790005_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20240812

40 Division of Water Resources
Facility Number - O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit: 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: f 2 2 Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name:--h&yme Owner Email:
Owner Name: d�ywx f Phone: 33U -432-`'1-J4-Le
Mailing Address: 1159 \Jmp NC Q-1 9DOLO
Physical Address: 21 ��►\fie Q2CdSvi�� CVC a1�J2D
Facility Contact: Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude: -1 C�° '4 2' -421
HZI 15w 3 ®Curlhin hwm a&7 D pa_x A(SK On©
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder HNon-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turke Poults
Other Other
DischarEes and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes `}�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: 7�
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) [] Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes -5�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes �4No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continued

[Facility Number: - Date of Inspection: 2—
Waste Collection&Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yeses V7���j No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 -Structure 6
Identifier: 'e
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in): 2kp"
Observed Freeboard(in): 1 " ()
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes 14No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes PNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes �5No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes 13�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes i5ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): r=Skau_
13. Soil Type(s):
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ;EgNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes 9No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes )Fzf No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes RrNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records &Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes XNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement?yes,cheek ho appre. i afe hn,r Jaclow ❑ Yes P<No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Ste Application Oweekly Freeboard ste Analysis ❑Sei1 AT&Aycis ❑Vltste�ransfers Weather Code
ainfall `Stocking ❑Crop Yield El1 Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes XNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No XNA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facilit Number: - Date of Inspection: 1 2. 2
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes -J:�(N o ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes � o ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes ❑`No IE3:IyA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ❑ No 5�NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? ��\\
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes �2� ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e.,discharge, freeboard problems,over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No J�IA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes �JNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes Jallo ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes J D o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
21. 'SOA &0 20-2-6 .
24. (x1►bM'M dW 2025.
� �lect�►Y1q�.�"e�7 tbo��reo,�c
�nreA '2e)(v
-ev\\\,e wNNwv"}Y` �uw Ike h�_�
0"0
Ir; IjGI
Reviewer/Inspector Name: 1LY1����CS�V�p�( Phone: 33D-11 LP-909-1
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: �� Date: 12-12T
Page 3 of 3 21412015