410021_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20240628

Division of Water Resources
Facility Number O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit: ® Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: ® Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
e
Date of Visit: 2Y 2* Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: ' I e ,� Region:4t
Farm Name: (, 3 r Owner Email:
Owner Name: J'�� a `�l.y.::, r ,.�.� Phone:
g fit'a 2- 1 iC4 l i V � ,� r �, WC
Mailin Address: � ' F � . � ��- ,;r'
Physical Address: �...t.."i-.1L Cc1 �111C1 .��y�t1� !`L !_ :1 ���
Facility Contact: Title: i e l(1('d , Phone: vim.
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: Certification Number:r;, - r
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: P, Longitude: ' ��fi. 01
�rr:111`% - -�ice, ��i 1� � 1. •�I'd L1�; (.�'i�l r C�, . ; ,1 r�1 1 1►C�, >:';Y tc �'a`i
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer DairyCow ''"X, fl
Wean to Feeder HNon-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ` (�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: /�
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) [:] Yes [:] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes,',JQrNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes S'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge? ✓-�
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

Facili Number: - j Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection&Treatment
4.Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a.If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes�T❑" No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?: J
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in):
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes Q�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e.,large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes &o ❑ NA ❑ N E
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9.Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require 0 Yes)<No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes 'KNo ❑ NA ❑ N E
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 5No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): 1.
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes Wo ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes jTgtNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes SZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17.Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA NE
Required Records &Documents ✓�� ❑
19.Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes 5 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box. ��
❑WUP ❑Checklists [:]Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
'`,ZiHaste Application Weekly Freeboard aste Analysis Soil Analysis ❑`I' i��� eather Code
Rainfall Stockingrop Yield20 Minute Inspections nthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections ❑Slucigeue3L
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ YesNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No [Q�NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facili Number: - Date of Inspection: „ 210a
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes--% o ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes ❑ No [aNA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes &rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes `KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? fz
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the 0 Yes $j&o ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 0 No Cjj�NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes ENo ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes [E�,No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes ff A ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
' t-dry Le a 12-?),c AU a VUA 020 a u
�41+Cati1317, "1� � z�•C7�m�pin-lec� �{"lL3 c ,t�sz� &0Z
C-pnq -b 0ja tom�br c 1�cp�'�D�n
2.1 jq)aq 12x3
Reviewer/Inspector Name: VV14rQTMf)1ywA Phone: 3;x+'71LO
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: �Vf)151 a
Page 3 of 3 21412015