Catawba IBT Annual Report 2010

2010 Annual Report on
Interbasin Transfers from
the Catawba River Basin
North Carolina Division of Water Resources
DWG
Division of Water Resources
Department of the Environment and Natural
Resources
August, 2011

INTRODUCTION
This report has been prepared in accordance with the Settlement Agreement signed on
December 3, 2010 reached between the States of South Carolina, North Carolina, Duke
Energy Carolinas LLC, and the Catawba River Water Supply Project. As a condition of
that agreement, "each State shall prepare an annual report of the average daily transfer
amounts for each entity holding an IBT certificate and provide it to the other State."
Therefore this annual report is intended to be a summary of interbasin transfers (IBTs)
to and from the Catawba River Basin, that are performed by IBT certificate holders.
BACKGROUND: IBT LAW IN NORTH CAROLINA
In 1993, the North Carolina Legislature enacted General Statute G.S. §143-215.221 as
part of An Act to Regulate Interbasin Transfers (Session Law 1993-348). This law
regulated large surface water transfers between river basins by requiring a certificate
from the Environmental Management Commission (EMC). In general, a transfer
certificate is required for new transfers of 2 million gallons per day (MGD) or more.
Due to the fact that the Surface Water Transfer Act was first adopted in 1993, many of
the IBT rules and requirements reference a system's daily flows and capacity at that
time. Facilities that were in existence prior to 1993 are said to have Grandfathered
Transfers up to either 25% above their average daily flow at that time, their maximum
system capacity at that time, or 2 MGD - whichever is greater. If a facility existed or was
under construction by July 1, 1993, a certificate is not required up to the full capacity of
that facility to transfer water, regardless of the transfer amount.
An important point in NC's IBT law is that it creates its own, specific definition of a "river
basin". According to G.S. §143-215.22G, there are 38 designated river basins. An IBT
certificate is required for any transfer, meeting the statutorily defined thresholds,
between any of these defined river basins. Figure 1 illustrates the designated river
basins.

Figure 1: Designated Interbasin Transfer River Basins
As defined in G.S. §143-215.22G
BASIN NAME
1-1 Broad River
2-1 Haw River
2-2 Deep River
2-3 Cape Fear River
2-4 South River
2-5 Northeast Cape Fear River
2-6 New River
3-1 Catawba River
3-2 South Fork Catawba River
4-1 Chowan River
4-2 Meherrin River
5-1 Nolichucky River
5-2 French Broad River
5-3 Pigeon River
6-1 Hiwassee River
• =
BASIN NAME
7-1 Little Tennessee River
7-2 Tuskasegee River
8-1 Savannah River
9-1 Lumber River
9-2 Big Shoe Heel Creek
9-3 Waccamaw River
9-4 Shallotte River
10-1
10-2
10-3
Neuse River
Contentnea Creek
Trent River
11-1 New River
12-1 Albemarle Sound
13-1 Ocoee River
14-1 Roanoke River
BASIN NAME
15-1 Tar River
15-2 Fishing Creek
15-3 Pamlico River & Sound
16-1 Watauga River
17-1 White Oak River
18-1
18-2
18-3
18-4
Yadkin River
South Yadkin River
Uwharrie River
Rocky River

The procedure for obtaining an Interbasin Transfer Certificate is specifically laid out in
G.S. §143-215.22L. The full process can take three to five years (or more), requires local
and interstate notification, and offers a number of opportunities for public comment
and review. The full text of G.S. §143-215.22L is included in Appendix C to this report.
As of August 2011, The North Carolina Environmental Management Commission has
issued interbasin transfer certificates for five water systems. Two of these certificates
directly affect the Catawba River Basin. Those two certificates, for Charlotte
Mecklenburg Utilities and the Cities of Concord and Kannapolis, are further discussed in
this report. The Division of Water Resources also estimates that there are more than
100 grandfathered systems performing smaller IBTs throughout the State. Up to 80% of
these systems transfer less than 2 MGD on a maximum daily basis. These grandfathered
systems fall below the statutory thresholds and are not required to submit daily transfer
estimates. Since these systems are not required to obtain an IBT certificate, they are
not discussed in this document.

CHARLOTTE MECKLENBURG UTILITIES
Charlotte Mecklenburg Utilities (CMU) has held an interbasin transfer certificate since
March 14, 2002. The certificate allows CMU to transfer up to 33 million gallons per day
(MGD) from the Catawba River Basin to the Rocky River Basin. Figure 2 illustrates CMUs
two water intakes in the Catawba River Basin, and five wastewater treatment plants
throughout the Catawba and Rocky River Basins. The utility pursued this certificate in
order to meet projected demands through 2030 in eastern Mecklenburg County.
Specific details of CMU's water treatment facilities and a further description of its
transfer is included in Appendix A: Charlotte Mecklenburg Utilities' 2010 Annual Report.
Figure 2: Charlotte Mecklenburg Utilities Service Area
CATA
LI
OLN
ON
NC/SCState Line
DE
ake N
1
rmanln -k
cDowell Creek
and Lake take
ine Creek
•
a
MECKLENBUR
,ugarCreek WWT 1
f
r
0
AN
CABARRUS
Cabarrus Co RRR
rd CreekWWTP
UNION
CMU provides water to retail customers in the Rocky River Basin, as well as customers in
the City of Concord and Town of Harrisburg, in neighboring Cabarrus County. However
water is only provided to Concord as an emergency backup to Concord's primary supply
consisting of Lake Howell and several smaller reservoirs. All of these reservoirs are

within the Rocky River basin. Concord received an IBT Certificate in January 2007 for the
transfer of up to 10 mgd from the Catawba River basin to the Rocky River basin.
Therefore water sold to Concord is not applied to CMU's IBT amount.
Charlotte Mecklenburg Utilities' IBT calculation methodology was approved by NC DWR
in June, 2006. Per the certificate, CMU reports the maximum daily IBT amounts
annually to NC DWR until such time as the transfer amount exceeds 80% of the
authorized amount. Once that amount is exceeded, Utilities is required to report
monthly. To date, CMU has not exceeded 80% of the authorized IBT amount.
In 2010 CMU reported a maximum daily transfer of 18.22 MGD from the Catawba River
Basin to the Rocky River Basin. This is 55% of the amount authorized in the certificate.
The average daily transfer for 2010 was 13.45 MGD, 41% of the authorized maximum
daily value. CMU's full 2010 IBT annual report is included in Appendix A. Annual reports
from 2002-2010 are available on the Division's website at
http://www.ncwater.org/Permits and Registration/Interbasin Transfer/ .

CONCORD AND KANNAPOLIS
The Cities of Concord and Kannapolis (the Cities) have held an interbasin transfer
certificate since January 2007. This certificate authorizes the transfer of up to 10 MGD
from the Catawba River Basin to the Rocky River Basin and 10 MGD from the Yadkin
River Basin to the Rocky River Basin. This amount was authorized based on the Cities'
needs through 2035 and an analysis of the yield of available water sources. In addition,
the Cities have a grandfathered transfer capacity (based on infrastructure in place prior
to 1993) of 6 MGD for transfers from the South Yadkin River Basin to the Rocky River
Basin. Figure 3 illustrates the Cites Service area and interbasin transfers. Specific details
of the Cities' service area and sales are included in Appendix B, Concord and Kannapolis'
2010 IBT Annual Report.
Figure 3: Concord and Kannapolis Service Area
In 2010 the Cities reached a settlement in a lawsuit filed by the Catawba River
Foundation, Inc. and the Protect the Catawba Coalition. While this does not affect the
IBT Certificate, its conditions, or required reporting in any way, the Cities did agree to
several operational conditions in the Catawba River Basin during drought. Until July 1,

2015, the Cities have agreed to transfer no more than 3.0 MGD (on a maximum day
basis) from the Catawba River Basin. Thereafter, the Cities must first transfer 5.0 MGD
from the Yadkin River Basin before exceeding an IBT of 3.0 MGD from the Catawba River
Basin. During designated droughts beyond July 1, 2015, following either Low Inflow
Protocol (LIP) or Drought Management Advisory Council (DMAC) Drought Stage
declaration, the Cities have agreed to limit the Catawba River Basin IBT so that it
corresponds to water use reduction goals. Further details about this agreement,
including the water use reduction goals after July 2015, can be found in Appendix B.
The Cities' IBT certificate requires an annual report listing the maximum daily transfer for the
calendar year. The average daily and maximum daily transfers for 2010 are summarized below
in Table 1.
Table 1: Concord and Kannapolis 2010 Interbasin Transfers
Interbasin Transfer
Authorized
Transfer (MGD)
2010 Maximum Daily
Transfer (MGD)
2010 Average Daily
Transfer (MGD)
Catawba to Rocky 10.0 1 0.007 2 0.005 2
Yadkin to Rocky 10.0 0.33 0.33
South Yadkin to Rocky 6.0 -0.5 4 -0.2 4
Notes:
1. Amount authorized by IBT certificate. The Cities have additionally agreed not to exceed 3.0 MGD from the
Catawba until July 1, 2015.
2. Based on purchases from Charlotte Mecklenburg Utilities. This purchase provides water to a single
neighborhood within the Cities' service area.
3. The average and maximum daily transfer from the Yadkin was the same each day due to a contract
agreement between Kannapolis and Salisbury.
4. The 6 MGD grandfathered capacity is based Kannapolis' ability to pump raw water to Kannapolis Lake.
This did not occur in 2010 due to pump maintenance and electrical improvements. Kannapolis' sale to the
Town of Landis did occur, however, which created a net transfer in the opposite direction (Rocky to South
Yadkin).
Based on the information provided above, Concord and Kannapolis transferred an
average of 0.005 MGD from the Catawba River Basin in 2010. The full 2010 annual
report is included in Appendix B. Annual reports from 2007-2010 are available on the
Division's website at
http://www.ncwater.org/Permits and Registration/Interbasin Transfer/ .
CONCLUSION
Based on the information previously discussed in this report, North Carolina estimates
that approximately 13.455 MGD was transferred from the Catawba River Basin on an
average daily basis by IBT certificate holders in 2010. Approximately 18.227 MGD was
transferred on a maximum daily basis. This amounts to 42% (on a max day) of the total
amount authorized to be removed from the basin by IBT certificates. For any questions
concerning these IBTs please contact Toya Ogallo with the NC Division of Water
Resources at [phone]. Further information can also be found on our website at
http://www.ncwater.org/Permits and Registration/Interbasin Transfer/ .

Appendix A: Charlotte Mecklenburg Utilities 2010 IBT Annual Report
CHAR JTTE
May 26, 2011
Mr. Tom Reeder
N.C. Division of Water Resources
1611 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1611
Subject: IBT Report for 2010
Dear Tom:
We are sending our calendar year 2010 IBT Annual Report. We are also transmitting this report to
you electronically. The report follows the format of earlier reports and includes a narrative section
with background and program progress reports along with spreadsheets detailing the IBT amount
calculation.
For calendar year 2010, we experienced an actual maximum day IBT of 18.22 mgd based on August
billing data and as of December 31, 2010, had additional outstanding IBT commitments of 1.64 mgd.
The summation of these amounts would indicate a 2010 IBT amount of 19.88 mgd which is less than
61 % of our authorized amount.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG UTILITIES
Barry M. t 1 , PE
Director
Cc: Toya F. Ogallo
Administration Division 5100 Brookshire Blvd. Charlotte, NC 28216 Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
Charlotte -Mecklenburg Utilities

Appendix A: Charlotte Mecklenburg Utilities 2010 IBT Annual Report
CHARLOTTE-MECKLEHBIIRG
UTILITIES
Charlotte Mecklenburg Utilities
Annual Report on Interbasin Transfer
Calendar Year 2010
The North Carolina Environmental Management Commission (EMC) approved Charlotte
Mecklenburg Utilities' (Utilities') petition to increase the amount of water transferred from the
Catawba basin to the Rocky River basin and an interbasin transfer (IBT) Certificate was issued
on March 14, 2002. The Certificate authorizes Utilities to transfer up to 33 million gallons per
day (mgd) from the Catawba River basin to the Rocky River basin.
The IBT Certificate requires Utilities to report maximum daily IBT amounts annually to the
North Carolina Division of Water Resources (NC DWR) until such time as the transfer amount
exceeds 80% of the authorized amount. Once that amount is exceeded, Utilities is required to
report monthly. To date, Charlotte -Mecklenburg Utilities has not exceeded 80% of the
authorized IBT amount.
System Overview
The Utilities operates the water and wastewater systems that serve Charlotte, Cornelius,
Davidson, Huntersville, Mint Hill, Matthews, Pineville, and much of the unincorporated areas of
Mecklenburg County. This system is divided between two river basins designated by NC
General Statutes for regulation of IBT water. The western portion of the system is within the
Catawba River basin and the eastern portion is within the Rocky River basin. Water transferred
from the Catawba River basin to the Rocky River basin that is not returned to the Catawba is
regulated IBT.
Water for distribution to Utilities' customers is withdrawn from the Catawba River basin at two
locations. An intake at Lake Norman sends water to the Lee S. Dukes Water Treatment Plant. A
second intake at Mountain Island Lake sends water to the Walter M. Franklin Water Treatment
Plant and to the Vest Water Treatment Plant. Potable water from these three plants is delivered
through an interconnected distribution system to retail customers throughout Utilities' service
area in Mecklenburg County and in small areas of Iredell, Cabarrus, and Union Counties. The
Utilities also provides wholesale water to municipal systems for Resale including: City of
Concord (NC), Town of Harrisburg (NC), Union County (NC), York County Water & Sewer
Authority (SC), and Lancaster County Water and Sewer District (SC).
Utilities treats wastewater at five advanced wastewater treatment plants (WWTP's) which
discharge into small streams in Mecklenburg County. Four of the streams are tributary to the
Catawba River basin and one (Mallard Creek) is tributary to the Rocky River basin. Utilities also
conveys wastewater generated in portions of Mecklenburg County to the Rocky River Regional
Wastewater Treatment Plant (RRRWWTP) operated by the Water and Sewer Authority of
Cabarrus County (WSACC). The RRRWWTP discharges treated effluent to the Rocky River.
Page 2 of 6

Appendix A: Charlotte Mecklenburg Utilities 2010 IBT Annual Report
CHARLOTTE-MECKLEHBIIRG
UTILITIES
IBT Monitoring
Water supplied to Utilities' retail customers in the Rocky River Basin, that is not returned to the
Catawba basin, is included in the reported IBT amounts. Water provided to municipalities with
service areas in the Rocky River basin include the City of Concord and the Town of Harrisburg.
Utilities can transfer treated potable water to the City of Concord through three metered
connections to their water system. All of Concord's service area is within the Rocky River
basin, so any water purchased by them becomes an IBT. Water service is only provided as an
emergency back-up to Concord's routine supply which is Lake Howell and several smaller
reservoirs. All of these reservoirs are within the Rocky River basin. Wastewater from Concord
is treated at the RRRWWTP. Utilities' agreement with Concord is that water will be supplied to
them subject to availability and subject to regulatory constraints including IBT and Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) limitations.
Concord received an IBT Certificate in January 2007, for the transfer of up to 10 mgd from the
Catawba River basin to the Rocky River basin. NC DWR advised Utilities that water sold to
Concord should not be applied to Utilities' IBT amount. Concord did not purchase any potable
water from Utilities in calendar year 2010, so the IBT amounts reported do not include sales to
Concord.
Utilities can transfer treated potable water to the Town of Harrisburg through two metered
connections to their water system. All of Harrisburg's service area is within the Rocky River
basin and is included in the Utilities' IBT amounts.
Table 1 below summarizes actual IBT amounts for calendar years 2002 through 2010 (all
calculated using the methodology approved by NC DWR in June of 2006). The table considers
the daily amounts of water transferred from the Catawba basin to customers within the Rocky
River basin that is not returned to the Catawba basin.
The data indicates that the maximum amount of IBT for year 2010 occurred in August, and was
18.22 mgd, less than 56% of the authorized maximum day value of 33 mgd. The average IBT for
2010 was 13.45 mgd, which is approximately 41% of the authorized maximum day value. In
addition to the amount of actual IBT reported in Table 1, Utilities has committed to provide
additional IBT to development that has been proposed but not yet activated in the Rocky River
basin. As of December 31, 2010, 1.16 mgd was committed to permitted donated projects
(subdivisions) that had not been activated and 0.50 mgd was committed to master meter
connections (generally commercial or multi -family developments) that had not been activated,
both based on maximum day estimates. This brings the total of the actual and outstanding IBT in
2010 to 19.88 mgd, or less than 61% of the authorized maximum day value.
Page 3 of 6

Appendix A: Charlotte Mecklenburg Utilities 2010 IBT Annual Report
CHARLOTTE-MECKLEHBIIRG
UTILITIES
Table 1. Actual IBT Summary
Calendar Year Avg. Annual IBT (mgd) Max. Day IBT (mgd)
2002 6.74 11.97
2003 6.91 9.82
2004 7.79 12.56
2005 8.66 13.79
2006 9.56 14.35
2007 9.96 17.22
2008 11.39 17.42
2009 12.04 16.00
2010 13.45 18.22
Compliance with Certificate Conditions
Condition 1 of Utilities' IBT certificate requires Mecklenburg County to summarize progress in
implementation of watershed management approaches of the Surface Water Improvement and
Management Program (S.W.I.M. program). This summary follows:
The watershed management approaches of the Surface Water Improvement and Management
(SWIM) Program continued to be implemented during calendar year 2010. Efforts continued
to focus on McDowell and Goose Creeks as in 2007, 2008 and 2009 as well as the South
Prong and West Branch of the Rocky River in Davidson as initiated in 2009. During
calendar year 2010, the following work was completed in the three (3) watersheds:
a) Survey and design were initiated on the restoration of 1,000 feet of stream and the
retrofit of 5 rain gardens within the North Mecklenburg Park Property in the McDowell
Creek watershed. In addition to the water quality benefits of the project, it will act as an
educational destination for property owners potentially affected by future stream
restoration and BMP retrofit projects.
b) Since 2002 Goose Creek has been listed by the N.C. Department of Environment and
Natural Resources (NCDENR) as impaired due to elevated levels of fecal coliform
bacteria. The predominant sewer treatment system in the watershed is private septic
systems; therefore, it was assumed that malfunctioning septic systems were a primary
source of the elevated bacteria levels. In 2008, Mecklenburg County initiated a program
to complete an inspection of all the septic systems in the watershed in order to identify
deficiencies and take the necessary actions to ensure correction. This effort was
completed in 2010 with the inspection of 1,422 septic systems resulting in the correction
of 13 deficiencies that could contribute to elevated bacteria levels in Goose Creek.
Following the completion of this project, NCDENR data documented a reduction in fecal
coliform bacteria levels and Goose Creek was removed from the list of impaired waters.
Page 4 of 6

Appendix A: Charlotte Mecklenburg Utilities 2010 IBT Annual Report
CHARLOTTE-MECKLEHBIIRG
UTILITIES
c) Mecklenburg County continues to partner with Creek ReLeaf environmental
organizations and local schools to plant trees along the banks of streams in Mecklenburg
County. The purpose of this effort is to restore the water quality buffer and floodplain.
During 2010, over 2,200 trees were planted by more 400 volunteers along the floodplain
of Little Sugar Creek.
d) Construction of the restoration of 10, 000 linear feet of Torrence and Torrence Tributary
#2 was nearly completed in 2010. This project is expected to reduce the overall sediment
load in the McDowell Creek watershed by as much as 7%.
e) In 2010, Mecklenburg County requested that the Army Corps of Engineers include the
Rocky River watershed in Mecklenburg County into their 206 Program for restoration.
As a result, the Corps selected the watershed for inclusion in Program.
f) Mecklenburg County applied for two Clean Water Management Trust Fund Grants for
the restoration of an additional 10,000 feet of stream in the McDowell Creek Watershed.
Condition 2 of Utilities' IBT certificate required a stakeholder process to investigate, develop,
adopt, and implement storm water ordinances that control water quantity from single-family
development and water quality for all development until completed. The requirements of
Condition 2 were completed in 2007.
Condition 3 of the IBT Certificate removes the Goose Creek subbasin from the area to be served
by the IBT, and imposes a moratorium on the installation of new IBT water lines (water lines
crossing the ridgeline) into Goose Creek subbasin until the impacts of additional growth on the
endangered species are fully evaluated.
The Utilities has requested the NC Division of Water Resources (DWR) to prepare an
Environmental Assessment (EA) of new development in the Goose Creek basin (Mint Hill
area), impacts to water quality, and measures required to protect the Carolina
Heelsplitter.
Condition 4 of the IBT Certificate provides that the Environmental Management Commission
may reopen the Certificate under certain circumstances. This did not occur in 2010.
Page 5 of 6

•
Appendix A: Charlotte Mecklenburg Utilities 2010 IBT Annua
tn
,w
CHARLOTTE-MECKLEHBIIFIG
UTILITIES
Condition 5 of the IBT Certificate requires Utilities to develop a compliance and monitoring plan
for reporting maximum daily transfer amounts, compliance with certificate conditions, and
progress on mitigation measures, and drought management activities. Utilities' monitoring plan
and reporting format were approved in June of 2006 by NC DWR and continue to be used for
2010.
Charlotte Mecklenburg Utilities monitored water treatment plant pump rates, streamflow
and lake storage indicators, the US Drought Monitor, and other factors in accordance
with the Utilities Water Shortage Response Plan. Measurements were assessed monthly
to identify designated triggers that could indicate developing drought conditions. All
appropriate planning, communication and preparation were in place to respond as
needed to changing conditions.
In coordination with 15 other utilities in the Catawba-Wateree river basin, Charlotte -
Mecklenburg participated in regional drought response planning and response activities
as directed by the FERC- approved Low Inflow Protocol.
Summary
The actual maximum day amount of water transferred from the Catawba River basin to the
Rocky River basin was 18.22 mgd, less than 56% of the authorized maximum day value of 33
mgd. The total of actual and outstanding IBT was 19.88 mgd, less than 61 % of the authorized
maximum day value. Utilities is in full compliance with IBT authorizations and compliance
conditions for calendar year 2010.
Page 6 of 6

Appendix B: Concord and Kannapolis 2010 IBT Annual Report
2010 Annual Report on Interbasin Transfers
for
The Cities of Concord and Kannapolis
Prepared for
City of Concord
City of Kannapolis
Submitted to:
North Carolina Division of Water Resources
January 2011
Prepared By:
0. CH2MHILL
411111.
11301 Carmel Commons Boulevard
Suite 304
Charlotte, NC 28226

Appendix B: Concord and Kannapolis 2010 IBT Annual Report
Executive Summary
The 2010 Annual Report on Interbasin Transfers (IBTs) for the Cities of Concord and
Kannapolis (Cities) includes monitoring data for daily tracking of IBT amounts and
documentation of compliance with all IBT Certificate conditions. Annual reports were
previously prepared for calendar years 2007, 2008, and 2009 and are available on the North
Carolina Division of Water Resources (NCDWR) website.
The North Carolina Environmental Management Commission (EMC) approved the Cities'
IBT Certificate in January 2007 authorizing transfers of up to 10 million gallons per day
(mgd) from the Catawba River Basin to the Rocky River Basin and 10 mgd from the Yadkin
River Basin to the Rocky River Basin. Additionally, a grandfathered IBT of 6 mgd authorizes
transfer from Second Creek, located in the South Yadkin River Basin, to the Rocky River
Basin. The terms "Cities" and "Certificate Holders" are used interchangeably herein.
In 2010, the Certificate Holders complied with all conditions of their IBT Certificate. The
Cities of Concord and Kannapolis purchased small amounts of water from Charlotte -
Mecklenburg Utilities (CMU) from the Catawba River Basin during 2010. The maximum
daily transfer from the Yadkin River Basin was 0.3 mgd.
In 2010, the City of Kannapolis did not pump water from Second Creek to Kannapolis Lake
under its South Yadkin River Basin grandfathered IBT. Water sales to Landis averaging 0.20
mgd resulted in an IBT to Second Creek (South Yadkin River Basin) during 2010. The
maximum day transfer to the South Yadkin River Basin was 0.54 mgd. IBT amounts for 2010
are provided in Table ES-1. The 2010 IBT daily transfers for Concord and Kannapolis are
shown in Figure ES-1.
In addition, a settlement was reached in 2010 on a lawsuit filed by the Catawba River
Foundation, Inc. and the Protect the Catawba Coalition. While this does not change the IBT
Certificate or required reporting in any way, the Cities did agree to some operational
conditions regarding the Catawba River Basin during times of drought.

Appendix B: Concord and Kannapolis 2010 IBT Annual Report
TABLE ES-1
2010 IBT Average Annual & Maximum Day Demands for Concord and Kannapolis Service Areas
Annual Report on Interbasin Transfers for the Cities of Concord and Kannapolis
Catawba River Basin
Water
Purchase
Year (mgd)°
Average Max.
Annual Day
2010 0.005
IBT as %
of
Certificateb
Max. Day
0.0%
Yadkin River Basin
Water
Purchase
(mgd)
Average Max.
Annual Day
0.3 0.3
IBT as % of
Certificate
Max. Day
3.0%
Second Creek°
(South Yadkin River Basin)
IBT as %
of Grand -
Water Transfer fathered
(mgd) Amounte
Average
Annual
0.20
Max.
Day Max. Day
0.54 27.1%
a Concord purchases water from CMU for a residential neighborhood. Only monthly total volume purchased
quantities are available.
b Maximum Day IBT of 10 mgd from the Catawba River Basin.
° Maximum Day IBT of 10 mgd from the Yadkin River Basin.
d The grandfathered 6-mgd Maximum Day IBT limit from Second Creek (South Yadkin River Basin) into the
Rocky River Basin is not included in the 10-mgd Maximum Day IBT limit for the Yadkin River Basin.
e Second Creek was not used as a water source in 2010. No transfer from the South Yadkin River Basin to
the Rocky River Basin occurred. Water sales to Landis resulted in a positive water transfer to the South
Yadkin River Basin.

Appendix B: Concord and Kannapolis 2010 IBT Annual Report
0.350
0.300
0.250
0.200
0.150
0.100
0.050
0.000
2010 Daily IBT Per Basin (mgd)
Notes:
- Permitted maximum IBT for the Catawba River Basin is 10 mgd
and the maximum IBT for the Yadkin River Basin is 10 mgd.
- Daily IBT for the Catawba River Basin includes purchase from
CMU of 0.005 mgd annual average daily flow.
,y0 ,y0 y0 ,y0 y0 y0 y0 y0 ,y0
\9� \�� \�� \�� \�� \tip \�� \tip
ti\ti\ti �\ti �\ti �,\ti\ti\ti �,\ti\ti do\ti titi\ti titi\ti
—4—Yadkin (Catawba
FIGURE ES-1
2010 Daily Interbasin Transfers by Basin

Appendix B: Concord and Kannapolis 2010 IBT Annual Report
Table of Contents
Executive Summary ES-1
1.0 Introduction 1-1
2.0 IBT Monitoring 2-1
2.1 Service Area Water Demand 2-1
2.2 Interbasin Transfers 2-1
3.0 Other Related Information 3-1
4.0 Compliance with Certificate Conditions 4-2
4.1 Condition 1
Licensure)
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.5
4.6
4.7
(Federal Energy Regulatory Commission [FERC]
Condition 2
Condition 3
Condition 4
Condition 5
Condition 6
Condition 7
4-2
(Drought Management Plan) 4-2
(Disaggregation of IBT Amount) 4-5
(Compliance and Monitoring Plan) 4-5
(EMC Consideration of Impacts) 4-5
(20-Year Certificate Evaluation) 4-5
(Limit of Certificate) 4-6
Appendix
Daily Interbasin Transfer Amounts for 2010
Acronyms and Abbreviations
CMU
DMAC
EMC
FERC
IBT
LIP
mgd
NCDWR
WSRP
WTP
Charlotte -Mecklenburg Utilities
Drought Management Advisory Council
Environmental Management Commission
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Interbasin Transfer
Low Inflow Protocol
million gallons per day
North Carolina Division of Water Resources
Water Shortage Response Plan
Water Treatment Plant

Appendix B: Concord and Kannapolis 2010 IBT Annual Report
1.0 Introduction
The Cities of Concord and Kannapolis (Cities) received an interbasin transfer (IBT)
Certificate, which was originally approved on January 10, 2007, and signed into effect on
January 25, 2007. The North Carolina Environmental Management Commission (EMC) has
authorized transfers of up to 10 million gallons per day (mgd) from the Catawba River Basin
to the Rocky River Basin and 10 mgd from the Yadkin River Basin to the Rocky River Basin.
As a condition of the IBT Certificate, the Cities are required to produce an Annual Report
that documents transfers over the past year. Annual reports were also prepared for calendar
years 2007, 2008, and 2009 and are available on the North Carolina Division of Water
Resources (NCDWR) website.
The Cities provide water to each other, various municipalities in the area (including:
Mount Pleasant, Midland, Harrisburg, and Landis), and unincorporated areas of Cabarrus
County. Concord owns and operates the water distribution system used by the Town of
Midland. Charlotte -Mecklenburg Utilities (CMU) and the City of Salisbury currently have
contracts to provide water to the Cities from the Catawba and Yadkin River Basins,
respectively. Kannapolis has an agreement in place with the City of Salisbury to purchase
0.3 mgd of finished water on a daily basis; the Cities are also in the process of constructing
an interconnection with the City of Albemarle, which is located in the Yadkin River Basin.
Currently, Concord purchases finished water from CMU for a small residential area.
The terms "Cities" and "Certificate Holders" are used interchangeably herein. Figure 1-1
illustrates the ability to transfer water among the Certificate Holders and all municipalities
served by the Certificate Holders.

Appendix B: Concord and Kannapolis 2010 IBT Annual Report
IMO TOVOISHIP
RAW WATER
FINI5HED'I'ATER
w;ATER 3.4.1E8
FIGURE 1-1
Water Connections of the Certificate Holders and All Municipalities Served by the Certificate Holders

Appendix B: Concord and Kannapolis 2010 IBT Annual Report
2.0 IBT Monitoring
2.1 Service Area Water Demand
Table 2-1 presents 2010 annual average water production for the Certificate Holders based
on finished water produced at the Hillgrove, Coddle Creek, and Kannapolis Water
Treatment Plants (WTPs). It also shows finished water purchases from CMU and the City of
Salisbury, if they occurred. Additionally, Table 2-1 presents the 2010 annual average IBT (or
water purchases) from each basin covered by the IBT Certificate and from Second Creek,
from which transfers are authorized by a grandfathered IBT. In 2010, finished water
production averaged 12.58 mgd and purchased IBT finished water averaged 0.30 mgd for
the Yadkin River Basin. The City of Concord purchased small amounts of water from CMU,
whose water source is from the Catawba River Basin, during 2010. The combined 2010
annual average water use for the Certificate Holders was 12.89 mgd.
TABLE 2-1
2010 Water Production or Purchases by River Basin
Annual Report on Interbasin Transfers for the Cities of Concord and Kannapolis
2010
Annual Average
Annual Average Purchased Water
(mgd)
Finished Water Catawba Yadkin
Produceda River River
Certificate Holders (mgd) Basinb Basin
Annual Average
Second Combined Water
Creek` Use (mgd)
Concord & Kannapolis 12.58 0.005 0.30
0.00 12.89
a Water produced within Rocky River Basin; may include water from Second Creek transferred directly into
Kannapolis Lake (none in 2010).
b Concord purchases water from CMU for a residential neighborhood. Only monthly total volume purchased
quantities are available.
In 2010, no water was transferred from the Second Creek raw water pump station to Kannapolis Lake.
2.2 Interbasin Transfers
Daily IBT amounts for the Certificate Holders are included in the Appendix. Data are
provided for the period January 1, 2010 through December 31, 2010. There was a small IBT
from the Catawba River Basin during the calendar year 2010 averaging 0.005 mgd. The
maximum day IBT from the Yadkin River Basin during the calendar year 2008 was 0.3 mgd,
which was consistent daily throughout 2010 due to contract agreements between Salisbury
and Kannapolis. This represents 3.0 percent of the permitted maximum day, 10-mgd IBT
from the Yadkin River Basin under the Certificate approved by the EMC in January 2007.
There were no transfers of raw water from Second Creek due to pump maintenance and
electrical improvements in this system. Table 2-2 shows the IBT use for the Certificate
Holders and the percentage of use from the Catawba and Yadkin River Basins.

Appendix B: Concord and Kannapolis 2010 IBT Annual Report
TABLE 2.2
2010 IBT Average Annual & Maximum Day Demands for Concord and Kannapolis Service Areas
Annual Report on Interbasin Transfers for the Cities of Concord and Kannapolis
Catawba River Basin
Water
Purchase
Year (mgd)
Average Max.
Annual Day
2010 0.005
IBT as %
of
Certificateb
Max. Day
0.0%
Yadkin River Basin
Water
Purchase
(mgd)
Average Max.
Annual Day
0.3 0.3
IBT as % of
Certificate
Max. Day
3.0%
Second Creek°
(South Yadkin River Basin)
IBT as %
Water Transfer of
(mgd) Certificates
Average
Annual
0.20
Max.
Day Max. Day
0.54 27.1%
a Concord purchases water from CMU for a residential neighborhood. Only monthly total volume purchased
quantities are available.
b Maximum Day IBT of 10 mgd from the Catawba River Basin.
° Maximum Day IBT of 10 mgd from the Yadkin River Basin.
d The grandfathered 6-mgd Maximum Day IBT limit from Second Creek (South Yadkin River Basin) into the
Rocky River Basin is not included in the 10-mgd Maximum Day IBT limit for the Yadkin River Basin.
e Second Creek was not used as a water source in 2010. No transfer from the South Yadkin River Basin to
the Rocky River Basin occurred. Water sales to Landis resulted in a positive water transfer to the South
Yadkin River Basin.
Figure 2-1 displays the daily IBT amounts for water purchases from the Catawba and
Yadkin River Basins.
0.350
0.300
0.250
0.200
0.150
0.100
0.050
0.000
2010 Daily IBT Per Basin (mgd)
Notes:
- Permitted maximum IBT for the Catawba River Basin is
10 mgd and the maximum IBT for the Yadkin River Basin is
10 mgd.
- Daily IBT for the Catawba Basin shows purchase from CMU
of 0.005 mgd annual average daily flow.
y0 y0 y0 y0 y0 y0 yo yo yo yo yo yo
Qi',\, yeti rx,\, t < \ti (0\ A 4, \, o\, tiA , ti„A ,
FIGURE 2-1
Daily IBT Amounts by Basin
Yadkin (Catawba

Appendix B: Concord and Kannapolis 2010 IBT Annual Report
3.0 Other Related Information
In 2010, a settlement was reached in a lawsuit filed by the Catawba River Foundation, Inc.
and the Protect the Catawba Coalition. While this does not affect the IBT Certificate, its
conditions, or required reporting in any way, the Cities did agree to some operational
conditions regarding the Catawba River Basin during times of drought.
Until July 1, 2015, the Cities have agreed to transfer no more than 3.0 mgd (maximum day)
from the Catawba River Basin. Thereafter, the Cities must first transfer 5.0 mgd from the
Yadkin River Basin before exceeding an IBT of 3.0 mgd from the Catawba River Basin.
During designated droughts beyond July 1, 2015, following either Low Inflow Protocol (LIP)
or Drought Management Advisory Council (DMAC) Drought Stage declaration, the Cities
have agreed to limit the Catawba River Basin IBT so that it corresponds to water use
reduction goals. A summary of this agreement is presented in Table 3-1.
TABLE 3-1
Catawba River Basin IBT during Drought Conditions
Annual Report on Interbasin Transfers for the Cities of Concord and Kannapolis
LIP Stage or DMAC Drought Stage Maximum Day Transfer (mgd)
0 / Abnormally Dry 10.0
1 / Moderate Drought 9.0
2 / Severe Drought 8.5
3 / Extreme Drought 7.0
4 / Exceptional Drought 6.0

Appendix B: Concord and Kannapolis 2010 IBT Annual Report
4.0 Compliance with Certificate Conditions
A summary of the conditions of the IBT Certificate approved on January 10, 2007 along with
the current status of compliance for each is provided below. Language from the certificate is
followed by 2010 actions for each condition.
4.1 Condition 1 (Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[FERC] Licensure)
If at any time any legal requirement that (a) governs the operation of the hydroelectric facilities in the
Catawba River Basin currently licensed as Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) Project
No. P-2232 or in the Yadkin Pee -Dee River Basin currently licensed as FERC Project Nos. P-2206
and P-2197 and (b) governs or affects water use and/or quality, substantially differs from the actual
or anticipated FERC license conditions or other legal requirement upon which the analysis
underlying this Certificate is based, such as changes to minimum flow requirements or drought
mitigation measures, the Commission may reopen and modify this Certificate.
This condition requires no action by the Certificate Holders.
4.2 Condition 2 (Drought Management Plan)
Each Certificate Holder shall prepare a Drought Management Plan. The Cities shall implement
measures corresponding to the most severe level of drought conditions in either the Catawba or
Yadkin River Basins. The Cities shall not transfer any water to any other jurisdictions unless that
jurisdiction agrees to be bound by this condition in full.
The Cities submitted the Drought Management Plan on July 31, 2007; comments were
received on November 11, 2007, and the revised plan was submitted on January 8, 2008. The
Drought Management Plan was incorporated into an updated Water Shortage Response
Plan (WSRP) in 2010. The WSRP, prepared as a joint document for the Certificate Holders, is
available on the NCDWR website at the following web address:
http:/ / www.ncwater.org/ Water_Supply_Planning/ Water_Shortage_Response_Plans/ plan
Table 4-1 shows Normal and Drought Stages 0-4, the names of each, the date the Catawba
River Basin managers implemented Draft LIP actions in response to drought monitoring,
the Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin drought monitor, and the associated actions taken by the
Cities.
Beginning in the winter of 2008, drought conditions in the state began to decrease,
permitting an easing of drought restrictions for both the Catawba and Yadkin River Basins.
In April 2009, the Cities adopted a restricted irrigation schedule which allows irrigation on
Tuesdays, Thursdays, and Saturdays only. This modified Level 0, Normal Responsible
Water Use, was in place throughout 2010 (Figure 4-1). Other outdoor water use conservation
measures are encouraged but not required. Both the Catawba and Yadkin River Basins
began the year with Normal water levels. For brief periods during the spring and early
summer, the drought level has switched to Stage 1 Abnormally Dry and back to Normal. In

Appendix B: Concord and Kannapolis 2010 IBT Annual Report
the fall, rainfall decreased and both basins moved to Abnormally Dry. The Catawba River
Basin progressed to D1, Moderate Drought, in October and fluctuated between Abnormally
Dry and Moderate Drought for the remainder of the year, ending in Moderate Drought.
During the year, Drought Monitor stages and the minimum state reduction goals never
reached the water conservation measures the Cities have in place; hence the Cities have
remained in their Normal Responsible Water Use Level 0. The Cities issued a joint press
release on October 8, 2010 to remind customers of the irrigation limitations and promote
conservation efforts.
Normal Responsible Water Use
Level 1
voluntary Water Restrictions
Level 1
Mandatory Water Restrictions
Level 2
Enhanced Mandatory
Level 3
V.W.1.21111.11111M
Figure 4-1
The Cities' Water Restriction Levels
The Cities have agreements in place that include enforcement policies with other systems
that purchase water from them.

Appendix B: Concord and Kannapolis 2010 IBT Annual Report
TABLE 4.1
Concord and Kannapolis 2010 Normal and Drought Stages
Annual Report on Interbasin Transfers for the Cities of Concord and Kannapolis
Drought
Stage
Drought
Monitor
Classification
2010 Period of Drought
Catawba River Basina
(Draft LIP)
Yadkin River Basinb
(NC Drought Monitor)
Action by Cities
Cities' Actions Taken
Normal
0 Abnormally
Dry
1 Moderate
Drought
2 Severe
Drought
3
Extreme
Drought
4 Exceptional
Drought
January 1 — July 6;
August 17 — September 14
July 6 — August 17;
September 14 — October 19;
November 2 — November 23
October 19 — November 2;
November 23 — December 31
January 1 — April 4;
May 18 - September 14;
October 5 — October 12
April 4 - May 18;
September 14 — September 28;
October 12 — December 31
Level 0 on April 11,
2009
Level 0 on April 11,
2009
Level 0 on April 11,
2009
Lawn irrigation allowed only on Tuesday,
Thursday, & Saturday. Other voluntary
conservation efforts encouraged.
Lawn irrigation allowed only on Tuesday,
Thursday, & Saturday. Other voluntary
conservation efforts encouraged.
Lawn irrigation allowed only on Tuesday,
Thursday, & Saturday. Other voluntary
conservation efforts encouraged.
a The Catawba River Basin is listed as the highest classification within the basin at a given date. Portions of the basin may be in a lower category.
b The Yadkin River Basin is listed as the highest classification within the basin at a given date. Portions of the basin may be in a lower category.
Level 0 Normal Responsible Water Use as defined by the Cities includes mandatory irrigation restrictions, limiting watering to 3 days per week. These restrictions
continued from 2009 through 2010.

Appendix B: Concord and Kannapolis 2010 IBT Annual Report
4.3 Condition 3 (Disaggregation of IBT Amount)
If the Certificate Holders discontinue their cooperative service agreement, then the permitted IBT
amount will be allocated amongst the Certificate Holders based on their projected 2030 needs.
The cooperative service agreement between the Certificate Holders remained in effect
throughout 2010.
The Cities and local municipalities cooperatively and effectively communicate and manage
their respective water distribution systems. The Cities sell water to each other and reconcile
billing monthly. Additionally, Concord owns and operates the water distribution system for
Midland, providing water service to all Midland customers. Harrisburg purchases water
from Concord, measured by five meters. Concord also provides water service to
unincorporated areas of Cabarrus County. Mount Pleasant did not purchase water from the
City of Concord in 2010. Further emphasizing the interconnected nature of the Cities and
local municipalities, Kannapolis provides water to Landis, located in the South Yadkin River
Basin, which is not subject to this IBT Certificate.
4.4 Condition 4 (Compliance and Monitoring Plan)
In cooperation with the Division of Water Resources, the Certificate Holders shall develop an IBT
Compliance and Monitoring Plan.
The Cities submitted the Compliance and Monitoring Plan on July 31, 2007. This plan was
finalized in December 2007.
4.5 Condition 5 (EMC Consideration of Impacts)
The EMC may reopen the Certificate and adjust existing or require new conditions to ensure
detrimental impacts are mitigated if environmental impacts are found to be substantially different
from those projected in the EMC's Findings of Fact.
This condition requires no action by the Certificate Holders. The EMC did not take action on
this condition in 2010.
4.6 Condition 6 (20-Year Certificate Evaluation)
In twenty years from the date of the Certificate, the Cities shall submit a written report to the EMC to
include: (a) summary of transfers for the previous twenty years, (b) discussion of any changes to the
environmental impacts assessment from IBT transfers, (c) summary of all actions to address actual or
potential drought conditions, (d) recommendations for any changes to the Certificate, (e) details on
consultation with interested stakeholders, and (fl certification of compliance with Certificate. This
will continue at 20-year intervals.
The IBT Certificate was approved on January 10, 2007 and signed into effect on January 25,
2007; therefore, the first 20-year certificate evaluation report will be completed in 2027.

Appendix B: Concord and Kannapolis 2010 IBT Annual Report
4.7 Condition 7 (Limit of Certificate)
The Certificate does not exempt the Cities from compliance with any other requirements of law.
This condition requires no action by the Cities.

Appendix B: Concord and Kannapolis 2010 IBT Annual Report
APPENDIX
Daily Interbasin Transfer Amounts for 2010

Appendix B: Concord and Kannapolis 2010 IBT Annual Report
Compliance & Monitoring Plan for the Cities of Concord & Kannapolis
2007 Concord-Kannapolis IBT Tracking
Condition of IBT Certificate (January 25, 2007)
Maximum day transfer from the Catawba River Basin
Maximum day transfer from the Yadkin Pee -Dee River Basin
Maximum day transfer from the South Yadkin River Basin (grandfather)
MGD
MGD
MGD
Maximum day transfer to the South Yadkin River Basin (cannot exceed transfer from South Yadkin by more than 1.99 MGD)
Map Code
Source Basin
Water Transfer (MGD) to Rocky River Basin
Salisbury 1
South Yadkin Yadkin
Raw Water to
Kannapolis Lake
from Second
DATE Creek
Salisbury Finished
water
Interconnection
with Kannapolis
Albemarle 1 CMU 1-3
Yadkin Catawba
Albemarle
Finished water
Interconnection
with Concord
CMU Finished
water
Interconnections
with Concorde
1/1/2010 j 0.000
1/2/2010 0.000
1/3/2010 0.000
1/4/2010 0.000
1/5/2010 0.000
1/6/2010 0.000
1/7/2010 0.000
1/8/2010 0.000
1/9/2010 0.000
1/10/2010 0.000
1/11/2010 0.000
1/12/2010 0.000
1/13/2010 0.000
1/14/2010 0.000
1/15/2010 0.000
1/16/2010 0.000
1/17/2010 0.000
1/18/2010 0.000
1/19/2010 0.000
1/20/2010 0.000
1 /21 /2010 0.000
1/22/2010 0.000
1/23/2010 0.000
1/24/2010 0.000
1/25/2010 0.000
1/26/2010 0.000
1/27/2010 0.000
1/28/2010 0.000
1/29/2010 0.000
1/30/2010 0.000
1 /31 /2010 0.000
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
2/2/2010 0.000
2/3/2010 0.000
2/4/2010 0.000
2/5/2010 0.000
2/6/2010 0.000
2/7/2010 0.000
2/8/2010 0.000
2/9/2010 0.000
2/10/2010 0.000
2/11/2010 0.000
2/12/2010 0.000
2/13/2010 0.000
2/14/2010 0.000
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
Water Sales (MGD)
South Yadkin
Kannapolis Finished
water sales to Landis
IBT Totals Per Basin
NOTE: All Wastewater discharge is to the Rocky River
from RRRWWTP, excluding water sales to Landis
(subtracted from Total South Yadkin IBT).
South Yadkin Yadkin Catawba
Total IBT from
South Yadkin
to Rocky River
Total IBT from
Yadkin to
Rocky River
Total IBT from
Catawba to
Rocky River
0.126 1 -0.126 0.300
0.004 1 1
0.128
0.172
0.196
0.216
0.226
0.228
0.179
0.180
0.180
0.180
0.179
0.179
0.185
0.181
0.140
0.153
0.178
0.172
0.179
0.169
0.150
0.152
0.148
0.175
0.144
0.185
0.134
0.135
0.139
0.125
-0.128
-0.172
-0.196
-0.216
-0.226
-0.228
-0.179
-0.180
-0.180
-0.180
-0.179
-0.179
-0.185
-0.181
-0.140
-0.153
-0.178
-0.172
-0.179
-0.169
-0.150
-0.152
-0.148
-0.175
-0.144
-0.185
-0.134
-0.135
-0.139
-0.125
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.161 1 U0.161 0.300
0.004
0.157
0.157
0.172
0.170
0.175
0.175
0.198
0.189
0.160
0.156
0.155
0.149
0.153
-0.157
-0.157
-0.172
-0.170
-0.175
-0.175
-0.198
-0.189
-0.160
-0.156
-0.155
-0.149
-0.153
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
Calculated Fields
% of
Permitted
from % of Permitted MDD
Catawba MDD Transfer from Yadkin Transfer
Grandfathered IBT
from Rocky River IBT from Yadkin to
Basin to South % of Permitted MDD South Yadkin % of Permitted
Yadkin River Basin Transfer River Basin MDD Transfer
0.004
0.036%
0.300 3.000%
- 0.126
-2.100%
-0.126
-6.332%I
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.036%
0.036%
0.036%
0.036%
0.036%
0.036%
0.036%
0.036%
0.036%
0.036%
0.036%
0.036%
0.036%
0.036%
0.036%
0.036%
0.036%
0.036%
0.036%
0.036%
0.036%
0.036%
0.036%
0.036%
0.036%
0.036%
0.036%
0.036%
0.036%
0.036%
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
-0.128
-0.172
-0.196
-0.216
-0.226
- 0.228
-0.179
- 0.180
-0.180
- 0.180
-0.179
- 0.179
-0.185
- 0.181
-0.140
- 0.153
-0.178
- 0.172
-0.179
- 0.169
-0.150
- 0.152
-0.148
- 0.175
-0.144
- 0.185
-0.134
- 0.135
-0.139
- 0.125
-2.133%
-2.867%
-3.267%
-3.600%
-3.767%
-3.800%
-2.983%
-3.000%
-3.000%
-3.000%
-2.983%
-2.983%
-3.083%
-3.017%
-2.333%
-2.550%
-2.967%
-2.867%
-2.983%
-2.817%
-2.500%
-2.533%
-2.467%
-2.917%
-2.400%
-3.083%
-2.233%
-2.250%
-2.317%
-2.083%
-0.128
-0.172
-0.196
-0.216
-0.226
-0.228
-0.179
-0.180
-0.180
-0.180
-0.179
-0.179
-0.185
-0.181
-0.140
-0.153
-0.178
-0.172
-0.179
-0.169
-0.150
-0.152
-0.148
-0.175
-0.144
-0.185
-0.134
-0.135
-0.139
-0.125
-6.432%
-8.643%
-9.849%
-10.854%
-11.357%
-11.457%
-8.995%
-9.045%
-9.045%
-9.045%
-8.995%
-8.995%
-9.296%
-9.095%
-7.035%
-7.688%
-8.945%
-8.643%
-8.995%
-8.492%
-7.538%
-7.638%
-7.437%
-8.794%
-7.236%
-9.296%
-6.734%
-6.784%
-6.985%
-6.281 %
0.004
0.045%
0.300 3.000%
-0.161
-2.683%
-0.161
-8.090%I
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.045%
0.045%
0.045%
0.045%
0.045%
0.045%
0.045%
0.045%
0.045%
0.045%
0.045%
0.045%
0.045%
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
-0.157
-0.157
-0.172
-0.170
-0.175
-0.175
- 0.198
-0.189
- 0.160
-0.156
- 0.155
-0.149
- 0.153
-2.617%
-2.617%
-2.867%
-2.833%
-2.917%
-2.917%
-3.300%
-3.150%
-2.667%
-2.600%
-2.583%
-2.483%
-2.550%
-0.157
0.157
0.157
0.172
0.170
0.175
0.175
0.198
0.189
0.160
0.156
0.155
0.149
-7.889%
7.889%
7.889%
8.643%
8.543%
8.794%
8.794%
9.950%
9.497%
8.040%
7.839%
7.789%
7.487%

Appendix B: Concord and Kannapolis 2010 IBT Annual Report
Maximum day transfer to the South Yadkin River Basin (cannot exceed transfer from South Yadkin by more than 1.99 MGD)
Water Transfer (MGD) to Rocky River Basin Water Sales (MGD)
Map Code Salisbury 1 Albemarle 1 CMU 1-3
Source Basin South Yadkin Yadkin Yadkin Catawba
Raw Water to Salisbury Finished Albemarle
Kannapolis Lake water Finished water
from Second Interconnection Interconnection
DATE Creek with Kannapolis with Concord
2/15/2010 0.000 0.300
2/16/2010 0.000 0.300
2/17/2010 0.000 0.300
2/18/2010 0.000 0.300
2/19/2010 0.000 0.300
2/20/2010 0.000 0.300
2/21/2010 0.000 0.300
2/22/2010 0.000 0.300
2/23/2010 0.000 0.300
2/24/2010 0.000 0.300
2/25/2010 0.000 0.300
2/26/2010 0.000 0.300
2/27/2010 0.000 0.300
2/28/2010 0.000 0.300
3/2/2010 0.000 0.300
3/3/2010 0.000 0.300
3/4/2010 0.000 0.300
3/5/2010 0.000 0.300
3/6/2010 0.000 0.300
3/7/2010 0.000 0.300
3/8/2010 0.000 0.300
3/9/2010 0.000 0.300
3/10/2010 0.000 0.300
3/11/2010 0.000 0.300
3/12/2010 0.000 0.300
3/13/2010 0.000 0.300
3/14/2010 0.000 0.300
3/15/2010 0.000 0.300
3/16/2010 0.000 0.300
3/17/2010 0.000 0.300
3/18/2010 0.000 0.300
3/19/2010 0.000 0.300
3/20/2010 0.000 0.300
3/21/2010 0.000 0.300
3/22/2010 0.000 0.300
3/23/2010 0.000 0.300
3/24/2010 0.000 0.300
3/25/2010 0.000 0.300
3/26/2010 0.000 0.300
3/27/2010 0.000 0.300
3/28/2010 0.000 0.300
3/29/2010 0.000 0.300
3/30/2010 0.000 0.300
3/31/2010 0.000 0.300
4/1 /2010
4/2/2010 0.000 0.300
4/3/2010 0.000 0.300
4/4/2010 0.000 0.300
4/5/2010 0.000 0.300
4/6/2010 0.000 0.300
4/7/2010 0.000 0.300
4/8/2010 0.000 0.300
CMU Finished
water
Interconnections
with Concorde
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
South Yadkin
Kannapolis Finished
water sales to Landis
0.172
0.175
0.174
0.169
0.177
0.172
0.173
0.171
0.151
0.150
0.180
0.160
0.155
0.152
0.166
0.167
0.151
0.189
0.165
0.150
0.149
0.155
0.193
0.159
0.150
0.145
0.147
0.130
0.159
0.153
0.159
0.136
0.140
0.145
0.123
0.148
0.170
0.176
0.155
0.150
0.151
0.146
0.151
0.143
0.137
IBT Totals Per Basin
NOTE: All Wastewater discharge is to the Rocky River
from RRRWWTP, excluding water sales to Landis
(subtracted from Total South Yadkin IBT).
South Yadkin Yadkin Catawba
Total IBT from
South Yadkin
to Rocky River
-0.172
-0.175
-0.174
-0.169
-0.177
-0.172
-0.173
-0.171
-0.151
-0.150
-0.180
-0.160
-0.155
-0.152
-0.166
Total IBT from Total IBT from
Yadkin to Catawba to
Rocky River Rocky River
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.003
-0.167
-0.151
-0.189
-0.165
-0.150
-0.149
-0.155
-0.193
-0.159
-0.150
-0.145
-0.147
-0.130
-0.159
-0.153
-0.159
-0.136
-0.140
-0.145
-0.123
-0.148
-0.170
-0.176
-0.155
-0.150
-0.151
-0.146
-0.151
-0.143
-0.137
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
% of Grandfathered IBT
Permitted from Rocky River IBT from Yadkin to
from % of Permitted MDD Basin to South % of Permitted MDD South Yadkin % of Permitted
Catawba MDD Transfer from Yadkin Transfer Yadkin River Basin Transfer River Basin MDD Transfer
0.004 0.045% 0.300 3.000% -0.172 -2.867% 0.153 7.688%
0.004 0.045% 0.300 3.000% -0.175 -2.917% 0.172 8.643%
0.004 0.045% 0.300 3.000% -0.174 -2.900% 0.175 8.794%
0.004 0.045% 0.300 3.000% -0.169 -2.817% 0.174 8.744%
0.004 0.045% 0.300 3.000% -0.177 -2.950% 0.169 8.492%
0.004 0.045% 0.300 3.000% -0.172 -2.867% 0.177 8.894%
0.004 0.045% 0.300 3.000% -0.173 -2.883% 0.172 8.643%
0.004 0.045% 0.300 3.000% -0.171 -2.850% 0.173 8.693%
0.004 0.045% 0.300 3.000% -0.151 -2.517% 0.171 8.593%
0.004 0.045% 0.300 3.000% -0.150 -2.500% 0.151 7.588%
0.004 0.045% 0.300 3.000% -0.180 -3.000% 0.150 7.538%
0.004 0.045% 0.300 3.000% -0.160 -2.667% 0.180 9.045%
0.004 0.045% 0.300 3.000% -0.155 -2.583% 0.160 8.040%
0.004 0.045% 0.300 3.000% -0.152 -2.533% 0.155 7.789%
0.003 0.034% 0.300 3.000%
- 0.166 -2.767%
0.166 8.342%I
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.034%
0.034%
0.034%
0.034%
0.034%
0.034%
0.034%
0.034%
0.034%
0.034%
0.034%
0.034%
0.034%
0.034%
0.034%
0.034%
0.034%
0.034%
0.034%
0.034%
0.034%
0.034%
0.034%
0.034%
0.034%
0.034%
0.034%
0.034%
0.034%
0.034%
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
-0.167
- 0.151
-0.189
- 0.165
-0.150
-0.149
-0.155
- 0.193
-0.159
- 0.150
-0.145
- 0.147
-0.130
- 0.159
-0.153
- 0.159
-0.136
- 0.140
-0.145
- 0.123
-0.148
- 0.170
-0.176
- 0.155
-0.150
- 0.151
-0.146
- 0.151
-0.143
-0.137
-2.783%
-2.517%
-3.150%
-2.750%
-2.500%
-2.483%
-2.583%
-3.217%
-2.650%
-2.500%
-2.417%
-2.450%
-2.167%
-2.650%
-2.550%
-2.650%
-2.267%
-2.333%
-2.417%
-2.050%
-2.467%
-2.833%
-2.933%
-2.583%
-2.500%
-2.517%
-2.433%
-2.517%
-2.383%
-2.283%
0.167
0.151
0.189
0.165
0.150
0.149
0.155
0.193
0.159
0.150
0.145
0.147
0.130
0.159
0.153
0.159
0.136
0.140
0.145
0.123
0.148
0.170
0.176
0.155
0.150
0.151
0.146
0.151
0.143
0.137
8.392%
7.588%
9.497%
8.291%
7.538%
7.487%
7.789%
9.698%
7.990%
7.538%
7.286%
7.387%
6.533%
7.990%
7.688%
7.990%
6.834%
7.035%
7.286%
6.181%
7.437%
8.543%
8.844%
7.789%
7.538%
7.588%
7.337%
7.588%
7.186%
6.884%
0.137 I -0.137 0.300 0.005 I I 0.005 0.049% 0.300 3.000% -0.137 -2.283% 0.137 6.884%I
0.140
0.138
0.124
0.175
0.324
0.149
0.155
-0.140
-0.138
-0.124
-0.175
-0.324
-0.149
-0.155
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.049%
0.049%
0.049%
0.049%
0.049%
0.049%
0.049%
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
-0.140
-0.138
- 0.124
-0.175
- 0.324
-0.149
- 0.155
-2.333%
-2.300%
-2.067%
-2.917%
-5.400%
-2.483%
-2.583%
0.140
0.138
0.124
0.175
0.324
0.149
0.155
7.035%
6.935%
6.231%
8.794%
16.281%
7.487%
7.789%

Appendix B: Concord and Kannapolis 2010 IBT Annual Report
Maximum day transfer to the South Yadkin River Basin (cannot exceed transfer from South Yadkin by more than 1.99 MGD)
Water Transfer (MGD) to Rocky River Basin Water Sales (MGD)
Map Code Salisbury 1 Albemarle 1 CMU 1-3
Source Basin South Yadkin Yadkin Yadkin Catawba
Raw Water to Salisbury Finished Albemarle CMU Finished
Kannapolis Lake water Finished water water
from Second Interconnection Interconnection Interconnections
DATE Creek with Kannapolis with Concord with Concorde
4/9/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
4/10/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
4/11/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
4/12/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
4/13/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
4/14/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
4/15/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
4/16/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
4/17/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
4/18/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
4/19/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
4/20/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
4/21/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
4/22/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
4/23/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
4/24/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
4/25/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
4/26/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
4/27/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
4/28/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
4/29/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
4/30/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
5/2/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
5/3/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
5/4/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
5/5/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
5/6/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
5/7/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
5/8/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
5/9/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
5/10/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
5/11/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
5/12/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
5/13/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
5/14/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
5/15/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
5/16/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
5/17/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
5/18/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
5/19/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
5/20/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
5/21/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
5/22/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
5/23/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
5/24/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
5/25/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
5/26/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
5/27/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
5/28/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
5/29/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
5/30/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
5/31/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
South Yadkin
Kannapolis Finished
water sales to Landis
0.155
0.156
0.223
0.195
0.213
0.158
0.227
0.136
0.169
0.201
0.233
0.151
0.151
0.16
0.158
0.165
0.142
0.166
0.17
0.165
0.165
0.179
0.181
0.182
0.170
0.241
0.233
0.243
0.539
0.181
0.155
0.253
0.201
0.198
0.200
0.220
0.225
0.218
0.147
0.172
0.178
0.300
0.352
0.225
0.225
0.243
0.199
0.145
0.140
0.143
0.141
0.104
0.113
IBT Totals Per Basin
NOTE: All Wastewater discharge is to the Rocky River
from RRRWWTP, excluding water sales to Landis
(subtracted from Total South Yadkin IBT).
South Yadkin Yadkin Catawba
Total IBT from
South Yadkin
to Rocky River
Total IBT from
Yadkin to
Rocky River
Total IBT from
Catawba to
Rocky River
-0.155
-0.156
-0.223
-0.195
-0.213
-0.158
-0.227
-0.136
-0.169
-0.201
-0.233
-0.151
-0.151
-0.160
-0.158
-0.165
-0.142
-0.166
-0.170
-0.165
-0.165
-0.179
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
-0.181
0.300 0.005
-0.182
-0.170
-0.241
-0.233
-0.243
-0.539
-0.181
-0.155
-0.253
-0.201
-0.198
-0.200
-0.220
-0.225
-0.218
-0.147
-0.172
-0.178
-0.300
-0.352
-0.225
-0.225
-0.243
-0.199
-0.145
-0.140
-0.143
-0.141
-0.104
-0.113
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
Interbasin Transfer
% of Grandfathered IBT
Permitted from Rocky River IBT from Yadkin to
from % of Permitted MDD Basin to South % of Permitted MDD South Yadkin % of Permitted
Catawba MDD Transfer from Yadkin Transfer Yadkin River Basin Transfer River Basin MDD Transfer
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.049%
0.049%
0.049%
0.049%
0.049%
0.049%
0.049%
0.049%
0.049%
0.049%
0.049%
0.049%
0.049%
0.049%
0.049%
0.049%
0.049%
0.049%
0.049%
0.049%
0.049%
0.049%
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
- 0.155
-0.156
- 0.223
-0.195
- 0.213
-0.158
- 0.227
-0.136
- 0.169
-0.201
- 0.233
-0.151
- 0.151
-0.160
- 0.158
-0.165
- 0.142
-0.166
- 0.170
-0.165
- 0.165
-0.179
-2.583%
-2.600%
-3.717%
-3.250%
-3.550%
-2.633%
-3.783%
-2.267%
-2.817%
-3.350%
-3.883%
-2.517%
-2.517%
-2.667%
-2.633%
-2.750%
-2.367%
-2.767%
-2.833%
-2.750%
-2.750%
-2.983%
0.155
0.156
0.223
0.195
0.213
0.158
0.227
0.136
0.169
0.201
0.233
0.151
0.151
0.160
0.158
0.165
0.142
0.166
0.170
0.165
0.165
0.179
7.789%
7.839%
11.206%
9.799%
10.704%
7.940%
11.407%
6.834%
8.492%
10.101%
11.709%
7.588%
7.588%
8.040%
7.940%
8.291%
7.136%
8.342%
8.543%
8.291%
8.291%
8.995%
0.005 0.055% 0.300 3.000%
-0.181 -3.017%
0.181 9.095%
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.055%
0.055%
0.055%
0.055%
0.055%
0.055%
0.055%
0.055%
0.055%
0.055%
0.055%
0.055%
0.055%
0.055%
0.055%
0.055%
0.055%
0.055%
0.055%
0.055%
0.055%
0.055%
0.055%
0.055%
0.055%
0.055%
0.055%
0.055%
0.055%
0.055%
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
-0.182
- 0.170
-0.241
- 0.233
-0.243
- 0.539
-0.181
- 0.155
-0.253
- 0.201
-0.198
- 0.200
-0.220
- 0.225
-0.218
- 0.147
-0.172
- 0.178
-0.300
- 0.352
-0.225
- 0.225
-0.243
- 0.199
-0.145
- 0.140
-0.143
- 0.141
-0.104
- 0.113
-3.033%
-2.833%
-4.017%
-3.883%
-4.050%
-8.983%
-3.017%
-2.583%
-4.217%
-3.350%
-3.300%
-3.333%
-3.667%
-3.750%
-3.633%
-2.450%
-2.867%
-2.967%
-5.000%
-5.867%
-3.750%
-3.750%
-4.050%
-3.317%
-2.417%
-2.333%
-2.383%
-2.350%
-1.733%
-1.883%
0.182
0.170
0.241
0.233
0.243
0.539
0.181
0.155
0.253
0.201
0.198
0.200
0.220
0.225
0.218
0.147
0.172
0.178
0.300
0.352
0.225
0.225
0.243
0.199
0.145
0.140
0.143
0.141
0.104
0.113
9.146%
8.543%
12.111%
11.709%
12.211%
27.085%
9.095%
7.789%
12.714%
10.101%
9.950%
10.050%
11.055%
11.307%
10.955%
7.387%
8.643%
8.945%
15.075%
17.688%
11.307%
11.307%
12.211%
10.000%
7.286%
7.035%
7.186%
7.085%
5.226%
5.678%

Appendix B: Concord and Kannapolis 2010 IBT Annual Report
Maximum day transfer to the South Yadkin River Basin (cannot exceed transfer from South Yadkin by more than 1.99 MGD)
Water Transfer (MGD) to Rocky River Basin Water Sales (MGD) IBT Totals Per Basin
NOTE: All Wastewater discharge is to the Rocky River
from RRRWWTP, excluding water sales to Landis
Map Code Salisbury 1 Albemarle 1 CMU 1-3 (subtracted from Total South Yadkin IBT).
Source Basin South Yadkin Yadkin Yadkin Catawba South Yadkin South Yadkin Yadkin Catawba
Raw Water to Salisbury Finished Albemarle CMU Finished
Kannapolis Lake water Finished water water
from Second Interconnection Interconnection Interconnections
DATE Creek with Kannapolis with Concord with Concorde
6/ . 0.000 0.3
6/2/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
6/3/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
6/4/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
6/5/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
6/6/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
6/7/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
6/8/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
6/9/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
6/10/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
6/11/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
6/12/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
6/13/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
6/14/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
6/15/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
6/16/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
6/17/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
6/18/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
6/19/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
6/20/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
6/21/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
6/22/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
6/23/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
6/24/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
6/25/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
6/26/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
6/27/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
6/28/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
6/29/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
6/30/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
7/2/2010 0.000 0.300 0.006
7/3/2010 0.000 0.300 0.006
7/4/2010 0.000 0.300 0.006
7/5/2010 0.000 0.300 0.006
7/6/2010 0.000 0.300 0.006
7/7/2010 0.000 0.300 0.006
7/8/2010 0.000 0.300 0.006
7/9/2010 0.000 0.300 0.006
7/10/2010 0.000 0.300 0.006
7/11/2010 0.000 0.300 0.006
7/12/2010 0.000 0.300 0.006
7/13/2010 0.000 0.300 0.006
7/14/2010 0.000 0.300 0.006
7/15/2010 0.000 0.300 0.006
7/16/2010 0.000 0.300 0.006
7/17/2010 0.000 0.300 0.006
7/18/2010 0.000 0.300 0.006
7/19/2010 0.000 0.300 0.006
7/20/2010 0.000 0.300 0.006
7/21/2010 0.000 0.300 0.006
7/22/2010 0.000 0.300 0.006
7/23/2010 0.000 0.300 0.006
Kannapolis Finished
water sales to Landis
0.170
0.280
0.253
0.230
0.225
0.231
0.222
0.231
0.230
0.237
0.182
0.208
0.181
0.197
0.245
0.215
0.373
0.220
0.218
0.227
0.320
0.296
0.223
0.261
0.306
0.246
0.203
0.306
0.202
0.282
0.192
0.205
0.204
0.204
0.229
0.301
0.302
0.276
0.239
0.227
0.186
0.199
0.228
0.263
0.247
0.202
0.203
0.178
0.251
0.183
0.293
0.232
0.225
Total IBT from
South Yadkin
to Rocky River
-0.170
Total IBT from
Yadkin to
Rocky River
0.300
Total IBT from
Catawba to
Rocky River
0.005 I
-0.280
-0.253
-0.230
-0.225
-0.231
-0.222
-0.231
-0.230
-0.237
-0.182
-0.208
-0.181
-0.197
-0.245
-0.215
-0.373
-0.220
-0.218
-0.227
-0.320
-0.296
-0.223
-0.261
-0.306
-0.246
-0.203
-0.306
-0.202
-0.282
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
% of Grandfathered IBT
Permitted from Rocky River IBT from Yadkin to
from % of Permitted MDD Basin to South % of Permitted MDD South Yadkin % of Permitted
Catawba MDD Transfer from Yadkin Transfer Yadkin River Basin Transfer River Basin MDD Transfer
0.005 0.046% 0.300 3.000%j.170 -2.833% 0.170 8.543%I
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.046%
0.046%
0.046%
0.046%
0.046%
0.046%
0.046%
0.046%
0.046%
0.046%
0.046%
0.046%
0.046%
0.046%
0.046%
0.046%
0.046%
0.046%
0.046%
0.046%
0.046%
0.046%
0.046%
0.046%
0.046%
0.046%
0.046%
0.046%
0.046%
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
-0.280
-0.253
-0.230
- 0.225
-0.231
- 0.222
-0.231
- 0.230
-0.237
- 0.182
-0.208
- 0.181
-0.197
-0.245
-0.215
- 0.373
-0.220
- 0.218
-0.227
-0.320
-0.296
- 0.223
-0.261
- 0.306
-0.246
- 0.203
-0.306
- 0.202
-0.282
-4.667%
-4.217%
-3.833%
-3.750%
-3.850%
-3.700%
-3.850%
-3.833%
-3.950%
-3.033%
-3.467%
-3.017%
-3.283%
-4.083%
-3.583%
-6.217%
-3.667%
-3.633%
-3.783%
-5.333%
-4.933%
-3.717%
-4.350%
-5.100%
-4.100%
-3.383%
-5.100%
-3.367%
-4.700%
0.280
0.253
0.230
0.225
0.231
0.222
0.231
0.230
0.237
0.182
0.208
0.181
0.197
0.245
0.215
0.373
0.220
0.218
0.227
0.320
0.296
0.223
0.261
0.306
0.246
0.203
0.306
0.202
0.282
14.070%
12.714%
11.558%
11.307%
11.608%
11.156%
11.608%
11.558%
11.910%
9.146%
10.452%
9.095%
9.899%
12.312%
10.804%
18.744%
11.055%
10.955%
11.407%
16.080%
14.874%
11.206%
13.116%
15.377%
12.362%
10.201%
15.377%
10.151%
14.171%
-0.192 0.300 0.006 I I 0.006 0.062% 0.300 3.000% -0.192 1-3.200% 0.192 9.648%I
-0.205
-0.204
-0.204
-0.229
-0.301
-0.302
-0.276
-0.239
-0.227
-0.186
-0.199
-0.228
-0.263
-0.247
-0.202
-0.203
-0.178
-0.251
-0.183
-0.293
-0.232
-0.225
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.062%
0.062%
0.062%
0.062%
0.062%
0.062%
0.062%
0.062%
0.062%
0.062%
0.062%
0.062%
0.062%
0.062%
0.062%
0.062%
0.062%
0.062%
0.062%
0.062%
0.062%
0.062%
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
-0.205
- 0.204
-0.204
- 0.229
-0.301
- 0.302
-0.276
- 0.239
-0.227
- 0.186
-0.199
- 0.228
-0.263
- 0.247
-0.202
- 0.203
-0.178
- 0.251
-0.183
- 0.293
-0.232
- 0.225
-3.417%
-3.400%
-3.400%
-3.817%
-5.017%
-5.033%
-4.600%
-3.983%
-3.783%
-3.100%
-3.317%
-3.800%
-4.383%
-4.117%
-3.367%
-3.383%
-2.967%
-4.183%
-3.050%
-4.883%
-3.867%
-3.750%
0.205
0.204
0.204
0.229
0.301
0.302
0.276
0.239
0.227
0.186
0.199
0.228
0.263
0.247
0.202
0.203
0.178
0.251
0.183
0.293
0.232
0.225
10.302%
10.251%
10.251%
11.508%
15.126%
15.176%
13.869%
12.010%
11.407%
9.347%
10.000%
11.457%
13.216%
12.412%
10.151%
10.201%
8.945%
12.613%
9.196%
14.724%
11.658%
11.307%

Appendix B: Concord and Kannapolis 2010 IBT Annual Report
Maximum day transfer to the South Yadkin River Basin (cannot exceed transfer from South Yadkin by more than 1.99 MGD)
Water Transfer (MGD) to Rocky River Basin
Map Code Salisbury 1
Source Basin South Yadkin Yadkin
DATE
7/24/2010
7/25/2010
7/26/2010
7/27/2010
7/28/2010
7/29/2010
7/30/2010
7/31/2010
Raw Water to
Kannapolis Lake
from Second
Creek
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
Albemarle 1
Yadkin
CMU 1-3
Catawba
Salisbury Finished Albemarle CMU Finished
water Finished water water
Interconnection Interconnection Interconnections
with Kannapolis with Concord with Concorde
0.300 0.006
0.300 0.006
0.300 0.006
0.300 0.006
0.300 0.006
0.300 0.006
0.300 0.006
0.300 0.006
8/2/2010 0.000 0.300 0.006
8/3/2010 0.000 0.300 0.006
8/4/2010 0.000 0.300 0.006
8/5/2010 0.000 0.300 0.006
8/6/2010 0.000 0.300 0.006
8/7/2010 0.000 0.300 0.006
8/8/2010 0.000 0.300 0.006
8/9/2010 0.000 0.300 0.006
8/10/2010 0.000 0.300 0.006
8/11/2010 0.000 0.300 0.006
8/12/2010 0.000 0.300 0.006
8/13/2010 0.000 0.300 0.006
8/14/2010 0.000 0.300 0.006
8/15/2010 0.000 0.300 0.006
8/16/2010 0.000 0.300 0.006
8/17/2010 0.000 0.300 0.006
8/18/2010 0.000 0.300 0.006
8/19/2010 0.000 0.300 0.006
8/20/2010 0.000 0.300 0.006
8/21/2010 0.000 0.300 0.006
8/22/2010 0.000 0.300 0.006
8/23/2010 0.000 0.300 0.006
8/24/2010 0.000 0.300 0.006
8/25/2010 0.000 0.300 0.006
8/26/2010 0.000 0.300 0.006
8/27/2010 0.000 0.300 0.006
8/28/2010 0.000 0.300 0.006
8/29/2010 0.000 0.300 0.006
8/30/2010 0.000 0.300 0.006
8/31/2010 0.000 0.300 0.006
1 /201 r 0.000 0.300 0.006 ( (
9/2/2010 0.000 0.300 0.006
9/3/2010 0.000 0.300 0.006
9/4/2010 0.000 0.300 0.006
9/5/2010 0.000 0.300 0.006
9/6/2010 0.000 0.300 0.006
9/7/2010 0.000 0.300 0.006
9/8/2010 0.000 0.300 0.006
9/9/2010 0.000 0.300 0.006
9/10/2010 0.000 0.300 0.006
9/11/2010 0.000 0.300 0.006
9/12/2010 0.000 0.300 0.006
9/13/2010 0.000 0.300 0.006
9/14/2010 0.000 0.300 0.006
Water Sales (MGD)
South Yadkin
Kannapolis Finished
water sales to Landis
0.228
0.231
0.204
0.203
0.234
0.204
0.224
0.221
0.230
0.219
0.234
0.237
0.227
0.210
0.207
0.220
0.225
0.227
0.235
0.248
0.251
0.244
0.240
0.220
0.222
0.227
0.218
0.190
0.181
0.179
0.232
0.249
0.220
0.213
0.175
0.180
0.242
0.215
0.199
IBT Totals Per Basin
NOTE: All Wastewater discharge is to the Rocky River
from RRRWWTP, excluding water sales to Landis
(subtracted from Total South Yadkin IBT).
South Yadkin Yadkin Catawba
Total IBT from
South Yadkin
to Rocky River
-0.228
-0.231
-0.204
-0.203
-0.234
-0.204
-0.224
-0.221
Total IBT from
Yadkin to
Rocky River
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
Total IBT from
Catawba to
Rocky River
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
-0.219
-0.234
-0.237
-0.227
-0.210
-0.207
-0.220
-0.225
-0.227
-0.235
-0.248
-0.251
-0.244
-0.240
-0.220
-0.222
-0.227
-0.218
-0.190
-0.181
-0.179
-0.232
-0.249
-0.220
-0.213
-0.175
-0.180
-0.242
-0.215
-0.199
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
from % of Permitted
Catawba MDD Transfer
0.006 0.062%
0.006 0.062%
0.006 0.062%
0.006 0.062%
0.006 0.062%
0.006 0.062%
0.006 0.062%
0.006 0.062%
from Yadkin
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
% of Grandfathered IBT
Permitted from Rocky River IBT from Yadkin to
MDD Basin to South % of Permitted MDD South Yadkin
Transfer Yadkin River Basin Transfer River Basin
3.000% -0.228 -3.800% 0.228
3.000% -0.231 -3.850% 0.231
3.000% -0.204 -3.400% 0.204
3.000% -0.203 -3.383% 0.203
3.000% -0.234 -3.900% 0.234
3.000% -0.204 -3.400% 0.204
3.000% -0.224 -3.733% 0.224
3.000% -0.221 -3.683% 0.221
% of Permitted
MDD Transfer
11.457%
11.608%
10.251%
10.201%
11.759%
10.251%
11.256%
11.106%
0.006
0.056%
0.300 3.000%
- 0.230
-3.833%
0.230
11.558%I
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.056%
0.056%
0.056%
0.056%
0.056%
0.056%
0.056%
0.056%
0.056%
0.056%
0.056%
0.056%
0.056%
0.056%
0.056%
0.056%
0.056%
0.056%
0.056%
0.056%
0.056%
0.056%
0.056%
0.056%
0.056%
0.056%
0.056%
0.056%
0.056%
0.056%
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
-0.219
- 0.234
-0.237
- 0.227
-0.210
- 0.207
-0.220
- 0.225
-0.227
- 0.235
-0.248
-0.251
-0.244
-0.240
-0.220
- 0.222
-0.227
- 0.218
-0.190
- 0.181
-0.179
-0.232
-0.249
- 0.220
-0.213
- 0.175
-0.180
- 0.242
-0.215
-0.199
-3.650%
-3.900%
-3.950%
-3.783%
-3.500%
-3.450%
-3.667%
-3.750%
-3.783%
-3.917%
-4.133%
-4.183%
-4.067%
-4.000%
-3.667%
-3.700%
-3.783%
-3.633%
-3.167%
-3.017%
-2.983%
-3.867%
-4.150%
-3.667%
-3.550%
-2.917%
-3.000%
-4.033%
-3.583%
-3.317%
0.219
0.234
0.237
0.227
0.210
0.207
0.220
0.225
0.227
0.235
0.248
0.251
0.244
0.240
0.220
0.222
0.227
0.218
0.190
0.181
0.179
0.232
0.249
0.220
0.213
0.175
0.180
0.242
0.215
0.199
11.005%
11.759%
11.910%
11.407%
10.553%
10.402%
11.055%
11.307%
11.407%
11.809%
12.462%
12.613%
12.261%
12.060%
11.055%
11.156%
11.407%
10.955%
9.548%
9.095%
8.995%
11.658%
12.513%
11.055%
10.704%
8.794%
9.045%
12.161%
10.804%
10.000%
0.274 I -0.274 0.300 0.006 I I 0.006
0.231
0.199
0.191
0.243
0.189
0.254
0.263
0.199
0.215
0.219
0.203
0.270
0.275
-0.231
-0.199
-0.191
-0.243
-0.189
-0.254
-0.263
-0.199
-0.215
-0.219
-0.203
-0.270
-0.275
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.060%
0.300 3.000%
-0.274
-4.567%
0.274
13.769%I
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.060%
0.060%
0.060%
0.060%
0.060%
0.060%
0.060%
0.060%
0.060%
0.060%
0.060%
0.060%
0.060%
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
-0.231
-0.199
-0.191
-0.243
- 0.189
-0.254
- 0.263
-0.199
- 0.215
-0.219
- 0.203
-0.270
- 0.275
-3.850%
-3.317%
-3.183%
-4.050%
-3.150%
-4.233%
-4.383%
-3.317%
-3.583%
-3.650%
-3.383%
-4.500%
-4.583%
0.231
0.199
0.191
0.243
0.189
0.254
0.263
0.199
0.215
0.219
0.203
0.270
0.275
11.608%
10.000%
9.598%
12.211%
9.497%
12.764%
13.216%
10.000%
10.804%
11.005%
10.201%
13.568%
13.819%

Appendix B: Concord and Kannapolis 2010 IBT Annual Report
Maximum day transfer to the South Yadkin River Basin (cannot exceed transfer from South Yadkin by more than 1.99 MGD)
Map Code
Source Basin
Water Transfer (MGD) to Rocky River Basin
Salisbury 1
South Yadkin Yadkin
Albemarle 1
Yadkin
CMU 1-3
Catawba
Raw Water to Salisbury Finished Albemarle CMU Finished
Kannapolis Lake water Finished water water
from Second Interconnection Interconnection Interconnections
DATE Creek with Kannapolis with Concord with Concorde
9/15/2010 0.000 0.300 0.006
9/16/2010 0.000 0.300 0.006
9/17/2010 0.000 0.300 0.006
9/18/2010 0.000 0.300 0.006
9/19/2010 0.000 0.300 0.006
9/20/2010 0.000 0.300 0.006
9/21/2010 0.000 0.300 0.006
9/22/2010 0.000 0.300 0.006
9/23/2010 0.000 0.300 0.006
9/24/2010 0.000 0.300 0.006
9/25/2010 0.000 0.300 0.006
9/26/2010 0.000 0.300 0.006
9/27/2010 0.000 0.300 0.006
9/28/2010 0.000 0.300 0.006
9/29/2010 0.000 0.300 0.006
9/30/2010 0.000 0.300 0.006
10/1/2010
10/2/2010 0.000 0.300 0.007
10/3/2010 0.000 0.300 0.007
10/4/2010 0.000 0.300 0.007
10/5/2010 0.000 0.300 0.007
10/6/2010 0.000 0.300 0.007
10/7/2010 0.000 0.300 0.007
10/8/2010 0.000 0.300 0.007
10/9/2010 0.000 0.300 0.007
10/10/2010 0.000 0.300 0.007
10/11/2010 0.000 0.300 0.007
10/12/2010 0.000 0.300 0.007
10/13/2010 0.000 0.300 0.007
10/14/2010 0.000 0.300 0.007
10/15/2010 0.000 0.300 0.007
10/16/2010 0.000 0.300 0.007
10/17/2010 0.000 0.300 0.007
10/18/2010 0.000 0.300 0.007
10/19/2010 0.000 0.300 0.007
10/20/2010 0.000 0.300 0.007
10/21/2010 0.000 0.300 0.007
10/22/2010 0.000 0.300 0.007
10/23/2010 0.000 0.300 0.007
10/24/2010 0.000 0.300 0.007
10/25/2010 0.000 0.300 0.007
10/26/2010 0.000 0.300 0.007
10/27/2010 0.000 0.300 0.007
10/28/2010 0.000 0.300 0.007
10/29/2010 0.000 0.300 0.007
10/30/2010 0.000 0.300 0.007
10/31/2010 0.000 0.300 0.007
1 • 0.000 0.300 0.005 ( (
11/2/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
11/3/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
11/4/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
11/5/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
11/6/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
Water Sales (MGD)
South Yadkin
Kannapolis Finished
water sales to Landis
0.240
0.237
0.250
0.248
0.254
0.250
0.245
0.320
0.204
0.227
0.219
0.143
0.207
0.198
0.197
0.188
0.212
IBT Totals Per Basin
NOTE: All Wastewater discharge is to the Rocky River
from RRRWWTP, excluding water sales to Landis
(subtracted from Total South Yadkin IBT).
South Yadkin Yadkin Catawba
Total IBT from
South Yadkin
to Rocky River
-0.240
-0.237
-0.250
-0.248
-0.254
-0.250
-0.245
-0.320
-0.204
-0.227
-0.219
-0.143
-0.207
-0.198
-0.197
-0.188
-0.212
Total IBT from
Yadkin to
Rocky River
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
Total IBT from
Catawba to
Rocky River
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.007
0.203
0.127
0.213
0.206
0.204
0.261
0.195
0.193
0.158
0.260
0.287
0.173
0.198
0.200
0.190
0.140
0.238
0.210
0.210
0.191
0.155
0.149
0.176
0.208
0.188
0.186
0.182
0.179
0.184
0.137
-0.203
-0.127
-0.213
-0.206
-0.204
-0.261
-0.195
-0.193
-0.158
-0.260
-0.287
-0.173
-0.198
-0.200
-0.190
-0.140
-0.238
-0.210
-0.210
-0.191
-0.155
-0.149
-0.176
-0.208
-0.188
-0.186
-0.182
-0.179
-0.184
-0.137
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.007
0.007
0.007
0.007
0.007
0.007
0.007
0.007
0.007
0.007
0.007
0.007
0.007
0.007
0.007
0.007
0.007
0.007
0.007
0.007
0.007
0.007
0.007
0.007
0.007
0.007
0.007
0.007
0.007
0.007
from % of Permitted
Catawba MDD Transfer
0.006 0.060%
0.006 0.060%
0.006 0.060%
0.006 0.060%
0.006 0.060%
0.006 0.060%
0.006 0.060%
0.006 0.060%
0.006 0.060%
0.006 0.060%
0.006 0.060%
0.006 0.060%
0.006 0.060%
0.006 0.060%
0.006 0.060%
0.006 0.060%
from Yadkin
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
% of Grandfathered IBT
Permitted from Rocky River
MDD Basin to South % of Permitted MDD
Transfer Yadkin River Basin Transfer
3.000% -0.240 -4.000%
3.000% -0.237 -3.950%
3.000% -0.250 -4.167%
3.000% -0.248 -4.133%
3.000% -0.254 -4.233%
3.000% -0.250 -4.167%
3.000% -0.245 -4.083%
3.000% -0.320 -5.333%
3.000% -0.204 -3.400%
3.000% -0.227 -3.783%
3.000% -0.219 -3.650%
3.000% -0.143 -2.383%
3.000% -0.207 -3.450%
3.000% -0.198 -3.300%
3.000% -0.197 -3.283%
3.000% -0.188 -3.133%
IBT from Yadkin to
South Yadkin
River Basin
0.240
0.237
0.250
0.248
0.254
0.250
0.245
0.320
0.204
0.227
0.219
0.143
0.207
0.198
0.197
0.188
% of Permitted
MDD Transfer
12.060%
11.910%
12.563%
12.462%
12.764%
12.563%
12.312%
16.080%
10.251%
11.407%
11.005%
7.186%
10.402%
9.950%
9.899%
9.447%
0.007
0.066%
0.300 3.000%
- 0.212
-3.533%
10.653%I
0.007
0.007
0.007
0.007
0.007
0.007
0.007
0.007
0.007
0.007
0.007
0.007
0.007
0.007
0.007
0.007
0.007
0.007
0.007
0.007
0.007
0.007
0.007
0.007
0.007
0.007
0.007
0.007
0.007
0.007
0.066%
0.066%
0.066%
0.066%
0.066%
0.066%
0.066%
0.066%
0.066%
0.066%
0.066%
0.066%
0.066%
0.066%
0.066%
0.066%
0.066%
0.066%
0.066%
0.066%
0.066%
0.066%
0.066%
0.066%
0.066%
0.066%
0.066%
0.066%
0.066%
0.066%
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
-0.203
- 0.127
-0.213
-0.206
-0.204
-0.261
-0.195
- 0.193
-0.158
- 0.260
-0.287
- 0.173
-0.198
-0.200
-0.190
- 0.140
-0.238
- 0.210
-0.210
- 0.191
-0.155
- 0.149
-0.176
- 0.208
-0.188
- 0.186
-0.182
- 0.179
-0.184
-0.137
-3.383%
-2.117%
-3.550%
-3.433%
-3.400%
-4.350%
-3.250%
-3.217%
-2.633%
-4.333%
-4.783%
-2.883%
-3.300%
-3.333%
-3.167%
-2.333%
-3.967%
-3.500%
-3.500%
-3.183%
-2.583%
-2.483%
-2.933%
-3.467%
-3.133%
-3.100%
-3.033%
-2.983%
-3.067%
-2.283%
0.203
0.127
0.213
0.206
0.204
0.261
0.195
0.193
0.158
0.260
0.287
0.173
0.198
0.200
0.190
0.140
0.238
0.210
0.210
0.191
0.155
0.149
0.176
0.208
0.188
0.186
0.182
0.179
0.184
0.137
10.201%
6.382%
10.704%
10.352%
10.251%
13.116%
9.799%
9.698%
7.940%
13.065%
14.422%
8.693%
9.950%
10.050%
9.548%
7.035%
11.960%
10.553%
10.553%
9.598%
7.789%
7.487%
8.844%
10.452%
9.447%
9.347%
9.146%
8.995%
9.246%
6.884%
0.178 I -0.178 0.300 0.005 I I 0.005
0.170
0.164
0.190
0.192
0.150
-0.170
-0.164
-0.190
-0.192
-0.150
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.047%
0.300 3.000%
-0.178
-2.967%
0.178
8.945%I
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.047%
0.047%
0.047%
0.047%
0.047%
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
-0.170
-0.164
- 0.190
-0.192
- 0.150
-2.833%
-2.733%
-3.167%
-3.200%
-2.500%
0.170
0.164
0.190
0.192
0.150
8.543%
8.241%
9.548%
9.648%
7.538%

Appendix B: Concord and Kannapolis 2010 IBT Annual Report
Maximum day transfer to the South Yadkin River Basin (cannot exceed transfer from South Yadkin by more than 1.99 MGD)
Water Transfer (MGD) to Rocky River Basin Water Sales (MGD)
Map Code Salisbury 1 Albemarle 1 CMU 1-3
Source Basin South Yadkin Yadkin Yadkin Catawba
Raw Water to Salisbury Finished Albemarle CMU Finished
Kannapolis Lake water Finished water water
from Second Interconnection Interconnection Interconnections
DATE Creek with Kannapolis with Concord with Concorde
11/7/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
11/8/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
11/9/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
11/10/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
11 /11 /2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
11/12/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
11/13/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
11/14/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
11/15/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
11/16/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
11/17/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
11/18/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
11/19/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
11/20/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
11 /21 /2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
11/22/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
11/23/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
11/24/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
11/25/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
11/26/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
11/27/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
11/28/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
11/29/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
11/30/2010 0.000 0.300 0.005
12/1/2010
12/2/2010 0.000 0.300 0.004
12/3/2010 0.000 0.300 0.004
12/4/2010 0.000 0.300 0.004
12/5/2010 0.000 0.300 0.004
12/6/2010 0.000 0.300 0.004
12/7/2010 0.000 0.300 0.004
12/8/2010 0.000 0.300 0.004
12/9/2010 0.000 0.300 0.004
12/10/2010 0.000 0.300 0.004
12/11/2010 0.000 0.300 0.004
12/12/2010 0.000 0.300 0.004
12/13/2010 0.000 0.300 0.004
12/14/2010 0.000 0.300 0.004
12/15/2010 0.000 0.300 0.004
12/16/2010 0.000 0.300 0.004
12/17/2010 0.000 0.300 0.004
12/18/2010 0.000 0.300 0.004
12/19/2010 0.000 0.300 0.004
12/20/2010 0.000 0.300 0.004
12/21/2010 0.000 0.300 0.004
12/22/2010 0.000 0.300 0.004
12/23/2010 0.000 0.300 0.004
12/24/2010 0.000 0.300 0.004
12/25/2010 0.000 0.300 0.004
12/26/2010 0.000 0.300 0.004
12/27/2010 0.000 0.300 0.004
12/28/2010 0.000 0.300 0.004
12/29/2010 0.000 0.300 0.004
South Yadkin
Kannapolis Finished
water sales to Landis
0.123
0.224
0.137
0.173
0.140
0.144
0.195
0.160
0.194
0.202
0.200
0.149
0.219
0.200
0.148
0.248
0.136
0.176
0.175
0.180
0.190
0.186
0.188
0.195
0.308
0.190
0.187
0.198
0.160
0.176
0.170
0.190
0.188
0.185
0.165
0.185
0.198
0.200
0.195
0.202
0.176
0.210
0.176
0.173
0.214
0.180
0.181
0.146
0.140
0.201
0.163
0.153
0.209
IBT Totals Per Basin
NOTE: All Wastewater discharge is to the Rocky River
from RRRWWTP, excluding water sales to Landis
(subtracted from Total South Yadkin IBT).
South Yadkin Yadkin Catawba
Total IBT from
South Yadkin
to Rocky River
Total IBT from
Yadkin to
Rocky River
Total IBT from
Catawba to
Rocky River
-0.123
-0.224
-0.137
-0.173
-0.140
-0.144
-0.195
-0.160
-0.194
-0.202
-0.200
-0.149
-0.219
-0.200
-0.148
-0.248
-0.136
-0.176
-0.175
-0.180
-0.190
-0.186
-0.188
-0.195
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
-0.308
0.300 0.004
-0.190
-0.187
-0.198
-0.160
-0.176
-0.170
-0.190
-0.188
-0.185
-0.165
-0.185
-0.198
-0.200
-0.195
-0.202
-0.176
-0.210
-0.176
-0.173
-0.214
-0.180
-0.181
-0.146
-0.140
-0.201
-0.163
-0.153
-0.209
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
Interbasin Transfer
% of Grandfathered IBT
Permitted from Rocky River IBT from Yadkin to
from % of Permitted MDD Basin to South % of Permitted MDD South Yadkin % of Permitted
Catawba MDD Transfer from Yadkin Transfer Yadkin River Basin Transfer River Basin MDD Transfer
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.047%
0.047%
0.047%
0.047%
0.047%
0.047%
0.047%
0.047%
0.047%
0.047%
0.047%
0.047%
0.047%
0.047%
0.047%
0.047%
0.047%
0.047%
0.047%
0.047%
0.047%
0.047%
0.047%
0.047%
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
- 0.123
-0.224
- 0.137
-0.173
-0.140
-0.144
- 0.195
-0.160
- 0.194
-0.202
- 0.200
-0.149
- 0.219
-0.200
- 0.148
-0.248
- 0.136
-0.176
-0.175
-0.180
- 0.190
-0.186
- 0.188
-0.195
-2.050%
-3.733%
-2.283%
-2.883%
-2.333%
-2.400%
-3.250%
-2.667%
-3.233%
-3.367%
-3.333%
-2.483%
-3.650%
-3.333%
-2.467%
-4.133%
-2.267%
-2.933%
-2.917%
-3.000%
-3.167%
-3.100%
-3.133%
-3.250%
0.123
0.224
0.137
0.173
0.140
0.144
0.195
0.160
0.194
0.202
0.200
0.149
0.219
0.200
0.148
0.248
0.136
0.176
0.175
0.180
0.190
0.186
0.188
0.195
6.181%
11.256%
6.884%
8.693%
7.035%
7.236%
9.799%
8.040%
9.749%
10.151%
10.050%
7.487%
11.005%
10.050%
7.437%
12.462%
6.834%
8.844%
8.794%
9.045%
9.548%
9.347%
9.447%
9.799%
0.004 0.044% 0.300 3.000% -0.308 -5.133% 0.308 15.477%
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.044%
0.044%
0.044%
0.044%
0.044%
0.044%
0.044%
0.044%
0.044%
0.044%
0.044%
0.044%
0.044%
0.044%
0.044%
0.044%
0.044%
0.044%
0.044%
0.044%
0.044%
0.044%
0.044%
0.044%
0.044%
0.044%
0.044%
0.044%
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
0.300
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
3.000%
-0.190
- 0.187
-0.198
- 0.160
-0.176
- 0.170
-0.190
- 0.188
-0.185
- 0.165
-0.185
- 0.198
-0.200
- 0.195
-0.202
- 0.176
-0.210
- 0.176
-0.173
- 0.214
-0.180
- 0.181
-0.146
- 0.140
-0.201
- 0.163
-0.153
- 0.209
-3.167%
-3.117%
-3.300%
-2.667%
-2.933%
-2.833%
-3.167%
-3.133%
-3.083%
-2.750%
-3.083%
-3.300%
-3.333%
-3.250%
-3.367%
-2.933%
-3.500%
-2.933%
-2.883%
-3.567%
-3.000%
-3.017%
-2.433%
-2.333%
-3.350%
-2.717%
-2.550%
-3.483%
0.190
0.187
0.198
0.160
0.176
0.170
0.190
0.188
0.185
0.165
0.185
0.198
0.200
0.195
0.202
0.176
0.210
0.176
0.173
0.214
0.180
0.181
0.146
0.140
0.201
0.163
0.153
0.209
9.548%
9.397%
9.950%
8.040%
8.844%
8.543%
9.548%
9.447%
9.296%
8.291%
9.296%
9.950%
10.050%
9.799%
10.151%
8.844%
10.553%
8.844%
8.693%
10.754%
9.045%
9.095%
7.337%
7.035%
10.101%
8.191%
7.688%
10.503%

Appendix B: Concord and Kannapolis 2010 IBT Annual Report
Maximum day transfer to the South Yadkin River Basin (cannot exceed transfer from South Yadkin by more than 1.99 MGD)
Map Code
Source Basin
DATE
12/30/2010
12/31/2010
Water Transfer (MGD) to Rocky River Basin
South Yadkin
Raw Water to
Kannapolis Lake
from Second
Creek
0.000
0.000
Salisbury 1
Yadkin
Salisbury Finished
water
Interconnection
with Kannapolis
0.300
0.300
Albemarle 1
Yadkin
Albemarle
Finished water
Interconnection
with Concord
CMU 1-3
Catawba
CMU Finished
water
Interconnections
with Concorde
0.004
0.004
AVG 2010 0.000
MAX 2010 0.000
0.300
0.300
0.000
0.000
0.005
Water Sales (MGD)
IBT Totals Per Basin
NOTE: All Wastewater discharge is to the Rocky River
from RRRWWTP, excluding water sales to Landis
(subtracted from Total South Yadkin IBT).
South Yadkin
Kannapolis Finished
water sales to Landis
0.164
0.162
South Yadkin Yadkin
Total IBT from
South Yadkin
to Rocky River
-0.164
-0.162
Total IBT from
Yadkin to
Rocky River
0.300
0.300
Catawba
Total IBT from
Catawba to
Rocky River
0.004
0.004
0.195
0.539
0.000
-0.195
0.000
0.000
0.299
0.300
0.000
0.005
0.007
1 1
Interbasin Transfer
from % of Permitted
Catawba MDD Transfer
0.004 0.044%
0.004 0.044%
% of Grandfathered IBT
Permitted from Rocky River
MDD Basin to South
from Yadkin Transfer Yadkin River Basin
0.300 3.000% -0.164
0.300 3.000% -0.162
IBT from Yadkin to
% of Permitted MDD South Yadkin % of Permitted
Transfer River Basin MDD Transfer
-2.733% 0.164 8.241%
-2.700% 0.162 8.141%
Transfers from Second Creek to Kannapolis Lake (South Yadkin Basin to Rocky River Basin) shall not exceed 6 MGD; positive numbers indicate this direction as the dominate.
Transfers from Kannapolis (via purchase from Salisbury) to Landis (Yadkin Basin to South Yadkin Basin) shall not exceed 2 MGD; negative numbers represent this direction of transfer as the dominate.
2 Water purchase data from CMU is monthly billing record data. Daily data are not available. Average calculated by number of days in a month. Max day data not available.
0.000
0.005
0.007
0.000%
0.050%
0.066%
0.000
0.300
0.300
0.000%
3.000%
3.000%
0.000
-0.195
-0.104
0.000%
-3.254%
-1.733%
0.000
0.165
0.539
0.000%
8.289%
27.085%

Appendix C
§ 143-215.22L. Regulation of surface water transfers.
(a) Certificate Required. — No person, without first obtaining a certificate from
the Commission, may:
(1) Initiate a transfer of 2,000,000 gallons of water or more per day from
one river basin to another.
(2) Increase the amount of an existing transfer of water from one river
basin to another by twenty-five percent (25%) or more above the
average daily amount transferred during the year ending 1 July 1993 if
the total transfer including the increase is 2,000,000 gallons or more
per day.
(3) Increase an existing transfer of water from one river basin to another
above the amount approved by the Commission in a certificate issued
under G.S. 162A-7 prior to 1 July 1993.
(b) Exception. — Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection (a) of this section,
a certificate shall not be required to transfer water from one river basin to another up to
the full capacity of a facility to transfer water from one basin to another if the facility
was in existence or under construction on 1 July 1993.
(c) Notice of Intent to File a Petition. — An applicant shall prepare a notice of
intent to file a petition that includes a nontechnical description of the applicant's request
and an identification of the proposed water source. Within 90 days after the applicant
files a notice of intent to file a petition, the applicant shall hold at least one public
meeting in the source river basin upstream from the proposed point of withdrawal, at
least one public meeting in the source river basin downstream from the proposed point
of withdrawal, and at least one public meeting in the receiving river basin to provide
information to interested parties and the public regarding the nature and extent of the
proposed transfer and to receive comment on the scope of the environmental
documents. Written notice of the public meetings shall be provided at least 30 days
before the public meetings. At the time the applicant gives notice of the public
meetings, the applicant shall request comment on the alternatives and issues that should
be addressed in the environmental documents required by this section. The applicant
shall accept written comment on the scope of the environmental documents for a
minimum of 30 days following the last public meeting. Notice of the public meetings
and opportunity to comment on the scope of the environmental documents shall be
provided as follows:
(1) By publishing notice in the North Carolina Register.
(2) By publishing notice in a newspaper of general circulation in:
a. Each county in this State located in whole or in part of the area
of the source river basin upstream from the proposed point of
withdrawal.
b. Each city or county located in a state located in whole or in part
of the surface drainage basin area of the source river basin that
also falls within, in whole or in part, the area denoted by one of
the following eight -digit cataloging units as organized by the
United States Geological Survey:
G.S. 143-215.22L Page 1

Appendix C
03050105
03050106
03050107
03050108
05050001
05050002
03050101
03050103
03050104
03010203
03010204
06010105
06010106
06010107
06010108
06020001
06020002
06010201
06010202
06010204
03060101
03060102
03060103
03060104
03060105
03040203
03040204
03040206
03040207
03010205
06020003
03010101
03010102
03010103
03010104
03010105
03010106
06010102
06010103
03040101
03040104
03040105
03040201
03040202
(Broad River: NC and SC);
(Broad River: SC);
(Broad River: SC);
(Broad River: SC);
(New River: NC and VA);
(New River: VA and WV);
(Catawba River: NC and SC);
(Catawba River: NC and SC);
(Catawba River: SC);
(Chowan River: NC and VA);
(Chowan River: NC and VA);
(French Broad River: NC and TN);
(French Broad River: NC and TN);
(French Broad River: TN);
(French Broad River: NC and TN);
(Hiwassee River: AL, GA, TN);
(Hiwassee River: GA, NC, TN);
(Little Tennessee River: TN);
(Little Tennessee River: TN, GA, and NC);
(Little Tennessee River: NC and TN);
(Savannah River: NC and SC);
(Savannah River: GA, NC, and SC);
(Savannah River: GA and SC);
(Savannah River: GA);
(Savannah River: GA);
(Lumber River: NC and SC);
(Lumber River: NC and SC);
(Lumber River: NC and SC);
(Lumber River: NC and SC);
(Albemarle Sound: NC and VA);
(Ocoee River: GA, NC, and TN);
(Roanoke River: VA);
(Roanoke River: NC and VA);
(Roanoke River: NC and VA);
(Roanoke River: NC and VA);
(Roanoke River: VA);
(Roanoke River: NC and VA);
(Watauga River: TN and VA);
(Watauga River: NC and TN);
(Yadkin River: VA and NC);
(Yadkin River: NC and SC);
(Yadkin River: NC and SC);
(Yadkin River: NC and SC);
(Yadkin River: NC and SC).
G.S. 143-215.22L Page 2

Appendix C
(3)
c. Each county in this State located in whole or in part of the area
of the source river basin downstream from the proposed point
of withdrawal.
d. Any area in the State in a river basin for which the source river
basin has been identified as a future source of water in a local
water supply plan prepared pursuant to G.S. 143-355(1).
e. Each county in the State located in whole or in part of the
receiving river basin.
By giving notice by first-class mail or electronic mail to each of the
following:
a. The board of commissioners of each county in this State or the
governing body of any county or city that is politically
independent of a county in any state that is located entirely or
partially within the source river basin of the proposed transfer
and that also falls within, in whole or in part, the area denoted
by one of the eight -digit cataloging units listed in
sub -subdivision b. of subdivision (2) of this subsection.
b. The board of commissioners of each county in this State or the
governing body of any county or city that is politically
independent of a county in any state that is located entirely or
partially within the receiving river basin of the proposed
transfer and that also falls within, in whole or in part, the area
denoted by one of the eight -digit cataloging units listed in
sub -subdivision b. of subdivision (2) of this subsection.
c. The governing body of any public water supply system that
withdraws water upstream or downstream from the withdrawal
point of the proposed transfer.
d. If any portion of the source or receiving river basins is located
in another state, all state water management or use agencies,
environmental protection agencies, and the office of the
governor in that state upstream or downstream from the
withdrawal point of the proposed transfer.
e. All persons who have registered a water withdrawal or transfer
from the proposed source river basin under this Part or under
similar law in an another state.
f. All persons who hold a certificate for a transfer of water from
the proposed source river basin under this Part or under similar
law in an another state.
g. All persons who hold a National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) wastewater discharge permit for
a discharge of 100,000 gallons per day or more upstream or
downstream from the proposed point of withdrawal.
h. To any other person who submits to the applicant a written
request to receive all notices relating to the petition.
G.S. 143-215.22L Page 3

Appendix C
(d) Environmental Documents. — The definitions set out in G.S. 113A-9 apply to
this section. The Department shall conduct a study of the environmental impacts of any
proposed transfer of water for which a certificate is required under this section. The
study shall meet all of the requirements set forth in G.S. 113A-4 and rules adopted
pursuant to G.S. 113A-4. An environmental assessment shall be prepared for any
petition for a certificate under this section. The determination of whether an
environmental impact statement shall also be required shall be made in accordance with
the provisions of Article 1 of Chapter 113A of the General Statutes; except that an
environmental impact statement shall be prepared for every proposed transfer of water
from one major river basin to another for which a certificate is required under this
section. The applicant who petitions the Commission for a certificate under this section
shall pay the cost of special studies necessary to comply with Article 1 of Chapter 113A
of the General Statutes. An environmental impact statement prepared pursuant to this
subsection shall include all of the following:
(1) A comprehensive analysis of the impacts that would occur in the
source river basin and the receiving river basin if the petition for a
certificate is granted.
(2) An evaluation of alternatives to the proposed interbasin transfer,
including water supply sources that do not require an interbasin
transfer and use of water conservation measures.
(3) A description of measures to mitigate any adverse impacts that may
arise from the proposed interbasin transfer.
(e) Public Hearing on the Draft Environmental Document. — The Commission
shall hold a public hearing on the draft environmental document for a proposed
interbasin transfer after giving at least 30 days' written notice of the hearing in the
Environmental Bulletin and as provided in subdivisions (2) and (3) of subsection (c) of
this section. The notice shall indicate where a copy of the environmental document can
be reviewed and the procedure to be followed by anyone wishing to submit written
comments and questions on the environmental document. The Commission shall
prepare a record of all comments and written responses to questions posed in writing.
The record shall include complete copies of scientific or technical comments related to
the potential impact of the interbasin transfer. The Commission shall accept written
comment on the draft environmental documents for a minimum of 30 days following
the last public hearing.
(f) Determination of Adequacy of Environmental Document. — The Commission
shall not act on any petition for an interbasin transfer until the Commission has
determined that the environmental document is complete and adequate. A decision on
the adequacy of the environmental document is subject to review in a contested case on
the decision of the Commission to issue or deny a certificate under this section.
(g) Petition. — An applicant for a certificate shall petition the Commission for the
certificate. The petition shall be in writing and shall include all of the following:
(1) A description of the facilities to be used to transfer the water, including
the location and capacity of water intakes, pumps, pipelines, and other
facilities.
G.S. 143-215.22L Page 4

Appendix C
(2) A description of all the proposed consumptive and nonconsumptive
uses of the water to be transferred.
(3) A description of the water quality of the source river and receiving
river, including information on aquatic habitat for rare, threatened, and
endangered species; in -stream flow data for segments of the source
and receiving rivers that may be affected by the transfer; and any
waters that are impaired pursuant to section 303(d) of the federal Clean
Water Act (33 U.S.C. § 1313(d)).
(4) A description of the water conservation measures used by the applicant
at the time of the petition and any additional water conservation
measures that the applicant will implement if the certificate is granted.
(5) A description of all sources of water within the receiving river basin,
including surface water impoundments, groundwater wells, reinjection
storage, and purchase of water from another source within the river
basin, that is a practicable alternative to the proposed transfer that
would meet the applicant's water supply needs. The description of
water sources shall include sources available at the time of the petition
for a certificate and any planned or potential water sources.
(6) A description of water transfers and withdrawals registered under G.S.
143-215.22H or included in a local water supply plan prepared
pursuant to G.S. 143-355(1) from the source river basin, including
transfers and withdrawals at the time of the petition for a certificate
and any planned or reasonably foreseeable transfers or withdrawals by
a public water system with service area located within the source river
basin.
(7) A demonstration that the proposed transfer, if added to all other
transfers and withdrawals required to be registered under G.S.
143-215.22H or included in any local water supply plan prepared by a
public water system with service area located within the source basin
pursuant to G.S. 143-355(1) from the source river basin at the time of
the petition for a certificate, would not reduce the amount of water
available for use in the source river basin to a degree that would impair
existing uses, pursuant to the antidegradation policy set out in 40 Code
of Federal Regulation § 131.12 (Antidegradation Policy)(1 July 2006
Edition) and the statewide antidegradation policy adopted pursuant
thereto, or existing and planned consumptive and nonconsumptive uses
of the water in the source river basin. If the proposed transfer would
impact a reservoir within the source river basin, the demonstration
must include a finding that the transfer would not result in a water
level in the reservoir that is inadequate to support existing uses of the
reservoir, including recreational uses.
(8) The applicant's future water supply needs and the present and
reasonably foreseeable future water supply needs for public water
systems with service area located within the source river basin. The
G.S. 143-215.22L Page 5

Appendix C
analysis of future water supply needs shall include agricultural,
recreational, and industrial uses, and electric power generation. Local
water supply plans prepared pursuant to G.S. 143-355(1) for water
systems with service area located within the source river basin shall be
used to evaluate the projected future water needs in the source river
basin that will be met by public water systems.
(9) The applicant's water supply plan prepared pursuant to G.S.
143-355(1). If the applicant's water supply plan is more than two years
old at the time of the petition, then the applicant shall include with the
petition an updated water supply plan.
(10) Any other information deemed necessary by the Commission for
review of the proposed water transfer.
(h) Settlement Discussions. — Upon the request of the applicant, any interested
party, or the Department, or upon its own motion, the Commission may appoint a
mediation officer. The mediation officer may be a member of the Commission, an
employee of the Department, or a neutral third party but shall not be a hearing officer
under subsections (e) or (j) of this section. The mediation officer shall make a
reasonable effort to initiate settlement discussions between the applicant and all other
interested parties. Evidence of statements made and conduct that occurs in a settlement
discussion conducted under this subsection, whether attributable to a party, a mediation
officer, or other person shall not be subject to discovery and shall be inadmissible in any
subsequent proceeding on the petition for a certificate. The Commission may adopt
rules to govern the conduct of the mediation process.
(i) Draft Determination. — Within 90 days after the Commission determines that
the environmental document prepared in accordance with subsection (d) of this section
is adequate or the applicant submits its petition for a certificate, whichever occurs later,
the Commission shall issue a draft determination on whether to grant the certificate. The
draft determination shall be based on the criteria set out in this section and shall include
the conditions and limitations, findings of fact, and conclusions of law that would be
required in a final determination. Notice of the draft determination shall be given as
provided in subsection (c) of this section.
(j) Public Hearing on the Draft Determination. — Within 60 days of the issuance
of the draft determination as provided in subsection (i) of this section, the Commission
shall hold public hearings on the draft determination. At least one hearing shall be held
in the affected area of the source river basin, and at least one hearing shall be held in the
affected area of the receiving river basin. In determining whether more than one public
hearing should be held within either the source or receiving river basins, the
Commission shall consider the differing or conflicting interests that may exist within the
river basins, including the interests of both upstream and downstream parties potentially
affected by the proposed transfer. The public hearings shall be conducted by one or
more hearing officers appointed by the Chair of the Commission. The hearing officers
may be members of the Commission or employees of the Department. The Commission
shall give at least 30 days' written notice of the public hearing as provided in subsection
(c) of this section. The Commission shall accept written comment on the draft
G.S. 143-215.22L Page 6

Appendix C
determination for a minimum of 30 days following the last public hearing. The
Commission shall prepare a record of all comments and written responses to questions
posed in writing. The record shall include complete copies of scientific or technical
comments related to the potential impact of the interbasin transfer.
(k) Final Determination: Factors to be Considered. — In determining whether a
certificate may be issued for the transfer, the Commission shall specifically consider
each of the following items and state in writing its findings of fact and conclusions of
law with regard to each item:
(1) The necessity and reasonableness of the amount of surface water
proposed to be transferred and its proposed uses.
(2) The present and reasonably foreseeable future detrimental effects on
the source river basin, including present and future effects on public,
industrial, economic, recreational, and agricultural water supply needs,
wastewater assimilation, water quality, fish and wildlife habitat,
electric power generation, navigation, and recreation. Local water
supply plans for public water systems with service area located within
the source river basin prepared pursuant to G.S. 143-355(1) shall be
used to evaluate the projected future water needs in the source river
basin that will be met by public water systems. Information on
projected future water needs for public water systems with service area
located within the source river basin that is more recent than the local
water supply plans may be used if the Commission finds the
information to be reliable. The determination shall include a specific
finding as to measures that are necessary or advisable to mitigate or
avoid detrimental impacts on the source river basin.
(3) The cumulative effect on the source major river basin of any water
transfer or consumptive water use that, at the time the Commission
considers the petition for a certificate is occurring, is authorized under
this section, or is projected in any local water supply plan for public
water systems with service area located within the source river basin
that has been submitted to the Depatlinient in accordance with G.S.
143-355(1).
(4) The present and reasonably foreseeable future beneficial and
detrimental effects on the receiving river basin, including present and
future effects on public, industrial, economic, recreational, and
agricultural water supply needs, wastewater assimilation, water
quality, fish and wildlife habitat, electric power generation, navigation,
and recreation. Local water supply plans prepared pursuant to G.S.
143-355(1) that affect the receiving river basin shall be used to evaluate
the projected future water needs in the receiving river basin that will
be met by public water systems. Information on projected future water
needs that is more recent than the local water supply plans may be
used if the Commission finds the information to be reliable. The
determination shall include a specific finding as to measures that are
G.S. 143-215.22L Page 7

Appendix C
necessary or advisable to mitigate or avoid detrimental impacts on the
receiving river basin.
(5) The availability of reasonable alternatives to the proposed transfer,
including the potential capacity of alternative sources of water, the
potential of each alternative to reduce the amount of or avoid the
proposed transfer, probable costs, and environmental impacts. In
considering alternatives, the Commission is not limited to
consideration of alternatives that have been proposed, studied, or
considered by the applicant. The determination shall include a specific
finding as to why the applicant's need for water cannot be satisfied by
alternatives within the receiving basin, including unused capacity
under a transfer for which a certificate is in effect or that is otherwise
authorized by law at the time the applicant submits the petition. The
determination shall consider the extent to which access to potential
sources of surface water or groundwater within the receiving river
basin is no longer available due to depletion, contamination, or the
declaration of a capacity use area under Part 2 of Article 21 of Chapter
143 of the General Statutes. The determination shall consider the
feasibility of the applicant's purchase of water from other water
suppliers within the receiving basin and of the transfer of water from
another sub -basin within the receiving major river basin. Except in
circumstances of technical or economic infeasibility or adverse
environmental impact, the Commission's determination as to
reasonable alternatives shall give preference to alternatives that would
involve a transfer from one sub -basin to another within the major
receiving river basin over alternatives that would involve a transfer
from one major river basin to another major river basin.
(6) If applicable to the proposed project, the applicant's present and
proposed use of impoundment storage capacity to store water during
high -flow periods for use during low -flow periods and the applicant's
right of withdrawal under G.S. 143-215.44 through G.S. 143-215.50.
(7) If the water to be withdrawn or transferred is stored in a multipurpose
reservoir constructed by the United States Army Corps of Engineers,
the purposes and water storage allocations established for the reservoir
at the time the reservoir was authorized by the Congress of the United
States.
(8) Whether the service area of the applicant is located in both the source
river basin and the receiving river basin.
(9) Any other facts and circumstances that are reasonably necessary to
carry out the purposes of this Part.
(1) Final Determination: Information to be Considered. — In determining whether
a certificate may be issued for the transfer, the Commission shall consider all of the
following sources of information:
(1) The petition.
G.S. 143-215.22L Page 8

Appendix C
(2) The environmental document prepared pursuant to subsection (d) of
this section.
(3) All oral and written comment and all accompanying materials or
evidence submitted pursuant to subsections (e) and (j) of this section.
(4) Information developed by or available to the Department on the water
quality of the source river basin and the receiving river basin,
including waters that are identified as impaired pursuant to section
303(d) of the federal Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. § 1313(d)), that are
subject to a total maximum daily load (TMDL) limit under subsections
(d) and (e) of section 303 of the federal Clean Water Act, or that would
have their assimilative capacity impaired if the certificate is issued.
(5) Any other information that the Commission determines to be relevant
and useful.
(m) Final Determination: Burden and Standard of Proof; Specific Findings. — The
Commission shall grant a certificate for a water transfer if the Commission finds that the
applicant has established by a preponderance of the evidence all of the following:
(1) The benefits of the proposed transfer outweigh the detriments of the
proposed transfer. In making this determination, the Commission shall
be guided by the approved environmental document and the policy set
out in subsection (t) of this section.
(2) The detriments have been or will be mitigated to the maximum degree
practicable.
(3) The amount of the transfer does not exceed the amount of the
projected shortfall under the applicant's water supply plan after first
taking into account all other sources of water that are available to the
applicant.
(4) There are no reasonable alternatives to the proposed transfer.
(n) Final Determination: Certificate Conditions and Limitations. — The
Commission may grant the certificate in whole or in part, or deny the certificate. The
Commission may impose any conditions or limitations on a certificate that the
Commission finds necessary to achieve the purposes of this Part including a limit on the
period for which the certificate is valid. The conditions and limitations shall include any
mitigation measures proposed by the applicant to minimize any detrimental effects
within the source and receiving river basins. In addition, the certificate shall require all
of the following conditions and limitations:
(1) A water conservation plan that specifies the water conservation
measures that will be implemented by the applicant in the receiving
river basin to ensure the efficient use of the transferred water. Except
in circumstances of technical or economic infeasibility or adverse
environmental impact, the water conservation plan shall provide for
the mandatory implementation of water conservation measures by the
applicant that equal or exceed the most stringent water conservation
plan implemented by a community water system, as defined in G.S.
143-355(1), that withdraws water from the source river basin.
G.S. 143-215.22L Page 9

Appendix C
(2) A drought management plan that specifies how the transfer shall be
managed to protect the source river basin during drought conditions or
other emergencies that occur within the source river basin. Except in
circumstances of technical or economic infeasibility or adverse
environmental impact, this drought management plan shall include
mandatory reductions in the permitted amount of the transfer based on
the severity and duration of a drought occurring within the source river
basin and shall provide for the mandatory implementation of a drought
management plan by the applicant that equals or exceeds the most
stringent water conservation plan implemented by a community water
system, as defined in G.S. 143-355(1), that withdraws water from the
source river basin.
(3) The maximum amount of water that may be transferred on a daily
basis, and methods or devices required to be installed and operated that
measure the amount of water that is transferred.
(4) A provision that the Commission may amend a certificate to reduce the
maximum amount of water authorized to be transferred whenever it
appears that an alternative source of water is available to the certificate
holder from within the receiving river basin, including, but not limited
to, the purchase of water from another water supplier within the
receiving basin or to the transfer of water from another sub -basin
within the receiving major river basin.
(5) A provision that the Commission shall amend the certificate to reduce
the maximum amount of water authorized to be transferred if the
Commission finds that the applicant's current projected water needs
are significantly less than the applicant's projected water needs at the
time the certificate was granted.
(6) A requirement that the certificate holder report the quantity of water
transferred during each calendar quarter. The report required by this
subdivision shall be submitted to the Commission no later than 30
days after the end of the quarter.
(7) Except as provided in this subdivision, a provision that the applicant
will not resell the water that would be transferred pursuant to the
certificate to another public water supply system. This limitation shall
not apply in the case of a proposed resale or transfer among public
water supply systems within the receiving river basin as part of an
interlocal agreement or other regional water supply arrangement,
provided that each participant in the interlocal agreement or regional
water supply arrangement is a co -applicant for the certificate and will
be subject to all the terms, conditions, and limitations made applicable
to any lead or primary applicant.
(o) Administrative and Judicial Review. — Administrative and judicial review of
a final decision by the Commission on a petition for a certificate under this section shall
be governed by Chapter 150B of the General Statutes.
G.S. 143-215.22L Page 10

Appendix C
(p) Certain Preexisting Transfers. — In cases where an applicant requests approval
to increase a transfer that existed on 1 July 1993, the Commission may approve or
disapprove only the amount of the increase. If the Commission approves the increase,
the certificate shall be issued for the amount of the preexisting transfer plus any increase
approved by the Commission. A certificate for a transfer approved by the Commission
under G.S. 162A-7 shall remain in effect as approved by the Commission and shall have
the same effect as a certificate issued under this Part. A certificate for the increase of a
preexisting transfer shall contain all of the conditions and limitations required by
subsection (m) of this section.
(q) Emergency Transfers. — In the case of water supply problems caused by
drought, a pollution incident, temporary failure of a water plant, or any other temporary
condition in which the public health, safety, or welfare requires a transfer of water, the
Secretary of Environment and Natural Resources may grant approval for a temporary
transfer. Prior to approving a temporary transfer, the Secretary shall consult with those
parties listed in subdivision (3) of subsection (c) of this section that are likely to be
affected by the proposed transfer. However, the Secretary shall not be required to satisfy
the public notice requirements of this section or make written findings of fact and
conclusions of law in approving a temporary transfer under this subsection. If the
Secretary approves a temporary transfer under this subsection, the Secretary shall
specify conditions to protect other water users. A temporary transfer shall not exceed six
months in duration, but the approval may be renewed for a period of six months by the
Secretary based on demonstrated need as set forth in this subsection.
(r) Relationship to Federal Law. — The substantive restrictions, conditions, and
limitations upon surface water transfers authorized in this section may be imposed
pursuant to any federal law that permits the State to certify, restrict, or condition any
new or continuing transfers or related activities licensed, relicensed, or otherwise
authorized by the federal government. This section shall govern the transfer of water
from one river basin to another unless preempted by federal law.
(s) Planning Requirements. — When any transfer for which a certificate was
issued under this section equals or exceeds eighty percent (80%) of the maximum
amount authorized in the certificate, the applicant shall submit to the Department a
detailed plan that specifies how the applicant intends to address future foreseeable water
needs. If the applicant is required to have a local water supply plan, then this plan shall
be an amendment to the local water supply plan required by G.S.143-355(1). When the
transfer equals or exceeds ninety percent (90%) of the maximum amount authorized in
the certificate, the applicant shall begin implementation of the plan submitted to the
Department.
(t) Statement of Policy. — It is the public policy of the State to maintain, protect,
and enhance water quality within North Carolina. It is the public policy of this State that
the reasonably foreseeable future water needs of a public water system with its service
area located primarily in the receiving river basin are subordinate to the reasonably
foreseeable future water needs of a public water system with its service area located
primarily in the source river basin. Further, it is the public policy of the State that the
cumulative impact of transfers from a source river basin shall not result in a violation of
G.S. 143-215.22L Page 11

Appendix C
the antidegradation policy set out in 40 Code of Federal Regulations § 131.12 (1 July
2006 Edition) and the statewide antidegradation policy adopted pursuant thereto.
(u) Renewal of Certificate. — A petition to extend or renew a certificate shall be
treated as a new petition. (1993, c. 348, s. 1; 1997-443, ss. 11A.119(a), 15.48(c);
1997-524, s. 1; 1998-168, s. 4; 2001-474, s. 28; 2007-484, s. 43.7C; 2007-518, s. 3;
2008-125, s. 1; 2008-198, s. 11.5.)
G.S. 143-215.22L Page 12