290021_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20240904

Division of Water Resources
Facility Number fcI - 1 Zi 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: *Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 1®Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: IFIAIA7 Arrival Time: 17' �wr� Departure Time: County*b\A Region:
Farm Name: ?_ed kyts -Ipqvm Owner Email:
Owner Name: V—e`(k �m\ r +tlA�`cb U�C) Phone: 33U-Z25-,2A4
Mailing Address: ZZ\ 3 bV Q'Y �A_aw Vd.IrAk&ODn NJ L 2j222-
Physical Address: a/
Facility Contact: Tp_U %MmMn Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: 4 Integrator:
Certified Operator: Nj�t_ Certification Number: N,
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35��}S� '3� Longitude: 0'1\y `-1% 21
CJZS 7 'f'oclA lanWOoc � O 7 �1 7�.� �V�d� �1prn2 7'7�WMchn
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder I INon-Layer I Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes �KNo RNA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made'? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes J;_eno ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes 5ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge? �\
Page 1 of 3 511212020 Continued

Faeili Number: 29 - Zil jDate of Inspection:
Waste Collection&Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes Y❑�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: %.paftzY
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in): LQ
Observed Freeboard(in): 09 Q 1, Q t-
5.Are there any immediate threats to h m grity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes XNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees, severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes XNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes JNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes '�;2/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [54 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): Lt)y'h `�`( a
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes X No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes LKNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes §�LNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes J,5�.,No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes 54/—No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes JgNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes ` <o ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box. �
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement?19yes,eheek4W appreprime b99t beiew. ❑ YesJb ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Waste Application �eekly Freeboard Waste Analysis �il Analysis ❑ww te�'Y�►sfers Weather Code
)S�Rainfall ❑Steeking ❑C d ❑i ia minette inspeetiens Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections ❑, JJydpje R irxzpy.
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes,�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No VNA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facilit Number: 74 - Date of Inspection: 01
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes ❑ No XNA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? [:] Yes [:] No `�NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes � No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues /��
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ❑ No �NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes "gNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes,check the appropriate box below. [:] Yes [:] No VNA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ><No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes 5<No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes _D5.Lo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question ft Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
1�.Cal�bvodtiun c'► . 7.�23. ,du�,o�a�x�, ZO7 .
b�\-A em,A\ AT wee CZWA).
� Cpnv�kd'� •p�'w\ -� cto�i�o�vv���rv�ayh� wtx-� �
1Z
Reviewer/Inspector Name: I&.�w`—Abwcm — Phone: 33U- 1U-%-9Pf7
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: J_ _ Date:
Page 3 of 3 511212020