Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNC0021504_Inspection_20140923Aja NCDENR North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Pat McCrory Governor September 23, 2014 Sam Stewart Town of Biscoe PO Box 1228 Biscoe NC 272091228 SUBJECT: 9/12/2014 Compliance Evaluation Inspection Town of Biscoe Biscoe WWTP Permit No: NCO021504 Montgomery County Dear Mr. Stewart: John Skvarla Secretary Enclosed please find a copy of the Compliance Evaluation Inspection form from the inspection conducted on 9/12/2014. The Compliance Evaluation Inspection was conducted by Tony W Honeycutt of the Fayetteville Regional Office. The facility was found to be in Compliance with permit NC0021504. Please refer to the enclosed inspection report for additional observations and comments. If you or your, staff have any questions, please call me at (910) 433-3339. Sincerely, Tony W Ho eccutt Environmental 'Specialist NCDENR Division of Water Resources Water Quality Regional operations Section cc: Sammy Ray'Stewart, ORC ,Cent rt F 'les f�ayetteville Ekes; Water Quality Program - 225 Green St., Ste. 714 Fayetteville, North Carolina 28301-5095 Phone: 910433-33001 FAX: 910486-07071 Customer Service:1-877-623-6748 An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer i'o United States Environmental Protection Agency Form Approved. EPA Washington, D.C. 20460 OMB No. 2040-0057 Water Compliance Inspection Report Approval expires 8-31-98 Section A: National Data System Coding (i.e., PCS) Transaction Code NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type Inspector . Fac Type 1. IN i 2 15 1 3 I NCO021504 111 12 14/09/12 17 18 Lci 19 I G I 201 21111111 III.IIII1IIIIIIIIII11IIIII IIIIIIIIIII r6 Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating B1 CIA — Reserved 72 L�J ] 73174 751 I I I. I I 80 67 70 jLJ 71 [LJ Section B: Facility Data Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW, also include Entry Time/Date Permit Effective Date POTW-name and NPDES hermit Number) 09:OOAM 14/09/12 14/09/01 Biscoe WWTP Exit Time/Date Permit Expiration Date Off NCSR 1556 01:30PM 14/09/12 19/06/30 Biscoe, NC 27209 Name(s) of Onsite Representative(s)/TiVes(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s) Other Facility Data Sammy Ray Stewart/ORC/910-428-4112/ Name, Address of Responsible Official/Tifle/Phone and Fax Number Contacted Sam Stewart,PO Box 1228 Biscoe NC 272091228//910-428-4112/9104283975 No Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated) Permit Flow'Measurement Operations & Maintenance Records/Reports M.Sludge Handling Disposal M Facility Site Review M Effluent/Receiving Waters Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary) (See attachment summary) Name(s) and Signature(s) of Inspector(s) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date Tony W Honeycutt FRO 6W//910-433-3339/ Signature Management Q A Reviewer Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers "Date B in 11 nison . F WQ#910-433-3300 Ext.72E �_ aL�_ Iq EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete. " Page# NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type 1 31 NCO021504 1 11 12 14/09/12 17 18 I C 1 Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary) The facility was clean and neat in appearance. Records, log books and lab reports were present and in acceptable shape. It is recommended that you have the crack in the digester addressed as note in the previous inspection report. As a reminder, please perform all laboatory calibration curves and temperature correction as required. Page# 2 v Permit: NCO021504 Owner -Facility: BiscoeWWTP Inspection Date: 09/12/2014 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Operations & Maintenance Yes No.' NA NE. Is the plant generally clean with acceptable housekeeping? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ Does the facility analyze process control parameters, for ex: MLSS, MCRT, Settleable 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Solids, pH, DO, Sludge Judge, and other that are applicable? Comment: Permit Yes No NA NE (If the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new M ❑ ❑ ❑• application? Is the facility as described in the permit? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ # Are there any special conditions for the permit? ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Is access to the plant site restricted to the general. public? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection? 0 ❑ , ❑ ❑ Comment: Record Keeoing Yes No NA NE Are records kept and maintained,as'required by the permit? M ❑ ❑ ❑ Is all required information readily available, complete and current? M ❑ ❑ ❑ Are all records maintained for 3 years (lab. reg. required 5 years)? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Are analytical results consistent with data reported on DMRs? ❑ 0 ❑ Is the chain -of -custody complete? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Dates, times and location of sampling Name of individual performing the sampling Results of analysis and calibration Dates of analysis Name of person performing analyses Transported COCs Are DMRs complete: do they include all permit parameters? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Has the facility submitted its annual compliance report to users and DWQ? M ❑ ❑ ❑ (If the facility is = or > 5 MGD permitted flow) Do they operate 24/7 with a certified operator ❑ El ® ❑ on each shift? Is the ORC visitation log available and current? M ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the ORC certified at grade equal to or higher than the facility classification? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the backup operator certified at one grade less or greater than the facility classification? M ❑ ❑ ❑ Is a copy of the current NPDES permit available on site? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Page# 3 Permit: NC0021504 Owner - Facility: Biscoe WWTP Inspection Date: 09/12/2014 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Record Keeping Yes No NA NE Facility has copy of previous year's Annual Report on file for review? ❑ ❑ ❑ Comment: Effluent Pipe Yes No NA NE Is right of way to the outfall properly maintained? ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Are the receiving water free of foam other than trace amounts and other debris? ❑ ❑ ❑ If effluent (diffuser pipes are required) are they operating properly? ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Comment: Flow Measurement - Influent Yes No NA NE # Is flow meter used for reporting? ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Is flow meter calibrated annually? ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the flow meter operational? ® ❑ ❑ ❑ (If units are separated) Does the chart recorder match the flow meter? ❑ '❑ ® ❑ Comment: Drying Beds Yes No NA NE Is there adequate drying bed space? M ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the sludge distribution on drying beds appropriate? ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Are the drying beds free of vegetation? ® ❑ ❑ ❑ # Is the site free of dry sludge remaining in beds? ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the site free of stockpiled sludge? ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the filtrate from sludge drying beds returned to the front of the plant? ❑ ❑ ❑ # Is the sludge disposed of through county landfill? ® ❑ ❑ '❑ # Is the sludge land applied? ❑ ❑ N ❑ (Vacuum filters) Is polymer mixing adequate? ❑ ❑ N ❑ Comment: Bar Screens Yes No NA NE Type of bar screen a.Manual b.Mechanical ❑ Are the bars adequately screening debris? ❑ ❑ ❑ Page# 4 Permit; NCO021504 Owner - Facility: Biscoe WWTP Inspection Date: 09/12/2014 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Bar Screens Yes No NA NE - Is the screen free of excessive debris? ❑ ❑ ❑ Is disposal of screening in compliance? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the unit in good condition? ■ .❑ ❑ ❑ Comment: New bar screen with more narrow spacing is in the works. Secondary Clarifier Yes No NA NE Is the clarifier free of black and odorous wastewater? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the site free of excessive buildup of solids in center well of circular clarifier? ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Are weirs level? M ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the site free of weir blockage? ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the site free of evidence of short-circuiting? N ❑ ❑ ❑ Is scum removal adequate? • ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the site free of excessive floating sludge? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the drive unit operational? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ . Is the return rate acceptable (low turbulence)? ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Is the overflow clear of excessive solids/pin floc? M ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the sludge blanket level acceptable? (Approximately '/< of the sidewall depth) ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 Comment: Aeration Basins Yes No NA NE Mode of operation Ext. Air . Type of aeration system Surface Is the basin free of dead spots? ❑ ❑ ❑ Are surface aerators and mixers operational? N ❑ ❑ ❑ Are the diffusers operational? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ Is the foam the proper color for the treatment process? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Does the foam cover less than 25% of the basin's surface? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the DO level acceptable? M ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the DO level acceptable?(1.0 to 3.0 mg/1) M ❑ ❑ ❑ Comment: Disinfection -Gas Yes No NA NE Are cylinders secured adequately? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Page# 5 Jk Permit: NCO021504 Inspection Date: 09/12/2014 Owner - Facility: Biscoe WWTP Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Disinfection -Gas Are cylinders protected from direct sunlight? Is there adequate reserve supply of disinfectant? Is the level of chlorine residual acceptable? Is the contact chamber free of growth, or sludge buildup? Is there chlorine residual prior to de -chlorination? Does the Stationary Source have more than 2500 Ibs of Chlorine (CAS No. 7782-50-5)? If yes, then is there a Risk Management Plan on site? If yes, then what is the EPA twelve digit ID Number? (1 000--_) If yes, then when was the RMP last updated? Yes No NA NE ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ N ❑ ❑ ❑ E ❑ Comment: The contact had some build-up of material. The ORC was planning to clean the structure after the inspection visit. Aerobic Digester Yes No NA NE Is the capacity adequate? ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Is the mixing adequate? ❑ ❑ N ❑ Is the site free of excessive foaming in the tank? ❑ ` ❑' N ❑ # Is the odor acceptable? ® ❑ ❑ ❑ # Is tankage available for properly waste sludge? ® ❑ ❑ ❑ Comment: The crack in the outer structure of the digester noted in the last inspection has vet to be addressed. Page# 6