20100952 Ver 1_Year 2 Monitoring Report_2015_20160224

FINAL
YEAR 2 (2015) ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT
MARTIN'S CREEK II MITIGATION PROJECT
Cherokee County, North Carolina
DMS Project No. 92633 (Contract No. 005717)
USACE Action ID No. SAW — 2009-00209/DWR Project No. 10-0952
SCO No. 08-07251-01
Data Collection — March -November 2015
Hiwassee River Basin
Cataloging Unit 06020002170010
SUBMITTED TO/PREPARED FOR:
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Mitigation Services
217 West Jones Street, Suite 3000A
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603
December 2015

FINAL
YEAR 2 (2015) ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT
MARTIN'S CREEK II MITIGATION PROJECT
Cherokee County, North Carolina
DMS Project No. 92633 (Contract No. 005717)
USACE Action ID No. SAW — 2009-00209/DWR Project No. 10-0952
SCO No. 08-07251-01
Data Collection — March -November 2015
Hiwassee River Basin
Cataloging Unit 06020002170010
SUBMITTED TO/PREPARED FOR:
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Division of Mitigation Services
217 West Jones Street, Suite 3000A
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603
SUBMITTED BY:
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, North Carolina 27603
December 2015

Table of Contents
1.0 PROJECT SUMMARY...................................................................................................... 1
2.0 METHODOLOGY............................................................................................................. 3
2.1 Streams........................................................................................................................4
2.2 Vegetation................................................................................................................... 5
2.3 Wetland Hydrology..................................................................................................... 5
3.0 REFERENCES........................................................................................................................ 6
Appendices
APPENDIX A. PROJECT BACKGROUND DATA AND MAPS
Figure 1. Vicinity Map
Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Table 4. Project Baseline Information and Attributes
APPENDIX B. VISUAL ASSESSMENT DATA
Figures 2 and 2A -2C. Current Conditions Plan View
Tables 5A -5E. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Table 6. Vegetation Condition Assessment
Stream Fixed -Station Photographs
Vegetation Monitoring Photographs
APPENDIX C. VEGETATION PLOT DATA
Table 7. Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment
Table 8. CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata
Table 9. Total and Planted Stems by Plot and Species
APPENDIX D. STREAM SURVEY DATA
Cross-section Plots
Longitudinal Profile Plots
Substrate Plots
Table IOa- IOf. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Table Ila -11f Monitoring Data
APPENDIX E. HYDROLOGY DATA
Table 12. Verification of Bankfull Events
Table 13. Wetland Hydrology Criteria Attainment Summary
Figure E1. Martin's Creek I130-70 Percentile Graph for Rainfall
Groundwater Gauge Graphs
Martin's Creek II (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 2 of 5 (2015)
DMS Project Number 92633 December 2015
Cherokee County, North Carolina Table of Contents

1.0 PROJECT SUMMARY
The North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality - Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) has
established the Martin's Creek II Mitigation Project (Site) located in Cherokee County, just south of the
town of Murphy. The Site includes a 93.87 -acre easement encompassed within 14 -digit Cataloging Unit
06020002170010 of the Hiwassee River Basin (Figure 1, Appendix B and Table 4, Appendix A). Land use
at the Site, prior to mitigation activities, was composed of livestock pasture, open land, a residence, and
forested areas. Martin's Creek and its tributaries were impaired by historical and current land management
practices, which included timber harvesting, pasture, channelization, and livestock grazing. Completed
project activities, reporting history, completion dates, project contacts, and project attributes are
summarized in Tables 1-4 (Appendix A).
The Site is located along Martin's Creek and several unnamed tributaries, which have been assigned Stream
Index Number 1-49 and Best Usage Classification of C. Site streams are listed on the NCDWQ draft 2014
and final 2012 Section 303(d) list of impaired streams due to a fair bioclassification for reduced
ecological/biological integrity and fish communities, and elevated levels of fecal coliform bacteria. The
Site is located within a Targeted Local Watershed that has been identified for stream and buffer restoration
opportunities (NCDMS 2008).
The Site lies within the focus area of the Peachtree -Martins Creek Local Watershed Plan (LWP) and
roughly corresponds to Restoration site #1 & Preservation site #1 of the LWP project atlas (NCDMS 2007).
Goals of the LWP include implementation of wetland and stream restoration projects that reduce sources
of sediment and nutrients by restoring riparian buffers, stabilizing stream banks, and restoring natural
channel geomorphology, particularly in headwater streams.
The project goals will directly address stressors identified in the Peachtree -Martins Creek LWP, namely
lack of riparian vegetation, channel modification, excess sediment inputs, excess nutrient inputs, and
bacterial contamination as follows.
• Restore geomorphically stable stream channels within the Site;
• Restore or enhance wetlands;
• Exclude livestock from accessing project streams, wetlands, and riparian zones;
• Improve and restore hydrologic connections and achieve uplift of ecosystem functions;
• Improve water quality within the Site by reducing bank erosion, improving nutrient and
sediment removal, and stabilizing stream banks;
• Restore and preserve headwater tributaries to the Peachtree -Martins Creek Watershed and
the Hiwassee River; and
• Improve aquatic and terrestrial habitat by improving substrate and in -stream cover, adding
woody debris, reducing water temperatures, and restoring riparian habitat.
The Site mitigation plan was completed in March 2010 with the final design and construction plans
completed in November 2010 (Table 2, Appendix A). Proj ect construction was completed between October
2012 and July 2013. The implemented mitigation is as follows (Figure 2, Appendix B and Table 1,
Appendix A).
Martin's Creek II (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 2 of 5 (2015)
DMS Project Number 92633 December 2015
Cherokee County, North Carolina page 1

8817 Stream Mitigation Units
• Restoring approximately 3486 linear feet of stream channel through construction of stable
channel at the historic floodplain elevation.
• Enhancing (level I) approximately 832 linear feet of stream channel through cessation of
current land use practices, installing grade control structures, repairing bank erosion,
restoring proper channel dimension, and planting with native forest vegetation.
• Enhancing (level II) approximately 1903 linear feet of stream channel through cessation of
current land use practices, removing invasive species, and planting with native forest
vegetation.
• Preserving 21,327 linear feet of stream channel.
5.97 Riparian Wetland Mitigation Units
• Restoring approximately 5.20 acres of riparian wetland by removing spoil castings,
restoring stream inverts to historic elevations rehydrating stream -side wetlands, removing
drain tile, eliminating land use practices, and planting with native forest vegetation.
• Enhancing approximately 1.61 acres of riparian wetland by fencing livestock and
supplemental planting.
Planting a native woody riparian buffer (at least 30 feet in width) adjacent to restored/enhanced
streams and wetlands within the Site.
• Protecting the Site in perpetuity with a conservation easement.
Stream Success Criteria
Stream restoration success criteria for the Site are based on the Stream Mitigation Guidelines issued in
April 2003 by the USACE and NCDWQ. Success criteria for stream restoration will include 1)
documentation of two bankfull events, 2) little change in the channel cross-section from as -built conditions,
3) stable longitudinal profile, 4) substrate consistency, and 5) photographic evidence of stability.
Bankfull Events
Two bankfull flow events in separate years must be documented within the 5 -year monitoring period.
Otherwise, the stream monitoring will continue until two bankfull events have been documented in separate
years.
Cross-sections
Riffle cross-sections on restoration and enhancement reaches should be stable and should show little change
in bankfull area, maximum depth ratio, and width -to -depth ratio. Riffle cross-sections should generally fall
within the parameters defined for channels of the appropriate Rosgen stream type. If any changes do occur,
these changes will be evaluated to assess whether the stream channel is showing signs of instability.
Indicators of instability include a vertically incising thalweg or eroding channel banks. Changes in the
channel that indicate a movement toward stability or enhanced habitat include a decrease in the width -to -
depth ratio in meandering channels or an increase in pool depth.
Lonizitudinal Profile
Longitudinal profile data for the stream reach should show that bedform features are remaining stable. The
riffles should be steeper and shallower than the pools, while the pools should be deep with flat water surface
slopes. The relative percentage of riffles and pools should not change significantly from the design
parameters.
Bed Material Anal
Substrate materials in restoration reaches should indicate a progression towards or the maintenance of
coarser materials in the riffle features and smaller particles in the pool features.
Martin's Creek II (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 2 of 5 (2015)
DMS Project Number 92633 December 2015
Cherokee County, North Carolina page 2

Photo Reference Sites
Photographs will be used to evaluate channel aggradation or degradation, bank erosion, success of riparian
vegetation, and effectiveness of erosion control measures subjectively. Lateral photos should not indicate
excessive erosion or continuing degradation of the banks. A series of photos over time should indicate
successive maturation of riparian vegetation.
Vegetation Success Criteria
Success criteria have been established to verify that the vegetation component supports community
elements necessary for forest development. Success criteria for this project includes an average density of
320 planted stems per acre must be surviving in the first three monitoring years. Subsequently, 290 planted
stems per acre must be surviving in year 4, and 260 planted stems per acre in year 5.
Wetland Success Criteria
Hydrologic success will be based on conditions of on-site reference wetlands. Success will be determined
by the following criteria.
Years One Through Three
Hydrologic success criteria will be met if the Site demonstrates groundwater table levels within 12 inches
of the soil surface for a minimum of 13% of the growing season (this criterion reflects a deviation of 50%
from the duration of saturation expected for this type of wetland system (-25%). Success for monitoring
years one through three will be determined based on this 50% tolerance of deviation from the duration of
wetland hydrology at the reference sites.
Years Four and Five
Success for monitoring years four and five will be determined based on a 20% tolerance of deviation from
the duration of wetland hydrology at the reference sites. Therefore, it is expected that in years four and five
the site will achieve a minimum of 20% saturation. Based on reference conditions and the criterion stated
above, it is expected that reference soil saturation for years one through five will continue to exceed the
regulatory 12.5% minimum requirement of the growing season for Cherokee County. In order to attain
conditions suitable for the formation of wetland vegetation and hydric soils, the Site should be saturated
within 12 inches of the surface or inundated for consecutive period equal to 24 days. However, to meet
hydrologic success criteria and mimic the reference wetland hydrology, the site should demonstrate wetland
hydrology for a minimum of 25 days in years one through three. In years four and five, this will increase
to a minimum of 38 days. Overbank flooding from the adjacent channel will also be noted during
monitoring.
Reference areas will be monitored for a minimum of five years.
Summary information/data related to the occurrence of items such as beaver or encroachment and statistics
related to performance of various project and monitoring elements can be found in tables and figures within
this report's appendices. Narrative background and supporting information formerly found in these reports
can be found in the Baseline Monitoring Report (formerly Mitigation Plan) and in the Mitigation Plan
(formerly the Restoration Plan) documents available on the Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) website.
All raw data supporting the tables and figures in the appendices are available from DMS upon request.
2.0 METHODOLOGY
Monitoring of the Site's restoration efforts will be performed until agreed upon success criteria are fulfilled.
Monitoring is proposed for the stream channel, riparian vegetation, and hydrology for a period of five years
(Figures 2 & 2A -2C, Appendix A). Monitoring reports of collected data will be submitted no later than
December of each monitoring year.
Martin's Creek II (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 2 of 5 (2015)
DMS Project Number 92633 December 2015
Cherokee County, North Carolina page 3

2.1 Streams
Post -restoration monitoring will be conducted for five years following the completion of construction to
evaluate the effectiveness of the restoration practices. Measurements were taken using a Topcon GTS 303
total station and Recon data collector. The raw total station file was processed using Carlson Survey
Software into a Computer Aided Design (CAD) file. Coordinates were exported as a text/ASCII file to
Microsoft Excel for processing and presentation of data, and are not georeferenced. Pebble counts were
completed using the modified Wolman method (Rosgen 1993). Monitored stream parameters include
stream dimension (cross-sections), pattern (longitudinal survey), profile (profile survey), and photographic
documentation. Stream data can be found in Appendix D.
Bankfull Events
The occurrence of bankfull events within the monitoring period will be documented by the use of a crest
gauge and photographs. One crest gauge was installed to record the highest watermark between site visits;
the gauge will be checked each Site visit to determine if a bankfull event has occurred (Figure 2A, Appendix
B). Photographs will be used to document the occurrence of debris lines and sediment deposition on the
floodplain during monitoring site visits.
Five bankfull events have been documented to date during monitoring year 2 (2015) for a total of eleven
bankfull events during years 1 (2014) and 2 (2015).
Cross-sections
A total of 19 permanent cross-sections, 12 riffle and 7 pool, were established and will be used to evaluate
stream dimension; locations are depicted on Figures 2, 2A, and 2B (Appendix B) Because riffle cross-
sections are critical in determining bankfull design parameters, the number of riffle cross-sections
established will generally outnumber pool cross-sections. Each cross-section will be marked on both banks
with permanent pins to establish the exact transect used. A common benchmark will be used for cross-
sections and consistently used to facilitate easy comparison of year-to-year data. The annual cross-section
survey will include points measured at all breaks in slope, including top of bank, bankfull, inner berm, edge
of water, and thalweg, if the features are present. Riffle cross-sections will be classified using the Rosgen
Stream Classification System.
No areas of concern or indicators of instability were observed during year 2 (2015) monitoring; therefore,
stream dimension measurements are currently meeting success criteria.
Longitudinal Profile
After Site construction, approximately 4493 linear feet of longitudinal profile was completed to document
baseline conditions. Longitudinal profile will be resurveyed annually for the duration of the five-year
monitoring period. Measurements include thalweg, water surface, bankfull, and top of low bank. Each of
these measurements will be taken at the head of each channel unit (e.g., riffle, pool) and at the maximum
pool depth. The survey will be tied to a permanent benchmark.
No areas of concern or indicators of bedform instability were observed during year 2 (2015) monitoring;
therefore, stream longitudinal profile measurements are currently meeting success criteria.
Bed Material Analysis
Pebble counts will be conducted annually on one permanent riffle cross-section (100 -counts) at the time
cross-section and longitudinal surveys are performed during the five year monitoring period. These samples
will reveal changes in sediment gradation over time as the stream adjusts to upstream sediment loads.
Year 2 (2015) pebble counts indicate the maintenance of coarser materials in the measured riffle feature;
therefore, bed material is currently meeting success criteria.
Martin's Creek II (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 2 of 5 (2015)
DMS Project Number 92633 December 2015
Cherokee County, North Carolina page 4

Photo Reference Sites
A total of 26 photographs will be used to visually document restoration success for at least five years
following construction. Photographs will be taken from a height of approximately five to six feet. Photo
locations will be recorded using sub -meter GPS to ensure that the same locations (and view directions) on
the Site are monitored in each monitoring period.
Year 2 (2015) photo reference sites show no channel aggradation or degradation, or bank erosion. In
addition, riparian vegetation is meeting success criteria based on stem counts across the Site; however, it is
too early in the monitoring period to show successive maturation of riparian vegetation.
2.2 Vegetation
After planting was completed, an initial evaluation was performed to verify planting methods were
successful and to determine initial species composition and density. Fifteen sample vegetation plots (10 -
meter by 10 -meter) were installed and measured within the Site as per guidelines established in CVS -DMS
Protocol for Recording Vegetation, Version 4.2 (Lee et al. 2008). Vegetation plots are permanently
monumented with 6 -foot metal t -posts at each corner. In each sample plot, vegetation parameters to be
monitored include species composition and species density. Visual observations of the percent cover of
shrub and herbaceous species will also be documented by photograph. Vegetation plot data can be found
in Appendix C.
Supplemental planting occurred at the Site in early 2015 with 3000 bare root stems as follows (Figures 2A -
2C (Appendix A).
500 river birch (Betula nigra)
500 sycamore (Platanus occidentalis)
500 tulip poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera)
500 black gum (Nyssa sylvatica)
500 northern red oak (Quercus rubra)
500 Shumard's oak (Quercus shumardii)
3000
Year 2 stem count measurements indicate an average of 459 planted stems per acre (excluding livestakes)
across the Site; therefore, the Site is currently meeting vegetation success criteria. In addition, all fifteen
individual vegetation plots met success criteria based on planted stems alone.
2.3 Wetland Hydrology
Thirteen RDS Ecotone WM groundwater monitoring gauges were installed within Site wetland restoration
areas to monitor groundwater hydrology (Figure 2A, Appendix A). Hydrological sampling will continue
for five years with gauges recording daily and downloaded at a minimum of quarterly throughout the
growing season (April 14 -October 21). In addition, an on-site rain gauge will document rainfall data for
comparison of groundwater conditions with extended drought conditions. Finally, groundwater gauges
located within riverine wetlands adjacent to restored stream reaches will supplement crest gauge
measurements to confirm overbank flooding events.
Twelve of the thirteen groundwater gauges met or exceeded wetland success criteria for the Year 2 (2015)
monitoring year. Although it is too early in the monitoring period to determine the extent of wetland that
is currently meeting wetland hydrology success criteria, Year 2 (2015) data indicates that the majority of
the Site wetland area is successful.
Martin's Creek II (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 2 of 5 (2015)
DMS Project Number 92633 December 2015
Cherokee County, North Carolina page 5

3.0 REFERENCES
ACIS-NOAA Regional Climate Centers. WETS Table Murphy, NC6001. Available online at:
http://agacis.rcc-acis.org/37039/wets/results [November 20, 2015].
Lee, M.T., R.K. Peet, S.D. Roberts, and T.R. Wentworth. 2008. CVS -DMS Protocol for Recording
Vegetation, Levels 1-2 Plot Sampling Only, Version 4.2. Available online at
http://cvs.bio.unc.edu/methods.htm.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ). 2012. Final North Carolina Water Quality
Assessment and Impaired Waters List (NC 2012 Integrated Report Category 5, 303(d) List)
(online). Available: http://portal.ncdenr.org/c/document library/get file?uuid=9d45b3b4-d066-
4619-82e6-ea8eaOe01930&groupld=38364 [February 17, 2014]. North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources, Raleigh, North Carolina.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ). 2014. Draft 2014 NC 303(d) List -Category 5
Assessments Requiring TMDLs (online). Available: http://portal.ncdenr.org/c/document library
get_file?uuid=096fb2ff-296b-4bd8-8b88-e83bb5984be6&groupld=38364 [February 17, 2014].
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Raleigh, North Carolina.
North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services (NCDMS) and Equinox Environmental Consultation and
Design. 2007. Peachtree -Martins Creek Local Watershed Plan (Phase3), Hiwassee River Basin,
Cherokee and Clay Counties, North Carolina. October 2007 Watershed Management Plan. [Online
WWW]. Available URL: http://www.hrwc.net/pmcplan/pmc plan_ executive_summary_.pdf.
North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services (NCDMS). 2010. Martin's Creek II Mitigation Plan. NC
Department of Environment and Natural Resources. Available online at
http://its.enr.state.nc.us/WebLink8/0/doc/140433/Pa eg 2.aspx
North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services (NCDMS). 2014. Annual Monitoring and Closeout
Reporting Format, Data Requirements, and Content Guidance, dated February 2014. NC
Department of Environment and Natural Resources. Available online at
http://portal.ncdenr.org/c/document�library/get file?p 1 id=60409&folderld=18877169&name=
DLFE-86604.pdf
North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services (NCDMS). 2008. Hiwassee River Basin Restoration
Priorities 2008 (online). Available: http://portal.ncdenr.org/c/document library/get file?uuid=
ea2df99d-3031-4c7b-87ea-79d56a3e4ale&groupld=60329. North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources, Raleigh, North Carolina.
Rosgen. 1993. Applied Fluvial Geomorphology, Training Manual. River Short Course, Wildland
Hydrology, Pagosa Springs, CO.
United States Army Corps of Engineers, United States Environmental Protection Agency, North Carolina
Wildlife Resources Commission, North Carolina Division of Water Quality (USACE et al.). 2003.
Stream Mitigation Guidelines.
United States Geological Survey (USGS). 1974. Hydrologic Unit Map - 1974. State of North Carolina.
Martin's Creek II (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 2 of 5 (2015)
DMS Project Number 92633 December 2015
Cherokee County, North Carolina page 6

Weakley, Alan S. 2012. Flora of the Southern and Mid -Atlantic States. Available online at:
http://www.herbarium.unc.edu/WeakleysFIora.pdf [September 28, 2012]. University of North
Carolina Herbarium, North Carolina Botanical Garden, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill,
North Carolina.
Martin's Creek 11 (final)
DMS Project Number 92633
Cherokee County, North Carolina
Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 2 of 5 (2015)
December 2015
page 7

APPENDIX A
PROJECT BACKGROUND DATA AND MAPS
Figure 1. Vicinity Map
Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Table 4. Project Baseline Information and Attributes
Martin's Creek II (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 2 of 5 (2015)
DMS Project Number 92633 December 2015
Cherokee County, North Carolina Appendices

`\ ti✓` y 'Ebenezer �1 y
ff
th
�, CFikR�i tomo 5 V . i
` Regia ,eti�
Grape seek
o �' %' • BEEF J� y\, �� (i
Project Location
M1 M�Y% reek 35.053464°N, 84.024879°Wt .
QF
.iidlCUp-
}{iL
�,{U�j \\. - 'oP _ _ 835 Iy,J,.; .•F�' (^1 - -ice
A NT AIiALe j� r
R� �;A'1lOtVA[ F E T w,
CLA_ Y
U U X iiNfO — — inoeF7.rrf; e` ARY
j UU U k I4J Ur U U U U k CO'
jLW U U U U U U U U U U U U U k
j UU U U Idft U U U U U U U U k y
j UU U "kD U U U U U U U k
jLW U U U U U U U U U U U U k m n o
U x U x
North Carolina
Department of
Environmental Quality
Division of
Axiom Environmental, Inc. Mitigation Services
U
U Ux
1U k
U U loot pp
A'S'S
U iU U
x
nokrrrr fait

Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits
Martin's Creek 11 Mitigation Site
Mitigation Credit Summations
Stream Riparian Wetland
Nonriparian Wetland
8817 5.97
---
Pro'ects Components
Station Range
Existing Linear
Footage/Acreage
Priority
Approach
Restoration/Restoration Linear
Restoration Footage/Acreage
Equivalent
Mitigation Mitigation
Ratio Credits
Comment
Right Prong Martin's Creek and UTs
17,234
---
Preservation 17,234-203= 17,031
5:1 3406.2
Three short reaches in upstream portion of RP UTl do not
have adequate buffer to claim credit and therefore have been
removed from the total linear footage and calculated
mitigation credits.
Right Prong Martin's Creek and UTs
971
---
Enhance II 971
2.5:1 388.4
Enhancement Level II - invasive species controls and
localized erosion stabilization.
Martin's Creek UTs
4296
---
Preservation 4296
5:1 859.2
Martin's Creek*
857
---
Enhance II 857
5:1 * 171.4
Enhancement Level II - invasive species controls and
localized erosion stabilization.
UT -2 to Martin's Creek
75
---
Enhance II 75
2.5:1 30.0
UT 1 (Reach 3) to Martin's CreekLevel
Station 00+00 to 03+37
337
Enhance I 337
1.5:1 224.7
I stream enhancement - grade control structures, repair
bank erosion, and restore proper dimension.
UT 1-3 (Reach 1) to Martin's CreekLevel
Station 00+00 to 04+95
495
Enhance I 495
1.5:1 330.0
I stream enhancement - grade control structures, repair
bank erosion, and restore proper dimension.
UT 1 (Reach 2) to Martin's Creek Station
00+00 to 10+52
1052
I
Restoration 1052
1:1 1052
Construction of a new channel on the existing floodplain.
UT 1 (Reach 4) to
Martin's Creek
05+46 to 05+91
332
II
51
37
Restoration 941
100
1:1 51.0
Construction of a new channel in a low slope valley.
05+91 to 06+35**
2:1** 18.5
06+35 to 15+75
1:1 941.0
15+75 to 16+75**
2:1** 50.0
U T 1-3 (Reach 2)
UMartin's Creek
to
05+54 to 05+90
1068
II
35
Restoration 20
1250
1:1 35.0
Construction of a new channel in a low slope valley.
05+90 to 06+10***
2:1*** 10.0
06+10 to 18+59
1:1 1250.0
Wetland Restoration
---
---
5.14
Restoration
0.06
1:1 5.14
Restoration of riparian wetlands through stream restoration
activities, filling abandoned channels and drain tiles,
removing spoil castings, and planting.
2:1^ 0.03
Wetland Enhancement
1.61
---
Enhancement 1.604
0.006
2:1 0.802
Enhancement of existing riparian wetlands by fencing
livestock and planting.
4:1' 0.002
Component Summation
Restoration Level
Stream pinear footage)
Riparian Wetland (acreage) Nonriparian Wetland (acreage)
Restoration
3486
5.20 —
Enhancement (Level I)
832
--
Enhancement (Level II)
1903
1.61 --
Preservation
21,327
--
Totals
27,548
6.81
Mitigation Units
8817 SMUs
5.97 Riparian WMUs 0.00 Nonriparian WMUs
* Martin's Creek proper is located beneath a power line; therefore, a credit ratio of 5:1 has been used to calculate mitigation units.
** UTl (Reach 4) stations 05+91 to 06+35 and 15+75 to 16+75 are located beneath a power line; therefore, a credit ratio of 2:1 has been used to calculate mitigation units.
*** UTI -3 (Reach 2) station 05+90 to 06+10 is located beneath a power line; therefore, a credit ratio of 2:1 has been used to calculate mitigation units.
^0.06 acres of wetland restoration is located beneath a power line; therefore, a credit ratio of 2:1 has been used to calculate mitigation units.
'0.006 acres of wetland enhancement is located beneath a power line; therefore, a credit ratio of 4:1 has been used to calculate mitigation units.
Martin's Creek II (final)
DMS Project Number 92633
Cherokee County, North Carolina
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
Monitoring Year 2 of 5 (2015)
December 2015
Appendices

Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Martin's Creek II Mitigation Site
Activity or Deliverable
Data Collection
Complete
Completion
or Deliver
Mitigation Plan
January 2010 -July
2010
September 2010
Final Design — Construction Plans
September 2010-
March 2011
March 2011
Construction
--
October 2012 -July 2013
Temporary S&E Mix applied to Entire Project Site
--
October 2012 -July 2013
Permanent Seed Mix applied to the Entire Project Site
--
October 2012 -July 2013
Bare Root; Containerized; and B&B Plantings for the
Entire Project Site
--
March 2014
Mitigation Plan/ As -Built (Year 0 Monitoring
Baseline)
April 2014
April 2014
Year 1 Monitoring
October 2014
December 2014
Warranty Supplemental Planting
--
March 2015
Year 2 Monitoring
November 2015
December 2015
Year 3 Monitoring
3201 Glenridge Drive
Year 4 Monitoring
Raleigh, NC 27604
Year 5 Monitoring
Baseline Data Collection
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
Table 3. Project Contacts Table
Martin's Creek II Mitigation Site
Designer
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc.
797 Haywood Road, Suite 201
Asheville, NC 28806
Micky Clemmons 828-350-1408
Construction Plans and Sediment and
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc.
Erosion Control Plans
797 Haywood Road, Suite 201
Asheville, NC 28806
Micky Clemmons 828-350-1408
Construction Contractor
River Works, Inc.
6105 Chapel Hill Rd.
Raleigh, NC 27607
919-582-3574
Planting Contractor
Carolina Silvics, Inc.
908 Indian Trail Road
Edenton, NC 27932
[phone]
As -built Surveyor
Turner Land Surveying. PLLC
3201 Glenridge Drive
Raleigh, NC 27604
919-875-1378
Baseline Data Collection
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, NC 27603
Grant Lewis 919-215-1693
Martin's Creek II (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 2 of 5 (2015)
DMS Project Number 92633 December 2015
Cherokee County, North Carolina Appendices

Table 4. Project Attribute Table
Martin's Creek II Mitigation Site
Project County
Cherokee County, North Carolina
Physiographic Region
Blue Ridge
Ecoregion
Broad Basins
Project River Basin
Hiwassee
USGS HUC for Project (14 digit)
06020002170010
NCDWQ Sub -basin for Project
04-05-02
Planning Area
Yes — Peachtree -Martins Creek LWP
WRC Class (Warm, Cool, Cold)
Cold
% of project easement fenced or
demarcated
100
Beaver activity observed during
design phase?
No
Right Prong Martin's
Creek
Martin's Creek
RP UTI
Mainstem
MC UTI
MC UTI -3
MC UT2
Mainstem
LII Enh
PI
Rest
LI
Enh
PI
Rest
Drainage Area
.17
0.6
0.02-0.18
0.07-0.08
0.39
6.81
Stream Order (USGS topo)
1 st
3rd
2nd
I st
1st
3rd
Restored Length (feet)
Perennial or Intermittent
I/P
I/P
P
P
P
P
P
P
Watershed Type
Rural
Watershed impervious cover
<10%
NCDWQ AU/Index number
1-49 (Martin's Creek), 1-49-3 (Right Prong Martins Creek)
NCDWQ Classification
C C I C C C
303d listed?
No
Upstream of a 303d listed
No
Reasons for 303d listed segment
NA
Total acreage of easement
93.87
Total existing vegetated acreage
of easement
Total planted restoration acreage
17 acres
Rosgen Classification of
preexisting
B
B
Eb/Fb/B
/G
Cb/G Eb/B
OF B C
Rosgen Classification of As -built
B
B
B/C
B/C B
C B C
Valley type
II
II VIII VIII VIII
Valley slope
N/A
0.015-0.05 0.007-0.04 N/A N/A
Cowardin classification of
proposed
N/A
N/A N/A N/A N/A
Trout waters designation
No
Species of concern, endangered
etc.
No
Dominant Soil Series
Cullowhee fine sandy
loam
Thurmont-
Dillard Complex
Arkaqua loam
Dillard loam
Arkaqua
loam
Arkaqua
loam
Arkaqua
loam
Martin's Creek II (final)
DMS Project Number 92633
Cherokee County, North Carolina
Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 2 of 5 (2015)
December 2015
Appendices

APPENDIX B
VISUAL ASSESSMENT DATA
Figures 2 and 2A -2C. Current Conditions Plan View (CCPV)
Tables 5A -5E. Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Table 6. Vegetation Condition Assessment
Stream Station Photographs
Vegetation Plot Photographs
Martin's Creek II (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 2 of 5 (2015)
DMS Project Number 92633 December 2015
Cherokee County, North Carolina Appendices

Fig. 2C -- _ 1
wo Ice
Right Prong Tributaries 4=..
i.
F.
1 �
y V
Aw
a
r
it
AWPF
Qr
Martins Creek Tributaries Fi 2B
4�
Fig.' -2A
0 500 1,000 2,000 3,000 4
Feet ��ya
_ ,'u - sA_ ru , .. -' �. � .4_ Y -.k. .. .1 � t '.. `�.�a� .'int -�_� � J• IIVIJ""'.'V'

Axiom Environmental, Inc.
Axiom Environmental
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, NC 27603
[phone]
CURRENT CONDITIONS PLAN VIEW
MARTINS CREEK II
DMS PROJECT # 92633
Cherokee County, North Carolina
Dwn. by.
KRJ
FIGURE
Date:
Nov 2015
2A
Project:
12-004.16

Axiom Environmental, Inc.
Axiom Environmental
218 Snow Avenue
Raleigh, NC 27603
[phone]
CURRENT CONDITIONS PLAN VIEW
MARTINS CREEK II (MARTINS CREEK TRIBUTARIES)
DMS PROJECT # 92633
Cherokee County, North Carolina
Dwn. by.
KRJ
FIGURE
Date:
Nov 2015
2B
Project:
12-004.16

btreams
Monitoring Reach
PlotsCvS
4 oil Photo Points
jr
44
Omm ear
250 500 1,000 1,500
Feet
• • b
� "�' 'y��� _. .. r� �.'��»k�'1 i4�f;1► moi. X + �O
• r
� _ „i.. r : r ` t T +r4! R � : ,¢a� �� �-Tt �` /r 1' r ;A ,�'A. � , A � ^• y
M
!
_♦ r'. —

Table 5A Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Reach ID UTI Reach 4
Assessed Length 1129
Adjusted %
Number
Number with
Footage with
for
Major
Stable,
Total
Number of
Amount of
% Stable,
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Channel
Channel
Performing
Number in
Unstable
Unstable
Performing
Woody
Woody
Woody
Cate o
Sub-Cateciory
Metric
as Intended
As -built
Se ments
Foota a
as Intended
Vegetation
Ve elation
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run units)
1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect
flow laterally (not to include point bars)
0
0
100%
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting
0
0
100%
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate
23
23
100%
3. Meander Pool
Condition
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.6)
—
25
25
100%
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)
25
25
100%
4.Thalweg Position
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)
25
25
100%
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)
25
25
100%
2. Bank
1. Scoured/Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or
scour and erosion
0
0
100%
100%
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2. Undercut
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable
0
0
100%
100%
and are providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse
0
0
100%
100%
Totals
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
$
$
o
100/o
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill.
$
$
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.
$
$
100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
15%. (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
$
$
100%
4. Habitat
Pool forming structures maintaining — Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull
Depth ratio > 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base -flow.
$
$
o
100/o

Table 56 Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Reach ID UTI Reach 3
Assessed Length 337
Adjusted %
Number
Number with
Footage with
for
Major
Stable,
Total
Number of
Amount of
% Stable,
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Channel
Channel
Performing
Number in
Unstable
Unstable
Performing
Woody
Woody
Woody
Cate o
Sub-Cateciory
Metric
as Intended
As -built
Se mentsFoota
a
as Intended
Vegetation
Ve etation
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run units)
1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect
flow laterally (not to include point bars)
0
0
100%
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting
0
0
100%
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate
10
10
100%
3. Meander Pool
Condition
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.6)
—
10
10
100%
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)
10
10
100%
4.Thalweg Position
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)
10
10
100%
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)
10
10
100%
2. Bank
1. Scoured/Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or
scour and erosion
0
0
100%
100%
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2. Undercut
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable
0
0
100%
100%
and are providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse
0
0
100%
100%
Totals
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
4
4
°
100/o
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill.
4
4
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.
4
4
100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
15%. (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
4
4
100%
4. Habitat
Pool forming structures maintaining — Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull
Depth ratio > 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base -flow.
4
4
o
100/o

Table 5C Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Reach ID UTI -3 Reach 2
Assessed Length 1305
Adjusted %
Number
Number with
Footage with
for
Major
Stable,
Total
Number of
Amount of
% Stable,
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Channel
Channel
Performing
Number in
Unstable
Unstable
Performing
Woody
Woody
Woody
a2!222U
Sub-Cateciory
Metric
as Intended
As -built
Se mentsFoota
a
as Intended
Vegetation
Ve etation
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run units)
1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect
flow laterally (not to include point bars)
0
0
100%
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting
0
0
100%
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate
32
32
100%
3. Meander Pool
Condition
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.6)
—
32
32
100%
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)
32
32
100%
4.Thalweg Position
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)
32
32
100%
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)
32
32
100%
2. Bank
1. Scoured/Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or
scour and erosion
0
0
100%
100%
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2. Undercut
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable
0
0
100%
100%
and are providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse
0
0
100%
100%
Totals
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
10
10
o
100/o
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill.
10
10
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.
10
10
100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
15%. (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
10
10
100%
4. Habitat
Pool forming structures maintaining — Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull
Depth ratio > 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base -flow.
10
10
o
100/o

Table 5D Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Reach ID UTI -3 Reach 1
Assessed Length 495
Adjusted %
Number
Number with
Footage with
for
Major
Stable,
Total
Number of
Amount of
% Stable,
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Channel
Channel
Performing
Number in
Unstable
Unstable
Performing
Woody
Woody
Woody
Cate o
Sub-Cateciory
Metric
as Intended
As -built
Se ments
Foota a
as Intended
Vegetation
Ve elation
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run units)
1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect
flow laterally (not to include point bars)
0
0
100%
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting
0
0
100%
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate
16
16
100%
3. Meander Pool
Condition
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.6)
—
22
22
100%
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)
22
22
100%
4.Thalweg Position
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)
22
22
100%
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)
22
22
100%
2. Bank
1. Scoured/Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or
scour and erosion
0
0
100%
100%
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2. Undercut
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable
0
0
100%
100%
and are providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse
0
0
100%
100%
Totals
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
21
21
o
100/o
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill.
21
21
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.
21
21
100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
15%. (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
21
21
100%
4. Habitat
Pool forming structures maintaining — Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull
Depth ratio > 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base -flow.
21
21
o
100/o

Table 5E Visual Stream Morphology Stability Assessment
Reach ID UTI Reach 2
Assessed Length 1051
Adjusted %
Number
Number with
Footage with
for
Major
Stable,
Total
Number of
Amount of
% Stable,
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Stabilizing
Channel
Channel
Performing
Number in
Unstable
Unstable
Performing
Woody
Woody
Woody
a2!222U
Sub-Cateciory
Metric
as Intended
As -built
Se mentsFoota
a
as Intended
Vegetation
Ve etation
Vegetation
1. Bed
1. Vertical Stability
(Riffle and Run units)
1. Aggradation - Bar formation/growth sufficient to significantly deflect
flow laterally (not to include point bars)
0
0
100%
2. Degradation - Evidence of downcutting
0
0
100%
2. Riffle Condition
1. Texture/Substrate - Riffle maintains coarser substrate
55
55
100%
3. Meander Pool
Condition
1. Depth Sufficient (Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull Depth > 1.6)
—
55
55
100%
2. Length appropriate (>30% of centerline distance between tail of
upstream riffle and head of downstrem riffle)
55
55
100%
4.Thalweg Position
1. Thalweg centering at upstream of meander bend (Run)
55
55
100%
2. Thalweg centering at downstream of meander (Glide)
55
55
100%
2. Bank
1. Scoured/Eroding
Bank lacking vegetative cover resulting simply from poor growth and/or
scour and erosion
0
0
100%
100%
Banks undercut/overhanging to the extent that mass wasting appears
2. Undercut
likely. Does NOT include undercuts that are modest, appear sustainable
0
0
100%
100%
and are providing habitat.
3. Mass Wasting
Bank slumping, calving, or collapse
0
0
100%
100%
Totals
0
0
100%
0
0
100%
3. Engineered
Structures
1. Overall Integrity
Structures physically intact with no dislodged boulders or logs.
57
57
o
100/o
2. Grade Control
Grade control structures exhibiting maintenance of grade across the sill.
57
57
100%
2a. Piping
Structures lacking any substantial flow underneath sills or arms.
57
57
100%
3. Bank Protection
Bank erosion within the structures extent of influence does not exceed
15%. (See guidance for this table in EEP monitoring guidance document)
57
57
100%
4. Habitat
Pool forming structures maintaining — Max Pool Depth : Mean Bankfull
Depth ratio > 1.6 Rootwads/logs providing some cover at base -flow.
57
57
o
100/o

Table 6 Vegetation Condition Assessment
Martins Creek II Mitigation Project
Planted Acreage 17
Ve etation Cateaory
Definitions
Mapping
Threshold
CCPV
Depiction
Number of
Polygons
Combined
Acreage
% Of
Planted
Acreage
1. Bare Areas
None
0.1 acres
none
0
0.00
0.0%
2. Low Stem Density Areas
None
0.1 acres
none
0
0.00
0.0%
2B. Low Planted Stem Density Areas
None
0.1 acres
none
0
0.00
0.0%
Total
0
0.00
0.0%
3. Areas of Poor Growth Rates or Vigor
None
0.25 acres
N/A
0
0.00
0.0%
Cumulative Total
0
0.00
0.0%
Easement Acreage` 93.87
Ve etation Cateaory
Definitions
Mapping
Threshold
CCPV
Depiction
Number of
Polygons
Combined
Acreage
% of
Easement
Acreage
4. Invasive Areas of Concern
Dense Chinese privet adjacent to UT1 R3.
1000 SF
Blue Polygon
1
0.04
0.0%
5. Easement Encroachment Areas3
None
none
none
0
0.00
00%
1 = Enter the planted acreage within the easement. This number is calculated as the easement acreage minus any existing mature tree stands that were not subject to supplemental planting of the understory, the channel acreage,
crossings or any other elements not directly planted as part of the project effort.
2 = The acreage within the easement boundaries.
3 = Encroachment may occur within or outside of planted areas and will therefore be calculated against the overall easement acreage. In the event a polygon is cataloged into items 1, 2 or 3 in the table and is the result of
encroachment, the associated acreage should be tallied in the relevant item (i.e., item 1,2 or 3) as well as a parallel tally in item 5.
4 = Invasives may occur in or out of planted areas, but still within the easement and will therefore be calculated against the overall easement acreage. Invasives of concern/interest are listed below. The list of high concern spcies are
those with the potential to directly outcompete native, young, woody stems in the short-term (e.g. monitoring period or shortly thereafter) or affect the community structure for existing, more established tree/shrub stands over timeframes
that are slightly longer (e.g. 1-2 decades). The low/moderate concern group are those species that generally do not have this capacity over the timeframes discussed and therefore are not expected to be mapped with regularity, but can
be mapped, if in the judgement of the observer their coverage, density or distribution is suppressing the viability, density, or growth of planted woody stems. Decisions as to whether remediation will be needed are based on the
integration of risk factors by DMS such as species present, their coverage, distribution relative to native biomass, and the practicality of treatment. For example, even modest amounts of Kudzu or Japanese Knotweed early in the
projects history will warrant control, but potentially large coverages of Microstegium in the herb layer will not Ilkley trigger control because of the limited capacities to impact tree/shrub layers within the timeframes discussed and the
potential impacts of treating extensive amounts of ground cover. Those species with the "watch list" designator in gray shade are of interest as well, but have yet to be observed across the state with any frequency. Those in red italics
are of particular interest given their extreme risk/threat level for mapping as points where isolated specimens are found, particularly ealry in a projects monitoring history. However, areas of discreet, dense patches will of course be
mapped as polygons. The symbology scheme below was one that was found to be helpful for symbolzing invasives polygons, particulalry for situations where the conditon for an area is somewhere between isolated specimens and
dense, discreet patches. In any case, the point or polygon/area feature can be symbolized to describe things like high or low concern and species can be listed as a map inset, in legend items if the number of species are limited or in the
narrative section of the executive summary.

Martin's Creek II
Year 2 Fixed Station Photographs
Taken July 2015
Photo Point 1
Photo Point 5
Martin's Creek II (final)
DMS Project Number 92633
Cherokee County, North Carolina
Photo Point 2
Photo Point 6
Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 2 of 5 (2015)
December 2015
Appendices

Martin's Creek II
Year 2 Fixed Station Photographs (continued)
Taken July 2015
Martin's Creek II (final)
DMS Project Number 92633
Cherokee County, North Carolina
Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 2 of 5 (2015)
December 2015
Appendices

Martin's Creek II
Year 2 Fixed Station Photographs (continued)
Taken July 2015
Martin's Creek II (final)
DMS Project Number 92633
Cherokee County, North Carolina
Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 2 of 5 (2015)
December 2015
Appendices

Mmi rel iron well
• ' r
Y s.
rnuw ruiuL Z-1
5�
4y Sk4
�b - 4s.
3•
4;
q�
*
C
j
0
Mmi rel iron well
• ' r
Y s.
rnuw ruiuL Z-1
5�
�b - 4s.
3•
4;
q�
r I• R. nT � ..

Martin's Creek II
Year 2 Fixed Station Photographs (continued)
Taken July 2015
Martin's Creek II (final)
DMS Project Number 92633
Cherokee County, North Carolina
Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 2 of 5 (2015)
December 2015
Appendices

Martin's Creek II
Year 2 Vegetation Monitoring Photographs
Taken July 12-13, 2015
Martin's Creek II (final)
DMS Project Number 92633
Cherokee County, North Carolina
Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 2 of 5 (2015)
December 2015
Appendices

Martin's Creek II
Year 2 Vegetation Monitoring Photographs
Taken July 12-13, 2015
(continued)
Martin's Creek I1 (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 2 of 5 (2015)
DMS Project Number 92633 December 2015
Cherokee County, North Carolina Appendices

Martin's Creek II
Year 2 Vegetation Monitoring Photographs
Taken July 12-13, 2015
(continued)
Martin's Creek II (final)
DMS Project Number 92633
Cherokee County, North Carolina
Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 2 of 5 (2015)
December 2015
Appendices

APPENDIX C
VEGETATION PLOT DATA
Table 7. Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment
Table 8. CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata
Table 9. Total and Planted Stems by Plot and Species
Martin's Creek II (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 2 of 5 (2015)
DMS Project Number 92633 December 2015
Cherokee County, North Carolina Appendices

Table 7. Vegetation Plot Criteria Attainment Based on Planted Stems
Martin's Creek II Mitigation Site (DMS Project Number 92633)
Vegetation Plot ID Vegetation Survival Threshold Met?
Tract Mean
1 Yes
100%
2 Yes
3 Yes
4 Yes
5 Yes
6 Yes
7 Yes
8 Yes
9 Yes
10 Yes
11 Yes
12 Yes
13 Yes
14 Yes
15 Yes
Martin's Creek II (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 2 of 5 (2015)
DMS Project Number 92633 December 2015
Cherokee County, North Carolina Appendices

Table 8. CVS Vegetation Plot Metadata
Martin's Creek II Mitigation Site (DMS Proiect Number 92633)
Report Prepared By
Corri Faquin
Date Prepared
7/29/2015 12:41
database name
Axiom-EEP-2015-A-v2.3.1.mdb
database location
C:\Axiom\Business\CVS
computer name
CORRI-PC
file size
50962432
DESCRIPTION OF WORKSHEETS IN THIS DOCUMENT------------
Metadata
Description of database file, the report worksheets, and a summary of project(s) and project data.
Pro', planted
Each project is listed with its PLANTED stems per acre, for each year. This excludes live stakes.
Pro', total stems
Each project is listed with its TOTAL stems per acre, for each year. This includes live stakes, all planted stems, and all
natural/volunteer stems.
Plots
List of plots surveyed with location and summary data (live stems, dead stems, missing, etc.).
Vigor
Frequency distribution of vigor classes for stems for all plots.
Vigor bSpp
Frequency distribution of vigor classes listed by species.
Damage
List of most frequent damage classes with number of occurrences and percent of total stems impacted by each.
Damage by Spp
Damage values tallied by type for each species.
Damage by Plot
Damage values tallied by type for each plot.
Planted Stems by Plot and Spp
A matrix of the count of PLANTED living stems of each species for each plot; dead and missing stems are excluded.
ALL Stems by Plot and spp
A matrix of the count of total living stems of each species (planted and natural volunteers combined) for each plot; dead
and missing stems are excluded.
PROJECT SUMMARY -------------------------------------
Project Code
92633
project Name
Martin's Creek II
Description
Stream and Wetland Restoration
River Basin
Hiwassee
length(ft)
stream -to -edge width (ft)
area (s m)
Required Plots (calculated)
Sampled Plots
15
Martin's Creek 11 (final)
DMS Project Number 92633
Cherokee County, North Carolina
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
Monitoring Year 2 of 5 (2015)
December 2015
Appendices

Table 9. Total and Planted Stems by Plot and Species
DMS Project Code 92633. Project Name: Martin's Creek II
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
PnoLS = Planted excluding livestakes
P -all = Planting including livestakes
T = All planted and natural recruits including livestakes
T includes natural recruits
Current Plot Data (MY2 2015)
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
92633-01-0001
PnoLS[P-all T
92633-01-0002
92633-01-0003
92633-01-0004
92633-01-0005
92633-01-0006
92633-01-0007
92633-01-0008
92633-01-0009
92633-01-0010
92633-01-0011
92633-01-0012
PnoLS P -all T Pnol-S P -all T PnoLS P -all T Pnol-S P -all T Pnol-S P -all T Pnol-S P -all T Pnol-S P -all T PnoLS P -all T Pnol-S P -all T PnoLS P -all T PnoLS P -all T
Acer rubrum
red maple
Tree
6
2
5
4
1
Alnus serrulata
hazel alder
Shrub
1
4
2
7
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
1 1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2 2
2
1
1
1 2
2
2
4
4
4
2
2
2
Carpinus caroliniana
American hornbeam
Tree
7
Carya
hickory
Tree
Carya alba
mockernut hickory
Tree
Carya glabra
pignut hickory
Tree
1
1
11
1
1
1
Diospyros virginiana
common persimmon
Tree
31
3
3
Fagus grandifolia
American beech
Tree
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
Juglans nigra
black walnut
Tree
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
11
1
1
3
3
3
3
3
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
21
2 4
4
4
31
3
3
1
1
3
Malus
apple
Tree
Nyssa
tupelo
Tree
1
1
1
11
1
11
11 1
11
2
21
21
1
11
1
1 1
11 1
11
2
2
2
Pinus strobus
eastern white pine
Tree
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
4
4
4
4
4
5
3
3
3
1
1
1
7
7
7
1 1
1
4
4
4 2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
1 1 1
Quercus
oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2 2
2
Quercus alba
white oak
Tree
Quercus coccinea
scarlet oak
Tree
1 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1 1 1
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
Quercus nigra
water oak
Tree
3
3
3
1 1
1
1
1
1
4
4
4
1 1
1
Quercus pagoda
cherrybark oal<
Tree
1 1
1
Quercus rubra
northern red oak
Tree
4
4
4
1
1
1
6 6
6
3
3
3
4
4
4
1 1
1
2
2
2 3
3
31
1
1
11
1
1
1
6 6 6
Quercus shumardii
Shumard's oak
ITree
Salix nigra
black willow
iTree
3
Unknown
Shrub or Tree
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
10
4
404.7
101 10
1
0.02
4 4
404.7 404.7
121
121 14
91 91
15
121
121 14
Ill
111 11
161
161 23
101 101
15
15
15 19
12
12
15
12
12 19
8
8
17
81 81 8
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
5 5
6 4 4 5 5 5 6 7 7 7 5 5
7 8 8 9 7 7
8 5
5 7 5 5
6 5 5 6Li2
3
485.6 485.6
566.6 364.2 364.2 607 485.6 485.6 566.6 445.2 445.2 445.2 647.5 647.5
930.8 404.7 404.7 607 607 607
768.9 485.6
485.6 607 485.6 485.6
768.9 323.7 323.7 688
323.7
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
PnoLS = Planted excluding livestakes
P -all = Planting including livestakes
T = All planted and natural recruits including livestakes
T includes natural recruits

Table 9. Total and Planted Stems by Plot and Species (continued)
DMS Proiect Code 92633. Proiect Name: Martin's Creek II
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
PnoLS = Planted excluding livestakes
P -all = Planting including livestakes
T = All planted and natural recruits including livestakes
T includes natural recruits
Current Plot Data (MY2 2015)
Annual Means
Scientific Name
Common Name
Species Type
92633-01-0013
PnoLSIP-all T
92633-01-0014
PnoLS P -all T
92633-01-0015
PnoLS P -all T
MY2 (2015)
PnoLSIP-all T
MY1 (2014)
PnoLS P -all T
MYO (2014)
PnoLS P -all T
Acer rubrum
red maple
Tree
18
4
1
Alnus serrulata
hazel alder
Shrub
40
17
71
25
Betula nigra
river birch
Tree
2
2
2
1 1
1
19
19
19
9
9
9
9
9
9
Carpinus caroliniana
American hornbeam
Tree
7
1
Ca rya
hickory
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
Carya alba
mockernut hickory
Tree
3
3
3
3
3
3
Carya glabra
pignut hickory
Tree
2
2
2
3
3
3
Diospyros virginiana
common persimmon
Tree
3
3
3
Fagus grandifolia
American beech
Tree
5
5
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
green ash
Tree
1
Juglans nigra
black walnut
Tree
1
41
1
1
1
4
1
1
2
Liriodendron tulipifera
tuliptree
Tree
1
1
2
20
20
23
20
20
20
24
24
24
Malus
apple
Tree
1
1
Nyssa
tupelo
Tree
9
9
9
4
4
4
Pinus strobus
eastern white pine
Tree
1
1
2
3
Platanus occidentalis
American sycamore
Tree
2
2
2
4 4
4
39
39
40
27
27
27
27
27
27
Quercus
oak
Tree
1
61
6
6
81
8
8
40
40
40
Quercus alba
white oak
Tree
1
Quercus coccinea
scarlet oak
Tree
3 3
3
7
7
7
7
7
7
3
31
3
Quercus michauxii
swamp chestnut oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
4
4
Quercus nigra
water oak
Tree
1
10
10
10
14
14
14
17
17
17
Quercus pagoda
cherrybark oak
Tree
I
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
Quercus rubra
northern red oak
Tree
5
5
5
3 3
3
101
10
101
501
50
50
25
25
25
21
2
2
Quercus shumardii
Shumard's oak
Tree
1
1
1
1
1
1
Salix nigra
Iblackwillow
lTree
3
Unknown
15hrub or Tree
2
2
2
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
11
5
445.2
11
1
0.02
5
445.2
15
6
607
11 11
1
0.02
4 4
445.2 445.2
53
7
2145
13
4
526.1
13
1
0.02
4
526.1
33
6
1335
170
14
458.6
170 281
15
0.37
14 21
458.6 758.1
124
13
334.5
124 162
15
0.37
13 19
334.5 437.1
134
12
361.5
134 142
15
0.37
12 15
361.5 383.1
Color for Density
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
PnoLS = Planted excluding livestakes
P -all = Planting including livestakes
T = All planted and natural recruits including livestakes
T includes natural recruits

APPENDIX D
STREAM SURVEY DATA
Cross-section Plots
Longitudinal Profile Plots
Substrate Plots
Tables IOa-f. Baseline Stream Data Summary
Tables l Ia-f. Monitoring Data
Martin's Creek II (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 2 of 5 (2015)
DMS Project Number 92633 December 2015
Cherokee County, North Carolina Appendices

Site
Elevation
Martins Creek II
92633
XS ID
XS - 1, Riffle
Project
UT 1- 4
Date:
7/22/2015
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Jernigan
6.58
94.18
7.57
c� .,..
8.53
94.24
9.70
94.25
10.50
•,.� _ _
z
94.26
11.96
94.56
12.98
94.80
14.60
95.14
17.10
95.20
j�
XS 1 Looking Upstream
Stream Type E
Martins Creek II - NCDMS Project Number 92633
Stream Reach UT 1-4
XS - 1, Station 15+32, Riffle
97
96 ------------------------------------------------------------
w
0 95 -------- ---
-----------
-------------------
- - -Bankfull
W
- -Flood Prone Area
94
MY -00 4/1/14
MY -01 9/10/14
t MY -02 7/22/15
93
0
10
20
Station (feet)
Station
Elevation
Number:
92633
XS ID
XS - 1, Riffle
Reach
UT 1- 4
Date:
7/22/2015
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Jernigan
Station
Elevation
0.00
95.42
2.26
95.38
3.65
94.63
4.66
94.29
5.46
94.11
6.58
94.18
7.57
94.19
8.53
94.24
9.70
94.25
10.50
94.47
11.38
94.26
11.96
94.56
12.98
94.80
14.60
95.14
17.10
95.20
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
95.1
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area:
8.2
Bankfull Width:
11.9
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
96.1
Flood Prone Width:
100.0
Max Depth at Bankfull:
1.0
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.7
W / D Ratio:
17.3
Entrenchment Ratio:
8.4
Bank Height Ratio:
d

Site
Elevation
Martins Creek II
92633
XS ID
Project
Reach
UT 1- 4
Date:
7/22/2015
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Jernigan
8.30
94.63
10.29
94.63
11.80
94.66
12.75
94.83
14.03
95.26
15.25
95.62
17.48
95.68
:e.
5. .. V . ..
XS 2 Looking Upstream
Stream Type E
Martins Creek II - NCDMS Project Number 92633
Stream Reach UT 1-4
XS - 2, Station 14+72, Riffle
97
-------------------------------------------------------------
96
0
- - --Bankfull
41 95
- - -Flood Prone Area
MY -00 4/1/14
MY -01 9/10/14
t MY -02 7/22/ l5
94
0
10
20
Station (feet)
Station
Elevation
Number:
92633
XS ID
XS - 2, Riffle
Reach
UT 1- 4
Date:
7/22/2015
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Jernigan
Station
Elevation
0.00
96.12
2.99
95.99
4.18
95.61
5.49
94.98
6.38
94.67
8.30
94.63
10.29
94.63
11.80
94.66
12.75
94.83
14.03
95.26
15.25
95.62
17.48
95.68
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
95.6
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area:
8.2
Bankfull Width:
11.3
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
96.6
Flood Prone Width:
100.0
Max Depth at Bankfull:
1.0
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.7
W / D Ratio:
15.6
Entrenchment Ratio:
8.8
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0

Site
Martins Creek II
92633
XS ID
Project
Reach
UT 1- 3, Reach 2
Date:
7/22/2015
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Jernigan
Max Depth at Bankfull:
0.5
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.4
W / D Ratio:
16.9
Entrenchment Ratio:
15.4
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
Station
Elevation
0.00
96.82
1.46
96.87
2.76
96.49
3.89
96.01
5.69
95.96
7.00
96.05
8.39
96.17
1,
9.86
96.72
11.09
96.83
XS 3 Looking Upstream
Stream Type E
Martins Creek II - NCDMS Project Number 92633
Stream Reach UT 1-3 Reach 2
XS - 3, Station 16+54, Riffle
98
97
!777777�
...................... ......
?
m
• Bankfull
�1 96
• Flood Prone Area
MY-00 4/1/14
My-01 9/10/14
t MY-02 7/22/15
95
0
10
Station (feet)
SUMMARY DATA
Number:
92633
XS ID
XS - 3, Riffle
Reach
UT 1- 3, Reach 2
Date:
7/22/2015
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Jernigan
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
96.5
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area:
2.5
Bankfull Width:
6.5
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
97.0
Flood Prone Width:
100.0
Max Depth at Bankfull:
0.5
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.4
W / D Ratio:
16.9
Entrenchment Ratio:
15.4
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0

Site
Martins Creek II
Project Number:
92633
XS ID
XS - 4, Pool
Reach
UT 1- 3, Reach 2
Date:
7/22/2015
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Jernigan
Station
Elevation
-0.3
96.8
2.0
96.8
3.3
96.1
4.1
95.6
5.2
95.1
6.1
95.2
6.9
95.7
7.7
96.1
8.9
96.3
10.0
96.7
11.3
96.9
13.4
97.2
— - - -Bankfull
d
--� •Flood Prone Area
_
W 95
MY -00 4/1/14
MY -01 9/10/14
SUMMARY DATA
Stream Reach UT 1-3 Reach 2
Bankfull Elevation:
96.7
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area:
6.4
Bankfull Width:
7.8
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
NA
Flood Prone Width:
NA
Max Depth at Bankfull:
1.6
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.8
W / D Ratio:
NA
Entrenchment Ratio:
NA
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
Stream Type IE
Martins Creek II - NCDMS Project Number 92633
Stream Reach UT 1-3 Reach 2
X- 4 Station 16+03, Pool
98
97
0 96
— - - -Bankfull
d
--� •Flood Prone Area
_
W 95
MY -00 4/1/14
MY -01 9/10/14
t MY -02 7/22/15
94
0 10
Station (feet)

Site
Martins Creek II
Project Number:
92633
XS ID
XS - 5, Riffle
Reach
UT 1- 3, Reach 2
Date:
7/22/2015
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Jernigan
Station
Elevation
0.00
97.38
2.28
97.27
3.22
96.92
4.13
96.46
5.60
96.28
6.93
96.48
7.94
96.69
9.14
97.14
10.52
97.39
12.31
97.49
— - - -Flood Prone Area
MY -00 4/1/14
MY -01 9/10/14
f MY -02 7/22/15
96
0 10
Station (feet)
SUMMARY DATA
Stream Reach UT 1-3 Reach 2
Bankfull Elevation:
97.3
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area:
4.3
Bankfull Width:
7.6
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
98.3
Flood Prone Width:
100.0
Max Depth at Bankfull:
1.0
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.6
W / D Ratio:
13.4
Entrenchment Ratio:
13.2
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
Stream Type M E
Martins Creek II - NCDMS Project Number 92633
Stream Reach UT 1-3 Reach 2
XS - 5, Station 14+24, Riffle
99
----------------------------------------------------------
98
z
0
?
m
--------------------------- - - - - ----- - - - - --—--- Bankfull
�1
97
— - - -Flood Prone Area
MY -00 4/1/14
MY -01 9/10/14
f MY -02 7/22/15
96
0 10
Station (feet)

Site
Elevation
Martins Creek II
97.71
2.75
Project Number:
92633
97.23
5.23
XS ID
Field Crew:
XS - 6, Pool
7.18
95.09
Reach
95.08
UT 1- 3, Reach 2
95.19
9.28
Date:
10.17
7/22/2015
12.65
96.71
14.74
96.96
XS 6 Looking Upstream
Stream Type E
16.72
97.31
Martins Creek II - NCDMS Project Number 92633
Stream Reach UT 1-3 Reach 2
XS - 6, Station 13+85, Pool
99
98
w
d
97
z ----------
0
------------------- ------------
96
• Bankfull
fil
� - � • Flood Prone Area
MY -00 4/1/14
95
MY -01 9/10/14
f MY -02 7/22/15
94
0
10
20
Station (feet)
Station
Elevation
0.00
97.71
2.75
97.71
3.32
97.23
5.23
94.44
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Jernigan
Station
Elevation
0.00
97.71
2.75
97.71
3.32
97.23
5.23
94.44
6.07
94.58
7.18
95.09
7.94
95.08
8.61
95.19
9.28
96.06
10.17
96.68
12.65
96.71
14.74
96.96
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
96.7
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area:
9.1
Bankfull Width:
9.0
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
NA
Flood Prone Width:
NA
Max Depth at Bankfull:
2.3
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
1.0
W / D Ratio:
NA
Entrenchment Ratio:
NA
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0

Site
Martins Creek II
92633
XS ID
XS - 7, Pool
Project
UT 1- 3, Reach 2
Date:
7/22/2015
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Jernigan
Max Depth at Bankfull:
1.9
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.6
W / D Ratio:
NA
Entrenchment Ratio:
NA
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
Station
Elevation
-0.10
98.66
3.57
98.79
4.87
96.31
6.23
96.71
8.15
97.77
- K • -
9.10
98.01
10.70
98.11
13.38
98.23
XS 7 Looking Upstream
Stream Type E
Martins Creek II - NCDMS Project Number 92633
Stream Reach UT 1-3 Reach 2
XS - 7, Station 10+75, Pool
100
99
d- -- - - - - -
-------
- --- ------ - - - - -- - -- - - - --
--- --
98
z
0
97
• Bankfull
W
• Flood Prone Area
MY -00 4/1/14
96
MY -01 9/10/14
t MY -02 7/22/15
95
0
10
Station (feet)
SUMMARY DATA
Number:
92633
XS ID
XS - 7, Pool
Reach
UT 1- 3, Reach 2
Date:
7/22/2015
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Jernigan
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
98.2
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area:
6.1
Bankfull Width:
9.5
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
NA
Flood Prone Width:
NA
Max Depth at Bankfull:
1.9
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.6
W / D Ratio:
NA
Entrenchment Ratio:
NA
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0

Site
Elevation
Martins Creek II
92633
XS ID
XS - 8, Riffle
Project
UT 1- 3, Reach 2
Date:
7/22/2015
4
Perkinson, Jernigan
3.99
99.44
4.69
99.34
5.25
99.33
5.84
99.18
6.31
99.40
6.82
99.71
7.59
99.90
8.67
100.09
9.86
100.02
10.45
100.02
XS 8 Looking Upstream
Stream Type E
Martins Creek
II - NCDMS Project Number 92633
Stream Reach UT 1-3 Reach 2
XS - 8, Station 09+59, Riffle
101
-------------------------------------------------
100
-
-----------
---- -
- - - -------- - - - - --
0
- - - -Bankfull
�1 99
- - - -Flood Prone Area
MY -00 4/1/14
My -01 9/10/14
t MY -02 7/22/15
98
0
10
Station (feet)
Station
Elevation
Number:
92633
XS ID
XS - 8, Riffle
Reach
UT 1- 3, Reach 2
Date:
7/22/2015
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Jernigan
Station
Elevation
0.20
99.91
1.41
99.82
2.05
99.81
2.61
99.62
3.19
99.51
3.99
99.44
4.69
99.34
5.25
99.33
5.84
99.18
6.31
99.40
6.82
99.71
7.59
99.90
8.67
100.09
9.86
100.02
10.45
100.02
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
99.8
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area:
1.8
Bankfull Width:
5.7
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
100.4
Flood Prone Width:
100.0
Max Depth at Bankfull:
0.6
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.3
W / D Ratio:
18.1
Entrenchment Ratio:
17.5
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0

Site
Martins Creek II
Project Number:
92633
XS ID
XS - 9, Pool
Reach
UT 1- 3, Reach 2
Date:
7/22/2015
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Jemigan
Station
Elevation
-0.30
101.64
1.84
101.58
3.55
101.38
4.75
100.00
6.25
99.40
7.14
99.59
7.83
100.41
8.92
100.59
10.25
100.97
12.23
101.27
14.56
101.13
— - - -Bankfull
W
- - -Flood Prone Area
-00
99
MY 4/1/14
MY -01 9/10/14
t MY -02 7/22/15
98
0 10
Station (feet)
SUMMARY DATA
Stream Reach UT 1-3 Reach 2
Bankfull Elevation:
101.3
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area:
7.2
Bankfull Width:
8.5
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
NA
Flood Prone Width:
NA
Max Depth at Bankfull:
1.9
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.8
W / D Ratio:
NA
Entrenchment Ratio:
NA
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
Stream Type IW I E
Martins Creek II - NCDMS Project Number 92633
Stream Reach UT 1-3 Reach 2
102 XS - 9, Station 08+79, Pool
---------------- ------------------------------------- -----
101
w
d
0 100
— - - -Bankfull
W
- - -Flood Prone Area
-00
99
MY 4/1/14
MY -01 9/10/14
t MY -02 7/22/15
98
0 10
Station (feet)

Site
Martins Creek II
92633
XS ID
XS - 10, Pool
Project
UT 1- 3, Reach 2
Date:
7/22/2015
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Jernigan
Max Depth at Bankfull:
1.6
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.8
W / D Ratio:
NA
Entrenchment Ratio:
NA
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
Station
Elevation
1
0.00
105.68
2.11
105.66
3.83
105.55
5.00
105.36
5.83
104.34
- "
6.62
103.98
8.01
104.02
9.07
105.18
10.39
105.67
12.73
105.70
XS 10 Looking Upstream
Stream Type E
Martins
Creek II - NCDMS Project Number 92633
Stream Reach UT 1-3 Reach 2
XS -10, Station 06+59, Pool
106
---- - - - - -- -
--------------------------
- - ----
105
z
0
- - -Bankfull
�l 104
- - -Flood Prone Area
MY -00 4/1/14
MY -01 9/10/14
t MY -02 7/22/15
103
0
10
Station (feet)
SUMMARY DATA
Number:
92633
XS ID
XS - 10, Pool
Reach
UT 1- 3, Reach 2
Date:
7/22/2015
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Jernigan
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
105.5
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area:
5.1
Bankfull Width:
6.2
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
NA
Flood Prone Width:
NA
Max Depth at Bankfull:
1.6
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.8
W / D Ratio:
NA
Entrenchment Ratio:
NA
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0

Site
Martins Creek II
92633
XS ID
XS - 11, Riffle
Project
UT 1- 3, Reach 1
Date:
7/22/2015
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Jernigan
Entrenchment Ratio:
4.4
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
Station
Elevation
SUMMARY DATA
0.00
113.76
Bankfull Elevation:
113.9
2.91
113.96
Bankfull Cross-Sectional Area:
2.0
4.05
113.81
Bankfull Width:
5.7
4.72
113.42
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
114.6
6.32
113.18
Flood Prone Width:
25.0
7.49
113.43
Max Depth at Bankfull:
0.7
8.79
113.77
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.4
13.90
114.47
W / D Ratio:
16.2
XS 11 Looking Upstream
Stream Type E
Martins
Creek I1- NCDMS Project Number 92633
Stream Reach UT 1-3 Reach 1
XS -11, Station 03+86, Riffle
115
-----------------------------------------------------------------
w
0 114
- - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
. - - . Bankfull
W
- - • Flood Prone Area
MY-00 4/1/14
MY-01 9/10/14
tY
M-02 7/22/15
113
0
10
Station (feet)
Number:
92633
XS ID
XS - 11, Riffle
Reach
UT 1- 3, Reach 1
Date:
7/22/2015
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Jernigan
Entrenchment Ratio:
4.4
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0

Site
Martins Creek II
Project Number:
92633
XS ID
XS - 12, Riffle
Reach
UT 1- 3, Reach 1
Date:
7/22/2015
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Jernigan
Station
Elevation
0.00
125.09
2.82
124.91
4.30
124.62
4.69
124.44
5.59
124.35
6.18
124.33
6.93
124.36
8.57
124.95
9.92
125.47
12.17
125.67
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
124.9
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area:
2.0
Bankfull Width:
5.6
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
125.5
Flood Prone Width:
14.0
Max Depth at Bankfull:
0.6
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.4
W / D Ratio:
15.7
Entrenchment Ratio:
2.5
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
126
124
Stream Type I E
Martins Creek II - NCDMS Project Number 92633
Stream Reach UT 1-3 Reach 1
xN - 12, station uu+bi, tattle
--------------------------------------------- ------
JIL_
7
________ ________________________ _________________
_ _ • Bankfull
• Flood Prone Area
MY -00 4/1/14
MY -01 9/10/14
t MY -02 7/22/15
Station (feet)
10

Site
Martins Creek II
Project Number:
92633
XS ID
XS - 13, Riffle
Reach
UT 1, Reach 4
Date:
7/22/2015
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Jernigan
Station
Elevation
0.00
99.78
2.38
99.56
3.60
99.08
5.52
98.80
6.58
98.60
7.49
98.24
9.05
98.71
9.91
99.18
10.69
99.46
13.85
99.64
• Flood Prone Area
MY -00 4/1/14
MY -01 9/10/14
M-02 7/22/15
tY
98
0 10
Station (feet)
SUMMARY DATA
Stream Reach UT 1 Reach 4
Bankfull Elevation:
99.2
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area:
3.0
Bankfull Width:
6.6
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
100.1
Flood Prone Width:
25.0
Max Depth at Bankfull:
0.9
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.5
W / D Ratio:
14.5
Entrenchment Ratio:
3.8
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
Stream Type I E
Martins Creek II - NCDMS Project Number 92633
Stream Reach UT 1 Reach 4
XS -13, Station 12+38, Riffle
101
100
__ __ __ _______________________ __ __ __ __ __ __ __
z
0
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ •Bankfull
�1
99
• Flood Prone Area
MY -00 4/1/14
MY -01 9/10/14
M-02 7/22/15
tY
98
0 10
Station (feet)

Site
Elevation
Martins Creek II
92633
XS ID
XS - 14, Riffle
Project
UT 1, Reach 4
Date:
7/22/2015
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Jernigan
6.61
99.79
7.44
99.78
8.64
100.12
9.96
100.63
11.07
100.69
12.08
100.73
s
XS 14 Looking Upstream
Stream Type E
Martins Creek II - NCDMS Project Number 92633
Stream Reach UT 1 Reach 4
XS -14, Station 11+37, Riffle
102
w 101
z
0
• Bankfull
1•Ll 100
• Flood Prone Area
MY -00 4/1/14
MY -01 9/10/14
t MY -02 7/22/15
99
0
10
Station (feet)
Station
Elevation
Number:
92633
XS ID
XS - 14, Riffle
Reach
UT 1, Reach 4
Date:
7/22/2015
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Jernigan
Station
Elevation
0.00
101.13
1.66
101.02
3.29
100.41
4.09
100.07
5.37
99.77
6.61
99.79
7.44
99.78
8.64
100.12
9.96
100.63
11.07
100.69
12.08
100.73
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
100.4
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area:
2.7
Bankfull Width:
6.1
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
101.0
Flood Prone Width:
25.0
Max Depth at Bankfull:
0.6
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.4
W / D Ratio:
13.8
Entrenchment Ratio:
4.1
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0

Site
Elevation
Martins Creek II
92633
XS ID
XS - 15, Pool
Project
UT 1, Reach 4
Date:
7/22/2015
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Jernigan
6.13.
99.60
6.68
99.91
7.64
100.31
9.07
100.61
11.34
100.65
13.70
100.78
]6.65
101.07
- -
XS 15 Looking Upstream
Stream Type E
Martins Creek II - NCDMS Project Number 92633
Stream Reach UT 1 Reach 4
XS -15, Station 10+21, Pool
102
101
w
0 100
• Bankfull
W
• Flood Prone Area
99
MY -00 4/1/14
MY -01 9/10/14
t MY -02 7/22/15
98
0
10
20
Station (feet)
Station
Elevation
Number:
92633
XS ID
XS - 15, Pool
Reach
UT 1, Reach 4
Date:
7/22/2015
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Jernigan
Station
Elevation
0.30
101.05
2.42
101.18
3.44
100.99
4.41
100.22
5.32
99.83
6.13.
99.60
6.68
99.91
7.64
100.31
9.07
100.61
11.34
100.65
13.70
100.78
]6.65
101.07
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
101.0
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area:
6.2
Bankfull Width:
12.4
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
NA
Flood Prone Width:
NA
Max Depth at Bankfull:
1.4
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.5
W / D Ratio:
NA
Entrenchment Ratio:
NA
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0

Site
Elevation
Martins Creek II
92633
XS ID
XS - 16, Riffle
Project
UT 1, Reach 4
Date:
7/22/2015
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Jernigan
6.22
100.83
7.33
100.87
r.
101.15
9.70
101.82
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
XS 16 Looking Upstream
Stream Type E
Martins Creek II - NCDMS Project Number 92633
Stream Reach UT 1 Reach 4
XS - 16, Station 09+53, Riffle
103
----------------------------------------------------------
102
-------- ------------------------------
---------
z
0
— - - • Bankfull
�l 101
• Flood Prone Area
MY -00 4/1/14
MY -01 9/10/14
MY -02 7/22/15
100
0
10
Station (feet)
Station
Elevation
Number:
92633
XS ID
XS - 16, Riffle
Reach
UT 1, Reach 4
Date:
7/22/2015
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Jernigan
Station
Elevation
0.00
102.04
1.74
102.05
2.37
101.79
4.11
100.95
5.08
100.97
6.22
100.83
7.33
100.87
8.14
101.15
9.70
101.82
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
SUMMARY DATA
12.50 101.93
Bankfull Elevation:
101.8
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area:
4.9
Bankfull Width:
7.4
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
102.8
Flood Prone Width:
25.0
Max Depth at Bankfull:
1.0
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.7
W / D Ratio:
11.2
Entrenchment Ratio:
3.4
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0

Site
Elevation
Martins Creek II
92633
XS ID
XS - 17, Pool
Project
UT 1, Reach 4
Date:
7/22/2015
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Jernigan
7.74
104.24
9.17
103.97
10.01
104.11
11.32
103.71
11.54
103.12
12.13
106.26
13.43
106.48
15.44
106.49
f
•1� i�
ti.
XS 17 Looking Upstream
Stream Type E
Martins Creek
II - NCDMS Project Number 92633
Stream Reach UT 1 Reach 4
XS -17, Station 07+41, Pool
107
106
------- --
------------------------------------
Pr
-------------
w
105
z
0
d104
- - - • Bankfull
�1
- - - • Flood Prone Area
MY -00 4/1/14
103
MY -01 9/10/14
t MY -02 7/22/15
102
0
10
Station (feet)
Station
Elevation
Number:
92633
XS ID
XS - 17, Pool
Reach
UT 1, Reach 4
Date:
7/22/2015
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Jernigan
Station
Elevation
0.15
106.04
2.53
105.88
4.17
105.79
5.62
104.90
6.61
104.63
7.74
104.24
9.17
103.97
10.01
104.11
11.32
103.71
11.54
103.12
12.13
106.26
13.43
106.48
15.44
106.49
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
105.8
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area:
10.6
Bankfull Width:
7.8
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
NA
Flood Prone Width:
NA
Max Depth at Bankfull:
2.7
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
1.4
W / D Ratio:
NA
Entrenchment Ratio:
NA
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0

Site
Martins Creek II
92633
XS ID
XS - 18, Riffle
Project
MC UT 1, Reach 2
Date:
7/22/2015
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Jernigan
Max Depth at Bankfull:
0.9
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.6
W / D Ratio:
14.3
Entrenchment Ratio:
3.0
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0
Station
Elevation
0.10
75.45
2.67
75.50
4.02
74.85
5.18
74.66
6.00
74.59
6.97
74.33
8.07
74.34
8.72
74.29
9.86
74.76
11.34
75.22
XS 18 Looking Upstream
12.64
75.41
13.77
75.49
Stream Type E
Martins Creek II - NCDMS Project Number 92633
Stream Reach MC UT 1 Reach 2
XS -18, Station 08+74, Riffle
77
76 -----------------------------------------------------------------
z
0
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - •Bankfull
W 75
- - - • Flood Prone Area
MY -00 4/1/14
MY -01 9/10/14
t MY -02 7/22/15
74
0
10
Station (feet)
SUMMARY DATA
Number:
92633
XS ID
XS - 18, Riffle
Reach
MC UT 1, Reach 2
Date:
7/22/2015
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Jernigan
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
75.2
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area:
4.7
Bankfull Width:
8.2
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
76.1
Flood Prone Width:
25.0
Max Depth at Bankfull:
0.9
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.6
W / D Ratio:
14.3
Entrenchment Ratio:
3.0
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0

Site
Elevation
Martins Creek II
92633
XS ID
XS - 19, Riffle
Project
MC UT 1, Reach 2
Date:
7/22/2015
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Jernigan
6.22
101.59
7.06
101.66
8.03
101.66
8.86
101.62
9.78
101.96
10.46
102.15
12.15
103.24
13.77
103.26
XS 19 Looking Upstream
Stream Type E
Martins
Creek II - NCDMS Project Number 92633
Stream Reach MC UT 1 Reach 2
XS -19, Station 04+37, Riffle
104
----------------------------------------------------------------
103
o----------------------------------
------------
- - - -Bankfull
�1 102
- - -Flood Prone Area
MY -00 4/1/14
MY -01 9/10/14
t MY -02 7/22/15
101
0
10
Station (feet)
Station
Elevation
Number:
92633
XS ID
XS - 19, Riffle
Reach
MC UT 1, Reach 2
Date:
7/22/2015
Field Crew:
Perkinson, Jernigan
Station
Elevation
0.00
102.49
2.45
102.56
3.50
102.21
4.37
101.99
5.01
101.54
6.22
101.59
7.06
101.66
8.03
101.66
8.86
101.62
9.78
101.96
10.46
102.15
12.15
103.24
13.77
103.26
SUMMARY DATA
Bankfull Elevation:
102.6
Bankfull Cross -Sectional Area:
5.8
Bankfull Width:
8.6
Flood Prone Area Elevation:
103.6
Flood Prone Width:
25.0
Max Depth at Bankfull:
1.0
Mean Depth at Bankfull:
0.7
W / D Ratio:
12.8
Entrenchment Ratio:
2.9
Bank Height Ratio:
1.0

t Name
Martins Creek II
2016
2017
2016
Year 2 Monitoring \Survey
Year 3 Monitoring \Survey
UT 1 - 3 Reach 1 and 2, Station 00+00 - 10+00
Station
Bed Elevation Water Elevation
t Number
92633
1016.9
98.2 98.5
20
22
992.6
7/22/15
Avg. Riffle Slope
0.0185
990.2
97.4 99.2
Perkinson, Jernigan
979.8
97.7 99.2
16
13
976.9
98.9 99.4
Pool to Pool Spacing
34
954.7
99.4 100.1
2014
951.8
98.8 100.1
2014
943.5
Year 0 Monitoring \Survey
Year I Monitoring \Survey
99.5 100.1
Station
Bed Elevation Water Elevation
Station
Bed Elevation Water Elevatio
996.5
98.7
99.1
1016.0
98.2
98.3
990.2
97.9
99.1
996.9
98.6
99.0
983.6
97.5
99.1
991.3
97.7
99.0
977.2
98.1
99.1
980.6
97.9
99.0
972.7
99.1
99.4
973.8
99.1
99.4
958.7
99.2
99.7
952.9
99.6
100.0
952.1
99,6
100.0
949.0
99.0
100.0
948.5
98.7
100.0
942.2
98.7
100.0
944.4
98.6
100.0
941.0
99.5
100.0
941.0
98.6
100.0
922.8
99.8
100.4
937.6
99.7
100.0
919.3
98.7
100.3
921.8
100.2
100.4
917.1
98.9
100.3
919.2
99.3
100.4
913.2
100.0
100.3
914.8
99.2
100.3
890.4
100.7
101.1
911.0
100.1
100.5
884.2
99.8
101.1
889.7
100.7
101.1
877.4
99.4
101.2
882.6
99.7
101.2
867.7
100.2
101.1
876.7
99.3
101.2
863.0
101.0
101.2
867.3
100.1
101.2
846.9
101.5
101.9
861.5
100.7
101.3
839.9
100.8
101.9
846.0
101.4
101.8
830.6
99.7
102.0
839.0
100.2
101.8
825.8
101.4
102.0
829.8
100.4
101.8
797.2
102.3
102.8
824.9
101.5
101.9
791.6
101.8
102.9
814.6
102.0
102.4
776.1
101.5
102.9
796.9
102.4
102.9
771.2
102.7
103.0
792.1
101.8
102.9
743.5
102.8
103.5
130
125
Martins Creek II, Project Number 92633
Year 2 (2015) Profile - UT 1-3 Reach 1 and 2, Station 00+00 to 10+00
2015
2016
2017
2016
Year 2 Monitoring \Survey
Year 3 Monitoring \Survey
Year 4 Monitoring \Survey
Station
Bed Elevation Water Elevation
Station Bed Elevation Water Elevation
Station Bed Elevation Water Elevation
1016.9
98.2 98.5
20
22
992.6
98.4 99.1
Avg. Riffle Slope
0.0185
990.2
97.4 99.2
979.8
97.7 99.2
16
13
976.9
98.9 99.4
Pool to Pool Spacing
34
954.7
99.4 100.1
951.8
98.8 100.1
943.5
98.7 100.1
941.6
99.5 100.1
925.3
99.9 100.4
921.4
99.0 100.5
917.1
98.7 100.4
914.0
100.0 101.2
889.8
100.4 101.3
886.8
99.7 101.3
875.5
99.7 101.3
869.0
100.2 101.3
845.9
101.1 102.1
835.2
100.0 102.1
832.5
100.4 102.1
828.3
101.4 102.1
799.1
102.3 103.1
795.5
101.6 103.1
779.4
101.5 103.1
775.9
101.9 103.2
755.2
102.8 103.4
722.0
103.8 104.3
Martins Creek II, Project Number 92633
Year 2 (2015) Profile - UT 1-3 Reach 1 and 2, Station 00+00 to 10+00
105
100
95 4
0
100 200 300 400 500
Distance (feet)
-Year 0 (2014) Bed -Year 1(2014) Bed
600
Year 2 (2015) Bed
700 800
-m-Year 2 (2015) Water Surface
900
-Year 2 (2015) TOB
1000
2014
2014
2015
2016
2017
Avg. Water Surface Slope
0.0161
0.0162
0.0174
Riffle Length
20
20
22
Avg. Riffle Slope
0.0185
0.0209
0.0163
Pool Length
14
16
13
Pool to Pool Spacing
34
34
35
105
100
95 4
0
100 200 300 400 500
Distance (feet)
-Year 0 (2014) Bed -Year 1(2014) Bed
600
Year 2 (2015) Bed
700 800
-m-Year 2 (2015) Water Surface
900
-Year 2 (2015) TOB
1000

Name Martins Creek II
UT 1 - 3 Reach 2, Station 10+00 - 20+00
Number 92633
7/22/15
2014
Year 0 Monitoring \Survey
Station
Bed Elevation
Water Elevation
1855.8
95.4
95.9
1852.5
94.6
95.8
1848.3
94.5
95.9
1844.3
95.3
95.9
1841.9
94.9
95.9
1834.0
94.4
95.8
1830.6
95.1
95.9
1814.5
95.4
96.0
1799.6
95.4
95.9
1794.8
95.2
96.0
1784.4
94.9
96.0
1777.9
95.1
96.0
1770.2
95.6
96.0
1746.1
95.6
96.0
1741.1
93.9
96.0
1732.1
94.5
96.1
1726.8
95.5
96.0
1690.1
95.8
96.2
1684.6
95.4
96.2
1673.3
95.1
96.2
1669.0
95.7
96.2
1656.8
95.9
96.2
1643.3
95.9
96.3
1641.8
94.6
96.3
1634.6
94.5
96.3
1630.6
95.8
96.3
1606.4
96.0
96.4
1604.7
94.9
96.4
94.7
103
102
101
100
m
m
99
v
w 98
c
0
> 97
a
W
96
95
94
93
1000
2015 2016 2017
Year 2 Monitoring \Survey Year 3 Monitoring \Survey Year 4 Monitoring \Survey
Station Bed Elevation Water Elevation Station Bed Elevation Water Elevation Station Bed Elevation Water Elevation
1829.0
2014
96.0
2015
Year 1 Monitoring \Survey
1791.8
Station
Bed Elevation Water Elevation
1856.9
94.6
95.7
1853.2
94.5
95.7
1850.5
95.3
95.8
1828.7
95.1
95.7
1806.0
95.5
95.8
1797.1
95.0
95.8
1784.6
95.0
95.8
1775.5
95.6
95.8
1752.2
95.6
95.9
1746.3
94.1
95.9
1738.4
94.2
95.9
1731.8
95.6
95.9
1694.6
95.8
96.1
1688.2
95.3
96.1
1681.4
95.0
96.2
1673.0
95.6
96.1
1646.9
95.9
96.1
1644.5
94.0
96.2
1641.4
94.7
96.1
1635.7
95.8
96.1
1610.2
96.0
96.3
1608.3
94.6
96.4
1599.6
95.1
96.3
1596.1
96.0
96.3
1570.6
96.0
96.5
1563.3
95.0
96.5
1556.6
94.7
96.5
1547.2
96.1
96.5
2015 2016 2017
Year 2 Monitoring \Survey Year 3 Monitoring \Survey Year 4 Monitoring \Survey
Station Bed Elevation Water Elevation Station Bed Elevation Water Elevation Station Bed Elevation Water Elevation
1829.0
95.1
96.0
2015
2016
1791.8
95.5
96.0
0.0162
0.0174
1784.6
95.0
96.0
20
20
1766.2
95.0
96.1
Avg. Riffle Slope
0.0185
1761.4
95.4
96.1
Pool Length
1736.6
95.5
96.1
1732.7
94.9
96.1
35
1722.3
94.7
96.1
1719.2
95.6
96.1
1682.4
95.8
96.3
1674.4
95.1
96.3
1665.0
95.0
96.3
1660.4
95.6
96.3
1634.7
95.8
96.3
1633.5
94.7
96.4
1623.5
94.9
96.3
1622.6
95.8
96.3
1599.6
95.9
96.4
1595.8
94.8
96.4
1588.4
95.3
96.4
1583.4
95.9
96.4
1557.9
95.9
96.6
1552.4
95.2
96.6
1542.8
95.2
96.6
1538.4
95.8
96.6
1507.0
96.1
97.0
1501.9
95.3
96.9
1485.2
95.7
96.9
Martins Creek II, Project Number 92633
Year 2 (2015) Profile - UT 1-3 Reach 2, Station 10+00 to 20+00
1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000
Distance (feet)
-Year 0 (2014) Bed -Year 1(2014) Bed -*-Year 2 (2015) Bed -**-Year 2 (2015) Water Surface -**..Year 2 (2015) TOB
2014
2014
2015
2016
2017
Avg. Water Surface Slope
0.0161
0.0162
0.0174
Riffle Length
20
20
22
Avg. Riffle Slope
0.0185
0.0209
0.0163
Pool Length
14
16
13
Pool to Pool Spacing
34
34
35
1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000
Distance (feet)
-Year 0 (2014) Bed -Year 1(2014) Bed -*-Year 2 (2015) Bed -**-Year 2 (2015) Water Surface -**..Year 2 (2015) TOB

Name Martins Creek II
MC UT 1 Reach 2, Station 00+00 - 06+00
Number 92633
7/22/15
2014
Year 0 Monitoring \Survey
Station
Bed Elevation
Water Elevation
603.4
90.7
91.5
601.2
92.0
92.2
583.1
92.7
92.9
575.4
92.8
93.0
573.4
92.1
93.0
570.9
92.3
93.0
569.9
93.7
93.8
556.2
94.0
94.3
544.5
94.8
95.0
539.5
94.1
95.0
537.3
95.2
95.3
525.6
95.9
96.2
517.2
96.1
96.3
514.1
95.6
96.3
510.6
95.6
96.3
507.6
96.7
97.1
495.4
97.8
98.0
478.4
98.7
99.0
476.3
97.8
99.0
473.4
97.7
99.0
472.2
99.6
99.7
462.6
99.9
100.1
460.0
99.4
100.1
457.1
99.2
100.1
455.9
100.3
100.4
445.4
100.6
100.9
443.4
440.2
100.1
101.2
100.9
101.3
130
125
120
m
115
m
a
w 110
c
0
01 105
W
100
95
90 +
0
100
2014
2016
2017
Year 1 Monitoring \Survey
Year 2 Monitoring \Survey
Station
Bed Elevation Water Elevation
603.8
91.2
Station Bed Elevation Water Elevation
600.7
90.5
92.0 92.0
597.8
92.0
575.8
582.4
92.2
0.0457
572.9
92.7
570.7
91.9
92.3 93.0
568.5
91.9
568.7
566.6
93.5
25
540.0
94.7
536.8
93.9
94.0 94.9
534.7
95.2
536.0
523.2
95.8
514.2
96.0
511.5
95.7
96.1
508.4
95.5
96.1
505.3
96.8
493.9
97.6
97.7
477.0
98.7
97.0 96.9
473.3
97.6
98.8
470.9
97.5
98.8
469.7
99.4
459.3
99.6
97.3 98.9
456.5
99.1
99.6
454.5
99.0
99.6
453.8
100.2
443.5
100.6
99.4 100.0
441.4
100.0
1007
439.2
101.2
100
200
Martins Creek II, Project Number 92633
Year 2 (2015) Profile - MC UT 1 Reach 2, Station 00+00 to 06+00
-Year 0 (2014) Bed -Year 1(2014) Bed
300
Distance (feet)
Yaer 7 1701 rl Rad
400
-*(-Year 2 (2015) Water Surface
2015
2016
2017
2016
Year 2 Monitoring \Survey
Year 3 Monitoring \Survey
Year 4 Monitoring \Survey
Station
Bed Elevation Water Elevation
Station Bed Elevation Water Elevation
Station Bed Elevation Water Elevation
600.5
92.0 92.0
16
17
575.8
92.7 93.1
Avg. Riffle Slope
0.0457
572.8
92.1 93.1
569.7
92.3 93.0
6
6
568.7
93.6 93.7
Pool to Pool Spacing
25
541.7
94.6 94.9
538.1
94.0 94.9
536.0
95.2 95.3
523.2
95.9 96.2
515.5
96.0 96.2
512.6
95.5 96.2
509.3
95.4 96.2
507.6
97.0 96.9
495.3
97.8 97.9
477.2
98.6 98.9
472.7
97.3 98.9
471.3
99.5 99.5
461.4
99.7 100.0
458.2
99.4 100.0
455.7
100.3 100.3
440.9
101.1 101.2
429.7
101.4 101.8
427.0
100.9 101.8
425.3
102.2 102.2
409.3
102.5 102.8
404.3
101.5 102.8
400.6
103.5 103.6
381.5
103.9 104.2
200
Martins Creek II, Project Number 92633
Year 2 (2015) Profile - MC UT 1 Reach 2, Station 00+00 to 06+00
-Year 0 (2014) Bed -Year 1(2014) Bed
300
Distance (feet)
Yaer 7 1701 rl Rad
400
-*(-Year 2 (2015) Water Surface
NA* No water in channel during field surveys
500
--Year 2 (2015) TOB
600
2014
2014
2015
2016
2017
Avg. Water Surface Slope
0.0577
NA*
0.0582
Riffle Length
19
16
17
Avg. Riffle Slope
0.0457
NA*
0.0447
Pool Length
6
6
6
Pool to Pool Spacing
25
22
24
NA* No water in channel during field surveys
500
--Year 2 (2015) TOB
600

Name Martins Creek II
MC UT 1 Reach 2, Station 06+00 - 12+00
Number 92633
7/22/15
2014
Year 0 Monitoring \Survey
Station
Bed Elevation
Water Elevation
1170.7
58.4
58.5
1137.5
59.4
59.6
1134.1
58.7
59.5
1132.5
60.4
60.5
1119.6
60.3
60.6
1116.2
61.8
61.8
1099.7
61.8
62.1
10813
623
62.4
1077.3
62.2
62.5
1074.5
62.7
62.9
1064.6
63.4
63.3
1049.9
64.3
64.5
1047.7
63.9
64.5
1041.2
63.9
64.5
1040.6
64.8
64.9
1031.8
65.0
65.4
1030.0
65.0
65.4
1026.5
65.0
65.4
1025.8
65.8
65.8
1017.7
65.8
66.0
1013.8
66.0
66.2
1012.6
65.7
66.2
1011.0
66.5
66.7
984.7
67.6
67.9
980.6
67.2
67.9
978.9
68.5
68.7
967.1
69.2
69.4
9554
fig 6
699
95
90
85
ia m
80
m
75
c
0
v 70
w
65
60
55
600
2016I 2017
Year 3 Monitoring \Survey Year 4 Monitoring \Survey
Station Bed Elevation Water Elevation Station Bed Elevation Water Elevation
Martins Creek II, Project Number 92633
Year 2 (2015) Profile - MC UT 1 Reach 2, Station 06+00 to 12+00
2014
2014
Year 2 Monitoring \Survey
Year 1 Monitoring \Survey
Bed Elevation Water Elevation
Station
Bed Elevation Water Elevation
1169.9
58.4
58.4
1153.8
58.8
58.9
1138.0
59.2
59.3
1135.4
58.8
59.3
1133.5
58.7
59.3
1132.4
60.4
61.9
1124.3
60.2
1074.4
1122.3
60.0
62.6
1118.7
60.3
1063.5
1115.6
61.7
63.3
1091.2
62.0
1046.0
1079.4
62.3
63.9
1077.1
62.0
1036.8
1075.5
61.9
65.2
1074.1
62.6
1022.3
1068.2
62.8
66.0
1066.6
62.6
1007.8
1064.6
62.6
1063.6
63.2
1053.6
63.9
1048.0
64.2
1044.7
63.7
1039.2
63.8
1038.1
64.9
1027.3
65.1
1024.5
64.7
1023.8
65.7
2016I 2017
Year 3 Monitoring \Survey Year 4 Monitoring \Survey
Station Bed Elevation Water Elevation Station Bed Elevation Water Elevation
Martins Creek II, Project Number 92633
Year 2 (2015) Profile - MC UT 1 Reach 2, Station 06+00 to 12+00
2015
2014
Year 2 Monitoring \Survey
Station
Bed Elevation Water Elevation
1175.6
57.7 58.0
1167.4
58.5
1134.6
59.5
1131.7
58.7 59.4
1130.6
60.5
1122.9
60.4
1120.3
60.1
1117.4
60.1
1114.0
61.7
1094.3
61.9
1077.2
62.3
1074.4
62.1
1072.2
62.6
1066.1
62.8
1063.5
62.7
1061.7
63.3
1052.3
63.9
1046.0
64.3
1042.4
63.9
1038.1
63.9
1036.8
64.7
1025.7
65.2
1022.9
64.8
1022.3
65.8
1014.1
66.0
1010.2
65.4
1007.8
66.3
2016I 2017
Year 3 Monitoring \Survey Year 4 Monitoring \Survey
Station Bed Elevation Water Elevation Station Bed Elevation Water Elevation
Martins Creek II, Project Number 92633
Year 2 (2015) Profile - MC UT 1 Reach 2, Station 06+00 to 12+00
NA* No water in channel durine field survevs
700
800
-Year 0 (2014) Bed -Year 1(2014) Bed
900
Distance (feet)
-*-Year 2(2015) Bed
1000
-K-Year 2 (2015) Water Surface
1100
-*-Year 2 (2015) TOB
1200
2014
2014
2015
2016
2017
Avg. Water Surface Slope
0.0577
NA*
0.0582
Riffle Length
19
16
17
Avg. Riffle Slope
0.0457
NA*
0.0447
Pool Length
6
6
6
Pool to Pool Spacing
25.0
22
24
NA* No water in channel durine field survevs
700
800
-Year 0 (2014) Bed -Year 1(2014) Bed
900
Distance (feet)
-*-Year 2(2015) Bed
1000
-K-Year 2 (2015) Water Surface
1100
-*-Year 2 (2015) TOB
1200

Name Martins Creek II
UT 1 Reach 3, Station 00+00 - 03+50
Number 92633
7/22/15
2014
Year 0 Monitoring Survey
Station
Bed Elevation
Water Elevation
336.4
91.4
91.5
323.6
91.8
92.1
320.5
90.9
92.1
317.3
91.2
92.0
311.2
92.2
92.6
299.7
92.5
92.8
295.8
92.5
92.9
292.0
92.3
92.8
288.2
92.3
92.8
284.7
92.8
93.1
265.6
93.6
93.8
255.6
93.3
93.8
245.2
93.3
93.8
239.5
93.1
93.8
235.9
94.2
94.9
229.6
94.8
95.3
227.0
94.6
95.3
222.6
94.6
95.3
216.1
95.0
95.3
205.3
95.4
95.8
202.6
95.3
95.8
199.9
95.3
95.8
195.5
95.7
96.0
182.7
95.9
96.3
168.2
96.5
96.8
153.0
96.8
97.0
151.3
1444
96.4
965
97.0
970
104
102
94
92
90
c
2014
Year 1 Monitoring Survey
Station
Bed Elevation
Water Elevation
339.1
91.4
91.5
326.0
91.7
92.0
322.7
91.0
92.0
320.3
91.7
92.0
299.9
92.5
92.8
296.9
92.4
92.8
292.0
92.3
92.8
286.9
92.7
93.0
268.6
93.6
93.8
262.1
93.4
93.8
254.3
93.3
93.8
245.8
93.3
93.8
241.3
92.8
93.8
236.7
94.4
94.7
229.6
94.8
95.0
225.4
94.5
95.1
222.1
94.9
95.1
203.3
95.5
95.7
191.6
96.0
96.2
188.0
95.7
96.3
179.6
95.7
96.3
173.6
96.2
96.4
152.1
96.8
97.1
147.3
96.7
97.1
144.2
96.9
97.1
135.3
97.5
97.8
132.9
97.0
97.8
129.9
97 1
91.E
Martins Creek II, Project Number 92633
Year 2 (2015) Profile - UT 1 Reach 3, Station 00+00 to 03+50
50 100 150
Distance (feet)
-Year 0 (2014) Bed -Year 1(2014) Bed Year 2 (2015) Bed
200
-x -Year 2 (2015) Water Surface
250
2015
2016
2017
2016
Year 2 Monitoring Survey
Year 3 Monitoring Survey
Year 4 Monitoring Survey
Station
Bed Elevation Water Elevation
Station Bed Elevation Water Elevation
Station Bed Elevation Water Elevation
335.5
91.6 91.7
21
21
313.4
92.1 92.5
Avg. Riffle Slope
0.0388
294.4
92.6 93.0
291.9
92.5 93.0
13
14
286.5
92.5 93.0
Pool to Pool Spacing
31
282.3
93.0 93.3
261.5
93.7 94.0
254.1
93.3 94.0
245.7
93.5 94.0
239.6
93.3 94.0
237.7
94.4 94.8
225.0
94.9 95.2
203.2
95.7 96.0
200.0
95.6 96.0
195.9
95.6 96.1
193.5
96.0 963
183.1
96.1 96.5
179.2
96.0 96.5
175.3
95.9 96.5
169.2
96.6 96.9
152.5
96.8 97.3
149.7
96.7 97.3
141.6
96.9 97.3
138.7
97.7 97.7
135.0
97.6 97.8
133.2
97.2 97.8
126.4
97.3 97.8
_123_5________97_7
98.0
Martins Creek II, Project Number 92633
Year 2 (2015) Profile - UT 1 Reach 3, Station 00+00 to 03+50
50 100 150
Distance (feet)
-Year 0 (2014) Bed -Year 1(2014) Bed Year 2 (2015) Bed
200
-x -Year 2 (2015) Water Surface
250
300
350
2014
2014
2015
2016
2017
Avg. Water Surface Slope
0.0305
0.0304
0.0305
Riffle Length
17
21
21
Avg. Riffle Slope
0.0388
0.0395
0.0310
Pool Length
13
13
14
Pool to Pool Spacing
31
34
44
300
350

Name Martins Creek II
UT 1 Reach 4, Station 05+50 - 17+00
Number 92633
7/22/15
2014
Year 0 Monitoring \Survey
Station
Bed Elevation
Water Elevation
1651.4
95.9
96.3
1644.5
95.0
96.3
1638.0
94.2
96.4
1634.4
96.3
96.4
1630.0
96.0
96.4
1624.0
94.5
96.4
1614.7
94.6
96.4
1611.1
96.7
96.8
1591.5
96.7
97.0
1571.8
97.0
97.2
1567.2
95.9
97.3
1563.9
95.7
97.3
1555.3
95.9
97.3
1551.1
97.0
97.2
1515.5
97.3
97.8
1512.7
96.4
97.8
1505.9
95.4
97.8
1500.0
96.8
97.7
1497.4
96.3
97.7
1495.0
96.3
97.8
1491.6
97.1
97.7
1450.2
98.1
98.3
1446.5
97.1
98.4
1440.5
96.4
98.3
1435.8
96.2
98.4
1429.6
97.9
983
1336.8
98.3
98.8
1320.1
98.3
98.9
112
110
108
106
m
104
102
c
0
v
100
w
98
96
94
92
550
750
-Year 0 (2014) Bed
950
-Year 1(2014) Bed
1150
Distance (feet)
-a-Year 2 (2015) Bed
1350
-m-Year 2 (2015) Water Surface
-*(_Year 2 (2015) TOB
1550
2014
2016
2015
Year 1 Monitoring \Survey
2017
Station
Bed Elevation Water Elevation
1672.7
94.9
95.6
1652.2
96.0
96.1
1643.3
94.7
96.2
1638.9
94.1
96.2
1636.1
95.0
96.2
1634.1
96.2
96.3
1623.8
94.8
96.3
1617.9
94.3
96.3
1611.2
94.8
96.3
1609.1
96.4
96.6
1570.4
96.9
97.1
1564.9
95.9
97.1
1557.1
95.9
97.1
1551.1
97.0
97.2
1515.2
97.5
97.6
1511.4
96.2
97.6
1502.7
95.6
97.6
1498.0
96.7
97.6
1493.6
96.1
97.6
1488.2
97.3
97.6
1448.8
98.0
98.2
1444.2
96.8
98.3
1435.5
96.2
98.2
1432.4
96.8
98.3
1424.8
98.0
98.2
1402.7
98.5
98.6
1398.5
97.8
98.7
1394.5
96.4
98.7
750
-Year 0 (2014) Bed
950
-Year 1(2014) Bed
1150
Distance (feet)
-a-Year 2 (2015) Bed
1350
-m-Year 2 (2015) Water Surface
-*(_Year 2 (2015) TOB
1550
2015
2016
2015
2017
2017
Year 2 Monitoring \Survey
Year 3 Monitoring \Survey
0.0123
Year 4 Monitoring \Survey
Station
Bed Elevation Water Elevation
Station Bed Elevation Water Elevation
Station
Bed Elevation Water Elevation
1683.1
95.5 95.8
Avg. Riffle Slope
0.0166
1664.7
95.8 96.3
�
N
Pool Length
1646.4
94.8 96.3
40
1640.1
94.7 96.3
40
46
1632.3
96.2 96.4
O
O
1630.1
95.9 96.5
1625.2
94.5 96.5
1618.0
94.8 96.5
n
1609.3
96.6 96.8
1606.4
96.8 97.4
1567.1
95.7 97.4
1561.2
95.8 97.3
1551.2
96.9 97.4
O
o
0
1547.3
97.4 97.9
1511.8
95.9 97.8
U-
1506.9
95.8 97.9
1497.8
97.1 97.8
1487.5
98.0 98.4
1446.9
96.3 98.4
1436.9
96.4 98.4
O
1431.6
97.8 98.4
40_
1427.8
98.5 98.9
1391.2
97.1 99.0
d
to
1385.5
96.3 99.0
1380.2
98.2 99.0
N
t0
1371.8
98.4 99.1
1353.1
97.8 99.1
1348.6
97.7 99.2
�.
O
Martins Creek II, Project Number 92633
Year 2 (2015) Profile - UT 1 Reach 4, Station 05+50 to 17+00
750
-Year 0 (2014) Bed
950
-Year 1(2014) Bed
1150
Distance (feet)
-a-Year 2 (2015) Bed
1350
-m-Year 2 (2015) Water Surface
-*(_Year 2 (2015) TOB
1550
2014
2014
2015
2016
2017
Avg. Water Surface Slope
0.0135
0.0123
0.0116
Riffle Length
21
23
6
M
Avg. Riffle Slope
0.0166
0.0161
0.1220
�
N
Pool Length
22
19
40
Pool to Pool Spacing
42
40
46
750
-Year 0 (2014) Bed
950
-Year 1(2014) Bed
1150
Distance (feet)
-a-Year 2 (2015) Bed
1350
-m-Year 2 (2015) Water Surface
-*(_Year 2 (2015) TOB
1550
N
d
M
r
r
�
N
r
C
O
O
O
O
n
M
to
O
O
O
o
0
U-
O
40_
t5
d
to
N
t0
N
O
�
�
�.
O
t5
m
N
O
V
750
-Year 0 (2014) Bed
950
-Year 1(2014) Bed
1150
Distance (feet)
-a-Year 2 (2015) Bed
1350
-m-Year 2 (2015) Water Surface
-*(_Year 2 (2015) TOB
1550

SummaryData
Project Name: UT to Martins Creek (Contreras)
1.042
D35
12.39
Cross -Section: 5
21.5
D84
43
D95
Feature: Riffle
2015
Description
Material
Size (mm)
Total # Item %
Cum %
Silt/Clay
silt/clay
0.062
6
11%
11%
Sand
very fine sand
0.125
2
4%
14%
fine sand 0.250 0%
14°%
medium sand 0.50 1 2%
16%
coarse sand 1.00 0%
16%
very coarse sand 2.0 2 4%
19%
Gravel
very fine gavel
4.0
0%
19%
fine gravel 5.7 0%
19%
fine gravel 8.0 3 5%
25%
medium gravel 11.3 5 9%
33%
medium gravel 16.0 3 5%
39%
course gavel 22.3 7 12%
51%
course gavel 32.0 12 21%
72%
very coarse gravel 45 8 14%
86%
very coarse gavel 64 3 5%
91%
Cobble
small cobble
90
2
4%
95%
medium cobble 128 2 4%
98%
large cobble 180 1 2%
100%
very large cobble 256 0%
100°%
Boulder
small boulder
362
0%
100%
small boulder 512 0%
100%
medium boulder 10240%
100%
0%
large boulder 2048r57
100°%
Bedrock
bedrock
400960%
100%
TOTAL a/o
of whole count
100%
100%
SummaryData
D16
1.042
D35
12.39
D50
21.5
D84
43
D95
92
Cumulative Percent
`'' �■■111111■■111111■■111111■■11,%:.I■■111111
' �■■111111■■111111■■111111■■!/llll�■■111111
''' �■■111111■■111111■■111111■//911111■■111111
' �■■111111■■111111■■IIIIII�I/�111111�■■111111
.' �■■111111■■111111■■1111111/IIIIIII�■■111111
�■■111111■■111111■■111111%■111111■■111111
' �■■111111■■111111■■111111%�I■111111■■111111
�■■111111■■111111■■Ill�il�.�■■111111■■111111
■■11= �:::•_•_=__w :iil�■■111111■■111111
,, �■■111111■■111111■■111111■■111111■■111111
100%
90%
80%
G 70%
K
a 60%
50%
U 40%
a 30%
20%
10%
0%
Individual Class Percent
Particle Size (mm)
■ YYO-2014 ■MY1-2014 ■MY2-2015

Table 10a. Baseline Stream Data Summary (UT -1 to Martin's Creek)
Martin's Creek II Mitigation Project - DMS Project Number 92633
Parameter Gauge Regional Curve
Pre -Existing Condition
(UT -1)
Reference Reach(es) Data
Design
(UT -1)
Monitoring
Baseline (UT -1 Reach 4)
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Only LL UL
Eq.
Min
Mean Med
Max
SD
Min
Mean Med
Max
SD Min
Max Med
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
BF Width (ft)
5.9
8.5 7.6
1.4.0
3.0
11.7
21.7
7.7
8.5
6.4
7.1
6.6
8.4
1.1
Floodprone Width (ft)
9.0
17.0 16.2
30.8
8.2
20
410
16
100
25
25
25
25
0
BE Mean Depth (ft)
0.3
0.6 0.6
0.8
0.2
0.6
1.0
0.5
0.7
0.5
0.6
0.6
0.8
0.2
BF Max Depth (ft)
0.6
0.9 1.0
1.1
0.2
0.9
2.5
0.7
0.9
0.8
1.0
0.9
1.2
0.2
BF Cross Sectional Area (ftZ)
3.6
4.7 4.3
6.2
1.2
10.2
13.1
4.1
6.0
3.2
4.5
3.8
6.4
1.7
Width/Depth Ratio
7.6
18.8 12.6
55.0
18.0
10.7
17.0
12.0
14.3
10.5
11.4
11.0
12.8
1.2
Entrenchment Ratio
1.2
2.0 2.0
2.9
0.6
1.7
32.0
2.0
11.8
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.6
0.1
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
2.0 1.8
4.1
1.1
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
I.0
1.0
1.0
0.0
Profile
Riffle len (fi)
5
21
20
40
8
Riffle sloe (ft/ft)
0.025
0.170
0.2000
1.9000
0.0100 0.1600
0.0009
0.0166
0.0148
0.0337
0.0111
Pool length (ft)8.0
22.0
22.0
37.0
9.5
Pool Max depth (fi)
2.2
2.5
1.6
2.0
2.1
2.3
2.3
2.4
0.2
Pool spacing (ft)
30.0
85.0
48.0
231.0
1.2.0
45.0
27.0
42.0
40.0
61.0
11.0
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
16
55
40
40
Radius of Curvature (ft)
28
47
30
40
30
40
Rc:Bankfidl width (ft/ft)
2
3
3.8
4.7
3.8
4.7
Meander Wavelength (ft)
70
260
15
30
15
30
Meander Width ratio
1.1
4.1
4.7
4.7
Transport parameters
Reach Shear Stress con etenc lbs/ftp
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfall
Stream Power (transport capacity) W/m]
Additional Reach Parameters
Ros en Classification
Eb/FbB/G/Cb
Aa/Bc
B/C
B/C
Bankfull Velocity s
4.2-4.4
3.9-4.3
Bankfull Discharge cfs)
16-25
Valley Length (ft)
1565
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
1747
781
Sinuosity
1.06 - 1.18
1.19
1.05-1.4
1.05-1.4
Water Surface Sloe (ft/ft)
0.015-0.05
0.0333
.01-.057
0.0135
BF slope(ft/ft)
----
----
Bankfull Floodplain Area acres
----
----
----
----
of Reach with Eroding Banks
----
----
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
----
Biological or Other
Table 10b. Baseline Stream Data Summary (Substrate, Bed, Bank, and Hydrologic Containment Parameter Distributions)
Martin's Creek 11 Mitigation Project - DMS Project Number 92633
1. 1•

Table 10c. Baseline Stream Data Summary (UT -1 to Martin's Creek)
Martin's Creek II Mitigation Project - DMS Project Number 92633
Parameter Gauge Regional Curve
Pre -Existing Condition
(UT -1)
Reference Reach(es) Data
Design
(UT -1)
Monitoring
Baseline (UT -1 Reach 2)
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Only LL UL
Eq.
Min
Mean Med
Max
SD
Min
Mean Med
Max
SD Min
Max Med
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
BF Width (ft)
5.9
8.5 7.6
1.4.0
3.0
11.7
21.7
7.7
8.5
8.0
8.7
Floodprone Width (fi)
9.0
17.0 16.2
30.8
8.2
20
410
16
100
25
BE Mean Depth (ft)
0.3
0.6 0.6
0.8
0.2
0.6
1.0
0.5
0.7
0.7
BF Max Depth (fi)
0.6
0.9 1.0
1.1
0.2
0.9
2.5
0.7
0.9
1.1
BF Cross Sectional Area (fe)
3.6
4.7 4.3
6.2
1.2
10.2
13.1
4.1
6.0
5.2
5.9
Width/Depth Ratio
7.6
18.8 12.6
55.0
18.0
10.7
17.0
12.0
14.3
12.3
12.8
Entrenchment Ratio
1.2
2.0 2.0
2.9
0.6
1.7
32.0
2.0
11.8
2.9
3.1
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1 2.0 1 1.8
1 4.1
1 1.1
1 1.0
1
1.0
1.0
1 I.0
1.0
Profile
Riffle len (fi)
5
21
20
40
8
Riffle sloe (ft/ft)
0.025
0.170
0.2000
1.9000
0.0100 0.1600
0.0009
0.0166
0.0148
0.0337
0.0111
Pool length (ft)8.0
22.0
22.0
37.0
9.5
Pool Max depth (fi)
2.2
2.5
1.6
2.0
2.1
2.3
2.3
2.4
0.2
Pool spacing (ft)
30.0
85.0
48.0
231.0
1.2.0
45.0
27.0
42.0
40.0
61.0
11.0
Pattern
Chatmel Beltwidth (ft)
16
55
40
40
Radius of Curvature (ft)
28
47
30
40
30
40
Rc:Bankfidl width (ft/ft)
2
3
3.8
4.7
3.8
4.7
Meander Wavelength(ft)
70
260
15
30
15
30
Meander Width ratio
1.1
4.1
4.7
4.7
Transport parameters
Reach Shear Stress coraetenc Ibs/fir
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Stream Power (transport capacity) W/mr
Additional Reach Parameters
Ros en Classification
Eb/FbB/G/Cb
Aa/Bc
B/C
C
Bankfull Velocity s
4.2-4.4
3.9-4.3
Bankfull Discharge cls)
16-25
Valley Length (ft)
1565
Channel Thalweg Length (ft)
1747
1176
Sinuosity
1.06 - 1.18
1.19
1.05-1.4
1.05-1.4
Water Surface Sloe (ft/ft)
0.015-0.05
0.0333
.01-.057
0.0577
BF slope tuft
----
----
Bankfull Floodplain Area acres
----
----
----
----
of Reach with Eroding Banks
----
----
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
----
Biological or Other
Table 10d. Baseline Stream Data Summary (Substrate, Bed, Bank, and Hydrologic Containment Parameter Distributions)
Martin's Creek 11 Mitigation Project - DMS Project Number 92633
1. 1•

Table 10c. Baseline Stream Data Summary (UT 1-3 to Martin's Creek)
Martin's Creek 11 Mitigation Project - DMS Project Number 92633
Parameter Gauge Regional Curve
Pre -Existing
Condition
Reference Reach(es) Data
Design
Monitoring
Baseline
(UT 1-3)
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Only LL UL Eq.
Min
Mean Med Max
SD
Min
can Med
Max
SD Min
Max
Med
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
BF Width (ft)
5.0
7.5
6.9 11.4
2.7
11.7
21.7
6.0
6.5
5.1
8.0
6.8
11.4
2.5
Floodprone Width (ft)
10.3
15.4
12.6 26.2
7.3
20
410
11
100
14
77
100
100
39
BF Mean Depth (ft)
0.3
0.4
0.4 0.6
0.1
0.6
1.0
0.5
0.5
0.3
0.6
0.5
0.9
0.2
BF Max Depth (ft)
0.9
0.9
0.9 1.0
0.1
0.9
2.5
0.6
0.5
0.9
0.9
1.2
0.3
BF Cross Sectional Area (fi)
2.9
3.0
3.0 3.3
0.2
10.2
13.1
2.9
3.2
1.7
5.1
3.0
9.9
3.5
Width/Depth Ratio
8.6
19.9
15.6 39.7
13.6
10.7
17.0
12.5
11.9
15.5
14.3
22.7
3.8
Entrenchment Ratio
1.5
2.1
2.0 2.7
0.6
1.7
32.0
3.8
15.4
2.7
9.4
9.4
15.4
5.0
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.7
1.4 3.0
0.9
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.0
Profile
Riffle length (ft)
7
19
18
51
10
Riffle slope (ft/ft)
0.013
0.100
0.2000
1.9000
0.0100
0.1800
0.0215
0.0457
0.0445 0.0667 0.0125
Pool length (ft)
3.0
6.0
6.0
10.0
2.0
Pool Max depth (ft)
2.2
2.5
1.6
Pool spacing (ft)
20.0
100.0
48.0
231.0
10.0
60.0
15.0
25.0
23.0
58.0
10.0
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft)
22
46
16
55
26
50
40
Radius of Curvature (ft)
14
28
28
47
15
40
30
40
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft)
12
5.6
2
3
2.5
6.7
3.8
4.7
Meander Wavelength (ft)
56
81
70
260
65
110
15
30
Meander Width ratio
1.9
9.2
1.1
4.1
4.3
8.3
4.7
Transport parameters
Reach Shear Stress cora etene Ibs/ftp
Max part size (mm) mobilized at bankfull
Stream Power (transport capacity) W/m2
Additional Reach Parameters
Ros en Classification
Eb/B/C/F
Aa/BC
B/C
1_
Bankfull Velocity (fps
6 -Feb
3.8-4.9
Bankfull Discharge (cfs
11.0-14.0
Valley Length (ft)
1320
Channel Thalweg Len (ft)
1584
2092
Sinuosity
1.2
1.19
1.26-1.42
1.2
Water Surface Slope ft/ft
0.007-0.04
0.0333
0.005-0.054
0.0161
BF slope ft/ft
----
----
Bankfull Floodplain Area acres
----
---
----
---
of Reach with Eroding Banks
----
----
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
----
----
Bioloizical or Other
----
----
Table ]Of. Baseline Stream Data Summary (Substrate, Bed, Bank, and Hydrologic Containment Parameter Distributions)
Martin's Creek II Mitigation Project - DMS Project Number 92633
I

Table lla. Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross Sections)
Martin's Creek H Midsation Project - DMS Project Number 92633
Table 11b. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Martin's Creek 11 Mitigation Project - DMS Project Number 92633
Parameter
Baseline (UT 1-3)
Cross Section 1 UT 1 Reach 4
MY -1 (UT 1-3)
Cross Section
2 UT 1 Reach 4
MY -2 (UT 1-3)
MY -3 (UT 1-3) MY -4 UT 1-3) MY -5 T 1-3)
Cross
Section 3 UT 1-3
Cross Section 4 UT 1-3
Cross
Section 5 T 1-3
Cross
Section 6 UT 1-3
Parameter
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Only
Riffle
Mean
Med
Max
Riffle
Min
Mean
Med
Riffle
SD
Min
Mean
Pool
Max
SD Min Mean Med Max SD Min Mean Med Max SD Min Mean Med Max SD
BF Width (ft)
Riffle
8.0
6.8
11.4
Pool
Dimension
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3
MY4 MY5
MY5+ MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5
MY5+ MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4
MY5
MY5+
14
MY2
MY3 MY4
MY5 MY5+ MYO
MYI
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY5+
MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY5+
BF Width ft
11.4
11.2
11.9
0.2
0.3
11.4
11.8
11.3
0.2
6.8
6.8
6.5
0.7
0.2
BF Max Depth (Ill
0.5
7.8
0.9
8.3
9.3
7.6
0.9
9.2
8.3
9.0
0.5
Floodprone Width (ft) (approx)
100.0
100.0
100.0
BF Cross Sectional Area (ft)
1.7
100.0
100.0
100.0
3.5
100.0
100.0
100.0
10.2
3.5
1.8
4.1
NA
8.2
100.0
100.0
100.0
15.5
NA
NA
NA
13.1
BF Mean Depth (ft)
0.8
0.8
0.7
12.7
15.6
0.9
0.9
0.7
Entrenchment Ratio
0.4
0.4
0.4
15.4
5.0
2.6
9.2
0.8
14.9
0.7
0.7
0.6
10.0
1.3
1.3
1.0
1.0
BF Max Depth ft
1.2
1.2
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.2
1.3
LO
LO
0.6
0.6
0.5
1 0.0
Profile
INANA
L6
1.2
1.2
1.0
2.7
2.6
2.3
BF Cross Sectional Area (ft)
9.6
9.4
8.2
4
1 20
9.9
10.2
8.2
1 4
2.8
2.8
2.5
9
4.1
1 22.2
1 22.7
6.4
1 11.5
6.2
6.3
4.3
0.0550
12.0
11.1
9.1
0.0183
Width/Depth Ratio
13.5
13.3
17.3
0.0154
0.0418
13.1
13.7
15.6
14
16.5
16.5
16.9
3
16
12
37
NA
3
11.1
13.7
13.4
8
NA
NA
NA
1 2.0
Entrenchment Ratio
8.8
8.9
8.4
1 1.9
1 2.6 1
8.8
8.5
8.8
1 1.9
14.7
14.7
15.4
7
1 4
1 31
1 63
NA
1 7
12.0
10.8
13.2
16
NA
NA
NA
1 71
Bank Hei ht Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.01.0
I.0
26
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Radius of Curvature (ft)
15
40
----
----
----
Cross
Section 7
UT 1-3
Cross Section
8 UT 1-3
Cross
Section 9 UT 1-3
Cross Section
10 UT 1-3
Cross
Section 11 UT 1-3
Cross
Section 12 UT 1-3
Parameter
110
Pool
Riffle
Pool
Pool
Riffle
4.3
Riffle
Additional Reach Parameters
Dimension
MYO
MY1
MY2
MY3
MY4 MY5
MY5+ MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5
MY5+ MYO
MYI
MY2
MY3 MY4
MY5 MY5+ MYO
MYl
MY2
MY3 MY4
MY5 MY5+ MYO
MY]
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5
MY5+
MYO
MYI
MY2
MY3 MY4 MY5 MY5+
BF Width ft
6.5
8.1
9.5
6.5
6.7
5.7
10.6
10.6
8.5
1833
5.3
4.1
6.2
6.8
6.0
5.7
5.1
5.4
5.6
Floodprone Width (ft) a rox
NA
NA
NA
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
100.0
100.0
100.0
NA
NA
NA
0.0162
NA
NA
NA
25.0
25.0
25.0
BF slope (fUft)
14.0
14.0
14.0
BF Mean Depth (Ill
1.1
0.8
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.9
0.8
0.8
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.3
0.4
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.4
SC%/SA%/G%/C%/B%BE%
BF Max Depth (ft)
2.7
2.1
1.9
0.9
0.7
0.6
2.0
1.8
1.9
1.2
1.4
1.6
0.6
0.7
0.7
0.5
0.6
0.6
BF Cross Sectional Area (ft)
7.1
6.8
6.1
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
3.0
2.8
1.8
9.3
8.0
7.2
3.3
2.7
5.1
2.3
2.5
2.0
1.7
1.7
2.0
Width/Depth Ratio
NA
NA
NA
14.1.
16.0
18.1
Biological or Other]
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
20.1
14.4
16.2
15.3
17.2
15.7
Entrenchment Ratio
NA
NA
NA
15.4
14.9
17.5
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
3.7
4.2
4.4
2.7
2.6
2.5
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
LO
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
d50 mm
----
----
----
Table 11b. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Martin's Creek 11 Mitigation Project - DMS Project Number 92633
Parameter
Baseline (UT 1-3)
MY -1 (UT 1-3)
MY -2 (UT 1-3)
MY -3 (UT 1-3) MY -4 UT 1-3) MY -5 T 1-3)
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Only
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD Min Mean Med Max SD Min Mean Med Max SD Min Mean Med Max SD
BF Width (ft)
5.1
8.0
6.8
11.4
2.5
5.4
8.2
6.8
11.8
2.6
5.6
7.8
6.5
11.9
2.7
Floodprone Width ft
14
77
100
100
39
14
77
100
100
39
14
77
100
100
39
BF Mean Depth (ft)
0.3
0.6
0.5
0.9
0.2
0.3
0.6
0.4
0.9
0.2
0.3
0.5
0.4
0.7
0.2
BF Max Depth (Ill
0.5
0.9
0.9
1.2
0.3
0.6
0.9
0.7
1.3
0.3
0.5
0.8
0.7
1.0
0.2
BF Cross Sectional Area (ft)
1.7
5.1
3.0
9.9
3.5
1.7
5.1
2.8
10.2
3.5
1.8
4.1
2.5
8.2
2.9
WidthIDepthRatio
11.9
15.5
14.3
22.7
3.8
13.1
15.3
15.0
18.0
2.0
12.7
15.6
16.1
19.0
2.1
Entrenchment Ratio
2.7
9.4
9.4
15.4
5.0
2.6
9.2
9.2
14.9
4.7
2.5
10.0
10.0
17.5
5.6
Bank Height Ran
1.0
1.0
LO
1.0
0.0
1.0
1.0
L0
LO
0.0
LO
1.0
1.0
1.0
1 0.0
Profile
Riffle length (ftA
4
1 20
1 19
1 41
1 8.9
1 4
1 20
1 20
1 44 1
9
4.1
1 22.2
1 22.7
63.5
1 11.5
Riffle sIo e (fUft) 0.0000
0.0185
0.0166
0.0550
0.0145
0.0000
0.0209
0.0183
0.0578
0.0153
0.0000
0.0163
0.0154
0.0418
0.0123
Poollen h ft
3
14
12
33
9
3
16
12
37
10
3
13
10
30
8
Pool Max depth (11)1
1.2
1 2.1
1 2.0
1 2.7
1 0.6
1 1.4
1 2.0
1 1.9
1 2.6 1
0.4
1 1.6
1 1.9
1 1.9
1 2.3
1 0.3
Pool spacing (11)1
7
1 4
1 31
1 63
1 15
1 7
1 34
1 33
1 75 1
16
1 7
1 35
1 35
1 71
1 15
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth ft
26
50
Radius of Curvature (ft)
15
40
Rc:Bankfull width fUft2.5
6.7
Meander Wwelen h (ft)
65
110
Meander Width ratio
4.3
8.3
Additional Reach Parameters
Ros en Classification
E -type
E -Type
E -type
Channel Thalweg Length ft
2092
2099
1833
Sinuosity
1.3
1.3
1.3
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
0.0161
0.0162
0.0174
BF slope (fUft)
-----
-----
Ri%/RU%P%G%/S%
SC%/SA%/G%/C%/B%BE%
dl6/d35/d5O/d84/d95
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metri
Biological or Other]

Table 11c. Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross Sections)
Martin's Creek D Mitigation Prniect - DMS Prniect Number 92633
Table lld. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Martin's Creek H Mitigation Project - DMS Project Number 92633
Parameter
Baseline (UT 1 Reach 4)
Cross Section 13 (UT 1 Reach 4)
MY -1 (UT 1 Reach 4)
Cross Section 14 (UT 1 Reach 4)
MY -2 (UT 1 Reach 4)
Cross Section 15 UT 1 Reach 4)
Cross Section 16 (UT 1 Reach 4)
Cross Section 17 (UT 1 Reach 4)
Parameter
Riffle
Riffle
Pool
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Only
Min
Riffle
Med
Max
Pool
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD Min Mean Med Max SD Min Mean Med Max SD Min Mean Med Max SD
BF Width ft
6.4
7.1
6.6
8.4
1.1
Dimension
MYO
MYI
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
MY5+ MYO
MYI
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
MY5+ MYO
MYI
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
MY5+ MYO
MYI
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
MY5+ MYO
MYI
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY5+
BF Width ft)
6.6
6.6
6.6
6.4
6.3
6.1
13.4
13.6
12.4
8.4
8.6
7.4
9.7
9.9
7.8
Floodprone Width (ft) (approx)
25.0
25.0
25.0
25.0
25.0
25.0
NA
NA
NA
25.0
25.0
25.0
NA
NA
NA
BF Mean Depth (ft)
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.4
0.8
0.8
0.5
0.8
0.7
0.7
1.4
1.4
1.4
BF Max Depth ft
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.8
0.8
0.6
2.1
2.1
1.4
1.2
1.2
1.0
2.4
2.7
2.7
BF Cross Sectional Area (te)
3.8
3.3
3.0
3.2
2.9
2.7
10.9
10.2
6.2
6.4
6.1
4.9
13.2
13.9
10.6
Width/De thRatio
11.5
13.2
14.5
12.8
13.7
13.8
NA
NA
NA
11.0
12.1
11.2
NA
NA
NA
Entrenchment Ratio
3.8
3.8
3.8
3.9
4.0
4.1
NA
NA
NA
3.0
2.9
3.4
NA
NA
NA
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
d5O (min)
----
22
---- IIIII
---- I
----
I ---- IIIII
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
Table lld. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Martin's Creek H Mitigation Project - DMS Project Number 92633
Parameter
Baseline (UT 1 Reach 4)
MY -1 (UT 1 Reach 4)
MY -2 (UT 1 Reach 4)
MY -3 (UT 1 Reach 4) MY4 (UT 1 Reach 4) MY -5 (UT 1 Reach 4)
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Only
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD Min Mean Med Max SD Min Mean Med Max SD Min Mean Med Max SD
BF Width ft
6.4
7.1
6.6
8.4
1.1
6.3
7.2
6.6
8.6
1.3
6.1
6.7
6.6
7.4
0.7
Floodprone Width (ft)
25
25
25
25
0
25
25
25
25
0
25
25
25
25
0
BF Mean Depth ft
0.5
0.6
0.6
0.8
0.2
0.5
0.6
0.5
0.7
0.1
0.4
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.2
BF Max Depth (ft)
0.8
1.0
0.9
1.2
0.2
0.8
1.0
0.9
1.2
0.2
0.6
0.8
0.9
1.0
0.2
BF Cross Sectional Area (fig)
3.2
4.5
3.8
6.4
1.7
2.9
4.1
3.3
6.1
1.7
2.7
3.5
3.0
4.9
1.2
Width/Dep,th Ratio
10.5
11.4
11.0
12.8
1.2
12312.7
12.6
13.2
0.5
10.6
13.0
13.2
153
23
Entrenchment Ratio
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.6
0.1
2.9
3.6
3.6
4.0
0.6
3.4
3.8
3.8
4.1
0.4
Bank Height Ratiol
1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0 1
1.0 1
0.0
1 1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0 1
1.0 1
0.0
1 1.0
1 1.0
1 1.0 1
1.0 1
0.0
Profile - Upstream
Riffle length (ft)
5
21
20
40
8
3
23
22
43
9
0.4
5.8
4.1
20.9
4.9
Riffle slope (ft/ft)
0.0009
0.0166
0.0148
0.0337
0.0111
0.0000
0.0161
0.0192
0.0426
0.0131
0.0031
0.1220
0.0556
1.0788
02138
Pool length (ft)
8
22
22
37
10
6
19
18
34
8
21
40
39
57
11
Pool Max depth (ft)
2.1
2.3
2.3
2.4
0.2
2.1
2.4
1 2.4
2.7
0.4
1.4
2.1
2.1
2.7
0.9
Pool spacing (ft)
27
42
40
61
11
15
40
1 42
57
12
23
46
49
66
11
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth (ft
40
Radius of Curvature ft
30
40
Rc:Bankfull width (ft/ft)
3.8
4.7
Meander Wavelength (ft
15
30
Meander Width ratio
4.7
Additional Reach Parameters
Ros en Classificatio
B/C - Type
Cb -Type
Cb -Type
Channel Thalweg Len (ft
781
786
1107
Sinuosity
1.2
1.2
1.2
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
0.0135
0.0123
0.0116
BF slope (ft/ft)
-----
-----
Ri%/RU%P%G%/S%
SC%/SA%/G%/C%B%BE%
dl6/d35/d5O/d84/d95
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other

Table l le. Monitoring Data - Dimensional Morphology Summary (Dimensional Parameters - Cross Sections)
Martin's Creek 11 Mitigation Proiect - DMS Proiect Number 92633
Parameter
Baseline (UT 1 Reach 2)
Cross Section 18 UT 1 Reach 2
Riffle
MY -1 (UT 1 Reach 2)
Cross Section 19 UT 1 Reach 2
Riffle
MY -2 (UT 1 Reach 2)
MY -3 (UT 1 Reach 2) MY -4 (UT 1 Reach 2) MY -5 (UT 1 Reach 2)
Dimension
MYO
MY1
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5
MY5+ MYO
MYI
MY2 MY3 MY4 MY5 MY5+
BF Width ft
8.0
7.9
8.2
8.7
8.0
8.6
Floodprone Width (ft) (approx)
25.0
25.0
25.0
25.0
25.0
25.0
BF Mean Depth ft
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.7
0.6
0.7
BF Max Depth ft
1.1
1.1
0.9
1.1
1.0
1.0
BF Cross Sectional Area (fe)
5.2
5.5
4.7
5.9
5.0
5.8
Width/Depth Ratio
12.3
11.3
14.3
12.8
12.8
12.8
Entrenchment Ratio
3.1
3.2
3.0
2.9
3.1
2.9
Bank Height Ratio
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
d50 mm
0.6
0.7
Table llf. Monitoring Data - Stream Reach Data Summary
Martin's Creek I1 Mitigation Project - DMS Project Number 92633
Parameter
Baseline (UT 1 Reach 2)
MY -1 (UT 1 Reach 2)
MY -2 (UT 1 Reach 2)
MY -3 (UT 1 Reach 2) MY -4 (UT 1 Reach 2) MY -5 (UT 1 Reach 2)
Dimension and Substrate - Riffle Only
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD
Min
Mean
I Med
Max
SD
Min
Mean
Med
Max
SD Min Mean Med Max SD Min Mean Med Max SD Min Mean Med Max SD
BF Width ft
8.0
8.7
7.9
8
8.2
8.6
Floodprone Width ft
25
25
25
BF Mean Depth ft
0.7
0.6
0.7
0.6
0.7
BF Max Depth Lft
LI
1.0
1.1
0.9
1.0
BF Cross Sectional Area (ft2)1
5.2
5.9
5.0
5.5
4.7
5.8
Width/Depth Ratio
12.3
12.8
11.4
12.5
12.7
14.3
Entrenchment Ratio
2.9
3.1
3.1
3.2
2.9
3.1
Bank Height Ratiol
I LO
I ILO
LO
Profile
Riffle length ft
7
19
18
51
10
4
16
12
37
9
4.3
16.5
12.8
46.7
9.4
Riffle slope ft/ft
0.0215
0.0457
0.0445
0.0667
0.0125
NA*
NA*
NA*
NA*
NA*
NA*
NA*
NA*
NA*
NEA*
Pool length ft
3
6
6
10
2
3
6
5
12
2
3
6
6
14
2
Pool Max depth ft
Pool spacing (ft)
15
25
23
58
10
9
22
19
45
9
9
24
19
55
11
Pattern
Channel Beltwidth ft
40
Radius of Curvature(ft)
30
40
Rc:Bankfull width ft/ft
3.8
4.7
Meander Wavelength 11
15
30
Meander Width ratio
4.7
Additional Reach Parameters
Ros en Classification
C - Type
C - Type
C - Type
Channel Thalweg Length ft
1176
1167
1176
Sinuosity
1.2
1.2
1.2
Water Surface Slope (Channel) (ft/ft)
0.0577
NA*
0.0582
BF slope ft/ft
-----
----
Ri%/RU%P%G%/S%
SC%/SA%/G%/C%/B%BE%
dl6/d35/d50/d84/d95
% of Reach with Eroding Banks
Channel Stability or Habitat Metric
Biological or Other
NA* No water in channel during field surveys.

APPENDIX E
HYDROLOGY DATA
Table 12. Verification of Bankfull Events
Table 13. Wetland Hydrology Criteria Attainment Summary
Figure E1. Martin's Creek 11 30-70 Percentile Graph for Rainfall
Groundwater Gauge Graphs
Martin's Creek II (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 2 of 5 (2015)
DMS Project Number 92633 December 2015
Cherokee County, North Carolina Appendices

Table 12. Verification of Bankfull Events
Martin's Creek II Mitigation Site (DMS Prosect Number 92633)
Date of Data
Date of Occurrence
Method
Photo (if
Collection
available)
Crest gauge data indicates a bankfull event after
August 25, 2014
April 7, 2014
approximately 2.4 inches of rain documented in one day at
---
an onsite rain gauge.
Crest gauge data indicates a bankfull event after
August 25, 2014
July 1, 2014
approximately 2.02 inches of rain was documented over two
---
days at an onsite rain gauge.
Crest gauge data indicates a bankfull event after
August 25, 2014
August 24, 2014
approximately 1.39 inches of rain documented over two days
---
at an onsite rain gauge.
Crest gauge data indicates a bankfull event after
October 27, 2014
September 3, 2014
approximately 1.67 inches of rain documented in one day at
---
an onsite rain gauge.
Crest gauge data and laid back vegetation indicate a bankfull
October 27, 2014
October 14, 2014
event after approximately 2.5 inches of rain documented in
1
one day at an onsite rain gauge.
Crest gauge data indicates a bankfull event after
April 12, 2015
November 17, 2014
approximately 1.44 inches of rain documented in one day at
---
an onsite rain gauge.
Crest gauge data indicates a bankfull event after
July 13, 2015
June 11, 2015
approximately 1.68 inches of rain documented in one day at
---
an onsite rain gauge.
Crest gauge data indicates a bankfull event after
July 13, 2015
June 26, 2015
approximately 1.57 inches of rain was documented in one
---
day at an onsite rain gauge.
Crest gauge data indicates a bankfull event after
September 11, 2015
August 19, 2015
approximately 2.94 inches of rain was documented over
---
three days at an onsite rain gauge.
Crest gauge data indicates a bankfull event after
November 18, 2015
September 26, 2015
approximately 2.65 inches of rain was documented over two
---
days at an onsite rain gauge.
Crest gauge data indicates a bankfull event after
November 18, 2015
October 3, 2015
approximately 4.50 inches of rain was documented over
---
three days at an onsite rain gauge.
Martin's Creek II (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 2 of 5 (2015)
DMS Project Number 92633 December 2015
Cherokee County, North Carolina Appendices

Table 13. Wetland Hydrology Criteria Attainment Summary
Martin's Creek II MitiEation Site (DMS Proiect Number 92633)
Martin's Creek II (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 2 of 5 (2015)
DMS Project Number 92633 December 2015
Cherokee County, North Carolina Appendices
Success Criteria Achieved/Max Consecutive Days During Growing Season
Gauge
(Percentage)
Year 1 (2014)
Year 2 (2015) Year 3 (2016) Year 4 (2017)
Year 5 (2018)
1
Yes/75 Days
Yes/118 Days
(39%)
(61.8%)
2
No/21 Days
Yes/36 Days
(11%)
(18.8%)
3
Yes/52 Days
Yes/72 Days
(27%)
37.7%)
4
No/21 Days
Yes/27 Days
(11%)
(14.1%)
5
No/ 15 Days
Yes/25 Days
(7.8%)
(13.1%)
6
Yes/58 Days
Yes/69 Days
(30%)
(36.1%)
7
Yes/85 Days
Yes/69 Days
(44%)
(36.1%)
8
Yes/65Days
Yes/72 Days
(34%)
(37.7%)
9
No/22 Days
Yes/27 Days
(11.5%)
(14.1%)
10
No/24 Days
Yes/28 Days
(12.5%)
(14.7%)
11
No/ 18 Days
No/22 Days
(9%)
(11.5%)
12
No/20 Days
Yes/27 Days
(10%)
(14.1%)
13
Yes/116 Days
Yes/117 Days
(61%)
(61.2%)
Martin's Creek II (final) Axiom Environmental, Inc. Monitoring Year 2 of 5 (2015)
DMS Project Number 92633 December 2015
Cherokee County, North Carolina Appendices

r.
7
6
U
5
4
d
3
2
1
0
Figure EI: Martin's Creek 11 30-70 Percentile Graph for Rainfall
Data from WETS Station: MURPHY, NC 6001
2015
—30th Percentile
—70th Percentile

12
10
8
6
4
2
0
-2
-4
ami -6
J
-8
to -10
12
-14
-16
c7
-18
-20
-22
-24
-26
-28
-30
-32
-34
-36
-38
-40
Martins Creek II Groundwater Gauge 1
Year 2 (2015 Data)
3.0
2.5
c
A A A U'7 V7 U'7 (.n (.n Ol Ol Ol Ol V V V V V W 00 00 00 l0 110 110 l0 I -a
N F\-� 0000 F\-� N N l\n F\-� F\-� N W F\-� F\-� N W V F\-� N N A I--' I--' N \ \ \ \ \ \ \
O V A \ \ U'1 N l0 \ N l0 O) \ O V A 1--' \ A I--' 00 00 In N l0 N W 6)Lq
Lq Lq Lq
l!1 l!1 lJ1 111 Ul lfl ll1 l!1 l!1 lJ1 lJ1 Vl Ul lfl lJ1 lJ1 l!1 l!1 l!1 lJ1 Vl Ul Ln Lq lJ1 Lq
In U'7 U'7 In
1.0
0.5

Martins Creek II Groundwater Gauge 2
Year 2 (2015 Data)
12 3.0
10 April 14 October 21
8
6 Growing Season Growing Season
4 Start End
2.5
2
0 IL
-2 1 Aix
v -4 _
ami -6 2.0
J �
_8 3
0 -8 Malfunction £
a
v 10
12 —
3 -14 21 Das 36 Das 16 Das 1.5
-16
18 Ds
-20
-22 1.0
-24
-26
-28
-30 — -
-32 — - 0.5
-34
-36 — — -
-38 — -
-40 16 111 1 1 1 1 1 0.0
A � Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln Ol Ol Ol Ol V V V V V 00 00 00 00 I'D 1.0 lD lD
N N 00 I--� N N Un F-� F-� N W N I--� N W V N N N N N N \ \ \ \ \
O V \ \ In N lD \ N l0 Ol \ O V N \ N 00 \ �--� 00 In N 1.0 N W
\ \ \ Fn N \ \ \ Ln \ \ \ Ln \ \ \ \ Ln
VI Ln F-1 lJl lJl F-1 Ln F-1 lJl F-+ F-1 Ln In Ln F-+ F-1 Ln In F-1 F-+ VI U'1 F-1 Ln F-+ VI Ln \ \ \
In lJl In Vl lJ1 In Ul Vl lJ1 ll1 Ul Vl lJ1 In Ul In In V1 Ul VI lJ1
In Lm N Ln
In

Martins Creek II Groundwater Gauge 3
Year 2 (2015 Data)
12
April
14
October
21
10
8
Growing
Season
Growing
Season
6
End
4
Sta
rt
2
0
_
if
x
V1
IV
1
11,11112
v
-4
J 6
p
d -O
r
10
3
12
_
65 Days
R7
Days
72
Da�
c -14
-
t� -16
-18
-20
-22
-24
-26
-28
-30
-32
-34
-36
-
-38
-
-40
—
ln
In
Ln
In In
Ol
Ol
Ol
Ol
J
_I
v
V
J
00
00
00
00
lD
lD 1.0
l0
N
N
N
I\-�
0000
N
N N
Ln
N
I\-�
N
W
N
I\-�
N
W
v
I\-�
N
N
A
I\-� N
N
\
\
\
\
\
O
J
\
\
In
N l0
\
N
I'D
at
00
\
H. 00
t n
N
I'D
H+
N
W
Ui
Ln
U�
Ln
F n
Un
V1
Ui
U�
Ln
F n Fn
Un Un
Ui
U�
Ln
N
Un
N
Ui
N
Ln
U�
F n
Un
Fn
Un
Fn
Un
U'1
N
Un
hn
Un
Fn
Un
111
Qn Ln
Ui Ui
Ui
Ln
Ln
U�
N
Ui
\
\
\
Un
Un
In
3.0
2.5
c
2.0
1.0
0.5
x1f

Martins Creek II Groundwater Gauge 4
Year 2 (2015 Data)
12 I 3.0
10 April 14 October 21
8 P
6 Growing Season Growing Season
4 Start End
2.5
2
0
c -2
a -4
v-6 2.0
a -8 0
3 -10 Q
-12
'
I Ds 16 Das 27
Das 1.50 -14 19 Days
-16
-18
-20
-22
-24 1.0
-26
-28
=z
_
-30
-32 0.5
-34
-36 -
-38 - -
Jim
-40 — " 0.0
Vl U, (P V, L" 01 0) 0) m v J v J J 00 00 00 00 lD l0 .0 lD
N N N F� 00 N N N UnF� N NW N N NW J N N N 41I--� F-� N \ \ \ \ \
N 1.0 \ N 1.0 Ol \ O V � 00 \ 00 Ln N 1.0 N W
\ \ N \ \ \ I--' \ \ \ \ I--' \ \ \ F' \ \ \ \ \ m W O
Ln Ln V1
Ui Ui Un Ui In Un Ui Ui In Ui Ln Ln Ui Ui Ln Un Ui Ui Ui Un Ln Ui Ui Ui

Martins Creek II Groundwater Gauge 5
Year 2 (2015 Data)
12 3.0
10 I April 14 October 21
8 GrowinSeason Growing Season
Growing
Season End
4 Start
2.5
2
0
c _2
a, -4
a 6A
A 2.0
AAJ
ar -8 0
3 -10 a
12 21 Das 25 Das
0 14 1.5 c
-18
-20
-22 1.0
-24
-26
-28
-30
-32 0.5
-34
-36
-38 Id
-40 mf mm 0.0
A ? A In In In In U1 Ql m Ol O J V V J V 00 00 00 00 l0 W l0 W N N N N N
N N 0000 F\-� N N U1 F\-� F\-� N W N I\-� N W v N N N \p I\-� N N \ \ \ \ \
O V .P \ \ In N W \ N W O \ O V A 00 \ 00 In N W N W
\ \ \ F-' \ \ \ \ \ \ \ F-' \ \ \ \ \ Q) W O
In U1 In In In In
In In In In Ln In Ln In (.n Ln Ln Um (.n Ln Ln In U1 Ln In In Ln N N N
VI In Ln

Martins Creek II Groundwater Gauge 6
Year 2 (2015 Data)
12 I 3.0
10 I April 14 October 21
8 Growing Season
6 Growing Season
4 Start
2.5
2
0
c _2 �
ai -6 2.0
J p
0! -8 O
3 10 a
3 -14 69 Days 38 Das 25 Das 17 Das 26 Das 1.5
-16 o�c
-18
-20
-22 1.0
-24
-26
-28
-30
-32 0.5
-34
-36
-38
-40 id 0.0
A A A In In In In In m m m m v V V -1 v 00 00 00 00 t0 t0 l0 t0
N N N \00NN NW N NN N -- -- I-
i- 00 LT1 W V N
O v \ \ Ul N l0 \ N UJ Ol \ O -I A N \ A N 00 \ P-+ 00 Ul N l0 N N W
\ \ \ H' \ \ \ N \ \ \ \ N \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ p) W O
N N N Ul Ul 1-a N N Ul N 1-a N Ul N N h+ N Ul N I-+ ha Ul N N h+ 1-+ N \ \ \
Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul N N I--�
U1 V1 U'1

Martins Creek II Groundwater Gauge 7
Year 2 (2015 Data)
12 3.0
10 April 14 - I
8 Growing Season October 21
6 Start Growing Season
4 End
2.5
2
0 -
2 Malfunction _
-4 I c
v _6 2.0
VIJ
ar -8 0
3 10 Q
0 -12
14 69 Days s 34 Da 1.5 c
0
Q -16 z
-18
-20
-22 1.0
-24
-26
-28
-30 -
-32 0.5
-34 -
-36 — --
-38 - - - —
-40 16 Rvi - 0.0
A A A Ll In In U1 In m Ol 0" m V V V V V 00 00 00 00 l0 lD lD 1.0
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ O O O O O
O V 4 \ \ Ln N l0 \ N to Ol \ O V 41 N \ � F-� 00 NJ NJ \ F -a 00 U1 N W N N W
\ \ \ \ \ \ f-' \ \ \ \ F-' \ \ \ F-' \ \ \ \ \ m W p
N F-� F -a Ul In Ul UI F -a F -a N F -a UI F -a F -a N In F -a Fa \ \ \
Ul U1 Ul Ul Ul Ul U1 Ul Ul U1 Ul Ul Ul U1 Ul Ul Ui U1 Ul Ui Ln N h -a �-a
U1 Ln U1

Martins Creek II Groundwater Gauge 8
Year 2 (2015 Data)
12 3.0
10 April 14 October 21
8 Growing Season Growing Season
6 Start End
4 2.5
2
_ 0
2
v -4
ai 6 2.0
J
v -8 0
3 10 a
-12
§ 14 68 Das 36 Das D ys 1.5
l7 -16 of6c
-18
-20
-22 1.0
-24
-26
28
-30
-320.5
i
-34 -
-36
-38 - —
11 1 IN 11
-40P - 0.0
A A A In In In In In m m m m v V v v v 00 00 00 00 t0 l0 t0 t0
N 00\NN\NWNN NN N--�00 n W V P�
O
-I A \ \ Ul N l0 \ N UJ Ol \ O -I A N \ A 00 \ H+ 00 Ul N l0 N N W
\ \ \ N \ \ \ N \ \ \ \ N \ \ \ \ \ \ \ pl W O
N N N Ul Ul N I— N Ul N N N Ul N N N N Ul N N N Ul N N N N N \ \ --
U1
Ul Ul Lill Ul Ul Lill Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul Lill Ul Ul Ul Ul N N N
Ul L9 Ul

1 �
October
April 14
G rowing Season Season
-. M
Sta rt
' �i��■■■i�i�ii�iii�i���i■iii■i�n��■����■i■
IWM
' �� ■■■IMMMMMIMM WEIM ■ .

• • 1
1 �
April 14 October 21 UEU
GrowingSeason row ng eason
Sta rt End
kSM WAN INES WAhWVNM R
WMEE1E\ERI INE a' ERI IN WEB m\ ■
■��WOU, MENNOW51NEW rI MINEENNE
INE NEEN MIN ONE MME MINEENEEN 0 IMENEWE
SEE NEEN MEN ONE MEM MINEENEEN m IMENEWE'
NEEN MIN ONE MIN! MINEEMIN m MINEENNE
n MINEENNE MINEEMIN 01
N IMENE103 MINEENEEN ■
n� MENMINEEN■1 INIMENEEN ■ R ,
■'W MINEEN■I ■ WEEME1E
wEEN Nw■I ■ WENEWERE
rimmmrimmi■1 IME■ INFEENIN�
�mim n Elt r wa mi 1M■■I ME INIENE-Im ..

Martins Creek II Groundwater Gauge 11
Year 2 (2015 Data)
12 3.0
10 IOctober 21
8 April 14 Growing Season
6 Growing Season End
4 Start
2.5
2 ILL
0
c 2 =
v -4
v _6A A 2.0
v -8 A rill
W1 'o
3 10 Q
3 -14 19 Days �� 22 Das 1.5
16 22 Das
-18
-20
-22 1.0
-24
-26
-28
-30 -
-32 0.5
-34
-36
-38 — -
-40 0.0
(, U, U, a) a) a) a) v v v v v 00 00 00 Co l0 l0 la la r N r N r
00\NN\W\NN N --I-00 U1 N N W --4
O \ Ul N la \ N la a) \ O -I A Co Co Ul N la N W
\ \ \ N N \ \ \ 1-' \ \ \ N \ \ \ \ N \ \ \ \ \ \ \ a) W O
N F+ N Ul Ul Ln Un N N N N N \ \ \
Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul Ln
In U1 In

Martins Creek II Groundwater Gauge 12
Year 2 (2015 Data)
12 3.0
10 April 14 October 21
8 Growing Season Growing Season
6
4 Start
2.5
2
_ 0
-2
c
ai6 2.0
3
a _8 0
m -10 Q
12 -
14 18 Das 1.5 4°
3 O
o _16 m
18 °C
-20
-22 1.0
-24
-26
-28
-30
-32 0.5
-34
-36
-38
-40 - - — - - - 0.0
A A A U9 In In In In Ql Ql m Ol v V V V V 00 00 00 00 LO LO LO LO
00 N N N Ln N N N W I--� F -a N W v N N N A F -a F -a N \ \ \ \ \
O -I A \ \ Ul N LO \ N l0 m \ O �I A F-� \ A F-� 00 \ F-� 00 Ul N l0 N W
Ln \ \ \ Ln \ \ \ \ \ Q7 W O
hn N N U'I U'1 hn N Ln U'I Fn Ln N U'I Fn Ln Ln Ln U'1 N Ln Ln U'1 Fn N Ln Ln N \ \ \
Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul Ul N F
Ln 1
In In In

Martins Creek II Groundwater Gauge 13
Year 2 (2015 Data)
12 3.0
10 April 14 October 21
8 Growing Season End Growing Season
6 Sta rt End
4 2.5
2
IT x T VY
_ 0
2
-4 I c
j -6 2.0
a -8 0
3 -10 a
-12 —
3 -147 117 Days 1.5 c
-16 I of6c
-18
-20
-22 1.0
-24
-26
28
-30
-32 0.5
-34
-36 — —
Lat
-38 - -
-40 — v IL 0.0
� 4� 4� Vi In U1 Lm U1 a> at a> Ol V V V V V 00 00 00 00 lD l0 1.0 lD
00 F� N N Vl F� F-� N W F-� F� N W V F-� N N F� I--� N \ \ \ \ \
O V ? \ \ Un N l0 \ N l0 a> \ O V N \ F+ 00 00 In N 1.0 N W
0) VJ O
Vl Ln In V1 V1 LrI
V1 Vi VI V1 Vi Vl Vl Vn V1 V7 Vl Vn V1 Vn Vl V1 VI Vi Vl V1 Vi l�Jl lJl l/l