760059_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20240722

Division of Water Resources
Facility Number - ® 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: e Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:13 12 2-12± 1 Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: 00"y e LLC_ Owner Email:
Owner Name:"t?ja jYp0.�= Cnkiycne Phone: 33W—
Mailing Address: -12.301 IYanSbo Mi I I YLd l k POW)k 11 o(den, hI C 2'131.3
Physical Address: Q_%4- 2,(OdL1(h Q( ,�IQab$a* fiQrdar). W_ 21313
Facility Contact: -Ni Title: WiJ(� Phone: 33U-2_15-14G1
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: Certification Number: uQ�)Yomj 1�
Back-up Operator: Certification Number: j�1nrS bV Z,3�
Location of Farm: Latitude: ]° S,j' 5s " Longitude: -1°l D ` Q ' 32"
M 220 1D > Level Cwss '2d,©_&xrvbx„-,QA,
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish ILayer I I Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder Non-La er Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish 'Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow 1 p
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other HOther
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes'J�U No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes"RNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes ER'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facili Number: - q 1 jDate of Inspection: 2-U Z
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?: J ✓
Designed Freeboard(in): " au ll 32''
Observed Freeboard(in): I U
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees, severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes `{ o ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan? �]"�
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ANo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ';2�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s): Ohrr.,c-W,1 D YYArA
13. Soil Type(s):
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ANo ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes tS�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes `WNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes 9"
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes;'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?19ye sheek the -iaw bo h_ iQ .c9oa4 ❑ Yes�NNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
`Waste Application Weekly Freeboard �aste Analysis ❑Soil Analysis ❑� a�� .�s Weather Code
Jaipfall `Stocking'-rop Yield�1 O Minute Inspections Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections ❑ y
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes `5g,N o ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No XNA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: - cSq I jDate of Inspection: 1 ZZ
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes %No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check [—] Yes [] No )KNA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes E}No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? L"11 P�
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes `E2�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 11
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems, over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No �A ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ',&2rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
21• �i Is duQ 2 az4. 1S11
Z�. C'alil�ra�icv� c�.e 2e�24.
32 ? M~,11;e`s v�`��L�Vla�" r 03L� �; ,4�N� wk,cos
-ko Vlaxl )C.►l ca �nrti SOW on >'ro
1 n (�•�,7L�
Reviewer/Inspector Name: l�r�S�e�t�ra- Phone: 331 p-771l—owg1
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: �� Date: -1122)
Page 3 of 3 511212020