20081031 Ver 2_24006169A Pre-Construction Notification - Goodwin Crossing_20240708

Pre -Construction Notification
Goodwin Crossing; USACE Action ID: SAW-2019-01521
Colliers Engineering & Design Project Number: 24006169A
July 8, 2024
Prepared for:
Eagle Land, LLC
3700 Computer Drive, Suite 280
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
Prepared by:
Colliers Engineering & Design, Inc. (DBA Maser Consulting)
2000 Regency Parkway
Suite 295
Cary, NC 27518
Main: 919-439-6082
Colliersengineering.com
Colliers
Engineering
& Design
Accelerating success.

Engineering
& Design
Table of Contents
1.0 PROJECT INFORMATION................................................................... 2
2.0 PROJECT HISTORY & EXISTING CONDITIONS ..................................................
3
3.0 PROPOSED PROJECT.......................................................................
4
3.1 Purpose & Need...........................................................................
4
3.2 Alternatives Analysis........................................................................
4
3.2.1 No Action Alternative.............................................................................
4
3.2.2 Alternative Examination...........................................................................
5
3.3 Preferred Alternative (Proposed Project)........................................................
5
3.3.1 Proposed lmpocts................................................................................
6
3.4 Avoidance & Minimization....................................................................
9
4.0 SUPPORTING PROJECT INFORMATION......................................................
11
4.1 Stormwater Management...................................................................
11
4.1.1 Planned Erosion and Sedimentation Control Practices ...............................................
77
4.1.2 Stormwater Design..............................................................................
11
4.2 Threatened & Endangered Species...........................................................
11
4.3 Cultural Resources........................................................................
12
4.4 Flood Zone Designation....................................................................
12
5.0 MITIGATION.............................................................................
14
APPENDIX A -PCN FORM & AGENT AUTHORIZATION
APPENDIX B -ISSUED PJD SAW-2019-01521 AND BUFFER DETERMINATIONS
APPENDIX C -PJD REQUEST FOR OFFSITE SANITARY SEWER
APPENDIX D -SANITARY SEWER APPLICATION ALTERNATIVE REQUEST/ANALYSIS
APPENDIX E -IMPACT EXHIBITS
APPENDIX F -SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
Pre -Construction Notification I July 8, 2024 2 1 2
Goodwin Crossing; USACE Action ID: SAW-2019-01521

Engineering
& Design
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
On behalf of Eagle Land, LLC, Colliers Engineering & Design, Inc. (DBA Maser Consulting) (CED) is submitting
a Preconstruction Notification (PCN) for Nationwide Permit (NWP) 29 and an Individual 401 Water Quality
Certification associated with the construction of the Goodwin Crossing and offsite sewer alignment
project located at 1301 Goodwin Road in Durham, North Carolina within Durham County (hereinafter referred
to as "Proposed Project"). In addition, we are requesting authorization of the Proposed Project under the Neuse
River Buffer Rules.
The objective of the Proposed Project is to construct an affordable and family friendly residential subdivision
with community cohesion and the necessary amenities north of the City of Durham that is designed to provide
needed housing that services the economically expanding Durham County area. The Proposed Project is located
on the south and north sides of Goodwin Road. The Proposed Project also includes an offsite sewer alignment
that extends east and a crosses a wetland/floodplain complex associated with Cabin Branch.
A total of 0.019-acres (110.2 linear feet) of jurisdictional Waters of the U.S. (WOUS) will be permanently impacted
by the Proposed Project associated with a road crossing located on within the southern section. Of the
0.019-acres of permanent jurisdictional WOUS impacts, 0.016-acres (92.1 linear feet) is associated with
construction of a culvert (i.e. permanent impact) and 0.003-acres (18.1 linear feet) is associated with the
placement of rip -rap that will be embedded at the existing stream bed elevation (i.e. permanent - no loss).
Construction of the road crossing will require 0.001-acres (7.5 linear feet) of temporary jurisdictional WOUS
impacts (i.e. workload - causeway). In addition, there will be a total of 0.43-acres of forested wetland impacts
associated with a 30-foot maintained sewer easement located within the northeastern section of the Proposed
Project. These forested wetland impacts are considered temporary; however, these impacts will permanently
convert the wetlands from forested to emergent wetland conditions (i.e. temporary/permanent
conversion). Additional impacts to Waters of the U.S. and wetlands are not proposed. Neuse River Buffer
impacts are also proposed as part of the road crossing and offsite sewer alignment.
The proposed Goodwin Crossing and offsite sewer alignment is a single and complete project with appropriate
land use control measures in place for specific areas which require them. Impacts to jurisdictional features have
been avoided and minimized to the maximum extent practicable by incorporating resourceful site planning,
including the utilization of the wetland delineation to adjust the layout to avoid and minimize impacts. The
proposed impacts are the result of the necessary infrastructure and facility layout, without which, the project's
goals would not be achieved.
To compensate for unavoidable impacts to wetlands, the Applicant proposes purchasing credits from Clearwater
Mitigation Solutions in the amount of 0.43 Wetland Mitigation Units (WMU) to satisfy the Proposed Project's
compensatory mitigation obligations. A Statement of Availability letter (Appendix F) dated June 20, 2024 for
wetland credits is provided by Clearwater Mitigation Solutions.
Pre -Construction Notification I July 8, 2024 1 1 36
Goodwin Crossing; USACE Action ID: SAW-2019-01521

Engineering
& Design
1.0 PROJECT INFORMATION
Project Name
Goodwin Crossing
Project Location
1301 Goodwin Road, Durham, NC
County: Durham
Nearest Municipality: City of Durham
Latitude/Longitude
36.093963/-78.881459
Project Size
+/- 82-acres
River Basin (HUC) & sub -watershed
8 Digit Hydrologic Units: 03020201; Neuse River Basin
Sub-watershed(s): Mountain Creek -Little River
Located in Watershed Protection Overlay District F/J-B
Nearest Stream (onsite / offsite)
Cabin Branch; Cabin Branch has a Stream index number of
27-2-21-7 and a Stream Classification of WS-IV (Water Supply
Watershed IV), and Nutrient Sensitive Waters NSW
Applicant
Eagle Land, LLC
3700 Computer Drive, Suite 280
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
Attention: Anderson Marlowe
[phone]
Marlowebuilders1 @gmail.com
Agent
Colliers Engineering & Design, Inc. (CED)
2000 Regency Parkway, Suite 295
Cary, NC 27518
Attention: George Buchholz
919-475-3874
[e-mail]
Pre -Construction Notification I July 8, 2024 2 1 36
Goodwin Crossing; USACE Action ID: SAW-2019-01521

Engineering
& Design
2.0 PROJECT HISTORY & EXISTING CONDITIONS
The Proposed Project consists of three (3) parcels of land that are associated with this PCN. Durham County
Parcel Information Numbers (PIN) 0835534274 and 0835429030 comprise the residential subdivision. The
offsite sanitary sewer crossing is located on PIN 0835728668 where it crosses Cabin Branch. The study area
for the Proposed Project is approximately 82-acres in size and located at latitudinal coordinates 36.093963
and longitudinal coordinates-78.881459. The Proposed Project is located approximately 6.5-miles north of
downtown Durham.
The Proposed Project contains two (2) major habitat community types: Maintained/Disturbed Areas and
Forested Areas. The Maintained/Disturbed Areas have had past, intermittent, and/or regular maintenance
activities. The Forested Areas can be broken down into two (2) habitat community types, and they are as
follows: Dry-Mesic Oak -Hickory Forest and Wetland Areas. The Dry-Mesic Oak -Hickory Forest Areas are
non -wetland areas and are the dominant habitat community type within the Proposed Project. The Dry-Mesic
Oak -Hickory Forest Areas are dominated by white oak (Quercus alba), red oak (Quercus rubra), pignut hickory
(Carya glabra), and tulip poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera) species. Other notable species observed within this
community include American beech (Fagus grandifolia), red maple (Acer rubrum), Hophornbeam (Ostrya
virginiana), sweet gum (Liquidambar styraciflua), loblolly pine (Pinus taeda), American holly (Ilex opaca), eastern
red cedar Uuniperus virginiana), common greenbrier (Smilax rotundifolia), and Christmas fern (Polystichum
acrostichoides). There are Wetland Areas within the Proposed Project that can be described as the following two
(2) wetland types: Headwater Wetlands and Bottomland Hardwood Forested Wetlands.
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) issued a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) on September
16, 2019 (USACE Action Id.: SAW-2019-01521) for the Goodwin Crossing residential development located on
Durham County PINS 0835534274 and 0835429030 (Appendix B). On February 9, 2024, CED conducted field
investigations to identify potential jurisdictional Waters of the U.S. (WOTUS) and wetlands subject to Federal or
State regulatory jurisdiction within the proposed study area of offsite sanitary sewer for the Goodwin Crossing
residential development. A total of 2.68 acres of wetland and 276 feet of stream were delineated within the
study area by CED on February 9, 2024. It is CED's professional opinion that the wetland and stream
features within the study area of offsite sanitary sewer would be considered jurisdictional WOTUS and wetlands.
A PJD request package for the Goodwin Crossing Offsite Sanitary Sewer is attached in Appendix C.
The North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality - Division of Water Resources (NC DWR) issued a
Buffer Determination Letter (RRO #19-112) on March, 2019 for the Goodwin Crossing residential development
located on Durham County PINS 0835534274 and 0835429030 (Appendix B). NC DWR issued an updated Buffer
Determination Letter (DWR Project 24-186) on June 25, 2024 for the Goodwin Crossing residential development
located on Durham County PINS 0835534274 and 0835429030 (Appendix B). NC DWR issued a Buffer
Determination Letter (DWR Project 24-095) on April 10, 2024 for the Goodwin Crossing Offsite Sanitary
Sewer (Appendix B).
Pre -Construction Notification I July 8, 2024 3 1 36
Goodwin Crossing; USACE Action ID: SAW-2019-01521

Engineering
& Design
3.0 PROPOSED PROJECT
The Goodwin Crossing project proposes the construction of a residential subdivision and an offsite sanitary
sewer alignment located in Durham, North Carolina. Access to the Proposed Project will be achieved
from Goodwin Road. The Proposed Project will include amenities (i.e. pedestrian walkways, landscape gardens,
park, play areas, etc.), open space areas, a roadway network, stormwater control measures (SCMs), and utility
improvements (i.e. sanitary sewer, water main, electrical powerline). The Proposed Project is an independent
and standalone project, which will contain its own public utilities which are proposed to connect to the City of
Durham public water, sewer, and storm systems.
3.1 PURPOSE & NEED
The City of Durham and Durham County has been experiencing economic expansion for several years; and as
a consequence, the County is experiencing a lack of residential accommodations due to increased population
growth. The purpose and need of the Proposed Project is to construct an affordable and family friendly
residential subdivision (known as the Goodwin Crossing) with community cohesion and the necessary amenities
and infrastructure within Durham which is experiencing a population increase. The Proposed Project will contain
its own public utilities; and therefore, is an independent project and considered a single and complete project
with appropriate land use control measures in place for specific areas which require them.
3.2 ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
In order to achieve the purpose and need of the Proposed Project, design alternatives were examined with the
goal of providing an appropriate residential subdivision while avoiding and minimizing impacts to streams and
wetlands located within the project site. Below is summary of the alternatives examined.
3.2.1 NO ACTION ALTERNATIVE
A "No Action" alternative is considered to be one that avoids all wetland and stream impacts. Due to the
constraints dictated by site topography and land -grading requirements, this project cannot be downsized or
shifted to avoid all jurisdictional areas and still satisfy the Proposed Project's purpose and need. Additionally,
due to the necessary area needed for a residential subdivision development, it has proven to be extremely
difficult to locate a similar project at a different location where no jurisdictional areas occur within Durham.
A "No Action" decision would result negatively to the increased population growth demands that is currently
being experienced within Durham. In addition, there are portions of the project site have a history of
disturbances from previous timbering activities. Therefore, it is reasonable to assume that utilizing this project
site for a residential subdivision would be more appropriate than attempting a similar type of project on an
undisturbed property. The "No Action" alternative is not capable of achieving the basic purpose and need of the
Proposed Project; and therefore, is not a reasonable alternative.
Pre -Construction Notification I July 8, 2024 4 1 36
Goodwin Crossing; USACE Action ID: SAW-2019-01521

Engineering
& Design
3.2.2 ALTERNATIVE EXAMINATION
A variety of alternatives were examined to maximize the amount of residential lots within the project site.
Each alternative, including the Preferred Alternative (Proposed Project), involves the addition of an off -site
sanitary sewer to be connected to an existing sanitary sewer located to the east. Alternatives that were
examined included the potential expansion of residential lots; however, these alternatives were deemed not
practical since they could result in additional impacts to a wetlands, streams, and buffers. Ultimately, the
alternatives were deemed not suitable in achieving the purpose and need of the Proposed Project while at the
same time avoiding and minimizing impacts to Waters of U.S. and wetlands located within the project site.
Offsite sanitary sewer alignments were examined to service the residential subdivision. There is an existing
public sanitary sewer located to the east of the residential subdivision. Efforts were made to keep the proposed
sewer outfall underground and following the City of Durham RGD standards on slope, pipe size and cover, but
the existing sewer outfall located on the Bemac Partners (REID:185940), USACE (REID:186002), and Judith Stafford
(REID:186001) properties is too shallow for a fully underground connection. Various routes were analyzed in an
attempt to stay underground but the existing wetlands in this area create a pinch point that can not be overcome
resulting in significant encroachments into wetlands.
An alternative (Preferred Alternative), proposes extending the sanitary sewer alignment east and into the City
of Durham property and crossing a wetland complex associated with Cabin Branch via aerial and tying to
the existing sewer line. This alternative has the least amount of wetland encroachments as compared to
other alternatives examined. In addition, all attempts to minimize the length of aerial crossing have been
analyzed. Although the proposed aerial crossing is approximately 650-feet long, with a manhole in between,
the Applicant is willing to undertake the significant cost to build the aerial, as a last practical alternative to
serve the proposed residential development with sanitary sewer. This alternative will meet the RGFD Section 7.7
criteria for aerial crossings since there is no other practical alternative (see Appendix D - Durham Alternative
Request Application). Ductile Iron lock joint pipe will be used within a casing pipe at least 1-foot above the
10-year flow depth and above the 25-year flow depth, along with concrete supports/piers.
3.3 PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE PROPOSED PROJECT)
The Proposed Project will consist of residential family lots with amenities in addition to a roadway network,
stormwater control measures (SCMs), and utility improvements (i.e. sanitary sewer, water main, electrical
powerline). The Proposed Project will be served by public roads, public water, and public sewer. The Proposed
Project will involve the addition of an offsite sanitary sewer to be connected to an existing public sanitary sewer
located to the east. The Proposed Project will connect to Goodwin Road from the south and north.
Below is a discussion of the proposed wetland, stream, and buffer impacts. Table 1, Table 2, and Table 3 lists the
proposed impacts. Impact Maps were prepared by The John R. McAdams Company, Inc. (Appendix Q.
Impact Sheet #1
A road is proposed to cross an intermittent stream and associate Neuse River Buffers. The proposed road
crossing is required to provide a road access to the southwestern section of the Proposed Project and to
provide to provide a point of ingress and egress for vehicular traffic in case of emergencies. Installation of
culvert associated with the road crossing shall be buried to maintain aquatic passage and to maintain passage
during drought or low flow conditions, and every effort shall be made to maintain the existing channel slope.
Pre -Construction Notification I July 8, 2024 5 1 36
Goodwin Crossing; USACE Action ID: SAW-2019-01521

Engineering
& Design
The riprap apron shall be embedded and placed at the elevation of the existing stream bed to promote the
safe passage of fish and other aquatic organisms. In addition, filter cloth must be placed underneath the riprap
apron. The proposed road crossing will impact Neuse River Buffers at this location.
Impact Sheet #2
It should be noted, that there will be Zone 3 F/J-B Buffer impacts associated with the Proposed Project. These
proposed impacts are not associated with this PCN application submittal.
Impact Sheet #3
Located in the northeastern section of the Proposed Project is a sanitary sewer alignment that crosses a
perennial stream and continues east offsite. Installation of the sanitary sewer below the steam will be conducted
by jack and bore methods. The sanitary sewer will maintain a 2-foot clearance between the steam and the
sewer pipe encasement. Sewer installation will be constructed in such a manner not to drain (i.e. french
drain) wetlands; thereby minimizing impacts. The proposed sanitary sewer extension will be located within
a permanently maintained 30-foot easement. The offsite sanitary sewer will extend east to an existing public
sanitary sewer located on Durham County PIN 0835728668. The proposed sanitary sewer alignment and 30-foot
easement will impact Neuse River Buffers at this location.
Impact Sheet #4
The offsite sanitary sewer will extend east to an existing public sanitary sewer located on Durham County
PIN 0835728668. The proposed alignment of the sanitary sewer crosses the stream and associated wetlands
as close to 90-degrees (i.e. perpendicular) as possible. The sewer alignment will be an aerial crossing. This
alternative will meet the RGFD Section 7.7 criteria for aerial crossings since there is no other practical alternative
(see Appendix D - Durham Alternative Request Application). Ductile Iron lock joint pipe will be used within
a casing pipe at least 1-foot above the 10-year flow depth and above the 25-year flow depth, along with
concrete supports/piers. There will be forested wetland impacts associated with a maintained sewer easement.
These forested wetland impacts are considered temporary; however, these impacts will permanently convert
the wetlands from forested to emergent wetland conditions (i.e. temporary/permanent conversion). The
proposed sanitary sewer alignment and 30-foot easement will impact Neuse River Buffers at this location.
3.3.1 PROPOSED IMPACTS
Impacts to Waters of the U.S. are unavoidable in order to achieve the goals of the Proposed Project. Proposed
impacts are shown on Figures 1 through 9 Wetland and Stream Impact Maps prepared by The John R. McAdams
Company, Inc. (Appendix Q. To accomplish the Purpose and Need of the Proposed Project, a total of 0.019-acres
(110.2 linear feet) of jurisdictional Waters of the U.S. (WOUS) will be permanently impacted by the Proposed
Project associated with a road crossing located on within the southern section. Of the 0.019-acres of permanent
jurisdictional WOUS impacts, 0.016-acres (92.1 linear feet) is associated with construction of a culvert (i.e.
permanent impact) and 0.003-acres (18.1 linear feet) is associated with the placement of rip -rap that will be
embedded at the existing stream bed elevation (i.e. permanent - no loss). Construction of the road crossing
will require 0.001-acres (7.5 linear feet) of temporary jurisdictional WOUS impacts (i.e. work pad/causeway). In
addition, there will be a total of 0.43-acres of forested wetland impacts associated with a 30-foot maintained
sewer easement located within the northeastern section of the Proposed Project. These forested wetland
impacts are considered temporary; however, these impacts will permanently convert the wetlands from forested
Pre -Construction Notification I July 8, 2024 6 1 36
Goodwin Crossing; USACE Action ID: SAW-2019-01521

Engineering
& Design
to emergent wetland conditions (i.e. temporary/permanent conversion). Additional impacts to Waters of the
U.S. and wetlands are not proposed. Neuse River Buffer impacts are also proposed as part of the road crossing
and offsite sewer alignment. The Proposed Project is a single and complete project with appropriate land use
control measures in place for specific areas which require them. Traditional equipment will be used consisting
of front-end loaders, bulldozers, paving equipment, graders, and earth movers.
Table 1. Wetland Impacts
W1 Land
Temp./Per
W-1 (Offsite Bottomland Yes
0.43
Clearing
M.
Sanitary Hardwood
Conversion
Sewer Forest
Delineation
Total Temporary Wetland Impacts (AC):
0.43
Total Permanent Wetland Impact (AC):
0
Total Wetland Impacts (AC):
0.43
Table 2. Stream Impacts
Site #
Reason/
ImpactImpact
Duration
Name
Type
Type
Width
Leng-.
S1
Road
Permane
Stream 4
Intermitt
Both
7.5
92.1
Crossing
nt
ent
- Culvert
S2
Fill -
Permane
Stream 4
Intermitt
Both
7.1
18.1
Rip -rap
nt - No
ent
Loss
Pre -Construction Notification I July 8, 2024 7 1 36
Goodwin Crossing; USACE Action ID: SAW-2019-01521

Table 3. Neuse River Buffer Impacts
L1.1
132
133
LIM
Road
Crossing
Road
Crossing
Sanitary
Sewer
Crossing
Sanitary
Sewer
Crossing
Total jurisdictional ditch impacts (LF):
Total permanent stream impacts (LF):
Total temporary stream impacts (LF):
Total stream and ditch impacts (LF):
Permanent I Stream 4
Permanent I Stream 4
Permanent I Stream 3
Permanent I Stream 3
Engineering
& Design
0
110.2
7.5
117.7
No 6,874
No 3,959
No 1,955
No 1,228
Pre -Construction Notification I July 8, 2024 8 1 36
Goodwin Crossing; USACE Action ID: SAW-2019-01521

B5 Sanitary Permanent S-1 (Offsite No
Sewer Sanitary
Crossing Sewer
Delineatio
n)
B6 Sanitary Permanent S-1 (Offsite No
Sewer Sanitary
Crossing Sewer
Delineatio
n)
3.4 AVOIDANCE & MINIMIZATION
2,630
Engineering
& Design
3,395
Impacts to jurisdictional features have been avoided and minimized to the maximum extent practicable by
incorporating resourceful site planning, including the utilization of the wetland delineation to adjust the layout
to avoid and minimize impacts. Avoidance and minimization measures were also accomplished during the
design phase of the Proposed Project. The proposed impacts result in the least impacts to Waters of the U.S.
while meeting the purpose and need. The Applicant has avoided and minimized impacts to the greatest extent
practicable given the purpose, need, and goals of the Proposed Project. The proposed impacts are required in
order for the Proposed Project's goals to be achieved.
A variety of alternatives were examined; however after further analysis of these alternatives, it was determined
that there would be impacts to Waters of U.S. and wetlands. The Preferred Alternative was ultimately chosen
since it was deemed suitable in achieving the purpose and need of the Proposed Project while at the same time
avoiding and minimizing impacts to Waters of U.S. and wetlands.
Proper sedimentation and erosion control methods will be utilized during all phases of construction and
installation as described in accordance with the requirements of the North Carolina Department of
Environmental Quality- Erosion and Sediment Control Planning and Design Manual and local codes. All work
will take place during dry conditions and can be facilitated from high, non -jurisdictional, stable ground. The
contractor shall install temporary construction entrances, silt fence, inlet and outlet protection, temporary
diversion ditches, temporary slope drains, temporary skimmer sediment basins, sediment basin baffles,
temporary sediment traps, and rip -rap outlet protection only as necessary to install devices. All erosion and
sediment control measures will be checked for stability and operation following every runoff producing rainfall,
but in no case less than once every week. Any needed repairs will be made immediately to maintain all measures
designed. An erosion control inspections report is required and will be kept by the owner's representative.
Temporary seeding and permanent seeding plans are included to restore impacted areas. The project will
meet all relative requirements of Best Management Practices and Engineered Stormwater Control Structures
as outlined through State and Local Stormwater Rules. Measures will be taken to prevent oil, tar, trash, debris
Pre -Construction Notification I July 8, 2024 9 1 36
Goodwin Crossing; USACE Action ID: SAW-2019-01521

Engineering
& Design
and other pollutants from entering the adjacent jurisdictional features. Any excess excavated materials not
utilized as back -fill will be placed and contained within upland areas and permanently stabilized to prevent
erosion into adjacent jurisdictional features. Therefore, stockpiling of excavated material within jurisdictional
Waters of the U.S. and wetlands will be strictly prohibited as part of the construction of this project. All project
construction activities initiated within jurisdictional Waters of the U.S. and wetlands will be carried to completion
in an expeditious manner to minimize the period of disturbance.
The Proposed Project has minimized the possibility of indirect impacts through implementation of planning
practices which reduce the influence of direct impacts on downstream water quality. Efforts to reduce indirect
impacts generally include:
1. Avoidance/minimization of direct wetlands/waters impacts through innovative site planning and utilization
of confirmed wetland delineation
2. Avoidance/minimization of partial wetland/stream impacts
3. Avoidance/minimization of impacts to primary drainage ways and floodplains
4. Strict adherence to all state and local stormwater and sediment control measures
Based on the current project layout, potential indirect impacts to downstream waters could still occur to Cabin
Branch. All proposed impervious development associated with this project will be routed to the proposed
stormwater control measures for the purpose of meeting detention and nutrient treatment requirements. Since
the proposed site drains to Cabin Branch, nitrogen export calculations, phosphorus export calculations, and
85% TSS removal will be required within the Lower Neuse Basin. The site is also required to meet the 50%
overall treatment required within the Falls Lake Watershed. The proposed land use for the site is less than 35%
impervious and the total site area contributes less than 10% of the total watershed based on an analysis point of
where Cabin Creek exits the site at the northeastern corner of the property. Therefore, this site is only required
to provide detention to reduce peak flow rates for the 1-year storm. Per City of Durham regulations, stormwater
management on this site shall meet the stormwater management performance standards for development set
forth in Durham City Code Chapter 70, Article X, Sections 70-736 through 70-741 (effective May 21, 2019).
Pre -Construction Notification I July 8, 2024 10 1 36
Goodwin Crossing; USACE Action ID: SAW-2019-01521

Engineering
& Design
4.0 SUPPORTING PROJECT INFORMATION
4.1 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
4.1.1 PLANNED EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PRACTICES
All temporary erosion and sediment control practices have been designed in accordance with the North Carolina
Department of Environmental Quality- Erosion and Sediment Control Planning and Design Manual. The
following are temporary erosion and sediment control practices for the Proposed Project:
1. Silt Fence: Silt fence will be used in natural outfall areas to provide a barrier to any sediment leaving
the site.
2. Silt Fence Outlet: Silt fence outlets are to be used in low areas to allow a drainage point to relieve
pressure from water held behind silt fences.
3. Temporary Sediment Trap: Temporary sediment traps will be installed at low points to protect receiving
lakes, streams, and adjacent properties. These will capture the initial sediment runoff prior to SCM and
stormwater infrastructure installation.
4. Rip -rap Outlet Protection: Rip -rap outlet protection will be used at the outlet of all discharges into
natural ground and drainage -ways to dissipate the energy from concentrated runoff and reduce the
scour potential in vegetated areas.
5. Temporary Permanent Seeding: Temporary and permanent seeding will be used to form a dense
ground cover and to reduce soil loss from exposed slopes.
4.1.2 STORMWATER DESIGN
A Stormwater Impact Analysis has been prepared by The John R. McAdams Company, Inc. (Appendix F). All
proposed impervious development associated with this project will be routed to the proposed stormwater
control measures for the purpose of meeting detention and nutrient treatment requirements. Since the
proposed site drains to Cabin Branch, nitrogen export calculations, phosphorus export calculations, and 85%
TSS removal will be required within the Lower Neuse Basin. The site is also required to meet the 50% overall
treatment required within the Falls Lake Watershed. The proposed land use for the site is less than 35%
impervious and the total site area contributes less than 10% of the total watershed based on an analysis point of
where Cabin Creek exits the site at the northeastern corner of the property. Therefore, this site is only required
to provide detention to reduce peak flow rates for the 1-year storm. Per City of Durham regulations, stormwater
management on this site shall meet the stormwater management performance standards for development set
forth in Durham City Code Chapter 70, Article X, Sections 70-736 through 70-741 (effective May 21, 2019).
4.2 THREATENED & ENDANGERED SPECIES
A review of publicly available databases regarding the potential occurrence of federally protected species was
conducted. Initially, a USFWS List of Endangered Species, Threatened Species, Federal Species of Concern
and Candidate Species for Durham County was reviewed. A refined search, using the USFWS Information
for Planning and Consultation (IPaC) database (Appendix F), was also reviewed to provide a more detailed
list of species and critical habitat under USFWS jurisdiction that are known or expected to occur on or near
the Proposed Project. In addition, information from the North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural
Pre -Construction Notification I July 8, 2024 11 136
Goodwin Crossing; USACE Action ID: SAW-2019-01521

Engineering
& Design
Resources - Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) was gathered regarding the potential occurrence of federally
protected species and evaluate potential vegetative community assemblages within the Proposed Project
(Appendix F).
CED conducted a Threatened and Endangered Species Habitat Assessment for the Proposed Project. Based on
the Habitat Assessment for the Proposed Project, optimal time to survey was not conducted for the following
species: Tricolored Bat (Perimyotis subflavus), Neuse River Waterdog (Necturus lewisi), Carolina Madtom
(Noturus furiosus), Atlantic Pigtoe (Fusconaia masoni), Michaux's Sumac (Rhus michauxii), and Smooth
Coneflower (Echinacea laevigata). Based on the on -site field investigations, suitable habitat is marginal and
limited to areas along Goodwin Road for the following species: Michaux's Sumac and Smooth Coneflower.
Suitable habitat may be present within perennial stream systems for the following species: Neuse River
Waterdog, Carolina Madtom, and Atlantic Pigtoe. Suitable habitat for the Tricolored Bat is located within the
Proposed Project. The following species have had documented occurrences within a one -mile radius of the
Subject Property according the North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources - Natural Heritage
Program (NCNHP): Neuse River Waterdog, Carolina Madtom, and Smooth Coneflower. Therefore, it is believed
that a biological finding of any future project is "May Affect; Not Likely To Adversely Affect" for the Tricolored Bat,
Neuse River Waterdog, Carolina Madtom, Atlantic Pigtoe, Michaux's Sumac, and Smooth Coneflower. It should
be noted that the Monarch Butterfly (Dana plexippus), is also listed for the Subject Property, however, it is a
Candidate species and is not afforded any specific legal protection at this time.
4.3 CULTURAL RESOURCES
Information was gathered as part of the desktop review to identify previously recorded cultural resources
within a 1-mile radius of the Proposed Project. The background review consisted of a cultural resources and
literature review of the Proposed Project. Qualified personnel visited the Division of Historical Resources, Office
of State Archaeology within the North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources to review data
for any previously recorded surveys, historic or prehistoric sites, and cemeteries located in or near the Project.
Additionally, the NC Historic Preservation Office's HPOWEB viewer, a public online database, was viewed to
identify publicly available information on historic structures, historic districts, and NRHP-listed properties located
in or near the Project. Site files, relevant maps, aerial photographs, topographic maps, and the NRCS Web Soil
Survey were also examined for historical and environmental information related to the Proposed Project.
The background review, consisting of a compilation of known above -ground historic resources revealed that
there is one cultural resource located adjacent to the Proposed Project. The Goodwin Road Log House is located
adjacent to the central portion of the Proposed Project area just outside of the APE. Additionally, there are eight
other cultural resources located within a 1-mile (1.6 km) radius of the Proposed Project. These include eight
historic structures. Based on the information provided and the results of this desktop assessment, CED has
determined there are limited cultural concerns with the proposed undertaking. The Proposed Project will not
directly effect any cultural resources located near the Proposed Project.
4.4 FLOOD ZONE DESIGNATION
A proposed Sanitary Sewer Extension for Goodwin Crossing (Site Plan #D2300173 and CD #D2100326), located
in the City of Durham, North Carolina has been studied to ensure that the proposed improvements to be
constructed in the vicinity of Cabin Branch, as depicted in this report, will not increase the base flood elevations
for Cabin Branch - mapped as Special Flood Hazard Areas in the effective FIRM number 3720083500K (panel
0835) dated October 19, 2018. The proposed development within the floodway will consist of the addition of
Pre -Construction Notification I July 8, 2024 12 1 36
Goodwin Crossing; USACE Action ID: SAW-2019-01521

Engineering
& Design
piers for an aerial sanitary sewer line, the associated maintenance easement, and manhole structures. The
engineer's analysis is based on the best available technical data and Letters of Map Change provided from the
state and FEMA.
This No Rise was originally submitted to the City of Durham on April 26, 2024. It was resubmitted on June 19,
2024, and is expecting approval by September of 2024.
Pre -Construction Notification I July 8, 2024 13 1 36
Goodwin Crossing; USACE Action ID: SAW-2019-01521

Engineering
& Design
5.0 MITIGATION
There will be a total of 0.43-acres of palustrine forested wetlands (PFC) that will be temporarily impacted/
permanently converted as a result of permanently maintained 30-foot sanitary sewer easement. Although these
forested wetlands will be impacted temporarily, these impacts will permanently convert the wetland from
forested to emergent wetland conditions. Therefore, the Applicant proposes to compensate for temporary/
permanent conversion wetland impacts at a 1:1 ratio.
All compensatory mitigation for unavoidable wetland impacts can be satisfied by purchasing credits from the
Clearwater Mitigation Solutions in the amount of 0.43 Wetland Mitigation Units (WMU) to satisfy the Proposed
Project's compensatory mitigation obligations. A Statement of Availability letter (Appendix F) dated June 20,
2024 for wetland credits is provided by Clearwater Mitigation Solutions.
Pre -Construction Notification I July 8, 2024 14 1 36
Goodwin Crossing; USACE Action ID: SAW-2019-01521

Engineering
& Design
APPENDIX A
PCN FORM & AGENT AUTHORIZATION
Pre -Construction Notification I July 8, 2024
Goodwin Crossing; USACE Action ID: SAW-2019-01521

STATE
3
u o
'tee auanv�t"k
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
Water Resources
Office Use Only
Corps Action ID no. [Click to enter.] Date received: [Click to enter.]
DWR project no. [Click enter.] Date received: [Click to enter.]
Site Coordinates:
Latitude (DD.DDDDDD): 36.093963
Longitude (DD.DDDDDD): 78.881459
Form Version 1.5, September 2020
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
(Ver. 1.5, September 2020)
For Nationwide Permits and Regional General Permits and corresponding Water Quality Certifications
Please note: fields marked with a red asterisk * are required. The form is not considered complete until all mandatory
questions are answered.
The online help file may be found at this link:
https://edocs.deg.nc.gov/WaterResources/O/edoc/624704/PCN%2OHelp%2OFile%202018-1-30.pdf
The help document may be found at this link:
http://www.saw.usace.army. mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-Program/Permits/2017-Nationwide-Permits/Pre-
construction-Notification/
Before submitting this form, please ensure you have submitted the Pre -Filing Meeting Request Form as DWR will not be
able to accept your application without this important first step. The Pre -Filing Meeting Request Form is used to satisfy 40
C.F.R. Section 121.4(a) which states "At least 30 days prior to submitting a certification request, the project proponent shall
request a pre -filing meeting with the certifying agency." In accordance with 40 C.F.R. Section 121.5(b)(7), and (c)(5), all
certification requests must include documentation that a pre -filing meeting request was submitted to the certifying authority
at least 30 days prior to submitting the certification request.
Attach documentation of Pre -Filing Meeting Request to this Application.
Date of Pre -filing Meeting Request (MM/DD/YYYY) *: Click or tap to enter a date.
DWR ID # Click to enter. Version Click to enter. (If applicable)
A. Processing Information
County (counties) where project is located: *
Durham Additional (if needed).
Is this a public transportation project? *
(Publicly funded municipal, state, or federal road, rail,
❑ Yes ❑x No
or airport project)
Is this a NCDOT project? *
❑ Yes ❑x No
If yes, NCDOT TIP or state project number:
Click to enter.
If yes, NCDOT WBS number: *
Click to enter.
❑x Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams, waters,
Clean Water Act)
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: *
❑ Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal
waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Page 1 of 25 PCN Form - Version 1.5, September 2020

❑x Nationwide Permit (NWP)
1b. Permit type(s)?
❑ Regional General Permit (RGP)
❑ Standard (IP)
This form may be used to initiate the standard/ individual permit process with the USACE. Please contact your Corps
representative concerning submittals for standard permits. All required items can be included as separate attachments
and submitted with this form.
1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes ❑x No
NWP number(s):
29
RGP number(s):
Click to enter
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR (check all that apply):
❑x 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ 401 Water Quality Certification— Express
❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
❑ Individual 401 Water Quality Certification
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification:
❑ Yes ❑x No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ❑x No
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit/certification application?
❑ Yes ❑x No
1 g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts?
® Yes ❑ No
If yes, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program.
1 h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?
❑ Yes ❑x No
1 i. Is the project located within an NC DCM Area of Environmental
Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ❑x No ❑ Unknown
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?
❑ Yes ❑x No
If yes, you must attach a copy of the approval letter from the appropriate Wildlife Resource Commission Office.
Trout information may be found at this link: http://www.saw.usace.army.miI/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-
Program/Agency-Coordination/Trout.aspx
Page 2 of 25 PCN Form - Version 1.5, September 2020

B. Applicant Information
1a.
Who is the primary contact?
Eagle Land LLC (attn: Anderson Marlowe)
1b.
Primary Contact Email:
[e-mail]
1 c.
Primary Contact Phone: (###)###-####
919-971-2022
1 d.
Who is applying for the permit/certification? (check
all that apply)
® Owner ❑ Applicant (other than owner)
1 e.
Is there an agent/consultant for this project?
® Yes ❑ No
2.
Landowner Information
2a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
Eagle Land LLC
2b.
Deed Book and Page No.:
DB :006629, PN: 00007
2c.
Responsible Party (for corporations):
Click to entE
2d.
Address
Street Address:
3700 Computer Drive
Address line 2:
Suite 280
City:
Raleigh
State/ Province/ Region:
NC
Postal/ Zip Code:
27609
Country:
USA
2e.
Telephone Number: (###)###-####
919-971-2022
2f.
Fax Number: (###)###-####
Click to enter
2g.
Email Address:
[e-mail]
3.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
3a.
Name:
Click to ente
3b.
Business Name (if applicable):
Click to enter.
3c.
Address:
Street Address:
Click to enter.
Address line 2:
Click to enter.
City:
Click to enter.
State/ Province/ Region:
Click to enter.
Postal/ Zip Code:
Click to enter.
Country
Click to enter.
3d.
Telephone Number: (###)###-####
Click to enter.
3e
Fax Number: (###)###-####
Click to enter.
Page 3 of 25 PCN Form - Version 1.5, September 2020

3f. Email Address: Click to enter.
4.
Agent/ Consultant (if applicable)
4a.
Name: *
George Buchholz
4b.
Business Name:
Colliers Engineering and Design
4c.
Address: *
Street Address:
2000 Regency Parkway
Address line 2:
Suite 295
City:
Cary
State/ Province/ Region:
NC
Postal/ Zip Code:
27518
Country:
USA
4d.
Telephone Number: (###)###-####
[phone]
4e
Fax Number: (###)###-####
Click to entE
4f.
Email Address:
[e-mail]
Agent Authorization Letter:
Attach a completed/signed agent authorization form or letter. A sample form may be found at this link:
https://www.saw.usace.army. mil/Missions/Reg ulatory-Permit-Program/Permits/2017-Nationwide-Permits/Pre-
construction-Notification/
Page 4 of 25 PCN Form - Version 1.5, September 2020

C. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Project Information
1 a. Name of project: *
Goodwin Crossing
1 b. Subdivision name (if appropriate):
Click to enter.
1c. Nearest municipality/town: *
Town of Durham
2.
Project Identification
2a.
Property identification number (tax PIN or parcel ID):
0835534274, 0835429030, and 0835728668
2b.
Property size (in acres):
82
2c.
Project Address:
Street Address:
1301 Goodwin Road
Address line 2:
LU UJ IL.
City:
Durham
State/ Province/ Region:
NC
Postal/ Zip Code:
Click to enter.
Country:
USA
2d.
Site coordinates in decimal degrees (using 4-6 digits
after the decimal point):
Latitude (DD.DDDDDD): 36.093963
Longitude (-DD.DDDDDD):-78.881459
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
Cabin Branch
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving
WS-IV, NSW
water:
The Surface Water Classification map may be found at this link:
https://ncdenr.maps.arcgis.com/apes/webappviewer/index.html?id=6el25ad7628f494694e259c8Odd64265
Neuse
3c. In what river basin(s) is your project located?`
noose additional (if needed)
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is
030202010203
located:
The Find Your HUC map may be found at this link:
https://ncdenr.maps.arcqis.com/apes/PubIicInformation/index.html?appid=ad3a85aOc6d644aOb97cdO69db238ac3
Page 5 of 25 PCN Form - Version 1.5, September 2020

4. Project Description and History
4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of
this application: *
The Proposed Project consists of 3 parcels of land that are associated with this PCN. Durham County
Parcel Information Numbers (PIN) 0835534274 and 0835429030 comprise the residential
subdivision. The offsite sanitary sewer crossing is located on PIN 0835728668 where it crosses Cabin
Branch. The study area for the Proposed Project is approximately 82-acres in size and located at
latitudinal coordinates 36.093963 and longitudinal coordinates-78.881459. The Proposed Project is
located approximately 6.5-miles north of downtown . The Proposed Project contains two (2) major
habitat community types: Maintained/Disturbed Areas and Forested Areas. The Maintained/Disturbed
Areas have had past, intermittent, and/or regular maintenance activities. The Forested Areas can be
broken down into two (2) habitat community types, and they are as follows: Dry-Mesic Oak -Hickory
Forest and Wetland Areas. The Dry-Mesic Oak -Hickory Forest Areas are non -wetland areas and are
the dominant habitat community type within the Proposed Project. The Dry-Mesic Oak -Hickory Forest
Areas are dominated by white oak (Quercus alba), red oak (Quercus rubra), pignut hickory (Carya
glabra), and tulip poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera) species. Other notable species observed within this
community include American beech (Fagus grandifolia), red maple (Acer rubrum), Hophornbeam
(Ostrya virginiana), sweet gum (Liquidambar styraciflua), loblolly pine (Pious taeda), American holly
(Ilex opaca), eastern red cedar (Juniperus virginiana), common greenbrier (Smilax rotundifolia), and
Christmas fern (Polystichum acrostichoides). There are Wetland Areas within the Proposed Project that
can be described as the following two (2) wetland types: Headwater Wetlands and Bottomland
Hardwood Forested Wetlands. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) issued a Preliminary
Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) on September 16, 2019 (USACE Action Id.: SAW-2019-01521) for
the Goodwin Crossing residential development located on Durham County PINS 0835534274 and
0835429030. On February 9, 2024, CED conducted field investigations to identify potential
jurisdictional Waters of the U.S. (WOTUS) and wetlands subject to Federal or State regulatory
jurisdiction within the proposed study area of offsite sanitary sewer for the Goodwin Crossing
residential development. A total of 2.68 acres of wetland and 276-feet of stream were delineated within
the study area by CED on February 9, 2024. It is CED's professional opinion that the wetland and
stream features within the study area of offsite sanitary sewer would be considered jurisdictional
WOTUS and wetlands. A PJD request package for the Goodwin Crossing Offsite Sanitary Sewer is
attached. The North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality - Division of Water Resources
(NC DWR) issued a Buffer Determination Letter (RRO 919-112) on March, 2019 for the Goodwin
Crossing residential development located on Durham County PINS 0835534274 and 0835429030. NC
DWR issued an updated Buffer Determination Letter (DWR Project 24-186) on June 25, 2024 for the
Goodwin Crossing residential development located on Durham County PINS 0835534274 and
0835429030. NC DWR issued a Buffer Determination Letter (DWR Project 24-095) on April 10, 2024
for the Goodwin Crossing Offsite Sanitary Sewer.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this
❑ Yes ❑x No ❑ Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past? *
4c. If yes, please give the DWR Certification number and/or Corps
[Click to enter.]
Action ID (ex. SAW-0000-00000):
jClick to enter.]
Attach any pertinent project history documentation
4d. Attach an 8'/ x 11" excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of
the project site.
Page 6 of 25 PCN Form - Version 1.5, September 2020

4e.
Attach an 8'h x 11" excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map
depicting the project site.
4f.
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the
4.16 acres
property:
4g.
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent
5,830 linear feet
and perennial) on the property:
4g1.
List the total estimated acreage of all existing open waters on the
Click to enter. acres
property:
4h.
Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The City of Durham and Durham County has been experiencing economic expansion for several years; and as a
consequence, the County is experiencing a lack of residential accommodations due to increased population
growth. The purpose and need of the Proposed Project is to construct an affordable and family friendly residential
subdivision (known as the Goodwin Crossing) with community cohesion and the necessary amenities and
infrastructure within Durham which is experiencing a population increase. The Proposed Project will contain its own
public utilities; and therefore, is an independent project and considered a single and complete project with appropriate
land use control measures in place for specific areas which require them.
4i.
Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The Proposed Project will consist of residential family lots with amenities in addition to a roadway network, stormwater
control measures (SCMs), and utility improvements (i.e. sanitary sewer, water main, electrical powerline). The
Proposed Project will be served by public roads, public water, and public sewer. The Proposed Project will involve the
addition of an offsite sanitary sewer to be connected to an existing public sanitary sewer located to the east. The
Proposed Project will connect to Goodwin Road from the south and north. The Proposed Project is a single and
complete project with appropriate land use control measures in place for specific areas which require them. Traditional
equipment will be used consisting of front-end loaders, bulldozers, paving equipment, graders, and earth movers.
4j.
Attach project drawings/site diagrams/depictions of impact areas for the proposed project.
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or in
® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
proposed impact areas?
Comments:
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) issued a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD)
on September 16, 2019 (USACE Action Id.: SAW-2019-01521) for the Goodwin Crossing residential
development located on Durham County PINS 0835534274 and 0835429030. On February 9, 2024,
CED conducted field investigations to identify potential jurisdictional Waters of the U.S. (WOTUS)
and wetlands subject to Federal or State regulatory jurisdiction within the proposed study area of offsite
sanitary sewer for the Goodwin Crossing residential development.
Name (if known): George Buchholz
5b. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional
Agency/Consultant Company: Colliers Engineering and
areas?
Design
Other: Spangler Environmental, Inc.
5c. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination,
❑x Preliminary ❑ Approved ❑ Emailed Concurrence
what type of determination was made? *
❑ Not Verified ❑ Unknown
Corps AID number (ex. SAW-0000-00000):
SAW-2019-01521
Page 7 of 25 PCN Form - Version 1.5, September 2020

5d. List the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determination or State determination if a determination was made by
either agency.
USACE: PJD — September 16, 209; NC DWR Buffer Determination: Buffer Determinations — March 8, 2019;
June 25, 2024; and April 10, 2024
5d1. Attach jurisdictional determinations.
Page 8 of 25 PCN Form - Version 1.5, September 2020

6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ❑x No
6b. If yes, explain.
'lick to enter.
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permit(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize
any part of the proposed project or related activity? This includes other separate and distant crossings for linear
projects that require Department of the Army authorization but don't require pre -construction notification.
The Proposed Project will contain its own public utilities; and therefore, is an independent project and considered a single
and complete project with appropriate land use control measures in place for specific areas which require them.
Page 9 of 25 PCN Form - Version 1.5, September 2020

D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
Impacts Summary
❑x Wetlands ❑x Streams - tributaries
1 a. Where are the impacts associated with your project ❑x Buffers ❑ Open Waters
(check all that apply):
❑ Pond Construction
2.
Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, complete this table for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2a1.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
2g.
Site #*
Impact
Impact
Wetland Name*
Wetland Type*
Forested
Jurisdiction
Impact Area
Reason/Type*
Duration*
?*
Type*
(ac)*
W1
Mechanized
Temporary
W-1 (Offsite Sanitary
Bottomland
Yes
Both
0.43
Clearing
Sewer Delineation)
Hardwood
Forest
W2
Choose one
Temp/
Click to enter
Choose one
Y/N
Choose one
Click to
Perm
enter
W3
Choose one
Temp/
Click to enter
Choose one
Y/N
Choose one
Click to
Perm
enter
W4
Choose one
Temp/
Click to enter
Choose one
Y/N
Choose one
Click to
Perm
enter
W5
Choose one
Temp/
Click to enter
Choose one
Y/N
Choose one
Click to
Perm
enter
W6
Choose one
Temp/
Click to enter
Choose one
Y/N
Choose one
Perm
2g1.
Total temporary wetland impacts
0.43 ac
2g2.
Total permanent wetland impacts
Click to enter. ac
2g3.
Total wetland impacts
0.43 ac
2h.
Comments:
There will be a total of 0.43-acres of forested wetland impacts associated with a 30-foot maintained sewer easement
located within the northeastern section of the Proposed Project. These forested wetland impacts are considered
temporary; however, these impacts will permanently convert the wetlands
from forested to emergent wetland conditions
(i.e. temporary/permanent conversion).
Page 10 of 25 PCN Form - Version 1.5, September 2020

3.
Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream/ tributary impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site,
complete this table for all stream/ tributary sites impacted.
** All Perennial or Intermittent streams must be verified by DWR or delegated local government
Site #*
3a.
Impact Reason/
Type*
3b.
Impact
Duration'
3d.
Stream Name*
3e.
Stream
Type*
3f.
Jurisdiction
Type*
3g.
Stream Width
(avg ft) *
3h.
Impact length
(linear ft)
S1
Crossing/ Culvert
Permanent
Stream 4
Intermittent
Both
7.5
92.1
S2
Fill (Incl. Riprap)
Permanent
Stream 4
Intermittent
Both
7.1
18.1
S3
Workpad/
Causeway
Temporary
Stream 4
Intermittent
Both
8.5
7.5
S4
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S5
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S6
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S7
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S8
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S9
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S10
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S11
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S12
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S13
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S14
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
S15
1;hoose one
Temp/ Perm
Click to enter
Per/Int
Choose one
Click to enter
Click to enter
3i1.
Total jurisdictional ditch impact:
0 linear ft
3i2.
Total permanent stream impacts:
110.2 linear ft
M.
Total temporary stream impacts:
7.5 linear ft
34.
Total stream and ditch impacts:
117.7 linear ft
3j.
Comments:
A total of 0.019-acres (110.2 linear feet) of jurisdictional Waters of the U.S. (WOUS) will be permanently impacted by
the Proposed Project associated with a road crossing located on within the southern section. Of the 0.019-acres of
permanent jurisdictional WOUS impacts, 0.016-acres (92.1 linear feet) is associated with construction of a culvert (i.e.
permanent impact) and 0.003-acres (18.1 linear feet) is associated with the placement of rip -rap that will be
embedded at the existing stream bed elevation (i.e. permanent - no loss). Construction of the road crossing will require
0.001-acres (7.5 linear feet) of temporary jurisdictional WOUS impacts (i.e. work pad/causeway).
Page 11 of 25 PCN Form - Version 1.5, September 2020

4.
Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries,
sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other
open water of the U.S., individually list all open water impacts
in the table below.
4a.
4b.
4c.
4d.
4e.
4e1.
4f.
Site #*
Impact Reason/
Impact
Waterbody Name*
Waterbody
Jurisdiction
Impact area (ac)*
Type*
Duration*
Type*
Type*
01
Choose one
Temp
Click to enter.
Choose one
Choose one
Click to enter.
Perm
02
Choose one
Temp/
Click to enter.
Choose one
Choose one
Click to enter.
Perm
03
Choose one
Temp/
Click to enter.
Choose one
Choose one
Click to enter
Perm
04
Choose one
Temp/
Click to enter.
Choose one
Choose one
Click to enter
Perm
4g.
Total temporary open water impacts
Click to enter. ac
4g.
Total permanent open water impacts
Click to enter. ac
4g.
Total open water impacts
Click to enter. ac
4h.
Comments:
Click to enter.
5.
Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction is proposed, complete the table
below. (*This
does NOT include offline stormwater
management ponds.)
5a.
5b.
5c.
5d.
5e.
Pond ID
Proposed use or
Wetland Impacts (ac)
Stream
Impacts (ft)
Upland
#
purpose of pond
Impacts (ac)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
Click to
Click to
Click to
Click to
Click to
Click to
Click to
enter.
enter.
enter.
enter.
enter.
enter.
enter.
P2
Choose one
Click to
Click to
Click to
Click to
Click to
Click to
Click to
enter.
enter.
enter.
enter.
enter.
enter.
enter.
5f.
Total
Click to
Click to
Click to
Click to
Click to
Click to
Click t-
enter.
enter.
enter.
enter.
enter.
enter.
ente
5g.
Comments:
Click to enter.
5h.
Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No
If yes, permit ID no.:
Click to enter.
5i.
Expected pond surface area (acres):
Click to enter.
5j.
Size of pond watershed (acres):
Click to enter.
5k.
Method of construction:
Click to enter.
Page 12 of 25 PCN Form - Version 1.5, September 2020

6. Buffer Impacts (DWR requirement)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. Individually list all buffer impacts.
❑x Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba
6a. Project is in which protected basin(s)?
❑ Jordan ❑ Goose Creek ❑ Randleman
(Check all that apply.)
❑ Other: Click to entE
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Site #*
Impact Type*
Impact Duration*
Stream Name*
Buffer
Zone 1 Impact*
Zone 2 Impact*
Mitigation
(sq ft)
(sq ft)
Required?*
B1
Crossing/ Culvert/
Permanent
Stream 4
No
6874
"lick to ente
Bridge
B2
Crossing/ Culvert/
Permanent
Stream 4
No
Click to enter
3959
Bridge
B3
Crossing/ Culvert/
Permanent
Stream 3
No
1955
Click to ente
Bridge
B4
Crossing/ Culvert/
Permanent
Stream 3
No
Click to enter
1228
Bridge
B5
Crossing/ Culvert/
Permanent
S-1 (Offsite Sanitary
No
2630
Click to ente
Bridge
Sewer Delineation)
B6
Crossing/ Culvert/
Permanent
S-1 (Offsite Sanitary
No
Click to enter
3395
Bridge
Sewer Delineation)
B7
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
:lick to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter
Click to enter.
B8
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
:lick to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter
Click to enter.
B9
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
:lick to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter
Click to enter.
B10
Choose one
Temp/ Perm
;lick to enter.
Y/N
Click to enter
Click to enter.
6h. Total temporary impacts:
Zone 1: 0 sq ft
Zone 2: 0 sq ft
6h. Total permanent impacts:
Zone 1: 11459 sq ft
Zone 2: 8582 sq ft
6h. Total combined buffer impacts:
Zone 1: 11459 sq ft
Zone 2: 8582 sq ft
6i. Comments:
Click to antar
Please attach supporting documentation (impact maps, plan sheets, etc.) for the proposed project.
Page 13 of 25 PCN Form - Version 1.5, September 2020

E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
Page 14 of 25 PCN Form - Version 1.5, September 2020

1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through project design: *
Impacts to jurisdictional features have been avoided and minimized to the maximum extent practicable
by incorporating resourceful site planning, including the utilization of the wetland delineation to adjust
the layout to avoid and minimize impacts. Avoidance and minimization measures were also
accomplished during the design phase of the Proposed Project. The proposed impacts result in the least
impacts to Waters of the U.S. while meeting the purpose and need. The Applicant has avoided and
minimized impacts to the greatest extent practicable given the purpose, need, and goals of the Proposed
Project. The proposed impacts are required in order for the Proposed Projects goals to be achieved.
A variety of alternatives were examined; however after further analysis of these alternatives, it was
determined that there would be impacts to Waters of U.S. and wetlands. The Preferred Alternative was
ultimately chosen since it was deemed suitable in achieving the purpose and need of the Proposed
Project while at the same time avoiding and minimizing impacts to Waters of U.S. and wetlands.
A "No Action" alternative is considered to be one that avoids all wetland and stream impacts. Due to
the constraints dictated by site topography and land -grading requirements, this project cannot be
downsized or shifted to avoid all jurisdictional areas and still satisfy the Proposed Prcject's purpose and
need. Additionally, due to the necessary area needed for a residential subdivision development, it has
proven to be extremely difficult to locate a similar project at a different location where no jurisdictional
areas occur within Durham. A "No Action" decision would result negatively to the increased
population growth demands that is currently being experienced within Durham. In addition, there are
portions of the project site have a history of disturbances from previous timbering activities. Therefore,
it is reasonable to assume that utilizing this project site for a residential subdivision would be more
appropriate than attempting a similar type of project on an undisturbed property. The "No Action"
alternative is not capable of achieving the basic purpose and need of the Proposed Project; and
therefore, is not a reasonable alternative.
A variety of alternatives were examined to maximize the amount of residential lots within the project
site. Each alternative, including the Preferred Alternative (Proposed Project), involves the addition of
an off -site sanitary sewer to be connected to an existing sanitary sewer located to the east. Alternatives
that were examined included the potential expansion of residential lots; however, these alternatives
were deemed not practical since they could result in additional impacts to a wetlands, streams, and
buffers. Ultimately, the alternatives were deemed not suitable in achieving the purpose and need of the
Proposed Project while at the same time avoiding and minimizing impacts to Waters of U.S. and
wetlands located within the project site.
Offsite sanitary sewer alignments were examined to service the residential subdivision. There is
an existing public sanitary sewer located to the east of the residential subdivision. Efforts were made to
keep the proposed sewer outfall underground and following the City of Durham RGD standards on
slope, pipe size and cover, but the existing sewer outfall located on the Bemac Partners
(REID:185940), USACE (REID:186002), and Judith Stafford (REID: 18600 1) properties is too shallow
for a fully underground connection. Various routes were analyzed in an attempt to stay underground
but the existing wetlands in this area create a pinch point that can not be overcome resulting in
significant encroachments into wetlands.
An alternative (Preferred Alternative), proposes extending the sanitary sewer alignment east and into
the City of Durham property and crossing a wetland complex associated with Cabin Branch via aerial
and tying to the existing sewer line. This alternative has the least amount of wetland encroachments as
compared to other alternatives examined. In addition, all attempts to minimize the length of aerial
Page 15 of 25 PCN Form - Version 1.5, September 2020

crossing have been analyzed. Although the proposed aerial crossing is approximately 650-feet
long, with a manhole in between, the Applicant is willing to undertake the significant cost to build
the aerial, as a last practical alternative to serve the proposed residential development with sanitary
sewer. This alternative will meet the RGFD Section 7.7 criteria for aerial crossings since there is no
other practical alternative. Ductile Iron lock joint pipe will be used within a casing pipe at least 1-foot
above the 10-year flow depth and above the 25-year flow depth, along with concrete supports/piers.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize proposed impacts through construction techniques: *
Proper sedimentation and erosion control methods will be utilized during all phases of construction and
installation as described in accordance with the requirements of the North Carolina Department of
Environmental Quality- Erosion and Sediment Control Planning and Design Manual and local codes.
All work will take place during dry conditions and can be facilitated from high, non jurisdictional,
stable ground. The contractor shall install temporary construction entrances, silt fence, inlet and outlet
protection, temporary diversion ditches, temporary slope drains, temporary skimmer sediment basins,
sediment basin baffles, temporary sediment traps, and rip -rap outlet protection only as necessary to
install devices. All erosion and sediment control measures will be checked for stability and operation
following every runoff producing rainfall, but in no case less than once every week. Any needed
repairs will be made immediately to maintain all measures designed. An erosion control inspections
report is required and will be kept by the owner's representative. Temporary seeding and permanent
seeding plans are included to restore impacted areas. The project will meet all relative requirements of
Best Management Practices and Engineered Stormwater Control Structures as outlined through State
and Local Stormwater Rules. Measures will be taken to prevent oil, tar, trash, debris and other
pollutants from entering the adjacent jurisdictional features. Any excess excavated materials not
utilized as back -fill will be placed and contained within upland areas and permanently stabilized to
prevent erosion into adjacent jurisdictional features. Therefore, stockpiling of excavated material
within jurisdictional Waters of the U.S. and wetlands will be strictly prohibited as part of the
construction of this project. All project construction activities initiated within jurisdictional Waters of
the U.S. and wetlands will be carried to completion in an expeditious manner to minimize the period of
disturbance.
The Proposed Project has minimized the possibility of indirect impacts through implementation of
planning practices which reduce the influence of direct impacts on downstream water quality. Efforts to
reduce indirect impacts generally include:
1. Avoidance/minimization of direct wetlands/waters impacts through innovative site planning and
utilization of confirmed wetland delineation
2. Avoidance/minimization of partial wetland/stream impacts
Avoidance/minimization of impacts to primary drainage ways and floodplains
4. Strict adherence to all state and local stormwater and sediment control measures
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S., Waters of the State, or Riparian Buffers
2a. If compensatory mitigation is required, by whom is it required?
(check all that apply)
❑x DWR ❑x Corps
Page 16 of 25 PCN Form - Version 1.5, September 2020

2b. If yes, which mitigation option(s) will be used for this ® Mitigation Bank
project? * (check all that apply) ❑ In Lieu Fee Program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if using a Mitigation Bank (Must satisfy NC General Statute143-214.11 (d1).)
3a. Name of mitigation bank:
Clearwater Mitigation Solutions
3b. Credits purchased/requested:
Type: Riparian Wetland
Quantity 0.43
Type: Choose one
Quantity Click to enter.
Type: Choose one
Quantity Click to enter.
Attach receipt and/or approval letter.
3c. Comments:
There will be a total of 0.43-acres of palustrine forested wetlands (PFO) that will be temporarily
impacted/permanently converted as a result of permanently maintained 30-foot sanitary sewer
easement. Although these forested wetlands will be impacted temporarily, these impacts will
permanently convert the wetland from forested to emergent wetland conditions. Therefore, the
Applicant proposes to compensate for temporary/permanent conversion wetland impacts at a 1:1 ratio.
All compensatory mitigation for unavoidable wetland impacts can be satisfied by purchasing credits
from the Clearwater Mitigation Solutions in the amount of 0.43 Wetland Mitigation Units (WMU) to
satisfy the Proposed Projects compensatory mitigation obligations. A Statement of Availability letter
dated June 20, 2024 for wetland credits is provided by Clearwater Mitigation Solutions.
4.
Complete if Using an In Lieu Fee Program
4a.
Attach approval letter from in lieu fee program.
4b.
Stream mitigation requested:
Click to enter. linear feet
4c.
If using stream mitigation, what is the stream temperature:
Choose one
NC Stream Temperature Classification Maps can be found under the Mitigation Concepts tab on the Wilmington
District's RIBITS website: (Please use the filter and select Wilmington district)
htti)s://ribits.usace.army.mil/ribits apex/f?o=107:27:2734709611497::NO: RP:P27 BUTTON KEY:O
4d.
Buffer mitigation requested (DWR only):
Click to enter. square feet
4e.
Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
Click to enter. acres
4f.
Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
Click to enter. acres
4g.
Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
Click to enter. acres
4h.
Comments:
Click to enter.
5. Complete if Providing a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
Page 17 of 25 PCN Form - Version 1.5, September 2020

5a. If proposing a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan,
including the amount of mitigation proposed.
'lirk to antar
5b. Attach mitigation plan/documentation.
6.
Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — DWR requirement
6a.
Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer
❑ Yes ❑x No
that requires buffer mitigation?
If yes, please complete this entire section — please contact DWR for more information.
6b.
If yes, identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires
mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required in the table below.
6c.
6d.
6e.
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact (square
Multiplier
Required mitigation
feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
Click to enter.
Click to enter.
Choose one
Click to enter.
Zone 2
slick to enter.
Click to enter.
choose one
Click to enter.
6f. Total buffer mitigation required
Click to enter.
6g.
If buffer mitigation is required, is payment to a mitigation bank or
❑ Yes ❑ No
NC Division of Mitigation Services proposed?
6h.
If yes, attach the acceptance letter from the mitigation bank or NC Division of Mitigation Services.
6i.
Comments:
DICK to enter.
Page 18 of 25 PCN Form - Version 1.5, September 2020

F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (DWR requirement)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers
® Yes ❑ No
identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. All buffer impacts and high ground impacts require diffuse flow or other forms of stormwater treatment. If the
project is subject to a state implemented riparian buffer protection program, include a plan that fully documents
how diffuse flow will be maintained.
All Stormwater Control Measures (SCM) must be designed in accordance with the NC Stormwater Design
Manual (https://deg.nc..qov/about/divisions/energv-mineral-land-resources/energv-mineral-land-permit-
guidance/stormwater-bmp-manual).
Associated supplement forms and other documentation must be provided.
❑ Level Spreader
What Type of SCM are you
❑ Vegetated Conveyance (lower seasonal high water table- SHWT)
providing?
❑ Wetland Swale (higher SHWT)
(Check all that apply)
0 Other SCM that removes minimum 30% nitrogen
❑ Proposed project will not create concentrated stormwater flow through the
buffer
For a list of options to meet the diffuse flow requirements, click here:
Attach diffuse flow documentation.
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this an NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's
Individual NPDES permit NCS000250? *
El Yes 0 No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as
defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)? *
❑ Yes 0 No
To look up low density requirements, click here:
http://reports.oah. state. nc.us/ncac/title%2015a%20-%20environmental%20guality/chapter%2002%20-
%20environmental%20management/subchapter%20h/15a%20ncac%2002h%20.1003.pdf
2c. IS the project over an acre?
0 Yes ❑ No
2d. Does this project have a stormwater management plan (SMP)
reviewed and approved under a state stormwater program or state-
0 Yes ❑ No
approved local government stormwater program? *
Note: Projects that have vested rights, exemptions, or grandfathering from state or locally implemented
stormwater programs or projects that satisfy state or locally -implemented stormwater programs through use of
community in -lieu programs should answer "no" to this question.
2e. Which of the following stormwater management program(s) apply?
0 Local Government
(Check all that apply) *
❑ State
If you have local government approval, please include the SMP on their overall impact map.
Page 19 of 25 PCN Form - Version 1.5, September 2020

❑ Phase II ❑ USMP
Local Government Stormwater Programs *
❑x NSW ❑x Water Supply
Please identify which local government stormwater program you are using.*
Durham
❑ Phase II ❑ HQW or ORW
State Stormwater Programs *
❑ Coastal Counties ❑ Other
Comments:
All proposed impervious development associated with this project will be routed to the proposed stormwater control
measures for the purpose of meeting detention and nutrient treatment requirements. Since the proposed site drains to
Cabin Branch, nitrogen export calculations, phosphorus export calculations, and 85% TSS removal will be required
within the Lower Neuse Basin. The site is also required to meet the 50% overall treatment required within the Falls
Lake Watershed. The proposed land use for the site is less than 35% impervious and the total site area contributes
less than 10% of the total watershed based on an analysis point of where Cabin Creek exits the site at the northeastern
corner of the property. Therefore, this site is only required to provide detention to reduce peak flow rates for the 1-year
storm. Per City of Durham regulations, stormwater management on this site shall meet the stormwater management
performance standards for development set forth in Durham City Code Chapter 70, Article X, Sections 70-736 through
70-741 (effective May 21, 2019).
Page 20 of 25 PCN Form - Version 1.5, September 2020

G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local)
❑ Yes ❑x No
funds or the use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require
preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or State (North Carolina) Environmental
El Yes El No
Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been
finalized by the State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the
❑ Yes ❑ No
NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.)
Comments:
Click to enter.
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A
NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), ❑ Yes ❑x No
DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or Riparian Buffer Rules
(15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. If you answered "yes" to the above question, provide an explanation of the violation(s)
;lick to enter.
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future
impacts) result in additional development, which could impact nearby
❑ Yes ❑x No
downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "no", provide a short narrative description:
The proposed Goodwin Crossing and offsite sewer alignment is a single and complete project with appropriate land
use control measures in place for specific areas which require them. Impacts to jurisdictional features have been
avoided and minimized to the maximum extent practicable by incorporating resourceful site planning, including the
utilization of the wetland delineation to adjust the layout to avoid and minimize impacts. The proposed impacts are the
result of the necessary infrastructure and facility layout, without which, the project's goals would not be achieved.
3c. If yes, attach a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis (.pdf) in accordance with the most recent
DWR policy.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project? ❑ Yes ❑x No ❑ N/A
Page 21 of 25 PCN Form - Version 1.5, September 2020

4b. If yes, describe in detail the treatment methods and dispositions (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater
generated from the proposed project. If the wastewater will be treated at a treatment plant, list the capacity
available at that plant.
Click to enter.
5.
Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a.
Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected
species or habitat? (IPAC weblink: https://www.fws.gov/ipac/ ffws.govl)
❑ Yes
❑x No
5b.
Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species
Act impacts? *
® Yes
❑ No
5c.
If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Raleigh
5d.
Is another federal agency involved? *
❑ Yes
❑x No ❑ Unknown
If yes, which federal agency?
Click to enter.
5e.
Is this a DOT project located within Divisions 1-8? *
❑ Yes
❑x No
5f.
Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the
U.S.? *
®Yes
El No
5g.
Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal? *
❑ Yes
❑x No
Link to NLEB SLOPES document: http://saw-reg.usace.army.mil/NLEB/1-30-17-signed
SLOPES&apps.pdf
NLEB-
5h.
Does this project involve the construction/ installation of a wind
turbine(s)? *
❑ Yes
❑x No
If yes, please show the location of the wind turbine(s) on the permit drawings/ project plans (attach .pdf)
5i.
Does this project involve blasting and /or other percussive activities
that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers,
mechanized pile drivers, etc.? *
❑ Yes
❑x No
If yes, please provide details to include type of percussive activity, purpose, duration, and specific location of this
activity on the property (attach .pdf)
Page 22 of 25 PCN Form - Version 1.5, September 2020

5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated
Critical Habitat? *
A review of publicly available databases regarding the potential occurrence of federally protected
species was conducted. Initially, a USFWS List of Endangered Species, Threatened Species, Federal
Species of Concern and Candidate Species for Durham County was reviewed. A refined search, using
the USFWS Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaQ database, was also reviewed to provide a
more detailed list of species and critical habitat under USFWS jurisdiction that are known or expected
to occur on or near the Proposed Project. In addition, information from the North Carolina Department
of Natural and Cultural Resources - Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) was gathered regarding the
potential occurrence of federally protected species and evaluate potential vegetative community
assemblages within the Proposed Project.
CED conducted a Threatened and Endangered Species Habitat Assessment for the Proposed
Project. Based on the Habitat Assessment for the Proposed Project, optimal time to survey was not
conducted for the following species: Tricolored Bat (Perimyotis subflavus), Neuse River Waterdog
(Necturus lewisi), Carolina Madtom (Noturus furiosus), Atlantic Pigtoe (Fusconaia masoni), Michaux's
Sumac (Rhus michauxii), and Smooth Coneflower (Echinacea laevigata). Based on the on -site field
investigations, suitable habitat is marginal and limited to areas along Goodwin Road for the following
species: Michaux's Sumac and Smooth Coneflower. Suitable habitat may be present within perennial
stream systems for the following species: Neuse River Waterdog, Carolina Madtom, and Atlantic
Pigtoe. Suitable habitat for the Tricolored Bat is located within the Proposed Project. The following
species have had documented occurrences within a one -mile radius of the Subject Property according
the North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources - Natural Heritage Program
(NCNHP): Neuse River Waterdog, Carolina Madtom, and Smooth Coneflower. Therefore, it is believed
that a biological finding of any future project is "May Affect; Not Likely To Adversely Affect" for the
Tricolored Bat, Neuse River Waterdog, Carolina Madtom, Atlantic Pigtoe, Michaux's Sumac, and
Smooth Coneflower. It should be noted that the Monarch Butterfly (Dana plexippus), is also listed for
the Subject Property; however, it is a Candidate species and is not afforded any specific legal protection
at this time.
Attach consultation documentation.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as
an Essential Fish Habitat?
❑ Yes
❑x No
Are there submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV) around
the project vicinity?
El Yes
❑x No El Unknown
Will this project affect submerged aquatic vegetation?
❑ Yes
❑x No ❑ Unknown
Explain:
"lick to enter
6b. What data source(s) did you use to determine whether your
site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
See 5j above
Page 23 of 25 PCN Form - Version 1.5, September 2020

7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
Link to the State Historic Preservation Office Historic Properties Map (does not include archaeological data):
htti)://gis. ncdcr.ciov/hi)oweb/
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural
preservation status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or
❑ Yes ❑x No
properties significant in North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data source(s) did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological
resources? *
Information was gathered as part of the desktop review to identify previously recorded cultural resources within a 1-
mile radius of the Proposed Project. The background review consisted of a cultural resources and literature review of
the Proposed Project. Qualified personnel visited the Division of Historical Resources, Office of State Archaeology
within the North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources to review data for any previously recorded
surveys, historic or prehistoric sites, and cemeteries located in or near the Project. Additionally, the NC Historic
Preservation Office's HPOWEB viewer, a public online database, was viewed to identify publicly available information
on historic structures, historic districts, and NRHP-listed properties located in or near the Project. Site files, relevant
maps, aerial photographs, topographic maps, and the NRCS Web Soil Survey were also examined for historical and
environmental information related to the Proposed Project.
The background review, consisting of a compilation of known above -ground historic resources revealed that there is
one cultural resource located adjacent to the Proposed Project. The Goodwin Road Log House is located adjacent to
the central portion of the Proposed Project area just outside of the APE. Additionally, there are eight other cultural
resources located within a 1-mile (1.6 km) radius of the Proposed Project. These include eight historic
structures. Based on the information provided and the results of this desktop assessment, CED has determined there
are limited cultural concerns with the proposed undertaking. The Proposed Project will not directly effect any cultural
resources located near the Proposed Project.
7c. Attach historic or prehistoric documentation.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
Link to the FEMA Floodplain Maps: https:Hmsc.fema.,qov/portal/search
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? *
❑ Yes ❑x No
8b. If yes, explain how the project meets FEMA requirements.
FEMA Flood Hazard Panel Map
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
NC FIRM Map FIRM number 3720083500K (panel 0835) dated October 19, 2018. A proposed
Sanitary Sewer Extension for Goodwin Crossing (Site Plan 4D2300173 and CD 4D2100326), located in
the City of Durham, North Carolina has been studied to ensure that the proposed improvements to be
constructed in the vicinity of Cabin Branch, as depicted in this report, will not increase the base flood
elevations for Cabin Branch — mapped as Special Flood Hazard Areas in the effective FIRM number
3720083500K (panel 0835) dated October 19, 2018. The proposed development within the floodway
will consist of the addition of piers for an aerial sanitary sewer line, the associated maintenance
easement, and manhole structures. The engineer's analysis is based on the best available technical data
and Letters of Map Change provided from the state and FEMA.
This No Rise was originally submitted to the City of Durham on April 26, 2024. It was resubmitted on
June 19, 2024, and is expecting approval by September of 2024.
Page 24 of 25 PCN Form - Version 1.5, September 2020

H. Miscellaneous
Comments:
f lirl, 4n cnfcr
Attach pertinent documentation or attachments not previously requested
I. Signature *
❑x By checking the box and signing below, I, as the project proponent, certify to the following:
• The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete, to
the best of my knowledge and belief;
• The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401
certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time;
• The project proponent hereby agrees that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter
66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• The project proponent hereby agrees to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66,
Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act");
• The project proponent hereby understands that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be
enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND
• As the project proponent, I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN/online form.
Full Name: George Buchholz
Signature: George Buchholz
Date: 7/8/2024
Page 25 of 25 PCN Form - Version 1.5, September 2020

2000 Regency Parkway
Suite 295
Cary North Carolina 27518
Main: 877 627 3772
Engineering
& Design
Name:
Address:
Phone:
Email:
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
Eagle Land LLC, (attn: Anderson Marlowe)
3700 Computer Drive, Suite 280
919-971-2022
Marlowebuilders1 @email.com
Project Name/Description: Goodwin Crossing
Project Number: 24006169A Project Manager: George Buchholz
Date: June 24, 2024
Re: Wetlands Related Consulting and Permitting
To Whom it May Concern:
1, the undersigned, hereby designate and authorize Colliers Engineering and Design to act in my behalf as my
agent in the processing of jurisdictional determinations and permit applications, to furnish upon request
supplemental information in support of applications, etc. from this day forward.
This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project.
NOTICE: This authorization, for liability and professional courtesy reasons, is valid only for government officials
to enter the property when accompanied by Colliers Engineering and Design staff.
lam. C:t L'I-C. 4i ���►!� �� z/&.�`
Print Signature
Date
Maser Consulting is now Colliers Engineering & Design
Accelerating success.

2000 Regency Parkway
Suite 295
Cary North Carolina 27518
Main: 877 627 3772
Engineering
& Design
PROPERTY OWNER CERTIFICATION FORM
Name: Eagle Land LLC, (attn: Anderson Marlowe)
Address: 3700 Computer Drive, Suite 280
Phone: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Project Name/Description: Goodwin Crossing
Project Number: 24006169A Project Manager: George Buchholz
Date: lune 24, 2024
Re: Property Owner Certification
To Whom it May Concern:
By signing below, you are indicating that you have the authority, or are acting as the duly authorized agent of a
person or entity with such authority, to and do hereby grant Corps personnel right of entry to legally access the
site if needed to perform the JD. Your signature shall be an affirmation that you possess the requisite property
rights to request a JD on the subject property.
F' IC �qnC� �-- L' Q- 6).
Property Owner (please print) Property Owner Signature
Ll
Date
Maser Consulting is now Colliers Engineering & Design
Accelerating success.

Engineering
& Design
APPENDIX B
ISSUED PJD SAW-2019-01521 AND BUFFER
DETERMINATIONS
Pre -Construction Notification I July 8, 2024
Goodwin Crossing; USACE Action ID: SAW-2019-01521

SAW-2019-01521
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW-2019-01521 County: Durham U.S.G.S. Quad: NW Durham
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Requestor: Eagle Land, LLC — Goodwin Road
Anderson Marlowe
Address: 3700 Comouter Drive (Suite 280)
Raleigh, NC 27609
Size (acres) 75.43 acres
Nearest Waterway Cabin Branch
USGS HUC 03020201
Nearest Town Durham
River Basin Neuse
Coordinates Latitude: 36.09299
Longitude:-78.879605
Location description: The proiect area is situated on both sides of Goodwin Drive, in the city of Durham, North Carolina. The
uroiect area consists of 75.43 acres of the northern portion of Durham Countv. The uroiect area is shown on the attached mat)
entitled "Corps Approved Wetlands Mad' as existing within a bold red boundary labeled "Approximate Propertv Boundary."
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
® There appear to be waters, including wetlands on the above described project area/property, that may be subject to Section 404
of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). The
waters, including wetlands have been delineated, and the delineation has been verified by the Corps to be sufficiently accurate
and reliable. The approximate boundaries of these waters are shown on the enclosed delineation map dated 7/1/2019. Therefore
this preliminary jurisdiction determination may be used in the permit evaluation process, including determining compensatory
mitigation. For purposes of computation of impacts, compensatory mitigation requirements, and other resource protection
measures, a permit decision made on the basis of a preliminary JD will treat all waters and wetlands that would be affected in any
way by the permitted activity on the site as if they are jurisdictional waters of the U.S. This preliminary determination is not an
appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part 331). However, you may
request an approved JD, which is an appealable action, by contacting the Corps district for further instruction.
❑ There appear to be waters, including wetlands on the above described project area/property, that may be subject to Section 404
of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403).
However, since the waters, including wetlands have not been properly delineated, this preliminary jurisdiction determination
may not be used in the permit evaluation process. Without a verified wetland delineation, this preliminary determination is
merely an effective presumption of CWA/RHA jurisdiction over all of the waters, including wetlands at the project area, which
is not sufficiently accurate and reliable to support an enforceable permit decision. We recommend that you have the waters,
including wetlands on your project area/property delineated. As the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland
delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that can be verified by the Corps.
B. Approved Determination
❑ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area/property subject to the permit
requirements of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403) and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
(CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for
a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ There are waters, including wetlands on the above described project area/property subject to the permit requirements of Section
404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) (33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this
determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.

SAW-2019-01521
❑ We recommend you have the waters, including wetlands on your project area/property delineated. As the Corps may not be
able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that
can be verified by the Corps.
❑ The waters, including wetlands on your project area/property have been delineated and the delineation has been verified by
the Corps. The approximate boundaries of these waters are shown on the enclosed delineation map dated DATE. We strongly
suggest you have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be reviewed and verified by the Corps. Once
verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA jurisdiction on your property which, provided
there is no change in the law or our published regulations, may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years.
❑ The waters, including wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat signed by the
Corps Regulatory Official identified below on DATE. Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this
determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ There are no waters of the U. S., to include wetlands, present on the above described project area/property which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA).
You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Morehead City, NC, at [phone] to determine their
requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US, including wetlands, without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). Placement of dredged or fill material, construction or
placement of structures, or work within navigable waters of the United States without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Sections 9 and/or 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (33 USC § 401 and/or 403). If you have any questions
regarding this determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact Joshua A. Deal at 919-554-4884 ext. 35 or
aoshua.a. dealCdusace.armv.mil.
C. Basis For Determination: The proiect area exhibits water bodies with indicators of ordinary high
water marks and wetland criteria as defined in the applicable regional supplement to the 1987
Wetland Delineation Manual. The water bodies on the site are listed in the attached table (See the
preliminary iurisdictional determination form dated 9/16/2019). This determination is based on a
field verification by Joshua Deal (USACE) on 7/24/2019.
D. Remarks: The water bodies in the proiect area were flagged by Spangler Environmental, Inc. and
are shown within the study area on the attached "Corps Approved Wetlands Map."
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the particular site
identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security
Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you should request
a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in B.
above)
This correspondence constitutes an approved jurisdictional determination for the above described site. If you object to this
determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. Enclosed you will find a
Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and request for appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this determination you
must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Phillip Shannon, Review Officer

SAW-2019-01521
60 Forsyth Street SW, Room 1OM15
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for appeal
under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP. Should you
decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by Not applicable.
**It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Division Office if you do not object to the determination in this correspondence. **
Corps Regulatory Official:
Date of JD: 9/16/2019 Expiration Date of JD: Not applicable
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so, please complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at
http://corpsmapu.usace.anny.mil/cm_apex/Vp=136:4:0
Copy furnished:
Agent: Spangler Environmental, Inc.
Dalton Cook
Address: 4338 Bland Road
Raleigh, NC 27609
Telephone Number: 919-875-4288
E-mail: Dalton(dspanglerenvironmental.com

NOTIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OPTIONS AND PROCESS AND
REQUEST FOR APPEAL
Applicant: Eagle Land, LLC — Goodwin Road File Number: SAW-2019-01521
Date: 9/16/2019
Attached
is:
See Section below
❑
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
A
❑
PROFFERED PERMIT Standard Permit or Letter ofpermission
B
❑
PERMIT DENIAL
C
❑
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
D
®
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
E
SECTION I - The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above decision.
Additional information may be found at or htlp://www.usace.anny.mil/Missions/CivilWorks/Res ulatolyPros4ramandPenuits.aspx
or the Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 11.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request
that the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district
engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will
forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your
objections and may: (a) modify the permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your
objections, or (c) not modify the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After
evaluating your objections, the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in
Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein,
you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of
this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days
of the date of this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section 11 of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division
engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new
information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the
date of this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers
Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section 11 of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the
preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed),
by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new information for further consideration by the
Corps to reevaluate the JD.

SECTION II - REQUEST FOR APPEAL or OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your objections to an initial
proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to this form to clarify where your reasons or
objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps memorandum for the
record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the review officer has determined is needed to
clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps may add new information or analyses to the record.
However, you may provide additional information to clarify the location of information that is already in the administrative
record.
POINT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION:
If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the
If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may
appeal process you may contact:
also contact:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division
Mr. Phillip Shannin, Administrative Appeal Review Officer
Attn: Joshua A. Deal
CESAD-PDO
Raleigh Regulatory Office
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, South Atlantic Division
U.S Army Corps of Engineers
60 Forsyth Street, Room 1OM15
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
Phone: [phone]
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government
consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15 day
notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunity to participate in all site investigations.
Date:
Telephone number:
Signature of appellant or agent.
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Attn: Joshua A. Deal, 69 Darlington Avenue, Wilmington, North Carolina
28403
For Permit denials, Proffered Permits and Approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:
Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Phillip Shannin, Administrative
Appeal Officer, CESAD-PDO, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 1OM15, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: 9/16/2019
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Eagle Land, LLC — Goodwin Road, 3700 Computer
Drive (Suite 280), Raleigh, NC 27609
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Wilmington District, Goodwin Road, SAW-2019-01521
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The project area is situated on both sides of
Goodwin Drive, in the city of Durham, North Carolina. The project area consists of 75.43 acres of the northern portion
of Durham County. The project area is shown on the attached map entitled "Corps Approved Wetlands Map" as existing
within a bold red boundary labeled "Approximate Property Boundary."
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC
County: Durham City: Durham
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Latitude: 36.09299 Longitude:-78.879605
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Cabin Branch
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
® Office (Desk) Determination. Date: 09/16/2019
® Field Determination. Date(s): 07/24/2019
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES INREVIEWAREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Estimated amount of
Geographic authority to
Type of aquatic
Latitude (decimal
Longitude (decimal
aquatic resources in
resources (i.e.,
which the aquatic resource
Site Number
review area (acreage
'may be" subject (i.e.,
degrees)
degrees)
wetland vs. non -
and linear feet, if
Section 404 or Section
wetland waters)
applicable
10/404)
Stream 1
36.096734
-78.878656
2372 If
Non -Wetland
Section 404
Stream 2
36.095852
-78.878113
1101 If
Non -Wetland
Section 404
Stream 3
36.095639
-78.878119
206 If
Non -Wetland
Section 404
Stream 4
36.091325
-78.880859
1790 If
Non -Wetland
Section 404
Stream 5
36.089788
-78.880399
122 If
Non -Wetland
Section 404
Wetland 1
36.097163
-78.879906
0.01 ac
Wetland
Section 404
Wetland 2
36.096493
-78.879381
1.00 ac
Wetland
Section 404

Estimated amount of
Geographic authority to
Type of aquatic
aquatic resources in
which the aquatic resource
Latitude (decimal
Longitude (decimal
resources (i.e.,
Site Number
review area (acreage
'may be" subject (i.e.,
degrees)
degrees)
wetland vs. non -
and linear feet, if
Section 404 or Section
wetland waters)
applicable
10/404)
Wetland 3
36.096423
-78.878626
0.17 ac
Wetland
Section 404
Wetland 4
36.092793
-78.879276
0.30 ac
Wetland
Section 404
Wetland 5
36.091776
-78.881936
0.09 ac
Wetland
Section 404
1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review
area, and the requestor of this PID is hereby advised of his or her option to request and obtain an
approved ID (AID) for that review area based on an informed decision after having discussed the
various types of IDs and their characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide General
Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre- construction notification" (PCN), or
requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or other general permit, and the permit applicant has
not requested an AID for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit
applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PID, which does not make an official
determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the option to request an AID
before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit
authorization on an AID could possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being required or
different special conditions; (3) the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than
accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant
can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that
permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5)
undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without requesting an AID
constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the PID; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g.,
signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps
permit authorization based on a PID constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the review area
affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and waives any challenge to such
jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement action, or in any
administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an AID
or a PID, the ID will be processed as soon as practicable. Further, an AID, a proffered individual
permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be
administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic jurisdiction exists over
aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional aquatic
resources in the review area, the Corps will provide an AID to accomplish that result, as soon as is
practicable. This PID finds that there "may be" waters of the U. S. and/or that there "may be"
navigable waters of the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the
review area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources below where
indicated for all checked items:
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map: Corps Approved Wetlands Map
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
® Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
❑ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:
❑ Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation:
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
❑ Photographs: ❑Aerial (Name & Date):
or ❑Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been
verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later iurisdictional determinations.
Signature and date of Regulatory
Staff member completing PJD
9/16/2019
Signature and date of person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining the signature is
impracticable)'
1 Districts may establish timeframes for requester to return signed PJD forms. If the requester does not respond within the
established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is necessary prior to finalizing an
action.

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources
below where indicated for all checked items:
0 Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map: Corps Approved Wetlands- Labeled
Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheetsldelineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
❑ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:
Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Web Soil Survery
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ Statellocal wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMAIFIRM maps:
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: .(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
❑ Photographs. ❑ Aerial (Name & Date):
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessaril
been verified by the Corps and _should _not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.
w4u,61z 9/12/2019
S nature and date of Signature and date of
Regulatory staff member person requesting PJD
completing PJD (REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)'
1 Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond
within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is
necessary prior to finalizing an action.

ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretan
LINDA CULPEPPER
Director
Eagle Land LLC
3700 Computer Drive
Suite 280
Raleigh, NC 27609
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
March 8, 2019
Subject: Buffer Determination Letter
RRO #19-112
Durham County
Determination Type:
Buffer
Intermittent/Perennial
® Neuse 05A NCAC 2B .0233)
❑ Tar -Pamlico (15A NCAC 213 .0259)
® Intermittent/Perennial Determination (where local
buffer ordinances apply)
❑ Jordan (I5A NCAC 2B .0267) (governmental
and/or intedurisdictional projects)
Project Name: Goodwin
Address/Location: 1301 & 1312 Goodwin Road
Stream(s): Cabin Branch
Determination Date: 05/8/2019 Staff: Rick Trone
4:;
�6EQ5
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality. Division of Water Resources z! Raleigh Regional Office
3800 Barrett Drive : 1628 Mail Service Center! Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1628
919.791.4200

Goodwin Road
Durham County
0510812019
Page 2 of 3
Feature
EII/Pt'I
Not
Subject`�1
Subject
Start@
Stop@
Soil
Survey
USGS
To o
A (Cabin
P
X
Throughout
X
X
Branch
Flag @
B
I
X
Off Property
approximately
X
X
36.09312
-78.87854
Flag @
B
P
X
approximately
Cabin Branch
X
X
36.09312
-78, 97854
C
1
X
Throughout
X
Flag @
D
1
X
approximately
Feature C
X
36.09103-78.88173
Flag @
Flag (a
E
I
X
approximately
proximately
approximately
X
36.09115-78,88354
35
-78-888.8835$
(1) E Ephemeral, I Intermittent, t Perennial, NP Not Present, NA Not Present
(2) Refers to State riparian buffer rules only Stream, wetland, or pond impacts are still subject to applicable water quality standards and permitting requirements.
Explanation: The stream(s)/pond(s) listed above has been located on the most recent published NRCS Soil Survey
of Durham County, North Carolina and/or the most recent copy of the USGS Topographic map at a 1: 24,000 scale.
Each feature that is checked "Not Subject" has been determined to not be an intermittent stream, perennial stream, a
pond connected to a stream feature, or the feature is determined not to be present. Stream features that are checked
"Subject" have been located on the property and possess characteristics that qualify it to be subject to the buffer
rules. There may be other streams located on the property that do not show up on the maps referenced above and are
therefore not subject to the buffer rules. However, if the stream features are present on the tract they are subject to
all other applicable North Carolina stream standards and permitting requirements as outlined in I SA NCAC 02B,
and may be considered jurisdictional according to the US Army Corps of Engineers.
This on -site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter. Landowners or affected
parties that dispute a determination made by the DWR may request a determination by the Director. An
appeal request must be made within sixty (60) days of date of this letter. A request for a determination by the
Director shall be referred to the Director in writing. If sending via US Postal Service: c/o Karen Higgins;
DWR — 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit, 1617 Mail Service Center; Raleigh, NC 27699-1617. If sending via
delivery service (UPS, FedEx, etc.): Karen Higgins; DWR -- 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit; 512 N. Salisbury
Street; Raleigh, NC 27604.
This determination is final and binding unless, as detailed above, an appeal is requested within sixty (60)
days.
This project may require a Section 404/401 Permit for the proposed activity. Any inquiries should be
directed to the US Army Corp of Engineers (Raleigh Regulatory Field Office) at (919)-554-4884.
If you have questions regarding this determination, please feel free to contact Rick Trone at (919) 7914257.
Sincer ly,
ouch, LG
Water Quality Regional Operations Center
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources V Rale gh Regional Office
3800 Barrett Dr.ve 11628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1628
919.791.4200

Goodwin Road
Durham County
0 '0$12019
Page 3 of 3
cc: RRO DWR File Copy
Dalton Cook, Spangler Environmental. (via email)
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality: Division of Water Resources Raleigh Regional Office
3800 Barrett Drive. 1628 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1628
919.791.4200

Goodwin Road
Durham County, NC-DWR Project # 19-112
A (Cabin Branch):
a
Subject
E: Subject
C: Subject
.am
It
NRCS Soil Survey Sheet 13
�` d saga
Durham Co NC 1976 Locations are approximate
Legend'- and are provided for refer-
ence only n
-project boundary Q �r ����,

Goodwin Road
Durham County, NC-DWR Project # 19-112
LISGS Topographical Map sr,
Northwest Durham Quadrangle 2016 E� Locations are approximate
Legend: and are provided for refer-
ence only
-Project boundary Q M..�' • I�JA,`JI

DocuSign Envelope ID: 2FB01 D48-CCDD-4DE8-9162-9A718E42A1213
ROY COOPER
Governor
ELIZABETH S. BISER
Secretary
RICHARD E. ROGERS, JR.
Director
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
June 25, 2024
DWR Project 24-186
Durham County
Eagle Land LLC
Attn: Anderson Marlowe
3700 Computer Dr., Ste. 280
Raleigh, NC 27609
(Delivered via email: (marlowbuildersl PUmail.com)
Subject: On -Site Determination for Applicability to the Neuse Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 02B .0714)
Project Name: Goodwin Road
Site Address / Location: 1301 & 1312 Goodwin Rd.; Durham, NC 27712
Dear Mr. Marlowe:
On June 19, 2024, Cherri Smith, at the request of Alex Hornaday with Spangler Environmental,
conducted an on -site review of the streams located on the subject property to determine the
applicability of the above -noted state regulations.
The Division of Water Resources has determined that the streams listed in the table below and
identified on the attached maps are shown on either the most recently published NRCS Soil Survey of
Durham County and/or the USGS National Map at a scale that incorporates the National Hydrography
Dataset High Resolution data at 1:24,000 scale. Streams that are listed as "Subject" on the below table
have been located on the ground at the site and possess characteristics that qualify them to be at least
intermittent streams in accordance with the NC Stream Identification Manual v.4.11 and therefore
subject to the Neuse Buffer Rules. Please be aware that streams identified as "not subject" may be
considered jurisdictional according to the US Army Corps of Engineers and subject to the Clean Water
Act.
Cabin Branch
Subject to
Depicted on
Depicted on
Stream ID
Determination
Start @
Stop @
Buffer Rules
Soil Survey
USGS Topo
Stream A
Perennial
Yes
Present Throughout.
Yes
Yes
36.093161,
Stream B
Intermittent
Yes
Yes
Yes
-78.578545
36.093161,Yes
Stream B
Perennial
Yes
Yes
-78 578545
D � ��� North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
Raleigh Regional Office I 3800 Barrett Drive I Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
NOR1H CAROL1Na 919.791.4200

DocuSign Envelope ID: 2FB01 D48-CCDD-4DE8-9162-9A718E42A1213
DWR 24-186
Goodwin Road
Durham County
Page 2 of 3
Subject to
Depicted on
Depicted on
Stream ID
Determination
Start @
Stop @
Buffer Rules
Soil Survey
USGS Topo
C
Intermittent
Yes
Present Throughout
Yes
No
36.091040,
D
Intermittent
Yes
Yes
No
-78.881734
36.091301,
36.091447,
E
Intermittent
Yes
Yes
No
-78883608
-78.883646
This on -site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter. The owner (or future
owners) should notify the Division (and other relevant agencies) of this decision in any future
correspondence concerning this property. Landowners or affected parties that dispute this
determination made by the Division may request a determination by the Director of Water Resources.
This determination is final and binding, unless an appeal request is made within sixty (60) calendar
days of the date of this letter to the Director in writing.
If sending via U.S. Postal Service:
Stephanie Goss - DWR 401 & Buffer
Permitting Branch Supervisor
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
If sending via delivery service (UPS, FedEx, etc.)
Stephanie Goss -DWR 401 & Buffer
Permitting Branch Supervisor
512 N Salisbury St.
Raleigh, NC 27604
This letter only addresses the applicability of the stated regulations on the streams identified on the
subject property and/or within the proposed project area. This letter does not approve any activity
within buffers or within waters of the state. There may be other regulated waters, streams or ponds
located on the property that do not appear on the maps or table referenced above. Any waters,
streams, or ponds on the site, including the streams identified in this letter, may be considered
jurisdictional according to the US Army Corps of Engineers and subject to the Clean Water Act. If you
have any additional questions or require additional information, please contact Cherri Smith at 919-791-
4200 or cherri.smithPdeq.nc.g0v. This determination is subject to review as provided in Articles 3 &
4 of G.S. 150B.
Sincerely,
�gDocuSigned by:
372DCBCB61EE4A8...
Michael Hall
Regional Supervisor
Division of Water Resources, Raleigh Regional Office
Department of Environmental Quality
Noa1H C�NAfll_
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
Raleigh Regional Office I 3800 Barrett Drive I Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
919.791.4200

DocuSign Envelope ID: 2F1301 D48-CCDD-4DE8-9162-9A718E42A1213
Enclosures: USGS Topographical Map
published NRCS Soil Survey
Electronic cc: Laserfiche
[e-mail]
NORTH CAROLINAD � Iv
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
Raleigh Regional Office I 3800 Barrett Drive I Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
919.791.4200
DWR 24-186
Goodwin Road
Durham County
Page 3 of 3

DocuSign Envelope ID: 2FB01 D48-CCDD-4DE8-9162-9A718E42Al2B
1301 & 1312 Goodwin Road
Durham County, NC-DWR Project # 24-186
Stream A —Subject
7- 71he #.
` GIF _
H r C --
r / �
F;
Stream C—Subject
rr
Stream E—Subject
Stream D—Subject
1 rc
ti 1
1:0'. its
NRCS Soil Survey Sheet
Durham CO NC 1976 ,' y � Approximate locations of
Legend: o Origin, Stop and
-project boundary �' .w � Intermittent/Perennial
* �" breaks
Stream A —Subject
Stream B—Subject

DocuSign Envelope ID: 2FB01 D48-CCDD-4DE8-9162-9A718E42Al2B
1301 & 1312 Goodwin Road
Durham County, NC-DWR Project # 24-186
E
ream A —Subject
Streams C, D, & E—Not Depicted
LE LN
Stream A —Subject
Stream B—Subject
USGS Topographical Map
a� �a
yr(so.n3
Durham Quadrangle 2019
y Approximate location of
Legend: Intermittent/Perennial
o nn
break of Stream B I�JA`V JI
-Project boundary

DocuSign Envelope ID: 6AC140E3-A417-4E3E-AC8C-23CrnrA10DBE
ROY COOPER
Governor
ELIZABETH S. BISER
Secretary
RICHARD E. ROGERS, JR.
Director
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
April 10, 2024
DWR Project 24-095
Durham County
Meritage Homes
Attn: Bill Robinson
3300 Paramount Parkway, Ste. 120
Raleigh, NC 27560
(Delivered via email: ([e-mail])
Subject: On -Site Determination for Applicability to the Neuse Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 02B .0714)
Project Name: Goodwin Crossing — Offsite Sanitary Sewer
Site Address / Location: Between Goodwin and Torredge Roads; Durham, NC 27712
Dear Mr. Robinson:
On April 10, 2024, Cherri Smith, at the request of Sean Stanton with Colliers Engineering & Design,
conducted an on -site review of the streams located on the subject property to determine the
applicability of the above -noted state regulations.
The Division of Water Resources has determined that the streams listed in the table below and
identified on the attached maps are shown on either the most recently published NRCS Soil Survey of
Durham County and/or the USGS National Map at a scale that incorporates the National Hydrography
Dataset High Resolution data at 1:24,000 scale. Streams that are listed as "Subject" on the below table
have been located on the ground at the site and possess characteristics that qualify them to be at least
intermittent streams in accordance with the NC Stream Identification Manual v.4.11 and therefore
subject to the Neuse Buffer Rules. Please be aware that streams identified as "not subject" may be
considered jurisdictional according to the US Army Corps of Engineers and subject to the Clean Water
Act.
Cabin Branch
Stream ID
Determination
Subject to Buffer
Rules
Start @
Stop @
Depicted on
Soil Survey
Depicted on
USGS Topo
A
Perennial
Yes
throughout project area
Yes
Yes
B
Perennial
Yes
throughout project area
Yes
Yes
C
Wetland
No*
throughout project area
Yes
Yes
* The only defined channel in this large wetland/floodplain complex is Cabin Branch (Stream B).
D � ��� North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
Raleigh Regional Office I 3800 Barrett Drive I Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
NOR1H CAROL Na 919.791.4200

DocuSign Envelope ID: 6AC140E3-A417-4E3E-AC8C-23C6DFA10DBE
DWR 24-095
Goodwin Crossing — Offsite Sewer
Durham County
Page 2 of 2
This on -site determination shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter. The owner (or future
owners) should notify the Division (and other relevant agencies) of this decision in any future
correspondence concerning this property. Landowners or affected parties that dispute this
determination made by the Division may request a determination by the Director of Water Resources.
This determination is final and binding, unless an appeal request is made within sixty (60) calendar
days of the date of this letter to the Director in writing.
If sending via U.S. Postal Service:
Stephanie Goss - DWR 401 & Buffer
Permitting Branch Supervisor
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
If sending via delivery service (UPS, FedEx, etc.)
Stephanie Goss -DWR 401 & Buffer
Permitting Branch Supervisor
512 N Salisbury St.
Raleigh, NC 27604
This letter only addresses the applicability of the stated regulations on the streams identified on the
subject property and/or within the proposed project area. This letter does not approve any activity
within buffers or within waters of the state. There may be other regulated waters, streams or ponds
located on the property that do not appear on the maps or table referenced above. Any waters,
streams, or ponds on the site, including the streams identified in this letter, may be considered
jurisdictional according to the US Army Corps of Engineers and subject to the Clean Water Act. If you
have any additional questions or require additional information, please contact Cherri Smith at 919-791-
4200 or cherri.smithPdeq.nc. og_v. This determination is subject to review as provided in Articles 3 &
4 of G.S. 150B.
Sincerely,
� nnDo''c��u,,Siiwgssne''d by:
V vt,�l�(ntil�
372DCBCB61EE4A8...
Michael Hall
Regional Supervisor
Division of Water Resources, Raleigh Regional Office
Department of Environmental Quality
Enclosures: USGS Topographical Map
published NRCS Soil Survey
Electronic cc: Laserfiche
[e-mail]
NORTH CAROLINAD � fl
J�f
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
Raleigh Regional Office I 3800 Barrett Drive I Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
919.791.4200

DocuSign Envelope ID: 6AC140E3-A417-4E3E-AC8C-23C6DFA10DBE
Goodwin Crossing—Offsite Sanitary Sewer
Durham County, NC-DWR Project # 24-095
a+ —fit C �• t ,�,►�� V
l Stream C—Not Subject
�' --• µfa _ �.
VE Or
i7r 3 AIDoWF
µ9
+
?A�9
};rB Stream A —Subject
��.
Stream B—Subject t
, O , }•Ire ��,,�� ,
Mfg
1'►I j pti3 i � � f
WSC
17
z ws .
'11C
a •Vn C:TE3
M[C -
'• 0
WSfar
• _� 0
^r`
r.
V
t
ry
%to
7
r
NRCS Soil Survey Sheet „EsrarE�
Mir �o.ins
Durham CO NC 1976,a Locations are approximate
Legend: and are provided for refer-
ence only:: Iwv l
-project boundary
ag vuwvro�i

DocuSign Envelope ID: 6AC140E3-A417-4E3E-AC8C-23C6DFA10DBE
Goodwin Crossing—OfFsite Sanitary Sewer
Durham County, NC-DWR Project # 24-095
Stream C—Not Subject
44,{jh irk
Ai
Stream A—
ti
r
USGS Topographical Map
a� �a
yr(so.n3
Durham Quadrangle 2019
Locations are approximate
Legend o and are provided for refer-
• ence only
-Project boundary �� "�

Engineering
& Design
APPENDIX C
PJD REQUEST FOR OFFSITE SANITARY SEWER
Pre -Construction Notification I July 8, 2024
Goodwin Crossing; USACE Action ID: SAW-2019-01521

urisdictional Determination Reauest
US Army Corps
of Engineers.
Wilmington District
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project
manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by
assigned counties can be found on-line at:
http://www.saw.usace.aimy.mil/Missions/Re ul�atoiyPermitProi4ram/Contact/CountyLocator.aspx,
by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your
request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager.
ASHEVILLE & CHARLOTTE REGULATORY
FIELD OFFICES
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
INSTRUCTIONS:
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
General Number: 910-251-4633
Fax Number: [phone]
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E, F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D — PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when
necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Version: May 2017 Page 1

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: 1000 Collins Drive
City, State:
County:
Durham, NC
Durham
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 0835728668
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Georae Buchholz
Mailing Address: 2000 Regency Parkway
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address
Select one:
Suite 295
919-475-3874
[e-mail]
I am the current property owner.
I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultanti
Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
Name: City of Durham
Mailing Address: PROP AND FACILITY MGMT 101
CITY HALL PLZ DURHAM, NC 27701
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address:
1 Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
2 Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Version: May 2017 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION',4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
George Buchholz
Print Name
Capacity: ❑ Owner Z Authorized Agent'
3/20/24
Date
George Buchholz
Signature
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
❑✓ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
❑ A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
❑ I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
❑ I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
❑ Other:
s For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
a If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
s Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Version: May 2017 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERNIINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One)
7 I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminM JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may
be "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United States"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional "waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
"preliminary" in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
❑ I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United
States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other "affected
party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
❑ I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
✓❑ Size of Property or Review Area 6.5 acres.
❑ The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Version: May 2017 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude: 36.096493 N
Longitude:-78.876207 W
A legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than 1 Ix 17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).6
■ North Arrow
■ Graphical Scale
■ Boundary of Review Area
■ Date
■ Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
■ Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
■ Jurisdictional non -wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non -Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
■ Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non -
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non -Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or "Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
Wetland and non -wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non -wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
6 Please refer to the guidance document titled "Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations" to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards. hM2://www.saw.usace.4rmy.mil/Missions/Regulatoly-Permit-
Pro gram/Jurisdiction/
Version: May 2017 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F4Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
• PJDs, please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form' and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
• AJDS• please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form'.
Vicinity Map
Aerial Photograph
USGS Topographic Map
Soil Survey Map
Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
Landscape Photos (if taken)
NCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
hJ Other Assessment Forms
' www.saw.usace.4rmy.mil/Portals/59/docs/regulatory/readocs/JD/RGL 08-02_App A Prelim _JD_Form fillable.pdf
8 Please see hM2://www.saw.usace.4M.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-Program/Jurisdiction/
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federaljurisdiction under the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local
government agencies, and the public, and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal
law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approved jurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District's website
and on the Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Version: May 2017 Page 6

6/24/24, 11:33 AM
Parcel Report
Durham County, NC Property Report 6/24/2024
Parcel Information
PIN:
0835728668
REID:
183386
Acreage:
78.37
Land Use:
PUBL SVC/ SEWER & WA
Deed Book:
000426
Deed Page:
00323
Plat Book:
000085
Plat Page:
000002
Subdivision:
PROP -CITY TR#991/13ROWN WA
Site Address:
1615 INFINITY RD
TER TREATMENT PLANT
Owner Address:
PROP AND FACILITY MGMT
PL000085-000002
101 CITY HALL PLZ
Owner Name:
CITY OF DURHAM
DURHAM, NC 27701
Land Value:
$1,156,645.00
Building Value:
$285,375.00
Total Value:
$1,442,020.00
Sale Price:
$NaN.undefined
Tax Maps are not to be used to establish boundaries and/or size. Use for such is soley the reponsibility of the user.
https://maps.durhamnc.gov/gomaps/Reports/UserDefined/parcel Report.htmI?objectl D=77546&url=https://webgis2.durhamnc.gov/server/rest/services/... 1 /2

6/24/24, 11:33 AM
Parcel Report
https://maps.durhamnc.gov/gomaps/Reports/UserDefined/parcel Report.htmI?objectl D=77546&url=https://webgis2.durhamnc.gov/server/rest/services/... 2/2

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)
Form Approved -
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD)
OMB No. 0710-0024
For use of this form, see Sec 404 CWA, Sec 10 RHA, Sec 103 MPRSA; the proponent agency is CECW-COR.
Expires 2024-04-30
DATA REQUIRED BY THE PRIVACY ACT OF 1974
Authority Rivers and Harbors Act, Section 10, 33 USC 403; Clean Water Act, Section 404, 33 USC 1344; Marine Protection, Research, and
Sanctuaries Act, Section 103, 33 USC 1413; Regulatory Program of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; Final Rule for 33 CFR
Parts 320-332.
Principal Purpose The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine whether there are any aquatic resources
within the review area that may be subject to federal jurisdiction under the regulatory authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local government agencies, and the
public, and may be made available as part of a public notice or FOIA request as required by federal law. Your name and property
location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in any resulting jurisdictional determination (JD), which
may be made available to the public on the District's website and/or on the Headquarters USACE website.
Disclosure Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the request for a JD cannot be evaluated
nor can a PJD be issued.
The Agency Disclosure Notice (ADN)
The public reporting burden for this collection of information, 0710-0024, is estimated to average 25 minutes per response, including the time for
reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of
information. Send comments regarding the burden estimate or burden reduction suggestions to the Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters
Services, at whs.mc-alex.esd.mbx.dd-dod-information-collections aQmail.mil. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of
law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control
number.
SECTION I - BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD:
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD:
Colliers Engineerring & Design, 2000 Regency Parkway Suite 295, Cary NC 27518; Attention George Buchholz; on behalf of
Meritage Homes.
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
Wilmington District
D. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: North Carolina County/Parish/Borough: Durham City: Durham
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Latitude: 36.096493 o Longitude:-78.87621 o
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Cabin Branch
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
1-1 Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
Field Determination
Date(s): February 9, 2024
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY JURISDICTION.
Site
Latitude (decimal
Longitude
Estimated amount of
Type of aquatic resource
Geographic authority to which the
Number
degrees)
(decimal degrees)
aquatic resource in review
(i.e., wetland vs. non-
aquatic resource "may be"
area (acreage and linear
wetland waters)
subject (i.e., Section 404 or
feet, if applicable)
Section 101404)
W-1
36.097089
-78.872514
2.68 acres
Wetland
Section 404
ENG FORM 6249, NOV 2023 Page 1 of 3

Site
Latitude (decimal
Longitude
Estimated amount of
Type of aquatic resource
Geographic authority to which the
Number
degrees)
(decimal degrees)
aquatic resource in review
(i.e., wetland vs. non-
aquatic resource "may be"
area (acreage and linear
wetland waters)
subject (i.e., Section 404 or
feet, if applicable)
Section 101404)
Non -wetland
S-1
36.046944
-78.872778
224 linear feet
Section 404
(Stream)
Non -wetland
S-2
36.09444
-78.878889
52 linear feet
Section 404
(Stream)
1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby
advised of his or her option to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an informed decision after having discussed
the various types of JDs and their characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit
verification requiring "preconstruction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or other general permit, and the permit
applicant has not requested an AJD for the activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has
elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD or no JD whatsoever, which do not make an official determination of jurisdictional aquatic
resources; (2) the applicant has the option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing
a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the
applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or other general permit
authorization; (4) the applicant can accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that permit,
including whatever mitigation requirements the USACE has determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject
permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the PJD or reliance on no JD whatsoever;
(6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of USACE permit
authorization based on a PJD or no JD whatsoever constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the review area affected in any way by that
activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement
action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be
processed as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual
permit denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it becomes appropriate to make
an official determination whether geographic jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official delineation of
jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the USACE will provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD
finds that there "may be" waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be" navigable waters of the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all
aquatic features in the review area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:
F. SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources below where indicated for all checked items:
Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map: Figures 1-4
Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
1-1 Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
1-1 Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report.
Rationale:
1-1 Data sheets prepared by the USACE:
1-1 Corps navigable waters' study:
ENG FORM 6249, NOV 2023 Page 2 of 3

® U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
® USGS NHD data.
® USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
® U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:
1:24000-1 Northwest Durham, NC; Neuse River Basin HUC 8 Digit: 03020201
ZUSDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey.
Citation: Durham County
ZNational Wetlands Inventory map(s).
Cite Name: 1:24000-1 Northwest Durham,NC
State/Local Wetland Inventory map(s):
ZFEMA/FIRM maps:
1-1 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
ZPhotographs: ® Aerial (Name & Date):
or © Other (Name & Date): Site Photos taken on 2-9-2024
Previous determination (s). File no. and date of response letter:
Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been verified by the USACE and should not be relied upon
for later jurisdictional determinations.
Name of Regulatory Staff Member Completing PJD
Date
Signature of Regulatory Staff Member Completing PJD
Name of Person Requesting PJD
Date
Signatureof Person Requesting PJD (REQUIRED, unless
obtaining the Signature is Impracticable
George Buchholz
2024-06-27
George Buchholz Digitally signed by George Buchholz
Date: 2024.06.27 11:07:44-04'00'
Districts may establish timeframes for requester to return signed PJD forms. If the requester does not respond within the established time frame, the
district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is necessary prior to finalizing an action.
ENG FORM 6249, NOV 2023 Page 3 of 3

Wetlands Delineation Report
Goodwin Crossing - Offsite Sanitary Sewer
Colliers Engineering & Design Project Number: 24000310A
February 29, 2024
Prepared for:
Meritage Homes
3300 Paramount Parkway, Suite 120
Raleigh, North Carolina 27560
Prepared by:
Colliers Engineering & Design, Architecture, Landscape Architecture,
Surveying, CT P.C. (DBA Maser Consulting)
2000 Regency Parkway
Suite 295
Cary, NC 27518
Main: 919-439-6082
Colliers
Engineering
& Design
Accelerating success.

Engineering
& Design
Table of Contents
1.0
PROJECT INFORMATION................................................................... 2
2.0
INTRODUCTION........................................................................... 3
3.0
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION................................................................... 4
4.0
BACKGROUND INFORMATION.............................................................. 5
4.1
U.S. Geological Survey Map................................................................... 5
4.2
Soil Survey................................................................................ 5
4.3
National Wetland Inventory and Floodplain Maps ................................................. 5
5.0
WETLAND & SURFACE WATER DELINEATION METHODOGY..................................... 7
6.0
WETLAND AND SURFACE WATER DELINEATION RESULTS ....................................... 8
6.1
Wetland and Surface Water Summary .......................................................... 8
6.2
Vegetation................................................................................ 8
6.3
Soils..................................................................................... 9
6.4
Hydrology................................................................................. 9
6.5
Wetland Areas............................................................................. 9
7.0
WETLAND DELINEATION CONCLUSION..................................................... 10
8.0
REFERENCE.............................................................................. 12
APPENDIX A -FIGURES
APPENDIX B -DATA FORMS
APPENDIX C -USACE ANTECEDENT PRECIPITATION TOOL
APPENDIX D -PHOTOGRAPHS
Wetlands Delineation Report I February 29, 2024
Goodwin Crossing - Offsite Sanitary Sewer 2 2

Engineering
& Design
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
On behalf of Meritage Homes, Colliers Engineering & Design, Architecture, Landscape Architecture, Surveying,
CT P.C. (DBA Maser Consulting) (CED) conducted field delineations for the Goodwin Crossing - Offsite Sanitary
Sewer near 1000 Collins Drive in Durham, North Carolina within Durham County (hereinafter referred to as
"Study Area"). The Study Area consists of four (4) parcels of land that can be further described as Durham County
Parcel Information Numbers (PIN): 0835-53-42-7438, 0835-62-58-8302, 0835-72-86-6801, and 0835-64-74-7590.
The Study Area is approximately 6.5-acres in size and located at latitudinal coordinates 36.096493 and
longitudinal coordinates-78.876207. The Study Area is located approximately 6.0-miles north of Durham, North
Carolina. The Study Area is being considered for offsite sanitary sewer for the Goodwin Crossing residential
development.
The Study Area was investigated to identify potential jurisdictional Waters of the U.S. (WOTUS) and wetlands
subject to Federal or State regulatory jurisdiction. The delineation methodologies developed by the USACE and
the USEPA, as described in the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual, Technical Report V--87-1 and
the Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Region (Version 2.0) and the subsequently issued USACE regulatory guidance regarding the identification of
jurisdictional stream channels through the recognition of field indicators of an ordinary high-water mark within
drainage features (Environmental Laboratory, 1987; USACE 2012; USACE 2005) were utilized during our
investigation. Surface waters were delineated based upon the methodology in the North Carolina Division of
Water Resources (NC DWR) Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and Perennial Stream and Their
Origins (Version 4.11).
Based on the field investigations, one (1) wetland feature and two (2) stream features were delineated within
the Subject Property by CED February 9, 2024. A total of 2.68-acres of palustrine forested/palustrine emergent
wetland and 276-linear feet of perennial stream (R3) were delineated within the Study Area. It is CED's
professional opinion that these water features would be considered jurisdictional WOTUS and wetlands. The
location and size of features delineated are shown on Figure 4. Wetland Delineation Map (Appendix A). In
addition, CED determined each surface water feature's applicability to the Neuse River Buffer Rules in
accordance with 15A NCAC 02B. 0233 (Neuse River Basin Rules). Based on the field investigations, Stream
Features S1 and S2 would have a 50-foot Neuse River Buffer. In Section 7.0, below, CED also determined
each surface water feature's applicability to the Durham County Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) Article
8 - Environmental Protection). Based on the delineation perennial Stream Feature S1 and S2 have a 100-foot
riparian buffer in accordance with the Durham County UDO. Additionally, Wetland Feature W1 has a 25-foot
wetland buffer in accordance with the Durham County UDO. A general discussion of allowable activities within
the riparian buffers is also provided.
Wetlands Delineation Report I February 29, 2024
Goodwin Crossing - Offsite Sanitary Sewer 27

Engineering
& Design
1.0 PROJECT INFORMATION
Project Name Goodwin Crossing - Offsite Sanitary Sewer
Project Location 1000 Collins Drive
Municipality
County
State
Latitude/Longitude
Study Area Size
U.S.G.S. Quadrangle
Potential Jurisdictional
Waters of the U.S. (WOTUS)
and wetlands
River Basin (HUC) &
sub -watershed
Nearest Stream
Navigable Water Nexus
Non Jurisdictional Wetlands/
Waters Present (Yes/No)
Durham
Durham
North Carolina
36.096493 /-78.876207
+/- 6.5-acres
Northwest Durham, NC, North Carolina
See Table 1: Aquatic Resource Summary Table
8 Digit Hydrologic Units: 03020201; Neuse River Basin
Sub-watershed(s): Mountain Creek -Little River
Located in Watershed Protection Overlay District F/J-B
Cabin Branch; Cabin Branch has a Stream index number of 27-2-21-7 and
a Stream Classification of WS-IV (Water Supply Watershed Iv), and
Nutrient Sensitive Waters NSW
The one wetland feature and two stream features would be considered
jurisdictional WOTUS and wetlands since the features are
incorporated into the Cabin Branch stream and finally discharge into the
Neuse River.
No
Wetlands Delineation Report I February 29, 2024
Goodwin Crossing - Offsite Sanitary Sewer 2 27

Engineering
& Design
2.0 INTRODUCTION
On behalf of Meritage Homes, Colliers Engineering & Design, Architecture, Landscape Architecture, Surveying,
CT P.C. (DBA Maser Consulting) (CED) conducted field delineations for the Goodwin Crossing - Offsite Sanitary
Sewer near 1000 Collins Drive in Durham, North Carolina within Durham County (hereinafter referred to as
"Study Area"). The Study Area consists of four (4) parcels of land that can be further described as Durham County
Parcel Information Numbers (PIN): 0835-53-42-7438, 0835-62-58-8302, 0835-72-86-6801, and 0835-64-74-7590.
The Study Area is approximately 6.5-acres in size and located at latitudinal coordinates 36.096493 and
longitudinal coordinates-78.876207. The Study Area is located approximately 6.0-miles north of Durham, North
Carolina. The Study Area is being considered for offsite sanitary sewer for the Goodwin Crossing residential
development.
The Study Area was investigated to identify potential jurisdictional Waters of the U.S. (WOTUS) and wetlands
subject to Federal or State regulatoryjurisdiction. According to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) regulations described in Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 CFR
Section 328.3 and 40 CFR Section 230.3) respectively, wetlands are "...areas that are inundated or saturated with
surface or groundwater at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances
do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions." In addition, CED
determined each surface feature's applicability to the 15A NCAC 02B .0714 Neuse River Riparian Buffer Rules and
the Durham County Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) Section 8.5 - Riparian Buffer Protection Standards
and Section 8.9 - Wetlands Protection Standards.
Wetlands Delineation Report I February 29, 2024
Goodwin Crossing - Offsite Sanitary Sewer 3 27

Engineering
& Design
3.0 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
The Study Area is located near 1000 Collins Drive in Durham, North Carolina within Durham County. The Study
Area extends across four (4) parcels located northeast of Goodwin Road and is approximately 6.00-miles north of
Durham, North Carolina. Located immediately adjacent to the northeast of the Study Area is a maintained
powerline right of way, while to the south, west, and north are forested areas.
The Study Area consists of undeveloped forested areas. The Forested Areas can be broken down into two
(2) habitat community types, and they are as follows: Dry-Mesic Oak -Hickory Forest and Wetland Areas.
The Dry-Mesic Oak -Hickory Forest Areas are non -wetland areas and are the dominant habitat community type in
the Study Area. The Dry-Mesic Oak -Hickory Forest Areas are dominated by white oak (Quercus alba), red oak
(Quercus rubra), pignut hickory (Carya glabra), and tulip poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera) species. Other notable
species observed within this community include American beech (Fagus grandifolia), red maple (Acer rubrum),
Hophornbeam (Ostrya virginiana), sweet gum (Liquidambar styraciflua), loblolly pine (Pinus taeda), American holly
(Ilex opaca), eastern red cedar Uuniperus virginiana), common greenbrier (Smilax rotundifolia), and Christmas
fern (Polystichum acrostichoides). There are Wetland Areas within the Subject Property that can be described as
Bottomland Hardwood Forested/Emergent Wetlands. A description of the Wetland Area can be found, below, in
Section 6.0 with a more detailed description of the wetland type found in Section 6.5.
Wetlands Delineation Report I February 29, 2024
Goodwin Crossing - Offsite Sanitary Sewer 4 27

Engineering
& Design
4.0 BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Prior to on -site field investigations, several publicly available sources of information were reviewed to determine
the likelihood of wetlands and surface waters occurring within Study Area. These mapping resources generally
include, but are not limited to, the United States Geological Survey (USGS) maps (Figure 1. Vicinity Map, Appendix
A), the U.S. Department of Agriculture - Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) soils database (Figure 2.
Published Soil Survey Map, Appendix A), National Hydrography Data set (NHD), the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) database and the Federal Emergency Management Act (FEMA) Floodplain
Panel maps (Figure 3. NHD/NWI/Floodplain Map, Appendix A).
4.1 U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY MAP
The Study Area appears on the Northwest Durham, NC, North Carolina Quadrangle USGS Maps (Figure 1.
Vicinity Map, Appendix A). The USGS map depicts the Study Area located northeast of Goodwin Road and
southwest of Torredge Road. Located within the northeast extent of the Study Area is Cabin Branch and its
associated riparian habitat, while to the south, west and north are forested areas. The Study Area is relatively
flat, elevations at the Study Area range from 280 to 320 feet above mean sea level (MSL) based on the USGS map.
4.2 SOIL SURVEY
The NRCS Web Soil Survey depicts the following five (5) map units within the Study Area and provides a
description of the properties and qualities of each soil:
• Altavista silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes, rarely flooded (AIB)- Moderately well drained, very high runoff,
depth to water table about 18 to 30 inches, hydric soil rating: yes.
• Chewacla and Wehadkee soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, frequently flooded (Ch) - Somewhat poorly
drained, low runoff, depth to water table about 6 to 24 inches, hydric soil rating: yes.
• Mayodan sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes (MfB) - Well drained, low runoff, depth to the water table
more than 80 inches, hydric soil rating: no.
• Mayodan sandy loam, 6 to 10 percent slopes (MfC) - Well drained, medium runoff, depth to the water
table more than 80 inches, hydric soil rating: no.
• Mayodan sandy loam, 10 to 15 percent slopes (MfD) - Well drained, medium runoff, depth to the water
table more than 80 inches, hydric soil rating: no.
Of the five (5) map unit soils, Altavista silt loam (AIB) and Chewacla and Wehadkee soils (Ch) are listed as being
hydric and are most likely to contain wetlands primarily due to the shallow seasonal high water table. The
published USDA County Soil Survey map depicts Altavista silt loam (AIB) and Chewacla and Wehadkee soils
(Ch) lying within the northwestern extent of the Study Area along Cabin Branch. Additionally, the published USDA
County Soil Survey map shows stream features located within the northwestern extent of the Study Area (Cabin
Branch) as well as a feature intersecting perpendicularly to the Study Area in the southwestern extent.
4.3 NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY AND FLOODPLAIN MAPS
The Study Area is in the Neuse River Basin (8 Digit HUC: 03020201) within the Mountain Creek -Little
River Sub -watershed. The NHD/NWI/Floodplain Map (Figure 3, Appendix A) shows two (2) stream features
located within the Study Area. One (1) stream is located within the northeast extent of the Study Area, while
Wetlands Delineation Report I February 29, 2024
Goodwin Crossing - Offsite Sanitary Sewer 5 27

Engineering
& Design
the other is located within the southwestern extent of the Study Area. In addition, the NHD/NWI/Floodplain
Map shows a freshwater forested/shrub wetland located adjacent to the stream in the northeast extent of
the Study Area and a riverine wetland located congruent to the stream in the southwest extent of the Study
Area. The Study Area does contain a floodplain and a flood way area according to FEMA Floodplain Panel Map
3720083500K (Figure 3, Appendix A).
Wetlands Delineation Report I February 29, 2024
Goodwin Crossing - Offsite Sanitary Sewer 6 27

Engineering
& Design
5.0 WETLAND & SURFACE WATER DELINEATION METHODOGY
The Study Area was investigated to identify potential jurisdictional Waters of the U.S. (WOTUS) and wetlands
subject to Federal or State regulatory jurisdiction. The delineation methodologies developed by the USACE
and the USEPA, as described in the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual, Technical Report
V--87-1 and the Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Eastern Mountains
and Piedmont Region (Version 2.0) and the subsequently issued USACE regulatory guidance regarding the
identification of jurisdictional stream channels through the recognition of field indicators of an ordinary
high-water mark within drainage features (Environmental Laboratory, 1987; USACE 2012; USACE 2005) were
utilized during our investigation. Surface waters were delineated based upon the methodology in the North
Carolina Division of Water Resources (NC DWR) Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and Perennial
Stream and Their Origins (Version 4.11.
The Study Area was walked, community types were characterized, and wetland and surface water boundaries
were flagged. Sample stations were established along the boundaries to examine vegetation, soils, and
hydrology. Using this data, boundaries were established based on changes in vegetation, soils, hydrology, and
surface water characteristics.
Wetlands Delineation Report I February 29, 2024
Goodwin Crossing - Offsite Sanitary Sewer 27

Engineering
& Design
6.0 WETLAND AND SURFACE WATER DELINEATION RESULTS
6.1 WETLAND AND SURFACE WATER SUMMARY
On -site field investigations of the Study Area were conducted by CED on February 9, 2024. The on -site delineation
did verify the presence of surface waters within Study Area. A summary of the aquatic resources identified within
the Study Area is provided below in Table 1: Aquatic Resource Summary. The location and size of the aquatic
resources delineated are shown on Figure 4. Wetland Delineation Map (Appendix A).
TABLE 1: AQUATIC RESOURCE SUMMARY TABLE
Note 1: Cowardin Classification; PFO = palustrine forested wetland; PEM = palustrine emergent wetland;
Note 2: All values are approximate
Note 3: Values are reflective only within sewer outfall study area. Delineation extended beyond sewer outfall study area.
6.2 VEGETATION
Representative plant species within the wetland areas include the following: Sweetgum (Liquidambarstyraciflua),
American Hornbeam (Carpinus caroliniana), White Oak (Quercus Alba), Red Maple (Acer rubrum), Long -stalked
sedge (Carex pedunculata), Soft rush Uuncus effusus), Cattail Sedge (Carex typhina), and Green Briar (Smilax
rotundifolia).
Representative plant species within the upland areas include the following: Sweetgum (Liquidambar
styraciflua), Red Maple (Acer rubrum), Loblolly Pine (Pinus taeda), American Beech (Fagus grandifolia), Tulip Tree
(Liriodendron tulipifera), Green Briar (Smilax rotundifolia), American Holly (Ilex opaca), and Christmas Fern
(Polystichum acrostichoides).
Wetlands Delineation Report I February 29, 2024
Goodwin Crossing - Offsite Sanitary Sewer 8 27

Engineering
& Design
6.3 SOILS
Hydric soils are defined as soils that formed under conditions of saturation, flooding, or ponding long enough
during the growing season to develop anaerobic conditions in the upper part of the soil (USDA 2003). The soils
in the wetland areas were variable, but for the most part, exhibited low chroma matrices with depleted matrixes
and redoximorphic features. Soils within the wetland areas chroma matrix colors ranged from grayish brown
(10YR 5/2) and dark grayish brown (10YR 4/2) to yellowish brown (10YR 5/6) within the upper 16 inches of the
soils. Textures within the wetland areas were primarily loamy clays. The upland soils on the Study Area exhibited
high chroma matrices and had no evidence of redoximorphic features. Soil textures were primarily silty clay.
6.4 HYDROLOGY
On -site field investigations of the Study Area were conducted by CED on February 9, 2024. The USACE Antecedent
Precipitation Tool (APT) was utilized for the Study Area and is provided Appendix C. Based on the USACE APT tool,
the on -site field investigations were conducted in "Wetter than Normal' precipitation conditions with a 30-day
rolling total.
The delineated wetland exhibited primary and secondary indicators of wetland hydrology. Positive indicators
of wetland hydrology included the following: surface water (Al), saturation (A3), water -stained leaves (139), and
oxidized rhizospheres on living roots (0). Secondary indicators include drainage patterns (1310), geomorphic
position (D2) and FAC-neutral test (D5). Indicators of wetland hydrology are largely absent in upland areas.
6.5 WETLAND AREAS
In general, the wetland area can be described as Bottomland Hardwood Forested/Emergent Wetlands. Overbank
flooding from the adjacent stream can be an important source of water for Bottomland Hardwood Forested/
Emergent Wetlands as can groundwater and surface runoff. Bottomland Hardwood Forested/Emergent
Wetlands are generally characterized by surface relief that provides good water storage. Wetland 1 is located
within the 100-year floodplain associated with Cabin Branch within the northeast extent of the Study Area.
Based the proximity to Cabin Branch and geographic positioning within the floodplain, Wetland 1 would be
considered Bottomland Hardwood Forested/Emergent Wetlands.
Wetlands Delineation Report I February 29, 2024
Goodwin Crossing - Offsite Sanitary Sewer 9 27

Engineering
& Design
7.0 WETLAND DELINEATION CONCLUSION
One (1) wetland feature and two (2) stream features were delineated within the Study Area by CED on February
9, 2024. A total of 2.68 acres of palustrine forested and palustrine emergent wetland, and 276 feet of total
stream were delineated within the Study Area. Field investigations were conducted in accordance with the
manuals, methodologies, and regulatory guidance procedures as stated in the Wetland and Surface Water
Delineation Methodology Section.
It is CED's professional opinion that the one (1) wetland feature and two (2) streams would be considered
jurisdictional WOTUS. The location and size of features delineated are shown on Figure 4. Wetland Delineation
Map(Appendix A).
Neuse River Buffers:
The Study Area is located within the Neuse River Basin. NC DWR has adopted buffer rules for the Neuse River
Basin (15A NCAC 02B. 0233). This rule applies 50-foot wide riparian buffers in the Neuse River Basin, directly
adjacent to surface waters (intermittent and perennial streams, lakes, ponds, and estuaries) excluding wetlands.
For the purpose of this rule, surface waters must be present in the field and be depicted on either the published
USDA County Soil Survey map or the most recent USGS topographic quadrangle map. Based on the field
investigations, Stream Features S-1 and S-2 would have a 50-foot Neuse River Buffer. Streams within the Study
Area that are applicable to the Neuse River Basin Buffer Rules and are shown on Figure 4. Wetland Delineation
Map (Appendix A).
Durham County Riparian Buffers:
CED determined each water surface feature's applicability to the Durham County Unified Development
Ordinance (UDO) Article 8 - Environmental Protection. The Study Area is located within the Falls/Jordan
Protected Area (F/J-B). Based on the delineation, perennial streams S-1 and S-2 have a 100-foot riparian buffer in
accordance with the Durham County UDO. Wetland 1 has a 25-foot buffer along the wetland perimeter boundary
in accordance to Durham County UDO Section 8.9.4. Surface features within the Study Area that are applicable
to the Durham County UDOs are shown on Figure 4. Wetland Delineation Map (Appendix A).
General Allowable Activities Within Riparian Buffers:
Allowable development activities within the stream buffers is dependent upon the type of use and whether that
activity is designated as exempt, allowable, allowable with mitigation, and/or prohibited. In general, utility line
crossings and roadway crossings are allowable uses; while new impervious structures, buildings, parking lots,
etc. are considered prohibited uses within the stream buffers.
The following are examples of the limited uses allowed within the buffer:
1. Perpendicular crossings (between 75 degrees and 105 degrees, as measured from the stream
center -line) for driveways, streets, roads, sidewalks, and associated bridge components;
2. Perpendicular overhead and underground utility crossings (between 75 degrees and 105 degrees, as
measured from the stream center -line);
3. Perpendicular (between 75 degrees and 105 degrees, as measured from the stream center -line)
greenways/hiking trails; that do not impact diffuse flow conditions;
4. Elevated greenways/hiking trails;
Wetlands Delineation Report I February 29, 2024
Goodwin Crossing - Offsite Sanitary Sewer 10 27

Engineering
& Design
5. Fences that do not remove forested vegetation.
The following uses are allowed in the less restrictive areas of the buffer:
1. All uses allowed in the stream side zone;
2. Overhead and underground utilities;
3. Greenways/hiking trails;
4. Playground equipment; and
5. Some stormwater best management practices (i.e., BMPs or SWMFs).
Wetlands Delineation Report I February 29, 2024
Goodwin Crossing - Offsite Sanitary Sewer 27

Engineering
& Design
8.0 REFERENCE
Cowardin, L. M., V. Carter, F. C. Golet, and E. T. La Roe. 1979. Classification of wetlands and deepwater habitats
of the United States. U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, D.C.
Environmental Laboratory. 1987. "Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual" Technical Report Y-87-1
US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Miss.
Environmental Laboratory. 2012. "Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual:
Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region (Version 2.0)". Technical Report ERDC/EL TR-09-19. US Army Engineer
Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, Miss.
Federal Interagency Committee for Wetland Delineation. 1989. Federal Manual for Identifying and Delineation
jurisdictional Wetlands. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, and U.S.D.A. Soil Conservation Service, Washington D.C. Cooperative technical publication. 76
pp. plus appendices.
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). 2019. Flood Map Service Center. https://msc.fema.gov/portal.
National List of Hydric Soils 2010, United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resource Conservation
Service, https://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/main/soils/use/hydric/
North Carolina - Division of Water Resources. 2010. Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and Perennial
Stream and Their Origins, Version 4.11.
United States Army Corps of Engineers. Antecedent Precipitation Tool (APT) - v1.0.19. May 3, 2021.
https://github.com/jDeters-USACE/Antecedent-Precipitation-Tool/releases/tag/v1.0.19
United States Department of Agriculture. Natural Resources Conservation Service
http://websoiIsurvey.nres.usda.gov/app/HomePage.htm
United States Fish and Wildlife Service. National Wetlands Inventory http://www.fws.gov/nwi/Overview.html
USDA, NRCS. 2003. Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States, Version 5.01, G.W. Hurt, P.M. Whited,
and R.F. Pringle (eds.). USDA, NRCS in cooperation with the National technical Committee for Hydric Soils, Fort
Worth, TX.
Wetlands Delineation Report I February 29, 2024
Goodwin Crossing - Offsite Sanitary Sewer 12 27

APPENDIX A
FIGURES
Engineering
& Design
Wetlands Delineation Report I February 29, 2024
Goodwin Crossing - Offsite Sanitary Sewer

•
N
0 1.000 2,000
Feet w i.
'S
Source: USGS24k Quadrangles: Northwest Durham, NC
Prepared For:
Meritage Homes Vicinity Map Figure 1
3300 Paramount Parkway, Suite 120
Raleigh, NC 27560
Offsite Sanitary Sewer - Goodwin Crossing Sewer Outfall
Prepared By: Q Sewer Outfall Study Area
Raleigh Office Durham County, North Carolina
2000 Regency Parkway, =Q Goodwin Crossing Property
sucez9s Date: Project Number Drawn By: Boundary
Cary, NC 27518 Engineering
wwwcou'iersengineering.com & Design 2/27/2024 24000310A SS

'~S• N
a V
tv A ho ' 1 ` 0 0
V •_ U
Q o o o
y} "' a lJ z v o
.51 CD
ii CD u N
br S a E
s
y�
•� `� o
I' co a
N
L bell
P
70 L
4-C: rB
L� ,`�, C •, :3 D m
3 o v
a
r , 0 0
cn cn C7 a
_ - 1 0 10
r
_T1-.r
00000 0
ar ti e N
�I A
1 v �
X,
I N O E N V
crj1 �
r O
0 O (V C I v�i V
L Z m
w c
-
a 20 M � a

x
LL
Q
V
m
r
=
o
0
Q
O
a
h
Oy
V
U
�
o
z
u
a
o
m
+.1
v
o
o
N
z
o
N
a
C
E
N
>
�
m
m
a
a)
al
°
in
E
v
v v
� � v
_
ro
_
U7
ra
�9
ai
v� >
tL U1 -Cf
C:
ai
a,>
a
E
v v
- (2
a)
v
a
m
I
a,
Q
T
�
v
a
—
a w
o i
—
°
p
a
d i
u O
a)
3
7
O
3
i >-
o
0 0
5 o ai
a,
o O
00
1
o
E
o
v
3 -
>;
1p on
N
O N v
o
v
V
ry z o
v
0 ' O
L Z
w
m
c
as
m dal
vN°
a, v
m _ o
m
0

_
�
I
. �..
.
0
-:.. .. ..-.
m
m
m
O H
U f6
by
ti
m
LL
+
O
o
N
LLa
oo
Ln
Q L L
yf
m
L~L
CD
i
0
�y
mu
°A LL
m
m
= L
_10
O 0� '�
� h
4-+ h
o
v
>
a
-F-
i o
o
o
�
a
a CJ z
m
s
i.+ _
•� •�
v
oCD
00
0
.LL...
N
L!1
N
O
m
;
F
4
V
=O
O
o
O
v
N
+:ij
m
O
_
vl
vi
,�
:-
h
O
�t
m
m
N
z
t
;:
i
L
a
Q d
VI
C C
°r
\ O
a
o
05
U
O
V1
S
;
m W y ai
N
+
3
IA
o
c
_
a
O
LL
=
w
mm
m
L\L J N C
a
_
U
N
L
O
=
Q
LD
v
O
Ln
0
q
m 0
o
L
t4°'
O
a
-
L
N
L
O
w T
m
v
Q
w
N
�
m
N
U
Q
o x O
N
3
_
3
N a w
mu_ v
H
ti av v
a
mu mu O
v
-
G!
n J a
V
j
�
=
_ 2 `m
L N U
O O u -o z
In LO m In U O
z z z
z z
v
o
O 11
0
Cl)
Z
O
L
5
m
m
O
LL
0
o
�
N
L(1
N
�
3
v
+
>
ao
`w
O
O `^
v
E
a O
v V-
pq ¢ N z
K
v
W j N
_ v
E O N
O
um
N
Z
ra
U� z
m
C
N u a L
au
00
N N W
a v
IL
a
a

Engineering
& Design
APPENDIX B
DATA FORMS
Wetlands Delineation Report I February 29, 2024
Goodwin Crossing - Offsite Sanitary Sewer

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Goodwin Crossing - Offsite Sanitary Sewer City/County: Raleigh Sampling Date: 2/9/24
Applicant/Owner: Merltage Homes State: NC Sampling Point: DP 1
Investigator(s): TD & SS Section, Township, Range: Raleigh
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): toe of slope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Concave Slope (%): 2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 Lat: 36.097426°N Long:-78.871948°W Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Altavista silt loam (AIB) NWI classification: PF01
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology 0 significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes 0✓ No 0
Are Vegetation=, Soil �, or Hydrology.= naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Wetland 1 data point taken within 10 FT of standing water
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
F71 Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
✓❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑✓ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes 0
No = Depth (inches): 2
Water Table Present? Yes 0
Saturation Present? Yes =
No= Depth (inches):
No = Depth (inches): 4
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes I_Z] No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP 1
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size. 30
) % Cover
Species?
Status
Number of Dominant Species
1. Liquidambar styraciflua
15
YES
FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 9 (A)
2. Carpinus caroliniana
15
YES
FAC
3. Quercus albs
5
NO
FACU
Total Number of Dominant
10
Species Across All Strata: (g)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 90% (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
35 = Total Cover
18
7
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover: 20% of
total cover:
OBL species 5 x 1 = 5
Sapling Stratum (Plots 15
)
FACW species 20 x 2 = 40
1. Liquidambar styraciflua
FAC
75 225
2. Carpinus caroliniana
YES
FAC
FAC species x 3 =
10
YES
FAC
FACU species 5 x 4 = 20
3.
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Column Totals: 105 (A) 290 (g)
5.
6.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.76
40
= Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
20
8
❑ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15
50% of total cover: 20% of
)
total cover:
✓❑ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
1
✓❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
2
❑ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
3.
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
4.
5.
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
6.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
= Total Cover
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Tree -Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
Herb Stratum (Plot size. 5
)
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
1. Carex pedunculata
5
YES
OBL
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
2. Juncus effusus
15
YES
FACW
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
3. Carex typhina
5
YES
FACW
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
4.
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
5.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
6
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
7.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
$
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
9.
ft (1 m) in height.
10.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
11.
25
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 13 20% of total cover:
5
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
30 )
1. Smilax rotundifolia
5
YES
FAC
3.
4.
Hydrophytic
5
= Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 3 20% of total cover: 1 Present? Yes ELI No�
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont -Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP 1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc Texture Remarks
0-4 10YR 4/2 LC
4-16 10 YR 5/2 80 10YR 5/6 20 C M MLC prominent redox concentrations
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
_❑ Histosol (Al)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
.❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Tvpe:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
F1 (Loamy Mucky Mineral)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soi
❑ Dark Surface (S7)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
0 Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
❑✓ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑✓ No ❑
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point:
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
2.
Total Number of Dominant
3.
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
= Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: )
FACW species x 2 =
1.
FAC species x 3 =
2.
FACU species x 4 =
3.
UPL species x 5 =
4.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
6.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
= Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
1
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
2
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
3.
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
4.
5.
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
6.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
= Total Cover
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
5.
6.
7.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size
1.
3.
4.
= Total Cover
20% of total cover:
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont -Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc Texture Remarks
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11:
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Tvpe:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soi
Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: Goodwin Crossing - Offsite Sanitary Sewer City/County: Raleigh Sampling Date: 2/9/24
Applicant/Owner: Merltage Homes State: NC Sampling Point: DP 3
Investigator(s): TD & SS Section, Township, Range: Raleigh
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): toe of slope Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): MLRA 136 Lat: 36.096944°N Long:-78.873333°W Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: Altavista silt loam (AIB) NWI classification: PF01
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes _0 No Q (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation = Soil .=, or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes 0 No
Are Vegetation = Soil 0, or Hydrology .0 naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes �0 No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes I v l Nowithin a Wetland? Yes 0 No 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes.I r L No
Remarks:
Wetland 1 data point taken within 10 FT of standing water
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑✓ Surface Water (Al)
❑ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
❑ High Water Table (A2)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑✓ Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑✓ Saturation (A3)
✓❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
,❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑ Water Marks (131)
❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (132)
❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (133)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
❑ Iron Deposits (135)
✓❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_❑Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑✓ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes 0
No ❑ Depth (inches): 2
Water Table Present? Yes ❑
No = Depth (inches):
II
Saturation Present? Yes Q
No ❑ Depth (inches): 4
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: DP 3
Tree Stratum (Plot size. 30 )
1. Liquidambar styraciflua
2. Carpinus caroliniana
3. Quercus albs
4.
5.
6.
Absolute
% Cover
15
15
5
35
Dominant Indicator
Species? Status
YES FAC
YES FAC
NO FACU
= Total Cover
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 9 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: 10 (g)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 90% (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
18
7
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
20% of
total cover:
OBL species 5 x 1 = 5
Sapling Stratum (Plots 15 )
FACW species 20 x 2 = 40
1. Liquidambar styraciflua
10
YES
FAC
75 225
2. Carpinus caroliniana
20
YES
FAC
FAC species x 3 =
3. Acer rubrum
10
YES
FAC
FACU species 5 x 4 = 20
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Column Totals: 105 (A) 290 (g)
5.
6.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2•76
40
= Total Cover
Vegetation Indicators:
20
8
IHydrophytic
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
50% of total cover:
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 )
20% of
total cover:
Q 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
1
Q 3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
2
❑ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
3.
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
4.
V
6.
= Total Cover
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Tree -Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
Herb Stratum (Plot size. 5 )
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
1. Carex pedunculata
5 YES OBL
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
2. Juncus effusus
15 YES FACW
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
3. Carex typhina
5 YES FACW
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
5. Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
6 approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
7. Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
$ herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
9. ft (1 m) in height.
10.
11. Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
25 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 13 20% of total cover: 5
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
1. Smilax rotundifolia 5 YES FAC
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
5
= Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: 3 20% of total cover: 1 Present? Yes T71 No�
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: DP 3
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Tvpe Loc Texture Remarks
0-4 10YR 4/2 LC
4-16 10 YR 5/2 80 10YR 5/6 20 C M MLC prominent redox concentrations
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
0 Histosol (Al)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Tvpe:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
F1 (Loamy Mucky Mineral)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sc
❑ Dark Surface (S7)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
0 Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
❑✓ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
❑ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
❑ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓❑ No ❑
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Five Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point:
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
2.
Total Number of Dominant
3.
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
= Total Cover
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
OBL species x 1 =
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: )
FACW species x 2 =
1.
FAC species x 3 =
2.
FACU species x 4 =
3.
UPL species x 5 =
4.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
5.
6.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
= Total Cover
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
1
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
2
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
3.
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
4.
5.
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
6.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
= Total Cover
Definitions of Five Vegetation Strata:
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
5.
6.
7.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size
1.
3.
4.
= Total Cover
20% of total cover:
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
herbaceous vines, regardless of size, and woody
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
ft (1 m) in height.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont -Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type' Loc Texture Remarks
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion,
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11:
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Tvpe:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soi
Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 1
S1 Perennial
Date: 2/9/24
Project/Site: Goodwin Crossing
Latitude: 36.0972
Evaluator: TD and SS
County: Durham
Longitude:-78.8800
Total Points: 40+
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other
Stream is at least intermittent
Ephemeral Intermitten erenni
e.g. Quad Name: Northwest Durham
if>_ 19 or perennial if>_ 30"
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
la. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
Q artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 0.5
1
1 1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal =
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL =
1.5 Other = 0
perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: Cabin Branch: 40+ points
Sketch:

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 1 S2 Perennial
Date: 2/9/24
Project/Site: Goodwin Crossing
Latitude: 36.0938
Evaluator: TD and SS
County: Durham
Longitude:-78.8791
Total Points: 32
Stream Determination (cir ne)
Other
Stream is at least intermittent
Ephemeral Intermittent erennia
e.g. Quad Name: Northwest Durham
if>_ 19 or perennial if>_ 30"
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 19.5 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
la. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
�`j
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No
Yes = 3
Q artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 4 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
©
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
u
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1
1
1 1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No
Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = 8.5
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
0
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
0
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
0
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0
1
1.5
25. Algae
0.5
1
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL =
1.5 Other
perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

Engineering
& Design
APPENDIX C
USACE ANTECEDENT PRECIPITATION TOOL
Wetlands Delineation Report I February 29, 2024
Goodwin Crossing - Offsite Sanitary Sewer

C N
� O
N
T �
�p N
�IN
dN
Q
t0 N
W N
tl �
� N
0 O
N
u m
W N
❑ oN
I M
O N
z�
M
u N
00
N
QM
� N
OM
� N
Q
V O O M ul
O �
d
O
z
t6
N
N
L m N rl
O
L
C
O
N N M M
7
R
i
O
C
O
U
O
o
c Z
U
N
C
N
N M of O
i m 7 In
9
O
O] h Itl
a cq N
m a
O
r
ti m o
� rl m OJ
a N N u'I
N N
0
m
c o
C O O 1l
W �
� N T N N N N
O O O
❑ N N N
O
m
m C
O O 01 Q O
N N M
ON n
M N
of C
01 3
O a
m �
N N ^ N
_ V u
� ❑ c � ro
o x m
o R y a 0
v o_
0 T
o
Q
❑ u ,u
C O O O O O
N
N
u
Q
T
(6
O
E co m 0 0
O
Z
T
d ul m of N tD
� rl O] lO O rl
w 7 o] Ill O .--I
� ri M u1 �l1
a)
Q D7 r-I 1!1 to l!1
C lO I� li I h T
o 'IR oR O O m
— l0 D7 01 rl N
i6 1� N li I C
N
w
Ol O
y m m o
u
^ M a m rn m
C 4 of O N ill
v
W
IA rl u1 l0 N O
� Ol to l0 l0 O]
C W o O1 O
j5
r r r r
O
O U o) 0) N rfl 0) m N
01 m N
T �t [0 M T
O O of m
M tD lO in �n
m M M M
E z ¢ ='n a a
z N I Ln
O � ❑ � J J
J Q
6 x o 'If
Ln J
N ❑ J
L ❑ _
a6 J
� a
U
O
N �
N
� C
O
N
� c
�
❑
� O
E n ti
W
H []
o 0
L 0C co
a
_Q
fop -W
T O
L
C
W
N E
i v
� cu
i Q
W] C
LLa
�
rl
(sayDul) Ilpjuip\d

Engineering
& Design
APPENDIX D
PHOTOGRAPHS
Wetlands Delineation Report I February 29, 2024
Goodwin Crossing - Offsite Sanitary Sewer

Page 1

Engineering
& Design
PROJECT NAME:
GOODWIN CROSSING - CIFFSITE SANITARY
SEWER
Photo No. 3
Description:
Typical Forested
Conditions
Corporate Headquarters:
331 Newman Springs Road, Suite 203
Red Bank, NJ 07701 SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
Main: 877 627 9772
Colliersengineering.com
SITE LOCATION: PROJECT NO.:
DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA 124000310A
Page 2

Page 3

Page 4

Colliers
Engineering
& Design
Colliers Engineering & Design is a trusted provider of
multi -discipline engineering, design and consulting
services providing customized solutions for public and
private clients through a network of offices nationwide.
For a full listing of our office locations, please visit
colliersengineering.com
M O ® 0 % a
Civil/Site • Traffic/Transportation • Governmental • Survey/Geospatial
Infrastructure • Geotechnical/Environmental • Telecommunications • Utilities/Energy
Accelerating success.

Engineering
& Design
APPENDIX D
SANITARY SEWER APPLICATION ALTERNATIVE REQUEST/
ANALYSIS
Pre -Construction Notification I July 8, 2024
Goodwin Crossing; USACE Action ID: SAW-2019-01521

IN
CITY OF
DURHAM
REFERENCE GUIDE FOR DEVELOPMENT ALTERNATIVE REQUEST APPLICATION
Department of Public Works, Department of Transportation and Department of Water Management
101 City Hall Plaza I Durham, NC 27701
919-560-4326 1 919-560-4316 1 triageCaDdurhamnc.gov
www.durhamnc.gov
Date:
Guidelines for successfully completing this application can be found in the section of the Reference Guide
for Development (RGD) titled "Alternatives Applications Procedures". Please note that staff is not required
to approve an alternative requested on this application and additionally staff cannot approve any request
that does not meet State minimum design criteria. Complete one application per request for an alternative
to one section of the RGD.
Please pay the fee online at this link: https://ipn2.pavmentus.com/rote/dhds (Select Payment Type
10-RGD Alternative -Engineering or 11-RGD Alternative-Stormwater)
Upload a copy of your payment receipt along with the completed application here:
https://durhamdsc.apP.box.com/f/87e7c1 a797db4c0e9803ffb679cOba60.
For questions, please contact triagea-durhamnc.gov.
❑ Tier 1 Request 1500 (does not significantly impact design or construction, or may be approved by City
staff with conditions)
❑ Tier 2 Request 4000 (significantly impacts design, construction, or future maintenance. It may require
significant review by City staff)
Project Name: Goodwin Crossing
Phase: 1 Previous Project Names: N/A
site Plan Case #: D2300173
Construction Drawing Case #:
M
Does this request propose deviation from State of North Carolina minimum design criteria for lift station or
pump station? o Yes a No
Project Address:
PIN numbers:
1301 Goodwin Road, Durham North Carolina
0835-04-53-4274
Property Owner/Developer:
Marlowe Builders
Type of Legal Entity: 6 Corporation o Limited Liability Company o Individual o Government
Email Address: marlowebullders1 @gmall.com
Phone: [phone]
Contact Person: Todd O'Daniel Company:
Email Address: o'[e-mail] Phone:
NC Contractor License # or NC PE License #: 22630
McAdams
919-361-5000
Acknowledgement:
Todd O'Daniel hereby petition City of Durham Staff for an Alternative from the RGD
provisions cited within this application to allow the alternative outlined on the property as described in this
application and the accompanying documentation submitted as burden of proof by the applicant.
Section of the Reference Guide: 7.7
Relevant State statute related to this request, if applicable:
Department/s Reviewing the Request: 0 PW Engineering ❑ PW Stormwater
❑ Water Management
❑ Transportation
Reference Guide for Development Alternative Request Application 2023-05-22 Page 1 of 2

Identify Hardship (should not include hardships resulting from actions of applicant or the property owner):
In order to service the proposed Goodwin Crossing development, all efforts have been made to keep
the proposed sewer outfall underground and following the City of Durham RGD standards on slope,
pipe size and cover, but the existing sewer outfall located on the Bemac Partners (REID:185940),
USACE (REID:186002), and Judith Stafford (REID:186001) properties is too shallow for a fully
underground connection. Various routes have been analyzed as attempts to stay underground but the
existing wetlands in this area create a pinch point that can not be overcome. Attached is the route
closest to working without an aerial and demonstrates the significant cover issues we encountered,
even with an oversized sewer pipe used to minimize slopes; which is not justified with the amount of
sewage flow proposed by the Goodwin Crossing development.
Description of Proposed Alternative:
A proposed alternative of taking the sewer route East, leaving the Goodwin Crossing
development property into the City of Durham property via Jack and Bore (underground)
and then turning North East, crossing the existing wetland via aerial and tying to the
existing sewer line on the Bemac Partners Property (REID:185940). All attempts to
minimize the length of aerial have been performed and the attached Aerial route is the
only alternative to serve the Goodwin Crossing development for sewer. Although the
proposed aerial is roughly 650' with a manhole in between, the developer is willing to
undertake the significant cost to build this aerial, as last practical alternative to serve this
proposed development with sewer.
How does the proposal provide an equivalent or superior level of quality, strength, effectiveness, durability,
maintainability, and protection of public health, safety, and welfare as is required in the RGD?
We're meeting the RGFD Section 7.7 criteria for Aerials since there is no other practical
alternative. Ductile Iron lock joint pipe will be used within a casing pipe at least 1-foot
above the 10-year flow depth and above the 25-year flow depth, along with concrete
supports/piers.
Include with application relevant project drawings, specifications, construction documentation and any other relevant
information necessary for evaluation.
Reference Guide for Development Alternative Request Application 2023-05-22 Page 2 of 2

VNIIO'dV:) HIHON 'NVHdnci
GV0d NIAA(1009 ZIET'S TOET
t713A31 - NVId 31lS 3AUVUSINWIV
E)NISSOU:) NIM4009
GVOH 7 IH MONS
z
ol <
<
(D
z C)
ZO
F- a F:
3&0
0
�
L2
<
Z,
o 0
z 2
0
.0
>
Ln
m
0
oo
co
z 0
<
0 z
m
u <
u
<
_Q
/jr

Engineering
& Design
APPENDIX E
IMPACT EXHIBITS
Pre -Construction Notification I July 8, 2024
Goodwin Crossing; USACE Action ID: SAW-2019-01521

�J 'YE
LAND
rJ'
i
/ TTP/LD-
J / /
\ f I I
(1\/FRAI I II\ADArT AREA I\AAD ffl _
YKVJtt- I JI I t7 JI Itt I #1
NC GRID (NAD83)
1.P-j 1,\MAR\MAR23002\04-d-ionAE,111-1g�I5 11-C-111. -D-1111A1--Da,i" ImpactMays\MAR23002-Ia-,El.dwg, 6/27n0249.28:11AM, Bandon B,,Il
w
�a� N
U
�a w
Aaw
chi)
Lu
s� p
Lu
AW
rn N
I�
If
I�
SEE IMPACT
\J SHEET#3
WETLANDS
NAME
AREA, SF (AC)
WETLAND W1
43,616 SF (1.00 AC)
WETLAND W2
7,599 SF (0.17 AC)
WETLAND W3
6,714 SF (0.15 AC)
WETLAND W4
3,936 SF (0.09 AC)
WETLAND W5
119,236 SF (2.74 AC)
TOTAL:
181,101 SF (4.16 AC)
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 125 250 500
1 inch = 250 ft.
PLAN INFORMATION
PROJECT NO. MAR-23002
FILENAME MAR23002-El
CHECKED BY 1PM
DRAWN BY BAB
SCALE 1"-250'
�+ SHEET 1
J� 7-� /� 7�
McADAms ...n,�a,--com DATE 06.27.2024
Th—hn R.MCAd—C—p-y,hc
FDns 621 b.—gh St—t
GOODWIN CROSSING
„,PSDD
Szlelgh, NC 276Ce
Dh-919. 361.5—
WETLAND AND STREAM IMPACT MAPS
'a'919. 3""69
11—se number: C-0293, C-18J
1301 & 1313 GOODWIN ROAD
DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA, 27712

`WETLAND W5
1p
SHET�4\Ll
H / I I \ %—\tom \yqr� li I�ll�j/// / 7' J1 ^\ %�c\�'1 `♦
21S�W4' SE WER II l /%/
N / ./^' �_ ��� \�\� O TFAL\47 l/ / o�s��_�'�` 1�^{`�� ri( 1
lie
Q b��/ f 1 � •�, � 'l
f if /// w
r I
1 11 y/� 7 I
1
OVERALL IMPACT AREA MAP #2 -
SS OUTFALL, SHEET #2
Q
NC GRID (NAD83)
9.28s4 Ann, B—d- B,,I l
The John R. MCAd— Company, Inc.
621 HIBsb.,°ngh9t.ee,
GOODWIN CROSSING
s,son
Raleigh, NC 27603
ph— 919. 361. 5000
WETLAND AND STREAM IMPACT MAPS
ra.919. 3" 2269
Ilcense C-0293, C-187
1301 & 1313 GOODWIN ROAD
number:
McAnAlvl s ,vww m�adam=�o c°m
DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA, 27712
WETLANDS
NAME
AREA, SF (AC)
WETLAND W7
43,616 SF (1.00 AC)
WETLAND W2
7,599 SF (0.17 AC)
WETLAND W3
6,714 SF (0.15 AC)
WETLAND W4
3,936 SF (0.09 AC)
WETLAND WS
119,236 SF (2.74 AC)
TOTAL:
181,101 SF (4.16 AC)
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 125 250 500
1 inch = 250 ft.
PLAN INFORMATION
PROJECT NO. MAR-23002
FILENAME MAR23002-El
CHECKED BY JPM
DRAWN BY BAB
SCALE 1"=250'
SHEET 2
DATE 06.27.2024

IMPACT SHEET #1
ZONE 1 UTILITY PERMANENT STREAM
CROSSING BUFFER IMPACT
IMPACT
ZONE 2 UTILITY PERMANENT NO —LOSS
CROSSING BUFFER STREAM IMPACT
IMPACT
TEMPORARY STREAM
IMPACT
A *V I
\LIMITS ( F I \\ \\ \� \ \ \ PERENNf>h STREAM
6 ISTURBJNCE\ V A I I
�\ P) I \ VARIABLE WIDTH 5253 3o I I 2 Y
I I I I WALL EASEMENT I\ ZON 1 II ZO E 2
I \ I I
CIT OF WURHaM 11 82 \ II s1 ! I
I 10' �O- VILo
SETI\ i A AI \ i \ \ \{Bi \ / /I I B2 I 5Q' NEU$E RI VtR I ��
BUFFER I \
6D
RETAINI G WALI_ ZO 1 UT LIT\T'"to
(DESIGN BY OT ERS I / ,`"`-x -I $ SS
I
r I WW
I (/fIYP , SEE DETAIL,/�
LI
vI \ I TBAN OF II
STREAM IMPACTS:
FENCE \OAR I \ CROSSING ,UgFFER\
1970SFRS\ —
/� I Q�
/ IF—
RETAIj ING WALL I \
{DEMN BY OTHE(\'S) I
50' NEUSE RIVER BUFFER \ I
TOTAL BUFFER IMPACTS:
SITE #
IMPACT REASON/TYPE
AVERAGE STREAM
STREAM IMPACT
STREAM IMPACT
IMPACT
WIDTH(FT)
LENGTH(LF)
AREA(AC)
DURATION
S1
CROSSING CULVERT
7.5
92.1
0.016
PERMANENT
S2
FILL(RIPRAP)
7.1
18.1
0.003
PERMANENT —
NO LOSS
S3
WORKPAD/CAUSEWAY
8.5
7.5
C.001
TEMPORARY
ZONE 1 BUFFER IM PACT AREA = 6,874 SF (0.16 AC)
ZONE 2 BUFFER IMPACT AREA = 3,959 SF (0.09 AC)
Q
NC GRID (NAD83)
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 15 30 60
1 inch - 30 ft.
Th—ho RAd, CPLAN INFORMATION
PROJECT NO. MAR-23002
FILENAME MAR23002-El
CHECKED BY 1PM
DRAWN BY BAB
SCALE 1"=30'
/� J� 7-� /� 7� SHEET 3
MCADAMS www.m�a,--com DATE 06.27.2024
py,hC.
621 HOlsb.,.,gh Sveei
GOODWIN CROSSING
8zlelg„nPmSenew
ph-91e.361.5000
WETLAND AND STREAM IMPACT MAPS
'a'919. 3" 2269
11—se—b—c-02e3, c-187
1301 & 1313 GOODWIN ROAD
DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA, 27712

IMPACT AREA 'T' PROFILE VIEW
360 360
w
z
o'
w
w
U
U
w
w
350
(3:
SL
PE)
350
8"
DIP
ATE
LIN
CONCR
HEADW
ARE
0
LL
TYP.
C
H
DNCRETE
—ADO
ALL
CUL
(TYP
ERT
)
\\
4"
IRC
LAR
JLVf
RT
340
340
rAD
E
G
G
330
330
10+00 11+00 12+00
Th—ho RAdCpy,mc. PLAN INFORMATION
PROJECT NO. MAR-23002
FILENAME MAR23002-El
CHECKED BY 1PM
DRAWN BY BAB
SCALE 1"=30'
M/� J� 7-� /� 7� SHEET 4
cA1JAms ...m�a,--com DATE 06.27.2024
621 HOlsb.,.,gh Sveei
GOODWIN CROSSING
„,PSe
Rz�elgh, NC new
ph-91e.361.5000
WETLAND AND STREAM IMPACT MAPS
'a'9'9. 3" "6e
nte.se..mbe C-02e3, C-187
1301 & 1313 GOODWIN ROAD
DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA, 27712

IMPACT SHEET #2
ZONE 3 BUFFER IMPACT
TOP OF
BANK__1 Q �/
PERENNIAL STKEAI3
—1,5�1' NEUSE RIVER BUFF \ 1�
\�i
\ RIPARIAN BUFFER SIGN�
\(TYP., SEE D€TAIL \ \}
\ t HEET C8.00)\
TOTAL BUFFER IMPACTS:
ZONES BUFFER IMPACT AREA = 7,296 SF (0.17 AC)
N GRAPHIC SCALE
0 15 30 60
NC GRID (NAD83) 1 inch - 30 ft.
,04 PF.d--1E,�--g�lreP1-C-111.1--.l's\-l-lnl—'gyimpactM­�—R-01m-,E1.d, 6n7/2024930,17AM,B—d-B,,Il
PLAN INFORMATION
Th—hoR—Ad—C—p-y,hC.
621 F-0neb.—gh St—t
GOODWIN CROSSING
PROJECT NO. MAR-23002
„,N'CT
Rzlelgn, me new
FILENAME MAR23002-El
WETLAND AND STREAM IMPACT MAPS
CHECKED BY 1PM
ph-91e. 361.5—
DRAWN BY BAB
'a'919. 3" 7269
1301 & 1313 GOODWIN ROAD
SCALE 1"=30-
n,e.se..mb—c-0293, cae7
J� 7-� /� 7�
DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA, 27712
SHEET 5
M/�
CADAMS www.m�a,--com
DATE 06.27.2024

IMPACT SHEET #3
? ZONE 1 UTILITY ZONE 2 UTILITY > ZONE 3 UTILITY
CROSSING BUFFER CROSSING BUFFER CROSSING BUFFER
IMPACT IMPACT IMPACT
/
CITY, OF DU RH M
io' o—BUIRHr
SET�ACK
/100' F/J—B BUFFED/ //li
{/ P
t�� I / / Z6NE z/ / z9NE 3
I
;N t t t- t t I I I /50' NEUSR RIVER BUFFER J _�
so
'� ONE 3
30' _
PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER ONE 1 TOP OF—+ % /
MAIryTAINS MINIMU�1 2' II I BANK
CLEARANCE BETW EN STREAM
LL ` AND SEWER PIPE
\ YJ ENCASEMENT =,NO STREAM
IMPACT (INSTi LLATION BYJ,-
�' 1� + DRY BORE 8V JACK)
CZONE A
ROSS? GTBUTFFER
Tf �
P 9F AREA=
II I: I I ZONE .3 UTILITY
fY/ OR Os NGIBUFfER-
I IMPAC11ff AREA
3881 5F ZONE/1 IDTILIT
CROSS*G BU€FER
IMPACTNARIEA—
1955 /I SITS 0(
ISTURAANCEI/�
1ONE/,2 u/ nuTJ
CROSSING BJJfFER
)MACTAEA= /$2O,
10'x20' 0'
BORE PIT ,CE NG
OF
PT
5p, DST�RBANt✓/
I / I
— — — —
l6 I ZON 3 / 20!—
/ ZONE 30'
ZONE i B3i / / / / Ji r /
/I I /
I / / RLj
BANKOF //
/ZONe-1 UTILITY
I OSS
CR ITACTN REA=
40�FI
\ \ i RIPARIAN BUFFER SIG
\ \ \ / / / // /J J / (TYP., SEE DETAIL;
SHEET C,&W
TOTAL BUFFER IMPACTS:
ZONE 1 BUFFER IMPACTAREA= 1,955 SF (0.045 AC) GRAPHIC SCALE
ZONE 2 BUFFER IMPACT AREA= 1,228 SF (0.028 AC)
0 5 30 60
ZONE 3 BUFFER IM PACT AREA = 5,401 SF (0.124 AC)
1 inch = 30 ft.
NC GRID (NAD83)
M.1Pm2ccs\MAR\MAR23062\09oa ,,­�ImPaa-,.—R—o2Eld, 6/27n024 9 31.30AM, B—d--.t
PLAN INFORMATION
The Jahn R. MCA-1 Company, Inc
621 F-0neb.—gh St—t
GOODWIN CROSSING
PROJECT NO. MAR-23002
Rzlelgn, me new
n`N'CT
FILENAME MAR23002-El
WETLAND AND STREAM IMPACT MAPS
CHECKED BY 1PM
ph-91e. 361.5—
DRAWN BY BAB
'a'919. 3" "69
1301 & 1313 GOODWIN ROAD
SCALE 1"=30'
naense..mb—c-02e3, c-187
7-� /� 7�
DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA, 27712
SHEET 6
MJ�
CADAMS www.maadam,�aom
DATE 06.27.2024

IMPACT SHEET #3 PROFILE VIEW
SSMH 141, STA. 14+1 .62, .00'
o
cli
/
o
M
/
/
K
/
XIS T
NIS
RAD
ORE
PIT
10
x15'
THEM
CROSUNG
/
�
I
I
I
I
I
.
ORE
A
ANE
16"
JACK
STEEL
8
D'CASI
DIF
SS
MEN
PE(
.25
WALL
TIIICKNESS
12+00 13+00 14+00
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 15 30 60
1 inch - 30 ft.
M.A-j-cs\MAR\MAR23002\04PFlan-Conmuceon DrawlrgsVG,rrent Da,in ImpactMays\MAR25002-I m-, El.dwg6/27n0249 33.03AM, B—d-B,,Il
The John R. MIA-1 Company, Inc.
621 HIBsb.,°°gh9t.ee,
GOODWIN CROSSING
s,son
Raleigh, NC 276D3
ph— 919. 361. 5DDD
WETLAND AND STREAM IMPACT MAPS
fav919. 3" 2269
Ilcense C-0293, C-187
1301 & 1313 GOODWIN ROAD
number:
MCADAMS ,vwwm�adam=�o�°m
DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA, 27712
PLAN INFORMATION
PROJECT NO. MAR-23002
FILENAME MAR23002-El
CHECKED BY JPM
DRAWN BY BAB
SCALE 1"=30'
SHEET 7
DATE 06.27.2024

ZONE 1 UTILITY
CROSSING BUFFER
IMPACT
IMPACT SHEET #4
ZONE 3 UTILITY WETLAND UTILITY
CROSSING BUFFER CROSSING IMPACT
IMPACT
ZONE 2 UTILITY
. ............_.::?::........:?
CROSSING BUFFER
IMPACT
l
i
i
PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER
MAINTAINS CLEARANCE
BETWEEN 100 YEAR FLOOD
ELEVATION AND SEWER PIPE
ENCASEMENT — NO STREAM
IMPACT (INSTALLATION BY
AERIAL)
TOTAL BUFFER IMPACTS:
CITY OF DURHAM 25'
WETLAND BUFFER IMPACT
_11 AND�CRBSSINGZ
IM PICj, Wi )
CI'/OF DURHAM— J
1 2.Y WE61ND
B( FFEf2 IMPACT
A EA=� 865 SF
SITE #
IMPACT
WETLAND STREAM
WETLAND IMPACT
IMPACT DURATION
REASON/TYPE
TYPE
AREA(AC)
uTIUTY
BOTTOMLAND
TEMPORARY/PERMANENT
WI
cROSSINc
HARDWOOD FOREST
0.43
CONVERSION
ZONE 1 BUFFER IMPACTAREA= 2,630 SF (0.06 AC)
ZONE 2 BUFFER IMPACT AREA = 1,452 SF (0.03 AC)
ZONE 3 BUFFER IMPACTAREA=3,395 SF (0.08 AC)
25' CITY OF DURHAM WETLAND BUFFER IMPACTAREA= 1,839 SF (0.04 AC)
UZ
NC GRID (NAD83)
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 30 60 120
1 inch = 60 ft.
PLAN INFORMATION
Th—hoR—Ad—C—p-y,hC.
621 Klhb.—gh St—t
GOODWIN CROSSING
PROJECT NO. MAR-23002
„,PSe
8zlelgh, NC new
FILENAME MAR23002-El
WETLAND AND STREAM IMPACT MAPS
CHECKED BY 1PM
ph-91e. 361.5eee
DRAWN BY BAB
,a,919. 3" `69
1301 & 1313 GOODWIN ROAD
SCALE 1"=60'
Il---b—C-82e3, C-187
J� 7-� /� 7�
DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA, 27712
SHEET 8
M/�
CADAMS www.m�a,--com
DATE 06.27.2024

■r���l��sla�iiiiiiii■■■■■■nl�
I■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■WIC
Ylflll■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■III
Illlill■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■1'�d■■■1f■1111111+�I1Y■■■■■■■■i■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■IEi■Irk■■■1\III■■■■■■■■■■■■■�■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■Ili■■■■■■■■.\`I■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■Ike■■�■■■W�
■■■■■■■■■■�n�■■■■■■■nil■■■■■■■■■®■■■■■■■■■■
±I'a■■■■■■■■i■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■lip■■■l;r�■■■ni�r■_■_■_W■_■_■_�■■■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■N1G11■■
■1\III■■■W■■■■i■■■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■Irk■■■■��'11■■■WYA■i■■■■■■■■■■■
PLAN INFORMATION
The Jahn R. MCA-1 Company, Inc.
621 Rlhb.—gh St—t
GOODWIN CROSSING
PROJECT NO. MAR-23002
n,PSe
Rz�elgh, NC new
FILENAME MAR23002-El
WETLAND AND STREAM IMPACT MAPS
CHECKED BY 1PM
ph-91e. 361.5000
DRAWN BY BAB
ra.919. 3" "69
1301 & 1313 GOODWIN ROAD
SCALE 1"=60-
naense nnmb—C-0293, C-1e�
J� 7-� /� 7�
DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA, 27712
SHEET 9
M/�
cA1JAms ...maa,--com
DATE 06.27.2024

Engineering
& Design
APPENDIX F
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
Pre -Construction Notification I July 8, 2024
Goodwin Crossing; USACE Action ID: SAW-2019-01521

CLEARWATER MITIGATION
S O L U T I O N S
June 20, 2024
Neuse River Basin - Riparian Wetland Credits
Statement of Availability as of 06/20/2024
Colliers
Attn: Mr. George Buchholz
2000 Regency Parkway, Suite 295
Cary, NC 27518
Applicant/Permittee: Eagle Land, LLC
c/o Mr. Anderson Marlow
3700 Computer Drive, Suite 280
Raleigh, NC 27609
Re: Availability of Riparian Wetland Credits for:
Goodwin Crossing, 1301 Goodwin Road, Durham, NC / (SAW-2019-01521)
Bank Name: Clearwater Neuse 01 Umbrella Mitigation Bank
Bank Sites: Lowlands Wetland Mitigation Site (USACE AID: SAW-2015-01815)
Bank Sponsor: Clearwater Mitigation Solutions, LLC
Permittee: Eagle Land, LLC
Permitting Authority: USACE Raleigh Regulatory FO
NCDWR Raleigh FO
Riparian Wetland Credits Requested: 0.43 acres (or WMUs)
Riparian Wetland Credits Available: 10.746 acres (or WMUs)
Service Area: Neuse River Basin, Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) 03020201
Dear Mr. Buchholz,
Clearwater Mitigation Solutions, LLC, currently has sufficient riparian wetland credits from the
Lowlands Wetland Mitigation Site to satisfy the riparian wetland mitigation requirements related to
the above -mentioned project. The project is located within service area (HUC 03020201) of the
Bank, in the Neuse River Basin. As the Bank Sponsor, Clearwater Mitigation Solutions, LLC,
attests to the fact that mitigation credits are available for reservation at this time.
This letter is simply a statement of availability of credits as of the date written. We have the
inventory as shown above, however, this letter is not a guarantee of availability as credits will be
sold on a first come, first serve basis. An invoice for this transaction will be sent upon your
request and we will formally reserve both the credits and price quoted for a period of 30-days
from the invoice.
Final transfer of the credits will be made upon receipt of a copy of the 404 and/or 401 and upon
receipt of your payment to Clearwater Mitigation Solutions, LLC. We will then issue a
mitigation credit transfer certificate verifying the credit purchase for your records. A copy of
the mitigation transfer certificate with an updated official credit ledger will also be sent to the
regulatory agencies for verification of the transaction.
Clearwater Mitigation Solutions
604 Macon Place. Raleigh, NC 27609
919-624-6901. [e-mail]

CLEARWATER IVIITIGATION
S O L U T I O N S
We appreciate the opportunity to assist you with your mitigation needs. Please contact me at
[phone] or clearwatermitigation(Lgmail.com if you have any questions or need any
additional information.
Sincerely,
�lk*�'
Kevin Yates
Cc: Mr. Anderson Marlowe — Eagle Land, LLC
Clearwater Mitigation Solutions
604 Macon Place. Raleigh, NC 27609
919-624-6901. [e-mail]

J MCADAMS
PROJECT DATA
GOODWIN CROSSING
Stormwoter Impact Analysis
PINS:
Address:
Site Plan #:
Stormwater Regulatory Basin:
River Basin:
Site Area:
Existing Impervious Area:
Proposed Impervious Area:
Proposed Impervious Percentage:
Land Disturbance Area:
TM DLS:
Watershed Protection Overlay:
SITE HISTORY & PROJECT DESCRIPTION
NARRATIVE > MAR-23002
0835-04-53-4274, 0835-04-42-9030
1301 & 1312 Goodwin Road
D2100326
Upper Falls Lake
Neuse
77.73 ac
0.00 ac
14.20 ac
18.27
3,385,718 sf
N/A
F/J-B
Goodwin Crossing is an approximately 77-acre proposed single-family development located east of the intersection of
Goodwin Road and Ventoria Road in Durham, North Carolina. The site spans two separate parcels on either side of
Goodwin Road and is comprised of single-family homes, associated streets, utilities, and stormwater control measures.
The site is currently wooded with no existing structures.
Drainage from the site flows into three unnamed tributaries that discharge into Cabin Branch. Cabin Branch (27-2-21-
7) is located within the Falls Lake Watershed. There are existing onsite environmental features (buffered streams)
located within the northern parcel and southern parcel that contain 50-foot buffers. All buffers are shown on the
drainage area maps contained in this SIA. The site does contain floodplain areas along the main tributary of Cabin Branch
and is located within the Falls Lake Watershed protection overlay.
The following report contains stormwater design calculations addressing the overall residential development. All
proposed impervious development associated with this project will be routed to the proposed stormwater control
measures for the purpose of meeting detention and nutrient treatment requirements. Since the proposed site drains
to Cabin Branch, nitrogen export calculations, phosphorus export calculations, and 85% TSS removal will be required
within the Lower Neuse Basin. The site is also required to meet the 50% overall treatment required within the Falls Lake
Watershed. The proposed land use for the site is less than 35% impervious and the total site area contributes less than
10% of the total watershed based on an analysis point of where Cabin Creek exits the site at the northeastern corner
of the property. Therefore, this site is only required to provide detention to reduce peak flow rates for the 1-year
storm. This report addresses the impact of stormwater runoff due to the proposed development.
Per City of Durham regulations, stormwater management on this site shall meet the stormwater management
performance standards for development set forth in Durham City Code Chapter 70, Article X, Sections 70-736 through
70-741 (effective May 21, 2019).
creating experiences through experience 2905 Meridian Parkway, Durham, NC 27713 / 919. 361. 5000

J MCADAMS
The regulations are as follows:
Sec. 70-738. Peak Runoff Control Requirements
NARRATIVE > MAR-23002
(a) Purpose. The purpose of this Section 70-738 is to ensure that the increases in volume, velocity, and peak flow of
stormwater discharges from Development are addressed, in order to mitigate the impacts on downstream properties
and receiving waters. All Development, including Development that may be exempt from pollutant reduction
requirements set forth in remaining sections of this Article, is subject to the requirements of this section unless exempted
in (b) below.
(b) Applicability, Calculation of Prior Impervious Surface Area. This Subsection 70-738 applies to the following
Development, assessed in comparison to pre -development prior Impervious Surface conditions as defined in (1) and (2)
below: (i) relocation of existing Impervious Surface area on a Multifamily and Other lot; (ii) increase in Impervious Surface
area on any lot subject to limitations on Impervious Surface area in on approved plat or plan for reasons such as
watershed protection or stormwater control measure requirements; (iii) increase of more than 500 square feet in
Impervious Surface area on a Multifamily and Other lot; (iv) 7 increase of more than 2000 square feet of Impervious
Surface area on a single family or duplex residential lot included on a preliminary or final plat submitted for review, or
on any lot utilized for recreation. For purposes of calculating these thresholds, subject Development that is part of a
Common Plan of Development shall be assessed with other portions of such common plan that have not previously
complied with peak flow requirements.
(1) For purposes of applying peak flow requirements for the 2- and 10-year storms, the land cover (including
type and location) existing as of April 23, 1997 shall be considered the "pre -development conditions",-
(2) For purposes of applying the peak flow requirement for the 1-year storm, the land cover (including type and
location) that existed as of March 9, 2001 for land in the Falls Basin and Lower Neuse Basin, and as of March
17, 2009 for land in the Jordan Basin shall be considered the "pre -development conditions",-
(c) Requirements.
(1) Stormwater impact analysis. Development that is not exempt under (b) above shall submit a stormwater
impact analysis or approved alternative to such analysis that complies with City Stormwater Standards as part
of the application for site plan or subdivision plat approval, or if such is not required, as part of submittals for
construction drawings or utility permit approval. Calculations shall be made in conformance with City
Stormwater Standards. No subdivision plats, site plans, utility permits, or construction drawings shall be
approved in the absence of a determination by the Department that required submissions have been made and
approved.
(2) One-year storm. Development that increases the peak runoff rate from the 1-year storm from pre -
development conditions shall provide stormwater management facilities in accordance with City Stormwater
Standards such that there is no net increase in peak runoff rate. This requirement shall be applicable in the
Jordan basin only when one acre or more of land has been cumulatively disturbed and the previously pervious
portion of the property as of March 17, 2009 will be developed to exceed 24% Impervious Surface area.
(3) Two- and ten-yearstorms. Development that increases the peak runoff rate from either the 2-year or the 10-
year storm from pre -development conditions may be required to provide stormwater management facilities to
address the impact, as determined in accordance with City Stormwater Standards.
(4) Other design storms. Development that increases the peak runoff from other design storms such as the 100-
year storm may be required to install stormwater management facilities to address the impact, as determined
in accordance with City Stormwater Standards.
creating experiences through experience 2of9

J MCADAMS
Sec. 70-739. Storm, 'ollutant Standards; exemptions
NARRATIVE > MAR-23002
(a) Exemptions for Limited Disturbances Development in which Land Disturbance, calculated cumulatively as of the
Applicable Baseline Date, is less than the thresholds in Table 1 below is exempt from the standards in subsections 70-
740 and 70-741, subject to paragraphs (1) and (2) below.
TABLET THRESHOLDS FOR APPLICAT7ONOFSTORMWATER POLLUTANTREQUIREMENTS
Project Location
Land Disturbance
Limited
Residential
Multifamily and
Other
Jordan Basin
1 acre
1 acre
Falls Basin
0.5 acre
12,000 sq. ft.
Lower Neuse Basin
1 acre
0.5 acre
(1) Common Plan of Development. Development that is part of a Common Plan of Development shall be included
in the calculation. If the applicable threshold set forth in Table 1 is exceeded, all other portions of the Common
Plan are subject to the requirements of this Article unless exempted by the following: i) the lot(s) within the
Common Plan was lawfully constructed after the baseline date in accordance with the applicable requirements
in effect at the time, ii) the lot(s) had a different applicant at the time of development, and iii) the lot(s) has a
different owner(s), parent, subsidiary, or other affiliate than does the project area.
(2) Redevelopment and Existing Development; maintenance of treatment. Redevelopment and Existing
Development that are exempt under these thresholds must continue to maintain and reconstruct all SCMs in
compliance with approved plans, prior ordinance requirements, and City Stormwater Standards.
(b) Other Exemptions. Additionally, Development is exempt if.,
(1) It qualifies in its entirety as Existing Development; or
(2) It does not increase Impervious Surface area over the Applicable Baseline Date, or
(3) It is undertaken by a state or federal entity in the Falls orJordon Basin; or
(4) It is undertaken by on entity covered by its own individual National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES) Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) permit.
Sec. 70-740. Required Reductions for Nutrients and TSS; Alternatives; Calculations
(a) Nutrient Loading Rate Limits. Development not exempt undersubsection 70-739 shall construct and implementSCMs
so as to limit the post construction loading rate of nitrogen and phosphorus from the project area to the limits set forth
in Table 2 below, orsholl comply with allowed alternative (b) below. A portion of the reduction requirements for nitrogen
and phosphorus may be met through off site measures or payments as set forth in 70-741.
TABLE2 NUTRIENT EXPORT LOAD LIMITS
Project Location
Export Limit Ibs/acre/year
Nitrogen
Phosphorous
Falls Basin
2.2
0.33
Lower Neuse Basin
3.6
1 not required
(b) Alternative for Low Impact Development. Development will be considered compliant with the nutrient reduction
obligations of this Section 70-740 if:
creating experiences through experience 3of9

J MCADAMS
NARRATIVE > MAR-23002
(1) In the Falls Basin it demonstrates that it meets the post development hydrologic criteria set forth in Chapter
2 of the North Carolina Low Impact Development Guidebook dated June of 2009, as it may be amended from
time to time, or
(2) In any basin it demonstrates compliance with pre -development runoff volume matching criteria using NC
DEQ's Storm-EZ spreadsheet.
(c) TSS Reduction. TSS reduction is applicable to Development as further described in this subsection (c) when the
following conditions are met:
*An increase in Impervious Surface area occurs as compared to what existed as of March 17, 2009, and
• The increase in Impervious Surface area assessed in comparison to pervious area existing as of March 17,
2009 exceeds 24%.
All increased Impervious Surfaces, as reasonably practical, must drain to on allowed SCM that is designed to provide a
minimum of 85% TSS removal or designated as a Primary SCM in the North Carolina Stormwater Control Measure Credit
Document and is sized to capture runoff from the first 1 inch of rainfall from all surfaces that drain to the SCM. These
requirements are expanded, and/or modified os follows:
(1) Piped areas in low density projects. Projects that do not require construction of SCMs because their
Impervious Surface percentage is less than that described in the paragraph above must treat TSS from
stormwater runoff that is conveyed in non -vegetated conveyances, such as stormwater pipes, but excluding road
and driveway crossings.
(2) Overtreotment to address untreatable areas. Where treatment for TSS is not reasonably practicable as
determined by the Department, such as when Impervious Surface areas include offsite transportation
improvements or small noncontiguous areas at the edge 10 of a project, additional reductions of TSS may be
required in treatable areas, such as overtreotment in other project areas or treatment of off -site run-on.
(d) Calculations for Nutrient Loading and TSS Removal. Pollutant loading calculations shall be made using City
Stormwater Standards. All increases in Impervious Surfaces shall be included, including but not limited to internal and
offsite transportation improvements in City maintained right-of-way. Approved methodologies for calculating pollutant
loading will be maintained in writing by the Public Works Department, and will include those methodologies and
calculations required by NC DEQ or alternative methodologies approved by the Public Works Department and NC DEQ.
(e) Submittals. An applicant shall submit pollutant loading calculations for the pre- and post -development conditions in
accordance with City Stormwater Standards as part of its application and as part of the stormwater impact analysis for
approval of a subdivision or site plan, utility permit, or construction drawings for a street or utility.
Sec. 70-741.On-site treatment requirements; offsite purchase and credit options, bacteria control
(a) On Site Nutrient Treatment Requirements. Nitrogen and phosphorus reduction requirements may be met, in part,
through offsite management measures or the purchase of nutrient credits. At a minimum, however, in the Falls Basin a
percentage of the required nitrogen and phosphorus reductions must be achieved through onsite treatment in the
amount shown in Table 3 below. In addition to meeting the percentage reductions below, in the Lower Neuse Basin,
nitrogen export load from the site must not exceed 6 lbs. per acre per year for Limited Residential, and 10 lbs. per acre
per year for Multifamily and Other. (Note: offsite credit purchases do not meet TSS removal requirements, which must
be met onsite.)
creating experiences through experience 4of9

I MCADAMS NARRATIVE > MAR-23002
TABLE 3 ONSITE NUTRIENTTREATMENT REQUIREMENTS
Minimum Onsite Nutrient Treatment
Project Location
Nitrogen
Phosphorous
Falls — General
*50% of required
*50% of required
reduction
reduction
Falls Downtown Area
*30% of required
*30% of required
reduction
reduction
Falls exceeding thresholds
*30% of required
*30% of required
but with less than 1 acre
reduction
reduction
land disturbance
No Percentage reductions
apply, but the 6110
Lower Neuse
nitrogen export limit
not required
described in paragraph
(a) above must be met
*The "required reduction" is the difference between the post -development loading rote in pounds per acre per
year before treatment minus the loading rote target in pounds per acre per year. The percentage shown in the
chart above is applied to the difference and the resulting number is the amount in pounds/acre/year that the
nutrient loading rote must be reduced onsite.
Reference Guide for Development, Sec. 8.1 Application of the Stormwater Ordinance
(3) A site to drainage area analysis con be used to show that the site is o small percentage of the total watershed area.
Further analysis between the site and the point of analysis of the total watershed area to determine the impact of the
increase in discharge is required. See the table below for percentage thresholds for using the site to drainage area
analysis.
Table 8.1-6: Site -to -Drainage Area Thresholds
Proposed Land Use
Threshold
— 85% impervious -
If the total site area as a percentage of the total
(ex. commercial, business, c =
watershed area at the analysis point is
0.75)
2.5% or less, your analysis is complete
— 70% impervious -
If the total site area as a percentage of the total
(ex. townhouses,
watershed area at the analysis point is
c = 0.60)
3% or less, your analysis is complete
— 35% impervious -
If the total site area as a percentage of the total
(ex. % acre single family homes,c=
watershed area at the analysis point is
0.30)
10%or less, your analysis is complete
creating experiences through experience 5 of 9

J MCADAMS
NARRATIVE > MAR-23002
Reference Guide for Development, Sec. 8.0.2 Stormwater Conveyance Systems Design
Stormwater conveyance systems (storm drain systems, culverts and ditches/open channels) shall be sized based upon
criteria listed in Table 8.0.1.
Table 8.0.1: Design Criteria for Installation of New Stormwater Conveyance Systems
System
Drainage Basin
Design Storm
l:
Design Criteria
Size
10-Year
HW/D must be less than or equal to 1.0 for both
Culverts
< 100 acres
inlet and outlet control conditions
25-Year
HW/D must be less than or equal to 1.0 for both
>= 100 acres
inlet and outlet control conditions
CALCULATION METHODOLOGY
■ Rainfall data for this area in the Durham, NC region is from NOAA Atlas 14. This data contains a depth -duration -
frequency (DDF) table describing rainfall depth versus time for varying return periods in the area. These rainfall
depths are input into the meteorological model within PondPack for peak flow rate calculations. Please
reference the precipitation information within the Miscellaneous Site Information section of this report for
additional information.
■ Using WebSoil Survey, the on -site soils were determined to range from hydrologic soil group (HSG) 'B' soils to
HSG 'D' soils. Since the method chosen to compute pre- and post -development peak flow rates and runoff
volumes is dependent upon the soil type, care was taken when selecting the appropriate Soil Conservation
Service Curve Number (SCS CN).
- Within each sub -basin, an approximate proportion of each soil group was determined using Web Soil
Survey Maps. Once an approximate proportion was determined, a composite SCS CN was computed
for each cover condition.
- A composite SCS Curve Number was calculated for both the pre- and post -development condition for
each indirectly connected (IC) impervious area in each subbasin using SCS curve numbers and land
cover conditions.
■ Land cover conditions for the pre -development condition were taken from aerial imagery taken from the
applicable baseline date for the site. Cover conditions for pre -development condition were determined using
aerial imagery shown on page 9 of this narrative from the appropriate baseline date. Land cover conditions for
the post -development condition were taken from the proposed layout.
■ The time of concentration was calculated using SCS TR-55 (Segmental Approach, 1986). The Tc flow path can
be divided into three segments: overland flow, concentrated flow, and channel flow. The travel time was then
computed for each segment, from which the overall time of concentration was determined by taking the sum
of each segmental time.
- The overland flow segments of Tc paths for both the pre- and post -development condition were
delineated to be compliant with the current RGFD.
- The channel dimensions used to calculate the travel time within the channel flow segment of all times
of concentration is based upon the best available site topography data.
creating experiences through experience 6of9

J MCADAMS
NARRATIVE > MAR-23002
■ Existing topographic survey on site is based upon survey performed by BNK, Inc. Offsite topographic information
is from LiDAR obtained from NC One Map.
■ PondPack Version V8i was used in determining the pre- & post -development peak flow rates for the 1-year
storm event, as well as routing calculations for the proposed stormwater control measures.
■ For 100-year storm routing calculations, a "worst -case" condition was modeled in order to ensure the proposed
facilities would safely pass the 100-year storm event. The assumptions used in this scenario are as follows:
- The starting water surface elevation in the facility, just prior to the 100-year storm event, is at the invert
of the secondary orifice. This scenario could occur as a result of a clogged primary orifice or a rainfall
event that lingers for several days. This could also occur as a result of several rainfall events in a series,
before the low -flow orifice has an opportunity to draw down the storage pool.
■ Pre- and post -development Nitrogen and Phosphorus Export Loading rates were calculated using the NCDEQ
SNAP Tool v4.2 and the City of Durham Nutrient Reporting Form.
■ HY-8 Software was used in determining headwater and tailwater conditions for the proposed culvert.
DISCUSSION OF RESULTS
PEAK FLOW ANALYSIS
1-Year Storm
This development is located within the Falls Lake Watershed and results in increases in peak runoff rates in the post -
development un-detained condition; therefore, it is required to provide 1-year peak flow mitigation. The 1-year peak
flow requirement has been met at POA #1, POA #2, and POA #3. Please refer to the Summary of Results for the reduction
in 1-year flows from the pre- to post -development condition.
It should be noted that the overall proposed development is less than 10% of the total site area flowing to an analysis
point of where Cabin Branch flows offsite at the northeast corner of the property line. The total site area to this point
is approximately 1,324 acres per StreamStats resulting in the proposed site contributing 6% to this overall drainage
area. Therefore, the proposed site is not required to analyze the 2- or 10-year peak flows for pre- and post -
development.
POLLUTANTAND NUTRIENT CONTROL REQUIREMENTS
The proposed site falls within the Falls Lake Basin Protection Overlay. The SNAP Tool, provided in Section 8 (Nutrient
Loading Calculations) of the enclosed report, shows the total post -development export for nitrogen and phosphorus.
TSS is treated with three primary SCMs onsite.
CULVERT SIZING
Goodwin Crossing contains a proposed culvert crossing on the west portion of the site as shown on the Culvert Drainage
Map. Per the City of Durham Reference Guide for Development Section 8.0.2 as outlined in the above sections, culverts
may be sized for the 10-year storm for drainage areas less than 100-acres and if the ratio of headwater to depth (HW/D)
is less than 1.0 for both the inlet and outlet conditions of the proposed culvert. The drainage area for this proposed
culvert encompasses approximately 23-acres meeting the 10-year design requirement. As shown in the Summary of
Results for the culvert included in Section 10 of this report, the the HW/D ratio for the 10-year storm is less than 1.0 for
creating experiences through experience 7of9

I MCADAMS
NARRATIVE > MAR-23002
both the inlet and outlet conditions. Further, the culvert safely conveys the 10-year storm without overtopping the
proposed road elevation of 355 and provides adequate freeboard.
LIMITATIONS
If the development on this tract is built as proposed within this report, then the requirements set forth in City of Durham
regulations will be met without additional stormwater management facilities. However, modifications to the proposed
development may require that this analysis be revised. Some modifications that would require this analysis to be revised
include:
1. The proposed site impervious surface exceeds the amount accounted for in this report.
2. The post -development watershed breaks change significantly from those used to prepare this report.
The above modifications may result in the assumptions within this report becoming invalid. The computations within
this report will need to be revisited if any of the above conditions become apparent as development of the proposed
site moves forward.
creating experiences through experience 8 of 9

I MCADAMS
NARRATIVE > MAR-23002
Figure 1: 2022 aerial imagery, representing cover conditions of baseline date March 2001
creating experiences through experience 9 of 9

United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
In Reply Refer To:
Project Code: 2023-0071056
Project Name: 23005962A- Goodwin Crossing
May 11, 2023
Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project
location or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The enclosed species list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, as
well as proposed and final designated critical habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your
proposed project and/or may be affected by your proposed project. The species list fulfills the
requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the
Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). If your project area
contains suitable habitat for any of the federally -listed species on this species list, the proposed
action has the potential to adversely affect those species. If suitable habitat is present, surveys
should be conducted to determine the species' presence or absence within the project area. The
use of this species list and/or North Carolina Natural Heritage program data should not be
substituted for actual field surveys.
New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of
species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to
contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to
federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical
habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the
Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be
completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be
completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and
implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested
through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list.
The purpose of the Act is to provide a means whereby threatened and endangered species and the
ecosystems upon which they depend may be conserved. Under sections 7(a)(1) and 7(a)(2) of the
Act and its implementing regulations (50 CFR 402 et seq.), Federal agencies are required to
utilize their authorities to carry out programs for the conservation of threatened and endangered

05/11/2023
species and to determine whether projects may affect threatened and endangered species and/or
designated critical habitat.
A Biological Assessment is required for construction projects (or other undertakings having
similar physical impacts) that are major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the
human environment as defined in the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)
(c)). For projects other than major construction activities, the Service suggests that a biological
evaluation similar to a Biological Assessment be prepared to determine whether the project may
affect listed or proposed species and/or designated or proposed critical habitat. Recommended
contents of a Biological Assessment are described at 50 CFR 402.12.
If a Federal agency determines, based on the Biological Assessment or biological evaluation, that
listed species and/or designated critical habitat may be affected by the proposed project, the
agency is required to consult with the Service pursuant to 50 CFR 402. In addition, the Service
recommends that candidate species, proposed species and proposed critical habitat be addressed
within the consultation. More information on the regulations and procedures for section 7
consultation, including the role of permit or license applicants, can be found in the "Endangered
Species Consultation Handbook" at:
http://www.fws.gov/endangered/esa-library/pdf/TOC-GLOS.PDF
Migratory Birds: In addition to responsibilities to protect threatened and endangered species
under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), there are additional responsibilities under the
Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGEPA) to
protect native birds from project -related impacts. Any activity, intentional or unintentional,
resulting in take of migratory birds, including eagles, is prohibited unless otherwise permitted by
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)). For more
information regarding these Acts see https://www.fws.gov/birds/policies-and-regulations.php.
The MBTA has no provision for allowing take of migratory birds that may be unintentionally
killed or injured by otherwise lawful activities. It is the responsibility of the project proponent to
comply with these Acts by identifying potential impacts to migratory birds and eagles within
applicable NEPA documents (when there is a federal nexus) or a Bird/Eagle Conservation Plan
(when there is no federal nexus). Proponents should implement conservation measures to avoid
or minimize the production of project -related stressors or minimize the exposure of birds and
their resources to the project -related stressors. For more information on avian stressors and
recommended conservation measures see https://www.fws.gov/birds/bird-enthusiasts/threats-to-
birds.php.
In addition to MBTA and BGEPA, Executive Order 13186: Responsibilities of Federal Agencies
to Protect Migratory Birds, obligates all Federal agencies that engage in or authorize activities
that might affect migratory birds, to minimize those effects and encourage conservation measures
that will improve bird populations. Executive Order 13186 provides for the protection of both
migratory birds and migratory bird habitat. For information regarding the implementation of
Executive Order 13186, please visit https://www.fws.gov/birds/policies-and-regulations/
executive-orders/e0-13186. php.

05/11/2023
3
We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages
Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project
planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Code in the header of
this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project that you submit
to our office.
Attachment(s):
• Official Species List
• Migratory Birds

05/11/2023
OFFICIAL SPECIES LIST
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the
requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether
any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed
action".
This species list is provided by:
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
[phone]

05/11/2023
PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Code: 2023-0071056
Project Name: 23005962A- Goodwin Crossing
Project Type: Residential Construction
Project Description: Colliers Engineering & Design CT, P.C. (DBA Maser Consulting) is
pleased to submit this proposal to provide professional services for a
proposed residential development known as the Goodwin Crossing
located in the Durham, North Carolina. The properties in question are
located at 1301 and 1312 Goodwin Road in Durham, North Carolina. In
total, the combined properties are approximately 75.43-acres and further
described as Durham Parcel Identification Numbers (PINS)
0835-53-42-7438 and 0835-42-90-3075 (see Figurel, below). The
properties are located within the City of Durham jurisdiction, within the
Neuse River Basin (HUC #: 03020201) in the Mountain Creek -Little
River Sub -Watershed, within the Durham Watershed Protection Overlay
District F/J-B, and contain floodway and floodplain areas associated with
Cabin Branch which is located along the northern property boundary of
PIN 0835-53-42-7438.
Project Location:
The approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https:
www.google.com/maps/(a�36.09247044999999,-78.88042713153564,14z
ns�n�h
.'.II I rr
Counties: Durham County, North Carolina

05/11/2023 3
ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT SPECIES
There is a total of 7 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.
Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include
species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species
list because a project could affect downstream species.
IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA
Fisheriesi, as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the
Department of Commerce.
See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially
within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office
if you have questions.
1. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an
office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
MAMMALS
NAME
Tricolored Bat Perimyotis subflavus
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/10515
AMPHIBIANS
NAME
STATUS
Proposed
Endangered
STATUS
Neuse River Waterdog Necturus lewisi Threatened
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6772
FISHES
NAME
STATUS
Carolina Madtom Noturus furiosus Endangered
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/528
CLAMS
NAME
STATUS
Atlantic Pigtoe Fusconaia masoni Threatened
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5164

05/11/2023
4
INSECTS
NAME STATUS
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus Candidate
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743
FLOWERING PLANTS
NAME STATUS
Michaux's Sumac Rhus michauxii Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5217
Smooth Coneflower Echinacea laevigata Threatened
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3473
CRITICAL HABITATS
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S
JURISDICTION.
YOU ARE STILL REQUIRED TO DETERMINE IF YOUR PROJECT(S) MAY HAVE EFFECTS ON ALL
ABOVE LISTED SPECIES.

05/11/2023
MIGRATORY BIRDS
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act! and the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Actz.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to
migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider
implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below.
1. The Migratory Birds Treat. Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
3. 50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)
The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the
USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your
project location. To learn more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how this
list is generated, see the FAQ below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this location,
nor a guarantee that every bird on this list will be found in your project area. To see exact
locations of where birders and the general public have sighted birds in and around your project
area, visit the E-bird data mapping tool (Tip: enter your location, desired date range and a species
on your list). For projects that occur off the Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing
the relative occurrence and abundance of bird species on your list are available. Links to
additional information about Atlantic Coast birds, and other important information about your
migratory bird list, including how to properly interpret and use your migratory bird report, can be
found below.
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures
to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE
SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be present and
breeding in your project area.
BREEDING
NAME SEASON
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus Breeds Sep 1 to
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention Jul 31
because of the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types
of development or activities.
Black -billed Cuckoo Coccyzus erythropthalmus Breeds May 15
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA to Oct 10
and Alaska.
https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9399

05/11/2023
BREEDING
NAME SEASON
Chimney Swift Chaetura pelagica Breeds Mar 15
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA t0 Aug 25
and Alaska.
Kentucky Warbler Oporornis formosus Breeds Apr 20
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA t0 Aug 20
and Alaska.
Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor Breeds May 1
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA to Jul 31
and Alaska.
Prothonotary Warbler Protonotaria citrea Breeds Apr 1 to
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA Jul 31
and Alaska.
Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus Breeds May 10
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA t0 Sep 10
and Alaska.
Rusty Blackbird Euphagus carolinus Breeds
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions elsewhere
(BCRs) in the continental USA
Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina Breeds May 10
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA to Aug 31
and Alaska.
PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be
present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project
activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and understand the
FAQ "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting
to interpret this report.
Probability of Presence (■)
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your
project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-week
months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey effort (see
below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One can have higher
confidence in the presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also high.
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:
The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in
the week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events for
that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted Towhee

05/11/2023
was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is
0.25.
2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of
presence is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum
probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of presence
in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12
(0.25) is the maximum of any week of the year. The relative probability of presence on
week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2.
3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical
conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the
probability of presence score.
Breeding Season( )
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time -frame inside which the bird breeds across
its entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project
area.
Survey Effort (1)
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys
performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The number of
surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.
No Data (—)
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant
information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on
all years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse.
— probability of presence breeding season I survey effort — no data
SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Bald
Non-BCCe 11111111 ING izi 4+1 [phone]; iiii Ni+
Vulnerable --- -- ---- ---- ---- —J+� ���� --- ---- ---- ----
Black -billed ++++ ++++ ++++ ++-I I I 1 I' I 777 TTTT
Cuckoo
+ I I I I I I + *+0+ ++++ ++++
Cuckoo
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
--- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---
Chimney Swift
BCC Rangew de ++++ ++++ ++++ +1111111 mill 1110 1+111111 ll++ ++++ ++++
(CON)

05/11/2023
4
Kentucky Warbler ++++ ++++ ++++ +++T �7l T+....... I'+ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++
BCC Rangewide _ JAN OEM.
(CON)
Prairie Warbler ++ ++++ 0+11 ,*+, 0+++ ++++ ++++ BCC Rangewide ++++ ++++ ++++ Jill Jill "
(CON) iNEENNE MENMEN EIM■
-------------
Prothonotary
le ++++ ++++ ++++ IN HE 111111111110 $11111111++ ++++ ++++ ++++
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Red-headed
Woodpecker
BCC Rangewide --- ---- ----
(CON)
Rusty Blackbird BCC -BCR 1111 IN 1001 ++0+ *+++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++++ ++0+ IFTTT 1011
Wood Thrush + �11: i I I +TT+ +� BCC Rangewide + I 1 1 I I 1 1 1 I I I I *11 11�1 111, 1 1 1
(CON)
Additional information can be found using the following links:
• Birds of Conservation Concern https://www.fws.gov/program/migratory-birds/species
• Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds https://www.fws.gov/library
collections/avoidinp--and-minimizinp--incidental-take-mip-ratorv-birds
• Nationwide conservation measures for birds https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/
documents/nationwide-standard-conservation-measures.pdf
MIGRATORY BIRDS FAQ
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts
to migratory birds.
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize
impacts to all birds at any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly
important when birds are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in
the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very
helpful impact minimization measure. To see when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding
in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures or permits
may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of
infrastructure or bird species present on your project site.
What does IPaC use to generate the list of migratory birds that potentially occur in my
specified location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern
(BCQ and other species that may warrant special attention in your project location.

05/11/2023 5
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian
Knowledge Network (AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, banding,
and citizen science datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as
occurring in the 10km grid cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identified as
warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act
requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore activities or
development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your
project area. It is not representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list
of all birds potentially present in your project area, please visit the Rapid Avian Information
Locator (RAIL,) Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds
potentially occurring in my specified location?
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data
provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). This data is derived from a growing
collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets.
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information
becomes available. To learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and
how to interpret them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me
about these graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering or migrating in my area?
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding,
wintering, migrating or year-round), you may query your location using the RAIL Tool and look
at the range maps provided for birds in your area at the bottom of the profiles provided for each
bird in your results. If a bird on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated
with it, if that bird does occur in your project area, there may be nests present at some point
within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not
breed in your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern
throughout their range anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands,
Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands);
2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation
Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA; and
3. "Non -BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on
your list either because of the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or (for non -eagles)
potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities
(e.g. offshore energy development or longline fishing).

05/11/2023 6
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made,
in particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC
species of rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can
implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles,
please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species
and groups of bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the
Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal also offers data and information about other taxa besides
birds that may be helpful to you in your project review. Alternately, you may download the bird
model results files underlying the portal maps through the NOAA NCCOS Integrative Statistical
Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic
Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use
throughout the year, including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this
information. For additional information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study
and the nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam Lorin.
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid
violating the Eagle Act should such impacts occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of
birds of priority concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for
identifying what other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC
use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location". Please be
aware this report provides the "probability of presence" of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s) that
overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look
carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no
data" indicator (a red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is the key component. If the survey
effort is high, then the probability of presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In
contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and, therefore, a lack of
certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting point for
identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might
be there, and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you
know what to look for to confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement
conservation measures to avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project activities,
should presence be confirmed. To learn more about conservation measures, visit the FAQ "Tell
me about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory
birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page.

05/11/2023
IPAC USER CONTACT INFORMATION
Agency:
Colliers Engineering and Design
Name:
Sean Stanton
Address:
2000 Regency Parkway
Address Line 2:
Suite 295
City:
Cary
State:
NC
Zip:
27518
Email
[e-mail]
Phone:
9843125647

Roy Cooper, Governor
■ ■■■
lr■■ ■ INC DEPARTMENT OF
0■,■i NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
■ ■■
May 12, 2023
Sean Stanton
Colliers Engineering & Design
2000 Regency Parkway, Suite 295
Cary, NC 27518
RE: Goodwin Crossing; 23005962A
Dear Sean Stanton:
❑. Reid Wilson, Secretary
Misty Buchanan
Deputy Director, Natural Heritage Program
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
A query of the NCNHP database indicates that there are records for rare species, important natural
communities, natural areas, and/or conservation/managed areas within the proposed project
boundary. These results are presented in the attached `Documented Occurrences' tables and map.
The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is documented within the project area or indicated within a one -mile
radius of the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS) for guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
httr)s://www.fws.gov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
Also please note that the NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional
correspondence if a Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Land and Water Fund
easement, or an occurrence of a Federally -listed species is documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at rod ney.butler�ncdcr.gov or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
DEPAR7HEN7 OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
121 W. JONES STREET. RALEIGH. NC 27603 • 1691 MAIL SERVICE CENTER. RALEIGH. NC 27609
OFC 919.707.9120 • FAX [phone]

■
\
CO \
*/\ a
s-eem
z ® o a cc)
CO.ggg
\ _ 0. ® \
< � z >
\\/
u
y 0 e Z
CO
Z c
{
(
/
\
ea
®
/ /
/
\
s 2
/
3
g
0 /
\
g 2
g
/
j
:
3
ƒ
\
CO\
9 %
§
\
\}
:
« 2
\<�)
co
%D
t:/}
»
\ /
/[
©ti/
_
±
t»3G:
2
o\�s=
k
y>p}\
�
e
\COJ
e5
/
\
/
{
( \
&
»
>
u
0
3
y±{
2
\
\ U
)
:3
e
9
v
e e
\/®
a
=/e
e
\»
6z
/ ®
2 \
®
u
�f
0
\\\\
sƒƒ
0
o
o
}\!2
r \e�
\ ±
/ 2 %
©
©
\ }
a
3
3
? >
g
a
a
y \
|
CO
CO
\/
E
E
/
)z
CO
\ z
\
} /
\ }
Z
s
\ƒ
%\:%/\
\O\\\�
/}\5
°e
2
3 ƒ
\
$
.0
0^
CO/
\s\
3
<
u
e
®
\
\
D-
\ \
\
E
\
2\
E
&
-
% }
`
4
4
c
co
.k
\ ƒ
.\ E
u
0
0
®
E
E22
\
\
0
/
} f
©
2
2
c
s
/
/
t
e-
t
\
o g
e
/
0
3
E
�
\ }
2
} »
E
\
Qo
\
\
a
=
u
=
e
-
ze=2
CO
/
\
/
o
» \
a
0
©
©
cn
(
cn
e
/
a)
co
a) c
s
e:
{ \
>
>
CO
/
4
4 3
~
��
\
\
4/_
ƒ\
3
-
2
_
-
E
_
E
-
2
3
a)
a)z
2\\\}
2
2
E 2
E
D
z=
e l
CO
=_>
CO
r=:
j/
CO
CO
e»
e
CO
CO»
o z%}
e 3
Z
e Z
e
Z
7 e
x
x O,J
9
c=
§
/

u
a
I
1
CO
CO
N Q
Q N
in M M CO
rp in0NCO
c 0 0 0 N
roUMN
7 N N W
c _ �
O > T
CC3-0z Coz
U) oo (�z
� � O
Q CL
CO
CO
z
U
C
N
D
O
U
0
E
a)
w
CO
T
it,
co
z
� � M
co co N M M M N N n N N N
� co (n (n (n (n (n (n (n N (n (n (n
O fo
�7 CJ
M
CJ
CJ CJ
CJ
N
CJ
cn
D
E �_
O UCO
N
O7
E
N
O7
N
O7
fo
M C
N Q O
E
m
CO
E
CO
E
co
W
W
W
N
�
co in
c
-0 co
N
co
N
E
co
LL
-
W
>)
E E
E
E
E
E
U
7 7
7
7
7
D
U
I
N
I
T
O
N
N
N
Q
M M
M
M
M
M
N
O
'+
C ,
N N
E
C U W
m
W
W
T u
u
CO
LL
N U
O_
W O
0
0
M O
O
O
O
r�o
>
N N CO
0 0
CO
O
CO
O
I,
00 0
�
O
C9
O
O
N
Q J
CO
N
m
0
O
M
+ -0
O
00
O
O
O
O
0-) O
O
O
U 0
N N
N
N
N
N
N
O
�
O
cn
cn
cn
cn
D
E
E
CO
�
D
E
o
—
co
0
Co
a
E
co
CO 0
> �
W'
co
J
J
CO
D
m
E
O
3
E
� o
E O
N O
N
cn
coo
o
u
z O-
Lu
u
a
E
0
co
CO
L
E
c
c
CO
o
CO
o
in O
—6
O
in
c
cn
cn
a
N U
cn O
to
to
C
C
C)
LL CO
�E
°
a
a
O
iE
O
Ecn
a.CC3
E.0)
U.a
E
E
-0
-0
EE.�
22 �
� a
zw
zCL
Ucn
J
J
CLLOLDcnm
O
0
U)
O�
N
N
M
C9
M
U—
0
O
Ln
W
M
C9cn
M
M
M
N
cn
U
O
>
>
C
>
U
0
, N
N
N
N
+
+
+ CL
C
C
C
C i
N D-
>,
>,
>, 2
E
E
E D
E O D
Q cn ro
cn
ro cn
o cn
U
Um,
> 0 o
O m
O m
O
W� (�
A Q LL CO
LL
CO LL
CO LL z
u z
u z
u >
N N
C� C�
N N N N
M M M M
Ltd M Ln
>, —
�
C C C C C C
U N N N N N N
�D- N N N N N co
N N N N
c c c c
N N N N
CO CO CO CO
N N N N
I I
J
I I I I I N
M
LL Q uuC )u
U
O
N
O N O
C9
O
M
M
Ln Lh C9 C9 O
O
O
000,6
DO, O
O
L
�
N cc) N 1, 0
O
O
ON
O
N O O O N
O
N
N
N N N
U
O O O O
m
U
Q O o o o U,
U, U U U U 2
CO
CO
in
i 0-
0 (1)
0(1)
O CO
CC3 0 0 0 0
J
D
O O O O .CO
E
c
cn
m m m m
c
c
CO
m m m m m
co
CO
CO
o
x> > > > CO
�
E
E
000
c
m m m m
N N N N in
a
CO
LE
D-Z
D-
CO
CO
CO
Z Z Z
�wwwwC7
Ln M
M M (D
cocc)
CO
N
O
CO CO
N
M
N N N M
C
C
C
C C C C C C
CL
CL
CL
CL CL CL CL CL CL
>
>
>
> > > > > >
ra
M
N
a

CO
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
M
I N
M
M
M
M
CO
o e
M
M
M
c
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
O f0
0
0
0
0
0
0
(3 Q�
0
(3
(3
(3
(3
(3
0
CC3
CC3
CC3 N
N
N
N
+ N+
C+
ro +
D+
O
D+
O
D+ D
O O
in
D
c
ro N
c
co N
c
ro a)
c
N
c
N
c
N
c
N
C+
c D c
CC3 CC3 N
c
ro a)
c
-E co a)
c
-E co N
c
ro N
+
O
O
-E O+
+
+
+
O O
O O
O
O� O
O� O
O� O O)
E
O E
O E
O E O
a
a
aCOa
Q�
<n
<n <n
<n
<n
<n
c
CO
W �
O
u
O
u N
N
+ O
C �
E r0 Q
U
W O
O
E N
O O
CO + CON M
�o C O
Q J U,�jn
N
OO O
N
O
a
O
E
cn co c
7 z N
0 CO
co E coO
E cn
E O O
W
c
O
co
c `co
cn
E D
c
�z co
U
cn
cn
E
u tu
O (n J
O
n
uO
N
Lij
O CO
O� a
c O CO
N C Q D
N OX O cn
CO
W (J >
O
O
O
I
I
I
I
I
I
J
J
J
N
I
I
T
M
m
C)
W
C)
T
T
T
Q
co
co
U
m
O
0O
0Q
0
M
LnCO
N
QN
O
O
�
O
M
O
O
Q
Lh
O
�
O
O
N
O
O
O
O
0-)
M
O
O
N
_
NQO
N
O
O
O
N
O
N
G)
O
N
O
N
N
c
c
c
c
Q
E
CD
0
0
0
0
�°
O
O
O
O
CO
CO
v
v
v
v
Cl
co
CD
a
J
�
n
N
n
N
i
i
i
i
N
N
N
N
N
N
CO
CO
f0
f0
N
C
D
�
CO
CO
O
O
O
O
O OCC3
CO
CO
CO
W
W
(3
0
CO
E
CO
CO
CO
n
O
Ln
O
Ln
O
0
U
E
E
E
E
o
CO
CO
Co
Co
E
E
E
E
cn
u
E
O
E E
E E
E E
E E
D
c
c
O
c
O
c
O
c
O
c a
o
a
a)
a
a)
a
a)
a
OL
E CO
E CO
E CO
E CO
cn
cn
cn
u cn
u Ln
u Ln
u
Co
Co
C
C
CCC3
0
>
—
D
D
D
D
J
J
J
O J
O J
O J
O
O
CO
f0
Co
f0
Co
f0
Co
f0
CMO
r,
O
CO
r,
O
M
(O
N
M
co
co
N
N
M
M
M
CDCO
N
N
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
co
CO
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
Ln
CO
Ln
CO
Ln
CO
Ln
CO
Ln
CO
Ln
CO
Ln
CO
Ln
CO
Ln
CO
Ln
CO
Ln
CO
Ln
CO
Ln
CO
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
0
u
N
a

CO CO
o v
M
>
>
+
+ N
N N+
ro a a
a
ro aJ
ro +�
N NCC3 a)
N N a
�
0 E aJ
CCO CCO E �' LF CO
Q CO CO
W W
W W
to
to
to
c
CO
W �
O
u
I
J
I I I
I I
u
N
N N N
N N
aJ
} O
C �
E
U
I
m
U
Q m
�
— O
W O
O
O
a
� c
c
O E
cn c
z
co o
E N
E o CO
E
O
z E E
u
c CO
E v
n
u CO D
o a �
0
cn C) CC)
E N
N W N
O
v CO
O a
c O CO
c n D
o 0CC3 cn
CO
LLJ >
O-)
N Ln O
O
O
N
N
N
N
�
O
O
O
O
O O
7
7
QOQO
N N
O
O
00 O
O
O
N N N
N
N
Q Q
0
CO CO
v v
O
O
— —
E
E
cn
>
>
oCO
u
CO
m
o
Co CoLn
O
a
a
D
CO CO
z z
z Q
z Q
cn
E
E
E
D
CO�
c c D
D
D
a)a)C
c
D-
E E LE
CO CO E
O
O
cn
D
E
a
a
-E
Q
E c
E c
Fj
UU
>,O>,O
n
n n n
<n u
<n u
O
M
C9
c
c c c
c
c
CO
CO CO CO
CO
CO
CO
co co CO
CO
CO
D
D D D
D
D
u
u u u
u
u
cn
cn cn cn
cn
cn
CO
CO CO co
co
CO
>
> > >
>
>
O M M M
U U U U U U
C
CO CC3
� m
u o CO
0)o
O CC3 = ro +
aE > E a
a 1) a) 0) O 0
> = X
a"""v
O (j) N M M M
Lnmmmmmm
CO
m
E
cn
E
O
CO
CO
CO
E
n
c cn
O
LE Cl
m � CO
a E
>_ m 0
CO
a n
a O
E
> m
D
O
O
u
CCO I
O .>\
(J -0 lu
a)
Q E w
v
> m
w m
�z�aa�a
�(D
E-0
z (n �
J J 0- U
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
Q a
a
a
a
a
a
a
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
mo
mu
mu
mu
co
co
co 'Co
u
u
u
u
u
u
u> CO
O J
J
J
J
J
J
J (n
C
CO
aJ
O
CO N c � E
O Q CO
Q CO 0�
O
O
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0�
Q E o
> Q CO
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q o cn
cn E U o
O D U U U U U U w z U
0
c
m >
E ELn
O m o
COCO
u CO
0
-Em (1)
Ln
CO
O > U
E = aaaaaa CO
E �cncncncncncna a
�
O D- D- D- D- D- Q O n
oz"'000000 m d) u,
cn Q z
N N E0 E0 E0 E0 E0 E0 Ecn
0
Q Q Q .O m
z z z z z z z CO
> >
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o�
cn
c c >, >, >, >, >, >, >, O c O
0 0 + + + + + + + c O c
uuuuuuuIU W
0
J,
N
a

\
\
\
\
z
_
/
_
\}
«2
\\
\\
}§
ww
::
ee
EE
\§
�:
\
\\
�\
\\
/\
CO e e e
3 3
e
>>
}
% % / /
/ /
4
\/ \ \ CO CO
/ /
CO
CO\
%
Occsaccssaasacs
2 2
2 2/
s
©©
=
3/
.2
. z
\
% %
/
/ /
\
\
a\
/\
.r g
- cc
/ /
\
\
ƒ\
:
® ^ CO
E
\ \
c
0-
) \
a) x z/
E ° \ \
CO CO
/ /
/
\ \
©e \
® ®e
CO
\CO e e
D / w s s / /
o} u ©e e g g
\ \
e 2
2
-
/
_ § =
/ 7
-
t o o.0 5 5 e e
==
o=
/
-
-
/ \ \ \ \
/ / \ \
\
\
\ \
o
\ \
\
6
\/ y ©s s z z/
/.».»
©©/
= Z
Z
z
a ._ y// y y
e e
y
y
\ z
\
/ /
\ \
/ \ \ / /
\ \
/
/
s/ e ess e e§§
e e/
e
e\
§
25ZZ22ZZooZZeZ
Z
\
®
E E
\
\
»
c E E
e
0\
(
\\\
»
\
�0
6=
\ \ \ \
/ /
\
0 \
\
®
e
J
s = .2 2
/ / % \
\ \
\ /
\ \
/
-6
\
\
� \ / \ \
\ .- e z z
% %
/
z\
=
2 «
f
e
0 0
g g
/ 2
/
(
\
® \ \ \
/ /
/
E � \ \
\ \ \ \
\ \
e
3 2
\
e3 \w
» » / /
Co \
/ \
\
\ m
D e CO/ 2 / /
o
© E
e z 3 3=_//\\\
©e e
e e._._
a
+ 6
: o
2/
/ / e /
o z$ 2 2 o coo
»»
= o
o§
} y
_
2:
//o\\/mm\
co
\
\$
a \\
o._._ s s
\ \
= z y w w
— = = _ =
= _
o o = =
= u
e =
±-
o Z
{ [
m / z 9 9 CO
e e
a
s s
e e
a \ .k
e » = ess \ \
.2.2
E E cn
g«=
» 3
\.? \
\ /
//\/mt%%////22/2/»-
-
__—
e e
e 3= c c
l_= o s s e e==
==
e e=
e a=
c
0 5
= ee
-`
x x
c e 3 x s s Z Z
o o Z Z
e e
2 0 0
\/
§
/

0)
C-
V)
0
L-
C)
C-
0
0
(3
00
00
N
W
r)
z
U
Z
w
z a o
m
a W
@ a` o
is (1) -a m
N d C 9 )
CA= fa 7 O
Z =3 d
CN
0ROD
I

United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
3916 Sunset Ridge Rd
Raleigh, NC 27607-3726
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
In Reply Refer To: February 28, 2024
Project Code: 2024-0055765
Project Name: 24000310A- Offsite Sanitary Sewer- Goodwin Crossing
Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project
location or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The enclosed species list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed, and candidate species, as
well as proposed and final designated critical habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your
proposed project and/or may be affected by your proposed project. The species list fulfills the
requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the
Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of
species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to
contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to
federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical
habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the
Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be
completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be
completed by visiting the IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and
implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested
through IPaC by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list.
The purpose of the Act is to provide a means whereby threatened and endangered species and the
ecosystems upon which they depend may be conserved. Under sections 7(a)(1) and 7(a)(2) of the
Act and its implementing regulations (50 CFR 402 et seq.), Federal agencies are required to
utilize their authorities to carry out programs for the conservation of threatened and endangered
species and to determine whether projects may affect threatened and endangered species and/or
designated critical habitat.
A Biological Assessment is required for construction projects (or other undertakings having
similar physical impacts) that are major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the
human environment as defined in the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)
(c)). For projects other than major construction activities, the Service suggests that a biological

Project code: 2024-0055765
02/28/2024
evaluation similar to a Biological Assessment be prepared to determine whether the project may
affect listed or proposed species and/or designated or proposed critical habitat. Recommended
contents of a Biological Assessment are described at 50 CFR 402.12.
If a Federal agency determines, based on the Biological Assessment or biological evaluation, that
listed species and/or designated critical habitat may be affected by the proposed project, the
agency is required to consult with the Service pursuant to 50 CFR 402. In addition, the Service
recommends that candidate species, proposed species and proposed critical habitat be addressed
within the consultation. More information on the regulations and procedures for section 7
consultation, including the role of permit or license applicants, can be found in the "Endangered
Species Consultation Handbook" at: https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/documents/
endan ered-species-consultation-handbook.pdf
Migratory Birds: In addition to responsibilities to protect threatened and endangered species
under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), there are additional responsibilities under the
Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGEPA) to
protect native birds from project -related impacts. Any activity, intentional or unintentional,
resulting in take of migratory birds, including eagles, is prohibited unless otherwise permitted by
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)). For more
information regarding these Acts, see Migratory Bird Permit I What We Do I U.S. Fish & Wildlife
Service (fws.gov).
The MBTA has no provision for allowing take of migratory birds that may be unintentionally
killed or injured by otherwise lawful activities. It is the responsibility of the project proponent to
comply with these Acts by identifying potential impacts to migratory birds and eagles within
applicable NEPA documents (when there is a federal nexus) or a Bird/Eagle Conservation Plan
(when there is no federal nexus). Proponents should implement conservation measures to avoid
or minimize the production of project -related stressors or minimize the exposure of birds and
their resources to the project -related stressors. For more information on avian stressors and
recommended conservation measures, see https://www.fws.gov/library/collections/threats-birds.
In addition to MBTA and BGEPA, Executive Order 13186: Responsibilities of Federal Agencies
to Protect Migratory Birds, obligates all Federal agencies that engage in or authorize activities
that might affect migratory birds, to minimize those effects and encourage conservation measures
that will improve bird populations. Executive Order 13186 provides for the protection of both
migratory birds and migratory bird habitat. For information regarding the implementation of
Executive Order 13186, please visit https://www.fws. ov/partner/council-conservation-
mi ratory-birds.
We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages
Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project
planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Code in the header of
this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project that you submit
to our office.
Attachment(s):
• Official Species List
2of7

Project code: 2024-0055765
02/28/2024
OFFICIAL SPECIES LIST
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the
requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether
any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed
action".
This species list is provided by:
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
3916 Sunset Ridge Rd
Raleigh, NC 27607-3726
[phone]
3 of 7

Project code: 2024-0055765
02/28/2024
PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Code: 2024-0055765
Project Name: 24000310A- Offsite Sanitary Sewer- Goodwin Crossing
Project Type: Disposal / Transfer
Project Description:
Project Location:
The approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https:
www. google.com/maps/(a)36.0962156,-78.87699874407038,14z
s
x
Counties: Durham County, North Carolina
4of7

Project code: 2024-0055765 02/28/2024
ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT SPECIES
There is a total of 7 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.
Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include
species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species
list because a project could affect downstream species.
IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA
Fisheriesi, as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the
Department of Commerce.
See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially
within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office
if you have questions.
1. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an
office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
MAMMALS
NAME
Tricolored Bat Perimyotis subflavus
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/10515
AMPHIBIANS
NAME
STATUS
Proposed
Endangered
STATUS
Neuse River Waterdog Necturus lewisi Threatened
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6772
FISHES
NAME
STATUS
Carolina Madtom Noturus furiosus Endangered
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/528
CLAMS
NAME
STATUS
Atlantic Pigtoe Fusconaia masoni Threatened
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5164
5 of 7

Project code: 2024-0055765 02/28/2024
INSECTS
NAME STATUS
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus Candidate
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743
FLOWERING PLANTS
NAME STATUS
Michaux's Sumac Rhus michauxii Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/5217
Smooth Coneflower Echinacea laevigata Threatened
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3473
CRITICAL HABITATS
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S
JURISDICTION.
YOU ARE STILL REQUIRED TO DETERMINE IF YOUR PROJECT(S) MAY HAVE EFFECTS ON ALL
ABOVE LISTED SPECIES.
6of7

Project code: 2024-0055765
02/28/2024
IPAC USER CONTACT INFORMATION
Agency:
Colliers Engineering and Design
Name:
Sean Stanton
Address:
2000 Regency Parkway
Address Line 2:
Suite 295
City:
Cary
State:
NC
Zip:
27518
Email
[e-mail]
Phone:
9843125647
7 of 7

Roy Cooper, Governor
■ ■■■
lr■■ ■ INC DEPARTMENT OF
0■,■i NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
■ ■■
February 28, 2024
Sean Stanton
Colliers Engineering & Design
2000 Regency Parkway, Suite 295
Cary, NC 27518
RE: Offsite Sanitary Sewer - Goodwin Crossing; 24000310A
Dear Sean Stanton:
❑. Reid Wilson, Secretary
Misty Buchanan
Deputy Director, Natural Heritage Program
NCNHDE-25115
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
A query of the NCNHP database indicates that there are records for rare species, important natural
communities, natural areas, and/or conservation/managed areas within the proposed project
boundary. These results are presented in the attached `Documented Occurrences' tables and map.
The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is documented within the project area or indicated within a one -mile
radius of the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS) for guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
httr)s://www.fws.gov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
Also please note that the NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional
correspondence if a Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Land and Water Fund
easement, or an occurrence of a Federally -listed species is documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact the NCNHP at natural.heritage�dncr.nc.gov.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
DEPAR7HEN7 OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
121 W. JONES STREET. RALEIGH. NC 27603 • 1691 MAIL SERVICE CENTER. RALEIGH. NC 27609
OFC 919.707.9120 • FAX [phone]

ea
n
CO (
\
s 2
»
/
\
n E
v
\
\
o e
g 2
g
:
\
/
c
e
:
_
3 d
\
(
/
CO CC3
(`
\
\\
0
\ƒ
\
2 /
©
\ \
3
\3
\�
/
\
LL
©tZ0
u
t
» 3
Gs
/
>
ES
E
%
/
_
CO
\
D- a)
\
>
/
CO/
j
»
e
0
x
3
}
s ±
{ ?
4
a
40
/ _
:
\\
s/
e
®
v
e
c a\
G
©2
CO
E CO
)
=.k 4
e= 2
y\
s/
cyg
/
=
\
\
\
-02 \ %
°
\
\ \
_
o a
±
/ / / y e
\
g
} \
/
Ln a 2
CO
}\Z/\2\
2 \
\.\
z
\%/
9®
m z
3(
j
\�\\
\-TT
\FD
CC3
CO
ZCO =c
\\,t
0
u
°°
CO
_»
/\
\
(1)CO
}/��
u
0~®
/�
\%(\/
-0
CO
�\�\
t
m
\
y=
?
/
H
CO°/
2
0 :
°
±
4
\\o/
/
c
4
\
%s%°
\
\
\\\\
\
ee
z
\
E
&
co\
c
CO
§
\ \
)
\
u
t
z
9
»
» K°
\
Z
y
g
y
\
\
m\z
E
/
} f
© (
/
MO
c
/
\
/
n
y \
\ \
(
\
\ )
' `
}
o
E
m
0
e
n
/
\
/
»
°
\
\
,
±
°
©
©
Z
2/%G
§
e
/
a)
a)§
co
e
z s
= §
/
>
CO
=
4
e
4 =
z\s/
\
<
E
\
z
—
2 E
2
2
\ \
\
E
_
_ E
_
/ _
\
/
/
/
/:
\ }
-
\
e
3
j /
5 3
3 o
Z e
%
Z
/
7 e
x
x O,J
9
\
c\
s
§
/

� �
M
CO
CO
T,
!
!
N n
(n
(j
o v
M
0 z
0
0
N (3
C�
CO
aJ
Q �
aJ
O a
a CO
0 + f0 E
CO
C
W
0
co
aJ +
CO CO
LL �
aJ
N
0
CO
O DCO u T N T T
O N N N
Q M
cn u
0 0
c
COcn
U E C U U m
c Q u F U
Q3:o wu
0 M N M O
0 O O
CC�0CC) 0 O O O O
N N H
i }
N co ro � �0
0 T N roLn ro O O O
CO (n =3cl, Q J a� Q O� O) O
o 0
CO a)z u 0
CO 0 LL aJ
Q E a O
— CO
ro V)
CO=3 L
cn
z o
O cn CO
u - c
z 0
O EU
c
c- O
E co a) E
c U CO 0
w E a > a
�CO z —
Q Q cn
a�
a) 0
0 C C C) LL
o o D-
E E cn c E
co -0 22 � CO
� a) o a 3:
0 (n 0- LL =) (n
CO 0
z N C9
aJ —
C9 CC)
u O o� N
W M N
7
0
O 0
O._ +
E C C C
a c D-6 E 6 E 6 E
E 0 0 E E E
dozuzuzu
N N N
N N (n (n (n N N N N
M M M Ln Ln
a Co a a a a co co a
CC) a a a a a M aJ a M N N
U U U
E LF- Q cc) cc) cc) cc) � � Q � Q �
co a a a a a
C C C
W n
aJ aJ aJ
c c c
aJ aJ aJ
CC) CC) CC)
N N N
I
0
I J I I I aJ T I T
M
M N
M � �
0 Ln
C�
+ a + rp
C � C
O O 0
N E Q
0) CC) 07
LL
Q u(( u T C) Lu T T
O N
C9 M M
O O O
O Lid 0
O 0 0
N N N
v
co
m m U)
0 (D 0 `—°
0
c c �
`° `° o
ro ro c
° ro E
a a
CC) co co
CD CD U
CC) N O
N M
C C C
CC) CC) CC)
CC) CC) CC)
=3 =3 =3
u u u
Ln Ln Ln
O C9 j- O
MNOLn
0-)
O
M
Ln
N
N
(96 O 0)
00O
M
O
Ln
O
O
N
O
CC) M n r- o-)
Ln
o0oo�o
0
0
N N N N
N
N
O O O
0
0
co
c
c
0
Cl
ro
c
a m
m
a
a
CC)
U)
00 00 00
U)
c
.� N
N
EEE-Oco
CC)
0
3
Oo
n (n (n E Lu
LU
T
n
(n (3
C
c
CC)
CC) CC) CC) cn
O
CC)
Ln
0
CC)
o
-0
0
u
`—° =
E
0
cc) cc) cc) =3-
D- C,
CC)
=3
E
c
o
CC) CC) CC) � �
0) 0) 0) Ln CT
�
(T
D-�
u u u C, cn
cn
a
�o �o �o
n
0
N 0
0
W W Lu J
J
J
0;_>
O
CO 0
O
M M
0-)
co
N
M
M
(9
C C C C C
C
C
C
C
n3 n3 n3 n3 m
CC)
CC)
CC)
CC)
Ln Ln Ln Ln Ln
Ln
Ln
Ln
Ln
r:
M
N
a

s 2
n \
/
/
/
/ /
/
o e
e
e
e
v v
e
3±
3
3
3
3 3
3
% >
% >
% >
\
a \
3/CC3
\ e
2\ e
2\ e
2%/ e%%
g=
s u=
s u=
s s u=
e s
\ �
\
/\
/\
/)\Qn)
7
e s
e s
e o s
o
\ \
/ /
u
e
e
e
e e
e
s
s
s
s s
s
\
Y
Y
Y
Y Y
Y
u
&
&
&
& &
&
/
\(\
E
)
/
3
/
O
/ a
\
/
3 E
\z EE
e .g .2 2
y v = CO
E \ u
E.e = _
// //
0
o c
a
\\ \
\ CO
/ E
/ / z CO
E } / cn
9
//\ CO
2
s c
- Ln
a _
^
CO
� �
\
\ 0
0 �
6 �N
\ \
3
\ e
\ \
\ \
\\
CO
/ /
\ \
\\
/ /
/
v
e
/
\ /
E E
\ \
� E t E
//\/
e = e =
OL O OL O
\ / \ /
s u s u
t t t t t t
e e e e e CO
2 6 6 6 6 6
CO CO CO CO CO CO
/ / / / / /
\ \ \ \ \ \
\
\ \ \ \
S S
\ � / \ � CO\ \ \ \ \
/e= -0e s e o 0 0 0
s e 0.2 0 0 3 3 (3 e
} aaaa % e
e eve v 4 / / / // CO
e e e e e O aaaa e s
t
CO
6
/
\
/ CO= \ E
/\ ± .0 42
\ CO 0
�
\\� \ a)E E E E/ t»
� CO® CO« \ \ \
? _
/ / \ \
3 ± > 3 2 / � \ \ \ \ 6 / /
» 0 y y y y © E
0 /\/2/ § OOOO/ //
/ 5
\ \ >
_ e e
» § / /
( § 2 c
z 3 =
( \ ~ c > 2
» OEO \ \
e \ 4 k o >
/ \ 0
\ C m J
\2 m y/ / y o
\ \ \ \ � / / / / / \
\ ` \ \ \ \ Cl Cl Cl Cl� CO
\
/ E /
( / O O O O / ± \
\ � / \ � � } / / / / / / \ /
± o= o// 4 4 3 3 3 3 4 .2 3
« \ / ./ / \ \ \
\z\\�\.k \\\\2\2
% / a)\ co (: / / /
Z7x2aee xxeeeeoeo
s
§
/

\
\
z
_
/
_
\}
ƒj
\§
\ƒ
\§
\/
~2
\
\3
E
E
�\
\
}\
>
p�
2
=:
(ce
®
6 o 2 2 2
7 e e
coe
e
G
4
\/ CO CO
/ CO\
/ CO
CO\
O
2
c c s s s
a sac
s
s
«`
3 ./
s/
%%
�\
\ \
\
\
\ \
» / /
\
E
z
0
/\
COe
\\\\\
.\ .\
a�
®/co
3
$
\ 2 % / /
:<
\
o} u_ g g
e 2
/ —
2
—
� f
_ _ _
0 ° o / /
\ \
° 2
2
, t
u
G z
>
G =
_
\
0 / /
.
D.(.(
\ \
\
\ \
e
E
ec2
e22e
%3
a=yye
ay
y
s}
E-OU//co//
o/
o o=
/
o
/
o
\\
s
co
s/eee=ee/e
e
2%
§
2 5 Z Z Z
o Z Z
e z
Z
\
s
:
»
E E
a) a)
cn
e
�\
E
\
}
O
/ /
\
/
CO
\ \
g/
\
J
> % CO
\ \
\ /CO
\ \
cn U
E
/
\ z
\
\ \
.\.\
% \
\
s
c //
D D/
2
/
2
>° 9 9
°°>
E
e(
_
/ \ s s
E \ \
/ 2
\ 2
« \
a)=
E
=
©_ =
e
E /
0
0
e
/
.0
e
/
\ E
/ / \ \
e e
% OD OD
) \
\
m \
g CO
= e w w
o»»
z o
e e
2»
�f\\y22
CO
\\
\ CO
/
/ o o
®
s s
\ _ _
_ =
\ u
CO
/ /
\ /
\ \
/ CO
/
/
\ \
e e
/ \
e » _ =
.2.2
E / /
—
§
%
\ \
s s
_
a s e e e
co
s=/
2 0
_
//
2/ y a a
e o o/
.=
3 4
e e
m_= e e§
e e=
g
m
g g
e= e
�
x x
c e 3 Z Z
o Z Z
e e
2 0 0
\\
s
§
/

C-
v
;^
,)
0
L-
C)
0
0
C�
L
!�
V !
L
co
`cz
V )
O
LC')
LO
N
W
Z
U
Z
w
z <
Q om
v u
v v
Q
'o =
a o
Co s 0 a con
v
C a a� ai
N 2 mff
Z m d
®2
PH
T
I.
N
r
a

Colliers
Engineering
& Design
Colliers Engineering & Design is a trusted provider of
multi -discipline engineering, design and consulting
services providing customized solutions for public and
private clients through a network of offices nationwide.
For a full listing of our office locations, please visit
colliersengineering.com
M O ® 0 % a
Civil/Site • Traffic/Transportation • Governmental • Survey/Geospatial
Infrastructure • Geotechnical/Environmental • Telecommunications • Utilities/Energy
Accelerating success.