760038_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20240722

Division of Water Resources
Facility Number - F_5Cb__1 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: *Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: ®Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: 122 24 1 Arrival Time: 2'.(� �I� Departure Time: County: Region: VA3S"
Farm Name: 1�f_In"s �> �f Owner Email:
Owner Name: eJ)MY- 6n �n�jah ��� Phone: 33 La - (619 - 5195
Mailing Address: 3w�(j uen-tn Ed� �G�ppw� �1C 272arj
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: lsdab�j Nien Title: %&gno, 'Ur Phone: 33Le - 3UZ-oOZp1
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: Certification Number: 1 J Q4
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: ICj�i Longitude:
�+ %)>QS �Iwy��>�Nwy �3 K�mp'M��t►2d-�®N\,Od M��t pel Qu ►n gad
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow - "i
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of'3 511212020 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection&Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: wr,.Ip 'tjr'14
Spillway?: J
Designed Freeboard(in): 24(
Observed Freeboard(in): i %I
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes �<No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees, severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes 14No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes kNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes Nor ❑ N A ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes j2fNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes JNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window rreett❑'.__Evidenc}e,�o�f,Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s): 1 -0�% C. 1 UtX r. C�li�h� l i"1 ag
13. Soil Type(s):
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes' ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes JNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes Wo ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes so No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes �jNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes P.
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Waste Application eekly Freeboard O Waste Analysis ❑S6Majsis ❑*4AW Trans rc �eather Code
3 Rainfall �ocking rop Yield 120 Minute Inspections Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑ No `%NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ONA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facilit Number: - Date of Inspection: 1
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes QrNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes 7❑ No �NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a PDA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? Yes '*&rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes allo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ONE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? r nA&1,
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes 12rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes JZio ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes,check the appropriate box below. [:] Yes [:] No OA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? Yes $No ❑ NA ❑NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? [:] Yes `Ea No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? [:] Yes RNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
21.S6 &Kk 2024-. .
24. Calibmiiun &Kxk 2024 c q\e d I,k5�2A &)g
41 21 1 2
Reviewer/Inspector Name: 'Sky)RU L _ _ Phone: 33U_ 0-atjq I
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: _ # Date: JZZ�7f�
Page 3 of 3 511212020