410013_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20240705

Division of Water Resources
Facility Number 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: C) Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: C Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: U; County: Region:
Farm Name: ��1�� ('��f�f�tirl� Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone: :3`�_: _U LC`1 . 3�_"I Sri
Mailing Address: � 4-155 V�'Vve_ Ct&y QA0'a)yul S W C_ 212-14
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Rdv-� Own ki"kns Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: Certification Number:U NMI'j 1213112-6;
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: - Longitude:
��� - v\ ��L'�- -7 �. ^: a � �W"V.� '}r-1 '�Ir; r,�AC_I1 �fc:��4 \1a� E'.�'l %��61`��,4k! �.��;1,ti'V�,k�L•c`%LLav` ��
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish ILayer Dairy Cow C
Wean to Feeder I INon-Layer I X.DairyCalf
Feeder to Finish ><Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish I Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Puults
Other Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes [] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes ,KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

Facili Number: - Date of Inspection: , s`T T.
Waste Collection&Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
V
a.If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): A2il t 1
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes -;3�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees,severe erosion, seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes 1;?rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes 9 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes'��o ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes jK,'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ]E�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): rV Ci iM� l� �
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No `Eg�NA 0 NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No jCR,'NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ❑ No tWNA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ;' &No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No 'I K"NA ❑ NE
Required Records &Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes )K[,No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes,check ❑ Yes J�Io ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP [:]Checklists [:]Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement?If-yes,-check the appropriate-box below. ❑ Yes � o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ eekly Freeboard ❑VA�� ❑Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Vdeafh"-Gec6
Rainfall tocking ❑Gib�P1d ❑ Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections ❑Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ✓ \ ❑ Yes 21 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of-3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: 41 - \? Date of inspection:
7 4-
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No 'f5�[NA ❑ NE
'
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check [:] Yes [:] No NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No 'ZNA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? 'Toy�c _
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes Pa�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes -5�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application) ��
31.Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ;&NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes XNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes )21.�4o ❑ NA 0 NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes�Lo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question ft Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
10 is?4"U. zu 2
24. Cc�1�brta�►�-n a,;�v.:j \sue
06M*ytsG�
Reviewer/Inspector Name: L'� �bh��nr� Phone: ip-1'� �j1-(
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: l� Date: ��-
T-T
Page 3 of 3 21412015