760011_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20240724

Division of Water Resources
Facility Number ® - 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: 1 2r� t}� Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: s nk_',� ZAM Owner Email:
Owner Name: r�- aQSaer Phone: 33(e-Lelc1 -4L
�j
Mailing Address: Calv*vv Q=aWjXk111. NC, 213Ue
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: 11"_Y)t ape j( Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude:3bP 4p' 30" Longitude: lot ° ';�614-1
\)S IA" 421d NC,�kvij qo�(D 7 O Wrg\M- CW" fla.
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder I INon-Layer I I I Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry . Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Pouets
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) 0 Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ]KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes -E '*o ❑ NA 0 NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 511212020 Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection: "1
Waste Collection&Treatment X�o
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ N E
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ N E
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in):
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ` XNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes XNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes JZ'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes Ej_No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes D'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s): mJ1 A%j f
13. Soil Type(s):
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes Wo ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes RNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes f�(No �A ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes [ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ®'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes 5;]�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?I—Lya",ahelgl +wo,...,gQPr., ❑ Yes'�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Waste Application (Weekly Freeboard � ��&_ ❑V�nst ers- Weather Code
5`�1
`Rainfall r4stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑1 ' s Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑S�ce
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes \JZ(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23.If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No XNA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection: '(
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ;B:!�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes b"�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes -$Zl No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No F;eNA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ❑ No %NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes *No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems, over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No �NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes �ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes qZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
z1. 86j1s QW 2_025
�
CcObdhov)v►) nexA vibe •�,�� �aa� �'m010 rt
a <�wt 4 W �\k Cj t,'\rem,
t� U*o(\C,\muveS In pvooytss
Reviewer/Inspector Name: ur�S n�o Phone: 331R--VLP-gUV
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 11,7
Page 3 of 3 511212020