760010_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20240903

Division of Water Resources
Facility Number '"](I - I (� O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit: 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: ® Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: Zq Arrival Time: '. Departure Time: County:1PQ0MdD\ph Region: Vy�c"
Farm Name: W-AAina Owner Email:
Owner Name: ehlnl.s L)Q(m1no Phone: \p—qip?�-�Pc to
Mailing Address: 254W maY1ln� ChUy'On 4_d, 5L60nla , N C. 21�Gb
Physical Address: k� lar A V.A. lwkl i 0,, , N C_ 2-13Sa
Facility Contact: ChYiC K.zdo\no� Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: Certification Number: pd pyt h(�,IU�L
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35° ' !j � Longitude: -19 c %t a %
UPS 52&>7T-4D]P_­0zT+E-ae4} 10l jc CodarSure ®Ceda-f S%� 9r 9+1 Dog
® u.Ych V_d > ©bo�keY-Vevrm le-a
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish HNNLon-Layer
ayer DairyCow
Wean to Feeder Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder. Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish I Layers 113eef Stocker
Gilts 11 INon-Layers 113eef Feeder
Boars I Pullets I Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes '�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

913 MV
Facility Number: - C2 Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection&Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes JR(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: L
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in): Z"
Observed Freeboard(in):
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees, severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes RNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes SNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ANo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 5No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes E�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes 'E;�j No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes 5g�No ❑ NA 0 NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes _C�3,/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes tKNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? .2Uz� ❑ Yes 5
t o ❑ NA ❑ NE
-Waste Application Weekly Freeboard Waste Analysis oil Weather Code
nfall Stocking crop Yield ;120 Minute Inspections Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections 7'Sluddgge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? / \ ❑ Yes KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? [:] Yes [—] No %NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

-1/,3
Facility Number: -j - In Date of Ins ection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes'34'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yesr: No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below. `��
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes T<No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes ,P!J�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes XNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? imkn o tv
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes $No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes _No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No KNA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes >kNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes E;�J"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
2 I.csoi Is da 2024 ; hod&rt
24. C ckkt bru&on 6-uz 2_025
25•S Iudy Suwey c11�p 2 b2 3 �nn� ed; 1�Z�
Reviewer/Inspector Name: K�/�S y�� �`�((,� Phone: 3?j(p- 7LO—OV-0 7
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: R!Date: Z
Page 3 of 3 21412015