20080143 Ver 1_Other Agency Comments_20080118

Buncombe County
Bridge No. 220 on SR 209$ over Reems Creek
Federal-Aid Project No_ BRZ-2098(1)
State Project 8.2844601
WBS # 33402.1.1
TIP Project No. B-4036
CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
AND
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DNISION OF HIGHWAYS
APPROVED:
O~ ~ D ~v W Gv...~
ATE ~ Gregory J. horpe, Ph.D.
Environmental Management Director
Project Development and Environmental
Analysis Branch, NCDOT
~~ Gf~ _
tv
DATE Jo .Sullivan , P.E.
~~,i Division Administrator, FHWA '

~ .,,.c SfATp
m ~ o
~ ~ __
a•nM
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTIV~NT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICfiAEL F. EASLEY
GOVERNOR
January 2, 2008
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue
Roorn 208
Asheville, NC 28801-5006
ATTN: Mr. David Baker
NCDOT Coordinator
Dear Sir:
LYNDO rI~IPPETT
SECRETARY
Subject: Clean Water Act Nationwide Permit 13 application for replacement of
Bridge No. 220 on SR 2098 (Herron Cove Road) over Reems Creek,
Federal Aid No. BRZ-2098(1), State Project No. 8.2844601, Buncombe
County, Division 13, TIP No_ B-4036. WBS Element No. 33402.1.1.
Please see the enclosed Pre-Construction Notification, permit drawings, design plans and
Rapanos jurisdictional determination form for the subject project. A Categorical
Exclusion (May 2006) and Right of Way Consultation (May 2007} were completed for
this project and distributed shortly thereafter. Additional copies are available upon
request. The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace
the 76.6 foot Bridge No. 220 with a single span box beam bridge of approximately 105
feet in length. The new structure will be built on the same alignment as the existing
bridge. During construction, traffic will be routed to an offsite detour. There will be a
total of 91 feet of permanent impacts to the Reems Creek due to the placement of Class B
rip rap in three ditches for bank stabilization.
IMPACTS TO WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES
General Description: There is one jurisdictional stream on the project site: Reems Creek_
This water resource is located in the French Broad River Basin (subbasin 04-03-02,
Hydrological Cataloguing Unit 06010105). The North Carolina Division of Water Quality
{NCDWQ) index number for the Reems Creek is 6-87-1. Reems Creek is classified by
MAILING ADDRESS: TeLEPrIONE: 919-715-1500 LOCATION:
NC DEPARTMENT OF Ti22ANSPORTATION FAX: [phone]$ CAPITOL BOULEVARD
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PARKER LINCOLN BUILDING, SUITE 168
1598 MAIL SERVICE CENTER WEBSlTE: WWW.DOH.DOT.STATE.NC.VS RALEIGH NC 27699
RALEIGH NC 27699-1598

the Division of Water Quality as a C-Tr water body. Neither High Quality Waters
(HQW), Water Supplies {WS-I or WS-II), Outstanding Resource Waters {ORW) nor
waters listed on the 303 {d) list occur in the project area or within 1.0 mile downstream of
waters in the project area_ The average baseflow width of the Reems Creek is
approximately 25 feet. Average depth is approximately 1-2 feet.
Permanent lmpacts: There will be a total of 91 feet of permanent impacts to Reems
Creek. Site 1 encompasses three ditches that will have Class B rip rap placed where they
enter Reems Creek. Rip rap will be used for bank stabilization to control erosion at these
sites.
Temporary Impacts: There will be no temporary impacts associated with this project.
Bridge Demolition: Bridge No. 220 has a superstructure that consists of timber floor on I-
beams with an asphalt wearing surface and timber railing. The substructure consists of
reinforced concrete abutments, and one interior bent consisting of a timber cap on timber
piles with concrete sills. Bridge No. 220, including it's interior bent will be removed
without appreciable fill in "Waters of the United States".
Utilit~hnpacts: There will be no impacts to jurisdictional waters due to utilities.
FEDERALLY PROTECTED SPECIES
Plants and animals with federal classifications of Endangered, Threatened, Proposed
Endangered and Proposed Threatened are protected under provisions of Section 7 and
Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended. As of May 10, 2007 the
United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) list 13 species under federal protection
for Buncombe County (Table 1 }. Surveys have determined that there is no suitable
habitat for the listed species. The NC Natural Heritage database of rare species and
unique habitats was reviewed in September 2007. There is no documentation of federally
listed species or unique habitats occurring within 1 mile of the project area.
Page 2 of 4

Table 1. Species Under Federal Protection in Buncombe County
Common Narr~e Scientific Name Federal Status Habitat Biological
Conclusion
Bog turtle Clemmys muhlenbuergii T (S/A} No Not required
Carolina northern flying
squirrel Glaucomys sabrinus
coloratus E No No Effect
Spotfin chub Hybo sis monacha T No No Effect
Gray bat Myotis grisescens E No No Effect
Eastern cougar Puma concolor couguar E No No Effect
Appalachian elktoe Alasmidonta raveneliana E No No Effect
Oyster mussel Epioblasma capscaeformis E No No Effect
Tan riffleshell Epioblasma florentina
walkeri E No No Effect
Bunched arrowhead Sagittaria fasciculata E No No Effect
Mountain sweet pitcher
plant Sarracenia jonesii E No No Effect
Spreading avens Geum radiatum E No No Effect
Virginia spiraea Spiraea virginiana T No No Effect
Rock gnome lichen Gymnoderma lineare E No No Effect
AVOIDANCE, MINIMIZATION AND MITIGATION
Avoidance and Minimization:
Avoidance examines all appropriate and practicable possibilities of averting impacts to
"Waters of the United States". The NCDOT is committed. to incorporating all reasonable
and practicable design features to avoid and minimize jurisdictional impacts, and to
provide full compensatory mitigation of all remaining, unavoidable jurisdictional stages;
minimization measures were incorporated as part of the project design.
• Best Management Practices will be followed for this project as outlined in "NCDOT's
Best Management Practices for Construction and Maintenance Activities".
Best Management Practices will be used during demolition of the existing bridge_
• Use of a single span structure.
• There will be no deck drains allowed to discharge directing into Reerns Creek.
• Preformed scour holes will be used to treat stormwater from the bridge and adjacent
road before entering the stream.
• Use of offsite detour.
• There will be an in-stream and 25-foot buffer work moratorium from October 15 to
April 15 for protection of trout.
Mitigation:
Permanent impacts for this project are 91 feet due to bank stabilization. Because the
proposed impacts do not constitute a "loss of Waters of the United States", no mitigation
is proposed.
Page 3 of 4

SCHEDULE
The project schedule calls for a June 17, 2008 Let date with a date of availability on July
29, 2008. The review date for the project is April 29, 2008.
REGULATORY APPROVALS
Section 404 Permit: It is anticipated that impacts relating to use of rip rap for bank
stabilization will be authorized under Section 404 Nationwide Permit No. 13 {Bank
Stabilization). We therefore request the issuance of a Nationwide Permit 13 for these
activities.
Section 401 Permit: We anticipate 441 General Certification No. 3689 will apply to this
project. All general WQC conditions will be adhered to during project construction.
Therefore, in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H, Section .0500(a) and 1 SA NCAC 2B.0200
we are providing two copies of this application to the North Carolina Department of
Environmental and Natural Resources, Division of Water Quality, for their records.
This project is located in a trout county, therefore comments from the North Carolina
Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) will be required prior to authorization by the
Corps of Engineers_ By copy of this letter and attachment, NCDOT hereby requests
NCWRC review. NCDOT requests that NCWRC forward their comments to the Corps
of Engineers and the NCDOT within 30 calendar days of receipt of this application.
Thank you for your assistance with this project. If you have any questions or need
additional information please contact Jason Dilday at jldilda~~dot.state.nc.us or (919)
715-5535. The application will be posted at http://207.4.62.65/PDEA/PermApps/.
Sincerely
~,
~-, ~'
~. , ,~
~~~~~ Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D
Environmental Management Director, PDEA
cc:
Wfattachment W/o attachment
Mr. Brian Wrenn, NCDWQ (2 Copies} Dr. David Chang, P.E., Hydraulics
Ms. Morello Buncick, USFWS Mr. Victor Barbour, P.E., Project Services Unit
Ms. Marla Chambers, NCWRC Mr. Greg Perfetti, P.E., Structure Design
Mr. Harold Draper, TVA Mr. Mark Staley, Roadside Environmental
Mr. J.J. Swain, P.E. (Div. 13), Division Engineer
Mr. Roger Bryan (Div. 13), DEO
Mr. Jay Bennett, P.E., Roadway Design
Mr. Majed Alghandour, P. E., Progran~ning and TIP
Mr. Art McMillan, P.E., Highway Design
Mr. Scott McLendon, USACE, Wilmington
Mr. Joseph Miller, P.E., PDEA Project Planning Engineer
Page 4 of 4

Office Use Only: Form Version March OS
USAGE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
I. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ^ Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
^ Section 10 Permit ^ Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
^ 401 Water Quality Certification ^ Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: Nationwide 13
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here:
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP} is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ^
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ^
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Environmental Management Director
Mailing Address: 1598 Mail Service Center
Telephone Number: [phone] Fax Number: {919) 733-9794
E-mail Address: jldilday(a,dot.state.nc.us
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached. if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name:
Company Affiliation:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number: Fax Number:
E-mail. Address:
Page 1 of 9

III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and. roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of ali buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Bride 220 over Reams Creek
2. T.LP. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): B-4036
3. Property Identification Number {Tax PIN): N/A
4. Location
County: Buncombe Nearest Town: Weaverville
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): N/A
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): SR 2098, Herron Cove
Road
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum}: 35'41'04' °N -82'33'40' °W
6. Property size (acres): N/A
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Reems Creek
8. River Basin: French Broad Basin
(Note -this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admire/maps%.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: Residental and forest communities
Page 2 of 9

10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Bride No. 220 will be replaced with a single span bridge of approximately 105 feet in length
using standard bride demolition and construction equipment.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: Bridge No. 19 is proposed for replacement due
to a sufficiency rating of 40 out of a possible 100 far a new structure. The bridge is
considered functionally obsolete and structurally deficient according to FHWA standards.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.LP. project, along with
construction schedules. N/A
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests. anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
N/A
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/VVaters of the State
It is the applicant's {or agent's) responsibility to determine; delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project_ Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads}. Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial}
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Page 3 of 9

1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: There will be a total of 91 feet of
permanent impacts to Reems Creek. Site 1 encompasses three ditches that will have Class B
rip rap placed where they enter Reems Creek. Rip rap will be used for bank stabilization to
control erosion at these sites.
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact Type of Wetland
(e.g., forested, marsh,
herbaceous, bog, etc.) Located within
100-year
Floodplain
(yes/no) Distance to
Nearest
Stream
(linear feet} Area of
Impact
(acres)
No wetlands -

Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0
3. List the total acreage (estimated} of all existing wetlands on the property:0
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited. to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
Stream Impact

Number
(indicate on map)

Stream Name
~['ype of
Impact
Perennial or
Intermittent? Average

Stream Width
Before Im act Impact

Length
(linear feet) Area of

Impact
{acres)
1 Reems Creek Perm Perennial 25 ft 91 0.05

Total Permanent Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 9 i 0.05
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dred~in~, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc_
Open Water Impact Name of Waterbody
Type of Impact Type of Waterbody Area of
Site Number (if applicable) {lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay, Impact
Page 4 of 9

(indicate on map) ocean, etc.} (acres)
No Impacts
Total Open Water Impact {acres) 0
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Impact (acres}: 0.05 (permanent)
Wetland Impact (acres}: 0
Open Water Impact (acres): 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.05 (permanent)
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 91 (permanent)
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ^ Yes ®No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact {acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
S. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ^ uplands ^ stream ^ wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond {e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.Traffic will be placed on a n
offsite detour. The new bride will be a spanning structure. NCDOT Best Management Practices
will be implemented during all phases of construction and demolition.
Page 5 of 9

VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 Linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and fiinction and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o. enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/stnngide_html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
There is 91 feet of permanent impacts to Reems Creek. Mitigation is not proposed for
this project because impacts do not constitute a "loss of Waters of the United States".
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP}. Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
{919} 715-0476 to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. if use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Page 6 of 9

Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): 0
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): 0
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested {acres}: 0
Amount ofNon-riparian wetland. mitigation requested (acres}: 0
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested {acres): 0
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ® No ^
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act {NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ® No ^
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ® No ^
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's {or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and rnap ali impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate_ Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Neuse}, 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Suffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ^ No
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers_
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Zone* Impact Multiplier Required
(square feet) Mitigation
1 3 (2 for Catawba)
2 1.5
Total
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone I .
Page 7 of 9

3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration /Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 1 SA NCAC 2B _0242 or .0244, or .0260. N/A
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
Stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level. There will be no deck drains allowed to
discharge directly into Reerns Creek. Preformed scour holes will be used to treat runoff so that
stormwater will not be discharged directly into the stream. The bridge will be replaced on the
same alignment as the previous structure.
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition {non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
XIIL Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500} or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ^ No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ^ No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts {required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ^ No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http:/lh2o.enr.state.nc.us/newetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
This project is limited to a bridge replacement. No indirect or cumulative impacts are
anticipated_
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
Page 8 of 9

It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application Buff ciently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time far these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
N/A

~ ~ ~~ c-~}
Ap~lican,~'IAgent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 9 of 9

l~ORTH CAROLIl~IA
a
a
b
E
~`
b
f
a~
0

0
0
~/ /~ ~
r
_ _ g ~~ WEAVE VIL E
,' ~ -~ ~;
L_; \ ~~~
\~-~ B ~~
LAKE LOU/SE , ti
- - I ~ SR ~~
~ 2ig7
i~ _ _ ~~
j
~~-~ ~ , ~
s-
~~ EN OJE ~~t.__7 i
.~ ~~ _ ~
~ ~-~_~;
~~/ ~ ~
`~ ~ ~'
L- _~- '~-''`
~ ~_~
~. r ~__
-~
_ SR 1003 _ ~
REEMS CREEK
~ S~ _ '~
/ SRI ~~ \ `-oyc~
No~~~"~~
- - ~~ ~~~
~~ ~ SR 2094
~i ~tPROJECT
~_ f
\~_
a~
~~
~o
~..~
Z
Z
WETLAII tD PERMIT DRA T~vI11lG
vlcllrrlTY ~P
Perm , t~+::avin~ Br--4~3~
Sh€:~t ~ of ~r
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
BUNCOMBE COUNTY
PROJECT: 33402.1.1 (B-4036)
REPLACEMENT OF BRIDGE N0.220
OVER REEMS CREEK
ON SR 2095
s~szoo~

,,,~{ 'r
;` ~~" cl7` `f %`r ~1- ~~\- -~\ _ _ -- '- -... ~( ~• ~t-` LL__ i ~~I. r~~+'ff I!r'~-.~J~ t•{~y;--T_~- ~~~-.tR~~?~fi ,1/r. I '.~._.~~ %iFr- f / r _'!r ~- -~-
~t r ' ~ r ~, +1 -~; ~~ \:~T`~~)-•~~, _ ` T_ r ~~( {~ v, :,c5 r~~~ - - / -' ' -
Y .~ ~~ ~~ ~~.~ } 1~''i~ yY ~r~"y 1 •.-'~"`~. ~ tl~ _~` -., '~ ~Z `i '•~~- >~~ ~\~'' -- `.~~ ~\~ ~t /~ ~_ ~= it - 1 - ~~
~-(Y .-- `" = R // , ~ j S` ~ ~ r Vii' ~~~ ~,~.t a - ' l ,bi~ `z j~~ •' '~'~~+~~, ~~ ~ %', ~~ ~ `~~~Jr~~ ; l-~l _ rte' ~- ~.~~ ' ~ I
~,=s~, 1` `~~ ,Kc ../~.~ Z a Yit .~.!_t _ ~`.~r(-~-.' -`~,Jr`J'{,~~f~~-~~.f- --~ ~r ~1 1 _ _
i I 1~ ~,.i _ ~. n ti f - ~ fir, - ~~~_ /"jv~ 4 .tip ~. ~ ` -yam. f
-.. ^, /`_'~ ~ ,~~ J' - ~ ! 1 f .v \\ _ - ~\ I~. ,~ ~ - { _~,J s 3 1 i ~ ~- ~---`_ ~r I 4 f I ` '}}~f ~~ 1 ~' r '1 \ ~+'/
-r ~s _ + i v. +, '-~} 1 ~4 ~ ~ "~._~,-1:~_L' _,~ ~ .3. '{~. \y Y ,'~-~ :'!^="~~~r `I~'tc•/~ !" "J. _'; 1 i E,t (i ~, p~
_./?j } ~if ...t ; '. L _ - ~~ ~~-~` ~-,Jl' _~.__.J~. ~{ . ~ • l 11 _ + ~ 3 ; 1, i. 3~~ , t_ ~ / ~ ~ "/f ? ` " c ,`l -, 1:1' ` ~ !t i „/ ( I f ~ •_
_~~ - i l!~ .iy . , ~~ -_ - ~-- tF~ -a'4 S ~ •. -- •H f •~. ~t • ~. lr r '~` zi f J~ yfJ'1 f :ems-.-7 ~-. ,1~'! Y ~ . r~_ , 1'i '~ i" `~ . ~,
- !ui ~ 't" -`-r{~~{ ~ -.. - •1 Z- •L`.1•• ~ ~ -.._, f _'~ , F: _~~~ a ~~ (Sf fY~fi - _ ~ j'am' ft ~ ~ ~ ~\ y _ 1 _, ~,(((~
;~ ~ ~ ; ~-~~-.'''n J -~ 1~ i, r i, . 7 r - \ ~~` {_ ///..:~ - ~, ~ ~~, I ^ ~~~.r' .. ~ - ~-^ ~- ~ r ~ ( . /' , i~ i (~ " I R: ~ r ~ ~ ~l~ I V ~~ Z \. ,.~,/ / : r~ ?~J
~._'' :,~,~:_ t~ •' ,C;~~lf ;R. ~ „J, • \y• S - ~~ ~ ~-. : r_ F.. F~ i~ :i ~r;„:.'~r~ ) ~ji ~~ ~ ~? - " ..~~` a` ~ ? _~l ~/; ~ ~ h
~,f~~t_`-_ [-' , ~( _ ,•~ • •'j~_~ ,f ` --•=''_i - -_ ~~, ~~~...-~:~~ e~ 1; Par. ~ 'f~ ~ ,/ '~/ V ~ f ~' ; / •~Z r--_~4~,(
! Y~• \ lye `~ y •r# ~,,° ~.i~' l ( / f ~+li. I ~ f ~ '/ 5 y `- \
. , ~l
~;',~y1I ~\\~ - 1~ ~ 'a i': ~_ v ~ ~• „,.• Y y.\Y-- r T--°'- •~\_ S / - ~:>~~ f (r,~~~' ~~ '- i~~r ~.i-' `•C-j ~`~\ ~"l~-~` ~~ ~ ~_~~
-- ` r - -..
~[ .. .
1` '~.. ~ - 7 a i ~- - '% ,~ i r `~~.. !` •'Y: ~ \•~7 1r \~` ~ i 4 ri- ,` :il~r a~ ` ~ \i ~/~'.~~ Cam-.
~\ i i q /'`:.4 ~' y ! -•r ~ 1 •-'~l ~ ~. 4t \}~a-•-r I /l~ R p f( ! i
j~ -. ~~~`'= ~.l `Lif~-'Jr~ ~!' + ~.Sr f` .~ I Y ~!}} ~!~ ' ~ ~~ ~~`~ 1 • l~. l~~ ~ ~ =?"~''~+i r' •- t ~_..~ ' i,- ~ -~i ~ t ~t~ .-.- ~; 7
`~~~ ~F . ~ '~ y V 1 ' '%" ~ ~ ~ ~ \ i ~ F" { ..~~ 1 / ~. ~.~~f' ~` ' , I -- )_ i I °~ r' _ '~ /~ j ! i ~ ~-~ •-- ;~'r )
~_~f ~ ~, 1 y'- p/ ~,^y " ~~ `i ~ ~~+ $ sn .~ _ `--3,- 1:~ » .I r ~' ~ 3~'• _~~,' ( ~J I', ~ ~ ,.~``Lr~ ~~/7r`~`~-~y~.
y f k 5 ~ _ `i L , t it'` ,,'~ `""` L,~.~~,~ ~`~ ~~v y ~~'"l5°a - .` . +e'~r? , ~ /`' :`h~ i ~ ~ ~} ` .. ~ _ ' % ~'r r~ _ } E~ _~ \ 3Jtf~-:. `~
t `i `11k ~~ ~v ~\1~Ty ~Q-x.11°""='~~1~,~,~ !l-~``-~~. '~ ~_ t ``r~ _~~~/.I ~o ( ~`'/~ - ~ 1 i "• !I~ _
`~ ~Ir` y ~ ~ ~j` f i! ~ f .:'~~~w~ " \ 1 i' 'S• ~ ( E . ~'/ ~ ~~ - `t i r s , ~ i i;.. ' '
\ ~~,/~1rI~: r~~~-r~( (1tF ~~ ~ 5~ ` ~~~~`` { -~ l ~ _ 4 ~ + , ~ ?~ ,11 `r _ ~ \ '~' E '` • • ! ~ -,yr~/'i'.. i /- f;s~{j0
// _~
`~a /'_' "t'~i-r~J 'I "`J~ - ~~rrti`--- „~`\\°~ I j -~lrt+r~ '~~_~•, ~_ ,'~[ U%~, 11`'~~-~ ,~~~.. ~`-Y• ~.. _ 4~~.; ~+
!~= i I ~a, L ; r ', `_r ~ t /f .~ ~ - \ ~ ~.~ .~ ~ i ! y`,~J.-~T l ~ `- v' s ' r i }-~~~•SR'A ~ .
/! ~f.;~~~~~ ~` ~~~~~~'_'r'~~\h t"~ Rw~•y 4y„I~f ~ ~ ~~~;~ 1 ~'~~Z. - ~p~ ` t~ J 4- ~~ ~_~j} _ .
• r' ~
'~~ ~\y L `; ~.~~w S ~~ c_.-, ~ ~.qQ -Ga p`~~'Ft f -^, it'-..i ~~~r, ~ ~ _ \y ~ _A.~-\ • `~{! :~1) ri"~
----._ _ - rf~ CF n. ' -\ + 1t ~ ,GJ~~~\41 •Sri. ~ ~~ ~,~~i ;; 1~ 1 ±~t, `~~Y l ~ r>~~ ~ ~~ ~ `\" ~ ~ Ji.._ ~ .-~ ~2 D y LA_ ng F.'t`71 a I?' ~~- ~ ~ . y `~ ~y~j~,'~~ -
=~-' -'~ -~ ~ -'-•.a'~~= ~,. .=~L'y5~ -:f 1 ~ _ >) E a!~ ~ .v`1,~,~; --f = - ~ is ~ ~ _ 4'O .f ,•tJ ? ~ i ~~~
l~~' - ~ a ~~-o~'•'•: ~ y 'cd.s ~..~~: - ~ 1 ~ t 1 s j' ~ /}~' _ ~ /~~ }~• -~ _ ~ r - ~ ~ _ - -~./ •i p i ~ i i ( ^~ - .~.~ '4~'~ )ri'"~
~'S~'~r'~t n± '1 `~.-n. ~• -~jrr20i7_ •~ ~i tr', If ~"\ l }~F. ~ e~~`vti f . _ J _ •' `J ` ~ '~~ Z
'`~ ~_ I'' /J ~• ~ ..« /f +f ,r • .~'r •'f } I ~• ` t ii ,~~ ~ } t'~I , ~ r I \ o, z ~ r- - - I i ~~ ~1,~~-'1-- __--~._--~ ~~~
~~'~ ~~= + n' ~i* ..i~c ~,' 'Yds .ltnio "Sl tt4.~t` n ~ ,~i ~r s `~~ - - _ =.-J _ ~ - ~.:+~'r-r `_""''` ~
~ ~ ' ~ • ~~~ ii { ` ,`~~.r:~~ ~'~~ .t-.,~ ~ \\ ~ ~ti` `-3C'-NQ rl. -_ I • i i~ ii. FL • ~~ ~ ~ ~~i''c~~~' _ L't4 ` ~ .-"-`• __ ~~t' k~~E ~\ \ ~•a~ ^ " ~ 61 . ~l
~_ =•-r..-. •~ ~. ~ ~ j'~~'''] f -1-p - ~, ~--~ J~ I a5t'~i ~ - ._ ~ ; _ ; q _ % S t -' ft f"' ~ ~,\~_ \ 1~`~~~~-•.-)
, .~~c~N t*z/ ~ ,.s ~-- .~j! ~ ' i. ~~ '~y yti'~; y~~ ~•r• j ~,1f r,~ vy ~,~ fF~ f ~~ ~)l ~~ '~~` da~\q
__ 'f € t~~~.a ~ ='~ •I _ j*'• S- //''~J I~~~. q'+`.`~':+' ~: .'r j"f/ 1~41µ~ " 1' ~ 1;~' ~~ .~0,~~~~\ \'s',
.i~JI- ~ - ~ ~. "fit. ,~ i !- ry /~1,,t •f~ i' /`, -~ ~ll~! •s~l s ,`~~ ~ -~.S'~ _ ~`'• ~~-_\--_~ ~ _
~~ ,? 4~t .4, ' •t -~_ ~ ~ ~ '+'i ~.){1~r ^~,'~i Y~-~}~'~ N ~G~L~i~ • ~i ~j~C~ L , ~ + \ ~ ~ C~#~~' Cil l .`~~}~. i~ iii r ~..~4's~ _-~~~ ~ r `~ `" t',\~` _
+~ l ~ l ~ r y} `'` V~~ rt R\ ~ } E l 3 /~ ~s p ~j ,~t ' .~ ~ _- ~ 9 - l ~~, ~ ]- ~- ~ r e ~~ ~~~-._
o- ~ \~ ~~ ~~~ >, ~'~ ~\ ~ t.w~ ~~~L~"~L~~~t~; Q~~ ~7~ ~ ~l°~i ~'li~. ~) r~ ~',`Ct-~ ~ ~-\~J ° ~\.'1+ ]11' -\\7 ~C'~' '~3d(j _ji `.
''rte\~ t'1 E ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~`.r --,1.;--ice ~7 c~ ~~`~P- I~ ~-~Nl~ ~..-~i:.~K• G~i~ j`~~-• Ire •'~~,r- ;' ~~t ~' °j '~` '~i
~` ;~) ~~ '.-.i~~~~-~'^V'.~~..-. fz~-~~ ,~-f ~~ ~~ '~P 2i~f~,C ~ ( ~~ l~, {, ~.( 00 _.=# fss~ \.~~` ~~ >~\ 4 - ~ f`~~
----~ ;` ~S.r'~ rr1`--J ~-.~~~~%`'~= ~7'vtNL`~V f~ G C..li'.,.'~~/ `~~~ G1--lr;.,~`~ ; i i~ ( -,I-- - _
i ~ == `: ~ ~ ~~----s ~t--~~ ~ ~ ~441t~r.-Y-~~.~~~. `~'" ~=~~ (~i~'~'~ cy- ~~ ~., \~ . - 1,1 - { ~ ~ t ; `./.r "r'-~`':~+ ~-
~~ ~ ~t1_f#~ ` ~ ur-r~~ ~ : { `~,~ `t ~~ ~ yp~p r ~ ~ ~' : f `>~~J ~ ~~` ~ ~,f~`~~%"~f~'~ L~?--'~ ~ ~~~'r `1) ~ t ~} ~ ~`
~"~ •.. _ l 1 )~ t, ;'~\~~~/`ti~`r~-~ :. ~ t~ C,,,,~ Vii' ~ -~ ,--- .` `~"r.-~ :~ ~"ti\S. ~,j",~1 + ~ . ~_ S ~
ti \^ ~ `_ ~J t ~ !``- Cs ~~,~ ~ r°~'\/i=6='~ -~ \ l~ltky_-'=c-"~7 (f r, J/ t~^ ~ (r~•'-'~c
~_~~-~~~ J i i~~-~ ~ ,. i~ ~~`~ i ,~~~r;~ f'-.^_.~ t~~~\C~ ti+. ~~- =~~~ ~ ~l ~~ ~.~, ~.="'° -.`_-"_` ` ~ti ~ ~ 'r [,•1 ~` '~i~tk~-.1 ~, _~C.`~`~~~, . ~ { t - - ~-- ~~ -!%~`r'.Y 11;~
[~VlC31Y(- ~ , ,.~.. ~1, ~ ti~'~~,~~~1f~~~--,~ i``\~~\~~5, L~~ ~,1 4` ~r:--~ `-''.`_'~~0~\\'c,~^~;) ~~f `_=-a~~+ l~rr/°^' ~`f^ ~_ ~'.r'-a.\~'!
~„ :fly i ~!_~ i~' ~ ~ - ~~~~"\- ~~~-~~a,1;~., ~ ~-~~'~ ~.~~~~,~t ~ ~~ J~ ~ 1li~~~"f.~~~`~_
~„~---t-- -.+~_ ' ~8t'/ \t~~~~ ~i J /~ ~~ ~°~~~. ~\\ `'r`~:~ f /r'~ r /~ , ~f ~5- _ ~_~~` rl fJ/~/f l . c..`~ ~~ ~.
l ~ ~ ~ ~'~'-~~~` ~ ~_~~. - ~_ ~~~ ~ j it \. 1\ ~: ~ ~ / i1 (.~` Fi~~ ~~- v -
!~ ~ _ --s ~~ ~_ ifs-:i:~ ~7 ! 11 li ilf! ~~„~\,l`a~ ~r- ~~,f ~~1 "~ ~:\~ I~~} 1~'tr-c>sj { r
' ~C /f °$-., f `~'" . ' :~ sue' f~1'~..~ ~~ ,~~; i~~f !:r ~(1 1,F , ~` `~:-~~ \ F4 - /fr /J h _ i /' _--~ ' 1 y`lam
'-- \' }C --~~..~. -' __ ~ }`,r itF i flr--~ j}\~r ~r ~.,_~~~~ # Y. , --. r, ~) r r ~r~~ '~t~ % ~-- ; ~ I i J3 y J~1;
/ = it J ' ^ -1 _~~/ -~:~'. .- `_ ~ ~ i 5 " t• -1 ,~.. `1'Au. i +~~~ ~ ,.~ - ~ l ism 1 •,~/• r ~ ~ ~_~'~_~y;
" ..,`~ ~` ~ _ t, ,r.! ~J / % }S~F t:';, i ~). t.~` \ ~ ~~%~-`~l -~1Fi t! f j c:~ ~~J~i
i . , ;\~ ~\`` =~_.-/ -/ ~ ) - ~~' ! 1~y ~ ~. ~-_-,._~ _ 1, '`- it ~`.. ` ._. ?,-f r
~. \ ~ vS0 Z= 9,.-~~ \ - I{ • t- t y/t#_ r ~~~ 1 ~ f__ ! }~i~" \ ~_ \ ~ ~ ~r 'i _/_~~', ~ ~iti:Cj,~ Y `~ ~ `/ r,`r~-i
.r - - _ - :`~ Si ,' _ -;.y \} \'%: ~.:~ -`Y~ - r: ~ ~t ~ ~:- _ \ .t1 ,~6", }'\ u,. `~c~ ~~ ~' ,ti r1 Y I`(; ~~~_ A F I. ~..Jl
1;~ '~ r~ is r /`;.~ =~'\~~ \~'•,i i C r J/ ,.t ~ [f ~ ~~~ l/ri . t ~\\~3.-., ~=_~.J--_~ y-' '' ll'~ s~'` ~ ~} ,.~:~#,~ ~/lf
- :~ i /. ~- ~ j~~~II~~/~i ~ 1,.1 Cr. Il i~ I-;i,{ F I ~'~J + ~~Y(.r~ if `'~'Fy\~ ~~=~ - _ ~ ~l r ~'• ~~\~ -~` i r(-Fgc~rF-.=. ~~.i
,,~~'',.~. _`5,1 ~ f /,f/ / .<" .": ,1 . ~' r \. ':~~~~~ ~i t : ~ ~ ~ ~ti `~-:-.'_'_ -~" - y / ~~w /- ~\~-='a ~, +si ~ ~ ~ r.1o-F. i
/ ~ 4h J~ - 'r / ~'%~/'+' ',~ ~': li:l F l~~h ~'~~ ,/ ~° -l:j f.! ~~~/~t F:~ >!i}3 ~ 1~ -r~~ ~--_~ `f~j f `~(f f!!-" ~~~7 #IL I 1 ~t - -fit,, ~I r J
_f ~ / ~! ` 1 !r l ;r'9 ~.D ~r ~`C.11( ~rff fir/ ~ it }~I #- _'iJ 1 'l R J/_.~r- ,~~''--z.r~-~~~xY~ 4_ t( f l`. ([ / /- ]l f ~.'i•-4t};
6° W ~- './ ''. + '~ i.-.i i- ~ !tA - ~` ! ,s :~ ?, 'j - _ r.\~ ~-. 7. ~ .L i~ /.lr -/ ,~~p 1J` -d
^~ 7~( ~~: _, -i1/• ,.%, //I;~ i J !:~ _,~. 11 ,~j a4 `' ~, .r -~1_`' ` =t- ~'_ : r. f ~-1 ;/f ` i I ~~ ~ l.• ~~~rt
z \ .~ r - s x 'i_ - ,~- .`t :1f ,i', ~-/ +l'f-. ~4 f `r it
Name: WEAVERVIh~E permit Drawing !-ocation: 035° 40' 39.4" N 082° 33` 37.7" W
Date: 2/27/2007 ShB@t ~ pf O Caption: Project: 33402.1.1 (B-4036)
Scale: 1 inch equals 2000 feet ---- €3 Replacement of Bridge No. 220 Over Reems Cr. on SR 2098
Copyright {C) 1997, Maptech, Inc.

a
3
O
0
a
b
C
O
6l
h
_~
aa~
J
0
0
a
0
OWNER'S NAME ADDRESS
O Balcrank Products, Inc. l Bafcrank Way
Weoverville, NC 28787
Capps, Jerome E. and Peggy H. 12 Herron Cove Rood
Weaverville, NC 28787
O Dyer, Louise A. and Holbert, Deanna 28 Longs Chapel Rood
Weavervrl/e, NC 28787
PROPERTY OW1~ER
1~AME A11 tD ADDRESS
~rmit Drawing
Sheet ~_ of
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
BUNCOMBE GOUNTY
PROJECT: 33402.L1 (B~036)
REPLACEMENT OF BRIDGE NO: 220
OVER REEMS CREEK
ON SR 2095
8~Er2oo~

NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
DMS[ON OF HIGHWAYS
~""fC~ia~ ~~~~'~~il~
~ ~ of BUNCOMBE COUNTY
' 4 -~""""'^ PROJECT; 33402.1.1 (8-403b)
arrJRevised 3i31toa 725 2007
WETLAND PERMIT IMPACT SUMMARY
WETLAND IMPACTS SURFACE WATER IMPACTS

I' Site
No.

Station
(FromlTo)

Structure
Size !Type
Permanent
Fillln
Wetlands
(ac}
Temp.
Pillln
Wetlands
(ac}
Excavation
in
Wetlands
(ac)
Mechanized
Clearing
in Wetlands
(ac) Hand
Clearing
in
Wetlands
(ac}
Permanent
SW
impacts
(ac)
Temp,
SW
impacts
ac) Existing
Channel
Impacts
Permanent
(ft} Existing
Channel
Impacts
Temp,
(ft)
Natural
Stream
Design
(ft)
1 -L-13+89 Ri Ra Embankment
Y <0.01 31
1 -L-14+08 Ri Ra
Embankment <OA1 31
1 -L-14+26 Ri Ra~Embankment <0.01 29

TOTALS: <0.03 91

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FOIZM
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section IV of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook.
SECTION I: BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD}:
B. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: B-4036 (Bridge No. 220 over Reems Creek)
C. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
State:NC County/parish borough: Buncombe City: Weaverville
Center coordinates of site {lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat. 35'41'04"° , Long. 82'33'40'° 1~.
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Reems Creek
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TNW) Into which the aquatic resource flows: French Broad River
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC): 06010105
Check if map/diagram of review area and/or potential jurisdictional areas is/are available upon request.
Check if other sites (e.g., offsite mitigation sites, disposal sites, etc...) are associated with this action and are recorded on a
different JD form.
D. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
Field Determination- Date(s):
SECTION Ii: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A. RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION.
There ~,]~pe~tq,be~p=o "navigable waters of the U.S." within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) in
the review area. [Required]
Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide.
~~ I Waters are presently used, or have been used in the past, or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce.
Explain:
B. CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION~
There ~ "waters of the U.S." within Clean Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area. [Required]
1. Waters of the U.S.
a. Indicate presence of waters of U.S. in review area (check all that apply): ~
TNWs, including territorial seas
Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
Re]atively permanent waters2 (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
__° Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Impoundments of jurisdictional waters
Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters, including isolated wetlands
b. identify (estimate) size of waters of the U.S. in the review area:
Non-wetland waters: 500 linear feet: 25 width {ft) and/or acres.
Wetlands: acres.
c. Limits (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on ls~biitsli€~ed 1~~
Elevation of established OHWM (if known):
2. Non-regulated waters/wetlands (check if applicable):3
[~ Potentially jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional.
Explain:
~ Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section III below.
' For purposes of this form, an RPW is defened as a tributary that is not a TNW and that typically flows year-round or has continuous flow at least "seasonally"
(e.g., typically 3 months).
3 Supporting documentation is presented in Section IILF.

SECTION III: CWA ANALYSIS
A. TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs. If the aquatic resource is a TNW, complete
Section IILA.1 and Section IILD.l. only; if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW, complete Sections IILA.1 and 2
and Section ll1.D.1.; otherwise, see Section IILB below.
1. TNW
Identify TNW:
Summarize rationale supporting determination:
2. Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is "adjacent":
B. CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT 15 NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANA:
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands, if any, and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rapanos have been met.
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non-navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are "relatively permanent
waters" (RPWs), i.e. tributaries that typically flow year-round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e.g., typically 3
months). A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional. If the aquatic resource is not a TNW, but has year-round
(perennial) flow, skip to Section III.D.2. If the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow,
skip to Section iI1.D.4.
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not directly abut an RPW requires a significant nexus evaluation. Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nexus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands if any) and a traditional navigable water, even
though a significant nexus finding is not required as a matter of law.
If the waterbody° is not an RPW, or a wetland directly abutting an RPW, a JD will require additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW. If the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the significant nexus evaluation must
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands. This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for
analytical purposes, the tributary and all of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary, or its adjacent wetlands, or both. If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands, complete Section IILB.1 for
the tributary, Section III.B.2 for any onsite wetlands, and Section III.B.3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary, both onsite
and offsite. The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section III.C below.
1. Characteristics of non-TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) General Area Conditions:
Watershed size:q~a ~nul~s
Drainage area: E,~~~~;.
Average annual rainfall: inches
Average annual snowfall: inches
(ii) Physical Characteristics:
(a) Relationship with TNW:
® Tributary flows directly into TNW.
^ Tributary flows through ~~,w~~}1i~ tributaries before entering TNW.
Project waters are ~fl Derr ~r~~ river miles from TNW.
s ~ ~ l ~~
Project waters are ~ 1C` ~~ nver miles from RPW.
Project waters are 0 3 ~~ ° ~ aerial (straight) miles from TNW.
Project waters arc ~~» „~,' ~ aerial (straight) miles from RPW.
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
identify flow route to TNWS:
Tributary stream order, if known:
a Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional information regarding swales, ditches, washes, and erosional features generally and in the grid
West.
s Flow route can be described by identifying, e. g., tributary a, which flows through the review area, to flow into tributary b, which then flows into TNW.

(b) General Tributary Characteristics (check all that apply):
Tributary is: ^ Natural
^ Artificial (man-made). Explain:
^ Manipulated (man-altered). Explain:
Tributary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate):
Average width: feet
Average depth: feet
Average side slopes: 'Vterti~al (~ ~,, otr ~e~s.
Primary tributary substrate composition {check all that apply):
^ Silts ^ Sands ^ Concrete
^ Cobbles ^ Gravel ^ Muck
^ Bedrock ^ Vegetations Type/% cover:
^ Other. Explain:
Tributary condition/stability [e.g., highly eroding, sloughing banks]. Explain:
Presence of run riffle/pool complexes- Explain:
Tributary geometry: ~~~~~ ~.
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope):
(c) Flow:
Tributary provides for ~!~1"~~rri~li~. `nd,>~ ~~
Estimate avera e number of flow events in review areal ear ~, , ~r ~ ~y
g Y ~ 1~ ~~eaer
Describe flow regime:
Other information on duration and volume: .
Surface flow is ,. ~ ~ wed. Characteristics:
Subsurface flow 1'I1~'~'`~t. Explain findings: _
^ Dye (or other) test performed:
Tributary has (check all that apply):
^ Bed and banks
^ OHWM6 (check all indicators that apply):
^ clear, natural line impressed on the bank
^ changes in the character of soil
^ shelving
^ vegetation matted down, bent, or absent
^ leaf litter disturbed or washed away
^ sediment deposition
^ water staining
^ other (list):
^ Discontinuous OHWM.' Explain:
^ the presence of litter and debris
^ destruction of terrestrial vegetation
^ the presence of wrack line
^ sediment sorting
^ scour
^ multiple observed or predicted flow events
^ abrupt change in plant community
If factors other than the OHWM were used to determ
High Tide Line indicated by:
^ oil or scum line along shore objects
^ fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore)
^ physical markings/characteristics
^ tidal gauges
^ other (list):
ins lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction {check all that apply):
Mean High Water Mark indicated by:
^ survey to available datum;
^ physical markings;
^ vegetation lines/changes in vegetation types.
(iii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize tributary (e.g., water color is clear, discolored, oily film; water quality; general watershed characteristics, etc.).
Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
~A natural or man-made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessarily sever jurisdiction (e.g., where the stream temporarily flows underground, or where
the OHWM has been removed by development or agricultural practices). Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the waterbody's flow
regime (e.g., flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert), the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break.
'ibid.

(iv) Biological Characteristics. Channel supports (check all that apply):
^ Riparian corridor. Characteristics (type, average width):
^ Wetland fringe. Characteristics:
^ Habitat for:
^ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
^ Fish/spawn areas- Explain findings:
^ Other environmentally-sensitive species. Explain findings: e
^ Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
2_ Characteristics of wetlands adjacent to non-TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) Physical Characteristics:
(a) General Wetland Characteristics:
Properties:
Wetland size: acres
Wetland type- Explain:
Wetland quality. Explain: .
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries. Explain:
(b) General Flow Relationship with Non-TNW:
Flow is u~teit~~#±~1~. Explain:
Surface flow zs s~iri~a;, egnfip~c
Characteristics:
Subsurface flow ~1 Explain findings:
^ Dye (ar other) test performed:
(c} Wetland Adiacency Determination with Non-TNW:
^ Directly abutting
^ Not directly abutting
^ Discrete wetland hydrologic connection. Explain:
^ Ecological connection. Explain:
^ Separated by berm barrier. Explain:
(d) Proximit r}_(Relationship) to TNW
Project wetlands are ~ ~= `t river miles from TNW.
Project waters are ~ ~ ~ aerial (strai ht) miles from TNW.
Flow is from: ~ ~ i~r~~~vi`g~~ 11.
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the ~~`~'~'~~~ floodplain.
(ii) Chemical Characteristics:
Characterize wetland system (e.g., water color is clear, brown, oil film on surface; water quality; general watershed
characteristics; etc.). Explain:
Identify specific pollutants, if known:
(iii) Biological Characteristics. Wetland supports (check all that apply):
^ Riparian buffer. Characteristics (type, average width):
^ Vegetation type/percent cover. Explain:
^ Habitat for:
^ Federally Listed species. Explain findings:
^ Fish/spawn areas. Explain findings:
^ Other environmentally-sensitive species. Explain findings:
^ Aquatic/wildlife diversity. Explain findings:
3. Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if any)
All wetlands} being considered in the cumulative analysis ~.~~
Approximately ( )acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis.

For each wetland, specify the following:
DirectlYabuts? (Y/N) Size in acres) Directly abuts? (Y/N) Size (in acres)
Summarize overall biological, chemical and physical functions being performed:
C. SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
A significant nexus analysis will assess the flow characteristics and functions of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determine if they significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity
of a TNW. For each of the following situations, a significant nexus exists if the tributary, in combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands, has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical, physical and/or biological integrity of a TNW.
Considerations when evaluating significant nexus include, but are not limited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the flow
of water in the tributary and its proximity to a TNW, and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands. It is not appropriate to determine significant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e.g. between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW). Similarly, the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus.
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW, as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instructional Guidebook. Factors to consider include, for example:
Docs the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any}, have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs, or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TN W?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any), provide habitat and lifecycle support functions for fish and
other species, such as feeding, nesting, spawning, or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any}, have the capacity to transfer nutrien#s and organic carbon that
support downstream foodwebs?
• Does the tributary, in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any}, have other relationships to the physical, chemical, or
biological integrity of the TNW?
Note: the above list of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below
1. Significant nexus findings for non-RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or indirectly into TN Ws. Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary itself, then go to Section 11LD:
2. Significant nexus findings for non-RPW and its adjacent wetlands, where the non-RPW flows directly or indirectly into
TNWs. Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands, then go to Section IILD:
3. Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not directly abut the RPW. Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below, based on the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands, then go to
Section I11.D:
D. DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS_ THE SUBJECT WATERS/WETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLl~:
1. TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands. Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area:
TNWs: linear feet width (ft), Or, acres.
Wetlands adjacent to TNWs: acres.
2. RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
I, Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year-round are jurisdictional. Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial: NCDWQ stream form score of 39.
[~ Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow "seasonally" (e.g., typically three months each year) are
jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section IILB. Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally:

Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: 500 linear feet 25 width (ft).
Other non-wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
3. Non-RPWsB that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
[~' Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW, but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW, and it has a significant nexus with a
TNW is jurisdictional. Data supporting this conclusion is provided a2 Section IILC.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
Other non-wetland waters: acres.
Identify type(s) of waters:
4. Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands-
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year-round. Provide data and rationale
indicating that tributary is perennial in Section IILD.2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is
directly abutting an RPW:
ial Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow "seasonally." Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section IILB and rationale in Section III_D2, above. Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW:
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
5. Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TN Ws.
~' Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW, but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisidictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section IILC.
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
6. Wetlands adjacent to non-RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Wetlands adjacent to such waters, and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional. Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section IILC.
Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area: acres.
7. Impoundments of jurisdictional waters.9
As a general rule, the impoundment of a jurisdictional tributary remains jurisdictional.
Demonstrate that impoundment was created from "waters of the U.S.," or
Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (l -6), or
Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below}.
E. ISOLATED [INTERSTATE OR INTRA-STATE] WATERS, INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS, THE USE,
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE, INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY}:10
~] which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes.
1= from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce.
which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce.
Interstate isolated waters. Explain:
Other factors. Explain:
Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting determination:
RSee Footnote # 3.
v To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section 1ILD.6 o£the Instructional Guidebook.
in Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based solely on this category, Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent with the process described in the Corps/EPA Memorandum Regarding CWA Act Jurisdiction Following Rapanos.

Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply):
Tributary waters: linear feet width (ft).
Other non-wetland waters: acres.
_.__
Identify type(s) of waters.
Wetlands: acres.
F. NON-JURISDICTIONAL WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS {CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional 5upplemcnts.
Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce.
^ Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision in "SWANCC," the review area would have been regulated based solely on the
"Migratory Bird Rule" (MBR).
Waters do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such a finding is required for jurisdiction. Explain:
[~ Other: {explain, if not covered above):
Provide acreage estimates for non jurisdictional waters in the review area, where the sole potential basis of jurisdiction is the MBR
factors (i.e., presence of migratory birds, presence of endangered species, use of water for imgated agriculture}, using best professional
judgment (check all that apply):
'''~_ Non-wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet width (ft).
~~~ Lakes/ponds: acres.
Other non-wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
i; Wetlands: acres.
Provide acreage estimates for non-jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the "Significant Nexus" standard, where such
a finding is required for jurisdiction (check all that apply):
Non-wetland waters (i.e., rivers, streams): linear feet, width (ft).
Lakes/ponds: acres.
Other non-wetland waters: acres. List type of aquatic resource:
~'i_ Wetlands: acres.
SECTION IV: DATA SOURCES.
A. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply -checked items shall be included in case fle and, where checked
and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant:
Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicandconsultant.
^ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
^ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
Corps navigable waters' study:
U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
^ USGS NHD data.
^ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
^ U.S. Geological Survey maps}. Cite scale & quad name:
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation:
National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
FEMA/FIRM maps:
^ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1.929)
Photographs: ^ Aerial (Name & Date):
or ^ Other (Name & Date):
~~' Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
=i' Applicable/supporting case law:
Applicable/supporting scientific literature:
'~ ° Other information (please specify):
B. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD:

._ _
- - .r
'" ~,v~ ' "' i ~ 1 ~_'\ ~.~ r '!~',.~ °~ ''T ` i,~~ it , J r~ {T t - 'F~ _ -~:~ l ~ ;_~~Jrj r"f -~1
e
. IttI t-._.r~~~..
~ ~ ~ ~ ' _ jam'
~ ~ .
~~Y .._-ti.~ ~ °!±. . ~-. -~ ~ ~ ~ \S ~~ ,l~'~ .. \_' a .ifGCL A'<+TYI-_~ .~ `-J i `---, ,~E t--'~ r--' - _ L~ f
~_ ~ ~,
M .t , ~' _ ~ , L~'S~/` ,/, ~ T ~r~ r+ \_ ~.S r - - . 11 ~. ~:.~~ _,_ • err i `- - -"% -+ ~ ~` ~1•~ ` - - -
~I 1 '~- fit
,`, ~ • r ~ '~ ! ~ / ,t a s: Jri' _ . s A ~,,. ~`~ _ _ ~ `~„~}, F ```- {-
.. - ~ ~' ~ ~~ / ~ ~ - \~ iv ,.s' i ., ~ •_-~f ~-• ~~ ~~~ ~ i ` --.~ a~ y S ~L~' ~Si }\ _ ~,/.• 1 i i ~~ir , ~ iki7
~_~f -~ i \ It~ ~~f ~ _ ".I' __- .S _ _ ~~~~\``Y '!~._4~t: ^.~ ~r-1~•1~L .f ` 1 Ib: -\ ~' { t~j f
~{r} ~, -~ rk~~ __. ~_~ _ ~ ~E_:: ~f~_ ~ ~ < t•~^ = ,~~L#33 1 # -,~ t ~±~ ;~ ~ ~J ~i ~ i, ~ `~~ E ~.' "'a r\.~ ~ ~ i ~~/
{~t - >t ~`r .i i. _ rh~S ~~Z_ -f. _ _ '( t!•s _s I L .r~.~ ;'jf ~ Z,'~~h~'" i~ ,~ ~~` f_i /~ j.~1(~_
t +' /
/'fir,\~ ~__ _,.}'~ . ~+ : r ~r -~ ~ ~. ~ '~. :,.~ .: F____ \\ ~~ --.Y~ _` ~Y "'~` f~'r y # ~ ~ {~ ~`-i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~; ~, % r-~f,'~ ~ ~ r` F ~i
- }. r- """_e~3' _ ~}. • ~ ,~ ~l}`l'~~ ~ e \ \r ~ °~ c--- ' ~'T ~_ ~ ~•_ ~t, e ~ .t ,., ~~- r r: ,~Y t y ~ ~ a j~ 'I ~ s ~-r ;ri r" ~ -~ t ,')r '~ ~Z.l a -jI~_`
e _ :.
~Y 1. l-
.r _v"~-.-~i~ - .. __ .€ _.r'~~~. ~u,t; ~ ; ~1E ~r 1: Park-_~ 44 _ + ? ,-s `~~, t
/7, f \ , ~ ~',~ ~~~ ..k' • ! a l sh . '~~ . r`i • /r . 'S `- ~y i (f i i ' ~ •~` t .r ~ ~ ., ~ _ f S th (4 1 ~~ .
/V/ - ,f~ 1
.: ~~. -,`- - '' 11, :-~ ~. f , 'a, _~J f t ~(. ,;.y ~ __I i`\ L (/ ~J- .f~f~ , ~'~_. '-~I ~ - _ _ ,~{ i ~~^~-~..
L`t'tr ',~ , ,; `J . ~ r 1' r •`~~ • ~ ~ ,( ~ l ~ -~ 1 j ~ ~ ` f 1+ _ ~ ''-'~~* -~,~ r-~
ct y ~~ ~J ~~° 1 ~ a ~~ `. \ ~~~~ ~. ^/ `•NV1,• .!~.~~~ ~~. .~~ i ` 1 ~) (~~ -T ~; - . i I ~ r - ~r' - I r`-M1
, ~" ~ ~ ~ -
_ r
~O-/;~~ ~1` _ -'-~.'`-~ 4 •~.1 r r, t~ ~ ` !i i s ~~~~•(-- ~ ~ -]IC, '! \\~•~'t ~ t 1 r 7;: -~J` f tI1- ~ a r• 5; r {~f, _- .~t}r`(
=it!' ~ i - . ~ { ..,i ,~~. ~"]r/ 'r {~ `- ~~\ ~~. ~~ ~ • f • ~ ~'~_ Y s + l~ St ~~' ~ ~~ ~ S ~ i l .~_ -
~r~//~ i~t ~?`- 'i fi r~ \ .,~ -r:// _ ~~•y~~,r ~'•-~`..C i ~ 1~ ~~~ _-~ mfr ~ _ / ;~ `r~~,~+
~ _
i~if~~ E ~ § `~~. +~k~~ ,a% _.*~~ `'~ ~5.71,`d',$pn~=" ~-YX~ ~`•` ;1~'~i' ro ~. Vii` ~~'' rr ~.'~-s\.ff + I :~ z~-J-f ) ti~
Eit ' t i!`.f i~_ 1~~~ j!: I'(f -ti ~ri•~"\`.~+~1eS ~.... ~`/: ~c:.'Y4.~} ~/~ ~`h.f ~ -,r.~•. ~ '~~' `•~_ •{~a-` - --. v.. ~ "'`~/~1' ---
J
`._ • `~ f rr h .~\` ~°i ~ '2 I3QtliA~ r • I • (~ i `,~S -,_,yw'?~~~-~ ~ l'' 'l, ~ ,~ ~ _ ..
._ • _
.~
.. -~ _ - _
_,
. f 4'r f. //}f~ J ...y /F r. ,p l ; ~< <' ( ~~ ~ /~ ! z =; ~ ~ s e~l" - ~---°"~- : i~ } ~' ~i ~' ~
~~r.-,` /~~ ~ '%':`r~r~~~t ~ rs' `~sy~1. + :~l r-~\ \~1 ~-~ ~~ F --; - s_ F' -- •r. _ $1~J0..•
• .
z / - _. _ys.S' !. `, 1' `, ' _r~r `• ~ r• ° 1 .', _-_::~i ~~` `r 1 ~~ l~ ~ '..i • .,'~(1y$r •;~f,,,.-.__~_i---' T ' - -.~ fr~ _ - ~.j .`~.~` ~~ • 5 ~,+L ';
'~ • ~ t~ r , :~.:;' es pi , _\h\ ~ - f ~.i~~ ~~.~ _ ~. ~°.°-w..:r° `~f, fir K - 4 t 1.
,= 3'~~ (_---~st~`+,. i :: .~~ .~•r r s}~ '- '~\ L ~ _ ~ f - \ ~ %. - -_. ~~{'~~ - - -`ta~`_. -~~. 1 ~~ t~- `v~r B4+ "r-ti~d s ~ ~_.-'°~~~Sy ~ 4~~ ~,,_
-' ° ' _ _ _ _
,
. .
~' _ ~ -
t ~ J .s
- ` ,
r _' r\,: ` r ~' ~ -~~\~ ...~\~-. .- , *`:.r y.- ' ~, 1. f .-. _:~,` 1 .:-t~~ >p °1'' -~~ ~- ±
/~ ~ ~ ,: _
-r . l f ~ ,r~ ~ ~~---.t ~ J { ~ f~ c i r e, ~,~.... -`t '7 _{, f _ ~ ~ ;r r - - ~ ~ r!ti _J /~-~
l,,. f• _ i` _ "-~_.~f////,- -- }(t~ _r.` ~'~f~- -~~ tS. ~E- - ram ~` f ,d:r~ l~{~'r
'~7`~'/(f~ y' ~i ~ _>~~~~ 0~7 'r t r..- ~~~.: _~'rB Qp~Fa c :~'s"..--I eJ ff ~1.t `'`I ~'... ~,\ _ 1€. ~-..+~-~.. __-~~\i -..1~ ~~ !~' :~--..-
r t ,!
•'._~~.~ ._~_ j f ~ '',~ t 'r ~~ .~ +x• ~ ~:. ~! ,-~ ~ j ~ y _~ Long C3tia S~ f`;'• ~ •:Y~j~~- i1 _
~` ~~
' _
-_ ..
=- -.-~ _ g . ~~--1 t ~ ~•ey "_-s .`_ .' S 4 Ys ,• < ) 1 s !~ ~ \ - ~~.,~ '• ~-~ 1 ~ ~ ~2lOk~ ~ ~ - ~ ,.;.j {jr
_ r ~~F r- ;•_r ~ ~ i~~r. _ _ r fy ,~ 1 ".. ~ / . f f .~ ~ ~ -_. . , J _ '•rsr ~~ 4 _ ~y f s- L~l.~, ` -
~---~,- - ' ~ s ~ •r
~1 5~~,•, a_-~ j ~ . ' .! rvt~ •• .' _ _ - .7 ST + rid, ,t ~ .- r ^ w. -" __ _ ` f ~~ .'L.......~.____ ~i%~ I
.•
.
..
`` ~:1 ,+'~ ~", '-:fitf Jrir O~" s •- `~ r- s #~`. wt -:~ ;' --.
t ~"-~ r 1 _
h J.`~i~"~/•.r rt.-.. is ~,~-r~ ~~ r~ _~~~-~p~--rte ~~". ~C~S-{1;ftiOtp ', t f -:~,! {~ r~-~ ~ ~ ~a~ _ __ ~ '~'~~~ ~~--~_ ! '~
~'~` •{ ~ 1 ; ~s '~~s.s_, ~ , " ~ L `•,--r 4~,~- o • 4~} a ~i'N fi ~ rt -4 f~ ' oL _; f ~„~ ,.~ t\``~~ :~t~~ t,~ ~- ~ ~A St~
-,--.LY.._ r - ~!x/Ja ...~..r _ ,.~ ,. ~~i. `'~ ~ j f • ,Y ~°~ d __ tr. j2 .~ - `~ p ~ ~;~ 4 - • l it~.t.~\~~~~ `~.-- ~! 1y `~
_~ ,•
,~---~ r 1 ~t 1}`may 1~ -. v-~ : p r • j ~ ~ ,,.ii'" °~ ~` ~l • r L % ~' ~ - ~~ `i ~~) ~ ~\~~~~` ~nt``\ y
J ~. ..
I • ,.~. _ _ ~.- ~~~`~ f;~ /x,iir' rc< yZ~,~+,~ ~..4.-% 'f~,,,f i ~: ~~ ~iL)~ F ~--~~`y `! r r` V~. _ ~; ~ ~; ~ (~3 rti his
~. 2~~' _ A.1 s / ~a tY t ~,+i i. `~ ` sl ~t fr"~~'~ ~~%14..,~i ~~~ Q-4'. ~ rF~~ - r~ ~~Lf ,j ~\\~ -!/- r~s:j' _ ~ _>~~- ~ t ,~ ~ 4
ti{ i 1`1 - /^. %I-..t h,. ~-. ~ ~-Jr~~~~••,~"~`~. \> >__/ \ l •sti `f-., ~~~ t ~ ii ~ '~ ` ""' _ i ~~.. ~4` l
-.a r ~ ' `,-r ~i~!~f `,...~~ if ``' ' ~~'~ 'VIIV L'~' _ Lili ~f~ ~~.~1~' ii' \'~. 3r`L r1 - ' ~-\ -' ~'-~-_~
~,~ i i' ~ ~~`.\['' t l` \~~ . \, ~ ~ ~ 4F ~~~\ ~ ~.yt°''S~-?t r"Y~1~{e~~ ~"°--~~~--`_=~~~~ ~~ ~~,i,'F~ s%. I~~.~'r--.;_~1~ - ii'. ~)s-5` ~~-•:r- ~! ~`~',
7~~f it 1 ~t,1 -~~1 ~• t ~ ~` { ~ ~~ -~ tits -.~ ~' __ ~~ \ .t, \~-'-~./ ~\.,1~_` tt ~{ -~.~~ `
{. ~A ~. ;+i`. c ~._ rte-. "3 I 1 ~-- ~ ~( .,~.= ''=~~=,~,~\.~~~~;\`4~-~~s-- r~_~ ~_.. - E -;~i{ ( .~ ~ _~
- 1 ~ -- C sfr ,: r ~ ~il ~t~, - 1 J'~^ _ ~~? ~ ~~~`-~\ %~~ '~ ~-~1`, ~ k '`~ ~ ~ '°^-.-! /~ }ra - `rt ~ ~~' e' t~_. 1_: ,~=_'J
_ .'~ ~ ~ 1 ,~ ~~,~ _ ~ ~`~~r~ ~ t~L L ~``1114~ ~~ " `~ i~, ~ ~ -_~--~'~ ~ ~~ ~ L~-~` Z -.\ 5 t\ ~~~k_-~f ~ /i , .f % ,'ll,~~`' ~-i4: t ~, lf~~~
_ ~ ~~ ~ ~~i ~ :G..1 h ! t € • 1 t t ~~' :~~~^ - ';i. ~4 \ -~~~ f „' ~--~:~'- . r,..-! ~L'-\~`'S' - _ _ ~._: i~~l ~~~.,, ti \f ~.y,~,. t'-~~ l ~ i-° ' 1 _ ~~- ~/ 3 # e: +'~r=.
~,.,Y,;i ~ , ~ # ~( .Yt:~ -,....~-js.'i , ~. ~~ ~`~~''~, f~=.~~ d ~\Lti"'=` - -'_`~i^_=1~- _`~s~ i' ~tiY'~R, ° ~t ~ ~ _ ~~.J .~ _ ~, 'f :(~ `f=
~..~.~.. , i ~. :~•1. .r _il( ti;l sr!-~`-~ ~.~~ 1-x-54 ,:-.-~kl+.\ }•: j 1`~r.~__.~f i~ ~... 1£'_~.'~e:~~`..°-`_ `G~_ "' !/~'-',',! l'`~ ~~~~=L_ _`~ ~, f. .. -~~.~ r __-- y~ .Y~'~-/'.`t:\ _. ~~x=i
~~E r ~ '.tip l i 45 t /~-'' ~z`~-, i ~ ~ ~ -- =~ "_-~_ ti..>.~ - _~,~~- r/~~-r' ~~~ ! ~"
'~ ~_ r r _ r~j' ~ -k}~---• ~~\•~ Y ~~f1~~ ~ ~-~~ i , ti~,!- {R I. ~.~~ ~~~; ~~ ~t .i i f ~1 ~/'i~~~-s~,. ~/' ~!~ %. ~~~ f
S` ~ Cr1 q J `T. ` ~ \ a ._ ~ ~ „~+ ~t f 4.y. i~~, ~ ~ l_ rr ~' \. f+'-_• 'i' --
-~ Z ~_ ~ ~s •--,~..F ,^ i l _ i r rrf'~{ is `: ~k a ~1 - `'~ _-~ - ~ 1 `~°_1~ ~ ~~F
7 ~•~ - ~~ - 1, - - 'ti -. ~ E- t \ ~ \• _J /mar V a-r
-.r 1 ` `rC~ S - i%a if a.! ! -i t ~ ff r ~ i' i1 - ._/- - i ~=~ i,tli ~ i ~ -` r- ~ ~-"
~` --.-z~_ 4 I ( s~ _„~ 1 t ~: s f ~, ~ (#- r! i~ ~ =e'~e /,r ,': tr `~~.~-_,s'~ ~ ~ i r! t -`~~ ~)I r _~ r' ~-
:T 'f_`. ~_ ~ i r,-l _~ '~'C-tai ~~! + # r~~r<~ ~/. .i 1 -~~`.T - ~ ~~ ~ ~~'~~~-~-~~ f.~ - ' ~ fif `. li
,~~,.' 1 / r I 'T--t _ 1. .~\ ~
_ (/, /~'`' $j _ :~~ ~~--~ j~~~~ 1,
6° W ~~ rr~.. `°_ - ~~`:.'~u„f-r~ r~ ~ J ~. rt ['(3H { ~ry ~~ ~.' f 1.: _ ~, -1--~i ~'t ~~t ~~ ~~ ~,~~v~ ~~ - S(.~- f._ i i~-~1 l r~-',1 , . ~J,od. j ~ t. ~I
Name: W~AV~RVILLE !! permit Drawinfl 7 Location: 035° 40' 39.4" N 082° 33' 37.7" W
Date: 2/27/2007 Sh~e~ ~ _ of Caption: Project: 33402.1.1 (B-4036)
Scale: 1 inch equals 2000 feet - Replacement of Bridge No. 220 Over Reems Cr. on SR 2098
CopVripht fCl 1997, Maptech. Inc

Buncombe County
Bridge No. 220 on SR 2098 over Reems Creek
Federal-Aid Project No. BRZ-2098(1)
State Project 8.2844601
WBS Project # 33402.1.1
TIP Project No. B-4036
CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION
April 2006
Document Prepared by:
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Ronald . Hairr
Project Manager ~41yd~atrr~~ry~~~,
,~•' G A R ~ '~•.
e +
• ~^
.: ~ ~ •
~ i
L ei ner, P.E.
Se i t i e President ~ T.
I~ F F•ea~rrNvS°p ~ ,.
,fi~~I~~" of { ` `~~~~ *~
For the North Carolina Department of Transportation
~'~~
J sep M' er, P.E.
ect Manager
Western Region Project Development Unit

PROJECT COMMITMENTS
Buncombe County
Bridge No. 220 on SR 2098 over Reems Creek
Federal-Aid Project No. BRZ-2098(1)
State Project 8.2844601
WBS # 33402.1.1
TIP Project No. B-4036
In addition to the standard Nationwide Permit No. 23 Conditions, the General Nationwide
Permit Conditions, Section 404 Only Conditions, Regional Conditions, State Consistency
Conditions, NCDOT's Guidelines for Best Management Practices for the Protection of
Surface Waters, General Certification Conditions, and Section 401 Conditions of
Certification, the following special corrunitments have been agreed to by NCDOT:
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch:
Approval under Section 26a of the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) Act will be
required. A copy of the approved Categorical Exclusion (CE} will be provided to the
TVA.
Division Construction/Project Services Unit:
There will be an in-stream and 25-foot buffer work moratorium from October 15 to
April 15.
The ".Guidelines for Construction of Highway Improvements Adjacent to or Crossing
Trout Waters in North Carolina" (October 27, 1992) will be adhered to throughout design
and construction of this project.
Green Sheet
B-4036 Categorical Exclusion
April 2006
Page 1 of 1

Buncombe County
SR 2098
Bridge No. 220 Over Reems Creek
Federal-Aid Project No. BRZ-2098(1)
State Project No. 8.2844601
WBS Project No. 33402.1.1
T.I.P. No. B-4036
INTRODUCTION: The replacement of Bridge No. 220 is included in the 2006-2012
North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) Transportation Improvement
Program (TIP) and the Federal-Aid Bridge Replacement Program. The location is shown
in Figure 1. No substantial environmental impacts are anticipated. The project is
classified as a Federal "Categorical Exclusion."
I. PURPOSE AND NEED STATEMENT
Bridge Maintenance Unit records indicate the bridge has a sufficiency rating of 40.0 out
of a possible 100 for a new structure. The bridge is considered functionally obsolete and
structurally deficient. The replacement of this inadequate structure will result in safer
and more efficient traffic operations.
II. EXISTING CONDITIONS
Bridge No. 220 is located on SR 2098 (Herron Cove Road) in Buncombe County.
SR 2098 is classified as a rural local route in the Statewide Functional Classification
System. Land use in the project area is woodland and residential. Private residences and
maintained yards are located in the southeast, southwest and northwest quadrants. There
is an old barn located northeast of the bridge.
There is a water line, sewer line, phone lines and aerial power lines located on the
downstream (west) side (Figure 4). Utility impacts are expected to be high.
Bridge No. 220 was constructed in 1960. The existing structure is 76.6 feet in length and
consists of two spans with the maximum span at approximately 40.8 feet. The clear
roadway width is 19 feet, providing two travel lanes with no effective shoulder width.
The existing right of way width is 60 feet. The superstructure of Bridge No. 220 consists
of a timber floor on I-beams with an asphalt wearing surface and timber railing. The
substructure of the bridge consists of reinforced concrete abutments, and one interior bent
consisting of a timber cap on timber piles with concrete sills. The bed to crown height is
approximately I6 feet. The normal depth of flow is 1.5 feet. The posted weight limit is
15 tons for single vehicles and 20 tons for truck-tractor semi-trailers.
The approach roadway from the northwest is an a horizontal curve with a length of 214
feet using a radius of 250 feet before entering a 55-foot tangent in advance of the bridge.
The approach roadway from the southeast is on a horizontal curve with a length of 255
B-4036 Categorical Exclusion

feet using a radius of 180 feet before entering a 141-foot tangent in advance of the bridge.
Residential driveways are located less than 50 feet from the north end of the bridge and a
residential driveway is located 100 feet from the south end of the bridge to the east side
of the road. The speed limit on SR 2098 (Herron Cove Road) in the vicinity of the bridge
is not posted, therefore a statutory speed limit of 55 miles per hour (mph) applies.
The estimated 2004 average daily traffic volume is 1,700 vehicles per day (vpd). The
projected traffic volume is expected to increase to 3,100 vpd by the design year 2030.
The volumes include 1 percent TTST and 3 percent dual tired vehicles.
This section of SR 2098 in Buncombe County is not part of a designated bicycle route
and is not listed in the TIP as needing incidental bicycle accommodations. Five {5)
school buses cross this bridge four (4) times daily for a total of twenty (20) daily trips.
There were two (2) accidents reported for the three-year period from September 1, 2001
through August 31, 2004.
IIL ALTERNATIVES
A. Project Description
The proposed replacement structure for Bridge No. 220 is a three-span sloping
abutment bridge. It is anticipated that the bridge length will be approximately 110
feet. The final bridge length and type will be determined during final design. The
proposed bridge will consist of two 12-foot travel lanes with eight-foot shoulders.
The drainage area for the bridge is 26.4 square miles and is located in a FEMA
Detailed Study area. The channel geometry is such that there is a large floodplain
on the East side and a small floodplain on the West side. The length and opening
size of the proposed structure may increase or decrease as necessary to
accommodate peak flows, as determined by a detailed hydraulic analysis to be
performed during the final design phase of the project.
The proposed approach roadway will consist of a 40-foot travelway providing two
12-foot travel lanes with eight-foot shoulders (Figure 3). The proposed right-of-
way width is variable. The design speed will be 60 mph_
B. Build Alternatives
Two (2) build alternatives studied for replacing the existing bridge are described
below.
Alternative 1 (Preferred -Figure 2A) replaces the existing bridge in-place while
maintaining traffic with an off-site detour. In Alternative 1, the bridge is replaced
with roadway improvements at the existing location. The detour route includes
SR 2094 (Stoney Knob Road) to the south and SR 1003 (Reems Creek Road) to
B-403b Categorical Exclusion 2

J
the north, both providing access to Old Business 19-23 (Weaverville Highway)
along a 2.7-mile route.
Alternative 2 (Figure 2B) replaces the existing bridge on new alignment 45 feet
downstream of the existing bridge while maintaining traffic on the existing bridge
during construction. Alternative 2 was not selected as the preferred because it is
not cast-effective and increases impacts to adjacent properties.
C. Alternatives Eliminated from Further Study
The "Do-Nothing" Alternative will eventually necessitate removal of the bridge.
This is not desirable due to the traffic service provided by SR 2098.
Investigation of the existing structure by the Bridge Maintenance Unit indicates
the rehabilitation of the old bridge is not feasible due to its age and deteriorated
condition.
D. Preferred Alternative
Alternative 1 was selected as the preferred alternative because it is more cost-
effective and provides less impact to adjacent properties than Alternative 2. The
Division Engineer concurs with Alternative 1 as the preferred alternative.
IV. ESTIMATED COSTS
The estimated costs, based on current 2004 prices, are as follows:
Alternative 1
(Preferred) Alternative 2
Structure Removal (existing) $15,400.00 $15,400.00
Structure (proposed) $264,000.00 $264,000.00
Roadway approaches $173,550.00 $190,620.00
Miscellaneous and Mobilization $119,050.00 $127,980.00
Engineering and Contingencies $78,000.00 $102,000.00
ROW/Const. Easements/LJtilities $310,000.00 $342,500.00
Total $960,000.00 $1,042,500.00
The estimated cost of the project, as shown in the 2006-2012 Transportation
Improvement Program, is $1,130,000 including $330,000 for right-of--way and $700,000
for construction.
B-4036 Categorical Exclusion
3

V. NATURAL RESOURCES
A. Methodology
Field investigations were conducted along the project study area on
October 10, 2003. Pedestrian surveys were undertaken to determine natural
resource conditions and to document natural communities, wildlife, and the
presence of protected species or their habitats.
Published information regarding the project study area and region was derived
from a number of sources including: United States Geological Survey (USGS)
7.5-minute topographical quadrangle map (Weaverville, North Carolina), United
States Fish and Wildlife Service (LTSFWS) database reviews, National Wetland
Inventory (NWI) map, NCDOT aerial photography (1" = 200'), and Natural
Resources Conservation Service (MRCS) soil survey mapping of Buncombe
County.
Surface waters within the project study area were evaluated in the field to
document their physical characteristics and jurisdictional status. Water resources
information was obtained from publications of the North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality (NCDENR-
DWQ).
Approximate boundaries of plant communities were mapped in the field utilizing
aerial photography of the project study area. Dominant plant species were
identified in each strata for each plant community. Plant community descriptions
are based on the classifications utilized by Schafale and Weakley (1990). Plant
names follow the nomenclature found in Radford et al. (1968}.
Wildlife occurrences were determined through visual field observations,
evaluation of habitat-types within the project study area, secondary indicators of
species (tracks, scat, and burrows), as well as a review of supporting literature
(Coe, 1994, Martof, et al, 1980, and Webster, 1985}. Field observations and
literature reviews (Bogan, 2002, Jenkins and Burkhead, 1993, Voshell, Jr., 2002)
were utilized to assess aquatic life.
Information concerning the potential occurrence of federal and state protected
species within the project study area and project vicinity was obtained from the
USFWS list of protected species (updated February 5, 2003 -current update as of
November 9, 2004) and the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCN~IP)
database of rare species and unique habitats (updated January 2004 -current
update as of November 9, 2004). Field evaluations of the project study area were
conducted to identify suitable habitat for protected species. If suitable habitat was
identified, field surveys were conducted for federally listed endangered or
threatened species.
B-4036 Categorical Exclusion

Jurisdictional wetlands were identified and delineated based on the methodology
outlined in the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual
(Environmental Laboratory, 1987). Wetland systems were classified based on the
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Classification of Wetlands and Deepwate~
Habitats of the United States (Cowardin, et al, 1979).
B. Physiography and Soils
Buncombe County is situated in the Blue Ridge Mountain physiographic province
of western North Carolina. The county encompasses 646 square miles and is
primarily rural. The county ranges in elevation from approximately 1,900 feet
mean sea level (MSL) where the Broad River flows into adjoining Henderson
County to over 6,000 feet MSL. Elevations within the project study area range
from approximately 2,020 to 2,040 feet MSL. The land uses surrounding and
within the project study area are residential homes interspersed with forested and
agricultural land.
The geologic features underlying the project study area are associated with the
Blue Ridge Belt, specifically, muscovite-biotite gneiss which is sulfidic and
interlayered with mica schist, minor amphibolite, and hornblende gneiss rock
(North Carolina Division of Land Resources, 1985). The project vicinity is
located within the Oconee Supergroup.
The portion of Buncombe County within the project study area has been mapped
by NRCS under the currently provisional {unpublished) soil survey. Official soil
series descriptions were obtained from the NRCS. A brief description of
unofficial soil types mapped by NRCS and/or observed during field investigation
is as follows:
The Evard-Urban land complex (2 to S percent slopes) consists mainly of very
deep, well-drained, sandy loamy on narrow to medium ridge tops and irregular or
convex slopes. The surface layer is typically brown loam up to 5.0 inches thick.
Permeability is moderate and surface runoff is low to medium. The Evard-Urban
land complex occurs along moderate slopes within the western portion of the
project study area.
Rosman fine sandy loam (0 to 3 percent slopes) consists mainly of very deep,
well-drained to moderately well-drained soils on nearly level floodplains. The
surface layer is typically dark brown loam up to 15 inches thick. Permeability is
moderately rapid and surface runoff is slow. In the project study area, Rosman
fine sandy loam occurs along the floodplain of Reems Creek.
French loam (0 to 3 percent slopes) consists of very deep, somewhat poorly
drained soils on nearly level floodplains. The surface layer is typically dark
brown loam up to 12 inches thick. Permeability is moderate and surface runoff is
medium. French loam occurs along the floodplain of Herron Cove Branch (a
B-4036 Categorical Exclusion

tributary to Reems Creek) in the eastern portion of the project area.
French loam and Rosman fine sandy loam are not listed as hydric soils of
Buncombe County; however, they are listed as soil units that typically contain
inclusions of hydric soils (USDA, 1995).
C. Water Resources
1. Waters Impacted
Streams, creeks, and tributaries within the project vicinity are part of the
Reems Creek watershed within the French Broad River Basin. The French
Broad River basin covers approximately 2,842 square miles.
Reems Creek and Herron Cove Branch account for the surface waters in
the project study area. The project study area is situated upstream of the
confluence of Reems Creek and the Pigeon River. It is located in
NCDWQ Subbasin 04-03-02 and USGS Hydrologic Unit 06010105
(NCDWQ 2003}. This section of Reems Creek from just south of the
intersection of Reem's Creek Road (SR 2098) and Eller Road (SR 2191)
to US 23, which includes the project study area, has been assigned by the
NCDWQ the Stream Index # 6-87-1 (NCDWQ 2003}.
The NCDWQ classifies surface waters of the state based on their intended
bes# uses. Reems Creek and Herron Cove Branch in the project vicinity
has been assigned a primary water resource classification of "C-Tr"
(NCDWQ 2003). Class "C" refers to waters that are protected far
secondary recreation, fishing, wildlife, fish and aquatic life propagation
and survival, agriculture, and other uses found suitable for Class "C"
waters. Secondary recreation includes wading, boating, and other uses
involving human body contact with water where such activities take place
in an infrequent, unorganized, or incidental manner. There are no
restrictions on watershed development or types of discharges in Class "C"
waters. The surface water classification of "Tr" is a supplemental
classification intended to protect freshwaters for natural trout propagation
and survival of stocked trout. No surface waters classified as High
Quality Water (HQW), Water Supplies (WS-I or WS-II}, or Outstanding
Resource Waters (ORW) occur within one mile of the project area
(NCDWQ 2003). Reems Creek and Herron Cove Branch are not
designated as essential fish habitat and do not contain anadromous and
warm water fish species.
2. Water Resource Characteristics
Reems Creek is a perennial stream that flows generally in a southwesterly
direction. The top of bank width is approximately 25 feet wide with a
B-4036 Categorical Exclusion 6

wetted width of 15 to 20 feet. One to two feet of moderately flowing
water was observed within the channel during the site visit. Reems Creek
has a bankfull depth of 4 feet throughout the project study area. The 3 to 5
feet tall stream banks appeared stable. The substrate consisted of silt and
sand with cobble and gravel riffle sections. The water was clear with
moderate sediment deposition. The channel morphology exhibits strong
indicators of a perennial channel. Excellent habitat conditions exist within
the channel far numerous aquatic species. The stream received a
NCDWQ stream classification of 39 and a USACE stream quality score of
72. NCDWQ stream classification forms are contained in the Appendix.
USACE Stream Quality Assessment worksheets are located in the
Appendix.
Based on Rosgen classification methods and field observation, Reems
Creek is an "F" channel. It is entrenched with a meandering, riffle/pool
channel on a low gradient with a high width/depth ratio.
Herron Cove Branch is a perennial stream that flows generally in a
northwest direction into Reems Creek 100 feet downstream of the bridge.
The top of bank width is approximately 15 feet wide with a wetted width
of 10 feet. Less than one foot of moderately flowing water was observed
within the channel during the site visit. Herron Cove Branch has a
bankfull depth of two feet throughout the project study area. The 3 to 6
feet tall stream banks appeared stable. The substrate consisted of silt and
sand with cobble and gravel riffle sections. The water was clear with
moderate sediment deposition. The stream received a NCDWQ stream
classification of 33.5 and a USACE stream quality score of 72. NCDWQ
stream classification forms are contained in the Appendix. USACE
stream quality assessment worksheets are located in the Appendix.
Based on Rosgen classification methods and field observation, Herron
Cove Branch is a "G" channel. It is an entrenched, narrow, and deep,
step/pool channel with low sinuosity.
The Ambient Monitoring System (AMS) is a network of stream, lake, and
estuarine water quality monitoring stations strategically located for the
collection of physical and chemical water quality data. No AMS
monitoring stations exist on Reems Creek within the project area or
upstream of the project within the project vicinity (NCDWQ 2003).
Point source dischargers located throughout North Carolina are regulated
through the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
program. Dischargers are required by law to register for a permit.
According to NCDWQ {2003), there are two permitted NPDES
dischargers in the subbasin, with one of those being a major discharger
B-403 6 Categorical Exclusion

(>0.5 MGD). However, there are no registered point discharges are
located in or directly upstream of the project study area.
Nonpoint source discharge refers to runoff that enters surface waters
through stormwater, snowmelt or atmospheric deposition. Land use
activities such as land development, construction, mining operations, crop
production, animal feeding lots, failing septic systems, landfills, roads and
parking lots are contributors of nonpoint source pollutants. The land uses
surrounding and within the project study area are residential homes with
farest and agricultural land. Nonpoint source pollution from the
residential areas may include lawn fertilizer, failing septic systems, and
sediment.
3. Anticipated Impacts to Water Resources
a) General impacts
The proposed project is expected to impact both soils and
topography. The topography within the project study area is
gently sloping. The construction of a new bridge and/or road
improvements is likely to require the removal of soils and the
placement of fill. No adverse long-term impacts to soils and
topography are expected from the proposed bridge replacement.
The primary sources of water-quality degradation in rural areas
are agricultural operations and construction. Aquatic organisms
are very sensitive to discharges and inputs resulting from
construction. Potential impacts associated with construction of
the proposed project include: increased sedimentation, scouring
of the streambed, soil compaction, and loss of shading due to
vegetation removal. Increased sedimentation from lateral flows
is also expected. Measures to minimize these potential impacts
include the formulation of an erosion and sedimentation control
plan, provisions for waste materials and storage, stormwater
management measures, and appropriate road maintenance
measures. NCDOT's Best Management Practices for Protection
of Surface Waters and Sedimentation Control guidelines will be
strictly enforced during the construction stages of the project.
NCDOT will strictly adhere to North Carolina's "Design
Standards in Sensitive Watersheds" (15A NCAC 04B .0024}
throughout design and construction of the project because of the
classification as trout waters. Due to the potential for water
quality impacts during construction, North Carolina Wildlife
Resources Commission (NCWRC) requests an in-stream
construction moratorium to limit the effects on fishery resources.
B-4036 Categorical Exclusion

The NCWRC has requested an in-stream and 25-foot buffer
work moratorium from October I S to April 15 for trout.
4. Impacts Related to Bridge Demolition and Removal
The superstructure of Bridge No. 220 consists of a timber floor on I-beams
with an asphalt wearing surface and timber railing. The substructure of
the bridge consists of reinforced concrete abutments, and one interior bent
consisting of a timber cap on timber piles with concrete sills. The bridge
has 2 unequal spans that total 77 feet in length.
It should be possible for the superstructure and substructure elements to be
removed without resulting in any temporary fill in "Waters of the United
States" during demolition and removal. The superstructure and
substructure elements noted above can be cut and removed without any
temporary fill falling into Reems Creek during demolition.
D. Biotic Resources
This section describes the existing vegetation and associated wildlife that occur
within the project study area. The project study area is composed two vegetative
communities based on topography, sails, hydrology, and disturbance. These
systems are interrelated and in many aspects interdependent. Scientific
nomenclature and common name (when applicable) are provided for each plant
and animal species listed. Subsequent references to the same organism only
include the common name.
1. Plant Comrnunities
The two plant communities observed in the project study area are low
mountain alluvial forest and maintained-disturbed area.
a) Low Mountain Alluvial Forest
This community occurs along the banks of Reems Creek and to a
lesser extent along Herron Cove Branch within the project study
area. The tree canopy in this community is non-contiguous with
gaps interspersed throughout the area. This alluvial forest
community can best be described as a variation of Montane
Alluvial Forest (Schafale and Weakley, 1990). These forests
occur along stream and river floodplains at moderate to high
elevations. They are palustrine and flood on an intermittent basis_
According to Schafale and Weakley (1990), the Montane Alluvial
Forest may be eroded or disturbed by catastrophic floods. These
forests occur throughout the mountain region except in the lower
valleys.
B-4036 Categorical Exclusion 9

Dominant tree species observed within the alluvial forest at the
time of site investigation include red maple (Ater rubrum},
sycamore (Platanus occidentalis), black walnut (Juglans nigra),
river birch (Betula nigra), tulip tree {Liriodendron tulipifera),
chestnut oak (Quercus prinus), northern red oak (Quercus
rubra), southern red oak (Quercus faleata), white oak {Quercus
alba), sassafras (Sassafras albidum), silver maple {Ater
saccharinum), Canada hemlock (Tsuga canadensis}, and
Virginia pine {Pinus virginiana}. Dominant sapling and shrub
species observed at the time of site investigation include
ironwood (Carpinus caroliniana), sourwood (~xydendrum
arboreum), spicebush {Lindera benzoin), black cherry (Prunus
serotina), hickory (Carya spp.), pale rhododendron
(Rhododendron maximum), black locust (Robinia pseudo-
acacia), tag alder (Alnus serrulata), chinquapin (Castanets
pumila}, elderberry (Sambucus canadensis), autumn olive
(Elaeagnus umbellata), smooth sumac (Rhus glabra), witch-
hazel {Hamamelis virginiana), wild hydrangea {Hydrangea
arborescens), Chinese privet {Ligustrum sinense), sweet leaf
(Symplocos tinetoria), flowering dogwood (Corpus florida), and
multiflora rose (Rosa multiflora). Dominant herbaceous species
observed at the time of site investigation include violets (Viola
spp.), blackberry (Rubus sp.}, creeping grass (Microsteguim
vimineum), common plantain (Ptantago major), asters (Aster
spp.}, Christmas fern (Polystichum acrostichoides},
partridgeberry (Mitchella repens}, henbit (Lamium
amplexicaule), pokeweed (Phytolacca americana), goldenrod
{Solidago sp.), chicory (Chichorium intybus}, clover (Trifolium
spp.), giant cane (Arundinaria sp.), common mullein {Verbascum
thapsus), and Pennsylvania smartweed (Polygonum
pensylvanicum). Dominant vine species observed at the time of
site investigation include poison ivy (Toxicodendron radicans),
Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), common greenbrier
(Smilax rotundifolia), morning glory {Ipomoea sp.), trumpet
creeper (Campsis radicans}, grape (Vitis spp.), and Virginia
creeper (Parthenocissus quinquefolia).
b) Maintained-Disturbed Land
These communities are located along the rights-of--way of
SR 2098, residential lawns, and agricultural areas including a
plowed field and pasture.
No mature trees were observed within the maintained-disturbed
area; however, saplings and seedlings of the following species
B-4036 Categorical Exclusion 10

were observed: red maple, sycamore, black walnut, tulip tree,
flowering dogwood, Virginia pine, and black cherry. The
following shrub species were observed: elderberry, autumn olive,
sumac, witch-hazel, hydrangea, Chinese privet, blackberry, and
multiflora rose. Dominant herbaceous species observed at the
time of site investigation include violets (Viola sp.), creeping
grass, Queen Anne's lace (Daucus carota), henbit, pokeweed,
chicory, clover, and giant cane. Dominant vine species observed
at the time of site investigation include poison ivy, Japanese
honeysuckle, common greenbrier, trumpet creeper, and Virginia
creeper.
2. Wildlife
The alluvial forest community in conjunction with open agricultural lands
and other disturbed areas offer high plant diversity and water availability;
thus providing high quality wildlife habitat. These communities provide a
variety of habitat for amphibians, reptiles, birds, and mammals.
The maintained roadside, pasture, and cropland provide rich ecotones for
foraging, while the alluvial forest provides foraging and cover. Raccoon
(Procyon lotor) tracks and past beaver (Castor canadensis) activity were
observed along Reems Creek. Wildlife accustomed to human activity was
sighted such as the American crow (Corvus brachyrhynchos), northern
mockingbird (Mimes polyglottos), northern cardinal {Cardinalis
cardinalis), and Carolina chickadee (Poecile carolinensis).
Common mammals which could be expected to utilize the project study
area habitat include Virginia opossum (Didelphis virginiana), smoky
shrew (Sorex fumeus), woodchuck (Marmota monax}, shrews and moles
(Insectivora), eastern cottontail (Sylvilagus floridanus), eastern chipmunk
(Tamias striates), woodchuck {Marmota monax), gray squirrel {Sciurus
carolinensis), eastern harvest mouse (Reithrodontomys humulis), muskrat
(Ondatra zibethicus), coyote (Canis latrans), and white-tailed deer
(Odocoileus virginianus).
Common birds which could be expected to utilize the project study area
habitat include hairy woodpecker (Picoides villosus), downy woodpecker
(P. pubescens), eastern wood-pewee (Contopus virens), eastern phoebe
(Sayornis phoebe), blue jay (Cyanocitta cristata), barn swallow {Hirundo
rustiea), tufted titmouse (Pares bicolor), white-breasted nuthatch (Sitta
carolinensis), American robin (Turdus migratorius), yellow warbler
(Dendroica petechia), and brown-headed cowbird (Molothrus ater).
Game species such as woodcock (Scolopax minor} and wild turkey
(Meleagris gallopavo) may be present. Predatory birds such as red-tailed
B-4036 Categorical Exclusion 1 1

hawk (Buteo jamaicensis) and eastern screech owl (Otus asio} are likely to
be found in the project vicinity.
Common reptiles and amphibians which could be expected to utilize the
project area habitat include brown snake (Storeria dekayi), northern water
snake (Nerodia sipedon), rat snake (Elaphe obsolete}, eastern fence lizard
(Sceloporus undulatus), five-lined skink {Eumeces fasciatus), Broadhead
skink (E. laticeps), snapping turtle (Chelydra serpentine) and eastern box
turtle (Terrapene Carolina).
3. Aquatic Communities
Reems Creek provides aquatic habitat within the project study area. The
physical characteristics (size and water quality} of the stream, as well as
the adjacent terrestrial community, directly influence faunal composition
of this aquatic community. The quality of aquatic habitat within the
project study area is expected to be high due in large part to a natural mix
of riffles, runs, and pools. Woody debris located throughout the stream
provides habitat, shade, and concealment pockets for several aquatic
species. Aquatic invertebrates are a major component of aquatic
ecosystems, as primary and secondary consumers, as well as prey items
for organisms higher in the food chain.
Insects typically found in this type of community include mayflies
(Ephemeroptera), stoneflies (Plecoptera), caddisflies (Trichoptera),
dragonflies (Odonata sp.) and aquatic beetles (Coleoptera). Flathead
mayflies (Heptageniidae), abundant stoneflies, and caddisfly casings were
observed during field review.
Brown trout {Salmo trutta) and rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) are
small gamefish that typically occur in this community. Small non-game
fish in the area that inhabit Reems Creek include the following: redbreast
sunfish (Lepomis auritus), bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus), Hiawassee
shiner (Notropis scabriceps}, logperch (Percina caprodes), blacknose dace
(Rhinichthys atratulus), longnose dace (R. cataractae), creek chub
(Semotilus atromaculatus), white sucker (Catostomus commersoni},
northern hog sucker (Hypentelium nigricans), and mottled sculpin {Cottus
bairdi).
No freshwater mussels were found by field surveys conducted on
September 10, 2003 and October 22, 2003. The searches were conducted
upstream and downstream on Reems Creek within the project area.
B-4036 Categorical Exclusion 12

4. Anticipated Impacts to Biotic Communities
a) Terrestrial Communities
Table 1 describes the acreage of plant communities within the
construction limits.
TABLE 1
ANTICIPATED IMPACTS TO PLANT COMMUNITIES
Community Type Alternative I(Preferred) Alternative 2 Impact
Im act Acres Acres
Low Mountain Alluvial
0 0
Forest
Maintained-Disturbed 1.28 1.44
Due to the minimal disturbance of plant communities anticipated
as a result of the bridge replacement, substantial impacts to
terrestrial wildlife populations are not expected.
Loss of wildlife is an unavoidable aspect of development.
Temporary fluctuations in populations of animal species that .
utilize these communities are anticipated during the course of
construction. Slow-moving, burrowing, and/or subterranean
organisms will be directly impacted by construction activities,
while mobile organisms will be displaced to adjacent
communities. Competitive forces in the adapted communities
will result in a redefinition of population equilibria.
b) Aquatic Communities
Aquatic organisms are acutely sensitive to changes in their
environment, and environmental impacts from construction
activities may result in long term or irreversible effects. Impacts
usually associated with in-stream construction include alterations
to the substrate and impacts to adjacent streamside vegetation.
Such disturbances within the substrate lead to increased siltation,
which can clog the gills and/or feeding mechanisms of benthic
organisms, fish, and amphibian species.
The removal of streamside vegetation and placement of fill
material during construction enhances erosion and possible
sedimentation. Quick revegetation of these areas helps to reduce
the impacts by supporting the underlying sails.
8-4036 Categorical Exclusion 13

Specific impacts to "Waters of the United States" have been
determined based on the construction limits (Table 2).
TABLE 2
ANTICIPATED IMPACTS TO JURISDICTIONAL STREAMS
(LINEAR FEET WITHIN CONSTRUCTION LIMITS)
Jurisdictional Stream Alternative 1 (Preferred) Alternative 2
Linear Feet Linear Feet
Reems Creek 50 43
Herron Cove Branch 69 197
E. Special Topics
1. "Waters of the United States": Jurisdictional Issues
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act requires regulation of discharges into
"Waters of the United States." The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
(USAGE) has the responsibility for implementation, permitting, and
enforcement of the provisions of the Act. The USAGE regulatory
program is defined in 33 CFR 320-330.
Wetlands, defined in 33 CFR 328.3, are those areas that are inundated or
saturated by surface water or groundwater at a frequency and duration
sufficient to support, and under normal circumstances do support, a
prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil
conditions.
The project study area was surveyed for jurisdictional wetlands in
accordance with guidelines for wetland definition as given in the 1987
Corps of Engineers YYetlands Delineation Manual. This approach
incorporates three criteria in delineating wetlands: (1) the presence of
hydrophytic vegetation, (2) the presence of hydric soils, and (3) evidence
of wetland hydrology. All three criteria must be present in a given
location for an area to be considered a jurisdictional wetland. No
jurisdictional wetlands were identified within the project study area.
2. Permits
Impacts to jurisdictional surface waters are anticipated to occur as a result
of proj ect construction.
B-4036 Categorical Exclusion 14

a) Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
Impacts to "Waters of the United States" come under the
jurisdiction of the USACE. Permits are required for highway
encroachment into jurisdictional wetlands and streams. Ariy
action that proposes to place fill into these areas falls under the
jurisdiction of the USACE under Section 404 of the Clean Water
Act (33 USC 1344). The Nationwide Permit 23 should cover the
impacts to jurisdictional streams in the project study area.
Nationwide Permit 33 may be needed for temporary construction
access.
b} Section 401 Water Quality Certification
A Section 401 General Water Quality Certification is also
required for any activity which may result in a discharge into
"Waters of the United States" or for which an issuance of a
federal permit is required. The NCDENR-DWQ has regulatory
input through Section 401 Water Quality Certification. The
issuance of a required Section 401 certification is a prerequisite
to the issuance of a Section 404 permit.
Final determination of permit applicability lies with the USACE.
NCDOT will coordinate with the USACE to obtain the necessary
permits.
c) TVA
Reems Creek is located in the Tennessee Valley Authority's
(TVA) Land Management District. Approval pursuant to Section
26a of the TVA Act is required for all construction and
development involving streams or floodplains in the Tennessee
River drainage basin.
3. Mitigation
The USACE has adopted, through the Council on Environmental Quality
(CEQ), a mitigation policy which embraces the concepts of "no net loss of
wetlands" and project sequencing. The purpose of this policy is to restore
and maintain the chemical, biological, and physical integrity of "Waters of
the United States," specifically wetlands. Mitigation of wetland impacts
has been defned by the CEQ to include: avoidance of impacts (to
wetlands), minimizing impacts, rectifying impacts, reducing impacts over
time, and compensating for impacts (40 CFR 1508.20). Each of these
aspects (avoidance, minimization, and compensatory mitigation) must be
considered in sequential order.
B-4036 Categorical Exclusion 15

Avoidance mitigation examines all appropriate and practicable
possibilities of averting impacts to "Waters of the United States."
Minimization includes the examination of appropriate and practicable
steps to reduce the adverse impacts to "Waters of the United States."
Compensatory mitigation is not normally considered until anticipated
impacts to "Waters of United States" have been avoided and minimized to
the maximum extent possible.
In accordance with I SA NCAC 2H.0506 (h) and 40 CFR 1508.20,
mitigation will be required for impacts to jurisdictional streams when
these impacts are equal to or greater than 150 linear feet per stream. In
addition, mitigation may be required for wetland impacts exceeding 0.10
acre. It is anticipated that the bridge replacement over Reems Creek will
likely impact less than 150 linear feet of stream. No wetlands are located
in the project study area. For Alternative 1, the Preferred Alternative, no
stream mitigation requirement is anticipated. Therefore, no stream or
wetland mitigation requirement is anticipated. However, final
permit/mitigation decisions will be determined by the USACE and
NCDWQ.
NCDENR has adopted permanent Nutrient Sensitive Waters Management
Strategy rules to protect and maintain 50-foot wide riparian buffers in
several watersheds across the state. At this time, surface waters in the
French Broad River Basin are not subject to NCDENR's Nutrient
Sensitive Waters Management Strategy rules.
The buffer protection regulations in the French Broad River Basin apply in
watersheds classified as Water Supply Watersheds which would not
include Reems Creek and Herron Cove Branch.
F. Rare and Protected Species
Federal law under the provisions of Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act
(ESA) of 1973, as amended, requires that any action likely to adversely affect a
federally protected species be subject to review by the USFWS. Other species
may warrant protection under separate state laws.
Plants and animals with federal classifications of Endangered (E), Threatened (T),
Proposed Endangered (PE), and Proposed Threatened (PT) are protected under
provisions of Section 7 and Section 9 of the ESA. The USFWS lists twelve
federally protected species for Buncombe County with one threatened due to
similarity of appearance.
B-4036 Categorical Exclusion 16

TABLE 3
FEDERALLY PROTECTED SPECIES FOR BUNCOMBE COUNTY
Common name Scientific name Federal Status Biological
Conclusion
Bog turtle Clemmys
muhlenbergii T(S/A) N/A
Carolina northern flying squirrel Glaucomys sabrinus Endangered No Effect
coloratus
Spotfin chub Hybopsis monacha Threatened No Effect
Gray bat Myotis grisescens Endangered No Effect
Eastern cougar Puma concolor Endangered No Effect
cou ar
Appalachian elktoe Alasmidonta
raveneliana Endangered No Effect
Oyster mussel Epioblasma
capsaeformis Endangered No Effect
Bunched arrowhead Sagittaria
fasciculata Endangered No Effect
Mountain sweet pitcher plant Sarracenia jonesii Endangered No Effect
Spreading averts Geum radiatum Endangered No Effect
Rock gnome lichen Gymnoderma
lineare Endangered No Effect
Virginia spiraea Spiraea virginiana Threatened No Effect
Bog turtle (Clemmys muhlenbergii)
Animal Family: Emydidae
Date Listed: November 4, 1997
Bog turtles are small (3 to 4.5-inch) reptiles with a weakly keeled carapace (upper
shell) that ranges in color from light brown to ebony. This species is easily
distinguished from other turtles by a large, conspicuous, bright orange to yellow
blotch on each side of its head. Bog turtles are semi-aquatic and inhabit muddy,
bog-like habitats. They can be found during the spring mating season from June
to July and at other times from April to October when the humidity is high and
temperatures are in the 70s. Bog turtle habitat consists of bogs, swamps, marshy
meadows, and other wet environments, specifically those which exhibit soft
muddy bottoms.
The northern population of the bog turtle (from New York south to Maryland)
was listed as federally threatened, and the southern population (from Virginia
south to Georgia) was listed as federally threatened due to similarity of
appearance. The southern populations are not protected under Section 7 of the
Endangered Species Act; however, the T(S/A) designation bans the collection and
B-4036 Categorical Exclusion 17

interstate or international commercial trade of bog turtles from the southern
population (USFWS 2004}.
This site contains no wetlands; therefore, suitable habitat for the bog turtle is not
present. No bog turtles were observed in the project vicinity. The NCNHP has
no records of any known populations of the bog turtle within cone-mile radius of
the project area. No impacts to this species from project construction are
anticipated.
Carolina northern flying squirrel (Glaucomys sabrinus coloratus)
Animal Family: Sciuridae
Date Listed: July 1, 1985
The northern flying squirrel is a small nocturnal mammal that inhabits the high
elevation ecotone between coniferous and northern hardwood forest. This high
elevation habitat usually occurs greater than 5,500 feet above MSL. These
squirrels are 10 to 12 inches long and weigh 3 to 5 ounces. Adults are gray with a
light brown to reddish cast on their backs and light gray to white or buff
undersides. The broad #ails and folds of skin between the wrist and ankles form
wing-like surfaces that enable these animals to glide downward from tree to tree
or tree to ground. These mammals eat a wide variety of foods such as lichens,
mushroom, seeds, nuts, insects and fruits. These squirrels nest in tree cavities
such as woodpecker holes and usually produce one litter in the early spring
(USFWS 2004).
Suitable habitat for the Carolina northern flying squirrel, consisting of mixed
deciduous/coniferous forests located 5,500 feet above MSL, does not exist within
the project area. Review of NCNHP maps indicated no known populations of this
species within one mile of the project area. No impacts to this species from
project construction are anticipated.
Biological Conclusion: No Effect
Eastern cougar (Felis concolor couguar)
Animal Family: Felidae
Date Listed: June 4, 1973
The eastern cougar is described as a large, unspotted, long-tailed cat. Its body and
legs are a uniform fulvous or tawny hue, and its belly is pale reddish or reddish
white. The inside of this cat's ears are light-colored, with a blackish color behind
the ears. Cougars feed primarily on deer, but their diet may also include small
mammals, wild turkeys, and occasionally domestic livestock, when available.
Cougars begin breeding when two or three years old and breed thereafter once
every two to three years. Atypical litter size is three, with the newborn kittens
weighing S to 16 ounces.
The primary habitat appears to be large wilderness areas with an adequate food
supply. Cougars avoid human-developed areas and have been considered by
B-4036 Categorical Exclusion 1 S

some as extirpated for this reason. Male cougars typically occupy a range of 25
or more square miles, and females from 5 to 20 square miles. Sightings have
been reported in three North Carolina areas including the Nantahala National
Forest, the northern portion of the Uwharrie National Forest, and North Carolina's
southeastern counties. The remaining population of this species is extremely
small, with exact numbers unknown (USFWS, 2004).
There are no large expanses of relatively undeveloped lands within the in the
project study area. Also, cougars are not likely in the project area due to the
frequency of human activity within the study area and localized development near
the study area. The NCNHP has no records of any known populations of the
eastern cougar within aone-mile radius of the project area. No impacts to this
species from project construction are anticipated.
Biological Conclusion: No Effect
Gray bat (Myotis grisescens)
Animal Family: Vespertilionidae
Date Listed: April 28, 1976
The gray bat is the largest of its genus in the eastern United States. It weighs
between 0.25 and 0.56 ounces and has a forearm that reaches from 1.6 to 1.8
inches in length. This bat can be distinguished from other eastern bats by its uni-
colored dorsal fur and by its wing membrane that connects to the foot at the ankle.
Other eastern species of bats have bi- or tri-colored dorsal fur and have a wing
membrane that connects to the base of their first toe. The gray bat's fur is dark
gray for a short time after it molts in July or August and then turns to a russet
color in between molts. It is known to feed on aquatic insects, especially
mayflies.
This bat inhabits only caves or cave-like habitats. They are very selective about
which caves they will inhabit. The caves are usually located within 0.62 miles of
a river or reservoir and have a specific temperature in both the summer and the
winter.
A memorandum dated July 2, 2002 serves as a programmatic screening survey for
the project. The results of the habitat evaluation indicated poor roosting habitat
and no evidence of bats. Review of NCNHP maps indicated no known
populations of this species within one mile of the project study area. No impacts
to this species from project construction are anticipated.
Biological Conclusion: No Effect
B-4036 Categorical Exclusion 19

Spotfin Chub (Hybopsis monacha)
Animal Family: Cyprinidae
Date Listed: September 9, 1994
spotfin chub is a small fish growing to a maximum size of 3.6 inches in length.
The body is elongate; usually there is one pair of minute, terminal labial barbels;
scales are moderate to somewhat small in size; and a distinctive large black spot is
present in the caudal region. The spotfin chub is restricted to the Tennessee River
drainage where it once occurred widely in 12 tributary systems distributed over
five states. The spotfin chub inhabits moderate to large streams, 50 to 200 feet
average width, with a good current, clear water, and cool to warm temperatures.
These streams have pools frequently alternating with riffles (USFWS 2004).
The project study area is not located within the Little Tennessee River Basin
where this species is known to occur. No impacts to this species from project
construction are anticipated.
Biological conclusion: No Effect
Appalachian elktoe (Alasmidonta raveneliana)
Animal Family: Unionidae
Date Listed: November 23, 1994
The Appalachian elktoe, listed in 1994 by the USFWS, is akidney-shaped
freshwater mussel endemic to the upper Tennessee River system in western North
Carolina and eastern Tennessee. The adult shell reaches 3.5 inches in length and
is usually dark brown with prominent to obscure greenish rays. This mussel
inhabits relatively shallow medium-sized creeks and rivers with moderate to fast
flowing water. It is generally found in gravelly substrates mixed with cobbles and
boulders or occasionally in silt-free, coarse sandy substrates. Reproduction is
similar to that of other freshwater mussels, and the banded sculpin (Cottus
carolinea) has been identified as a host species for developing glochidia.
Historically, this mussel was found in the French Broad River system, including
French Broad main stem and the Little River in Transylvania County (USFWS,
2004).
Suitable habitat for the Appalachian elktoe consisting of shallow medium-sized
creeks with fast flowing water and clean, silt-free, gravel substrates is readily
available in the project area. Review of NCNHP maps indicated no known
populations of this species within one mile of the project area. A mussel survey
conducted by qualified aquatic biologists on September 10, 2003 and October 22,
2003 found no mussels in the project study area. No impacts to this species from
project construction are anticipated.
Biological Conclusion: No Effect
B-4036 Categorical Exclusion 20

Oyster mussel (Epiobdasma capsaeformis)
Animal Family: Unionidae
Date Listed: January Z 0, 1997
The oyster mussel is a small, up to 2.1 inches in length, freshwater mussel. Its
distinguishing characteristic is the pronounced development of the posterior-
ventral region in the females. The outer shell or perostracum is dull to sub-shiny
yellowish to green with numerous thin dark green rays. The inside shell or nacre
is whitish to bluish-white in color. This mussel inhabits small to mediums sized
streams with a coarse sand to boulder substrate (no mud) and moderate to swift
currents (USFWS, 2004).
Suitable habitat for the oyster mussel consisting of small to mediums sized
streams with a coarse sand to boulder substrate (no mud) and moderate to swift
currents is readily available in the project area. Review of NCNHP maps
indicated no known populations of this species within one mile of the project area.
A mussel survey conducted by qualified aquatic biologists on September 10, 2003
and October 22, 2003 found no mussels in the project study area. No impacts to
this species from project construction are anticipated.
Biological Conclusion: No Effect
Bunched arrowhead (Sagittaria fasciculata)
Plant Family: Alismataceae
Date Listed: July 25, 1979
Bunched arrowhead is an emergent aquatic perennial herb, which grows 6.0 to
13.0 inches in height. Its spatulate-shaped leaves reach 12 inches long and 0.3
inch wide, and stem from the base of the plant. Three white petals are present
during flowering and fruiting occurs from May to July.
Bunched arrowhead grows in seepage areas that have little or no net flow but are
not stagnant. The soil in the seepages can be characterized as sandy loams
overtopped by a muck layer ranging in depth from 9.8 to 23.6 inches (USFWS,
2004).
Review of NCNHP maps indicated no known populations of this species within
one mile of the project area. No seepages are located in the project study area;
therefore no suitable habitat for the bunched arrowhead exists within the project
study area_ No impacts to this species from project construction are anticipated.
Biological Conclusion: No Effect
Mountain sweet pitcher plant (Sarracenia jonesii)
Plant family: Sarraceniaceae
Date listed: September 30, 1988
Mountain sweet pitcher plant is a perennial, carnivorous herb. Its leaves form
pitchers that are hollow, trumpet shaped, and dull green with Criss-crossing
B-4036 Categorical Exclusion 21

maroon to purple veination. The deep maroon flowers are three to four inches
wide and borne singly at the top of a stalk in the spring, usually in May. Due to
its distinct appearance, this plant is readily identifiable outside of its spring
flowering season. This species inhabits wet bogs with mucky surfaces and sandy
bottoms. Review of NCNHP maps indicated no known populations of this
species within one mile of the project area. No mucky bog habitat is present;
therefore no suitable habitat exists in the project study area. No impacts to this
species from project construction are anticipated.
Biological Conclusion: No Effect
Spreading avens (Geum radiatum)
Plant family: Rosaceae
Date listed: April 5, 1990
Spreading avens is a perennial herb of the Rosaceae family. The densely
pubescent plant forms a basal rosette arising from horizontal rhizomes. The basal
leaves are kidney-shaped, serrate, and three to six inches wide. The inflorescence
is an indefinite cyme supporting a few, large (1 to 2 inches in diameter}, yellow
flowers. Flowering occurs from June through September. This plant is found in
sunny locations such as high elevation rocky balds, pockets of soil on nearly
vertical cliffs, and shrub-free (due to rock or ice falls) grassy areas at the base of
cliffs. These sunny/rocky openings are surrounded by spruce-fir (Picea rubens-
Abies fraseri) forests that generally occur above 5,500 feet elevation (USFWS,
2004}.
The highest elevation in the study area is approximately 2,100 feet above MSL,
well below the high elevation habitats where this plant grows. Review of
NCNHP maps indicated no known populations of this species within one mile of
the project area. No suitable habitats such as rocky balds or vertical cliffs were
observed in the project study area. No impacts to this species from project
construction are anticipated.
Biological Conclusion: No Effect
Virginia spiraea (spiraea virginiana)
Plant family: Rosaceae
Date listed: June 15, 1990
Virginia spiraea grows from 2 to 10 feet tall and has arching, upright stems. This
shrub bears cream-colored flowers on branched and flat-topped axles. Its
alternate leaves are of different sizes and shapes. spiraea spreads clonally and
forms dense clumps, which spread in rock crevices and around boulders.
Flowering occurs in June and July.
Virginia spiraea occurs along rocky, flood-scoured riverbanks in gorges or
canyons. Flood scouring is essential to this plant's survival because it eliminates
B-4036 Categorical Exclusion 22

taller woody competitors and creates river wash deposits and early successional
habitats. Spiraea is found in thickets (USFWS, 2004).
Review of NCNHP maps indicated no known populations of this species within
one mile of the project area. No rocky, flood scoured riverbanks exist within the
project study area; therefore no habitat for Virginia spiraea is located within the
project study area. No impacts to this species from project construction are
anticipated.
Biological Conclusion: No Effect
Rock gnome lichen (Gymnoderma lineare)
Plant family: Cladoniaceae
Date listed: January 18, 1995
Rock gnome lichen is a squamulose lichen of the reindeer moss family. This
species is the only member of its genus occurring in North America. It occurs in
small (usually less than one square yard), dense colonies of narrow, strappy, Leaf-
like pads. These strap-like lobes are usually blue-gray on the upper surface and
generally shiny white on the lower surfaces. The fruiting bodies are borne at the
tips of the strap-like lobes and are black, in contrast to the red to brown fruiting
bodies of other reindeer moss lichens. These lichens fruit from July through
September. The rock gnome lichen is endemic to the southern Appalachian
Mountains of North Carolina and Tennessee. They primarily inhabit vertical rock
faces in areas of high humidity such as river gorges or areas frequently bathed in
fog. Most populations occur above an elevation of 5,000 feet (USFWS, 2004).
The project study area lacks suitable habitat for the rock gnome lichen consisting
of high humidity environments such as deep river gorges or other seepy wet rock
faces. The highest elevation in the project study area is approximately 3,050 feet
above MSL, well below the elevations (2,020 to 2,040 feet above MSL) preferred
by this species. Review of NCNHP maps indicated no known populations of this
species within one mile of the project area. No impacts to this species from
project construction are anticipated.
Biological Conclusion: No Effect
There are 33 federal species of concern listed by the USFWS for Buncombe
County (Table 4}. Federal species of concern (FSC) are not afforded federal
protection under the Endangered Species Act and are not subject to any of its
provisions, including Section 7. NCNIIP records indicated no recorded
occurrences of FSC within one mile of the project study area.
B-4036 Categorical Exclusion 23

TABLE 4
FEDERAL SPECIES OF CONCERN FOR BUNCOMBE COUNTY
Common Name Scientific Name State ~~ I3abitat Requirement Habitat
Status Present

Bachman s sparrow
imophila aestivalis ,~
SC open longleaf pine forests old
fields [breeding season only]
No
spruce-fir forests or mixed
Southern Appalachian
saw-whet owl egolius acadicus T hardwood/spruce forests (for No
nesting)
Rafnesque's big-eared
bat Corynorhinus
(=Plecotus) rafznesquii ,I,* roosts in old buildings, caves, and
mines, usually near water No
Cryptobranch us
Hellbender alleganiensis SC large and clear fast-flowing streams No
Cerulean warbler Dendroica cerulea SR mature hardwood forests; steep
slopes and coves in mountains No
Blotched chub Erimystax insignis SR primarily French Broad drainage No
Southern Appalachian Loxia curvirostra SC
~ coniferous forests preferably ~
~ No

red crossbill
spruce-fir
~
roosts in hollow trees (warmer
Eastern small-footed Myotis leibii SC months), in caves and mines No
myotis
(winter)
Southern Appalachian
woodrat Neotoma floridana
haematoreia SC rocky places in deciduous or mixed
forests No
rocky places and abandoned
Alleghany woodrat Neotoma magister SC buildings in deciduous or mixed
forests in the northern mountains No
and adjacent Piedmont

Longhead darter
Percina macrocephala
SC* lar er creeks and small to medium
siz~d rivers often in silty areas
No
Southern Appalachian

black-capped poecile atricapillus
SC high elevation forests, mainly
No
chickadee racticus spruce-fir [breeding season only]
Paddlefish Polyodon spathula E* French Broad River No
(Southern water shrew Sorex palustris
unctulatus SC stream banks in montane forests No
Southern Appalachian
! mature, open hardwoods with
,
',yellow-bellied Sphyrapicus varius
appalaciensis SC scattered dead trees [breeding No
sapsucker season only]
' woodland borders or openings,
s
Appalachian Bewick Thryomanes bewickii *
E farmlands or brushy fields, at high No
wren altus elevations [breeding season only]
French Broad crayfish Cambarus reburrus W2 tributaries of French Broad River No
rocky ridges, woodland openings,
Tawny crescent Phycoides batesii *
SR at higher elevations; host plants -- No
butterfly batesii asters, mainly Aster undulatus
Diana fritillary Speyeria Jana SR* rich woods and adjacent edges and No
butterfly openings; believed extirpated from

B-4036 Categorical Exclusion 24

the lower Piedmont; host plants --
violets {Viola)
Fraser fir Abies fraseri SR-L spruce-fir forests No
Piratebush Buckley ~ blu
ffs, dry slopes, forests on lower No
disticho h Ila
y p
slo es
Cain's reedgrass Calamagrostis cainii 0 high elevation rocky summits No
Glade spurge Euphorbia purpurea SR-T forests, especially over mafic rock No
Mountain heartleaf Hexastylis contracts 0 acidic forests under rhododendron No
French Broad heartleaf Hexastylis SR-L cove forests
rhombiformis No
Butternut Juglans cinerea L'sted cove forest and rich woods No
Gray's lily Lilium grayi T-SC bogs, wet meadows, seeps, grassy No
f
d
hi
h
l
i
orests
bal
s,
g
e
evat
on
Fraser's loosestrife Lysimachia fraseri E* forests, roadsides No
Sweet pinesap Monotropsis odorata SR-T dry forests and bluffs No
Pinnate-lobed black- Rudbeckia triloba var. SR-T mafic cliffs No
eyed susan innatoloba
Carolina saxifrage Saxifraga caroliniana SR-T high to middle elevation moist No
l
d
k
iffs an
roc
outcrops
c
Divided-leaf ragwort Senecio millefolium 0 on or near rock outcrops No
Mountain catchfly Silene ousts SR-T rich slopes, cove forests, montane
forests
k
hickor No
oa
-
y
*Historic record -the species was last observed in the county more than 50 years ago.
**E=Endangered, T=Threatened, SC=Special Concern, SR=Significantly Rare, L=Limited range,
T=Throughout
VI. CULTURAL RESOURCES
A. Compliance Guidelines
This project is subject to compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act of 1966, as amended and implemented by the Advisory Council
on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with Section 106, codified
at 36 CFR Part 800. Section 106 requires Federal agencies to take into account
the effect of their undertakings (federally funded, licensed, or permitted) on
properties listed in or eligible for the National Register of Historic Places, and to
afford the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation a reasonable opportunity to
comment on such undertakings.
B. Historic Architecture
A field survey of the Area of Potential Effects (APE) for Bridge No. 220 was
conducted. In a letter dated January 2$, 2003, the State Historic Preservation
Officer (SHPO) determined that the project as proposed will not affect any
historic architectural properties either listed in or eligible for listing in the
B-4036 Categorical Exclusion 25

National Register of Historic Places within the APE. A copy of the letter is
included in the Appendix.
C. Archaeology
In a memorandum dated March 14, 2006, it was stated by SHPO that there were
no sites located within the project area during the course of the NCDOT
archaeology survey. NCDOT recommended that no further archaeological
investigation be conducted in connection with this project. SHPO concurred with
this statement since the project will not involve significant archaeological
resources. A copy of this memorandum is included in the Appendix.
VII. ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS
The project is expected to have an overall positive impact. Replacement of an inadequate
bridge will result in safer traffic operations.
The project is a Federal "Categorical Exclusion" due to its limited scope and lack of
substantial environmental consequences.
The bridge replacement will not have an adverse effect on the quality of the human or
natural environment with the use of current NCDOT standards and specifications.
The project is not in conflict with any plan, existing land use, or zoning regulation. No
substantial change in land use is expected to result from construction of the project.
No adverse impact on the community is anticipated. Right-of--way acquisition will be
limited. No relocations are expected with the implementation of the proposed alternative
and access to a residential driveway, shown as blocked in its current location by new
guard rail, will be resolved during final design.
No adverse effect on public facilities or services is anticipated. The project is not
expected to adversely affect social, economic, or religious opportunities in the area.
There are no publicly owned recreational facilities, or wildlife and waterfowl refuges of
national, state, or local significance in the vicinity of the project.
The Farmland Protection Policy Act requires all federal agencies or their representatives
to consider the potential impacts to prime and important farmland soils by all land
acquisition and construction projects. Prime and important farmland soils are defined by
the Natural Resources Conservation Service (MRCS}. Since there are no prime or
important farmlands in the immediate vicinity of the proposed bridge the Farmland
Protection Policy does not apply.
The project is located in Buncombe County, which has been determined to be in
compliance with the National Ambient Air Quality Standards. 40 CFR Parts 51 and 93
B-4036 Categorical Exclusion 26

are not applicable because the proposed project is located in an attainment area. This
project is not anticipated to create any adverse effects on the air quality of this attainment
area.
This project is an air quality "neutral" project, so it is not required to be included in the
regional emission analysis (if applicable} and a project level CO analysis is not required_
The traffic volumes will not increase or decrease because of this project. The project's
impact on noise and air quality will not be substantial.
Noise levels could increase during construction but will be temporary. If vegetation is
disposed of by burning, all burning shall be done in accordance with applicable local
laws and regulations of the North Carolina SIl' for air quality in compliance with 15
NCAC 2D.0520. This evaluation completes the assessment requirements for highway
traffic noise (23 CFR Part 772) and for air quality (1990 CAAA and NEPA) and no
additional reports are required.
A field reconnaissance survey was conducted in the vicinity of the project and based on
the survey, there are no anticipated underground storage tank (CYST) impacts with this
project. Research shows that no regulated or unregulated landfills or dumpsites occur
within the project limits, and no superfund sites were identified in the vicinity of the
project.
Buncombe County is a participant in the National Flood Insurance Program. The project
site on Reems Creek is included in a Detailed FEMA Study area. A copy of the Flood
Insurance Rate Map is shown in Figure 5. The project is not anticipated to increase the
level or extent of the upstream flood hazard and no practical alternatives exist to crossing
the flood plain. All reasonable measures will be taken to minimize harm to the flood
plain.
On the basis of the above discussion, it is concluded that no significant adverse
environmental effects will result from implementation of the project.
VIII. PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT
Efforts were undertaken early in the planning process (January 2003) to contact local
officials to involve them in the project development with scoping letters. A newsletter
was mailed to local residents and public officials on July 8, 2004 announcing a Citizens'
Informational Workshop. A Citizens' Informational Workshop was held on
July 27, 2004 at Weaverville Elementary School in Weaverville, Buncombe County,
from 4:30 p.m. to 6:30 p.m. Alternative 1 was presented as the Preferred Alternative due
to the reduced impacts to adjacent properties and reduced cost of construction. The
citizens and local officials in attendance preferred Alternative 1.
B-4036 Categorical Exclusion 27

<;
E
4
""4
vt
-i
R
~b
41
"~`
~~sr . ors __ ~ Ftr~.
L2

~' iz i~ e'
ExlsrlNG
GROUND
.--.~ GRADE
POI T
o.oz ao2 _ o.oa_
~y ~;~
TYPICAL SECTION FOR
ROADWAY APPROACH

8' 12' t2' 8'
GRADE
D
DESIGN DATA
FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION:
RURAL LOCAL
DESIGN SPEED - 60 mph
2004 ADT -1,700 vpd
2030 ADT - 3,100 vpd
DUAL - 3 °h, TTST -1
4~ EXISr1NG
GROUND
~_
VARIABLE
SLOPE
~f~~
ExlSrING
GROUND
~~-
TYPICAL SECTION FOR
PROPOSED STRUCTURE

--C~ ~a
c~. ~
. .
~, t ~ .
~; ~ ~ c~` C

c~ .

t,4~ r~, ~5,.
1 ~ _ ....~._ .... , ~~ _
' i ,fir ~ w
~-
x ~ ~~r ~ ~,~~ ~~ ~
I4~1~
~~~'~ ~t~3~~ .~~
,~
~~' .
1 ~ I'y ~~
1 .~,,
~s<<,
A
B-4036
SITE
~~~ ~~
~.~r~i~wl~ I~~~ X
.r
~h ~•~ i~+'j~,
~~~rl~~" '~I"li'irl
~7i r,~
,,.
~;~ „
~~ ~
M ~'r:E1i 1,:~
~~~
~i
1,
~~'~:~
~`I~1~,"~'h
~_
..
~4.~
~,N$'h'1~,1' ~' Ik ~''~lk
~. ~~' ti 4a
,~
FIGURE S - FLO~DPLAIN MAP
,, ~; ~I~t~ONxl F~~O INS~IINCE pR~6R~M ~'
~. m... _. _... ~
L _
_... __.. _ .W... - .
,, i
I
~~ ~ ~IRI~
;' ~~Q~l~ ~N~~IR~~IG~ ~kT~ ~~P
~~~ N~~4~~1~8~ C(~~~:1'fYa
~~ i
~~ , ~ ~~~~~ ' ~a~~~l~i~~~
'~*~s ~ .
~ ICI
f +~ ~ ~ ~
I~
~ II,s ,t ~ p~'~; ; ~~~1~11910~ ~~0
A IIf I',,~
~ ~~ 1 , ~~`.! :~C rtu, Ihit•_+< "~;~tt ~:,tIL.: f,,~T ar• `IiC:~~
~_ '3~'I,,~' ~
"i'~r ~ r,
~~ I, A.o I.' ~ 41~~ all.
i ~i ~ ~ ~ l ~~~::ra~ ~~rr~ a .;I ti~ ~,.~r r:r
~ I ~
f~~ ; 'I I
~I'~ ~ ";I.~~
~i(df~} F> u~' ':. 'rii; ilf6'dl I~ 4'i n^~ llb.w !~.wi k+.6:
I >,rt'r p;~,'bq rr.~ :I:rkA ~ GV.ilbtrin' 0.f~,~Srii .ua.~l
i ~)<-:~i YI'di rl ",* :;1r~ C' r) n ~ v:5 :} :i~J ~~+ by 'Y16L1',
~M~~~~
3~p~C019~ G
~f~CTI~E ~~~
~;~ PINY ~, ~9~6
~i~~~ ~;i~ ~; Feticr~lErn~t~~ttcy r~tatrlncnt age~ck;
~~i; ''II: ~~' ,
This is an ortfic~~e Gc~rj at ;. pflrb aR of thr ata~r refcrcntnd tixd map, It
•a~as cxTractny using F•1.ii1 Cln~l~ n~ 1'fvs map dxs nat rctlect tnangeS
nr al'tlcndntCnt". ~~,nLh rt~~~y h8+~^ tcen iiadc .~ts~qucnT to Trrc da;m 4n The
tlil~ "Ic;c:k F'nr tlta i ~w5t pm~luat i rtd,~sr~atr~~,r Ahnitl t~tianai ~Inntl InRllranrr
F'rz7gtdlri ~~Ud r~t8~ GFIdCk lhd I'EMn ?IdiNJ t~~tt ~~Orw:' 8t ~t,~~vr rny.C !ti~118.~~+~
r~
~~'4**~ ee
L~~G ~ ~
~,

Appendix

tt,~,•c H F ~~ : y
o' -- '=~ United States Department of the Interior
w_
O
NATIONAL PARK SERVICE ~~ ~ ~1 ~~
,,,~ ~ ~,,,, Blue Ridge Parkway
199 Hemphill Knob Road
IN REPLY REFER 7'O
Asheville. North Carolina 28803
L76 i 9 ~Ft~3 ,~ ~ ;~~
PIN 1230 ~ ~ ~ ~'' ~
February 1 l , 2003 k '-t~~': ~ ~~'"~ ~"~~~~
• pr `•.s F~ O 1~l1` . `S '?~
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph. D.
Environmental Management Director
North Carolina Department of Transportatior,
Yrc~jtcl Development a::. i=;nvirtrrinici~iai .~~ialysis :3ranc.~
I548 Mail Service Center
Raieibh, North Carolina 2769~~-1 X43
Subject: bequest for comments on Bridge Replacement Projects B-4032, B-403b, B-403;.,
B-4258, B-4261, B-2988, B-4144, B-429 t
Dear Ur. Thorpe:
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the above referenced projects. Parkway staff
reviewed the scoping document and the potential impacts of the proposed project on resource
values that may be present on National Park Service (NPS) lands and have the following
comments:
The proposed projects should have no impact to park natural resources.
In reference to Bridge Number 262, over south Hominy Creek on SR 3~F52 connecting to State
Route 1 S1: SR 1 SI is an important connecting road to the Blue RidgE Parkway: Would this
bridge construction in any way delay 5R 151 traffic or reroute vehicular traff c on the Blue
Ridge Parkway. from SR 1 SI ? If so what would be the delay duration? We would want to review
detour sign planning, if applicable. Otherwise, we have no visual impact concerns to the Blue
Ridge Parkway, as this bridge is located out of the park viewshed area.
In reference to Bridge Number 13, on SR 1890 and near SR 276, crossing over the East Fork of
the Pigeon River: SR 276 is an important connecting road to the Blue Ridge Parkway. Would
this bridge construction in any way delay SR 276 traffic or reroute vehicular traffic on the Blue
Ridge Parkway from SR 276? If sa what would be the delay duration? We would tivant to
review detour sign planning, if applicable. Otherwise, we have no visual impact concerns to the
Blue Ridge Parkway, as this bridge is Iecated out of the park vietivshed area.
Again, thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on these important bridge
replacement projects. If you ha~~e any questions, please contact Suzette Mulling, Environmental
Protection Specialist, at 82$/271-4779 ext. 219.

Sincerely.
Daniel W. Brown
Superintendent
cc: Park Resident Landscape Architect, BLRI
Chief, Branch of Resource Management, BLRI
Highlands District Ranger, BLRI
Highlands District Resource Management Specialist, BLRI

sK
j
./
C'ES.~~~'-RG-~

~r.]`~1f3l~.~~f~~„'~ Fi?R NORTH CARC>Z_l[~.4 I~1-~:l',4R'T''~~I/NT CAF TiZANSrC3FcTs~'TICtN
(NCDt~TI, PROJ EC-J' I'3EV ELUPMENT fin' LU F N v i rz C3Nl~~LNT~~L .411iA 1,Y 5IS BRA?~TC'H,
I3RI17(•;~ R~~L~ICEMEItiT Pl..ANN1NCi UNIT, f~TTTti': ~~~illiam T. Goadti~•in
S(J~3EC'T: Nat~>!r~:l ltes~urces Tectulical Re}~uris, 13t-ici~e Replacerrlenl Prt~jects, ~:r'i' ~(.~US
1 . The purpose of this ttZe~norandulll is to res}~and tc~ your regilest far uur c-;~z»n~el~is u~ the
?~1 bt-idec rcplaccnlent 17rojects ie7 I'}ivisioEi 13 tllai are. listed a» tale attact~cci sii~:~~t.
~?. 13ased on the rcfcrcnc~d ru}zorts, 1 ci 1~1-~ject ciic:s cxllihit c-h ~~ractei-istics that 1~~a~,id r•~~>>.c;
us to Mac;, the-)~l ill ~-Ollr v4ilci~~ or rCd C:.ttc:l:c~rie~ I~~e~•~I~i1~~. t118t additi~~Jiul ~.I~~ e ci~ril•_1iI!:>.t~~sr-~ u.•it1~
r~:sourcc and re~ulatar}~ agencies sflould be m~+int~tinecl inr succeSJ>ft:l pr~>jc-rt ~_t»z~}~1LiioI1. ?-hc:sc
characteristics i11c]i1dC the nresel~ce of hi,lz C]17811t~' i3C1111~~IC }Ici177~~1i, ~~',.~iSini:1C1111~ rCS'Ollrce '~4';].1eI'S,
trout tisl,eries, suitable l~a~iiat fvr ~.ndan~.c;recl species t~tlcl ilrlresul5~~~. e„cls:l~;ered species i5su~5.
L`nd~r tlzr~~e circ~.u-~ist~lJlcec, vve tvptlld norJZi:~ll}~ rc:e:c~ri~n~erEti that t32e Lxlst~J-1g l~r='c?~e rtlZlct>.Jrc:, ~•~
re;~laLed ~~•itll anut.lE'I' S}?ci?lI•JII7c :.t1~2CiurC a'3IJ[1 t11:i1 i):1C C'U33~E:'uCt3(~17 L~} nJISJi~ c'~C;iLilTS h.-: :l~'~7:~CCi
ttnl°ss i~;C ca etOt:I'S SI'B' 8150 S~-~inrlJr.S~; SEr~IC:ELtI~ZS. ~ heSC ~ ~) Ytr+~~~i;i ; :;;c3u.c~e tl~lc; fc~ll~~} iI:Y' ~i'''~.
F3-4ii3?, E~-4Cl_~i, Ii-=~,~?:~c~, I3-~0~~, B-~C-~f, B-4C)-~7, ~3-~'4i ~:_;, --~-~1~9. I3-~,?ri?. f -~?`-4_ ~--,~~='.
F3-4?t7l-, l3-=~?!i ~ . Y3-=t.~`t?>_ 1~-~.~..(jC~ ~'3I1Cf B-=~? wlU,
'. T~lci rc1i~1:li1;773~ ~ 3 `~t-t~ject ;ices l~~ck itle i1151in~>.aitiliill~ charactcri~tic:5 r?frren~ed ab,yti-c:
illl(~ t~~~i-~%i~ ~~`~ L~'+~liiCi ~i1t1(:v iii~'+ii 3I1yC>+II' QI'~eII L:1i~S;t~I"j~ Tl"~C:itilli~ t1l~:i liOtiilfii '~"lr'C)l:C~~I:.ti
~~rvc:eti~~res sh~~uld die ~~ble to address anticil,ateci itlinaets tc aclttat;e resources. IhLst. ] 3 ;iTC.)~['_Cis
:ncltJdc nc~ i-olluti~i~~~~ TIP's: B-4p~-C.,i B-.~~;y, ~~-4f1~(), I3-401, B-.:1t1:~:=~. B-.~t.i45. B-=~19~t, B-
~t t r~ ~, I:t-41'15, f3-4 i 9b, F3-:~ 19"%. I3-41 ~)$ ZJlCI B-4~G=~.
4. F'le~ise lie ret»indecl that all 24 o!-these l~rc~l~osed l~mjeets are lc~e~lted in trout wati;rs
c-ounties anti wii.l tc:f~tlirc: ire-ciischarge notificaiioll iv ti1i5 ~ftice alld tllC i~Turth ~;'1J'•€ilina ~~~iJc~iife ..
FZesc~urces C'oml~lission prior to the rise c~i',1n_y Nationti~ridc Perrnii.
J. if t'CU h;.1~~: "c1li~' (~EI;'.-$C1r:i1S, p1Cf15[; C:[)71141C~ )))[: iit tclcpllonc {1;~~Ft) ? ;'~- '~3•~~}, L;~:i~=7lti!~,i1 ~~.

5 Cc:v~n VV. L Vinci
Rc~i.1l{~tor;~ Pr'c?jcc;l Iyl~ins~;~:~-
~.stletirillc Re`lulatery t~;eld Cif-f:~.:~:

~j' DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
_' ~~.111~ WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
~ 151 PATTON AVENIIE
ROOM 208
ASHEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28801-5006
REPLY TO
ATTE3vT10f`[ OF:
CESAW-RG-A May 23, 2003
MEMORANDUM FOR NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
(NCDOT}, PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS BRANCH,
ATTN: Gregory J. Thorpe, PhD, Environmental Management Director
SUBJECT: Natural Resources Technical Reports, Bridge Replacement Projects, 2002-2008
Transportation Improvement Plan
1. The purpose of this memorandum is to respond to your requests of January 6, 2003, April
10, 2003 and May 6, 2003 with supplemental information provided on May 13, 2003
seeking our comments on 6 bridge replacement projects in Division 10 and 12 bridge
replacement projects in Division 13.
2. Based on the referenced reports and other information provided, 12 project sites exhibit
characteristics that would cause us to place them in your yellow to red categories
meaning that additional close coordination with resource and regulatory agencies should
be maintained for successful project completion. These characteristics include the
presence of high quality aquatic habitat, outstanding resource waters, trout fisheries,
presence of wetlands, presence of endangered species or suitable habitat for endangered
species and unresolved endangered species issues. Under these circumstances, we would
normally recommend that the existing bridge structure be replaced with another spanning
structure and that construction of onsite detours be avoided unless the detours are also
spanning structures. In addition, bridge demolition should not result in any discharge
into waters or wetlands at the site. These 12 projects include the following TIP's: B-
3905, B-4032, B-4036, B-4037, B-4051, B-4182, B-4258, B-4262, B-4278, B-4294, B-
4295, B-4296.
3. The remaining 6 project sites lack the distinguishing characteristics referenced above and
we would therefore place them in your green category meaning that normal processing
procedures should be able to address anticipated impacts to aquatic resources. These 6
projects include the following TIP's: B-3813, B-3815, B-3874, B-3907, B- 4261, B-4263.
4_ Please be reminded that all 12 projects in Division 13 are located in trout waters counties
and will require pre-discharge notification to this office and the North Carolina Wildlife
Resources Commission prior to the use of any Nationwide Permit.

CESAW-RG-A
May 23, 2003
5_ If you have any questions, please contact me at telephone [phone], extension 4.
~~ ..I'V V ~-•" .. _
Steven W. Lund
Regulatory Project Manager
Cc: William T. Goodwin
Bridge Replacement Planning Unit
~OP~

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael Eas{ey, Governor
Bill Ross, Secretary
Gregory Thorpe, Director
~ ~ •
NORTH CAROLINA ~EPARTIrtENT OF
ENVIROt~IMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
June 1 S, 20U2
Memorandum To: William T. Goodwin, Jr., PE, Unit Head '
Bridge Replacement Planning Unit
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
Through: John Do ~ ~
NC Divisi o Wa~ Quality
From: Robert Ridings
NC Division of Water Quality
Subject: Review of Natural Systems Technical Reports for bridge
replacement projects scheduled for construction in CFY 2005:
"Green Light" Projects: B-4077, B-4082, B-4090, B-4152, B-4248,
B-403 , B-4059, B-4.060, B-4155, B-4258, B-4177, B-4178,
B-4198, B-4197, B-4194, 8z B-4192.
On all projects, use of proper sediment and erosion control will be needed. Sediment and erosion
control measures should not be placed in wetlands. Sediment should be removed from any water
pumped from behind a cofferdam before the water is returned to the stream.
This office would prefer bridges to be replaced with new bridges. However if the bridge must be
replaced by a culvert and 150 linear feet or more of stream is impacted, a stream mitigation plan
will be needed prior to the issuance of a 401 Water Quality Certification. While the NCDWQ
realizes that this may not always be practical, it should be noted that for projects requiring
mitigation, appropriate mitigation plans will be required prior to issuance of a 4Q1 'Water Quality
Certification
For permitting, any project that falls under the Corps of Engineers' Nationwide Permits 23 or 33
do not require written concurrence by the NC Division of Water Quality. Notification and
courtesy copies of materials sent to the Corps, including mitigation plans, are required_ For
pro}ects that fall under the Corps of Engineers Nationwide Permit 14 or Regional General Bridge
Permit 31, the formal 401 application process. will be required including appropriate fees and
mitigation plans.
Any proposed culverts shall be installed in such a manner that the original stream profile is not
altered (i.e. the depth of the channel must not be reduced by a widening of the streambed).
Existing stream dimensions are to be maintained above and below locations of culvert
extensions.
WetIandsl401 Unit 232! Crabtree Blvd. Suite 250 Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Telephone [phone] FAX # [phone]

Do not use any machinery in the stream channels unless absolutely necessary. Additionally,
vegetation should not be removed from the stream bank unless it is absolutely necessary.
NCDOT should especially avoid removing large trees and undercut banks. If large, undercut
trees must be removed, then the trunks should be cut and the stumps and root systems left in
place to minimize damage to stream banks.
Special Note on projects B-4077 and B-4090- these waters are classified as 303(d) waters.
Special measures for sediment control will be needed
Thank you for requesting our input at this time_ The DOT is reminded that issuance of a 4~1
Water Quality Certification requires that appropriate measures be instituted to ensure that water
quality standards are met and designated uses are not degraded or lost.

® ~~r~~ ~.ro~il~~. iTi~~~.li~~ es0~..~~-~.~s CO~~rr~iss~Or~
Charles R. Fullwood, Executive Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: William T. Goodwin, P.E., Unit Head
Bridge Replacement Planning Unit
Project Development and Er--;yi~Qnmental Analysis Branch, NCDOT
u..,,.. ~/~ (~~.
FROM: Owen F. Anderson, Mountain Region Coordinator
Habitat Conservation Program
DATE: "July 3, 2002
SUBJECT: Scvping and Natural Resources Technical Report, Replace Bridge No 220 on SR
2098 Over Reems Creek, Buncombe County, TIP. No. B-4036
" Fish and )~ldlife project Status: YELLOW
Biologists with the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission familiar with the
project area have reviewed the technical report for the subject project to assess the potential for
adverse impacts to fish and wildlife resources. Our comments are provided in accordance with
provisions ofthe National Environmental Folicy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(c)) and the Fish and
Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 661-667d).
The proposed work involves the replacement of bridge number 220 on SR 2098 over
Reems Creek. Construction impacts on fish and wildlife resources will depend on the extent of
disturbance in the streambed and surrounding floodplain areas. The vegetation surrounding the
bridge is mostly disturbed and wildlife habitat value is low. The narrow riparian corridor is
composed mostly of piedmont/mountain bottornland forest with discontinuous wetland fringe
along the stream This narrow riparian provides valuable wildlife cover and a travel cover in the
disturbed landscape.
The Division of Water Quality classifies this reach of Reem Creek as C trout. Heron
Cove Branch, a tributary that has its confluence a short distance downstream of the bridge is also
classified as C trout. Additionally, Reems Creek is designated as ahatchery-supported trout
Mailir7gAddress: Division of Inland Fisheries • 1721 Mail Service Center • Raleigh, NC 2 7699-1 72 1
""'-'--~------ ro+a~ -~z~ ~[.~~ e.~r 7R7 ~'aY• (9191 715-7643

Tip No B-4036, Bridge No220, SR 2098 2 7uly 3, 2002 '
Buncombe County, Reems Creek
stream by the NCWRC. It is the opinion of biologists with the NCWRC that this project could
result in adverse impacts to trout.
Based on historical ranges and suitable habitat, there is potential for the Appalachian
ellctoe (Alasmidonta raveneliana}, the oyster mussel (Epioblasma capsaeformis) and the tan
ri$leshell (Epioblasma}Iorentine walkeri) to exist in the area. Therefore, we concur with the
proposal do perform a mussel survey. The Endings will need to be considered in the alternatives
analysis and design of the project.
We prefer bridge designs that do not alter the natural stream morphology or impede fish
passage. Efforts should be made during design to place bridge supports outside of the bankfull
channel. Bridge designs should also include provisions for the deck drainage to flow through a
vegetated upland buffer prior to reaching the subject surface waters. Correction of altered stream
morphology at the road crossing should be considered during design. Waste rock and dirt from
bridge construction and road realignments should be disposed of in upland areas that are outside
of riparian area and above the 100-year floodplain.
Streams and riparian zones provide connectivity of the landscape; and thus, are natural
movement corridors for terrestrial wildlife species. Bridge designs should consider leaving
sufficient corridors under the bridge to encourage movement of wildlife under the bridge rather
than across the highway. The movement of animals, especially larger animals (e.g., deer and
bear}, under the bridge may reduce automobile crashes involving wildlife. Where feasible,
increasing the riparian corridor width under the bridge is recommended.
In most cases, we prefer the replacement of the existing structure at the same location
with road closure. If road closure is not feasible, a temporary detour should be designed and
located to avoid wetland impacts, minimize the need for clearing and to avoid destabilizing stream
banks. If the structure will be on a new alignment, the old structure should be removed and the
approach fills removed from the 100-yeaz floodplain_ Approach fills should be removed down to
the natural ground elevation. The area should be stabilized with native herbaceous species and
planted with native tree species. If the azea that is reclaimed was previously wetlands, NCDOT
should restore the area to wetlands. If successful, the site may be used as wetland mitigation for
the subject project or other projects in the watershed.
Listed below are our standard recommendations on this project. Because the Corps of
Engineers (COE) recognizes the project county as a "trout water county", the NCWRC will
review any nationwide or general 404 permits for the proposed projects and will Likely request the
following as conditions of the 404 permit.
l . This bridge should be replaced with another spanning structure.
2, Bridge deck drains should not discharge directly into the stream..

Tip IVo B-4036, Bridge No220, SR 2098 3 3uly 3, 2002
Buncombe County, Reerns Greek
3. Live concrete should not be allowed to contact the water in or entering into the stream.
Water that has inadvertently come in contact with live concrete should not be
discharged to surface waters but should be disposed in an upland area.
4. If possible, bridge supports (bents) should not be placed in the stream.
5. If temporary access roads or detours are constructed, they should be removed back to
original ground elevations immediately upon the completion of the project. Disturbed
areas should be seeded or mulched to stabilize the soil and native tree species should be
planted with a spacing of not more than 10'x10'. If possible, when using temporary
structures the area should be cleared but not grubbed_ Clearing the area with chain
saws, mowers, bush-hogs, or other mechanized equipment and leaving the stumps and
root mat intact, allows the area to revegetate naturally and minimi~.es disturbed soil.
6. A cleaz bank (riprap free) area of at least 10 feet should remain on each side of the
steam underneath the bridge.
7. Sedimentation and erosion control measures sufficient to protect High Quality Waters
must be implemented prior to any ground disturbing activities. Structures should be
maintained regularly, especially following rainfall events.
8. Temporary or permanent herbaceous vegetation should be planted on all bare soil
' within 15 days of ground disturbing activities to provide long-term erosion control.
9. All work in or adjacent to stream waters should be conducted in a dry work area.
Sandbags, rock berms, cofferdams, or other diversion structures should be used where
possible to prevent excavation in flowing water.
10. Heavy equipment should be opera#ed from the bank rather than in stream channels in
order to min;mi~e sedimentation and reduce the likelihood of introducing other
pollutants into surface waters.
11. Only clean, sediment-free rock should be used as temporary fill (causeways}, and
should be removed without excessive disturbance of the natural stream bottom when
construction is completed.
12. During subsurface investigations, equipment should be inspected daily and maintained
to prevent conta~~nation of surface waters from leaking fuels, lubricants, hydraulic
fluids, or other toxic materials.
13. Wastewater from drilling operations should not be discharged to surface waters but
should be pumped to upland areas.

Tip No B-4036, Bridge No220, SR 2(}98 4 July 3, 2002 ~ ,
Buncombe County, Reert7S Creek
14. Instream construction and construction within the 25-foot buffer is prohibited
during the trout-spawning period of October i5 to April 15 to avoid impacts on
trout reproduction.
15. Discharge of materials into surface waters from demolition of the old bridge should be
avoided as much as practicable. Any materials that inadvertently reach surface waters
should be removed.
16. Discharging hydroseed mixtures and washing out hydroseeders and other equipment in
or adjacent to surface waters is strictly prohibited.
17. Suitable mussel habitat exists at this project site and rare mussels are known from this
drainage; therefore the project area should be surveyed for fish and freshwater
mussels. NCDOT biologist Mr. Tim Savidge should be notified. If survey results
reveal the presence of listed species, special measures to protect these sensitive species
may be required. NCDOT should also contact the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for
information on requirements of the Endangered Species Act as it relates to the project
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment during the early stages of these
projects. If you have any questions regarding these comments, please contact me at {828) 452-
2546.
cc: Mr. Steve Lund, NCDOT Coordinator, COE, Asheville
Ms. Marella Buncick, Blologlst, USFWS Asheville
Ms. Cynthia Van Der Wiele, Highway Coordinator, Division of Water Quality

® North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
Charles R. Fullwood, Executive Director
TO: John Wadsworth, Project Planning Engineer
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch, NCDOT
FROM: Marla Chambers, Highway Projects Coordinator
Habitat Conservation Program, NCWRC
DATE: March 21, 2003
SUBJECT: Scoping review of NCDOT's proposed bridge replacement projects B-4032, B-
4036, B-4037, B-4258, B-4261, B-29$8, B-4144, B-4291 in Buncombe,
Rutherford, Haywood and Transylvania Counties.
North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) has requested comments from
the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCV~RC) regarding impacts to fish and
wildlife resources resulting from the subject project. Staff biologists have reviewed the
information provided and have the following preliminary comments. These comments are
provided in accordance with the provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C.
4332(2)(c)) and the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16 U.S.C_
661-667d).
Our standard recommendations for bridge replacement projects of this scope are as
follows:
1. We generally prefer spanning structures. Spanning structures usually do not require work
within the stream and do not require stream channel realignment. The horizontal and
vertical clearances provided by bridges allows for human and wildlife passage beneath
the structure, does not block fish passage, and does not block navigation by canoeists and
boaters.
2. Bridge deck drains should not discharge directly into the stream.
3. Live concrete should not be allowed to contact the water in or entering into the stream.
Mailing Address: Division of Inland Fisheries 1721 Mail Service Center ~ Raleigh, NC 27699-1721
Telephone: [phone] ext. 281 Fax: [phone]

Bridge Scopings Page 2 March 21, 2003
4. If possible, bridge supports (bents) should not be placed in the stream.
5. If temporary access roads or detours are constructed, they should be removed back to
original ground elevations immediately upon the completion of the project. Disturbed
areas should be seeded or mulched to stabilize the soil and native tree species should be
planted with a spacing of not more than 10'x10'. If possible, when using temporary
structures the area should be cleared but not grubbed. Clearing the area with chain saws,
mowers, bush-hogs, or other mechanized equipment and leaving the stumps and root mat
intact, allows the area to revegetate naturally and minimizes disturbed soil.
6. A clear bank (riprap free) area of at least 10 feet should remain on each side of the steam
underneath the bridge.
7. In trout waters, the N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission reviews all U_S. Army Corps of
Engineers nationwide and general `404' permits. We have the option of requesting
additional measures to protect trout and trout habitat and we can recommend that the
project require an individual `404' permit.
8. In streams that contain threatened or endangered species, Mr. Hal Bain with the NCDOT
- ONE should be notified. Special measures to protect these sensitive species may be
required_ NCDOT should also contact the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for information
on requirements of the Endangered Species Act as it relates to the project.
9. In streams that are used by anadromous fish, the NCDOT official policy entitled "Stream
Crossing Guidelines for Anadromous Fish Passage (May 12, 1997)" should be followed_
10. In areas with significant fisheries for sunfish, seasonal exclusions may also be
recommended.
11. Sedimentation and erosion control measures suff cient to protect aquatic resources must
be implemented prior to any ground disturbing activities. Structures should be
maintained regularly, especially following rainfall events.
12. Temporary or permanent herbaceous vegetation should be planted on all bare soil within
15 days of ground disturbing activities to provide long-term erosion control.
13. All work in or adjacent to stream waters should be conducted in a dry work area.
Sandbags, rock berms, cofferdams, or other diversion structures should be used where
possible to prevent excavation in flowing water.
14. Heavy equipment should be operated from the bank rather than in stream channels in
order to minimize sedimentation and reduce the likelihood of introducing other pollutants
into streams_

.Bridge 5copings Page 3 March 21, 2003
15. Only clean, sediment-free rock should be used as temporary fill (causeways), and should
be removed without excessive disturbance of the natural stream bottom when
construction is completed.
16. During subsurface investigations, equipment should be inspected daily and maintained to
prevent contamination of surface waters from leaking fuels, lubricants, hydraulic fluids,
or other toxic materials.
If corrugated metal pipe arches, reinforced concrete pipes, or concrete box culverts are
used:
1. The culvert must be designed to allow for aquatic life and fish passage. Generally, the
culvert or pipe invert should be buried at least 1 foot below the natural streambed
(measured from the natural thalweg depth}. If multiple barrels are required, barrels other
than the base flow barrel(s) should be placed on or near stream bankfull or floodplain
bench elevation (similar to Lyonsfield design). These should be reconnected to
floodplain benches as appropriate. This may be accomplished by utilizing sills on the
upstream end to restrict or divert flow to the base flow barrel(s). Silled barrels should be
filled with sediment so as not to cause noxious or mosquito breeding conditions_
Sufficient water depth should be provided in the base flow barrel during Iow flows to
accommodate fish movement. If culverts are longer than 40-50 linear feet, alternating or
notched baffles should be installed in a manner that mimics existing stream pattern This
should enhance aquatic life passage: 1) by depositing sediments in the barrel, 2) by
maintaining channel depth and flow regimes, and 3) by providing resting places for fish
and other aquatic organisms. In essence, the base flaw barrels} should provide a
continuum of water depth and channel width without substantial modifications of
velocity.
2. If multiple pipes or cells are used, at least one pipe or box should be designed to remain
dry during normal flows to allow for wildlife passage.
3. Culverts or pipes should be situated along the existing channel alignment whenever
possible to avoid channel realignment. Widening the stream channel must be avoided.
Stream channel widening at the inlet or outlet end of structures typically decreases water
velocity causing sediment deposition that requires increased maintenance and disrupts
aquatic life passage.
4. Riprap should not be placed in the active thalweg channel or placed in the streambed in a
manner that precludes aquatic life passage. Bioengineering boulders or structures should
be professionally designed, sized, and installed.
In most cases, we prefer the replacement of the existing structure at the same location
with road closure. If road closure is not feasible, a temporary detour should be designed and
located to avoid wetland impacts, minimize the need for clearing and to avoid destabilizing
stream banks. If the structure will be on a new alignment, the old structure should be removed
and the approach fills removed from the 100-year floodplain. Approach fills should be removed

Bridge Scopings Page 4 March 21, 2003
down to the natural ground elevation. The area should be stabilized with grass and planted with
native tree species. Tall fescue should not be used in riparian areas. If the area that is reclaimed
was previously wetlands, NCDOT should restore the area to wetlands. If successful, the site array
be used as wetland mitigation for the subject project or other projects in the watershed.
Project specific comments:
1. B-4032, Buncombe Co., Bridge No. 130 over the Broad River. The Broad River is
classified as C-Tr and rainbow trout are present. An in-stream and 25-foot buffer work
moratorium from January 1 to April 15 should apply.
2. B-4036, Buncombe Co., Bridge No. 220 over Reems Creek. Reems Creek is classified as
C-Tr and is hatchery supported trout water. An in-stream and 25-foot buffer work
moratorium from October 15 to April 15 should apply.
3. B-4037, Buncombe Co., Bridge No. 262 over South Hominy Creek. South Hominy
Creek is classified as C-Tr and rainbow and brown trout are present. An in-stream and
25-foot buffer work moratorium from October 15 to April 15 should apply.
4. B-4258, Rutherford Co., Bridge No. 7 over the Broad River. The Broad River flows into
Lake Lure just downstream of this bridge and is classified as B-Tr and C-Tr in the project
vicinity. The site is downstream of Hatchery Supported Trout Water and an in-stream
and 25-foot buffer work moratorium for rainbow trout, from January 1 to April 15, is
most appropriate for this project.
5. B-4261, Rutherford Co_, Bridge Nos. 39 and 37 over Fork of Cathey's Creek. The Santee
chub (Cyprinella zanema), a state listed significantly rare fish species, occurs both
upstream and downstream of the project. An in-stream work moratorium to protect
smallmouth bass and redbreast sunfish, from May 1 to July 15, is most appropriate for
this project.
6. B-2988, Haywood Co., Bridge No. 13 over the East Fork of the Pigeon River. The East
Fork of the Pigeon River is classified as WS-III Tr in the project area and rainbow and
brown trout are present. Appalachian elktae (Alasmidonta raveneliana), a federal and
state listed endangered mussel species and the olive darter (Perei~za squamata}, a state
listed special concern fish species, are present in the Pigeon River downstream of the
East Fork Pigeon River confluence. An in-stream and 25-foot buffer work moratorium
from October 15 to April 15 should apply. Special precautions should be taken to
prevent sedimentation downstream.
7. B-4144, Haywood Co., Bridge No. 211 over Richland Creek. Trout are present in
Richland Creek, class B waters, which joins the Pigeon River not far downstream of the
project site. Longear sunfish (Lepomis ~negalotis), a state significantly rare fish species,
has been observed in Richland Creek upstream of the project. An in-stream and 25-foot
buffer work moratorium from October 15 to April 15 should apply.

Bridge Scopings Page 5 Maxch 21, 2003
8. B-4291, Transylvania Co_, Bridge No_ 193 over the Davidson River. Rainbow and brown
trout are present in the project area of Davidson River, class C waters, which joins the
French Broad River not far downstream of the project site. The creeper (Strophitus
undulatus), a state listed threatened mussel species, is present in the French Broad River
immediately downstream of the confluence of the Davidson River. Two amphibian
species, the common mudpuppy (necturus maculasus), state special concern, and the
hellbender (Cryptobranchus alleganiensis), federal species of concern and state special
concern, have been found in the Davidson River upstream of the project site_ An in-
stream and 25-foot buffer work moratorium from October 15 to April 15 should apply.
Special precautions should be taken to prevent sedimentation downstream. In addition, a
public access area should be incorporated into the plans for this project.
We request that NCDOT routinely minimize adverse impacts to fish and wildlife
resources in the vicinity of bridge replacements. The NCDOT should install and maintain
sedimentation control measures throughout the life of the project and prevent wet concrete from
contacting water in or entering into these streams. Replacement of bridges with spanning
structures of some type, as opposed to pipe or box culverts, is recommended in most cases.
Spanning structures allow wildlife passage along streambanks, reducing habitat fragmentation
and vehicle related mortality at highway crossings_
If you need further assistance or information on NCWRC concerns regarding bridge
replacements, please contact me at [phone]. Thank you for the opportunity to review and
comment on these projects.
cc: Cynthia Van Der Wiele, DWQ
Marella Buncick, USF'WS
Sarah Kopplin, NHP

Eot A11 the
s~° APo
e '~~~
. •Z+' r
,~'' ~ ~~
z ~E:~~~ ~
h
~~8H8 ~ -
7y1~~ r,~
~- ~
North Carolina Department of Cultural Reso ~~,l~,~f ~~ .,~~y
State Historic Preservation Office °~~~'~~R, ,T _, ~ ~~~ ~~
David L. S. Brook, Administrator ~l~il~ ~ ~ ~,~ `~ ~~S
Michael F. Easley, Governor Divisio rival Resources
Lisbeth C. Evans, Secretary David J. OLson, Director
Jeffrey J. Crow, Deputy Secretary
January 28, 2003
MEMORANDUM
TO: ~ Greg Thorpe, Manager
Project Development and Environmental. Analysis Branch
NCDOT Division of Highways ~.--~~3-?~(Q
FROM: David Brook{'{~'~ !~~ '' _" `' "~. 1.~ f '
.J t q
lip
SUBJECT: Bridge 220 on SR 2098, Buncombe Co., ER 02-897
We have received notification of a nationwide permit application for fine above project and would
like,ta comment.
The proposed project is at, or in very close proxirnity, to previously recorded site 31BN19.
We recommend that a comprehensive survey be conducted by an experienced archaeologist to
identify and evaluate the significance of archaeological remains that may be damaged or destroyed by
the proposed project. Potential effects on unknown resources must be assessed prior to the
initiation of construction activities.
Two copies of the resulting archaeological survey report, as well as one copy of the appropriate site
forms, should be forwarded to us for review and comment as soon as they are available and well in
advance of any construction activities.
A list of archaeological consultants who have conducted or expressed an interest in contract work in
North Carolina is available at www.arch.dcr.state.nc.us/consults. The archaeologists listed, or any
other experienced archaeologist, may be contacted to conduct the recommended survey.
We have determined that the project as proposed will not affect any historic structures.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act
and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Corripliance with Section 106
codified at 3G CFR Part 800.
www. hno. d cr.state.nc. us
Location Mailing Address Telephone/Fax
ADMINISTRATION 507 N. Blount 5t., Raleigh t~lC 4617 Maii Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4617 [phone] • 733-8653
I2ESTORATiON 515 N. Blount St., Raleigh NC 46]3 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 27699-4613 [phone] • 7154801
SURVEY & PLANNING 515 N. Blount St., Raleigh NC 4638 Mai] Service Center, Raleigh NC 27694618 (9I9) 733-6545 • 715-4801

J~:riuary 28, 2003
P2ge 2
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the above
comment, contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919/733-4763. In all
future communication concerning this project, please cite the above referenced tracking number.
cc Wadsworth, NCDOT
Wilkerson, NCDOT
Mary Pope Furr, NCDOT

~ ~~E 4
~~~ ~ ~ 'ns
P1

"~ a ~~ _- -~y.

~
~~ ~-=~~
North Carolina Department of Cultural. Resources
State Historic Preservation Office
Pctcr E3. tiandbcck, Administrator
AEichacl E~. I :a.~le}•, C ~cn•ernor Office of Archi~cy and Flistory
E .i.Iicrh C_. 1 ~.~•:u1.c, tieeretlrv E~isision of E [ixtc~rieal Re~ourect
Jcffrct• J. C~ro~r, E3c•~uty Srcrctary I~arid Lirook, I~irc:ctor
March 14, 2006
MEMORANDUM •
To: Matt Wilkerson, Archaeology Supervisor
NCDCtT -Office of Huinan Environment
FROM: Peter Sandbeck ' ~ ~~sr'~~ ~~ CC~~-
SUBJECT: Bridge No. 220 on SR 2098, B-4036, Buncombe County, ER 02-8497
Thank you for your letter transmitting the archaeological survey for the above project. We apologize for the
delay in our response.
The report meets our office's guidelines and those of the Secretary of the Interior. During the, course of the
survey, no sites were located within the project area. Mr. Zinn has recommended that no further
archaeological investigation be conducted in connection with this project. We concur with this
recommendation since the project will not involve significant archaeological resources.
The above comments are made pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and the
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for compliance with Section 106 codified at 3G CFR
Part $00.
Thank you for your cooperation and considerations. If you have any questions concerning the above
comment, please contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, environmental review coordinator, at 919.733.4763. In all
future communication concerning this project, please cite the above referenced tracking number.
cc: Jesse Zinn, NCDOT
Location Mailing Address Te1epF~one f Fax
ADMINISTRATION 507 N. lilocsnt Strcct, lialciE;h N~: 4(17 flail Scn-icc (;crater, 1LniciL-h NC: 27C,')~14C 17 (917)733-47(3/73 ~-8653
RESTORATION Sly N. Rlnunt titrcct, Ralcil;h N(; 4f l7 ltitail Sen•icr (:enter, Raleigh N(: 27G944(E7 [phone]/715480!
SURVEY Sc PLANNING SI S N. lil~~unr titrcct, lialciE,rh, IVC 4(17 hlvl Scn-icc C:entcr, Raleigh NC 37f )<14C17 [phone]/7"154801

~ i ~
~unco~be
TYansportation Department
74 Washington Avenue
Asheville. North Carolina 28804
Phone: [phone] -Fax: (82$) 252-8637
- ~~G E ! Vc~
July 23, 200I
~~ ~~8 2 I 2D03
ra ~
Mr. Davis Moore ~~a'o c+visroH of ~°
North Carolina Department of Transportation ~o`~fi~. HtG~~~ ~~
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch ~~F, ~T v~to~'s s~~
1548 Mail Service Center ~ t ~ N ~~~
Raleigh, NC 27699-1548
RE: Replacement of Bridge l~Iumber 220 located on SR 2098 over Reems Creek
Dear Mr. Moore:
I am writing in response to your request concerning the number of school buses that cross bridge
number 220 on Herron Cove Road in Buncombe County. Five school buses cross this bridge four
times a day. This does not include the parents who transport their children to and/or from school.
Students who live in this area attend Weaverville Elementary School, Weaverville Prunary School,
North Buncombe Middle School, and North Buncombe High School
Buses could be temporarily rerouted onto Reems Creek Road and Stoney Knob Road d11rlllg
bridge construction, if it is not feasible to provide an on site detour with the replacement of the -
'bridge at its existing location or provide the permanent realignment of the road with a new bridge
while maintaining traffic on the existing bridge. Please notify the Buncombe County Schools' -
Transportation Department at the address above when a date has been set for the begin of this
project. This will provide us with sufficient time to establish new bus runs with the schools that
are affected. -
If you need additional information, please contact me at the address or telephone number listed.
above.
Sincerely,
Harold F. Laflin
Director of Transportation
Attachment
pc: Mr. -Marshall Roberts
CouvL~jr I~ublic Schools

EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
`~
NORTH CARDLtNA
Count~T of Bun~orll~~
r ,
BUNCOMBE COUNTY EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY
EMERGENCY OPERATING CENTER
35 WOODFIN STREET
ASHEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 289(?1
~i..jerry Vehaun Director of Emergency Sen-ices
Mr. Davis Moore July 3, 2001
NCDOT
Project Development &
Environmental Analysis Branch
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1548
Re: State Project No. 8.2844701_. B..±f037
State Project No. 8.2844601-f~--4036
State Project No. 8.1845601-- Q - t!-O 3 2.
Dear Mr. Moore:
In reply to your request for information regarding the above listed projects, there
are no problems which we will not be able to address by re-routing emergency vehicles
while these projects are underway. There are no unworkable situations involved with
these three projects.
Should you need additional information, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
~M.
M. rry V Haun, Director
Emergency Services
MAILING ADDRESS: 60 COURT PLAZA, ASHEVILLE. N. C. 28801 -3561

~ J2 F L O C AT I O N R E P O R T
~X E.I.S. ~ CORRIDOR ~ DESIGN
North Carolina Department of Transportation
RELOCATION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
PROJECT: 8.2844601 couNTY BUNCOMBE Alternate 1 Of 2 Alternates
i.D. NO.: ~ B-4036 F.A. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Bridge Number 220 on SR 2098 (Herron Cove Road) over Reerns Creek
'~ E ,, rz ~'~ ~ ~ r

ESTIMATED DISPLACEES ~ INCOME LEVEL
Type of
Dispfacees Owners Tenants Total Minorities 0-7 5M 15-25M 25-35M 35-50M 50 UP
Residential 1 0 1 ~ 0 0 0 1 O 0
BUSineSSeS O 0 O 0 VALUE OF DWELLING DSS DWELLWG AVAILABLE
Farms 0 0 0 0 Owners Tenants For S ale For R ent
Nan-Profit O 0 0 0 o-2Drae p S o-iso p o-2aM 5 S 0-150 p
ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS 20-4DM U 150-250 ~ 20-40w- ~ ~ 150-250 ~(
Yes iJo Explai» al! "YES" answers. 40-70nA ' 250-400 p 40-70m1 ~ g 250-400 7
X 1. Will special relocation services be necessary? 7D-100rN p 400-60D p TO-100M 1 g 400-6D0 ~ 1
x 2. Wilt schools or churches be affect by 100 uP p 600 uP p 1oD uP 36 600 u~ g
- displacement? TOTAL 1 ~' ' 0 B6 25
X 3. Will business services still be available after REMARKS (Respond by Number}
project? 3. Business services wilt not be disrupted due to the project.
x 4. Wilt any business be displaced? If so, 6. Beverly-Hanks Realtors and local real estate publications
indicate size, type, estimated number of indicate that sufficient DSS housing properties will be
employees, minorities, etc. available.
X 5. Will relocation cause a housing shortage? $. As necessary in accordance with State law.
6. Source for available housing (list). 12. Beverly-Hanks Realtors and local real estate publications
x 7. Will additional housing programs be needed? indicate that sufFcient DS5 housing properties will be
X 8. Should Last Resort Housing be considered? available.
x 9. Are there large, disabled, elderly, etc.
families?
x 10. Wi11 public housing be needed for project?
x 11. Is public housing available?
X 12. Is it felt there will be adequate DSS housing
housing available during relocation period?
x 13. Will there be a problem of housing within
financial means?
14. Are suitable business sites available {list
source). NIA
15. Number months estimated to complete
RELOCATION? '12 months ==~~~ ~<~>`_
*'You may notice a difference in the number of displacees on the Relocation E!S Report and the Appraisal Cost Estimate. This is due to possible
proximity damage being a factor on the Gost Esfimafe Report and improvements »of actually in the proposed acquisition areas shown o» the
plans.
~- ~

--~-~- r vfWa t Date Relocation Coordinator Date
Form is.a Bevis a os~z I c~nginai tsi dopy 7: Kerocauon c;oorarnator
Copy 2: Division Relocation Fife

~~b ' R E L O C A T I O N R E P O R T
E.I.S. a CORRIDOR ~ DESIGN
r ~,
North Carolina Department of Transportation
RELOCATION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
PROJECT: 8.2844601 couNTY BUNCOMBE Alternate ~ 2 Of 2 Alternates
l.D. NO.: B-4036 F.A. PROJECT
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: Bridge Number 220 on SR 2098 (Herron Cove Road) over Reetns Creek
+ef'1.'~tg~"v.ae h ~Ti-.si' C - ~T :.. k C~ r~'I~' ~'~.,,~- k !
So9a`^
ESTIMATED DISPLACEES ~ . INCOME LEVEL
Type of
Displacees Owners Tenants Tota! Minorities 0-'15M '15-25M 25-35M 35-SOM 50 UP
Residential O 0 D ~~` 0 O D 0 0 0
BUSIneSS@S 0 0 O 0 VALUE OF DWELLING . ° . DSS DWELLING AVAILABLE
Farms 0 0 0 0 Owners Tenants For S ale For R ent
Non-Profit 0 0 0 D o-2oM p S o-t5o p o-zaM 5 S o-~so p
ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS ~ 20-40M ~ t50-250 p 2Q-40M ~ ~ '150-250 ~
Yes No Explain al/ "YES"answers. 40-TOM O 250-400 p 4D-70M 1G 250-400 7
x 1. Will special relocation services be necessary? To-7oOM p 4oo-soo p 70-'104M ~g 4oo-soo ~~
x 2. Will schools or churches be affect by iov uP p s00 uP p wo uP 36 soo uP g
displacement? TOTAL O - - _ 0 "'~ ~' ~'''' B6 25
x 3. Will business services still be available after REMARKS (Respond by Number)
project? No reiocatees on this alternate.
x 4_ Wilt any business be displaced? If so,
indicate size, type, estimated number of
• employees, minorities, etc.
x 5. Will relocation cause a housing shortage?
- 6. Source for available housing (list).
x 7. Will additional housing programs be needed?
x 8. Should Last Resor# Housing be considered?
x 9. Are there large, disabled, elderly, etc.
families?
x 10. Wilt public housirg be needed for project?
x 11. fs public housing available?
x 72. !s i# felt there will be adequate DSS housing
housing available during relocation period?
x 13. Will there be a problem of housing within
frnancial means?
14. Are suitable business sites available (list
source). NIA
15. Number months estimated to complete
RELOCATION? N//~ `'~~:`;;<<~=
w:~:.~ ~,
"'You may notice a difference in the number of displacees on the Relocation EIS Reporf and the Appraisal Cos! Esfimafe. This is due fo possible
proximity damage being a factor on the Cost Estimate Report and improvements not actually in the proposed acquisition areas shown on the
plans.
3~u~LS ~
'~ ~:» a

-...
~'-ht~fiidlf Date ` ...~.~.~' '. Relocation Coordihator Date

form ~5.a ~}evised 09-02 f priginaf 8~ Copy 1: Relocation Coordinator
~/ Copy 2. Division Relocation File

~.
NC`DW(~ ~trearn C'Tassification Form
Project Name B-4036 River Basin French Broad County Buncombe Evaluator BAR
DWQ Prj Nearest Reems Creek Latitude Signature BAR
Number Stream
Date '101'10/2003 USGS Weaverville Longitude Location Bn ge #220 on
UAD SR 2098
jcedgement of the evaluator, the eature is a rnan-made ditch and not a moth led natural stream-this ratin s stem should not be used

~ r;. F:
Prima -Field Indicators ~ r,` t~ _ ,. ~ ~ ~ ~'.'?~ -~ ~ - f~ _
I. Geomor holo Absent Weak Moderate Stron Score
1} Is There ARiffle-Poo] S uence? 0 1 2 3 i~-~?~~3?~'_:_'-"=G?
2) Is The USDA Texture Ln Streambed Different From Surrounding

Terrain? 0 1 2 3
~ :a'.
~~x3. ~1- .
~ _....-~r~-~?~'?-
3) Are Natural Levees Present? 0 1 2 3 _~~=~~lr„~'~_
4) Is The Channel Sinuous? 0 1 2 3 ;''._~_'_:.2'~
5 Is There An Active Or Relic Flood lain Present? 0 3 2 3 `~~~~'a
6} Is The Channel Braided? 0 1 2 3 ;x==0~=
7) Are Recent Alluvial De osits Present? 0 1 2 3 ~~#,1?~~`'
$) Is There A Bankfull Bench Present? 0 1 2 3 ~=-"~~=
9} Is A Continuous Bed & Bank Present? 0
('.!`3Vp7'E.= Beal:&:Barik`:Caused'ByDitchirigAnd:'FiYITBUUT:SJrirlost - Thei[:Scare D*;- ,r.,r, ,~-. _.; 1 2 3 ~-~1~~'z~~3~~x=#'
?= i.~ F~`; +~' - :?,::a.`"a ; _': ' ?.~ A ~ - r ~~.~ . '~
10 Is A 2 Order Or Greater Channel As Indicated On To o Ma
( P P Yes
And/or In Field Present?
3
No
0 ~.•y~ t~=?`
~ '~3
•~~~:~ i
PRIMARY GEDMORPHOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS : ~=
II. Hvdrolo Absent Weak Moderate Stron
1) Is There A Groundwater F1ow/Discharge Present? 0 1 2 3 =1~#~~~1#;?~tr
PRIMARY HYDROLOGY INDICATOR POINTS:
III. Biolo Absent Weak Moderate 5tron
1) Are Fibrous Roots Present In Streambed? 3 2 1 0 ssf3~~
2) Are Rooted Plants Present In Streambed? 3 2 1 0 ~=?~~,~~?=
:

3) Is Peri h on Present?
0
1
2
3 r
.r
' ~"•;.~s~ • F ,
4) Are Bivalves Present?
0
1
2
3
=- :ff~ ~~
PRIMARY BIOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS:

1
. .. t .. '. ~.- ; . .. ~ - .:': ~ S ~f :i t ^fhY W J -%.
Seconda ~ ~F~eld Indicators. <: ~ , ..I ;. J • re.. e;: . ~ t,...c ....... _..v .. _ cir .. , , i..-:. ~7" .~~ A: tr ~•.... d~, -'~u"a

s>a~ _ A ..'.Yi elf., ~-rR -H3. .iv. ~. ~~; + _ h y ~ t~•
T
's 4;1 t ~ ~t~o'~~;'W',="F-.
I. Geomor bolo Absent Weak Moderate Stron
1 Is There A Head Cut Present In Channel? 0 0.5 1 I.5 ' *' t~'' '
5..,
2) Is There A Grade Control Point In Channel? 0 0.5 1 1.5 '`~;F3_i(IS;
3) Does Topo by Indicate A Natural Drainage Way? 0 QS 1 1.5 *-ra`,'--_i~~'L~~:
SECONDARY GEOMORPHOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS:
e.
II. H droto Absent Weak Moderate Stron
1 Is This Year's Or Last's Leaflitter Present In 5treambed? 1.5 1 0.5 0
2 Is Sediment On Plants (Or Debris Present? 0 0.5 l 1.5 Viz- ,~±=Qtr
3 Are Wrack Lines Present? 0 0.5 1 1.5 '~~; ;°'-.'''•
4) Ls Water In Channel .4nd X48 Hrs. Since Last Known Rain? (*NOTE:
If Ditch Indicated In #9 Above Skip This Step And #5 Below*)
0
0.5
1
I.5 1 ==r
~ ~.°~`~_~;; '- ::.
v
5) Is There Water In Channel During Dry Conditions Or In Growing
Season ? 0 0.5 I 1.5 '
....
, - ..;~•.
6} Are Hydric Soils Present In Sides Of Channel (Or In Headcut)? Yes 1.5 No 0 ~r'*-'1K5-~'.;
SECONDARY HYDROLOGY INDICATOR POINTS:
-.. l r .
-•~~ _-
III. Biolo Absent Weak Moderate Stron
1) Are Fish Present? 0 0.5 1 i .5 ~' "`-' `~ ' ~_
~_ - ,~
•
2) Are A hibians Present? 0 0.5 1 1.5 xll#~f'i€IIi~~
~F~
3) Are A vatic Turtles Present? 0 0.5 i 1.5 r~~ _ ~?`~?=
4 Are Cra ash Present? 0 0.5 1 1.5 ~ ~ ~~ ~•~~'
5) Are Macrobenthos Present? 0 0.5 ~ 1 1.5 1=1~;~=_
6} Are Iron Oxidizin Bacteria/Fun Present? 0 0.5 1 l .5 ~0':`~ t
7 Is Filamentous Al ae Present? 0 0.5 1 1-5 =,~`°O
8} Are Wetland Plants In Streambed? SAV Mostly OBL MosNy FACW MosNy FAC Mostly
RACUlUPL
2 1
*- ,.. `-. • ... - _...: ~ .~..: • ..:. _; : ...._ ...~:_ •'-
T.7irs'St 'UNLESS S.4-Y~?reten
{-~NOTE',=lfTotal'llbsence`,Of.4JJ'Plaratsln.'3tredmbed_Rt.JYnled..47iove;Slap ep
_ . 0.75 0.5 O ?~~:,~ Q,
s 1r s *s~:`eF's 'js. - '"~ cis?.. ~ ~ s -. a: • 3. y V-..=e ~q
t - a, ~ ... -. s..,..;":';~ ..,s ~t r~ .::, ?:5~,, - ^~ .
) __ „~-,~~
..
SECONDAR Y BIOLOGY INDICA TOR POINTS: _
••
TOTAL POINTS (Primary +Secondary~ rea er an r qua o oin s e ream s eas
Intermittent 39

NCDWQ Stream Classification Form
r 3
Project Name B-4036 River $asin French Broad County Buncombe Evaluator BAR
DWQ Prj Nearest Herron Cove Branch Latitude Signature BAR
Number Stream
Date 10/10/2003 USGS Weaverville, NC Longitude Location ~ ge no. 220 5R
UAD 2098
~YLt`:ASh N V 1 h: tJ evacuator ana [anaowner agree rnar me jearure rs a man-mace aucn, rnen use of rnrs john rs nor necessary. srsa, rj rn me oesr proJessronat
judgement of the evaluator, the eature is a man-made ditch and not a moth red natural stream-this ratin s stem should not be used

r ~ ,.
Prima : Field Indicators . ,,_, . _r} ~ ~` ~ ;
~• r.. ., r_ e~.... s.. S 'i,^ ,.~i.y1t r.'.i .. ..:F.. .r-. r•...e. .Y.., -.~ it r f -' .~. p- FY4.. ~-cam .
I. Geomor bolo Absent Weak Moderate Stron Score
1) Is There ARiffle-Pool S uence? 0 1 2 3 =~-i~ ~3~=r?._...==~
2) Is The USDA Texture In Streambed Different From Surrounding
Terrain - 0 1 2 3 ~ F, ~~
F
3) Are Natural Levees Present? 0 I 2 3 =~~:~=i~7~~?~.~`:.
4 Is The Channel Sinuous? 0 1 2 3 " ~;~1~~:~Y=
5 Is There An Active Or Relic Flood lain Present? 0 1 2 3 ~`31~=~-~_
6) Is The Channel Braided? 0 1 2 3 ~-~~;.0'
7 Are Recent Alluvial De osits Present? 0 1 2 3 ~'.~{`~'F3I?;;
8 Is There A Bankful] Bench Present? 0 1 2 3 ~=`I°-~3
9 Is A Continuous Bed 8c Bank Present? 0 1 2 3 ~`t3'';'.~~{
(t NOTE ^:I Bect 8c Bank Caused By Drtchizig And=ii!ITH(~UT.: SinLOSEtj+Theri::Score. U*)' ~ .. n. a~~ ~ ;, k, .,. ~:;. .t _,->-~? ..t, ~.
-
10 Is A 2° Order Or Greater Channel As Indicated On To o Ma
And/Or In Fieid Present.
Yes
3
No
0 ""''" ~~`"
Ft ~•,
PRIMARY GEOMORPHOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS : X17
II. H drolo Absent Weak Moderate 5tron
1) Is There A Groundwater Flow/Discharge Present? 0 1 2 3 ~=~'~1
PitIMARYHYDROLOGYINDiCATOR POINTS: '0 -'
III. Biolo Absent Weak Moderate Stron
1 Are Fibrous Roots Present In Streambed? 3 2 1 0 ~?_
2) Are Rooted Plants Present In Streambed? 3 2 1 0 ;?1t~=~*~'1~~:.~=
3) ]s Peri h on Present? 0 1 2 3 x~i:=> ~ ,.=~?
4) Are Bivalves Present? 0 1 2 3 '~`s"30=
PRINIARYBIOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS:

t -.._ ~_ .,_ .. . .. .~~:. '..:" ~ t.. -_ p ' _ ^T f ~ ` ~. ~ .:.~ ~E N ~, 4 ~~:x::. f. ,}' ,~_ ~'p u ~- ~, 5,~iY" ,s ~.-~~s"~.stC L-_.a qty .-~~'
Secanda Field. Vindicators ~ .,.,.~ ,•..-.......' - ~ ~...., _ y ---~ ~.;:~: .. ,C~
j ~a ~.u~ ~c~~1. ..
I. Geomor hold Absent Weak Moderate Stron
1) Is There A Head Cut Present In Channel? 0 0.5 1 1.5 ~5~'f~''~
2) Is There A Grade Control Point In Channel? 0 0.5 1 1-5 ~~r-~iLI'`.~',~~rV'"~
3) Does Topography Indicate A Natural Drainage Way? 0 0.5 1 I.5 ;'I~5~~t~
SECONDARY GEOMORPHOLOGY INDICATOR POINTS: ,;'. ~' a
II. H drolo Absent Weak Moderate Stron
I Is This Year's Or Last's Leaflitter Present In Streambed? I.5 1 0.5 0 ~~.0:5
2 Is Sediment On Plants (Or Debris) Present? 0 0.5 ] 1.5 ;=i?"Qi~T~€
3) Are Wrack Lines Present? 0 0.5 1 1.5 ~'""..';j,~.11.~.--

4} Is Water In Channel ,4nd >48 Hrs. Since Last Known Rain? (*NOTE:
If Ditch Indicated In #9 Above Skip This Step And #5 Below*)

0

0.5

1

1.5 r=- t ,
~ ~'
~ ,
.
5) Is There Water In Channel During Dry Conditions Or In Growing
Season ? 0 0.5 1 1.5 ~~'~`_,};~=
-~}FYr
~~-~'
6) Are Hydric Soiis Present In Sides Of Channel (Or In Headcut)? Yes 1.5 No 0 '''Fi=~;:'r1.F5-Yl?.~'
SECONDARYHYDROLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: _ ;.
III. Biolo Absent Weak Moderate Stron
1) Are Fish Present? 0 0.5 1 1.5 ~ ~_,,~;
2) Are Am hibians Present? 0 0.5 1 1-5 ~~0~ti'
3) Are A uatic Turtles Present? 0 0.5 1 1.5 Q
4 Are Cra fish Present? 0 0.5 1 1.5 ~~--::,L
5 Are Macrobenthos Present? 0 0.5 ~ 1 1.5 ~'t?75;
6) Are Iron Oxidizin Bacteria/Fun s Present? 0 0.5 1 1.5 Ol'-
7) Is Filamentous Al ae Present? 0 OS 1 1.5 =1 ;~~'I
8) Are Wetland Plants In Streambed? SAV Mostly OBL Mostly FACW Mostly FAC Mostly
FACU/UPL
2 I 0.75 0.5 0 ~*1M~~~#r~'~{:
. ,. .. ~
{.T_NOTE'`ffTo'~aT~Ibs~nce:Oj.~lllPlantsln`S'rreambed;As~foedAboxe;SldpThfsStep,JNLES.^,S.dF'Presen _
t"f"~.,,.;'i;`r~'?F_"' 3 .,-,'.,jh~ r,a..: ~; '~_'" "~~-R
kr ~,~.ra~ ~„
SECONDARYBIOLOGYINDICATOR POINTS: _
`
TOTAL POINTS (Primary -F Secondary ~ rea er an r qua o om s e eam s eas
Intermittent 33.5

a ~JSACE AID# DWQ # Site # {indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSNSENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following informatiyo~n for stream rre_ach under assessment: ~~~ _
1. Applicant's name: ti! ~tL Z. Evaluator's name: i'~,
3. Date of evaluation ~ d ! 4. Time of evaluation: ' ~ U Q~1~~-~.
S. Name of stream: ~ ~ `~/~' ~ 6. River basin: ~~
7. Approximate drainage area: ~ ~ cl.C~
9. Length of reach evaluated: ~ S. Stream or(d~er:
10. County: 17~lYlC_~~~

11. Site coordinates (if kno~n pre er in(d~eci al degrees.
Latitude (ex. 34 872312}: ~`-' • ~ ~~ ~ `~ ~ I2. Subdivision name (if any Q`
Longitude (ex. -77.5556 ] 1): _ • ~ ~ ~ t`3 L~
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) PhotolGIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of ach u er e r ation {note n erby ~ ds and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location_ }:
~, 4
14. Proposed channel work (if any
15. Recent weather conditions:
16. Site conditions at time of visit:
,~ 4r
' 17.~entify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
~V/ Trout ~'Vaters Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I-IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES ~ Ifyes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quar~d map? YES NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey?~S NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: 1~ % Residential - % Commercial % Industrial ~~O-/oJAgricultural
~:- ~ % Forested % Cleared /Logged % Other [
22. Bankfull width: ~ _ 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank):
:~
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2%) ,~aentle (2 to 4%) _~Moderate (4 to 10%) Steep (> 10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight Occasional bends ~/ Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel
instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate- ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how ~ to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review {e.g., the stream flows frort`e a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score {from. reverse}: ~ _ Comments:
Evaluator's Signature Date ~ V
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and nvi nmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change -version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
4 --J:
~
~ .'{LC ~7-,.' .+ , L-.~- r' °Yi'C it'_}_ 1,1 I r,-~. eT R Y.,r 4, r _j- t~ - ..~ Y... P _ - r - 1. 5 .. ,. .... _ _:,, ..._ _ ' __ d :"4 -- - 1'
I .._.~ ...~.-,+ ._.. ~~ _ f.:.. .,,. .t r r ~ ~ ~
'~ ~.
4r~
-
G~ON P
OI~T`
RAI~G~--
t~~C~RE
~
~
~
'~'~ "c _.
:N + E~ -
~
ra _H ~
,.
,
~~~ a ,,
::
:.r
~
~
~t
.
'
#
T . , ~.~~riSC012E r.
~..-~ C13ARACTERISTTOS~, ~ :
f3 ~3' t
Y ~ -~ :.:y
:~ ~-~°
~~5
~, D
.. ,
.,,
.
.
I
:
.. ,
:: rt
Y ,, -~ -~. fi ;c ., .:
, :;~ :_.,.~
z' ..~
:y oasta;~ s
Piedmont x~r-,.Mounfan
'
'
~: r
; ,~ z
.,
..:.l.?=, ~
_:
~1,-
_ .
, ,
,
_
_
,_.,.y,p'r .: ?-A..4 .:'t'i-,. ~.4'..i ..:~ -;:_. ,ay. !.,.-.. r F.•: -fi'z~s:r. .'F. d t ,v r._ t ~~' ~.. w:y -'u &'; S :-{e~. ~l. ~?- .
.x ?`_k• aa:f -
-
~,
s "~~ , ~ Presence of flow l persistent.'poois in strearrr ~ -'" ~ ~ ~" ° a s~ ~ ` ~F,~ Rt ;, ~F r R ~~~"
Q S
_
z,
- ;.
1 - a
~ ~' 0
~
~
0 4 ~~' `~
r
c
a ~. I
. _ .
, i ry
,f. , . -
,„:
;-r _ _ ~. -r
_ r
..
~:.:
~ r'~ ' . w~
~~ _ (no flaw or saturation D; •strorl •.flow =~rlax polnts~ ,~^ ~, ~ _ ~ ~~ ,,, r • ~R-~,
'
~ /
"~ ;~
r+~,< =~ ti ~ Evidence of past bumai'alteration s{ +`
~
~~ ~ s,~`~ `:
f 7 - "h ~h ,-J .~ .. _. ..F .. -:- _~' - :J- ,I T ~ ~ _ -'~ ~ ~~.' v
~ 1'~ ~~~ ~
~ "~Y
TJh O
t
~ ~ F~:
/J
1..~
~~~~ _ .
q
. y
J
l
~- ~ - (eXtensLVe altera.tiorl = Q, Ilo alteratlon.= 71.1a?C.poiIits).- t i4R 7 CIS ~ =y~~ L f *t ~ ~~ t~ }~~~~ 1
!h t.1~:3rp, fw -!. '~1 1. k~~} 4 ,~-:J Rl' avian zon~e~ -, ~ ~f[. ~ Y Y{,y~'Y:. s° .F:R: ~4 fkFM,y 2- +zr'~'J~~R _, y~~-4 3 7~,'^4~1 BSI
.
,
'.
!!
P -
~
r~^ "s
!
t"
~
- ~
I
~ 6
~
rt
~
n,,,-, ~
r `'~"~
~~ ~ , t
.
.~. ; z
_
~
: ~ . n
,
~
r5.
e , ~
_. ~
[v I
e tx t.,
Et.. !r \;/
l',+ r~ 3 ._ i^
.L V, ,_ 'Y
5~- i~o-::biiffe_ 0 `eont uou~'~~ide.l7uffer:° Inax Dints}.r. ~'~, ,~'`>.~~ ~_,__~,,'~.,. ,n t-=~y ,;, x,r :~f~;~F r~4
~
ate.
~ :_~ ,,~ r" -" ~- E;vtdenca ofnutrient or cheuilcal discharges ~ _ ~'` r `'""~` "'~ ~j f ` ~=`-~`~ '"~~
-
,
~
~~ ',.7,- ~_
_ '~..~~~>3
~[ ~~~
t ~: ~,.G"sy t''... ., ._ .,, .• .. .:. ''.: * f ~ b - . _~ ' ~ s,. _..'. ~~. _..t F` y ~~%~ Y_ -"Y''
Q ~ 4 ~ -~~~ ~-
:no dlschar es--max amts
extensive dlschar es = O
~ >*
"
,~,~~,
~~~ ,
j .,
t
_
~

:
~' -
..
~' ..
;' , - rf ~, ~ Groundwater discl-ar e r a ~ ~r =~ ~ i ~ >x~ ,- s-~+~s r fir'.;, +~~~rr *~ yl>~Y

;, _ ,
c ~ tii_,,~'"- ~' uy4 'C1 .+~t~~ T g .µ- "` 't<r = '~' k. '.y -'P` s $~. x,
4.
4 5
~.~} ~~~: _ - -- - z>< •~.:.~~~~, r=~' r+ ' s~
-~ 0 ~'~3=.~>y-~$ Y~~O ~4 :~~~:
-:
.~ t , ~~
Q ~
4~~
"
~~°
#"
~
~`
"
.
f
~ ~
_
._
~
,
~
,
r
.
_
no discharse-: 0 span s, seap5rv~etlands .etc °inax poiYits r..x ~= 3 a>:~~~ ~~_ ;~~.~ >*,~.xr 4~,,:~,r~,w,;.,.,a~~>~~.~:,~~
~' : ~ ~ _(
__
>=~
7'-r ~-+_,; ~-~r ~ ~~~ „t, ~ :,Presence of adjacent floodplair~~-`~ ~ ~. .~r r t~ /~, ~~~~">rF~ ~~ -~/~ { ~:~A'~, ,~,,,;:_ ~ ~ ~.. 'x`~ M -
~
>
"':x` Vl Y
'.i-~^w~. -.
~ `
'r Lr?S rt7r~ Q
•
c[' k ~
~ V ~ `'P
w
'~r
ti
:-i-- - ~
~
i J~
'=
-
2•rtr
~'
~
,
f _
r '~
;,
y
,
.
.
'
.
~.
.
-.
.
as
,
rs,
-
..
r O ;c
a
- . F
-
,
extensive flooelplain= max oints~ ~ ~r ~~`, ~,_ ~ J .~ ~ ~~f r st -err i_;='~'~'"~,~~..,'r "4'
~~ ~. ~ ~n[z flaodplairi - 0
-~ 3 ~
ry
..
,~ ' a ,
.
,
ri4 .,kF '4 Yi'e ~~
.'.~ _Y c 'J~' ~ R 4e7i _~ ~ - _ ..._. - ~.: } .c 4~. W ~.t k' 7- +. w s ~ - ~•('3',iyL ,-;si ~ ~- i .,
-~ ~- ~--~~~} +~ ~r Entrenchment'/'flood lain access ~-~ }a~ ~ <`~~ f ~~ a~^ -~ ~ ~ ~"'»~..~~~,~+~'~ ~x ~ ~ ~s
~
_
:1;~: ..V k ~f:,~y~:K _'
.ati 7 .fit ~ .z~ ~".'-.aYT. L. ~W.Z ` :t v'a'i:...._ _ : -7' ` x ts..~ ~: TM ~ rte,. ~. 3r•~'+'~~~ ~ ~4r d2 ~',; ~ .,.~~'.€ ' Y~ +:.F. - +
~x
7J -~ Jx
°~-
~
~-~.~~`~~ -~ ~
~~
frequenfifloodut mace points \
~-~~ r
~deepl entrencfied 0
-
< ~~
uE M~
~
~
T
~:--~
Z. ,
.
„
.
,
,.
,
~ >
,~-
H
_
-
~
_ y =Y ~ ~
_~.e
'
~~
"
..#+. T•1l^
I
v
- ,'t
G-
tj
~ - - -
,
r ~
~
r
~H
'
•
~.,•~b2EIrrF
~
_~.^'iS~i
J~.~~ '
.
~ ~
~
'
.
.
J lE .
..:r1'v1'
.l. - ",'iT'
f 7 ..-..T ~_ ~
L 2'r ~
S~r4 }'~,i .~ '
YF'
M
CM
~
-~ ` ,~. ~~;~ ~ y~~y :~~tirt Presence of adlacent
tvetlandsu~~;t.;~•' ~~ ~~' °~~i. .~M9 - ~c~ ~~•. ~ ~x A~t'+~'~L~,=` ~g~(~' ~:.`' - k
, u.. r,. ~
-
~y
° "~ :..i~*"'~~ , ",.jlrt.~rJ .f•.•~~.: Ltr ..-l `~ {~ Z~
'T ~i"~`r'f1 G:^ •VA
!isr..'• ~`-~'e+k {` r-~*Rz? ~.
- . h:~ -:'ti:
1t~ ?~t --
'
, '
c
w_-,-=~
'n-•
,
_
~,
.
.
Tt,~„fx,=J'
y
.. Y '~ .: kY r~ tlt~ t Y~-I4~Ji~af .
~ t--~ ~~"'~~ t~ue~Iands 0;' Iar e~ adjacent wetlands maX polnts~~~t~ ~ 4 rer~'r~ w~"{, ~~' n~~~: ^'-~{3~-~~ ~T,
} ~ - •__.. ~

'~ ::~.
,6..-:~
~~~,,~ .
,
~--< ~ f ,~ ~.: s r~~s~ ~ ~~ ~,~ . han:nel sinuosi:{v _ '~*°~ ~ " =~ it ; ~ ~ t .a TJ ~ .~,i ~ ~r s~., r~~~~~r t;.~ ~ kr.~ ~ -'~~~e:,~.~-,~`~°
~' ~,r r r .qC `.7 -' . ~rroxr~' Y~ ~ w ~ ~~ ~x ,~" c,. ~. I+~ ,,„~Y ~~~,, •~T~. ~ ~ ~`k ~~ ~._ w,
{,"j9 ~,..r• <, ex Ters~~v~ eI annelizatioiiC 0' naturaL;~aieanclel- ~` ~s Dints s ' ~ ~~ ~* ~~` ~^ ~^`~ ,~9 ~ 4r~~,~~, r,~~3` -~;~,
~
.Y~
~ ..
{~
'
~
~
~
3' S vl' ~
-~:.. • s~ °'.k,„ "~'d
r 7 1 ~" ~ ~ ! _ .7 R
~. .+f~TO_ ~~..-s'_. t '
Wv z{9',,.~
k',g k"> +: S hw
~`Sr 44 Y~'= ~ ~i 1X 5/_4 ~ 1e~ ,-~-Sediment In V.t" 1~ ~ ._ S- ~~ ~S~a~4~~~.~ ti.t7}` - ~ ~J~'{ - 4 .~:1~
+i~~~¢¢ (~ , S ._ 'iF 3•• .~ tz~ ~"e ~' P ,7q F 21~ ~ ^~ W '.41Y' J{a~a"°~S'~ a'r' v"~• ~4 I~~1T , (~ ~~ {~` 7 ~ ~~ '. Y (~. As.+ .'f :r1:.f r~.~-lt,3K' C.7 ~
. ~ '`eti.,~.
V. '~f Y's ~ ~ 4~"at" .i ~i,~~'
tea ~'~ ~_witw` kF?i! ~x4M ~. Q N S~..q aY ~-t'^,Y' i 2' i su: G. ti:~ .'Y ~ Yils. : %1=.. t ~ 1 ' V .Jf
~ V -
Y
`
'
~~
'
~-
,
.
..
..
G
~':x~ ~~-~~ ~~~~~ `~
r~ ~'~ r ~ ~xterls:ive "depositioiY ar llttle'or no sedunentr--~nia~e po:nts~ ~
~.~
~r~~
~
~~
,
,, ~
- ~ W 5
tir
~
-'
~
t`
r~
~`
r
~-~~~
:,
~>
r:;
~~,
~- ~~-~~ ..-~~~~>~, ~~
~-,~,
`` ~~'
~;of channel'bed ubstrat~
{:~,~ ~;~.^~~ ~~(t'irne~`-lioino enaus~ 0-;;Ear e=;;diverse:.sizes iriaxpot~its~~.':;:~,,.,a~F :~=,~ ~t<,1~z~•~~~'~.~~x~~~'-___~ ~. ~w;a,.•3~? -'
~
r e, -++-cwf- - -a mac' --r .Y"- ~ ... - S
-. = a ~.~ w ~ : ~'->, ~ -k: ^r~{
,6".,~~`~`~ '~~"~~~S~~YLdeIICe~Of..rCbanIIel IRG1s10I1,01' W+IdeIIlII.g~+ ro7'G"x,~~„ ~ i~ ~ ~ :~ '~ . ~ s~
m :;t"~s ' ~~~- ' fv~y~3~~ Y ~ a~,~`~•
, l y yr_€N'S ~'~,', ~ ~, -~ - >~l~x ' f ..-~.~'y's
~-'q'".'.
~~~ ~' 1
~~ S
;°' ~"~ ::
'~ ~
•
^
~
~

//.^'ly
.
.
u
.
,
stablesbed 8~~ban~s.>:= ina~:poiats~}>~
:~~'d;eepE~y~7ncxsed,.f- 0'
.
:
~ k;~
,
'r~~'~ ~L ~ =
~
~ `
1
,
_
,
,
...
.-,l - _
'ti.4kki',a tt ~x-r: •r ~: ~. ~ q, y;, fr ~.~ ' k - [. . - ~. r .s € t i I„y,, _ _ : ~~ 'fit .: ; - ~ ~, 4 _; -01.~
,', ^~ ?~~.+•.~T e'.cS~'4 ,.r '~~xeseace o~mal:oi~~bank faltures~Y µ'~~v~:f~ ~~~ t •~ .l i}~. ?' 9~i~G~ x ••k l5= -5, ~~"~'-+r. ^~
e~'.0. xe"";A'1-rtl,` ~'
'~
F
'~~!"v ~~ ~ r 1 "'~~;`SF e ~
~'
.L'~~r
- 'S ~_t*~
~a'~ '`'-
~~~~~ ~drti
Y-~t_ ~,
¢Yhl !. ~y~e w a h ~' '1
~~
E
`
'
~
F
~
_
.
;i
.
~
"fit
r
.
m
^
-
V.
~, 'ri:
R
a.le;:barrks
.<no_::eroslon;-~st`
r
max~
oliits~,~ ~a~!>!~'
u=
~.~:i=~~•,~~.:~>~~
ls~~ere.:eros on -_0
'``
r;~ ~ k -"
_
,
,
~
...
_
,~
, :.._. __
~~. tiy~p<i h x tly,,,~,#~.j:-7 .i~'-ixs: "`~nf,.E.y _' ~. .. + ~~ x!i - ~ -.tt-frY ~'~ ~"~' "~J;`~n"'PF J A ~r i,~§~ ~r' ~.+v~..ry ~'*as4:
.r., ,'~,,~~~~,~~ ~~~~12,ootdepth and~deos~t~on,barllcs~~r~~a.~~~'~~r~ ~~r~..~ ~,~~a:. '~~ ~_,~~;,, ~~ ~''~•`
~-.~.~.~. •r,~ -~~-~q~-t.~-x~~~~ ~r:~.~',.~_:~= ~,~ ,~ r_~',~ _ ~, .:a-~.~~; ~~ :U..,~ 3'~ (3`,~- 4 ~
~y 0 ;5
~~ s.:_~~~~
~
~
~
~
,
,
,,,~ i'~~'~,}~" ~~5!~-,:~
:,~ -~-y wiz"
,-+
~LiC3~C~1SZ}7~e=TOOtSk ,flydense LOQt~IrOllaIIOLEt awn IIItSf ta~~'~a. 3~d.~~e~.
~
•
s
}
.
~,S oa:~.,A ..rt. ~
.
Y,
~ t
~" - - rN ~ .,;_,-.: qur' _~~ a
:x-Ni_ si: 'S. l:" o.~ r«~_:.~.~;-.....~ :u
~~?~ ~ ~~ <'~'~`lem'actsb 'a rice~tiire~F.,,livestock,,_o.rtimbe -~-prodt~ctio~r~~'., tq~=~ ~ ~'., ~ -t~%, ~~`'~"~- ;
~.~~F ~-, : ~ - ~,~;~ ~ ~•.nRrt:.'. ~"~• g t r , ~ s' .r ~r9r : ~t p, ,a.., ~' f' ~, ~ T r~r,~ ~ ~~~-. ~, ~` yF' i r,~..>•c~, j r ~ P i
'>'r lr~'~' 14... . °'Y.Jr ~. ~I.:.. 9 ~ ~"SF- t_ ~~ '3 tP ...N d~+~
~ l~e%t.e 4.r~ 2 ~~ ~
...
J ~k'
~~ i N ~~ lj
$
~ {
~ 1~~~ ..
• ~~~
$
~~~~
'
~
~~~~ A
~
,
,~ . ,
.
q
ti
r _.
'
t
1
:
Ti
~.J
J prF
R ~E~
F "
,:max, oLnfs-~
substantiaLimpact -4, bo~_e~!ideuc,e
,
~-M
~
.~ ~~,,~.~•~
~'w`
.
',~
~.~:~
~:,~`~
~
.t ~
~~,,~_.~ 1'
i
:
~~~
-
~~~-~
~
+
.
_
'
~{
_
_
.
.
..
.
_
.
.
:
.
:
. Y
--
F,'00
;~
F
~~Y:F1`~ - ~a ' ~~{L~'*~.T`r G ~-~' .:{ ! _i,:it I - - srv~ f ~~a h ~ ~S' _ 'TC'±~y 7'i~~lr:~~~~ M '1~ ~ 1 ~.~~ ~ T' • ~iy ~ .C ~. :f ` ~~
7•~.: 57~ .~' ~;~~,r.~ ~,,~ xPxesence o,i~rl~fle-pooI/ripplepgoi complexes :'.z~ ~ ~~~y .~.~~. ~_;~.,~~'.(~;.~.. `~~ ~.9 ~z~~;~;„~.:.
a`
q
=C`-'T
t i
7 q•
`
V 'L
4L1'
~
rL: - ~
ri
>
`~~•'
•
r~ a
~~
?:
4
'
. ~ :~-
' ~
~
' 4{k
~
~
-
~
~
,~
-
-
,
~.r~
. >
^ ~y
~
-
w
,
y..~
~
rf
..
. u
~
~
.~{.
.~,
k.~t
Ji.1J~,~, ~
r
.
-
= 7~. r.
~;E
w ,
welt de~elb ed ,~ Irrax oinks} F7; ~,*4^~'~~ ~~~~~5~.~;-.~~'~~a~-t~~~. ~.
es,~npples az pools. Q;
y~ y ~ no{°r1
f~'1
,
,
,
,
.
l
~ 'tct }Li t
i
~ i Y;
l w'i'~`~
4`rt
s
'
~ ~
~G: 'J` ~'SE f
`
'
'
'
'
..
. ~
,~
i
y..
i, d
at
fn
V
.
- , ~T~~ Y ~s~~..~;~ ~ ., ~~~~r
-~e~ ~.~~ ~fi,,.. ~,~ 'FF.i.'y ~''pl~ .~, ~
le~iit~ ~,,,iS~~~.~~~'~
~;.Habltat comp
~~ t~~.,~,
=~
3`
- ~
s"
'
~~,ec
RRrY1~
rrY
a~~'S~~
-~ '~7~i r4~
'ip^
~ ~' (~'
~"
• r?
l•
~fi
~~'
-~
-
Y~' N
{
~
"T~+~•
=~t
~
~~e~~
fi
~'~~
-
°~ ~/y
~ ~ ]
~
~
,~
,
s~
_
,
.
.
n. ~ ~
~ yo
,
r .
rr
..5?.
~y
..t
,
.
r
rYr
a
w..
I.1
?ti
rS
:
t.
€
..I_~-//r"
~•~~000,,,!!! y5 _- ~~~..'
~h r T~~'e ~.:d -ll,ttle'O>o;I10.133bii8.t a,.frequent:'~al`reti frabttats-~maX- ~ aints~_ fr'~^~-~'~-~~,-" s~ r'~-t, _~ \_,~
~~ Sa2-~ ~ Y~ ~ >• ~ ate' ~n a `i~ a udR~' ail` S .. r. w _ ~Z
tY~' t ~~k ~~.E-e.,~,~~ '~N 5+~: ~aIIO COYerHge OVB.~'SC~eRlll~ed.:S k~J~k ~ '~~~ ' ~~.'.~•~ " sS. ~ ..'i,1 a ~.:~ ~
,... `") ~. ~, -r a '~a..fs:P' ^~. J.. ; t~:~l-- . r = P.Y _~ .+ ~. r i:_ a,.,i xs~~ ~fi ~ to ~'~`~c'~`,.(4 ~ >,~.;s' ;e t-t ~~ ?:~~.Q`r -,~ ~~€.~>~ - - .O r' `j,'Jr~s
~
tafion
0- continuous canoe maxpoints ~;
;
~~
~~
~~ ~~'
`~ ~ h~
*~
~
r
o
l
jd
~
~
~ ~_ ~
(
~'+~~;;
.
6
.
,
~ ~•
-
~-.a
.~
s
J
r.
ia
in v
e
e
9;
~ _->=
n
s
t
t
t+-' w y,,~~ +tia,~ i~J~vj''i ~-'j' a,~r~~=f•=..~ ~ _ ~ iGdr-Y-~~v~ p'~a~,R--`:,;1~ rt :,Q. '~ca .'i~~~,.~~'"'~~ x"is ~ _"S;Vfi~~~5~;-
,~ '- . ~: ~ _.-~:. ,JSubstrate emlieddedness• ~.r i ~``= ,: S ~'~' E~r. ,,. ,~~ ~~'"~-~ 1ti~~v ~'i`°=sF~
a
w
.''""
.
r ~
J
,r ~;'
~
~~~
~ I~
OL~
z'~~
l
"
~
~
"" ""
'
~`'=
'1~~
'
_~:
H
~~~~
^
"
,
te
r,
~
-: ¢ _ - _ .:.
:~. .
,
r,~
z~
, ~
~
~
-
:~,~'
~
~
.~~
~.1'~=, -
_ '
t
F`
="_~a~-
~~~,
~3~~ ::rm~;rx~r.,3.r .•t~'.~'~=
s:~-4 n ~~ *~ ~~ 'fee' :)~` - embedded-~0;: loose~~sfrtrctu"re<; _ -.rn'ax) ~'~ a,=~~
.-
~
"„ [
. ._ . _ a ;--,.:x_ ~ r - - -c .y u. r ~.,'-fir ,
- r:. r^-t• 5. •i:,~'i
~.'~; ~ is ~"~'~-"''~-'Presence oflstream s4nvertebrates (See.na::~4)'~~ F~~" ~`~ ~> <:~~~,-~~ra~ ~~r~s~~-~~1 ~ ~~~~•r_;;.~,.
. ~3.. , r F ~ ?'+. L ; ,~ ,~ ;" - ~ .
'~.ru-.#Cy~X -.+-,r~..~_ ~L~. ~ _ ~'
. ~,. ~ ~r'~''...f,~~•.4'~F'
.,y" vL::~!~ 11' e
*"-#:
ZOe
'
~
a
~
v
.
.
,~~;
,
,~ ~--~,..n
EOminorl; riurnerous pes
ina
x points) ~'~ ~~'~~`~'~ ~x~c,-`
~"e~ideFice O
~fi ` ~:~~' '~ ~'''~
` E~ ~~ `
_
,
.
m
.. _
..
:..~ -~
3 _y::-y.-.
, .:
. .. a•.
°`
r'.'°
"
'
~
'
-
~
d
' -
"
~
'
~
,
is ~
r~_ '~+
,. .
x
~'+-'-V.
" -
v
E .,3+
-...rrcr t
fi+
.,h ~ tir
~
~ ~f-Ya~i
~~ ~. ~~ ~- y ~
t
,._~ u ~~~ ~. :fit,' •-~ ~- P esen.ce of am hlblans • -~ s .~, x.~,.-, ~~,;. rE .~
~
~O>r--~~_
~' ~~ ~ ~jE-~l~ -~:~~.,~ ~',~~`r~' ~a~~; ~v~ "~ ~- ~- rY w ,i P ~ ~„~~5`~"``r r~~~~.~, ~ ~•`~,hp"^' r~,
t:~ ''
~ :~ •a~
'
"
"
~
~
-
~
,
a
~.~',"-~b~~z. ~
550;:3 ~- ~_.
numerous- es~4
~ma~c al>t
s~-~
~~
~
-~~
~•~~-(na euiden~ee_ , 0„comrnom,
SF>~: v
x
-
.
~
...~,
,. .~"
91F
_
.
:
:-
1.4 n
y
_ _
'
-
'
~
r ~
~..
.
t
~.
= --..i%. c~ .x.
.~K.. ~
^T~:s' ~i`ifi.
' F - wY"W -*C:' ~P
J ~1
_ ~~$.. :1:
m2 _: S° i ltl"}L'.-~~'^.{_''~'7` . vs•.:.-
~~} -resen Ce`oir^~fiSh: i Lw9 F {~Dkkt`'~'r ~..d~ ~,~ .~. _
?~ ~f!!~~...,._~ .,3~J1 ! •"~ ~S~l'. vA _~ ~.4v~5r~.r"f S ~ ~-~ ~ Y~ IC ~ '~ ~~t.~~~1~ I/ ~'s ~~~'I r.' t R w ~~k 'G ~ ~~ ~~~ ~ ~x~,
r. kw` ~ a' _.:,~'.. [~.~uf,,:.~a ,:,:~?'~~s"`''~~. ~ u7~L _ `Q?!-~ ~}~:n,
ssaGL''`.- -r- ` U~~~.~~ry N~s~~t{S~~
-r'^;d T
~
rM7Y',;
i .
:.
!~s'~ a-'t ~.ts .
.;
~•-
f
4~
i r
~~
"~
~
'
4
~
~~
~
p
.
.
..
,
i
.
.
.x
,-
. r
n-,
..
e~r.!-derice' ~0' 'eo.minorr' numerous: " 'es' -~utax~ airlts~ `~~ ~-_~~ fi '.G~ ~•a~~~''~~~
~ a~;~-'~r
'}--+~- ~ ~.., ~'~ '
~`
,t,~~ ~
.~
`"
~
` r
~~~
7~
„
.-
MN
- -... a_ s _
t"1'= .:$' F i4~'. $k ~ r. -:°' r _`.~ i 'J _~4"` i x' i:~ _ ~ ~~.* yv 4--I
= ~~.. ~ "~-n-,~~~~ ~. ~,ax~~-~',~iclenee o~~veldEtfe use ,:~ ~ ,a=,~ T~~~;~=~~w '~ ' . r r;<:: -~ Y~- i~ * , i~3/r~~„~~~-'; _ ,;;.~ ~~,~' - ~ ~~ , ~~
.rt"'.^X^SF,
ii?o ,. E4,~a t!~'r,
mow
- ~~ ~~'~`e;„''T-.'i }~. __ I 7~'. rs 3~,.;_ :~I~.~S~rs{,
~'~j~~. ,~ lli`;--i.-. _~~~a -'r~ E~
.,~+
rfk.., _ t.~~'
- I
. -+.
¢;
S
`4
-
- Z ~ viP l 'C r r" J
_
_
,
,
,
a
..
I
ii,
s .
.
S'Sr "! ~ 2a:
i Y "C• +
~;~,j; _ *
-~~ ,.~°.H _s~r=.~~~~+~
~r~ ~,~ ~.-~~:` .,:~t~.~.,._
-r ~~~ :tom-~~~~~} ~rio+: evxdence_ =~0,:'ab`undalit.evid'ence
=m:a:~'Roults~j~~~;~~, ~~L:~ - ~;:~'~ .
,
,.
.
,
.W'" utfr+ _ 'J.f% l,:e •.tf'C = Y: r(•- r `^"_:' q'y'di::19R^4°-J _ i-~ •L. .~ ~ __F2" 'i.1t"' .•tlSf
. w.
-.~-vT=''•~..ti`- '~ t„~ .~f. ^''1,:~; ~.a,. -{'Ee:,l.~rc.+r«t,a#C ~},~r5 x ~~'~.., s 3'.s?ir~+rl. }~,~~!e=;: 'e`~,,"4~3y, g''~ -;7.i•'~^.`sy~~, e~,?°i~. j'~fjk•~~r7Y. ~'.3U~.,, tit,~3~d '~- ~~4F.:~ -S;a~.li~X s _
C
.ts~r;~ ~_ :.k5~i' • rb~,~~t r:T t_.. _, f:., :;~ __ `N~• ~*•ft• ~ fr : g"~. ,s, s ~, ~ .fi..' ~ ..may. - .i ~, °,R-
j
~Q~~ ' ~:?O.U~
q~`
.~~ ~'~ _ OO
-~~'~atal.
Pgsrits:l''oss ible
~
' =~ ~
~
_~ ~
~~- ~
G+" 1
~
`'
~
~
~
~~~
~~ h .sj ^'l.: {
~.. ~. _ ~r~
`r - ~ .~
~ ~~
.
j
~

~5~
r
.
n
; n
~
,
~
j~
:
•H~ .
{ , .-
-
;,,~
_
.
a.
?
~
:
^., t~ _'c~ypt~
p: ~c ~9a . ~ •r a y~~~ ~'
~I'' "'. '~~.rµ ~
~ s's~?f~~ '~~
.
~: ~:r~~~"Y'~,1
~ry 'L
dr
=
v`sr-; "K~
~^~'N + -k'!y~.
Ei e : 'f F'~ .
'ei'
7:r
r r
.r~S %I ~5R ~
r t
G '
i §
z 7
5
'b~~'
~r'~~'
~'
I~
'
5x
:6'
t
:= t
t:"?
~T''
~'
"i''wm'
,
_
.
. v
.
„
.
,{
,,,
..
.
.
,
__.
..
e
z»
w{h
r
_s~ ti
.
Y.
.
.
,
3
-,]j.~~•'sW.a`~j~~ir.Y~'~4'~'i~%~~~'t~~ 1 f`~d ~;`S!4 .,~Yi`'~7'ryV ~.I4-id';.^'~?~M1_^ ~.~3 ~_..,A .~S ~ i~i~ ti'tiaE vY :y, l~:j? ~wurxl ~~.df yr `+Y.I.~,-r. I,~ ^7 .vW.._~. ..tly ~,..fx `e~ if FS]{~ ~~.-0 F-T.IP~.::
gl 1.uLtt~a.,"~]." g - ~~w' ~. c~ C' T`cJ y~.`~~" 1 ,.l ~ h. r ~4M L/~F~ is '~.
3 ^4.., ire .yy>:t`~' fi i ~4~'I
~~~ ~ ~ ~' -y.. ~P"'"A T'. ~„X,^ lA'1^Ysk hJ'f+~ ~•~f,,~ -~'q~ ~ y1TM~~l',y. - yF>.. 4o."f~~,.~
'r~'U~ ~'kj~"~ - .~ ry" Lq,.~
J~
;..
~ ~.
~
.~
A'
*~
"
t ~ a e
' << ~
} ~~
t
TOTAL
S"C QRE
ls
f _. ..
.
...
.
~
~
.w
c,
;,
,
.~
,
~ ~~~ ~.:. _
~.::,.::~,~;: ~,r,
r~ ~
~~
,~k , ~
; ' a
o ~eri
er; on~
i~s
;
~ ~ ~ ~~t~ 1
y~.~r.s~
~
I P. g
~
~
r
`
~
'
~
~
,
.
.::^~,},~'!"73. a i5~1=~_ ^.!i;-c ,:~~15+"1 :"k: ~rrT(.`
;S:ii- ,~h'Cl+'~•~!'~s~ro
.'
'r n. a._.^4 F+sl~ t.~a~~:fi ,: ~f~isi.~!st`~-..~.. ,Ga_id _~a.s „t ~;,r. ;s.:t-h r'±i~
,~c<~^S.~r='.;~;a
l+K: , __: ;~i..,~
.L'g:
v'~i~3i? V' ~n.~il~t~i' -
'~ These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

~iJSACE A133# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached rnap)
~, ; STREAlYI QUALITY ASSESSMENT W ORKS~IEET _ ~,~-~- . .,;.
Provide the following informat'on or the stream reach under assessment:
~(~\.
~
licant's name: ~''~-~C1
1
A 2
Evaluator's name
~
CG
.
pp
3. Date of evaluation: ~~ ~b ~~ .
.
~-} y~
4. Time of evalu~,on: c~ V C3 ~''~.
5. Name of stream: ~ 6. River basin:
7. Approximate drainage area: ~ GIC 8. Stream or er:
9. Length of reach evaluated: ~ 10. Caunty:~t~iC.
1 L Site coordinates (if kno p
c
~ •~ in de 'mal degrees. 12. Subdivision name {if any

~~
~
~ ;
L
i
d
Latitude (ex. 34.872312}: ong
tu
e (ex, -77.555bt 1): V
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13.ccLocation of r(~ach ~n-der valuate e n rby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):

14. Proposed channel work (if any):
15. Recent weather conditions: ,~ _ '
16. Site conditions at time of visit: '~
17. I~d ntify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
V Trout Waters Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I-N)
1$. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of them~e ev~aluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map?~YES~ NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Surve .? ES NO
Z1. Estimated watershed land use: ~ % Residential °1o Commercial % Industrial ~\°/JO/Agricultural
} [ ~% Forested % Cleared !Logged % Other (
22. Bankfult width: C / 23. Bank height (from b~ed~to top of bank): ~-
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat {0 to 2%) Gentle (2 to 4%) " Moderate {4 to 10%) Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight Occasional bends ~equent meander Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
Location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions., enter D in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e,g., the stream- flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more con#inuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between D and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse):~~ Comments: _
Evaluator's Signature Date {.~ ,O
This channel evalua#ion form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and nvir nmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Farm subject to change -version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

S'I`REANI QUALITY ASSESSNiEN'T W ORKSHEE'T
s
- s ~t~ -S X '~~,. '-' r I 1 li+ ~ i h ;. - r-i ! J.- _ - __ .r'~
~ +e 9 S I ~ ~ ie`~f _tr :Jt _! ~- ..:,.'- ( i.. .:... 1, .~.'~. .J. ..lam 1 t ~J.~ V~1
P,GIN'T RANG ~
ECGR:~GIflN
; r..~..,''^',n:iM.S?r`r.
1+i1' F-.

..~ j
.
,
: ~.. { , ;~ ~, ! r,
•{~,/ }Ti
:~ ; # ~~ ~ J CN`AR ACTS-RISTLGS f' Fr~, < ~ ~ _. v
a i ]. e-. 5}~"y 7 ~'~'rq u7"C d } -' ',2.-. 15~,~ J 1 1~
'"
'_ .
}
4`- w
- _
+5,
'
~t
[ C
1-
}
d
_
~
, ~
~
. ~
: .rti,
1
_- 1 ]
i 1 Y. 1
oa
a
.
_i
montr;.~ :1~lOltlltaI3_,sAn:~:,:~.•~. ;5-~
.~.~"_~ ~1. ~,...~=z ~,.~ x 1~-:,~... , :Y~>< r4 it •: ... n ..~T ,a,. _.".: ;f ~~. A ie
• ;: ,P
j' ~ .. -
~~ ~>" = ,~ "Prese'nce of:f~ow /persistent pools in. stream ~ ~ >; , ~ ~ ,N 3^ ti .~ ~ ~'~~; ~~
.
t
i ,..~ - ,;r - = 1 r,, ,.
~ 0 '4
L 0 5 _
0 ~ ~
~
a~:
~
J
~
, ~
.
c
Q
i
x~
(na flow or saturation: 0,-s'tron ,flaw .max points` ~" y~~ s~
'
-
~
r rx`~
E.vides~ce of past human alteration F a t , r L m .> ` fi~ "~ ,
-. ,
S 4r~ `~ -~• ~- ri
~= 1 .
; '
f_~
-
~¢• i ~
~=k- - o
t
~"' Q -
~ l
kL"~"' ~ ~ ~
r
, - _
..
.
.
_
]
r,.»,-
y
'J ac s
O
,~
~
1
t
n = 0
~
~
lte
rio
lteTat
rits
(
xt
siv
~
"
x:
~
-
ra
lo
,-
a
- _
~ :~
s+~„ t!~:~r.~:
lon ;
ma
_
e
en
e
a
pot
)
: -
~ i
~ - ~ ~. it Fd - # ! F "F y+4Y} f 4'.:. ~t C'S ~ a,.i+w 7 ~A_:r.` ~ f '~^ ~ ~~
1~` {4t l{~ ~ i ~ ~ -
Riparian zone ~,. ~. , J 7
r
S a s
~` ~ ~ .
r} ! " ~ 0
4
~ ; ~,'~
3 '
::
Q 6 ;
:
_
~ ~
..
~
.
. _
,~ ,
.
J3
.. -
r
,.,>` ..
•-s
--
; eonttauous
_widetiuffer = maxpo~nts~ " ~ ~ d~.iE ,•> ~ a ~~' k ~ ~t~.•c~~~'
~ ~ : (no: buffer
Q
..
,
~~~,~~
,

- A tr
'~ ~` Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges" 7j `~ ~ ` - y .>,~ ~_ ~ °~~~
_: ~:. - 1...
.. - -
,
~
;x'~icQ
~
-
0
-
~
~' -
Q
"
'
~p 4
'
'
'
1
_
~
Y
J .:
~ ,1.,_
. ....
~.y~.„ ~..c~~
.r
`
.y.
~ldy~ ~ ~~
.r .. ~ . _ .
-
'
.. .y.
F~
V r
~
O
d
h-
es
-
s
a
mts
t
d
ch 1
}
ar es
,..no
i
c
ar
-
:=m
ensive:
is
x- o
~ .~_~': . ~..,._-rte ,r~ _<~• ~-..._;- ~. ~...:~i.:.,~.z•~_,~1i
»- - _ e:c
` ~ ° - ~' , ~ _ s h .~; ,, G-roundwater discharge. ~, `~ ~°-' ~ ~• ~' •. ~,, .~: ~'•>-- ' -,x~~.t , l,. t a~-f 1 ~~~ f:>o r~K ~y~
F~ ~~ ~ (no dtschar e = 0 .spnn s seeps`, wetlands,,:etc ~ =max points - °--'r~,~- a ;~~- •~- ~~~ ~ };~-.~ ~~ _ ~~•~!~!;~~-~..~-~~-:}
~'

t
_ ~
'.:.
k
~
-1
~
. 1F
'w
hl
~-
•
~.. i.
fi
U'
~
-
' I .
y µ 1. {
#- i tr ,
+
iF
~
~
.
_ +
.tit
h
d..-
.
.
1
r
CL can
'~
-~ti,t ~ Y
Presence oJ'ad~acent`floodpla~ir r~, = ~- , /~~ ~~,7~ .~ !1 A - .~~~, ~ ~€`
.~.,:~ 6 ,~
#
+
~
~
.
~~
~
Ll ~ llr-. ''t H.~i~ +w~~7!~~k nu.-` '
_..'.l.
-~.~~, '~' '~4! - - S _ ",.Y`s •..'. },r 'e s ~.w . N ~~a', 4 ^~., r V' Y-~,r
:t
~ f~ '~r ~',
~
~
;
ct - 0
extensive; flood
lai
max<
o'snts'~
~
µ-~
~~
-
:
~
K
~
'
~--~
flood
laulr=
o
~ ~
~r
;
, w
r
,
~
.
p
s
p
r3
.~=
ri
~..
r
~;
no •
.~ ~-
_
„~
~
(
~
r
, "Y ~i. l :. .-. - , ZY `~ t .'f' fir"".- T.. ~Y' 44 tai" S/T-t' .Fli"t" `4 §. ~. ~n~ S~ Sj}lWI4'i 1.~'T
s
odTll
=
y
-~
nchme
t l fl
c
e
t
%
...
•
,T
:1
n
o
~lII ac
ess L ~ ik ff:.yb y ~ xi t1k~ r -i
n
re
~ ~
"~. C-,e;- > 1 - n.iG- : h .{w J 7~>- P _ r k I~ - .d i+~. rr .~--. ~.. ''~ r r •._, } t ~':'1` - /,~f- !'S .~~3k
-S3 .s';.• ,...,. ^1 r_ --.... e a ._.~. t A,w sr.-a r„hf*" 4 F~ Q J i-` s, '~-.h ~"Q -Y - ''~ V ~ x..r
//~~ ~.~ X~
...I"~1` El+F 'L.s a'.- ... :~ .. .~ _M1 :: aa^ , bra.: - ~S `' ~. y Y1 't ,"` J Fk'I.. ~'.
: J ~ t deepl entrenched 0"; frequent-fTaodcn - rnax pamts) ~ - . ~' ,~.t~~ ;.~ ~ -~ >-~~~'~a ~ _.~~~
,
;,~1!
~pS
..
.
1
y
t:
~a
.,
~ dt~1~lRa
-0
F--
'
,
l~'
..+,
r
r
`w
, ^
-~
~
+"i ~y
i
3-
"
'
.,
r
~
~
~ _
~
_
.
Yr
~
i
y
.:
T
.
d
f:
k
i .aa+3
.
r,-e:: rt ~..,
Yss•lr S: i)"i q rY tas
.-r: ..
u
,y,.~ po ~ •r:. ,f .. "~: '^ ..~r _Presence. of
ad~acentwetlnnds x .i M,ai- *'k`~ fi- y.~ i -~rs'3,E' ~ t.- ~ e.
, 1 LL/~-.r~N~.7_k'~ .
4 W ~ d.~ 4~ ~
{'nrrf ~. I~.
~i
`v~li.~YGJV~ eL..
;•,!,i_S- _ 1. Yd".i. -vmvs swuC 4 >
..,t Q U,~
-Q,. ,.,~ }i~ 14~y`~.'+
},~Sk al
2r'. S.. ~ V
:~~ . _
~~ 3+' t
O
"~' Q
=k
_
~
•
+
,
a
~
-
,
j
•
:
:
.
l
r
~~
L^x ~ F 'y S.`-~':;... y R
f4 ~ .[Z --MlN ~' { ':~ J•IS '.1S.YF.L'i
~ ~ # ~-(na• wel~lands O; lar tad#acentwetlands = maw. ou~.~) ~" ~~ ~`~"'` ~,4 t ~ "~'~"`' T#~-r' -~{i ~
~~
`.~
i
'~2`F~`~~
R
"
,
a
Y .~i.
+{
~ y i .~ I.`.: -YM~•5 ~. ~'td fl'; ~ 'S ~1
.~'.'? FTS 1+~ ~ ~{ ~_-'"tlC ~S: i.l -r 5_ Y .t~ }~.
( J € ~:..ryyy. r"~t ,.. .t.n .•-.
:.(' w±v 1 t^.. a.;y~` 4~ ~ tr- }' b ~^ ..i Ch-annet sinuosity ..~a~s:~ mod]'-, ~ j.'.++ r'11G .. Ate, Ir{ - ,:Sk }Ai._ 'y?y. VSa- '4e {: {.n kn'_s f+~. 4' ~...,r5 it /~~• ,-'~" x
?'k ,,.
`~
,'
'x r
m ~
n:
:+t
:Y• ~
^g yr
€ a•~`
f+`'~'
0 4
'
Yi' 9
^~
+.!
~ ~
Q
r ='
r
"
~
~
~
~
''~
l~'
'
~'
'
.
J
,
y
~
..
: _.
:
y.
..
_
_n±,
:
~~
~,
:
~}~,
~f.y,
.
> :a
:
t
.~.,
•>>j
•
i
.~_
c
}~'
..7 _.
_:natura~neander :-,max: outs ~~ a'~~
~ _: ;extens~•ve cIi~anneI~zat~ori.=}0
:~: ~~~? ~~'"~ ~
~ ~• -F ~ ``~` x~:~~~ '~
~ ~. tr.
7,~=
,
.
.
.
~
....
.
'
-
"'
• _
~{1_x~
-.. :1. 1,~~.. ~ ._S f~
~1•
-
.- - •_'' r' ~o- ~~ i<z ~L~A. ~ ~ ~ t
~~rx `~ .sc ~:~;;~_ • a ; a., z ~ .~~t ~rt ~° Sediment in ut z ~':~f ~3+ '.~ ` .~ °~^ 1T ~ ~ ~ ""-I;,~,w-,~ ~"` •~~- ~ ~-.~ ~ .~ „t s,r' j ~~;~~' k :r
, ...i'' 1 !~ "' ..u~ , H ~ t(t' as ~ ~~'? t. .. - ~ L~/lU^ '}~y M '!~. Ab r•- a ~~~ aay~~. ' % ~~Fr ~ u~ ~ A 'r ~-_,- ~ ~i S ~~r"~^
,..
.
.
¢
l
~
F{
~~ _'
~
~- y
fir-
Q-
~
1
'-
s~
"
d
'
-
1 1Q
`
F
~'S
~
ry
f
,
, .
x_. :_?!
,.r
ys
., :s T
, i •; ~' ~
..
.. I:., a.a
.
=
,.,r
.._
~. ,:..i .'k y.:
.
'~yr
`}`~XrF
_"s: ~,,,-yb:.
.el :ems
_3YI.yri .,,i~.:..
t~':
'a~~ :
r. 71X6 U J
"K'.f-Y
~
ELF -3d~ ~
de osition 4r little or no sedunen~ ma~poants ~ i.,r~: t"
,, ~-,~a r„-
~extens~~e
.,~!
~~~~~
~,~
''
~a
s
.
.
..
.
;
-
,
_
:~ ~.
~
:
`
`
'~
~
~`
`
'
'
.
a ..
~~~,
:~;~_;t ,~ :•~ ~ ~~ ,~.~, J ~. _ e 1 f`c a :
~
_".
~~ ~:
~
a_
rte:, t~ k ~ ~:~.~ .~:
=.~
~
;;~~ a<, ~ =..E::~-~ ~, ~,„ Size BSc diY rs f3+~~o harm 1' b d, substr~ter~.r ~r~ ~ ~ ~ i _! . .,~ys~.~, .t."A .4 ~. "'~~n~~
.~ g ~ 1. ~ ' n i..:` r..: r _ =-`'~'~ - s~~ -$~ - i.:.; _ r : _ u ; ,K y ~,y ,~:>< a - e W,.s. ~~- ~ ~ i'~. ' 11+" l~.~B N~.~..L - ~ r -
~ ... . .. ' .- .
'
-
~ ~
~
"
'
"
~~ ~
~ ~
~
~
~
~~
4&
~r,l - r
'F
. YF~I'i%li" .5~-r',
ar~e•,,:dLVerse;.sizes--"m
~
F~.~,_~ y,~.k,~:.fine`:`homo enoirs,._.Q,~t
ax_ osnts ~ :. ..
~l~ :.xr.. ,r_,~. M_~-~~~,~.> i~ .~..
~~
.'._
F
T
)
y~'y ' i1~r,:er 'r ~:-c't'+e1ri ~~$ - - ~ .::;-,. a _ __ .e. ~~, ~ ,~~ ~ 4 . ~. ~+- ,~~'~:a f41~>t,.'~iai' !~ r'°~-:' S^<'.,'.f' ". '~r?c4 ~ :. ;psi '°~

_ . ,
;rx ~~ ~ ~E r -~E.~!xdence~o~cFiannel tncislon or`~idening~ xq~~--.~~ =~". .ICJ-~~ i~ "~~ ~#'tv
rL
~
• F
,
.
'O
~
U
5
~
`~`
c0
~
''
~'
~
+
7
-~{.,t x~ ;;~-.r
~
~,r
x ~
.~..,•~,
= .
.
:~~. ~, R~, w t ~;t-~~
a:~;~l~ ,..
. -^~ u-;. ~.:,~„
~„
.~,r~ ~~
- ~2., ~ r
r
, c:
.~ ~~:1~~ ~;aP"(:deeply~ncTSed =-O~,stable• bedf8cbanlcs.;~'max point~}'~F.~~~; ` ~~.~,x~.:~~.,:;~~ '~r~~~`~s~`~~
r
~
~ida~ -.^OK. y_'t tar,M~. e'~k..
;n
~~ kR- r+F-~ A..~"its n~ :'.1c'i,• d,-H-.. .. r_. .:s i~r~':...u'.. 7. #-$->~'` ,~Y#,ic:~.',r,+..y rF:'~1":. ~
_ - ~~ `,.~~, t,..: „.~,~~s=F ~ -•'~ Presence: ofma,or bank, failures r~ .x. ~~°!r"~ ~ -~,„~ ,~ :~ ~ '~~~~ .~ ~s ;.-,~'r;~l~ : r,~,
_,~ _ ~~~..~ ~r~.3
~
~'~~M~-~-.~~~~~~~Q~.'~;'' .y ~p..~;.~rx
~~' ~-~w~~.~
~
~r~r'~ ....
E ~ ~r*~3 ~
~ y,~.4,-}~:,~
:~•;--~
~x
~~ ~~T+~~
~~:
:
~~
~
~
_
,Z
~
,
,
.
.
..;
~r
.
7..:
~ ~ , ::r. ~~'~`severe. er~sinn Q- no erosFOn-=stable•banks,~r rna~ ~
~'~i' , •~_ ~ a~~s~,
~.
!_ .
~
W
N i F,~ ••r'~1 ~ la - L. _.7-~ 3 L ...Y _,.7] {~.«T= 7~,,~,~ ~*~:% ~ll^ Lr1G ~ ~^t 5 A "~ - i~L91F1*,'I,'~~"~ 'fy / ~kn~ _"~.~W: ~S•. }i
CS ~'" , "+d-~ ir",c~y,.,yy.:S~~ .~r ,YRoot.de tht;BR'd LLen$1 ,on",b3pT~.t. ~"r~'d,;r[-}_. 'ly~Lli ~F-..~.~~. ~F"Y 1.'i' ":nTY"~~' J'7.' J -~.i~E ~'~. ~..
/{ }~ - r..., =a%;'~ZS ..f..... .:tp;~"'r 4• ~« 'Sr F' .r.1SY:r+.3i, •',x+ra:•, '.•~;k1.dW-x~p`..w. { Cyy, ^~ w ~^''s. by ~~ ~ ,,~ i/,~ ~: ~'"4 ~•
~ '+: ki r L .'~ $. 'Y5'„Kw~'3 ~1,~~'~~ .~- 3£.Y..-~R~ ~~~ P~s-U) k~~~ Sul . ~~rti~.a'°~ 3'4
~•+ll~'Jf~~ ~~r
~
"
'
~
`
'
`.
' 4
~
'
:~,e~ 3 +'~ ~~. .:~~
,ry"~:.~ ~+ f~ ~i~" '_nh;visible~r.
bout rnaaG oai~nts ~',~s
,k~."~i~~-~°~: ~h~
oots~. 0, dense-roots throe
-
..-J~-
r~~-k'~.y ~ i.,: .Y { ~ r.., - ~* ~. ih 1 Y " ~£i rK. "3 'i ..'~1'. --f'f ~~: M•4
~'
A •.
k=.~1,:' „~r,- act'.b ,agrtcuTfu~e,},,ltvestock or. tnon5cr,,Rroduction„~-,1' ~~_~~~~ ~~~~ st ~l ~'~~=
{ ~ ~ A~~lrs `, i yJ!
ca:..:f$~` ~~
a a3Mx• ~ ~'~L/~, ~ ~~~ a$
.
v
fcS e5'
< tlT~'
I
~
!
~ '
7
`
"
I
'
~

z
.
.
. _
.
i
y
yr .
w
d•
• d.,r,
,:! .
~ b
~^~~~` .,-)r .:w,.L 7 ._ 7
L
'• .)- sEi ~ ;~'b
al ~_ Jly, ,t rr•d.. ~ 31
'r~u
r~ f~ ; .":.
~~"~-~r~-~r~. F~~~~.~ ,s:ubsta~%tiaL't~ipaet T:O,~io~evid~uue ~;~rna.~o~ts~~~~r l ~*~x'~. `W~~~ ~~~~'~;`?:~;~ -- I ~
_
y
._
~
_
_
_
.ski '.s :'. -,y:, ,.> .a _. ~.1---x!' -iic-,d^'~- "~ _" nFt -cu::'.~_Yti •:~ - ~ ~.' ~r~ z..,;;7y : -r` s-a:,Y..
~..~
:.;,»:^^ - ~
-~~~:~ 're-i"'h'~{ -+~ca. tiY R r -. -. ,~ ~w::""`.?'Gar S- r Fc`~+ wl.'l~`~„',.5~..3JC'J'sJr•~,`{~.saim ~~k,~l '~,.~~'~t7~1 `s°<ilr~?
II s _ ~„ ~.~ -Presence gfrtfflepoAAollri~spie:.pool"co~Sr..mpleaces~~ f"S ..~ .,1,.~~}yy ~(~ ~'~ ;_. 1
wt?. '~. _S L } ~•-Yti .~ 'iS ~.i.. $".R a wC,-}. Y- ~.i''. :'V` K...rf:'~d: 'r5' •Y. "IS5';n~.~2V•.1V•~~~~X{~~~0~~~~ ~~:1 FT?,r"~~ '~~"'
'`
EA
~,
h~
'
~
~`
`
"~
~ ~
ls
-= 0;
lL dev
l
mad o
fi
~
~-
~
~~
'~
o
d
pt
s
~ '
~~
-
'i$1`
~
~
.~
,~-.
.,
.
r
~
.E1'
J:i
~,
; o
=-
_we
e
o ~ re
.ui
s
,~:
w
~.
x ,
:
.~ .
x£
es
rip
es.:c
j'.'
~
}:~_ ~
.: no4r
s~
~'-H7~' i'. ?'S s-'FF. r 3 ~ diLY ~ '~.~.c is r'. i_. ~L i '~.I'~ ,.r' .fi ~XSf j'C i_'~S ~ P'Y.t .i.. Y' -_-3':TYI'4~~ .~e)r ~a5~4~Z,-,~~'i-NTS~ - +P ._ ~ ..~ ,f•~L~..~.~~j'G'k5~j.
~r -~ ~ .- r='``;~~{~'` :~iHabitat compleautyF~.~~,,~E,~;'`~ _~~ ~,-~:~`Y~~~ ~~'`~,:~ .,~~".;".~,~ L- ~~~ ~~~`;,., ,r ~ ~._. ~S
} ~.Q',z~R
.
a~.~
~.:t~ r.~; ~
1<7~.=7 ~ ~~ ~
,~
.~0~ n
ti
~:~
::-
~t~
•~~~
a"{6
.
~
^
~
-
-~
~~;:
~Y
`
!~t
`
;
r~ ,.;~.
, ~h
t
,.
~
~
;
:~
;
>: ~
~
~:
~
:~
~
.
.:1~~
:-
~~.-
~.
•~s
~g
little ornohabifat -=d.Or frec~uenf waned: habtta~ts .~rnax v:~nfs~: >
-.~d"°~ ~•~~•~~~~ ~ ~~.~J.~7z~ ~+~` ~
`
• ~
.~ ~ ~~s~+:
r
-
,
3
:..
~
,
'
"'
`
"
~
'
,, y,~c~-fi ~n~~.•~ ~ ~r .~~",
`~~..:~n
~-1i' ~ '~"~-;<m~-~
..~
~
~ ~;
~~'~rFr'
~~
:;~~ ~ ~~' '' ?~~~r, ~ ~~'~ " ~Cano' cvvera e;.
~. ~ ~,k. r• P _ g over streambed ~1,..~y" ~ ,~ ~ ~r r r,. s~,. }~; .J.l ~Y n~F ~, '~~.
' :r. . ° ~ r,. •r~ r ~y" ,r ~ ~ o {;z„ wild iAAlr,~ _ ~ft~i"~k ~+~+xw«M ~K, .-'~''Y ,,,,,sue ~ r 1 ~"~ -tA~
.
_ - ' ' ':-5 -a~a - , - }x~- m
a ad
xV~
^~f!
a J ~ -
=,
..
~ 'S'
t~
y
m
c O [
~ -: i
-'
~
e
Y
-
-
'
~y
.~
.
.
.
.
~~~
„~
3~
. .
~;
R aq
.-.-
_ ,
. , J
...1,
,
~y
a ~
._u+
~
~S
~i.._ .
,__., (ncs'shadin .vegetation +0 contlrlnaus canoe niax orots ~3. ~~-~-!~~ ~ ,~ ~'_,~ 4 "3 w e~ w ,
.r
~
~.
'
~ y~ 1 ,~J ~•
'rv~,n^~lr~Y _w...:.: `rzr_.i i~~-r7j,. ry 7 m '•' ;>.:- e_i.._ ..~.: ...+ J.~' f~rC 1:R Y' 'k.. '~t+a {~
aF'"~0 %+.I.y~n' iRyy ..,{~sf j~vtl1~}'dC`" l~f~•a t'1'~` ^.`%r-]F
~ - ~ -.Y+.~ ~!!' i 3~ ~~' ~. ~^'~1 `.-Substra~e embeddedness,,N ~ wie. ..,*'"1i 1.P_- !!~?y~.t. ~S.-Y k Yk,~,.-l ir.},{~i'Ct~:!~ - 3` 2'L.r"f.:,d~ -.~ E-4= ?i`.'4,i~f+s''.L'. ~ (~'JW~~ l
,
~
"
41
~
i 'i
.s.
Q~_
~}K
-S
if
~
a
~
'
~
~
'
~
g
~
l;
1
~"``
~C
'
X
~
~
~'
~
~
W
S
.!e
~
M}:~..~, ~
'
.S-
.
r
v
.;
~}.:~~rt3
<ir
~-
•
,i. ti
r :
:
~
c
_
~.3 -t'
~~§',
' t.
111*
~5
x~;.7:
I
.y~
i.-.:~{{
+~~~'y
'~~
~•i'u1,`+
h~i ~~ti~,+~~
'k-W
- d~ uaes~i- ry
r•
'
~ 1
'
'^ ~ ~'.•-
'
"
'
~
-
~ ~ ~'
~
rbed~
d
lo
~
"
' _
..,
,
`
E'~
G., t
a
s.?•.
•s.
S_
..
k
_I,E+t
~
.~~;
._.
e
..- 0~
a•~,~iy .
oserstructure~:7;~uia~c~~
l:a ai -,~:~..,-.n_.~~ ~~st r :s
;d
ee 1 =era
~• ~,•,~: ~ r ~: ~ ....... I- r..,t. ,....~.. ~1~~~' . ,=~:.
1.a' ._ :,.-- - ~-.. --:il--:.'.,.r.. _ / :i,:.:.' -~ - t~.-a' da - r m~ a. ~. :t+ k''y; a'"r~:i
•~: .- ~=~' ; ~.,d~.~-~F* ~ fisP"res`en ce ofstream' invertebrates :seep a 'e-4 ~ ~~~•~ ~ -,~~.~'~, t2:,~~•~ ,~~.r~~~, I~ "~~~~',~ ~T ~~~~:; .~~ _ '~:~.~.~
_ 1. ,~ P fl
m
D ~',.~...~~:
.,~,
~ ~~~', ~ s, r : p 4:
+,_~a: 1k- ~ pp:,-, ~ ~ ~_. '
. u.,
.
~;:
20 ~ -
: ~• ~,, , ~
~
-:
'-
~
t
~
'x
/ 5 T
'~
~
-
.,
r
,
_
,
.
+,
.,
;
. „ ..~
..-..
.i
M
_
a r S
i.+s~
1" _
{ + eEY txv
z<- Ix.
sF::'2 ~ _.
a
"7 t~ j ~•k r`G
max Dints r y~ ~, ~i ~r .~~'" F,: ~ r ~}~ ~yI f 1 ~,~, .--~
~ Jx ~nb- evidence: 0
common
numerous: es
r
`-x='
ss
--z
. - ~ ~
7
~ ~
~
p
~
.
.
..
i.i<
a
,
.
;] d+h'h. W
~
-- ?Wt
fk~l C:_Yi
i6~
~rd
~"'Lf,_ ~ Y ) Y - '
6(r ~~ - ~. • ~~_ .7` rrp;~~ " +? .-is "I k~i: 1 ~ ~7 1.,~.~rt.•°•~`x^ ' 0 p"4 ~, P~` "} 'lMat'd+'~. -~:" ~~ s~nt. g` q ++^~,~ .
EJ.~ ~!I'''JJ.l -~G •,: r 1 ~J}1 :~]:~: ~"~~~~.1.1lyy!',`~~,Presence.of aritph~lian~~~:,,~r~.. ~~*~~^~ 1 ry--~.~,n~l';`~-:=F ~~~ .~~"'~[y~:~.1~~.'~~ a it.`;,w ~ ~..
~: -
W'
-
~.f7~ ^:~- JY
1}y3Y~.~
'F- ...y~l]S~~JI;R•
+
~~'~
~,
1•L5
j~d
$
Yom
' f
•,'
`
~'r4
S:~4 n- ~
L
ii'
~t
$~
~
n'•
~
~
'
~~
~i1
-
k '
fiT...
..S -
.
~:
_ .
~
-
,
.i
L
-
+.~1
k::
1}
:i
F!4
:
~
ii
YL~3:
r
6
sf Y
t
1~
i .r(~f- -
boznmon; nunxeror~s pes: sruax~poi
:C~
;
>:~ ~ ~~(no evidence: O
_ °i~"~ur~,~~~'~~;~~~-~~~~ ~::i•~~'~ '~,~s~~ , ~~ .:
,
t
,
;
~?.' <3 -.-6~ tt ~: _ _ _ _ r. _i `:~ I _ n - is K S"nkl~-. ~~ i-N" Ts'l."• ,-w' ¢, ~s
_,~ ~ .~`~3 - ,.~~ ,~-^~~~ ~~~ ~ `~gr:,esence~-of.~fisl:~~t ~•, = t r~;,.~, ':~R'' :~ ~, ~~' ;'~~ ~, rte'-~;~,-~~~;z~ ; `K t~~.~~ '
!''~ry~~ i` a> ~. J ~~i*,s~~ - t,'~•a ~. y.l>• ~~~~ "~-,,f"*~. „~..~ a ~-r ,•t>t,.~~a~-fir - ~~- ~,~
v t S.. '}R'.te7~Ai->"1''ii
,,~-+'~~s r- M~
:^F r ~~,ie- ~ -.~~ t,~.
.~r~} T~.
SM?it: ~~~ ~"~ ~ :Jk?1•r~~~-Y--S r ti •. _ ~~~ ~~+':~'~~•,I
.'ll.~
k: ~^!
~~`t y GGr4r ~ tF~'4
: '-f v
'
"
~
m
,
_
:.
.
.
F
.
~' ~~,.,"~
' t, i r"r~~;~.
~
>xz (no av~dence- U co~nmon,~numerou's peso s maw oints~ ~,,.a ~~„~L°~~t,
~,
: ,:- 3C? ~s ~ -.r:~x .. :-: ,:.I¢ ~ - ". - 53:. - rTi i cl'~h: r .p - t .1',nra 9
,., r, F^' ~ .. ~ - - ~ `*~F4-'+~':Y~, . -.:~'"`~i?'-•~s, . ~y, ~uk.-~`r11. ~s s. _,l{M r ;t ,~j,~r, _n~~,~3! -3k~r- ~' xl Y ~`3e
L,r:F' ~ `S''356~. a'°-. a .s, _ ~~'~•~',Fvidence-'oL Wlldl~.feuse-E-:~:~..FF '{n 2 "Y s 7~.J{~s; •i: -f,.~~Y~a_~~ -''W;:• `'•~ ~ 9?O'A yyy'~y ..~5.. F. )5
~~ J •~"!-~C
B'tR. ~ ~" .
N:'5~~~~MJ}}'}^; ~ '. (~'c~C, ~`I~r. ~ ~ 1y=R.y'4L Oi.
~
..vi!+~.:h')ii
. .. - ai.
~_.~ ~7 Y~~d'r r ~ ~~ ~ ~ 'K. i. J 1 G~+_ ~ SSr~;:1
S~'
~
°~
~
"
~
°

,
.
,
•
.
n
a
,~
, ~
~t
~,~.,M~`;
`^~`~~~~i
~;,:~~ .~r ~;~~
sJ;T~ ~''~ '
3•S
r
'
,.,;~ {n~.evidence~= Orabundaiit•
euiiierice
max::pol.nts•):'~-~' "'~
t•: ,+s J ~..Y:a it -ti~ 1:3
't.
~ _:Es,_ a~ a~=:
.f':--
~': =4s
~t
`
_
:
_
.
,Y
.
.
.
- .
.
';r- ~y jt : n • - r ~r •rs c q - _ J t; t-s x ,r--tea... sr..
]his Sew M,l~ 4 C ~ r~p~ti}.
3P.Y S,r~-•~ ryh: ~ 1 Ei~; J ~ ';n.--a C~ 't y~Y~!" 3'x ~y~ ,_~a 1 f~ , ~~{~i.~a ~iF~ ' Lyl~• ~I '!'~7i''` fit `~--
,L; 3'~4~ 3 w- •K«Y'11. 'I'~ap,.tl~ih,' ~_tit~.f~-T_~"J''. 4[il~ .4~~~, {i' 1f, ~_ P.f 1~~L'w Y'Gn.':' ~~~l~%T~'a prZ~- -. 4a - .Fran .+seA~c yi~941h -Ma ~~l~`h7~, L". w~.e• ,{l~° ~1,' «v~G" -•
d=- ."hd%5;. ~&;~ '~~. _'y'.r~. ~.k3':}'heah..t^l.,f lJynl~*1•F=':lie- :f Ste. '-1i• .~1;. f..~~tw_ •~~}i~: aj:Cti(ra. 1Se'e ~C. ~~r'~•, u.. 4~~y p27 [~ if~l'1' ~'1'r y/~('~y~,, P ~. '!0.' -~.i'~swe .1~-' 7C~*_
j
5
E ~., ~.-'ELI Y ! !~+~ ~y. L, k' i I O~s f~.,a?:r ....s ~'1:« ~ -J'i'3T•;
; ~1=1'04:7:~i 2'riZ ..A ~. 1'.l'l4/•Y"'-: _ ~ ~-~~.'~ a .L•. T:s.'
i~~~
`
: ~
~~ln is r
`
~$$
~UIe'
c?~r
-^~
,i~~l
~~'.
e
'
'
'~'~
.
:
~
~
~
`
~ "
~
~
,,
~
~;
.
`yn
~ -
ri
,:~•
i
";;
.~.'
.T
w-"~. ;
>
/ ~
+~
E*
~s,~
.
y
~'Nr'nw. ..j~ L~ {~"~~,.y,,~ ~' v._5.r ~
f ~yLV..f -L3t
~ '+~..j ,a
J
f":`~`1F~~
' r ~ -~ ~s..5i: SI ;~ 9C..~S=. ~.[~i'~, [ vry'lL~+. 'A-r '~A Pr'.Y.!~~f~.1L2G.T:1..~.i~+~~f.Y~F~F"', ~~~~'
'G~. `
JSI•~~RR~~S.:~~Y~ i~~5"~•
_ '~'dL ra &;~ti.. - .-F;~ - !_ rr e-',a t~.a a3u -1. :
F .Siz~ t..•~5x?:.----. •x5.44 :'~+ •~ F91.1r+~,: ' .,?i`~F '!~i`m...`,_•n...fr<.•~ 1
. .
,4
.nt'-~f_^.;:~Y-...
A• ~.. _ .. ..
`~'
1.Y=,-N~ _',~-+. 1. ~: tY:. rl l ^ ~.' -Y ~ ~-1 .-r h.n ,E"~.1~ }'Jt.'t:.. it y' :'1ir'. a. ate' ,.N'` L.-'sr a ~ ~-s'~ * 'ialT u'rn' ] ~,,
.`:. 9.. ..a~"j7•is.t ri:;'~+"°tl' ._LS. ~ ~' .i - 1.,;~t iW~cy^_i': ~ i" yrT~IY ~Y: li a~i. rIY - fiW fv' ..,~,~. '~-.. ..5... 1,-!• •.'~'at~lilla•l ti ~ T' =.°i. ~+^) , .'tF
y .. 9~.,a.,- ~ } F~.,_. , # ~~;~'~::,..g>s..~'y;: ~. -v!•.~. ~.ar.n-~]~.:'~7*~-'~ r;~ rrgg~~ 1{.,~ ~ ``f~ .2:
Y~7d?r'rL7Z 'LA1d•~:il~ ti+:'r.A ~il'~.:K`.~+`+~. :.fi 1'_l•[~yR. }'1 } -+it ~~ F: - P,'.1:. _ °'~~S3~'~. .~ L v?• ~~ 'lik{ . '
, r
~~
~>~~` ~~
~
~
-~~
~
T~
TAL
~
f
SC~
t
r
" a
~
'~=
~ti'.
Yw~°
-'
'
.~
~
~
}~~ _ .~... ~.,
.a
e ~
, s
:
~
so~'erl
e~on~
-'~~-~•,,~~~•~, ~
i
s
_: 1•~~K,~
~
+
' -
s
.
"
~
~
'~'
~
7
~
'
"
~
'
a
~
~~
r
~
~
~
~
g
~
~
'
~
~
,a
.,
' F-
r
,
~-°a
`~
~rr.Y.'.
~.-„I'
~a :?
~; .e^
.:r 1~
, ~ 4,:. . +.c:.=:. ;;:e.r~-e~,"r:su„ ,=-'i,_ r~t
F~r
~c~ ~•-.
'f`~3~
,
~s
::S'tJ'3!et
r~}~„
~~ea
«yf!°=~ ~r~
-;3
,~-
'~
`
'i.
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.