310505_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20240625

Division of Water Resources
Facility Number 3 - 50,E O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit: WCompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review O Structure Evaluation p Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time:ins-� Departure Time: Cowrty:'Duld„A Region:
r- ET W
Farm Name: � .A)je,r Owner Email: "�
Owner Name: ue-6 _-TA'y6SfW ds Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: ( L/I—/b LIEU Integrator
Certified Operator: -12--u \ LQy1j In/ Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish I 11-ayer I I I Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder I jNon-Layer I I I Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder. Dry Poultry_ Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 44 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(if yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 04 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facility Number: - SpS jDatc of Inspection: 71171
Waste Collection&Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes R No ❑ NA ❑ NI.
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes [:] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: —j 5
Sp i I kvay?:
Designed Freeboard(in): �_
Observed Freeboard(in): T
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Ycs [X No ❑ NA ❑ N I?
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Ycs � No ❑ NA ❑ NI
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes U No ❑ NA ❑ NF
8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes VT No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes � No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes MNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes M No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes U No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes N No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records& Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage& Permit readily available? ❑ Yes M No ❑ NA ❑ NF.
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ N F
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ N I:
❑Waste Application ❑Weekly Freeboard ❑Waste Analysis [:]Soil Analysis ❑Waste Transfers ❑Weather Code
❑Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑Crop Yield ❑120 Minute Inspections ❑Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections [:]Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes dK No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes '
® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued

Facilit Number: - Date of Ins ection: Zr Z
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 60 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes W No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes OLNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes [:] No KA NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes (] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
flow ra+t from C061brM!6n i5 ZC)S ern b4A� U'M rl�
200 9vr& on TIZV-z1 s .
9
51�dg� d 2a-ZA
sl udg� p,�acl��any b°/a ; n l ay oo n I .
Reviewer/Inspector Name: 0MV, � l eD� 'G� Phone: ��A's 24S 2
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: oyyl,� (aj [,;0, Sa� Date: 7S/7.jp2,`1
Page 3 of 3 511212020