 2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
Figure 93. Vanadium Isotherms for MW — 12 BR (50)
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

5.0
4.5
4.0
3.5
3.0
2.5
U) 2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
Figure 94. Vanadium Isotherms for MW — 12 BR (50)
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

5.0
4.5
4.0
3.5
3.0
2.5
U) 2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
Figure 95. Vanadium Isotherms for MW — 12 BR (88.5)
2 3 4 5 6 7
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O

5.0
4.5
4.0
3.5
3.0
2.5
U) 2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
Figure 96. Vanadium Isotherms for MW — 12 BR (88.5)
•
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O

Figure 97. Vanadium Isotherms for MW — 13 BR
4.0
3.5
3.0
2.5
2.0
U) 1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0 --,
0 10 20 30 40
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O
50 60

4.0
3.5
3.0
2.5
a' 2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
Figure 98. Vanadium Isotherms for MW — 13 BR
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O

4.0
3.5
3.0
2.5
2.0
U) 1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
Figure 99. Vanadium Isotherms for MW — 16 BR (36.5)
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O Freundlich

Figure 100. Vanadium Isotherms for MW — 16 BR (54)
1 •
0.5
0.4
0.3 •
U)
0.2
•
• •
0.1
Me
0 50 100 150 200
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O

Figure 101. Vanadium Isotherms for MW — 16 BR (54)
0.6 •
0.5
0.4
0.3
U •
0.2 •
•
0.1 •
0 50 100 150 200
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O

5.0
4.5
4.0
3.5
3.0
a' 2.5
CO 2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
Figure 102. Vanadium Isotherms for SB — 7
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O

5.0
4.5
4.0
3.5
3.0
2.5
U) 2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
Figure 103. Vanadium Isotherms for SB — 7
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O