The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20160195 Ver 1_Application_20160301Carpenter,Kristi From: Bryan, Roger D Sent: Tuesday, March O1, 2016 10:08 AM To: Beckwith, Loretta A SAW; Chambers, Marla J; Barnett, Kevin; Carpenter,Kristi; Andrew Henderson (andrew_henderson@fws.gov) Cc: DeWit, Benjamin J; Medlin, Christopher D Subject: Bridge 100571 Buncombe Permit Application Attachments: Bridge 100571 Buncombe Permit Application.pdf; Bridge 100571 Buncombe Plans.pdf; Bridge 100571 Buncombe PJD Form.pdf; Bridge 100571 Buncombe photos.docx Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Follow up Flagged I have attached a NWP 14 permit application for a bridge to arch culvert project in Buncombe County. I have also attached the PJD Form for the Corps file. Please email me if you need any additional information. Thanks Roger D. Bryan Division Environmental Program Supervisor II Division 13 Department of Transportation 828 251 6171 office 828 337 5234 mobile rdbryan@ncdot.gov 55 Orange Street PO Box 3279 Asheville, NC 28802-3279 Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties. Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties. Corps Submittal Cover Sheet Please provide the following info: 1. Project Name:_Bridge ] 00571, SR 3442 Waters Cove Road 2. Name of Yroperty Owner/Applicant: NC DO'I' 3. Name of Consultant/Agent: *Agent nulhorization needs to be allached. 4. Related/Previous Action ID nwnber(s): 5. Site Address: N/t1 6. Subdivision Name: 7. City: Enka 8. County: Buncombe 9. Lat: 35.50773 Long: -82.65994 (Decimal Degrees Please ) 10. Quadrangle Name: Enka ll. Waterway: Bill Moore Creek 12. Watershed: French Broad River 13. Requested Action: X Nationwide Permit # 14 General Permit # _ Jurisdictional Determination Request Pre-Application Request The following iuformation will be completed by Corps offce: AID: Prepare File Folder Assign number in ORM Begin Date Authorization: Sectiou 10 Section 404 Project Description/ Nature of Activity/ Project Purpose: Site/Waters Name: Keywords: Transportation March l, 2016 Ms. I.,ori Beckwith US Army Corps of Engineers I51 Patton Avenue, Room 208 Asheville, NC 28801-5006 Subject: Nationwide Permit # I4 [3ridge 100571, SR 3442 Waters Cove Road State ProjectNo. 17BP.13.R36 Buncombe County, NC Dear Ms. Beckwilh: PAT McCRORY covornor NICHOLAS J. TENNYSON Secretpry 1 have enclosed a set of plans, a PCN application for NWP # 14, and a vicinity map relative to the proposed bridge replacement project on SR 3442 Waters Cove Road, Buncombe County, NC. We p�ropose to replace the existing 13' timber bridge with a double pipe arch (2@ 81" x 59") with low flow arch and sills. SGeam slope at the site is 2.5%. Culvert installation will result in permanent impact to 45 linear feet of Bill Moore Creek; Floodplain bench construction will permanently impact an additional 83 linear feet. Temporary impacts to 148 feet of the stream are necessaiy for dewatering/diversion. The stream is approximately 7 feet wide with predominately gravel and cobble substrate. Bill Moore Creek is classified as Class C. Existing channel morphology will be maintained upstream and downstream of the culvert. Riparian vegetation will be reestablished along disturbed areas associated with the project. Stormwater will be diverted through grass-lined ditches or vegetated buffers prior to entering streams. This project may impact potentially suitable no�thern long-eared bat (Myolrs seplentr�io�talis) (NLEB) sununer roosting habitat via bridge removal. Therefore, a may affect, not likely to adversely affect is requested for the NLEB. No U�ee clearing will be performed for the project. The existing bridge is constructed of timber. The crown to bed measurement (distance from travel surface to streambed) is 6 feet. Clearance between the bottom of the bridge and lhe stream surface is approximately 3 feet. A swvey of the bridge did not reveal any evidence of usage by ba[s. For the proposed action, NCDOT has committed to the conservation measures listed below: !`�'Nothing Compares� Sta�c of North Camlina I Depahmenl of Transpor�alion I Division Thirleen 55 Omn6e Slreel � NO f3ox±279 I Ashcville, NC 28802-3279 8282516171 T Ms. Lori [3eckwith Page-2 Bridge 100571, Buncombe County March l, 2016 I) No alterations of a known hibernaculum's entrance or interior environment if it impairs an essential behavioral pattern, including sheltering Northern long-eared bats (Janua�y 1 through December 31); 2) No tree removal within a 0.25 mile radius of a known hibernacula (Janua�y 1 through December 31); and 3) No cutting or destroying a known, occupied maternity roost tree, or any other trees within a I50-foot radius from the known, occupied maternity tree during the period from June I through and including July 31. NCDOT has detennined that the proposed action does not require separate consultation on the grounds that the proposed action is consistent with the final Section 4(d) rule, codified at 50 C.F.R. § 17.40(0) and effective ['eb�va�y 16, 2016. Section 7 responsibilities are therefore considered fulfilled. No effect on the remaining Buncombe County list of federally protected species (threatened or endangered) or designated critical habitat will occur. Andrew Henderson of US Fish and Wildlife Service is copied on the application for review. As a pairt of the 401 Certification process, the project was processed through the DOT Programmatic Agreement for Minor Project as required by Section 106 of the National Historic Preseivation Act of 1966 and GS 121-12(a). No Historic Resources will be affected. By copy of this letter, we request Marla Chambers, North Carolina Wildlife Resow•ces Commission Western Region Coordinator, to eonunent directly to the Corps concerning the permit request. E3y copy of this letter, we are asking the Area Roadside Field Operations Engineer, to comment on the above project Bill Moore Creek is classified as Class C. "1'he project will not require a trout buffer variance. By copy of this letter, I am forwarding one electronic copy of the application package to Kristi Lynn Carpenter, NC Division of Water Resources, Transportation Permitting Unit with cc to Kevin Barnett, NC DWR Asheville Regional Office for review and comment. Please charge tlie application fee of $240.00 to WBS element # 17BP.13.R.36. Please forward comments directly to the Carps with copy to Division 13 Environmental Officer. Yoin• earliest coi�sideration for this request would be gready appreciated. If you have any questions or information needs, please contact me at (828) 251-6171. Sincerely, �'� � �� Roger D. Bryan Division 13 Environmental Officer Gnclosin•es cc: J.J. Swain, Jr., P.E. Chris Medlin, P.E. Ben DeWit, CPESC Kevin Barnett Marla Chambers Andrew Henderson Office Use Only: Corps action ID no. DWQ project no. Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008 Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form A. Applicant Information 1. Processing 1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the X Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit Corps: 1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number:l4 or General Permit (GP) number: 1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? X Yes ❑ No 1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply): X 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit ❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization 1 e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ 401 For the record only for Corps Permit: because written approval is not required? Certification: ❑ Yes X No ❑ Yes X No 1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation X Yes ❑ No of impacts7 If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program. 1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h ❑ Yes X No below. 1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes X No 2. Project Information 2a. Name of project: Bridge 100517, SR 3442 2b. Caunty: Buncombe 2c. Nearest municipality / town: Enka 2d. Subdivision name: N/A 2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state 17BP.13.R.36 project no: 3. Owner Information 3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: North Carolina Department of Transportation 3b. Deed Book and Page No. N/A 3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if N/A applicable): 3d. Streetaddress: N/A 3e. City, state, zip: N/A 3f. Telephone no.: N/A 3g. Fax no.: N/A 3h. Email address: N/A Page 1 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 4. Applicant Information (if different from owner) 4a. Applicant is: North Carolina Department of Transportation 4b. Name: J.J. Swain, Jr., P.E., Division Engineer 4c. Business name N.C. Department of Transportation (if applicable): 4d. Street address: 55 Orange Street, P.O. Box 3279 4e. City, state, zip: Asheville, NC 25802 4f. Telephone no.: 828-251-6171 4g. Fax no.: 828-251-6394 4h. Email address: rdbryan(�ncdot.gov 5. Agenf/Consultant Information (if applicable) 5a. Name: N/A 5b. Business name N/A (if applicable): 5c. Streetaddress: N/A 5d. City, state, zip: N/A 5e. Telephone no.: N/A 5f. Fax no.: N/A 5g. Email address: N/A Page 2 of 10 B. Project Information anq Prior Project History 1. Property Identification , 1a. Property identification no; (tax PIN or parcel ID): N/A 1b. Site coordinates (in decir�ial degrees): Latitude: 35.50773° N Longitude: - 82.65994° W 1c. Propertysize: 0.1 acres 2. Surtace Waters 2a. Name of nearest body of'Iwater (stream, river, etc.) to gill Moore Creek proposed project: 2b. Water Quality Classificatibn of nearest receiving water. C 2c. River basin: I French Broad 3. Project Description 3a. Describe the existing con'�itions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: , Existing bridge on SR 34�42 surrounded by low density residential area and pasture. 3b. List the total estimated a,reage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0 ' 3c. List the total estimated lin�ar feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 100 3d. Explain the purpose of th� proposed project Replace the existing 13' tjmber bridge with a double pipe arches (2@ 81" x 59") with low flow arch and sills. 3e. Describe the overall proj�'ct in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: A permanent impact to 95 linear feet of Bill Moore Creek will be necessary for pipe installation with 83' of floodplain bench construction and pank stabilization. A temporary impact to 148 linear feet will be necessary for an impervious dike/diversio�n to dewater the work area during construction. Equipment used will include excavator, crane, and trucks. I 4. Jurisdictional Determinations 4a. Have jurisdictional wetlan!d or stream determinations by the Corps or State been requ�sted or obtained for this property / project (including all priorlphases) in the past? ❑ Yes X No ❑ Unknown Comments: 4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made? ❑ Preliminary ❑ Final 4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company: Name (if known): N/A Other: N/A 4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation. 5. Project History 5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for � Yes X No ❑ Unknown this project (including all prior phases) in the past? 5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions. 6. Future Project Plans 6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes X No 6b. If yes, explain. Page 3 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version Proposed Impacts Inventory 1. Impacts Summary 1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply): ❑ Wetlands X Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction 2. Wetland Impacts If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted. 2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f. Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction number — Type of impact Type of welland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ — non-404, other) (acres) Tem orar T W1 ❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ W2 ❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ W3 ❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ W4 ❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ WS ❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ W6 ❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ 2g. Total wetland impacts 2h. Comments: 3. Stream Impacts If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this question for all stream sites impacted. 3a. 3 b. 3c. 3 d. 3e. 3f. 3 g. Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact number - (PER) or (Corps - 404, 10 stream length Permanent (P) or intermittent DWQ — non-404, width (linear Temporary (T) (INT)? other) (feet) feet) S1 ❑ P X T Impervious gill Moore Creek X PER X Corps � 148 Dike/Dewatering ❑ INT ❑ DWQ S1 X P❑ T Arch Culvert Bill Moore Creek X PER X Corps � 45 ❑ INT ❑ DWQ S1 X P❑ T Floodplain gill Moore Creek X PER X Corps � 83 Benches ❑ INT ❑ DWQ SZ � P � T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ S3 ❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ 3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 276 3i. Comments: 45 feet of permanent culvert impact, 83 feet of permanent impacts for floodplain benches, 148 feet of temporary impacts for dewatering. Page 4 of 10 4. Open Water Impacts If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of the U.S. then individuall list all o en water im acts below. 4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e. Open water Name of waterbody impact number — (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres) Permanent (P) or Tem orar T 01 ❑P❑T 02 ❑P❑T 03 ❑P❑T 04 ❑P❑T 4f. Total open water impacts 4g. Comments: 5. Pond or Lake Construction If ond or lake construction ro osed, then com lete the chart below. 5a. 5b. Sc. 5d. 5e. Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland Pond ID Proposed use or purpose (acres) number of pond Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded P1 P2 Sf. Total 5g. Comments: 5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no: 5i. Expected pond surface area (acres): Sj. Size of pond watershed (acres): 5k. Method of construction: 6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ) If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts below. If an im acts re uire miti ation, then ou MUST fill out Section D of this form. 6a. ❑ Neuse ❑ Tar-Pamlico ❑ Other: Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman 6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g. Buffer impact number— Reason Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact Permanent (P) or for Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet) Tem orar T im act re uired? 61 ❑P❑T ❑Yes ❑ No 62 ❑P❑T ❑Yes ❑ No B3 ❑P❑T ❑Yes ❑ No 6h. Total buffer impacts 6i. Comments: Page 5 of 10 D. Impact Justification and Mitigation 1. Avoidance and Minimization 1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project. Minimized length of culvert and has low flow arch and silis to maintain natural stream channel bottom within the structure. 1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques. N/A 2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State 2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for X Yes ❑ No impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? 2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ❑ DWQ X Corps ❑ Mitigation bank 2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this X Payment to in-lieu fee program project? ❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation 3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank 3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: 3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity 3c. Comments: 4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program 4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. X Yes 4b. Stream mitigation requested: 45 linear feet 4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ❑ warm Xcool ❑cold 4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet 4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres 4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres 4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres 4h. Comments: 5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan 5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan. Page 6 of 10 PCN Farm — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ 6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ❑ Yes X No buffer mitigalion? 6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the amount of mitigation required. 6c. 6d. 6e. Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation (square feet) (square feet) Zone 1 3(2 for Catawba) Zone 2 �,5 6f. Total buffer mitigation required: 6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank, permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund). 6h. Comments: Page 7 of 10 E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ) 7. Diffuse Flow Plan 1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers idenlified � Yes X No within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? 1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why. Comments: ❑ Yes ❑ No 2. Stormwater Mana ement Plan 2a. What is lhe overall percent imperviousness of this project? N/A 2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? X Yes ❑ No 2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: 2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan: The project will use BMP's to the Maximum Extent Practicable (MEP) in compliance with NCDOT's NPDES Permit No. 000250 Post Construction Stormwater Program ❑ Certified Local Government 2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? X DWQ Stormwater Program ❑ DWQ 401 Unit 3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review 3a. In which local governmenYs jurisdiction is this project? N/A ❑ Phase II 3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ❑ NSW apply (check all that apply): ❑ USMP ❑ Water Supply Watershed X Other: N/A 3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been N/A attached? 4. DWQ Stormwater Pro ram Review ❑ Coastal counties ❑ HQW 4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply � ORW (check all that apply): ❑ Session Law 2006-246 X Other. N/A 4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been attached? N/A 5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review 5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? N�q 5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? N/A Page 8 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version F. Supplementary Information 1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement) 1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the � Yes ❑ No use of public (federal/state) land? 1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ❑ Yes � No (North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? 1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.) ❑ Yes ❑ No Comments: 2. Violations (DWQ Requirement) 2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑ Yes � No or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 26 .0200)? 2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ❑ Yes � No 2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): 3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement) 3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in � Yes � No additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? 3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description. 4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement) 4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility. N/A Page 9 of 10 PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version 5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement) 5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or � Yes ❑ No habitat? Sb. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act � Yes � No impacts? ❑ Raleigh Sc. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. ❑ Asheville 5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat7 Field survey of the project area and evaluation of current distribulion data. 6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement) 6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes � No 6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat? Current Maps/Database 7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement) 7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation � Yes � No status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in North Carolina history and archaeology)? 7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources? Current Maps/Database 8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement) 8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? � Yes ❑ No 8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: Project will not impact water passage or flood zone beyond existing conditions 8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? Current FEMA Maps Roger D. Biyan �� 3/1/2016 ApplicanUAgenPs Printed Name ApplicanUAgei Ys Signature Date (AgenPs signature is valid only if an authorization letler from the applicant is provided. Page 10 of 10 i. : �1 '+ZF . �� { p��"' � . . ::3 A.4�.�'� �""i�..9,i.-�� b>;. ... �. ��`�'. O wv. .-:1.:�� "ti •- �..� �� ""a ±��F - :-� _<� _ ' ._+f� 5 5 { .. 5 . .. ..,. . c _. . . 1 � ,;-,,,., �f�ti ar9 ce'v' i i'i� 3;.[eY � ^.. xgw� .. � � 1 S; i�` --t � � Q`� x - �� , p��. Fa ", a� � 5}� r >, a�;,A � s 4 az b,� }. r xa �, t a.,., ✓ �. � _J.. 7 . . . d �';l+e , ..Y ��ti' Figure 1. Bridge 300571, Bill Moore Creek (above and below), Buncombe County, NC. ��YR�.. 5�� /1i'�;ESL!! i f iJ. Y.��N C.aF ��t. �/�r �� _ <-1S^; s : � �Y- Y � a +«r ., . � " � ��X � :'u: - . \ � � , � ��— ��}` � t y � q� itti. � �. �� .�� ` � � �� Y:�r�...._ . � p '� '. r i o � � � k t •':iti .. . � AR � _�j e _ =eai'.. " . . M Y��9�': Y \i ... .. -,��i . I c."Rb�", k� � R` � A! �,c t' �j! Z t _ i �Y@r - _ Figure 2. Bridge 100571 Timber bridge structure over Bill Moore Creek, Buncombe County, NC. v"f3 . n. ,. „ Envrronmental Qualiry PAT MCCRORY roverror DONALD R. VAN DER VAART secrem.y Mr. Roger Bryan NCDOT Division 13 Em'uonmental Supervisor North Carolina Departmen[ of Traasportation Post Office Box 3279 Asheville, North Carolina 28802 Dear Mr. Bryan: February 26, 2016 Subject: Mitigation Acceptance Letter: Division 13 Project, Replace Bridge Number 100571 over Bill Moore Creek on SR 3442 (V✓aters Cove Road), Buncombe County; WBS Element 17BP.13.R36 The putpose of this le[ter is to notify you that ihe North Carolina Depariment of Environmental Quality - Division of Mitigation Services (NCDEQ-DMS) will provide the compensatory sveam mitigation for thc subject projecl. Based on the infoimation received from you on February 24, 2016, the impacfs are located in CU 06010105 of the French Broad River basin in the Southem Mountains (SM) Eco-Region, and are as follows: Nrench Broad Stream Wetlands Buffer (Sq. FtJ 06010105 Non- Coastal SM Cold Cool Waan Riparian Ri arian Marsh 7°ne I Zone 2 Impacts 0 45.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 feeUacres TMs impact and associated miHgation need were under projec[ed by the NCDOT in ihe 2016 impact dafa. NCDEQ-DMS will wmmi[ to implement sufficient compensatory slream mitigalion credits to offset the impacts associated with tlus project as detemuned by the regulatory agencies using the delivety timeline listed in Section F3.c.iii of ihe In-Lieu Fee Inshument dated July 28, 2010. If the above referenced impact amounts aze revised, then tttis mitigation acceptaace letter will no longer be valid and a new mitigation accepiance let[er will be required &om NCDEQ-DMS. 8420. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Ms. Beth Hazmon a[ 919-707- Siucerely, �^ LV.�+-�..� Jazne Stanfill Credit Management Supervisor cc: Ms. Lori Seckv✓ith, USACE -- Asheville Regulatory Field O�ce Mr. Cluistopher D. Medlin, P.E., Division 13 Bridge Maintenance Manager Ms. Linda Fitzpatrick, NCDOT - PDEA File: SR 3442 - Bridge 100571 - Division 13 !`�'Nothing Compares%�.. S�aleollfathCa�olirv 6rvimnntenlal(]a:ifry 1601 MailSeiNce ( enRr i Roleigh, North faroGnr 2169414U1 Y19�707�BE00 �,�� y ti:� .. . . . . . . �, �"._' .�_ ''.e}"�: "k:' yy�`? -� '!,.` '$; � � '+_S _s3 ' y: r. y,�4Y,�,yy- ,� ,. . � — ' � - . _ . , � � ,. � . �� , '� " �� .1'Y .. . i . . . � }' � ` ` . ._ e . _ + �i1 ' yi . . ' - � �r' .� •( 4 - y � _ _ �a_ �:�..� ..; - - .��, ��. _ . � _ :_ ��, — _ - _ _ ,� ,s�s+,, �; k,, , _ _ . � .,� _ - - 6 _ �� • .�� «��p � � F� _ - � h: �. >. - -.�� '�� yy,�� - , _ _ _ . - k .-r= _ r.:�" v "=.��T� ,• _ � - . a!� �Y� ' � �• ,�' �"-�` � � =� '" �-- y�, � � 3��, �d� ., r, i - a �~�' _ x-'.'�.9�i ck+'. � �. t1�� -' _ � :. ._.r, _ ' �- yt� �: �:.^'v ,. ., rt"?� � � �s.� � . � ks' 4 �� - !N ��t �c�. �� jy,'i =' . � C' e" �4�� 1 � fr . -� � �� i. - - t.,_ "..�� . C �,yY w- � ' .. ._ li.. - i\L.� �.�� ' r' . - � � i�� . ��4r �s .s.. _ __ _'.. .- � i~.�j"� '`.+iv ,� � . �,�. �� i � � �� .a+s�.� � :.� + Y ,`� � ��_%��_ ��. - -.r �%t� � ..i{+t*• � i+ > :i w, ��—� " .� ��s �s'�^s � ^' �' � 'a, � -: k � ° �� ra:-.- .��rs _ a��'F'�� a ._�f'a"vg�. '6`-�� V . .�L,_ ._ x ._- - _ _ c v. �': . � � . .T�"SS:`- _" -. � _ �<y �fFr, �ro �� ,��. _, �,�` ��`s ' . ��y^V'"�'��-� ' ;. �'� .��f ��=..� ,.. ��., h� ,_. �- ;:� � ��`��.- , .. ,., � �`�4�a. �S �'��'� "' i, � ?�� _ .. _ � �- � :,fr -. ti _ �::7 � ��, �� . • f' oi.� �. � 1 - . � L r � y Isz-� � y . �.._ �\ � ,�:"��/ .,�: , ��W." <' t i.' , 1 / ��r � � � � $.�I�'. .� �...� �� . r .;a�� '{ ' . � I 'JI.� . .y' �� ld�P! � � / -.fi I � ��., � . � ��, .'1'F� , _. �L ._ , _°+1�.t.._ s �, . w� � � - � �� 3 �. �. - ��_ , � � � _.`��*�, , . �. - �`� .' °'._��,� . t ,. � � J �� -� ,+}: . . ��b, . "�,`. �'�`� a �.,.. , . _ - - y��::�' �w�` aaw - � - .. e�� N 4+nM u !�:�,� . �.. . . . ' ,. _�`.i ' n - � ; - '� -' - -. .�; -.,n ., S. �'. � ,� � � "�`� �� . n* � � �'...:'. � � ��`"� ' �. �}f�- '� s� t�1 F �. ��- � ,�. N� ,.�t ,�� :a. _- ' 4' =�.� ��IrfF+''p,� !�r �'�E..b.w n ��;yi� r , � , . �� ': k € li.'�b� �"' �,�i{jL /, - �'�� .i �� ,� �� ' �� :s&+7i��: � �,2i`'� �.�.R -�•@ '^S4 c`,. / -„�. � �� .. "� :ti `� .� =x :, � ^ �� .. �► a� . s. - W ^ a � � • �' �, - =�v. .. � �� t, ,,r� .s�rt��"5. � ., � 5 .' y, � s .� � .5t� _ 4 4. F r1 C Y Y � �F �� .� i�� . � l�ti.t aar � a. y* v. y � G r '" � /p� ' �.�fy� 3 � �� c � � �� . A., � � _ � . � - i �i,. � bi, � � ��}�,' ^ � ,��/ � . ��C. �x . t ..�, � •. � . � . a ,�� ' �` t� j�� L " -�}ty J� �;:'ai �� `J ��.. •� �s"'',. � . w:, �3Y' . �`�.f`.: • �;9 jti ��,s�'' �� Figure 1. Bridge 100571, Bill Moore Creek (above and below), Buncombe County, NC. x'' 4._;� ' �, + r.�'"_. � `<< �. - �.. j� ,> ��v�� —�� ' �f .�j ;�'; - ,� '� " -- ~. .s«±�e� _ _ _ `1u"n� � - - ' — , '��qr,�.; � _ d _ . - _• �._ � � ._ � - _ �,,, � - ; 1 ' - "-."`'""" - . � �^,,, � / - �� t� , - ai-'+. :�, -+*'- . '` _ `:::.-� , . � - r .. , � : ' -- - � 1► ' x , .K;� _ _ . ,y - . s - 1 ' 6. � �� .,,,,j't^� yz'.6�. _ _ -�v �E Y�� ..-- � - � � S� '� � - �N '�' .� � � � - ' �_ _ � . � � ,. -: _ ,i - . r. y!��r� : � µ�'.s� �z ♦ .�.., r . — � � �� ""�' r''�iM � A t_ - , ,.:�" � . _.�. I ; .. ��'4. aYy � . `��. ?��:� �12' � ' � ��' � t � ~ � �- a �' � - -�- ��'� !°a. "-'�`� f�� ..� ,� � +,la`c �.,�►y.z � - ; ` � l�=- �"-• '' . a-�*'� `°�, ` ` ` �",�� f� '�, f '� Y s; .x ca�� - �I, - �; � __ � 'J� �,�`'� J`R �' �s4 r: � �, � � - � Yj�M+� ,; _ � ' K " Z . � �,_'� ' ":. �" _ -� ' �-�s - .r'� ;,�r �:'�y ; ?� : - : ,� �: � .., - �;�, ,s. F ,4 "'��k- � �_ .-. ,�-► •. � _ `�`_: . t <ti,,,,�a -„ '� . , _�, r _ � �+,;•x,�• �t+ \.t ��i�\�-., � ,� i�'_. y,� ,., ,�-��` {.+� ' ' � � * a t ' V .� -Y \� �' �� :a '� � ,`. a �+ � " �.� + � , r ,� � s ,�, �� ,� , .; � ; ya4 r 4. � ; � �.� �A : �' : .��`l -= � ; 1�� ig',�, ',�'- ' '� "- �;: � ': w • � �- � � � \ C !'� 1 �� i`�b• �° t++ � Fr �, "�' � { � "- y� a1' � �. 2- _r. ��.Ri,'^ .q��y � F�� ;'y� � ��,� � � A±k ��k'�t _y ?. �� '`T� • J �a� �' • �.�, Q�! . .�iR,a _ ��4 l..� . . i r' ��}, 4;� ^�. A".F'�' ^ . r" ►t '� �7. ir� • �.,+f.�� "` f"�k � T �,��`�r � .�ri3 . � � _'-�' S_ �i .r�{f . ��1� r�.-~�-.. ... 4' 1 ; �� I� �e+:lb �f' � .. - i� . �. �� , ._ ;, ,� . 4' =� _' � � .��1�� . . . � � .r.� � ` 1. " ......-� . ht. . � . . _ _._ - _ . - T - . � , rj�_- + _ _�:-� � 4w"r�'�' -. � « ' f - �r - ,� . . . .R�� 71 _ _ _ _� � - . .� - � � 'I' ' ' . �� . � � ��-.� � �� f � ��` ,�-� � �� . ,p� �RS'� �•�.A} � � �,_ ii �� ,� i �i �~� �� \a� �� : ��' � _ ��.'�. ;,;.;�r � ._ ., , �"-"�tr ` �^ �k� I�a. ,.. �� z. � - #s�' �^ ��+Y: :�� ,. � •.�,:s. �SS�`�. ~ �� ' Pl� .�T �� Y''.�y� .�. ._' . ',� 4 1 L ..'�f r�='''. �S �:� , � �`�: 1 ' L �. ��_� � . _ . . :�� . , .. ... �` . �._ ° , q`.'�.�..*+; ��...� �, v '*'"��'�� . -,^� "., . " ' _ L �� -� �� " ��t't� 'J,�2 i � �_� " � � `� ��` �� *-� �' � �-- s��- �- �n�� : --�— �-��. -� � - _ .'�� -�:, _ -�_k�,�. , - F'i �.Y " : ! ��! , - . -9C`i � ; 'k:�. .2 M < ' , . : • j � � � y � .. �� . a� � - Figure 2. Bridge 100571 Timber bridge structure over Bill Moore Creek, Buncombe County, NC. ATTACHMENTA PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM BACKGROUNDINFORMATION A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD): B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD: NC Department of Transportation, 55 Orange SUeet, P.O. Box 3279 Asheville, NC 28802 C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Bridge replacement wilh arch culveris for Bridge 100571, Sft 3442, Buncombe County, NC (USE THE ATTACHED TABLE TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE WATERBODIES AT DIFFERENT SITES) State: NC COunty/pa�ish/bOrOugh: euncomee CIYy: Enka Center coordinates of site (IaUlong in degree decimal format): Lat. ae.eona °N; Long. -sz.sessa °W. Universal Transverse Mercator: Name of nearest waterbody: B�ii Moo�e aeek Identify (estimate) amount of waters in the review area: Non-wetland waters: ,00 linearfeet: � width (ft) and/or acres. Cowardin Class: ��e��e .Stf281'Yl F�OW: Perennial Wetlands: N�A acres. Cowardin Class: Name of any water bodies on the site that have been identified as Section 10 waters: Tidal: Non-Tidal: E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY): � Office (Desk) Determination. Date: � Field Determination. Date(s): Zi2izois SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for preliminary JD (check all that apply - checked items should be included in case file and, where checked and requested, appropriately reference sources below): � Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the applicanUconsultant: � Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the appl�nUconsultant. Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report. Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. ❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps: _ ❑ Corps navigable waters' study: ❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: � USGS NHD data � USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps �✓ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: � z4000, e�ka ❑ USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: ❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: ❑ State/Local wetland inventory map(s): ❑ FEMA/FIRM maps: � 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929) ❑ Photographs: ❑ Aerial (Name & Date): or � �tfl@f �NalllQ (� �ate�. Pholosofsireamwithinpermilapplication,3/1/2016 � Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter: � Other information (please specify): 1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional waters of the United States on the subject site, and the permit applicant or other affected party who requested this preliminary JD is hereby advised of his or her option to request and obtain an approved jurisdictional determination (JD) for that site. Nevertheless, the permit applicant or other person who requested this preliminary JD has declined to exercise the option to obtain an approved JD in this instance and at this time. 2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre-construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non-reporting NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an approved JD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware of the following: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization based on a preliminary JD, which does not make an official determination of jurisdictional waters; (2) that the applicant has the option to request an approved JD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an approved JD could possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) that the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) that the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5) that undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting an approved JD constitutes the applicanYs acceptance of the use of the preliminary JD, but that either form of JD wil� be processed as soon as is practicable; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit authorization based on a preliminary JD constitutes agreement that all wetlands and other water bodies on the site affected in any way by that activity are jurisdictional waters of the United States, and precludes any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an approved JD or a preliminary JD, that JD will be processed as soon as is practicable. Further, an approved JD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331, and that in any administrative appeal, jurisdictional issues can be raised (see 33 C.F.R. 331.5(a)(2)). If, during that administrative appeal, it becomes necessary to make an official determination whether CWA jurisdiction exists over a site, or to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional waters on the site, the Corps will provide an approved JD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This preliminary JD finds that there "may be" waters of the United States on the subject project site, and identifies all aquatic features on the site that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information: IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarilv been verified bv the Corps and should not be relied upon for later iurisdictional determinations. Signature and date of Regulatory Project Manager (REQUIRED) �✓� , 3 � or� Sig ture and d� e of person requesting preliminary JD (REQUIRED, unless obtaining the signature is impracticable) �� ,4�y North Carolina Department of Transportation SG[�Y�11W2tPr . I � ,,.,.,,.,, Highway Stormwater Program ��.� STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN (Version 2.04; Released November 2015) FOR NCDOT PROJECTS WBS Element: 17BP.13.R.36 TIP No.: County(ies): Buncombe Page 1 of 2 General Project Information WBS Element: 17BP.13.R.36 TIP Number: Project Type: Bridge Replacement Date: 12/10/2015 NCDOT Contact: Bill Zerman, P.E. Contractor I Designer: Sungate Design Group, P.A. Address: NCDOT Hydraulics Unit Address: g15 Jones Franklin Road 1590 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27606 Ralei h, NC 27699-1590 Phone: 919 707-6755 Phone: 919 859-2243 Email: bzerman ncdot. ov Email: whines sun atedesi n.com CitylTown: Candler, NC Count ies : Buncombe River Basin s: French Broad CAMA County? No Wetlands within Project Limits? No Pro'ect Description Pro'ect Len th lin. miles or feet : 035 Miles Surroundin Land Use: Rural Residential Proposed Pro'ect Existin Site Pro'ect Buiit-Upon Area ac. 0.1 ac. 0.1 ac. Typical Cross Section Description: 2- 10' paved lanes 2- 9' paved lanes, 15' gravel Annual Avg Daily Traffic (veh/hr/day): Design/Future: 100 Year: 1995 Existin : 100 Year: 1995 General Project Narrative: This project involves the replacement of Bridge No. 100571 over Bill Moore Creek on SR 3442 (Waters Cove Road) in Buncombe County, NC with a 2@81 "x59" Aluminized (Description of Minimization of Water CSPA. This bridge replacement and the associated roadway improvements have been designed in a manner that minimizes the increase in impervious surface area. Sills will be Quality Impacts) installed at the upstream and downstream ends of the two culverts to retain bed material. The sills in one barrel will be 1' higher than the sills in the other barrel with a floodplain bench constructed upstream and downstream of the culvert, allowing the stream to flow through only one barrel under normal flow conditions. In the northwest and southwest quadrants of the project, stormwater runoff will be collected and conveyed to the creek in ditches that will be rip rap lined as necessary to prevent erosion. Waterbody Information Surface Water Body (1): Bill Moore Creek NCDWR Stream Index No.: 6-76-7 NCDWR Surface Water Classification for Water Body Primary Classification: Class C Supplemental Classification: None Other Stream Classification: None Impairments: None Aquatic T&E Species? No Comments: NRTR Stream ID: N/A Buffer Rules in Effect: N/A Project Includes Bridge Spanning Water Body? No Deck Drains Discharge Over Buffer? N/A Dissipator Pads Provided in Buffer? N/A Deck Drains Discharge Over Water Body? N/A (If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) (If yes, describe in the General Project Narrative; if no, justify in the (If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) General Project Narrative) E-]j�sj��ti��y North Carolina Department of Transportation � � St�rtll�vrdter I �..,.,,, Highway Stormwater Program ��' STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN -- (Version 2.04; Released November 2015) FOR NCDOT PROJECTS WBS Element: 17BP.13.R.3E TIP No.: County(ies): Buncombe Page 2 of 2 Bridge to Culvert Avoidance and Minimization Proposed Structure Summary Sheet No. & Station Sheet No.: 4 Station: 12+04 -L- Number of Barrels: 2 Drainage Area (ac or sq mi): 0.41 Sq. Miles Barrel Width/Diameter (ft): 6'-9" Surface Water Body: Bill Moore Creek Barrel Height (ft : 4'-11" Culvert T e: Aluminized CSPA Culvert Length (ft 44'-5" Avoidance and Minimization Efforts: The proposed culvert will be buried 1.0' with sills at the inlet and outlet of the low flow channel to retain bed material. A floodplain bench and 2.0' (Bridge to Culvert) sills at the inlet and outlet of the high flow barrel of the culvert promote low flow in one barrel only so that the existing low flow channel dimensions and velocities can be maintained as closely as possible. The culvert approximates the existing bed slope and provides a smooth transition from upstream to downstream. Stream Slope Fish and/or Aquatic Life Passage Existing Average Stream Slope (°/a): 2.54 % Existing Low Flow Channel Dimensions 7.1' wide Proposed Culvert Slope (%): 2.46 % in the Stream: 1.2' deep Culvert Burial Proposed Culvert Burial Depth (ft): 1 Existing Streambed Material: Sand, cobbles, and boulders Proposed Low Flow Dimensions 6.8' wide Through the Culvert: 1.0' deep Proposed Sills/Baffles: The culvert will have 1.0' sills at the inlet and outlet of the low flow barrel and 2.0' sills at the inlet and outlet Existing Low Flow Velocities in the of the high flow barrel. Stream (ft/s): 1.4 ropose ow ow e oci ies roug the Culvert (fUs): 1.5 Alternating Low Flow Sills/Baffles: N/A Culvert/Stream Alignment Stream Patterns Upstream and Downstream The stream is relatively straight in the vicinity of the crossing with some slight sinuosity upstream of the culvert. There is some bank degredation of the Culvert that Could Affect Fish and sloughing of the bank in areas approaching and leaving the crossing. Passage and Bank Stability: Bed Forms Impacted by Culvert (riffles, A shallow pool is upstream of the crossing, followed by a glide and riffle where the proposed culvert will be located. pools, glides, etc.): Low Flow Floodplain Bench Required? Yes A floodplain bench is necessary to provide the low-flow channel geometry necessary to approximate the existing stream as well as (provide justification) adequately pass high flow events without increasing water surface elevations upstream of the culvert. Sharp Bends at Inlet/Outlet? No The proposed culvert is aligned such that the existing stream will approach and exit the culvert without bends. (describe culvert alignment with stream) Stream Realignment Necessary? (provide No N/A justification) Bank Stabilization: Class I rip rap has been specified for the banks upstream and downstream of the proposed culvert for the purpose of bank stabilization. Outlet Velocities Natural Stream Channel 2-yr Velocity (ft/s): 6.4 Natural Stream Channel 10-yr Velocity (ft/s): 7.5 Proposed Culvert 2-yr Outlet Velocity (ft/s): 6 Proposed Culvert 10-yr Outlet Velocity (ft/s): 7.1 Roadway Geometric Considerations Evaluate/Describe Roadway Geometric Constraints: N/A � � � � � � � � 3i E L a � �o %� O=L N�t \ �'n E 0 �i �, n See Sheet 9-A For Index of Sheets See Sheet 2 For Conventlonal Symbols �� a � /� J �� gi// n,jo _ Cree °r� �k � Bill Moore � � �� \ 3� � � ' � � �PROJECT � SITE VICI11tITY MAP ON-SITE DETOUR �� B U1�COMBE CO U1�TY LOCATION: BRIDGE NO.I00571 OVER BILL MOORE CREEK 01V SR 3442 TYPE OF WORK GRADIIVG, DRAIIVAGE, A1VD PAVIIVG WETLAND AND SURFACE WATER IMPACTS PERMIT -L- STA 10 + 90.00 �IECT l7BP.l3.R.36 -L- � � tz -L- STA 12 + 73.16 E111D PROJECT 17BP.13.R.36 PERMIT DRAWING SHEET 1 OF b '-�,r/1 _ NAD 83�86 ' DENOTES IMPACTS IN � SURFACE WATER __; ��,=_ M AOCTS INE SUORFACE WATER SURFACE WATER IMPACTS PERMIT CL 'I' RIP RAP EST. 30 TONS EST. 50 SY GF � —L — ST Ao l0 —�90000 � BEGIN PROJECT l7BPal3aRo36 WI��IAM �AFATE REEVES SPEC. CUT DITCH W/CL 'B' RIP RAP � SEE DETAIL #1 � �� WOOD DECK i � �� i �BSTI \ � � HTR \ i O �� ` � � � I � — 1 PORCH \ I 1 � I � I 1 � I � � � � WOOD STEPS � J, 1 I �I BSTJ � " C�� — EXISTING R/W � w�7�� ` GR � o E/,'S� — _ _ �a; �� R 344 C�VE /�'� \ — — _ _ � , . �z�� - i 2 _/5-G� ---- �---- � , � --- � �� X X X—� / � � EXISTING R/W � / i k „ �'O x \ DETAIL #1 SPECIAL CUT DITCH ( Not to Scale) 1 �% Natural �,��et Ground �I � F�d' d Filter Fabric � Type of Liner= Class 'B' Rip—Rap 2 @81 "x59" ALUMINIZED CSPA Front Ditch Slope Min. D=1.0 Ft. Max. d =1.0 Ft. F ROM STA. 10 + 75 TO STA. 11 + 80 —L— LT FROM STA. 12 + 05 TO STA. 12 + 50 —L— LT C C � T \ �\ SPEC. CUT DITCH W/CL 'B' RIP RAP SEE DETAIL #1 � x --------- EXISTING BRIDGE TO BE REMOVED CL 'I' RIP RAP EST. 50 TONS EST. 70 SY GF RETAI N —L — ST Ao l2 f73o16 END PROJECT l7 GEORGE I_� RICE � �� , —GR , , ,—�� / � ,—'�R ___— � , � �� 'JSoRo36 PROIECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO. 178PJ3eRa36 04 ILW SHEET NO. ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS ENGINEER ENGINEER PERMIT DRAWING SHEET 2 OF 6 0 � � DENOTES IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER DENOTES TEMPORARY IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER SURFACE WATER IMPACTS PERMIT CL 'I' RIP RAP EST. 30 TONS - EST. 50 SY GF ,� —L— STAo 10-�90000 � � BEGIN PROJECT l7BPal3aRo36 WI��IAM �AFATE REEVES SPEC. CUT DITCH W/CL 'B' RIP RAP � SEE DETAIL #1 > � ��OOD DECK � BST � I �z�� H T R � ZZ�m � �—� I� �,� I POR H i/ �� i �� OD �TEP � � i s �� gsT� � � P _ � � — Ex�TiN� R,w w�TE s �� R � —��5a i � 442 � ,�R ---- ��_ i � � � � � __ � — � � �-- i zz 5 �� i �� E T�Nc R� �'\ �� , � / .i / � l �� X � �@81"x59" / ALUMINISPA DETAIL #1 SPECIAL CUT DITCH ( Not to Scale) 1 �% Natural �,��et Ground �I � F�d' d Filter Fabric � Type of Liner= Class 'B' Rip-Rap Front Ditch Slope Min. D=1.0 Ft. Max. d =1.0 Ft. F ROM STA. 10 + 75 TO STA. 11 + 80 —L— LT FROM STA. 12 + 05 TO STA. 12 + 50 —L— LT -, . - ^ �<< � �— �� vv��\ \ �� , �� e �� N � � \" � � \ � �, N � / \ �f\ �� ,�,; � , Z�' %\ �� a5 0°� N\ � ;� `�N � ;— , , e . /� �� \ ,�, �� _/ � � � --�-- �-- .�--- � EXISTING BRIDGE ..__ TO BE REMOVED CL 'I' RIP RAP EST. 50 TONS EST. 70 SY GF REM c v� \ �� CUT DITCH ' 'B' RIP RAP `DETAIL #1 � � —L — ST Ao l2 �730/6 �ND PROJECT l7 GEORGE I_� RICE �� '.`�� --I � �' � � � � ' � � , =1 � � � N � � N � � �, � � �� W �'S �� \ \ 9 \ �N� , �, � N � `� � ' � `�N � �� " \ � � \ � \ �, � N � � � �, � � o� � \ -� � � — � \ \ � � �� \ , � � �- \ \ 2� �°� � �� PROIECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO. 178PJ3eRa36 04 ILW SHEET NO. ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS ENGINEER ENGINEER PERMIT DRAWING SHEET 3 OF 6 'JSoRo36 � , � ��— �� :,� , \ � �� Hr NR� 270 2��J 250 200 C� S 1-A 12+04 -� C� GRQDE E�E�=22590 l4 2�81°x59" ALUMINIZED CSPA W/ SILLS SKEW=68° EXST TB RT EXST TB LT 2:1 NORMAL 2.16:1 SKEWED � � EXST TB LT ��___ / EXSTTB RT \ - _� � � --- _ �_ � �-�,� - - - � _ - - - _ - _ _ EXST BED INV ELEV=2252.44 SLOPE = 0.0246 FT/FT NWS AND WSE ON 3-28-12 = 2253.8 �PS-�R�� 00 �� -- - ---- ---- -�\ - - EXST WATER EXST BED O U DOWNSIREAM � �� WETLAND PERMIT IMPACT SUMMARY WETLAND IMPACTS SURFACE WATER IMPACTS Hand Existing Existing Permanent Temp. Excavation Mechanized Clearing Permanent Temp. Channel Channel Natural Site Station Structure Fillln Fillln in Clearing in SW SW Impacts Impacts Stream No. (From/To) Size / Type Wetlands Wetlands Wetlands in Wetlands Wetlands impacts impacts Permanent Temp. Design (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ft) (tt) (tt) � � �'F'79 TO �2'F'3rJ -L- STREAMBANKSTABILIZATION < Q.Q� 36 2@ 81 "x59" CSPA < 0.01 45 STREAMBANKSTABILIZATION < O.O� 47 TEMPORARY DEWATERING O.O� � 4H TOTALS: 0.01 0.01 128 148 0 Revised 3/31/05