HomeMy WebLinkAbout20160189 Ver 1_Application_20160229Carpenter,Kristi
From: Bryan, Roger D
Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 11:53 AM
To: Beckwith, Loretta A SAW; Chambers, Marla J; Barnett, Kevin; Carpenter,Kristi; Andrew
Henderson (andrew_henderson@fws.gov)
Cc: DeWit, Benjamin J; Medlin, Christopher D
Subject: Bridge 100677 Buncombe Permit Application
Attachments: Bridge 100677 Buncombe Permit Application.pdf; Bridge 100677 Buncombe
Plans.pdf; Bridge 100677 Buncombe SMP.pdf; Bridge 100677 Buncombe PJD
Form.pdf; Bridge 100677 Buncombe photos.docx
Follow Up Flag:
Flag Status:
Follow up
Completed
I have attached a NWP 14 permit application and plans for a bridge to culvert project in Buncombe County. I have also
attached the PJD Form for the Corps file.
Please email me if you need any additional information.
Thanks
Roger D. Bryan
Division Environmental Program Supervisor II
Division 13
Department of Transportation
828 251 6171 office
828 337 5234 mobile
rdbryan@ncdot.gov
55 Orange Street
PO Box 3279
Asheville, NC 28802-3279
, �M i +� � .� _
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.
Corps Submittal Cover Sheet
Please provide the following info:
1. Project Name: Bridge ] 00677, SR 1397 Surrett Cove Road
2. Name of Property Owner/Applicant: NC DOT
3. Name of Consultant/Agent:
*Agcnt authorizalion needs lo be allached.
4. Related/Previous Action ID number(s):
5. Site Address: N/A
6. Subdivision Name:
7. City: Leicester
8. County: Buncombe
9. Lat: 35.67281 Long: -82.85470 (Decimal Degrees Please )
] 0. Quadrangle Name: Sandvmush
11. Waterway: Bald Fark Creek
12. Watershed: French Broad River
13. Requested Action:
X Nationwide Permit # 14
General Permit #
Jurisdictional Determination Request
_ Pre-Application Request
The following information will be completed by Corps office:
AID:
Prepare File Folder Assign nwnber in ORM Begin Date
Authorization: Section 10 Section 404
Project Description/ Nature of Activity/ Project Purpose:
Site/Waters Name:
Keywords:
Transportation
February 29, 2016
Ms. Lori Beckwith
US Anny Co�ps of Engineers
I51 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, NC 28801-5006
Subject: Nationwide Permit#14
Bridge 100677, SR 1397 Surrett Cove Road
State Project No. 17BP.13.R.151
Buncombe County, NC
Dear Ms. Beckwith:
PAT McCRORY
c����no�
NICHOLAS J. TENNYSON
Secmmry
I have enclosed a set of plans, a PCN application for NWP #14, and a vicinity map relative to the
proposed bridge replacement project on SR 1397 Surrett Cove Road, Buncombe County, NC.
We propose to replace the existing 28' timber/steel bridge with a double barrel box culvert (2@
10' x 4') with low flow barrel and sills. Stream slope at the site is 3.00%. Culvert installation
will result in permanent impact to 52 linear feet of Bald Fork Creek; floodplain bench
construction will pennanently impact an additional 83 linear feet. Temporary impacts to 130 feet
of the stream are necessary for dewatering and an onsite detour culvert. The stream is
approximately 10 feet wide with a predominately gravel/cobble/boulder substrate. Bald Fork
Geek is classified as Class C.
Existing channel morphology will be maintained upstream and downstream of the culve�rt.
Riparian vegetation will be reestablished along disturbed areas associated with the project.
Stonnwater will be diverted through grass-lined ditches or vegetated buffers prior to entering
streams.
This project may impact potentially suitable northern long-eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis)
(NLEB) summer roosting habitat via bridge and tree removal. Therefore, a may affect, not Iikely
to adversely affect is requested for the NLEB. Minor tree clearing will be performed for the
project. The existing bridge is constructed of steel and timber. The crown to bed measurement
(distance from travel surface to streambed) is 5 feet. Clearance between the bottom of the bridge
and the stream surface is approximately 2-3 feet. A survey of the bridge did not reveal any
evidence of usage by bats.
For the proposed action, NCDOT has committed to the conservation measures listed below:
!`/'Nothing Compares�-
S�a�e of Noith Ca�olinn I Depm1menl ofTrensporla�ion I Di ision Thi�teen
55 Orenge S�ae� � PO Box i2]9 � Ashe�ille, NC 28802-3279
828 251 GI71 '1'
Ms. La�i Qeckwith
Page —2 [3ridge 100677, [3uncombe County
�ebrua�y 29,2016
I) No alterations of a known hibernaculum's entrance or interior environment if it impairs
an essential behavioral pattern, including sheltering No�rthern long-eared bats (January I
through December 31);
2) No tree removal within a 0.25 mile radius of a known hibernacula (Jauuary I through
December 31); and
3) No cutting or destroying a known, occupied maternity roost tree, or any other trees within
a I50-foot radius from the known, occupied maternity U�ee during the period from June 1
lhrough and including July 31.
NCDOT has determined that the proposed action does not require separate consultation on the
grounds that the proposed action is consistent with the final Section 4(d) rule, codified at 50
C.F.R. § 17.40(0) and effective February 16, 2016. Section 7 responsibilities are therefore
considered fiilfilled.
No effect on tl�e remaining Buncombe Counry list of federally protected species (threatened or
endangered) or designated critical habitat will occur. Andrew Henderson of US Fish and Wildlife
Service is copied on the application for review.
As a pait of the 401 Certification process, the project was processed through the D07'
Programmatic Agreement for Minor Project as required by Section 106 of the National
Historic Preservation Act of 1966 and GS 121-12(a). No Historic Resources will be affected.
Qy copy of this letter, we request Marla Chambers, North Carolina Wildlife Resow�ces
Commission Western Region Coordinator, to comment directly to the Corps eoncerning the
permit request.
By copy of this letter, we are asking the Area Roadside Field Operations Engineer, to comment
on the above project. Bald Fork Creek is classified as Class C. The project will not require a
trout buffer variance.
By copy of this letter, I am forwarding one electronic copy of the application package to
Kristi Lynn Carpenter, NC Division of Water Resources, Transportation PermitCing Unit
with ec to Kevin Barnett, NC DWR Asheville Regional Office for review and comment.
Please charge the application fee of $240.00 to WBS element # 17BP.13.R.151. Please
forward comments directly to the Corps with copy to Division 13 Enviromnental Officer.
Your earliest consideration for this request would be greaUy appreciated. If you have any
questions or information needs, please contact me at (828) 251-6171.
Sincerely,
''�� � �,��"
Roger D. I3iyan
Division 13 Gnvironmental Officer
Enclosures
cc: J.J. Swain, Jr., P.E.
Chris Medlin, P.E.
Ben DeWit, CPESC
Kevin Barnett
Marla Chambers
Andrew Henderson
t f;�
�� ��t�� J{F gC}�
� g � �H
� ; ? t E �
L:T r.�:�
� !da7E�
>
C;`6...dYbI�.I'.`+!\
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps: X Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number:l4 or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? X Yes ❑ No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
X 401 Water Qualily Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ 401 For the record only for Corps Permit:
because written approval is not required? Certification:
❑ Yes X No ❑ Yes X No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation X Yes ❑ No
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program.
1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h ❑ Yes X No
below.
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes X No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: Bridge 100677, SR 1397
2b. County: Buncombe
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Leicester
2d. Subdivision name: N/A
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state 17BP.13.R.151
project no:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: North Carolina Department of Transportation
3b. Deed Book and Page No. N/A
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if N�A
applicable):
3d. Streetaddress: N/A
3e. City, state, zip: N/A
3f. Telephone no.: N/A
3g. Fax no.: N/A
3h. Email address: N/A
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: North Carolina Department of Transportation
4b. Name: J.J. Swain, Jr., P.E., Division Engineer
4c. Business name N.C. Department of Transportation
(if applicable):
4d. Street address: 55 Orange Street, P.O. Box 3279
4e. Cily, state, zip: Asheville, NC 28802
4f. Telephone no.: 828-251-6171
4g. Fax no.: 828-251-6394
4h. Email address: rdbrvan ncdot.gov
5. AgenUConsultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: N/A
5b. Business name N/A
(if applicable):
5c. Streetaddress: N/A
5d. City, state, zip: N/A
5e. Telephone no.: N/A
5f. Fax no.: N/A
5g. Email address: N/A
Page 2 of 10
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1 a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): N/A
1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Lalitude: 35.67281° N Longitude: - 82.85470° W
1c. Propertysize: 0.1 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to gald Fork (Creek)
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: C
2c. River basin: French Broad
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Existing bridge on SR 1397 surrounded by low density residential area and forest.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
200
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
Replace existing 28' timber/steel bridge with a double barrel box (2@ 10' x 4') culvert with low flow barrel and sills.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
A permanent impact to 52 linear feet of Bald Fork Creek will be necessary for culvert construction with 83' of
floodplain bench construction. A temporary impact of 130 linear feet will be necessary for an impervious dike to
dewater the work area during construction and 45 linear feet of temporary pipe for an onsite detour. Equipment used
will include excavator, crane, and trucks.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past? ❑ Yes X No ❑ Unknown
Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type � preliminary ❑ Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company:
Name (if known): N/A Other: N/A
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for � Yes X No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help fle" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes X No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands X Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction
number — Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact
Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ — non-404, other) (acres)
Tem orar T
W1 ❑ P � T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
WZ � P� T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
W3 ❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P❑ T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps
❑ No ❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact
number - (PER) or (Corps - 404, 10 stream length
Permanent (P) or intermittent DWQ — non-404, Width (linear
Temporary (T) (INT)? other) (feet) feet)
S1 ❑ P X T Impervious gald Fork Creek X PER X Corps � 0 130
Dike/Dewatering ❑ INT ❑ DWQ
Onsite Detour X PER X Corps
S1 ❑ P X T Pipe Bald Fork Creek � INT ❑ DWQ �o 45'
S1 X P � T Box Culvert Bald Fork Creek X PER X Corps 10 52
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
S1 X P � T Floodplain gald Fork Creek X PER X Corps 10 83
Benches ❑ INT ❑ DWQ
S2 ❑ P � T ❑ PER ❑ Corps
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
S3 ❑ P � T ❑ PER ❑ Corps
❑ INT ❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 265
3i. Comments:52 feet of permanent culvert impact, 83 feet of permanent impacts for floodplain bench, 130 feet of temporary
impacts for dewatering/onsite detour pipe. *- The 45 linear feet of detour pipe is within the 130' of dewatering.
Page 4 of 10
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individuall list all o en water im acts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number — (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Tem orar T
01 ❑P❑T
02 ❑P❑T
03 ❑P❑T
04 ❑P❑T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If ond or lake construction ro osed, then com lete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. Sd. 5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
Pond ID Proposed use or purpose (acres)
number of pond
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
Sg. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If an im acts re uire miti ation, then ou MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar-Pamlico ❑ Other:
Project is in which protected basin7 ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number— Reason Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or for Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
Tem orar T im act re uired?
B1 ❑P❑T ❑Yes
❑ No
62 ❑P❑T ❑Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑P❑T ❑Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments:
Page 5 of 10
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Minimized length of culvert and added low flow barrel and sills to maintain natural stream channel bottom within the
structure.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
N/A
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for X Yes ❑ No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ❑ DWQ X Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this X Payment to in-lieu fee program
project?
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. X Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: 52 linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ❑ warm Xcool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ❑ Yes X No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c. 6d. 6e.
Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet) (square feet)
Zone 1 3(2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10
E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified � Yes X No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Comments: ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Stormwater Mana ement Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? N/A
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? X Yes ❑ No
2c. if this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
The project will use BMP's to the Maximum Extent Practicable (MEP) in compliance with NCDOT's NPDES Permit No.
000250 Post Construction Stormwater Program
❑ Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? X DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local governmenYs jurisdiction is this project? N/A
❑ Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ❑ NSW
apply (check all that apply): ❑ USMP
❑ Water Supply Watershed
X Other. N/A
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been N/A
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Pro ram Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply � ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006-246
X Other. N/A
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached7 N/A
5. DWq 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? N/A
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? N/A
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the � yes ❑ No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ❑ Yes � No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. if you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) ❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑ Yes � No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 26 .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ❑ Yes � No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in � Yes � No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will lhis project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or � Yes ❑ No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act � Yes � No
impacts?
❑ Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
Field survey of the project area and evaluation of current distribution data.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes � No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
Current Maps/Database
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation � Yes � No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
Current Maps/Database
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? � Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: Project will not impact water passage or flood zone beyond existing
conditions
Sc. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? Current FEMA Maps
Roger D. Bryan 2/29/2016
Applicant/AgenYs Printed Name ApplicanUAge s Signature Date
(AgenCs signaWr is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is rovided.)
Page 10 of 10
fl
� � ' aa e s�mx 21�v`a � t°�et.� ` c ° :i ..q' 2 . ''
1 . � , '-� X ,�� �,Frr'��� �', x �¢k� n...: A �'p.
�+y, - v.�y�. i ^� e r � ���� 3 a�'Y'
'� � t i �� Y �� �c 3 � � K ��51 , 4 EiF�'A • � . .�
� i,f � ^'g��" � '.d§Y �'" '
� k,� �,c "",� �`s'rtk"1€t .
v
F, :
�� � � � ,,?+�.,v�'.� f �;_^ t '�,kfi�fy, �i`; ;:.. � . . ' �
t�4g� �� � r� � ' Sp� S� ' i ' a�._ ;.
r''� Stc '� '' '4 ,�,�- ;�
� � ��a +3'hd'`� ; s t 1'rq`r a4;.. 1 ����j � � � �:,,:�
� p1� 6 �'�' � � � , �. S `� ��,�
�_, � `� `�
� ��x µ`3^' '� . ��: r 'f� �sy,: ' . �,��'* ' � niq/4.r .
�.� f . 1 !�w�'� �;����'��Y .
[ {
��� '.��E��X�4`_:, � � a ��` �4f � '
� �.. p( 1 j � . / p �., e+ ` y��a 4 �tV ! � �
� ' � t �• � . . �.•� -'� t . xfs Y ..r %,����*,� �' � ��J�v , t��i
rffi ��a °�" i'vc ,{�y+p' � "�-r w'� i 'i� 8�y��*' �-'� i
o � ' v 4 � � � �'�F t � s� � . � _ � ���9� ; $ IB �! �> . ; .
�'�iuA�R . �5%y c 1� w'IS�,������ `� � '; .f" : S '�T ( P,� r - �i a � :
¢ ��.,� Y°''Ya �r �'�+°j � �+ xY'ta+� w.. .: ;-. , a�4Y„�`"�' i � i �1;�3 � ��,+,1'
�#+ � � F� �� �s'* .8,� 4 r�5 .s.,. '?� " ��X ^.i��d'^ ; "�
� �QJ.,r ♦ � �7 ��n° � � v t o . � a i4 � �� i � r
v'1.iY4hL��h 4u. %� w ��� ���, . �r � i � > � ` �i��.er�°y.i� ��
�j�^ �,`_�,,�y'�yy ,�' � r
� ._,. . . .iF� ��'� �ws . . S ' <<� ,.�r'�v9��s"��1s�y� �'�.^��. , li�����
Figure 1. Bridge 100677, Bald Fork Creek near bankfull level (above and below�, Buncombe County, NC.
s� . :�
t {
; ,A � � �
� ; , � � � ;�
,��
:
}r'4.� *4n -,
x. r$ . . 3A , �E� 3. a � �' _o-.
_ i� ` 4
�
� yy� r r�� 'ye,. �. � �': 4
. . �;m, iM b. �, .�•.�_::���, . S�"�> � -~ Yr�, .
1 yF E '
y . .�,., ... ..,`. �/
i /,�3<''$•
���'i�� '�i �'� V� �d
f.� 'rt I'�� ' '6, r a..�n+�
� . .'� ��'�., •
� F �� � .y+.4ac " ` _ � � '� ">..r` 'r�
. . � � ' �
f �>� _
.w#ir.. � , 4 �
." ' ,S'n � .. .
�
�t ..
;t � ��;.: 4� `y�«, � ..
9 ' `'�,. �', ����,
� ��
1+- ;, „o- i �:�
��.�� �.9� ��
�+,„ 9�
,,
� ; w��< � , �
�� � 6 � � ,�..�. � "��'��.:»�
.z
Figure 2. Bridge 100677 Substructure and Deck, Buncombe County, NC.
�; ;,
'�!Kl4'+ ..
Environmental
Quality
PAT MCCRORY
Goverwr
DONALD R. VAN DER VAAR7
Secrelary
Mr. Roger Bryan
NCDOT Division 13 Enduonmental Supervisor
North Carolina DepaAment of Transpodation
Post Office Box 3279
Asheville, North Cazolina 28802
Dear Mr. Bryan:
Febcuary 26, 2016
Subject: Mitigation Acceptance Letter:
Division 13 Project, Replace Bridge Number 100677 over Bald Creek on SR 1397 (Su[rett Cove
Road), Buncombe County; WBS Element 17BP.13.R.151
The purpose of this letter is to notify you t6et the North Cazolina Department of Environmenta] Quality -
Division of Mitigation Services (NCDEQ-DMS) will provide the compeusatory stream mitigation for the subjec[
ptojec[. Based on the infortnation received from you on February 24, 2016, the impacts are located in C[J 06010105
of the French Broad River basin in the Southem Mountains (SM) Eco-Region, and are as follows:
French Broad Stream WeUands Buffer (Sq. FI.)
06010105 Non- Coastal
SM Cold Cool Wazm Riparian R. �� M�h Zone l Zone 2
Impacts 0 52.0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(feeUacres)
This impact and associated mitigation need were under projected by the NCDOT i¢ the 2016 iropact data.
NCDEQ•DMS will commit to implement sufficient compensarory stream mitigation credits to offset the impacts
associated with this project as detertnined by the regulatory agencies using the delivery timeline listed in Section
F.3.c.iii of the In-Lieu Fee InsWment da[ed July 28, 2010. If the above ceferenced impact amounts are revised, then
this mitigation acceptance letter will no longer be valid and a new mitigation acceptance letter will be required from
NCDEQ-DMS.
8420.
If you have any questions or need addi[ional infomiation, please contact Ms. Beth Hazmon at 919-707-
Sincerely,
�
Jame . Staufill
Credit Managemenl Supervisor
cc: Ms. Lori Beckwith, USACE -- Asheville Regulatory Field Office
Mr. Christopher D. Medlin, P.E., Division 13 Bridge Maintenance Manager
Ms. Linda FitzpaVick, NCDOT - PDEA
File: SR 1397 - Bridge ]00677 - Division 13
�Nothing Compares�
S�a1colNorlhCawline Enviiun�nent�IQaa111y
16DI MaI15erviceCente� I Paleigh,Nor[hCamlina2IG55-1401
919]0]�8G0�
� rFC a� {' . . _ _ ... .. I
�a (
*� -n„ �
See Sheet � A For I ndex of Sheets
See Sheet � B f or Conventi onal Symbols
NOTE:
1. THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN ANY MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES.
2. CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED TO THE
3. CHANGED BRIDGE TO CULVERT.
����� � ����� ��������
��II ���� � �� ��� � ����
LOCATI011t: BRIDGE 1��.100677 4VER . BALD CREEI�
41� SR 1397 (S URRETT CD VE ROAD)
T YPE OF WORI�: GRADIII tG, DRAI11lA GE, PA T�I1�G, A11 tD S TR UCT URE
WETLAN D AN D SU RFACE WATER IMPACTS PERMIT
—L— STA 10 + 75.00
BEGI1� BRIDGE REPLA CEMEI�T
PROJECT 17BP.13.R.151
BEGIN CULVERT
—L— STA. 12 + 50 +/-
SURRE� C�vE RD
SR 139�1 �'
�
i
TO RANDALL _L �
COVE ROAD — —
.� _ —DET—
— — ' � �S �
, , ��
��s� ^ ��s�_�
�� � ��s ALp���REEK
' � B END CULVERT
�� �
—L— STA. 12 + 90 +/—
BEGIN DETOUR
-DET— STA. 11 + 77.22
LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD II MODIFIED.
Bq�p CREEK �s�
>> �s—� - �S�
J �s�
—/
��
�` �
` ' \
�. .
, .
, �
.�\\�,______\\
END DETOUR
—D ET— STA. 13 + 2 7.2 7
—L— STA 14 + 40.00
E1�D BRIDGE REPLACEMEI�T
PROJECT I7BP.I3.R.151
SUBMITTAL 677—S003 25% PLANS 07f14,/15
RESPONSE 677—S002 25% PLANS 08/�5✓15
�r
C,pF k gq��
R�qO
PERMIT DRAWING
SHEET 1 OF 4
��
��
0
N
�
QQ
ZZ
�
amec
����� � 2801 Yorkmont Road, Suite 100
Charlotte, NC 28208
W������ Phone (704) 357-8600
Fax (704) 357 8638
���������� �����
�� N�� u�� �'�� � % � ���u�d���d�z��
����������� �����
ID� Iv�°Il° �J�]E ]��1E8 C�I�T�°1ClEk�74'TII�N
Pre ared ln the Office ofe P/ans Pre ored Fore
GRAPHIC SCALES DESIG11l DATA PROJECT LEI�GTH KCi Assa��ates ofN.c., P.A. HYDRAULICS E1VGIIVEER
� 4601 siX Forks xoaa DIVISI01�1 OF HIGHWAYS
A�I ���� _ �� LandmarkgenterII,Suite220 j020 Bit'Cli Ri[� e Dt'.
20 �0 0 20 40 LENGTH OF ROADWAY PROJECT 17BP.13.R.151 = 0.061 MILES KCI Rale; h Nc 2�609 g �o��
Phone (919) 783-9214 R a Ze igh, NC 2 76I0
�«p ��w�.w k�, ��m Fax (919) 783-9266 � 0� ��
K = p/o 2 0 1 2 S T A N D A R D S P E C I F I C A T I O N S � Q� ��
PLANS = 0.008 MILES ��
L E N G T H O F S T R U C T U R E P R O J E C T 1 7 B P. 1 3. R. 1 5 1 D E W A Y N E L. S Y K E S, P. E. � ��
� _ ��p RIGHT OF WAY DATE: PROJECT ENGINEER SIGNATURE: P.E. � �
20 10 0 20 40 T= 0 % JULY 15, 2014 `' �
V= 25 MPH TOTAL LENGTH OF PROJECT 17BP.13.R.151 = 0.069 MILES ROADWAY DESIG11t E1�GI11lEER � �
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL) LETTIIIIG DATE: BARRY C. SMITH, P.E. ���� ooQ��
FUNC CLASS = RURAL LOCAL JULY 15� ZO�4 PROJECT DESIGN ENGINEER �� ��p� Q
o �
10 5 0 10 20
SUB—REGIONAL TIER 11lCDOT C01�TACT.• VIRGII�IA MABRY
PROFILE (VERTICAL) P.E.
PPU MANAGER
SIGNATURE:
J
N
�
N
1
W
�
0
PERMIT DRAWING
SHEET 2 OF 4
HUGH ROBERT BOYD
DB 3700 PG 30
PROPOSED BANK
STA61 LIZATI O N
0
/ i
/ /
/ /
/ /
� O�%/
/
, �
, �
, ���
, C� ,
, �
, �
, �
, �
, �
, ,
� �
, �
i i
� �
�
.
o E � �N� R/ ° F��_ �
, ,
,
.
�
— _ �
, E� o ,
IMPERVIOUS DIKE
2 — lOX4 BOX
C U LVE RT
0
0
o S
HUU��
12
PROPOSED FLOODPLAIN
BENCH
- �
�
__--f'�
s� RRETT
SR I
,—
�,,
� _- —
_-� -- � �
,
___--- �
_ _____
O � _ i —�
— — �
— — �
�_ - - � / � �
, _ - — WOODS . � , �i �
- — - - — --�— � al ,—_� `
J / /�- JS - � . � �
EXIST ING �R � _
,-� �� JS �%� �P
� ___-- , ,ls � �
�� � � . �
�' ��% vE
�� / - , � � O; P � TB cA-�� LI
� P � ' � TB $`
� WOODS U�� % � oIN P�,�� -rE�
� P . � � ; . � R�P
T�
PVE
�
_ p�
W0�
—
�; ��!v�
.� ���_, ..�� r
. r
► . �;: �_�_���. .
���►�in.�!°:e.�v..�'-�►- //
_ ._, ,
,�Jr; u,1/111�:ni�,re/� /�
illll�������������'� � � �
.
�j'��,. ,; ��i/� �.
�, .
r/ .���`
� r -
�� � �
. •
.
, _
:�
�r�
.
�: _
�uH►v Pa & DIANE Wo THOMAS
DB 37q3 PG 892
�
OD
PVE
G
��
� - � `�
� , Qo
�� � �
���
/ � �
�
Q� QJ
/
*DO NOT DISTURB OIL TANK
TED Jo & JANId UE SURRETT
DB 497 G 159
,
�-
s °
�JS—
� �S
� -- —
�
� .
\��
�
PROPOSED BANK
STABILIZATION
:
zB� /
R K/
A�-� � �S
8
TE
BRIDGE 100677
�
O
O
N
N
�
�
00
0
a
z
0
BL
���� ��
�`�C
�
� � _ S, `l NFS V `' R�
. , ___ �,�\ \ �
. ,F � — , �� j��� a
. � ��
. \ , .—( � - - -� s C����
� �� � F
' ' � � �,�cj Do
. '
. `. �
, . � _
� , � o
� �,
' \\ G ,,,-----___ _ - �� ` �; '� \
' , r,� -__�� � � � � ,
�_�.°!� - ��� �� �� ��5.
—�� _____ �� � , � , 6�S
� � _ _ _ �� T
. —� � - _ � � , E�is T� � �
.
. ,
. �
�' ' � N� ,
�/ � � . R/� ���
. ,
. ,
� .
� ' l�i
� 0
. �
' � � 0
. . �
\ � S
� � � �
., .
PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
l7BP,l3oRel5/ 4
RrW SHEET NO.
ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER ENGINEER
����������� �����
�� ��� ��� �:� ��N������p��
�� Engineers . Planners • Scientists . Cons[ruction Managers
� KC I 4601 Six Forks Road, Landmark Center [I, Suite 220
Raleigh, NC 27609-5210
�� httpl/www.kci.com phone (919) 783-9214 • Fax (919) 783-9266
�
� .
amec
������ 2801 Chaklotte�NC d8��u8e 100
Phone(704) 357-8600
W �� �� Fax (704) 357 8638
�
� �� WOODS � , � �
, � .
.
. � �, ,�
� �
�
.
. ,
.
� ��, �. �
�, .
.
SITE 1 ���
TEMP. PIPE DIVERSION FOR DEWATERING
�120 LF OF 30" PIPE�
11
PROPOSED TEMP.
2- 47" X 71" ARCH PIPE
�45 LF)
IMPERVIOUS DIKE
PROPOSED FLOODPLAIN
BENCH
DENOTES IMPACTS IN
SURFACE WATER
MEGAN BRENT JOHNSON
DB 2081PG q7
a
DENOTES TEMPORARY
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
FOR —L — PROFILE, SEE SHEET 5
FOR ST RUCT URE PLANS, SEE
SHEETS S—1 TO S—?
N
O
N
1
W
�
0
PERMIT DRAWING
SHEET 3 OF 4
HUGH ROBERT BOYD
DB 3700 PG 30
IMPERVIOUS DIKE
2 - lOX4 BOX
C U LVE RT
12
PROPOSED FLOODPLAIN
BENCH
*DO NOT DISTURB OIL TANK
TED Jo & JANId UE SURRETT
DB 497 G 159
BRIDGE 100677
�
O
O
N
N
�
�
00
0
Q
z
PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
l7BP,l3oRel5/
RrW SHEET NO.
ROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER
SHEET NO.
4
HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER
����������� �����
�� ��� ��� �:� ��N������p��
� �� Engineers . Planners • Scientists . Cons[ruction Managers
� KC I 4601 Six Forks Road, Landmark Center [I, Suite 220
Raleigh, NC 27609-5210
�� httpl/www.kci.com phone (919) 783-9214 • Fax (919) 783-9266
� �
� .
PRO POS,E D$AN K %,% amec
� � ������ 2801 Yorkmont Road, SuiYe 100
Charlotte, NC 28208
STAB I,��AT I O N�� ��� /'�� wheeler PF Xe�; �4;'�s� g638°
!,
�
, � � ' !� � � / / / ,' i '�� �'
�; � i
�� � � � � ���,� � � �-
o , �, �, � . , � � � , ,
, , �
� , , , , � ,� ; / �
,
- �� �, �',
� V �� 1� � � r � /
; ;
� ,, � ,, -re _ % — � ��. � �� /
� �
,
,� � � � , � , , � �� �
� % � , � � � . T _ �--- � % . - ; : - � i �--, � �,
_ _ ' � � ' % _ � ° � � �'' � � /
\ o — — ! � / I�
,o r� - -- R ��
� >'�
�
a_ � o f � � 8
_ —_ -. — � . "� � � �
-- D , � , —
PROPOSED BANK , - - -_ , � ';� '�, � o �_- ��, . _- . ,, ��A__
,
, . _ -
_-
-- --- , � TE
-
------
STABILIZATION 1r ,---��\�✓,' - ��---��I, , ��, � �.
� _� -� / / , � � � ,,l � �—y� - �� '�--- � ---- - i
� / � — � �� ,� ,�J � -- - Tg � ��� �,
o �� / �� � � � � � . , �� �� � , � - � , �� �
% � � /� � , f �� � `,--� , ; --� � ---- �-- � � ____ _� �
. /
; , . � / ,, � � B
� '' ' � �
� `
, , �-
� �
;; ' , � / � /`
r � � , , J �
, � � � � � , ,/ ��� ° / � � � � �
/ % /
1 � / ' � i � O � � �� �
, ' /i i � '
'` i i � � ' � � � ° D � � �
i ; �� �� � � ,
� �
i ��� � � � �
� `% �% � � ��PR ��G � � , ,,
� � �
� � �� �,,� , e � i -�� 2�
; / / %� ; � ' H�US � � �- ��
,
� , �_ � —
��� � � � ��� �� � ��� ���� � � � � �� ��� -� -_- �- �
, � � i
�, � / , , __ _
f
\ , j � /, '
;�� � � � �
�, � � � ��� � �� �� ,— \ � /
,
� , - ,, � ,
,
,� . , ,
1� o ,� � ��� R� �- � ��� ;� � �_ �%_—� _ � qT � / �
� ----
� ,, , � , , � -�-- --__
� , � � � . � �--
� \ �� � � o � �
��'�� �� ��� ���� � ��i �� ��� �
_ o
�
;'� R 5 �� `� W D B �� �
,
, B�-2 ��� � ' ����,, � _ ----__ � � - � � /�'�� �� '
� \
-
-- — � �,� BL_3 I
.'\ - — '' �� � \��� � �
� _ - �� ' �
--- ���' �
• - � .�� ��.:n��,•i���
1 I ��` �"�1►:�u��! :..' ;�,'n �
.
, ,
--��'��� ` �,���►����� /
_ � .
" ro�� Ul _�nNIN.r.�� - �
` � _�'_'t •Q�,s � ''/►��Iv���' � i� �
v- - —
• �`� � _ � �E� � ��P�RC
.� � �, �� , c E�i� ' H
P� , , � f � � lNFs T//�c �
�i — — �' S�j/�� � �i
� `'-� � � --���� a
� � . ,F � ��j� j�\ �
� � �
, , � -- � � , C�
� , `_ �
-_ - --- ���
, -r� , , _ r � s,�
= � � �,� — F
- _
�' '�, � i '�. — �, � � �.� Do ��
_ _ � � �9%
�` , � � , � �.
�1 '_ � � , � � _
_ � , 0
- % —� \ � � \
� , �, . . - � _,� �� � �
_ � Q \�� G� '--____-__- ��— �, �, � �, � �\
��
,, , .,
� _ �� � o � --- — � � � / � ��
� � � �� -- � — �- _, �
�� _� r,� ��� �� ��� �� �
_ _ � , o , , � S.
� � �
BM �l ' \ � � � �
� , . _ _, _ _ � , _ ; � � �,,`~\
_ . � _ _� : � �ST
, _ �.,�� c�
� / �— I � , / a - - / �[ � t' /-- - --� _ _ _ `_ _ ' _ � _, , � �
_ , ��� o _ _
i i E - E o � �� — — �. � I � .'- - � - ' v - � -- — — — -_ _ - _ _ - - �- ` ` � \ � �, �'� '` ~ �`�
/ ` --_�_-,_'�-_� — \
, , _ _ -- � �_
� �� �
I 0 / / � � � � -'_ � � '� — i ' ` �` � --' ' � - -� � ` � \ \ l� � \ \ n / �` ��
� / � � � - — —' — Q `� - -- �— _�� � � � — - — - - � l� � , �V � ��
� ' \ — — — � � / ',- - - \ � �- Q % __ = � � =—_ — — — -_ ?� \ . ' � � . � ��' ��
— � s -- - -
� _ �. /� ,,:. .� f -� � �� / % - - - - - - _ _ . \` �� � � -����- � ���^�,� �/ • `� � � � �/ � � \ _ .
� �— � _ ,' - ,/ / / % / � ...— -� — � � � = — - _ _ — —�� \ � �n �
_ ,
^� � _ , , �1 r i � _ _.— �, . �— - � = — = - -- — � —_ \� '�� �� �
� �_�� ` �
( ` ,-- - � _ - _ - � �� , ,_
i / -- — - _ �— \ � .
� i � \ -- � �
_ _ - � - " � - � — � � � �
- -- --- — \.
- , / / � � � \
�/,00
- - / - � � - -- � \ \� � �
-- - __ � \ � .
/ �
�- =- - - � �l � � — — =-- - — ------ — -- -- -� — � � � .
— - — � — - —
— -- - - �
_ _-�--: - _ � -= P, - - _ - - - - � —_ - - __W 0 _ _ — _ � ��� �. ��
i ,. --- - _ - — � _ � � = � ---- - - '= : / _ — _ - � �
--
/ : - ` _ _ _ ; -�� - , , - - - _ , - � -- � � � — — - - _ __ — � � �\ ��� � ` �
� � � �\
�- -- —
�
� i - y � �� � '/ �� -- ----- — — �_ � � � � — _ -- � — _ — _� � AV; �� �" �� � ��
- -
_ �
�
� ,� : �--- . � _-- � � � . �
- , �
/
�I�' - � _ c -- ��� - ; -��_ / � --- � _ — -- �---- —� ��/ � ����— — _ � ���� � � � ���
�/ R - — � — �
_
�S��I� ' � � ���.7 � -- � - � - -__ _ _ -_ - - -- � �— � �/ "�� _�—�� . ' \
\�,� �
E /� � V,-' � / .� `�� �' _ - - - - -- � — � � � �� — � � � �� ���� \\, -����� ��� � �
, _ �� - - � � �
� , - � ,
._ � ;_
_ _ ' . ��
- ��-�� J ,, - ,- - - � - _ _ - _ � � _ _ _ _ �, s ���� �,� � ��, � �
� S JS , --�� - - � ,, - _ -- _ _
- _ _ � - , . � ; __ _ ��.
- - --
__ _
� / �— :. -� � % � �, � � —� � � 'C , ., r- ,; / - _ _ _ !: -_ � � ����\� ��� \\ , � / � � �.
-- �
� �i � i� �E � S , --- � ��� � �\\ �\ �� \ �
� � _�
�- - �{
„ � � `�. �, � � � � � s-- � � �l � i � / � � - �� � � �� �� '�� �
���� - =- a, - __ _- --TB ��_� P-rv � . ;����� � pU SITE 1 -- ��� �� ���� � � ��
\
p. - , � � � & c ; r
� / � WOODS / �� =' ; POW TE�" —�
�- ; ,
Pv� - �� % \� . �' ROP � �H� � - �C.�
� � / .� / � �.
� ^�
_- � �
,�
� �
�
,
��
�
PVE
�
� p�
_ W0�
�uH►v Pa & DIANE Wo THOMAS
DB 37q3 PG 892
—�\ ��,�������� � ,�,
� ��� ��� �� ' ,�� � .
.. � \\�� \� �
� \,;; ��:�\� \ .
TEMP. PIPE DIVERSION FOR DEWATERING �,� � �
�120 LF OF 30" PIPE� ��
DENOTES IMPACTS IN
11 SURFACE WATER
PROPOSED TEMP.
2- 47" X 71" ARCH PIPE
(45 LF)
IMPERVIOUS DIKE
PROPOSED FLOODPLAIN
BENCH
MEGAN BRENT JOHNSON
DB 2081PG q7
a
DENOTES TEMPORARY
IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER
FOR —L — PROFILE, SEE SHEET 5
FOR ST RUCT URE PLANS, SEE
SHEETS S—1 TO S—?
WETLAND PERMIT IMPACT SUMMARY
WETLANDIMPACTS SURFACE WATERIMPACTS
Hand Existing Existing
Permanent Temp. Excavation Mechanized Clearing Permanent Permanent Temp. Temp. Channel Channel Natural
Site Station Structure Fillln Filll� in Clearing in SW SW SW SW Impacts Impacts Stream
No. (From/To) Size / Type Wetlands Wetlands Wetlands in Wetlands Wetlands impacts impacts impacts impacts Permanent Temp. Design
(sf) (sf) (sf) (sf) (sf) (sf) (ac) (sf) (ac) (If) (If) (If)
1 -L- 11+61 - 12+47' Floodplain Bench / Bank Stabilization 79.0 <0.01 40.0
1 -L- 12+73 - 13+20' Floodplain Bench / Bank Stabilization 239.0 <0.01 43.0
1 -L- 12+50 - 12+90' Pro osed Culvert 800.0 <0.01 52.0
1 -L- 11+83 - 13+01' Impervious Dike / Dewatering 89.0 <0.01 130.0
1 -L- 11+37 - 13+66' Onsite Detour 355.0 <0.01 45.0
TOTALS': 1118.0 0.0 444.0 0.0 135.0 175.0 0
NOTES:
�
. 'y Y.... . . .
• � = 4 -�
' kti! I
� � � a � ..-,..}' S � i�-,t"d' �,�" ! • .
�, y "� fi ,�.y `4'�' .��-, �'� � � ��a� . � � �� � � �
y <. s a `��� � { y i'� �y E s, i + . � !"1 �j��\'µI�h� '+�� > ��-
3R'� A ''''� ',� � ''t I �, p�� , � d ' - �" ' �
� .:F S a ��` Y � � � �� , r� . . . �:�;�' ..�
�,;, e�^'''� .� " � 4 � - 'Y`` .� fp .� -�'�' � . :"t � _ .�.
t�'�`; � � } ' ,2 � � "} � y.v.y' --
K 1�' `w - f1+ A . '.r
�. �i1���= 4� �� ' �. � s
�a 6 q-�� �' {T � y'a.-,`�� $� •� y . �y� -- = � -'
� - ' .. �i t� F� ..
� � @ k � �,§ A 1 , f._ .�j� �p�,�...9" .,
� � �1 qj% �i 1 . '� '._ s �, i, .
q, . , \'+`., � tr�,, +.� � � # �f1_CA���#��y.iry� = .. Y � - . . _
i, �'' �,ir �' " �S �' � F � ,: T. a �F$t.,'.i � � � f : P � ���R �
i��',� p 'q, w c� � �
� � ,� r� w �k.� � '�" "
��" - � I�9iY � ..._� i. , - _�i �k` . �� A • � . .�
y " � �_ � " ' ;?b.:." . � r:� _ d:�
p`v'.-. �''fi.����?. fd �.. .. ` .. � � �� . . ' .l
F
° a �.k ��� �� ► ,n.. �ti °� t:E •'eF � �n�� � � � � � �
..R- � \4+ 3�l� . �,�y 1i�f+Fh4� _. ,
Zl 4 �''sd �(!t� N 1 f Pwt ' �! �id �r I � �_ � .
l � � d P . :Y
v �.�`�"�y .' _� .,� � ' � " . �{ ' .
� � "�'ti'�,r Z :.�� �� w dr� � °� R;�' �'".�� „� ; �' . �" . , ' _ ..
�� �`- � ; � .,; � _.
� .. �, �,t ;r;n� :µ �- }'
{' �
,� °�� � ` �, ,� �, ' , ,.�°
. ,�.-�jy {
. � 4 Nl-' �. � 'F�I P '�7M".� _ . 1' y a . '� A F.' ' _4
1 , .+.'� - . ;�: � -' ,l . ,` B k��'
t � [ %' �,�r,r �,� � '-�•r•- - - : � .� a �. �. y
�„ :' I �,`�c k p ' � � y ` n'��, � �e i } �y � x
�� � : 1 i 4 � # . 3.�. � �I � . �� -. . ' �� � `�i����J,�`^' !` c� � �i � r
� ». _ '
y r� '��'., �i .� ,y � 'f.'� r�'' `�- - . .�r,,�R.'�, oa
'� �, .���7'����1a �l� t.t �F _ `tl �f S � r �.�T"��y��S� �� ' . �'�� At'�'�,'� ' r�� �� '�,�.
s
� ` � .i� ' _ `"-� ."� ,, � ',� ��: ��',,
� . � L �, ., . �� . - �� .� ' _ . . '\.; . ' r, ,� C i �y n '
i �� �?�.� a�Y' ��� . . ; '. , . � \` y, � � Je,�}.,��e..
��i' y . „s .. � �A` ' ;.e: , . , ^ ` �_r''
��� �'�' �t9y �y � ':'a. �' , �..�. 1 .� � ��T;
�c F �l/� .;�.:: �
'}` '� � , .�$�� "� : � � � �in-. � �., � _ • . y�' ' � \ �'.
:�Yi�� fN��l..' 1��ir y ��F 'l{ E��� ����j�.� _ r4��I.4�4� �'7'� -� � . .. .' �\�kri:CY.�h��±
F
� �` , �e � � �' � F+ 4 f. �
�e�� ��,'/� { � ,.i,_�YC ' '/
f. ..-
�.: ' � � �r �. /
� �. . . ' � � �A � �� I
� Y ! ' ` �
� �� ��, - �_• ���.� _
� � � 1 ,
� _ � . �,n�^T . .
��� . . ��r �.' � _ _y��J/ �
o ^�4� �.
( _•�.. \;/ ��ifi.. •�i�J. '�- _
�
�.'� . xx s � :.
y..4'�M�J�,-.' .',��'sh�:r�,."3'..._, ..�:.�,;,�'.i�
Figure 1. Bridge 100677, Bald Fork Creek near bankfull level (above and below), Buncombe County, NC.
�,..�_ -- ' �
.�
��,- ~ �� . . y ..
��. _ � � �
, � _ ��
� - ` - °�-" .-t �
- � - ` � ,r � -r-"'.� q�
� ,� ���..i� .}�r�
,s` ' .� f''��4 �'-h �;� �!�
. .. � . 4.` ti `,�'� -•�r� �
� �� ���� � y�_'�� ��.#
� � y 1y [ ., f F . .s ,. t� e�. -'
� i��i ` ��� ' �����y
x++ . � �
�����_ ._ ;+r . � y, ,�'s�'`'t'��
r
�.� �y��' j� -���T �'..�J
�-_ ==, `�sk, r �'" . `
�� ' r - __.t,::y .
� �. -'F"+F�: ; ,'�'` _'�j� : . . . . � _ . �� �rr�::,,''' i
�. 1. � � �,
�l �,,�t " �r��- - � : T� .;
� �' �,�.� �
� ,�-.k ,..m . -
�r �= §x :-_ .�- `�' � � . ��� �
� , n} .�: - � y. �
� * � �� _ �
� �� '� � ..�:�' �
- -.�` � . .. �t �
� � - , � �,�. _ ; ,.,.� .
_ ��.s
�- � �,,,� �R , 5 ,'� . " �
� . --�s �` v�_ � x
s 1- � � �i �'��'� _ ""''^= ��' �
,� �.� � �� � `� r�'� '
, '�, _� , �
:� � �� �
� ��
�
�,:'� �,.,
' � �,�,�� � ; ,:
� ��
�-
_ ..� .
�-�,-- � �_ . �
_ ��
_ .�� �.. ,
_ �� - ��
.. - ,Y� . �
--� :
� � ' �, - - . .. r
.' - ��� F ......
_ .``�_�.f,:.`
. _ _ � .. �.i.
-� �,` . ��._
� �-`a� _� � ..
+E`�
__ .j.'�"; �.-F`�'� . ' .
Figure 2. Bridge 100677 Substructure and Deck, Buncombe County, NC.
ATTACHMENT A
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
BACKGROUNDINFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL
DETERMINATION (JD):
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PRELIMINARY JD:
NC Depadment of Transporlation, 55 Orange SUeet, P.O. Box 3279
Asheville, NC 26802
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
eridge replacemenl with culvert for Britlge 100677, SR 1397, Buncombe County, NC
(USE THE ATTACHED TABLE TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE WATERBODIES AT DIFFERENT
SITES)
State: NC COu�lty/pal'iSh/bo�ough: euncombe CIYY: Leicester
Center coordinates of site (IaUlong in degree decimal format):
Lat. as.s�zai °N; Long. -e�.esa�o °W.
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: ea�d Fo�k c�eek
Identify (estimate) amount of waters in the review area:
Non-wetland waters:
zoo linear feet: �o width (ft) and/or acres.
Cowardin Class: ���e���e
Stream Flow:
Wetlands: N�A acres.
Cowardin Class:
Name of any water bodies on the site that have been identified as Section 10
waters:
Tidal:
Non-Tidal:
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT
APPLY�:
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
� Field Determination. Date(s): Zi25izo�s
SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for preliminary JD
(check all that apply - checked items should be included in case file and,
where checked and requested, appropriately reference sources below):
� Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the
applicanUconsultant:
❑ Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the
appli�canUconsultant.
Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
� USGS NHD data
� USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps
❑✓ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: � z4000, sa�aYM�Sn
❑ USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey.
Citation:
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/Local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
� 100-year Floodplain Elevation is:
(National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
❑ Photographs: ❑ Aerial (Name & Date): or
� �t�l@f �Nali�Q t4t �8te�.Photosofsireamwithinpermitapplication,2/29I2016
� Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
� Other information (please specify):
1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional waters of the
United States on the subject site, and the permit applicant or other affected party
who requested this preliminary JD is hereby advised of his or her option to
request and obtain an approved jurisdictional determination (JD) for that site.
Nevertheless, the permit applicant or other person who requested this
preliminary JD has deciined to exercise the option to obtain an approved JD in
this instance and at this time.
2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or
a Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring
"pre-construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non-reporting
NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an
approved JD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware of the
following: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization
based on a preliminary JD, which does not make an official determination of
jurisdictional waters; (2) that the applicant has the option to request an approved
JD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and
that basing a permit authorization on an approved JD could possibly result in less
compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) that
the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting
the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4)
that the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply
with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation
requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5) that undertaking
any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting
an approved JD constitutes the applicanYs acceptance of the use of the
preliminary JD, but that either form of JD will be processed as soon as is
practicable; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps
permit authorization based on a preliminary JD constitutes agreement that all
wetlands and other water bodies on the site affected in any way by that activity
are jurisdictional waters of the United States, and precludes any challenge to
such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement
action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether
the applicant elects to use either an approved JD or a preliminary JD, that JD
will be processed as soon as is practicable. Further, an approved JD, a proffered
individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual
permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331,
and that in any administrative appeal, jurisdictional issues can be raised (see 33
C.F.R. 331.5(a)(2)). If, during that administrative appeal, it becomes necessary
to make an official determination whether CWA jurisdiction exists over a site, or
to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional waters on the site, the Corps wili
provide an approved JD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable.
This preliminary JD finds that there "may be" waters of the United States on the
subject project site, and identifies all aquatic features on the site that could be
affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not
necessarilv been verified bv the Corps and should not be relied uaon for
later iurisdictional determinations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory Project Manager
(REQUIRED)
2 -29 zol�
Sigr ture and a ate of
person requesting preliminary JD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)
�[j�f1ti.�, �ti� North Carolina Department of Transportation
SlCli Il l�Vc1tC'!" I
,�.,.�.,., Highway Stormwater Program ��i
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
(Version 2.02; Released April 2015) FOR NCDOT PROJECTS
WBS Element: 17.BP.13.R.151 TIP No.: SF-100677 County(ies): Buncombe Page 1 of 2
General Project Information
WBS Element: 17.BP.13.R.151 TIP Number: SF-100677 Pro'ect T pe: Brid e Replacement Date: 2/24/2016
NCDOT Contact: Marc Shown Contractor I Desi ner: Shirshant Sharma
Address: NCDOT Hydraulics Unit Address: Amec Foster Wheeler
1590 Mail Service Center 2801 Yorkmont Road, Suite 100
Ralei h, NC - 27699-1590 Charlotte, NC 28208
Phone: 919-707-6700 Phone: 704-357-5511
Email: mshown ncdot. ov Email: shirshant.sharma amecfw.com
Cit ITown: Leicester Count ies : Buncombe
River Basin s: French Broad CAMA County? No
Wetlands within Project Limits? No
Pro'ect Descri tion
Pro'ect Len th lin. miles or feet : 475 ft Surroundin Land Use: Woods (Rural)
Pro osed Pro'ect Existin Site
Pro'ect Built-U on Area ac. 0.2 ac. 0.2 ac.
Typical Cross Section Description: (Approach) 2- 9ft lanes with 3ft grassed shoulders (Approach) 2- 8.5ft lanes with 4ft grassed shoulders
(Culvert) 2- 9ft lane with 3ft paved shoulders (Bridge) 1- 13ft lane with 3.3ft paved shoulder
Annual Avg Daily Traffic (veh/hr/day): Desi n/Future: 1000 Year: 2014 Existing: 1000 Year: 2011
General Project Narrative: The existing single span 28' bridge is being replaced with a proposed double 10X4 (partially buried) box culvert. The culvert section will be normal crown with 2°/o cross slope,
(Description of Minimization of Water with 9' travel lanes and 3' shoulders. The right barrel has a 1' concrete sill and will finction as a low flow barrel. The left barrel has a 2' concrete sill and will function as an overflow
Quality Impacts) barrel. Existing drainage patterns are being maintained and stormwater runoff is being discharged as far away from the stream as possible.
Waterbod Information
Surface Water Bod 1: Bald Creek NCDWR Stream Index No.; 5-22-2
NCDWR Surface Water Classification for Water Body Prima Classification: Class C
Supplemental Classification: None
Other Stream Classification: None
Impairments: None
Aquatic T8E Species? No Comments:
NRTR Stream ID: Buffer Rules in Effect: N/A
Pro'ect Includes Brid e Spannin Water Bod ? Yes Deck Drains Dischar e Over Buffer? No Dissipator Pads Provided in Buffer? N/A
Deck Drains Dischar e Over Water Bod ? No (If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) (If yes, describe in the General Project Narrative; if no, justify in the
(If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) General Project Narrative)
][j��y�� �jy North Carolina Department of Transportation /
SlDCt71�V�ter � ��
Highway Stormwater Program �
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN —
(Version 2.02; Released April 2015) FOR NCDOT PROJECTS
WBS Element: 17.BP.13.R.1 TIP No.: SF-100677 County(ies): Buncombe Page 2 of 2
Bridge to Culvert Avoidance and Minimization
Proposed Structure ummary
Sheet No. & Station Sheet No.: 4 Station: Number of Culverts: 2
Drainage Area (ac or sq mi): 2.7 Sq. Miles Culvert Width/Diameter (ft): 10
Surface Water Body: (1)Bald Creek Culvert Height (ft): 4
Culvert T e: Concrete Box Culvert Culvert Length (ft) 52
Avoidance and Minimization Efforts: The proposed culvert has two barrels with one functioning as a low flow barrel. As such, under low flow (bankfull) conditions, the existing stream
(Bridge to Culvert) is approximately 17 feet in width whereas the low flow culvert opening is only 10 feet in width. This results in a somewhat higher velocity in the
culvert at the upstream end. However, at the downstream end of the culvert, the backwater from the 60" pipe downstream results in a proposed
outlet velocity that is less than existing. The proposed culvert slope is flatter than existing to reduce outlet velocities and minimize erosion.
Stream Slope Fish and/or Aquatic Life Passage
Existing Average Stream Slope (%): 3.00 % Existing Low Flow Channel Dimensions 2.5' deep trapezoidal channel, 15' top width, 8'
Proposed Culvert Slope (%): 1.80 °/o in the Stream: bottom width, 2:1 side slopes.
Culvert Burial
Proposed Culvert Burial Depth (ft): 1'
Existing Streambed Material: Mix of coarse sand, gravel and cobble (D50 = 7 mm) Proposed Low Flow Dimensions 10'X1'
Through the Culvert:
Proposed Sills/Baffles: Concrete Sills (1' Deep RT, 2' Deep LT) - The culvert
is buried 1' below the existing streambed, but the xisting Low ow e ocities in t e
second culvert barrel has an additional 1 foot of sill Stream (ft/s): 2.0 (U/S) / 3.1 (D/S)
height so that it functions as an overflow barrel. ropose ow ow e oci ies roug 3.72 (U/S) / 2.2 (D/S)
the Culvert (ft/s):
Alternating Low Flow Sills/Baffles: Right barrel is low flow, left barrel is high flow.
No alternating baffles.
Culvert/Stream Alignment
Stream Patterns Upstream and NA
Downstream of the Culvert that Could
Affect Fish Passage and Bank Stability:
Bed Forms Impacted by Culvert (riffles, NA
pools, glides, etc.):
Low Flow Floodplain Bench Required? Yes Culvert overtops at less than 5 year event. Floodplain bench has been provided to separate low flow and high flows through the
(provide justification) two culvert barrels. The low flow event is the flow which resulted in 1 foot of depth at the upstream end of the low flow culvert
Sharp Bends at Inlet/Outlet? Yes Inlet to the culvert has a sharp bend, hence extended wing walls are proposed to channelize water and prevent erosion.
describe culvert ali nment with stream
Stream Realignment Necessary? (provide No
justification)
Bank Stabilization: Wing walls are expected to provide sufficient stabilization. Drainage area to the culvert is 2.7 sq. mi and the culvert overtops at less than 5 year
Outlet Velocities
Natural Stream Channel 2-yr Velocity (ft/s): 3.52 (existing) Natural Stream Channel 10-yr Velocity (ft/s): 12.84 (existing)
Proposed Culvert 2-yr Outlet Velocity (ft/s): 5 Proposed Culvert 10-yr Outlet Velocity (fUs): 8.3
Roadway Geometric Considerations
Evaluate/Describe Roadway Geometric Constraints: