Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20240908 Ver 1_PCN_Chemours Lock and Dam Seep Diversion_Bladen NC_062824_20240628GeosynlecO' consultants Geosyntec Consultants of NC, P.C. NC License No.: C-3500 and C-295 Pre -Construction Notification U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Nationwide Permit 38, and North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality Individual 401 Water Quality Certification Lock and Dam 3 Seep Diversion Bladen County, North Carolina Prepared for The Chemours Company FC, LLC 22828 NC Highway 87 Fayetteville, NC 28306 Prepared by Geosyntec Consultants, Inc. 2501 Blue Ridge Road, Suite 430 Raleigh, NC 27607 Project Number TR1210 June 2024 Geosyntec consultants Geosy - C..WSameWNC, P.C. NC License No.: C-3500 and C-295 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND.............................................................. 1 1.1 Project Background and Scope........................................................................ 1 1.2 Project Purpose and Need................................................................................ 2 1.3 Construction..................................................................................................... 2 2. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING AND POTENTIAL IMPACTS ............................ 2 2.1 Introduction...................................................................................................... 2 2.2 Water Resources............................................................................................... 3 2.2.1 Wetlands, Streams, and Other Special Aquatic Sites ........................... 3 2.2.2 Floodplains........................................................................................... 4 2.2.3 Coastal Management Zone................................................................... 5 2.3 Threatened and Endangered Species................................................................ 5 2.4 Cultural Resources........................................................................................... 6 3. MITIGATION........................................................................................................... 6 4. SECTION 404 AND SECTION 10........................................................................... 7 4.1 Regional and General Conditions.................................................................... 7 5. SECTION 401........................................................................................................... 7 6. SECTION 408........................................................................................................... 7 ATTACHMENTS Figure 1 — USGS Site Location Map Figure 2 — Delineation Map Figure 3 — NRCS Soil Survey Figure 4 — FEMA Floodplain Map Appendix A — PCN Application Form and Checklist Appendix B — Site Plans and Impact Exhibit Appendix C — Photographic Record Appendix D — Stream Data Forms Appendix E — USACE Upland Data Points Appendix F — USFWS Coordination Package Appendix G — SHPO Coordination Package Chemours LockAndDamSeep_PCN Narrative ii June 25, 2024 Geosyntec ° consultants Geosy C..WSamsWNC, P.C. NC License No.: C-3500 and C-295 1. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND 1.1 Project Background and Scope Geosyntec Consultants of NC, P.C. (Geosyntec), on behalf of Chemours Fayetteville Works (Chemours) respectfully submits this Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) requesting authorization for an action identified as the Lock and Dam 3 Seep Diversion (Project). Chemours intends to install two seepage diversion channels adjacent to a public boat ramp located on U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) property at the William O'Huske Lock and Dam 3 in Bladen County, North Carolina (Figure 1). At the Project location, groundwater seepage discharges to the Cape Fear River and encroaches onto the boat ramp during high flow events. This groundwater seepage contains per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) from the Chemours facility upgradient of the USACE property. The proposed diversion channels are measures requested by the USACE and North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ) to prevent water from flowing onto the boat ramp and any areas frequented by the public. The total survey area is approximately 1-acre and contains the Cape Fear River (SI) and an unnamed intermittent stream (S2; Figure 2). The anticipated total permanent impacts to waters of United States (WOTUS) and traditionally navigable waters (TNW) resulting from this action are 0.043-acre (72 linear feet), summarized in Table 1. Table 1. Summary of Proposed Impacts to the Cape Fear River for the Lock and Dam 3 Seep Diversion (Project) Duration Type Length (linear feet) Area (acres) Permanent Fill 72 LF 0.043-acre Temporary Workspace 18 LF 0.036-acre TOTAL 90 LF 0.079-acre This PCN is prepared in compliance with the notification requirements of the USACE Nationwide Permit' (NWP) program and the NCDEQ 401 Water Quality Certification (401 WQC) procedures. It is our belief that impacts associated with this Project may be authorized under the permitting requirements of USACE Nationwide Permit 38 (NWP 38) — Cleanup of'Hazardous and Toxic Waste and will require an approved Individual 401 WQC from NCDEQ. Further, the Project site intersects areas under USACE Civil Works jurisdiction, and a request for authorization in accordance with the i 33 U.S.C. 1344, Clean Water Act, Section 404; and 33 U.S.C. 403, Rivers and Harbors Act, Section 10 33 U.S.C. 1341, Clean Water Act, Section 401; and 15A-NCAC-02H-.0500, North Carolina Administrative Code, Water Quality Certification Chemours LockAndDarnSeep_PCN 1 June 25, 2024 Geosyntec ° consultants Ge,,ure Comsw—of NC, P.C. NC License No.: C-3599 and C-295 USACE Wilmington District's Section 408' program is included in this PCN. The PCN Application Form and Checklist is attached as Appendix A 1.2 Project Purpose and Need The purpose of the Project is to implement measures to prevent groundwater seepage from encroaching onto a public boat ramp and surrounding public shoreline recreational areas, as requested by the USACE and NCDEQ. PFAS contaminants originate from upgradient of the Project site and remediation actions within areas beyond the Project site are ongoing under the Consent Order and Consent Order Addendum between Chemours and the State of North Carolina. Geosyntec conducted a jurisdictional waters delineation at the Project site on 8 May 2024 to support Project design and planning for potential regulatory requirements. Based on the results of the delineation, minor impacts to streambed are required to implement the Project. 1.3 Construction Geosyntec engineers, on behalf of Chemours, developed Project -specific plans (Appendix B) that include the implementation of construction best management practices (BMPs) to minimize impacts associated with stormwater runoff, erosion, and sedimentation. Following receipt of applicable permit authorizations, the proposed construction is anticipated to begin in during low -flow periods in 2024 and take approximately one week to install the drainage channels. Construction activities will generally proceed as follows: • BMP installations • Site preparation for accessing equipment and materials into the workspace • Excavation of trench and installation of diversion channel materials (riprap, underlain by 30- mil high density polyethylene (HDPE) geomembrane and non -woven geotextile cushion) • Restoration of the temporary workspaces and final stabilization 2. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING AND POTENTIAL IMPACTS 2.1 Introduction This section describes the affected environment and Project impacts that have the potential to be greater than de minimis. Prior to conducting a physical ecological assessment of the proposed Project area, a Geographic Information Systems (GIS) desktop review was conducted using publicly available vector datasets such as National Wetland Inventory (NWI) polygons, National Hydrography Dataset (NHD) flowlines and waterbodies, Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) s 33 U.S.C. 408, Rivers and Harbors Act, Section 14 Chemours LockAndDarnSeep_PCN 2 June 25, 2024 Geosyntec ° consultants Ge,s otm C—WtamsWNC, P.C. NC License No.: C-3500 and C-295 viewer, U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) 1:24,000 topographic maps, USGS 3D Elevation Program lidar derived terrain, and current/historical aerial imagery to provide a general understanding of the landscape characteristics of the site. Geosyntec was contracted by Chemours to complete an aquatic resources delineation. The assessment included wetland and stream delineations as well as assessment of potential threatened and endangered species habitats. The field visit was conducted on 8 May 2024 within the USACE William O'Huske Lock and Dam #3 property (Figure 1). A photographic record of site characteristics is provided in Appendix C. The Project site is limited to the sparsely vegetated right bank of the Cape Fear River, which contains an existing boat ramp and riprap bank stabilization. Portions of the survey area from Geosyntec's May 2024 site assessment intersects mixed hardwood forested habitat adjacent to the Project area. This habitat includes representative canopy and midstory species such as box elder (Ater negundo) and hackberry (Celtis occidentalis), and a dense herbaceous layer of poison ivy (Toxicodendron radicans), perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne), and Japanese hops (Hb774ulus japonicus). The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (MRCS) Web Soil Series identified one soil type within the Project area: Congaree silt loam, frequently flooded (Cn), which is identified as a hydric soil in Bladen County. NRCS identifies the remainder of the site as water. The most recent published hardcopy of the NRCS Soil Survey is included in Figure 3 to fulfil Section C(4e) of the PCN application. 2.2 Water Resources The project area is located within the Phillips Creek -Cape Fear River subwatershed (12-digit Hydrologic Unit Code [HUC]: 030300050104). The USEPA sets national water quality standards based on a series of pollutants. Waters listed as impaired have a concentration of one or more of these pollutants above the standard. Data on this section of the Cape Fear River is inconclusive in the most recent 2022 Final 303(d) List for North Carolina; however, construction activities are not anticipated to affect the quality assessment status of Cape Fear River or its tributaries or result in an increase of listed pollutants. 2.2.1 Wetlands, Streams, and Other Special Aquatic Sites Wetlands are defined by the USACE (33 CFR §328.3, 1986) and the USEPA (40 CFR §230.3, 1980) as "areas that are inundated or saturated by surface or groundwater at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions." Many wetlands and other aquatic features, including intermittent, and perennial streams, are considered WOTUS by the USACE and deemed "jurisdictional" under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. Chemours LockAndDarnSeep_PCN 3 June 25, 2024 Geosyntec ° consultants Geory C..WSamsWNC, P.C. NC License No.: C-3599 and C-295 During the 8 May 2024 delineation, the survey area was assessed for wetlands using methodology outlined in the 1987 USACE Wetland Delineation Manual4. Specifically, the presence or absence of jurisdictional areas was determined using methods outlined in Section D, subsection 2, for on -site inspections. The USACE Regional Supplement for the Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region, Version 2.05 was also used during field surveys. Streams on -site were evaluated using a combination of in- house data forms and the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ), Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and Perennial Streams and Their Origins (NCDWQ 2010). Geosyntec recorded all water resources with a Global Positioning System (GPS) with submeter capabilities (Manufacturer/Model: Trimble R1 receiver). Within the assessed survey area, two streams (S 1 and S2) were identified and delineated. No wetlands were observed within the survey area; however, a palustrine forested wetland (PFO) was observed outside the survey limits, draining into S2. The survey area is dominated by S 1 (Cape Fear River) on the central and eastern site boundaries. The ordinary high-water mark (OHWM) of S 1 was identified based on criteria including sediment deposition, water staining, presence of wrack lines, and changes in the vegetative community. S2 (unnamed intermittent stream) originates within the PFO area west of the survey limits, where wetland seepage forms a channel and flows southeast out of the treeline to join S 1. An intermittent flow regime was determined for S2 based on a NCDWQ Score of 28.75, where the stream was most notably characterized by strong presence of iron oxidizing bacteria and presence of biological indicators including amphibians, macro invertebrates, and wetland vegetation. Stream forms documenting site conditions at the time of the survey are included for review (Appendix D). The remainder of the survey area is comprised of uplands and documented through two USACE upland data points (Appendix E). 2.2.2 Floodplains A floodplain is the area adjacent to a water body that may be partially or fully flooded during flood stage conditions. The 100-year floodplain is defined as the area that has a one percent chance of flooding each year. Construction within the 100-year floodplain is regulated by a variety of state and local governments. FEMA is responsible for mapping floodplain locations and county floodplain administrators are often responsible for permitting work within regulated areas. The Project will construct permanent structures within the 100-year floodplain (Figure 4), and coordination with Bladen County's floodplain administer will occur prior to start of work. 4 Environmental Laboratory. 1987. "Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual," Technical Report Y-87- 1. U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station. Vicksburg, MS. s U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). 2010. Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region, Version 2.0., ERDC/EL TR-10-16, Vicksburg, MS: U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center. Chemours LockAndDarnSeep_PCN 4 June 25, 2024 Geosyntec ° consultants Geosy C..WSamsWNC, P.C. NC License No.: C-3500 and C-295 2.2.3 Coastal Management Zone The Project area does not occur within the North Carolina Coastal Zone boundary. As such, Chemours will not need to coordinate with the North Carolina Division of Coastal Management for this project. 2.3 Threatened and Endangered Species The Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA) provides protection and conservation for threatened and endangered wildlife and plants. Per the ESA, it is against the law to harm, hurt, shoot, pursue, lure, wound, kill, destroy, harass, gig, spear, ensnare, trap, capture, collect, or to attempt to engage in such conduct with any threatened or endangered (T&E) species, or to adversely impact critical habitat. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) maintains lists for federally listed species. In North Carolina, the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) manages species at a state level and the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) maintains a database of documented occurrences of protected species and sensitive habitats. Geosyntec prepared a Project Review Request in accordance with the procedures outlined by the USFWS Eastern North Carolina Ecological Services (Raleigh Field Office), Project Planning and Consultation webpage. The request package is attached (Appendix F) and will be submitted to the Raleigh Field Office via email concurrently with this PCN submittal. Resources consulted for the request include the USFWS Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaQ tool and NCNHP database to determine species with potential to occur at the Project site. The NCNHP report indicates no federally protected species have documented occurrences at the Project site, and the IPaC report suggests the following seven species have potential to occur in vicinity of the Project: 1. Red -cockaded woodpecker (RCW; Picoides borealis), Endangered 2. Northern long-eared bat (NLEB; Myotis septentrionalis), Endangered 3. Tricolored bat (Perimyotis subflavus), Proposed Endangered 4. American alligator (Alligator mississippiensis), Similarity of Appearance (Threatened) 5. Monarch butterfly (Danaus plexippus), Candidate 6. Rough -leaved loosestrife (Lysimachia asperulaefolia), Endangered 7. American chaffseed (Schwalhea americana), Endangered In summary, no protected species were observed during 8 May 2024 site assessment and no impacts to protected species are anticipated as a result of the Project activities. Potentially suitable habitat was observed within the survey area for NLEB and tricolored bat (forested areas), and American alligator (Cape Fear River). No tree clearing or disturbance within the treeline is proposed and, a "No Effect" determination was generated for NLEB using the USFWS NLEB Rangewide Determination Key. In regard to aquatic species, adverse effects are not anticipated as work will occur during low -flow periods and not require water -diversion methods in the river. Please refer to the Project Review Request (Appendix F) for a detailed assessment of the Project's potential to affect protected species. Chemours LockAndDarnSeep_PCN 5 June 25, 2024 Geosyntec ° consultants Geosy C..WSamsWNC, P.C. NC License No.: C-3500 and C-295 2.4 Cultural Resources According to the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) of 1966, cultural resources include prehistoric and historical archaeological resources, as well as architectural resources. Prehistoric resources include evidence of human activity that predates the advent of written records. Historic archaeological resources often include battlegrounds, campsites, roads, or other structures representing the recorded history period of a region. Architectural resources include those of historic or aesthetic significance (typically more than 50 years in age) and often include buildings, bridges, and dams, or entire districts with significant structures. The North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) Historic Properties mapping application was reviewed for the Project site. The Project is adjacent to the William O'Huske Lock and Dam 3, which is listed eligible for the National Register of Historic Places. No disturbance is proposed to the Lock and Dam structures, and the seep diversion channels will be installed adjacent to existing modern structures (i.e., boat ramp, riprap bank stabilization), occupying a minimal footprint of disturbance. A project review request was prepared in accordance with SHPO's online project review procedures and will be submitted to SHPO concurrently with this PCN submittal. Please see the attached consultation request (Appendix G). 3. MITIGATION The proposed Project is designed to minimize impacts to the greatest extent practicable while accomplishing the Project purpose (i.e., preventing public access to contaminated groundwater seepage). Impacts are limited to areas that are most accessible by the public at the boat ramp and recreational shoreline. The project does not encroach into waters that extend beyond the forested treeline and is primarily adjacent to areas effected by existing disturbance (riprap bank stabilization, boat ramp). The project will be scheduled during low -flow periods (anticipated Summer 2024) to avoid the use of temporary de -watering methods for work below the ordinary high-water mark of the Cape Fear River. Site access will be accomplished using existing impervious surfaces (boat ramp via Bill Hall Road) and measures to minimize temporary soil disturbance within the temporary workspace. Site -specific BMPs will be implemented to avoid and minimize erosion/sedimentation within the Cape Fear River. Since the Project is being conducted as a remediation action at the request of the USACE and NCDEQ; incorporates the aforementioned impact -reduction measures; and will result in no more than minimal disturbance required to accomplish the Project purpose, mitigation is not proposed for this Project at this time. Should the USACE or NCDEQ determine that mitigation is required for this Project, then a site -specific compensatory mitigation plan will be designed and submitted for agency approval prior to beginning construction. Chemours LockAndDarnSeep_PCN 6 June 25, 2024 Geosyntec ° consultants Geosy C..WSamsWNC, P.C. NC License No.: C-3500 and C-295 4. SECTION 404 AND SECTION 10 Streams within the Project site are subject to federal regulation under Section 404 (S1 and S2) and Section 10 (S1). Authorization for impacts is being requested under NWP 38, and subject to the conditions described below. 4.1 Regional and General Conditions USACE Headquarters released Public Notices dated January 13, 2021 and December 27, 2021 addressing the 32 General Conditions (GCs) applicable to use of the NWPs. In the Public Notice dated February 4, 2022 by the USACE Wilmington District published Regional Conditions (RCs) for most individual NWP authorizations. RCs provide additional protections for the aquatic environment that is necessary to ensure that the NWPs authorize only those activities with no more than minimal adverse environmental effects. The Project was evaluated against the USACE GCs and USACE Wilmington District's RCs, and will comply with all conditions. There are no NWP-specific RCs applicable for use of NWP 38 and no activity -specific RCs established by the USACE Wilmington District. 5. SECTION 401 The NCDEQ, Division of Water Resources (NCDWR) denied Section 401 Water Quality Certification (WQC) for use of NWP 38, and application for an Individual 401 WQC must be made to NCDWR. The USACE Wilmington District and NCDEQ developed a PCN application to allow for j oint submittal of applications for certain activities authorized through NWPs and Regional General Permits under Sections 401, 404, and 10. The PCN form requesting authorization for the proposed project is attached as Appendix A. 6. SECTION 408 The Project site is located on federally -owned property and intersects areas under USACE Civil Works jurisdiction. Geosyntec, on behalf of Chemours, is requesting authorization to proceed with work pursuant to Section 408. The referenced Civil Works project is the William O'Huske Lock and Dam 3, and no impacts will occur to the lock and dam structures as a result of the work. Chemours LockAndDarnSeep_PCN 7 June 25, 2024 FIGURES Ash ebdrd AA Fuquay- arina Sanford '� i -�` - Goldsboro It � �Fayer evllle ' r - %0 6` • nd waste-.� ' or4s �\ 0 h rl r } vvi"m o Husk e .1ock and Dam No 3 Lock and Dam 3 Seep Diversion 1 ; .� �� `' Site Location: (34.833831,-78.823650) I I ISO 1 j Legend 0 500 1,000 2,000 Feet Project Area Date: Scale: Drawn By: Applicant No.: Geosyntec� USSITE LOCATION MAP 5/16/2024 1:12,000 Msw consultants Chel•1'lours- Lock and Dam 3 Seep Diversion Project Chemours Fayetteville Works Reference: Figure No. G,-,),tec C-0tantsntNC, P.C. WORLD TOPOGRAPHIC MAP PROVIDED BY ESRI NC License No.: C-3300 and C-293 Bladen County, Nolth Carolina DI , Legend • ,� OProjectArea ®Stream 1 - Cape Fear River, OHWM { ` ®Stream 2 - Unnamed Intermittent, OHWM A Stream Form Ag h 0 40 80 160 Feet • Upland Data Point l l l l l l l l t- Date: Scale: �DrawnBy: Applicant No.: Geosyntec° DELINEATION MAP 6/3/2024 1:1,000 Msw consWtant5 it ChemourS" Lock and Dam 3 Seep Diversion Project C}temours Fayetteville Works Reference: Figure No. CaosynoecCo 11tantaofNC,P.C. Bladen County, Nolth Carolina AERIAL IMAGERY PROVIDED BY ESRI, DATED 2023 ^ NC License No.: C-7500and G295 2 R❑ 1 L: R J Vg �p �V,oB- Y Bab I" Va8 BaH '=.�1 L71t De Ro l / Ro �� ( Ro £ I,dLi � �y R GJ[3 80-9 c/ � Ltl T 1 tt 000 Ili% 9I DB A..• y, a R ,� rlirrc:;1 f -.. yF / 1 `Ca i ,4',H _ 1..)cl 1 �� y.1mBAA �' AaA LaB �1 Ro e A t Wa8 DyF Ra 3 �1 / r IU a 11 NoA wrn6 , p LaB I�o 1 1318 IdVB l / o ✓' - 1 We Lab , U NoA NuB 1' Cn At /� 1 eA LeA ma + WOB 1 ,C e a a Ch m Noll' qu Ca o C6 Wan j I � I Cnl o �Ce 'Ca I111111 I C I I C Ln6 Cr L J c Ix LaL At 1 e y ,( AJA � �96 �GbA NoB NoA Cn �'aN D1rr � r ` TCsldf Ce Lao -�, Landing AaA C,hA _ R o 4� Ch 1 IIl C. �BnB L nB NnA / �1 y `�J AaADo 'f _� e 9 DYF Cn1 1 II a LaB Ro p� WaB Nob ` 1 �AdA / Project �. CD I ` Ro _aB ,bA Co i VPt LaB At t-a6 NoA Ro We �� AaA t bYF � 1. Woe We WmB `O Ro uA lab puA2 r° 1 I �=a , m 1 Ro �v n AuA ae NoA �` ` 1 �7 WP 1` I_aB �nB Dc fl = u d J DyF I I CO CdI C a Pages Lakr Ch DO�ProS pec t JAt N08 n r - Hall ` 0= Dv° ch Landing Laf3 CM P p /) flrunrh Ra Ce w O A AuA J Cn \ \ �/ L I 'm Legend WaB Dyf 0 1,000 2,000 4,000 Feet W`nB \ Project Area Ln Date: Scale: Drawn By: Applicant No.: Geosyntec" NRCS SOIL SURVEY 5/31/2024 1:24,000 MSW Consultants Chef' ours- Lock and Dam 3 Seep Diversion Project C}temours Fayetteville Works Reference: Figure No. GI-1p—, Co 1111tants f NC, P.C. SOIL SURVEY DATA PROVIDED BY NATURAL NC License No.: C-3300 and C-293 Bladen County, Notth Carolina RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE (NRCS), NCDOT PROJECT ATLAS SWEEP GROUP APPENDIX A PCN Application Form and Checklist Version 4.3 Updated December 6, 2023 401 & Buffer Permitting PCN Submittal Checklist ❑X The application fee (Checks may be made out to "N.C. Division of Water Resources" - $323.00 for 401 Water Quality Certification with minor impacts - $767.00 for 401 Water Quality Certification with major impacts ree will be paid following receipt - Express Review Fee (Amount requested on Acceptance of Fee Request from NC DWR Letter) ❑X One complete copy of the PCN Application and supporting documentation (no larger than 11 X 17 plans if submitting paper copies) Stormwater Management Plan (if applicable — see PCN Form Help File Section F) N/A 1) Please provide the stormwater management plan along with all supporting information pertaining to this project including the following: a. Entire site development/layout plans delineating all drainage areas; b. Design calculation sheets for all proposed SCM(s) sized for both on -site and off -site drainage; c. Application form SWU-101, the $505 application fee and last two signature pages may be omitted; d. Supplemental form for each proposed SCM and Required Items Check List (https://deci.nc.gov/about/divisions/energy-mineral-and-land- resources/stormwater/stormwater-program/stormwater-design) along with all required items; e. A Notarized Operation & Maintenance Agreement for each proposed SCM ; f. Detailed construction drawing sheets shall include (i) Erosion and sediment control plans; (ii) Installation and planting schedules for the proposed SCMs; (iii) Appropriately scaled plan views and cross sectional details of all SCMs and associated components — inlet and outlet structures, forebay, respective zones and pertinent elevations; (iv) Collection system routing stormwater to the proposed SCMs; (v) Any energy dissipator and vegetated area (if provided); (vi) Maintenance access/easement for the proposed SCMs. If your project is located within a State implemented Riparian Buffer Rule Area, submit the N/A following along with site plans and PCN form: 1) Details for on -site diffuse/dispersed flow provisions, (refer to https://deg.nc.gov/about/divisions/energy-mineral-and-land- resources/stormwater/stormwater-grog ram/stormwater-design). N/A DWR Stream Determination Forms for streams on property and DWR determination letter for wetlands or streams (if applicable). The following is the most critical of all the information that you must provide. The quality and detail of the information will often determine the expeditiousness of the review. The following is a checklist of the types of pertinent information required at a minimum: Version 4.3 Updated December 6, 2023 Maps and Plans: ❑X The most recent version of the 1:24,000 USGS Topographic Map - Please cleanly draw or delineate the site boundaries on the topographic map. ❑X The most recent version of the bound and published County NRCS Soil Survey Map - (required for projects within the Neuse River Basin, Tar -Pamlico River Basin, Randleman Lake Watershed and the Catawba River Basin, also recommended for all projects) - Please clearly delineate the site boundaries, etc. on the map. If the delineation obscures any of the features, it is recommended that a clean copy be provided. Copies of the current soil survey and/or soil survey map sheets can be obtained from the local NRCS County Office (http://www.nc.nres.usda.gov/). GIS soil layers are not acceptable. ❑X Vicinity map - Please clearly mark the location and approximate boundaries of the property and project on the map. Please indicate north arrow and scale. Please include applicable road names or State Road numbers. ❑X The Site Plan - The most critical map to be provided is the site plan. The following is the minimum list of plans that are typically needed. ❑X Pre-construction/Pre-existing conditions - This sheet (or sheets) must include: • All jurisdictional and non -jurisdictional wetland, stream, water features, State regulated buffers (delineated into Zones 1 and 2) • Topographic contours with elevations • Any existing structures and impervious areas • Existing utility lines and easements • Existing roads, culverts, and other pertinent features • North arrow and the scale (1":50' scale is recommended). ❑X Proposed conditions - This sheet (or sheets) must include: • All jurisdictional and non -jurisdictional wetland, stream, water features, State regulated buffers (delineated into Zones 1 and 2) • Lot layout (if a subdivision or commercial development is proposed) - lots must be developable without further impacts to jurisdictional and non -jurisdictional wetlands, streams, water features, and State regulated buffers. Building envelopes must be provided when streams, wetlands, riparian buffers, or water features exist on a lot • All built -out structures and impervious cover • Final grading contours with elevations • All utilities and easements (including septic fields on all lots within 100 feet of stream, wetland, or water features - if applicable) • Impacted areas — these should correspond with the Impact numbers listed on your PCN form. N/A Drainage Plans - Final drainage plans must include the following: • Locations and pertinent elevations and sizes of the stormwater collection system and drainage ways • All inlets and outlets must also be shown with pertinent elevations (All outlets to wetlands must be at a non -erosive velocity, generally less than 2 ft/sec during the peak flow from the 10-yr storm) • Scaled stormwater BMPs must also be indicated as required by DWR rules and policies Version 4.3 Updated December 6, 2023 • In certain cases (see Section F of PCN form), final stormwater management plan must also be provided (see Stormwater Management Plan Checklist) ❑X Proposed Impacts - All impacts to jurisdictional and non -jurisdictional wetland, stream, water features, and State regulated buffers must be shown and labeled on the site plans at a scale no smaller than 1" = 50'. All excavation, fill, flooding, stabilization, and other impacts that will be conducted in or near jurisdictional and non -jurisdictional wetland, stream, water features, and State regulated buffers must be indicated. Please provide cross sectional details showing the provisions for aquatic life passage (burial of culvert 20% for culverts <_ 48 inches, and 1- foot for culverts > 48 inches). Wetland Impacts: N/A Precise grading and final elevation contours must be provided. Existing vegetation and any clearing must be specified. N/A All subsurface utility lines must indicate the location of anti -seep collars. Construction detail for anti -seep collars must be provided. N/A Roadway or other crossings of riparian wetlands may require floodway culverts to maintain existing hydrological conditions. N/A Plans should show that the hydrology of remaining wetlands on the site will be maintained. Stream Impacts: l Stream impacts must be clearly shown on the plans. The centerline as well as the banks of the stream must be surveyed or located by GPS for the portion of the stream to be impacted. N/A The inlet and the outlet of all culverts should be aligned with the stream as much as possible. Inlet and outlet elevations and streambed elevations should be indicated. Any inlet or outlet protection must be shown and enumerated on the impact map(s). N/A For bottomless culverts or other spans, a vertical cross section should be provided that shows the minimum distance from each span to each stream bank, the stream cross section, the height of the span above the stream and the minimum distance from the edge of each footer to each stream bank. Additionally, please provide a signed and sealed geotechnical report of subsurface soils at the proposed bottomless culvert location. The report must comply with the Division of Highways — Guidelines for Drainage Studies and Hydraulic Design, prepared by A.L. Hankins, Jr., State Hydraulics Engineer - 1999. Version 4.3 Updated December 6, 2023 N/A Multiple culverts or sectioned box culverts typically require the use of sills, off- setting or other means to match the cross section of the existing stream (in order to maintain stream stability and provide aquatic life passage). A vertical cross section of the culverts should be shown overlain with the up and downstream stream cross section including the stream flood -prone area. N/A Impacts associated with dam construction must indicate and enumerate all fill associated with the dam footprint, spillway and any bank stream bank stabilization. The length of stream impounded must also be indicated and enumerated. STATE 43 r NORTH CAROLINA Environmental Quality Water Resources Office Use Only Corps Action ID no. [Click to enter.] Date received: [Click to enter.] DWR project no. [Click enter.] Date received: [Click to enter.] Site Coordinates: Latitude (DD.DDDDDD): 34.833831 Longitude (DD.DDDDDD): 78.823650 Form Version 4.3, February 22, 2024 Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form (Ver. 4.3, February 22, 2024) For Nationwide Permits and Regional General Permits and corresponding Water Quality Certifications Please note: fields marked with a red asterisk are required. The form is not considered complete until all mandatory questions are answered. The PCN help document may be found at this link: https://www.deg. nc.gov/water-resou rces/pcn-help-docu ment-last-updated-1162024 Page 1 of 20 PCN Form Version 4.3- February 22, 2024 A. Processing Information County (counties) where project is located: Bladen Additional (if needed). Is this an ARPA project? ❑ Yes 0 No If yes, ARPA project number: The project number can be found on the "Letter of Intent to Fund" (LOIF) or "Offer and Acceptance Letter". If you are unable to locate Click or tap here to enter text. your DWI ARPA Funding Project Number, please contact Corey Basinger at core y.basincrer5.ncdenr.gov for further assistance. Is this a NCDMS project? (Click yes only if NCDMS is the applicant or co- ❑ Yes 0 No applicant) Is this a public transportation project? (Publicly funded municipal, state, or federal road, rail, ❑ Yes 0 No or airport project) Is this a NCDOT project? ❑ Yes 0 No If yes, NCDOT TIP or state project number: Click to enter. If yes, NCDOT WBS number: Click to enter. 0 Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams, waters, Clean Water Act) la. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: 0 Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act) Has this PCN previously been submitted? ❑ Yes 0 No Please provide the date of the previous submission. Click to antar n Hate. 0 Nationwide Permit (NWP) 1 b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek El Regional General Permit (RGP) authorization? ❑ Standard (IP) This form may be used to initiate the standard/ individual permit process with the USACE. Please contact your Corps representative concerning submittals for standard permits. All required items can be included as attachments and submitted with this form. 1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ❑ Yes 0 No NWP number(s) (list all numbers ): 38 RGP number(s) (list all numbers ): Click to enter. Are you a federal applicant? ❑ Yes 0 No If yes, please provide a statement concerning compliance with the Coastal Zone Management Act N/A 1d. Type(s) of approval sought from DWR (check all that apply): ❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ 401 Water Quality Certification— Express ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization 0 Individual 401 Water Quality Certification Is this a courtesy copy notification ❑ Yes 0 No Page 2 of 20 PCN Form Version 4.3- February 22, 2024 1 e. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required? * For the record only for DWR 401 Certification: ❑ Yes 0 No For the record only for Corps Permit: ❑ Yes 0 No 1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit/certification application? ❑ Yes 0 No 1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts? ❑ Yes 0 No If yes, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program. 1 h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties? ❑ Yes 0 No 1 i. Is the project located within an NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ Unknown 1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed? ❑ Yes 0 No If yes, you must attach a copy of the approval letter from the appropriate Wildlife Resource Commission Office. Trout information may be found at this link: httr)://www.saw.usace.army.miI/Missions/Regulatory-Permit- Program/Agency-Coordination/Trout.aspx Page 3 of 20 PCN Form Version 4.3- February 22, 2024 B. Applicant Information 1a. Who is the primary contact? * Kevin Garon 1 b. Primary Contact Email: Kevin.garon@chemours.com 1 c. Primary Contact Phone: * (###)###-#### (704) 560-6435 1 d. Who is applying for the permit/certification? * (check all that apply) ❑ Owner Z Applicant (other than owner) 1 e. Is there an agent/consultant for this project?* ® Yes ❑ No 2. Landowner Information 2a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 2b. Deed Book and Page No.: Click to enter. 2c. Contact Person (for corporations): Dana Matics 2d. Address Street Address: Click to enter. Address line 2: Click to enter. City: Click to enter. State/ Province/ Region: Click to enter. Postal/ Zip Code: Click to enter. Country: Clirk to PntPr_ 2e. Telephone Number: * (###)###-#### 919-542-4501 x2423 2f. Fax Number: (###)###-#### Click to enter. 2g. Email Address: * Dana. I.matics@usace.army. miI 3. Applicant Information (if different from owner) 3a. Name: Kevin Garon 3b. Business Name (if applicable): The Chemours Company FC, LLC 3c. Address: Street Address: 22828 Hwy 87 W Address line 2: Click to enter. City: Fayetteville State/ Province/ Region: NC Postal/ Zip Code: 28306 Country USA 3d. Telephone Number: (704) 560-6435 3e Fax Number: (###)###-#### Click to enter. 3f. Email Address: * Kevin.garon@chemours.com Page 4 of 20 PCN Form Version 4.3- February 22, 2024 4. Agent/ Consultant (if applicable) 4a. Name: * Alex Mathes 4b. Business Name: Geosyntec Consultants of NC, P.C. 4c. Address: * Street Address: 2501 Blue Ridge Road Address line 2: Suite 430 City: Raleigh State/ Province/ Region: NC Postal/ Zip Code: 27607 Country: USA 4d. Telephone Number: (713) 859-5712 4e Fax Number: (###)###-#### Click to enter. 4f. Email Address: * AMathes@Geosyntec.com Agent Authorization Letter: Attach a completed/signed agent authorization form or letter. A sample form may be found at this link: https://www.saw. usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-Program/Permits/2017-Nationwide-Permits/Pre- construction-Notification/ Page 5 of 20 PCN Form Version 4.3- February 22, 2024 C. Project Information and Prior Project History 1. Project Information la. Name of project: Lock and Dam 3 Seep Diversion 1 b. Subdivision name (if appropriate): Click to ente• 1c. Nearest municipality/town: Bladen County 2. Project Identification 2a. Property identification number (tax PIN or parcel ID): 0137248 2b. Property size (in acres): 22.25 2c. Project Address: Street Address: 1248 Bill Hall Road Address line 2: Click to ente City: Fayetteville State/ Province/ Region: NC Postal/ Zip Code: 28306 Country: USA 2d. Site coordinates in decimal degrees (using 4-6 digits after the decimal point): * Latitude (DD.DDDDDD): 34.833831 Longitude (-DD.DDDDDD):-78.823650 3. Surface Waters 3a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project: Cape Fear River 3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving WS-IV water: The Surface Water Classification map may be found at this link: https://experience.arcgis.com/experience/7073e9l 22ab74588b8c48ded34c3df55/ Cape Fear 3c. In what river basin(s) is your project located? * Choose additional (if needed) 3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is 030300050104 located: The Find Your HUC map may be found at this link: https://ncdenr.maps.arcqis.com/apps/Publicinformation/index.html?appid=ad3a85aOc6d644aOb97cdO69db238ac3 Page 6 of 20 PCN Form Version 4.3- February 22, 2024 4. Project Description and History 4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: The approximately 1-acre project site is on the right bank of the Cape Fear River near the William O'Huske Lock and Dam 3. Existing structures within the project site include a public boat ramp and riprap bank stabilization, and surrounding land use includes public recreational areas (picnic pavilions, shoreline access). 4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown project (including all prior phases) in the past? If yes, please give the DWR Certification number and/or Corps [Click to enter.] Action ID (ex. SAW-0000-00000): jClick to enter.] Attach any pertinent project history documentation 4b2. Is any portion of the work already complete? ❑ Yes ® No If yes, describe the completed work. Click tn Pnter text. 4c. List of other certifications or approvals/denials received from other federal, state or local agencies for work described in this application not related to the 404 or 401. N/A 4d. Attach an 8'/z x 11" excerpt from the most recent version of the USGS topographic map indicating the location of the project site. 4e. Attach an 8'/z x 11" excerpt from the most recent version of the published County NRCS Soil Survey map depicting the project site. 4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the 0 acres property: 4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent 263 linear feet and perennial) on the property: 4g1. List the total estimated acreage of all existing open waters on the 0 acres property: 4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: Chemours intends to construct a seepage diversion channel adjacent to a public boat ramp located on U.S. Army Corps of Engineers property at the William O'Huske Lock and Dam 3 in Bladen County, North Carolina (Figure 1). This diversion channel is necessary to divert seepage water from the Lock and Dam Seep such that it does not flow over the boat ramp. 4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The drainage channels will capture the seepage water as it emanates from the tree line, and will ultimately divert it to a path that is parallel to the boat ramp. The parallel portion will be installed at a minimum 6-foot offset from the ramp. The drainage channel will consist of a trench filled with riprap, underlain by a 30-mil high density polyethylene (HDPE) geomembrane, with a non -woven geotextile cushion between the geomembrane and riprap for protection. Engineering calculations were performed to determine the dimensions of the trench that will accommodate surge flow from a 1-year storm. A design drawing of the diversion ditches is attached. 4j. Attach project drawings/site diagrams/depictions of impact areas for the proposed project. 4k. Will this activity involve dredging in wetlands or waters? ❑ Yes ® No If yes, describe the type of dredging, the composition of the dredged material, and the locations of disposal area. Click to enter text Page 7 of 20 PCN Form Version 4.3- February 22, 2024 5. Jurisdictional Determinations 5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or in ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown proposed impact areas? Comments: A wetland and stream delineation was conducted by Geosyntec on 8 May 2024, where the Cape Fear River (S1) and unnamed intermittent stream (S2) were observed within the project site. Please see discussion of the delineation methodology and results in the PCN narrative. 5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, ❑ Preliminary ❑ Approved ❑ Emailed concurrence what type of determination was made? ❑x Not Verified ❑ Unknown ❑ n/a Corps AID number (ex. SAW-0000-00000): Click to ente, Name (if known): Alex Mathes, Nathan Weaver 5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional Agency/Consultant Company: Geosyntec Consultants of areas? NC, P.C. Other: Clic, o enter, 5d. List the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determination or State determination if a determination was made by either agency. N/A 5d1. Attach jurisdictional determinations. 6. Future Project Plans 6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes ® No 6b. If yes, explain. N/A Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permit(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity? This includes other separate and distant crossings for linear projects that require Department of the Army authorization but don't require pre -construction notification. No. The activities are anticipated to meet the conditions of NWP 38 for impacts to waters regulated under Section 404 and Section 10. A request for authorization under Section 408 is included in this PCN submission. 7. Addresses of adjoining property owners, lessees, etc. whose property adjoins the waterbody (if more than can be entered here, please attach a supplemental list) Please see attached list of adjacent property owners adjoining the Cape Fear River 8. Scheduling of activity: Anticipated scheduling is during low -flow periods in Summer 2024, following receipt of applicable state and federal authorizations. Work is expected to be completed within one week. Page 8 of 20 PCN Form Version 4.3- February 22, 2024 D. Proposed Impacts Inventory 1. Impacts Summary 1a. Where are the impacts associated with your project (check all that apply): ❑ Wetlands ❑ Buffers ❑ Pond Construction 0 Streams - tributaries ❑ Open Waters 2. Wetland Impacts If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, complete this table for each wetland area impacted. 2a. Site #* 2a1. Impact Reason/Type 2b. Impact Duration* 2c. Wetland Type 2d. Wetland Name* 2e. Forested ?* 2f. Jurisdiction Type* 2g. Impact Area (ac)* W1 Choose one Temp/ Perm Choose one Click to enter Y/N Choose one Click to enter W2 Choose one Temp/ Perm Choose one Click to enter Y/N Choose one Click to enter W3 Choose one Temp/ Perm Choose one Click to enter Y/N Choose one Click to enter W4 Choose one Temp/ Perm Choose one Click to enter Y/N Choose one Click to enter W5 Choose one Temp/ Perm Choose one Click to enter Y/N Choose one Click to enter W6 Choose one Temp/ Perm Choose one Click to enter Y/N Choose one Click to enter W7 Choose one Temp/ Perm Choose one Click to enter Y/N Choose one Click to enter W8 Choose one Temp/ Perm Choose one Click to enter Y/N Choose one Click to enter W9 Choose one Temp/ Perm Choose one Click to enter Y/N Choose one Click to enter W10 Choose one Temp/ Perm Choose one Click to enter Y/N Choose one Click to enter W11 Choose one Temp/ Perm Choose one Click to enter Y/N Choose one Click to enter W12 Choose one Temp/ Perm Choose one Click to enter Y/N Choose one Click to enter W13 Choose one Temp/ Perm Choose one Click to enter Y/N Choose one Click to enter W14 Choose one Temp/ Perm Choose one Click to enter Y/N Choose one Click to enter W15 Choose one Temp/ Perm Choose one Click to enter Y/N Choose one Click to enter 2g1. Total temporary wetland impacts Click to enter. ac 2g2. Total permanent wetland impacts Click to enter. ac 2g3. Total wetland impacts Click to enter. ac 2h. Type(s) of material being discharged and the amount of each type in cubic yards: Click to enter text. 2i. Comments: Not Applicable, no wetland impacts proposed. Page 9 of 20 PCN Form Version 4.3- February 22, 2024 3. Stream Impacts If there are perennial or intermittent stream/ tributary impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, complete this table for all stream/ tributary sites impacted. ** All Perennial or Intermittent streams must be verified by DWR or delegated local government Site #* 3a Impact Reason* 3b. Impact Duration* 3c. Impact Type* 3d. Stream Name 3e. Stream Type 3f. Jurisdiction Type* 3g. Stream Width (avg ft) * 3h. Impact length (linear ft) S1 Channel Construction Permanent Fill (Incl. Riprap) S1 Cape Fear River Perennial Both 430 72 S2 Workspace Temporary Other S1 Cape Fear River Perennial Both 430 18 S3 Click to enter Temp/ Perm Choose one Click to enter Per/Int Choose one Click to enter Click to enter S4 Click to enter Temp/ Perm Choose one Click to enter Per/Int Choose one Click to enter Click to enter S5 Click to enter Temp/ Perm Choose one Click to enter Per/Int Choose one Click to enter Click to enter S6 Click to enter Temp/ Perm Choose one Click to enter Per/Int Choose one Click to enter Click to enter S7 Click to enter Temp/ Perm Choose one Click to enter Per/Int Choose one Click to enter Click to enter S8 Click to enter Temp/ Perm Choose one Click to enter Per/Int Choose one Click to enter Click to enter S9 Click to enter Temp/ Perm Choose one Click to enter Per/Int Choose one Click to enter Click to enter S10 Click to enter Temp/ Perm Choose one Click to enter Per/Int Choose one Click to enter Click to enter S11 Click to enter Temp/ Perm Choose one Click to enter Per/Int Choose one Click to enter Click to enter S12 Click to enter Temp/ Perm Choose one Click to enter Per/Int Choose one Click to enter Click to enter S13 Click to enter Temp/ Perm Choose one Click to enter Per/Int Choose one Click to enter Click to enter S14 Click to enter Temp/ Perm Choose one Click to enter Per/Int Choose one Click to enter Click to enter S15 Click to enter Temp/ Perm Choose one Click to enter Per/Int Choose one Click to enter Click to enter S16 Click to enter Temp/ Perm Choose one Click to enter Per/Int Choose one Click to enter Click to enter S17 Click to enter Temp/ Perm Choose one Click to enter Per/Int Choose one Click to enter Click to enter S18 Click to enter Temp/ Perm Choose one Click to enter Per/Int Choose one Click to enter Click to enter S19 Click to enter Temp/ Perm Choose one Click to enter Per/Int Choose one Click to enter Click to enter S20 Click to enter Temp/ Perm Choose one Click to enter Per/Int Choose one Click to enter Click to enter 3i1. Total jurisdictional ditch impact: 0 linear ft 3i2. Total permanent stream impacts: 72 linear ft M. Total temporary stream impacts: 18 linear ft 34. Total stream and ditch impacts: 90 linear ft 3j. Comments: Total stream impacts are 90 linear feet (LF; 0.079-acre). Permanent stream impacts comprise 72 LF (0.043- acre) and temporary stream impacts comprise 18 LF (0.036-acre). Please see the attached Impact Exhibit. Page 10 of 20 PCN Form Version 4.3- February 22, 2024 4. Open Water Impacts If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of the U.S., individually list all open water impacts in the table below. 4a. Site #* 4a1. Impact Reason 4b. Impact Duration* 4c. Waterbody Name* 4d. Activity Type* 4e. Waterbody Type* 4f. Impact area (ac)* 01 Click to enter. Temp/ Perm Click to enter. Choose one Choose one Click to enter. 02 Click to enter. Temp/ Perm Click to enter. Choose one Choose one Click to enter. 03 Click to enter. Temp/ Perm Click to enter. Choose one Choose one Click to enter. 04 Click to enter. Temp/ Perm Click to enter. Choose one Choose one Click to enter. 05 Click to enter. Temp/ Perm Click to enter. Choose one I Choose one Click to enter. 4g. Total temporary open water impacts Click to enter. ac 4g. Total permanent open water impacts Click to enter. ac 4g. Total open water impacts Click to enter. ac 4h. Comments: Not applicable, no open water impacts proposed. 5. Pond or Lake Construction If pond or lake construction is proposed, complete the table below. (*This does NOT include offline stormwater management ponds.) 5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e. Pond ID Proposed use or Wetland Impacts (ac) Stream Impacts (ft) Upland # purpose of pond Impacts (ac) Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Click tc Click to Click to Click to Click to Click to Click to P1 Choose one enter. enter. enter. enter. enter. enter. enter. P2 Choose one Click to Click to Click to Click to Click to Click to Click to enter. enter. enter. enter. enter. enter. enter. P3 Choose one Click to Click to Click to Click to Click to Click to Click to enter. enter. enter. enter. enter. enter. enter. Click to Click to Click to Click to Click to Click to Click to 5f. Total enter. enter. enter. enter. enter. enter. enter. 5g. Comments: Click to enter. 5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no.: Click to enter. 5i. Expected pond surface area (acres): Click to enter. 5j. Size of pond watershed (acres): Click to enter. 5k. Method of construction: Not applicable, no pond or lake construction is proposed. Page 11 of 20 PCN Form Version 4.3- February 22, 2024 6. Buffer Impacts (DWR requirement) If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. Individually list all buffer impacts. 6a. Project is in which protected basin(s)? (Check all that apply.) ❑ Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Jordan ❑ Goose Creek ❑ Randleman ❑ Other: Click to enter. Site #* 6b. Impact Type* 6c. Impact Duration* 6d. Stream Name* 6e. Buffer Mitigation Required?* 6f. Zone 1 Impact* (sq ft) 6g. Zone 2 Impact* (sq ft) B1 Choose one Temp/ Perm Click to enter. Y/N Click to enter. Click to enter. B2 Choose one Temp/ Perm Click to enter. Y/N Click to enter. Click to enter. B3 Choose one Temp/ Perm Click to enter. Y/N Click to enter. Click to enter. B4 Choose one Temp/ Perm Click to enter. Y/N Click to enter. Click to enter. B5 Choose one Temp/ Perm Click to enter. Y/N Click to enter. Click to enter. B6 Choose one Temp/ Perm Click to enter. Y/N Click to enter. Click to enter. B7 Choose one Temp/ Perm Click to enter. Y/N Click to enter. Click to enter. B8 Choose one Temp/ Perm Click to enter. Y/N Click to enter. Click to enter. B9 Choose one Temp/ Perm Click to enter. Y/N Click to enter. Click to enter. B10 Choose one Temp/ Perm Click to enter. Y/N Click to enter. Click to enter. B11 Choose one Temp/ Perm Click to enter. Y/N Click to enter. Click to enter. B12 Choose one Temp/ Perm Click to enter. Y/N Click to enter. Click to enter. B13 Choose one Temp/ Perm Click to enter. Y/N Click to enter. Click to enter. B14 Choose one Temp/ Perm Click to enter. Y/N Click to enter. Click to enter. B15 Choose one Temp/ Perm Click to enter. Y/N Click to enter. Click to enter. B16 Choose one Temp/ Perm Click to enter. Y/N Click to enter. Click to enter. B17 Choose one Temp/ Perm Click to enter. Y/N Click to enter. Click to enter. B18 Choose one Temp/ Perm Click to enter. Y/N Click to enter. Click to enter. B19 Choose one Temp/ Perm Click to enter. Y/N Click to enter. Click to enter. B20 Choose one Temp/ Perm Click to enter. Y/N Click to enter. Click to enter. 6h. Total temporary impacts: Zone 1: Click to enter. sq ft Zone 2: Click to enter. sq ft 6h. Total permanent impacts: Zone 1: Click to enter. sq ft Zone 2: Click to enter. sq ft 6h. Total combined buffer impacts: Zone 1: Click to enter. sq ft Zone 2: Click to enter. sq ft 6i. Comments: Not applicable. The Cape Fear River does not occur within a NC DWR Riparian Buffer Protection Program. Please attach supporting documentation (impact maps, plan sheets, etc.) for the proposed project. Page 12 of 20 PCN Form Version 4.3- February 22, 2024 E. Impact Justification and Mitigation 1. Avoidance and Minimization 1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through project design: The proposed project is designed to minimize impacts to the greatest extent practicable while accomplishing the project purpose (i.e., preventing public access to groundwater seepage). Impacts are limited to areas that are most accessible by the public at the boat ramp and recreational shoreline. The project does not encroach into waters that extend beyond the forested treeline and is primarily adjacent to areas effected by existing disturbance (riprap bank stabilization, boat ramp). 1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize proposed impacts through construction techniques: The project will be scheduled during low -flow periods (anticipated Summer 2024) to avoid the use of temporary de -watering methods for work below the ordinary high-water mark of the Cape Fear River. Site access will be accomplished using existing impervious surfaces (boat ramp via Bill Hall Road) and measures to minimize temporary soil disturbance within the temporary workspace. Site -specific Best Management Practices (BMPs) will be implemented to avoid and minimize erosion/sedimentation within the Cape Fear River. 2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S., Waters of the State, or Riparian Buffers 2a. If compensatory mitigation is required, by whom is it required? * ❑ DWR ❑ Corps (check all that apply) 2b. If yes, which mitigation option(s) will be used for this ❑ Mitigation Bank project? (check all that apply) ❑ In Lieu Fee Program ❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation 3. Complete if using a Mitigation Bank (Must satisfy NC General Statute143-214.11 (d1).) 3a. Name of mitigation bank: Click to enter. 3b. Credits purchased/requested: Type: Choose one Quantity Click to enter. Type: Choose one Quantity Click to enter. Type: Choose one Quantity Click to enter. Attach receipt and/or approval letter. 3c. Comments: Click to enter 4. Complete if Using an In Lieu Fee Program 4a. Attach approval letter from in lieu fee program. 4b. Stream mitigation requested: Click to enter. linear feet 4c. If using stream mitigation, what is the stream temperature: Choose one NC Stream Temperature Classification Maps can be found under the Mitigation Concepts tab on the Wilmington District's RIBITS website: (Please use the filter and select Wilmington district) https://ribits.or)s. usace.army.mii/ords/f?p=107:2:::::: 4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWR only): Click to enter. square feet 4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: Click to enter. acres Page 13 of 20 PCN Form Version 4.3- February 22, 2024 4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested: Click to enter. acres 4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: Click to enter. acres 4h. Comments: Click to enter. 5. Complete if Providing a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan 5a. If proposing a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan, including mitigation credits generated. Click to enter. 5b. Attach mitigation plan/documentation. 6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — DWR requirement 6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer ❑ Yes ® No that requires buffer mitigation? If yes, please complete this entire section — please contact DWR for more information. 6b. If yes, identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the amount of mitigation required in the table below. 6c. 6d. 6e. Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation (square feet) (square feet) Zone 1 Click w enter. Click w enter. t,nuuse one Click w enter. Zone 2 Click to enter. Click to enter. Choose one Click to enter. 6f. Total buffer mitigation required Click to enter. 6g. If buffer mitigation is required, is payment to a mitigation bank or ❑ Yes ❑ No NC Division of Mitigation Services proposed? 6h. If yes, attach the acceptance letter from the mitigation bank or NC Division of Mitigation Services. 6i. Comments: Click to enter. Page 14 of 20 PCN Form Version 4.3- February 22, 2024 F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (DWR requirement) 1. Diffuse Flow Plan 1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers ❑ Yes ® No identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? 1 b. All buffer impacts and high ground impacts require diffuse flow or other form of stormwater treatment. If the project is subject to a state implemented riparian buffer protection program, include a plan that fully documents how diffuse/dispersed flow will be maintained. All Stormwater Control Measures (SCM) must be designed in accordance with the NC Stormwater Design Manual (httr)s://deg.nc.gov/about/divisions/energv-mineral-land-resources/energv-mineral-land-permit- quidance/stormwater-bmp-manual). Associated supplement forms and other documentation must be provided. ❑ Level Spreader What Type of SCM are you ❑ Vegetated Conveyance (lower seasonal high water table- SHWT) providing? ❑ Wetland Swale (higher SHWT) (Check all that apply) ❑ Other SCM that removes minimum 30% nitrogen ❑ Proposed project will not create concentrated stormwater flow through the buffer For a list of options to meet the diffuse flow requirements, click here. Attach diffuse flow documentation. 2. Stormwater Management Plan 2a. Is this an NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250? El Yes 0 No 2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)? ®Yes El No To look up low density requirements, click here: http://rer)orts.oah.state.nc.us/ncac/title%2015a%20-%20environmental%20guality/chapter%2002%20- %20environmental%20management/subchapter%20h/15a%20ncac%2002h%20.1003.pdf 2c. Does this project have a stormwater management plan (SMP) ❑ Yes ❑ No reviewed and approved under a state stormwater program or state - approved local government stormwater program? ® n/a — project disturbs < 1 acre Note: Projects that have vested rights, exemptions, or grandfathering from state or locally implemented stormwater programs or projects that satisfy state or locally -implemented stormwater programs through use of community in -lieu programs should answer "no" to this question. 2d. Which of the following stormwater management program(s) apply? ❑ Local Government (Check all that apply.) ❑ State If you have local government approval, please include the SMP on their overall impact map. Local Government Stormwater Programs ❑ Phase II ❑ USMP ❑ NSW ❑ Water Supply Page 15 of 20 PCN Form Version 4.3- February 22, 2024 Please identify which local government stormwater program you are using. Click to enter. State Stormwater Programs ❑ Phase II ❑ HQW or ORW ❑ Coastal Counties ❑ Other Comments: The project disturbs less than one acre, therefore a stormwater management plan is not required. The project has been designed with a trench that is calculated to accommodate surge flows from a 1-year storm. Page 16 of 20 PCN Form Version 4.3- February 22, 2024 G. Supplementary Information 1. Environmental Documentation 1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) 0 Yes ❑ No funds or the use of public (federal/state) land? 1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State (North Carolina) Environmental El Yes 0 No Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? 1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the ❑ Yes ❑ No NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.) Comments: Project does not meet SEPA criteria. 2. Violations (DWR Requirement) 2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), Federally Non -Jurisdictional Wetlands /Classified Surface Waters ❑ Yes 0 No (15A NCAC 2H. 1400) DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? 2b. If you answered "yes" to the above question, provide an explanation of the violation(s): UlicK to enter. 3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement) 3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional development, which could impact nearby ❑ Yes 0 No downstream water quality? 3b. If you answered "no", provide a short narrative description: No additional development is anticipated in relation to this seep diversion project. The project footprint is minimal (less than one acre) and low -impact, post -construction maintenance of the diversion channels will be performed (i.e., powerwashing of riprap to remove normal sediment deposition and maintain channel porosity/function). 3c. If yes, provide a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the most recent DWR policy. (Attach .pdf) 4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement) 4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project? ❑ Yes ❑ No 0 N/A Page 17 of 20 PCN Form Version 4.3- February 22, 2024 4b. If yes, describe in detail the treatment methods and dispositions (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project. If the wastewater will be treated at a treatment plant, list the capacity available at that plant. Click to enter. 5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement) 5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected 0 Yes ❑ No species or habitat? (IPAC weblink: https://www.fws.gov/ipac/ ffws.govl) * 5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species 0 Yes ❑ No Act impacts? 5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. Raleigh 5d. Is another federal agency involved? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ Unknown If yes, which federal agency? Click to enter. 5e. Is this a DOT project located within Divisions 1-8? ❑ Yes 0 No 5f. Will you cut any trees in order to conduct the work in waters of the U.S.? El Yes 0 No 5g. Does this project involve bridge maintenance or removal? ❑ Yes 0 No 5g1. If yes, have you inspected the bridge for signs of bat use such as staining, guano, bats, etc.? Representative photos of signs of bat use ❑ Yes ❑ No can be found in the NLEB SLOPES, Appendix F, pages 3-7. Representative photos of signs of bat use can be found in the NLEB SLOPES, Appendix F, pages 3-7. Link to NLEB SLOPES document: http://saw-reg.usace.army.mil/NLEB/1-30-17-signed NLEB-SLOPES&apps.pdf If you answered yes to 5g1, did you discover any signs of bat use? * ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown If yes, please show the location of the bridge on the permit drawings/ project plans 5h. Does this project involve the construction/ installation of a wind turbine(s)? El Yes ❑x No If yes, please show the location of the wind turbine(s) on the permit drawings/ project plans (attach .pdf) 5i. Does this project involve blasting and /or other percussive activities that will be conducted by machines, such as jackhammers, ❑ Yes 0 No mechanized pile drivers, etc.? If yes, please provide details to include type of percussive activity, purpose, duration, and specific location of this activity on the property (attach .pdf) 5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat? A USFWS IPaC Official Species List and North Carolina Natural Heritage Program database search were evaluated to determine potential state and federally protected species with potential to occur at the project site. Qualified Geosyntec biologists performed a site assessment on 8 May 2024 to determine the presence of suitable habitat for protected species. A project review request was prepared using the aforementioned datasources and following procedures outlined by the USFWS Eastern North Carolina Ecological Services field office (i.e. Raleigh Field Office) and will be submitted for review. Please see the attached consultation documents and further discussion of protected species in the PCN narrative. Page 18 of 20 PCN Form Version 4.3- February 22, 2024 Attach consultation documentation. 6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement) 6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as ®Yes El No an Essential Fish Habitat? Is there submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV) around El Yes ®No El Unknown the project vicinity? Will this project affect submerged aquatic vegetation? ❑ Yes ❑x No ❑ Unknown Explain: The NCDEQ Submerged Aquatic Vegetation (SAV) Historic Extent mapping application does not indicate SAV in the vicinity of the project site. 6b. What data source(s) did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat? NOAA Essential Fish Habitat mapping application. The project site intersects portions of the Cape Fear River designated as Essential Fish Habitat for Snapper Grouper; however, work will be limited to low -flow seasons, requires a minimal footprint, and is anticipated to be completed in approximately one week. Work will be conducted "in -the -dry" and not require water diversion measures within the Cape Fear River. No impacts are expected for aquatic species or habitats, including Essential Fish Habitat, as a result of the project. 7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement) Link to the State Historic Preservation Office Historic Properties Map (does not include archaeological data): htti3://gis.ncdcr.aov/hi3oweb/ 7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural ®Yes El No preservation status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in North Carolina history and archaeology)? 7b. What data source(s) did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources? The North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) Historic Properties map was reviewed at the project site. The project is adjacent to the William O'Huske Lock and Dam 3, which is listed eligible for the National Register of Historic Places. No disturbance is proposed to the Lock and Dam structures, and the seep diversion channels will be installed adjacent to existing modern structures (i.e., boat ramp, riprap bank stabilization), occupying a minimal disturbance footprint. A project review request was prepared in accordance with SHPO's online project review procedures, and will be submitted to SHPO for review and comment. Please see the attached consultation request and further discussion of historic resources in the PCN narrative. 7c. Attach historic or prehistoric documentation. 8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement) Link to the FEMA Floodplain Maps: httr)s://msc.fema.gov/portal/search 8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? * ® Yes ❑ No 8b. If yes, explain how the project meets FEMA requirements. The project will comply with applicable FEMA-approved floodplain management requirements as set by Bladen County's flood damage preventation ordinance (Bladen County, North Carolina Code of Ordinances, Ch. 27) Page 19 of 20 PCN Form Version 4.3- February 22, 2024 8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA Flood Map Service Center application, FIRM panel 3720035900J, effective 1/5/2007 H. Miscellaneous Comments: Click +^ Attach pertinent documentation or attachments not previously requested I. Signature * ❑x By checking the box and signing below, I, as the project proponent, certify to the following: • The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete, to the best of my knowledge and belief; • The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401 certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time; • The project proponent hereby agrees that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act"); • The project proponent hereby agrees to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act'); • The project proponent hereby understands that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature; AND • As the project proponent, I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN/online form. Full Name: Alex Mathes Signature: * �/ Date: 6/25/2024 Page 20 of 20 PCN Form Version 4.3- February 22, 2024 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Form Approved - AUTHORIZATION TO ACT AS AN AGENT OMB No. 0710-0003 For use of this form, see Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899, Expires XX-XX-XXXX and Section 103 of the Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act, the proponent agency is CECW-COR. The Agency Disclosure Notice (ADN) The Public reporting burden for this collection of information, 0710-003, is estimated to average 5 minutes per response, including time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding the burden estimate or burden reduction suggestions to the Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, at whs mc-alex esd mbx dd-dod-information-collectionsna mail rrui. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. Purpose: This form is used by members of the public to authorize an agent (for example - a private consultant) to act on their behalf in all matters relating to all dealings with the USACE regarding the project. This includes taking all necessary actions for the application, processing, issuance, and/or acceptance of a Clean Water Act and/or Rivers and Rivers Act delineations, determinations, and/or permits. This form is a component in the Corps Regulatory Request System (RRS), which is an online permitting application portal for the Regulatory Program. ITEMS 1 THRU 3 - FOR USACE USE ONLY 1. APPLICATION NO. 2. FIELD OFFICE CODE 3. DATE RECEIVED ITEMS 4 THRU 14.00MPLETD BY THE -PROPERTY OWNER 4. PROJECT NAME 5. PROJECT LOCATION Lock and Dam 3 Seep Diversion Cape Fear River, Bladen County, NC 6. APPLICANT NAME (first, middle, last) 7. AGENT NAME Kevin Garon Alex Mathes Company (if applicable): Company. - The Chemours Company FC, LLC Geosyntec Consultants of NC, P.C. E-mail Address: E-mail Address: Kevin.garon@chemours.com AMathes@Geosyntec.com 8. APPLICANT ADDRESS (if applicable) 9. AGENT ADDRESS (if applicable) Address Address 22828 Hwy 87 W 2501 Blue Ridge Road, Suite 430 City: State: City: State: Fayetteville NC Raleigh NC 10. APPLICANT PHONE NUMBERS. WAREA CODE 11. AGENT PHONE NUMBERS. WAREA CODE a. Residence b. Business c. Fax a. Residence b. Business c. Fax 704-560-6435 713-859-5712 12. APPLICANT/AGENT CERTIFICATION By signing below, I hereby authorize the agent listed above, to act on my behalf in all matters relating to all dealings with the USACE regarding the project and properties listed above, including taking all necessary actions for the application, processing, issuance, and/ or acceptance of a Clean Water Act and/or Rivers and Rivers Act delineations, determinations, and/or permits. Any and all acts carried out by my agent on my behalf as it relates to this project and property shall have the same effect as acts of my own. I agree to review all information submitted to the USACE on my behalf by my agent and certify that any information submitted on my behalf is true and correct. 13. SIGNATURE O APPLI 14. DATE .. --' - -7 18 U.S.C. Section 1001 provides th : Whoever, in any manner within the jurisdiction of any d artment or agency of the United States knowingly and willfully falsifies, conceals, or covers up any trick, scheme, or disguises a material fact or makes any false, fictitious or fraudulent statements or representations or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing same to contain any false, fictitious or fraudulent statements or entry, shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than five years or both. ENO FORM 6295, JAN 2024 PCN Form C(7): Adjacent property owners ad -joining the subject waterbody (Cape Fear River) Adjacent Landowner: Cumberland Chemours Company FC LLC 22828 NC 87 HWY W Fayetteville, NC 28306 Cumberland Adjacent Landowner: North Carolina Coastal Land Trust 720 Market Street Wilmington, NC 28401 APPENDIX B Site Plans _ _ F _ Z _ W w w d a a w u z n o rc ui ���� ii� II�� L o, APPENDIX C Photographic Record GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS OF NC, P.C. Geosyntec' Photographic Record consultants Client: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Number: TR1210 Site: Lock and Dam 3 - Seep Diversion Location: Bladen County, NC Photograph 1 Date: 5/8/2024 Direction: North Comments: Site overview photo, taken south of the William O'Huske Lock and Dam 3 public boat ramp on the Cape Fear River. Photograph 2 Date: 5/8/2024 Direction: Southwest Comments: Photo of the Cape Fear River (Stream 1) ordinary high-water mark (OHWM), demarcated with pink pin flags. Visible OHWM indicators include water stains on riprap, sediment deposits, wrack lines, and change in vegetation density. GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS OF NC, P.C. Gees nteGll' Photographic Record Client: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Number: TR1210 Site: Lock and Dam 3 - Seep Diversion Photograph 3 Date: 5/8/2024 Direction: Southeast Comments: Stream flowing southeast into the Cape Fear River (Stream 1), adjacent to the southern edge of the boat ramp. This portion of Stream 2 is below the river's OHWM, and stream boundary is marked by pink pin flags. Photograph 4 I Date: 5/8/2024 Direction: Northwest Comments: Secondary view of Stream 2 flowing adjacent to the boat ramp. Stream boundary is marked by pink pin flags, and pink pin flags indicating the river's OHWM are also visible in background. Location: Bladen County, NC 2 GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS OF NC, P.C. Geosy lte& Photographic Recordiu�" Client: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Number: TR1210 Site: Lock and Dam 3 - Seep Diversion Location: Bladen County, NC Photograph 5 Date: 5/8/2024 Direction: Southeast_ Comments: View of Stream 2" channel at tree line, draining southeast to the Cape Fear River. 'v Photograph 6 Date:5/8/2024 ' Direction: West Comments: View of Stream 2 channel origin, where palustrine wetland ,a ' seepage begins to ...., . channelize and drain toward the east/southeast to the Cape Fear River. - •wr APPENDIX D Stream Forms NC Division of Water Quality -Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11 NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 Date: May 7, 2024 Project/Site: Lock and Dam Seep Latitude: 34.833874 Diversion Evaluator: N. Weaver County: Bladen Longitude:-78.823818 Total Points: 28.75 Stream Determination (circle one) Other: Stream 2 Stream is at least intermittent if >_ 19 or perennial if >_ 30' Intermittent (>19) Stream ID: A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 7) Absent Weak Moderate Strong Score 1 a' Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3 Moderate (2) 2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3 Weak (1) 3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step- pool, ripple -pool sequence 0 1 2 3 Weak (1) 4. Particle size of stream substrate 0 1 2 3 Absent (0) 5. Active/relict floodplain 0 1 2 3 Absent (0) 6. Depositional bars or benches 0 1 2 3 Weak (1) 7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3 Weak (1) 8. Headcuts 0 1 2 3 Absent (0) 9. Grade control 0 1 0.5 1 1 1.5 Absent (0) 10. Natural valley 0 1 0.5 1 1 1.5 Moderate (1) 11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3 No (0) a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 10.5) 12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1 2 3 Moderate (2) 13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 0 1 2 3 Strong (3) 14. Leaf litter 1.5 1 0.5 0 Weak (1) 15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 0.5 1 1.5 Moderate (1) 16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 1 0.5 1 1 1.5 Weak (0.5) 17. Soil -based evidence of high water table? No = 0 Yes = 3 Yes (3) C. Biology (Subtotal = 11.25) 18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2 1 0 Absent (3) 19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3 2 1 0 Absent (3) 20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 1 2 3 Moderate (2) 21. Aquatic Mollusks 0 1 2 3 Absent (0) 22. Fish 0 0.5 1 1.5 Weak (0.5) 23. Crayfish 0 1 0.5 1 1 1 1.5 Absent (0) 24. Amphibians 0 0.5 1 1.5 Moderate (1) 25. Algae 0 0.5 1 1.5 Moderate (1) 26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0 FACW (0.75) perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual. Notes: One frog, small pod of gambusia, tadpoles, two caddisfly (no shell), many nematode worms, one isopod Sketch: 41 Geosplec consultants Geosyntec Consultants of NC, P.C. NC License No.: C-3500 and C-295 Water Resources Field Data Form Data Sheet No. S-1 Cape Fear River Project Name: Chemours Fayetteville Works State/County: Bladen County, NC Lock and Dam 3 - Seep Diversion Date: 05/08/2024 Aerial Sheet No.: Surveyors: A. Mathes; N. Weaver GPS Point No.(s): Associated Data Sheet No(s): DP -I, DP-2 Stream [X] Spring[ ] Water Well[ ] Stream Information Name: S-1 Cape Fear River Stream Width: water 450-500 ft. Perceptible Flow Yes [X] No [ ] bank to bank 500-550 ft. Direction of Flow: South Perennial X Intermittent Ephemeral Probed Stream Depth Bottom Substrate Observed Water Quality [ ] 0-6" [ ] Shale [ ] Clear [ ] 7-12" [ ] Bedrock [X] Slightly Turbid [ ] 13-24" [ ] Cobble/Gravel [ ] Turbid [ ] 25-36" [ ] Sand [ ] Very Turbid [X] >36" [X] Silt/Clay [ ]Organic Aquatic Habitat Wildlife Observed (species) Observed Use [ ] Sand Bar [ ] Waterfowl [ ] Drinking [ ] Sand/Gravel Beach Bar [X] Fish micropterus salmoides minnows [ ] Irrigation [ ] Mud Bar [X] Turtles Tracheyms scripta elegans [ ] Swimming [X] Overhanging Trees/Shrubs [ ] Frogs [X] Fishing [ ] Cobble Riffles [ ] Invertebrates [X] Drainage [ ] Deep Pods/Holes [ ] Salamanders [X] Boating [ ] Aquatic Vegetation [ ] Other: [ ] Other: [ ] Other: Left Bank* Height and Slope Right Bank* Height and Slope [ ] 0-3' [ ] 0-20% (0-11 °) [ ] 0-3' [ ] 0-20% (0-11 °) [X] 3-6' [X] 21-50% (12-27°) [X] 3-6' [X] 21-50% (12-27°) [ ] 6'+ [ ] 51-100% (28-45°) [ ] 6'+ [ ] 51-100% (28-45°) * Direction when facing downstream Bank Substrate Erosion Potential Channel Meander [ ] Shale [ ] Sand [ ] Low [X] Low [ ] Bedrock [X] Silt/Clay [X] Moderate [ ] Medium [ ] Cobble [ ] Organic [ ] High [ ] High OHWM Criteria — Ordinary High Water Mark [X] clear, natural line impressed on bank [X] destruction of terrestrial vegetation [X] changes in character of soil [X] presence of wrack line [X] shelving [X] sediment sorting [X] vegetation matted down, bent or absent [X] scour [X] leaf litter disturbed or washed away [X] abrupt change in plant community [X] sediment deposition [X] other (list) water staining on bank rip -rap, [X] water staining lock & dam pillars, and concrete boat ramp. [X] presence of litter and debris (over) Geosptec consultants Geosyntec Consultants of NC, P.C. NC License No.: C-3500 and C-295 Stream Info Cont'd Data Sheet No.: S-1 Adjacent Vegetation Type: Mixed hardwood floodplain forest Dominant Vegetative Species: Trees: boxelder, hackberry, green ash Shrubs: hackberty, boxelder Herbs: ryegrass, Japanese hops, wild geranium, curly dock Estimated % of canopy closure over stream channel: 0-25% X 26-50% 51-75% X 76-100% Presence of threatened/endangered species (fish, reptiles, or amphibians)? [X] Unknown [ ] No [ ] Yes (identify) Spring, Information Approximate distance and direction from centerline: Associated Wetland [ ] Yes: Data Form No. [ ] No Surrounding Land Use: Associated Vegetation Type: Water Well Information Type:[ ] Private [ ] Community [ ] Municipal/Public [ ] Unknown Surrounding Land Use: Approximate distance and direction from centerline: Notes: Data point located immediately downstream of the William Huske Lock & Dam. Cape Fear River is a navigable Section 10 waterway. OHWM boundary established with presence of staining on bank rip -rap armoring and boat ramp, absence of vegetation below OHWM line, and presence of wrackline at OHWM boundary of Cape Fear River. Stream 2 is an unnamed tributary to the Cape Fear River and drains a mature forested wetland located outside of the project area. Photos: �I a, Photo of Cape Fear River at water line, looking north. Photo of Cape Fear River from the boat ramp, looking south. APPENDIX E USACE Upland Data Points WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Site: Lock and Dam Seep Diversion City/County: Bladen County Sampling Date: 5/8/2024 Applicant/Owner: Chemours State: SC Sampling Point: DPI Investigator(s): N Weaver, A Mathes Section, Township, Range: NA Landform: (hillslope, terrace, etc.): slope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope % : 2-10 Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR: P / MLRA: 133A Lat. 34.8340060 Long.-78.823818 Datum: WGS84 Soil Map Unit Name: Congaree silt loam, frequently flooded NWI Classification: L1 UBHh Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for time of year? Yes No X (If no, explain in the Remarks) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are Vegetation ,Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? Are Normal Circumstances Present? Yes X No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Hyd ric Soil Present? Yes No X Yes No X Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X Remarks: Datapoint along the OHWM boundary of Cape Fear River, adjacent to the public boat ramp. See Hydrology Remarks for Climatic Summary. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is require; check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Surface Water (At) Aquatic Fauna (B13) Surface Soil Cracks (136) High Water Table (A2) Mad Deposits (1315) (LRR U) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) Drainage Patterns (1310) Water Marks (131) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (1316) Sediment Deposits (132) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Drift Deposits (133) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soil (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Algal Mat or Crust (134) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Iron Deposits (135) Other (Explain in Remarks) Geomorphic Position (D2) Inundation Visible on Aerial Shallow Aquitard (D3) Imagery (137) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Water Stained Leaves (139) Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Yes No X Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream guage, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: --See Climatic Summary Below -- Remarks: The field surveys were conducted May 8, 2024 during a period in which the region had received above normal rainfall amounts for the May month -to -date (a 0.45" surplus from a 0.76" normal value) as of May 8. This includes recent precipitation events just prior to the surveys in which 0.12 and 1.03" were recorded on 5/5 and 5/6; respectively. The observed Year -to -Date amount was 10.86" which is a 3.62" deficit according to the National Weather Service Fayetteville Area, SC climate station. Considering recent rainfall but overall deficit for the year, the delineators felt that surface hydrology was normal with minimal stormwater influence affecting typical surface hydrology despite the below average annual precipitation to date. No high-water, flooding conditions were observed. A review of regional drought conditions from the website droughtmonitor.gov indicated abnormally dry conditions existed for the regional area for the week of April 30, 2024. In addition, based o the results of the climate analysis using the Antecedent Precipitation Tool (Deter, USACE v.2.0.0) the calculated output was a -9 value "Drier that Normal' with the graphic indicating the 30-day Rolling Total was located within the 30-Year Normal Range (see attached graphic). US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants Sampling Point: I DP1 Absolute Dominant Dominance Test Worksheet Tree Stratum Plot size: r= 30' % Cover Species? Indicator Status 1. Number of dominant species that are 2. 3. OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A) Total number of dominant species 4. 5. across all strata: 2 (B) 6. Percent of dominant species that are 7. OBL, FACW, or FAC: 50 % (A/B) Prevalence Index Worksheet 0 = Total Cover 50% of total Cover: 0 20 % of Total Cover: 0 Total % cover of: Multiply by: Saoling/Shrub Stratum Plot size: r= 30' OBL species 0 x 1 0 1. FACW species 5 x 2 1D 2. FAC species 35 x 3 105 3. FACU species 70 x 4 280 4. UPL species 0 x 5 0 Column Total 110 (A) 395 (B) 5. 6. Prevalence Index: 3.6 (B/A) Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 7. 8. 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 9. 2 - Dominance Test is >50 3 - Prevalence Index is <3.0' 0 = Total Cover 50% of total Cover: 0 20% of Total Cover: 0 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) Herb Stratum Plot size: r= 30' `Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic 1. Lalium perenne 40 Y FACU 2. Humulus japonicus 25 Y FAC 3. Geranium maculafum 20 N FACU 4. Rumex crispus 10 N FAC Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: 5. Erigeron canadensis 10 N FACU Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. 6. Bidens frondosa 5 N FACW 7. Sapling/Shrub- Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH 8 and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size, and 9. 10. woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody Vine- All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. it. 110 = Total Cover 50% of total Cover: 55 20 % of Total Cover: 22 Woody Vine Stratum Plot size: r= 30' 1. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? 2. Yes No X 3. 4. 5. 0 = Total Cover 50% of total Cover: 0 20% of Total Cover: 0 Remarks: (if observed, list morphological adaptations below). US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region SOIL Sampling Point: DP1 Profile Description: (Describe to depth needed to document the indicator or confirm absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color % Color % Type* Lee** Texture Remarks 0-8 10YR5/3 100 Loam / Clay 8-14 10YR5/4 99 7.5YR5/6 1 C M,PI Loam / Clay *Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand grains **Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils *** Histosol (Al) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)(LRR S, T,U) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O) Histic Epipedon (A2) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S,T,U) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S) Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1)(LRR O) Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A, B) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matirx (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)(LRR P, S, T) Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)(MLRA 15313) Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Red Parent Material (TF2) 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) Redox Depressions (F8) Other (Explain in Remarks) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) Mad (F10) (LRR U) *** Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) IDepleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Iran -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)(LRR O, S) Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Reduced Vertic (F18) (MRLA 150A, 150B) Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A) Stripped Matrix (S6) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)(MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U) Restrictive Layer (if observed) Type: Depth (inches): 6+ Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region Site: Lock and Dam Seep Diversion City/County: Bladen County Sampling Date: 5/8/2024 Applicant/Owner: Chemours State: SC Sampling Point: DP2 Investigator(s): N Weaver, A Mathes Section, Township, Range: NA Landform: (hillslope, terrace, etc.): slope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex Slope % : 2-10 Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR: P / MLRA: 133A Lat. 34.8337990 Long.-78.8239200 Datum: WGS84 Soil Map Unit Name: Congaree silt loam, frequently flooded NWI Classification: L1 UBHh Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for time of year? Yes No X (If no, explain in the Remarks) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are Vegetation ,Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? Are Normal Circumstances Present? Yes X No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Yes No X Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X Remarks: Datapoint just above OHWM of Cape Fear River within heavily forested area. See Hydrology Remarks for Climatic Summary. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one is require; check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Surface Water (At) Aquatic Fauna (1313) Surface Soil Cracks (136) High Water Table (A2) Mad Deposits (1315) (LRR U) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (1310) Water Marks (131) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16) Sediment Deposits (132) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Drift Deposits (B3) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soil (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8) Algal Mat or Crust (134) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Iron Deposits (B5) Other (Explain in Remarks) Geomorphic Position (D2) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery Shallow Aquitard (D3) (137) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Water Stained Leaves (139) Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): Yes No X Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth (inches): (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream guage, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: --See Climatic Summary Below -- Remarks: The field surveys were conducted May 8, 2024 during a period in which the region had received above normal rainfall amounts for the May month -to -date (a 0.45" surplus fro a 0.76" normal value) as of May 8. This includes recent precipitation events just prior to the surveys in which 0.12 and 1.03" were recorded on 5/5 and 5/6; respectively. The observed Year -to -Date amount was 10.86" which is a 3.62" deficit according to the National Weather Service Fayetteville Area, SC climate station. Considering recent rainfal but overall deficit for the year, the delineators felt that surface hydrology was normal with minimal stormwater influence affecting typical surface hydrology despite the below average annual precipitation to date. No high-water, flooding conditions were observed. A review of regional drought conditions from the website droughtmonitor.gov indicate abnormally dry conditions existed for the regional area for the week of April 30, 2024. In addition, based on the results of the climate analysis using the Antecedent Precipitation Tool (Deter, USACE v.2.0.0) the calculated output was a -9 value "Drier that Normal' with the graphic indicating the 30-day Rolling Total was located within the Year Normal Range (see attached graphic). US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants Sampling Point: I DP2 Absolute Dominant Dominance Test Worksheet Tree Stratum Plot size: r= 30' % Cover Species? Indicator Status 1. Acernegundo 40 Y FAC Number of dominant species that are 2. Celtis occidentalis 30 Y FACU 3. Fraxinus pennsylvanica 15 N FACW OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A) Total number of dominant species across all strata: 6 (B) 4' 5. 6. Percent of dominant species that are 7. OBL, FACW, or FAC: 50 % (A/B) Prevalence Index Worksheet 85 = Total Cover 50 % of total Cover: 42.5 20 % of Total Cover: 17 Total % cover of: Multiply by: Saolin❑/Shrub Stratum Plot size: r= 30' OBL species 5 x 1 5 1. Acernegundo 30 Y FAC FACW species 45 x 2 90 2. Celtis occidentalis 10 Y FACU FAC species 140 x 3 420 3. FACU species 60 x 4 240 4. UPL species 0 x 5 0 Column Total 250 (A) 755 (B) 5. 6. Prevalence Index: 3.0 (B/A) Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 7. 8. 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 9. 2 - Dominance Test is >50 3 - Prevalence Index is <3.0' 40 = Total Cover 50 % of total Cover: 20 20 % of Total Cover: 8 Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) Herb Stratum Plot size: r= 30' 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic 1. Toxicodendron radicans 50 Y FAC 2. Lolium perenne 20 Y FACU 3. Bignonia capreolata 10 N FAC 4. Sicyos angulatus 10 N FACW Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata: 5. Galium tinctorium 10 N FACW Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height. 6. Cardamine impatiens 5 N FAC 7. Smilax rotundifolia 5 N FAC Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH 8. Carex grayi 5 N FACW and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall. Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless of size, and 9. Juncus effusus 5 N OBL 10. Arundinaria gigantea 5 N FACW woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall. Woody Vine- All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height. it. 125 = Total Cover 50 % of total Cover: 62.5 20 % of Total Cover: 25 Woody Vine Stratum Plot size: r= 30' 1. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? 2. Yes No X 3. 4. 5. 0 = Total Cover 50 % of total Cover: 0 20 % of Total Cover: 0 Remarks: (if observed, list morphological adaptations below). Mature floodplain forest along Cape Fear River US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region SOIL Sampling Point: DP2 Profile Description: (Describe to depth needed to document the indicator or confirm absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color % Color % Type` Loc" Texture Remarks 0-10 10YR3/3 100 Loam / Clay 10-11 10YR6/3 99 7.5YR4/6 1 C M Loam / Clay 11-18 10YR3/6 100 *Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand grains **Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils *** Histosol (Al) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)(LRR S, T,U) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O) Histic Epipedon (A2) Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S,T,U) 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S) Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1)(LRR O) Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A, B) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matins (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)(LRR P, S, T) Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)(MLRA 15313) Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Red Parent Material (TF2) 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) Redox Depressions (F8) Other (Explain in Remarks) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) Mad (F10) (LRR U) *** Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)(LRR O, S) Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Reduced Vertic (F18) (MRLA 150A, 15013) Sandy Redox (S5) I lPied.ort Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A) Stripped Matrix (S6) Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)(MLRA 149A, �153C,153D) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U) Restrictive Layer (if observed) Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0 �N O N N 3 p �N m U N ON N (S@gDUI) IlpJuip�l APPENDIX F USFWS Coordination Package Geosyntec consultants Geosyntec Consultants of NC, P.C. NC License No.: C-3500 and C-295 Via Email U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Raleigh Field Office P.O. Box 33726 Raleigh, NC 27636-3726 2501 Blue Ridge Road, Suite 430 Raleigh, North Carolina 27607 PH 919.870.0576 www.,-cosyntcc.com 25 June 2024 Subject: Project Review Request: Threatened and Endangered Species Consultation Chemours Fayetteville Works Lock and Dam 3 Seep Diversion Bladen County, North Carolina USFWS IPaC Project Code: 2024-0085242 To Whom It May Concern: Geosyntec Consultants of NC, P.C. (Geosyntec), on behalf of Chemours Fayetteville Works (Chemours), is submitting this request for project review in accordance with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), Raleigh Field Office's online project review guidance. Geosyntec completed in-house project review on 25 June 2024 and requests USFWS concurrence with our findings, summarized in the attached USFWS Species Conclusions Table (Appendix A). Background and Scope of Work Chemours intends to construct a seepage diversion channel adjacent to a public boat ramp located on U.S. Army Corps of Engineers property at the William O'Huske Lock and Dam 3 in Bladen County, North Carolina (Figure 1). This diversion channel is necessary to divert seepage water from the Lock and Dam Seep such that it does flow over the boat ramp. Approximately 112 linear feet of diversion channel is proposed and will consist of stone riprap underlain by a non -woven geotextile material and necessitate minor excavation/grading. Total ground disturbance is approximately 0.1-acre. No tree disturbance is proposed for this project. Construction of the diversion channel involves permanent fills below the ordinary high-water mark of the Cape Fear River, and authorization from the USACE, Wilmington District will be requested for proposed impacts to areas within Corps jurisdiction under Section 404, Section 10, and Section 408. A Pre -Construction Notification will be submitted to the USACE requesting coverage under Nationwide Permit No. 38 (Cleanup of Hazardous and Toxic Waste), as well as a request for Section 408 approval. Further, an Individual 401 Water Quality Certification will be requested from NCDEQ, Division of Water Resources. engineers I scientists I innovators U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service — Raleigh Field Office 25 June 2024 Page 2 Site access will be accomplished from the boat ramp via Bill Hall Road. Following receipt of applicable permit authorizations, the proposed construction is anticipated to begin in during low -flow periods in Summer 2024 and take approximately one week to install the drainage channels. Required Project Review Documentation Defined Action Area and IPaC Species List: Geosyntec consulted the USFWS Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC) tool to determine the project action area and identify federally protected or sensitive species with potential to be impacted by project activities (IPaC Project Code 2024-0085242; Appendix B). Seven species were identified in the IPaC report as potentially occurring at the project site: 1. Red -cockaded woodpecker (RCW; Picoides borealis), Endangered 2. Northern long-eared bat (NLEB; Myotis septentrionalis), Endangered 3. Tricolored bat (Perimyotis suhflavus), Proposed Endangered 4. American alligator (Alligator mississippiensis), Similarity of Appearance (Threatened) 5. Monarch butterfly (Danaus plexippus), Candidate 6. Rough -leaved loosestrife (Lysimachia asperulaefolia), Endangered 7. American chaffseed (Schwalhea americana), Endangered State Coordination: The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) conducted a database review of the project action area for documented occurrences of federally protected species. The NCNHP report indicates no occurrences of federally listed species are documented on -site (Appendix C). Habitat Assessment: Qualified Geosyntec biologists conducted a field reconnaissance on 8 May 2024 to determine if suitable habitat is present for species identified in the IPaC Species List and NCNHP report. Please see the attached photographic record illustrating current site conditions (Appendix D) and the results of the habitat evaluation, summarized in Table 1. Critical Habitat: The project does not intersect designated Critical Habitat according to the IPaC Report and USFWS Critical Habitat Mapper. Eagle Protection: Neither the IPaC report nor the NCNHP report documents bald eagle nesting areas in the project vicinity. Further, the project will not require tree clearing or blasting, and loud noise components will be minimal. Northern long-eared bat: No tree clearing is proposed and no NLEB hibernacula (caves/mines) were observed on -site. Further, Geosyntec evaluated the site using the USFWS Northern Long-eared Bat Rangewide Determination Key, which resulted in a determination of "no effect" (Appendix E). engineers I scientists I innovators U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service — Raleigh Field Office 25 June 2024 Page 3 Red -cockaded woodpecker - Moore County Only The project is not located in Moore County, therefore RCW project review guidelines are not applicable. RCW is listed on the IPaC Species List for the project site, but no suitable habitat or RCW individuals were observed. Species Conclusions Table/Determinations: The completed Species Conclusions Table is attached in Appendix A. Your review of this consultation package is appreciated. As discussed above Geosyntec, on behalf of Chemours, requests your concurrence with our effect determinations. Should you have questions or require additional information, please contact the undersigned by phone or email. Sincerely, Mackenzie S. Wallace, CAE Senior Staff Ecologist (470) 230-8862 Mackenzie. Wallace@Geosyntec. com r Alexander M. Mathes Senior Ecologist (713) 859-5712 AMathes@Geosyntec. com Attachments: Figure 1: Vicinity Map Appendix A: USFWS Species Conclusions Table Appendix B: USFWS IPaC Official Species List 2024-0085242 Appendix C: NCNHP Project Review Appendix D: Photographic Record Appendix E: USFWS NLEB Rangewide Determination Key Table 1. Rare, Threatened, and Endangered Species with Potential to Occur Near the Lock and Dam 3 Seep Diversion Site in Bladen County, North Carolina engineers I scientists I innovators Ash ebdrd AA Fuquay- arina Sanford '� i -�` - Goldsboro It � �Fayer evllle ' r - %0 6` • nd waste-.� ' or4s �\ 0 h rl r } vvi"m o Husk e .1ock and Dam No 3 Lock and Dam 3 Seep Diversion 1 ; .� �� `' Site Location: (34.833831,-78.823650) I I ISO 1 j Legend 0 500 1,000 2,000 Feet Project Area Date: Scale: Drawn By: Applicant No.: Geosyntec� USSITE LOCATION MAP 5/16/2024 1:12,000 Msw consultants Chel•1'lours- Lock and Dam 3 Seep Diversion Project Chemours Fayetteville Works Reference: Figure No. G,-,),tec C-0tantsntNC, P.C. WORLD TOPOGRAPHIC MAP PROVIDED BY ESRI NC License No.: C-3300 and C-293 Bladen County, Nolth Carolina Appendix A USFVVS Species Conclusions Table Q) ca H (n r_ 0 .N t� c 0 L) N d 'v d CL U) O U) Cl Q a) a) CO co C m Cl O U O J It N O N \O CO LSD ai co (] C/) LD Cn COCO M o cu LL CU roLL C/) C U) LL LL /� LL LL LL a a) L^^ C/ J C/) CA C/)C/)o a- a) LL i- m 2 d a) 2 a= - Z _ -0 Z a_ a_ a_ a_ D: o U Z Z UZ Z Z Z Z Z aU •E� Z m U U U U U co co O m Z Z Z Z Z Q 3 > c L) i — dj U U U U U Cl) (D n3 a_a) Q) O— C/) a) :3 O O O O O cuto U c6 U) Cl) C/) C/) C/) C/) -0 m m Q O Q� U) CD U i L)co O 2 cu co co co U)z UU a� a cu cn a a L > > 0 0 a) v 0 Q (3) :1cm a aJ .2:+ O c6 LU O a Z O O ti U o U O O U U U U � CU CU CU CU CU QN >, L) >, N N N N N L U r O r- O O O O O LL Z 2 (o 2 f6 Z Z Z Z Z c O O O Q Q7 U a) U a) U a-' a) a) Q N-a Q C N� Q ~ L zm yam+ m � L) L) L) i i♦ i = � _� U U) a] U) a] U) a] ) a] Y o O o� o� o" O L O L O� O O L) Z Ci U Ci U Ci U Z Q Z Q Z Q Z Q D a) a) as 5 E cu @ _ w Z m L L .N p Q cu m U 0 n c N > N a C m 2 -P- U)) a N o m , m � in � Q cn Q m .v .+_� �O L) — o N �m N � = � @ m.�a �� O (n N mm 4) a o a� mu3i-0 �,w 0a � m �fl� am co m� 2 a�i cn o u) Q) ��m Y N m L w N a"a N U N m'Eo c L m m1E N U U) c a)� m a) io U) a a) U UL 6o a 2 = E o E cw U) Of _w �da U wfw U Lu i Q) co O U) a) U 0 U) a) a) O a N O � N j O N — co U) L U a) O Q ui a) a) c O Q 0) O c >+ O oU f0 O O U) O V Q C C] O a) v L y CD O � � O C O CD C T N 2 > a) 5 N O o 0 fo C Q) � � Q E O) � C6 m co — c .a a) cnn E U N � N oE L) L U Y O co L) G Q G H c U) Appendix B USFWS IPaC Official Species List 2024- 0085242 8 'r' 7 � BIRCH 3 '6' United States Department of the Interior FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office 3916 Sunset Ridge Rd Raleigh, NC 27607 Phone: (919) 856-4520 Fax: (919) 856-4556 In Reply Refer To: Project Code: 2024-0085242 Project Name: Chemours - Fayetteville c.' 1 vfso-1 WV*r!VLJFE JW 05/02/2024 19:23:14 UTC Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project location or may be affected by your proposed project To Whom It May Concern: The enclosed species list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, as well as proposed and final designated critical habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your proposed project and/or may be affected by your proposed project. The species list fulfills the requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). If your project area contains suitable habitat for any of the federally -listed species on this species list, the proposed action has the potential to adversely affect those species. If suitable habitat is present, surveys should be conducted to determine the species' presence or absence within the project area. The use of this species list and/or North Carolina Natural Heritage program data should not be substituted for actual field surveys. New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be completed by visiting the IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested through the IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list. The purpose of the Act is to provide a means whereby threatened and endangered species and the ecosystems upon which they depend may be conserved. Under sections 7(a)(1) and 7(a)(2) of the Act and its implementing regulations (50 CFR 402 et seq.), Federal agencies are required to utilize their authorities to carry out programs for the conservation of threatened and endangered Project code: 2024-0085242 05/02/2024 19:23:14 UTC species and to determine whether projects may affect threatened and endangered species and/or designated critical habitat. A Biological Assessment is required for construction projects (or other undertakings having similar physical impacts) that are major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the human environment as defined in the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2) (c)). For projects other than major construction activities, the Service suggests that a biological evaluation similar to a Biological Assessment be prepared to determine whether the project may affect listed or proposed species and/or designated or proposed critical habitat. Recommended contents of a Biological Assessment are described at 50 CFR 402.12. If a Federal agency determines, based on the Biological Assessment or biological evaluation, that listed species and/or designated critical habitat may be affected by the proposed project, the agency is required to consult with the Service pursuant to 50 CFR 402. In addition, the Service recommends that candidate species, proposed species and proposed critical habitat be addressed within the consultation. More information on the regulations and procedures for section 7 consultation, including the role of permit or license applicants, can be found in the "Endangered Species Consultation Handbook" at: https://www.fws. gov/sites/default/files/documents/endangered-species-consultation- handbook.pdf Migratory Birds: In addition to responsibilities to protect threatened and endangered species under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), there are additional responsibilities under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGEPA) to protect native birds from project -related impacts. Any activity, intentional or unintentional, resulting in take of migratory birds, including eagles, is prohibited unless otherwise permitted by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)). For more information regarding these Acts, see https://www.fws.gov/program/migratory-bird-permit/what- we-do. The META has no provision for allowing take of migratory birds that may be unintentionally killed or injured by otherwise lawful activities. It is the responsibility of the project proponent to comply with these Acts by identifying potential impacts to migratory birds and eagles within applicable NEPA documents (when there is a federal nexus) or a Bird/Eagle Conservation Plan (when there is no federal nexus). Proponents should implement conservation measures to avoid or minimize the production of project -related stressors or minimize the exposure of birds and their resources to the project -related stressors. For more information on avian stressors and recommended conservation measures, see https://www.fws.gov/library/collections/threats-birds. In addition to MBTA and BGEPA, Executive Order 13186: Responsibilities of Federal Agencies to Protect Migratory Birds, obligates all Federal agencies that engage in or authorize activities that might affect migratory birds, to minimize those effects and encourage conservation measures that will improve bird populations. Executive Order 13186 provides for the protection of both migratory birds and migratory bird habitat. For information regarding the implementation of Executive Order 13186, please visit https://www.fws.gov/partner/council-conservation- migratory-birds. 2of10 Project code: 2024-0085242 05/02/2024 19:23:14 UTC We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Code in the header of this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project that you submit to our office. Attachment(s): ■ Official Species List ■ USFWS National Wildlife Refuges and Fish Hatcheries ■ Bald & Golden Eagles ■ Migratory Birds OFFICIAL SPECIES LIST This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed action". This species list is provided by: Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office 3916 Sunset Ridge Rd Raleigh, NC 27607 (919) 856-4520 3of10 Project code: 2024-0085242 05/02/2024 19:23:14 UTC PROJECT SUMMARY Project Code: 2024-0085242 Project Name: Chemours - Fayetteville Project Type: Drainage Project Project Description: Approximately 1.1-acre review area for proposed seep diversion. Project Location: The approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https:// www.google.com/maps/(a)34.8338739,-78.82358732510323,14z Counties: Bladen County, North Carolina 4of10 Project code: 2024-0085242 05/02/2024 19:23:14 UTC ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT SPECIES There is a total of 7 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list. Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species list because a project could affect downstream species. Note that 1 of these species should be considered only under certain conditions. IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA Fisheriesl, as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the Department of Commerce. See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office if you have questions. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of Commerce. 5of10 Project code: 2024-0085242 05/02/2024 19:23:14 UTC MAMMALS NAME nrvr19 Northern Long-eared Bat Myotis septentrionalis Endangered No critical habitat has been designated for this species. This species only needs to be considered under the following conditions: ■ This species only needs to be considered if the project includes wind turbine operations. Species profile: https://ecos.fws. ov/ecp/species/9045 Tricolored Bat Perimyotis sub flavus Proposed No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Endangered Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/10515 BIRDS NAME STATUS Red -cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis Endangered No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Species profile: littps://ecos.fws. ov/ecp/species/7614 REPTILES NAME STATUS American Alligator Alligator mississippiensis Similarity of No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Appearance Species profile: https://ecos.fws. ov/ecp/species/776 (Threatened) INSECTS NAME STATUS Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus Candidate No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743 FLOWERING PLANTS NAME STATUS American Chaffseed Schwalbea americana Endangered No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Species profile: httj2s://ecos.fws.gov/ecl2/species/1286 Rough -leaved Loosestrife Lysimachia asperulae folia Endangered No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2747 CRITICAL HABITATS THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S JURISDICTION. 6of10 Project code: 2024-0085242 05/02/2024 19:23:14 UTC YOU ARE STILL REQUIRED TO DETERMINE IF YOUR PROJECT(S) MAY HAVE EFFECTS ON ALL ABOVE LISTED SPECIES. USFWS NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE LANDS AND FISH HATCHERIES Any activity proposed on lands managed by the National Wildlife Refine system must undergo a 'Compatibility Determination' conducted by the Refuge. Please contact the individual Refuges to discuss any questions or concerns. THERE ARE NO REFUGE LANDS OR FISH HATCHERIES WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA. BALD & GOLDEN EAGLES Bald and golden eagles are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Actl and the Migratory Bird Treaty ActZ. Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to bald or golden eagles, or their habitats3, should follow appropriate regulations and consider implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described in the links below. Specifically, please review the "Supplemental Information on Migratory Birds and Eagles". 1. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940. 2. The Migratory Birds TreateT� of 1918. 3. 50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a) THERE ARE NO BALD AND GOLDEN EAGLES WITHIN THE VICINITY OF YOUR PROJECT AREA. MIGRATORY BIRDS Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Actl and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Actz. Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described in the links below. Specifically, please review the "Supplemental Information on Migratory Birds and Eagles". 1. The Migratory Birds TreateT� of 1918. 2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940. 3. 50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a) 7of10 Project code: 2024-0085242 05/02/2024 19:23:14 UTC For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, see the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY below to see when these birds are most likely to be present and breeding in your project area. NAME BREEDING SEASON Brown -headed Nuthatch Sitta pusilla Breeds Mar 1 to Jul This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation 15 Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA https://ecos.fws. ov/ecp/species/9427 Chimney Swift Chaetura pelagica Breeds Mar 15 to This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental Aug 25 USA and Alaska. hLLps://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9406 Prairie Warbler Setophaga discolor Breeds May 1 to Jul This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental 31 USA and Alaska. https://ecos.fws. ov/ecp/species/9513 Prothonotary Warbler Protonotaria citrea Breeds Apr 1 to Jul This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental 31 USA and Alaska. hLLps://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9439 Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus Breeds May 10 to This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental Sep 10 USA and Alaska. https://ecos.fws. ov/ecp/species/9398 Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina Breeds May 10 to This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental Aug 31 USA and Alaska. hLLps://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9431 PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read "Supplemental Information on Migratory Birds and Eagles", specifically the FAQ section titled "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting to interpret this report. Probability of Presence (■) Green bars; the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your project overlaps during that week of the year. Breeding Season( ) 8of10 Project code: 2024-0085242 05/02/2024 19:23:14 UTC Yellow bars; liberal estimate of the timeframe inside which the bird breeds across its entire range. Survey Effort (1) Vertical black lines; the number of surveys performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. No Data (—) A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week. probability of presence breeding season I survey effort — no data SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC BrownNuthatch headed — — — — — — — — "" "'� �'' - — ----------------------- BCC Nuthatch -BCR J �' ft wide BC,mney C Rang -- (CON) Prairie BCCRangewede — — — — ---- — — — — --UIIII IIII IIII — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — - -- (CON) ry--- Warblerthon Warbler ' --_ IIII IIII IIII IIII — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — BCC Rangewide (CON) Woodpecker — — — — — — — — — — — — —�+— —III IIII IIII IIII II-- — — — — — — — — ---- BCC Rangewide (CON) Wood rush BCCRhgewide — — — — — — — — — — — — — — U —III IIII IIII IIII — — — — — — — — — — — — ---- (CON) Additional information can be found using the following links: • Eagle Management https://www.fws.gov/program/eagle-management ■ Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds https://www.fws.gov/library/ collections/avoiding-and-minimizing-incidental-take-migratorye ■ Nationwide conservation measures for birds https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/ documents/nationwide-standard-conservation-measures.pdf ■ Supplemental Information for Migratory Birds and Eagles in IPaC https://www.fws.gov/ media/suuulemental-information-mic!ratorv-birds-and-bald-and-golden-eagles-mav-occur- project-action 9of10 Project code: 2024-0085242 05/02/2024 19:23:14 UTC IPAC USER CONTACT INFORMATION Agency: Private Entity Name: Mackenzie Wallace Address: 1255 Roberts Blvd NW Address Line 2: Ste 200 City: Kennesaw State: GA Zip: 30144 Email mackenzie.wallace@geosyntec.com Phone: 4702308862 10 of 10 Appendix C NCNHP Project Review Roy Cooper, Governor M■�■■■ NC DEPARTMENT OF IBM NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES NONE May 3, 2024 Mackenzie Wallace Geosyntec Consultants, Inc. 1255 Roberts Blvd NW Kennesaw, GA 30144 RE: Geosyntec Consultants, Inc. -Cape Fear River Dear Mackenzie Wallace: D. Reid Wilson, Secretary Misty Buchanan Deputy Director, Natural Heritage Program NCNHDE-25913 The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above. A query of the NCNHP database indicates that there are records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, and/or conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary. These results are presented in the attached `Documented Occurrences' tables and map. The attached `Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report. If a Federally -listed species is documented within the project area or indicated within a one -mile radius of the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here: https://www.fws.gov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37. Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission. Also please note that the NC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Land and Water Fund easement, or an occurrence of a Federally -listed species is documented near the project area. If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance, please contact the NCNHP at natural.heritageLdncr.nc.gov. Sincerely, NC Natural Heritage Program DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL ANp CULTURAL RESOURCES ® 121 W. JONES STREET. RALEIGH. NC 27603 • 1651 MAIL SERVICE CENTER, RALEIGH. NC 27699 OFC 919.707.9120 • FAX 919.707,912E as / / \ \ / 2 s2 3 a # 2 \ ry 0 s � _ = y y _ z ± / / % \ j / / % m 2 0 0/ c c e a° ± e/ Cl e m .p ± a\ « ® S \ g » G \ c a '\ n s z \ \ \ / ƒ% \ ƒ E E E E a g 2 2 2 2 s s s (D s o ƒ ƒ / \ \ < G G G G 4 2 g ± \ ® \ ® \\ ® LLJ 000 \ \ \ - a o 0 0')- e § 9 0 7 \ \ + ® % o ® % 6 c x % % © « % > z w e e 2 z a e g s 0 o ¢ \ s 2 G / 0 e 0 m 0-) _ § ® o \ % \ \/ \/ ) \ ° \ \ 0 ) ® /0 � ~ / a / f \ y / 0 j ® \ \ \ \ \ z ® \ } \ G 3 y m c \ G g � a J / 6 Ln _ > \ \ \ \ / / » \ ^ Ln \ 2 \ m o a)\ E » y / a j \ \ / / \ s L 3 R \ / j / / / / \ LL / y % % % % % 3 \ o \ o \ e \ \ ~ �\\\\ƒ\ 2 \ ( \.> y.> y.> ± LLJ emememc I ƒ \ \ \ ■ § \ 7 \ E e- % % s e um)U)2 a e e s s g 2 \ \ / / / / / # / s % \ m e o e 3± s G 3 © 3 e G 3 « e G s 3 s G 3 3 m < 2 2 ° — c a / \ o \ 0 2 ( ? ( 6 \ o ? \ ? \ ro \ ? \u / M » % / % j / j / E « % / / / / % / / \ e/ \±y±agzge \±cg , D-0 D-0 * g g ® O ul u/ p ® e ® e=® 0 7 » \ � \ \ \ s / ± a)G e \ \ \ \ \ \ \ } \ y x e e 4 ± z u > f > f \ \ \ \ \ \ 7 7 / > / 2 ƒ y 2 2 2 y y & & % ƒ c> < G G 6 6 G G \ « / \ \? o/ x 2 0 \ o \ U O O x x < °/® \\ s �/ mcee )® = a m o N» 9 y y o V 0 9 9 0 o ® $ $ © ® » » & 0 0 0 m 0 s z> z / 0 2%# # ƒ V © % V 3 0 0 ^ a // e 2 < o c 0 0 » m \ o o a a a % 9 .= 2 G / \ \ » 0 / 0 \ \ z \ o a a \ <u 0 \ 2 \ 4 3 ® % e » 3» / \ 2 % 0 \ \ / \ u \ \ / \ / \ ( » % = o x 6 ° = a © = o \ \ / ° \ a z g° J e \ / / / \ n ® \ / / \ \ \ / % % % / 0 / g } U e G 3 y o < S , s s a \ 0 ® CD - E / \ © \ -C j ƒ \ / a 6 g e § / o / \ • ? a >> // o c / u \ \ 2 g / / / % \ \ Y % sLn % e ± \ E y \ \ / ® / j \ » / % / \ t / 2 ) \ / \ J \ \ \ \ a o \ \ / ƒ \ \ / d \ / Y 2 \ \ / \ _ a « a s® a%® \/ w 2 a o \ E E\> y \ \ w \w=s=�a\ oaw gE = j o o w = 3 — 3 o — > e o s=- o= 0 o g o e e = g 2 \ � e o e a U m m 2 e m c a e< w y \ / co/ / 0 0 0')m ® L y e 0 0 a r % / \ N N / \ % % \ � u \ \ > > > g >1 > >1 > '_zz \ c \ \ \ \ C > > > / C \ E $ E \ E \ \ » » / E e e�e_e_e E 2 3 2 3 0 0 2 / / e= e % / =._ % / _._ % _._ / % } _._ % _ % o 0 0 o o / / 0 3 e222emzmzmzmc ze 2O 2O > > § \ z \ c 31 \ _ e _ \\ \9 \\ \) / \E \/ \ /\ as > `/ > e J7 z > { g \ g \ / \ s / co \/ \ 2 _ ° / \ 0 + '} / '/ \ \ E 2 e s o 5 s s a e g = \ \ � /� /> 4 3 \ / / o o - t g . ~ ƒ / , © \ \ \ 2 / o _ / / 5 \ \ \/ °z \ // \=w a\ j \/ a § e s 2 2 Z Z 3± 3j \ u } \ \ 0> a E % \ s} 6 LL / } \ \ / C e / \ %z ® » E C \ / / \ \ / / \ s © ^ o« \ �} / s > \ z z / % f E \ \ \ a \a0 a z ? = 2 \\ E / E % » e / n ® / / > \ -0 e _ fL x\ \ ( ƒ $ / CD> \ / � � � \ \\\ m 0 J \ ? y e\ 4 y e s s e c e 9 / \\? y?\\ \m Z a) e e m m - ® \ 2 a / / t \ « \ \ / / / / \ \ / \ / / / % § \ w HE Z U Z U. E _ FRo E a F� =a ww o0 0y ¢UZ a � = w z Q o ra � � U Q N N p f�6 Q - 7 O ru N 6 CD d fu O z m ILN ®®ao F Appendix D Photographic Record GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS OF NC, P.C. Geosyntec' Photographic Record consultants Client: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Number: TR1210 Site: Lock and Dam 3 - Seep Diversion Location: Bladen County, NC Photograph 1 Date: 5/8/2024 Direction: North Comments: Site overview photo, taken south of the William O'Huske Lock and Dam 3 public boat ramp on the Cape Fear River. Photograph 2 Date: 5/8/2024 Direction: Southwest Comments: Photo of the Cape Fear River (Stream 1) ordinary high-water mark (OHWM), demarcated with pink pin flags. Visible OHWM indicators include water stains on riprap, sediment deposits, wrack lines, and change in vegetation density. GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS OF NC, P.C. Gees nteGll' Photographic Record Client: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Number: TR1210 Site: Lock and Dam 3 - Seep Diversion Photograph 3 Date: 5/8/2024 Direction: Southeast Comments: Stream flowing southeast into the Cape Fear River (Stream 1), adjacent to the southern edge of the boat ramp. This portion of Stream 2 is below the river's OHWM, and stream boundary is marked by pink pin flags. Photograph 4 I Date: 5/8/2024 Direction: Northwest Comments: Secondary view of Stream 2 flowing adjacent to the boat ramp. Stream boundary is marked by pink pin flags, and pink pin flags indicating the river's OHWM are also visible in background. Location: Bladen County, NC 2 GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS OF NC, P.C. Geosy lte& Photographic Recordiu�" Client: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Number: TR1210 Site: Lock and Dam 3 - Seep Diversion Location: Bladen County, NC Photograph 5 Date: 5/8/2024 Direction: Southeast_ Comments: View of Stream 2" channel at tree line, draining southeast to the Cape Fear River. 'v Photograph 6 Date:5/8/2024 ' Direction: West Comments: View of Stream 2 channel origin, where palustrine wetland ,a ' seepage begins to ...., . channelize and drain toward the east/southeast to the Cape Fear River. - •wr Appendix E USFWS NLEB Rangewide Determination Key 8 'r' 7 � BIRCH 3 '6' United States Department of the Interior FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office 3916 Sunset Ridge Rd Raleigh, NC 27607 Phone: (919) 856-4520 Fax: (919) 856-4556 vfso-1 ax'unut't: In Reply Refer To: 05/30/2024 21:24:47 UTC Project code: 2024-0085242 Project Name: Chemours - Fayetteville Federal Nexus: yes Federal Action Agency (if applicable): Army Corps of Engineers Subject: Record of project representative's no effect determination for 'Chemours - Fayetteville' Dear Mackenzie Wallace: This letter records your determination using the Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC) system provided to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) on May 30, 2024, for 'Chemours - Fayetteville' (here forward, Project). This project has been assigned Project Code 2024-0085242 and all future correspondence should clearly reference this number. Please carefully review this letter. Ensuring Accurate Determinations When Using IPaC The Service developed the IPaC system and associated species' determination keys in accordance with the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA; 87 Stat. 884, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) and based on a standing analysis. All information submitted by the Project proponent into IPaC must accurately represent the full scope and details of the Project. Failure to accurately represent or implement the Project as detailed in IPaC or the Northern Long-eared Bat Rangewide Determination Key (Dkey), invalidates this letter. Answers to certain questions in the DKey commit the project proponent to implementation of conservation measures that must be followed for the ESA determination to remain valid. Determination for the Northern Long -Eared Bat Based upon your IPaC submission and a standing analysis, your project has reached the determination of "No Effect" on the northern long-eared bat. To make a no effect determination, the full scope of the proposed project implementation (action) should not have any effects (either positive or negative), to a federally listed species or designated critical habitat. Effects of the action are all consequences to listed species or critical habitat that are caused by the proposed Project code: 2024-0085242 IPaC Record Locator: 746-144149278 05/30/2024 21:24:47 UTC action, including the consequences of other activities that are caused by the proposed action. A consequence is caused by the proposed action if it would not occur but for the proposed action and it is reasonably certain to occur. Effects of the action may occur later in time and may include consequences occurring outside the immediate area involved in the action. (See § 402.17). Under Section 7 of the ESA, if a federal action agency makes a no effect determination, no consultation with the Service is required (ESA §7). If a proposed Federal action may affect a listed species or designated critical habitat, formal consultation is required except when the Service concurs, in writing, that a proposed action "is not likely to adversely affect" listed species or designated critical habitat [50 CFR §402.02, 50 CFR§402.13]. Other Species and Critical Habitat that May be Present in the Action Area The IPaC-assisted determination for the northern long-eared bat does not apply to the following ESA -protected species and/or critical habitat that also may occur in your Action area: ■ American Alligator Alligator mississippiensis Similarity of Appearance (Threatened) ■ American Chaffseed Schwalbea americana Endangered ■ Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus Candidate ■ Red -cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis Endangered ■ Rough -leaved Loosestrife Lysimachia asperulae folio Endangered ■ Tricolored Bat Perimyotis sub flavus Proposed Endangered You may coordinate with our Office to determine whether the Action may affect the animal species listed above and, if so, how they may be affected. Next Steps Based upon your IPaC submission, your project has reached the determination of "No Effect" on the northern long-eared bat. If there are no updates on listed species, no further consultation/ coordination for this project is required with respect to the northern long-eared bat. However, the Service recommends that project proponents re-evaluate the Project in IPaC if: 1) the scope, timing, duration, or location of the Project changes (includes any project changes or amendments); 2) new information reveals the Project may impact (positively or negatively) federally listed species or designated critical habitat; or 3) a new species is listed, or critical habitat designated. If any of the above conditions occurs, additional coordination with the Service should take place to ensure compliance with the Act. If you have any questions regarding this letter or need further assistance, please contact the Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office and reference Project Code 2024-0085242 associated with this Project. DKey Version Publish Date: 05/15/2024 2 of 10 Project code: 2024-0085242 IPaC Record Locator: 746-144149278 05/30/2024 21:24:47 UTC Action Description You provided to IPaC the following name and description for the subject Action. 1. Name Chemours - Fayetteville 2. Description The following description was provided for the project'Chemours - Fayetteville': Approximately 1.1-acre review area for proposed project. The approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https:// www.google.com/maps/(a)34.8338739,-78.82358732510323,14z DKey Version Publish Date: 05/15/2024 3 of 10 Project code: 2024-0085242 IPaC Record Locator: 746-144149278 05/30/2024 21:24:47 UTC DETERMINATION KEY RESULT Based on the information you provided, you have determined that the Proposed Action will have no effect on the Endangered northern long-eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis). Therefore, no consultation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service pursuant to Section 7(a)(2) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (87 Stat. 884, as amended 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) is required for those species. QUALIFICATION INTERVIEW 1. Does the proposed project include, or is it reasonably certain to cause, intentional take of the northern long-eared bat or any other listed species? Note: Intentional take is defined as take that is the intended result of a project. Intentional take could refer to research, direct species management, surveys, and/or studies that include intentional handling/encountering, harassment, collection, or capturing of any individual of a federally listed threatened, endangered or proposed species? No 2. Your project overlaps with an area where northern long-eared bats may be present year- round. Time -of -year restrictions may not be appropriate for your project due to bats being active all year. Do you understand that your project may impact bats at any time during the year and time - of -year restrictions may not apply to your project? Yes 3. The action area does not overlap with an area for which U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service currently has data to support the presumption that the northern long-eared bat is present. Are you aware of other data that indicates that northern long-eared bats (NLEB) are likely to be present in the action area? Bat occurrence data may include identification of NLEBs in hibernacula, capture of NLEBs, tracking of NLEBs to roost trees, or confirmed NLEB acoustic detections. Data on captures, roost tree use, and acoustic detections should post-date the year when white - nose syndrome was detected in the relevant state. With this question, we are looking for data that, for some reason, may have not yet been made available to U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. No 4. Does any component of the action involve construction or operation of wind turbines? Note: For federal actions, answer `yes' if the construction or operation of wind power facilities is either (1) part of the federal action or (2) would not occur but for a federal agency action (federal permit, funding, etc.). No DKey Version Publish Date: 05/15/2024 4ot10 Project code: 2024-0085242 IPaC Record Locator: 746-144149278 05/30/2024 21:24:47 UTC 5. Is the proposed action authorized, permitted, licensed, funded, or being carried out by a Federal agency in whole or in part? Yes 6. Is the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), or Federal Transit Administration (FTA) funding or authorizing the proposed action, in whole or in part? No 7. Are you an employee of the federal action agency or have you been officially designated in writing by the agency as its designated non-federal representative for the purposes of Endangered Species Act Section 7 informal consultation per 50 CFR § 402.08? Note: This key may be used for federal actions and for non-federal actions to facilitate section 7 consultation and to help determine whether an incidental take permit may be needed, respectively. This question is for information purposes only. No 8. Is the lead federal action agency the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) or Federal Communications Commission (FCC)? Is the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) or Federal Communications Commission (FCC) funding or authorizing the proposed action, in whole or in part? No 9. Is the lead federal action agency the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC)? No DKey Version Publish Date: 05/15/2024 5 of 10 Project code: 2024-0085242 IPaC Record Locator: 746-144149278 05/30/2024 21:24:47 UTC 10. Have you determined that your proposed action will have no effect on the northern long- eared bat? Remember to consider the effects of anv activities that would not occur but for the proposed action. If you think that the northern long-eared bat may be affected by your project or if you would like assistance in deciding, answer "No" below and continue through the key. If you have determined that the northern long-eared bat does not occur in your project's action area and/or that your project will have no effects whatsoever on the species despite the potential for it to occur in the action area, you may make a "no effect" determination for the northern long-eared bat. Note: Federal agencies (or their designated non-federal representatives) must consult with USFWS on federal agency actions that may affect listed species [50 CFR 402.14(a)]. Consultation is not required for actions that will not affect listed species or critical habitat. Therefore, this determination key will not provide a consistency or verification letter for actions that will not affect listed species. If you believe that the northern long-eared bat may be affected by your project or if you would like assistance in deciding, please answer "No" and continue through the key. Remember that this key addresses only effects to the northern long-eared bat. Consultation with USFWS would be required if your action may affect another listed species or critical habitat. The definition of Effects of the Action can be found here: https://www.fws.gov/media/northern-long-eared-bat-assisted-determination-kU- selected -definitions No 11. Your project overlaps with an area where northern long-eared bats may be present year- round. Is suitable northern long-eared bat habitat present within 1000 feet of project activities? Yes 12. Will the action cause effects to a bridge? No 13. Will the action result in effects to a culvert or tunnel? No 14. Does the action include the intentional exclusion of northern long-eared bats from a building or structure? Note: Exclusion is conducted to deny bats' entry or reentry into a building. To be effective and to avoid harming bats, it should be done according to established standards. If your action includes bat exclusion and you are unsure whether northern long-eared bats are present, answer "Yes." Answer "No" if there are no signs of bat use in the building/structure. If unsure, contact your local U.S. Fish and Wildlife Services Ecological Services Field Office to help assess whether northern long-eared bats may be present. Contact a Nuisance Wildlife Control Operator (NWCO) for help in how to exclude bats from a structure safely without causing harm to the bats (to find a NWCO certified in bat standards, search the Internet using the search term "National Wildlife Control Operators Association bats"). Also see the White -Nose Syndrome Response Team's guide for bat control in structures No DKey Version Publish Date: 05/15/2024 6 of 10 Project code: 2024-0085242 IPaC Record Locator: 746-144149278 05/30/2024 21:24:47 UTC 15. Does the action involve removal, modification, or maintenance of a human -made structure (barn, house, or other building) known or suspected to contain roosting bats? No 16. Will the action directly or indirectly cause construction of one or more new roads that are open to the public? Note: The answer may be yes when a publicly accessible road either (1) is constructed as part of the proposed action or (2) would not occur but for the proposed action (i.e., the road construction is facilitated by the proposed action but is not an explicit component of the project). No 17. Will the action include or cause any construction or other activity that is reasonably certain to increase average daily traffic on one or more existing roads? Note: For federal actions, answer `yes' when the construction or operation of these facilities is either (1) part of the federal action or (2) would not occur but for an action taken by a federal agency (federal permit, funding, etc.). . No 18. Will the action include or cause any construction or other activity that is reasonably certain to increase the number of travel lanes on an existing thoroughfare? For federal actions, answer `yes' when the construction or operation of these facilities is either (1) part of the federal action or (2) would not occur but for an action taken by a federal agency (federal permit, funding, etc.). No 19. Will the proposed action involve the creation of a new water -borne contaminant source (e.g., leachate pond pits containing chemicals that are not NSF/ANSI 60 compliant)? No 20. Will the proposed action involve the creation of a new point source discharge from a facility other than a water treatment plant or storm water system? No 21. Will the action include drilling or blasting? No 22. Will the action involve military training (e.g., smoke operations, obscurant operations, exploding munitions, artillery fire, range use, helicopter or fixed wing aircraft use)? No 23. Will the proposed action involve the use of herbicide or other pesticides (e.g., fungicides, insecticides, or rodenticides)? No DKey Version Publish Date: 05/15/2024 7 of 10 Project code: 2024-0085242 IPaC Record Locator: 746-144149278 05/30/2024 21:24:47 UTC 24. Will the action include or cause activities that are reasonably certain to cause chronic nighttime noise in suitable summer habitat for the northern long-eared bat? Chronic noise is noise that is continuous or occurs repeatedly again and again for a long time. Note: Additional information defining suitable summer habitat for the northern long-eared bat can be found at: https://www.fws. gov/media/northern-long-eared-bat-assis Led -determination -key -selected -definitions No 25. Does the action include, or is it reasonably certain to cause, the use of artificial lighting within 1000 feet of suitable northern long-eared bat roosting habitat? Note: Additional information defining suitable roosting habitat for the northern long-eared bat can be found at: https://www.fws. gov/media/northern-long-eared-bat-assisted-determination-key-selected-definitions No 26. Will the action include tree cutting or other means of knocking down or bringing down trees, tree topping, or tree trimming? No 27. Will the action result in the use of prescribed fire? No 28. Will the action cause noises that are louder than ambient baseline noises within the action area? No DKey Version Publish Date: 05/15/2024 8 of 10 Project code: 2024-0085242 IPaC Record Locator: 746-144149278 05/30/2024 21:24:47 UTC PROJECT QUESTIONNAIRE Will all project activities by completed by November 30, 2024? Yes DKey Version Publish Date: 05/15/2024 9 of 10 Project code: 2024-0085242 IPaC Record Locator: 746-144149278 05/30/2024 21:24:47 UTC IPAC USER CONTACT INFORMATION Agency: Private Entity Name: Mackenzie Wallace Address: 1255 Roberts Blvd NW Address Line 2: Ste 200 City: Kennesaw State: GA Zip: 30144 Email mackenzie.wallace@geosyntec.com Phone: 4702308862 LEAD AGENCY CONTACT INFORMATION Lead Agency: Army Corps of Engineers DKey Version Publish Date: 05/15/2024 10 of 10 Table 1. Rare, Threatened, and Endangered Species with Potential to Occur Near the Lock and Dam 3 Seep Diversion Site in Bladen County, North Carolina Table I Rare, Threatened, and Endangered Species with Potential to Occur at the Lock and Dam 3 Seep Diversion Site in Bladen County, North Carolina Project: Lock and Dam 3 Seep Diversion Location: Bladen County, NC Owner: Chemours Fayetteville Works Latitude: 34.833875' Longitude:-78.823583' Species Federal Common Name (n State ") Habitat Site Habitat Site Supports Identified on Effect Determinationt3t Sta[us Status Habitat Site Birds SEEN - Sparsely vegetated river hank «th boat Excavated cavities within in mattne ramp and riprap stabilization, adjacent Picoides horealis Red -cockaded E E longleaf pine and (occasionally) loblolly to hardwood forest and palusu tire No No 1 woodpecker pine stands with an open understory; wetland. Wetland seepage drains to usually within sandhill communities. small intermittent strcam adjacent to boat ramp. Mammals Winter hibernacula includes caves and Sparsely vegetated river hank with boat mines with high humidity, constant ramp and riprap stabilization, adjacent hlyatis Not long-eared temperatures, and no air currents. to hardwood forest and palusume septentrionulis bat E T Summer roosting occurs in cavities or wetland. Wetland seepage drains to Yes No I*�, crevices of both living or dead trees b0at intermittent strcam adjacent to s) and foraging occurs in forested (snags) boa[ ramp. undcrsuny. Hibernates in caves, mines, culverts, and Sparsely vegetated river bank «th boat other protected confined spaces. ramp and riprap stabilization, adjacent Perinryotis Tricolored bat PE E Summer roosting habitat consists of to hardwood forest and palustrine Yes No 2 subflavus deciduous hardwood trees, Spanish wetland. Wetland seepage drains to moss, pine needles, and other man-made small intermittent stream adjacent to structures. boat ramp. Sparsely vegetated river bank azth boat Swampy areas, rivers, streams, lakes, ramp and riprap stabilization, adjacent Alligalor American alligator SA(T) T and ponds. Primarily freshwater, will to hardwood forest and palustrine Yes No 2 rnississippiensis venture into brackish salt water. wetland. Wetland seepage drains to small intermittent strcam adjacent to boat ramp. Fish Sparsely vegetated riverbank with boat Rivers sections «th moderate to switt ramp and riprap stabilization, adjacent Carpoides sp. cf. Atlantic highfin SC r currents and sand ogravel substrates. to hardwood forest and palusu-inc Yes No 2 velifer c:upsucker Range includes Catawba, Pee Dee, and wetland. Wetland seepage drains to Cape Fear rivers. small intermittent strcam adjacent to boat ramp. Insects Sparsely vegetated river bank «th boat ramp and riprap stabilization, adjacent Danausplexippus Monarch butterfly C -- Prairies, meadows, grasslands; requires to hardwood forest and palustrine No No 1 milkweed for egg -laying and larval form. wetland. Wetland seepage drains to small intermittent stream adjacent to boat ramp. Sparsely vegetated river bank «th boat Small sandy streams and slow -moving ramp and riprap stabilization, adjacent Sornamchloru Coppery emerald -- SR creeks in forested or partially forested to hardwood forest and palustrine Yes No 2 georgiaaa wetland. Wetland seepage drains to areas. small intermittent snezun adjacent to boat ramp. Sparsely vegetated riverbank with boat ramp and riprap stabilization, adjacent St)lur-us ivae Shining clubtail -- SR Sandy creeks or small rivers with clean to hardwood forest and palustrine No No 1 waters. wetland. Wetland seepage drains to small intermittent strcam adjacent to boat ramp. Sparsely vegetated riverbank with boat sandhill communities, within xeric to ramp and riprap stabilization, adjacent Asiragalus Sandhills milk- SCV dry-mesic longleaf pine and scrub oak to hardwood forest and palustrine No No 1 nrichauxii vetch woodlands. wetland. Wetland seepage drains to small intermittent stream adjacent to boat ramp. Table 1_RTE_Lock and Dam Seep 1 42 March 2024 Table I Rare, Threatened, and Endangered Species with Potential to Occur at the Lock and Dam 3 Seep Diversion Site in Bladen County, North Carolina Project: Lock and Dam 3 Seep Diversion Location: Bladen County, NC Owner: Chemours Fayetteville Works Latitude: 34.833875' Longitude:-78.823583' Species Common Name Federal (r1 State ") Habitat Site Habitat Site Supports Identified on Effect Determinationt3t Status Status Habitat Site Sparsely vegetated river bank with boat ramp and riprap stabilization, adjacent Erioaonurn Southem wild- SCH Longleaf pine sandhills and pine -oak to hardwood forest and palustrine No No 1 tomentosum buckwheat woodlands. wetland. Wctland seepage drains to small intermittent stream adjacent to boa[ ramp. Open, grass -shrub ccotoncs, between Sparsely vegetated riverbank with boat longleaf pine uplands and pond pine ramp and riprap stabilization, adjacent Lysimachia Rough -leaved E E pocosins on moist sands or shallow to hardwood forest and palustrine No No 1 cupemlaejblia loosesnife organic soils overlaying sand. May wetland. Wetland seepage drains to occur in open artificially disturbed areas small intermittent sh cam adjacent to (roadsides, powerline rights -of -way). boa[ ramp. Sparsely vegetated river bank with boat ramp and riprap stabilization, adjacent Schnnlbea American chatfseed E E Sandy, moist to dry, grassy areas and to hardwood forest and palustrine No No 1 amerfcana oak-pineflatwoods with frequent fire. wetland. Wetland seepage drains to small intermittent stream adjacent to boat ramp. Mussels Sparsely vegetated river bank with boat Found in variable substrates (silt, loose ramp and riprap stabilization, adjacent Elliptin Cape Fear spike -- SC or firm sand, gravel, muddy) in low to hardwood forest and palustrine Yes No 2 marsupiobesa gradient creeks in the Cape Fear, wetland. Wetland seepage drains to Lumber, and Neuse drainages. small intermittent stream adjacent to boa[ ramp. Small steams to large rivers with well Sparsely vegetated riverbank with boat waters and, gravel, or cobble ramp and riprap stabilization, adjacent Elloxygenated iookensis Roanoke slabshcll SC substrates in the Roanoke, Tar, Neuse, to hardwood forest and palustrine Yes No 2 r�aanetland. r oan White Oak, Cape Fear, Lumber, and wWetland seepage drains to w Yadkin-Pcc Dec drainages. small intermittent stream adjacent to boa[ ramp. Typically larger streams or rivers with Sparsely vegetated riverbank with boat sand and gravel substrates and low to ramp and riprap stabilization, adjacent Lampsilis canosa Yellow lampmussel E moderate currents in the Chowan, to hardwood forest and palusu inc Yes No 2 Roanoke, Neuse, Tar, Cape Fear, wetland. Wetland seepage chains to Lumber, Yadkin -Pee Dee drainages. small intermittent stream adjacent to boat ramp. Sparsely vegetated river bank with boat Small rivers and creeks with nod m soft ramp and riprap stabilization, adjacent Villasa dclunrbis Eastern creekshell -- SR sand within the Cape Fear, Lumber, to hardwood forest and palustrinewetland. Yes No 2 Yadkin-Pcc Dec, and Catawba drainages Wetland sec a c drains to pa g` small intermittent stream adjacent to boat ramp. "r Federal status (USFWS): E = Endangered; T = Threatened; PE = Proposed Endangered; C = Candidate; SA(T) = Similarity of Appearance (Threatened) j')Not Lh Carolina State Status (NCDWR): E = Endangered; SR = Significantly Rare; SC = Special Concern; SCV = Special Concern Vulnerable; SCH = Special Concern Historical ")Endangered Species Act Effects Determination; 1 = No effect; 2 = May affect, but is not likely to adversely affect; 3 = May affect, and is likely to adversely affect. "Determination for Northern long eared bat evaluated through USFWS NLEB Rangewide Determination Key for the project site Table 1_RTE_Lock and Dam Seep 2 of 2 March 2024 APPENDIX G SHPO Coordination Package Geosyntec consultants Geosyntec Consultants of NC, P.C. NC License No.: C-3500 and C-295 2501 Blue Ridge Road, Suite 430 Raleigh, North Carolina 27607 PH 919.870.0576 www.,-cosyntcc.com 25 June 2024 Via Email State Historic Preservation Office NC Dept. of Natural and Cultural Resources 109 E. Jones Street, 2"d Floor Raleigh, NC 27601 Subject: Project Review Request: Cultural Resource Consultation Chemours Fayetteville Works Lock and Dam 3 Seep Diversion Bladen County, North Carolina To Whom It May Concern: Geosyntec Consultants of NC, P.C. (Geosyntec), on behalf of Chemours Fayetteville Works (Chemours), is submitting this request for project review in accordance with the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office's (SHPO) online project review guidance. Geosyntec completed in-house project review on 25 June 2024 and requests SHPO's comments and/or concurrence. Required Project Review Documentation Project Name and Location: Lock and Dam 3 Seep Diversion William O'Huske Dam, Bladen County, North Carolina 1248 Bill Hall Rd, Fayetteville, NC 28306 Project Contact: Applicant: Kevin Garon The Chemours Company FC, LLC 22828 NC Highway 87 Fayetteville, NC 28306 (704) 560-6435 Kevin. garon@chemours. com Agent: Alex Mathes Geosyntec Consultants of NC, P.C. 2501 Blue Ridge Road, Suite 430 Raleigh, North Carolina 27607 (713) 859-5712 AMathes@Geosyntec.com engineers I scientists I innovators North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office 25 June 2024 Page 2 Project Description: Chemours intends to construct a seepage diversion channel adjacent to a public boat ramp located on U.S. Army Corps of Engineers property at the William O'Huske Lock and Dam 3 in Bladen County, North Carolina (Figure 1). This diversion channel is necessary to divert seepage water from the Lock and Dam Seep such that it does flow over the boat ramp. The total project review area is approximately 1-acre, and the acreage of ground disturbance is approximately 0.1-acre. Approximately 125 linear feet of diversion channel is proposed and will consist of a trench filled with riprap underlain by a non -woven geotextile material and requires minor excavation/grading. Construction of the diversion channel involves permanent fills below the ordinary high-water mark of the Cape Fear River. Authorization from the USACE, Wilmington District will be requested for proposed impacts to areas within Corps jurisdiction under Section 404, Section 10, and Section 408. A Pre -Construction Notification will be submitted to the USACE requesting coverage under Nationwide Permit No. 38 (Cleanup of Hazardous and Toxic Waste), as well as a request for Section 408 approval. Further, an Individual 401 Water Quality Certification will be requested from NCDEQ, Division of Water Resources. The proposed work is adjacent to the William O'Huske Lock and Dam 3 (NC SHPO Site ID BL0261). Construction of the Lock and Dam 3 was completed in 19351, and the structure is determined eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. Current conditions in vicinity of the lock/dam are influenced by modern structures and public access. A concrete boat ramp and riprap bank stabilization is on the Cape Fear River's right bank, located between the proposed seep diversion channel and the lock/dam structure. Asphalt roadways and parking areas provide public access to the boat ramp, and picnic grounds are west of the lock/dam. Due to the existing modern disturbances on -site and the minimal footprint of the proposed seep diversion channel, no effects are anticipated to the William O'Huske Lock and Dam as a result of the project. Included for your review is a map of the project area (Figure 1), photographic record and KMZ file of the review area boundary. Your review of this consultation package is appreciated. As discussed above Geosyntec, on behalf of Chemours, requests your comments and/or concurrence with our effect determinations. Should 1 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, National Inventory of Dams query for William O. Huske Lock and Dam engineers I scientists I innovators North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office 25 June 2024 Page 3 you have questions or require additional information, please contact the undersigned by phone or email. Sincerely, Mackenzie S. Wallace, CAE Senior Staff Ecologist (470) 230-8862 Mackenzie.Wallace@Geosyntec.com Attachments: Figure 1: Vicinity Map Historic Resources Photographic Record KMZ File of Review Area Alexander M. Mathes Senior Ecologist (713) 859-5712 AMathes@Geosyntec.com engineers I scientists I innovators Ash ebdrd AA Fuquay- arina Sanford '� i -�` - Goldsboro It � �Fayer evllle ' r - %0 6` • nd waste-.� ' or4s �\ 0 h rl r } vvi"m o Husk e .1ock and Dam No 3 Lock and Dam 3 Seep Diversion 1 ; .� �� `' Site Location: (34.833831,-78.823650) I I ISO 1 j Legend 0 500 1,000 2,000 Feet Project Area Date: Scale: Drawn By: Applicant No.: Geosyntec� USSITE LOCATION MAP 5/16/2024 1:12,000 Msw consultants Chel•1'lours- Lock and Dam 3 Seep Diversion Project Chemours Fayetteville Works Reference: Figure No. G,-,),tec C-0tantsntNC, P.C. WORLD TOPOGRAPHIC MAP PROVIDED BY ESRI NC License No.: C-3300 and C-293 Bladen County, Nolth Carolina GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS OF NC, P.C. Geosyntec' Historic Resources Photographic Record 0O1S1ita"ts Client: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Number: TR1210 Site: Lock and Dam 3 - Seep Diversion Location: Bladen County, NC Photograph 1 Date: 5/8/2024 Direction: North Comments: Site overview photo, taken south of the William O'Huske Lock and Dam 3 public boat ramp on the Cape Fear River. Photograph 2 Date: 5/8/2024 Direction: East Comments: William O'Huske Lock and Dam 3 structures, taken from the boat ramp. GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS OF NC, P.C. Geosyntecl�' Photographic Record ""s`Ilt""` Client: Chemours Fayetteville Works Project Number: TR1210 Site: Lock and Dam 3 - Seep Diversion Location: Bladen County, NC Photograph 3 Date: 5/8/2024 Direction: East Comments: William O'Huske Lock and Dam 3 structures, taken from Cape Fear River shoreline. Photograph 4 Date: 5/8/2024 Direction: East Comments: Secondary view of William O'Huske Lock and Dam 3 structures, taken from Cape Fear River shoreline. 2