NC0004987_6. MSS CAP Part 2 Appx C_FINAL_20160304

This page intentionally left blank

UNC CHARLOTTE
Addendum to Soil Sorption Evaluation
Marshall Steam Station
Catawba County, NC
Prepared for:
HDR Engineering, Inc.
Hydropower Services
440 S. Church St, Suite 1000
Charlotte, NC 28202
Investigators:
William G. Langley, Ph.D., P.E.
Dongwook Kim, Ph.D.
UNC Charlotte / Lee College of Engineering
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
EPIC Building 3252
9201 University City Blvd.
Charlotte, NC 28223
February 2, 2016

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 Background.........................................................................................................................1
2 Results................................................................................................................................1
3 Comments and Recommendations..................................................................................... 1
4 References......................................................................................................................... 3

TABLES
Table 1.
Arsenic
Table 2.
Boron
Table 3
Cadmium
Table 4
Chromium
Table 5
Molybdenum
Table 6
Selenium
Table 7
Thallium
Table 8
Vanadium
FIGURES
(See Tables 1-8 for figure numbers)

Background
This addendum provides three sorption isotherm equations for batch data analyzed and initially
reported in the Soil Sorption Evaluation for Marshall Steam Station (Langley and Oza 2015).
The isotherm model equations are:
Linear: S = KdC
Linear with So > 0: S = KdC + So
Freundlich: S = KfC'm
where S is the constituent concentration on soil (ug/g), Kd is the linear sorption coefficient (ml/g),
C is the constituent concentration in water (ug/1), So is the soil concentration at C = 0, n is the
unitless Freundlich exponent, and Kf is the Freundlich constant (I'/nug('-'/n)/g). The parameters
Kd, So, Kf, and n are estimated using linear regressions on the sorption data. The parameter So
represents that portion of constituent concentration on the soil that is sorbed irreversibly.
2 Results
Results are provided in Tables 1 through 8 by constituent and sample. The results include
parameter estimates and indicators of the goodness -of -fit of the resulting model equations to the
sorption data.
3 Comments and Recommendations
In addition to the general comments and qualifiers offered in the Results and Table 16 of the
original report, the following comments and recommendations are provided.
For the fate and transport model, the range of sorption estimates (maximum and minimum)
should be used as the upper and lower limits for selecting a calibrated value that is consistent
with measured constituents.
For a specific constituent and sample, the isotherm model with the minimum chi-square value
best represents the lab data in its arithmetic form.
Linear isotherms with So < 0 are considered not applicable because they imply negative soil
concentrations (S) as constituent concentration (C) approaches zero.
For linear isotherms with So > 0, the y-intercept So is assumed to represent irreversible sorption
as opposed to previous exposure to the constituent in the field which is manifested as a
negative -sloping or irregular isotherm as would have been noted in the original report.

Freundlich isotherms with n < 1 are considered not applicable because they are not concave
downward (Freundlich 1924).
For constituents not considered for Marshall, sorption values may be transferable from other
sites with similar geochemical settings, or may be estimated using site -specific data from the
Comprehensive Site Assessment in a geochemical model.
2

4 References
Freundlich H. 1924. The Elements of Colloidal Chemistry, translated by George Barger. Dutton
and Company Publishers: New York, NY, pp. 58-61.
Langley, W.G. and Oz, Shubhashini. Soil Sorption Evaluation for Marshall Steam Station, UNC-
Charlotte, October 2015.
Ho, Yuh-Shan, Wen-Ta Chiu, and Chung -Chi Wang. "Regression analysis for the sorption
isotherms of basic dyes on sugarcane dust." Bioresource technology 96.11 (2005): 1285-1291.
Matott, L. Shawn, IsoFit Documentation and User's Guide Version 1.2, State University of New
York at Buffalo Department of Civil, Structural and Environmental Engineering Version 1.2,
updated 01 /18/07.
3

This page intentionally left blank

Table 1 Arsenic
No.
data points
Linear Isotherm, So = 0
Linear isotherm, So > 0
Freundlich isotherm
Trial A
Trial B
Trial A
Trial B
Trial A
Trial B
Well ID
Trial A
Trial B
Kd
z
R
z
Kd
z
R
z
Kd
So
z
R
z
Kd
So
z
R
z
K,
1 /n
z
R
z
K,
1 /n
z
R
z
Fig. Nos.
1/g
-
Ng/g
1/g
-
Ng/g
1/g
Ng/a
-
Ng/g
1/g
Ng/g
-
Ng/g
(c)
-
-
Ng/g
(c)
-
-
Ng/g
AB-1 BR
5
5
0.469
0.994
0.210
0.460
0.995
0.192
0.441
0.294
0.994
0.103
0.433
0.280
0.996
0.075
0.571
0.940
0.990
0.070
0.570
0.928
0.990
0.047
1,2
AB-1 S
5
5
0.001
0.766
0.509
0.001
0.854
0.227
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
3,4
AB - 2 S
5
5
0.496
0.975
1.247
0.496
0.979
1.034
0.437 0.606 1 0.985 0.237
0.442 0.564 1 0.989 0.181
0.847 0.807 1 0.981 0.104
0.826 0.813 1 0.986 0.071
5,6
AB - 4 D
5
5
0.012
0.979
0.148
0.011
0.940
0.355
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
7,8
AB - 6 BR
5
5
0.033
0.888
2.403
0.037
0.918
1.607
0.024 0.421 1 0.927 0.183
0.028 0.380 1 0.950 0.136
0.189 0.580 1 0.977 0.048
0.171 0.619 1 0.989 0.028
9,10
AB-8 D
5
5
0.343
0.843
3.083
0.337
0.847
2.998
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
11,12
AB - 11 D
5
5
0.340
0.994
0.175
0.356
0.994
0.161
0.320
0.283
0.995
0.074
0.338
0.239
0.991
0.123
0.428
0.930
0.996
0.039
0.403
0.974
0.991
0.099
13,14
AB - 16 D
5
5
0.399
0.990
0.363
0.402
0.995
0.167
0.369
0.377
0.991
0.142
0.378
0.279
0.996
0.053
0.535
0.910
0.988
0.088
0.512
0.917
0.998
0.020
15,16
AS-1 D
5
5
0.052
0.957
2.813
0.048
0.952
3.021
0.043
0.682
0.991
0.077
0.039
0.705
0.988
0.096
0.280
0.614
0.994
0.018
0.274
0.610
0.996
0.012
17,18
GWA - 1 S
5
5
0.316
0.963
2.565
0.336
0.968
2.236
0.271
0.760
0.984
0.231
0.291
0.721
0.988
0.182
0.780
0.706
0.996
0.026
0.785
0.716
0.996
0.020
19,20
GWA-2D
5
5
0.037
0.965
1.045
0.034
0.946
1.342
0.031
0.545
0.969
0.173
0.027
0.637
0.945
0.300
0.130
0.727
0.974
0.097
0.119
0.745
0.972
0.145
21,22
Linear So=O
Linear So>0
Freundlich
Kd
Kd
So
K,
1/n
Maximum
0.496
0.442
0.760
0.847
0.974
Minimum
0.001
0.024
0.239
0.119
0.580
Median
0.326
0.305
0.483
0.470
0.776
Notes
a. Coefficient of determination (R2) indicates goodness of fit of individual isotherm to its linear regression (Ho et al. 2005).
b. Minimum chi-square (X2) indicates best fit of three isotherms in arithmetic form (Ho et al. 2005, Ng et al. 2002).
c. units: 1(1 ")pg('-'/")/g
d. Not applicable for So<0 or Kd<0 from linear regression.
e. Not applicable for (1/n)>1 or Kf<0 from Freundlich regression (Matott 2007).
f. For all C<MDL (method detection limit), estimate a minimum Kd using C = MDL at lowest soil -to -solution ratio.
a. Isotherm data not available.

Table 2 Boron
No.
data points
Linear Isotherm, So = 0
Linear isotherm, So > 0
Freundlich isotherm
Trial A
Trial B
Trial A
Trial B
Trial A
Trial B
Well ID
Trial A
Trial B
Kd
2
R
2
Kd
2
R
2
Kd
So
2
R
2
Kd
So
2
R
2
Kf
1/n
2
R
2
Kf
1/n
2
R
2
Fig. Nos.
I/g
Ng/g
1/g
Ng/g
I/g
ug/g
ug/g
1/g
Ng/g
Ng/g
(c)
Ng/g
(c)
Ng/g
AB-1 BR
0
0
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
AB-1 S
0
0
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
AB - 2 S
5
0
0.002 0.983 0.050
(g)
(d)
(g)
(e)
(g)
23,-
AB - 4 D
0
0
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
AB - 6 BR
0
0
(g)
(g)
(d)
(g)
(g)
(g)
AB - 8 D
0
0
(g)
(g)
(d)
(g)
(g)
(g)
AB - 11 D
5
0
0.001
0.980
0.028
(g)
(d)
(g)
(e)
(g)
24,-
AB - 16 D
4
4
0.001
0.993
0.007
0.001 0.934 0.064
0.001 0.076 1 0.543 0.007
(d)
0.003 0.805 1 0.603 0.007
1 (e)
25,26
AS-1 D
0
0
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
GWA - 1 S
4
4
0.001 0.986 0.016
0.001 0.974 0.030
0.001 0.113
1 0.202 0.014
(d)
0.006 0.682
1 0.243 0.014
(e)
27,28
GWA - 2D
0
0
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
-I-
Linear So=O
Linear So>O
Freundlich
Kd
Kd
So
K,
1/n
Maximum
0.002
0.001
0.113
0.006
0.805
Minimum
0.001
0.001
0.076
0.003
0.682
Median
0.001
0.001
0.095
0.004
0.743
Notes
a. Coefficient of determination (R2)indicates goodness of fit of individual isotherm to its linear regression (Ho et al. 2005).
b. Minimum chi-square (X2) indicates best fit of three isotherms in arithmetic form (Ho et al. 2005).
c. units: lo/n)pg(1-vn)/g
d. Not applicable for So<0 or Kd<0 from linear regression.
e. Not applicable for (1/n)>1 or Kf<0 from Freundlich regression (Matott 2007).
f. For all C<MDL (method detection limit), estimate a minimum Kd using C = MDL at lowest soil -to -solution ratio.
g. Isotherm data not available.

Table 3 Cadmium
No.
data points
Linear Isotherm, So = 0
Linear isotherm, So > 0
Freundlich isotherm
Trial A
Trial B
Trial A
Trial B
Trial A
Trial B
Well ID
Trial A
Trial B
Kd
2
R
2
Kd
2
R
2
Kd
So
2
R
2
Kd
So
2
R
2
Kf
1/n
2
R
2
Kf
1/n
2
R
2
Fig. Nos.
1/g
-
Ng/g
1/g
-
Ng/g
I/g
ug/g
ug/g
1/g
Ng/g
Ng/g
(c)
Ng/g
(c)
Ng/g
AB-1 BR
5
5
0.021
0.831
1.838
0.020
0.859
1.500
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
29,30
AB-1 S
5
4
0.894
0.795
2.366
0.881
0.820
1.770
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
31,32
AB - 2 S
5
5
0.062
0.995
0.143
0.063
0.989
0.229
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
33,34
AB - 4 D
5
5
0.108
0.792
2.227
0.076
0.649
4.430
(d)
0.060 0.481 1 0.242 1 4.402
(e)
0.138 1 0.784 1 0.578 5.119
35,36
AB - 6 BR
5
5
0.149
0.968
0.087
0.149
0.921
0.182
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
37,38
AB - 8 D
5
5
0.429
0.975
0.714
0.429
0.973
0.714
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
39,40
AB - 11 D
5
5
0.297
0.999
0.069
0.331
0.988
0.367
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
41,42
AB - 16 D
3
4
1.2414
0.999
0.009
1.0923
1 0.999
0.059
(d)
(d)
1.232 0.997 1 0.998 0.009
(e)
43,44
AS-1 D
5
5
0.052
0.846
1 1.819
0.049
0.881
1.443
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
45,46
GWA - 1 S
5
5
0.194
0.998
1 0.081
0.197
0.995
0.138
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
47,48
GWA - 2D
5
5
0.171
0.993
0.272
0.173
0.995
0.115
0.166 0.103 0.985 0.190
0.171 0.038 0.989 0.116
0.249 0.864 0.951 0.251
(e)
49,50
Linear So=O
Linear Sp>O
Freundlich
Kd
Kd
So
K,
1/n
Maximum
1.241
0.171
0.481
1.232
0.997
Minimum
0.0204
0.0598
0.038
0.138
0.784
Median
0.172
0.166
0.103
0.249
0.864
Notes
a. Coefficient of determination (R2)indicates goodness of fit of individual isotherm to its linear regression (Ho et al. 2005).
b. Minimum chi-square (X2) indicates best fit of three isotherms in arithmetic form (Ho et al. 2005).
c. units: lo/n)pg(1-vn)/g
d. Not applicable for So<0 or Kd<0 from linear regression.
e. Not applicable for (1/n)>1 or Kf<0 from Freundlich regression (Matott 2007).
f. For all C<MDL (method detection limit), estimate a minimum Kd using C = MDL at lowest soil -to -solution ratio.
g. Isotherm data not available.

Table 4 Chromium
No.
data points
Linear Isotherm, So = 0
Linear isotherm, So > 0
Freundlich isotherm
Trial A
Trial B
Trial A
Trial B
Trial A
Trial B
Well ID
Trial A
Trial B
Kd
2
R
2
Kd
2
R
2
Kd
So
2
R
2
Kd
So
2
R
2
Kf
1/n
2
R
2
Kf
1/n
2
R
2
Fig. Nos.
1/g
-
Ng/g
1/g
-
Ng/g
I/g
ug/g
ug/g
1/g
Ng/g
Ng/g
(c)
Ng/g
(c)
Ng/g
AB-1 BR
5
5
0.296
0.770
0.811
0.305
0.802
0.700
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
51,52
AB-1 S
4
4
0.006
0.238
0.342
0.004
0.317
0.137
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
53,54
AB - 2 S
1
0
0.874
(f)
(g)
(f)
(g)
(f)
(g)
55,-
AB - 4 D
0
0
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
-
AB - 6 BR
5
0
0.032
0.953 1 0.096
(g)
(d)
(g)
(e)
(g)
56,-
AB - 8 D
1
0
0.874
(f)
(g)
(f)
(g)
(f)
(g)
57,-
AB - 11 D
1
0
1.334
(f)
(g)
(f)
(g)
(f)
(g)
58,-
AB - 16 D
4
3
0.519
0.811
0.602
0.438
0.835
0.424
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
59,60
AS-1 D
5
4
0.007
0.719
0.037
0.004
0.944
0.006
(d)
0.001 0.007 1 0.839 0.000
0.006 0.976 1 0.274 0.050
0.008 0.282 1 0.700 0.000
61,62
GWA - 1 S
3
3
0.549
0.826
0.479
0.380
0.990
0.052
1 (d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
63,64
GWA - 2D
0
0
(g)
(g)
I (g)
(g)
I (g)
(g)
-I-
Linear So=O
Linear So>O
Freundlich
Kd
Kd
So
K,
1/n
Maximum
1.334
0.001
0.007
0.008
0.976
Minimum
0.0036
0.0014
0.007
0.006
0.282
Median
0.342
0.001
0.007
0.007
0.629
Notes
a. Coefficient of determination (R2)indicates goodness of fit of individual isotherm to its linear regression (Ho et al. 2005).
b. Minimum chi-square (X2) indicates best fit of three isotherms in arithmetic form (Ho et al. 2005).
c. units: lo/n)pg(1-vn)/g
d. Not applicable for So<0 or Kd<0 from linear regression.
e. Not applicable for (1/n)>1 or Kf<0 from Freundlich regression (Matott 2007).
f. For all C<MDL (method detection limit), estimate a minimum Kd using C = MDL at lowest soil -to -solution ratio.
g. Isotherm data not available.

Table 5 Molybdenum
No.
data points
Linear Isotherm, So = 0
Linear isotherm, So > 0
Freundlich isotherm
Trial A
Trial B
Trial A
Trial B
Trial A
Trial B
Well ID
Trial A
Trial B
Kd
2
R
2
Kd
2
R
2
Kd
So
2
R
2
Kd
So
2
R
2
Kf
1/n
2
R
2
Kf
1/n
2
R
2
Fig. Nos.
1/g
-
Ng/g
1/g
-
Ng/g
1/g
ug/g
-
ug/g
1/g
Ng/g
-
Ng/g
(c)
-
-
Ng/g
(c)
-
-
Ng/g
AB-1 BR
2
2
1.897
0.971
1.238
1.928
0.972
1.171
1.389
2.033
1.000
0.000
1.418
2.004
1.000
0.000
3.422
0.591
1.000
0.000
1.883
0.990
0.734
1.257
65,66
AB-1 S
0
0
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
AB - 2 S
2
2
3.346
1.000 1 0.001
2.541
0.991 1 0.290
3.306 0.083
1 1.000 0.000
2.087 1.302
1 1.000 0.000
3.389 0.984
1 1.000 0.000
3.389 0.742
1 1.000 0.000
67,68
AB - 4 D
1
1
0.0003
(f)
0.0002
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
69,70
AB - 6 BR
3
3
0.003
0.929
0.125
0.003
0.946 1 0.090
0.0001
0.460
0.103
0.002
0.0004 0.431 1 0.308 0.004
0.356
0.060
0.179
0.002
0.227 0.156 1 0.396 0.004
71,72
AB - 8 D
3
0
0.594
0.915
7.414
(g)
0.438
1.901
0.958
0.374
(g)
2.006
0.543
0.932
0.240
(g)
73,-
AB - 11 D
5
5
0.036
0.860
13.791
0.035
0.926
12.940
1 0.026
1.237
0.925
0.527
0.027
0.990
0.984
0.159
0.490
0.478
0.995
0.038
0.525
0.434
0.973
0.194
74,75
AB - 16 D
5
5
0.036
0.933
3.900
0.036
0.937
3.584
0.028
0.931
0.972
0.211
0.028
0.909
0.974
0.187
0.249
0.610
0.993
0.026
0.245
0.611
0.998
0.009
76,77
AS-1 D
5
5
1 0.013
0.789
10.567
0.013
0.800
10.711
0.008
1.104
0.820
0.358
0.007
1.077
0.856
0.274
0.356
0.394
0.974
0.071
0.364
0.382
0.979
0.045
78,79
GWA - 1 S
5
5
0.066
0.842
1 34.221
0.068
0.848
32.490
0.049
1.437
1 0.920
0.887
0.052
1.425
0.924
0.853
1 0.932
0.429
1 0.993
0.052
0.928
0.434
0.994
0.045
80,81
GWA - 2D
4
4
0.001
0.964
1 0.039
0.001
0.964
0.046
(d)
(d)
I (e)
(e)
82,83
Linear So=O
Linear So>O
Freundlich
Kd
Kd
So
K,
1/n
Maximum
3.346
3.306
2.033
3.422
0.990
Minimum
0.0002
0.0001
0.083
0.227
0.060
Median
0.036
0.028
1.104
0.525
0.478
Notes
a. Coefficient of determination (R2)indicates goodness of fit of individual isotherm to its linear regression (Ho et al. 2005).
b. Minimum chi-square (X2) indicates best fit of three isotherms in arithmetic form (Ho et al. 2005).
c. units: lo/n)pg(1-vn)/g
d. Not applicable for So<0 or Kd<0 from linear regression.
e. Not applicable for (1/n)>1 or Kf<0 from Freundlich regression (Matott 2007).
f. For all C<MDL (method detection limit), estimate a minimum Kd using C = MDL at lowest soil -to -solution ratio.
g. Isotherm data not available.

Table 6 Selenium
No.
data points
Linear Isotherm, So = 0
Linear isotherm, So > 0
Freundlich isotherm
Trial A
Trial B
Trial A
Trial B
Trial A
Trial B
Well ID
Trial A
Trial B
Kd
2
R
2
Kd
2
R
2
Kd
So
2
R
2
Kd
So
2
R
2
Kf
1/n
2
R
2
Kt
1/n
2
R
2
Fig. Nos.
1/g
-
Ng/g
1/g
Ng/g
I/g
ug/g
ug/g
1/g
Ng/g
Ng/g
(c)
Ng/g
(c)
Ng/g
AB-1 BR
5
0
0.898
0.948
2.949
(g)
(d)
(g)
(e)
(g)
84,-
AB - 1 S
0
0
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
-
AB - 2 S
3
0
1.290 0.944 4.421
(g)
1.000 2.034
1 0.958 1 0.511
(g)
2.715 0.650
1 0.900 0.445
(g)
85,-
AB - 4 D
0
0
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
-
AB - 6 BR
5
0
0.014
0.921
1.974
(g)
0.009 0.963
1 0.916 0.241
(g)
0.110 0.630
1 0.974 0.093
(g)
86,-
AB - 8 D
4
0
0.507
0.951
1.888
(g)
(d)
(g)
(e)
(g)
87,-
AB - 11 D
5
0
0.084
0.961
2.422
(g)
0.071
1.012
0.976
0.367
(g)
0.270
0.752
0.990
0.110
(g)
88,-
AB - 16 D
5
0
0.089
0.987
0.629
(g)
0.080
0.605
0.990
0.147
(g)
0.172
0.856
0.990
0.065
(g)
89,-
AS-1 D
0
0
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
-
GWA - 1 S
5
0
10.147 0.922 8.737
(g)
0.120 1.445
1 0.957 0.810
(g)
0.718 0.628
1 0.988 0.172
(g)
90,-
GWA - 2D
0
0
1 (g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
-I-
Linear So=O
Linear So>O
Freundlich
Kd
Kd
So
K,
1/n
Maximum
1.290
1.000
2.034
2.715
0.856
Minimum
0.014
0.009
0.605
0.110
0.628
Median
0.147
0.080
1.012
0.270
0.650
Notes
a. Coefficient of determination (R2) indicates goodness of fit of individual isotherm to its linear regression (Ho et al. 2005).
b. Minimum chi-square (X2) indicates best fit of three isotherms in arithmetic form (Ho et al. 2005).
c. units: lo/n)pg(1-vn)/g
d. Not applicable for So<0 or Kd<0 from linear regression.
e. Not applicable for (1/n)>1 or Kf<0 from Freundlich regression (Matott 2007).
f. For all C<MDL (method detection limit), estimate a minimum Kd using C = MDL at lowest soil -to -solution ratio.
g. Isotherm data not available.

Table 7 Thallium
No.
data points
Linear Isotherm, So = 0
Linear isotherm, So > 0
Freundlich isotherm
Trial A
Trial B
Trial A
Trial B
Trial A
Trial B
Well ID
Trial A
Trial B
Kd
2
R
2
Kd
2
R
2
Kd
So
2
R
2
Kd
So
2
R
2
Kf
1/n
2
R
2
Kf
1/n
2
R
2
Fig. Nos.
1/g
-
Ng/g
1/g
-
Ng/g
I/g
ug/g
ug/g
1/g
Ng/g
Ng/g
(c)
Ng/g
(c)
Ng/g
AB-1 BR
5
5
0.108
0.996
0.254
0.103
0.998
0.142
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
91,92
AB-1 S
5
5
0.192
0.925
1.603
0.224
0.981
0.558
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
93,94
AB - 2 S
5
5
0.075
0.999
0.024
0.076
1.000
0.009
0.073 0.142 1 0.999 1 0.008
(d)
0.088
0.966
1.000
0.004
1 0.081
0.983
0.999
0.011
95,96
AB - 4 D
5
5
0.121
0.932
2.123
0.086
0.723
7.733
(d)
0.070 1.072 1 0.408 1 6.047
0.277
0.733
0.796
3.371
0.406
0.597
0.704
7.171
97,98
AB - 6 BR
5
5
0.611
0.997
0.326
0.678
0.995
0.272
0.582 0.340 1 0.998 0.043
(d)
0.857
0.859
0.994
0.082
0.796
0.892
0.960
0.442
99,100
AB-8 D
5
5
0.565
0.998
0.137
0.546
0.998
0.109
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
101,102
AB - 11 D
3
3
1.629
0.984
1.060
1.860
0.953
3.905
1 1.386
1.503
0.993
0.093
1.477
2.144
0.953
0.672
2.597
0.765
0.997
0.021
3.314
0.694
0.870
0.661
103,104
AB - 16 D
5
5
0.804
0.998
0.178
0.795
1 0.999
0.166
0.773
0.324
1.000
0.014
0.778
0.181
0.998
0.050
1.012
0.903
0.999
0.023
1.004
0.887
0.992
0.127
105,106
AS-1 D
5
5
0.522
0.992
1 0.527
0.480
0.999
0.055
(d)
0.476
0.063
0.999
0.045
(e)
1 0.513
0.975
0.992
0.046
107,108
GWA - 1 S
4
4
0.694
0.969
3.775
0.729
0.973
3.108
0.585 1.548 1 0.992 0.180
0.621
1.455
0.993
0.143
1.722
0.674
0.999
0.004
1.694
0.690
1.000
0.001
109,110
GWA-2D
5
5
0.678
0.902
2.637
0.673
0.930
1.887
(d)
(d)
0.848
0.808
0.800
4.006
0.573
0.992
0.864
2.324
111,112
Linear So=O
Linear Sp>O
Freundlich
Kd
Kd
So
K,
1/n
Maximum
1.860
1.477
2.144
3.314
0.992
Minimum
0.075
0.070
0.063
0.081
0.597
Median
0.556
0.603
0.706
0.848
0.859
Notes
a. Coefficient of determination (R2) indicates goodness of fit of individual isotherm to its linear regression (Ho et al. 2005).
b. Minimum chi-square (X2) indicates best fit of three isotherms in arithmetic form (Ho et al. 2005).
c. units: lo/n)pg(1-vn)/g
d. Not applicable for So<0 or Kd<0 from linear regression.
e. Not applicable for (1/n)>1 or Kf<0 from Freundlich regression (Matott 2007).
f. For all C<MDL (method detection limit), estimate a minimum Kd using C = MDL at lowest soil -to -solution ratio.
g. Isotherm data not available.

Table 8 Vanadium
No.
data points
Linear Isotherm, So = 0
Linear isotherm, So > 0
Freundlich isotherm
Trial A
Trial B
Trial A
Trial B
Trial A
Trial B
Well ID
Trial A
Trial B
Kd
2
R
2
Kd
2
R
2
Kd
So
2
R
2
Kd
So
2
R
2
Kf
1/n
2
R
2
Kf
1/n
2
R
2
Fig. Nos.
1/g
-
Ng/g
1/g
-
Ng/g
I/g
ug/g
ug/g
1/g
Ng/g
Ng/g
(c)
Ng/g
(c)
Ng/g
AB-1 BR
2
2
2.488
0.984
0.155
2.469
0.985
0.145
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
113,114
AB-1 S
0
0
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
AB - 2 S
2
0
0.984
0.999
0.012
(g)
0.904
0.185
1.000
0.000
(g)
1.089
0.887
1.000
0.000
(g)
115,-
AB - 4 D
5
5
0.006
0.986
0.059
0.006
0.898
0.329
0.006
0.016
0.916
0.056
0.005 0.123
1 0.536 0.266
0.012
0.871
0.884
0.060
0.034 0.619
1 0.605 0.322
116,117
AB - 6 BR
5
5
0.228
0.996
0.179
0.238
0.994
0.324
0.222
0.204
0.993
0.180
(d)
(e)
(e)
118,119
AB - 8 D
3
4
1.633
0.966
0.409
1.425
0.898
1.181
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
120,121
AB - 11 D
5
5
0.525
0.994
0.100
0.547
0.993
0.124
1 0.513 0.072 1 0.988 0.109
0.532 0.089 1 0.987 0.133
(e)
(e)
122,123
AB - 16 D
5
5
0.194
0.902
1.370
1 0.191
0.919
1.189
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
124,125
AS-1 D
5
5
0.052
0.935
2.793
0.048
1 0.931
3.157
0.042
0.515
0.978
0.111
0.038
0.523
0.978
0.106
0.279
0.582
1.000
0.001
0.285
0.562
0.999
0.002
126,127
GWA - 1 S
3
3
0.511
0.960
1.161
0.493
0.957
1.277
0.405
0.806
0.979
0.105
0.389
0.828
0.979
0.109
1.046
0.677
0.979
0.047
1.048
0.666
0.979
0.048
128,129
GWA - 2D
5
5
0.024
0.976
0.254
0.023
0.970
0.252
0.022
0.132
1 0.935
0.161
0.020
0.184
0.924
0.182
0.051
0.810
0.900
0.177
0.037
0.893
0.924
0.162
130,131
Linear So=O
Linear So>O
Freundlich
Kd
Kd
So
K,
1/n
Maximum
2.488
0.904
0.828
1.089
0.893
Minimum
0.006
0.005
0.016
0.012
0.562
Median
0.238
0.132
0.184
0.279
0.677
Notes
a. Coefficient of determination (R2)indicates goodness of fit of individual isotherm to its linear regression (Ho et al. 2005).
b. Minimum chi-square (X2) indicates best fit of three isotherms in arithmetic form (Ho et al. 2005).
c. units: lo/n)pg(1-vn)/g
d. Not applicable for So<0 or Kd<0 from linear regression.
e. Not applicable for (1/n)>1 or Kf<0 from Freundlich regression (Matott 2007).
f. For all C<MDL (method detection limit), estimate a minimum Kd using C = MDL at lowest soil -to -solution ratio.
g. Isotherm data not available.

9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Figure 1. Arsenic Isotherms for AB — 1 BR
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
C (ug/1)
• Trial -A linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

8
7
6
— 5
_0)
°' 4
U) 3
2
0
Figure 2. Arsenic Isotherms for AB — 1 BR
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

Figure 3. Arsenic Isotherms for AB — 1 S
0.8
0.7
•
W.
0.5
0.4
U) 0.3
•
0.2
•
•
0.1
0.0
0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O

Figure 4. Arsenic Isotherms for AB — 1 S
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5 •
'7' 0.4
U) 0.3
0.2
•
0.1
0.0
0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O

9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Figure 5. Arsenic Isotherms for AB — 2 S
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

9
8
7
6
°' 5
4
3
2
1
0
Figure 6. Arsenic Isotherms for AB — 2 S
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
U)
1.0
of
Figure 7. Arsenic Isotherms for AB — 4 D
•
0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O

3.0
2.5
2.0
U)
1.0
Figure 8. Arsenic Isotherms for AB — 4 D
0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O

3.0
2.5
2.0
c' 1.5
U)
1.0
Figure 9. Arsenic Isotherms for AB — 6 BR
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

3.0
2.5
2.0
S' 1.5
U)
1.0
Figure 10. Arsenic Isotherms for AB — 6 BR
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

Figure 11. Arsenic Isotherms for AB — 8 D
7 •
6
M
_0)
°' 4
U
•
1
•�
0
0
3
6
9
12
15
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O

Figure 12. Arsenic Isotherms for AB — 8 D
1.1
7 •
6
—5
_0)
0' 4
Z
U) 3
2
1
0
0 3 6 9 12 15
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O

8
7
6
—5
_0)
0' 4
Z
U) 3
2
0
Figure 13. Arsenic Isotherms for AB — 11 D
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

8
7
6
— 5
_0)
°' 4
U) 3
2
C
Figure 14. Arsenic Isotherms for AB — 11 D
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

9
8
7
6
°' 5
0)
M
U 4
3
2
C
Figure 15. Arsenic Isotherms for AB — 16 D
0 3 6 9 12 15 18
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

9
8
7
6
°' 5
U 4
3
2
C
Figure 16. Arsenic Isotherms for AB — 16 D
0 3 6 9 12 15 18
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

Figure 17. Arsenic Isotherms for AS — 1 D
u

8
6
5
4
U) 3
2
0
Figure 18. Arsenic Isotherms for AS — 1 D
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

9
8
7
6
°' 5
rn
U 4
3
2
0
Figure 19. Arsenic Isotherms for GWA— 1 S
0 4 8 12 16 20 24
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

Figure 20. Arsenic Isotherms for GWA — 1 S
4

on
5
°' 3
U)
Figure 21. Arsenic Isotherms for GWA— 2D
20 40 60 80 100 120 140
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

Figure 22. Arsenic Isotherms for GWA— 2D
Con
5
x

1.0
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
1110.5
U) 0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
Figure 23. Boron Isotherms for AB — 2 S
•
0 100 200 300 400
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear SO=O

0.50
0.45
0.40
0.35
0.30
0.25
U) 0.20
0.15
0.10
0.05
0.00
Figure 24. Boron Isotherms for AB — 11 D
•
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear SO=O

0.50
0.45
0.40
0.35
0.30
'3' 0.25
CO 0.20
0.15
0.10
0.05
WIN
Figure 25. Boron Isotherms for AB — 16 D
0 60 120 180 240 300 360
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear SO=O linear SO>0 Freundlich

0.50
0.45
0.40
0.35
0.30
0.25
W 0.20
0.15
0.10
0.05
0.00
Figure 26. Boron Isotherms for AB — 16 D
• 0
•
•
0 60 120 180 240 300 360
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear SO=O

0.50
0.45
0.40
0.35
0.30
0.25
W 0.20
0.15
0.10
0.05
0.00
Figure 27. Boron Isotherms for GWA— 1 S
•
• --.,OOW- •
•
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear SO=O linear SO>0 Freundlich

0.50
0.45
0.40
0.35
-, 0.30
5' 0.25
U) 0.20
0.15
0.10
0.05
0.00
Figure 28. Boron Isotherms for GWA — 1 S
•
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear SO=O

5.0
4.5
4.0
3.5
—, 3.0
2.5
U) 2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
Figure 29. Cadmium Isotherms for AB — 1 BR
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O

Figure 30. Cadmium Isotherms for AB — 1 BR
5.0
4.5
4.0
•
3.5
3.0
2.5
U) 2.0
1.5
1.0 •
0.5 • •
0.0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O

Figure 31. Cadmium Isotherms for AB — 1 S
6
5
4
0' 3
U)
2
1
• •
0
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O
•
3.5
•
4.0

I
4
°' 3
Z
U)
2
Ic
Figure 32. Cadmium Isotherms for AB — 1 S
•
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O

7
6
5
J&4
U) 3
2
0
Figure 33. Cadmium Isotherms for AB — 2 S
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O

7
6
5
J&4
U) 3
2
is
Figure 34. Cadmium Isotherms for AB — 2 S
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O

5.0
4.5
4.0
3.5
3.0
2.5
U) 2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
Figure 35. Cadmium Isotherms for AB — 4 D
0 10 20 30 40
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O
50

5.0
4.5
4.0
3.5
3.0
2.5
U) 2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
Figure 36. Cadmium Isotherms for AB — 4 D
10 20 30 40 50
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

1.0
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
U) 0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
Figure 37. Cadmium Isotherms for AB — 6 BR
1 2 3 4 5
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O

1.0
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
c/) 0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
Figure 38. Cadmium Isotherms for AB — 6 BR
•
1 2 3 4 5
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O

8
7
6
—5
°' 4
Z
3
2
1
0
Figure 39. Cadmium Isotherms for AB — 8 D
0 3 6 9 12 15
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O

8
6
— 5
°' 4
U) 3
2
is
Figure 40. Cadmium Isotherms for AB — 8 D
0 3 6 9 12 15
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O

7
6
5
�4
3
2
is
Figure 41. Cadmium Isotherms for AB — 11 D
0 5 10 15 20
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O

7
6
5
�4
03
2
0
Figure 42. Cadmium Isotherms for AB — 11 D
0 5 10 15 20
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O

s
6
— 5
°' 4
U) 3
2
0
Figure 43. Cadmium Isotherms for AB — 16 D
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O Freundlich

s
7
6
�5
0' 4
U) 3
2
no
Figure 44. Cadmium Isotherms for AB — 16 D
0 1 2 3 4 5 E
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O

5.0
4.5
4.0
3.5
3.0
2.5
U) 2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
Figure 45. Cadmium Isotherms for AS — 1 D
•
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O

5.0
4.5
4.0
3.5
3.0
2.5
U) 2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
Figure 46. Cadmium Isotherms for AS — 1 D
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O

7
6
5
�4
3
2
0
Figure 47. Cadmium Isotherms for GWA— 1 S
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O

7
6
5
�4
U) 3
2
Ic
Figure 48. Cadmium Isotherms for GWA— 1 S
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O

s
6
�5
°' 4
U) 3
2
1
0
Figure 49. Cadmium Isotherms for GWA— 2D
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

s
6
5
°' 4
c/) 3
2
is
Figure 50. Cadmium Isotherms for GWA— 2D
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O linear So>O

Figure 51. Chromium Isotherms for AB — 1 BR
1.4
1.2
1.0
0)0.8
Z
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
0.0 0.5
•
•
•
1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O

Figure 52. Chromium Isotherms for AB — 1 BR
1.4
1.2
1.0
0.8
U) 0.6
0.4
0.2 / •
•
M
•
•
•
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O

Figure 53. Chromium Isotherms for AB — 1 S
0.10
0.09
0.08 •
0.07
0.06
°' 0.05
U) 0.04
0.03
0.02
0.01
0.00
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O

Figure 54. Chromium Isotherms for AB — 1 S
0.10
0.09
0.08
0.07
0.06
'3' 0.05
U) 0.04
0.03
0.02
0.01 •
0.00
0 1 2
•
• •
3 4 5 6
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O

1.0
0.8
0.6
U) 0.4
0.2
0.0
Figure 55. Chromium Isotherms for AB — 2 S
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O

Figure 56. Chromium Isotherms for AB — 6 BR
1.0
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6 •
0.5
U) 0.4
0.3
0.2
•
0.1 • •
0.0
0 5 10 15 20
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O

1.0
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
Figure 57. Chromium Isotherms for AB — 8 D
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O

1.4
1.2
1.0
0)0.8
U) 0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
Figure 58. Chromium Isotherms for AB — 11 D
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O

1.5
1.2
a, 0.9
U) 0.6
0.3
0.0
Figure 59. Chromium Isotherms for AB — 16 D
•
0.0 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.5 1.8 2.1
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O

Figure 60. Chromium Isotherms for AB — 16 D
1.5
•
1.2
a, 0.9
=IIy
•
0.3 1 •
0.0 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.5 1.8 2.1
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O

Figure 61. Chromium Isotherms for AS — 1 D
M
0.05 •
0.04
0.03
0.02
0.01 �� •
•
NM
0 1 2 3 4 5
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O Freundlich

Figure 62. Chromium Isotherms for AS — 1 D
0.030
0.025
0.020
0.015
•
U)
0.010
0.005
0 1 2 3 4 5
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

2.0
1.8
1.6
1.4
6, 1.2
1311.0
U) 0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
Figure 63. Chromium Isotherms for GWA— 1 S
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O
4.0

2.0
1.8
1.6
1.4
1.2
j' 1.0
U) 0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
Figure 64. Chromium Isotherms for GWA— 1 S
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O

U)
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
0.0
Figure 65. Molybdenum Isotherms for AB — 1 BR
1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0
C (ug/1)
• Trial -A linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
0.0
Figure 66. Molybdenum Isotherms for AB — 1 BR
1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

M
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
"1,
Figure 67. Molybdenum Isotherms for AB — 2 S
0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich
4.0

12
10
8
6
4
2
0
0.0
Figure 68. Molybdenum Isotherms for AB — 2 S
0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich
4.0

0.12
0.10
0.08
60.06
U)
0.04
Figure 69. Molybdenum Isotherms for AB — 4 D
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O

0.12
0.10
;AMR]
0.06
0.04
0.02
0.00
Figure 70. Molybdenum Isotherms for AB — 4 D
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O

0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
C/) 0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
Figure 71. Molybdenum Isotherms for AB — 6 BR
0 40 80 120 160 200 240
C (ug/1)
• Trial -A linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
S' 0.4
W 0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
Figure 72. Molybdenum Isotherms for AB — 6 BR
0 40 80 120 160 200 240
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Figure 73. Molybdenum Isotherms for AB — 8 D
0 3 6 9 12 15
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

s
7
6
�5
°' 4
W 3
2
A
Figure 74. Molybdenum Isotherms for AB — 11 D
50 100 150
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

Figure 75. Molybdenum Isotherms for AB — 11 D
M
7

8
7
6
— 5
_0)
0' 4
Z
U) 3
2
U
Figure 76. Molybdenum Isotherms for AB — 16 D
0 30 60 90 120 150 180
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

8
7
6
�5
0' 4
3
2
U
Figure 77. Molybdenum Isotherms for AB — 16 D
0 30 60 90 120 150 180
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

4.0
3.5
3.0
2.5
2.0
W 1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
Figure 78. Molybdenum Isotherms for AS — 1 D
0 50 100 150 200 250
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

4.0
3.5
3.0
2.5
rn
2.0
U) 1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
Figure 79. Molybdenum Isotherms for AS — 1 D
0 50 100 150 200 250
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Figure 80. Molybdenum Isotherms for GWA— 1 S
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
C (ug/1)
• Trial -A linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Figure 81. Molybdenum Isotherms for GWA— 1 S
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

Figure 82. Molybdenum Isotherms for GWA — 2D
0.5
0.4
0.3 •
0.2 /
0.1
mg
•
0 60 120 180 240 300 360 420
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O

0.5
0.4
0.3
cm
U) 0.2
0.1
0.0
Figure 83. Molybdenum Isotherms for GWA— 2D
0 60 120 180 240 300 360 420
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O

12
10
8
0)
-' 6
4
Figure 84. Selenium Isotherms for AB — 1 BR
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear SO=O

14
12
10
8
U 6
4
2
0
Figure 85. Selenium Isotherms for AB — 2 S
0 2 4 6 8 10
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear SO=O linear SO>0 Freundlich

5.0
4.5
4.0
3.5
a, 3.0
a' 2.5
U) 2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
Figure 86. Selenium Isotherms for AB — 6 BR
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear SO=O linear SO>0 Freundlich

12
10
8
_0)
°' 6
U)
4
Figure 87. Selenium Isotherms for AB — 8 D
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear SO=O

10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
U
Figure 88. Selenium Isotherms for AB — 11 D
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear SO=O linear SO>0 Freundlich

14
12
10
ai 8
U) 6
4
2
W
Figure 89. Selenium Isotherms for AB — 16 D
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear SO=O linear SO>0 Freundlich

12
10
8
0)
6
U)
4
2
0
Figure 90. Selenium Isotherms for GWA — 1 S
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear SO=O linear SO>0 Freundlich

12
10
6
CO
4
Figure 91. Thallium Isotherms for AB — 1 BR
0 20 40 60 80 100
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O
120

12
10
EV
0)
0' 6
CO
4
oil
n
Figure 92. Thallium Isotherms for AB — 1 BR
20 40 60 80 100
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O
120

12
10
_cm
°' 6
4
Figure 93. Thallium Isotherms for AB — 1 S
•
0 10 20 30 40 50
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O

12
10
8
6
Z
4
i•:
1
Figure 94. Thallium Isotherms for AB — 1 S
0 10 20 30 40 50
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O

12
10
8
6
Z
4
f►:
Figure 95. Thallium Isotherms for AB — 2 S
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

12
10
8
6
Z
4
f►:
Figure 96. Thallium Isotherms for AB — 2 S
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O Freundlich

12
10
8
6
Z
CO
4
Figure 97. Thallium Isotherms for AB — 4 D
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O Freundlich

12
10
8
_CY)
°' 6
Z
U)
4
is
Figure 98. Thallium Isotherms for AB — 4 D
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

12
10
8
6
4
Figure 99. Thallium Isotherms for AB — 6 BR
0 3 6 9 12 15 18
C (ug/1)
• Trial -A linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

12
10
8
6
4
oil
I
Figure 100. Thallium Isotherms for AB — 6 BR
3 6 9 12 15 18
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O Freundlich

12
10
8
6
U)
4
!1
Figure 101. Thallium Isotherms for AB — 8 D
0 5 10 15 20
C (ug/1)
• Trial -A (not available) linear So=O

12
10
8
_0)
°' 6
Z
U)
4
Figure 102. Thallium Isotherms for AB — 8 D
0 5 10 15 20
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B (not available) linear So=O

14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
Figure 103. Thallium Isotherms for AB — 11 D
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

12
10
HE.]
Cn 6
4
2
0
Figure 104. Thallium Isotherms for AB — 11 D
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
Figure 105. Thallium Isotherms for AB — 16 D
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
C (ug/1)
• Trial -A linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

14
12
10
o� 8
U) 6
4
2
n
Figure 106. Thallium Isotherms for AB — 16 D
i0_�
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

10
9
8
7
6
5
C/) 4
3
2
1
0
Figure 107. Thallium Isotherms for AS — 1 D
0 4 8 12 16
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O
20 24

10
9
8
7
6
5
U) 4
3
2
1
0
Figure 108. Thallium Isotherms for AS — 1 D
0 4 8 12 16 20
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich
24

16
14
12
—10
8
C/) 6
4
2
0
Figure 109. Thallium Isotherms for GWA— 1 S
0 5 10 15 20
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

16
14
12
—10
o� 8
U) 6
4
2
0
Figure 110. Thallium Isotherms for GWA— 1 S
0 5 10 15 20
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

Figure 111. Thallium Isotherms for GWA— 2D
14
12
10
Off,
6
Gl
2 _ •
0
•
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
C (ug/1)
9 Trial - A linear So=O Freundlich

Figure 112. Thallium Isotherms for GWA— 2D
14
12
10
8
6
4
•
2
•
0
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O Freundlich

5.0
4.5
4.0
3.5
a, 3.0
2.5
U) 2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
Figure 113. Vanadium Isotherms for AB — 1 BR
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O

5.0
4.5
4.0
3.5
3.0
2.5
C/) 2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
Figure 114. Vanadium Isotherms for AB — 1 BR
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O

3.0
2.5
PAC,
0)
�' 1.5
1.0
Eff1jul
Figure 115. Vanadium Isotherms for AB — 2 S
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0
C (ug/1)
• Trial -A linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

1.4
1.2
1.0
0.8
U) 0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
Figure 116. Vanadium Isotherms for AB — 4 D
0 30 60 90 120 150 180
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

1.4
1.2
1.0
0.8
� 0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
Figure 117. Vanadium Isotherms for AB — 4 D
0 30 60 90 120 150 180
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

12
10
8
6
4
Figure 118. Vanadium Isotherms for AB — 6 BR
0 10 20
C (ug/1)
30 40 50
• Trial - A linear So=O linear So>O

12
10
8
_0)
°' 6
4
Figure 119. Vanadium Isotherms for AB — 6 BR
0 10 20 30 40 50
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O

5.0
4.5
4.0
3.5
3.0
c'' 2.5
U) 2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
Figure 120. Vanadium Isotherms for AB — 8 D
•
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O

5.0
4.5
4.0
3.5
3.0
2.5
U) 2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
Figure 121. Vanadium Isotherms for AB — 8 D
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O

w
4
0' 3
U)
2
w
Figure 122. Vanadium Isotherms for AB — 11 D
0 2 4
C (ug/1)
6 8 10
• Trial - A linear So=O linear So>O

4
0' 3
U)
Figure 123. Vanadium Isotherms for AB — 11 D
0 2 4 6 8 10
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O linear So>O

Figure 124. Vanadium Isotherms for AB — 16 D
5
•
4
°' 3
2
1 •
0
0 5 10 15 20
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O

Figure 125. Vanadium Isotherms for AB — 16 D
0
on
•
4
0' 3
2
1 �
j
0
0 5 10 15 20
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O

4.0
3.5
3.0
2.5
2.0
CO 1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
Figure 126. Vanadium Isotherms for AS — 1 D
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

4.0
3.5
3.0
2.5
2.0
U) 1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
Figure 127. Vanadium Isotherms for AS — 1 D
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

Figure 128. Vanadium Isotherms for GWA — 1 S

I
4
°' 3
2
w
Figure 129. Vanadium Isotherms for GWA— 1 S
0 2 4 6 8 10
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
of
Figure 130. Vanadium Isotherms for GWA— 2D
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
U)
1.0
of
Figure 131. Vanadium Isotherms for GWA — 2D
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich