20160243 Ver 1 - Sweetwater Sub_NWP 29 PCN_complete_03.04.16 - 3/9/2016

jj WithersRavenel
/ Our People. Your Success.
1410 Commonwealth Drive, Suite 101
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
t: 910.256.9277 1 f: 910.256.2584
TO:
NC Division of Water Resources
512 N. Salisbury Street; 9th Floor
Raleigh, NC 27604
WE ARE SENDING YOU
® Attached
❑ Shop Drawings
❑ Prints
❑ Copy of Letter
❑ Change order
Letter of Transmittal
03/04/16 02140249.00
Ms. Karen Higgins
Sweetwater Subdivision - Apex, NC
NWP 29 PCN Submittal
the following
❑ Under separate cover via items:
❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications
❑ Diskette ❑
COPIESDATE
NO.
DESCRIPTION
4
03/04/16
02140249.00
NWP 29 PCN
1
03/04/16
02140249.00
Check for $570 Application Fee
1
03/04/16
02140249.00
CD of PCN
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit
❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit
❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return
❑ For review and comment ❑
❑ FOR BIDS DUE 20 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER
copies for approval
copies for distribution
corrected prints
REMARKS:
L Q5 U'-
Iy'Ni�r D
8 2016
-WAT R
COPY TO: File SIGNED:
If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once.

■0 WikhersRavenel
NOOur People. Your Success.
March 4, 2016
US Army Corps of Engineers
NC -Division of Water Resources
Regulatory Field Office
401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
Mr. James Lastinger
Ms. Karen Higgins
3331 Heritage Trade Drive
1617 Mail Service Center
Suite 105
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699
Wake Forest, NC 27587
Re: Sweetwater Subdivision - Apex, Wake County
NWP 29 PCN Submittal
Corps AID: SAW -2014-02171
WR Project #02140249.00
Dear Mr. Lastinger and Ms. Higgins,
On behalf of Experience One Homes, LLC, we are requesting authorization from the USACE to use
NWP 29 for 0.14 acres of permanent wetland impacts and 281 If of permanent stream impacts for
construction of the proposed subdivision. We are also requesting a 401 WQC from NCDWR for
the above referenced impacts.
The project is ±151 acres in size and is located at 3121 US 64 Hwy West, south of the intersection
of US 64 Hwy and Jenks Road in Apex, Wake County (Latitude: 35.7380°N; Longitude: -
78.9157°W). The project is located in the Cape Fear River basin (Jordan Lake watershed) and onsite
waters drain to Reedy Branch. The Water Quality Classification for Reedy Branch is WS -V; NSW
and the Stream Index Number is: 16-41-10-1. The cataloging unit for the site is 03030002.
Proposed Project
The purpose of the proposed project is to construct a residential subdivision to meet the demand
for single family residential housing in Apex. The proposed project consists of the construction of a
418 lot residential subdivision, including 62 townhomes, 356 single family lots, an amenity center
and associated infrastructure including roads, utilities and stormwater management.
The planned use for the northern portion of the property will be commercial use (i.e. retail, offices,
etc), which will be constructed in the future. At this time, the final design of this area has not been
finalized. However, there are no jurisdictional features within the Future Commercial areas, and
additional impacts/permitting will not be required for construction within this area.
Please note that there are no proposed activities in southeastern parcel shown on the Overall
Exhibit. The wetlands, streams and buffers on this parcel have been delineated; however, this area
was not included in the Jurisdictional Determination for the proposed project. Due to the issues
with streams and buffers on this parcel, as well as issues with accessibility, this area has been
designated as Open Space, and there is no development proposed on this parcel.
1410 Commonwealth Drive, Suite 1011 Wilmington, NC 28403
t: 910.256.9277 1 f: 910.256.2584 1 www.withersravenel.com I License No. C-0832
Cary I Greensboro I Pittsboro I Raleigh I Wilmington

Sweetwater Subdivision
Project History
40 WithersRavenel.
Our People, Your Success.
James Lastinger with the Corps of Engineers preliminarily approved the wetland delineation during
a field review on 11/24/14 (SAW -2014-02171), which is documented in an email, dated 11/26/14.
The email has been has been provided as an Appendix. We are requesting issuance of the
Jurisdictional Determination in conjunction with issuance of the NWP 29. The JD Inventory Table
has been included as an Appendix.
The Town of Apex issued a Buffer Determination Letter for the proposed project on 10/24/14
(Apex project #14-014). The Town of Apex Buffer Determination Letter has been provided as an
Appendix. Please note that impacts to riparian buffers will be permitted by the Town of Apex.
Proposed Impacts
The proposed impacts consist of 0.14 acres of permanent wetland impacts and 281 If of permanent
stream impacts.
The proposed 0.14 acres of permanent wetland impacts (Impact #5) will occur from construction of
Lots 243 through 248, which will result in the removal of the entire Wetland B. Wetland B is a small
wetland within the upper reach of a natural crenulation. The hydrology of Wetland B is provided
primarily by discharge from an upstream non -jurisdictional pond, as well as runoff from the
surrounding uplands during rain events.
The proposed 281 If of permanent stream impacts will occur from construction of road crossings.
Impact #1 (±209 If) will occur to Reedy Branch, which is a perennial stream. This crossing is
necessary to connect the proposed project to the existing Timken Forest Drive within the
Abbington subdivision to the east. This connection is a requirement by the Town of Apex as a
condition of the site plan approval. Additionally, the connection to Timken Forest Drive will allow
for interconnectivity with the Abbington subdivision, allowing access to the future commercial
development area without having to access US 64 Hwy. During installation of the culvert, a bypass
channel will be constructed to maintain flow until the flow is directed through the culvert.
Impact #3 (±81 If) will occur to an intermittent unnamed tributary to Reedy Branch, which has been
designed to cross the stream at a perpendicular angle.
Avoidance and Minimization
Prior to site plan design, the applicant requested that a detailed wetland delineation be conducted
so that impacts to wetlands and "waters" could be minimized.
Proposed permanent stream impacts have been minimized to only those impacts necessary to
construct roads. Road crossings have been designed to cross the streams at as close to
perpendicular angles as possible. Additionally, retaining walls have been utilized for the Reedy
Branch crossing (Impact #1) and UT to Reedy Creek crossing (Impact #3) to stabilize road fill and
minimize impacts.
Page 2of4

Sweetwater Subdivision 40 WithersRavenel.
Our People, Your Success.
The proposed location of the crossing for Reedy Branch (Impact #1) was dictated by both the
existing terminus of Timken Forest Drive, as well as the significant sinuosity of Reedy Branch.
Reedy Branch is very sinuous in the general location of the proposed crossing, and a perpendicular
crossing at a straight section of the stream could not be achieved. The proposed location actually
represents the least linear footage of impacts of all of the alignments explored. The proposed
alignment also allows for the best alignment of the culvert for capturing and discharging the flow of
Reedy Branch. Alternative alignments would have resulted in either the flow into or out of the
culvert to occur at very sharp angles, which would have required armoring of the stream bed and
banks to prevent erosion. However, the culvert alignment within the proposed crossing will
actually allow the intake and outfall flows to be relatively straight, decreasing the potential for
erosion and preventing the need for armoring with rip -rap, further minimizing impacts.
The proposed 0.14 acres of permanent wetland impacts (Impact #5) to Wetland B will occur from
construction of lots 243 through 248, as well as fill for construction of Brown Velvet Lane and Hass
Avenue. Wetland B consists of a small wetland (0.14 acres) within a natural crenulation below a
non -jurisdictional pond. The hydrology of Wetland B is provided primarily from discharge from the
upstream non -jurisdictional pond, as well as runoff from surrounding uplands during rain events.
The upstream non -jurisdictional pond will be filled as part of the proposed development, which will
remove the primary source of hydrology for Wetland B. The proposed development will also
redirect all runoff away from Wetland B, as all stormwater runoff must be captured in the
stormwater management system and treated prior to discharge. Even if impacts to Wetland B were
minimized to only impacts necessary for the road fill, the hydrologic source would be completely
removed, and the remaining portion of Wetland B would eventually dry up and become uplands.
Therefore, it was determined that the integrity and long term viability of Wetland B could not be
maintained in the post -development condition, and the functional value of Wetland B would be
better served by providing mitigation within a regionally significant mitigation bank.
Furthermore, Lots 243 through 248 are needed to offset development costs associated with the
project and offsite improvements. The loss of these lots would significantly affect the feasibility of
the project.
Impacts have been further minimized by designing the sewer line crossings depicted on Map B and
Map D to be installed via bore and jack to avoid temporary stream impacts at these crossings.
Mitigation
Stream Mitigation
The applicant proposes to mitigate for the 289 If of permanent stream impacts at 2:1 ratio by
purchasing a total of 578 If of stream mitigation credits. WR contacted mitigation banks within the
Cape Fear 0303002 basin and there was no stream mitigation available in any mitigation banks
servicing this basin. Therefore, the applicant will provide the proposed stream mitigation through
the purchase of 578 If of stream mitigation creditsfrom NCDMS. Acopyof the Letter of Acceptance
from NCDMS has been provided as an Appendix.
Page 3 of 4

Sweetwater Subdivision
Wetland Mitigation
40WithersRavenel
Our People. Your Success.
The applicant proposes to mitigate for the 0.14 acres of permanent wetland impacts through the
purchase of mitigation credits at a 2:1 mitigation ratio, resulting in the purchase of 0.28 acres of
riparian wetland mitigation. The applicant proposes to purchase the 0.28 acres of wetland
mitigation from Restoration Systems, LLC in the Cripple Creek Stream & Wetland Mitigation Bank
(Restoration Systems, LLC). A copy of the Letter of Availability from Restoration Systems, LLC has
been provided as an Appendix.
Stormwater Management Plan
The stormwater management plan consists of three wet detention ponds that will discharge into
level spreaders and vegetated filter strips, which will achieve 90% TSS and nitrogen removal. The
stormwater management plan will be reviewed and approved by the Town of Apex.
The current request is for 0.14 acres of permanent wetland impacts and 281 If of permanent
stream impacts (see the attached maps and PCN for details).
Please feel free to contact me if you have questions or require additional information to complete
your review.
Sincerely
WithersRavenel
Troy Beasley
Senior Environmental Scientist
Attachments:
• PCN Form
• Agent Authorization
• USGS Quad
• Wake County Soil Survey
• Approved Wetland Delineation Exhibit
• Town of Apex Buffer Determination Letter
• Corps Email Approving Wetland Delineation
• NCDMS Letter of Acceptance for Stream Mitigation
• Restoration Systems. LLC Letter of Availability for Wetland Mitigation
• Impact Exhibits
Page 4 of 4

C)�0� W ALc,
r
G1 MIMWc
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Page 1 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
1b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: NWP 29 or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
® Yes
❑ No
1d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
® Yes
❑ No
1g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes
® No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Sweetwater Subdivision
2b.
County:
Wake
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Apex
2d.
Subdivision name:
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
See Owner Information & Parcels Exhibit in Appendices
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d.
Street address:
3e.
City, state, zip:
3f.
Telephone no.:
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
Page 1 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑ Agent ® Other, specify: Contract Purchaser
4b.
Name:
David Schmidt — Manager
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
Experience One Homes, LLC
4d. Street address:
PO Box 5509
4e.
City, state, zip:
Cary, NC 27512
4f.
Telephone no.:
919-991-1402
4g.
Fax no.:
4h.
Email address:
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
Troy Beasley
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
Withers and Ravenel
5c.
Street address:
1410 Commonwealth Drive, Suite 101
5d.
City, state, zip:
Wilmington, NC 28403
5e. Telephone no.:
910-256-9277
5f.
Fax no.:
910-256-2584
5g.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
1a.
Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
PINs: 0722439900; 0722446225; 0722422603;
0722550104;0722544883
1 b.
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.7380°N Longitude: - 78.9157
(DD.DDDDDD)-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c.
Property size:
±151.5 acres
2.
Surface Waters
2a.
Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
Reedy Branch (Stream Index: 16-41-10-1)
proposed project:
2b.
Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
WS -IV; NSW
2c.
River basin:
Cape Fear/ Jordan Basin (H UC: 03030002)
3.
Project Description
3a.
Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The project area currently consists primarily of undeveloped woodlands, within interspersed residences. The land use in
the general vicinity consists of residential and commercial uses.
3b.
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
±0.37 acres
3c.
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
±6,379 If
3d.
Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the proposed project is to construct a residential subdivision to meet the growing demand for single family
residential housing in Apex.
3e.
Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The proposed project consists of the construction of a 418 lot residential subdivision, consisting of 62 townhomes and
356 single family lots, an amenity center and associated infrastructure, including roads, utilities and stormwater
management. Standard commercial construction equipment and techniques will be used to construct the proposed
project.
The northern portion of the property will consist of commercial development (i.e. retail, offices, etc.), which will be
constructed in the future. At this time, the final design of this area has not been finalized. However, there are no
jurisdictional features within the Future Commercial areas, and additional impacts/permitting will not be required for
construction.
Please note that there are no proposed activities in southeastern parcel shown on the Overall Exhibit. The wetlands,
streams and buffers on this parcel have been delineated, however, this area was not included in the Jurisdictional
Determination for the proposed project. Due to the issues with streams and buffers on this parcel, as well as issues with
accessibility, this area has been designated as Open Space, and there is no development proposed on this parcel.
Page 3 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
®Yes El No El Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
®Preliminary El Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency/Consultant Company: WithersRavenel
Name (if known): Troy Beasley/Martin Richmond
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
James Lastinger with the Corps of Engineers preliminarily approved the wetland delineation during a field review on
11/24/14 (SAW -2014-02171), which is documented in an email, dated 11/26/14, which has been provided as an
Appendix. We are requesting issuance of the JD in conjunction with issuance of the NWP 29. The JD Inventory Table
has been included as an Appendix.
The Town of Apex issued a Buffer Determination Letter for the proposed project on 10/24/14 (Apex project #14-014). The
Town of Apex Buffer Determination Letter has been provided as an Appendix.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
❑ Yes ❑ No ® Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
® Yes ❑ No
6b. If yes, explain.
The proposed project will be developed in phases; however, all impacts necessary for the construction of all phases are
addressed in this application. The residential subdivision will be the first phase, and all proposed impacts will occur within
the residential phase. The Future Commercial areas will be designed and constructed in the future. However, there are
no jurisdictional features within the Future Commercial Areas and additional permitting will not be required.
Page 4 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number -
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ - non -404, other)
(acres)
Temporary T
Impact #5
Fill for lot
®Yes
®Corps
(Wetland B)
construction
Headwater Forest
❑ No
®DWQ
0.14 ac
® P El
2g. Total wetland impacts
0.14 ac
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ - non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
Impact #1
Culverted Road
PER
®Corps
(Stream 2)
Crossing
Reedy Branch
El INT
®DWQ
15'
209 If
® P El T
Impact #3
(Stream 1)
Culverted Road
UT to Reedy
PER
®Corps
5'
81 If
®P❑T
Crossing
Branch
® INT
® DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
289 If
3i. Comments:
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
4b.
4c.
4d.
4e.
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number -
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
01 ❑P❑T
02 ❑ PEI T
03 ❑ PEI T
04 ❑P❑T
4L Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
Page 5 of 12
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5a.
5b.
5c.
5d.
5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose
(acres)
number
of pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ® Other: Jordan
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number —
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary T
impact
re uired?
131 ❑P❑T
F-1 Yes
❑ No
B2 ❑P❑T
❑Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑P❑T
❑Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments: Buffer impacts will be permitted through the Town of Apex.
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Prior to site plan design, the applicant requested that a detailed wetland delineation be conducted so that impacts to wetlands
and "waters" could be minimized.
Proposed permanent stream impacts have been minimized to only those impacts necessary to construct roads. Road
crossings have been designed to cross the streams at as close to perpendicular angles as possible. Additionally, retaining
walls have been utilized for the Reedy Branch crossing (Impact #1) and UT to Reedy Creek crossing (Impact #3) to stabilize
road fill and minimize impacts.
The proposed location of the crossing for Reedy Branch (Impact #1) was dictated by both the existing terminus of Timken
Forest Drive, as well as the significant sinuosity of Reedy Branch. Reedy Branch is very sinuous in the general location of the
proposed crossing, and a perpendicular crossing at a straight section of the stream could not be achieved. The proposed
location actually represents the least linear footage of impacts of all of the alignments explored. The proposed alignment also
allows for the best alignment of the culvert for capturing and discharging the flow of Reedy Branch. Alternative alignments
would have resulted in either the flow into or out of the culvert to occur at very sharp angles, which would have required
armoring of the stream bed and banks to prevent erosion. However, the culvert alignment within the proposed crossing will
actually allow the intake and outfall flows to be relatively straight, decreasing the potential for erosion and preventing the need
for armoring with rip -rap, further minimizing impacts.
Page 6 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

The proposed 0.14 acres of permanent wetland impacts (Impact #5) to Wetland B will occur from construction of lots 243
through 248, as well as fill for construction of Brown Velvet Lane and Hass Avenue. Wetland B consists of a small wetland
(0.14 acres) within a natural crenulation below a non -jurisdictional pond. The hydrology of Wetland B is provided primarily
from discharge from the upstream non -jurisdictional pond, as well as runoff from surrounding uplands during rain events. The
upstream non -jurisdictional pond will be filled as part of the proposed development, which will remove the primary source of
hydrology for Wetland B. The proposed development will also redirect all runoff away from Wetland B, as all stormwater
runoff must be captured in the stormwater management system and treated prior to discharge. Even if impacts to Wetland B
were minimized to only impacts necessary for the road fill, the hydrologic source would be completely removed, and the
remaining portion of Wetland B would eventually dry up and become uplands. Therefore, it was determined that the integrity
and long term viability of Wetland B could not be maintained in the post -development condition, and the functional value of
Wetland B would be better served by providing mitigation within a regionally significant mitigation bank.
Furthermore, Lots 243 through 248 are needed to offset development costs associated with the project and offsite
improvements. The loss of these lots would significantly affect the feasibility of the project.
Impacts have been further minimized by designing the sewer line crossings depicted on Map B and Map D to be installed via
bore and jack to avoid temporary stream impacts at these crossings.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Retaining walls will be used to stabilize fill at the stream crossings. Sediment and erosion control measures will be installed to
prevent sediment from escaping into adjacent streams and wetlands.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
® Yes ❑ No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ® Corps
® Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
®Payment to in -lieu fee program
project?
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: Cripple Creek Stream & Wetland Mitigation Bank (Restoration Systems, LLC)
Type:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Quantity: 0.28 acres
Riparian Wetland
3c. Comments: Mitigation for the 0.14 acres of permanent wetland impact are being provided at a 2:1 ratio, resulting in the
purchase of 0.28 acres of riparian wetland mitigation.
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
® Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
578 linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
® warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments: Due to a lack of available stream mitigation in a private mitigation bank, the stream mitigation will be provided
through DMS.
Page 7 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ❑ No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 8of12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
® Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Comments: Diffuse flow will be achieved through level spreaders and vegetated
❑ Yes ® No
filter strips. The diffuse flow requirements will be reviewed and permitted by the
Town of Apex during the stormwater permit review.
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
34.5%
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
® Yes ❑ No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
The proposed stormwater management plan consists of three wet detention ponds, which will outfall into level spreaders
and vegetated filter strips. The stormwater management plan will be reviewed and approved by the Town of Apex.
® Certified Local Government
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
Town of Apex
® Phase II
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
® NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ® No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 9 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes ® No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
All impacts necessary for development of the entire project are addressed under this application and no future impacts
will be required. Additionally, the proposed project is located on the western edge of the heavily developed portion of
Apex. While the proposed project will be located within a currently expanding area of Apex, it is not anticipated to be the
specific catalyst for future development adjacent to the project, but rather the availability of land and general desirability
for development to be located in this area will be the catalyst for future development in the area.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Town of Apex sanitary sewer
Page 10 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
® Yes ❑ No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑ Yes ® No
impacts?
❑ Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
WR reviewed the NC Natural Heritage Program database, located at https://ncnhde.natureserve.org/contenVmap to
identify if there were any known occurrences of endangered species on or near the proposed project. The review of the
NHP data did not identify any occurrences of endangered species or critical habitat on the subject property or within 1.0
miles of the project, see attached NCNHP project review letter. Site reviews did not identify any potential habitat for any
federally protected species known to occur in Wake County, except for the Northern Long Eared Bat.
Potential habitat for the northern Long-eared bat (NLEB) is listed as mature forest with trees over 3" dbh, which is used
for roosting during the day. Since the majority of the project area consists of mature forest over 3" DBH, there is potential
northern long eared bat habitat present. The USFWS Final 4(d) rule for the Northern Long -Eared bat specifies that tree
removal within the White Nose Syndrome (WNS) Zone is not prohibited as long as it occurs more than 0.25 miles from
known hibernacula and does not result in destroying known occupied maternity roost trees, or any other trees within a
150 ft -radius from the maternity tree, during the pup season (June 1 — July 31). The proposed project is not located
within 0.25 miles of any known hibernacula, nor is there any known maternity roost trees present on the project or in the
vicinity. Therefore, WR concludes that the project "may affect, but is not likely to adversely affect" the northern long-
eared bat.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
There are no waters in Wake County classified as EFH.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
W&R reviewed the NC State Historic Preservation Office's online database, located at: http://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/, to
determine if there were any known historic or cultural resources within or in the vicinity of the proposed project. The
database review did not identify any known resources within the proposed project. The review of the SHPO database
identified three historic sites within 0.50 miles. The HOP Site IDs are: WA1036 (House), WA1035 (Mills House/Gone)
and WA -R180 (House and Outbuildings — 1940s Farm Complex). All three historic sites are located on the north side of
US 64, which is a 4 lane divided highway. The proposed development will have no impacts to these historic resources.
Page 11 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
70 Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? www.ncfloodmaps.com
Troy Beasley — WithersRavenel
I 1
Authorized Agent
03/04/16
Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided.)
Page 12 of 12
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM

WITHERS ��_ RAVENEL
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
AUTHORITY FOR APPOINTMENT OF AGENT
The undersigned contract purchaser, ExperienceOne Homes, LLC (Client) does hereby appoint
Withers & Ravenel, Inc. as his, her, or it's agent for the purpose of petitioning the appropriate
local, state and federal environmental regulatory agencies (US Army Corps of Engineers, NC
Division of Water Quality, NC Division of Coastal Management, local municipalities, etc.) for: a)
review and approval of the jurisdictional boundaries of onsite jurisdictional areas (wetlands,
streams, riparian buffers, etc.) and/or; b) preparation and submittal of appropriate environmental
permit applications/requests for the ExperienceOne-Apex Property, located south of the
intersection of US Hwy 64 and Jenks Road in Apex, Wake County. The project area
consists of 5 parcels (PINs: 0722446225; 0722446225; 0722439900: 0722550104;
0722442603;0722730032;)
The Client does hereby authorize that said agent has the authority to do the following acts on
behalf of the owner:
(1) To submit appropriate requests/applications and the required supplemental
materials;
(2) To attend meetings to give representation on behalf of the Client.
(3) To authorize access to subject property for the purpose of environmental
review by appropriate regulatory agencies.
This authorization shall continue in effect until completion of the contracted task or termination by
the Client.
Date:,
Agent's Name, Address & Telephone: raignature of CH t:
Withers & Ravenel. Inc. l
(Name s Print) (Title)
115 MacKenan Drive (—
Cary. NC 27511 (Signature))
tu
Tel. [phone]- ')
Mailing Address
. N c, -Z'1 S 2_
City I State Zip
Phone.
Email:
115 MacKenan Drive I Cary, NC 275111 tel.: [phone] fax: [phone] www.withersravenel.com I License No. C-0832
1410 Commonwealth Drive I Suite 1011 Wilmington, NC 28403 1 tel: [phone] fax: [phone]
7011 Albert Pick Road I Suite G I Greensboro, NC 27409 1 tel: [phone] fax: [phone]

USGS QUADS

cAtnE�/ J L a(sn�re
/ � ySµUDE'piCRFt RO .�
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 1500 3000 751
HCl` L 1r
1 inch = 3000 ft. / ` �, �\ V z JFxRSRO
rso ( i,
st
rk
o f. EP
64
aitnr,C uR Deck ( °
W Airpark
x u
a
~�
,E(vE 001 Cr RO O.
� i� wunr -!+l/ �, �,,� 1 J �,`.I/ll � �•� �() t-- sor ( E1 °°�,a`'°� 4v+e
:. �; \ .;� � � ��._'� V \ ` �__/ - Wit. aP.' '. � i ^ _� •1 � ��. PINDtIITeP
16,p APEX
�.rso�
70Jo uorl°p
7 N/NSMP INS K• )q[
CUE
1 �
Im
' ��/ ` /�.f �` - i /I .c'i�I C1. •,� � 1 f /" :�. � �j S��s�� � � ` �f �o �L/ " f
/ I
0 IVI DAIRY R0 •w i r
�W4Y
11 0 0
SWEETWATER SUBDIVISION USGS QUAD (2013) — NEW HILL 40- WithersRavenel
WA Engineers I Planners I Surveyors
APEX WAKE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA

GRAPHIC SCALE
0 400 800
R1 O a� 1 inch 800 ft.
0
_z v
0
4
300 v
l � �
rk� .
M/
r
%�
A.e e d-�'B� o
o
SWEETWATER SUBDIVISIONUSGS QUAD (2013) -NEW HILL WITHERS RAVENEL
ENGINEERS 1 PLANNERS 1 SURVIVORS
APEX WAKE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA

WAKE CO. SOIL SURVEY

GRAPHIC SCALE
Cy 0 250 500
2
1 inch = 500 ft.
( U �� - •
II
11
V
CrE
Wy
II
r _ G rC
if Cr B2 Wo C rC
CrB2
G
CrC2
j� C
WsC2 I�
• CrE
h r A
I1 �
CrC2
Wo AfA
sC2 Cr62_
'
Au CfC2 \
— r
SWEETWATER SUBDIVISION WAKE CO. SOIL SURVEY - SHEET 656
Engineers I Planners I Surveyors WithersRavenel
APEX WAKE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA

I_\»:IOITA: IDabs/: IIW_121W,
101AIIzIAil IMZI*:/:11:311

7�'!'' /'si-` ` .i T}_ry� �.L..Q•, is ri, `. �.�.-,r"`!.,
�t:t✓• t}yJ! f t --T � 1�'`r�CrM} a rig -�j-5 GRAPHIC
r r,
0 250 500
I inch 500 ft.
Y (
POND 1
NON-JURISDICTIQNA
t
j
POND 2
-
NON JURISDICTIONAL
--_ -` r.
! -
POND 3 /7�
NON-JURISDICTIO L
S_ Iw
r STREAM 2 t
PERENNIALk..
EEDY BRANCH
4 N �.
s
A +' r
NON -JURISDICTIONAL
' N
e _
TLAND B
ter.. \ 11
REEDY BRANC
NOTES:
1 JURISDICTIONAL STATUS BASED ON FIELD VERIFICATION BY
JAMES LASTINGER WITH CORPS OF ENGINEERS ON 11/24/14
(SAW -2014-02171).
SWEETWATER SUBDIVISION WETLAND DELINEATION EXHIBIT lipEngineers I Planners I Surveyors WithersRavenel
APEX WAKE COUNTY NOKTH CAKOLINA

ICOINTJZto] Oil 9 *AT :19J99mIN
01:0IAOuIIz/_lIIQz11:0a121:7

October 24, 2014
Martin Richmond
115 MacKenan Drive
Cary, NC 27511
Subject: Stream Buffer Determination JApex 14-01
Experience One - Apex Site
Primary Watershed —Jordan Lake Watershed
Dear Mr. Richmond,
On October 17, 2014, 1 met with you at the subject site to evaluate numerous drainage features
including four (6) ponds and determine if they were subject to the Town of Apex (Town)
riparian buffer rules. Based on the information obtained during the site visits and per the
requirements set forth in Section 6.1.11 of the Town Unified Development Ordinance (UDO), I
concur with the drainage features as shown on the attached map titled "Buffer Location
Exhibit" and summarized in the table below.
Shown as on
Shown as on
A�
of m o f
4v9��
THE PEAK OF GOOD LIVING
-'
P. D_ BOX 250
USGS
Soil Survey
APEX. NORTH CAROLINA
27502
October 24, 2014
Martin Richmond
115 MacKenan Drive
Cary, NC 27511
Subject: Stream Buffer Determination JApex 14-01
Experience One - Apex Site
Primary Watershed —Jordan Lake Watershed
Dear Mr. Richmond,
On October 17, 2014, 1 met with you at the subject site to evaluate numerous drainage features
including four (6) ponds and determine if they were subject to the Town of Apex (Town)
riparian buffer rules. Based on the information obtained during the site visits and per the
requirements set forth in Section 6.1.11 of the Town Unified Development Ordinance (UDO), I
concur with the drainage features as shown on the attached map titled "Buffer Location
Exhibit" and summarized in the table below.
PPE*
'1873
CA
Shown as on
Shown as on
Determination
Determined
Drainage Feature
Buffer
USGS
Soil Survey
made in the field
Width
Feature A
Not Present
Intermittent
Ephemeral
0 feet
(17 Points)
Feature B
Intermittent
Perennial
Ephemeral
0 feet
(11.5 Points)
Feature C
Intermittent
Intermittent
Ephemeral
0 feet
(15.5 Points)
Feature E
Not Present
Intermittent
Ephemeral
0 feet
(17 Points)
Ephemeral
Feature G
Not Present
Intermittent
0 feet
(8 Points)
Feature H
Not Present
Intermittent
Ephemeral
0 feet
(4.5 Points)
PPE*
'1873
CA

Town of Apex
Stream Buffer Determination SApex 14-414)
Page 2 of 2
This on-site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter. Landowners or
affected parties that dispute a determination made by the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) or
Delegated Local Authority in the Jordan Lake watershed may request a determination by the
DWQ Director.
An appeal request must be made within sixty (60) days of date of this letter or from the date
the affected party (including downstream and/or adjacent owners) is notified of this letter. A
request for a determination by the Director shall be referred to the Director in writing c/o Ian
McMillan, DWQ Wetlands/401 Unit, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650.
Otherwise the appeal procedure will be in accordance with UDO Section 6.1.11.
If you dispute the Director's determination, you may file a petition for an administrative
hearing. You must file the petition with the Office of Administrative Hearings within sixty (60)
days of receipt of this notice of decision. A petition is considered filed when it is received in the
Office of Administrative Hearings during normal office hours. The Office of Administrative
Hearings accepts filings Monday through Friday between the hours of 8:00am and S:OOpm,
except for official State holidays. To request a hearing, send the original and one (1) copy of the
petition to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-
6714. A copy of the petition must also be served to the Department of Natural Resources, c/o
Mary Penny Thompson, General Counsel, 1601 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1601.
This determination is final and binding unless, as detailed above, you ask for a hearing or appeal
within sixty (60) days. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (919)
249-3413.
Sincerely,
/4 � �/�_ � _�, cr, __� � �
Michael S. Deaton, PE
Environmental Programs Manager
Attachments
Ephemeral
Feature I
Not Present
Intermittent
0 feet
(13 Points)
Ephemeral
Feature J
Intermittent
Intermittent
0 feet
(14 Points)
Feature K
Not PresentIntermittent
Not Present
0 feet
This on-site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter. Landowners or
affected parties that dispute a determination made by the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) or
Delegated Local Authority in the Jordan Lake watershed may request a determination by the
DWQ Director.
An appeal request must be made within sixty (60) days of date of this letter or from the date
the affected party (including downstream and/or adjacent owners) is notified of this letter. A
request for a determination by the Director shall be referred to the Director in writing c/o Ian
McMillan, DWQ Wetlands/401 Unit, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650.
Otherwise the appeal procedure will be in accordance with UDO Section 6.1.11.
If you dispute the Director's determination, you may file a petition for an administrative
hearing. You must file the petition with the Office of Administrative Hearings within sixty (60)
days of receipt of this notice of decision. A petition is considered filed when it is received in the
Office of Administrative Hearings during normal office hours. The Office of Administrative
Hearings accepts filings Monday through Friday between the hours of 8:00am and S:OOpm,
except for official State holidays. To request a hearing, send the original and one (1) copy of the
petition to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-
6714. A copy of the petition must also be served to the Department of Natural Resources, c/o
Mary Penny Thompson, General Counsel, 1601 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1601.
This determination is final and binding unless, as detailed above, you ask for a hearing or appeal
within sixty (60) days. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (919)
249-3413.
Sincerely,
/4 � �/�_ � _�, cr, __� � �
Michael S. Deaton, PE
Environmental Programs Manager
Attachments

/.
GRAPHIC SCALE
1 250 500
- > �' � f� rte• 1 r? .. � 1. -" _ I
irch
O ... • Yom, \"� tis t -. - f
11a POND 2
MOT SUBJECT NOT SUBJECT
rvg'o Ott
PON
� 9 �j�' • `�l � SLY � � 1 r ! � � �., �/ # . y .
� I�'• wi - oma,. -r. •. P., �% �
y s
,4;. *:M%`� 4r K' + -. NOT S r JECT--��
rte;IL
sz a
CT
d Es�I
E F
FEATURE L a`
JECT
RANCH SUBJECT
FEST
BEGINS {
1; { -`fi FEATURE G
NOT SUBJECT
FEATURE E
NOT SUBJECT
�
FLAG S -i(. -
FEATURE F '
STOPCRANNEL ' (REEDY 13RANIFIj t-
�y
SUBJECT
FEATURED
OFFSITE

q
GRAP I III tic 11 I
I incl I ioo n
! f 10
1 k
ND 2 r.
A { ND :I I
r ` TURES •t `/ `' ■
:r
FEAT R H F TIJRE 1 10,
r
• FOATURE F
• N B13ANCH �
F TOR
Oro
�—�
i F irRE G
FE:,ATEJRE L40
� f
FEATYAE F—
FEAT r '
_ F FEATURF�F,t
{REEDY B#ANCUI
EXPERIENCE ONE - APEXUSGS �I�
CUA© - NEW F-IIEL WITHERS &— RAVENEL
lMilraaAb I ►LAIIAsas 1 tUaVtVaat

A POND 2
FEATURE B FEA RE
PON
FEATURE
t r
•
�
REI
FEATU
ATURE F
EDY BRANCH
AF
x
'ATURE E
FEATURE ¢�
r (REEDY BRANCH)
! 3 3

CORPS EMAIL APPROVING
WETLAND DELINEATION

Richmond, Martin
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE
Martin,
Lastinger, James C SAW <[e-mail]>
Wednesday, November 26, 2014 11:03 AM
Richmond, Martin
RE: ExperienceOne - Apex (02140249.00) - Revised JD Exhibit (UNCLASSIFIED)
Thanks for meeting with me on 11/24/14. 1 have reviewed the revised map and everything looks good per the
jurisdictional calls made in the field. I have assigned Corps AID number SAW -2014-02171 to this project. Please use this
number on all further correspondence regarding this project. It is my understanding that once I receive survey maps
and Rapanos forms that an approved JD needs to be issued.
James Lastinger
Regulatory Specialist
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
US Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
ADDRESS: 3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105 Wake Forest, NC 27587
Tel: [phone], x32
Fax: [phone]
Regulatory Homepage: http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/WETLANDS
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so, please complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at http://regulatory.usacesurvey.com/.
-----Original Message -----
From: Richmond, Martin[mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2014 9:01 AM
To: Lastinger, James C SAW
Cc: Beasley, Troy
Subject: [EXTERNAL] ExperienceOne - Apex (02140249.00) - Revised JD Exhibit
James,
This email is in follow-up to our site meeting for the ExperienceOne-Apex site, Wake County on 11/24/2014. At the site
meeting, the wetland delineation was approved as depicted in the attached exhibit.
We understand that it may be several months before the formal JD letter is issued; however, it would be helpful if we
could get written documentation that the wetland delineation has been preliminarily approved in order to move
forward with submittals to the Town of Apex. If you could, please review the attached revision and reply to this email
with concurrence.

As always, please let me know if you have any questions.
Thanks, and have a great holiday weekend
Martin
Martin Richmond
Withers & Ravenel<http://www.withersraveneI.com/sigs/WRLogo.gif>
115 MacKenan Drive Cary, NC 27511
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Direct: 919.535.5206
[e-mail]
www.withersravenel.com <http://www.withersravenel.com>
NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY AND NONDISCLOSURE: This electronic message, which includes any attachments and other
documents referred to herein, contains information from Withers & Ravenel, Inc. that may be proprietary or
confidential. The information is intended for the use of the addressee(s) only. If you are not the addressee, note that any
disclosure, copying, printing, distribution, or use of the contents of this message is prohibited. If you received this
message in error, please advise the sender by reply and delete this electronic message and any attachments.
COPYRIGHT NOTICE: Copyright 2014 Withers & Ravenel, Inc. All Rights Reserved by Withers & Ravenel, Inc. This
electronic message, any attachments thereto and all documents referred to therein are provided for the recipient's
information only, and no rights are licensed, transferred or otherwise granted by the transmission of this electronic
message by Withers & Ravenel, Inc. or receipt of this message by the recipient or any other party.
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE

�•?=. �.S.��s .i �n^ �.L..Q•, is ir!`. f.I�-,r"`!.,
� t:L✓ • ;}tiTr"_`�f f t --T � i�r'�Rr��ri} a r i• -�jr -5 GRAPHIC
r r,
0 250 500
I inch 500 ft.
Y (
POND 1
NON-JURISDICTIQNA
t
POND 2
NON -JURISDICTIONAL
! -
POND 3 /7�
NON-JURISDICTIO L
1. w
Ax
7 - STREAM 2 j
-
ys N r,
__,�, • �'.:'� PON -5
{ NON -JURISDICTIONAL
t
NOTES:
1) JURISDICTIONAL STATUS BASED ON FIELD VERIFICATION BY
JAMES LASTINGER WITH CORPS OF ENGINEERS ON 11/24/14.
EXPERIENCE ONE - APEX WETLAND WITHERS & RAVENEL
LOCATION EXHIBIT ENGINEERS 1 PLANNERS 1 SURVEYORS
APEX WAKE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA

Iz[a]07u1.11:1a121:Zo7 W_«41A2CAI z[a]0
Vol h" i 10:0 MaINI[e1AIEel Z

Environmental
Quality
March 4, 2016
David Schmidt
Experience One Homes, LLC
PO Box 5509
Cary, NC 27512
PAT MCCRORY
Governor
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
Secretary
Expiration of Acceptance: September 4, 2016
Project: Sweetwater Subdivision County: Wake
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) is willing to accept
payment for compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project as indicated in the table
below. Please note that this decision does not assure that participation in the DMS in -lieu fee mitigation program will be
approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts. It is the responsibility of the applicant to
contact permitting agencies to determine if payment to the DMS will be approved. You must also comply with all other
state, federal or local government permits, regulations or authorizations associated with the proposed activity including
G.S. § 143-214.11.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not received a
copy of the issued 404 Permit/401 Certification/CAMA permit within this time frame, this acceptance will expire. It
is the applicant's responsibility to send copies of the permits to DMS. Once DMS receives a copy of the permit(s) an
invoice will be issued based on the required mitigation in that permit and payment must be made prior to conducting the
authorized work. The amount of the in -lieu fee to be paid by an applicant is calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and
policies listed at http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/eep.
Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the DMS, the impacts that may require compensatory
mitigation are summarized in the following table. The amount of mitigation required and assigned to DMS for this impact
is determined by permitting agencies and may exceed the impact amounts shown below.
Impact
River
CU Location
Stream (feet)
Wetlands (acres)
Buffer I
Buffer II
Basin
(8 -digit HUC)
(Sq. Ft.)
(Sq. Ft.)
Cold Cool
Warm
Riparian
Non -Riparian
11Coastal Marsh
Cape
03030002
0 0
289
0
0
0
0
0
Fear
Upon receipt of payment, DMS will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. The mitigation will be
performed in accordance with the In -Lieu Fee Program instrument dated July 28, 2010 and 15A NCAC 02B .0295 as
applicable. Thank you for your interest in the DMS in -lieu fee mitigation program. If you have any questions or need
additional information, please contact Kelly Williams at [phone].
cc: James Lastinger, USACE-Raleigh
Cherri Smith, agent
Sincerely,
Ja ' B Stanfill
Asset Management Supervisor
Nothing Cornpares_'.a..
State of North Carclin^ Environmental Quality
1601 Mail Service Center i Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601
919-707-8600

RESTORATION SYSTEMS, LLC LETTER
101 ff_\%11 W_1:3111 VA do]:A'Filf/ :o I W_1216] ul111Iffil I IQ 21

Statement of Mitigation Credit Availability
Cripple Creek Stream & Wetland Mitigation Bank
March 4, 2016
Mr. James Lastinger
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
3331 Heritage Trade Drive
Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
Re: Availability of Compensatory Wetland Mitigation Credits
Project: Sweetwater Subdivision
We are providing this letter in accordance with 33 CFR §332.8(r), to confirm that .28 Riparian Wetland Mitigation
Credits (Credits) from the Cripple Creek Stream & Wetland Mitigation Bank (Bank) are currently available and may
be used, once transferred, for compensatory mitigation relative to the Sweetwater Subdivision project, and as
proposed by Experience One Homes, LLC (Applicant).
The Applicant may ultimately purchase the Credits, if they are available, following Permit issuance. Should the
Applicant purchase the Credits at that time, we will complete and execute the Compensatory Mitigation
Responsibility Transfer Form (Transfer Form) within five (5) days of receipt of the full purchase price.
We will additionally provide copies of the completed and executed Transfer Form to the Applicant, the Bank's US
Army Corps (USACE) Project Manager and, if needed, other regulatory agencies. In addition, we will provide USACE
with an updated copy of the Bank's Ledger, reflecting the transaction. Transaction information in the updated Bank
Ledger will include relevant Permit and Applicant information as well as the number and resource type of the debited
Credits.
Should your office have any questions, please contact me at 919.334.9123.
Sincerely,
' 7
Tiffani Bylow
Restoration Systems, LLC

II&I9MI9*A' 00110.1kW

S tE
J.�
SITE AERIAL — NTS
SWEETWATER SUBDIVISION IMPACT MAPS
j:............................I--
-••-� I FUTURE
ZONED ONLY a
FOR
' �� I ��
j COMMERCIAL
FUTURE
�i ZONED ONLY
FOR .
COMMERCIAL .. ..
BANKS
WITHERS & RAVEN EL
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
115 MacKenan Drive Cary, North Carolina 27511 tel: [phone] www.withersravenel.com License No. C-0832
nl Irr-T ILIP1r-V
SHT. 1 - OVERALL IMPACT MAP INDEX
SHT. 2 - IMPACT MAP A
SHT. 3 - IMPACT MAP B
SHT. 4 - IMPACT MAP C
SHT. 5 - IMPACT MAP D
SHT. 6 - IMPACT MAP E
DEVELOPER/OWNER
EXPERIENCE ONE HOMES, LLC
P.O. BOX 5509
CARY, NC 27512
919-991-1402
500 0
1 inch = 500 ft.
TIMKEN FOREST DR.'
.'.
EXISTING•,�•••.....= i
�•��•
ABBINGTON •�
SUBDIVISION_ ` •...
Ey
I .:a •....
.• ••�'�
j � x'4„1 +.
A
SITE-OPEN �q
•.......
SPACE
WITHERS & RAVEN EL
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
115 MacKenan Drive Cary, North Carolina 27511 tel: [phone] www.withersravenel.com License No. C-0832
nl Irr-T ILIP1r-V
SHT. 1 - OVERALL IMPACT MAP INDEX
SHT. 2 - IMPACT MAP A
SHT. 3 - IMPACT MAP B
SHT. 4 - IMPACT MAP C
SHT. 5 - IMPACT MAP D
SHT. 6 - IMPACT MAP E
DEVELOPER/OWNER
EXPERIENCE ONE HOMES, LLC
P.O. BOX 5509
CARY, NC 27512
919-991-1402
500 0
1 inch = 500 ft.

.I
I
■I
I I
I
-----1�--- F'7' TT-TT71— —
I
I
�I
I
8�
CORE BANKS ST
CORE BANKS ST
•
I 1 `♦
EXIST.POND
; r�
� —.m
!
� 1 l 1 I�
1
_r
O •
\/��� I■
,
/
_
, , I ; 1V
1 1 1 � l i t
1
;
EXIST. POND
.I:
1
TIMKEN
.. '
�,—..:.w. .....�:
FOREST DR.
1: ,
■II '1 �`1�� I 1 I yNsw �, \'.`�.�:• ,� .'.4...."
IIF ---J - �. �� ~--_ — I---- O— �I -- _�_— I I I ��'` `I �I Ib _—_ EEe .�e'A . ! ; '/ 1 '1 r•....�
■ice—N � I �-- — J ~ -- �_ I � � 1 �I II 1\ `I I I i f..-..• ..�f« :� E!p �� .may 1 •, ��• N i
-Ll,� IF............ ..• u ; *�• �, ,.�-.���.��:
'MAPA Q __ I ...."" , .,,:; ,�.....e ;
/ ♦ -R R -•n I i. EXIST.POND rrr 'R. :R •1
, J `• ANT >, '':M,F I
■i� - \ \ i \ _J ,L_\ 1 j - i ��` e — — R D -':sw� : 1
Imo_ .� �/�. F � � -\ �� :� _� 1 I e . , _ 31 '• �T;'••• '' �. �•.,%• / 11
�,'� - \ \ -\.77/i �� - \ - � / 1�1 .1 I� , yg!! •y , r•r 7; ;,, r . �, r f♦♦ � � :; N �I' i
li. �� ��� , �\,' � i\, -� r`� \ � � -� ii I 1 z 1 r I �--- � � i . ? i. -��.a 1 , � •.. I
•\\y \ \ \y�" [ \. \ O\ �\ /� \ \ _ /\. - i i i 1 I I r'� — .� ..rrA j I < / 'RKY 7�+-*'e i` /'�°,�•
� \ � � ,\ ��, f�Q� � \ i .,` �\ � � j i i i I � i r � •'•.���°'• ;�� _� r. i. � 1 ' 1 �i�i�+• a '• 1 - p; i 1 i ,•••
Alr
\ \ i\, \ \. \ \� i.. �\ f i i i 1 � � � � ♦♦v�M i• r .R r ; '�j�: ♦♦,♦ ° 'e
I
�`�•-MAP�1F-��.+,;
A�
•� �--- —_ ,S, \ .! Q \ /' i � � i /; / , ♦ / / 1 � I 1 I t t i '/ ' \\\ II ` 11 I .....
I`.e�\ \ ''9s��i\ \ � \� � `�\ v \ l i i , � � ''� ♦� 1/' �i-tea-rl 1 I I ` 1
r ---- �
0\
/
Lu
-Lu
> I I 3' \ ,
I — >
IMPACT MAP INDEX
EXIST.POND
; r�
� —.m
, 111 I I ,'" ,' / ' _ � /
MAP C — #3
— WETLAND IMPACT (PERMANENT)
_r
— STREAM IMPACT (NONE)
MAP E — #5
`_MAP C,�=\off
■II '1 �`1�� I 1 I yNsw �, \'.`�.�:• ,� .'.4...."
IIF ---J - �. �� ~--_ — I---- O— �I -- _�_— I I I ��'` `I �I Ib _—_ EEe .�e'A . ! ; '/ 1 '1 r•....�
■ice—N � I �-- — J ~ -- �_ I � � 1 �I II 1\ `I I I i f..-..• ..�f« :� E!p �� .may 1 •, ��• N i
-Ll,� IF............ ..• u ; *�• �, ,.�-.���.��:
'MAPA Q __ I ...."" , .,,:; ,�.....e ;
/ ♦ -R R -•n I i. EXIST.POND rrr 'R. :R •1
, J `• ANT >, '':M,F I
■i� - \ \ i \ _J ,L_\ 1 j - i ��` e — — R D -':sw� : 1
Imo_ .� �/�. F � � -\ �� :� _� 1 I e . , _ 31 '• �T;'••• '' �. �•.,%• / 11
�,'� - \ \ -\.77/i �� - \ - � / 1�1 .1 I� , yg!! •y , r•r 7; ;,, r . �, r f♦♦ � � :; N �I' i
li. �� ��� , �\,' � i\, -� r`� \ � � -� ii I 1 z 1 r I �--- � � i . ? i. -��.a 1 , � •.. I
•\\y \ \ \y�" [ \. \ O\ �\ /� \ \ _ /\. - i i i 1 I I r'� — .� ..rrA j I < / 'RKY 7�+-*'e i` /'�°,�•
� \ � � ,\ ��, f�Q� � \ i .,` �\ � � j i i i I � i r � •'•.���°'• ;�� _� r. i. � 1 ' 1 �i�i�+• a '• 1 - p; i 1 i ,•••
Alr
\ \ i\, \ \. \ \� i.. �\ f i i i 1 � � � � ♦♦v�M i• r .R r ; '�j�: ♦♦,♦ ° 'e
I
�`�•-MAP�1F-��.+,;
A�
•� �--- —_ ,S, \ .! Q \ /' i � � i /; / , ♦ / / 1 � I 1 I t t i '/ ' \\\ II ` 11 I .....
I`.e�\ \ ''9s��i\ \ � \� � `�\ v \ l i i , � � ''� ♦� 1/' �i-tea-rl 1 I I ` 1
r ---- �
0\
/
Lu
-Lu
> I I 3' \ ,
I — >
SITE AERIAL - NTS
�i -- 1 1 ♦ i IX �X 300 0
MAP D
1 inch = 300 ft.
NO. ReVI510n Date B oes�s�er 5<ale SWEETWATER SUBDIVISION
, — AS NOTED sng r Nm.
Oraw91 —Dale 092015 IMPACT EXHIBITS OVERALL IMPACT MAP INDEX wiTHERs �►vENEL
� cnecEdsy Ion Na. ENGINEERS 1 PLANNERS 1 SURVEYORS
02140249 APEX WAKE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA ns mx<Kenan od e e, ,.,•nwrolm. vsn 1e1:919469-3340 w .y,[rh r a. l.< D«„:e N,. 60832
IMPACT MAP INDEX
MAP A — #1
■I
� —.m
, 111 I I ,'" ,' / ' _ � /
MAP C — #3
— WETLAND IMPACT (PERMANENT)
MAP D — #4
— STREAM IMPACT (NONE)
MAP E — #5
`_MAP C,�=\off
SITE AERIAL - NTS
�i -- 1 1 ♦ i IX �X 300 0
MAP D
1 inch = 300 ft.
NO. ReVI510n Date B oes�s�er 5<ale SWEETWATER SUBDIVISION
, — AS NOTED sng r Nm.
Oraw91 —Dale 092015 IMPACT EXHIBITS OVERALL IMPACT MAP INDEX wiTHERs �►vENEL
� cnecEdsy Ion Na. ENGINEERS 1 PLANNERS 1 SURVEYORS
02140249 APEX WAKE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA ns mx<Kenan od e e, ,.,•nwrolm. vsn 1e1:919469-3340 w .y,[rh r a. l.< D«„:e N,. 60832
IMPACT MAP INDEX
MAP A — #1
— STREAM IMPACT (PERMANENT)
MAP B — #2
— STREAM IMPACT (NONE)
MAP C — #3
— WETLAND IMPACT (PERMANENT)
MAP D — #4
— STREAM IMPACT (NONE)
MAP E — #5
— WETLAND IMPACT (PERMANENT)
SITE AERIAL - NTS
�i -- 1 1 ♦ i IX �X 300 0
MAP D
1 inch = 300 ft.
NO. ReVI510n Date B oes�s�er 5<ale SWEETWATER SUBDIVISION
, — AS NOTED sng r Nm.
Oraw91 —Dale 092015 IMPACT EXHIBITS OVERALL IMPACT MAP INDEX wiTHERs �►vENEL
� cnecEdsy Ion Na. ENGINEERS 1 PLANNERS 1 SURVEYORS
02140249 APEX WAKE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA ns mx<Kenan od e e, ,.,•nwrolm. vsn 1e1:919469-3340 w .y,[rh r a. l.< D«„:e N,. 60832

I / /
CURRENT SFHA PROPC
100 -YEAR FLOODPLAIN I I I 100 -YE,
\_CURRENT SFHA
100 -YEAR FLOODPLAIN
#1 STREAM — 209 LF
/ '(PERMANENT)
CURRENT SFHA
100 -YEAR FLOODPLAIN
ll
290
285
280
275
STREAI
270
265
260
IKADAt'T ADCA
IMPACT AREA #1 —STREAM IMPACT
209 LF (PERMANENT)
CENTERLINE
290
285
280
275
270
CENTERLINE
265
260
—0+50 0+00 0+50 1+00 1+50 2+00 2+50 3+00
12'xlO'CULVERT CROSS—SECTION
SCALE: 1'=100'
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE 10'X10' CULVERT
1. REMOVE ONLY TREES TO INSTALL ROCK CHECK DAM AND ALONG
STREAM DIVERSIONS AND ALONG CULVERT PATHS.
2. INSTALL TEMPORARY ROCK CHECK DAM.
3. CONSTRUCT STREAM DIVERSION CHANNELS IN AREAS SHOWN
ON PLANS.
4. ONCE STREAM DIVERSION CHANNELS HAVE BEEN
CONSTRUCTED, PROVIDE A TEMPORARY DAM TO DIVERT STREAM
FLOW INTO NEW CHANNEL AND AWAY FROM CONSTRUCTION
AREAS.
5. INSTALL SILT FENCE ALONG TOP OF BANK OF EXISTING STREAM
CHANNEL AND STREAM DIVERSION SECTIONS.
6. CLEAR AND GRUB ONLY AREAS NECESSARY TO COMPLETE
CONSTRUCTION OF CULVERTS.
7. CONSTRUCT CULVERTS AND HEADWALLS.
8. EXCAVATE STREAM TO PROVIDE DRAINAGE FROM EXISTING
CREEK THROUGH CULVERTS AND TIE TO EXISTING DOWNSTREAM
CREEK.
9. BACKFILL STREAM SECTIONS OUTSIDE OF NEW STREAM
CHANNELS.
10. GRASS AND SEED DISTURBED AREAS OUTSIDE BETWEEN FILLS
SLOPES AND LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE. GRAPHIC SCALE
11. INSTALL TREE PROTECTION AND SILT FENCE ALONG TOE OF FILL
SLOPES.
12. REMOVE ROCK CHECK DAM AFTER INSTALLATION OF SILT FENCE
ALONG TOE OF FILL SLOPE AND GROUND COVER HAS BEEN
ESTABLISHED. RESTORE AREAS ALONG ROCK CHECK DAM. 1 inch = 60 ft.
Rev1sio° °a`� B °�""°`� _`�°� SWEETWATER SUBDIVISION
AS NOTED si,,.,.,,,,
o„w�oy o„e WITHERS RAVENEL
0920,5
IMPACT EXHIBITS IMPACT MAP A 2
ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
02140249 APEX WAKE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA ��o ry„��,nnc �i��az�s�� i�i,9�9 469 3340 w�m���,�P�ei-gym o-c-0asz

04
—° LOT IMPACT AREA
/I IMPACT AREA #2 - STREAM IMPACT -NONE
1
D40LOT LLJLoZ
I N
406 �� R,�
► I� IW �� I ---- J D LOP
► O] m � 4 J � � I � /i
12 W uo /
N � \ 411
D LOT �I 1
/ ► I� I� 1 �I SCM#1 I — / aw Z
rn ► Q m o
► " ^�' w407
► I I / 01 ti MI D LOT
► l 1 1 / i of �I
I /
'I
\ 4
► BORE PIT 1 0
r �' D LOT �
LOCATIONS
► 408
►� �� s I/
D LOT\
/ i� ► �__ ----� \ s
SANITARY
SEWER
—
,� 40
,SEWER OUTFALL 9
OT �
�j
OTtlt�3—
,O�FF #2 STREAM - NOi — _ ARIAtVFFER
QPR.P� IMPACT DUE TO� = . -
2� BORE AND JACK
ONE ti6� CONSTRUCTION PROPS c
�y 2 RIPARIAN BUFFER
RIPARIAN BUFFER GRAPHIC SCALE
60 0
1 inch = 60 ft.
Revision °a`� By SWEETWATER SUBDIVISION
_ AS NOTED �,�N�.
o„w,9y o„e WITHERS RAVENEL
09-2015 IMPACT MAP B IMPACT EXHIBITS 3
a,ekao- mbNo. ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
02140249 APEX WAKE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA ��o ry„��,nnc �i��az�s�� 1,1 919+193340 No -c-0932

w�
IMPACT AREA
IMPACT AREA #3 - STREAM IMPACT
81 LF (PERMANENT)
290 290
CENTEu
j GLORIOSA i
285 STREET 285
4�I
I
i
280 280
HEADWALL HEAD AL
REINING WALL
275 275
STREAM CENTERLINE
36„ 80.6S ENT
270 12" BURY RCP@3S�o
INV IN=EL 271.33
12" BURY
265 INV OUT=EL 268.50 265
260 — 260
—0+50 0+00 0+50 1+00 1+50 22-005.47
36' RCP CULVERT CROSS—SECTION
SCALE: 1'=100'
308 30 1
C LOT C T C LOT 5 \ \ \
2 \
SCM #3 \ GRAPHIC SCALE
—25" � I� 60 v
1 inch = 60 ft.
No. Revision Date B oes�s�e, 5<a�e SWEETWATER SUBDIVISION
t — AS NOTED
D.o By WITHER8 RAVENEL
09.2015 IMPACT EXHIBITS IMPACT MAP C 4
cneakdBy obNa. ENGINEERS 1 PLANNERS 1 SURVEYORS
02140249 1 APEX WAKE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA ns mx<Ke"a"od e e, ,.„ nw,"r": vsn 10:91-643340 w .wo-ne,,,,, l.< Li, s. ".Coo3z

LU
Z.
J
B LOT
SCM #3
_ g
260
fop
J
ZONE 3 RIPARIAN BUFFE /
/ ;� A / SANITARY .0000
ER
✓,
ZONE 2 RIPARIAN BUFFER 'OUTFALL
306
_ _ ice/
C LOT _ _ / ZONE 1 RIPARIAN BUFF W / /$S�
oe
/
/
/-
/ 1 255 \ ZONE 1 RIPARIAN B UFFV No / ///
/ ////
#4' STREAM - NO ZONE 2 RIPARIAN BUFFE 00,
IMPACT DUE TO
o
C LOT �� BORE AND JACK
CONSTRUCTION
\) v ZONE 3 RIPARIA 6GFFE
1 ! y' IMPACT AREA
x SANITARY SEWER /// / //// IMPACT AREA #4 - STREAM IMPACT 0 LF
//
—� BORE PIT `�, OUTFALL // /Ss //
LOCATION , //
/
E
I
// nv 0
1 inch = 60 ft.
" KQV11O° Ua,e 11""°`� SWEETWATER SUBDIVISION
_ AS NOTED
o„w�o� o„e WITHERS RAVENEL
D — 09-2°15 IMPACT EXHIBITS IMPACT MAP D 5
�ji 0eked 6y iobno. ENiINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
02140249 APEX WAKE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA ��o ry„� -,1h C­I.� 2z 11 i,i,9194e 14o w�m���,�P�ei-gym k o-c-0asz

o
3
IMPACT ARFA
IMPACT AREA #5 - WETLAND IMPACT (PERMANENT)
0.140 AC
GRAPHIC SCALE
60 0
1 inch = 60 ft.
".."'— 1 U�t, °
AS NOTED SWEETWATER SUBDIVISION
WITHERS RAV E N E L
09.2015 IMPACT EXHIBITS IMPACT MAP E 6
� 0=ymbNa. ENGINEERS I PLANNERS I SURVEYORS
02140249 APEX WAKE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA o <,-,%-1hC-1— 27,1ee19+e9-3140 L.—,N. 00832