20201366 Ver 2_2020-1366 V2_FINAL_Foy Farm As-Built Report__20240715

FOY FARM NUTRIENT OFFSET AND BUFFER MITIGATION BANK PARCEL

MY0 AS-BUILT & BASELINE MONITORING REPORT
DWR PROJECT # 2020-1366 V2
NEUSE RIVER BASIN

In Agreement with:
Restoration Systems Neuse 04 Nutrient
Offset Umbrella Banking Instrument

July 2024

Prepared by:

And

Restoration Systems, LLC Davey Resource Group, Inc.
1101 Haynes Street, Suite 211 3101 Poplarwood Ct, Ste 120.
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 Raleigh, NC 27604

Foy Farm Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel DWR Project # 2020-1366 V2
As-built & Baseline Monitoring Report – July 2024 pg. i
Foy Farm Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel
DWR Project # 2020-1366 V2
As-Built & Baseline Monitoring Report

Table of Contents
1.0 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 2
2.0 Parcel Location ................................................................................................................................. 2
2.2 Parcel Objectives ...................................................................................................................... 3
3.0 Restoration Activities ....................................................................................................................... 3
3.1 Parcel Preparation: ................................................................................................................... 4
3.2 Riparian Area Restoration Activities ........................................................................................ 4
3.2 Easement Boundaries .............................................................................................................. 5
3.4 Post Restoration DWR Site Visit ............................................................................................... 5
4.0 Mitigation Potential ......................................................................................................................... 5
5.0 Monitoring Protocol & Success Criteria ........................................................................................... 6
5.1 Monitoring Protocol ................................................................................................................. 6
5.2 Parcel Maintenance ................................................................................................................... 6
5.3 Long Term Management Plan .................................................................................................... 6
6.0 Financial Assurance .......................................................................................................................... 7
7.0 References ....................................................................................................................................... 7

Appendices
Appendix A: General Figures and Tables
Figure 1 - Parcel Location / Service Area
Figure 2 - Restoration Activities
Figure 3 - Current Conditions Plan View
Figure 4 - Credit Area
As-built Survey – Sheets 1-4
Table 1 - Project Credits
Table 2 - Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3 - Project Contact
Table 4 - Project Baseline Information and Attributes

Appendix B: Baseline Vegetation Data, CVS Output Tables
Table 5 - Baseline Vegetation
Figures 5.1-5.39 Vegetation Plot Photos

Appendix C: NC DWR Stream Determination & Buffer Viability

Appendix D: DWR As-Built Correspondence & Photo Log

Foy Farm Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel DWR Project # 2020-1366 V2
As-built & Baseline Monitoring Report – July 2024 pg. 2
1.0 Introduction
Restoration Systems (Sponsor) is pleased to provide the North Carolina Division of Water Resources
(NCDWR) with this As-built & Baseline Monitoring Report for the Foy Farm Bank Parcel (Parcel).
Restoration Systems, LLC (RS), acting as Bank Sponsor (Sponsor), proposed the Parcel under the conditions
of the Restoration Systems Neuse 04 Nutrient Offset Umbrella Banking Instrument (UBI) and Foy Farm
Bank Parcel Development Package (BPDP), which was approved by NCDWR on May 1, 2023. The Parcel
was planned and designed according to the UBI, 15A NCAC 02B .0703, and the Consolidated Buffer
Mitigation Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295. This document details the riparian area restoration activities,
monitoring efforts, and the final mitigation potential of the Parcel.

Measuring 78.25 acres, the Parcel is designed to provide mitigation credits for unavoidable impacts due
to development within the Neuse River Basin. NCDWR representatives conducted an onsite determination
for parcel applicability and suitability of Site Features on March 18, 2021. A Site Viability letter for Buffer
& Nutrient Offset was provided by the Division on April 16, 2021.

Restoration Systems is the fee simple owner of the property on which the conservation easement is
situated. North Carolina Wildlife Habitat holds the conservation easement. The Deed of Conservation
Easement was recorded at the Jones County Register of Deeds on December 14, 2023; Bk 432, Pg 443.
The Conversation Easement Plat was also recorded; Plat C141, Page 3 to C141 Page 5. Easement corners
are currently marked with t-posts wrapped in PVC and high-visibility tape.

The Site was planted on January 22, 2024. Historically, agricultural fields slated for restoration were in no-
till agriculture and good condition. Typical field treatments were continued through the end of 2023. Prior
to planting, the power line crossing feature 3a was removed. Riparian buffer restoration activities
included bare-root planting and broadcast application of a permanent seed mix (Figure 2, Appendix A).
During February 12 – 16, 2024, Davey Resource Group installed thirty-nine (39) Carolina Vegetation Survey
(CVS) monitoring plots and collected as-built data (Appendix B).

2.0 Parcel Location
The Parcel is located approximately 3 miles west of the town of Trenton in Jones County, NC. The Parcel
is within the Neuse River Basin 14- digit USGS Cataloging Unit 03020204010070 of the Middle Atlantic
Coastal Plain (North Carolina Division of Water Quality [NCDWQ] Sub-basin Number 03- 04-11) (Figure 1,
Appendix A).

Parcel Location: (35.086417°, -77.401632°)
Directions to Parcel from Raleigh:
- Get on I-40 E from N Blount St and Hammond Rd (2.5 mi)
- Continue on I-40 E. Drive from US-70 E, US-70 BYP E and US-70 E to Kinston (79.7 mi)
- Follow NC HWY 58 S to Foy Ln (16.5 mi)
- Sharp left onto Middle Rd (0.3 mi)
- Turn right onto Foy Ln (102 ft)
- Latitude, Longitude: 35.086417°, -77.401632°

2.1 Parcel Background
The Parcel encompasses 78.25 acres of land over one tract of historical agricultural fields. Prior to Parcel
development, land use is described as agricultural row crop production including cotton, corn, and
peanuts. The landowners regularly applied fertilizers and herbicides to the fields. Streams and ditches on

Foy Farm Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel DWR Project # 2020-1366 V2
As-built & Baseline Monitoring Report – July 2024 pg. 3
the parcel had no existing riparian buffer. Site Features are devoid of woody vegetation outside of
forested areas due to historic and agricultural practices.

The Parcel is comprised of one tract with hydrological features that drain to Trent River, a tributary of the
Neuse River. There were no existing structures in the project area.

2.2 Parcel Objectives
The primary goals associated with the restoration of riparian areas within the Bank Parcel focused on
providing ecological and water quality enhancements to the Neuse River Basin by restoring the riparian
area to create a functional riparian corridor. Goals were accomplished as outlined in the following table.

Table A – Parcel Objectives
Goal Objective
Decrease nutrient levels
Nutrient input will be decreased by filtering runoff from the
agricultural fields through restored native buffer zones. The off-site
nutrient input will also be absorbed on-site by filtering flood flows
through restored floodplain areas, where flood flows can disperse
through native vegetation.
Decrease sediment input
Sediment from off-site sources will be captured by deposition on
restored floodplain areas where native vegetation will slow overland
flow velocities.
Decrease water temperature and
increase dissolved oxygen
concentrations
Planted riparian trees will shade the streams as they mature, reducing
thermal pollution.
Create appropriate terrestrial habitat Buffer areas will be restored by planting native vegetation.
Permanently protect the project Parcel
from harmful uses A conservation easement will be recorded on the Parcel.

3.0 Restoration Activities
Riparian area restoration involved planting appropriate native tree species along the 200-foot-wide
Riparian area restoration involved planting appropriate native tree species along the riparian corridor.
Vegetation management and herbicide applications may be needed over the first few years of tree
establishment in the riparian restoration areas to prevent encroachment of undesirable species that may
out-compete the planted native vegetation. Tree species planted across the Parcel included the species
and percentages listed in Table B. Bareroot stems were well mixed prior to planting to ensure diversity of
bare roots across planted areas and monitoring plots. In addition, no one tree species will be greater than
50% of the established stems.

An appropriate seed mix of annual and perennial species listed below in Table C has also been applied to
provide temporary and permanent ground cover for soil stabilization and reduction of sediment loss
during rain events in areas without existing herbaceous cover.

Foy Farm Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel DWR Project # 2020-1366 V2
As-built & Baseline Monitoring Report – July 2024 pg. 4
3.1 Parcel Preparation:
Historically, agricultural fields slated for restoration were in no-till agriculture and good condition. Typical
field treatments were continued through the end of 2023. The power line crossing feature 3a was
removed.

3.2 Riparian Area Restoration Activities
The Site was planted with bare-root hardwood species on January 22, 2024. Approximately 49.80 acres
were planted at an average density of 644 stems per acre on 8’ x 8’ spacing. The tree species planted were
proposed in the Bank Parcel Development Plan (BPDP) and are listed below in Table B. White oak (Quercus
alba), referenced in Table 6 under “Proposed Substitutes” of the BPDP, was substituted for Willow oak
(Quercus phellos) and is added to Table B in red. A photo log of planting efforts is provided in Appendix D.

In addition to planting bareroot hardwoods, the Site was seeded with a mix of native annual and perennial
herbaceous cover, Table C. Species not initially reported in the approved BPDP have been added in red.
Seeding was completed in February 2024.

As-built baseline vegetation data is provided in Appendix B. Baseline data was collected in February
2024 by Davey Resource Group and derived an average planted stem density of 644 stems per acre
(Table 5: Foy Farm CVS Baseline Vegetation Data).

Table B – Planting List
Common Name Scientific Name % of Total
Planted Trees
As-built
# Planted
As-built
% of Total
Planted Trees
Forest Strata
River birch Betula nigra 10% 3,400 10% Canopy
Redbud Cercis canadensis 5% 1,700 5% Subcanopy
Persimmon Diospyros virginiana 10% 3,400 10% Canopy
Green ash Fraxinus pennsylvanica 5% 1,700 5% Canopy
Tulip poplar Liriodendron tulipifera 5% 1,700 5% Canopy
Red mulberry Morus rubra 10% 3,400 10% Canopy
Wax myrtle Myrica ceifera 5% 1,700 5% Shrub
Sycamore Platanus occidentalis 10% 3,400 10% Canopy
White oak Quercus alba 10% 3,400 10% Canopy
Swamp chestnut oak Quercus michauxii 10% 3,400 10% Canopy
Water oak Quercus nigra 10% 3,400 10% Canopy
Willow oak Quercus phellos 10% 3,400 10% Canopy
American elm Ulmus americana 10% 3,400 10% Canopy
Total 34,000

Foy Farm Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel DWR Project # 2020-1366 V2
As-built & Baseline Monitoring Report – July 2024 pg. 5
Table D – Permanent Seed
Common Name Scientific Name Annual/Perennial
Plains Coreopsis Coreopsis tinctoria Annual
Deertongue, Tioga Panicum clandestinum Perennial
Blackeyed Susan Rudbeckia hirta Perennial
Purpletop Tridens flavus Perennial
Lanceleaf Coreopsis Coreopsis lanceloata Perennial
Clasping Coneflower Rudbeckia amplexicaulis Annual
Oxeye Sunflower Heliopsis helianthoides Perennial
Common Yarrow Achillea millefolium Perennial
Perennial Gaillardia (Blanketflower) Gaillardia aristata Perennial
Purple Coneflower Echinacea purpurea Perennial
Winter Bentgrass Argostis hyemalis Perennial
Bluefalse indigo Baptisia australis Perennial
Cosmos Cosmos bipinnatus Annual
Rocket Larkspur Consolida ajacis Annual
Showy Tick trefoil Desmodium canadense Perennial
Virginia Wildrye Elymus virginicus Perennial
Narrowleaf Sunflower Helianthus angustifolius Perennial
Wild Bergamot Monarda fistulosa Perennial

3.2 Easement Boundaries
Easement boundaries are identified by markers and posts in the field to ensure a clear distinction between
the Parcel and adjacent properties. Boundary markers that have been disturbed, damaged, or destroyed
will be repaired and/or replaced on an as needed basis. Contact information for the conservation
easement holder will be included on easement markers. RS marked the easement at every corner with an
iron, CE cap, and t-post wrapped in PVC and high-visibility tape. Additionally, conservation easement signs
were placed on each corner.

3.4 Post Restoration DWR Site Visit
DWR and RS visited the site on April 8, 2024 to observe work to date. Easement posts and markers were
installed and the site had been planted. DWR observed low stems at top of pond banks near monitoring
plots 5 and 27 and requested supplemental stems. Both areas had green spring growth of various land
cover species. Approximately 1 week later, RS install 300 stems along both areas using surplus trees of
the previously approved species. Photos of the general areas and close up of stems are included in
Appendix D.

4.0 Mitigation Potential
Of the Parcel's 78.25 acres protected under the conservation easement, 47.00 acres are anticipated
provide Nutrient Offset Credits equivalent to 106,845.670 pounds of nitrogen offset credit as detailed in
Appendix A, Table 1 – Project Credits. Riparian area restoration, measured from the top of bank on Parcel
streams and ditches, will include at least 50' from the tops of banks and will extend outward a maximum
of 200' from tops of banks and will generate Nutrient Offset Credits that are not transferable to Riparian
Buffer Credit per the approved UBI. Nitrogen offset credits will be generated from the project and shown
on separate ledgers.

Foy Farm Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel DWR Project # 2020-1366 V2
As-built & Baseline Monitoring Report – July 2024 pg. 6

5.0 Monitoring Protocol & Success Criteria
Per the UBI, the Sponsor shall monitor the Site, in its entirety, as described in the BPDP until such time as
DWR determines that the performance standards described below have been met. The monitoring period
shall be a minimum of five (5) consecutive years.

5.1 Monitoring Protocol
Restoration monitoring procedures for vegetation will monitor plant survival and species diversity.
Quantitative sampling will include thirty-nine (39) permanent 10 x 10-meter vegetation plots as outlined
in the CVS Level 1-2 Protocol for Recording Vegetation, Version 4.2 (Lee et al. 2008) and will occur no
earlier than Fall of each year (Figure 2, Appendix A). Vegetation plot placement will adequately represent
riparian buffer credit and nutrient offset credit areas. A reference photo will be taken from the origin
point of each plot. All planted stems in the plots will be marked with flagging tape and recorded. Data
collected will include species, height, planting type (planted stem and/or volunteer). Total and planted
stem density by plot and species will be reported during monitoring years 0-5 (Table 5, Appendix B).
Individual and average stem height data will be reported during monitoring years 3-5. Monitoring of the
restoration efforts will be performed for five years or until success criteria are fulfilled.

Restoration Systems shall submit to NCDWR annual monitoring reports no later than December 31st of
each year. Each report will document the success of the vegetation and any maintenance, supplemental
planting, or encroachment within the easement areas. Success criteria within the buffer will be based on
the survival of planted species at a density of 260 stems per acre after five years of monitoring.

The first annual monitoring activities will commence at the end of the first growing season, at least six
months after planting has been completed.

5.2 Parcel Maintenance
If the Parcel or a specific component of the Parcel fails to achieve the success criteria outlined in Section
5.1, adaptive measures will be developed and/ or appropriate remedial actions will be implemented. Site
maintenance will be performed to correct any identified problems on the Parcel that have a high likelihood
of affecting the project success. Such items include, but are not limited to, fire, flooding, drought, or
insects that cause excess tree mortality. Any actions implemented will be designed to achieve the success
criteria and will include a work schedule and updated monitoring criteria. Any parcel maintenance
performed will be included in the monitoring report for that year. A rigorous herbicide schedule may need
to be implemented in the first few years of tree establishment in the restoration areas to prevent the
establishment of invasive species that may out-compete the planted native vegetation. The only
herbicides used on the Parcel will be aquatic approved herbicides that will be applied in accordance with
North Carolina Department of Agriculture rules and regulations.

The easement boundary will be checked annually as part of monitoring activities. Easement boundary
conditions and any maintenance performed will be reported in the annual monitoring reports to DWR. If
mowing is deemed necessary by the Sponsor during the monitoring period, the Sponsor must receive
approval from DWR prior to conducting any mowing within Neuse Buffer Zones 1 and 2 to ensure that no
buffer violations have occurred.

5.3 Long Term Management Plan
The conservation easement will preserve all areas and prohibit all use of the property inconsistent with

Foy Farm Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel DWR Project # 2020-1366 V2
As-built & Baseline Monitoring Report – July 2024 pg. 7
its use as a nutrient offset and riparian buffer mitigation property, including any activity that would
materially alter the biological integrity of the Site/Parcel. Restoration Systems is the fee simple owner of
the property on which the conservation easement is situated. North Carolina Wildlife Habitat holds the
conservation easement. The Deed of Conservation Easement was recorded at the Jones County Register
of Deeds on December 14, 2023; Bk 432, Pg 443. The Conversation Easement Plat was also recorded; Plat
C141, Page 3 to C141 Page 5. Easement corners are currently marked with t-posts wrapped in PVC and
high-visibility tape.

6.0 Financial Assurance
RS will secure all financial assurances according to the approved UBI. No bond shall be less than $100,000
initially, to cover monitoring expenses. Performance bonds for monitoring shall be renewed at least
annually to cover the next years monitoring period, with confirmation of renewal provided to DWR with
each annual monitoring report when applicable. DWR reserves the right to alter the credit release
schedule if monitoring reports are submitted without proof of bond renewals when applicable.

7.0 References

Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule - 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (Published November 17, 2014)

Lee, M.T., R.K. Peet, S.D. Roberts, and T.R. Wentworth. 2008. CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation.
Version 4.2. North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Ecosystem
Enhancement Program. Raleigh, North Carolina.

Schafale, M. P. and Weakley, 2012. A Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina, Fourth
Approximation.

Foy Farm Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel DWR Project # 2020-1366 V2
As-built & Baseline Monitoring Report – July 2024 Appendix A: General Figures and Tables
Appendix A: General Figures and Tables

Figure 1 - Parcel Location / Service Area
Figure 2 - Restoration Activities
Figure 3 - Current Conditions Plan View
Figure 4 - Credit Area
As-built Survey – Sheets 1-4
Table 1 - Project Credits
Table 2 - Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3 - Project Contact
Table 4 - Project Baseline Information and Attributes

!.
Bank Parcel Location35.086417°, -77.401632°
Trent River
Neuse River
New River
White Oak River
LENOIRCOUNTY
CRAVENCOUNTY
JONESCOUNTY
DUPLINCOUNTY
ONSLOWCOUNTY CARTERETCOUNTY
CRAVENCOUNTY
CARTERETCOUNTY
PAMLICOCOUNTY
Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, OrdnanceSurvey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
FIGURE
Drawn by:
Date:
Scale:
Project No.:
Title:
Project:
Prepared for:
1³
Jones County, NC
RJH
1:425,000
SERVICE AREAMAPNEUSE 04
FOY FARMNUTRIENT OFFSETBANK PARCEL
Legend
!.Foy Farm Bank Parcel Location Pin
NC Major Rivers
North Carolina County Boundaries
Neuse River USGS 8-Digitl HUC 03020204, Service Area for Nutrient Offset Credits
0 10 205
Miles
FEB. 2023
2020-1366v2
NC DEQ Division of Water Resources
401 & BufferPermitting Branch
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
Feature 1 Origin
Feature 1b
Feature 1a
Feature 9
Feature 7b
Feature 7 Origin
Feature 4d
Feature 4c
Feature 4b
Feature 4a
Feature 4 Start
Feature 4 FinshFeature 6 Origin
Feature 6b
Feature 6a
Feature 8 Start
Feature 8b
Feature 8a
Feature 5 Start
Feature 5a
Feature 5b
Feature 1a
Feature 3a
Feature 3b
Feature 3 Origin
Mi
d
d
l
e

R
o
a
d
Nob
l
e
s

L
o
o
p

R
o
a
d
Easement Maintenance AreaExisting Overhead Utility40 Foot Width (0.41 Acres)
Overhead Utiltiy Line Removed From the Easement Area
6
4
3
9
1
5
2
8
7
11
38
33
32
37
26
18
13
21
20
29
22
12
36
24
30
23
19
34
31
28
39
35
25
14
16
27
15
10 17
FIGURE
Drawn by:
Date:
Scale:
Project No.:
Title:
Project:
Prepared for:
³
Jones County, NC
RJH
1:5,000
FOY FARMNUTRIENT OFFSETBANK PARCEL
0 720 1,440360
Feet
FEB. 2024
2020-1366v2
NC DEQ Division of Water Resources
401 & BufferPermitting Branch
2
RESTORATION ACTIVITIES
Legend
Area Parcels
Foy Farm - Conservation Easement: 78.25 Acres
Existing Powerline
Centerline
30-Foot ROW
Foy Farm Features
Stream (Intermittent/Perennial)
On-Line or Off-Line Pond
Ditch
Wetland
Surveyed Top of Bank (TOB)
Surveyed Top of Bank (TOB) Offset
TOB-50
51-100
101-200
Installed Vegetation Monitoring Plots (39 Total)
Planted Area: 49.80 Acres
Feature 1 Origin
Feature 1b
Feature 1a
Feature 9
Feature 7b
Feature 7 Origin
Feature 4d
Feature 4c
Feature 4b
Feature 4a
Feature 4 Start
Feature 4 Finsh
Feature 6 Origin
Feature 6b
Feature 6a
Feature 8 Start
Feature 8b
Feature 8a
Feature 5 Start
Feature 5a
Feature 5b
Feature 1a
Feature 3a
Feature 3b
Feature 3 Origin
M
i
d
d
l
e

R
o
a
d
No
b
l
e
s

L
o
o
p

R
o
a
d
Easement Maintenance Area
Existing Overhead Utility
40 Foot Width (0.41 Acres)
Overhead Utiltiy Line
Removed From the Easement Area
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
18
8
10
9
111213
14 15
16
17
3
4
2
1
5
23
24
25
26
27
28
6 29
30
31
35
34
33
32
36
37
39
22
21
20
19
38
7
FIGURE
Drawn by:
Date:
Scale:
Project No.:
Title:
Project:
Prepared for:
³
Jones County, NC
RJH
1:5,000
FOY FARM
NUTRIENT OFFSET
BANK PARCEL
0 725 1,450362.5
Feet
APRIL 2024
2020-1366v2
NC DEQ
Division of
Water Resources
401 & Buffer
Permitting
Branch
3
CCPV
(MY0 2024)
Legend
Area Parcels
Foy Farm - Conservation Easement: 78.25 Acres
Existing Powerline
Centerline
30-Foot ROW
Foy Farm Features
Stream (Intermittent/Perennial)
On-Line or Off-Line Pond
Ditch
Wetland
Surveyed Top of Bank (TOB)
Surveyed Top of Bank (TOB) Offset
TOB-50
51-100
101-200
Installed Vegetation Monitoring Plots (39 Total)
Plot Success
Meets Standard
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
Feature 1 Origin
Feature 1b
Feature 1a
Feature 9
Feature 7b
Feature 7 Origin
Feature 4d
Feature 4c
Feature 4b
Feature 4a
Feature 4 Start
Feature 4 FinshFeature 6 Origin
Feature 6b
Feature 6a
Feature 8 Start
Feature 8b
Feature 8a
Feature 5 Start
Feature 5a
Feature 5b
Feature 1a
Feature 3a
Feature 3b
Feature 3 Origin
Mi
d
d
l
e

R
o
a
d
Nob
l
e
s

L
o
o
p

R
o
a
d
Easement Maintenance AreaExisting Overhead Utility40 Foot Width (0.41 Acres)
Overhead Utiltiy Line Removed From the Easement Area
6
4
3
9
1
5
2
8
7
11
38
33
32
37
26
18
13
21
20
29
22
12
36
24
30
23
19
34
31
28
39
35
25
14
16
27
15
10 17
FIGURE
Drawn by:
Date:
Scale:
Project No.:
Title:
Project:
Prepared for:
³
Jones County, NC
RJH
1:5,000
FOY FARMNUTRIENT OFFSETBANK PARCEL
0 720 1,440360
Feet
APRIL 2024
2020-1366v2
NC DEQ Division of Water Resources
401 & BufferPermitting Branch
4
CREDIT AREA
Legend
Area Parcels
Foy Farm - Conservation Easement: 78.25 Acres
Existing Powerline
Centerline
30-Foot ROW
Foy Farm Features
Stream (Intermittent/Perennial)
On-Line or Off-Line Pond
Ditch
Wetland
Surveyed Top of Bank (TOB)
Surveyed Top of Bank (TOB) Offset
TOB-50
51-100
101-200
Installed Vegetation Monitoring Plots (39 Total)
Foy Farm - Asbuilt Credit Determination
Diffuse Flow (DWR Memo 2008-019 - No Credit)
Riparian Restoration for NOC, Ditch
Riparian Restoration for NOC, In-Line Pond - Not Subject
Riparian Restoration for NOC, I/P - Subject
Wetland and Forested Areas - No Credit
NOTE ABOUT WIDTHS & CREDITING:
Nutrient Offset Credit (NOC) Nutrient Offset Credit is contiguous from TOB, is a minimum of 50 ft. from the TOB and a maximum of 200 ft. from the TOB.
Table 1.  FOY FARM, 2020‐1366v2, Project Credits
Project Area
N Credit Conversion Ratio (ft2/pound)
P Credit Conversion Ratio (ft2/pound)
Credit Type Location
Subject? (enter 
NO if 
ephemeral or 
ditch 1)
Feature Type Mitigation Activity Min‐Max Buffer 
Width (ft)Feature Name Total Area (ft2)
Total (Creditable) 
Area of Buffer 
Mitigation (ft2)
Initial Credit 
Ratio (x:1)% Full Credit  Final Credit 
Ratio (x:1) 
 Convertible to 
Riparian 
Buffer? 
 Riparian Buffer 
Credits 
 Convertible to 
Nutrient Offset? 
 Delivered 
Nutrient Offset: 
N (lbs) 
 Delivered 
Nutrient 
Offset: P (lbs) 
Nutrient Offset Rural No Ditch Restoration
3B
Diffuse Flow
No Credit
4,350 1 No — No — —
Nutrient Offset Rural No Ditch 0‐100
3B
Maintenance ROW
No Credit
10,713 0 100% No — No — —
Nutrient Offset Rural No Ditch 101‐200
3B
Maintenance ROW
No Credit
4,644 0 33% No — No — —
———
Nutrient Offset Rural No Ditch Restoration 0‐100 1B, 3B, 6B 287,097 0 1 100% No — Yes 14,981.105 —
Nutrient Offset Rural No Ditch Restoration 101‐200 1B, 3B, 6B 344,687 0 1 33% No — Yes 17,986.228 —
———
Nutrient Offset Rural No In‐Line Pond Restoration 0‐100 1A, 3A, 5A, 8B 441,784 0 1 100% No — Yes 23,052.880 —
Nutrient Offset Rural No In‐Line Pond Restoration 101‐200 1A, 3A, 5A, 8B 461,405 1 33% No — Yes 24,076.730 —
———
Nutrient Offset Rural Yes I / P Restoration 0‐100 1A, 4B, 4D, 5B, 6A, 7A 171,004 0 1 100% No — Yes 8,923.217 —
Nutrient Offset Rural Yes I / P Restoration 101‐200 1A, 4B, 4D, 5B, 6A, 7A 341,607 0 1 33% No — Yes 17,825.510 —
———
———
———
———
———
———
———
Totals (ft2):2,067,291 0 0.000 106,845.670 0.000
Total Buffer (ft2):00
Total Nutrient Offset (ft2):2,067,291 N/A
Total Ephemeral Area (ft2) for Credit:00
Total Eligible Ephemeral Area (ft2):0 0.0%Ephemeral Reaches as % TABM
Enter Preservation Credits Below Total Eligible for Preservation (ft2):0 0.0%Preservation as % TABM
Credit Type Location Subject? Feature Type Mitigation Activity Min‐Max Buffer 
Width (ft)Feature Name  Total Area (sf) 
Total (Creditable) 
Area for Buffer 
Mitigation (ft2)
Initial Credit 
Ratio (x:1)% Full Credit  Final Credit 
Ratio (x:1) 
 Riparian 
Buffer Credits 
Buffer —
—
—
—
—
Preservation Area Subtotals (ft2):00
Square Feet Credits
0 0.000
0 0.000
0 0.000
0 0.000
Square Feet Credits
Nitrogen:106,845.670
Phosphorus:0.000
Neuse 03020204
19.16394
N/A
Restoration:
Enhancement:
Mitigation Totals
2,067,291
TOTAL AREA OF BUFFER MITIGATION (TABM)
TOTAL NUTRIENT OFFSET MITIGATION
Mitigation Totals
Nutrient Offset:
Preservation:
Total Riparian Buffer:
1.  The Randleman Lake buffer rules allow some ditches to be classified as subject according to 15A NCAC 02B .0250 (5)(a).
last updated 08/03/2020

Foy Farm Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel DWR Project # 2020-1366 V2
As-built & Baseline Monitoring Report – July 2024 Appendix A: General Figures and Tables
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Activity / Milestone BPDP Proposed Date Actual Date
BPDP Approved NA May 1, 2023
Parcel Protection NA November 28, 2023
Planting January, 2024 January 22, 2024
As-built Data Collection February, 2024 February 12 – 16, 2024
Construction Completion Walkthrough NA April 8, 2024
As-built Report Submittal NA July 2024
Year 1-5 Monitoring December 2024 – 2029 On schedule

Table 3: Project Contact
Role Firm POC & Address
Project Sponsor Restoration Systems, LLC
Barrett Jenkins: [e-mail]
1101 Haynes Street, Suite 211
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Planting Contractor: Restoration Systems, LLC
Josh Merritt: [e-mail]
1101 Haynes Street, Suite 211
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Seeding Contractor: Restoration Systems, LLC
Matthew Harrell: [e-mail]
1101 Haynes Street, Suite 211
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Baseline Data Collection Davey Resource Group, Inc.
Ben Furr: [e-mail]
3101 Poplarwood Ct, Ste 120.
Raleigh, NC 27604
Vegetation Monitoring: Davey Resource Group, Inc.
Ben Furr: [e-mail]
3101 Poplarwood Ct, Ste 120.
Raleigh, NC 27604

Foy Farm Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel DWR Project # 2020-1366 V2
As-built & Baseline Monitoring Report – July 2024 Appendix A: General Figures and Tables

Table 4: Project Baseline Information & Attributes
Project Information
Project Name Foy Farm
County Jones
Project Area (acres) 78.25
Project Coordinates (latitude and longitude) 35.086417ºN, -77.401632ºW (NAD83/WGS84)
Project Watershed Summary Information
Physiographic Province Inner Coastal Plain
River Basin Neuse
USGS Hydrologic Unit 8-digit 03020204 USGS Hydrologic Unit14-digit 03020204010070
DWR Sub-basin 03-04-11
Project Drainage Area Percentage of Impervious
Area 0%

Foy Farm Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel DWR Project # 2020-1366 V2
As-built & Baseline Monitoring Report – July 2024 Appendix B: Baseline Vegetation Data, CVS Output Table
Appendix B: Baseline Vegetation Data, CVS Output Tables
Table 5 - Baseline Vegetation
Figures 5.1-5.39 Vegetation Plot Photos

Table 5: Foy Farm CVS Baseline Vegetation Data
PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T
Betula nigra River Birch, Red Birch Tree 3 3 3 7 7 7 1 1 1 5 5 5 8 8 8 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 2 2 2 4 4 4 7 7 7 2 2 2 1 1 1
Cercis canadensis Easter Red Bud Shrub Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Diospyros virginiana American Persimmon, PossumwoodTree 1 1 1 3 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 6 6 6 2 2 2 2 2 2
Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash, Red Ash Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 9 9 9 2 2 2 1 1 1
Liriodendron tulipifera Tulip Tree Tree 1 1 1 5 5 5 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 4 4
Morella cerifera Common Wax-myrtle, Southern BayberryShrub Tree 1 1 1 4 4 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 4 4 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2
Morus rubra Red Mulberry Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Platanus occidentalis Sycamore, Plane-tree Tree 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2
Quercus alba White Oak Tree
Quercus michauxii Basket Oak, Swamp ChestnutOakTree 6 6 6 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 8 8 8 5 5 5 3 3 3 2 2 2 1 1 1 5 5 5 1 1 1 3 3 3 1 1 1
Quercus nigra Water Oak, Paddle Oak Tree 1 1 1 2 2 2 4 4 4 1 1 1 4 4 4 1 1 1
Ulmus americana American Elm Tree 3 3 3 2 2 2 1 1 1 10 10 10 2 2 2 3 3 3 4 4 4 7 7 7 3 3 3 5 5 5 3 3 3 7 7 7
15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 20 20 20 14 14 14 16 16 16 18 18 18 14 14 14 16 16 16 16 16 16 27 27 27 20 20 20 12 12 12 14 14 14 14 14 14
6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 6 6 6 5 5 5 6 6 6 7 7 7 8 8 8 5 5 5 7 7 7 6 6 6 5 5 5
607 607 607 607 607 607 607 607 607 809.4 809.4 809.4 566.6 566.6 566.6 647.5 647.5 647.5 728.4 728.4 728.4 566.6 566.6 566.6 647.5 647.5 647.5 647.5 647.5 647.5 1093 1093 1093 809.4 809.4 809.4 485.6 485.6 485.6 566.6 566.6 566.6 566.6 566.6 566.6
PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T
Betula nigra River Birch, Red Birch Tree 6 6 6 4 4 4 1 1 1 3 3 3 1 1 1 5 5 5 3 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2
Cercis canadensis Eastern Red Bud Shrub Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 1 1 1
Diospyros virginiana American Persimmon, PossumwoodTree 3 3 3 1 1 1 7 7 7 3 3 3 1 1 1 3 3 3 1 1 1 5 5 5 2 2 2 1 1 1 3 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1
Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash, Red Ash Tree 1 1 1 3 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1
Liriodendron tulipifera Tulip Tree Tree 2 2 2 1 1 1 6 6 6 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Morella cerifera Common Wax-myrtle, Southern BayberryShrub Tree 8 8 8 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 4 4 2 2 2
Morus rubra Red Mulberry Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1
Platanus occidentalis Sycamore, Plane-tree Tree 3 3 3 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1
Quercus alba White Oak Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 6 6 2 2 2
Quercus michauxii Basket Oak, Swamp ChestnutOakTree 5 5 5 4 4 4 1 1 1 5 5 5 4 4 4 3 3 3 4 4 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3
Quercus nigra Water Oak, Paddle Oak Tree 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 4 4 4 1 1 1 7 7 7 1 1 1
Ulmus americana American Elm Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 9 9 1 1 1 3 3 3 4 4 4 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 6 6 6 4 4 4 4 4 4
17 17 17 24 24 24 17 17 17 16 16 16 17 17 17 15 15 15 16 16 16 14 14 14 15 15 15 13 13 13 13 13 13 15 15 15 13 13 13 15 15 15 13 13 13
5 5 5 8 8 8 7 7 7 8 8 8 6 6 6 5 5 5 7 7 7 5 5 5 8 8 8 7 7 7 7 7 7 6 6 6 5 5 5 7 7 7 7 7 7
688 688 688 971.2 971.2 971.2 688 688 688 647.5 647.5 647.5 688 688 688 607 607 607 647.5 647.5 647.5 566.6 566.6 566.6 607 607 607 526.1 526.1 526.1 526.1 526.1 526.1 607 607 607 526.1 526.1 526.1 607 607 607 526.1 526.1 526.1
PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T
Betula nigra River Birch, Red Birch Tree 7 7 7 6 6 6 6 6 6 4 4 4 2 2 2 7 7 7 3 3 3 119 119 119
Cercis canadensis Eastern Red Bud Shrub Tree 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 3 23 23 23
Diospyros virginiana American Persimmon, PossumwoodTree 4 4 4 3 3 3 1 1 1 3 3 3 4 4 4 2 2 2 69 69 69
Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green Ash, Red Ash Tree 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 34 34 34
Liriodendron tulipifera Tulip Tree Tree 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 1 1 1 43 43 43
Morella cerifera Common Wax-myrtle, Southern BayberryShrub Tree 4 4 4 2 2 2 42 42 42
Morus rubra Red Mulberry Tree 1 1 1 6 6 6
Platanus occidentalis Sycamore, Plane-tree Tree 1 1 1 2 2 2 19 19 19
Quercus alba White Oak Tree 2 2 2 14 14 14
Quercus michauxii Basket Oak, Swamp ChestnutOakTree 3 3 3 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 3 2 2 2 5 5 5 2 2 2 95 95 95
Quercus nigra Water Oak, Paddle Oak Tree 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 36 36 36
Ulmus americana American Elm Tree 3 3 3 1 1 1 6 6 6 5 5 5 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 121 121 121
15 15 15 16 16 16 17 17 17 16 16 16 14 14 14 16 16 16 16 16 16 18 18 18 14 14 14 621 621 621
6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 5 5 5 5 5 5 6 6 6 5 5 5 7 7 7 6 6 6 12 12 12
607 607 607 647.5 647.5 647.5 688 688 688 647.5 647.5 647.5 566.6 566.6 566.6 647.5 647.5 647.5 647.5 647.5 647.5 728.4 728.4 728.4 566.6 566.6 566.6 644.4 644.4 644.4
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
Current Plot Data (MY0 2024)
Current Plot Data (MY0 2024)
Scientific Name Common Name Species Type
Stem count
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
Stems per ACRE
Scientific Name Common Name Species Type
001-01-0039 MY0 (2024)
1 39
0.02 0.96
0.02
0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
001-01-0037 001-01-0038
1 1
0.02 0.02
0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
1 1
001-01-0030
001-01-0031 001-01-0032
001-01-0025 001-01-0026 001-01-0027 001-01-0028 001-01-0029
001-01-0033 001-01-0034 001-01-0035 001-01-0036
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
001-01-0016
Annual Means
1 1 1 1
001-01-0021 001-01-0022 001-01-0023 001-01-0024
1
0.02
1
001-01-0017 001-01-0018
Scientific Name Common Name Species Type
001-01-0001 001-01-0002 001-01-0003 001-01-0004 001-01-0005 001-01-0006
Stem count
001-01-0019 001-01-0020
001-01-0013 001-01-0014 001-01-0015
size (ares)
size (ACRES)
Species count
1
0.02
1
0.02
1
0.02
1
0.02
1
0.02
1
0.02
Stems per ACRE
1
0.02
001-01-0008 001-01-0009 001-01-0010 001-01-0011 001-01-0012
1
0.02
1
0.02
1
0.02
1
0.02
1
0.02
Current Plot Data (MY0 2024)
Exceeds requirements by 10%
Exceeds requirements, but by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements, by less than 10%
Fails to meet requirements by more than 10%
0.02
1
0.02
1
0.02
1
0.02
1
0.02
1
0.02
1
0.02
Color for Density
001-01-0007

Foy Farm Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel DWR Project # 2020-1366 V2
As-built & Baseline Monitoring Report – July 2024 Appendix B: Baseline Vegetation Data, CVS Output Table
Figures 5.1 – 5.39 Vegetation Plots

Figure 5.1 - Plot 1 Figure 5.2 - Plot 2
Figure 5.3 - Plot 3 Figure 5.4 - Plot 4
Figure 5.5 - Plot 5 Figure 5.6 - Plot 6

Foy Farm Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel DWR Project # 2020-1366 V2
As-built & Baseline Monitoring Report – July 2024 Appendix B: Baseline Vegetation Data, CVS Output Table
Figure 5.7 - Plot 7 Figure 5.8 - Plot 8
Figure 5.9 - Plot 9 Figure 5.10 - Plot 10
Figure 5.11 - Plot 11 Figure 5.12 - Plot 12

Foy Farm Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel DWR Project # 2020-1366 V2
As-built & Baseline Monitoring Report – July 2024 Appendix B: Baseline Vegetation Data, CVS Output Table
Figure 5.13 - Plot 13 Figure 5.14 - Plot 14
Figure 5.15 - Plot 15 Figure 5.16 - Plot 16
Figure 5.17 - Plot 17 Figure 5.18 - Plot 18

Foy Farm Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel DWR Project # 2020-1366 V2
As-built & Baseline Monitoring Report – July 2024 Appendix B: Baseline Vegetation Data, CVS Output Table
Figure 5.19 - Plot 19 Figure 5.20 - Plot 20
Figure 5.21 - Plot 21 Figure 5.22 - Plot 22
Figure 5.23 - Plot 23 Figure 5.24 - Plot 24

Foy Farm Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel DWR Project # 2020-1366 V2
As-built & Baseline Monitoring Report – July 2024 Appendix B: Baseline Vegetation Data, CVS Output Table
Figure 5.25 - Plot 25 Figure 5.26 - Plot 26
Figure 5.27 - Plot 27 Figure 5.28 - Plot 28
Figure 5.29 - Plot 29 Figure 5.30 - Plot 30

Foy Farm Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel DWR Project # 2020-1366 V2
As-built & Baseline Monitoring Report – July 2024 Appendix B: Baseline Vegetation Data, CVS Output Table
Figure 5.31 - Plot 31 Figure 5.32 - Plot 32
Figure 5.33 - Plot 33 Figure 5.34 - Plot 34
Figure 5.35 - Plot 35 Figure 5.36 - Plot 36

Foy Farm Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel DWR Project # 2020-1366 V2
As-built & Baseline Monitoring Report – July 2024 Appendix B: Baseline Vegetation Data, CVS Output Table
Figure 5.37 - Plot 37 Figure 5.38 - Plot 38

Figure 5.39 - Plot 39

Foy Farm Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel DWR Project # 2020-1366 V2
As-built & Baseline Monitoring Report – July 2024 Appendix C: NC DWR Stream Determination & Buffer Viability
Appendix C: NC DWR Stream Determination & Buffer Viability

April 16, 2021 (replaces letter dated March 30, 2021)

Barrett Jenkins
Restoration Systems, LLC
(via electronic mail: [e-mail] )

Re: Site Viability for Buffer Mitigation & Nutrient Offset – Foy Farm Site
Near 35.08650466, -77.400175761
Neuse 03020204
Jones County

Dear Mr. Jenkins ,

On September 15, 2020, Katie Merritt, with the Division of Water Resources (DWR), received a
request from you on behalf of Restoration Systems , LLC (RS) for a site visit near the above -
referenced site in the Neuse River Basin within the 8-digit Hydrologic Unit Code 0302020 4. The site
visit was to determine the potential for riparian buffer mitigation and nutrient offset within a
proposed Easement Boundary, which is more accurately shown in the attached map labeled “Foy
Farms DWR Viability/Determination Map (Figure 1) prepared by RS. On December 9, 2021, Ms.
Merritt performed a site assessment of the subject site. Staff with RS were also present.

Ms. Merritt’s evaluation of the features onsite and their associated mitigation determination for the
riparian areas are provided in the table below. This evaluation was made from Top of Bank (TOB)
and landward 200’ from each feature for buffer mitigation pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0295
(effective November 1, 2015) and for nutrient offset credits pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0703.
DocuSign Envelope ID: BDA7037F-E13D-46C6-B08B-86AB44E87E40
Foy Farm Sit e
Restoration Systems, LLC
April 16, 2021 (revised letter dated March 30, 2021)
Page 2 of 5

Feature Classification
onsite
1Subject
to
Buffer
Rule
Riparian Land uses
adjacent to Feature
(0-200’)
Buffer
Credit
Viable
3Nutrient
Offset
Viable
4,5Mitigation Type Determination w/in
riparian areas
1a Stream

Yes Non-forested agricultural
fields with mature forest
below outfall of pond
2Yes

Yes (fields
only)

Non-forested fields - Restoration Site per
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n)

Forested Areas – Preservation Site per
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(5)

1a Pond in-line Pond Yes, but
likely ag.
Exempt
and “not
subject”)
Non-forested agricultural
fields
Yes
*see note
Yes

Non-forested fields - Restoration Site per
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(3)
The dam needs to have controlled access
by RS & should be deeded along with the
easement so that dam integrity is
maintained, or secure its connection to
include the stream below.
1b Ditch
>3’ depth

No Non-forested agricultural
fields
No Yes

Restoration Site per 15A NCAC 02B
.0295 (n)
1
(located
above ditch
1b)
Pond No Non-forested agricultural
fields
No No

hydrologically connected to a ditch (1b)
2 in-line pond Yes, but
likely ag.
Exempt
and “not
subject”)
Non-forested agricultural
fields
No
*see note
No
*see note

Note: Conservation easement is shown to
include only the upper segment of the
pond and does not include controlled
access of the outlet connecting the pond to
the stream. The entire pond must be
within the conservation easement and
extend to the culvert crossing/outlet such that the pond maintains its “in-line pond
status”. This pond is not viable for credit
without its connection to feature 4 secured.

If able to comply with requirements, then
it will qualify as a Restoration Site per
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(3)

3a/origin Stream w/ in-
line pond
Yes, but
pond
likely ag.
Exempt
and “not
subject”)
Non-forested agricultural
fields

Yes Yes Restoration Site per 15A NCAC 02B
.0295 (o)(3)

no dam was identified in the field
3b Ditch
>3’ depth

No Non-forested agricultural
fields
No Yes Restoration Site per 15A NCAC 02B
.0295 (n)
74a/start Stream w/ in-
line pond
Yes Non-forested maintained
lawn
Yes No

Restoration Site per 15A NCAC 02B
.0295 (n)
DocuSign Envelope ID: BDA7037F-E13D-46C6-B08B-86AB44E87E40
Foy Farm Site
Restoration Systems, LLC April 16, 2021 (revised letter dated March 30, 2021)
Page 3 of 5
Feature Classification
onsite
1Subject
to Buffer
Rule
Riparian Land uses
adjacent to Feature (0-200’)
Buffer
Credit Viable
3Nutrient
Offset Viable
4,5Mitigation Type Determination w/in
riparian areas
4b
starts below
pond and
ends at 4d
Stream within
an old
impoundment
Yes innermost riparian areas are
not forested & not in
agriculture. Adjacent fields
are in agriculture. Top of
banks include some
forested areas.

2Yes Yes
(adjacent
fields only)
Non-forested areas - Restoration Site per
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n)

Forested Areas – Preservation Site per
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(5)

4c wetland No Non-forested agricultural
fields
No No N/A
74d
see map
Stream Yes Combination of forested
and non-forested areas.
Not in agriculture. Most of
this reach is within an
active floodplain with
inundated soils.
2Yes
(see
note)
Yes (fields
only)
Non-forested fields - Restoration Site per
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n)

Forested Areas – Preservation Site per
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(5)

Note: Most of the riparian areas along 4d
are inundated and within an active
floodplain making it highly difficult to
establish woody vegetation (trees). It is
likely that vegetation planted along this
reach will be at high risk of low
performance.

5a In-line pond Yes Left Bank – non-forested
maintained lawn
Right Bank – non-forested
agriculture
Yes Yes (right
bank only)
Right Bank/Non-forested ag fields -
Restoration Site per 15A NCAC 02B
.0295 (n)
Left Bank/Maintained Lawn - Restoration
Site per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n)

5b Stream Yes Non-forested agricultural fields with areas of mature
forest
2Yes Yes (fields only) Non-forested fields - Restoration Site per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n)

Forested Areas – Preservation Site per
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(5)
Note: No credits are allowed within the
DOT R.O.W

6a Stream No Mostly mature forest with
non-forested agricultural
fields adjacent to the
woodline
2Yes Yes (fields
only)
Non-forested fields - Restoration Site per
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n)

Forested Areas – Preservation Site per
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(4)

DocuSign Envelope ID: BDA7037F-E13D-46C6-B08B-86AB44E87E40
Foy Farm Sit e
Restoration Systems, LLC
April 16, 2021 (revised letter dated March 30, 2021)
Page 4 of 5
1Subjectivity calls for the features were determined by DWR in correspondence dated March 18, 2021 using the 1:24,000 scale
quadrangle topographic map prepared by USGS and the most recent printed version of the soil survey map prepared by the NRCS .
2The area of preservation credit within a buffer mitigation site shall comprise of no more than 25 percent (25%) of the tot al area of buffer
mitigation per 15A NCAC 0295 (o)(5) and 15A NCAC 0295 (o)(4). Site cannot be a Preservation Only site to comply with this rule.
3NC Division of Water Resources - Methodology and Calculations for determining Nutrient Reductions associated with Riparian Buffer
Establishment
4 Determinations made for this Site are determined based on the proposal provided in maps and figures submitted with the request.
5 All features proposed for buffer mitigation or nutrient offset, must have a planted conservation easement established that includes the
tops of channel banks when being measured perpendicular and landward from the banks, even if no credit is viable within that riparian
area. 6The area of the mitigation site on ephemeral channels shall comprise no more than 25 percent (25%) of the total area of buffer
mitigation per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(7).
7DWR assessed the feature during the site visit when the original conservation easement boundary included the feature; therefore, the
land use description & mitigation determination is being included.

Determinations provided in the table above were made using a proposed easement boundary showing
proposed mitigation areas shown in Figure 1. A map representing the proposal for the site is attached
to this letter and is initialed by Ms. Merritt on March 30, 2021. Substantial changes to the proposed
Feature Classification onsite
1Subject
to
Buffer
Rule
Riparian Land uses
adjacent to Feature
(0-200’)
Buffer
Credit
Viable
3Nutrient
Offset
Viable
4,5Mitigation Type Determination w/in
riparian areas
6b Ditch

No non-forested agriculture
fields with a narrow fringe
of forested areas
*see
Note
Yes (fields
only)
Non-forested fields - Restoration Site per
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(8)

Forested areas – no credit

*Buffer Mitigation – Assessment concludes the ditch meets 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(8) (A, B, C, D & E). More information on the watershed is needed for complete assessment. See rule
7a/origin

Stream within
an old
impoundment
Yes innermost riparian areas are
not forested & not in
agriculture. Adjacent fields
are in agriculture
Yes Yes
(adjacent
fields only)
Restoration Site per 15A NCAC 02B
.0295 (n)
77b Wetland No non-forested No No N/A
78a Stream Yes mature forest 2Yes No Preservation Site per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(5)

8b In-line pond Yes, but
likely ag.
Exempt
and “not
subject”)
Non-forested agricultural
fields (with a single family residence & yard)
Yes
*see note
Yes Non-forested agriculture fields only -
Restoration Site per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(3)

Notes: The dam needs to have controlled
access by RS & should be deeded along
with the easement so that dam integrity is maintained, or secure its connection to
feature 8b.
No credits are allowed within the DOT
R.O.W or private yard
9 No
determination
performed
N/A Mostly mature forest
adjacent to agricultural
fields
N/A N/A N/A

DocuSign Envelope ID: BDA7037F-E13D-46C6-B08B-86AB44E87E40
Foy Farm Site
Restoration Systems, LLC April 16, 2021 (revised letter dated March 30, 2021)
Page 5 of 5
easement boundary could affect the Site’s potential to generate buffer and nutrient offset credits.
Where riparian areas adjacent to in -line ponds are fully or partially proposed for buffer mitigation or
nutrient offset credit, the entire pond must be protected with a permanent conservation easement and
its outfall controlled by RS to be viable to generate buffer or nutrient offset mitigation credits.
Otherwise, additional measures as determined by DWR will be required to be viable to generate
mitigation credits.

This letter does not constitute an approval of this Site to generate buffer and nutrient offset credits.
Pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0295, a mitigation proposal and a mitigation plan shall be submitted to
DWR for written approval prior to conducting any mitigation activities in riparian areas and/or
surface waters for buffer mitigation credit. Pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0703, a proposal regarding a
proposed nutrient load-reducing measure for nutrient offset credit shall be submitted to D WR for
approval prior to any mitigation activities in riparian areas and/or surface waters.

All vegetative plantings, performance criteria and other mitigation requirements for riparian
restoration, enhancement and preservation must follow the requirements in 15A NCAC 02B .0295 to
be eligible for buffer and/or nutrient offset mitigation credits. For any areas depicted as not being
viable for nutrient offset credit above, one could propose a different measure, along with supporting
calculations and sufficient detail to support estimates of load reduction, for review by the DWR to
determine viability for nutrient offset in accordance with 15A NCAC 02B .0703.

This viability assessment will expire on March 30, 2023 or upon approval of a mitigation plan
by the DWR, whichever comes first. This letter should be provided in any nutrient offset,
buffer, st ream or wetland mitigation plan for this Site .

P lease contact Katie Merritt at [phone] if you have any questions regarding this
correspondence.
Sincerely,

Paul Wojoski, Supervisor
401 and Buffer Permitting Branch
PW/kym
Attachments: “Foy Farms DWR Viability/Determination Map”

cc: File Copy (Katie Merritt)

DocuSign Envelope ID: BDA7037F-E13D-46C6-B08B-86AB44E87E40
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!(
Fea ture 1 Sta rt
Fea ture 1 Origin
Fea ture 1 Finish
Fea ture 1b
Fea ture 1a Fea ture 9
Fea ture 7 Sta rt
Fea ture 7 Origin
Fea ture 7 Finsh
Fea ture 4d
Fea ture 4c
Fea ture 4b
Fea ture 4a
Fea ture 4 Sta rt
Fea ture 4 Finsh
Fea ture 6 Finsh
Fea ture 6 Origin
Fea ture 6 Sta rt
Fea ture 6b
Fea ture 6a
Fea ture 8 Sta rt
Fea ture 8b
Fea ture 8a
Fea ture 8 Finsh
Fea ture 5 Sta rt
Fea ture 5 Finsh
Fea ture 5a
Fea ture 5b
Fea ture 2 Sta rt
Fea ture 2 Finsh
Fea ture 2
Fea ture 3 Finsh
Fea ture 1a
Fea ture 3a
Fea ture 3b
Fea ture 3 Origin
Fea ture 3 Sta rt Legend
Ba nk Pa rc el Fee Sim p le Tra c t
Foy Fa rm - Post DW R Via b ility Visit: Prop osed Ea sem ent(12-2020) +/- 76 Ac res
!(DW R Via b ility Pins - Fea ture Brea k Points (for id entific a tion)
!(DW R Strea m Determ ina tion Pins
Site Features
Ma n-Ma d e Ditc h
I/P Strea m , or I/P through In-Line Pond
In-Line Pond
W etla nd
RESTORATION SYSTEMS, LLC
1101 HAYN ES ST, SUITE 211RALEIGH, N C 27604PHON E : 919.755.9490FAX : [phone]
SCALE:
DATE: 03 - 2021
Coord ina te System :N AD_1983_SP_N C_FIPS_3200_Ft.
Aeria l Im a gery: (c) servic es.nconem a p .gov - 2019
SITE: N euse04
Foy FarmsDWR Viability/Determination Map2019 Imagery³1 in = 375 feet
0 340 680 1,020 1,360170
Feet
This m a p a nd a ll d a ta c onta ined within a re sup p lied a s is with no wa rra nty. Restora tion System s, LLC exp ressly d isc la im s resp onsib ility for d a m a ges or lia b ility from a ny c la im s tha t m a y a rise out of the use or m isuse of this m a p . It is the sole resp onsibility of the user to d eterm ine if the d a ta on this m a p is c om p a tible with the user’s need s. This m a p wa s not c rea ted a s survey d a ta , nor should it b e used a s suc h. It is the user’s resp onsibility to obt a in p rop er survey d a ta , p rep a red b y a lic ensed surveyor, where required b y la w.
Feature 7b
3/30/2021
DocuSign Envelope ID: BDA7037F-E13D-46C6-B08B-86AB44E87E40

March 30, 2021

Barrett Jenkins
Restoration Systems, LLC
(via electronic mail: [e-mail] )

Re: Site Viability for Buffer Mitigation & Nutrient Offset – Foy Farm Site
Near 35.08650466, -77.400175761
Neuse 03020204
Jones County

Dear Mr. Jenkins,

On September 15, 2020, Katie Merritt, with the Division of Water Resources (DWR), received a
request from you on behalf of Restoration Systems, LLC (RS) for a site visit near the above-
referenced site in the Neuse River Basin within the 8-digit Hydrologic Unit Code 03020204. The site
visit was to determine the potential for riparian buffer mitigation and nutrient offset within a
proposed Easement Boundary, which is more accurately shown in the attached map labeled “Foy
Farms DWR Viability/Determination Map (Figure 1) prepared by RS. On December 9, 2021, Ms.
Merritt performed a site assessment of the subject site. Staff with RS were also present.

Ms. Merritt’s evaluation of the features onsite and their associated mitigation determination for the
riparian areas are provided in the table below. This evaluation was made from Top of Bank (TOB)
and landward 200’ from each feature for buffer mitigation pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0295
(effective November 1, 2015) and for nutrient offset credits pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0703.

Feature Classification
onsite
1Subject
to
Buffer
Rule
Riparian Land uses
adjacent to Feature
(0-200’)
Buffer
Credit
Viable
3Nutrient
Offset
Viable
4,5Mitigation Type Determination w/in
riparian areas
1a Stream & in -
line pond
Yes Non-forested agricultural
fields with mature forest
below outfall
2Yes Yes (fields
only)

Non-forested fields - Restoration Site per
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n)

Forested Areas – Preservation Site per
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(5)

1b Ditch
>3’ depth

No Non-forested agricultural
fields
No Yes

Restoration Site per 15A NCAC 02B
.0295 (n)

DocuSign Envelope ID: 6956CB36-2F9B-4CEB-BE36-9D96738EEE1A
Foy Farm Sit e
Restoration Systems, LLC
March 30, 2021
Page 2 of 5
Feature Classification
onsite
1Subject
to
Buffer
Rule
Riparian Land uses
adjacent to Feature
(0-200’)
Buffer
Credit
Viable
3Nutrient
Offset
Viable
4,5Mitigation Type Determination w/in
riparian areas
2 in-line pond Yes, but
likely ag.
Exempt
and “not
subject”)
Non-forested agricultural
fields
No
*see note
No
*see note

Note: Conservation easement is shown to
include only the upper segment of the
pond and does not include controlled
access of the outlet connecting the pond to
the stream. The entire pond must be
within the conservation easement and
extend to the culvert crossing/outlet such
that the pond maintains its “in-line pond
status”. This pond is not viable for credit
without its connection to feature 4 secured.

If able to comply with requirements, then
it will qualify as a Restoration Site per
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(3)

3a in-line pond Yes, but
likely ag.
Exempt
and “not
subject”)
Non-forested agricultural
fields

Yes Yes Restoration Site per 15A NCAC 02B
.0295 (o)(3)

3b Ditch
>3’ depth

No Non-forested agricultural
fields
No Yes Restoration Site per 15A NCAC 02B
.0295 (n)
74a Stream & in -
line pond
Yes Non-forested maintained
lawn
Yes No

Restoration Site per 15A NCAC 02B
.0295 (n)
4b
starts below
pond and
ends at 4d
Stream within
an old
impoundment
Yes innermost riparian areas are
not forested & not in
agriculture. Adjacent fields
are in agriculture. Top of
banks include some
forested areas.

2Yes Yes
(adjacent
fields only)
Non-forested areas - Restoration Site per
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n)

Forested Areas – Preservation Site per
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(5)

4c wetland No Non-forested agricultural
fields
No No N/A
74d
see map
Stream Yes Combination of forested
and non-forested areas.
Not in agriculture. Most of
this reach is within an
active floodplain with
inundated soils.
2Yes
(see
note)
No Non-forested fields - Restoration Site per
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n)

Forested Areas – Preservation Site per
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(5)

Note: Most of the riparian areas along 4d
are inundated and within an active
floodplain making it highly difficult to
establish woody vegetation (trees). It is
likely that vegetation planted along this
reach will be at high risk of low
performance.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 6956CB36-2F9B-4CEB-BE36-9D96738EEE1A
Foy Farm Site
Restoration Systems, LLC
March 30, 2021
Page 3 of 5
Feature Classification
onsite
1Subject
to
Buffer
Rule
Riparian Land uses
adjacent to Feature
(0-200’)
Buffer
Credit
Viable
3Nutrient
Offset
Viable
4,5Mitigation Type Determination w/in
riparian areas
5a In-line pond Yes Left Bank – non-forested
maintained lawn
Right Bank – non-forested
agriculture
Yes Yes (right
bank only)
Right Bank/Non-forested ag fields -
Restoration Site per 15A NCAC 02B
.0295 (n)

Left Bank/Maintained Lawn - Restoration
Site per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n)

5b Stream Yes Non-forested agricultural
fields with areas of mature
forest
2Yes Yes (fields
only)
Non-forested fields - Restoration Site per
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n)

Forested Areas – Preservation Site per
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(5)

Note: No credits are allowed within the
DOT R.O.W

6a Stream No Mostly mature forest with
non-forested agricultural
fields adjacent to the
woodline
2Yes Yes (fields
only)
Non-forested fields - Restoration Site per
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (n)

Forested Areas – Preservation Site per
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(4)

6b Ditch

No non-forested agriculture
fields with a narrow fringe
of forested areas
*see
Note
Yes (fields
only)
Non-forested fields - Restoration Site per
15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(8)

Forested areas – no credit

*Buffer Mitigation – Assessment concludes the ditch meets 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(8) (A, B, C, D & E). More information on the watershed is needed for complete assessment. See rule

7a

Stream within
an old
impoundment
Yes innermost riparian areas are
not forested & not in
agriculture. Adjacent fields
are in agriculture
Yes Yes
(adjacent
fields only)
Restoration Site per 15A NCAC 02B
.0295 (n)
77b Wetland No non-forested No No N/A
78a Stream Yes mature forest 2Yes No Preservation Site per 15A NCAC 02B
.0295 (o)(5)

8b In-line pond
(stream starts
above pond)
Yes, but
likely ag.
Exempt
and “not
subject”)
Non-forested agricultural
fields (with a single family
residence & yard)
Yes

Yes Non-forested agriculture fields only -
Restoration Site per 15A NCAC 02B
.0295 (o)(3)

Notes:
No credits are allowed within the DOT
R.O.W or private yard

DocuSign Envelope ID: 6956CB36-2F9B-4CEB-BE36-9D96738EEE1A
Foy Farm Sit e
Restoration Systems, LLC
March 30, 2021
Page 4 of 5
1Subjectivity calls for the features were determined by DWR in correspondence dated March 18, 2021 (ID# 2020-1366) using the
1:24,000 scale quadrangle topographic map prepared by USGS and the most recent printed version of the soil survey map prepared by
the NRCS .
2The area of preservation credit within a buffer mitigation site shall comprise of no more than 25 percent (25%) of the total area of buffer
mitigation per 15A NCAC 0295 (o)(5) and 15A NCAC 0295 (o)(4). Site cannot be a Preservation Only site to comply with this rule.
3NC Division of Water Resources - Methodology and Calculations for determining Nutrient Reductions associated with Riparian Buffer
Establishment
4 Determinations made for this Site are determined based on the proposal provided in maps and figures submitted with the request.
5 All features proposed for buffer mitigation or nutrient offset, must have a planted conservation easement established that includes the
tops of channel banks when being measured perpendicular and landward from the banks, even if no credit is viable within that riparian
area.
6The area of the mitigation site on ephemeral channels shall comprise no more than 25 percent (25%) of the total area of buffer
mitigation per 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(7).
7DWR assessed the feature during the site visit when the original conservation easement boundary included the feature; therefore, the
land use description & mitigation determination is being included.

Determinations provided in the table above were made using a proposed easement boundary showing
proposed mitigation areas shown in Figure 1. A map representing the proposal for the site is attached
to this letter and is initialed by Ms. Merritt on March 30, 2021. Substantial changes to the proposed
easement boundary could affect the Site’s potential to generate buffer and nutrient offset credits.
Where riparian areas adjacent to in-line ponds are fully or partially proposed for buffer mitigation or
nutrient offset credit, the entire pond must be protected with a permanent conservation easement and
its outfall controlled by RS to be viable to generate buffer or nutrient offset mitigation credits.
Otherwise, additional measures as determined by DWR will be required to be viable to generate
mitigation credits.

This letter does not constitute an approval of this Site to generate buffer and nutrient offset credits.
Pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0295, a mitigation proposal and a mitigation plan shall be submitted to
DWR for written approval prior to conducting any mitigation activities in riparian areas and/or
surface waters for buffer mitigation credit. Pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0703, a proposal regarding a
proposed nutrient load-reducing measure for nutrient offset credit shall be submitted to DWR for
approval prior to any mitigation activities in riparian areas and/or surface waters.

All vegetative plantings, performance criteria and other mitigation requirements for riparian
restoration, enhancement and preservation must follow the requirements in 15A NCAC 02B .0295 to
be eligible for buffer and/or nutrient offset mitigation credits. For any areas depicted as not being
viable for nutrient offset credit above, one could propose a different measure, along with supporting
calculations and sufficient detail to support estimates of load reduction, for review by the DWR to
determine viability for nutrient offset in accordance with 15A NCAC 02B .0703.

This viability assessment will expire on March 30, 2023 or upon approval of a mitigation plan
by the DWR, whichever comes first. This letter should be provided in any nutrient offset,
buffer, stream or wetland mitigation plan for this Site.

Feature Classification
onsite
1Subject
to
Buffer
Rule
Riparian Land uses
adjacent to Feature
(0-200’)
Buffer
Credit
Viable
3Nutrient
Offset
Viable
4,5Mitigation Type Determination w/in
riparian areas
9 No
determination
performed
N/A Mostly mature forest
adjacent to agricultural
fields
N/A N/A N/A

DocuSign Envelope ID: 6956CB36-2F9B-4CEB-BE36-9D96738EEE1A
Foy Farm Site
Restoration Systems, LLC
March 30, 2021
Page 5 of 5

Please contact Katie Merritt at [phone] if you have any questions regarding this
correspondence.
Sincerely,

Paul Wojoski, Supervisor
401 and Buffer Permitting Branch
PW/kym
Attachments: “Foy Farms DWR Viability/Determination Map”

cc: File Copy (Katie Merritt)

DocuSign Envelope ID: 6956CB36-2F9B-4CEB-BE36-9D96738EEE1A

Foy Farm Nutrient Offset and Buffer Mitigation Bank Parcel DWR Project # 2020-1366 V2
As-built & Baseline Monitoring Report – July 2024 Appendix D: DWR As-Built Correspondence & Photo Log
Appendix D: DWR As-Built Correspondence & Photo Log

1101 Haynes St, Suite 211, Raleigh NC 27604

Foy Farm Nutrient Offset Bank DWR #2020-1366 v2
AsBuilt Walkthrough Meeting April 8, 2024

Minutes:

DWR and RS visited the site on April 8, 2024 to observe work to date. Easement posts and markers were
installed and the site had been planted. DWR observed low stems at top of pond banks near monitoring
plots 5 and 27 and requested supplemental stems. Both areas had green spring growth of various land
cover species. Approximately 1 week later, RS install 300 stems along both areas using surplus trees of
the previously approved species. Photos of the general areas and close up of stems are included below
for record keeping.

Barrett Jenkins

Project Manager
Restoration Systems

1101 Haynes St, Suite 211, Raleigh NC 27604

Extra bareroots added to fescue are at edge of pond near monitoring plot 5, including surplus oak, and
river birch.

1101 Haynes St, Suite 211, Raleigh NC 27604

Barerootes planted near monitoring plot 27 at top of bank along pond edge. Species include oaks, river
brirch and tulip polar.

1101 Haynes St, Suite 211, Raleigh NC 27604

Close ups of supplemental stems planted.

Foy Farm
As-Built (January 2024) Photo Log
Photo 1: Crew Member Planting a Bareroot
Foy Farm Nutrient Offset Bank Parcel (2024) Photo Log
DWR ID #: 2020-1366v2 Restoration Systems, LLC
Photo 2: Crew Member Planting a Row of
Bareroots along an In-line Pond Around UT-8
Foy Farm
As-Built (January 2024) Photo Log
Photo 3: Crew Members Planting a Section of Easement
Foy Farm Nutrient Offset Bank Parcel (2024) Photo Log
DWR ID #: 2020-1366v2 Restoration Systems, LLC
Photo 4: Planted Tulip Poplar Bareroot
Foy Farm
As-Built (January 2024) Photo Log
Photo 5: Davey Staff Member Performing Quality Control
for Planted Bareroots Behind Crew Members
Foy Farm Nutrient Offset Bank Parcel (2024) Photo Log
DWR ID #: 2020-1366v2 Restoration Systems, LLC
Photo 6: Crew Supervisors Checking the Spacing
and Quality of Planted Bareroots