20080100 Ver 1_Application_20080114

:- .
'.r ~~Tc
'~ ,~~~~R~T~r ~~
;r
.@~~ ~-
. ~~'Q9i
~'Cy
STATE of NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS LYNDO TIPPETT
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
January 9, 2008
Mr. Brian Wrenn
401/Transportation Permitting Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, N.C. 27699-1650
osoioo
SUBJECT: Bridge #95 Replacement on SR 1537 (Miracle Farm Road), Iredell County
Dear Mr. Wrenn:
The North Carolina Department of Transportation proposes to replace a 20 ft g 40 ft timber
bridge with a 33 ft z 55 ft concrete bridge on SR 1537 (Miracle Farm Road) in Iredell County.
Class II riprap will be utilized for stabilization under the bridge structure. The "normal" stream
width was determined to be ~20 ft based upon a reference stream channel cross-section surveyed
approximately 145 feet upstream of the bridge. A stream cross-section was also surveyed in the
immediate vicinity of the bridge, which was determined to be 24 feet; thus indicating that channel
is slightly overwidened at the bridge. Due to the existing stream width at the bridge, the Class II
riprap utilized for the stabilization under the bridge will be placed at the edges of the active
stream channel; however, the 20 foot active channel width will be maintained under the bridge.
Temporary linear cofferdams will be used to divert the stream flow around the construction site
as necessary. Upon project completion, the area impacted by the temporary cofferdams will be
returned to pre-project conditions. The total scope of the work will result in 60 feet of permanent
impacts to Third Creek, which is classified as Class C waters by the Division of Water Quality.
The project is not located within 'h mile of any critical watershed area nor is SR 1537 a rural or
urban arterial; therefore, hazardous spill basins are not required. Enclosed is the hazardous spill
basin checklist.
This office has conducted a GIS and field survey for the project for historical sites and
threatened/endangered species sites. No sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places
are located in the vicinity of the project nor did there appear to be any eligible structures. The
federally listed species for Iredell County (USFWS list dated December 20, 2007) include bog
turtle (Clemmys muhlenbergii) and the Dwarf-flowered heartleaf (Hexastylis nan~ora).

Bridge #95, SR 1537, Miracle Farm Road
Page 2
January 9, 2008
Natural Heritage Program records document the nearest dwarf-flowered heartleaf location
approximately 11.5 miles southwest of the proposed project area (in Catawba county). The
heartleaf is usually found on dry to moist ravine slopes (usually north facing and of the oak-
hickory-pine forest type) and in boggy areas near springheads. There did not appear to be
suitable habitat within the proposed project azea and heartleaf species were observed. No impact
on this species is anticipated. Natural Heritage Program records document the nearest bog turtle
location approximately 11 miles north of the proposed project area (in Alexander County). Bog
turtles aze typically found in bogs, marshes, and wet pastures. There is no suitable habitat located
within the project area. T/SA species aze not subject to Section 7 consultation; however, no
impact on this species is anticipated.
I have enclosed apre-construction notification for a NW#14, sketches of planned activities, and
location maps relative to the project.
Project information for the 401 Automated Payment Procedure is as follows:
• Work order number: 150465-55120005-12B.204921-4685
• TIP #: NA
• Project Category: $240.00 Fee
If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact me at [phone]. Thank
you for your time and consideration to this matter
Respectfully yours,
M.L. Holder, P.E.
Division Engineer
Twelfth Division
Trish Simon
Division 12 Environmental Supervisor
Enclosures
Cc: Polly Lespinasse, DWQ, Mooresville Regional Office

Office Use Only: Form Version March OS
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No. 2 0 0 8 0 1 0 0
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not appiicanie~~ or ..NiA .)
I. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
^ Section 404 Permit ^ Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
^ Section 10 Permit ^ Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ^ Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NW # 14 (WQC#3704)
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ^
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here: ^
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ^
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Mike Holder N.C. Department of Transportation
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 47
Shelby North Carolina 28151
Telephone Number: 704-480-9020 Fax Number: 704-480-5401
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Trish Simon
Company Affiliation: N.C. Department of Transportation
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 47
Shelby North Carolina 28151
Telephone Number: 704-480-9044 Fax Number: 704-480-5401
E-mail Address: tsimon(a~dot.state.nc.us
Page 1 of 8

III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Bridge #95 Replacement, SR 1537 (Miracle Farm Road)
2. T.LP. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): 12B.204921
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): NA
4. Location
County: Iredell Nearest Town: Statesville
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): NA
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): From Statesville, Hwy 90
west, turn left on SR 1537 and proceed to brid e
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 35°49'57"°N 81°01'38"°W
6. Property size (acres): < 0.10 acres
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Third Creek, Class C Waters (from source to a
Fourth Creek).
8. River Basin: Yadkin
(Note -this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: Existing Conditions-Bridge on paved secondary road.
General Land Use- Residential and agricultural.
Page 2 of 8

10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used.
Replacement of a deteriorating 20-foot x 40-foot timber bridge with a 33-foot x 55-foot
concrete bridge Class II Riprap will be utilized for stabilization under the bridge structure.
Typical heavy equipment (cranes trackhoe backhoe etc) will be used for the construction
of this project
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose of the proposed work is to replace
a deteriorating bridge for the safety of the travelling.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.NA
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
No future permit requests are anticipated at this site.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: Permanent impacts from riprap
stabilization.
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Page 3 of 8

Wetland Impact Type of Wetland Located within Distance to Area of
Site Number Type of Impact (e.g., forested, marsh, 100-year
Floodplain Nearest
Stream Impact
(acres)
(indicate on map) herbaceous, bog, etc.) es/no linear feet)

Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 0
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply len~,th X width, then divide by 43,560.

Stream Impact

Stream

Perennial or Average

Stream Width
Impact
Area of
Number Name Type of Impact Intermittent? Before Length Impact
(indicate on map) Im act (linear feet) (acres)
1 Third
Creek Riprap Stabilization Perennial 20 feet 60 feet 0.028
1 Temporary Linear 80 feet 0.037
Cofferdams
* 60 feet *.028 acre
Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) permanent permanent
*Permanent impacts contained within area of temporary impacts 80 feet .037 acre
temporary temporary
impacts impacts
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact
Name of Waterbody Type of Waterbody Area of
Site Number (if applicable) Type of Impact (lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay, Impact
indicate on ma) ocean, etc.) (acres)

Total Open Water Impact (acres) 0
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Impact (acres): Permanent 0.028
Wetland Impact (acres): 0
Open Water Impact (acres): 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.037
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): Permanent 60 feet
Page 4 of 8

7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ^ Yes ®No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
8. Pond Creation NO POND IMPACTS
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ^ uplands ^ stream ^ wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Expected pond surface area:.
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. Class II riprap will be utilized
under the bridge for stabilization. Comparing a reference stream channel cross-section taken
approximately 145 feet upstream of the bridge~20 feet) and stream channel cross-section taken
in the immediate vicinity of the bridge (24 feet) indicated that channel is slightly overwidened at
the bridge. Due to the existing stream width at the bridge, the Class II riprap utilized for the
stabilization under the bridge will be placed at the edges of the active stream channel; however,
the active channel will maintain the 20 feet "normal" stream width.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
Page 5 of 8

aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o. enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.html.
Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
NO MITIGATION ANTICIPATED.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet):
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount ofNon-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
1. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ® No ^
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ^ No
Page 6 of 8

3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ^ No ^
X.
Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify )? Yes ^ No
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
* I Impact ~ Required
Zone ,,,,,__~_~ r ~,~ Multiplier *,~;*;,,,,;,,,,
3 (2 for Catawba)
1.5
Total
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additiona120 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
XI.
XII.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration /
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260.
Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
Stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level.
A minor increase will occur by replacing the 20 ft x 40 ft brid>;e with a 33 ft x 55 ft bridge.
Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
No wastewater is generated from the project.
type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Enhancement, or Payment into the
appropriate information as identified
Page 7 of 8

XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ^ No
Is this anafter-the-fact permit application? Yes ^ No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ^ No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
The bridge replacement will not result in additional development of the surrounding area.
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
~. ,~~p /-q-o8
Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 8 of 8

\•: --'~°~°r°- -
~ t ooc w¢n average depths of less than 1 foot or
~
\ '' I with drainage areas less than 1 square mile;
~
d
an
areas protected by levees from 100-year

/• flood.
. ~ OTHER AREAS

20NE X Areas determined to be outside 500-year flood
-
plain.
ZONED Areas in which flood hazards are undeter-
mined.
UNDEVELOPED COASTAL BARRIERS[

~ Otherwise
d
••
` I
entified Identified
Protected Areas
' '
\ . ,• 1963 1990 Or later
Identified

I 1991 or Later
oastal barrier areas are normally located within or adjacent to special flood
LEGEND
SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREAS INUNDATED
' ~ BY 100-YEAR FLOOD
~
~ ZONE A No base flood elevations determined.
/
~\ ~• ZONE AE Base flood elevations determined.
(~ •'\
' 20NE AH Flood depths of 1 to 3 feet (usually areas of
f
'\ ponding); base flood elevations determined.
1 ZONE AO Flood depths of 1 to 3 feet (usually sheer flow
~ on sloping terrain); average depths deter-
mined. for areas of alluvial fan flooding;
i velocities also determined.
I ZONE A99 Tc be protected from 100-year flood by
Federal flood protection system under con-
struction; no base flood elevations deter-
- ~ mined.
ZONE V Coastal flood with velocity hazard (wave
action); no base flood elevations determined.
ZONE VE Coastal flood with velocity hazard (wave
/ action); base flood elevations determined.

. FLOODWAY AREAS IN ZONE AE
~
~. /••~"'~' ~ OTHER FLOOD AREAS
/ /• ZONE X Areas of 500-year flood; areas of 100-year
flood with average depths of less than 1 foot or
~ with drainage areas less than 1 square mile;
and areas protected by levees from 100-year
flood.
1537 a OTHER AREAS
ZONE X Areas determined to be outside 500-year0ood-
plain.
ZONEA •~
~
ZONED Areas in which flnud hazards are undeter-
•" mined.
~
~ UNDEVELOPED COASTAL BARRIERS[
~
~ ~~ ~ ~
/
Sf t nlv•~.~„•
Identified hlonlili°~I I'rutrr h•d An•.i.
1983 _ I`r'hl ur Ldrr IJrni~iu~l
Thrrd Creek / I'''' I ..r L.ih•r
[Coastal barrier areas are normally located within or adjacent to special flood
j '
/~I hazard areas.
j • // Floudplain Boundary
Floodwav Boundary
:~ - - Lone D Boundary
/
•
'~

•
~
-I '~` Boundary DividinK Special Flood Hazard
~
~ . Zones, and Bowulary Dividing Areas of Dif-
ferent Coastal Basc Flood Elevations Within
Special Flood Hazard Zones.
/~' 513 Base Flood Elevation Linn, Elevation in Feet`
•` ~ ~D1 Cross Section Line
/
IEL 987) Base flood Elevation in Feet Where Uniform
/ ~ Within Zone'
• -~ '~
: RM 7x Elevation Reference Mark
~
•
~' •M 1.5 River Mile

v ,
IiA
a
O
U
A
/~A
V\
BAI. •2 ~ AR SPACE SET IN BASE
BF 70'DAA. 54/.82'RIGNT OF
Si0. 20T73.73 -1-, ELEV. = B94.IB.

[ BRIDGE 6
F SORYEY-L
70 SR 1534
_ ISR 1577 (MIRACLE FARN R0. A017_ _ _
19~~ 20a00
I7o
920
910
900
890
880
eta
B6a
850
810
e7D
~T$
WI
~'
I-
SR 1536
III
T8
I POT STA. 21x77.69 -L-
POT STA. IS~05.34 -Y-
I~[ SLAVEY -Y-
I
SA 1537
IsiwuL
tu.w 21100 2150 21177.89
PROFILE ALONG ~ SURVEY
SCALE: I'= 20'
TIE prNTln s PIP Rw ro ff D.lo Fm Nlu eE TIE xclGl
I+Ae s of Tus~ w~ ¢acc of PIP PaP ww ws ~.
Ncoa~rnxTEO o TIE coaElm aU N TIID Nwc TE RIP
P,v wu ff LEnsA;n ar eEINC IEIOED .was w anrlFlm
ring vwwv wllu~~wlo ~~wiNli~ml+m~u,7 wlr
Q PFA TW
www PIP R,w aiw II Iz -o Tllloxl FILTw FNSNc
E70 BTNI w). I IsD Tab Iao SQYfE vNiS
Nan.ETn b ~ IDa Toc uo sarrE vxra~
Tors m Tob ~T sa+vE v.Tas
2 PILES FOR EIO ®1f M 1 9VLL tE OPIx4N TO A NwIYw ffMl'L
LM/Cltt 6 LS Tab Excel
MIEN fAIVIEL PILE; TIE uall LLl.1 ~W mN! SNe11 MOTE Ems,
a PILES xT ~®.n ro ~ff mlwl ro Fel ELEVArIw ro NIOEn
1wN EL FT. M'O 11E ff IFL CMxCItt D= a5 Tab Es9a
s TIE rmn wlT lCla ELCVSrIw FTn Fanloar b z I ¢.. ssco Fr. TIE
~ wlTlrx ELEVxrlw Is rTn ua [. wlNwxvg ForaT; To In.ITw
a,: sau PP ass v+PC TIE LIFE or TIE sTwa-nrE.
6. liE t[pIIiFD EMIW CM•.Cltt 4<TIE 91REM FWTIEG nT aHRxEM
P0. 2 Tff. TIE R]}TIwD BEMINi C.:PxCltt YVII fE xEHIi LED.
~ m lli Ta irw¢sw~rwrl~w ro NIDE~w Tlw slPU~wlw ~ xroE',
s F~Irs •TNisnx~in In i saal ~ NErm wr IEasT s IroES InrD
rlTl. lu, TIIIGrES As sow w TIE P-Nb.
~. w anlro rmn wO1ECf iw awl EE IEwIrEn nT N[mETrr lu z
RIP PTV sMLL IoT DE PLnan No.E ,re sTPrw LIEF.
la ~ S1FEL PILES BYI.L ~GILVFNI~ IN AaIIU.vaE NIM gCTIW t0
TIE 6fxNWEI FPECIFIGTIaE'. 21Ib STEEL vILE4
SFCI/a HiNISIaS Gkv
11. IDT SEO Fw YFM N12
Iz DELIIEwroRS w DnwIEP wIL ro w sTFa DExN arTalulL D.xl
Nu® TIE PPItF DIO FDI STFFL EE ay~UP It..
A ~EmEw DoE IEaES LoJ,rlw
DESCRIPTION DF E%ISTINL Bfl10GF I '
1 SPAN Y 10'-6; 2'ASPHILI NEARING SDRFACE ON 2xID ANO 3x8 TIMBER ,^~
ON I-BEMIS; END BENTS CONSIST IX 1IY8ER CApS AND PILES MI LH iINdEN
BOLAMEADS; 19'-2'CLEAfl ROADMAY [IOTH.
PROJECT NO. 33504
COUNTY: IREDELL
STATION: 20 + 96.46
REPLACES BRIDGE NO. 95
[TATD3 OF /80WBN CRWOLB[A
®LEDDkWVP8L4098 ®ff HW&GO>8DC7194G 40®PO
[AL[IDM
GENERAL DRAWING
BRIDGE N0. 95 ON SR 1537
Q~N [ARO/.. OVER THIRD CREEK
°RSSyO~f'~ 30' CLEAR ROADWAY - 90° SKEW
N[EI[IONS
f •~.......•~ NO. [Y DA T[ MO. [Y DAT[ ~ r
J F. YON~°
B
PLAN
'iB833T S[AlE: 1'= 20'-0'
-0.9960'/. -0./%0~ ~ ~1
PYI STA _20125.00 -L- PYI STA. 21K0.00 -L-
EL. - 897.20' EL. = 896.58'
VC = 90.00' VC • 76.00'
GRADE DATA -L- GRADE DATA -L-

DOWEL LOCATION DETAIL
NOTE: ( OF DOeELS SHALL PATCH [ OF DO'MEL
MOLES IN COPED SLAB UNITS.
F]
TOP OF
DRAINS.
TXE
6'$OUAHE AWYIWJM OR
GALVANIZED STEEL WIRE 4 MESX
HARDWARE CLOTH OF COMMERCIAL
OUAUTY. ANCHOR FIRMLY TO
FILL FACE.
SECTION THRU ABUTMENT STEM VIEW Y-Y
NOTE
NO SEPARATE PAYMENT MILL BE MADE FOA FIRNISHING AND INSTALLING
THE PVC PLASTIC PIPE DRAINS, HARDWARE CLOTH AND FASTENERS,
iNE ENTIRE CO51 OF THIS NWY SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE UNIT
CONTRACT PRICE FOR TXE SEVERAL PAY ITEMS.
PIPE DRAIN DETAILS
--.PPRDxrunrE alsnwc
ID LINE
fUSS II
FILL FACE
APPRO%]Y1TF E%ISTING
•S7 STONE CRWND LINE
UNCLASSIFIED STRUCTURE E%CAVATION ------ -'----'- --- --'----
'
1 `TBY BAGGED STONE
B OZ
NON

CLASS II RTP PAP .
WOVEN
FILTER FABRIC
(SLOPE VARIES -
FROM 1'/hl TO 2:11 I•-6' LIMITS OF
FOUNDATION
ExfdYdTION
/
N
Ap'-E
`°I EXCAVATED
YATEAIAL
2'TO 6'SIZE
S
4
E s
_ ~
a
A

EXCAVATION AND EMBANKMENT AT ABUTMENT
NOTES FOR SUBSTRUCTURE SCOUR~CTIGN
SUBSTRUCTWE SCOIR PROTECTION SNALI BE PROYIOEO AS INDICATED
IN THE PLANS. THE Iwo i0 SI% INCH SIZE STIXVE SHALL BE PLACED
4F TEA FOOTING FORMWORK H45 BEEN REMOVED AND WHILE THE
EXCAVATION [S OEWATERED.
THE TNO TO SI% INCH SIZE SCDlNi PROTECTION SiplE SMALL BE HARD
AND DURABLE IN NATURE. NHILE NO SPECIFIC GRADATION IS REQUIRED
TIE VANIOUS SIZES W STONE SHALL BE REASONABLY EOWLLY
DISTRIBUTED NI THIN TIE REQUIRED SIZE RANGE. THE STOYff SHALL
BE ESSENTIALLY CUBICAL IN SHAPE.
THE COST OF TIE WORK INCLUDING THE TNO 10 SI% INCH SIZE STONE,
•TBIA BAGGED STONE MATERIALS, EOUIP11ENi, TOOLS. LABOR AND
INCIDENTALS NECESSARY i0 COMPLETE THE WORK SHALL BE INCLlAEO
IN THE LUMP SUN PRICE BID FOR PLACEMENT OF SUBSTAU(TURE.
CLASS II AIP RAP SMALL BE PAID FOR Ai THE UNIT PRICE BIO FOR
CLASS II AIP RAP PER TON LNCUSSIFIEO SiNICTLWE EXCAVATION
AND FgN10ATI0N E%CAYATION COSTS SMALL BE INCLUDED IN iNE
LUMP SUM PRICE fOfl EXCAVATION ANO EMBANKMcNT.
EXCAVATION AND EMBANKMENT AT WINGS
PROJECT NO. 33504
COUNTY: IREDELL
STATION: 20+96.46
REPLACES BRIDGE NO. 95 ',
84&Y8 OF PIO841N CAIIOUWA ~'.,
®IE~kW4 ML1@M4 ®IF 4N9 ro V0~®DW Y,E 41®W '~,
•uuN~
CAST-IN-PLACE
ABUTMENT N0. 2 i
ABUTMENT DETAILS
55' SPAN WITH APPROACH SLAB
30' CLEAR ROADWAY - 90° SKEW
,RO b~ASSOGU7E3, P.C. -
_
(.wr°InV Eyiunr AN YI w10MW
wr ~.x°Axcvorw ..,. No. n wAra xo. n oAr: 12~.
TO SCALE ,° .,d,,. ~ ~ - •-~
~~ 19

1
_ _-
-L-
P/Sto 14+50J8 Pl Sta 16+95_43 \~.
~ = 535!90 (RTJ ~ =2939'320 fATl
D = 3' 49 /10 D = 915 590
L = l467Y L = 3/835'
T = 73.9Y T = 16283'
R = 15LVA0' R = 6/5D0' /*F
\+~
S
BEG P
-L-
i
Bl-4 PWC S+a N6JE 6NBEL M[1pLSON oEu
oa aas ra icn
EOOtE -009]
w ~ ~.
a ~
era a z
a ~ NuNUU~Pi.~zrs~
0 yo ~\ ($p5 B9156-2 BL PINC
~ BY qNL Sia. N~21CUI
. ~
/~- U~\~ \
156 ~.f^'`\\\~ a
FFE
a
}------- ~B-41~6~
((~~ a '"~.
._______ ___ JMYY NAtk C01BS N1ID NFE e, .u
R ~ BEBECLA 000165 ~ ``\\p,~`GNq„/"' Y~ioBW
.___________ oa ac PG as C~,
ES~S p' ~ 0 i
a 9y / ~/~1 ./ _ 651FD e1U
a a me / ~~~ =aece = o~.m YCwim
~,p~ _0.0.0.JJJ E EP.p : NCOOL.OX
~ do ~, w~".
END PROJECT B-4156 / //!r~'~ay
-L- STA. 21+67.83
a
o~~'
a a -Y-
P! Sta 14+3838 P! 510 18+21517
.E(/~NE a / O = IZ 35 K)5 (LT/ ~ = 20'CO'CVO (LTl
~~OB". NK'.PwEU nrw D = 237' 262' D =TOY 4BB
L = 48!58' L = P84.49
r = z4Jn' T = I437Y
R 2JB359 R = 8ISD0'
-C- POT Z+7YB9 = r
/~ =i~c~N-"-%--
l
w L ~ I : I -Y- POC /5+0534
`~, /5
yiN~ i --
/
~ • ~- ~°'T ~' _ 1a
_ i„ _
i ~ ~ E - ~
\ I . I R7GA7' OF WAY AREA DAT.f
/

y
j
~
'/
•v
rNm
nmrmr oe+au wue
/
EpN~
~ .W~Y ENf
~
WY
x
/
.
O
~~~1e[u
/ /
/ ~ 0.YOE AONNEL ANO FFE y I I
I I W/~10 IF~EQ7!'C PNED C?GI
I
~
/ 0.opu e.ONWEL -L- PT IB+S!
' /
Od. M6 YF 105
/ j oa. i.e ru s5o ~N ~~MM'$i
/
~/ '
•
~ 4

L
~
E
Y ~e
~~
/ ~
dEROPEN
W.Ot;A
~~~ PL
e
61
g 09. iii
BEWN AWMJAGI SUB END A^PABA:H SUB
-r ror a~.x
PAVEMENT SCHEDULE
'
- - PC 15+33J0 I ~ m
I I C c- ror Ev.noo
-Y- +7 J '4
.
I
2 SURFACE COURSE.7YPE SF95A ~ ,%
-L- PT 15+29.48 a .
4BASE CWRSE.TYPE B25DB
~
m,,,_ ~ T
I
- ~ ., I ~ -
.I I
I I I~
)
fN7TH MATER/AL „~ ~ e~
I e

EXISTING PAVEMENT ',
~ .,I I
~ I
,/ SEWN BRIDGE ENO 6NIOGE
. I
I I "~"'~
-t- vm m.Garn
SKETCH 51lOWING ROABWAY~- ~ ~s~
!
E Y- i awou
:~
SS; £~I I
j
I
/N RELATION TO STRUCTURE
' ,
BN • 2
-L- STA 20+7333,54982' RT
RR SP1KE IN BASE OF 30'OAK
ELB9418

•N., ____-_ rw.uu
`"' TYPICAL SECTION

I '
i
f
I Y
? 3
i
k
ROADSIDE ENVIRONMBNTAL UNIT \~ ~ ~ ®l\ ~ ®~ (/ ~ ®~ " II ~ ~ ®~ IE //
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ` 11 ,I„~Jl 1'l`/ JLIL 1111 1111"'
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
wa~.c + ~ }_~_____ ______.
YOOY STANDARD SPECIFICATIANS ® 6fO ~D C$PS 64156-z BL Pac 5 n ~ 5=
~~ ' \ ~=-_~_ BY\ C Sia. Na2~i I = a ~ a ~ ~~ I t Q ~ OTC` ~
NOTES: ANY DEVIATION FROM OPTIONS GIVEN WILL `~ ~\\ d =. ~° I ' I ~/ / ~S
~I I m
REQUIRE PRIOR APPROVAL BY ENGINEER BEG P OJECT B-4156 .. ~~ ~- -o-~ ;,H ~K. ~ \ (J s - '; ~
-L~ 1 65.00 ~ '+x ~\\ i ~ END PROJECT B-4156 /
~~
ADDmoNU EROSION coNTROL DEncES MAr ~ fJ ~ \\ ~ N_ I -L- STA. 21 +67.83
NEED TO BE INSTALLED AS DIRECTED BY THE ~aa y
SI ~~GJ ~ a° .§ I I ~C
ENGINEER ~ G.9 MAIB ~ qb 5 I a op~ Q / -Y-
'~ ~, fi ° ~ " ' ~ ~ PI StD 14+3838 P/ Sta 18+2/90
NOTE: ~'ab ~ ~` Ltl6 .FLUwE Q / p = lz 3B'lOS f1T1 p = Z?00'OO1T lLTI
o = z.n'2Br D = ror4ss
UnU7E SPECIAL snLLING BASIN '+s~ .._ ~...,~. ` w~ 5 !f [ONC'.P,WEO PTLN
As mwNC BASIN wnEBE ArrueuLE. ew L. L =48158' L =284.49'
~ ~ ~ ~ ~-~ ~ ~ T = 24lT/' T I437Y
..~
BL-4 PINC Sta. IIH5.1T ' ~ S_-_ / R =218359' R B15DD'
~~:~~~ =vP=ro ~ 32g~ -1- POT 21+7199 +
~~-~~~ ~ ~ -Y- POC 15+0534 J t5
~`: i~
sA~~ ~
% /~/ ~ of x armu. .n -mr.....K ~ E l - . I /~
IXM' Y~p.pp~ •F~ .8
/ / ',~~. rt[aa SSI I I W/.9 (f.F(ll .PNED PTCN f/
w.,.~ // / / -L- FC 15+3310 I I ~ - -Y- +
^..~.:_
e:.
/// ~~j -L- PT /5+23.48 © _I ~: II 1; I $kd ~ Sam6u1
~ ~ ~~
/ /~/ .; : ,,/; ~ :I I I 1605.01 T.mP•r.n Silt F=°« .._.._._...__._ -
/ ~ w ~ ~ 1633.01 T...P•••n R..4 51c C6.°4 TTPe A_...
~~
'><~~
B~u • z
-L- 57A 20+7333.54492' Rf
RR SPIKE IN BASE a` 3G' OAK
EL8941B
o~
Tsa
s~, si9
~~~
mg
H
3
yyyyO
K
9 i
O ~
~_
N D
N ~
ri ~
is
~ °
K~
9
D
PLPN
s~~~
ag~~~
,•j
NOTE
STRUCTURAL STONE SHALL BE STONE FOR
EROSION CONTROL (CLASS "B") IWD SNALL BE
PAID FOR AT THE CONTRACT BID PRICE FOR <
"LUMP SW FOR EROSION CONTROL."
SEOIYENT CONTROL STONE SHALL BE N0. 5 ~
OR N0. 67 STONE AND SHALL BE PAID F
a
FOR AT THE CONTMCT BIO PRICE FOfl s
LL
"LUMP SUM FOR EROSION CONTROL." i V
W
a f.)
of
O J
O 4D
r LYt
6
~~ ~I Y/> CHNMEL }~ •tT s
rHi r
Y
a ~=
'
~ ~ t
r
I '"
d
B
SECTION B •~
W
6ECTION A-A ~
..Y
EROSION CONTROL PLAN AND
DETAILS ARE PROVIDED BY
THE NCDOT ROADSIDE
ENVIROMENTAL UNR
PROJECT NO. 33504
COUNTY: IREDELL
STATION: 20 + 96.46
REPLACES BRIDGE NO. 95
BTA82 OF MOYTY CAROLINA
®L40'AA4BfIlEN14 Off TWAPdBffOWYAB~ONI
MALMIBM
BRIDGE N0. 95 ON SR 1537
OVER THIRD CREEK
• ~ 6-
19

NCDOT
HAZARDOUS SPILL BASIN CHECKLIST
Division: 1 ?. County: TrPr1P11 Project ID:
River Basin: Yadkin Bridge No: Bridge #95 Replacement
Route: SR 1537 (Miracle Farm Road) Stream: Third Creek, Class C
Waters
Water Quality Criteria:
Yes No
Stream Crossing Blue Line On USGS r r
ORW r r
WSI r
WS II,III OR IV, Crossing Within O.Smi of W.S. Critical Area r ~
Roadway Criteria:
Route Designation-
Yes No
Arterial Urban >` r
Arterial Rural r r
Additional Site Information:
Yes No
Is a Hazardous Spill Basin Required? 1- ~
Criteria Based Upon NCDOT "Best Management Practices for the
Protection of Surface Waters" (March, 1997).

Bridge #95, SR 1537
(Miracle Farm Road)
Iredell County
~~-r~-
~~
~:
Bridge #95
Upstream
Downstream

r~:
..
~,.
.,;
t ,
~ r' \. ~
~-. ~-y f- t '~
~''~_f~
r 'w s~" ~
• I f /
~~ . t
~ Y
!`
y~ ~' ~ + ~. • ~ ~ ~ ,
ti t ~' ,'J {
s { r
., k .1 / r } J~ l ( 'off
•`~ f F 1!`yr ~ !F l~ ff
~ ,
i - I ~'
! v
• , 1
~~`~~~~ ;~.; ~ j Bridge #95
~~' ~~ ~ '~~~~..~~ Replacement .
9 -~~• 9
^ + `
~~,. ~ ~,^'.~ ~'~ ~ T . ~: ti .. ~ . ~~
~` - ,r
~... ~ _
'-.. .. 'may. ~ - ~- - ~
.r i ~ ,:
~ r),
1 ~ 111 5 \ 5 y ~4 (( ~' } t~~1'~. ~,'
} ~ ~, . ;,
+ 'fir ~' .-.+ tom, }ry ~ ~"~ 4..1^ t .. _
~f _ ~j ~ ~.'- _ _
F h.
T '- / f A
._ -r
f r
_ 1 i
~~•-_` ~
Name: STONY POINT Location: 035° 49' 57.0" N 081 ° 01' 38.73" W
Date: 1/7/2008 Caption: Bridge #95 Replacment, SR 1537 (Miracle Farm Road), Third
Scale: 1 inch equals 1000 feet Creek, Class C Waters, Yadkin River Basin
Copyright (C) 1998,