20181192_Build Traffic Analysis Report - December 2009_20151201

SOUTHERN AND
EASTERN WAKE
FREEWAY
(S.T.I.P. PROJECTS
R-2721, R-2828, and R-
2829)
FINAL 2011 AND 2035
BUILD TRAFFIC CAPACITY
ANALYSIS REPORT
PREPARED FOR:
��� o;� r,-i a:� •�; r, i. i r� r.
; � Turnpike Authority
5400 Glenwood Avenue
Suite 400
Raleigh, N.0 27612
PREPARED BY:
HNTB North Carolina, PC
343 East Six Forks Road
Suite 200
Raleigh, NC 27609
December 2009

NORTH CAROLINA TURNPIKE AUTHORITY
SOUTHERN AND EASTERN WAKE FREEWAY
(S.T.I.P. PROJECTS R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829)
FINAL 2011 AND 2035 BUILD TRAFFIC CAPACITY ANALYSIS
1:7�1i7:��
Prepared For:
�► ti�a„� <.,a��,��e
J Turnpike Authority
5400 Glenwood Avenue
Suite 400
Raleigh, N.0 27612
Prepared by:
HNTB North Carolina, PC
343 East Six Forks Road
SUIt@ 200 �p�`���1�,CAI„����i
Raleigh, NC 27609 a` OQ'. R�! �°'
�. � :OFEssi�• /2'
.
' _ ¢� SEAL � �
December 2009 : a, . 34318 '
= '�
"•.,�pf �:�'crrrE;��=��,��;
'�+.,`.�y REyN`�`��
r

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................... 1
1.1 Background ..................................................................................................1
1.2 Purpose of Report ........................................................................................ 1
2.0 EXISTING ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS/NETWORK ........................................ 2
3.0 TRAFFIC CAPACITY ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY ................................................. 3
4.0 TRAFFIC CAPACITY ANALYSIS RESULTS ............................................................ 3
4.1 2011 Build Non-Toll Traffic Capacity Analysis ............................................... 4
4.2 2011 Build Toll Traffic Capacity Analysis ....................................................... 6
4.3 2011 Build Southern Wake Toll, Eastern Wake Non-Toll Traffic Capacity
Analysis......................................................................................................... 8
4.4 2035 Build Non-Toll Traffic Capacity Analysis ............................................. 10
4.5 2035 Build Toll Traffic Capacity Analysis ..................................................... 12
4.6 2035 Build Southern Wake Non-Toll, No Eastern Wake Traffic Capacity
Analysis....................................................................................................... 14
4.7 2035 Build Southern Wake Toll, No Eastern Wake Traffic Capacity
Analysis. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .16
4.8 2035 Build Southern Wake Toll, Eastern Wake Non-Toll Traffic Capacity
Analysis....................................................................................................... 18
5.0 SUMMARY .............................................................................................................. 20
TABLES
Table 1. 2011 Build Non-Toll LOS and V/C Ratios Results .......................................... 5-6
Table 2. 2011 Build Toll LOS and V/C Ratios Results .................................................. 7-8
Table 3. 2011 Build Southern Wake Toll, Eastern Wake Non-Toll LOS and V/C Ratios
Results........................................................................................................ 9-10
Table 4. 2035 Build Non-Toll LOS and V/C Ratios Results ...................................... 11-12
Table 5. 2035 Build Toll LOS and V/C Ratios Results .............................................. 13-14
Table 6. 2035 Build Southern Wake Non-Toll, No Eastern Wake LOS and V/C Ratios
Results........................................................................................................ 15-16
Table 7. 2035 Build Southern Wake Toll, No Eastern Wake LOS and V/C Ratios
Results. ....................................................................................................... 17-18
Table 8. 2035 Build Southern Wake Toll, Eastern Wake Non-Toll LOS and V/C Ratios
Results...................................................................................................... 19-20
/_l ll�►`_I_�111
A. Figures
1) Traffic Capacity Analysis Study Area
2) NCLOS Facility Types - 2011
3) NCLOS Facility Types — 2011- No Eastern Wake Freeway
4) NCLOS Facility Types - 2035
5) NCLOS Facility Types - 2035- No Eastern Wake Freeway
6.1-6.10) 2011 Build Non-Toll LOS and V/C Ratios
:� .

7.1-7.11)
8.1-8.11)
9.1-9.11)
10.1-10.11)
11.1-11.11)
12.1-12.11)
13.1-13.11)
2011 Build Toll LOS and V/C Ratios
2011 Build Southern Wake Toll, Eastern Wake Non-Toll LOS and
V/C Ratios
2035 Build Non-Toll LOS and V/C Ratios
2035 Build Toll LOS and V/C Ratios
2035 Build Southern Wake Non-Toll, No Eastern Wake LOS and
V/C Ratios
2035 Build Southern Wake Toll, No Eastern Wake LOS and V/C
Ratios
2035 Build Southern Wake Toll, Eastern Wake Non-Toll LOS and
V/C Ratios
B. NCLOS Results and Facility Descriptions
C. Meeting Minutes
�� ��INTB

Southe�n and Easte�n Wake F�eeway
Final Build Traffic Capacity Analysis Report (December 2009)
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background
The North Carolina Turnpike Authority (NCTA) and the North Carolina Department of
Transportation (NCDOT) are studying ways to improve travel in southern and eastern
Wake County. The Southern and Eastern Wake Freeway Project (NCDOT STIP
Projects R-2721, R-2828, and R-2829) is approximately 28 miles long, extending from
the NC 55 Holly Springs Bypass to I-40 near the US 74 Clayton Bypass (Southern
Wake Freeway) and then to US 64 Knightdale Bypass (Eastern Wake Freeway). These
projects are being considered as possible candidate toll facilities. The results of this
planning-level traffic capacity analysis will be used by the NCTA and NCDOT for
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) studies.
1.2 Purpose of Report
The purpose of this planning-level traffic capacity analysis is to identify existing and
projected roadway facility operations and deficiencies for the major roadways
surrounding the Southern and Eastern Wake Freeway project under 2011 and 2035
Build conditions. The results of the analysis will be used to support the alternatives
development process for the project. A study area map and figures are located in
Appendix A.
The traffic capacity analysis was based on the Southern and Eastern Wake Freeway
Final Traffic Forecast Report prepared by HNTB in February 2009. This forecast is
endorsed by the NCDOT and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). This traffic
capacity analysis references the following forecast volumes for the 2011 and 2035 Build
scenarios:
• 2011 Build Non-Toll
• 2011 Build Toll
• 2011 Build Southern Wake Toll, Eastern Wake Non-Toll
• 2035 Build Non-Toll
• 2035 Build Toll
• 2035 Build Southern Wake Non-Toll, No Eastern Wake
• 2035 Build Southern Wake Toll, No Eastern Wake
• 2035 Build Southern Wake Toll, Eastern Wake Non-Toll
The figures in Appendix A include all forecast volumes as provided in the traffic
forecast.
HNTB utilized North Carolina Level of Service Software (NCLOS), version 2.0, to
determine segmental roadway level of service and volume to capacity (V/C) ratios for
the Build scenarios.
1 ��INTB

Southe�n and Easte�n Wake F�eeway
Final Build Traffic Capacity Analysis Report (December 2009)
2.0 EXISTING ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS/NETWORK
There are several major roadways in the study area, which includes portions of Durham,
Wake and Johnston Counties. The existing major roadways included in the traffic
forecast include: I-40, I-540, NC 540, I-440, US 64 Bypass (Knightdale Bypass), US 70
Bypass (Clayton Bypass), and US 1/64. Refer to Figure 1 for a map of the study area.
Figures 2, 3, 4, 5 provide the facility type for each study area roadway for the 2011 and
2035 Build scenarios. Roadway facility types were based on field observations and
NCDOT functional classification maps. Descriptions of the major roadways within the
study area are as follows:
1-40: I-40 is the primary freeway corridor for regional connectivity between Raleigh,
RTP, Durham and Chapel Hill in the Triangle. I-40 varies from a four-lane to an eight-
lane freeway in the traffic forecast study area. The posted speed limit is 65 miles per
hour (mph) through the traffic forecast study area.
I-440 (Cliff Benson Beltline): I-440 is an existing loop freeway around the City of
Raleigh, featuring four-lane and eight-lane cross-sections in the vicinity of the traffic
forecast study area, with auxiliary lanes in vicinity of surface street interchanges. The
posted speed limit is 60 mph.
US 1/64: US 1/64 is an existing controlled access freeway that serves regional traffic in
Cary and Apex. US 1/64 has a six-lane cross section in the traffic forecast study area,
with auxiliary lanes near interchanges and improved interchange configurations at
Walnut Street and Cary Parkway (NCDOT STIP Project U-3101). The posted speed
limit is 65 mph.
1-540: I-540 is an existing loop freeway around the northern portions of Wake County. It
currently spans from I-40 on the western side of Wake County to the US 64 Bypass
near Knightdale in eastern Wake County. The facility features a six-lane cross section
in the study area, with auxiliary lanes at interchanges and a posted speed limit of 65
mph.
NC 540: NC 540 is an existing freeway facility that is an extension of I-540 in western
Wake County from I-40 to NC 55 near RTP. This segment of NC 540 from NC 55 to NC
54 features a six-lane cross section with a posted speed limit of 65 mph. It is currently a
Non-Toll facility but is scheduled to become a Toll facility upon the completion of the
Triangle Expressway.
US 64 Bypass: US 64 Bypass is an existing controlled access freeway in the traffic
forecast study area providing access to areas of east Wake County to I-440 and further
to I-95. In the traffic forecast study area, US 64 Bypass has a six-lane cross-section,
with auxiliary lanes at interchanges and a posted 65 mph speed limit.
2 ��INTB

Southe�n and Easte�n Wake F�eeway
Final Build Traffic Capacity Analysis Report (December 2009)
US 70 Bypass (Clayton Bypass): US 70 Bypass is an existing controlled access
freeway in the traffic forecast study area providing access to areas of Johnston County
to I-40. In the traffic forecast study area, the Clayton Bypass has a four-lane cross-
section, with auxiliary lanes at interchanges and a posted speed limit of 65 mph.
Other sizeable roadways that are in the study area include NC 147, US 1, US 401, NC
55, US 70, NC 42, NC 50, Ten-Ten Road (SR 1010), Timber Drive (SR 2812) and
Hammond Road (SR 2026). These existing thoroughfares are primarily multi-lane
facilities with 35, 45, or 55 mph speed limits in the study area and provide regional
connectivity and access throughout Wake County, with interchange connections to the
major roadways described above.
3.0 TRAFFIC CAPACITY ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY
HNTB conducted Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) mainline segmental capacity
analyses for each facility segment in the following manner for the various 2011 Build
and 2035 Build scenarios:
• The traffic capacity analysis was based on the Southern and Eastern Wake
Freeway Final Traffic Forecast Report prepared by HNTB in February 2009.
• The traffic forecast report assumes high-occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes along
I-40 and NC 147 in 2035 based on the adopted 2030 Capital Area Metropolitan
Planning Organization (CAMPO) Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP). The
2035 Build did not include analysis of the additional HOV lanes or HOV traffic
volumes along I-40 and NC 147 to provide a consistent facility comparison
between scenarios.
• NCLOS software, Version 2.0, was used to determine segmental roadway levels
of service (LOS) and V/C ratios for all scenarios. The approved traffic forecast is
a link-level forecast which for the purposes of this study includes the mainline
freeway segments.
• The analysis criteria and input values for each roadway type (freeway, multi-lane
highway, 2-lane highway, and arterial) are based on field-observed data
collection, the approved traffic forecast and engineering judgment.
• Roadway LOS and V/C ratios were analyzed for all scenarios. Study area
roadways were divided into facility segments with specific capacity thresholds
based on varying roadway characteristics as defined by NCLOS software.
3 ��INTB

Southe�n and Easte�n Wake F�eeway
Final Build Traffic Capacity Analysis Report (December 2009)
4.0 TRAFFIC CAPACITY ANALYSIS RESULTS
The traffic capacity analysis references the following forecast volumes for the 2011 and
2035 Build scenarios:
• 2011 Build Non-Toll
• 2011 Build Toll
• 2011 Build Southern Wake Toll, Eastern Wake Non-Toll
• 2035 Build Non-Toll
• 2035 Build Toll
• 2035 Build Southern Wake Non-Toll, No Eastern Wake
• 2035 Build Southern Wake Toll, No Eastern Wake
• 2035 Build Southern Wake Toll, Eastern Wake Non-Toll
In Tables 1 through 8, the highest forecasted AADT for each facility segment was
compared to the corresponding NCLOS capacity volumes to determine the worst case
LOS for that facility segment. The tables show the facility segment, NCLOS
identification, and comparison to the NCLOS volume capacity (V/C). The NCLOS
volume capacity is the maximum AADT before the facility exceeds roadway capacity
and reaches LOS F. LOS E is typically reached when volumes are at or near capacity.
LOS D or better indicates that the facility segment is operating at acceptable LOS with
excess capacity. The corresponding V/C ratio provides a direct comparison between
the forecasted AADT and NCLOS facility segment capacity. It should be noted that due
to the limitations of the NCLOS software, the V/C ratios for certain facility types will not
directly correspond to the LOS result. NCLOS results and roadway criteria are provided
in Appendix B.
4.1 2011 Build Non-Toll Traffic Capacity Analysis
Under the 2011 Build Non-Toll scenario, the scheduled roadway widening improvement
along I-40 from Wade Avenue to US 1/64 (STIP I-4744) and the new toll facilities of
Triangle Parkway and Western Wake Freeway (NC 540) (collectively known as the
Triangle Expressway) are included in the traffic capacity analysis. In general, the
majority of study area roadway facilities, 29 of 43 facility segments, operate at
acceptable levels of service (i.e. LOS D or better). The remaining, 14 of the 43 facility
segments currently operate with roadway capacities at LOS E or F. Facilities that have
segments predicted to be operating near or over capacity include I-40, I-540, US 1/64,
NC 147, NC 42, NC 50, NC 55, and Ten Ten Road. The new facilities of Southern and
Eastern Wake Freeway are expected to operate at LOS B with a 2011 opening year.
These facilities are expected to divert traffic and provide alternate routes to I-40, I-540
and other parallel routes. Under the 2011 Build Non-Toll scenario, a roadway segment
along Ten Ten Road from US 1 to Graham Newton Road has the highest expected V/C
ratio of 1.15. Table 1 provides a summary of the V/C and LOS results for facility
segments. Figure 6 shows a LOS overview of the entire study area and Figures 6.1 —
6.11 show individual facility segment AADT, V/C, and LOS for the study area roadways
in this scenario.
4 ��INTB

Southe�n and Easte�n Wake F�eeway
Final Build Traffic Capacity Analysis Report (December 2009)
Table 1- 2011 Build Non-Toll V/C and LOS Results
Facility From To NCLOS ID 2011 AADT * NCLOS V/C LOS
Se ment Capacit **
I-40 NC 55 NC 147 F5 123,300 117,300 1.05 F
I-40 NC 147 Wade Ave. F9 172,900 157,500 1.10 F
I-40 Wade Ave. US 1/64 F14 115,200 117,300 0.98 E
I-40 US 1/64 Ra�ke Wheeler F5 121,000 117,300 1.03 F
I-40 Lake Wheeler Rock Quarry F9 119,900 157,500 0.76 D
Rd. Rd.
I-40 Rock Quarry Rd. I-440 F11 105,700 198,100 0.53 C
I-40 I-440 US 70 F13 102,100 118,600 0.86 D
I-40 US 70 NC 42 F13 62,400 78,600 0.79 D
I-40 NC 42 NC 210 F2 49,900 78,600 0.63 C
NC 147 I-40 Cornwallis Rd. F4 69,200 73,000 0.95 E
I-540 I-40 Lumley Rd. F8 100,400 106,200 0.95 E
I-540 US 64 Bypass US 64 F6 51,100 91,100 0.56 C
Business
NC 540 I-40 Triangle Pkwy F15 39,300 88,500 0.44 B
I-440 I-40 R� es Franklin F5 92,700 117,300 0.79 D
I-440 I-40 US 64 Bypass F9 87,800 157,500 0.56 C
I-440 US 64 Bypass US 64 F5 86,000 117,300 0.73 D
Business
US 64 Bypass I-440 I-540 F6 64,000 91,100 0.70 C
US 64 Bypass I-540 US 64 F7 66,700 90,700 0.74 D
Business
Triangle Pkwy. I-40 NC 540 F16 13,200 110,700 0.12 A
McCrimmon NC 540 McCrimmon MLH 5 10,100 96,000 0.11 A
Pkw . Ext. Pkw .
NC 540 Triangle Pkwy NC 55 (South) F15 25,500 88,500 0.29 A
Southern NC 55 Bypass I-40 F17 32,200 88,900 0.36 B
Wake
Eastern Wake I-40 US 64 Bypass F18 44,200 91,600 0.48 B
Clayton I-40 NC 42 F3 43,800 69,600 0.63 C
Bypass
US 1/64 Tryon Rd. I-40 F10 122,000 120,200 1.01 F
US 1 New Hill Tryon Rd. F1 71,100 81,300 0.87 D
Holleman Rd.
Ten Ten Rd US 1 Graham Ten Ten 1 26,100 22,700 1.15 F
Newton Rd.
Ten Ten Rd R� ham Newton NC 50 Ten Ten 2 8,900 23,800 0.37 A
NC 55 US 1 Main St. MLH 6 47,800 52,200 0.92 E
NC 55 Main St. Ra ke Chapel MLH 3 30,400 53,600 0.57 C
NC 55 Wake Chapel Rd. US 401 NC 55 1 15,000 15,300 0.98 E
US 401 NC 55 NC 42 MLH 2 38,000 71,500 0.53 C
5 ��INTB

Southe�n and Easte�n Wake F�eeway
Final Build Traffic Capacity Analysis Report (December 2009)
Facility From To NCLOS ID 2011 AADT * NCLOS V/C LOS
Se ment Ca acity**
NC 42 NC 55 R� Drug Store 2 LH 2 10,900 28,600 0.38 E
NC 42 R� Drug Store �_40 NC 42 1 24,500 26,400 0.93 E
NC 42 I-40 Bratton Dr. NC 42 2 11,300 40,700 0.28 D
NC 42 Bratton Dr. Clayton 2 LH 1 12,600 40,900 0.31 E
Bypass
Timber Dr. US 70 NC 50 Timber 19,200 32,600 0.59 B
Hammond Rd. I-40 US 70 Hammond 24,000 39,300 0.61 C
US 70 I-40 Tryon Rd. MLH 4 56,100 98,700 0.57 C
US 70 Tryon Rd. I-40 MLH 1 31,100 65,800 0.47 C
US 70 I-40 Guy Rd. MLH 2 58,000 71,500 0.81 D
NC 50 Cleveland Rd New Rand Rd 2 LH 3 18,000 28,600 0.63 E
NC 50 New Rand Rd US 70 NC 50 1 11,000 18,800 0.59 A
� Highest AADT along facility segment is reported.
*� Maximum LOS E volume before facility exceeds capacity and reaches LOS F.
4.2 2011 Build Toll Traffic Capacity Analysis
Under the 2011 Build Toll scenario, which includes construction of both Southern Wake
Freeway and Eastern Wake Freeway as toll facilities, the scheduled roadway widening
improvement along I-40 from Wade Avenue to US 1/64 (STIP I-4744) and the new toll
facilities of Triangle Expressway are included in the traffic capacity analysis. In general,
traffic volumes remain similar to the 2011 Build Non-Toll scenario. Of the 43 facility
segments, 29 are expected operate at acceptable LOS while, 14 of the 43 facility
segments are predicted to operate with roadway capacities at LOS E or F. Facilities
that have segments predicted to operate near or over capacity include I-40, I-540, US
1/64, NC 147, NC 42, NC 50, NC 55, and Ten Ten Road. The new facilities of Southern
and Eastern Wake Freeway are expected to operate at LOS B with a 2011 opening
year. These facilities are expected to divert traffic and provide alternate routes to I-40,
I-540 and other parallel routes. Under the 2011 Build Non Toll scenario, a roadway
segment along Ten Ten Road from US 1 to Graham Newton Road has the highest
expected V/C ratio of 1.15. Table 2 provides a summary of the V/C and LOS results for
facility segments. Figure 7 shows a LOS overview of the entire study area and Figures
7.1 — 7.11 show individual facility segment AADT, V/C, and LOS for the study area
roadways.
6 ��INTB

Southe�n and Easte�n Wake F�eeway
Final Build Traffic Capacity Analysis Report (December 2009)
Table 2- 2011 Build Toll V/C and LOS Results
Facility From To NCLOS ID 2011 AADT * NCLOS V/C LOS
Segment Capacit **
I-40 NC 55 NC 147 F5 123,300 117,300 1.05 F
I-40 NC 147 Wade Ave. F9 172,900 157,500 1.10 F
I-40 Wade Ave. US 1/64 F14 115,000 117,300 0.98 E
I-40 US 1/64 R�ke Wheeler F5 121,000 117,300 1.03 F
I-40 R�ke Wheeler Rock Quarry Rd. F9 117,400 157,500 0.75 D
I-40 R�ck Quarry I-440 F11 105,700 198,100 0.53 C
I-40 I-440 US 70 F13 92,200 118,600 0.78 D
I-40 US 70 NC 42 F13 62,500 78,600 0.80 D
I-40 NC 42 NC 210 F2 49,900 78,600 0.63 C
NC 147 I-40 Cornwallis Rd. F4 69,200 73,000 0.95 E
I-540 I-40 Lumley Rd. F8 100,300 106,200 0.94 E
I-540 US 64 Bypass US 64 Business F6 53,200 91,100 0.58 C
NC 540 I-40 Triangle Pkwy F15 19,300 88,500 0.22 A
I-440 I-40 R� es Franklin F5 92,900 117,300 0.79 D
I-440 I-40 US 64 Bypass F9 87,600 157,500 0.56 C
I-440 US 64 Bypass US 64 Business F5 86,100 117,300 0.73 D
US 64 Bypass I-440 I-540 F6 63,900 91,100 0.70 C
US 64 Bypass I-540 US 64 Business F7 66,900 90,700 0.74 D
Triangle Pkwy. I-40 NC 540 F16 13,200 110,700 0.12 A
McCrimmon NC 540 McCrimmon MLH 5 10,100 96,000 0.11 A
Pkw . Ext. Pkw .
NC 540 Triangle Pkwy NC 55 (South) F15 25,500 88,500 0.29 A
Southern NC 55 Bypass I-40 F17 32,200 88,900 0.36 B
Wake
Eastern Wake I-40 US 64 Bypass F18 43,900 91,600 0.48 B
Clayton I-40 NC 42 F3 43,700 69,600 0.63 C
Bypass
US 1/64 Tryon Rd. I-40 F10 122,100 120,200 1.02 F
US 1 New Hill Tryon Rd F1 71,200 81,300 0.88 D
Holleman Rd.
Ten Ten Rd US 1 R� ham Newton Ten Ten 1 26,100 22,700 1.15 F
Ten Ten Rd Graham NC 50 Ten Ten 2 16,200 23,800 0.68 B
Newton Rd.
NC 55 US 1 Main St. MLH 6 47,800 52,200 0.92 E
NC 55 Main St. Wake Chapel Rd. MLH 3 30,400 53,600 0.57 C
NC 55 R� ke Chapel US 401 NC 55 1 15,000 15,300 0.98 E
US 401 NC 55 NC 42 MLH 2 38,000 71,500 0.53 C
NC 42 NC 55 R� Drug Store 2 LH 2 10,400 28,600 0.36 E
:■�►��J
.

Southe�n and Easte�n Wake F�eeway
Final Build Traffic Capacity Analysis Report (December 2009)
Facility From To NCLOS ID 2011 AADT * NCLOS V/C LOS
Se ment Ca acity**
NC 42 R� Drug Store I-40 NC 42 1 24,600 26,400 0.93 E
NC 42 I-40 Bratton Dr. NC 42 2 11,300 40,700 0.28 D
NC 42 Bratton Dr. Clayton Bypass 2 LH 1 12,600 40,900 0.31 E
Timber Dr. US 70 NC 50 Timber 22,300 32,600 0.68 C
Hammond Rd. I-40 US 70 Hammond 24,800 39,300 0.63 C
US 70 I-40 Tryon Rd. MLH 4 55,600 98,700 0.56 C
US 70 Tryon Rd. I-40 MLH 1 32,900 65,800 0.50 C
US 70 I-40 Guy Rd. MLH 2 58,000 71,500 0.81 D
NC 50 Cleveland Rd New Rand Rd 2 LH 3 18,000 28,600 0.63 E
NC 50 New Rand Rd US 70 NC 50 1 10,900 18,800 0.58 A
� Highest AADT along facility segment is reported.
*� Maximum LOS E volume before facility exceeds capacity and reaches LOS F.
4.3 2011 Build Southern Wake Toll and Eastern Wake Non-Toll Traffic Capacity
Analysis
Under the 2011 Build Southern Wake Toll and Eastern Wake Non-Toll scenario, the
scheduled roadway widening improvement along I-40 from Wade Avenue to US 1/64
(STIP I-4744) and the new toll facilities of Triangle Expressway are included in the traffic
capacity analysis. In general, the traffic volumes remain similar to the 2011 Build Non-
Toll and Build Toll scenario. Of the 43 facility segments, 29 are expected operate at
acceptable LOS while, 14 of the 43 facility segments are predicted to operate with
roadway capacities at LOS E or F. Facilities that have segments predicted to operate
near or over capacity include I-40, I-540, US 1/64, NC 147, NC 42, NC 50, NC 55, and
Ten Ten Road. The new facilities of Southern and Eastern Wake Freeway are
expected to operate at LOS B with a 2011 opening year. These facilities are expected
to divert traffic and provide alternate routes to I-40, I-540 and other parallel routes. In
2011, a roadway segment along Ten Ten Road from US 1 to Graham Newton Road has
the highest expected V/C ratio of 1.15. Table 3 provides a summary of the V/C and
LOS results for facility segments. Figure 8 shows a LOS overview of the entire study
area and Figures 8.1 — 8.11 show individual facility segment AADT, V/C, and LOS for
the study area roadways.
8 ��INTB

Southe�n and Easte�n Wake F�eeway
Final Build Traffic Capacity Analysis Report (December 2009)
Table 3- 2011 Build Southern Toll and Eastern Non-Toll V/C and LOS Results
Facility From To NCLOS ID 2011 AADT * NCLOS V/C LOS
Segment Capacit **
I-40 NC 55 NC 147 F5 123,300 117,300 1.05 F
I-40 NC 147 Wade Ave. F9 172,800 157,500 1.10 F
I-40 Wade Ave. US 1/64 F14 115,000 117,300 0.98 E
I-40 US 1/64 R�ke Wheeler F5 120,900 117,300 1.03 F
I-40 R�ke Wheeler Rock Quarry Rd. F9 119,900 157,500 0.76 D
I-40 R�ck Quarry I-440 F11 105,600 198,100 0.53 C
I-40 I-440 US 70 F13 92,100 118,600 0.78 D
I-40 US 70 NC 42 F13 62,500 78,600 0.80 D
I-40 NC 42 NC 210 F2 49,900 78,600 0.63 C
NC 147 I-40 Cornwallis Rd. F4 69,200 73,000 0.95 E
I-540 I-40 Lumley Rd. F8 100,500 106,200 0.95 E
I-540 US 64 Bypass US 64 Business F6 53,200 91,100 0.58 C
NC 540 I-40 Triangle Pkwy F15 19,300 88,500 0.22 A
I-440 I-40 R� es Franklin F5 92,800 117,300 0.79 D
I-440 I-40 US 64 Bypass F9 87,500 157,500 0.56 C
I-440 US 64 Bypass US 64 Business F5 86,200 117,300 0.73 D
US 64 Bypass I-440 I-540 F6 64,000 91,100 0.70 C
US 64 Bypass I-540 US 64 Business F7 66,900 90,700 0.74 D
Triangle Pkwy. I-40 NC 540 F16 13,100 110,700 0.12 A
McCrimmon NC 540 McCrimmon MLH 5 10,200 96,000 0.11 A
Pkw . Ext. Pkw .
NC 540 Triangle Pkwy NC 55 (South) F15 25,500 88,500 0.29 A
Southern NC 55 Bypass I-40 F17 32,200 88,900 0.36 B
Wake
Eastern Wake I-40 US 64 Bypass F18 45,900 91,600 0.50 B
Clayton I-40 NC 42 F3 43,900 69,600 0.63 C
Bypass
US 1/64 Tryon Rd. I-40 F10 122,000 120,200 1.01 F
US 1 New Hill Tryon Rd. F1 71,100 81,300 0.87 D
Holleman Rd.
Ten Ten Rd US 1 R� ham Newton Ten Ten 1 26,100 22,700 1.15 F
Ten Ten Rd Graham NC 50 Ten Ten 2 15,000 23,800 0.63 A
Newton Rd.
NC 55 US 1 Main St. MLH 6 47,800 52,200 0.92 E
NC 55 Main St. Wake Chapel Rd. MLH 3 30,400 53,600 0.57 C
NC 55 R� ke Chapel US 401 NC 55 1 15,000 15,300 0.98 E
US 401 NC 55 NC 42 MLH 2 38,000 71,500 0.53 C
NC 42 NC 55 R� Drug Store 2 LH 2 10,400 28,600 0.36 E
9 ��INTB

Southe�n and Easte�n Wake F�eeway
Final Build Traffic Capacity Analysis Report (December 2009)
Facility From To NCLOS ID 2011 AADT * NCLOS V/C LOS
Se ment Ca acity**
NC 42 R� Drug Store I-40 NC 42 1 24,600 26,400 0.93 E
NC 42 I-40 Bratton Dr. NC 42 2 11,300 40,700 0.28 D
NC 42 Bratton Dr. Clayton Bypass 2 LH 1 12,600 40,900 0.31 E
Timber Dr. US 70 NC 50 Timber 19,200 32,600 0.59 B
Hammond Rd. I-40 US 70 Hammond 24,300 39,300 0.62 C
US 70 I-40 Tryon Rd. MLH 4 59,200 98,700 0.60 C
US 70 Tryon Rd. I-40 MLH 1 31,100 65,800 0.47 C
US 70 I-40 Guy Rd. MLH 2 58,000 71,500 0.81 D
NC 50 Cleveland Rd New Rand Rd 2 LH 3 18,000 28,600 0.63 E
NC 50 New Rand Rd US 70 NC 50 1 10,900 18,800 0.58 A
� Highest AADT along facility segment is reported.
*� Maximum LOS E volume before facility exceeds capacity and reaches LOS F.
4.4 2035 Build Non-Toll Traffic Capacity Analysis
Under the 2035 Build Non-Toll scenarios, additional scheduled roadway improvements
included in the traffic capacity analysis include widening I-40 from US 70 to NC 42
(STIP I-5111) and widening Ten Ten Road from US 1 to Graham Newton Road. In
general, traffic volumes increase substantially from 2011 throughout the study area with
noticeable effects on roadway LOS. Of the 43 facility segments, only 13 are expected
to operate at acceptable LOS. In 2035, 30 of the 43 identified study area facility
segments are predicted to operate at LOS E or F. Facilities that have segments
predicted to operate near or over capacity include I-40, I-540, US 1/64, US 1, US 64
Bypass, US 70, NC 147, NC 42, NC 50, NC 55, Ten Ten Road, Timber Drive, and
Hammond Road. The facilities of Southern and Eastern Freeway are expected to
operate at LOS D and LOS E in under the 2035 Build Non-Toll condition, respectively.
In 2035, a roadway segment along I-540 from I-40 to Lumley Road has the highest
expected V/C ratio of 1.54. Table 4 provides a summary of the V/C and LOS results for
facility segments. Figure 9 shows a LOS overview of the entire study area and Figures
9.1 — 9.11 show individual facility segment AADT, V/C, and LOS for the study area
roadways.
10 ��INTB

Southe�n and Easte�n Wake F�eeway
Final Build Traffic Capacity Analysis Report (December 2009)
Table 4- 2035 Build Non-Toll V/C and LOS Results
Facility From To NCLOS ID 2035 AADT * NCLOS V/C LOS
Se ment Capacit **
I-40 NC 55 NC 147 F5 129,700 117,300 1.11 F
I-40 NC 147 Wade Ave. F9 193,200 157,500 1.23 F
I-40 Wade Ave. US 1/64 F14 150,000 117,300 1.28 F
I-40 US 1/64 Rake Wheeler F5 160,900 117,300 1.37 F
I-40 R�ke Wheeler Rock Quarry Rd. F9 171,200 157,500 1.08 F
I-40 R�ck Quarry I-440 F11 145,100 198,100 0.73 D
I-40 I-440 US 70 F13 106,200 118,600 0.90 E
I-40 US 70 NC 42 F13 77,100 118,600 0.65 C
I-40 NC 42 NC 210 F2 71,900 78,600 0.91 E
NC 147 I-40 Cornwallis Rd. F4 93,600 73,000 1.28 F
I-540 I-40 Lumley Rd. F8 164,000 106,200 1.54 F
I-540 US 64 Bypass US 64 Business F6 83,000 91,100 0.91 E
NC 540 I-40 Triangle Pkwy F15 85,100 88,500 0.96 E
I-440 I-40 Ra es Franklin F5 134,300 117,300 1.14 F
I-440 I-40 US 64 Bypass F9 140,500 157,500 0.89 E
I-440 US 64 Bypass US 64 Business F5 125,000 117,300 1.07 F
US 64 Bypass I-440 I-540 F6 110,300 91,100 1.21 F
US 64 Bypass I-540 US 64 Business F7 122,100 90,700 1.35 F
Triangle Pkwy. I-40 NC 540 F16 40,900 110,700 0.37 B
McCrimmon NC 540 McCrimmon MLH 5 30,200 96,000 0.31 B
Pkwy. Ext. Pkwy.
NC 540 Triangle Pkwy NC 55 (South) F15 78,900 88,500 0.89 E
Southern NC 55 Bypass I-40 F17 70,000 88,900 0.79 D
Wake
Eastern Wake I-40 US 64 Bypass F18 88,500 91,600 0.97 E
Clayton I-40 NC 42 F3 63,600 69,600 0.91 E
B pass
US 1/64 Tryon Rd. I-40 F10 157,700 120,200 1.31 F
US 1 New Hill T on Rd F1 99,000 81,300 1.22 F
Holleman Rd. ry
Ten Ten Rd US 1 R� ham Newton Ten Ten 1 57,200 45,400 1.26 F
Ten Ten Rd Graham NC 50 Ten Ten 2 19,000 23,800 0.80 C
Newton Rd.
NC 55 US 1 Main St. MLH 6 51,700 52,200 0.99 E
NC 55 Main St. Wake Chapel Rd. MLH 3 61,300 53,600 1.14 F
NC 55 R� ke Chapel US 401 NC 55 1 14,000 15,300 0.92 D
US 401 NC 55 NC 42 MLH 2 49,400 71,500 0.69 D
NC 42 NC 55 R� Drug Store 2 LH 2 18,700 28,600 0.65 E
11 ��INTB

Southe�n and Easte�n Wake F�eeway
Final Build Traffic Capacity Analysis Report (December 2009)
Facility From To NCLOS ID 2035 AADT * NCLOS V/C LOS
Se ment Ca acity**
NC 42 R� Drug Store I-40 NC 42 1 32,500 26,400 1.23 F
NC 42 I-40 Bratton Dr. NC 42 2 19,000 40,700 0.47 D
NC 42 Bratton Dr. Clayton Bypass 2 LH 1 22,400 40,900 0.55 E
Timber Dr. US 70 NC 50 Timber 42,800 32,600 1.31 F
Hammond Rd. I-40 US 70 Hammond 37,000 39,300 0.94 D
US 70 I-40 Tryon Rd. MLH 4 79,200 98,700 0.80 D
US 70 Tryon Rd. I-40 MLH 1 53,500 65,800 0.81 D
US 70 I-40 Guy Rd. MLH 2 91,000 71,500 1.27 F
NC 50 Cleveland Rd New Rand Rd 2 LH 3 26,200 28,600 0.92 E
NC 50 New Rand Rd US 70 NC 50 1 12,500 18,800 0.66 D
� Highest AADT along facility segment is reported.
*� Maximum LOS E volume before facility exceeds capacity and reaches LOS F.
4.5 2035 Build Toll Traffic Capacity Analysis
Under the 2035 Build Toll scenarios, additional scheduled roadway improvements
included in the traffic capacity analysis include widening I-40 from US 70 to NC 42
(STIP I-5111) and widening Ten Ten Road from US 1 to Graham Newton Road. In
general, traffic volumes increase substantially from 2011 throughout the study area with
noticeable effects on roadway LOS. Of the 43 facility segments, only 13 are expected
to operate at an acceptable LOS. In 2035, 30 of the 43 identified study area facility
segments are predicted to operate at LOS E or F. Facilities that have segments
predicted to operate near or over capacity include I-40, I-540, I-440, US 1/64, US 1, US
64 Bypass, US 70, NC 147, NC 42, NC 50, NC 55, Ten Ten Road, Timber Road, and
Hammond Road. The facilities of Southern and Eastern Freeway are expected to
operate at LOS D and LOS E in under the 2035 Build Toll condition, respectively. In
2035, a roadway segment along I-540 from I-40 to Lumley Road has the highest
expected V/C ratio of 1.54. Table 5 provides a summary of the V/C and LOS results for
facility segments. Figure 9 shows a LOS overview of the entire study area and Figures
9.1 — 9.11 show individual facility segment AADT, V/C, and LOS for the study area
roadways.
12 ��INTB

Southe�n and Easte�n Wake F�eeway
Final Build Traffic Capacity Analysis Report (December 2009)
Table 5- 2035 Build Toll V/C and LOS Results
Facility From To NCLOS ID 2035 AADT * NCLOS V/C LOS
Se ment Capacit **
I-40 NC 55 NC 147 F5 128,200 117,300 1.09 F
I-40 NC 147 Wade Ave. F9 193,200 157,500 1.23 F
I-40 Wade Ave. US 1/64 F14 150,000 117,300 1.28 F
I-40 US 1/64 Lake W�heeler F5 162,000 117,300 1.38 F
I-40 Lake W�heeler Rock Quarry Rd. F9 172,300 157,500 1.09 F
I-40 Rock Q�uarry �-440 F11 145,100 198,100 0.73 D
I-40 I-440 US 70 F13 106,200 118,600 0.90 E
I-40 US 70 NC 42 F13 77,100 118,600 0.65 C
I-40 NC 42 NC 210 F2 71,900 78,600 0.91 E
NC 147 I-40 Cornwallis Rd. F4 93,600 73,000 1.28 F
I-540 I-40 Lumley Rd. F8 164,000 106,200 1.54 F
I-540 US 64 Bypass US 64 Business F6 82,500 91,100 0.91 E
NC 540 I-40 Triangle Pkwy F15 86,800 88,500 0.98 E
I-440 I-40 Jone R�ranklin F12 134,300 117,300 1.14 F
I-440 I-40 US 64 Bypass F9 141,500 157,500 0.90 E
I-440 US 64 Bypass US 64 Business F5 124,100 117,300 1.06 F
US 64 Bypass I-440 I-540 F6 110,300 91,100 1.21 F
US 64 Bypass I-540 US 64 Business F7 120,400 90,700 1.33 F
Triangle Pkwy. I-40 NC 540 F16 40,500 110,700 0.37 B
McCrimmon NC 540 McCrimmon MLH 5 29,600 96,000 0.31 B
Pkw . Ext. Pkw .
NC 540 Triangle Pkwy NC 55 (South) F15 78,700 88,500 0.89 D
Southern NC 55 (South) I-40 F17 69,900 88,900 0.79 D
Wake
Eastern Wake I-40 US 64 Bypass F18 88,900 91,600 0.97 E
Clayton I-40 NC 42 F3 63,400 69,600 0.91 E
Bypass
US 1/64 Tryon Rd. I-40 F10 157,700 120,200 1.31 F
US 1 New Hill Tryon Rd. F1 99,300 81,300 1.22 F
Holleman Rd.
Ten Ten Rd US 1 GrahaR�Newton Ten Ten 1 57,200 45,400 1.26 F
Ten Ten Rd Graham NC 50 Ten Ten 2 18,900 23,800 0.79 C
Newton Rd.
NC 55 US 1 Main St. MLH 6 52,200 52,200 1.00 E
NC 55 Main St. Wake Chapel Rd. MLH 3 61,800 53,600 1.15 F
NC 55 Wak RC�hapel US 401 NC 55 1 14,000 15,300 0.92 D
US 401 NC 55 NC 42 MLH 2 49,400 71,500 0.69 D
NC 42 US 401 Old Dr�u�g Store 2 LH 2 19,000 28,600 0.66 E
13 ��INTB

Southe�n and Easte�n Wake F�eeway
Final Build Traffic Capacity Analysis Report (December 2009)
Facility From To NCLOS ID 2035 AADT * NCLOS V/C LOS
Se ment Ca acit **
NC 42 Old Dr�u�g Store I-40 NC 42 1 32,500 26,400 1.23 F
NC 42 I-40 Bratton Dr. NC 42 2 19,000 40,700 0.47 D
NC 42 Bratton Dr. Clayton Bypass 2 LH 1 22,600 40,900 0. 55 E
Timber Dr. US 70 NC 50 Timber 42,800 32,600 1.31 F
Hammond Rd. I-40 US 70 Hammond 38,900 39,300 0.99 E
US 70 I-40 Tryon Rd. MLH 4 77,700 98,700 0.79 D
US 70 Tryon Rd. I-40 MLH 1 53,200 65,800 0.81 D
US 70 I-40 Guy Rd. MLH 2 91,000 71,500 1.27 F
NC 50 Cleveland Rd New Rand Rd 2 LH 3 28,900 28,600 1.01 F
NC 50 New Rand Rd US 70 NC 50 1 12,300 18,800 0.65 B
� Highest AADT along facility segment is reported.
*� Maximum LOS E volume before facility exceeds capacity and reaches LOS F.
4.6 2035 Build Southern Wake Non-Toll and No Eastern Wake Traffic Capacity
Analysis
Under the 2035 Build Southern Wake Non-Toll and No Eastern Wake Freeway
scenario, additional scheduled roadway improvements included in the traffic capacity
analysis include widening I-40 from US 70 to NC 42 (STIP I-5111) and widening Ten
Ten Road from US 1 to Graham Newton Road. In general, traffic volumes increase
substantially from 2011 throughout the study area with noticeable effects on roadway
LOS. Of the 42 facility segments, only 13 are expected to operate at acceptable LOS.
In 2035, 29 of the 42 identified study area facility segments are predicted to operate at
LOS E or F. Facilities that have segments predicted to operate near or over capacity
include I-40, I-540, I-440, US 1/64, US 1, US 64 Bypass, US 70, NC 147, NC 42, NC
50, NC 55, Ten Ten Road, Timber Drive, and Hammond Road. Without the Eastern
Wake Freeway segment, the Southern Wake Freeway is expected to operate at LOS D
under the 2035 Build Southern Non-Toll and No Eastern Wake Freeway condition. In
2035, a roadway segment along I-540 from I-40 to Lumley Road has the highest
expected V/C ratio of 1.54. Table 6 provides a summary of the V/C and LOS results for
facility segments. Figure 11 shows a LOS overview of the entire study area and
Figures 11.1 — 11.11 show individual facility segment AADT, V/C, and LOS for the
study area roadways.
14 ��INTB

Southe�n and Easte�n Wake F�eeway
Final Build Traffic Capacity Analysis Report (December 2009)
Table 6- 2035 Build Southern Wake Non-Toll and No Eastern Wake V/C and LOS
Results
Facility From To NCLOS ID 2035 AADT * NCLOS V/C LOS
Se ment Capacit **
I-40 NC 55 NC 147 F5 128,300 117,300 1.09 F
I-40 NC 147 Wade Ave. F9 193,500 157,500 1.23 F
I-40 Wade Ave. US 1/64 F14 148,400 117,300 1.27 F
I-40 US 1/64 Lake W�heeler F5 162,600 117,300 1.39 F
I-40 Lake W�heeler Rock Quarry Rd. F9 176,200 157,500 1.12 F
I-40 Rock Q�uarry I-440 F11 148,900 198,100 0.75 D
I-40 I-440 US 70 F13 111,200 118,600 0.94 E
I-40 US 70 NC 42 F13 77,500 118,600 0.65 C
I-40 NC 42 NC 210 F2 72,200 78,600 0.92 E
NC 147 I-40 Cornwallis Rd. F4 93,800 73,000 1.28 F
I-540 I-40 Lumley Rd. F8 163,700 106,200 1.54 F
I-540 US 64 Bypass US 64 Business F6 56,600 91,100 0.62 C
NC 540 I-40 Triangle Pkwy F15 87,000 88,500 0.98 E
I-440 I-40 Jone R�ranklin F12 135,800 117,300 1.16 F
I-440 I-40 US 64 Bypass F9 156,500 157,500 0.99 E
I-440 US 64 Bypass US 64 Business F5 126,400 117,300 1.08 F
US 64 Bypass I-440 I-540 F6 110,100 91,100 1.21 F
US 64 Bypass I-540 US 64 Business F7 123,600 90,700 1.36 F
Triangle Pkwy. I-40 NC 540 F16 40,400 110,700 0.36 B
McCrimmon NC 540 McCrimmon MLH 5 30,400 96,000 0.32 B
Pkwy. Ext. Pkwy.
NC 540 Triangle Pkwy NC 55 (South) F15 78,600 88,500 0.89 D
Southern Wake NC 55 (South) I-40 F17 67,900 88,900 0.76 D
Eastern Wake I-40 US 64 Bypass F18 NA
Clayton I-40 NC 42 F3 61,700 69,600 0.89 D
Bypass
US 1/64 Tryon Rd. I-40 F10 159,300 120,200 1.33 F
US 1 New Hill Tryon Rd. F1 100,000 81,300 1.23 F
Holleman Rd.
Ten Ten Rd US 1 GrahaR�Newton Ten Ten 1 58,100 45,400 1.28 F
Ten Ten Rd Graham NC 50 Ten Ten 2 19,200 23,800 0.81 C
Newton Rd.
NC 55 US 1 Main St. MLH 6 52,100 52,200 1.00 E
NC 55 Main St. Wake Chapel Rd. MLH 3 59,800 53,600 1.12 F
NC 55 Wak RC�hapel US 401 NC 55 1 14,900 15,300 0.97 E
US 401 NC 55 NC 42 MLH 2 49,100 71,500 0.69 D
NC 42 US 401 Old Dr�u�g Store 2 LH 2 18,900 28,600 0.66 E
15 ��INTB

Southe�n and Easte�n Wake F�eeway
Final Build Traffic Capacity Analysis Report (December 2009)
Facility From To NCLOS ID 2035 AADT * NCLOS V/C LOS
Se ment Ca acit **
NC 42 Old Dr�u�g Store I-40 NC 42 1 33,100 26,400 1.25 F
NC 42 I-40 Bratton Dr. NC 42 2 21,100 40,700 0.52 D
NC 42 Bratton Dr. Clayton Bypass 2 LH 1 24,000 40,900 0.59 E
Timber Dr. US 70 NC 50 Timber 48,400 32,600 1.48 F
Hammond Rd. I-40 US 70 Hammond 38,800 39,300 0.99 E
US 70 I-40 Tryon Rd. MLH 4 76,900 98,700 0.78 D
US 70 Tryon Rd. I-40 MLH 1 93,500 65,800 1.42 F
US 70 I-40 Guy Rd. MLH 2 77,800 71,500 1.09 F
NC 50 Cleveland Rd New Rand Rd 2 LH 3 30,300 28,600 1.06 F
NC 50 New Rand Rd US 70 NC 50 1 12,700 18,800 0.68 B
NA = Facility does not exist in the scenario.
* Highest AADT along facility segment is reported.
*� Maximum LOS E volume before facility exceeds capacity and reaches LOS F.
4.7 2035 Build Southern Wake Toll and No Eastern Wake Traffic Capacity Analysis
Under the 2035 Build Southern Wake Toll and No Eastern Wake Freeway scenario,
additional scheduled roadway improvements included in the traffic capacity analysis
include widening I-40 from US 70 to NC 42 (STIP I-5111) and widening Ten Ten Road
from US 1 to Graham Newton Road. In general, traffic volumes increase substantially
from 2011 throughout the study area with noticeable effects on roadway LOS. Of the 42
facility segments, only 14 are expected to operate at acceptable LOS. In 2035, 28 of
the 42 identified study area facility segments are predicted to operate at LOS E or F.
Facilities that have segments predicted to operate near or over capacity include I-40, I-
540, I-440, US 1/64, US 1, US 64 Bypass, US 70, NC 147, NC 42, NC 50, NC 55, Ten
Ten Road, Timber Road, and Hammond Road. Without the Eastern Wake Freeway
segment, the Southern Wake Freeway is expected to operate at LOS D under the 2035
Build Southern Wake Toll and No Eastern Wake Freeway condition. In 2035, a
roadway segment along I-540 from I-40 to Lumley Road has the highest expected V/C
ratio of 1.55. Table 7 provides a summary of the V/C and LOS results for facility
segments. Figure 12 shows a LOS overview of the entire study area and Figures 12.1
— 12.11 show individual facility segment AADT, V/C, and LOS for the study area
roadways.
16 ��INTB

Southe�n and Easte�n Wake F�eeway
Final Build Traffic Capacity Analysis Report (December 2009)
Table 7- 2035 Build Southern Wake Toll and No Eastern Wake V/C and LOS
Results
Facility From To NCLOS ID 2035 AADT * NCLOS V/C LOS
Se ment Capacit **
I-40 NC 55 NC 147 F5 128,200 117,300 1.09 F
I-40 NC 147 Wade Ave. F9 193,200 157,500 1.23 F
I-40 Wade Ave. US 1/64 F14 149,000 117,300 1.27 F
I-40 US 1/64 Lake W�heeler F5 163,200 117,300 1.39 F
I-40 Lake W�heeler Rock Quarry Rd. F9 174,600 157,500 1.11 F
I-40 Rock Q�uarry I-440 F11 148,300 198,100 0.75 D
I-40 I-440 US 70 F13 111,300 118,600 0.94 E
I-40 US 70 NC 42 F13 77,700 118,600 0.66 C
I-40 NC 42 NC 210 F2 72,400 78,600 0.92 E
NC 147 I-40 Cornwallis Rd. F4 93,600 73,000 1.28 F
I-540 I-40 Lumley Rd. F8 164,900 106,200 1.55 F
I-540 US 64 Bypass US 64 Business F6 56,400 91,100 0.62 C
NC 540 I-40 Triangle Pkwy F15 87,000 88,500 0.98 E
I-440 I-40 Jone R�ranklin F12 135,200 117,300 1.15 F
I-440 I-40 US 64 Bypass F9 157,700 157,500 1.00 F
I-440 US 64 Bypass US 64 Business F5 126,700 117,300 1.08 F
US 64 Bypass I-440 I-540 F6 110,300 91,100 1.21 F
US 64 Bypass I-540 US 64 Business F7 123,900 90,700 1.37 F
Triangle Pkwy. I-40 NC 540 F16 40,400 110,700 0.36 B
McCrimmon NC 540 McCrimmon MLH 5 30,100 96,000 0.31 B
Pkwy. Ext. Pkwy.
NC 540 Triangle Pkwy NC 55 (South) F15 78,600 88,500 0.89 D
Southern Wake NC 55 (South) I-40 F17 67,900 88,900 0.76 D
Eastern Wake I-40 US 64 Bypass F18 NA
Clayton I-40 NC 42 F3 61,700 69,600 0.89 D
Bypass
US 1/64 Tryon Rd. I-40 F10 158,900 120,200 1.32 F
US 1 New Hill Tryon Rd. F1 100,000 81,300 1.23 F
Holleman Rd.
Ten Ten Rd US 1 GrahaR�Newton Ten Ten 1 56,900 45,400 1.25 F
Ten Ten Rd Graham NC 50 Ten Ten 2 19,300 23,800 0.81 C
Newton Rd.
NC 55 US 1 Main St. MLH 6 52,200 52,200 1.00 E
NC 55 Main St. Wake Chapel Rd. MLH 3 61,000 53,600 1.14 F
NC 55 Wak RC�hapel US 401 NC 55 1 14,200 15,300 0.93 D
US 401 NC 55 NC 42 MLH 2 49,400 71,500 0.69 D
NC 42 US 401 Old Dr�u�g Store 2 LH 2 19,000 28,600 0.66 E
17 ��INTB

Southe�n and Easte�n Wake F�eeway
Final Build Traffic Capacity Analysis Report (December 2009)
Facility From To NCLOS ID 2035 AADT * NCLOS V/C LOS
Se ment Ca acit **
NC 42 Old Dr�u�g Store I-40 NC 42 1 33,000 26,400 1.25 F
NC 42 I-40 Bratton Dr. NC 42 2 21,000 40,700 0.52 D
NC 42 Bratton Dr. Clayton Bypass 2 LH 1 24,100 40,900 0.59 E
Timber Dr. US 70 NC 50 Timber 47,300 32,600 1.45 F
Hammond Rd. I-40 US 70 Hammond 39,700 39,300 1.01 F
US 70 I-40 Tryon Rd. MLH 4 67,700 98,700 0.69 D
US 70 Tryon Rd. I-40 MLH 1 92,600 65,800 1.41 F
US 70 I-40 Guy Rd. MLH 2 78,500 71,500 1.10 F
NC 50 Cleveland Rd New Rand Rd 2 LH 3 30,700 28,600 1.07 F
NC 50 New Rand Rd US 70 NC 50 1 12,900 18,800 0.69 B
NA = Facility does not exist in the scenario.
* Highest AADT along facility segment is reported.
*� Maximum LOS E volume before facility exceeds capacity and reaches LOS F.
4.8 2035 Build Southern Wake Toll and Eastern Wake Non-Toll Traffic Capacity
Analysis
Under the 2035 Build Southern Wake Toll and Eastern Wake Non-Toll Freeway
scenario, additional scheduled roadway improvements included in the traffic capacity
analysis include widening I-40 from US 70 to NC 42 (STIP I-5111) and widening Ten
Ten Road from US 1 to Graham Newton Road. In general, traffic volumes increase
substantially throughout the study area with noticeable effects on roadway LOS. Of the
43 facility segments, only 12 are expected to operate at acceptable LOS. In 2035, 31 of
the 43 identified study area facility segments are predicted to operate at LOS E or F.
Facilities that have segments predicted to operate near or over capacity include I-40, I-
540, I-440, US 1/64, US 1, US 64 Bypass, US 70, NC 147, NC 42, NC 50, NC 55, Ten
Ten Road, Timber Road, and Hammond Road. The facilities of Southern and Eastern
Freeway are expected to operate at LOS D and LOS F under the 2035 Build Southern
Wake Toll and Eastern Wake Non-Toll condition, respectively. In 2035, a roadway
segment along I-540 from I-40 to Lumley Road has the highest expected V/C ratio of
1.55. Table 8 provides a summary of the V/C and LOS results for facility segments.
Figure 13 shows a LOS overview of the entire study area and Figures 13.1 — 13.11
show individual facility segment AADT, V/C, and LOS for the study area roadways.
18 ��INTB

Southe�n and Easte�n Wake F�eeway
Final Build Traffic Capacity Analysis Report (December 2009)
Table 8- 2035 Build Southern Wake Toll and Eastern Wake Non-Toll V/C and LOS
Results
Facility From To NCLOS ID 2035 AADT * NCLOS V/C LOS
Se ment Capacit **
I-40 NC 55 NC 147 F5 128,600 117,300 1.10 F
I-40 NC 147 Wade Ave. F9 193,400 157,500 1.23 F
I-40 Wade Ave. US 1/64 F14 150,000 117,300 1.28 F
I-40 US 1/64 Lake W�heeler F5 163,300 117,300 1.39 F
I-40 Lake aheeler Rock Quarry Rd. F9 176,000 157,500 1.12 F
I-40 Rock auarry I-440 F11 150,700 198,100 0.76 D
I-40 I-440 US 70 F13 106,200 118,600 0.90 E
I-40 US 70 NC 42 F13 77,000 118,600 0.65 C
I-40 NC 42 NC 210 F2 71,700 78,600 0.91 E
NC 147 I-40 Cornwallis Rd. F4 93,700 73,000 1.28 F
I-540 I-40 Lumley Rd. F8 164,100 106,200 1.55 F
I-540 US 64 Bypass US 64 Business F6 84,000 91,100 0.92 E
NC 540 I-40 Triangle Pkwy F15 86,700 88,500 0.98 E
I-440 I-40 Jone R�ranklin F12 134,400 117,300 1.15 F
I-440 I-40 US 64 Bypass F9 142,300 157,500 0.90 E
I-440 US 64 Bypass US 64 Business F5 123,400 117,300 1.05 F
US 64 Bypass I-440 I-540 F6 110,100 91,100 1.21 F
US 64 Bypass I-540 US 64 Business F7 120,100 90,700 1.32 F
Triangle Pkwy. I-40 NC 540 F16 40,500 110,700 0.37 B
McCrimmon NC 540 McCrimmon MLH 5 29,500 96,000 0.31 B
Pkwy. Ext. Pkwy.
NC 540 Triangle Pkwy NC 55 (South) F15 78,200 88,500 0.88 D
Southern Wake NC 55 South I-40 F17 67,200 88,900 0.76 D
Eastern Wake I-40 US 64 Bypass F18 93,100 91,600 1.02 F
Clayton I-40 NC 42 F3 62,200 69,600 0.89 E
Bypass
US 1/64 Tryon Rd. I-40 F10 158,000 120,200 1.31 F
US 1 New Hill Tryon Rd. F1 99,300 81,300 1.22 F
Holleman Rd.
Ten Ten Rd US 1 GrahaR�Newton Ten Ten 1 57,100 45,400 1.26 F
Ten Ten Rd Graham NC 50 Ten Ten 2 18,800 23,800 0.79 C
Newton Rd.
NC 55 US 1 Main St. MLH 6 52,600 52,200 1.01 F
NC 55 Main St. Wake Chapel Rd. MLH 3 61,600 53,600 1.15 F
NC 55 Wak Rtlhapel US 401 NC 55 1 25,100 15,300 1.64 F
US 401 NC 55 NC 42 MLH 2 49,400 71,500 0.69 D
NC 42 US 401 Old Dr�u�g Store 2 LH 2 18,900 28,600 0.66 E
19 ��INTB

Southe�n and Easte�n Wake F�eeway
Final Build Traffic Capacity Analysis Report (December 2009)
Facility From To NCLOS ID 2035 AADT * NCLOS V/C LOS
Se ment Ca acit **
NC 42 Old Dr�u�g Store I-40 NC 42 1 32,400 26,400 1.23 F
NC 42 I-40 Bratton Dr. NC 42 2 19,300 40,700 0.47 D
NC 42 Bratton Dr. Clayton Bypass 2 LH 1 23,000 40,900 0.56 E
Timber Dr. US 70 NC 50 Timber 43,000 32,600 1.32 F
Hammond Rd. I-40 US 70 Hammond 35,100 39,300 0.89 F
US 70 I-40 Tryon Rd. MLH 4 67,300 98,700 0.68 D
US 70 Tryon Rd. I-40 MLH 1 53,100 65,800 0.81 D
US 70 I-40 Guy Rd. MLH 2 91,000 71,500 1.27 F
NC 50 Cleveland Rd New Rand Rd 2 LH 3 28,900 28,600 1.01 F
NC 50 New Rand Rd US 70 NC 50 1 14,200 18,800 0.76 C
� Highest AADT along facility segment is reported.
*� Maximum LOS E volume before facility exceeds capacity and reaches LOS F.
5.0 SUMMARY
Utilizing the Southern and Eastern Wake Freeway Final Traffic Forecast Report
prepared by HNTB in February 2009 and NCLOS 2.0, the planning-level traffic capacity
analysis demonstrates that several of the major roadways in the study area are
expected to operate at unacceptable levels of service and be over capacity in the 2011
Build scenarios. However, both the Southern and Eastern Wake Freeway are expected
to operate well under capacity at LOS B in the 2011 Build scenarios while relieving
traffic volumes on other competing study area roadways.
In the 2035 Build scenarios, the majority of roadways in the study area are expected to
operate at LOS E or F. In general, traffic volumes increase substantially from 2011
throughout the study area with noticeable effects on roadway LOS. Southern Wake
Freeway is predicted to operate at LOS D in 2035 for all Build scenarios, while Eastern
Wake Freeway is expected to operate at LOS D as a Toll facility and LOS E or F as a
Non-Toll facility.
This planning-level traffic capacity analysis identifies existing and projected roadway
facility operations and deficiencies for the major roadways surrounding the Southern
and Eastern Wake Freeway project under 2011 and 2035 Build conditions. These
results of the capacity analysis will be used to support the alternatives development
process for the project.
20 ��INTB

N
W E
S
Legend
Analysis Links
Southern Wake Freeway
- �—w� Eastern Wake Freeway
Highway Network
i li Counties
I_ _ J
� Study Area
0 1 2 3 4 5
I I Miles � iurnp�Ke Hutnonty

Southern and Eastern Wake
Freeway Build
Traffic Capacity Analysis
Figure 2
NCLOS Facility Types - 2011
HNTB Project # 46816
Date: December 2009
N
W E
S
Legend
Highway Network
i li Counties
I_ _ J
� Study Area
0 1 2 3 4 5
I I Miles � iurnp�Ke Hutnonty

Southern and Eastern Wake
Freeway Build
Traffic Capacity Analysis
Figure 3
NCLOS Facility Types - 2011
No Eastern Wake Freeway
HNTB Project # 46816
Date: December 2009
N
W E
S
Legend
Highway Network
i li Counties
I_ _ J
� Study Area
0 1 2 3 4 5
I I Miles � iurnp�Ke Hutnonty

Southern and Eastern Wake
Freeway Build
Traffic Capacity Analysis
Figure 4
NCLOS Facility Types - 2035
HNTB Project # 46816
Date: December 2009
N
W E
S
Legend
Highway Network
i li Counties
I_ _ J
� Study Area
0 1 2 3 4 5
I I Miles � iurnp�Ke Hutnonty

Southern and Eastern Wake
Freeway Build
Traffic Capacity Analysis
Figure 5
NCLOS Facility Types - 2035
No Eastern Wake Freeway
HNTB Project # 46816
Date: December 2009
N
W E
S
Legend
Highway Network
i li Counties
I_ _ J
� Study Area
0 1 2 3 4 5
I I Miles � iurnp�Ke Hutnonty

N
W
S
Legend
Highway Network
i li Counties
I_ _ J
� Study Area
0 1 2 3 4 5
I I Miles � iurnp�Ke Hutnonty

N
W
S
Legend
�-
� _ J Counties
2011 Highway Network
� Study Area
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25
I I Miles ,� �urnp�Ke N►uinoriiy

N
W E
S
Legend
Ir � Counties
----�
2011 Highway Network
� Study Area
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25
I I ; � �urnpiKe Huinor�iy
Miles

N
W E
S
Legend
Ir � Counties
----�
2011 Highway Network
� Study Area
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25
I I Miles
HNTB, North Carolina, PC
� �urnpiKe E►utnvriiy 343 East Six Forks Road, suite 200
Raleigh, NC 27609

N
W E
S
Legend
Ir � Counties
----�
2011 Highway Network
� Study Area
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25
I I Miles
HNTB, North Carolina, PC
' �urnp�Ke Eauinor�ty 343 East Six Forks Road, suite 200
Raleigh, NC 27609

N
W E
S
Legend
�_ _ � Counties
2011 Highway Network
� Study Area
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25
I I Miles
HNTB, North Carolina, PC
-� �urnp�Ke �►uinoriiy 343 East Six Forks Road, suite 200
Raleigh, NC 27609

N
W E
S
Legend
�_ _ J Counties
2011 Highway Network
� Study Area
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25 HNTB, North Carolina, Pc
I I �urnpiKe �►utnor�iy 343 East Six Forks Road, suite 200
Miles ' I Raleigh, NC 27609

N
W
S
Legend
� i Counties
`----J
2011 Highway Network
� Study Area
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25 HNTB, North Carolina, Pc
I I ;� � �urnpiKe E►utnor�ty 343 East Six Forks Road, su�te 200
Miles Raleigh, NC 27609

N
W
S
Legend
Ir � Counties
----�
2011 Highway Network
� Study Area
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25
I I Miles
/
�
/
HNTB, North Carolina, PC
343 East Six Forks Road, Suite 200
Raleigh, NC 27609

N
W E
S
Legend
Ir � Counties
----�
2011 Highway Network
� Study Area
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25 HNTB, North Carolina, Pc
I I iurnp�Ke �►uinor�iy 343 East Six Forks Road, suite 200
Miles ' I Raleigh, NC 27609

N
W
S
Legend
Ir � Counties
----�
2011 Highway Network
� Study Area
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25
I I Miles
HNTB, North Carolina, PC
-� �urnp�Ke �►uinor�ty 343 East Six Forks Road, suite 200
Raleigh, NC 27609

N
W E
S
Legend
Ir � Counties
----�
2011 Highway Network
� Study Area
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25 HNTB, North Carolina, Pc
I I �urnpiKe E►uinor�iy 343 East Six Forks Road, su�te 200
Miles " � Raleigh, NC 27609

N
W
S
Legend
Highway Network
i li Counties
I_ _ J
� Study Area
0 1 2 3 4 5
I I Miles � iurnp�Ke Hutnonty

N
W E
S
Legend
�-
� _ J Counties
2011 Highway Network
� Study Area
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25
I I Miles ,� �urnp�Ke N►uinoriiy

N
W E
S
Legend
Ir � Counties
----�
2011 Highway Network
� Study Area
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25
I I ; � �urnpiKe Huinor�iy
Miles

N
W E
S
Legend
Ir � Counties
----�
2011 Highway Network
� Study Area
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25
I I Miles
HNTB, North Carolina, PC
�urnp�Ke wutnor�ty �43 East Six Forks Road, suite 200
� � Raleigh, NC 27609

N
W
S
Legend
Ir � Counties
----�
2011 Highway Network
� Study Area
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25
I I Miles
HNTB, North Carolina, PC
IUCI1pIK@ Ht.ILIIOCIt)/ 343 East Six Forks Road, Suite 200
� Raleigh, NC 27609

N
W
S
Legend
�_ _ � Counties
2011 Highway Network
� Study Area
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25
I I Miles
HNTB, North Carolina, PC
-� iurnpiKe �►utnoriiy 343 East Six Forks Road, suite 200
Raleigh, NC 27609

N
W
S
Legend
� � Counties
�__�-1
2011 Highway Network
� Study Area
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25
I I Miles
HNTB, North Carolina, PC
� �urnpiKe E►utnoriiy 343 East Six Forks Road, suite 200
Raleigh, NC 27609

N
W
S
Legend
� � Counties
�__�-1
2011 Highway Network
� Study Area
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25
I I Miles
HNTB, North Carolina, PC
IUC17pIK@ HUT�'10CIi�/ 343 East Six Forks Road, Suite 200
' Raleigh, NC 27609

N
W
S
Legend
Ir � Counties
----�
2011 Highway Network
� Study Area
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25
I I Miles
/
�
/
HNTB, North Carolina, PC
343 East Six Forks Road, Suite 200
Raleigh, NC 27609

N
W E
S
Legend
Ir � Counties
----�
2011 Highway Network
� Study Area
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25
I I Miles
HNTB, North Carolina, PC
� iurnpiKe �►utnoriiy 343 East Six Forks Road, suite 200
Raleigh, NC 27609

N
W E
S
Legend
Ir � Counties
----�
2011 Highway Network
� Study Area
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25
I I Miles
HNTB, North Carolina, PC
IUCI1pIK@ Ht.ILIIOCIt)/ 343 East Six Forks Road, Suite 200
� Raleigh, NC 27609

N
W E
S
Legend
Ir � Counties
----�
2011 Highway Network
� Study Area
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25
I I Miles
HNTB, North Carolina, PC
� �urnpiKe E►utnoriiy 343 East Six Forks Road, suite 200
Raleigh, NC 27609

N
W
S
Legend
Highway Network
i li Counties
I_ _ J
� Study Area
0 1 2 3 4 5
I I Miles � iurnp�Ke Hutnonty

N
W E
S
Legend
�-
� _ J Counties
2011 Highway Network
� Study Area
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25
I I Miles ,� �urnp�Ke N►uinoriiy

N
W E
S
Legend
Ir � Counties
----�
2011 Highway Network
� Study Area
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25
I I ; � �urnpiKe Huinor�iy
Miles

N
W E
S
Legend
Ir � Counties
----�
2011 Highway Network
� Study Area
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25
I I Miles
HNTB, North Carolina, PC
;� iurnpiKe �►uinoriiy 343 East Six Forks Road, suite 200
Raleigh, NC 27609

N
W E
S
Legend
Ir � Counties
----�
2011 Highway Network
� Study Area
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25
I I Miles
HNTB, North Carolina, PC
� �urnpiKe E►utnoriiy 343 East Six Forks Road, suite 200
Raleigh, NC 27609

N
W E
S
Legend
�_ _ � Counties
2011 Highway Network
� Study Area
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25
I I Miles
HNTB, North Carolina, PC
-� �urnp�Ke �►uinor�ty 343 East Six Forks Road, suite 200
Raleigh, NC 27609

N
W E
S
Legend
� i Counties
��_J
2011 Highway Network
� Study Area
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25
I I Miles
HNTB, North Carolina, PC
� �urnpiKe f+►uinor�iy 343 East Six Forks Road, suite 200
Raleigh, NC 27609

N
W E
S
Legend
� i Counties
�__J
2011 Highway Network
� Study Area
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25
I I Miles
HNTB, North Carolina, PC
� �urnpiKe f+►uinor�iy 343 East Six Forks Road, suite 200
Raleigh, NC 27609

N
W E
S
Legend
Ir � Counties
----�
2011 Highway Network
� Study Area
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25
I I Miles
/
�
/
HNTB, North Carolina, PC
343 East Six Forks Road, Suite 200
Raleigh, NC 27609

N
W E
S
Legend
Ir � Counties
----�
2011 Highway Network
� Study Area
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25
I I Miles
HNTB, North Carolina, PC
1�lCI1pIK@ HUZ�'lOClt�/ 343 East Six Forks Road, Suite 200
� Raleigh, NC 27609

N
W E
S
Legend
Ir � Counties
----�
2011 Highway Network
� Study Area
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25
I I Miles
HNTB, North Carolina, PC
� �urnp�Ke �►uinor�iy 343 East Six Forks Road, suite 200
Raleigh, NC 27609

N
W E
S
Legend
Ir � Counties
----�
2011 Highway Network
� Study Area
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25
I I Miles
HNTB, North Carolina, PC
;� �urnpiKe f+►uinoriiy 343 East Six Forks Road, suite 200
Raleigh, NC 27609

N
W
S
Legend
Highway Network
i li Counties
I_ _ J
� Study Area
0 1 2 3 4 5
I I Miles � iurnp�Ke Hutnonty

N
W
S
Legend
�-
� _ J Counties
2035 Highway Network
� Study Area
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25
I I Miles ,� �urnp�Ke N►uinoriiy

N
W E
S
Legend
Ir � Counties
----�
2035 Highway Network
� Study Area
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25
I I ; � �urnpiKe Huinor�iy
Miles

N
W
S
Legend
Ir � Counties
----�
2035 Highway Network
� Study Area
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25
I I Miles
HNTB, North Carolina, PC
� �urnpiKe �►uinor�ty 343 East Six Forks Road, suite 200
Raleigh, NC 27609

N
W E
S
Legend
Ir � Counties
----�
2035 Highway Network
� Study Area
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25
I I Miles
HNTB, North Carolina, PC
� �urnp�Ke �►utnor�ty 343 East Six Forks Road, suite 200
Raleigh, NC 27609

N
W E
S
Legend
�_ _ � Counties
2035 Highway Network
� Study Area
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25
I I Miles
HNTB, North Carolina, PC
-� �urnp�Ke �►uinoriiy 343 East Six Forks Road, suite 200
Raleigh, NC 27609

N
W E
S
Legend
� i Counties
�----�
� 2035 Highway Network
� Study Area
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25
I I Miles
HNTB, North Carolina, PC
-� �urnpiKe E►utnor�ty 343 East Six Forks Road, suite 200
Raleigh, NC 27609

N
W
S
Legend
� i Counties
`----J
2035 Highway Network
� Study Area
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25
I I Miles
HNTB, North Carolina, PC
-� �urnpiKe E►utnor�ty 343 East Six Forks Road, suite 200
Raleigh, NC 27609

N
W E
S
Legend
Ir � Counties
----�
2035 Highway Network
� Study Area
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25
I I Miles
/
�
/
HNTB, North Carolina, PC
343 East Six Forks Road, Suite 200
Raleigh, NC 27609

N
W
S
Legend
Ir � Counties
----�
2035 Highway Network
� Study Area
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25
I I Miles
HNTB, North Carolina, PC
� �urnpiKe f+►utnoriiy 343 East Six Forks Road, suite 200
Raleigh, NC 27609

N
W E
S
Legend
Ir � Counties
----�
2035 Highway Network
� Study Area
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25
I I Miles
HNTB, North Carolina, PC
;� iurnpiKe f+►utnoriiy 343 East Six Forks Road, suite 200
Raleigh, NC 27609

N
W E
S
Legend
Ir � Counties
----�
2035 Highway Network
� Study Area
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25
I I Miles
HNTB, North Carolina, PC
�, IUYI1pIK@ HIIZIIOCIt�/ 343 East Six Forks Road, Suite 200
Raleigh, NC 27609

N
W
S
Legend
Highway Network
i li Counties
I_ _ J
� Study Area
0 1 2 3 4 5
I I Miles � iurnp�Ke Hutnonty

N
W E
S
Legend
�-
� _ J Counties
2035 Highway Network
� Study Area
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25
I I Miles ,� �urnp�Ke N►uinoriiy

N
W E
S
Legend
Ir � Counties
----�
2035 Highway Network
� Study Area
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25
I I ; � �urnpiKe Huinor�iy
Miles

N
W E
S
Legend
Ir � Counties
----�
2035 Highway Network
� Study Area
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25
I I Miles
HNTB, North Carolina, PC
-� �urnpiKe N►utnor�ty 343 East Six Forks Road, suite 200
Raleigh, NC 27609

N
W E
S
Legend
Ir � Counties
----�
2035 Highway Network
� Study Area
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25
I I Miles
HNTB, North Carolina, PC
-� iurnpiKe f+►uinor�iy 343 East Six Forks Road, suite 200
Raleigh, NC 27609

N
W
S
Legend
�_ _ � Counties
2035 Highway Network
� Study Area
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25
I I Miles
HNTB, North Carolina, PC
-� �urnpiKe N►utnor�ty 343 East Six Forks Road, suite 200
Raleigh, NC 27609

N
W E
S
Legend
�_ _ � Counties
� 2035 Highway Network
� Study Area
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
I I Miles
HNTB, North Carolina, PC
� �urnpiKe �►utnor�ty 343 East Six Forks Road, suite 200
Raleigh, NC 27609

N
W E
S
Legend
�_ _ � Counties
2035 Highway Network
� Study Area
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25
I I Miles
HNTB, North Carolina, PC
-� �urnp�Ke �►uinoriiy 343 East Six Forks Road, suite 200
Raleigh, NC 27609

N
W E
S
Legend
Ir � Counties
----�
2035 Highway Network
� Study Area
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25
I I Miles
/
�
/
HNTB, North Carolina, PC
343 East Six Forks Road, Suite 200
Raleigh, NC 27609

N
W E
S
Legend
Ir � Counties
----�
2035 Highway Network
� Study Area
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25
I I Miles
HNTB, North Carolina, PC
� �urnpiKe f+►utnoriiy 343 East Six Forks Road, suite 200
Raleigh, NC 27609

N
W E
S
Legend
Ir � Counties
----�
2035 Highway Network
� Study Area
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25
I I Miles
HNTB, North Carolina, PC
-� iurnpiKe f+►uinor�iy 343 East Six Forks Road, suite 200
Raleigh, NC 27609

N
W E
S
Legend
Ir � Counties
----�
2035 Highway Network
� Study Area
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25
I I Miles
HNTB, North Carolina, PC
-' iurnpiKe wuinoriiy 343 East Six Forks Road, suite 200
Raleigh, NC 27609

Southern and Eastern Wake
Freeway Build
Traffic Capacity Analysis
Figure 11
2035 SW Non-Toll, No EW
LOS & V/C Ratios
HNTB Project # 46816
Date: December 2009
N
W E
S
Legend
2008 Highway Network
i li Counties
I_ _ J
� Study Area
0 1 2 3 4 5
I I Miles � iurnp�Ke Hutnonty

N
W
S
Legend
�-
� _ J Counties
2035 Highway Network
� Study Area
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25
I I Miles ,� �urnp�Ke N►uinoriiy

N
W E
S
Legend
j� Counties
2035 Highway Network
� Study Area
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25
I I ; � �urnpiKe Huinor�iy
Miles

Southern and Eastern Wake
Freeway Build
Traffic Capacity Analysis
Figure 11-3
2035 SW Non-Toll, No EW
LOS & V/C Ratios
HNTB Project # 46816
Date: December 2009
N
W E
S
� LOS A-C
LOS D
LOS E
� LOS F
Legend
j� Counties
2035 Highway Network
� Study Area
*High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV)
Volumes in Parentheses.
LOS = Level of Service
V/C = Volume to Capacity
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25
I I Miles
� NORrH cARouNA HNTB, North Carolina, PC
; J Turnpike Authority 343 East Six Forks Road, Suite 200
Raleigh, NC 27609

Southern and Eastern Wake
Freeway Build
Traffic Capacity Analysis
Figure 11-4
2035 SW Non-Toll, No EW
LOS & V/C Ratios
HNTB Project # 46816
Date: December 2009
N
W E
S
� LOS A-C
LOS D
LOS E
� LOS F
Legend
j� Counties
2035 Highway Network
� Study Area
*High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV)
Volumes in Parentheses.
LOS = Level of Service
V/C = Volume to Capacity
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25
I I Miles
� rvoRrH cnRouNA HNTB, North Carolina, PC
� Turnpike Authority 343 East Six Forks Road, Suite 200
Raleigh, NC 27609

N
W E
S
Legend
�_ _ � Counties
2035 Highway Network
� Study Area
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25
I I Miles
HNTB, North Carolina, PC
� �urnp�Ke �►uinoriiy 343 East Six Forks Road, suite 200
Raleigh, NC 27609

N
W
S
Legend
� i Counties
�----�
� 2035 Highway Network
� Study Area
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25
I I Miles
HNTB, North Carolina, PC
;� �urnpiKe �►utnoriiy 343 East Six Forks Road, suite 200
Raleigh, NC 27609

N
W
S
Legend
�_ _ � Counties
2035 Highway Network
� Study Area
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25
I I Miles
HNTB, North Carolina, PC
-� �urnp�Ke �►uinor�ty 343 East Six Forks Road, suite 200
Raleigh, NC 27609

N
W
S
Legend
j� Counties
2035 Highway Network
� Study Area
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25
I I Miles
%�
/
/
HNTB, North Carolina, PC
343 East Six Forks Road, Suite 200
Raleigh, NC 27609

N
W E
S
Legend
j� Counties
2035 Highway Network
� Study Area
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25
I I Miles
HNTB, North Carolina, PC
' �urnpiKe �►uinority 343 East Six Forks Road, suite 200
Raleigh, NC 27609

N
W E
S
Legend
j� Counties
2035 Highway Network
� Study Area
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25
I I Miles
HNTB, North Carolina, PC
` iurnpiKe �►uinoriiy 343 East Six Forks Road, suite 200
Raleigh, NC 27609

N
W
S
Legend
j� Counties
2035 Highway Network
� Study Area
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25
I I Miles
HNTB, North Carolina, PC
-� �urnp�Ke �►uinor�ty 343 East Six Forks Road, suite 200
Raleigh, NC 27609

Southern and Eastern Wake
Freeway Build
Traffic Capacity Analysis
Figure 12
2035 SW Toll, No EW
LOS & V/C Ratios
HNTB Project # 46816
Date: December 2009
N
W E
s
Legend
2008 Highway Network
i li Counties
I_ _ J
� Study Area
, � �� ��,�k
i � ��`� ������� � L
, �
, �a� ��,
� �'S� , (r �''� � � S�{��'
' i .\�L,�,�; �f. �� l_7�, �K � �'7,X,_-4�.1 *��i..," 1 y .
4 �
Y �
F��
� �? .Tf�j �1Jitl��l���`t +1 I-1 r��. �,.
l �'i•.�,��'. � � yc� `r� Y l �.T�� �
���y/ � � �{�—\fr
� l�F �4 � �����I� �vl Fil
���� 3.1?-, � �l'� 7� ^l { `- r :� • 4� �"��Y s .
�" r�'� �rLU''CF ��� ���yll rT'��Y�f�}�.�
t
i;�-y�' ��� ���"� T�f� �r �
I � t ,��' j�.{ a rv
/ . /y P
��� ���� �� ;
� �^
� �y� � �'�L� �
,�
� � li �
C ? 1-2 A
V ������ �.
'�
I <
; ���� -
F t -�(
�� �
��
I__---- _ � 1t` ��
�j�il r~_ �� . �,:hf
Y If I r-I�� 4 r .
r } � � b ��� ���I .II � _
�I , /�� yk�✓ � ^ �1.i `._�j`-- dl'. ,.
Li �
/ `�' � _ } . � ,
�
`��� � �
�:� . . �� .� ..
��� � rl � ��.-� ��.._ : �
� ���.,,��
r 4 �— e',
l � r._� � �
�'�,,,�/� ��v��
i� � � —,.� ��-w�. /'
/ , I� \ � �� ��-V�bi'/ r . ��'C.-'t"'� /
�I � —�I � � I--�'� � I _ � 1—.� �� �Va ..�•� '��Jr�l, i /
�� � � ��--�% � - I ��. �C`�� - ���; � �
� �� ... � -�L r� �/ / r�,l �, _ �y � r�i � �. n_ �� I
�� _
�
'(� 1 r� J�` i,X "L�
, �, _
� _ � -�_��:� ��=���� � � � � -
0 1 2 3 4 5
I I Miles
_ i ���'� � �-„ =� � � '- �:, .
' � �%��n-�� � `� �� f � �
- ,�, �
,/
� .�
�� �� �-
_ ;,
,,
,_._.. ., ..
-�f�r;� L= v \ �,�-�" � ��� ��� .
� -_. �� �� I1 ~ ( �
�� il � �\�I� /
� � �� L ' T .._ . .
- 7�;-; �'�/�-�— .
� ��,
�
�,-� / ' ��� �`� i`
\ '� �ti c ��. � �
- ��-
;
� _ .�'�
{����:
i '-';- � l
� iurnp�Ke Hutnonty
- P�
_7.

N
W E
S
Legend
�-
� _ J Counties
2035 Highway Network
� Study Area
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25
I I Miles ,� �urnp�Ke N►uinoriiy

N
W E
S
Legend
� i Counties
�__J
2035 Highway Network
� Study Area
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25
I I � �urnpiKe Huinor�iy
Miles

N
W
S
Legend
�_ _J Counties
I
2035 Highway Network
� Study Area
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
I I ; � iurnp�Ke N►uinor�iy
Miles

N
W E
S
Legend
2035 Highway Network
j__ J Counties
� Study Area
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25
I I ; � �urnp�Ke �►utnor�ty
Miles

N
W E
S
Legend
j_ _ J Counties
Highway Network
� Study Area
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25
I I Miles ,� �urnp�Ke N►uinoriiy

N
W
S
Legend
�_ _ J Counties
2035 Highway Network
� Study Area
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25
I I Miles
HNTB, North Carolina, PC
;� �urnpiKe E►uinor�iy 343 East Six Forks Road, suite 200
Raleigh, NC 27609

N
W E
S
Legend
2035 Highway Network
� Study Area
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25
I I Miles
HNTB, North Carolina, PC
-� �urnpiKe Huinoriiy 343 East Six Forks Road, suite 200
Raleigh, NC 27609

N
W E
S
Legend
j_ _ J Counties
2035 Highway Network
� Study Area
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25 HNTB, North Carolina, Pc
I I Miles ;� iurnpiKe f+►uinoriiy 343 East Six Forks Road, suite 200
Raleigh, NC 27609

N
W
S
Legend
j__ � Counties
2035 Highway Network
� Study Area
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25
I I Miles
HNTB, North Carolina, PC
-� �urnp�Ke wutnority 343 East Six Forks Road, suite 200
Raleigh, NC 27609

N
W E
S
Legend
j� Counties
2035 Highway Network
� Study Area
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25
I I Miles
HNTB, North Carolina, PC
-� �urnp�Ke �►utnor�iy 343 East Six Forks Road, suite 200
Raleigh, NC 27609

N
W
S
Legend
j� Counties
2035 Highway Network
� Study Area
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25
I I Miles
HNTB, North Carolina, PC
-� �urnp�Ke �►utnor�ty 343 East Six Forks Road, suite 200
Raleigh, NC 27609

N
W E
S
Legend
Highway Network
��---�i
_ _ J Counties
� Study Area
; - � -n '`; f � �;:hi
`
' �f, :._ �
,_:.,��>=- \�
�—�i�,
� �
-� -��,�� � \
� � �-s J
� �� � �� --
� ,� �.
0 1 2 3 4 5
I I Miles
;-r1: i
��'
i '-''�. t
�7
� iurnp�Ke Hutnonty

N
W E
S
Legend
�-
� _ J Counties
2035 Highway Network
� Study Area
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25
I I Miles ,� �urnp�Ke N►uinoriiy

N
W
S
Legend
Ir � Counties
----�
2035 Highway Network
� Study Area
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25
I I ; � �urnpiKe Huinor�iy
Miles

N
W
S
Legend
Ir � Counties
----�
2035 Highway Network
� Study Area
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25
I I ; � �urnpiKe �►utnor�ty
Miles

N
W E
S
Legend
Ir � Counties
----�
2035 Highway Network
� Study Area
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25
I I ; � �urnpiKe N►utnor�ty
Miles

N
W E
S
Legend
�_ _ � Counties
2035 Highway Network
� Study Area
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25
I I Miles
HNTB, North Carolina, PC
� iurnpiKe �►uinoriiy 343 East Six Forks Road, suite 200
Raleigh, NC 27609

N
W E
S
Legend
L_ _ �, Counties
s 2035 Highway Network
� Study Area
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25
I I ; � �urnp�Ke N►utnor�iy
Miles

N
W
S
Legend
� i Counties
�---�
2035 Highway Network
� Study Area
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25
I I ; ' �urnpiKe �►utnor�ty
Miles

N
W E
S
Legend
Ir � Counties
----�
2035 Highway Network
� Study Area
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25
I I Miles
/
/
�

N
W
S
Legend
j_�� Counties
2035 Highway Network
� Study Area
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25
I I ; � �urnpiKe �►utnor�ty
Miles

N
W
S
Legend
Ir � Counties
----�
2035 Highway Network
� Study Area
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25
I I ; � �urnpiKe �►utnor�ty
Miles

N
W
S
Legend
Ir � Counties
----�
2035 Highway Network
� Study Area
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25
I I ; � �urnpiKe �►utnor�iy
Miles

NCLOS Software Facility Descriptions
Arterials:
Also know as urban streets, arterials serve longer through trips while also providing access to adjacent commercial,
residential and industrial land uses. Collector streets are included under this facility type for the purpose of the HCM and
this program.
High-Speed:
Area with very low surrounding density with no on-street parking and very little pedestrian activity. Typified by either
multilane divided or two-lane roadways with shoulders.
Principal Arterial:
A major surface street with serves relatively long trips between major points and through-trips entering, leaving and
passing through the urban area. Mobility (speed) is very important whereas access is of minor importance. Typically
used to connect important activity centers and major traffic generators.
Suburban:
An area with a mixture of densities for housing and employment.
Principal Arterial:
A major surface street with serves relatively long trips between major points and through-trips entering, leaving and
passing through the urban area. Mobility (speed) is very important whereas access is of minor importance. Typically
used to connect important activity centers and major traffic generators.
Minor Arterial:
A functional category of a street allowing trips of moderate length within a relatively small geographical area. Although
mobility (speed) is important for minor arterials, their main function is to provide access. They also are typically used to
connect principal arterials to one another.
Intermediate:
An area with characteristics in between those of an urban area and a suburban area. Typically, the roadway is multilane,
either divided or undivided, with two travel lanes per direction and some pedestrian and parking activity along the
roadway.
Principal Arterial:
A major surface street with serves relatively long trips between major points and through-trips entering, leaving and
passing through the urban area. Mobility (speed) is very important whereas access is of minor importance. Typically
used to connect important activity centers and major traffic generators.
Minor Arterial:
A functional category of a street allowing trips of moderate length within a relatively small geographical area. Although
mobility (speed) is important for minor arterials, their main function is to provide access. They also are typically used to
connect principal arterials to one another.
Urban:
An area typified by high densities of developments or concentrations of population, drawing people from several areas
within a region.
Principal Arterial:
A major surface street with serves relatively long trips between major points and through-trips entering, leaving and
passing through the urban area. Mobility (speed) is very important whereas access is of minor importance. Typically
used to connect important activity centers and major traffic generators.
Minor Arterial:
A functional category of a street allowing trips of moderate length within a relatively small geographical area. Although
mobility (speed) is important for minor arterials, their main function is to provide access. They also are typically used to
connect principal arterials to one another.
2 Lane Hiqhwavs:
An undivided roadway with two travel lanes, one for use by traffic in each direction. In order to pass a slow moving
vehicle, drivers must maneuver into the opposing lane while taking into consideration oncoming traffic. At times, an
additional passing lane may be added in one direction in order to improve opportunities for passing. Passing lanes also
can be provided in both directions of travel at the same location, resulting in a short section of four-lane undivided
highway with improved passing opportunities in both directions.
Multi-Lane Hiqhwavs:
Typically have a total of four or six lanes, counting both directions, often with medians or two-way left-turn lanes (TWLTL),
although they can be undivided as well. Usually located in suburban communities leading into central cities or along high-
volume rural corridors connecting two cities or large trip producers. Multi-lane highways often have traffic signals but
successive signals are typically not within 2.0 miles of each other (< 2.0 miles would usually be considered an arterial)
Freewavs:
A continuously divided highway with full access control, two or more travel lanes in each direction, and uninterrupted
traffic flow provided through the use of grade separated interchanges. There are no signalized or stop-controlled at-grade
intersections, and direct access to and from adjacent property is not permitted.

2011 Build
Southem Toll,
2011 Build Non 2011 Build Toll Eastern Non- 2035 Build Non- 2035 Build Toll
ID Facility From To NCLOS ID Toll AADT Capacity V/C LOS AADT Capacity V/C LOS Toll AADT Capacity V/C LOS Toll AADT Capacity V/C LOS AADT Capacity V/C LOS
I-401 I-40 NC 55 NC 147 F5 123300 117300 1.05 F 123300 117300 1.05 F 123300 117300 1.05 F 129700 117300 1.11 F 128200 117300 1.09 F
NC 147 1 NC 147 I-40 Cornwallis Rd F4 69200 73000 0.95 E 69200 73000 0.95 E 69200 73000 0.95 E 93600 73000 1.28 F 93600 73000 128 F
I-40 2 I-40 NC 147 Davis Dr F9 172900 157500 1.10 F 172900 157500 1.10 F 172800 157500 1.10 F 182900 157500 1.16 F 153900 157500 0.98 E
I-40 2 I-40 Davis Drive S Miami Blvd F9 156900 157500 1.00 E 156800 157500 1.00 E 156700 157500 0.99 E 175600 157500 1.11 F 175600 157500 1.11 F
I-40 2 I-40 S Miami Blvd Pa e Rd F9 164100 157500 1.04 F 164100 157500 1.04 F 164000 157500 1.04 F 162000 157500 1.03 F 162000 157500 1.03 F
I-40 2 I-40 Page Rd I-540 F9 167900 157500 1.07 F 167900 157500 1.07 F 167900 157500 1.07 F 171900 157500 1.09 F 173600 157500 1.10 F
I-540 1 I-540 I-40 Aviation Pkw F8 89300 106200 0.84 D 88600 106200 0.83 D 89000 106200 0.84 D 154200 106200 1.45 F 154200 106200 1.45 F
I-540 1 I-540 Aviation Pkwy Lumley Rd F8 100400 106200 0.95 E 100300 106200 0.94 E 100500 106200 0.95 E 164000 106200 1.54 F 164000 106200 1.54 F
I-40 2 I-40 I-540 Air ort Blvd F9 138200 157500 0.88 D 138100 157500 0.88 D 138100 157500 0.88 D 158800 157500 1.01 F 157400 157500 1.00 E
I-40 2 I-40 Airport Blvd Aviation Pkwy F9 142500 157500 0.90 E 142300 157500 0.90 E 142500 157500 0.90 E 159400 157500 1.01 F 159400 157500 1.01 F
I-40 2 I-40 Aviation Pkw Harrison Ave F9 156200 157500 0.99 E 156200 157500 0.99 E 156300 157500 0.99 E 193200 157500 123 F 193200 157500 1.23 F
I-40 2 I-40 Harrison Ave Wade Ave F9 163400 157500 1.04 F 163400 157500 1.04 F 163400 157500 1.04 F 193200 157500 123 F 193200 157500 1.23 F
I-40 3 I-40 Wade Ave NC 54 F14/F5 99600 117300 0.85 D 99400 117300 0.85 D 99400 117300 0.85 D 129200 117300 1.10 F 129200 117300 1.10 F
I-40 3 I-40 NC 54 Cary Towne Blvd F14/F5 109600 117300 0.93 E 109400 117300 0.93 E 109400 117300 0.93 E 134500 117300 1.15 F 134500 117300 1.15 F
I-40 3 I-40 Car Towne Bivd US 1/64 F14/F5 115200 117300 0.98 E 115000 117300 0.98 E 115000 117300 0.98 E 150000 117300 128 F 150000 117300 128 F
I-404 I-40 US 1/64 Gorman St F5 121100 117300 1.03 F 121000 117300 1.03 F 120900 117300 1.03 F 150900 117300 129 F 152100 117300 1.30 F
I-40 4 I-440 I-40 Jones Franklin Rd F5 92700 117300 079 D 92900 117300 079 D 92800 117300 0J9 D 134300 117300 1.14 F 134300 117300 1.14 F
I-40 4 I-40 Gorman St Main Campus Dr F5 117800 117300 1.00 F 117700 117300 1.00 F 117700 117300 1.00 F 143600 117300 122 F 144800 117300 123 F
I-40 4 I-40 Main Cam us Dr Lake Wheeler Rd FS 117800 117300 1.00 F 117700 117300 1.00 F 117700 117300 1.00 F 160900 117300 1.37 F 162000 117300 1.38 F
I-40 5 I-40 Lake Wheeler Rd S Saunders St F9 119900 157500 0.76 D 117400 157500 0.75 D 119900 157500 0.76 D 159300 157500 1.01 F 161700 157500 1.03 F
I-40 5 I-40 S Saunders St Hammond Rd F9 112800 157500 072 C 113700 157500 OJ2 D 112800 157500 072 C 171200 157500 1.09 F 172300 157500 1.09 F
I-40 5 I-40 Hammond Rd Rock Quarry Rd F9 112400 157500 0.71 C 112800 157500 0.72 C 112300 157500 0.71 C 156800 157500 1.00 E 156800 157500 1.00 E
I-40 6 I-40 Rock Quarr Rd I-440 F11 105700 198100 0.53 C 105700 198100 0.53 C 105600 198100 0.53 C 145100 198100 073 D 145100 198100 0.73 D
I-40 7 I-40 I-440 Jones Sausage Rd F13 102100 118600 0.86 D 92200 118600 0.78 D 92100 118600 0.78 D 106200 118600 0.90 E 106200 118600 0.90 E
I-40 7 I-40 Jones Sausa e Rd US �0 F13 86000 118600 0.73 C 86200 118600 0.73 D 86100 118600 0.73 C 99700 118600 0.84 D 99700 118600 0.84 D
I-40 8 I-40 US 70 Clayton Bypass F2/F13 55400 78600 0.70 C 55400 78600 0.70 C 55400 78600 0.70 C 60000 118600 0.51 B 62000 118600 0.52 C
I-40 8 I-40 Clayton B ass NC 42 F2/F13 62400 78600 0.79 D 62500 78600 0.80 D 62500 78600 0.80 D 77100 118600 0.65 C 77100 118600 0.65 C
I-40 8 I-40 NC 42 NC 210 F2 49900 78600 0.63 C 49000 78600 0.62 C 49900 78600 0.63 C 71900 78600 0.91 E 71900 78600 0.91 E
I-440 2 I-440 I-40 Poole Rd F9 72200 157500 0.46 B 72100 157500 0.46 B 72000 157500 0.46 B 107800 157500 0.68 C 107800 157500 0.68 C
I-440 2 I-440 Poole Rd US 64 Bypass F9 57800 157500 0.56 C 87600 157500 0.56 C 87500 157500 0.56 C 140500 157500 0.89 E 141500 157500 0.90 E
I-440 3 I-440 US 64 B ass US 64 Bus FS 86000 117300 0.73 D 86100 117300 0.73 D 86200 117300 0.73 D 125000 117300 1.07 F 124100 117300 1.06 F
US 64 1 US 64 Bypass I-440 New Hope Church F6 63100 91100 0.69 C 63100 91100 0.69 C 63200 91100 0.69 C 105400 91100 1.16 F 105400 91100 1.16 F
US 64 1 US 64 Bypass New Hope Church Hodge Rd F6 64000 91100 OJO C 63900 91100 O70 C 64000 91100 O70 C 110300 91100 t21 F 110300 91100 1.21 F
US 64 1 US 64 Bypass Hodge Rd I-540 F6 62800 91100 0.69 C 62800 91100 0.69 C 62900 91100 0.69 C 106400 91100 1.17 F 106400 91100 1.17 F
US 64 2 US 64 B pass I-540 Smithfield Rd F7 66700 90700 0.74 D 66900 90700 0.74 D 66900 90700 0.74 D 122100 90700 1.35 F 120400 90700 1.33 F
US 64 2 US 64 Bypass Smithfield Rd Wendell Falls Blvd F7 63700 90700 0.70 C 63700 90700 0.70 C 63700 90700 0.70 C 115800 90700 128 F 114300 90700 1.26 F
US 64 2 US 64 B ass Wendell Falls Blvd US 64 Bus F7 53000 90700 0.58 C 53000 90700 0.58 C 53000 90700 0.58 C 90300 90700 1.00 E 89800 90700 0.99 E
I-540 2 I-540 US 64 Bypass US 64 Bus F6 51100 91100 0.56 C 53200 91100 0.58 C 53200 91100 0.58 C 83000 91100 0.91 E 52500 91100 0.91 E
NC 540 1 NC 540 I-40 NC 54 F15 39300 88500 0.44 B 19300 88500 022 A 19300 88500 022 A 85100 88500 0.96 E 86800 88500 0.98 E
NC 540 1 NC 540 NC 54 Triangle Pkwy F15 22700 88500 0.26 A 12600 88500 0.14 A 12600 88500 0.14 A 56700 88500 0.64 C 56200 88500 0.64 C
Trian le 1 Trian le Pkw I-40 Ho son Rd F16 13200 110700 0.12 A 13200 110700 0.12 A 13100 110700 0.12 A 40900 110700 0.37 B 40500 110700 0.37 B
Trian le 1 Triangle Pkwy Hopson Rd Davis Dr F16 13200 110700 0.12 A 13200 110700 0.12 A 13100 110700 0.12 A 40900 110700 0.37 B 40500 110700 0.37 B
Trian le 1 Triangle Pkw Davis Dr NC 540 F16 9300 110700 0.08 A 9200 110700 0.08 A 9300 110700 0.08 A 40200 110700 0.36 B 39500 110700 0.36 8
McCrimmon McCrimmon Ext. NC 540 McCrimmon Pkwy MLH5 10100 96000 0.11 A 10100 96000 0.11 A 10200 96000 0.11 A 30200 96000 0.31 B 29600 96000 0.31 B
WWF 1 W Wake Frwy Trian le Pkw NC 55 F15 19700 88500 022 A 19700 88500 022 A 19700 88500 022 A 53700 88500 0.61 C 53500 88500 0.60 C
WWF 1 W Wake Frwy NC 55 Morrisville Pkwy Ft5 15500 88500 0.18 A 15500 88500 0.18 A 15500 88500 0.18 A 56100 SS500 0.63 C 55900 88500 0.63 C
WWF 1 W Wake Frwy Morrisville Pkw Hi h House Rd F15 13900 88500 0.16 A 13900 88500 0.16 A 13800 88500 0.16 A 54000 88500 0.61 C 53900 88500 0.61 C
WWF 1 W Wake Frwy Hi h House Rd US 64 Ft5 16000 88500 0.18 A 16000 88500 0.18 A 16200 88500 0.18 A 61200 58500 0.69 C 61200 88500 0.69 C
WWF 1 W Wake Frwy US 64 Old US 1 F15 15200 88500 0.17 A 15200 88500 0.17 A 15200 88500 0.17 A 64100 85500 0.72 D 64200 88500 0.73 D
WWF 1 W Wake Frvvy Old US 1 US 1 F15 25500 88500 0.29 A 25500 88500 0.29 A 25500 88500 0.29 A 68400 SS500 0.77 D 65300 88500 0.77 D
WWF 1 W Wake Frw US 1 Old HS-A ex Rd F15 24800 88500 028 A 24800 88500 028 A 24500 88500 028 A 78900 88500 0.89 E 75700 88500 0.89 D
WWF 1 W Wake Frwy Old Holly Springs-Apex Rd NC 55 Bypass F15 16500 88500 0.19 A 16500 88500 0.19 A 16600 88500 0.19 A 58800 88500 0.66 C 59300 88500 0.67 C
SWF 1 S Wake Frvv NC 55 B ass Holl S rings Rd F17 17400 88900 0.20 A 17400 88900 020 A 17400 88900 020 A 44700 88900 0.50 B 44700 88900 0.50 B
SWF 1 S Wake Frvvy Holly Springs Rd Bells Lake Rd F17 23400 88900 0.26 A 23300 88900 0.26 A 23400 88900 0.26 A 58900 88900 0.66 C 59200 88900 0.67 C
SWF 1 S Wake Frw Bells Lake Rd US 401 F17 29300 88900 0.33 B 29200 88900 0.33 B 29200 88900 0.33 B 69900 88900 0.79 D 69800 88900 0.79 D
SWF 1 S Wake Frwy US 401 Old Sta e Rd F17 32200 88900 0.36 B 32200 88900 0.36 B 32200 88900 0.36 B 70000 SS900 0.79 D 69900 88900 0.79 D
SWF 1 S Wake Frw Old Sta e Rd NC 50 F17 25300 88900 028 A 25300 88900 028 A 25300 88900 0.28 A 55100 88900 0.62 C 55000 88900 0.62 C
SWF 1 S Wake Frwy NC 50 I-40 F17 23800 88900 027 A 23800 88900 027 A 23800 88900 027 A 50400 88900 0.57 C 50300 88900 0.57 C
EWF 1 E Wake Frw I-40 Cornwallis Rd F18 14500 91600 0.16 A 14300 91600 0.16 A 15500 91600 0.17 A 32300 91600 0.35 B 32300 91600 0.35 B
EWF 1 E Wake Frwy Cornwallis Rd US 70 F18 26800 91600 0.29 A 26700 91600 0.29 A 29000 91600 0.32 B 51200 91600 0.56 C 51300 91600 0.56 C
EWF 1 E Wake Frwy US 70 Rock Quarry Rd F18 34400 91600 0.38 B 34100 91600 0.37 B 35900 91600 0.39 B 62400 91600 0.68 C 63200 91600 0.69 C
EWF 1 E Wake Frwy Rock Quarry Rd Auburn Knightdale Rd F18 33700 91600 0.37 B 33600 91600 0.37 B 35500 91600 0.39 B 67000 91600 0.73 D 67100 91600 0.73 D
EWF 1 E Wake Frw Auburn Kni htdale Rd Poole Rd F18 34100 91600 0.37 B 34000 91600 0.37 B 36000 91600 0.39 B 68600 91600 0.75 D 68800 91600 0.75 D
EWF 1 E Wake Frwy Poole Rd US 64 Bypass Ft8 44200 91600 0.48 B 43900 91600 0.48 B 45900 91600 0.50 B 88500 91600 0.97 E SS900 91600 0.97 E
Clayton Byp. 1 Clayton Bypass I-40 Comwallis Rd F3 37900 69600 0.54 C 37600 69600 0.54 C 37600 69600 0.54 C 51300 69600 0J4 D 51200 69600 074 D
Clayton Byp. 1 Clayton Bypass Cornwallis Rd NC 42 F3 43800 69600 0.63 C 43700 69600 0.63 C 43900 69600 0.63 C 63600 69600 0.91 E 63400 69600 0.91 E
US 1 1 US 1 NC 751 W Wake Frw F1 27900 81300 0.34 B 27900 81300 0.34 B 27900 81300 0.34 B 54900 81300 0.68 C 54600 81300 0.67 C
US 1 1 US 1 W Wake Frvvy NC 55 Ft 35700 81300 0.44 B 35700 81300 0.44 B 35700 81300 0.44 B 66300 81300 0.82 D 66200 81300 0.81 D
US 1 1 US 1 NC 55 Ten Ten Rd F1 70400 81300 0.87 D 70500 81300 0.87 D 70400 81300 0.87 D 89100 81300 1.10 F 89100 81300 1.10 F
US 1 1 US 1 Ten Ten Rd Tryon Rd Ft 71100 81300 0.87 D 71200 81300 0.88 D 71100 81300 0.87 D 99000 51300 122 F 99300 81300 122 F
US 1/64 1 US 1164 Tr on Rd Car Pkw F10 92600 120200 0.77 D 92900 120200 0.77 D 92800 120200 0.77 D 124700 120200 1.04 F 124700 120200 1.04 F
US 1/64 1 US 1/64 Cary Pkwy Walnut St F10 122000 120200 1.01 F 122100 120200 1.02 F 122000 120200 1.01 F 157700 120200 1.31 F 157700 120200 1.31 F
US 1/64 1 US 1/64 Walnut St I-40 F10 83200 120200 0.69 C 83300 120200 0.69 C 83200 120200 0.69 C 105300 120200 0.88 D 105300 120200 0.88 D
Ten Ten 1 Ten Ten Rd US 1 Penny Rd Ten Ten 1 26100 22700 1.15 F 26100 22700 1.15 F 26100 22700 1.15 F 57200 45400 126 F 57200 45400 1.26 F
Ten Ten 1 Ten Ten Rd Penny Rd Jessie Dr Ten Ten 1 26100 22700 1.15 F 26100 22700 1.15 F 26100 22700 1.15 F 57200 45400 126 F 57200 45400 1.26 F
Ten Ten 1 Ten Ten Rd Jessie Dr Kildaire Farm Rd Ten Ten 1 19300 22700 0.85 D 19900 22700 0.88 D 19300 22700 0.85 D 30300 45400 0.67 B 30500 45400 0.67 B
Ten Ten 1 Ten Ten Rd Kildaire Farm Rd Holl S rin s Rd Ten Ten 1 14400 22700 0.63 B 15800 22700 0.70 B 14400 22700 0.63 B 34300 45400 0.76 B 33500 45400 0.74 B
Ten Ten 1 Ten Ten Rd Holly Springs Rd Graham Newton Rd Ten Ten 1 15500 23800 0.65 B 17500 23800 0.74 B 15500 23800 0.65 B 46600 45400 1.03 F 45000 45400 0.99 E

2035 Build
2035 Build 2035 Build Southern Toll,
Southern Non-Toll, Southern Toll, No Eastern Non-Toll
No Eastem AADT Capacity V/C LOS Eastem AADT Capacity V/C LOS AADT Capacity V/C LOS
128300 117300 1.09 F 128200 117300 1.09 F 128600 117300 1.10 F
93800 73000 1.28 F 93600 73000 128 F 93700 73000 128 F
183100 157500 1.16 F 153900 157500 0.98 E 183400 157500 1.16 F
175700 157500 1.12 F 175600 157500 1.11 F 176100 157500 1.12 F
161100 157500 1.02 F 162000 15�500 1.03 F 162200 157500 1.03 F
169300 157500 1.07 F 171900 157500 1.09 F 170900 157500 1.09 F
154800 106200 1.46 F 155100 106200 1.46 F 154100 106200 1.45 F
163700 106200 1.54 F 164900 106200 1.55 F 164100 106200 1.55 F
157600 157500 1.00 F 157400 157500 1.00 E 158100 157500 1.00 F
159500 157500 1.01 F 159400 157500 1.01 F 159800 157500 1.01 F
193200 157500 123 F 193200 157500 123 F 193200 157500 123 F
193500 157500 1.23 F 193200 157500 1.23 F 193400 157500 123 F
129200 117300 1.10 F 128200 117300 1.09 F 129200 117300 1.10 F
124100 117300 1.06 F 134500 117300 1.15 F 134500 117300 1.15 F
148400 117300 127 F 149000 117300 127 F 150000 117300 128 F
152400 117300 1.30 F 152100 117300 1.30 F 152000 117300 1.30 F
135800 117300 1.16 F 135200 117300 1.15 F 134400 117300 1.15 F
145000 117300 124 F 145900 117300 124 F 145000 117300 124 F
162600 117300 1.39 F 163200 117300 1.39 F 163300 117300 1.39 F
161500 157500 1.03 F 162800 157500 1.03 F 161400 157500 1.02 F
176200 157500 1.12 F 174600 15�500 1.11 F 176000 157500 1.12 F
161200 157500 1.02 F 160200 157500 1.02 F 160900 157500 1.02 F
148900 198100 0.75 D 148300 198100 0.75 D 150700 198100 0.76 D
111200 118600 0.94 E 111300 118600 0.94 E 106200 118600 0.90 E
108900 118600 0.92 E 108400 118600 0.91 E 99700 118600 0.84 D
68600 118600 0.58 C 68000 118600 0.57 C 61600 118600 0.52 C
77500 115600 0.65 C 77700 118600 0.66 C 77000 118600 0.65 C
72200 75600 0.92 E 72400 78600 0.92 E 71700 78600 0.91 E
115700 157500 0.75 D 118700 157500 0.75 D 108200 157500 0.69 C
156500 157500 0.99 E 157700 157500 1.00 F 142300 157500 0.90 E
126400 117300 1.08 F 126700 117300 1.08 F 123400 117300 1.05 F
106900 91100 1.17 F 107200 91100 1.18 F 105500 91100 1.16 F
110100 91100 1.21 F 110300 91100 121 F 110100 91100 121 F
108500 91100 1.19 F 108600 91100 1.19 F 105900 91100 1.16 F
123600 90700 1.36 F 123900 90700 1.37 F 120100 90700 1.32 F
116400 90700 1.28 F 117300 90700 129 F 114300 90700 126 F
56900 90700 0.96 E 87200 90700 0.96 E 89300 90700 0.98 E
56600 91100 0.62 C 56400 91100 0.62 C 84000 91100 0.92 E
87000 88500 0.98 E 87000 88500 0.98 E 86700 88500 0.98 E
56500 88500 0.64 C 56500 58500 0.64 C 56400 88500 0.64 C
40400 110�00 0.36 B 40400 110700 0.36 B 40500 110700 0.37 B
40400 110700 0.36 B 40400 110700 0.36 B 40500 110700 0.37 B
39600 110700 0.36 B 39600 110700 0.36 B 39700 110700 0.36 B
30400 96000 0.32 B 30100 96000 0.31 B 29500 96000 0.31 B
53700 88500 0.61 C 53700 88500 0.61 C 53500 88500 0.60 C
56500 88500 0.64 C 56300 88500 0.64 C 55800 88500 0.63 C
54400 88500 0.61 C 54200 88500 0.61 C 53700 88500 0.61 C
62400 88500 071 C 61700 88500 O70 C 61400 88500 0.69 C
64000 88500 0.72 D 64000 88500 0.72 D 64200 88500 0.73 D
68200 88500 0.77 D 68200 88500 0.77 D 68000 88500 0.77 D
78600 88500 0.89 D 78600 88500 0.89 D 78200 88500 0.88 D
59000 88500 0.67 C 59000 88500 0.67 C 59000 88500 0.67 C
43700 88900 0.49 B 43700 88900 0.49 B 44000 88900 0.49 B
57500 88900 0.65 C 57500 58900 0.65 C 57000 88900 0.64 C
67900 88900 0.76 D 67900 88900 0.76 D 67200 88900 0.76 D
64200 88900 0.72 C 64200 88900 0.72 C 66800 88900 0.75 D
46800 88900 0.53 C 46800 88900 0.53 C 52900 88900 0.60 C
36300 88900 0.41 B 36300 88900 0.41 B 48700 88900 0.55 C
33000 91600 0.36 B
53900 91600 0.59 C
65700 91600 072 C
70500 91600 0.77 D
71600 91600 0.78 D
93100 91600 1.02 F
52600 69600 0.76 D 52600 69600 0.76 D 50300 69600 0.72 D
61700 69600 0.89 D 61700 69600 0.89 D 62200 69600 0.89 E
54700 81300 0.67 C 54600 81300 0.67 C 54700 81300 0.67 C
66600 81300 0.82 D 66600 81300 0.82 D 66200 81300 0.81 D
89700 81300 1.10 F 89700 81300 1.10 F 89100 81300 1.10 F
100000 81300 1.23 F 100000 51300 123 F 99300 81300 122 F
125600 120200 1.04 F 125600 120200 1.04 F 124900 120200 1.04 F
159300 120200 1.33 F 158900 120200 1.32 F 158000 120200 1.31 F
106500 120200 0.89 D 105300 120200 0.88 D 105100 120200 0.87 D
55100 45400 128 F 56900 45400 125 F 57100 45400 1.26 F
58100 45400 1.28 F 56900 45400 125 F 57100 45400 126 F
29900 45400 0.66 B 30000 45400 0.66 B 30300 45400 0.67 B
33000 45400 0.73 B 33300 45400 0.73 B 33700 45400 0.74 B
44900 45400 0.99 E 45200 45400 1.00 E 46200 45400 1.02 F

2011 Build
Southem Toll,
2011 Build Non 2011 Build Toll Eastern Non- 2035 Build Non- 2035 Build Toll
ID Facility From To NCLOS ID Toll AADT Capacity V/C LOS AADT Capacity V/C LOS Toll AADT Capacity V/C LOS Toll AADT Capacity V/C LOS AADT Capacity V/C LOS
Ten Ten 2 Ten Ten Rd Graham Newton Rd Blaney Franks Rd Ten Ten 2 4000 23800 0.17 A 12300 23800 0.52 A 12300 23800 0.52 A 10100 23800 0.42 A 10000 23800 0.42 A
Ten Ten 2 Ten Ten Rd Blane Franks Rd Lake Wheeler Rd Ten Ten 2 5600 23800 024 A 13200 23800 0.55 A 13200 23800 0.55 A 11100 23800 0.47 A 11100 23800 0.47 A
Ten Ten 2 Ten Ten Rd Lake Wheeler Rd US 401 Ten Ten 2 8900 23800 0.37 A 15000 23800 0.63 B 15000 23800 0.63 B 16200 23800 0.68 B 16200 23800 0.68 B
Ten Ten 2 Ten Ten Rd US 401 Fann Brown Rd Ten Ten 2 7000 23800 029 A 16200 23800 0.68 B 7000 23800 0.29 A 16000 23800 0.67 B 16000 23800 0.67 B
Ten Ten 2 Ten Ten Rd Fanny Brown Rd Old Sta e Rd Ten Ten 2 2800 23800 0.12 A 3100 23800 0.13 A 3100 23800 0.13 A 11300 23800 0.47 A 11300 23800 0.47 A
Ten Ten 2 Ten Ten Rd Old Sta e Rd Rand Rd Ten Ten 2 6700 23800 0.28 A 6800 23800 029 A 6800 23800 029 A 19000 23800 0.80 C 18900 23800 0.79 C
Ten Ten 2 Ten Ten Rd Rand Rd Sauls Rd Ten Ten 2 4500 23800 0.19 A 4300 23800 0.18 A 4300 23800 0.18 A 15400 23800 0.65 B 15400 23800 0.65 B
Ten Ten 2 Ten Ten Rd Sauls Rd NC 50 Ten Ten 2 8800 23800 0.37 A 8800 23800 0.37 A 8800 23800 0.37 A 14100 23800 0.59 A 14100 23800 0.59 A
NC 50 2 NC 50 Cleveland Rd S Wake Frwy 2LH 3 12400 28600 0.43 D 12400 28600 0.43 D 12400 28600 0.43 D 17300 28600 0.60 E 17400 28600 0.61 E
NC 50 2 NC 50 S Wake Frw Ten Ten Rd 2LH 3 12400 28600 0.43 D 12400 28600 0.43 D 12400 28600 0.43 D 17300 28600 0.60 E 17400 28600 0.61 E
NC 50 2 NC 50 Ten Ten Rd Rand Rd 2LH 3 9700 28600 0.34 D 9600 28600 0.34 D 9700 28600 0.34 D 14300 28600 0.50 E 14300 28600 0.50 E
NC 50 2 NC 50 Rand Rd Buffaloe Rd 2LH 3 17400 28600 0.61 E 17400 28600 0.61 E 17600 28600 0.62 E 26200 28600 0.92 E 26500 28600 0.93 E
NC 50 2 NC 50 Buffaloe Rd New Bethel Rd 2LH 3 15200 28600 0.53 E 15200 28600 0.53 E 15200 28600 0.53 E 19000 28600 0.66 E 25500 28600 0.89 E
NC 50 2 NC 50 New Bethel Rd New Rand Rd 2LH 3 18000 28600 0.63 E 18000 28600 0.63 E 18000 28600 0.63 E 25500 28600 0.89 E 28900 28600 1.01 F
NC 50 1 NC 50 New Rand Rd Timber Dr NC 50 1 11000 18800 0.59 A 10900 18800 0.58 A 10900 18800 0.58 A 12500 18800 0.66 B 12300 18800 0.65 B
NC 50 1 NC 50 Timber Dr Lakeside Dr NC 50 1 11000 18800 0.59 A 10900 18800 0.58 A 10900 18800 0.58 A 12500 18800 0.66 B 12300 18800 0.65 B
NC 50 1 NC 50 Lakeside Dr US 70 NC 50 1 11000 18800 0.59 A 10900 18800 0.58 A 10900 18800 0.58 A 12500 18800 0.66 B 12300 18800 0.65 B
Hammond 1 Hammond Rd I-40 Rush St Hammond 23100 39300 0.59 C 23300 39300 0.59 C 23600 39300 0.60 C 34700 39300 0.88 D 34700 39300 0.88 D
Hammond 1 Hammond Rd Rush St Tryon Rd Hammond 24000 39300 0.61 C 24800 39300 0.63 C 24300 39300 0.62 C 37000 39300 0.94 D 37200 39300 0.95 D
Hammond 1 Hammond Rd Tr on Rd Mechanical Blvd Hammond 17600 39300 0.45 C 20900 39300 0.53 C 19700 39300 0.50 C 33600 39300 0.85 D 38900 39300 0.99 E
Hammond 1 Hammond Rd Mechanical Blvd US 70 Hammond 17600 39300 0.45 C 20900 39300 0.53 C 19700 39300 0.50 C 33600 39300 0.85 D 38900 39300 0.99 E
Timber 1 Timber Dr US 70 Foxwood Dr Timber 15700 32600 0.48 B 22300 32600 0.68 C 19200 32600 0.59 B 30200 32600 0.93 D 25000 32600 0.77 C
Timber 1 Timber Dr Foxwood Dr Grovemont Rd Timber 15700 32600 0.48 B 22300 32600 0.68 C 19200 32600 0.59 B 30200 32600 0.93 D 25000 32600 0.77 C
Timber 1 Timber Dr Grovemont Rd Vandora S rin s Timber 19200 32600 0.59 B 21300 32600 0.65 C 19200 32600 0.59 B 27100 32600 0.83 C 27100 32600 0.83 C
Timber 1 Timber Dr Vandora Springs Aversboro Rd Timber 13800 32600 0.42 B 13800 32600 0.42 B 13800 32600 0.42 B 34300 32600 1.05 F 34500 32600 1.06 F
Timber 1 Timber Dr Aversboro Rd NC 50 Timber 16900 32600 0.52 B 17200 32600 0.53 B 16900 32600 0.52 B 42800 32600 1.31 F 42800 32600 1.31 F
Timber1 TimberDr NC 50 New Rand Rd Timber 16900 32600 0.52 B 17200 32600 0.53 B 16900 32600 0.52 B 42800 32600 1.31 F 42800 32600 1.31 F
US 70 1 S Saunders St I-40 Pecan St MLH 4 56100 98700 0.57 C 55600 98700 0.56 C 55800 98700 0.57 C 66500 98700 0.67 C 66500 98700 0.67 C
US 70 1 S Saunders St Pecan St Rush St MLH 4 56100 98700 0.57 C 52100 98700 0.53 C 54500 98700 0.55 C 65900 98700 0.67 C 65300 98700 0.66 C
US 70 1 Wilmin ton St Rush St Tr on Rd MLH 4 50600 98700 0.51 C 50900 98700 0.52 C 59200 98700 0.60 C 79200 98700 0.80 D 77700 98700 079 D
US 70 2 US 70 Tryon Rd Timber Dr MLH 1 30800 65800 0.47 B 32900 65800 0.50 C 30700 65800 0.47 B 40500 65800 0.62 C 39500 65800 0.60 C
US 70 2 US 70 Timber Dr Year an Rd MLH 1 30000 65800 0.46 B 26800 65800 0.41 B 28900 65800 0.44 B 43200 65800 0.66 C 42900 65800 0.65 C
US 70 2 US 70 Yeargan Rd Vandora Springs MLH 1 30000 65800 0.46 B 26800 65800 0.41 B 28900 65800 0.44 B 43200 65800 0.66 C 42900 65800 0.65 C
US 70 2 US 70 Vandora S rin s Aversboro Rd MLH 1 28600 65800 0.43 B 28600 65800 0.43 B 28600 65800 0.43 B 53500 65800 0.81 D 53200 65800 0.81 D
US 70 2 US 70 Aversboro Rd NC 50 MLH 1 28600 65800 0.43 B 28600 65800 0.43 B 28600 65800 0.43 B 53500 65800 0.81 D 53200 65800 0.81 D
US 70 2 US 70 NC 50 New Rand Rd MLH 1 21900 65800 0.33 B 21900 65800 0.33 B 21900 65800 0.33 B 40900 65800 0.62 C 40700 65800 0.62 C
US 70 2 US 70 New Rand Rd Timber Dr Conn MLH 1 31100 65800 0.47 C 31200 65800 0.47 C 31100 65800 0.47 C 36700 65800 0.56 C 36700 65800 0.56 C
US 70 2 US 70 Timber Dr Conn White Oak Rd MLH 1 31100 65800 0.47 C 31200 65800 0.47 C 31100 65800 0.47 C 36700 65800 0.56 C 36700 65800 0.56 C
US 70 2 US 70 White Oak Rd I-40 MLH 1 27500 65800 0.42 B 27600 65800 0.42 B 27500 65800 0.42 B 48800 65800 0.74 D 48800 65800 0.74 D
US 70 3 US 70 I-40 Greenfield Pkw MLH 2 44600 71500 0.62 C 50900 71500 071 D 50600 71500 071 D 70500 71500 0.99 E 70000 71500 0.98 E
US 70 3 US 70 Greenfield Pkwy Auburn Knightdale Rd MLH 2 44600 71500 0.62 C 50900 71500 0.71 D 50600 71500 0.71 D 70500 71500 0.99 E 70000 71500 0.98 E
US 70 3 US 70 Aubum Knightdale Rd E Wake Frwy MLH 2 44600 71500 0.62 C 50900 71500 071 D 50600 71500 071 D 70500 71500 0.99 E 70000 71500 0.98 E
US 70 3 US 70 E Wake Frvvy Guy Rd MLH 2 58000 71500 0.81 D 58000 71500 0.81 D 58000 71500 0.81 D 91000 71500 127 F 91000 71500 127 F
NC 55 2 NC 55 US 1 Jessie Dr MLH 6 47800 52200 0.92 E 47800 52200 0.92 E 47800 52200 0.92 E 51700 52200 0.99 E 52200 52200 1.00 E
NC 55 2 NC 55 Jessie Dr Main St MLH 6 47800 52200 0.92 E 47800 52200 0.92 E 47800 52200 0.92 E 51700 52200 0.99 E 52200 52200 1.00 E
NC 55 2 NC 55 B pass Main St W Wake Frwy MLH 3 28900 53600 0.54 C 28900 53600 0.54 C 28900 53600 0.54 C 36200 53600 0.68 C 37000 53600 0.69 D
NC 55 2 NC 55 Bypass W Wake Frwy Holly Springs Rd MLH 3 30400 53600 0.57 C 30400 53600 0.57 C 30400 53600 0.57 C 53800 53600 1.00 F 54800 53600 1.02 F
NC 55 2 NC 55 B ass Holl S rings Rd Avent Ferr Rd MLH 3 30200 53600 0.56 C 30200 53600 0.56 C 30200 53600 0.56 C 57500 53600 1.07 F 58000 53600 1.08 F
NC 55 2 NC 55 Bypass Avent Ferry Rd NC 55 Bypass MLH 3 30300 53600 0.57 C 30400 53600 0.57 C 30400 53600 0.57 C 61300 53600 1.14 F 61800 53600 1.15 F
NC 55 2 NC 55 NC 55 B ass Hillto -Needmore Rd MLH 3 24600 53600 0.46 B 24600 53600 0.46 B 24600 53600 0.46 B 56400 53600 1.05 F 56400 53600 1.05 F
NC 55 2 NC 55 Hilltop-Needmore Rd James Slau hter Rd MLH 3 24600 53600 0.46 B 24600 53600 0.46 B 24600 53600 0.46 B 56400 53600 1.05 F 56400 53600 1.05 F
NC 55 2 NC 55 James Slau hter Rd Wake Cha el Rd MLH 3 23800 53600 0.44 B 23900 53600 0.45 B 23800 53600 0.44 B 38200 53600 0.71 D 38200 53600 0.71 D
NC 55 2 NC 55 Wake Chapel Rd Broad St MLH 3 15000 53600 028 A 15000 53600 028 A 15000 53600 028 A 14000 53600 026 A 14000 53600 0.26 A
NC 55 1 NC 55 Broad St US 401 NC 55 1 15000 15300 0.98 E 15000 15300 0.98 E 15000 15300 0.98 E 14000 15300 0.92 D 14000 15300 0.92 D
US 401 1 US 401 NC 55 Judd Pkwy MLH 2 24400 71500 0.34 B 38000 71500 0.53 C 24400 71500 0.34 B 24600 71500 0.34 B 24800 71500 0.35 B
US 401 1 US 401 Judd Pkw Sunset Lake Rd MLH 2 28300 71500 0.40 B 28300 71500 0.40 B 28300 71500 0.40 B 47700 71500 0.67 C 47700 71500 0.67 C
US 401 1 US 401 Sunset Lake Rd NC 55 MLH 2 38000 71500 0.53 C 38000 71500 0.53 C 38000 71500 0.53 C 49400 71500 0.69 D 49400 71500 0.69 D
NC 42 3 NC 42 US 401 NC 55 2LH 2 9600 28600 0.34 E 9600 28600 0.34 E 9600 28600 0.34 E 14100 28600 0.49 E 14100 28600 0.49 E
NC 42 3 NC 42 NC 55 Eastern Pkwy 2LH 2 9600 28600 0.34 E 9600 28600 0.34 E 9600 28600 0.34 E 14100 28600 0.49 E 14100 28600 0.49 E
NC 42 3 NC 42 Eastern Pkwy Kennebec Rd 2LH 2 9600 28600 0.34 E 9600 28600 0.34 E 9600 28600 0.34 E 14100 28600 0.49 E 14100 28600 0.49 E
NC 42 3 NC 42 Kennebec Rd Panther Lake Rd 2LH 2 9300 28600 0.33 E 10400 28600 0.36 E 10400 28600 0.36 E 18700 28600 0.65 E 19000 28600 0.66 E
NC 42 3 NC 42 Panther Lake Rd Hillto Rd 2LH 2 10900 28600 0.38 E 9700 28600 0.34 E 9700 28600 0.34 E 16600 28600 0.58 E 16500 28600 0.58 E
NC 42 3 NC 42 Hilltop Rd Old Stage Rd 2LH 2 10900 28600 0.38 E 9700 28600 0.34 E 9700 28600 0.34 E 16600 28600 0.58 E 16500 28600 0.58 E
NC 42 3 NC 42 Old Stage Rd Mt. Pleasant Church Rd 2LH 2 6500 28600 023 D 6500 28600 023 D 6600 28600 023 D 15300 28600 0.53 E 15300 28600 0.53 E
NC 42 3 NC 42 Mt. Pleasant Church Rd Rock Service St 2LH 2 6700 28600 023 D 6700 28600 023 D 6700 28600 023 D 14900 28600 0.52 E 14900 28600 0.52 E
NC 42 3 NC 42 Rock Service St Sauls Rd 2LH 2 8200 28600 0.29 E 8200 28600 029 E 8200 28600 029 E 16000 28600 0.56 E 16000 28600 0.56 E
NC 42 3 NC 42 Sauls Rd NC 50 2LH 2 8200 28600 0.29 E 8200 28600 029 E 8200 28600 029 E 16000 28600 0.56 E 16000 28600 0.56 E
NC 42 3 NC 42 NC 50 Old Dru Store Ln 2LH 2 7000 28600 0.24 D 7000 28600 024 D 7000 28600 0.24 D 11700 28600 0.41 E 11600 28600 0.41 E
NC 42 1 NC 42 Old Dru Store Ln I-40 NC 42 1 24500 26400 0.93 E 24600 26400 0.93 E 24600 26400 0.93 E 32500 26400 123 F 32500 26400 123 F
NC 42 2 NC 42 I-40 Bratton Dr NC 42 2 11300 40700 028 D 11300 40700 0.28 D 11300 40700 0.28 D 19000 40700 0.47 D 19000 40700 0.47 D
NC 42 4 NC 42 Bratton Dr Cornwallis Rd 2LH 1 11300 40900 0.28 E 11300 40900 028 E 11300 40900 028 E 19000 40900 0.46 E 19000 40900 0.46 E
NC 42 4 NC 42 Cornwallis Rd Government Rd 2LH 1 11500 40900 028 E 11500 40900 028 E 11500 40900 028 E 22400 40900 0.55 E 22600 40900 0.55 E
NC 42 4 NC 42 Government Rd Clayton Bypass 2LH 1 12600 40900 0.31 E 12600 40900 0.31 E 12600 40900 0.31 E 22000 40900 0.54 E 22200 40900 0.54 E

2035 Build
2035 Build 2035 Build Southern Toll,
Southern Non-Toll, Southern Toll, No Eastern Non-Toll
No Eastem AADT Capacity V/C LOS Eastem AADT Capacity V/C LOS AADT Capacity V/C LOS
9900 23800 0.42 A 10100 23800 0.42 A 10000 23800 0.42 A
11200 23800 0.47 A 11200 23800 0.47 A 11100 23800 0.47 A
16400 23800 0.69 B 16400 23800 0.69 B 16300 23800 0.68 B
16600 23800 0.70 B 16500 23800 0.69 B 16200 23800 0.68 B
12100 23800 0.51 A 12400 23800 0.52 A 11200 23800 0.47 A
19200 23800 0.81 C 19300 23800 0.81 C 18800 23800 0J9 C
15900 23800 0.67 B 15800 23800 0.66 B 15400 23800 0.65 B
13200 23800 0.55 A 13200 23800 0.55 A 14100 23800 0.59 A
16300 28600 0.57 E 14900 28600 0.52 E 17500 28600 0.61 E
16300 28600 0.57 E 14900 28600 0.52 E 17500 28600 0.61 E
15200 28600 0.53 E 15200 28600 0.53 E 14300 28600 0.50 E
28100 28600 0.98 E 28300 28600 0.99 E 26400 28600 0.92 E
26400 28600 0.92 E 26800 28600 0.94 E 25500 28600 0.89 E
30300 28600 1.06 F 30700 28600 1.07 F 28900 28600 1.01 F
12700 18800 0.68 B 12900 15800 0.69 B 14200 18800 0.76 C
12700 18800 0.68 B 12900 18800 0.69 B 14200 18800 0.76 C
12700 18800 0.68 B 12900 18800 0.69 B 14200 18800 0.76 C
36100 39300 0.92 D 37500 39300 0.95 D 34700 39300 0.88 D
38800 39300 0.99 E 39700 39300 1.01 E 34700 39300 0.88 D
35700 39300 0.91 D 36600 39300 0.93 D 35100 39300 0.89 D
35700 39300 0.91 D 36600 39300 0.93 D 35100 39300 0.89 D
25800 32600 0.79 C 32800 32600 1.01 F 30200 32600 0.93 D
25500 32600 0.79 C 32800 32600 1.01 F 30200 32600 0.93 D
21300 32600 0.65 C 28800 32600 0.88 C 26800 32600 0.82 C
40900 32600 125 F 40600 32600 125 F 34500 32600 1.06 F
45400 32600 1.48 F 47300 32600 1.45 F 43000 32600 1.32 F
45400 32600 1.48 F 47300 32600 1.45 F 43000 32600 1.32 F
68100 98700 0.69 D 67600 98700 0.68 D 67300 98700 0.68 D
67700 98700 0.69 D 67000 98700 0.68 C 65300 98700 0.66 C
76900 98700 078 D 67700 98700 0.69 D 66700 98700 0.68 C
93500 65800 1.42 F 92600 65800 1.41 F 39700 65800 0.60 C
44000 65800 0.67 C 43800 65800 0.67 C 44600 65800 0.68 C
44000 65800 0.67 C 43800 65800 0.67 C 44600 65800 0.68 C
53200 65800 0.81 D 53500 65800 0.81 D 53100 65800 0.81 D
53200 65800 0.81 D 53500 65800 0.81 D 53100 65800 0.81 D
39900 65800 0.61 C 40900 65800 0.62 C 39900 65800 0.61 C
36500 65800 0.55 C 36400 65800 0.55 C 36800 65800 0.56 C
36500 65800 0.55 C 36400 65800 0.55 C 36800 65800 0.56 C
51200 65800 0.78 D 50000 65800 0.76 D 48800 65800 0.74 D
77800 71500 1.09 F 78500 71500 1.10 F 70000 71500 0.98 E
77800 71500 1.09 F 78500 71500 1.10 F 70000 71500 0.98 E
77800 71500 1.09 F 78500 71500 1.10 F 70000 71500 0.98 E
77300 71500 1.08 F 77700 71500 1.09 F 91000 71500 127 F
52100 52200 1.00 E 52200 52200 1.00 E 52600 52200 1.01 F
52100 52200 1.00 E 52200 52200 1.00 E 52600 52200 1.01 F
34500 53600 0.64 C 36200 53600 0.68 C 36900 53600 0.69 D
51200 53600 0.96 E 54300 53600 1.01 F 54400 53600 1.01 F
56200 53600 1.05 F 57800 53600 1.08 F 57600 53600 1.07 F
59800 53600 1.12 F 61000 53600 1.14 F 61600 53600 1.15 F
56500 53600 1.05 F 56400 53600 1.05 F 56600 53600 1.06 F
56500 53600 1.05 F 56400 53600 1.05 F 56600 53600 1.06 F
38200 53600 0.71 D 38400 53600 0.72 D 38200 53600 0.71 D
14900 53600 028 A 14200 53600 026 A 14300 53600 0.27 A
14900 15300 0.97 E 14200 15300 0.93 D 14300 15300 0.93 D
25900 71500 0.36 B 25100 71500 0.35 B 25100 71500 0.35 B
47700 71500 0.67 C 47700 71500 0.67 C 47700 71500 0.67 C
49100 71500 0.69 D 49400 71500 0.69 D 49400 71500 0.69 D
14100 28600 0.49 E 14100 28600 0.49 E 14100 28600 0.49 E
14100 28600 0.49 E 14100 28600 0.49 E 14100 28600 0.49 E
14100 28600 0.49 E 14100 28600 0.49 E 14100 28600 0.49 E
18900 28600 0.66 E 19000 28600 0.66 E 18900 28600 0.66 E
16600 28600 0.58 E 16600 28600 0.58 E 16600 28600 0.58 E
16600 28600 0.58 E 16600 25600 0.58 E 16600 28600 0.58 E
15400 28600 0.54 E 15400 28600 0.54 E 15300 28600 0.53 E
15100 28600 0.53 E 15100 28600 0.53 E 15000 28600 0.52 E
16000 28600 0.56 E 15900 28600 0.56 E 16000 28600 0.56 E
16000 28600 0.56 E 15900 28600 0.56 E 16000 28600 0.56 E
11900 28600 0.42 E 11800 28600 0.41 E 11600 28600 0.41 E
33100 26400 125 F 33000 26400 125 F 32400 26400 1.23 F
21100 40700 0.52 D 21000 40700 0.52 D 19300 40700 0.47 D
21100 40900 0.52 E 21000 40900 0.51 E 19300 40900 0.47 E
24000 40900 0.59 E 24100 40900 0.59 E 23000 40900 0.56 E
23800 40900 0.58 E 23900 40900 0.58 E 22600 40900 0.55 E

Facility Name
Project Name:
Region Type:
Facility Type:
Classification
Terrain Type:
Street Class:
2LH 1
SE Wake Capacity Analysis
Piedmont
Two Lane Highway
Rural
Level
I
Lane Width(ft): 12
Lat. Clearance(ft): 6
No Passing Zones: 20.00 %
Access Points/Mile: 10
Grade Length(mi): 0.00
Grade Percent: 0.00 %
PHF:
K Factor:
D Factor:
Printed At: 9:23:13AM On: 5/7/2009
0.90
0.07
0.60
LOS
A
B
C
D
D
Organization: HNTB
Truck/Bus Percent: 7.00 %
RV Percent: 0.00 %
BFFS(mph): 50
Max AADT
0
0
2,800
10,000
40,900

Facility Name
Project Name:
Region Type:
Facility Type:
Classification
Terrain Type:
Street Class:
2LH 2
SE Wake Capacity Analysis
Piedmont
Two Lane Highway
Rural
Level
I
Lane Width(ft): 12
Lat. Clearance(ft): 6
No Passing Zones: 20.00 %
Access Points/Mile: 10
Grade Length(mi): 0.00
Grade Percent: 0.00 %
PHF:
K Factor:
D Factor:
Printed At: 9:24:04AM On: 5/7/2009
0.90
0.10
0.65
LOS
A
B
C
D
D
Organization: HNTB
Truck/Bus Percent: 6.00 %
RV Percent: 0.00 %
BFFS(mph): 50
Max AADT
0
0
2,000
7,000
28,600

Facility Name
Project Name:
Region Type:
Facility Type:
Classification
Terrain Type:
Street Class:
2LH 3
SE Wake Capacity Analysis
Piedmont
Two Lane Highway
Rural
Level
I
Lane Width(ft): 12
Lat. Clearance(ft): 6
No Passing Zones: 20.00 %
Access Points/Mile: 10
Grade Length(mi): 0.00
Grade Percent: 0.00 %
PHF:
K Factor:
D Factor:
Printed At:10:16:15AM On: 5/7/2009
0.90
0.10
0.70
LOS
A
B
C
D
D
Organization: HNTB
Truck/Bus Percent: 6.00 %
RV Percent: 0.00 %
BFFS(mph): 55
Max AADT
0
2,000
7,000
13,700
28,600

Facility Name
Project Name:
Region Type:
Facility Type:
Classification:
Terrain Type:
Fl
SE Wake Capacity Analysis
Piedmont
Freeway
Suburban
Level
Lane Width(ft):
Number of Lanes:
Interchanges/Mile:
Lat. Clearance(ft):
Grade Length(mi):
Grade Percent:
PHF:
K Factor:
D Factor:
Printed At: 4:45:29PM On: 5/4/2009
12
2
0.75
6
0.00
0.00 %
0.90
0.08
0.60
LOS
A
B
C
D
E
Organization: HNTB
RV Percent: 0.00 %
Truck/Bus Percent: 16.00 %
Driver Population: 1.00
Max AADT
24,500
40,100
57,700
72,200
81,300

Facility Name
Project Name:
Region Type:
Facility Type:
Classification:
Terrain Type:
F10
SE Wake Capacity Analysis
Piedmont
Freeway
Suburban
Level
Lane Width(ft):
Number of Lanes:
Interchanges/Mile:
Lat. Clearance(ft):
Grade Length(mi):
Grade Percent:
PHF:
K Factor:
D Factor:
Printed At: 4:21:21PM On: 5/5/2009
12
3
0.75
6
0.00
0.00 %
0.90
0.09
0.55
LOS
A
B
C
D
E
Organization: HNTB
RV Percent: 0.00 %
Truck/Bus Percent: 14.00 %
Driver Population: 1.00
Max AADT
36,800
60,300
86,400
107,000
120,200

Facility Name
Project Name:
Region Type:
Facility Type:
Classification:
Terrain Type:
F11
SE Wake Capacity Analysis
Piedmont
Freeway
Suburban
Level
Lane Width(ft):
Number of Lanes:
Interchanges/Mile:
Lat. Clearance(ft):
Grade Length(mi):
Grade Percent:
PHF:
K Factor:
D Factor:
Printed At: 4:22:24PM On: 5/5/2009
12
5
1.00
6
0.00
0.00 %
0.90
0.09
0.55
LOS
A
B
C
D
E
Organization: HNTB
RV Percent: 0.00 %
Truck/Bus Percent: 18.00 %
Driver Population: 1.00
Max AADT
61,900
101,300
144,200
176,900
198,100

Facility Name
Project Name:
Region Type:
Facility Type:
Classification:
Terrain Type:
F12
SE Wake Capacity Analysis
Piedmont
Freeway
Suburban
Level
Lane Width(ft):
Number of Lanes:
Interchanges/Mile:
Lat. Clearance(ft):
Grade Length(mi):
Grade Percent:
PHF:
K Factor:
D Factor:
Printed At: 4:23:1 OPM On: 5/5/2009
12
2
1.00
6
0.00
0.00 %
0.90
0.09
0.55
LOS
A
B
C
D
E
Organization: HNTB
RV Percent: 0.00 %
Truck/Bus Percent: 6.00 %
Driver Population: 1.00
Max AADT
24,500
40,000
57,800
72,900
82,300

Facility Name
Project Name:
Region Type:
Facility Type:
Classification:
Terrain Type:
F 13
SE Wake Capacity Analysis
Piedmont
Freeway
Suburban
Level
Lane Width(ft):
Number of Lanes:
Interchanges/Mile:
Lat. Clearance(ft):
Grade Length(mi):
Grade Percent:
PHF:
K Factor:
D Factor:
Printed At: 3:07:47PM On: 5/6/2009
12
3
0.50
6
0.00
0.00 %
0.90
0.09
0.55
LOS
A
B
C
D
E
Organization: HNTB
RV Percent: 0.00 %
Truck/Bus Percent: 18.00 %
Driver Population: 1.00
Max AADT
36,900
60,400
86,100
105,900
118,600

Facility Name
Project Name:
Region Type:
Facility Type:
Classification:
Terrain Type:
F14
SE Wake Capacity Analysis
Piedmont
Freeway
Suburban
Level
Lane Width(ft):
Number of Lanes:
Interchanges/Mile:
Lat. Clearance(ft):
Grade Length(mi):
Grade Percent:
PHF:
K Factor:
D Factor:
Printed At: 3:08:11PM On: 5/6/2009
12
2
1.00
6
0.00
0.00 %
0.90
0.09
0.55
LOS
A
B
C
D
E
Organization: HNTB
RV Percent: 0.00 %
Truck/Bus Percent: 18.00 %
Driver Population: 1.00
Max AADT
23,100
37,800
54,600
68,800
77,700

Facility Name
Project Name:
Region Type:
Facility Type:
Classification:
Terrain Type:
F15
SE Wake Capacity Analysis
Piedmont
Freeway
Suburban
Level
Lane Width(ft):
Number of Lanes:
Interchanges/Mile:
Lat. Clearance(ft):
Grade Length(mi):
Grade Percent:
PHF:
K Factor:
D Factor:
Printed At: 3:08:32PM On: 5/6/2009
12
3
0.75
6
0.00
0.00 %
0.90
0.11
0.60
LOS
A
B
C
D
E
Organization: HNTB
RV Percent: 0.00 %
Truck/Bus Percent: 18.00 %
Driver Population: 1.00
Max AADT
27,100
44,400
63,600
78,800
88,500

Facility Name
Project Name:
Region Type:
Facility Type:
Classification:
Terrain Type:
F16
SE Wake Capacity Analysis
Piedmont
Freeway
Suburban
Level
Lane Width(ft):
Number of Lanes:
Interchanges/Mile:
Lat. Clearance(ft):
Grade Length(mi):
Grade Percent:
PHF:
K Factor:
D Factor:
Printed At: 3:08:S1PM On:S/6/2009
12
3
0.75
6
0.00
0.00 %
0.90
0.10
0.55
LOS
A
B
C
D
E
Organization: HNTB
RV Percent: 0.00 %
Truck/Bus Percent: 9.00 %
Driver Population: 1.00
Max AADT
34,000
55,600
79,600
98,600
110,700

Facility Name
Project Name:
Region Type:
Facility Type:
Classification:
Terrain Type:
F17
SE Wake Capacity Analysis
Piedmont
Freeway
Suburban
Level
Lane Width(ft):
Number of Lanes:
Interchanges/Mile:
Lat. Clearance(ft):
Grade Length(mi):
Grade Percent:
PHF:
K Factor:
D Factor:
Printed At: 3:09:07PM On: 5/6/2009
12
3
0.50
6
0.00
0.00 %
0.90
0.11
0.60
LOS
A
B
C
D
E
Organization: HNTB
RV Percent: 0.00 %
Truck/Bus Percent: 18.00 %
Driver Population: 1.00
Max AADT
27,700
45,300
64, 600
79,400
88,900

Facility Name
Project Name:
Region Type:
Facility Type:
Classification:
Terrain Type:
F18
SE Wake Capacity Analysis
Piedmont
Freeway
Suburban
Level
Lane Width(ft):
Number of Lanes:
Interchanges/Mile:
Lat. Clearance(ft):
Grade Length(mi):
Grade Percent:
PHF:
K Factor:
D Factor:
Printed At: 3:09:21PM On:S/6/2009
12
3
0.50
6
0.00
0.00 %
0.90
0.10
0.65
LOS
A
B
C
D
E
Organization: HNTB
RV Percent: 0.00 %
Truck/Bus Percent: 15.00 %
Driver Population: 1.00
Max AADT
28,500
46,600
66,500
81, 700
91, 600

Facility Name
Project Name:
Region Type:
Facility Type:
Classification:
Terrain Type:
F2
SE Wake Capacity Analysis
Piedmont
Freeway
Suburban
Level
Lane Width(ft):
Number of Lanes:
Interchanges/Mile:
Lat. Clearance(ft):
Grade Length(mi):
Grade Percent:
PHF:
K Factor:
D Factor:
Printed At: 4:47:25PM On: 5/4/2009
12
2
0.50
6
0.00
0.00 %
0.90
0.09
0.55
LOS
A
B
C
D
E
Organization: HNTB
RV Percent: 0.00 %
Truck/Bus Percent: 18.00 %
Driver Population: 1.00
Max AADT
24,000
39,300
56,400
70,000
78,600

Facility Name
Project Name:
Region Type:
Facility Type:
Classification:
Terrain Type:
F3
SE Wake Capacity Analysis
Piedmont
Freeway
Suburban
Level
Lane Width(ft):
Number of Lanes:
Interchanges/Mile:
Lat. Clearance(ft):
Grade Length(mi):
Grade Percent:
PHF:
K Factor:
D Factor:
Printed At: 4:48:15PM On: 5/4/2009
12
2
0.75
6
0.00
0.00 %
0.90
0.09
0.65
LOS
A
B
C
D
E
Organization: HNTB
RV Percent: 0.00 %
Truck/Bus Percent: 7.00 %
Driver Population: 1.00
Max AADT
21,000
34,400
49,400
61,800
69,600

Facility Name
Project Name:
Region Type:
Facility Type:
Classification:
Terrain Type:
F4
SE Wake Capacity Analysis
Piedmont
Freeway
Suburban
Level
Lane Width(ft):
Number of Lanes:
Interchanges/Mile:
Lat. Clearance(ft):
Grade Length(mi):
Grade Percent:
PHF:
K Factor:
D Factor:
Printed At: 4:49:48PM On: 5/4/2009
12
2
1.00
6
0.00
0.00 %
0.90
0.10
0.55
LOS
A
B
C
D
E
Organization: HNTB
RV Percent: 0.00 %
Truck/Bus Percent: 9.00 %
Driver Population: 1.00
Max AADT
21, 700
35,500
51,200
64,600
73,000

Facility Name
Project Name:
Region Type:
Facility Type:
Classification:
Terrain Type:
FS
SE Wake Capacity Analysis
Piedmont
Freeway
Suburban
Level
Lane Width(ft):
Number of Lanes:
Interchanges/Mile:
Lat. Clearance(ft):
Grade Length(mi):
Grade Percent:
PHF:
K Factor:
D Factor:
Printed At: 4:51:19PM On: 5/4/2009
12
3
1.00
6
0.00
0.00 %
0.90
0.09
0.55
LOS
A
B
C
D
E
Organization: HNTB
RV Percent: 0.00 %
Truck/Bus Percent: 18.00 %
Driver Population: 1.00
Max AADT
35,500
58,100
83,600
104,300
117,300

Facility Name
Project Name:
Region Type:
Facility Type:
Classification:
Terrain Type:
F6
SE Wake Capacity Analysis
Piedmont
Freeway
Suburban
Level
Lane Width(ft):
Number of Lanes:
Interchanges/Mile:
Lat. Clearance(ft):
Grade Length(mi):
Grade Percent:
PHF:
K Factor:
D Factor:
Printed At: 4:52:13PM On: 5/4/2009
12
3
0.75
6
0.00
0.00 %
0.90
0.10
0.65
LOS
A
B
C
D
E
Organization: HNTB
RV Percent: 0.00 %
Truck/Bus Percent: 15.00 %
Driver Population: 1.00
Max AADT
27,900
45,700
65,500
81,100
91,100

Facility Name
Project Name:
Region Type:
Facility Type:
Classification:
Terrain Type:
F7
SE Wake Capacity Analysis
Piedmont
Freeway
Suburban
Level
Lane Width(ft):
Number of Lanes:
Interchanges/Mile:
Lat. Clearance(ft):
Grade Length(mi):
Grade Percent:
PHF:
K Factor:
D Factor:
Printed At: 4:52:56PM On: 5/4/2009
12
3
0.75
6
0.00
0.00 %
0.90
0.10
0.65
LOS
A
B
C
D
E
Organization: HNTB
RV Percent: 0.00 %
Truck/Bus Percent: 16.00 %
Driver Population: 1.00
Max AADT
27,800
45,500
65,200
80,700
90,700

Facility Name
Project Name:
Region Type:
Facility Type:
Classification:
Terrain Type:
F8
SE Wake Capacity Analysis
Piedmont
Freeway
Suburban
Level
Lane Width(ft):
Number of Lanes:
Interchanges/Mile:
Lat. Clearance(ft):
Grade Length(mi):
Grade Percent:
PHF:
K Factor:
D Factor:
Printed At: 439:58PM On: 5/5/2009
12
3
0.75
6
0.00
0.00 %
0.90
0.10
0.55
LOS
A
B
C
D
E
Organization: HNTB
RV Percent: 0.00 %
Truck/Bus Percent: 18.00 %
Driver Population: 1.00
Max AADT
32,500
53,300
76,300
94,500
106,200

Facility Name
Project Name:
Region Type:
Facility Type:
Classification:
Terrain Type:
F9
SE Wake Capacity Analysis
Piedmont
Freeway
Suburban
Level
Lane Width(ft):
Number of Lanes:
Interchanges/Mile:
Lat. Clearance(ft):
Grade Length(mi):
Grade Percent:
PHF:
K Factor:
D Factor:
Printed At: 4:19:59PM On: 5/5/2009
12
4
1.00
6
0.00
0.00 %
0.90
0.09
0.55
LOS
A
B
C
D
E
Organization: HNTB
RV Percent: 0.00 %
Truck/Bus Percent: 18.00 %
Driver Population: 1.00
Max AADT
48,400
79,300
113,500
140,300
157,500

Facility Name
Project Name:
Hammond
SE Wake Capacity Analysis
Region Type: Piedmont
Facility Type: Arterial
Design Category: Suburban
Functional Category: Minor Arterial
Street Class: Class II
Number of Lanes:
Segment Len.(mi)
Signals/Mile:
Cycle Length(s):
g/C Ratio:
PHF:
K Factor:
D Factor:
Printed At: 9:19:25AM On: 5/7/2009
2
2.50
3.00
120
0.55
0.90
0.09
0.60
LOS
A
B
C
D
E
Organization:
Prop. Lt:
FFS(mph):
Arival Type:
Max AADT
0
0
27,400
3 8,100
39,900
HNTB
12.00 %
45
3

Facility Name
Project Name:
Region Type:
Facility Type:
Classification:
Terrain Type:
MLH 1
SE Wake Capacity Analysis
Piedmont
Multi-Lane Highway
Suburban
Level
Number of Lanes: 2
Lane Width(ft): 12
Lat. Clearance(ft): 10
Access Points/Mile: 25.00
Median Type: Divided
Grade Length(mi): 0.00
Grade Percent: 0.00 %
PHF:
K Factor:
D Factor:
Printed At: 5:09:45PM On: 5/4/2009
0.90
0.09
0.60
LOS
A
B
C
D
E
Organization: HNTB
Driver Population: 1.00
Truck/Bus Percent: 7.00 %
RV Percent: 0.00 %
Max AADT
18,900
30,900
44,700
60,100
65,800

Facility Name
Project Name:
Region Type:
Facility Type:
Classification:
Terrain Type:
MLH 2
SE Wake Capacity Analysis
Piedmont
Multi-Lane Highway
Suburban
Level
Number of Lanes: 2
Lane Width(ft): 12
Lat. Clearance(ft): 10
Access Points/Mile: 25.00
Median Type: Divided
Grade Length(mi): 0.00
Grade Percent: 0.00 %
PHF:
K Factor:
D Factor:
Printed At: 5:18:53PM On: 5/5/2009
0.90
0.09
0.55
LOS
A
B
C
D
E
Organization: HNTB
Driver Population: 1.00
Truck/Bus Percent: 8.00 %
RV Percent: 0.00 %
Max AADT
20,500
33,600
48,500
65,300
71,500

Facility Name
Project Name:
Region Type:
Facility Type:
Classification:
Terrain Type:
MLH 3
SE Wake Capacity Analysis
Piedmont
Multi-Lane Highway
Suburban
Level
Number of Lanes: 2
Lane Width(ft): 12
Lat. Clearance(ft): 10
Access Points/Mile: 25.00
Median Type: Divided
Grade Length(mi): 0.00
Grade Percent: 0.00 %
PHF:
K Factor:
D Factor:
Printed At: 5:11:59PM On: 5/4/2009
0.90
0.10
0.65
LOS
A
B
C
D
E
Organization: HNTB
Driver Population: 1.00
Truck/Bus Percent: ll.00 %
RV Percent: 0.00 %
Max AADT
15,400
25,200
36,400
49,000
53,600

Facility Name
Project Name:
Region Type:
Facility Type:
Classification:
Terrain Type:
MLH 4
SE Wake Capacity Analysis
Piedmont
Multi-Lane Highway
Suburban
Level
Number of Lanes: 3
Lane Width(ft): 12
Lat. Clearance(ft): 10
Access Points/Mile: 25.00
Median Type: Divided
Grade Length(mi): 0.00
Grade Percent: 0.00 %
PHF:
K Factor:
D Factor:
Printed At: 5:13:07PM On: 5/4/2009
0.90
0.09
0.60
LOS
A
B
C
D
E
Organization: HNTB
Driver Population: 1.00
Truck/Bus Percent: 7.00 %
RV Percent: 0.00 %
Max AADT
28,400
46,400
67,000
90,200
98,700

Facility Name
Project Name:
Region Type:
Facility Type:
Classification:
Terrain Type:
MLH 5
SE Wake Capacity Analysis
Piedmont
Multi-Lane Highway
Suburban
Level
Number of Lanes: 3
Lane Width(ft): 12
Lat. Clearance(ft): 10
Access Points/Mile: 25.00
Median Type: Divided
Grade Length(mi): 0.00
Grade Percent: 0.00 %
PHF:
K Factor:
D Factor:
Printed At: 1:40:31PM On: 5/6/2009
0.90
0.10
0.55
LOS
A
B
C
D
E
Organization: HNTB
Driver Population: 1.00
Truck/Bus Percent: 9.00 %
RV Percent: 0.00 %
Max AADT
27,600
45,100
65,200
87,700
96,000

Facility Name
Project Name:
Region Type:
Facility Type:
Classification:
Terrain Type:
MLH 6
SE Wake Capacity Analysis
Piedmont
Multi-Lane Highway
Suburban
Level
Number of Lanes: 2
Lane Width(ft): 12
Lat. Clearance(ft): 10
Access Points/Mile: 25.00
Median Type: Undivided
Grade Length(mi): 0.00
Grade Percent: 0.00 %
PHF:
K Factor:
D Factor:
0.90
0.10
0.65
LOS
A
B
C
D
E
Printed At: 9:11:28AM On: 5/14/2009
Organization: HNTB
Driver Population: 1.00
Truck/Bus Percent: ll.00 %
RV Percent: 0.00 %
Max AADT
14,900
24,400
35,300
47,500
52,200

Facility Name
Project Name:
NC 42: 1
SE Wake Capacity Analysis
Region Type: Piedmont
Facility Type: Arterial
Design Category: Intermediate
Functional Category: Minor Arterial
Street Class: Class III
Number of Lanes:
Segment Len.(mi)
Signals/Mile:
Cycle Length(s):
g/C Ratio:
PHF:
K Factor:
D Factor:
Printed At:10:25:33AM On: 5/7/2009
2
0.62
5.00
120
0.50
0.90
0.10
0.65
LOS
A
B
C
D
E
Organization:
Prop. Lt:
FFS(mph):
Arival Type:
Max AADT
0
0
400
22,000
26,400
HNTB
5.00 %
35
3

Facility Name
Project Name:
NC 42: 2
SE Wake Capacity Analysis
Region Type: Piedmont
Facility Type: Arterial
Design Category: Intermediate
Functional Category: Minor Arterial
Street Class: Class III
Number of Lanes:
Segment Len.(mi)
Signals/Mile:
Cycle Length(s):
g/C Ratio:
PHF:
K Factor:
D Factor:
Printed At:10:26:22AM On: 5/7/2009
2
0.59
5.00
120
0.50
0.90
0.07
0.60
LOS
A
B
C
D
E
Organization:
Prop. Lt:
FFS(mph):
Arival Type:
Max AADT
0
0
0
31, 700
40, 700
HNTB
5.00 %
35
3

Facility Name
Project Name:
NC 50: 1
SE Wake Capacity Analysis
Region Type: Piedmont
Facility Type: Arterial
Design Category: Suburban
Functional Category: Minor Arterial
Street Class: Class II
Number of Lanes:
Segment Len.(mi)
Signals/Mile:
Cycle Length(s):
g/C Ratio:
PHF:
K Factor:
D Factor:
Printed At: 8:46:04AM On: 5/7/2009
1
3.20
1.00
120
0.55
0.90
0.10
0.70
LOS
A
B
C
D
E
Organization:
Prop. Lt:
FFS(mph):
Arival Type:
Max AADT
11, 700
14,100
15,200
16,800
18,800
HNTB
5.00 %
45
3

Facility Name
Project Name:
NC 55: 1
SE Wake Capacity Analysis
Region Type: Piedmont
Facility Type: Arterial
Design Category: Intermediate
Functional Category: Minor Arterial
Street Class: Class III
Number of Lanes:
Segment Len.(mi)
Signals/Mile:
Cycle Length(s):
g/C Ratio:
PHF:
K Factor:
D Factor:
Printed At:10:06:48AM On: 5/7/2009
1
1.20
4.00
120
0.50
0.90
0.10
0.65
LOS
A
B
C
D
E
Organization:
Prop. Lt:
FFS(mph):
Arival Type:
Max AADT
0
0
10,800
14,400
15,300
HNTB
15.00 %
35
4

Facility Name
Project Name:
Ten Ten: 1 (2035)
SE Wake Capacity Analysis
Region Type: Piedmont
Facility Type: Arterial
Design Category: Suburban
Functional Category: Minor Arterial
Street Class: Class II
Number of Lanes:
Segment Len.(mi)
Signals/Mile:
Cycle Length(s):
g/C Ratio:
PHF:
K Factor:
D Factor:
Printed At: 8:37:13AM On: 5/7/2009
2
3.60
1.00
120
0.55
0.90
0.10
0.55
LOS
A
B
C
D
E
Organization:
Prop. Lt:
FFS(mph):
Arival Type:
Max AADT
22,400
35,200
37,600
40,900
45,400
HNTB
5.00 %
45
3

Facility Name
Project Name:
Ten Ten: 1
SE Wake Capacity Analysis
Region Type: Piedmont
Facility Type: Arterial
Design Category: Suburban
Functional Category: Minor Arterial
Street Class: Class II
Number of Lanes:
Segment Len.(mi)
Signals/Mile:
Cycle Length(s):
g/C Ratio:
PHF:
K Factor:
D Factor:
Printed At: 8:33:34AM On: 5/7/2009
1
3.60
1.00
120
0.55
0.90
0.10
0.55
LOS
A
B
C
D
E
Organization:
Prop. Lt:
FFS(mph):
Arival Type:
Max AADT
11,100
17,500
18,800
20,500
22,700
HNTB
5.00 %
45
3

Facility Name
Project Name:
Ten Ten: 2
SE Wake Capacity Analysis
Region Type: Piedmont
Facility Type: Arterial
Design Category: Suburban
Functional Category: Minor Arterial
Street Class: Class II
Number of Lanes:
Segment Len.(mi)
Signals/Mile:
Cycle Length(s):
g/C Ratio:
PHF:
K Factor:
D Factor:
Printed At: 838:29AM On:S/7/2009
1
10.40
1.00
120
0.55
0.90
0.10
0.55
LOS
A
B
C
D
E
Organization:
Prop. Lt:
FFS(mph):
Arival Type:
Max AADT
14,900
17,900
19,300
21,200
23,800
HNTB
5.00 %
45
3

Facility Name
Project Name:
Timber
SE Wake Capacity Analysis
Region Type: Piedmont
Facility Type: Arterial
Design Category: Suburban
Functional Category: Minor Arterial
Street Class: Class II
Number of Lanes:
Segment Len.(mi)
Signals/Mile:
Cycle Length(s):
g/C Ratio:
PHF:
K Factor:
D Factor:
Printed At: 9:20:25AM On: 5/7/2009
2
4.00
2.00
120
0.55
0.90
0.11
0.65
LOS
A
B
C
D
E
Organization:
Prop. Lt:
FFS(mph):
Arival Type:
Max AADT
0
20,500
28,900
30,500
32,600
HNTB
12.00 %
45
3

HNTB North Carolina, PC 343 E. Six Forks Road
The HNTB Companies Suite 200
Engineers Architects Planners Raleigh, NC 27609
FINAL
Project Name Date of Meetinq
Southern and Eastern Wake Freeway 4/7/09
HNTB Project #
46816
From:
John Grant. P.E.
Purpose of Meetinq
Discuss scope/methodology of the
planning-level traffic capacity analysis.
MEETING MINUTES
Present:
Renee Roach, P.E.
Benjetta Johnson, P.E.
Doumit Ishak
Missy (Dickens) Pair, P.E.
Tracy Roberts, AICP
Spencer Franklin, P.E.
Bradley Reynolds, P.E.
John Grant, P.E.
Telephone [phone]
Facsimile [phone]
www.hntb.com
Location
NCDOT Transportation Mobility
and Safety Conference Room 161
Time
2:00 p.m.
I■ ■ ���
NCDOT-Transportation Mobility and Safety
NCDOT-Transportation Mobility and Safety (Congestion Management)
NCDOT-Transportation Mobility and Safety (Congestion Management)
NCDOT-Project Development and Environmental Analysis
HNTB-NCTA General Engineering Consultant (GEC)
HNTB-NCTA GEC
HNTB-NCTA GEC
HNTB-NCTA GEC
The following summarizes the meeting held on April 7, 2009 with the North Carolina Department of
Transportation (NCDOT) to discuss the Southern and Eastern Wake Freeway scope/methodology for the
planning-level traffic capacity analysis. The results of the analysis will be used to support development of
purpose and need far the proposed Southern and Eastern Wake Freeway project.
Introductions
• Introductions were conducted around the room. Each of the attendees introduced themselves and
stated their role on the project and signed the attendance sheet.
Mr. Roberts discussed the project background and stated the objective of the meeting was to
reach agreement on the scope and methodology of the planning-level traffic capacity analysis for
the proposed Southern and Eastern Wake Freeway project. The results of the analysis will be used
to support development of the purpose and need for the project. Mr. Roberts explained that the
North Carolina Turnpike Authority (NCTA) has not officially adopted Southern and Eastern
Wake Freeway as a candidate toll project, but that this is anticipated later this year. However,
should the project remain with NCDOT as a non-toll project, the results of the planning-level
capacity analysis could also be used by NCDOT for their own National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) studies (as is the case with the previously-completed traffic forecast referenced below).
The intent is that work products developed by NCTA could be used by either NCDOT or NCTA.
Mr. Franklin mentioned that the planning-level capacity analysis will utilize the approved
Southern and Eastern Wake Freeway Final Traffic Forecast Report prepared by HNTB on behalf

Southern and Eastern Wake Freeway
April 7, 2009 Meeting Minutes
Page 2 of 3
of NCTA in February 2009. A hard copy of the report was provided to Ms. Johnson at the
meeting.
Planning-Level Traffic Capacity Analysis
• Mr. Grant mentioned that the analysis will be performed in accordance with the "NCDOT
Congestion Management Capacity Analysis Guidelines" revised 2-15-2006. Any deviations from
these guidelines will be discussed with NCDOT and explained in the memorandum.
• Mr. Grant stated that North Carolina Level of Service (NCLOS) software, Version 2.0, will be
used to determine segmental roadway levels of service and volume-capacity ratio for all scenarios
because the approved traffic forecast is a link-level farecast does not have detailed directional
movements.
• Mr. Grant mentioned that the analysis will only include the mainline freeway segments and not
the ramp merge, ramp diverge, and weaving elements. NCLOS is not capable of providing this
level of detailed analysis and no capacity analyses will be performed for collector-distributor
(CD) roadways as NCLOS is not designed for this application.
• Mr. Grant mentioned that the analysis criteria for each roadway (freeway and arterial) will be
established for the analysis and provided in the inemorandum. The initial analysis assumptions
and scenarios were included with the agenda (attached) and Mr. Grant discussed these
assumptions. These input values will be based on field-observed data collection, the approved
traffic forecast and engineering judgment.
• Mr. Grant mentioned that roadway levels of service and volume-capacity ratios will be analyzed
for a11 routes included in the traffic %recast.
• Mr. Grant showed a similar example of a traffic operations technical memorandum for an NCTA
project. The Gaston East-West Connector Traffic Operations Technical Memorandum was
coinpleted by PBS&J in Septeinber 2008 and the approach and methodology in that
memorandum will be used as an example for the Southern and Eastern Wake Freeway traffic
capacity analysis.
• Mr. Grant mentioned that a crash data request will be submitted to NCDOT and that a separate
crash analysis report will be completed during development of the purpose and need. Mr. Grant is
coordinating the scope of the crash data request with Brian Mayhew of NCDOT. Update: NCTA
submitted the request for crash data to NCDOT on April 1 S, 2009. NCDOT agreed to provide the
crash data by May 1 S, 2009.
• Ms. Pair asked if safety would be included as a need for the project. Mr. Roberts responded that it
is unlikely to be included as a need but that crash data would still be collected. Ms. Pair was in
agreement that anticipated new location projects, such as Southern and Eastern Wake Freeway,
generally do not have a safety component of the purpose and need due to the difficulty in
demonstrating that safety improvements on existing roads would be provided by new location
proj ects.
Wrap-up
• Mr. Reynolds asked if anyone had questions or concerns with the proposed scope and
methodology to be used for the planning-level capacity analysis. All meeting attendees were in
agreement with the assumptions, approach and scenarios as discussed.
Action Items
o HNTB mailed a copy of the latest NCLOS software (Version 2.0) to Ms. Benjetta
Johnson, P.E. on Apri120, 2009.

Southern and Eastern Wake Freeway
April 7, 2009 Meeting Minutes
Page 3 of 3
o HNTB will prepare draft meeting minutes and distribute to all attendees for comment.
After the comments are addressed, HNTB will submit final meeting minutes.
The foregoing constitutes our understanding of the matters discussed and the conclusions reached. If there are
any questions, corrections, omissions, or additional comments, please advise John Grant (HNTB) within five
working days after receipt of these minutes.
cc: Attendees
Jennifer Harris, P.E., NCTA
Project File