410019_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20240724

Division of Water Resources
Facility Number ® - ® 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: r112 Arrival Time: Departure Time: IC� County Region:wwz
Farm Name:�� ����� t(m Owner Email: Sm14� A\CR)Nr1V)CX)_fa-xY,
Owner Name: ( '��[ �` Phone: 33\p —�4�1-1¢32a
Mailing Address: t p9ACo NC,\,\j\N W �1 ; bL\h%0nV k\\e t\3 C Z'1)Q
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: �\�\\(' ��Ql� Title: �j�p,�q(�Qr Phone: 3-JU 161U- k1256
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: Certification Number: U hYS)Q�I \1131j2/*
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Qu 1 u` \5" Longitude:
®> ourmohO
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder HNon-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow 2p
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity _Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
III Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes '\EZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system'?(If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes 'ER—No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 511212020 Continued

Facility Number: - \0k Date of Inspection: '[
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes I%LNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: UWW Vk\W
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in):
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes jbgrNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes IS::ZIo ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ YesIo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement? T
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement? \�4
11.Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s): hp c�ela 0
13. Soil Type(s):
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAW MP? ❑ Yes 'Wlo ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes r2KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes Jallo ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes MNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
T—
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes '-ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑_Yeso ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement? _ ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
aste Application Weekly Freeboard Waste Analysis Sail Analysis Meather Code
-JZRainfall ❑trzJd _❑Crop Yield ❑ u e nspec ions Mont y an 1"Rainfall Inspections ❑shift e£�
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes �❑ No '5�[NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 214120I5 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes
'*'�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes n NoNA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes �❑ N_oNA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ❑ No `� NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? �'`�
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes 'o-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes gNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e..discharge, freeboard problems,over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [:] No ;KNA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes JZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes U]No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes FZf No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question ft Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
21•�6ki dk. 2o2M.D �l reedy vv dam.', �1c RSVP
,i A-• Ca��brahun d� 2�2�
Reviewer/Inspector Name: 1f�� �p Phone: 3&--V U—gLpq:j
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: N Date: -7/��'
Page 3 of'3 511212020