NCG020088_Rescission Report_20240709

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit:NCG020088 Effective: 07/01/21 Expiration: 06/30/25 Owner: Heidelberg Materials Southeast Agg LLC
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Heidelberg Materials- Durham Plant
County: Durham 5013 Denfield St
Region: Raleigh
Durham NC 27704
Contact Person:Mary Ann Hoerle Title: Env Manager Phone: [phone]
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications: SWNC,
Primary ORC: Certification: Phone:
Secondary ORC(s):
On-Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Inspection Date: 07/09/2024 Entry Time 11:25AM Exit Time: 02:20PM
Primary Inspector:Thaddeus W Valentine Phone:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Mining Activities Stormwater Discharge COC
Facility Status: Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Question Areas:
Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page 1 of 3

Permit: NCG020088 Owner-Facility:Heidelberg Materials Southeast Agg LLC
Inspection Date: 07/09/2024 Inspection Type:Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
I viewed the site for a rescission of there NCG02 permit and meet with Kelly Tackett(Plant Manager)for that quarry. I looked
at the site for the submitted NOI for NCG07 and noted some updates to the SP3 which can be found in the new NCG070238
permit report. I recommend the rescission for this facility be approved
Page 2 of 3

Permit: NCG020088 Owner-Facility:Heidelberg Materials Southeast Agg LLC
Inspection Date: 07/09/2024 Inspection Type:Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Yes No NA NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan? ❑ ❑ ❑
#Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map? ❑ ❑ ❑
#Does the Plan include a"Narrative Description of Practices"? ❑ ❑ ❑
#Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas? ❑ ❑ ❑
#Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years? ❑ ❑ ❑
#Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices? ❑ ❑ ❑
#Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment? ❑ ❑ ❑
#Does the Plan include a BMP summary? ❑ ❑ ❑
#Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)? ❑ ❑ ❑
#Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan? ❑ ❑ ❑
#Does the facility provide and document Employee Training? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
#Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
#Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: All teh records were still on site and in order
Qualitative Monitoring Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: Report provided
Analytical Monitoring Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
#Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑
Comment: The report was provided. No flow has been reported each time and is valid considering the site
filters most of the stormwater and any remaining would pool until evaporated
Permit and Outfalls
Yes No NA NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site? ❑ ❑ ❑
#Were all outfalls observed during the inspection? ❑ ❑ ❑
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division? ❑ ❑ ❑
#Has the facility evaluated all illicit(non stormwater)discharges? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: We viewed teh single outfall
Page 3 of 3