20240866 Ver 1_NewBern_JmsCrk_PJD_Package_full_210211_20240624

Axiom Environmental, Inc.
February 11, 2021
Emily Thompson
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, NC 27889
Axiom Environmental, Inc.
218 Snow Avenue, Raleigh, North Carolina 27603 919-696-3045
RE: Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination package, New Bern, Jimmies Creek drainage basin
Dear Emily,
On behalf of the City of New Bern, Axiom is happy to provide the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (USACE) with the attached Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) package
for the Jimmies Creek drainage basin in New Bern, NC. Jurisdictional area delineations were
conducted from early August through September 2020. Natural Resources Conservation Service
(NRCS) WETS tables data indicates that precipitation was within or above normal for this time.
The Jimmies Creek drainage basin encompasses a highly developed portion of New Bern.
Residential development dominates the basin, with a corridor of commercial development
generally centered along Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard. A golf course dominates the western
portion of the drainage basin. Elevations within the basin range from a high of approximately 36
feet (North American Vertical Datum of 1988 [NAVD 88]) along the northwest boundary of the
basin to a low of approximately I foot NAVD 88 near the outfall of Wilson Creek.
Please find attached to this letter the following items:
• USACE Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions,
• USACE FINALSAW-JD-REQUEST-FORM-20170508
• USACE PJD-fillable-form 2016-11
• USACE PJD Aquatic Resources Table (attachment to the USACE PJD fillable form
2016-11)
• Potential jurisdictional area figures
• Potential jurisdictional area data forms
• Jimmies Creek soils summary
• Jimmies Creek WETS table data
• City of New Bern/Axiom Environmental Agent Authorization form
All information regarding the current definitions of the Waters of the United States (WOTUS)
are provided in the Federal Register, 33 CFR 328.3 and 40 CFR 120.2, The Navigable Waters
Protection Rule: Definition of "Waters of the United States. A Rule by the Engineers Corps and
the Environmental Protection Agency on 0412112020, " and available at:

hllps://www.federalre ig ster_gov/documents/202O/O4/2l/2O2O-02500/the-navigable-waters-protec
tion-rule-definition-of-waters-of-the-united-states.
No Traditional Navigable Waters (TNWs) are located within the project area of the Jimmies
Creek basin. The discussion within the Federal Register regarding TNWs (and Territorial Seas)
is available at: htt2s://www.federalregister.gov/d/2020-02500/p-290.
Tributaries to TNWs are defined as linear features that exhibit either intermittent or perennial
flow. The flow regime of tributaries to TNWs are documented with the North Carolina Stream
Identification Forms version 4.11 (and the associated documentation, Methodology for
Identification oflntermittent and Perennial Streams and Their Origins), and stream quality is
documented using USACE Stream Quality Assessment Forms. The flow regime of each
tributary is identified on mapping as intermittent (i) or perennial (p).
Adjacent wetlands (Discussion in Federal Register at https://www.federalre ig ster.gov/d/ 2020-
02500/p-460). Jurisdictional wetlands are identified by characteristic hydrology, soils, and
hydrophytic vegetation and are flagged in the field with sequentially numbered flagging to
facilitate review (except in maintained areas where flags are subject to damage or removal). All
areas exhibiting jurisdictional wetland criteria have been included; wetlands have not been
separated into adjacent and isolated categories.
Most project features are ditches that were created to drain the local urban and residential
infrastructure. The flow regimes of project ditches were rated using the Methodology for
Identification oflntermittent and Perennial Streams and Their Origins. Ditches that demonstrate
geomorphic, hydrologic, and biologic indicators representative of tributaries are identified on
mapping as intermittent (i) or perennial (p). Ditches with less than intermittent flow may support
the hydrology, soils, and hydrophytic vegetation characteristic of jurisdictional wetlands.
Ditches that do not support jurisdictional wetlands or a flow regime characteristic of tributaries
are depicted as potential non -wetland waters when an Ordinary High Water Mark is present.
Soils data extracted from the NRCS digital data for Craven County indicates that soils within the
Jimmies Creek basin include soil series characteristic of riparian and non -riparian landscapes.
Several stream features are depicted throughout the basin (Figure 4).
The hydrography depicted on Figure 5 of the PJD package indicates several streams generated by
the NC Department of Environmental Quality (NCDEQ) Headwater Stream Spatial Dataset
(HSSD) program and incorporated into the latest version of the Advancing Transportation
through Linkages, Automation, and Screening (ATLAS) hydrography dataset. HSSD streams
are generated using a range of environmental data, primarily Digital Elevation Model derivatives
(i.e. elevation, slope, curvature), and field -located data points to perform a regression analysis of
likely stream origin points. It should also be noted that current HSSD/ATLAS hydrography is
generated from Legacy Light Distance and Ranging (LiDAR) data (collected during or near 2005
with a grid size of 20 feet). This is significant as small and/or flat landscape features are
occasionally misrepresented at this scale. The stormwater infrastructure in urban areas (and
dominating the Jimmies Creek drainage basin) can also cause misrepresentations in the
hydrography model.

Figures 7 and 7A through 7M depict additional regulatory jurisdictions: in this case, areas
subject to the Neuse River Riparian Buffer Rules regulated by the NC Division of Water
Resources (NCDWR) and areas subject to Coastal Area Management Act (LAMA) rules under
the jurisdiction of the NC Division of Coastal Resources (NCDCM). Features subject to Neuse
River Riparian Buffer Rules consist of intermittent or perennial streams (tributaries) that are
depicted on the US Geological Survey (USGS) 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle and/or on
NRCS Soil Survey mapping. Areas subject to NCDCM jurisdiction were verified on -site by Mr.
Brad Connell of the NCDCM during a field visit on August 11, 2020.
Figures 8 and 8A through 8M of the attached PJD package depict the activities and locations of
FEMA-defined Category A and Category D work where they occur in or adjacent to
jurisdictional features. Category A work consists of the removal of accumulated sediment and
debris within ditches and stream channels. The removal of vegetative and miscellaneous debris
(including trash, white goods, construction debris, and other non -natural introduced items) is
anticipated to occur as a non -regulated activity that does not require permitting. Accumulated
sediment removal is anticipated to be Exempt from Section 404 permitting as maintenance to
existing drainage ditches. Sediment will be removed to the extent of the original ditch geometry.
Ditches will not be deepened or widened. Category D work consists of maintenance and repairs
to structures and slopes. Damaged structures and slopes that require the addition of rip rap or
similar hardened structure are anticipated to be permitted under USACE Nationwide Permitting
(NWP3, Maintenance and/or NWP13 Bank Stabilization) and NCDCM General Permitting
where appropriate. Currently, the locations of Category D activities have been identified;
however, potential impacts have not been quantified. It is anticipated that some areas identified
as potential Bank Stabilization activities may not intersect the associated OHWM and therefore
will not be subject to Section 404 permitting. In these cases, these activities will be removed
from the catalog of permitted activities and a request will be submitted to add them to the
inventory of non -regulated activities.
The City of New Bern would like to request approval for activities that may be performed with
No Permit Required (both Exempt and Non -regulated activities) and anticipates referencing this
PJD package for upcoming permitting projects.
Please let us know if you have any questions about the information within this package. We are
happy to discuss any items by phone, email, or in the field, and can provide additional
photographs, data forms, or figures that you may need. We look forward to working with you
further on this project.
Sincerely,
e
Scott Davis
Senior Scientist/Project Manager

Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions
ACTION ID 9: SAW -
Prepare file folder ❑
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]:
Begin Date (Date Received):
Assign Action ID Number in ORM ❑
2. Work Type: ❑Private ❑Institutional ✓❑Government ❑Commercial
3. Project Description / Purpose [PCN Form 133d and 133e]:
The City of New Bern has proposed to remove sediment and debris from ditches/stream channels as well repair culverts and stabilize
ditch/stream banks that were damaged by Hurricane Florence.
4. Property Owner / Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A4]: City of New Bern, Matt Montanye, Director of Public
5. Agent / Consultant [PNC Form A5 — or ORM Consultant ID Number]:
Axiom Environmental, c/o Scott Davis
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form 135b]:
7. Project Location —Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form Blb]:
New Bern - Jimmies Creek (35.104068,-77.106935)
8. Project Location —Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form Bla]: N/A
9. Project Location — County [PCN Form A2b]: Craven
10. Project Location —Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]: New Bern
11. Project Information —Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form 132a]: Neuse River Estuary
12. Watershed / 8-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form 132c]: 03020204
Authorization: Section 10 ❑ Section 404 ❑✓
Regulatory Action Type:
❑ Standard Permit
Nationwide Permit 9
Regional General Permit 9
✓ Jurisdictional Determination Request
Section 10 and 404 ❑
::]Pre -Application Request
❑ Unauthorized Activity
❑ Compliance
❑ No Permit Required
Revised 20150602

urisdictional Determination Reauest
US Army Corps
of Engineers
Wilmington District
This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project
manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by
assigned counties can be found on-line at:
http://www.saw.usace.gr y.mil/Missions/RegulatoiyPermitProgram/Contact/CoLiLocator.aspx,
by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your
request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager.
ASHEVILLE & CHARLOTTE REGULATORY
FIELD OFFICES
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina 28801-5006
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
RALEIGH REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
INSTRUCTIONS:
WASHINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina 27889
General Number: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WILMINGTON REGULATORY FIELD OFFICE
US Army Corps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
General Number: 910-251-4633
Fax Number: [phone]
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E, F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D — PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when
necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Version: May 2017 Page 1

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: City of New Bern
City, State:
County:
New Bern, NC
Craven
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN):
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Axiom Environmental. c/o Scott Davis
Mailing Address: 218 Snow Avenue
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address
Select one:
Raleigh, NC 27603
919-696-3045
[e-mail]
I am the current property owner.
I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultanti
Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION'
Name: City of New Bern- Matt Montanye, Dire,
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 1129
New Bern, NC 28563
Telephone Number: 252-639-7501
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
' Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
2 Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Version: May 2017 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION',4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
Matt Montanye, Director of Public Works, City of New Bern
Print Name
Capacity: ❑ Owner ✓❑ Authorized Agents
Date
Signature
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
❑✓ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a projector perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
❑ I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
❑✓ Other:
3 For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOTIUSACE protocols, skip to Part E.
a If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
s Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Version: May 2017 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One)
❑✓ I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminarX JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may
be "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United States"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional "waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
"preliminary" in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
❑ I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United
States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other "affected
party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
❑ I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
❑✓ Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
✓❑ Size of Property or Review Area 82.9 acres.
❑ The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Version: May 2017 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude:
35.104068
Longitude:-77.106935
A legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than 11x17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).6
■ North Arrow
■ Graphical Scale
■ Boundary of Review Area
■ Date
■ Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
Jurisdictional non -wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non -Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non -
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non -Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or "Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate_
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
Wetland and non -wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non -wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
6 Please refer to the guidance document titled "Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations" to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards. hLtp://www.saw.usace.gM.milIN4issions/Regulatory-Permit-
Pro gram/Jurisdiction/
Version: May 2017 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
• PJDs, please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form' and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
• AJDs_ please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form'
0 Vicinity Map
171 Aerial Photograph
USGS Topographic Map
Soil Survey Map
Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
Landscape Photos (if taken)
NCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
Other Assessment Forms
' www.saw.usace.army.ntil/Portals/59/docs/re atorv/readocs/JD/RGL_08-02_App A Prelim JD Form fillable.pdf
' Please see http://www.saw.usace.gM.mil/Missions/Re atory-Permit-Program/Jurisdiction/
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federal jurisdiction under the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local
government agencies, and the public, and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal
law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approved jurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District's web site
and on the Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Version: May 2017 Page 6

Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD:
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Scott Davis, Axiom Environmental; 218 Snow Avenue, Raleigh, NC 27603
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Craven City: New Bern
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat.: 35.104068 Long.:-77.106935
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Neuse River Estuary
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site
number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount
of aquatic resource
in review area
(acreage and linear
feet, if applicable)
Type of aquatic
resource (i.e., wetland
vs. non -wetland
waters)
Geographic authority
to which the aquatic
resource "may be"
subject (i.e., Section
404 or Section 10/404)
Please
see
attached
table

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option
to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an
informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their
characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a
Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre -
construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the
activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has
elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an
official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the
option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit
authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result
in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the
applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can
accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and
conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has
determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject
permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance
of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit
authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the
review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and
waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance
or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7)
whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms
and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively
appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic
jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official
delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds
that there "may be"waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be" navigable waters of
the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review
area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources
below where indicated for all checked items:
■❑ Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map:
Vicinity; Aerial photography; LiDAR; Soils; Hydrography; Potential jurisdictional areas; additional areas assessed.
❑ Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
OR U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: Askin (1983), New Bern (1988) 24k quads.
FEW Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Web Soil Survey (current), SS of craven county (1989)
■❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: NC statewide wetlands, NWI online (current, accessed May 8, 2020).
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
❑ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: .(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
■❑ Photographs: ■❑ Aerial (Name & Date): 2016 NC OneMap Imagery
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify): Jimmies Creek Basin
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily
been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory staff member
completing PJD
Digitally signed by Scott Davis
Cott Davis Date 2021.02.11 13:31 21-05'00'
Signature and date of
person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)'
' Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond
within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is
necessary prior to finalizing an action.

City of New Bern, Jimmies Creek drainage basin
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) Form
Table of Aquatic Resources in the review area that "may be" subject to regulatory jurisdiction.
Site number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount of
aquatic resource in
review area (acreage
and linear feet, if
Type of aquatic
resource (i.e., wetland
vs. non- wetland
waters)
Geographic authority to
which the aquatic resource
"may be" subject (i.e.,
Section 404 or Section
Wilson Creek-p
35.100712
-77.109098
7294 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
Wilson Creek-i
35.108522
-77.103227
908 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
JC-NWW-1p
35.107965
-77.101883
1087 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
JC-NWW-2p
35.105080
-77.109806
2202 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
JC-NWW-3p
35.106546
-77.115596
1652 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
JC-NWW-4p
35.104302
-77.112502
1886 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
JC-NWW-5p
35.091131
-77.096055
3570 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
JC-NWW-5i
35.093060
-77.099405
107 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
JC-NWW-6p
35.098991
-77.107621
357 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
JC-NWW-7i
35.113936
-77.102864
553 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
JC-NWW-8i
35.108641
-77.101615
372 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
JC-NWW-9i
35.106905
-77.108678
447 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
JC-NWW-10i
35.104643
-77.112905
50 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
JC-NWW-11i
35.104136
-77.106987
77 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
JC-NWW-12i
35.106998
-77.102905
170 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
JC-NWW-13i
35.104416
-77.105505
114 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
JC-NWW-14i
35.109386
-77.100472
597 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
JC-NWW-15i
35.093381
-77.105144
35 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
JC-NWW-16i
35.097383
-77.091326
5822 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
JC-NWW-17i
35.096884
-77.091702
153 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
JC-NWW-18i
35.096705
-77.090409
130 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
JC-NWW-19i
35.091079
-77.090831
179 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
JC-NWW-20i
35.092083
-77.094642
46 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
JC-NWW-21
35.093683
-77.090784
29 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
JC-NWW-22
35.094460
-77.089323
26 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
JC-NWW-23
35.094589
-77.088875
178 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
JC-NWW-24
35.094560
-77.088803
25 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
JC-NWW-25
35.096356
-77.089758
213 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
JC-NWW-26
35.095662
-77.088223
522 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
JC-NWW-27
35.096238
-77.089455
212 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
JC-NWW-28
35.095923
-77.087395
1522 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
JC-NWW-29
35.097070
-77.090426
172 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
JC-NWW-30
35.097036
-77.090201
197 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
JC-NWW-31
35.096679
-77.091410
94 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
JC-NWW-32
35.107638
-77.107593
200 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
JC-NWW-33
35.100434
-77.093105
57 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
JC-NWW-34
35.105625
-77.106666
463 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
JC-NWW-35
35.104097
-77.104879
111 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
JC-NWW-36
35.105853
-77.101995
1055 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
JC-NWW-37
35.104247
-77.103602
164 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
JC-NWW-38
35.104311
-77.103147
78 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
JC-NWW-39
35.103967
-77.102806
169 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
JC-NWW-40
35.104285
-77.102189
790 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
JC-NWW-41
35.104129
-77.102059
29 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
JC-NWW-42
35.104380
-77.100549
30 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
JC-NWW-43
35.107389
-77.098635
425 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
JC-NWW-44
35.107365
-77.0990691
27 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404

City of New Bern, Jimmies Creek drainage basin
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) Form
Table of Aquatic Resources in the review area that "may be" subject to regulatory jurisdiction (continued).
Site number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount of
aquatic resource in
review area (acreage
and linear feet, if
Type of aquatic
resource (i.e., wetland
vs. non- wetland
waters)
Geographic authority to
which the aquatic resource
"may be" subject (i.e.,
Section 404 or Section
JC-NWW-45
35.107310
-77.098939
71 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
JC-NWW-46
35.110245
-77.100034
316 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
JC-NWW-47
35.113945
-77.102245
27 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
JC-NWW-48
35.113191
-77.100724
337 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
JC-NWW-49
35.116294
-77.103625
505 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
JC-NWW-50
35.107213
-77.109699
29 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
JC-NWW-51
35.116732
-77.126966
4583 linear feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
JC-W1
35.108242
-77.103341
0.725 acre
Wetland
Section 404
JC-W2
35.108296
-77.101702
0.264 acre
Wetland
Section 404
JC-W3
35.108543
-77.100831
0.010 acre
Wetland
Section 404
JC-W4
35.107247
-77.102844
0.032 acre
Wetland
Section 404
JC-W5
35.106958
-77.103038
0.046 acre
Wetland
Section 404
JC-W6
35.105803
-77.109524
0.064 acre
Wetland
Section 404
JC-W7
35.105544
-77.109564
0.006 acre
Wetland
Section 404
JC-W8
35.104941
-77.109944
0.030 acre
Wetland
Section 404
JC-W9
35.104668
-77.110042
0.029 acre
Wetland
Section 404
JC-W10
35.104344
-77.114662
0.597 acre
Wetland
Section 404
JC-W11
35.103210
-77.109612
7.132 acres
Wetland
Section 404
JC-W12
35.099625
-77.108785
1.435 acres
Wetland
Section 404
JC-W13
35.097926
-77.106425
3.652 acres
Wetland
Section 404
JC-W14
35.093274
-77.104964
0.217 acre
Wetland
Section 404
JC-W15
35.090889
-77.102910
1.090 acre
Wetland
Section 404
JC-W16
35.090644
-77.097119
4.018 acres
Wetland
Section 404
JC-W17
35.091810
-77.094977
0.012 acre
Wetland
Section 404
JC-W18
35.091929
-77.094276
0.060 acre
Wetland
Section 404
JC-W19
35.092061
-77.094382
0.013 acre
Wetland
Section 404
JC-W20
35.091994
-77.094042
0.022 acre
Wetland
Section 404
JC-W21
35.091848
-77.093734
0.007 acre
Wetland
Section 404
JC-W22
35.091711
-77.093143
0.006 acre
Wetland
Section 404
JC-W23
35.091572
-77.092691
0.019 acre
Wetland
Section 404
JC-W24
35.091338
-77.092368
0.021 acre
Wetland
Section 404
JC-W25
35.091269
-77.090980
0.001 acre
Wetland
Section 404
JC-W26
35.091174
-77.090596
0.023 acre
Wetland
Section 404
JC-W27
35.089175
-77.097648
0.002 acre
Wetland
Section 404
JC-W28
35.093075
-77.095376
<0.001 acre
Wetland
Section 404
JC-W29
35.093630
-77.091467
0.035 acre
Wetland
Section 404
JC-W30
35.093588
-77.091959
0.001 acre
Wetland
Section 404
JC-W31
35.097235
-77.092705
0.038 acre
Wetland
Section 404
JC-W32
35.096818
-77.091978
0.001 acre
Wetland
Section 404
JC-W33
35.096903
-77.092190
0.001 acre
Wetland
Section 404
JC-W34
35.096590
-77.092801
0.040 acre
Wetland
Section 404
JC-W35
35.094755
-77.105777
0.002 acre
Wetland
Section 404
JC-W36
35.099637
-77.111054
0.019 acre
Wetland
Section 404
JC-W37
35.104241
-77.106488
0.003 acre
Wetland
Section 404
JC-W38
35.104202
-77.104632
0.016 acre
Wetland
Section 404
JC-W39
35.106930
-77.101247
0.016 acre
I Wetland
Section 404

City of New Bern, Jimmies Creek drainage basin
Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) Form
Table of Aquatic Resources in the review area that "may be" subject to regulatory jurisdiction (continued).
Estimated amount of
Type of aquatic
Geographic authority to
Latitude
Longitude
aquatic resource in
resource (i.e., wetland
which the aquatic resource
(decimal
(decimal
review area (acreage
vs. non- wetland
"may be" subject (i.e.,
Site number
degrees)
degrees)
and linear feet, if
waters)
Section 404 or Section
JC-W40
35.098486
-77.091424
0.007 acre
Wetland
Section 404
JC-W41
35.114058
-77.108374
0.130 acre
Wetland
Section 404
JC-W42
35.115314
-77.107297
0.001 acre
Wetland
Section 404
JC-W43
35.115256
-77.107165
0.001 acre
Wetland
Section 404
JC-W44
35.107175
-77.113969
0.020 acre
Wetland
Section 404
JC-W45
35.107206
-77.114006
0.001 acre
Wetland
Section 404
Non -wetland waters
JC-SW1
35.108715
-77.103138
0.084 acre
Section 404
Surface Waters
Non -wetland waters
JC-SW2
35.104547
-77.114106
0.217 acre
Section 404
Surface Waters
Non -wetland waters
JC-SW3
35.104547
-77.114106
0.260 acre
Section 404
Surface Waters
Non -wetland waters
JC-SW4
35.093329
-77.095434
0.002 acre
Section 404
Surface Waters
40,465 linearfeet
Non -wetland waters
19.865 acres
Wetlands
Totals
0.563 acres
Non -wetland waters (surface waters)

N O
O 0- �
ww 42iv o OU
Co y W
o o � LL Z 5 Q. V1 Q i
pR N W m U E U m .o i7
c O od' N az_v 'vim to LL
E r Z O E=E
a �3o Is -"� —
a` a` z° m z m n z 3 `m o o o 0IL 2
a`
00 HOFJA
'a
oe
10
.vim• �� / � .,+� � `�' , �
�x \,
5
VA\ v � � �� ''fir •ip '�,!'- }
I

i
�
- -
O
W
W
m
`
a
m
Z 7 a
Wo
W
N N
;
m
roc
maZ° .
mm �¢
FC
�0�
W Q
m
N
O
Er yr �v
w
E
F��
w
o
r
�
^2
a
'o`a oZ
' -=°ovr
vz... m_
a`
oa
o -
!
1
� F
13
p rn
� N d
O
W
(� N
z LL
0 o fn a`

Q
z = 7 ryo 0
_ f7 ry
.. W W W W OU
0] N W
m
r C hey W N A A U Z o Z o D
o E z Z c a N N V m a (i
W }O �m 16
0
c V �_ d `w z v _ a z
o la
a` a` z m N- a �'n C7 ¢` o o m a`
r,
m iti
O
w � '
w T -
00 k.ur
:. PL alwr
Adz
A

i
z
- -
O O
r
W
m
W
`
a
m
A A
Z 7 a
W
W
UZ
N N
Q
U
m
roc
maZ° .
m
cN
W Q
N
.O
Er w£ �0
w`
o
w
0�
�m
d
pa
_�Z
m
E
c
r
F
V
.m
z... mo -
o
a` a`
o
-
z m-a -. C7¢
may/
W.....
NOWY
�J._ ..

=
0
7
ryo
0
z
_
f7
ry
W
0]
N
m
W d W
m
W
0
E 3
r L z
3a��
Z o
�z Q ���o
N N U m z E¢
w
7 W
N
_
a
w¢ �Lvrc�
(�
W
�m _On uz
..
a
}O•��
E
o vzv _
ao
z
o
—
o C7 ¢`
0
0
—
0
a`
P
dy
4d
d
,. dsem
Z
a
d
ar
a
Qeo

i
z
- -
O
N
r c
W
Q
w
z
`
N
m
aAA
Z a
W
W
UZ
N N
Q
U
m
L��
m'ooc
.
m E
o
v N
6
W Q
00
N
O
Er v£ �U
w`
w
g
_o`a �Z
mzwr
E
r
v z...�_
z m�a �'n C7 ¢`
11
p
rn
�
N
O
d
�
W
LL
N
o
LL
z
0
o
rn a`ro
� ,t- yBdarHill,Rd -.
0
r\
"0,
r
Aw
Jn
4 54 Yvv\
r
s
s \ .
ga.
' E
y777 o u

i
�
- -
O
r
W
m
W
`
a
m
A A
Z 7 CL
Wo
W
UZ
N N
Q
U
m
roc
maZ° .
m
o
°N
W Q
N
O
Er w£ �0
`
w`
w
0�
g00
_o a�z
mzwr
E
r
Fo-
o vz... m_
oo
a`
-
J
L7
fit.
O
U
G°Q,�e G\C
�
of
Gf.
5
ss
A7
GouPeC
H
O
\� Or,
o
r
•

'
Z
K
C
U
2`
a
TE
o
n
U Z
z a..
W
d t
:zi_¢LLI
H
w�
U
Q
w Q
m
E
�m
O
L.
�
a
g�EaE�="
As
I� W of R M N
61
t� tO lA a M N O
d
N
R C t7 M CI N N N N N N N N N N
- - �111111111111111

0 o rn
i ryo o
O
d
w c W y a.N p
—
d
U) m T
16
o✓ Zia NN U x�>>
w W a
O } U a E - n z
mm
Q O u 3-0
°
L a` z m z a° ° t o o o
N
eA
f` j o � fy--•� -� }� ` �r �� U , p
0
ao
CL
IL
1 C p L
C
r i /
.'._1"+W \ �.. �• � � �� o � � �-._" � �� 1J' � z � �� a \,: l �-g5'f�
11 i
is 4 4
cr
ta—
t\ y
J (�
1 f
z
f'

o rn
m
N
N O
...
1 0
..
pc ov
�rnm
Wv`¢nw
~
m�orn
�n
m
WE
m-mo
o„
L(i
U
rO`
0
F
0Za
(77
C
>�
o
n�-wLLUo>vv
LL
E
z�<
>
oawQ
zmz
o
v
-N-
r
Ymo o
E
�o
m -
�-Fv
On
ov
3
v
a`
a`
7o
zmNao <zz
zd�
z£m>
z?¢`o`n�£
v
�io J. - .

p ry rn
z O o
o1°
W m V.
3 a,� �z m "To w
c ° 7 z E 'a N N N D v z ¢ 7 (�
j �a wQ Ervr��
w r7 p 6 00 O U ao`a-O _ m LL
E w } d ..Z �� ..
c V �_ N cvzw _ $2 Z
Q U 7 _ otS _
a` a` aL
z m N, oD C7 ¢` a v
m�
3
� a
4 3 go
0\�a
t
c
E E 3 3 ° 3 s
m - °
zm - - - - - E F >
- - - - - °
O
_ m i) m m m m m m o o z m
Pa alwnqua,
-
1
f
•' 1= � '-Ram 6q � fq
�i Pw
U J a
9�

�I�j p ry rn
i � - = O
W m Vo V
��o �"To w
o � '�` z a NN N.0 v z�¢
j �a wQ Ervr��
w r7 p O0� 00 O U ao`a-O _m LL
E w r d �Z � 3 T ..
o F-� V �_ W `w z v _ 8= n z
Imo- ~ o t u 3
Q U _ _ N lw
a` a` z mN- o C7¢ as
5
N
N OJ G�O� � o d
a s ;
oA� �
H -
m m -p
m
G
w o -
- - - - -
'if
N 1.5 N N N N N N p N
�a A001101R�t
M ,
N
N
Ap
-t Ali-
AigAwl
.. G'sea'R -•; ��Jd ' iLL U N n F - UL•a
~ Ak

im
0'7"-

i O-
5 yo
-
= W ° " 0 0
m w W f6 r2` oz°
d r•O UE 'o
c z d c A UN •�.V tontonz
Z w Wa 'ate Er wr �v
w ✓ O °0� �m N 1-on-C
E w } Q 7 , C) `o
^2 n
o `w _
U
w T u
¢` as m
r _
m'
a
o
w l c
m' = E
c � 3
41
om
z �
z N �
Eo
Y.
o
o
m m m -
m 'o
3
E n U
1o�oo -
Z o >
o
o =
T .O o o o ] N o
N
r a` aam z z m z a
001,
9 Lunqualf)
M � mow. •
Mir
I^
G
G
1 Y_'
uvoojgs!uul
F
1 _. - � � 1, k • �'1�*l .�
p
�
O
rn
O
�
N
0
� d
z
W
c� ti
z
LL
N
0
o
rn a`
�
atr�0
r
PTM

0
�j z = p 7 p o
5 w om b
= w w
w V V z
m w C L Z� o ez
d w an d K w
C.� _ .o
c w w e A U N •� .V m az E¢ W
w O CDd' m Q'i _v _ LL
E w r S C, �` zo
v z ... _ uo
F— Uo w o _ v T' S
a` a` z m a o C7 ¢` a s
9 J• ,
4J
4. A - m'
� S
o � v
t m
Gee z n
s
z
\ � � c L o 0
m °
v z � � >
z` 4to =E =EE E o
•p T O o 0 o U o U
c) a` a a m z z m z m
0
ti
!
QrcGe<
s
s Gt v
Py
G'
P
r-.
r
K O
O •'
6
Q a t..
y
a
L

0
y z w o o d
w
w � w N w `v
m W z
m w C L�Uo Nz w
d w an d K C .� _ T o
•�.V �az�¢ j
w O C D d' m Q 'i �"O n_ U _ LL
E w r �_ S '-� C, �` a z
o r-� r U wz... _ 82
O EL
a` a` a ion Co 7 ¢` a s m m o o a` z m -N
0
lea
/ o bd
40
I 7
low
c ,F/
Ot
0
al
4°� F . � • Gt f �V m
m z
m o m
44
�Oti sm % z
T p
Gw �
cwe O u I
o
� O
m�
a F >
> a U -
U o U \
z z m z d

C i o
O—
5 w Y y
= W
m w W f6 r2` c oz
c z d c A V N •� .V az
Z d Wa Erow �v
w ✓ o °off � 00 Q •� I - C)
E w r 7 1 C, � h3
wz... _ o-
F— ~ o t u
o - -
a` a` z m�a C7
rl-
Ln
�om
z o
m � �
� 4
Y
z
� o o
3 �
- o �
m -
E - o U
o
T .O N N N ] N N
•i� a` m m m z z m z r m

M N 0
Zz v `v o - d
d w mw� K N� r0U`o avEL°_ — o, — W
c Z N C 'f0 V N Q U v v c-z E 4 Z � E � -� - - 7 Q
WCL m V� Erva�� av" vZ°' 5E"> (� 00
c O ol
C D �' -U > `.5
-.a� LL
E w F Q..+ aOn uZ uw� -gym arg T ..
c CC �U wt
p V C_ L vZ..._N>rn .� v'OC av a Z
4) W Y tD L 0 T N a W .. U
`3_
Q a` a` d z° m�a nC7 ¢` ¢`� m _ >F `mw Qzv v oa°
� � %�• r M
N � a
N E M ? M.
- z 0 - z
O Q O O Q O
a° 3 0 E 0 E
- w _ w
_ o � z z � I 4'
m
y
T '0
a° a° M M M Z° Z° z z° z° z
0
00LE ...
V r
a
s
' J i
r�-
A114 •� m
•. � 1. - - -
�1
it w
3
T y�

M o 0
Z z E v`v oo ..
- d
-4
0z>_Emrco awe a z
W
c w•U o
A L z E � oC"-
m
Uv E� vm Eoo aoWrZ°
CD w �a LL
o °c
v°°°
vV ov3av v
or
`3>v
d z
mry TnC7 ¢` ¢`0 m _ >F `mw ¢za'v
J,
66s -
'i' - 669 --.E
r f L69
,ALN }

'
-
y z
w
c
L
w m
z
m
a c ' C
w
LL
6 ()4
F� O
o
E
oo
}
U
Q
o w
a` a`
i
U
■
M
-
0
0
Y
E
_
-
x
-
rn
�'
d
wN
L
v v
.o -.
� o E 0-c r
:.
- o>
w
K
a) f6
r�U `o
av�EL° -
_ -
w
VZ
Vl
f6L
Q-V
m�Um
m az
zb `v --
��__ w
_
�`
_
-
U
w pap
V
�a
E r w r. U
.o w v - v Z °
- '
-
(� 00
C a+
�-On uZ
>
uwv _,�
-ate
..
LL
a
o vzv�
10 '^
5 _
via_
o,..
z
o rn v � _
�?a:°v���
o'er
�'
3
3
w
v
_
w
z° mrva nC74
¢� m _ >F `mw
¢zI 'v
oa°
o
fn
a`
pd
} L M
mww.
O
` M
n
� V
e L M
t �!
orb
N V 0
7 V
f /
�'
C+ <
.. Y ' f 1 l• a Fb 1 - - olk
.

OM ~ .
3
3
0
3
M N 0
Zz v
_ .
c.r.
-v a d
r E"a °EwV -tW or rU o vmNw �
.Zc EL u aZEEN a
11J
Q
Z CL 2v� "ao°amV 5EZ
mEvtu�°LL Oa Z wv
vZ
voo v3Tv3
� _IL m`zrv.m _ >F a� ¢mo o n
-w-
o
E M
a
o_
in
O

M N 0
Z z E v -E-
x a - .. d
c Z dC.A UN fQ6 LU mnZE" - aU o av
Z E�� _
- - llJ
LL
Z CL E
Erva�cc�i avv =Z '�€� (9 co
LL
T- N � .a� ragv
E E -gym
�_N
p oz.v'-0CinY aL m O E aT Z .. U
`3_
ILz° mNa -8¢` ¢m m _ >F `mw ¢za'v oa° o o m a`
.f
_ Z<s
Sys o
h^9 �69 9ZS
o
h
6�
m ..
M
N �
eS �
n
47-
x': . r. tr �' '••y E o E o
10
75 i° M M
75
r.) w
O O
• J i� - ', s A l u u
"w` ♦ m a m a
�: m `o a z `5 a z
r !
o o o o
0
�.` Z
. 4"'�`*' `� Y_ •� 1. _ / �. a�i a�i a�i a�i a�i a a o a a o
�'•� � S'S ry,� �� .Y -" f � G a` a° a° ° ° a° a° a° zzz ° °
^zzz

N N 0
Z z E v `v — x r - d
..
r ci o a OE'E " — — w
c z wc•A UN QU vaWmz E¢ Z�E� � - E 7
wQ a` tiF-• a` 0 �
`o„
uc °rv_ a Z
LL
o a °
v°°' ° vV ov3a
in
>a0oo
° `3n
IL z_ >FmW. !0 110,
N411
at At
n
m
N
:y
PA
f0 y
+ 4`
h �
f •�': °-. ., '� - 1, ffF ,yam, _
611 *1. f0 E � m E
* r E ° E °
E o E o
s �: • Ilk
o 0
J Y M i O E L E L
�< P 11•.. W Z W Z
_m m m m
o a a o
a° a° a° a° a° z° z° z z° z° z

'
-
y z
w
c
w m
m
z .` a
w
0 m
o
W
E
oo
U
Q
C
a` a`
3 0
M -o
W .� v v o E v r .� Z - 4 >_
f6 t�Uo av�EL° - _ -
Z f6 L m U -
UN QU m m-zE¢ Z�E _--
L oo
wm v� Erv,�� vZ" M>
Ca+ On uZ uww -' v5 0
o `vZv _ - v'; a v r w
_ .3o -
d z° mry TnC7 ¢` ¢`o m _ >F `mw ¢zv'v oa°
�.. le .
41
AMR-
� �A
M
a
z
0
0
z
a
o
Z

N
z
z
w
`
Y
w
m
m
w
R
E
o
3
z
3 m
w '° 'm
Z� a
2
U
U1 Q
b
d ca
•V d
>
U
R a
O
z ;u
-
Y
W
u
E
c
r
m
.. ,n
�-y r
V
'
o
u
u
u
u
u
u
°�' u
u
w
v
,v
o
.v
o
.v
�
o
h o
o
= o
o
o
� o
� o
O v
w
m
0
0 v
0
0
0
E `O
a ° R
O z m O
z m
W W
N w
W w
u w
v w
u w
W w
W W
y aw+ m
>> O
m
O
w m
01 O
um
°' O
w m
v O
w um
v 0
w m
v 0
m
v 0
m
v 0
E
= o
` o
= o
= o=
o
= o
= o
o
y
N
00
n
O
Q1
O
c-I
r
•E a w
N
a a E
a
z x N
O c
C w
o
E 'o
N
N
N
2
R
R
v
w •y�w
mmuuNn
o
mN
oR
oR
o
a
O
O
O
o
m
o
o
Oo
N
o
�A
o
'R
m
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
OO
O
O
O
O
O
O
00
m
6
R
N
U
m
N
V
O
m
V
N
m
V
N
m
V
m
m
V
f
m
U
m
V
L
m
V
m
u
m
'
m
V
V
u
V
'
V
V
V
V
V
u
V
V
jp
a
E
c
°p
w
3
V
spuel;eN\ lel;ue;od
Potential Non -Wetland Waters
00 NI�IRI-1
N
W
Q-'
00
0
LL
O
0 ^
o
V
v
.0 w
^ w
z d
'O m O `o
w
v > C
w
V w
•E Roa'
a w n
2
z w o
O
M N
O v
w N
> > O
w
CE V
c
.�ava
N
M
C
a E :o
O w w
z x
0
w w
w
w w
w
w w
w
w
O w
v v
C C
w
C
v v
v
v v
v
v d
R
w u •�
•�
m ry
v
N
n
m
N
m o
m in
N�
�o
�n a
� w
`• c
N m
r
w m
o
c
w
N
z z
V V
z
V
z z
V V
z
V
z z
V V
z
V
z
V
t0 O O N N. W O O W V O lO O i i i 1 O m 0 N �
O W O d N v m v m m lO m m m m V m n m ul
Z > w m N
O R
w
•� � y c
w
E m 0
`m ' w
0 w o
o z g
z
O V O M V
to O
w N N W ifl
= 0
O^.
Y U Y ri
E Q W N
`i a E
o. E =o
0 w w
z x n
o c v v v v v w v v v w v v v w v v v w v w v v v v v v w v w v v v v v v w v w v v
O> v v v v v w v v w v v v v w v v v v w v v v w v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v w v v v v w
E O R
w 'S 61 O 00 O ✓1 00 n O ul ✓1 f` V ul n n O 0l m m WN ul m ON ✓1 lO rl 0 n
Q0 1
E T N
N m v
� R
inn O. r o0 Q) 0 .-I N j�j V inn lO F 00 61 0 rl N m o f` W m O ml N m V ifl tD n W m 0
N N N rV m m m m m m m m m m V V
E V 3 3 3 3 3 z 3 z z z 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
c oo z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z
u b U b d U b U b d U d U d U U U U b U b U b U U U U b U b
� 3

Wilson Creek
NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
S5f
Date: r
`� ,. 3�/ bt0
ProjectlSite: �( y�y,��
v%
Latitude: �r 1b12JS
Evaluator: FM'j *jAM
County: 40(v_A
Longitude: -77, pips-)t
Total Points:
Stream Determination (circ
Other *W i1 WG
Stream is at least intermittent / (
if ? f 9 or perennial if ? 30*
Ephemeral Intermitten rennial
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
I" Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
3
4. Particle size of stream_ substrate
5. Activelrelict floodplain
0
1
3
0
1
2
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7, Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
8. Headcuts
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes ,3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussi� in manual
B. Hvdroloav (Subtotal = q; '16 ]
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
4
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
4
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes T;
t'. Riolonv lSuhtntal = ) D ]
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
7275
3
22. Fish
0
110
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1.5
25. Algae
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See . 35 of manual.
Notes: Art j, Aeh3 ;YLA,�1
►r
Sketch:

Characteristics Considered When Making an OHWM Determination
Dimensions " Wilson Creek
Width: 'S �¢' Site:
�m
Height: _ �� aQ,
Depth waters) _%**��'� Notes
Natural I
Chan
Destruction i
Prese
Vegetation mattei
Leaf litter dis-
Multipi
Chai
ine impressed on bank
Shelving
✓
ges in character of soil
Df terrestrial vegetation
;nce of litter and debris
Wracking
................
�.....................
i down, bent, or abse
_____�.
Sediment sorting
r/
Curbed or washed away
Scour
Deposition
e observed flow events
Bed and banks
Water staining
nge in plant community
Other:

I USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map) 1
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHE�EpT��
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: / •w 2. Evaluator's name: 7Y`471 JAK1A" Wilson Creek
3. Date of evaluation: )3 ] 4. Time of evaluation: ?-y
5. Name of stream: r ►� ^�1liY; sew 6. River basin: )e
7. Approximate drainage area: 8. Stream order: Z
9. Length of reach evaluated: 10. County:JZe!!! W A
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any):
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): Longitude (ex.-77.556611):
Method location determined (circle): GP ' Topo She O LA:ial) Photo/GIS` OtherGIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation y roads ach map identifying stream(s) location):
14. Proposed channel work (if any):
15. Recent weather conditions:�`��
16. Site conditions at time of visit:
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: _Section 10 _Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters X Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES O If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map?1`ES/NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? ES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: j" % Residential _% Commercial _% Industrial _% Agricultural
_% Forested _% Cleared / Logged _% Other )
".
22. Bankf ill width: ].�.- by 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank):
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2%) _Gentle (2 to 4%) _Moderate (4 to 10%) _Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight Occasional bends _Frequent meander _Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
INTotal Score (from reverse): Comments:
Evaluator's Signature l Date_
This channel evaluation rm is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change — version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET Wilson Creek
ECOREGION POINT
RANGE
#
CHARACTERISTICS
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
1
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0-4
0-5
(no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = maxpoints)
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0-5
( extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = maxpoints)
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
0-5
no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points)
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0-4
5'
extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = maxpoints)
5
Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
0-4
no discharge = 0• springs, sees wetlands. etc. = maxpoints)
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0-4
0-2
no flood Main = 0: extensive flood Main = maxpoints)
A"
7
Entrenchment / floodplain access
0-5
0-4
0— 2
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = maxpoints)'
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0- 4
0-2
no wetlands = 0; lace adjacent wetlands = maxpoints)
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
/
(extensive channeliaation = 0; natural meander = maxpoints)
10
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
I
extensive deuosition = 0: little or no sediment = maxpoints)
1 I
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0-5
�..
fine, homogenous = 0: large, diverse sizes = maxpoints)
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0-4
0-5
y,
(deeply incised = 0: stable bed & banks = maxpoints)
�-4
13
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0-5
0-5
3
n
,r,
(severe erosion = 0; no erosion. stable banks = maxpoints)
01
Q
14
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0-4
0-5
2
F.
(no visible roots = 0• dense roots throughout = maxpoints)
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0-4
0-5
D
r substantial impact --0; no evidence = max points)
16
Presence of rit'lle-pool/ripp a -pool complexes
0-3
0-5
0-6
r
no riffles/r )ples or pools = 0; well-develo ed = maxpoints)
Q
17
Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0 — 6
Z
l�
little or no habitat = 0• Ire cent varied habitats =max aims}
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0-5
0-5
..
(no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy= max points)
w
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0-4
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max)
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0-5
0-5
2
do evidence = 0• common, numerous tv es = maxpoints)
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
Z
^�(no
evidence = 0; common, numerous types = maxpoints)
'4
22
Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
)
no evidence = 0; common, numerous types - max pDints
m
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0-5
3
{no evidence — 0: abundant evidence = maxpoints)
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
1
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

Wilson Creek
P�'
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
'j _ /')>_
Date: a©��
Project[Site: IMj :
Latitude: 35- 10 7-370
Evaluator: 1"-Pi�t�taV7c�.✓
County:
Longitude:'77./a3D-3
Total Points:
St'eamisatleast intermittent r
Stream Determination (circle one)
Other
if _ 19 or perennial if z 30" y
Ephemeral Intermittent n ial
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =_L J }
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2�
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
01
9. Grade control
0
0
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
11. Second or greater order channel
No;= 0
Yes = 3
-artiticial ditches are not rated: see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 1, � )
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
fi1 ' �_
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
t
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
: 0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
`0.5
1-
1 r
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes
C. Biology (Subtotal = -1, ]
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
[
'1L?
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0.
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
�0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
ff3
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW =
0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: s S',q vrVSG , / (,,
Sketch: �jr-c<� G, h�ud CA J (,4AAM/,Vj 114
C d 01 (_Q t7 C. P V. i �' l J UW -V G (4 4- i '4v fp I F ® 4
(A irU µ j U �` ` r`
%) wak � � i C/!"L9l n 1-K 5 s ✓
'ef

Wilson Creek
NC DWO gtream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: OQ `
Project/Site: `r3Ga�
Latitude:
Evaluator: \�tev°`7Q
County: C-Mue
Longitude:'? rOv3
Total Points:
Stream Determination(circle one)
Other i e� wje_
Stream is at least intermittent �5
if>_ 19 or perennial if>_ 30*
Ephemeral. I Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
2
3
2 Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
;iJ
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1,
2
3
4: Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2,
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
P
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
(12
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
)
2
3
8. Headcuts
2=
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No 0,,
Yes = 3 u 7-s_
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
R HVrlrnlnnv lSi ihtntal = I 0 i
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1-'
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1 ,'
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
d
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes 3 .
C Biola Subtotal =
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0 ;
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
.0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1.5
23. Crayfish.
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0'
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
Q.5 ..
i 1 i
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW 5: OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
_s-
Notes:
Sketch: �i � ' O 01 V%- ) c �. .. M C r , o f[r l �` ct � (/
���JL N�G� � � ���_ •I-LO w �� � (,'r'�5 !� �/YD �9 �-� �N' .
Nwt
ly_woiww .wa
re�C,1A01

USACE AID# DWQ #
Wilson Creek
Site #
(indicate on attached map)
M STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
C� (' 'J �� �✓ 2. Evaluator's name: � < t at'.)1. Applicant's name: � ++ C
3. Date of evaluation: U B ` 4. Time of evaluation: i l y J
5. Name of stream: r7 6. River basin: 141ecl5 e
7. Approximate drainage area: lv 3 a c—,t5 8. Stream order:
9. Length of reach evaluated: 06 10. County: �✓
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any):
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): • 107 -3 ` Q _ Longitude (ex.—77.556611): 7 -7. ! o 3 �, 3
Method location determined (circle): 40) Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
da(? Sd 41PA 0 �- �LL e ir,f 0-1 .tic a -,.. � 4 l& i ( 95 0
14. Proposed channel work (if any)..
15. Recent weather conditions: �(� CC, w�o� 4 O ' �► �, + �f ��
16. Site conditions at time of visit: 7 ( t
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: _Section 10 _Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: 10 % Residential 70 % Commercial _% Industrial _% Agricultural
% Forested _% Cleared / Logged ta_% Other f
22. Bankfull width: 1,3 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): / -
24. Channel slope down center of stream: _Flat (0 to 2%) LGentle (2 to 4%) _Moderate (4 to 10%) _Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight _Occasional bends Frequent meander _Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): Comments: I (—ew L%k 14ee— � i�`'�P�' "�
r7 � ,' 0- "1 e,14. q-, �-ro s.-1 4. %..de— f d ff e< ktr rf-opt —S-i kG 001/9 } "A-t•
ruti ,r—tf.--P11e..I/ I Sr./GI— of r- -4 .^PWr.k.nc. Y]-P I-t—r YIVro''+t1--,
Evaluator's Signature Date �V
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental rofessionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

Wilson Creek
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
ECOREGION POINT
RANGE
#
CHARACTERISTICS
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0-4
0-5
r
i no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = max points)
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0-5
(extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points)
3
Riparian zone
0 - 6
0 - 4
0 - 5
/
k
(no buffer = 0: contiguous, wide buffer = max oints)
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0-4
0
extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = maxpoints)
5
Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
0-4
(no discharge = 0; s rin s, see s, wetlands, etc. = max ointsl
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0- 4
0- 4
0- 2
y
(no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = max points)
�C
7
Entrenchment / floodplain access
0-5
0-4
0-2
A((deeply
entrenched = 0; frequent flooding= max ints}
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0-2
(no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = maxpoints)
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
( extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = maxpoints)
10
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
(extensive deposition-- 0: little or no sediment = max oints)
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0-5
---
(fine, homogenous = 0• large, diverse sizes = maxpoints)
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0-4
0-5
�r
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points )
13
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0-5
0-5
a
(severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = maxpoints)
14
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0-4
0-5
3
(no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0,5
0-4
0-5
G
(substantial impact =0; no evidence = maxpoints)
16
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
0-3
0-5
0-6
F
(no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-develo ed = maxpoints)
17
Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
6-6
11
�
( little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = maxpoints)
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
D _ 5
0-5
0-5
(no shading vegetation = 0; continuous cano � = max points)
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
o - 4
----
1deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max)
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0-5
0-5
i
no evidence = 0: common, numerous types = maxpoints)
0
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
j
O
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max ints)
O
22
Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
(no evidence - 0; common, numerous tyRes = maxpoints)
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0-5
V
tno evidence = 0; abundant evidence = maxpoints)
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
`
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

r
q
ry Ll
_Sil�hh`(�,
I
JC-NWW-lp
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: „ �,� ,
Project/Site: l.n
Latitude: 3 j� 00 r
y
-
Evaluator: � �- � I/ IM
County: C
Longitude: 771 1007
Total Points:
Stream Determination
(clrSIM=4
Other A42LV
Stream is at least intermittent
`
Ephemeral Intermitten erennial
e.g. Quad Name:
if 2 19 or perennial if >_ 30'
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal =
Moderate
Strong
Absent
Weak
18, Continuity of channel bed and bank
FY
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
2
3
a
Y
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
0
1
2
ripple -pool sequence
0
fi..
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
5. Active/relict floodplain
o
1
2
3
6. Depositional bans or benches
0
1
2
�•
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. 'Headcuts
to
1
2
9. Grade conirol
I , `0 .:
0.5
1
1
10.Naturalvalley
0
_0.5
1
1,5
i
second or greater order channel r
' No = 0
Yes
,.artificial ditches 11f9 not rated; see discussions in manual
B. H drolo '(Subtotal =
12. Prese ` of Baseflow
10
1
2
3,
13. Iron oxidizing b4cte6'31.
,
1
2
_3
14.',Leaf litter
1.5
r 1
0.5
r
;
15,;! .edirnertt,.011,plants or debris
0
0.5
'
"
'
16. Organfc debrMtries or piles
0
0.5
1 '•'
1
._17,oil-based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
- es = •y; �7? -,
7
C. BiolQ . LZubtotal
~
��1.8. Fibrous roots ie streambed
2
1.
, 0-
1b. Rooted upland plants in streambed '
3
2
1
- 0
20. Macrobenthos'(notedive'rsity and abundance)
_
Cj
2
3. •• _
"
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1�
2
22. Fish
0
' 0.5
1
23. Crayfish
0.5
24. Amphibians
CD,%
0.5
-• '-1
1
1.5
1.5
25. Algae
0.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other =0
p& finial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
`
Notes ---
Sketch:
A
l
:a.
+ T�

74
Vs
Characteristics Considered WhenWaking an OHWM Determination
JC-NWW-lp
Dimensions
Width:
Height: -2_
r"Notes
Depth water:
Natural line Impressed on bank
Char
Destruction
Pros
Vegetation matte
Led litter dh
MUMP
Cha
Shelving
gas In character o(soil
V
A terrestrial 0§etedofi
ince of litter and debris
V
Wracking
V/
J down, bent, or absent
Sediment sorting
turbed or washed away
Scour
Deposition
9 observed flow events
Bad and banks
Water staining
nge in plant community
Z
Amb,
I

USACE AID#
DWQk
JC-NWW-lp
Site # (indicate on attached map)
M STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: ��� � �^ 2. Evaluator's name: 1Zk t>t5Wk.- J 4- f I r,
3. Date of evaluation: 4. Time of evaluation: C, C ��
5. Name of stream: C-C d C 6. River basin: Ne V _
7. Approximate drainage area: d ZLP 8. Stream order: i
9. Length of reach evaluated:
10. County: 4 v -e✓'%-
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any): t�
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): i D S-4 L Longitude (ex. 77.556611): { UO2
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby oads andlandmarksand attach map
f id ntifying stream(s) location):
_ �'+�.,�r• f� �unw{�, ��'
14. Proposed channel work (if any)::
15. Recent weather conditions: 410 r vv►r l
16. Site conditions at time
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: _Section 10 _Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters wl'-Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES NO If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES
21. Estimated watershed land use: % Residential 66 % Commercial _% Industrial _% Agricultural
_% Forested _% Cleared / Logged _% Other { )
22. Bankfull width: _ 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 2—
24. Channel slope down center of stream: at (0 to 2%) _G le (2 to 4%) Moderate (4 to 10%) _Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight _Occasional bends _Frequent meander _Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): �, s Comments: `Ct lI,=1`rH+�✓� � �
Evaluator's Signature ¢-tom—, Date � - 12--
This channel evaluation form i intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change —version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

JC-NWW-lp
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
ECOREGION
POINT
RANGE
#
CHARACTERISTICS
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
I
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0-4
0-5
(no flow or saturation = 0; strona flow = max points t
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0-5
G
extensive alteration = 0• no alteration = maxpoints)
3
Riparian z one
0-6
0-4
0-5
U
(no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points)-
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0-4
(extensive discharges = 0• no discharges = max points)
I
a
5
Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
0-4
d
(no discharge = 0; springs, sees wetlands etc. = maxpoints)
U
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0-4
0-2
�-
no flood lain = 0; extensive flood lain = maxpoints)
Entrenchment / floodplain access
0-5
0-4
0-2
�-
p"
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max points)
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0-2
�II
(no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = maxpoints)
i
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
3
extensive channelization = 0• natural meander = maxpoints)
10
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
extensive de osition= 0: little or no sediment = maxpoints)
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0-5
l�
fine, homogenous = 0; large. diverse sizes = max points
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0-4
0-5
2
(dee lv incised = 0: stable bed & banks = maxpoints)
E-
13
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0-5
0-5
�4
(severe erosion = 0: no erosion, stable banks = max oints
d
14
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0-4
0-5
2
no visible roots = 0; dense roots throu hout = max points)
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0-4
0-5
substantial im act =0; no evidence = max pints
16
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
0-3
0-5
0-6
(no riffles/rip2les or pools = 0: well -developed = max points)
d
17
Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6
`i
E�
little or no habitat = 0• frequent, varied habitats = maxpoints)
W
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0-5
0-5
`1
x
no shadingvegetation = 0: continuous canopy= max oints
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0-4
A
(deeply embedded = 0: loose structure = max)
1 "
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0-5
0-5
no evidence = 0: common, numerous types = maxpoints)
p21
Presence of amphibians
0 - 4
0-4
0-4
(no evidence = 0: common, numerous es = max ints
22
Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
(no evidence = 0: common, numerous types = max points)
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0-5
(no evidence = 0• abundant evidence = maxpoints)
Total Points Po ssible
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

JC-NWW-2p
SS � new SS 53
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: g+ I: 20
ProjectlSite: i�(mifl ms (,Vr-
Latitude: -35-
I )p•l)c1
Evaluator: Sm� (1� ��
county: CY6jVtr
Longitude:-77, ))bb573
Total Points:
Stream is at least infermittent
-1
Stream Determination (cir
Ephemeral Intermitten Perelin"
other /�Ir(if,� �✓G
1
Name:
if>_ 1gar perennial if>_ 30*
I e.g. Quad
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = M3 3
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1e Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3, In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
1
2
2
3'
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
B. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
co:;
1
2
3
9. Grade control
Q '
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes
3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal =
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
yestm
G. 1310lo Subtotal = 'b `J
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1.5
25. Algae
COT)_
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Othe = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: l i ',
LA WLE K. rS 11 'LA
Sketch: P.n�t ►^ 1 i'4+t- �'
� J►v

Characteristics Considered When Making an OHWM Determination
Dimensions 08vi �Q, site: SSC MAY 13_,
Width: 8 Ft lP ff <�
Height: 3 ft 4 a¢'
m
Depth wateral -I f t �� �O �� Notes
Natural I
Chan
Destruction
Pres
Vegetation matte
Leaf litter dis
Multipl
Cha
JC-NWW-2p
ine impressed on bank
Shelving
ence
ges in character of soil
of terrestrial vegetation
of litter and debris
Wracking
1/
d down, bent, absent
✓
_ F
Sediment sorting
✓
_
turbed or washed away
vv
Scour
Deposition
e observed flow events
Bed and banks
Water staining
nge in plant community
Other:

USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
lmm
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment: ylf�
1. Applicant's name:
AAW-
3. Date of evaluation: �1 j31 1-0
5. Name of stream: � ;"i'1 If15�z i S
7. Approximate drainage area: `tw
9. Length of reach evaluated:__
2. Evaluator's name:JC-NWW-2p
4. Time of evaluation: /0 3J
6. River basin: ALi l:
8. Stream order:
10. County: t,01 yM
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any): +^p l t
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): Lo 77.556611): —�"7 ■/PPO
Method location determined (circle)a��L�o Sheet O o (Aerial) P�and
ther GIs Other
13. Location of reach under eval roads h map identifying stream(s) location):
14. Proposed channel work (if any):
15. Recent weather
16. Site conditions at time of
/VrY-,A, I — rWI-V
i S 2sqw *A�
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: _Section 10 _Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters fi� Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? jYEV NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey?<�o NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: /PV % Residential _% Commercial _% Industrial _% Agricultural
_% Forested _% Cleared / Logged _% Other
22. Bankfull width: 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank):
24. Channel slope down center of stream: _Flat (0 to 2%) Gentle (2 to 4%) _Moderate (4 to 10%) _Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight k Occasional bends _Frequent meander _Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): Lf J
Evaluator's Signature _0 Date
This channel evaluation f m kisintendVd to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and envir nmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change — version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

JC-NWW-2p
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
#
CHARACTERISTICS
ECOREGION POINT
RANGE
SCORE
Coastal
piedmont
Mountain
1
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0-4
0-5
(no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = maxpoints)
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0-5
(.extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max pints)
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0- 4
0-5
ze
(no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = maxpoints)
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0 - 5.
0-4
0-4
extensive discharaes = 0; no discharges = maxpoints)
5
Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
0-4
3
d(no
discharge = 0; springs, sees wetlands, etc. = maxpoints)
U
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0-4
0-2
no flood lain = 0; extensive flood lain = max points)
Entrenchment / floodplain access
0 5
0- 4
0- 2
L
-J
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding= max points)
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0-2
--
no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = max points)
L�
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0- 3.
(extensive channelization = 0' natural meander = maxpoints)
10
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
extensive de osition= 0: little or no sediment = max oints
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0-5
fine, homogenous = 0; lie. diverse sizes = maxpoints)
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0-4
0 - 5
f2
7•
dee lv incised = 0; stable bed & banks = maxpoints)
13
Presence of major hank failures
0-5
0-5
0-5
3
(severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = maxpoints)
q
e
14
Root depth and density on banks
0 - 4
0-5
F
(no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = maxpoints)0-3
✓�
1s
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0-4
0-5
4)
(substantial impact =0: no evidence = max ioints
16
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
0-3
0-5
0-6
no riffl s/ri2ples or pools = 0; well -developed = maxpoints)
e
17
Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6
!little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0-5
0-5
(no shading ve etation = 0• continuous cano v = max oints
19
Substrate embeddeduess
NA*
0-4
0-4
dee 1 embedded = 0; loose structure = max)r--
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0 - 5
0 5
no evidence = 0• common, numerous tv es = maxpoints)
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
2*
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max pints)
O
22
Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
no evidence = 0• common, numerous types = maxpoints)
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0 -
0-5
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max mints).
Total points Possible
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
�p
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

JC-NWW-3p
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: ProjectlSite: Ti►m�S Latitude:
Evaluator: SVY?�tXV-1 AWi01 A County: (,011M Longitude: '7712b'fV
Total Points: Stream Determination (cir Other /1 ea ig11" / L
streamisatLast intermittent 2,9� � Ephemeral Intermittent erennial e.g. Quad Name:
if>_ 19 or perennial if>_ 30*
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
18Continuity of channel bed and bank ' ; ; ',
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3_
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
(D
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
2
3
5. Active/relictfloodplain
C
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
! 1 •
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No U,
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
o u..a.,i..... ■o L�.+.i- II
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
.5
1
1 1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes 3
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
U3
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
q
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
Q2
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75: OBLtl 0 Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be Identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Note's�:y f t; ,, i ;i ` ;`Ci•'
A.
V 4`E 115
,� 1 �! i,.�
C AC
Sketch: l% 1�'"t5 1vt, rtMd Otyr-)
A�

Characteristics Considered When Making an OHWM Determination
JC-NWW-3p
Dimensions 011 WM site: S S � �- Ivy
Width: 30 ft 15 Ft m _ -
Height: Ffi c� 6
Depth water: 0-0,2F � <o �o :?� Notes
Natural
Chan
Destruction
Presi
Vegetation matte
Leaf litter dis
Multipl
Cha
line impressed on bank
Shelving
ges in character of soil
Df terrestrial vegetation
:nce of litter and debris
Wracking
J down, bent, or absent���
Sediment sorting
turbed or washed away
Scour
J
J
Deposition
e observed flow events
Bed and banks
Water staining
nge in plant community
Other:

USACE AID#
1 - -- -
DWQ#
Site # (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
F03 -� ;-AQV
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment: M Mre,
1. Applicant's name:
%jlW ��' 2. Evaluator's name: 5940I I� JC-NWW-3p
3. Date of evaluation: 'M2,110 4. Time of evaluation: 1P SS
5. Name of stream: A ate tySS* `10 1 6. River basin: IYA44&
7. Approximate drainage area: YDr At 8. Stream order: 1
9. Length of reach evaluated:. Pzpo� 10. County: '• mil
11. Site coordinates (if known): gprefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any):_
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 35'���%� 7 __L7t,,, _ "ex.-77.556611): —77dww Z-)
Method location determined (circle): GP /Topo Sheet rtho (Aerial) Photo/ ' Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under eval (n roman mar s and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
S J �IP4, rl)I f & � tp ma) Aj /Izr,
14. Proposed channel work (if any):, /
15. Recent weather conditions: �✓6yIhA
16. Site conditions at time of visit: / Y
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: _Section 10 _Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point?/fEDNO If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES 0 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES
21. Estimated watershed land use: � % Residential _% Commercial _% Industrial _% Agricultural
-% Forested _% Cleared / Logged _% Other ( )
22. Bankfull width: 3p !"� 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank):_
24. Channel slope down center of stream: K. Flat (0 to 2%) _Gentle (2 to 4%) _Moderate (4 to 10%) _Steep (> 10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: k Straight _Occasional bends _Frequent meander _Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality. �W�
Total Score (from reverse): Comments:_
Evaluator's Signature Date
s l'jzo
This channel evaluati form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change — version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET JC-NWW-3p
CHARACTERISTICS
ECOREGION POINT RANGE
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
1
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0-4
0-5
S
(no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = max )hints )
Z
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0- 5
extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = maxpoints)
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
0-5
I .
no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points)
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0-4
!�
extensive discharges - 0: no discharges = max oints
5
Groundwater discharge
0- 3
0-4
0-4
U(no
discharge = 0: springs, seeps, wetlands. etc. = maxpoints)
.,,
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0-4
0-2
no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = max points)
Entrenchment / floodplain access
0- 5
0- 4
0- 2
(deeply. entrenched = 0; frequent floodig = max points)
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0-2
no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = maxpoints)
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
(extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = maxpoints)
10
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
extensive de osition= 0; little or no sediment = max oints
1 I
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0-5
-1-
(fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max points
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0-4
0-5
�•
dee _ iv incised = 0: stable bed & banks = maxpoints)
13
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0-5
0-5
3
�
(severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = maxpoints)
14
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0-4
0-5
E„
(no visible roots = 0• dense roots throughout = maxpoints)
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0-4
0-5
(substantial impact =0: no evidence = max ints
16
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
0-3
0-5
0 - 6
'
l
(!Lcriffles/ri11 ales or pools = 0; well -developed = max Dints
_
1
Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6
F'
( little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = maxpoints)
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0-5
0-5
no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = maxpoints)
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0-4
(deeply embedded = 0: loose structure = max)
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0-5
0-5
'
no evidence = 0• common, numerous types � maxpoints)
J
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
{no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max pDints)3
0
22
Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
p
no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = maxpoints)
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0-5
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max . nintsl
Total Points Possible
100
100
100.
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)'
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

JC-NWW-4p
54-o)
NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: ) p
ProjectlSite: j) MV4l4 s t4e&
Latitude: I J i) pI f 2,01
Evaluator: 3Y'A)� j j W1
County: [,wWM
Longitude: -77, )) lOV 4,
Total Points:
Stream Determination (ci
other �/GI:J % ►� / t
Stream is at least intermittent
if>_ 19 or perennial if? 30*
Ephemeral Intermitte Perenni I
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = %'L-�
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a- Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3'
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ri le ool sequence
0
1
2
LJ
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Activelrelictfloodplain
0
1
2
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
a3
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1.
11. Second or greater order channel
NoTO)
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not raieu, see uisuussiuis In manuai
B. H drolo Subtotal = )7.
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3,
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
1 0
1 0.5
5R1
5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 0.5
LV
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes 3
C_ Rioloov (Subtotal = IT .1"-- 1
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
j
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other - 0_•
*perennial streams may also be iden ed usinQ other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
,
Notes: -Pe'
W 0 / �,<�
... s >'� ✓`^� r
u�v`
Sketch:
f
r�
J�

Characteristics Considered When Making an OHWM Determination
JC-NWW-4p
Dimensions �¢, site:
Width:
Height? coo a�
Depth water: p , j 5 i �� �O �
Notes
Natural I
Chan
Destruction
Pros
Vegetation matte
Leaf litter dis
Multipl
Cha
ine impressed on bank
Shelving
ges in character of soil
of terrestrial vegetation

USACE AID#
DWQ#
_..._— - __.__...___ - 1
Site # (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET -AW
l:T
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment: �'ir^w►(a')',
1. Applicant's name: 9'YV) 2. Evaluator's name: .✓_` A JC-NWW-4p
3. Date of evaluation: g �Z ZA-) 4. Time of evaluation: )2-,0
5. Name of stream: 11 s�✓iGr SS, :�) 6. River basin:
7. Approximate drainage area:_ Gloms 8. Stream order:
9. Length of reach evaluated: S� T�- 10. County:._4A
11. Site coordinates (if known): r� prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any):
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 4 ,� Longitude (ex.-77.556611):
Method location determined (circle): PS �eoads
Orth Aerial) Photo/GI Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluate n an s.ara ch map identifying stream(s) location):
14. Proposed channel work (if any):
15. Recent weather conditions: `►w"�''
16. Site conditions at time of visit: ,`l
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: _Section 10 _Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point NO If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YEN
21. Estimated watershed land use: 3> % Residential jo % Commercial _% Industrial _% Agricultural
7% Forested _% Cleared / Logged % Other
22. Bankfull width: � Z h� 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank):
24. Channel slope down center of stream: X_Flat (0 to 2%) _Gentle (2 to 4%) _Moderate (4 to 10%) _Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight X Occasional bends _Frequent meander _Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): :57Comments:_ 'l
Evaluator's Signature I-1' . ff
Date
a —,f
This channel evaluatio form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners andfenvifonmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

JC-NWW-4p
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
ECOREGION
POINT
RANGE
#
CHARACTERISTICS
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
i
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0-4
0-5
(no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = maxpoints)
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0-5
�
(extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max Dints
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
0-5
(no buffer = 0: contiguous wide buffer = maxpoints)
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0-4
extensive discharges = 0: no discharges = max Dints
5
Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
0-4
3
(no discharge = 0: springs. seeps, wetlands. etc. = maxpoints)
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0-4
0- 2
2J
('no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = maxpoints)
S
='
Entrenchment / floodplain access
0- 5
0- 4
0- 2
3
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max points)
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0-2
(no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = maxpoints)
9
Channel sinuosity
0- 5
0-4
0-3
L�
extensive channelization = 0• nalural meander = maxpoints)
10
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
(extensive de osition= 0: little or no sediment = maxpoints)
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0-5
--
fine, homy venous = 0: large. diverse sizes = max points]
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0-4
0-5
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = maxpoints)
13
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0-5
0-5
�=+
severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks =max Dints
@
14
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0-4
0-5
(no visible rants = 0• dense roots throughout =max Dints
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0-4
0-5
substantial impact =0: no evidence = max points)
16
Presence of riffle-poolfripple-pool complexes
0-3
0-5
0-6
2,
(no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well -developed = maxpoints)
F
Q
17
Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6
F'
(little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = maxpoints)
�
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0-5
0-5
S
(no shading vegetation = 0; continuous cano.y = maxpoints)
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0-4
---
(deeph embedded = 0. loose structure = max)
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0-5
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous tv es - maxpoints)
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
(no evidence = 0: common, numerous types = max points)
O
22
Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
m
no evidence = 0; common. numerous 1� lies = max pDints)
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0 - 6
0-5
0-5
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = maxpoints)
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also tinter on first page)
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

JC-NWW-5i
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form
Version 4.11
Date: ( . o --Z{%
Project/Site:�iw,,,,�/°� ���
Latitude:
Evaluator:
•4 ; G C f� ! �'r [�
County: C f'o►i/�.tt/\
Longitude:
dq�g 2
Total Points:
_
? 4yq`' yl
Stream is at least intermittent CL
if z Igor erennial if z 30*
Stream Dete circle one)
Ephemeral
Other
ntermitte Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomor holoI (Subtotal
18' Continuity of channel bed and bank
Absent Weak
Moderate
Strong
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0 1
2
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
1
2
3
ri le- ool SEEN,,uence
0 1
4. Particle size of stream substrate
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
C0 1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0 1
�? '
3
8. Headcuts
0 1
3
9. Grade control
-0 . 1
2
3
10. Natural valley
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
0 0.5
1
-
1.5 '
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discu ssioI manual
No _
Yes = 3
B. H drolo Subtotal =
12. Presence of Baseflow
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0 1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
0 1
� 1
2
,3�
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0.5
p
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0� 0.5 ,
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
0 �'5
1
1.5
C. Bioloov Iqibtotal = r>
No=O
Yes=3
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3 2
1�
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
&-f 2
1
0
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
2
3
23. Crayfish
0 0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0 .5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0 ' 0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
0
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual. FACW = 0.75; BL = 1,5' - then = 0
Notes:
ketch:

Characteristics Considered When Making an OHWM Determination
Dimensions
4 JC-NWW-Si
Width: 2-S fz Site:
10�
Height: L- Z J0 b- -
otp
Depth water: .- y�o �� �Z Notes
Natural I
Chan
Destruction
Press
Vegetation matte
Leaf litter dis
Multip
Cha
!no impressed on bank
Shelving
ges in character of soil
A terrestrial vegetation
once of litter and debris
Wracking
i down, bent, or absent
Sediment sorting
Curbed or washed away
Scour
.Deposition
e observed flow events
�
Bed and banks
Water staining
nge in plant community
Other:

LLSACE AID# DWQ #
TC-NWW-5i
145f � 41,
Site # (indicate on attached map)
FM STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Allo*-
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: We,4 ,. J �,ww 2. Evaluator's name: F : 1 4vow.
3. Date of evaluation: `� to ---020 4. Time of evaluation: - 2c7
5. Name of stream: U"T- %6 'W' d p,. 6. River basin:
7. Approximate drainage area: i l m.L 8. Stream order: 4
9. Length of reach evaluated: S °0 F�- 10. County: CtoLV-"-*%
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any):,
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): Longitude (ex.—77.556611): R -,p '041
-741
Method location determined (circle): GPS opo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
1 ­2 titan t N S �aJ
14. Proposed channel work (if any):
15. Recent weather conditions: NuP,--,
16. Site conditions at time of
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: — ction 10 _Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters V Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES OAT If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? C ✓ O 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: Residential _% Commercial _% Industrial _% Agricultural
00 % Forested _% Cleared / Logged _% Other [
22. Bankfull width: 2— 3 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank):`-
24. Channel slope down center of stream:�lat (0 to 2%) �1t1e (2 to 4%) _Moderate (4 to 10%) _Steep (> 10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: - Straight ✓ Occasional bends _✓Frequent meander _Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
LITotal Score (from reevvfers� : � Comments: S..o..l� �. I .... ...t
Evaluator's Signature If_ Date " `2,pay
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change — version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

JC-Nww-5i
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
ECOREGION
POINT
RANGE
#
CHARACTERISTICS
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
I
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0-4
0-5
(no flow or saturation = 0• strong flow = max points)
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0-5
[ extensive alteration = 0' no alteration = maxpoints)3
3
Riparianz one
0-6
0-4
0-5
L
no buffer = 0• contiguous, wide buffer = maxpoints)
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0-4
( extensive dischar es = 0; no discharges = maxpoints)
a
5
Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
0-4
d
(no discharge = 0• springs, see s, wetlands etc. = maxpoints)
U
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0-4
0-2
t�
no floodplain = 0• extensive flood lain = maxpoints)/
7
Entrenchment / floodplain access
0-5
0-4
0-2
a
(deeply entrenched = 0• frequent floodin • = max points)
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0-2
(no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = maxpoints)
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = maxpoints)
10
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
(extensive deposition-- 0• little or no sediment = max points
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0-5
/
fine. homogenous = 0: large, diverse sizes = max oints
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0-4
0-5
G/
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = maxpoints)
H
13
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0-5
0-5
u
a
severe erosion = 0, no erosion stable banks = max points 1
/
dRoot
14
depth and density on banks
0-3
0-4
0-5
H
(no visible roots = 0; dense roots throw hout = max points)
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0-4
0-5
(substantial impact =0• no evidence = maxpoints)
16
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
0-3
0-5
0-6
(no riffles/ripples or pools = 0• well -developed = maxpoints)
d
17
Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6
( little or no habitat = 0; frequent,varied habitats = max points)
M
I8
Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0-5
0-5
no shadingvegetation = 0: continuous canopy= max points)
x
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA
0-4
0-4
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure =max)
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0-5
0-5
2�
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = maxpoints)
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
p
{no evidence = 0; common numerous types = max points)
�-1
22
Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
y
, no evidence = 0; common numerous es = max oints
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0-5
no evidence = 0• abundant evidence = maxpoints)
Total Points Po ssible
100
100
100
Z
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

USACE AID#
DWQ #.
JC-Nww-5i A 56�-
Site # (indicate on attached map)]
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET Aft
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment: -
1. Applicant's name: A(L w ?C'Q*✓
3. Date of evaluation: 'i -10 --?02V
5. Name of stream: TF J,) W c %-) &-te�
7. Approximate drainage area: D - 3
9. Length of reach evaluated: �0 4
2. Evaluator's name:
4. Time of evaluation: I I = o 7 .wl
6. River basin: -,,'
8. Stream order: I
10. County: C nkj- r
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any):
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): '?,S-, D 1-s3 Li 7 Longitude (ex.-77.556611): --R. l o ct � S`
Method location determined (circle): S Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluat' note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
14. Proposed channel work (if any):
15. Recent weather conditions: Nvf�-^-'�
16. Site conditions at time of visit: Al", (M.�
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: Section 10 _Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YESOP' If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES QNU'�) 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YESQ
01
21. Estimated watershed land use: l60 % Residential _% Commercial _% Industrial _% Agricultural
_% Forested
22. Bankfull width: b
24. Channel slope down cente f stream: _Flat (0 to 2%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight _Occasional bends
_% Cleared / Logged _% Other I
23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): /3
ntle (2 to 4%) _Moderate (4 to 10%) _Steep (>10%)
_Frequent meander _Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to ,site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): omments• I— t� 'I U✓1
Owl t
Evaluator's Signature / Date b]I`■-'Avzi
m
This channel evaluation foris intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and enlvirnmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change -version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
A,c JC-NWW-5p
IT)ft- i,
/4-s if'p, -' '.atA !J
Date: Crj - 1(2 - 7 02 0
Project/Site: '5 ,,,, � t� f, G
Latitude: 0-1
Evaluator:`
County: G Ca/st�
Longitude: -1-;7- C) i Z7(o
Total Points:
Stream r least intermittent
Stream Determination Tale-o")�
Ephemeral Intermitte Perennial
Other M3 aee4 i 1
`e. Quad Name:
if >_ 19 or;�erennia! if 2 30"
P
9�
A. Geomor holo Subtotal =
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
03
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
0
0
0
0
0
J1J -�
1
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
4. Particle size of stream substrate
5. Active/relict floodplain
6. Depositional bars or benches
7. Recent alluvial deposits
8. Headcuts
L9
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
1
1.5
Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1
L110.
1. Second or greater order channel
o =
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal = °� t S
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
`1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 ,
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
C. Biology (Subtotal = )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
�.0 a
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
•
1
2
3
22. Fish
0.5
1
23. Crayfish
0
1
24. Amphibians
-
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:
All '

Characteristics Considered When Making an OHWM Determination
• JC-NWW-Sp
Dimensions
l� Site:
Width: - — —
Height:
Depth water: - _ Iti Notes
Natural line impressed on bank
Shelving
n character of soil
errestrial vegetation
of litter and debris
Wracking
, bent, or absent
Sediment sorting
ed or washed away i
Scour t%
Deposition
served flow events
Changes l
Destruction of t
Presence
Vegetation matted down
Leaf litter disturb
0
Multiple ob
Change i
Bed and banks
Water staining

JC-NWW-6p
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 PJ � - 01
Date: - ©E)
Project/Site' Jf � �,{
Latitude:
Evaluator: �!R (S(uSGf,.�
County: C-Qv
Longitude:'72,1(���G�
./
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
Stream Determination (circle one)
Ephemeral Intermittent erenn
Other s/fv h/
e.g. Quad Name:
if z 19 or perennial if z 30
ti
A. Geomorphology {Subtotal =
Absent
Weak
1
1
Moderate
Strong
is Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
2
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
9
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
)
2
3
8. Headcuts
0)
1
2
3
9. Grade control
(P
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
N
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual e
B. Hydrology Subtotal = j 11 -
12. Presence of Basef low
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
<:15
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1�
16. Organic debris lines or piles
1 0
1 0.5
1
1'S�
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
INo = 0
Yes =
C. Biology (Subtotal = S. 5 ) v
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0-
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
Q
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
!E
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW= 0.75; OBL =
1.5 Other
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

JC-NWW-6p
USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
M STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: 60 - �iectl 6 en Iy 2. Evaluator's name: Kf'Al4C&-
3. Date of evaluation: a` 0 _ 4. Time of evaluation':`
5. Name of stream: P5f ji 6. River basin: Q�l
7. Approximate drainage area: wt.' 8. Stream order: 0
9. Length of reach evaluated: 10. County: C- 4Vv10✓
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any): �—
Latitude (ex.34.872312):s. ©��°l!G[ _ Longitude (ex.-77.556611):_ 77, t�s
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other .
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
C. L S f
14. Proposed channel work (if any): V-0, -
15. Recent weather conditions: G. I) F V d dw r, e-t
16. Site conditions at time of visit:_ ( (Old-1 141V f , k r rl
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: _Section 10 _Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES &I If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES (SO) 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES 6z,
21. Estimated watershed land use: LIN Residential ON Commercial _% Industrial _% Agricultural
_% Forested _% Cleared / Logged _% Other ( )
22. Bankfull width: `( 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 1 - f
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2%) _Gentle (2 to 4%) _Moderate (4 to 10%) _Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight _Occasional bends _Frequent meander _Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): Comments:
Evaluator's Signature i/ Date
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

JC-NWW-6p
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
ECOREGION POINT
RANGE
#
CHARACTERISTICS
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
1
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0-4
0-5
S-
(no flow or saturation = 0; stronE flow = max points)
2
Evidence of past human alteration
o- 6
0-5
0-5
1
extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0-
0-5
(no buffer = 0: contiguous, wide buffer = max oints)
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0-4
n
(extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = maxpoints)
5
Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
0- 4
(no discharge = 0• springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = maxpoints)
U
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0-4
0-2
(no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain =maxpoints)
Entrenchment / floodplain access
0- 5
0- 4
0- 2
p"
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding= max points)
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0-2
(no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = maxpoints)
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
(extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = maxpoints)
10
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
extensive de osition= 0; little or no sediment = maxpoints)
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0-5
(fine, homogenous = 0: large, diverse sizes = max ints)
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0-4
0-5
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = maxpoints)
E*
,
13
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0-5
0-5
a
(:severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = maxpoints)
14
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0-4
0-5
F„
(no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
(I - 5
0-4
0-5
iy
substantial impact --0; no evidence = max points)
( J
16
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
0-3
0-5
0-6
F(no
riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well -developed = maxpoints)
17
Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6
E�
( little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = maxpoints)
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0-5
0-5
r
7
(no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points)
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0-4
-�
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max)
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0-5
0 - 5
(no evidence = 0: common, numerous types = maxpoints)
0
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
O
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = maxpoints)
C22
Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = maxpoints)
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0-5
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = maxpoints)
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
Sd�
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

JC-NWW-7i
NC DWn Stream Tdentificafian Farm Vereinn d 11
Date: Lo- j I--z �•, s
Project/Site: , f A Y� c�dc
Latitude: 3 // $ r� G [�
Evaluator: Zoi7�`�
County: Ctk
Longitude:,)
Longitude:a�v�
Other �k- ISEW
Total Points: ,../
Stream is at least intermittent b
Stream Determ 'on (circle one)
t
if a 19 or is erennial if >_ 30*
Ephemeral nterrn en erennial
e.g. Quad Name:
r
A. Geomomholoov (Subtotal = I Absent I Weak I Moderate _ Strona 1
1a, Continuity of channel bed and bank
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1`;
3
0
,
-
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
- .l5
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2 .:
3
8. Headcuts
C 9
1
2
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
c0 .
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0 1
1 Yes = 3
arunuai uncnes are not raieu; see aiscus ons to manual
B. Hvdroloov (Subtotal = ]
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1.
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
U. bioloav ( subtotal = "l . S ]
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
•1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
' 3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
C�O
1
2
•3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0`
1
3 ,•
22. Fish
0
0.5
23. Crayfish
0 '
0.5
1
`T.5 .•
24. Amphibians
Q'
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.7� BU=.1
Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:
r

Characteristics Considered When Making an OHWM Determination
Dimensions
Width:
Height: ' -
Depth water: tj
Natural line impr
Changes in cl
Destruction of terresl
Presence of li
Vegetation matted down,
Se
Leaf litter disturbed o
Multiple obsen
Change in pl
b
SL JC-NWW-7i
0 Site:
4-
m
y�o �� �� Notes
med on bank
Shelving
iaracter of soil
rial vegetation
der and debris
Wracking
)ent, or absent
diment sorting
✓'
r washed away
Scour
Deposition
1
,ed flow events
.
Bed and banks
Water staining
,
ant community
f l
Other.

JC-NWW-9i
55,t, b IN
N!'r llIll" Vni Vnrcinn A 111
-c
Date: II1W
ProjectlSite: ai l G,,
Latitude: 30, )07242P
Evaluator: 5�4j ✓ , j!^'*
County: rW)o-A
Longitude:: -77��jdd)p9)__311
Total Points:
Stream Det ircle one)
Other /1W &r' y'VG
Stream is at least intermittent 21 �'J
Ephemeral Intermitt Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
if >_ 19 or perennial if � 30*
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal- 's
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
18 Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
3
5. Activelrelict floodplain
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
1
2
3
8• Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
a2
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
11. Second or greater order channel
No , 0
Yes = 3
f7 i
0 U rA lQi I,+l,+mil - I 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
11
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0. V
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
.5
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes T 3
G. Biology Subtotal = %-a
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
21. Aquatic Mollusks
22. Fish 0
23. Crayfish
24- Amphibians
25. Algae
26. Wetland plants in streambed
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notesr'
Sketch:�Dt11"k,
t
2
1
0
2
1
0
1
2
3
1
2
3
0.5
1
1.5
0.5
1
1.5
0-5
1
1.5
0.5
1
1.5
FACW = 0.75;
OBL = 1.5 Other =
0

Characteristics Considered When Making an OHWM Determination
Dimensions
t,J ,,, JC-NWW-9i
I AZ Qj Site: 5� an�BrM-►i� )A
Width: $�
Height: 3 .cam a�<
Depth water: 6I� __- F -%*Z� Notes
Natural
Char
Destruction
Press
Vegetation matte
Leaf litter dis
Multip
Cha
ine impressed on bank
Shelving
ges in character of soil
-7 )f terrestrial vegetation
,nce of litter and debris
Wracking
i down, bent, or absent
V
.._............... -
'
Sediment sorting
Curbed or washed away
Scour
Deposition
e observed flow events
Bed and banks
Water staining
nge in plant community
Other:

USACE AID# DWQ #
Site #_ (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
AQP
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:`lft�_
Il ` � JC-NWW-9i
1. Applicant's name: 4 °t.�^� 2. Evaluator's name: l
3. Date of evaluation:. V) yho 4. Time of evaluation: %L7Z%
5. Name of stream: 14 �iW� SIP ) A 6. River basin: dwy�
7. Approximate drainage area:�M12 -f& r-7 8. Stream order:
9. Length of reach evaluated: ! 10. County: UA r"
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any): t
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): Longitude (ex.-77.556611): - ! s. i>
Method location determined (circle): XPSA�oShe ho (Aerial) Photo/ Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evalu�n( o ds and lan and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
14. Proposed channel work (if any):
15. Recent weather
16. Site conditions at time of
/✓,
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: _Section 10 _Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters X Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES 9 If yes, estimate the water surface area:_
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES T 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES
21. Estimated watershed land use: /170 % Residential _% Commercial _% Industrial _% Agricultural
_% Forested _% Cleared / Logged _% Other
22. Bankf ill width: .1U 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 309-
24. Channel slope down center of stream: _Flat (0 to 2%) Gentle (2 to 4%) _Moderate (4 to 10%) _Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight _Occasional bends _Frequent meander _Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse):
1;1 Evaluator's Signature s Date— Mvh-P
This channel evaluation o m is inte ded to be used only as a guide to assist landowners an environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

JC-NWW-9i
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
ECOREGION POINT
RANGE
CHARACTERISTICS
SCORE
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
Coastal Piedmont
Mountain
0-5
0-4
(no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = max points y
7
Evidence of past human alteration
0 -- 6
0-5
0-5
i extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points)
- - — - -
3
_
0-6
0-4
0-5
Riparian zone
(no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max pints)
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0-4
extensive dischar cs = 0 no dischar es =max pints]
5
Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
0-4
no discharge = 0: springs, seeps, wetlands. etc. = maxpoints)
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0-4
0-2
no floodplain = 0• extensive floodplain = maxpoints)
4
Entrenchment / floodplain access
0- 5
0- 4
0 2
dee tv entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max points)
to
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0-2
{no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = maxpoints)
9
Channel sinuosity
0- 5
0- 4
0- 3
extensive channelization = 0: natural meander = max points)
,/�
10
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
3
{extensive deposition-7 0; little or no sediment = maxpoints)
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0-5
(fine, homogenous = 0: lame, diverse sizes = max points)
-
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0-4
0-5
�.
(deeply incised = 0: stable bed & banks = max ppints
E"'
13
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0-5
0-5
Z.+
severe erosion = 0: no erosion. stable banks = maxpoints)
<
14
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0-4
0-5
E~
no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max mints)
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0-4
0-5
Q
substantial impact =0: no evidence = max poink
16
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
0-3
0-5
0-6
no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well -developed = max ppints)
d
17
Habitat complexity
Q.-G.
0-6
0--6
r
�,
( little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points
/
m
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0_5
0-5
0-5
(no shading ye ° etation = 0: continuous canopy = maxpoints)
EW
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0-4
�-
dee ly embedded = 0, loose structure = max
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0-5
0 - 5
r
no evidence = 0- common_ numerous tv es =max pints
l
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
j
a
-
no evidence = 0: common, numerous types =maxpoints)
?2
Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
no evidence = 0; common,numerous types - max pints
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0-5
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max oints
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
W TOTAL SCORE (also enter an first page)
07�
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

JC-NWW-l0i, I I i
e25 P -01 = 55 G- -12 I
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: I?Zp
Project/Site: i/iYowe
Latitude: Xb )y'i7 '7
Evaluator:
County: t
Longitude:-'�`,))Z�73
Total Points:
Stream Det I ircle one)
Other /1%vJ WWei
Stream is at least intermittent �7c b
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
if? 19 or rennial if>_ 30"
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = It )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong-
1 "-Continuity of channel bed and bank {
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalvveg
0
1
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
3
5. Active/relictfloodplain
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
_2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
7717
3
8. Headcuts
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1.5
10. Natural valley
�}'
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
R Hvrlrnlnnv /Suhtntal = ';, , � 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
1..
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
t
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
C Rinlnnv /Suhtntal 5', 1
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
" 1
2
3
22. Fish
0
�
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1.5
25. Algae
0
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
Other - O
"perennial streams may also be identified using other methods.
See p. 35 of manual..
Notes: i l !
�..
Sketch: �YK 4 tvt Yr'tJ�S
r� rt

Characteristics Considered When Making an OHWM Determination
JC-NWW-IOi, I I i
Dimensions site:
Width: �r m
Height: "!IL
c� a�< Ssy°vA
Depth water: ^� � -%��' Notes
Natural I
Chan
Destruction
Pres
Vegetation matte
Leaf litter dis
Multip
Cha
ine impressed on bank
Shelving
ence
ges in character of soil
�
of terrestrial vegetation
of litter and debris
_................
Wracking
d down, bent, or absent
_ _ _ _ .._...... --
_ _
Sediment sorting
turbed or washed away
Scour
✓
Deposition
e observed flow events
Bed and banks
u
Water staining
nge in plant community
Other:

USACE AID#
DWQ#
Site # (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
to
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
JC-NWW-l0i, lli
1. Applicant's name: W M4 2. Evaluator's name: J —
3. Date of evaluation: )) _� f4. Time of evaluation: b$sf
5. Name of stream: ]� ✓ %" �} $ 5� � � 6. River basin: 1 ")e-
7. Approximate drainage area: Pr`2 8. Stream order:
9. Length of reach evaluated:, ` J ,k 10. County:_ tiG1t
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any): �y
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 35,±*n
7 Longitude (ex.—77.556611): '7/ , 11 Z� � 3
Method location determined (circle)PS 1�ad<'and
ia�5R
Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evalach map identifying stream(s) location):
14. Proposed channel work (if any):
15. Recent weather conditions:
16. Site conditions at time of visit:
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: _Section 10 _Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation poi<!Z5 NO If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES NO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YE TO
21. Estimated watershed land use: % Residential _% Commercial _% Industrial _% Agricultural
r� Sk—% Forested _% Cleared / Logged % Other
22. Bankfull width: j 5 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank): 4 CB`
24. Channel slope down center of stream: _Flat (0 to 2%) %& Gentle (2 to 4%) _Moderate (4 to 10%) _Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight .Occasional bends _Frequent meander _Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 31
rv1 Q�(rM
Evaluator's Signature Late
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change — version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET JC-NWW-10i, Ili
#
CHARACTERISTICS r
ECOREGION
POINT
RANGE
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
!Mountain
1
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0-4
0-5
(no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = maxpoints)
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0-5
D
extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points)
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
0-5
3
(no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points)
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0-4
3
extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = maxpoints)
5
Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
0-4
07-
U(no
discharge = 0• springs, seeps, wetlands. etc. = max points)
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0-2
O
„
no floodplain = 0: extensive floodplain = max points)0-4
Entrenchment / floodplain access
0-5
0-4
0-2
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max points
S
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0-2
Z
no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = max points]
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
'
extensive channelization = 0• natural meander = maxpoints)
10
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
(extensive deposition-- 0; little or no sediment = maxpoints)
1 l
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0-5
(fine, homogenous = 0; lari7e. diverse sizes = maxpoints)
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
() - 5
0-4
0-5
(dee. l v incised = 0; stable bed & banks = maxpoints)
„Ey
13
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0-5
0-5
severe erosion = 0; no erosion. stable banks = maxpoints)
J
14
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0-4
0-5
f no visible roots = 0• dense roots throe liout = maxpoints)
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0-4
0-5
(substantial impact act =0; no evidence = max points
16
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
0-3
0-5
0-6
no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well -developed = max points
Q
17
Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6
(little or no habitat = 0:. frequent, varied habitats = max points
02
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0-5
0-5
no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points]
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0-4
�—
(deeply embedded = 0: loose structure = max)
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0 4
0-5
0-5
no evidence = 0; common, numerous tv es == maxpoints)
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
4-4
0-4
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max points)
C)
22
Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = rnax points)
r23
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0-5
no evidence = 0• abundant evidence = max points )
Total Points Possible
100
i00
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
5 � Jc-Nww- i 2;,
Date: d
Project/Site: C�+� �
Latitude: 5 IQ1 ��
Evaluator:
County: /
C-4vQ�;
Longitude:_l1�d��
0,
Total Points:
Stream Determination circle one
f
Other �me
Stream is at least intermittent I (,r�
Ephemeral I went Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
if a 1s or erennial if 30* ( [
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = r
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
�j
(9
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
ffl
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
01
2
3
8. Headcuts
Oi
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
6i
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No =i'0 .
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 7 )
12. Presence of Baseflow
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
110)
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
I'
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 0.5
1
i 1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
(Yes
C. Biologv (Subtotal = `7, S` )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
'0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; !LBL
= 1.9 Other �4__
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:
t

L USACE AID#.
DWQ#
JC-Nww-12i
Site # (indicate on attached map)
FE-3 STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET Aep
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: C, t i 9
3. Date of evaluation:
5. Name of stream:-
7. Approximate drainage area: -L 44 0 C rr
9. Length of reach evaluated: r ` `
2. Evaluator's name: FJF-Vk("u5
4. Time of evaluation: d t y 0
6. River basin: Idat �/
8. Stream order:
Z
IJ
10. County: G-wit ,
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any): Q.-/ilrt
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): ) S ` 1 Q - 6I3 Longitude (ex.—77.556611):
Method location determined (circle): 0A Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluati note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
u 8A.11 d. C9-Qe \A�t Illi�''� f#C,_.: tw`P,cfr'1 `01, l-t9m COmerRu.
14. Proposed channel work (if any): ��� (� G �` !� ( u
15. Recent weather conditions: Q
16. Site conditions at time of visit: r (t" u d `! • VL N- ce, i '
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: _Section 10 _Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES­-4If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES 1� 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES
21. Estimated watershed land use: _a% Residential /o Commercial _% Industrial _% Agricultural
22. Bankfull width:
_% Forested _% Cleared / Logged _% Other ( �)
a 5 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank):
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2%) _Gentle (2 to 4%) Moderate (4 to 10%) _Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight _Occasional bends Frequent meander _Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): Comments: �(j f.+ �!� �`�• * SAS
Ir Evaluator's Signature_
���--- — Date �$ f G
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental 1professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

JC-Nww-12i
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
ECOREGION POINT
R14,NGE
#
CHARACTERISTICS
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
I
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0- 4
0-5
E no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = maxpoints)
(/
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0-5
+
(extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points]
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
0-5
3
no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = maxpoints)
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0-4
1
(extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = maxpoints)
D`
,a
5
Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
0-4
G
U(no
discharge = 0• springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = maxpoints)
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0- 4
D- 4
0- 2
3
y
(no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = max oints
7
Entrenchment / floodplain access
0-5
0-4
0-2
a 0
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max ints)
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0-2
(no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = maxpoints)
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
€
extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max oints
l0
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0- 4
/
(extensive de osition= 0; little or no sediment = maxpoints)
! .
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0-5
------
(fine, homogenous = 0: large. diverse sizes = maxpoints)
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0-4
0-5
�+
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = maxpoints)
13
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0-5
0-5
a
( severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max ointsl
14
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0-4
0-5
n
(no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = max points)
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0-4
0-5
I
(substantial impact =0; no evidence = maxpoints)
16
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
0-3
0-5
0-6
no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well -developed = maxpoints)
17
Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6
�
(little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = maxpoints)
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0-5
0-5
S`
x
(no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points)
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0-4
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max)
"r
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0-5
0-5
(no evidence = 0: common, numerous types = maxpoints)
0
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
O
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = maxpoints)04
1"
O
22
Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = maxpoints)
23FEvidence
of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0-5
(no evidence = 0• abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible
100
l00
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

JC-NWW-13i
S;m �f ssf
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 0',
Project/Site: Uw-iy'11e"5
Latitude: 36, P`¢'*W
Evaluator: S. ' J,;nn
ry
County: G�Ir�ri
Longitude: -77, Ivb-5?i3
Total Points:
Stream Dete circle one)
Other %yw &-j�M &
Stream is at least intermittent
if? 19 or perennial if>- 30*
Ephemera ntermitten Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = L 5�
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1" Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2, Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
(03
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
(0.>
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No 0 '
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. H drolo Subtotal = q 1J
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
QD
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
i.
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5,-
15
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high meter table?
No = 0
- YeOz.3_1
C_ Bioloov (Subtotal = 11, ]
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
)
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
05
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5
Other 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: MM61 (A h5vi S LAC
r�-
Sketch:
C

Characteristics Considered When Making an OHWM Determination
Dimensions oflm �q, Site: JC-NWW-13i
Width:
�.
Height: 3 Ff 4aO aQ'
Depth water:0, j -p Az
Notes
Natural
Chan
Destruction i
Pres(
Vegetation mattei
Leaf litter dis-
Multipl
Chai
ine impressed on bank
Shelving
ges in character of soil
Df terrestrial vegetation
once of litter and debris
Wracking
J
i down, bent, or bsen
Sediment sorting
✓
Curbed or washed away
✓
Scour
Deposition
e observed flow events
Bed and banks
✓
Water staining
ige in plant community
Other:

USACE AID#_
DWQ#
Site # (indicate on attached map)
M STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORK,GSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assess ment:
J1'MIS—AQP
1. Annlicant's name: NCW Dow) 2. Evaluator's name: �Y" � 11� /,#,A;4, JC-NWW-13i
3. Date of evaluation: � 4. Time of evaluation: It7� 7
5. Name of stream: 'AT- ,r`f� y) It ,, 6. River basin:
7. Approximate drainage area: 5P At re 1 8. Stream order: I
9. Length of reach evaluated:_ 5P Ft, 10. County:Y�i't
11. Site coordinates (if known): }pref11er in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any): y l
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 3S+ D ! i Longitude (ex.-77.556611): r7
Method location determined (circle): S o Shee-(Tftho ( erial) Photo�I Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evalua� , A"did�a� vtdffEr attach map identifying stream(s) location):
14. Proposed channel work (if any):
15. Recent weather conditions: XIW �`
16. Site conditions at time of visit: Aow*
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: _Section 10 _Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters ll�f\ Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES ® If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES 45) 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YE 5
21. Estimated watershed land use: IX % Residential % Commercial _% Industrial % Agricultural
% Forested % Cleared / Logged _% Other ( 1
22. Bankf ill width: Ir F)- 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank):
24. Channel slope down center of stream: D-Flat (0 to 2%) _Gentle (2 to 4%) _Moderate (4 to 10%) _Steep (> 10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight _Occasional bends _Frequent meander _Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): ? V Comments:
Evaluator's Sienature ■ 1 v
This channel evaluationfform is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners andlenvifonmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET TC-NWW-13i
ECOREGION POINT
RANGE
CHARACTERISTICS
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
1
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0-4
0-5
no flow or saturation = 0, strong= flow =max Dints}
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0-5
(extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = maxpoints)
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
0-5
(no buffer = 0; contiguous wide buffer = maxpoints)
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0-4
(extensive discharges = 0: no discharges = max oints
5
Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
0-4
d
i no discharge = 0: springs, seeps, wetlands. etc. = max points)
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0-4
0-2
D
no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = maxpoints)
7
Entrenchment / floodplain access
0-5
0-4
0-2
D
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max points]
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0-2
D
no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = maxpoints)
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = maxpoints)
10
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
extensive de osition= 0; little or no sediment = max oints
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA* -. `_
0-4
0-5
�--
(fine, homogenous = 0: lame, diverse sizes = max Dints
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0-4
0-5
` f
(deeply incised = 0: stable bed & banks = maxpoints)
�'
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0-5
0 - 5
' f
a
severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max oints)
M
14
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0-4
0-5
Ems:
no visible roots = 0- dense roots throug[tout = max points)
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0-4
0-5
( substantial impact =0: no evidence = maxpoints)
16
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
0-3
0-5
0-6
no riffles/ripples or pools = 0• well -developed = max points)
"0-
17
Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6
little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)
�
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0-5
0-5
(no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0-4
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0-5
0-5
(no evidence = 0: common., numerous tv es = max pDints
J
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
C
no evidence = 0: common, numerous types = maxpoints)
'4
C
22
Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0 4
q
no evidence = 0: common, numerous types = maxpoints)
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0-5
no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = maxpoints)
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
T
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first pace)
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

USACE AID#
DWQ#
JC-NWW-7i, 14i \
Site # (indicate on attached map)
M STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET —AQP
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment: -
1. Applicant's name: fft vi- 13
3. Date of evaluation: % ' lZ "7020
S. Name of stream: Ufi lu, Is "A
7. Approximate drainage area: 0.0 `89' b
9. Length of reach evaluated: I clog '
2. Evaluator's name: n7EtG i t
4. Time of evaluation: IN '.00 taw%
6. River basin:
8. Stream order:
10. County: «e4v'\
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any):
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): ? 9� I / 0 Z,- =- Longitude (ex.-77.556611): — 1 � '1.0VO
Method location determined (circle): GP Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluap ] (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach/map identifying streams) location):
14. Proposed channel work (if any):
15. Recent weather conditi
16. Site conditions at time
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: —section 10 _Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters _✓Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES (00 If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES 10
21. Estimated watershed land use: -19 % Residential
_% Forested
22. Bankfull width: I ` S
24. Channel slope down center stream: _ at (0 to 2%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight _Occasional bends
20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey?
YES t b
�0 % Commercial _% Industrial _%
Agricultural
_% Cleared / Logged _% Other
23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank):
_Gentle (2 to 4%) _Moderate (4 to 10%)
_Steep (>10%)
_Frequent meander _Very sinuous
Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
L
Total Score (from reverse): S Comments:
Evaluator's Signature Date 5 /.;—Y d�>—d
This channel evaluation form & intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change — version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

JC-NWW-7i, 14i
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
ECOREGION
POINT
RANGE
#
CHARACTERISTICS
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
I
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0-4
0-5
'Z
no flow or saturation = 0• strong flow = maxpoints)
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0-5
extensive alteration = 0• no alteration = maxpoints)
3
Riparian z one
0-4
0-5
no buffer = 0 • contiguous, wide buffer = max points)_0-6
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0-4
extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points)
5
Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
0-4
d
no discharge = 0• springs, sees wetlands, etc. = maxpoints)
0
�
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0-4
0-2
2
flood lain = 0• extensive flood lain = max oints)
a(no
7
Entrenchment / floodplain access
0-5
0-4
0-2
2
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = max points)
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0-2
O
no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = max points)
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
b
( extensive channelization = 0: natural meander = maxpoints)
10
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
extensive deposition-- 0• little or no sediment = max oints )
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0-5
44
(fine, homo enous = 0: par e, diverse sizes = max oints r
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0-4
0-5
3
(deeply incised = 0• stable bed & banks = max pointsl
13
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0-5
0-5
(severe erosion = 0; no erosion stable banks = maxpoints)
W
d
14
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0-4
0-5
Z
(no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout =max points)
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0-4
0-5
5
(substantial impact =0; no evidence = max points)
16
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
0-3
0-5
0-6
(no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well -developed = max points)
E"
Q
17
Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6
2
F-
i little or no habitat = 0: frequent. varied habitats = max points F
d
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0-5
0-5
x
{ no shading vegetation = 0: continuous cano = maxpoints)
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA
0-4
0-4
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max)
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0-5
0-5
(no evidence = 0; common numerous types = max points)
O
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
z
no evidence = 0; common, numerous ty pes = maxpoints)
O
22
Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
2
i no evidence = 0: common. numerous types = max points)
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0-5
(no evidence = 0: abundant evidence = maxpoints)
3
Total Points Po ssible
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

1�
Jc-Nww-14i 7.
NC DWQS?ream Identification Form Version 4.11
Dater' ill 1Z E? 0?tJ Project/Site: �Latitude:�s'
Evaluator: County: Longitude:
. ltv f_
Total Points: Stream Det attt n4pircle one) Other w"j sza' ,% (!
Stream is at least intermittent
ff >_ 19 or perennial if? 30* 2 Ephemeral termittent Perennial e.g. Quad Name:
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = }
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
5. Active/relict floodplain
''0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
1
2
3
9. Grade control
1 0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
f3
Yes =3
amnciai aacnes are not ratea; see aiscussion3sn manual
B. Hvdroloav !Subtotal = G�
12, Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
C 2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1�
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water t ble?
No = 0
Yes^= 3
U. tSIO100V (Subtotal = 14 .'.--_1
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
t 3
.2i
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
- 3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
23. Crayfish
6
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
��-
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75;
BL = 1. ther = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:
14

JC-NWW-14i
Characteristics Considered When Making an OHWM Determination
Dimensions / r�
- + 0 Slte: � 1
Width:_ 1 _� Lm
Height: �OcaO oav�
L Depth water: - ,i y4, 4 Notes
Natural lira
Change
Destruction of i
Preseni
Vegetation matted c
Leaf litter distw
JVlultiple,i
Chang
impressed on bank
Shelving
s in character of soil
arestrial vegetation
e of litter and debris
V/
Wracking
own, bent, or absent
Sediment sorting
bed or washed away
Scour
.Deposition
)bserved flow events
Bed and banks
y
Water staining
e in plant community
Other.

Jc-Nww-15i
AU LW V Stream Identification Norm Version 4.11
,M/
ijDate:
�o Project/Site: w S �� Latitude:
Evaluator: R� County: may, ,� Longitude:- ,10
Total Points: % Stream De rmination (circle one) Other / �+ 13�N
Stream is at least intermittent `� J E hems - Intermitten erennial e. Quad Name:
if >_ 19 orperennial if z 30* p 9�
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = t0 •` ? )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Stron=
1 a. Continuity of channel bed and bank
/0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0 _
2
3
•4. Particle size of stream substrate
Qom'
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
Z_
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
Qy
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0;.
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
':5.5 -}
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0 .
Yes = 3
arnnciai aitcnes are not rates; see aiscusss in manual -
B. Wdroloav (Subtotal = 1 t
12. Presence of Baseflow
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
-0-_
V
1
1
2
0.5
3
0­1
14. Leaf litter
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0-51-
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3 %
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
~0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
Q
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
(0)
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
`1_j
1.5
25. Algae
< 0. 1�
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBE = 1.5 Other = (L
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch:

Characteristics Considered When Making an OHWM Determination
Jc-Nww-isi
Dimensions /J 5
Width: Site: I �✓ _
Height: l io-40 oa��
Depth water: (-= l,,�., y+�, Notes
Natural line impressed
Changes in charact
Destruction of terrestrial vi
Presence of later ai
Vegetation matted down, bent, i
Sedimer
Leaf litter disturbed or wall
DI
Multiple observed fla
Bed a
water
Change in plant cc
on bank
- --
shelving
i
?r of soil
qetation
d debris
Vrecking
►r absent
t sorting
red away
Scour
1position
w events
,
id banks
\j
staining
✓
mmunity
�v°
Other.

JC-NWW-16i
USACE AID# DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET r,
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment: �J Q
1. Applicant's name: C' " Of �J�cr/i�%rn -� 2. Evaluator's name: / W
3. Date of evaluation: ao d V t (_ 4. Time of evaluation: 100
5. Name of stream: ps c, . C" 6. River basin: N eqw
7. Approximate drainage area: ti > -� (-fe . 8. Stream order:_ Q
9. Length of reach evaluated: 1 00 / _ 10. County: (^Uup w y
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any):-` p �/
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): ;5 Qct;l, Longitude (ex.—77.556611): 7 1�/ - oI'cf i 7
Method location determined (circle): Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS
13. Location of reach under evalualieFrTnote nearby roads and landmarks and attach map id
1ow5. .}&1 rA(o,, ti 4c p v-Q-74 :,(Jc dI 6e(4 _,
14. Proposed channel work (if any)
[A,-w P
15. Recent weather conditions: rt J- "'d 01,E � 4k Q- � d -�•�.
16. Site conditions at time of visit: (V 'l- ( (G" t%,f !: C. - F
Other
stream(s) location):
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: _Section 10 _Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES 0 %If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YESOP 20. Does cli na nel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES
21. Estimated watershed land use: _% Residential l6 0% Commercial _% Industrial _% Agricultural
�% % Forested _% Cleared / Logged % Other (
22. Bankfull width: -4 ` -0 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank):
24. Channel slope down center of stream: _Flat (0 to 2%) _Gentle (2 to 4%) Moderate (4 to 10%) _Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: ,-Straight _Occasional bends _Frequent meander _Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality. Total � Score (from reverse): �Comments: (94 1, � PP
( f - tr—t "10 P--V
Evaluator's Signature VZ Date &,COT
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

JC-NWW-16i
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
ECOREGION POINT
RANGE
#
CHARACTERISTICS
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
1
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0-4
0-5
no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = max points)
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0-5
t2
(extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = maxpoints)
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
0-5
d
(no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = maxpoints)
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0-4
1
i extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points)
5
Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
0-4
(no discharge = 0; springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = maxpoints)
V
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0-4
0-2
(no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = maxpoints)
7
Entrenchment / floodplain access
0-5
0-4
o- 2
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding = maxpoints)
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
o- 4
0-2
(no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = max mts)
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
(.extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = maxpoints)
10
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
( extensive de osition= 0; little or no sediment = max pints)
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0-5
-
(fine, homoeenous = 0• large, diverse sizes = maxpoints)
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0-4
0-5
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = maxpoints)
13
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0-5
0-5
a1
a
(severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max points)
14
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0-4
0-5
1
E
(no visible roots = 0; dense roots throu0out = maxpoints)
r�
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0-4
0-5
(substantial impact =0; no evidence = maxpoints)
C/
16
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
0-3
0-5
0-6
F(no
riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well -developed = maxpoints)
17
Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6
( little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0-5
0-5
(no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = maxpoints)
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0-4
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max)
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0-5
0-5
`9
(no evidence = 0 • common, numerous types = max points)
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
O
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = maxpoints)
O
22
Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = maxpoints)
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0-5
U
(no evidence = 0• abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible
100 -7
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

JC-NWW-16i
Date:
NC DWQ!(Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Project/Site:
Evaluator: P'ol,) Latitude:
County:
Total Points: �rG(/[4.n/ Longitude: 77 �d
Stream is at least intermittent `1 (�� Stream Determ' 6
if> 19 or erennial if>_ 30* pC (circle one) Other �(% Ephemeral rnter itt nt Perennial e.g. QuadNameU'blt-U/
A. Geomor hololi I (Subtotal =
a.
1 Continuity of channel bed and bank
Absent
Weak
Moderate
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0 . �
1
Strc
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ri le- ool se uence
0
2
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
�I�
t
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
_ -
2
3
8. Headcuts
0
1'
2
3
9. Grade control
/
1
2
3
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
2
3
11. Second or greater order channel
a
0.5
1
1.5
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. H drolo
No= O
1
Yes = 3
1.5
Subtotal = / �
(
12.
_ _
Presence of Baseflow
s
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
14. Leaf litter
0
2 r
15. Sediment on plants or debris
1.5
d
2
0.5
3
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
0
0
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
0
0.5
.
1
1.5
C. Biolo (Subtotal =
No = 0
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
Y s = 3
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
2
1
0
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
0
22. Fish
1
2
3
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
3
24. Amphibians
0.5
1.5
25. Algae
0.5
1
1.5
26• Wetland plants in streambed
0
0.5
1
1.5
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See
Notes:
p. 35 of manual. FACW = 0.75;
L = 1 Other = 0
1.5
Sketch: t �(( ,� p4e-
C#e j
(� wt pIt j o e - - l V� E, ly,
�e��h.��t r ..

JC-NWW-16i
1 USACE AID# _ _ _ DWQ # _ Site # (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
-AUP
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: ('} t9 #04.o� t 2 i0'u./ 2. Evaluator's name:_
3. Date of evaluation: G a� I3 4. Time of evaluation: 0 �J �0
5. Name of stream: q 1712e 3A9 6. River basin: Wht Q.
7. Approximate drainage area: k u,4, �Ja`_.l•✓5 8. Stream order: 1
9. Length of reach evaluated: CPO 10. County: C e-aU i'W
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer
//iin decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any):
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): d Longitude (ex.-77.556611): _ q
Method location determined (circle): Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evalu � (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
14. Proposed channel work (if any): (EL1 K f
15. Recent weather conditions: � 01 R e o ` �1) �Sf r ✓Y1 , &4-f Ct
16. Site conditions at time of visit: c t d r1 J 4
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: _Section 10 Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters _Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? 0 NO If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES N 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES
21. Estimated watershed land use: _% Residential 10 t7% Commercial % Industrial _% Agricultural
_% Forested _% Cleared / Logged ­% Other {
22. Bankfull width:. _ 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank):__
24. Channel slope down center of stream: _Flat (0 to 20%) _Gentle (2 to 4%) Moderate (4 to 10%) _Steep (>101/o)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight _Occasional bends Frequent meander Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
L
Total Score (from reverse):
rCiVy 'A - �,S i1 �r"irtvt /G
w4
w - -i
O / �
Evaluator's Signature _ _ Date__
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmen al professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change - version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

JC-NWW-16i
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
EGOREGION POINT
RANGE
CHARACTERISTICS
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
1
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0-4
0-5
(no flow or saturation = 0; strop flow = max points)
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0- 6
0- 5
0- 5
CIP
(extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
0-5
(no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points)
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0-4
]
(extensive discharges = 0: no discharges = max pints]
5
Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
0-4
/
(no discharge = 0; springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = maxpoints)
,�.
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0-4
0-2
3„
(no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = max points
Entrenchment / floodplain access
0-5
0-4
0-2
r
/
deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding= max points)
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0-2
(no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = maxpoints)
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
(extensive channelization = 0• natural meander = maxpoints)
l
10
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
t
(extensive de osifion--0; little or no sediment = maxpoints)
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0-5
fine, homogenous = 0; large. diverse sizes = max oints)
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0-4
0-5
deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points
13
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0-5
0-5
severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = max . oints y
14
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0-4
0-5
no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout out =max Dints y
rA
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0-4
0-5
(substantial impact =0; no evidence = maxpoints)
16
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
0-3
0-5
0-6
l
(no riffles/ri . les or gals = 0: well -developed = max ints
`
.t
17
Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6
(little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = maxpoints)
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0-5
0-5
.;
(no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = maxpoints)
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0 - 4
0--4
—1
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max)
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0-5
0-5
1
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = maxpoints)
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
t^%
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = max pcints
O
22
Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
m
no evidence - 0; common, numerous types = maxpoints)
r23
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0-5
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible
i 00
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
3
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

JC-Nww-17i
NC ilW(1 Ctream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: � d (� f 7
Project/Site:
Pro �'�� �1
Latitude:
Evaluator: ��l
[
County: ('C, c--P>✓
Longitude: 7 7 Nigrl
Total Points:
Stream Determ' ' n (circle one)
Other tI�Z V bDrw
Stream is at least intermittent a [-
Ephemeral I t i t Perennial
e.g. Quad Name:
if> 19 or arennial if 2: 30" �` J
A. Geomorphology (Subtotal = 1 r �C )
1 a, Continuity of channel bed and bank
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
/0 i
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
2
3
0
tom'
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
W,1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1'
2
3
8. Headcuts
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
(Q.52
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual - --
R HVrlrnlnnv f.quhtntal = I f ]
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
3)
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
0 0.5
No = 0
1.5
Yes =
(. RlnlnAv fSiihtntal = 4C-3 i
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
[f
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: f �� P50 AVE IL ed ROKV lawf,
h- Da�411U�.'.1 Wc'_e'
1C9 5,
, t(,111 I'r'v`A/ 40K
'!
'

!- 5 C-NWW-17i
USACE AID# _. DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
M STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET _AW
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment: _ L
1. Applicant's name: C tA4 0 W%(?�% f5VA/ 2. Evaluator's name:
3. Date of evaluation: �-,0 'r�(, 4 Time of evaluation: %Q Cl
5. Name of stream: P r717 Q Rk 44,-(
7. Approximate drainage area: Z_ g 44(r f 5
9. Length of reach evaluated: (0
6. River basin: W 2 tt
8. Stream order:
10. County:
C 0-a e ✓
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any)':: 9d 121(w5L/!�V L y Apt 0— rr.Crt
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): J L l0 -•. ', longitude (ex. —77.5W11):
Method location determined (circle): GPS Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluation (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
lk i� G� �eJ �...!-� �� ��� QiK 1 k a I�c�7(r-S iUQ4 Ltr f
14. Proposed channel work (if any):
15. Recent weather conditions: G `I `� Y/ �. `- d �' �- F
16. Site conditions at time of visit: u wU. ' " ,+ j
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: _Section 10 _Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters ,Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed (I-N)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES U If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YESO 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: 'T—% Residential % Commercial % Industrial _% Agricultural
_aL% Forested _% Cleared / Logged _% Other I
22. Bankfull width: t) _ 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank):
24. Channel slope down center of stream: _Flat (0 to 2%) _Gentle (2 to 4%) _Moderate (4 to 10%) _Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight _Occasional bends Frequent meander _Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
continent section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): 3 Comments: F "h ' � h lip k .��= 4cx,
Evaluator's Signature_ . J --- Dated: ram:
This channel evaluation faun is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change — version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

JC-Nww-17i
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
ECOREGION POINT
RANGE#
CHARACTERISTICS
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
Nlountain
I
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0-4
0-5
(no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = maxpoints)
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0-5
(extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points)
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
0-5
1
(no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = maxpoints)
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0-4
(extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points)
5
Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
0-4
?-
(no discharge = 0; springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max pomts y
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0-4
0-4
0-2
(no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = maxpoints)
!/
a
Entrenchment / floodplain access
0- 5
0- 4
0- 2
01
(deeplyentrenched = 0; frequent g ent flooding = max points
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0-2
(no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = maxpoints)
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
extensive channelization = 0: natural meander = maxpoints)
10
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
(extensive de osition= 0; little or no sediment = maxpoints)
it
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0-5
---r
{fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max Ants)
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0-4
0-5
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max -points)
13
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0-5
0-5
severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks = maxpoints)
14
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0-4
0-5
1
F,
(no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = maxpoints)
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0-4
0-5
(substantial impact =0; no evidence = maxpoints)
16
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
0-3
0-5
0-6
(no riffles/ripples or pools = 0: well -developed = maxpoints)
E-
1
Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6
1^
(little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = maxpoints)
!'
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0-5
0-5
(no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max pDints
19
Substrate embeddeduess
NA*
0-4
0-4
(deeply embedded = 0; Ioose structure = max)
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0-5
0-5
no evidence = 0: common, numerous types = max pDints
>,,
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
Q
(no evidence - 0; common, numerous types = maxpoints)
O
22
Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = maxpoints)
CO
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0-5
d
c no evidence = 0: abundant evidence = maxpoints)
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
'TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
; (�
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

JC-NWW-18i
NC DWO Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 P] P - ldw(7
Date: -2-00SI3
Project/Site: �� Q,i�
Latitude:
Evaluator:
County: C- aL)a✓
Langitude:'7
Total Points:
is at least intermittent )
StreamJ9
Stream Determinat'circle one)
aw
Ephemer Perennial
Other
if _ orperennial if = 30* O�
ntermitten
e.g. Quad Name:
A. Gemmnrnholnnv rSnhtntal = / C� Oh-.Pnt I Wank Mnrinr!%fn c4r�r�n
18. Continuity of channel bed and bank
1
2
3 Y
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
-0
?
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
t� 5<
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
'r
1
.2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
07
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
'01
1
2
3
9. Grade control
41
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valleys
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No
Yes = 3
ai lu wide wUA 1u_b MV IIUL LdLCU, ti= UI5Gu55I UnS In mdnUaI
B. Hvdroloov (Subtotal = 1 I ]
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
Ly
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
1
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
U. t510100V fStJntntal = 'ri.S 1
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
13=+y
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0,
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
07
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
0
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; dBL = :1.5� Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: ft7 S �itl/ `tl�t✓P�'
e ►+l/'t{.�►y:n� ��
C
`?
Veep
a.
'
(� f • k; �,,t , a`l(�Gl % ei iv(.�,�1l fuA f 5o /S
r JCC, o5 t t110C46 e"5 'ZS-14C Vrf/' her
f �4� kle4fitt4r/ -p(c(Ij 5 pecve

DWQ
#.
JC-Nww-18i
Site # (indicate on attached map)
LH!AC2ElD#—
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET AdQp
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: G �O.f,2. Evaluator's name:
3. Date of evaluation:_ �' d 1 4. Time of evaluation: D q a b
5. Name of stream: r 5 J� 6. River basin: aleu j Q
7. Approximate drainage area:
9. Length of reach evaluated: 'ii
8. Stream order: O
10. County: C—aae,, ,
11. Site coordinates (if known): pr/e'fer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any): �^
Latitude (ex. 34.872312): 3T, o (p1p � � Longitude (ex.-77.556611): ^ 7 7, O i 0 }
-13
Method location determined (circle): ( 6�fi Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluati6n (note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
let-l-L u�- Wl 41(NrG 0
14. Proposed channel work (if any): 0,-0 P`
15. Recent weather conditions: � 1 "„ f/ Li— , 7-a ---t
16. Site conditions at time of visit: CV" r )f f d
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: _Section 10 _Tidal Waters _Essential Fisheries Habitat
—Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters _Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evaluation point? YES& If yes, estimate the water surface area:
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES EP 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES
21. Esd-hated watershed land use: % Residential _W/o Commercial _% Industrial _% Agricultural
_% Forested _% Cleared / Logged _% Other (_
22. Bankfull width: / 0 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank):_,_
24. Channel slope down centef of stream: Flat (0 to 2%) _Gentle (2 to 4%) _Moderate (4 to 10%) _Steep (>10%)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight _Occasional bends _Frequent meander _Very sinuous _Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characterist,,; identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality.
Total Score (from reverse): omments: Pen C 10/7 w
lot e- @. wo- [ 5
Evaluator's Signature Q ' )� ' """ Date � `� `
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change —version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

JC-Nww-18i
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
ECOREGION POINT
RANGE
#
CHARACTERISTICS
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
!Mountain
1
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
it - 4
0-5
(no flow or satur(17
a ion = 0; strop flow = max oints)
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0-5
extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points)
V
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
0-
(no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = maxpoints)
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0 - 4
O
(extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = max points)
Groundwater discharge
0-3
0-4
0-4
U5
(no discharge = 0; s rip s, seeps, wetlands, etc. = max points)
6
Presence of adjacent floodplain
0- 4
U- 4
0- 2
y,
(no floodplain = 0; extensive floodplain = max points)
Entrenchment / floodplain access
0- 5
U- 4
4- 2
O
p
(deeply entrenched = 0; frequent flooding= maxpoints)
8
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0-2
(no wetlands = 0; large adjacent wetlands = maxpoints)
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
(extensive channelization = 0; natural meander = max points)_
1%
10
Sediment input
0-5
0-4
0-4
1
(extensive de osition= 0; little or no sediment = maxpoints)
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0-5
fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = max points)
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
o - 4
0-5
�.
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = max points
13
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0-5
0-5
�
(severe erosion = 0; no erosion, stable banks =max ints)
14
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0-4
0-5
(no visible roots = 0; dense roots throughout = maxpoints)
D
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0-4
0-5
O
substantial impact =0; no evidence = max Dints)
16
Presence of riffle-pool/ripple-pool complexes
0-3
0-5
0-6
t
(no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well -developed = maxpoints)
F
17
Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6
( little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = max points)
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0-5
0-5
(no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points)
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0-4
(dee slv embedded = 0: loose structure = max)
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0-5
0-5
(no evidence = 0; common. numerous ty2es = maxpoints)
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
O
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = maxpoints)
O22
Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = maxpoints)
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0-5
(no evidence = 0; abundant evidence = max points)
Total Points Possible
100
100
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 f25 ,5 JC-NWW-19i
Date: a O�p
Project/Site: �t „thy (�P�
Latitude:
Evaluator: l' ,y0
County: (� u�
Longitude: F IT 07 ill
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent
Stream Determi n (circle one)
Ephemeral In itt t Perennial
Other
Name
if 2! 19 or perennial if >_ 30'
p er .
e. 9� Quad
A. Geomor holo (Subtotal = i 1 5 )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong _
3
1" Continuity of channel bed and bank �
0
1
2
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
"F
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
0
2
3
4. Particle site of stream substrate
5. Active/relict floodplain
6. Depositional bars or benches
2
3
4
1
2
3
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
2
3
8. Headcuts
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal = s }
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
f
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
t^]j
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
1 0.5
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Y s =
C. Biology (Subtotal�-
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1)
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5
1
1 1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
1
1 1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Other = 0
perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: I*<-",�,- _ r� �< <
.f �(� v- I U-'r Q Lit_ "/Gr tr cacti. c-i��U ,
C-L&w" Vtt775-ed
�r ff�rvi ��
* 1.4
C o� C1f?lo

USACE AID#
JC-NWW-19i
DWQ # Site # (indicate on attached map)
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Provide the following information for the stream reach under assessment:
1. Applicant's name: C ` C�� !� w �3l'%^� 2. Evaluator's name: ��— 40i-
3. Date of evaluation: 1� 0 4. Time of evaluation:
5. Name of stream: SJ 6. River basin: Y 5 C t •
7. Approximate drainage area: / 8. Stream order:
9. Length of reach evaluated: l �� 10. County: r—a-,A -
11. Site coordinates (if known): prefer in decimal degrees. 12. Subdivision name (if any): Latitude (ex. 34.872312): Longitude (ex.—77.556611):. - -7 7. f) c� :9 ci t! q
Method location determined (circle): G S Topo Sheet Ortho (Aerial) Photo/GIS Other GIS Other
13. Location of reach under evaluat�note nearby roads and landmarks and attach map identifying stream(s) location):
j %
J"L KrQ� V. Ca I. `i/
14. Proposed channel work (if any): ►/ 0. ,!�
q d
15. Recent weather conditions: r4 well A7
16. Site conditions at time of visit:
17. Identify any special waterway classifications known: ,Section 10 _Tidal Waters Essential Fisheries Habitat
_Trout Waters _Outstanding Resource Waters _ Nutrient Sensitive Waters Water Supply Watershed (I -IV)
18. Is there a pond or lake located upstream of the evalua ion point? YES 1d If yes, estimate the water surface area:.
19. Does channel appear on USGS quad map? YES �i 20. Does channel appear on USDA Soil Survey? YES NO
21. Estimated watershed land use: %Residential _% Commercial _% Industrial % Agricultural
_% Forested �% Cleared / Logged _% Other (
22. Bankfull width: X . 23. Bank height (from bed to top of bank):
24. Channel slope down center of stream: Flat (0 to 2%) _Gentle (2 to 4%) Moderate (4 to 10%) _Steep (>101/o)
25. Channel sinuosity: Straight _Occasional bends Frequent meander Very sinuous Braided channel
Instructions for completion of worksheet (located on page 2): Begin by determining the most appropriate ecoregion based on
location, terrain, vegetation, stream classification, etc. Every characteristic must be scored using the same ecoregion. Assign points
to each characteristic within the range shown for the ecoregion. Page 3 provides a brief description of how to review the
characteristics identified in the worksheet. Scores should reflect an overall assessment of the stream reach under evaluation. If a
characteristic cannot be evaluated due to site or weather conditions, enter 0 in the scoring box and provide an explanation in the
comment section. Where there are obvious changes in the character of a stream under review (e.g., the stream flows from a pasture
into a forest), the stream may be divided into smaller reaches that display more continuity, and a separate form used to evaluate each
reach. The total score assigned to a stream reach must range between 0 and 100, with a score of 100 representing a stream of the
highest quality. !
ro
Total Score (from reverse): �Comments:,
Evaluator's Signature Date 0M-
This channel evaluation form is intended to be used only as a guide to assist landowners and environmental professionals in
gathering the data required by the United States Army Corps of Engineers to make a preliminary assessment of stream
quality. The total score resulting from the completion of this form is subject to USACE approval and does not imply a
particular mitigation ratio or requirement. Form subject to change — version 06/03. To Comment, please call 919-876-8441 x 26.

JC-NWW-19i
STREAM QUALITY ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
ECOREGION POINT
RANGE
#
CHARACTERISTICS
SCORE
Coastal
Piedmont
Mountain
1
Presence of flow / persistent pools in stream
0-5
0-4
0-5
r�
(no flow or saturation = 0; strong flow = maxpoints)
2
Evidence of past human alteration
0-6
0-5
0-5
0
(extensive alteration = 0; no alteration = max points)
3
Riparian zone
0-6
0-4
0-5
(no buffer = 0; contiguous, wide buffer = max points)
4
Evidence of nutrient or chemical discharges
0-5
0-4
0-4
(extensive discharges = 0; no discharges = maxpoints)
5
Groundwater discharge
0- 3
0-4
0-4
(no discharge = 0; springs, seeps, wetlands, etc. = maxpoints)
6
Presence of adjacent floodpiain
0_ 4
0-4
0-2
0
y
(no flood lain = 0; extensive flood lain = maxpoints)
g
7
Entrenchment / floodplain access
0- 5
0- 4
0- 2
p'
(deeply entrenched = 0; fmquent flooding = max pints
S
Presence of adjacent wetlands
0-6
0-4
0-2
(no wetlands =. 0; large adjacent wetlands = maxpoints)
t'
9
Channel sinuosity
0-5
0-4
0-3
(extensive channelization = 0• natural meander = maxpoints)
10
Sediment input 1
0-5
0-4
0-4
(extensive deposition-- 0: little or no sediment = maxpoints)
11
Size & diversity of channel bed substrate
NA*
0-4
0-5
(fine, homogenous = 0; large, diverse sizes = maxpoints)
12
Evidence of channel incision or widening
0-5
0-4
0-5
(deeply incised = 0; stable bed & banks = maxpoints)
13
Presence of major bank failures
0-5
0-5
0-5
2-
severe erosion = 0: no erosion, stable banks = maxpoints)
J
14
Root depth and density on banks
0-3
0-4
0-5
E
(no visible roots = 0; dense roots througliout = maxpoints)
15
Impact by agriculture, livestock, or timber production
0-5
0-4
0-5
O
(substantial impact --0; no evidence = maxpoints)
16
Presence of riffle-pooltripple-pool complexes
0-3
0-5
0-6
1
(no riffles/ripples or pools = 0; well-developiLd = maxpoints)
F
Q
17
Habitat complexity
0-6
0-6
0-6
( little or no habitat = 0; frequent, varied habitats = maxpoints)
18
Canopy coverage over streambed
0-5
0 5
0-5
C
no shading vegetation = 0; continuous canopy = max points)
19
Substrate embeddedness
NA*
0-4
0-4
(deeply embedded = 0; loose structure = max)
20
Presence of stream invertebrates (see page 4)
0-4
0-5
0-5
no evidence = 0: common, numerous types = maxpoints)
21
Presence of amphibians
0-4
0-4
0-4
O
no evidence = 0; common, numerous types = maxpoints)
-J
0
22
Presence of fish
0-4
0-4
0-4
(no evidence = 0; common, numerous es = max points)
l
23
Evidence of wildlife use
0-6
0-5
0-5
(no evidence = 0: abundant evidence = max oints
Total Points Possible
100
l00
100
TOTAL SCORE (also enter on first page)
* These characteristics are not assessed in coastal streams.

JC-NWW-20i
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11 PS G -- o f
Date: ©� (
ProjectlSite: P�
j
Latitude:`
Evaluator:
County: (-40C
Longitude:
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent �{
Stream Determ' tion (circle one)
Other �(%W P7 ��-v
if > 19 or perennial if > 30* 1 l
Ephemeral I e i t Perennial
p
e. Quad Name:
g
r
A. Geomor holo (Subtotal = (9
Absent
0
Weak
1
Moderate
2
Strong 1
3
1a Continuity of channel bed and bank
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
,0l
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0
f
T
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
�1, 3_5
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
C
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
2
3
3
8. Headcuts
C'
1
9. Grade control
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
('0'
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
NS= 0
Yes = 3
artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = l () ]
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
12
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0 1
0.5
1
1.
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
s = 3
G. Biology (Subtotal = 16 )
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
02
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1:
1.5
23. Crayfish
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0
0.5
4.
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; O = 1.5 Other = 0
*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: .1o6;J5rde d 6-trtn d If d Fe
e- �y V ti ai'."P
cl a r i't
'yin C/9(j✓ic,
/

Jc-w3
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: fy-N Z) sinw%t;d [ _ City/County: 4/4/ 6-v*f% Sampling Date: Ob- 12 -?020
Applicant/Owner: State: � SamplingPoint:
Investigator(s): P R Q-�& t �I -`b"h Section, Township, Range: 1 ,U ns� U _ U
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc,): a±S d;iA Local relief (concave, convex, none): (0t4teDK-A- Slope (%): 7
Subrogion (LRR or MLRA): 1 - I4 Let: '-f 10t Long: -ZZ���p2 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name:moo i� tlw SCIAJ D yv\ NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No - (If no, explain in Remarks.) /
Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation- Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
oummART sir rrrvumvO - AUMU" alM map SI1VwirrV SarrrFAUrV FlVrrrl W6CRWn.7, uanaca.u, nuNv.wna ■vMIAN-1 -w.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area . /
Hydric Soil Present? Yes within a Wetland? Yes v No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks: f I _- 41 r
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is reauired:
Surface Water (Al) _
High Water Table (A2) _
✓ Saturation (A3)
_ Water Marks (B1) _
_ Sediment Deposits (82) _
_ Drift Deposits (83) _
_ Algal Mat or Crust (64)
_ Iron Deposits (B5) _
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87)
✓ WalerStained Leaves (139)
;heck all that aooly)
Aquatic Fauna (813)
Mad Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Liming Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tiled Soils (C6)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Seconoary Inaicsiors rmunmum or rwo reouirec
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88)
_ Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Shallow Aquitard (133)
_ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
_ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T. U)
Surface Water Present? Yes No — Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes o =Depth (inures): /
Saturation Present? Yes ✓ No Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes y No
(includes caaillazv frinae)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

Jc-w3
VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
i)
Absolute Dominant Indicator
status
r (Plot size: )
r Pr�
1. cKwh
I
2. N 3 5-
3.
4. 64, 0 . ( R
�-
5.
6.
7.
8.
Total Cover
50% of totp 1I cover:
044-r
20% of total cover:
Saplin a/Shrub Stratum (Plot tze:
)
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover: Z-
r Stratum Plot size: )
�..
2. IS-ft,
w
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
7� = Total Cover
500A of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Remarks: (if observed, list morphological adaptations
below).
Sampling Point:�d�wv�
Dominance Test Warl(Sneet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: _ (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species _
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals: _
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub -Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater then 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less then 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes /No
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

Jc-w3
SOIL �1 Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.)
=i Depth Matrix Redact Features
"r (inches) Color and % Color mdsb % Tvoe Loc- Texture Remarks
)_2✓ lid%� 100
y y_
'� e: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced i41�tr:x MS=Masked 5 d Grains. 2Locatian: PL=Pare Lining, M=Malrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, un€ess•c3thervrise holed.) �
Bt'�bry T, U)_
Indicators for Problematic Hydric s .
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histosof (A1}
_ Folyvalue 5urfacs (SA��.RR S,
_
_ _
Histic F�ipedan (A2)
_Thin Dark stinace lS°1 {LRR 5, T, ill
_ . 2 cm Muck {A10] (LRR S)
_
Black Histic (A3)
_Loamy Mucky Mineral (F;) (LRR t])
�- Reduced Vertfc (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B) ..
_
Hydrogen f ulfide (A4)
_ Loamy ;a(ayed MOVIX T7)
Piedmont Floodplaln Solis (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
_
Stratified Liyers (A5)
_ Depleted Melrrx (F3)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
_
Organic Bodies (AS) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Redox Dsrk Surface SF6)
(MLRA153B)
_
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Depleted.DPr'k Surface iF71
Red Parent Material (TF2) _ =
Muck Presence (AS) (LRR U)
_ Redox Depressions f F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)-,,:
_
_ 1 c Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
-Merl (FiO) (LRR U)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
pleted Below Dark Surface (Ail) _
T Depleted Ochric (F11) [MLRA1511
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR D, P "I }
3lndlcatars of hydtaphytic vegetation and
_
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) X Urnbric Surface (F13) [LRR P, T, U)
wellend hydrology mus€ be present.
_
Sandy Mucky Mineral (Si) (LRR O, S)
_ Della Ochric (F17) (MLRA 1511
unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
ReduCea Verttc {F18 h(MLRA i 50A. 15061
yr Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Fioodplain Solis {F19) (MLRA 149A)
d Matrix (86)
_Anomalous Bright Loamy So Is (F20) (MLRA 148A, 153C;153D)
Daf3[;Sr�Taca (S7) [LRR P, 5, T, U)
Restrictive, ayer iff observed):
.,
Type
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes " No,__
OS-A",dorps of Engineers
t&
+i
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —VO, icr'• :.0

Jc-w3
,L
9.�
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
L , 2 1,732.)
� rojactlEite: 'H�u S '' City/County: A-W .moAl Sampling Date:
r�� n State: � Sampling Point:r,i`%�
Apoicanuovmer- —
tn'vestigalor(s):. Q � � i ! o Section, Township, Range: ^rJ h a
Local relief (concave, convex, none): Q' wL- Slope
jandform (hiilslope, terrace, etc): + 1 •4+1,
� yip
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): - Let: 'S5' (O©JSr .. Long: ��v Datum: WGS
_ �'� r
Soil Map Unit Name: I o - mil v ` -C' 5011 NWI classification: _ Pro
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.) /
Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation- , Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
rHydric
phytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area /
So11 Present? Yes No r/ wkhin a Wetland? Yes Nond Hydrology Present? Yes No V
51'3�'fII l'cs calf. wa''� ,,
HYDROLOGY
Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required:
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
Saturation (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
_
Water Marks (B1)
_ Oxidized Rhizosp Ares along Living Roots (C3)
_
_ Sediment Deposits (B2)
_ Presence ci deduced Iron (C4)
Drift Deposits (63)
- recent Iron Reduction in Tiled Soils (C6)
_ Algal Met or Crust (64) _ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Iron Deposits (B5) _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136) j
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
Drainage Patterns (B10)
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) ;
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8) t
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (q9)
Geomorphic Position (132)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ FAC-Neutral Test (135)
_ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches):
,Water Table Present? Yes No-� Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): _ Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

Jc-w3
VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
r�
�0
Absolute Dominant Indicator
�. }
Tree Stratum (Plot size:
3G Cover status
1. r) n V,
2.
3.
4.
5.
B. _ _ -
7.
-
8.
' =,Total Cover
50%oftotal cover:
20%'oifM61 cover: (r
SaDlina/Shrub Stratum (Plat size:
1. #� ". .A tt r0 ✓' co C11-
2.
3.
-
4.
5.
6.
7. '
8.
'Z0 = Total Cover
500% of total cover:
r o 20% of total cover: _
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
✓
2.
3.
4.
5
6.
7.
8.
9.
�^
10.
�-
11.
12.
= Total Cover
WA of total cover:
3 20% of total cover:
WOody Vine Stratum (Plot size: '-- )
1.
2.
3-
4.
5.
Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
US,Anny Corps of Engineers
Sampling Point:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: - - (A)
Total Number of Dominant /
Species Across All Strata: 1� (B)
Percent of Dominant Species ���
OBL, FACW, FAC: -O (AIB)'
That Are or
{
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
MUltiDIV bT
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species .
x 2 = _ .
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals: _
(A) (13)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1pid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_✓2 Dominance Test is >50°%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
SapiingfShrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 it tall.
Woody vine -All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0
i

Jc-w3
Sampling Point
SOIL
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm tlr"bsence of Indicators.)
Depth Matrix
in es color imdst) %
Redox Features
Remarks_
Loc
Cdor mdstr % Type'Texture
'Type: =Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Ji EllLoc�6Cr�l
PI -Ware Linin4, M=Matrix.
Indic'atoi's for prbblematic Hydric Soils':
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted)
_ Histosd (Al)
_ Pdyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S '• L1
_ 1 cm Mucl�'i+1(LRR O)
2 cm Mu clC(,°0) (LRR S) ,4 a
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Thm Dark Surface (Sa) ILRR S, T, U
Loamy Mucky Mineral (f1) (LRR 0)
_
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA A50A,B)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (LRR P; T$, T)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
_
_Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
_
_ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
(MLRA
_Red Parenntt Material (TF2)
_
_ Muck Presence (AB) (LRR U)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
1 cm Muck (AB) (LRR P, T)
_ Marl (F10) (LRR U)
_
_
pepleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) X Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
_ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
_
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1505)
_
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (86)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA
149A,153C, 153D)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, 3, T, U)
-- — — -- --
Type: T
Depth (im
US Army Corps of Enplrtr
v, +:
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0
x.

JC-W5
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and GulfCoastalPlain Region
Project/Site: �' 1 ✓'� i f �� City/County: N 94/ 1P'c-/ Sampling Date:
ApplicanVOwner: # 'a State: 9L Sampli!=g Point:
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:._ r_
Landform (hilislope, terrace, etc.): Lt fo,
- Local relief (concave, convex, none): C G ✓Gy,v Slope
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): - Let: -32 1 � l� � 146 Long,- 77. t i ` Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: fLrt t mci L U P � v T NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typily
his time of year? Yes No 4 (If no, explain in Remarks.) x
Are Vegetation, Soit A, or Hydrologysignificantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation ^ e� , Soit AL, or Hydrologynaturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes_ No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
Gt1'c,y
k a rJ� �o ycI Ct 7 C---c
kd)uf k-
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is require
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ High Water Table (A2)
Saturation (A3)
_ Water Marks (B1)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Algal Mat or Crust (84)
— Iron Deposits (65)
— Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No
So—e 1w,I-pvcq' ),il` aft C ie41 dwt
A 'C/5 E 4o�Q cEL,Pt.,..r['
t
tack all that apply)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
Mart Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tiled Soils (C6)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches}:
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): 1 �/
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): !-- - _J Wetland Hydrology Present?
jmcludes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required
_ Surface Soil Cracks (86)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
— Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ FAC-Neutral Test (135)
Sphagnum moss (138) (LRR T, U)
Yes k No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
1. _ t".P f- fl--* h - %.
,aver
1- �
2.._
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:-
20% of total cover:
Saplina/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
= Total Cover
50°% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: V )
..�
1. ti --.e 17
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
= Total Cover
_
500A of total cover: 20% of total cover: _
Woodyyne Stratum (Plot size: 3� )
1. •^^ �r e
'-�
2 J
3.
4.
5.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Sampling Point: i �O9
Vj
Dominance Test vmrksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
(A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
(B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
(A!B)
Total % Cover of:
OBL species
FACW species
FAC species
FACU species
UPL species
Column Totals:
Multiply by:
x1=
x2=
x3=
x4=
x5=
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50°%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub -Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb -AID herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine -AID woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes 4No
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: 3��
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color nolW % Color molsti % T e Loc' Texture _Remarks
'Tyne _C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pare Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Sail Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils?:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
_ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153B)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Muck Presence (AS) (LRR U)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Marl (F10) (LRR U)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
_ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR 0, P, T)
31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Coast Prairie Redox (All6) (MLRA 150A)
X Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
_ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
_ Sandy Redox (85) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_ Stripped Matrix (86) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Dark Surface (37) (LRR P, 3, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (If observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

JC-W5
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
{ `. City/County: "' �l bQr&11 r�V ampling Date: )-005/q
ProjecVSite: (`h m `E - n yj . V
Applicanb'Owner: t i 1` ii � ' Dr"' _ _ State: CSamplin •Point: / /`
r
Investigator(s): _ p- Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): (Ltd r f � Local relief (concave, convex, none): CG✓ fIL Slope
Subregion (LRR or MLRA )4 Let: Long: ? Datum:
-
Cnil Man Unit Name: IL (A, t(ti'.: 5�,` ��i'sMs_ _ NWI classification: _
Are climatic 1 hydrr`oVic conditions n the site typical for this time of year? Yes No _� (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation N' soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � No
Are Vegetation, Soil , or Hydrology -W naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No - is the Sampled Area �(
Hydric Soil Present? Yes- No - within a Wetland? Yes No /
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No /; 1
Remarks: t'1 C% je, G U o C,,� a Y7 cc,,,i d V 0.+�rY �1 C— S ! GL5 Wt t`
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one
is required: check all that ADDlvt
Surface Water 01)
_ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Marl Deposits (615) (LRR U)
Saturation (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
_
Water Marks (61)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
_
Sediment Deposits (82)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_
_ Drift Deposits (133)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tiled Soils (C6)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (64)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Iron Deposits (B5)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (89)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present?
Water Table Present?
Saturation Present?
Remarks:
Surface Soil Cracks (156)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
_ Drainage Patterns (610)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Geomorphic Position (132)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
_ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T. U)
Yes No Depth (inches):
Yes No Depth (inches):
Yes No-X1- Depth (inches): __ _ ,twetland Hydrology Present?
(stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Yes No X
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

Jc-w5
VEGETATION Strata) Use
(Four — scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:
Absolute Dominant Indicator
?
Dominance Test wiorksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover, s
' r �
�? �!
Number of Dominant Species �
1. [,Qr r� R Mv+ I S-
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: - (A)
Total Number of Dominant
2. r / !' '+✓4 c "�.� �S �3)
3•
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
�5
5
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (AB)
67. .
_
Prevalence Index worksheet:
8
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
t = Total Cover
OBL species x 1 =
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
FACW species x 2 =
_
SapliniaZhrub Stratum (Plot size: - r ) j
1. .rr{, J la r -� o i��% ye� � (hJ
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: _. (A)
2
3.
4•
Prevalence Index = B/A =
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6•
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7•
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50°%
8.
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
119 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: _�
_
Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) `�
r % �� '" 1` J !
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be disturbed
1. - 5 �
2. _` _ ��5 C+ f
present, unless or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
GA
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
4.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
SaplinglShrub -Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
5
6•
7,
8•
Herb -Ali herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
9.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tell.
10. -
Woody vine All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11.
height.
12.
= Total Cover
50°% toy cover: cZ:.� 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: �f )
2.
3.
4.
5•
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Present? Yes No
Remarks: (If observed• list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Point: � - LP
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(Inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Twe Loe- Texture Remarks
C 2 I Y 3/1 100
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
location: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (Al) _
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2) _
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_ Black Histic (A3) _
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside M LRA 150A,B)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1`19) (LRR P, S, T)
_ Stratified Layers (AS) _
Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
_ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) _
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153B)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) _
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) _
Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) _
Mari (1710) (LRR U)
_ Other (Explain In Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _
Iran -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) X
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) _
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150S)
_ Sandy Redox (85) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
_ Dark Surface (37) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (If observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes L No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: I )y-y-i1%f City/County: Jyl /I 1 �1f Sampling Date: i7
Applicant/Owner: State: t�L_ Sampling Point: Jkx 167 -
Investigator(s): I lut I W'1 Section, Zowns , Range: TQ.AJ" 4*0
r
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): G'' '� Local relief (concave, convex, none):Slope (%): CZ
�
Subregion (LRR or MsLAR�A.): W T Lat: S, 9,-t I Long: -7710 1Gr 4 Datum: W,'S t8 t
Soil Map Unit Name: r unarm s M P4 V, 1 )PA0 � J)� " �M NWI classification: i il���r it►11e� / �� 5
Are climatic /hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks.) /
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes V No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
within a Wetland.
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators iminimum of one is recwired: check all that apply]
❑
Surface Water (Al)
LJ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
E
High Water Table (A2)
❑ Marl Deposits (615) (LRR U)
lJ
Saturation (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑
Water Marks (131)
f❑T
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
❑
Sediment Deposits (62)
1uf
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑_
Drift Deposits (133)
1L--Jf
I --I Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
a
Iron Deposits (65)
0 Other (Explain in Remarks)
a Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
a Water -Stained Leaves (69)
Yes V No
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
® Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
Drainage Patterns (1310)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (616)
II Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
II Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No _�� Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
(includes caoillary frin4e]
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available
Remarks:
I�
� ki U y1 { 5 oMM Ayn
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

JC-ws
VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: 7'•-;�
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: �) Species? Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
over
f
Number of Dominant Species
FAC: �7
1._(n�': �. w�'ir�� :wR I mil—
That Are OBL, FACW, or (A)
T.. • _
3. �.14Y�^J'i "Gf -: i/�
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B}ar
full
4. r
Percent of Dominant Species }
<�
5
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
8
�ro = Total Cover
OBL species x 1 =
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
FACW species x 2 =
Sapling/Shrub 5,tratum (Plot size: 30'Y )
FAC species x 3 =
1 re4 r�
FACU species x 4 =
2
UPL species x 5 =
3
Column Totals: (A) (B)
4.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
5•
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7•
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
8.
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
= Total Cover
_
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
50% of total cover:_ 20% of total cover: 2
_
30 Y
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
c
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1. ¢ r ; ; �+r.�,. 1 w! �' /A 2A �w
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2. )AM, nh ` j/� _� �—
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree —Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
4.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5
height.
6•
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
7
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tali.
8.
Herb —All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
g,
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10.
Woody vine —All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11.
height.
12.
_ = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: 11
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Hydrophytic /
_ = Total Cover Vegetation ✓
)% of total cover: Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: 5 WY —0 4—
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist] % Color (moist) % Type' Loc _ Texture Remarks
� s 10 ul. 100 l)+yldu .paw! I /* UYAVrA
'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Histosol (Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Muck Presence (AB) (LRR U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (At 1)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
S, T, U)
�❑--II 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
u 2 Muck (LRR S)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR
O)
cm (A10)
u Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR
Gleyed Matrix
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Loamy (F2)
El Soils
Depleted Matrix (F3)
u Anomalous Bright Loamy (F20)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 15313)
❑
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
(F8)
in Remarks)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
Other (Explain
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Hydric Soil Present? Yes v No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: ^r^'1M/ eA L iP City/County: NGw Awee Sampling Date: ` 7A
Applicant/Owner: /' ` r State:Sampling Point: —PI
Investigator(s): rm► �t _ _ Section, Township, Range: TiA3n�3 `h P
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): 14fr Local relief (concave, convex, none): 4�. Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LAX % Lat: Long: Datum: WUS
Soil Map Unit Name:
Are climatic / hydroloc
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed?
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic?
classification: NA
Vo (If no, explain in Remarks.) /
Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ✓ No
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes V7- No within a Wetland? Yes No V
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Seconda Indicators fminimum of two required)
El
Surface Surface Water (Al)
El Aquatic Fauna (613)
17
High Water Table (A2)
Marl Deposits (615) (LRR U)
LJ
Saturation (A3)
1❑-r
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑
Water Marks (131)
1L---If
I —I Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Root
❑
❑
Sediment Deposits (132)
Drift Deposits (133)
tQ-r Presence of Reduced Iron
L-I Recent Iron R n in Tilled Soils (C6)
Q
Algal Mat or Crust (64)
Iron Deposits (135)
❑ ck Surface (C7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
InundatioXVislble- erial
Imagery (137)
❑
d.'ater-Stained Leaves (69)
Ll Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
❑ Drainage Patterns at.D)
❑ M Ines
Dry -Season Waterr Table (C2)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No �_ Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No C Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes
(includes capillary_ fringe]
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: 5 WX b d 1Y
^} '
`'�
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree
1.
Stratum (Plot size: %' • )
y Tl.. r Y_ �_ er 1/ ✓
% Cover
35 .
Species? Status
L �_
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
2.
t '_ N .i
w
3.
� R l t")Xf7YYy • R " ��- f
I -
�3 �
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: :57 (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species Tjp
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7.
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
8
8D
= Total Cover
OBL species x 1 =
50% of tQlal cover;
20% of total cover:
FACW species x 2 =
Saglino/Shrub
Stratum b)
FAC species x 3 =
1 %
(Plot size:
1 fn hol (►� Y►er
10
Y
FACU species x 4 =
2 C
`
-�
UPL species x 5 =
3.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
4•
Prevalence Index = B/A =
5•
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
_/� Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
?•
_V 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
8.
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0'
ib
= Total Cover
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
50% of total cover:_
20% of total cover: _/
_
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1. ____'--
✓( ) PL M r' M f-AAMO. "'.'.
�W
i�
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
Tree -Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
4.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5
height.
6.
SaplinglShrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
7.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
8.
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
g,
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10.
Woody vine - AII woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11.
height.
12.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover: 2
Woody
Vine Stratum (Plot size:
)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
= Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

Sampling Point:
SOIL
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
depth
Matrix
Redox Features
Color (moist) % Type' L_Ic_
Texture Remarks
%
inches)Color
M.
moist
100
d�'
LA_IQ
Is
�' ��
I° Y "Ft D M
'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
I
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) ❑ 1 to Muck (rob (LRR O)
Histosol(Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic 03)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer
Type:
Depth (inches):
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
n (LRR S)
2 cm Muck
Fl
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
Tu1 rtic (
TUI Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
u Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153B)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
r❑-I
u Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
MLRA 1511
unless disturbed or problematic.
Delta Ochnc (F17)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

JC-wio, ii
5k6¢1 5>•%3, 1 swG
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic
,7and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: � )Myq )Its `�, City/County: /�� � /5�im /�;' 1� Sampling Date: g -?, �
Applicant/Owner: Y' • State: JVL Sampling Point: S -D
Investigator(s): 1'tt� )AM Section, o i�, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): irc-f•CX 'V- Slope (%): 47_ -
Subregion (LRR or MLRRA�): Lat: 33 = �i� _`� Long: -770)'077 Datum: p.0111/
Soil Map Unit Name: r Ir�S`✓1 A N q; � DArl �1� t� $ )OA NWI classification: 26I%�w-,4'4 Tvl
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this ime of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects,.important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes V
� No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? YesNowithin a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? YesNo
Remarks: �)OC{A�� ✓h '?�°t*�'�1� •� �bbJ � ��' 9N�►'�t l�
r
HYDROLOGY
nyaroiogy inaicators:
.Surface Water (Al) ❑
Aquatic Fauna (613)
Pigh Water Table (A2)
Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
1Q-1
,Saturation (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
1L-J-r
Water Marks (131)
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
1IJ�
Sediment Deposits (132)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
1l-_JT
Drift Deposits (63) u
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Algal Mat or Crust (64) ❑
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
u Iron Deposits (135) 0 Other (Explain in Remarks)
nundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
❑
Dd Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Water Table Present? Yes No
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (inches): d -�
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches): �I
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑ ,Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
_Drainage Patterns (810)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
EvI ry-Season Water Table (C2)
_�y' Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ aturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

Jc-wi0, ii
VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover S ecies? Status
(Plot size:'
1. fLY rLMVIAIT
50 PAC.,
2. :1U
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:_
20% of total cover:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30
1. Air IAS it'aCY A I M A
)
't orst
-
2. Mor A101, (40f rMA
- - Y FAG
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
= Total Cover
10
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30 )
J
1. Df.Y1kVl�l�l�'! GVlit�tAertr
41
2. S014% M LU Yst,!I AS
20 Ohl,
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Cover
50% of total cover:
Total
20% of total cover: If
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30
A
)
is , ad 'As
2.
3.
4.
5.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Sampling Point:. wjj , F ;.
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: f (A)
Total Number of Dominant All
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is:53.0'
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree -Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

Jc-w10, 11
SOIL Sampling Point: swab-lNb Wf'T
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist), % Tvpe Loc- Texture Remarks
d-� 100 15
,-2.0T iO %f !# f f _ f!� yi" iD�'b C M ],.jig5�.
i e: c=Uoncentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
U
Histosol (Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
H
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑
HStratified
Layers (A5)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
❑
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
D
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
0
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
0
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
D
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
0
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
❑
0
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
D
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
PL=Pore Lin
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
-0
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
T❑�
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
uReduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
-0
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
1 T
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
u Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted
(MLRA 153B)
Dark Surface (F7)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Redox Depressions (F8)
T❑
u Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Hydric Soil Present? Yes
No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

5'WAr -5w,R t 5)4L
Jc-wio, ii
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: V) ���� vy City/County: LO �Vvll Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: AIAVYI State: H4i Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): _ ,! } Section, Township, Range: Ou�✓�5��>�
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): ; ilv v I Local relief (concave, convex, none): <A'1 Slope
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): iae Lat: 36*, 1pqy2y Long: —77. )I tf 77 7 Datum: W & S 2)4
Soil Map Unit Name: , Ww t I )0AAi IP 11H&d_e4 S 144M NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes V No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology I
Primary
Indicators (minimum of one is require& check all that apply)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
❑
Surface Water (Al) L1 Aquatic Fauna (1313)
High Water Table (A2) Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
❑ Drainage Patterns (1310)
r�Q�r
LJ
111
Saturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Ci)
Moss Trim Lines (816)
LJ
1uf
Water Marks (61) Oxidized Rhizosphere Living Roots (C3)
II Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑
1u-t
Sediment Deposits (B2) LJ Presence used Iron (C4)
Drift Deposits (63) nt Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)II
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
aturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
III
Algal Mat or Crust (B4 Thin Muck Surface (C7)
� Geomorphic Position (D2)
1.1
❑
Iron Deposits [� El Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ hallow Aquitard (D3)
�FAC-Neutral
❑
Inrunation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
Water -Stained Leaves (69)
Test (D5)
Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No —0 Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): /
71,
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes v No
(includes cauiilary frinoe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

J&W10, ii
VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ' M -r jr ) % Cover S eeies? Status
1. S FAC
2. 1. I.A'S -tQIG&- Z® SAC+
3.
4.
5,
6.
7.
8.
_Y = Total Cover
50%of total cover: _� 20% of total cover:
3
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
1. 39nolta 9) (ndiFtbyg Y FAG
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: a`� 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.J
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11. l
12.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30'Y )
1. S V8i M% v n o n cki Po I i A •- D IF�C
2.
4
5
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
list morphological adaptations below).
Sampling Point: �Np
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC
Prevalence Index we
Total % Cover of:
OBL species
FACW species
FAC species
FACU species
UPL species
Column Totals:
e> UP (A/B)
heet:
Multiply by:
x 1 =
x2=
x3=
_. x4=
x5=
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 253.0'
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree -Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub -Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

Jc-w10, 11
SOIL
Sampling Point: Nw U10
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
finches3 Color moist % Color {moist) % Type Loc- Texture Remarks
- 100
11 1005
Z 1�11 100 3fl D M - -�
'Type: C=Concentration, D=De Jetion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Linin , M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑ Histosol (Al)
❑
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
T❑
LJ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
13 Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
❑
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
u Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
(MLRA 153B)
❑ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
❑ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions
T❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
❑
(F8)
Marl (F10) U)
u Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
D
(LRR
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Active Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
IMIA3
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) 31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U) wetland hydrology must be present,
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151) unless disturbed or problematic.
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

J
JC-W 12
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA F Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: D f Nfit v�e_iri 1 ^ec I/ /itfr ty: L' Q�ll IP�rJ �L qq�� y
r\ C' /coun �C(tl Sampling Date: �V I ApplicanUOwner: Y 4- , w r3 o
`' State: A�le_ Sampling Point:
pl g
Investigator(s):. JP r'-Ail WF
� ` 7Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): A �a� �w Local relief (concave, convex, none):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): 7 Ir"3AL Lat: _�� na4 a -ell _� _ iv�--
NWI slope (%):ugDatum: �5�Sal Map Unit Name:14-4 -IK�t �r ru��v �JY l�{ ) � , �l�tr► classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic condition on the site typical for this time of -
year? Yes No --k- (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation I� Soil or Hydrology N significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation Al—, Soil or Hydrology _ j�/ naturally
problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes
Hydric Soil Present? Yes Is the Sampled Area
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No
Remarks: � _�
1 .a)cj f VIP
HYDROLOGY
r Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Prima Indicators minimum of one is re uired- check all that a
_Surface Water (Al)
High Water Table (A2)
_Aquatic Fauna (B13)
Saturation
_ Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
�s
Wa1er Markss (B1)
Sediment
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
Deposits (B2)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Drift Deposits (B3)
, Recent Iron Reduction in Tiled Soils (C6)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Thin Mi+rlr ice„
— Iron Deposits (B5) -- -� %-, I
_ Inundation visible on Aerial Imagery (67) Other (Explain in Remarks)
c-WEller-Stained Leaves (139)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present?
Water Table Present?
Saturation Present?
Remarks:
Yes -/1 No_ Depth (inches):
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
_ Drainage Patterns (610)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Acluitard (133)
kFAC-Neutral Test (D5)
_ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Yes X No Depth (inches):
Yes_ No Depth (inches):` Wetland Hydrology Present?
(stream gauge,
Photos, previous
Yes,L No
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

Jc-W 12
VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 3 D ) % Cover Species? Status
3.
5.
6.
8._
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: � 20% of total cover:
lin Shrub (Plot size: d )
YL�
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
_ = Total Cover
500A of total cover: < 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plat side:
O )
'"' � �
1. '� : rev' • re d t,
^�- ..r c'�j: �L U�
2.
Y�,
3. .✓O. v. _ ,..
w _ t U -T
27
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
= Total Cover
as
500A of total cover: 20% of total cover:10
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot
size: 3d )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
= Total Cover
500A of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Remarks: of observed, list
morphological adaptations below).
� i _"1Gy
�
Sampling Point: �v
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPI. species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = BJA=
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling Shrub -Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

Jc-w12
SOIL
Sampling Pant: NA/ vex
rrome uescriptron: tuescnoe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(Inches) Color maist % Color (moist % T e Loc' Texture Remarks
L --IQ+ I 2 100 k� 7% G.
'Type: C--Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced_Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Sdil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside M LRA 150A,B)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Sails (1719) (LRR P, S, T)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
_ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153B)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Muck Presence (AS) (LRR U)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Marl (1710) (LRR U)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al I)
_ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
_ Thick Dark Surrace (Al2)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
X Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
_ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1719) (MLRA 149A)
_ Stripped Matrix (86)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A,
153C, 153D)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (If observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
1
Hydric Soil Present? Yes
No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

JC-w12
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region ( �
ProjecYsite: � —ri �— City/County: ► -�^- �' � Sampling Date: _ �' `� 0 `4
Applicantowner: C-' t? iL WtA,- State: 1 6 Sampling Point: vl"
Investigator(s): —( ! ; -t, 5 CA, _ Section, Township, Range: T_ W%A S �►!�
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): E(Qrdlffa cam- Local relief (concave, convex, none): (,//V-12! Slope f%k 0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Y r ._ A Let: _ ._� �� �� _ 9� Lon � � �, � � Datum: Vf�s
_
Soil Map Unit Name: wtafkf tk&-,e SWa ki„IMkc(cr�[rc�ia.ir�c.,NWlGassfication: -/f
Are climatic f hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No _y— (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetationy Soil i✓ or Hydrology A/ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes V.— No
Are Vegetation Al' , Soil A, or Hydrology _A/ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
HYDROLOGY
Indicators:
Yes k No _ _
Yes 17— No_ _
Yes No
is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland?
Primal � Indicators .minimum cf one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Water (Al) _
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ High Water Table (A2) _
Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
_ Saturation (A3) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
_ Water Marks (B1) _
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
_ Sediment Deposits (62) _
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Drift Deposits (83) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tiled Soils (C6)
Algal Mat or Crust (64) _
Than Muck Surface (C7)
_ Iron Deposits (135) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Field Observations:
I
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two recuired)
Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88)
_ Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Geomorphic Position (132) i
Shallow Aquitard (133)
_ FAC-Neutral Test (DS)
_ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Surface Water Presets? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): _ I`
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes
imcludes ca ills frin e)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

Jc-wi2
VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point:
Dominance Test virorksheet:
-. Absolute Dominant Indicator
_
Tree Stratum (Plot size: % Cover Species? 221PS i
Cur
Number of Dominant Species
1. Q i 4,10 f Lt f (J .: ., rra 2 Q SSG-5 b
-�
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
2.
Total Number of Dominant
3.
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (AB)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
8
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
= Total Cover
OBL species x 1 =
50% of total cover: 10 20% of total cover:
FACW species x 2 =
Saplina/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: _ )
,�
FAC species x 3 =
FACU 4 =
1. t �� i'.✓4 35.!
species x
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
2
3.
4.
Prevalence Index = BJA=
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7.
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
8
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
= Total Cover
500A of total cover: 20% of total cover:
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
E+
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
N/l ✓T L
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2. r) V./) ; (f r- i -*-S L-1 4(-/
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. 4 " Jr
Tree -Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
4.
5 _
6.
Sapling[Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 it (1 m) tall.
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine -AII woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
7,
8•
9.
10.
11.
12
-3U = Total Cover
500A of total canter: 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Strat (Plot size
2.
3.
4.
5. Hydrophytic
= Total Cover Vegetation
50°k of total arver:_ 20% of total cover:
Present? Yes No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

Jc-w12
SOIL
Profile
tothe depth needed to document the maicator or confirm
Depth Matrix Redox Features
inches Color moist % Color moist at T
r 3x 100 — LOc" Texture
100
Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Sail Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.1
_ Histosol (A1)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
_ 1 cm Muck (AS) (LRR P, T)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al I)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 15oA)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (Si) (LRR O, S)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (SS)
_ Stripped Matrix (86)
_ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, a, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (If observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
ence
Sampling Pant: qv
Remarks
livy j 70Y
location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matr
Indicators for Problematic Hydric
_ Poiyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O) v .
_ Thin Dark Surface (89) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
_ Reduced Vertic (FIB) (outside MLRA 150A, S)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
_
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
(MLRA 15313)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Marl (F10) (LRR U)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
% Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
_ Reduced Vertic (FIB) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A,
153C, 153D)
Hydric Soil Present? Yes 7k No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

Jc-wi3
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
ProjectlSite: (✓ I 41 ��Gifj City/County: A/evI���avei✓ Sampling Date: �r r
AppiicantlOwner. _ C— a f Ithrov ► P�rli G lr✓ C!
State: Sampling Point: P�
Investigator(s): Q���[N�1�v✓ Section, Township, Range:' T®�� S 4t2 — (}
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc-.) �d� ` Local relief (ooneave, convex, none): i+ Slop Slo
+ (°6):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): / �s Lti Let: �. Oq� Long: `7. Datum:
Sal Map Unit Name: 0141-►`7 Os, on ,.5iti-1y' n �i^��c!« ie�r�,.l l P 1
(� NWI classfication:
Are climatic 1 hydro is conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No _ X (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil )1 , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are—"'Noormal Circumstances" present? Yes _X_ No
Are Vegetation Soil —$_, or Hydrology u naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
r—
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Yes r No —
Yes No —
Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No
li'7mre g(/frgCe
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reouireM
Primary Indicators rminmmum of one is reimired•
check all that a;.,, I_:
_Surface Soil Cracks (136)
—Surface Water (Al) _
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
-'Rlgh Water Table (A2) _
Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
_ Drainage Patterns (810)
,"Saturation (A3) _
Hydrogen Suede Odor (C1)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
ater Marks (131) _
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (132) _
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
T Drift Deposits (133) _
Recent Iron Reduction in Tiled Soils (C6)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134) _
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Iron Deposits (85) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Shallow Aquitard (03)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67)
,-FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes_ No
Depth (inches):,
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (inches): 9
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
�ctudes�illaryfrhp)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Q rrl l✓��$
C
h-d(5� o�Jn�c�� �ODPo,S
855[(.t,5
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

JC-w13
VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point:"��
IIV�k
Absolute Dominant Indicator
f Dominance Test vrorksheet:
(Plot size: ` ) % Cover ?
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
2.
3.
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
Species Percent of Dominant
5.
That AreOBL, FACor W, FAC: i(A/3)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7.
Total % Cover of: MultiDly bT
8.. _
2 = Total Cover
OBL species x 1 =
�(
50% of total cover: l D 20% of total comer:
FACW species x 2 =
Sapline/Shrub Stratum (Plat size: D )
pPc�5
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4=
1, ^ R (r✓� 5 ySJ`r/c�wr c 4
UPL species x 5 =
2
_
Column Totals: (A) (B)
3.
4.
Prevalence Index = B/A = _
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6. — —
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7•
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
8
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
= Total Cover
_
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
_
Herb Stratum (Plot �jize: 0 } —
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1. ( �,$, 1 4 V a v" ✓� r Y! ��
Z
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2. � l� Urye UV'G riJi i' rq
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
Tree —Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
4.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5
height.
6.
Sapling/Shrub —Woody plants, excluding vines, less
7.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
$•
Herb —All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
g,
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10.
Woody vine —All woody vines greeter than 3.28 it in
11.
height.
12.
Total Cover
50"10 of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Pilot size: )
1. �' 4✓►.1. 1 ��
2.
3.
Hydrophytic
4.
5.
= Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Present? Yes No
Remarks: (if observed, list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

Jc-W13
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color moist %
100
Color (moist) % Type' Loc-
Texture Remarks
�Oy GCS
I
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pare Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Sail Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) _ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
_ Reduced Vertic (1718) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Solis (1`19) (LRR P, S, T)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (173)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
_ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
,g,1'Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153B)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Mari (F10) (LRR U)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
_ Depleted Ochric (Fi 1) (MLRA 151)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Iron -Manganese Masses (1`12) (LRR O, P,
T) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Coast Prairie Redox (All 6) (MLRA 150A) X Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
watland hydrology must be present,
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
_ Delta Ochric (1`17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150113)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA
149A, 153C, 153D)
_ Dark Surface (87) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes A No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

Pk//JC-W13
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf /Coastal Plain Region 67
j�
Project/Site: _ D t wt % 5 - k / City/County: �L• r �'L _yt __ Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner. �� 4— M L,/ State: IJG Sampling Point: w ' d IT
Investigator(s): L. — Section, Township, Range: T-r) Sk
Landform (hrlislope, terrace, etc.): (I #+ a r, r rn - Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): — �r Let: �� sr Ok �`� Long: —? 7 Datum: Wli,tq
Soil Map Unit Name: I/►1 V4 WI45&t, i ew,,- �.wc 5.,,�. )(94mjAe ckdC,_ 5u,,Jl bkk, NWI classification: %U
Are climatic f hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No _ (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology, significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances' present? Yes A, No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Weiland Hydrology Present?
Remarks:
Yes No
Yes No =
Yes No
• �'uw � � t S uG1 diQ Cr�PrccS�
HYDROLOGY
Indicators:
Primary Indicators minimum of one is required- check all that apply)
Surface Water (At)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Saturation (A3)
Water Marks (B1)
w Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Drift Deposits (83)
Algal Mat or Crust (1514)
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland?
_ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
T Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
T Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Iron Deposits (85)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present?
Water Table Present?
Saturation Present?
RemlIarks:
(t (0
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Yes
_ Surface Soil Cracks (86)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88)
_ Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ Moss Trim Lines (616)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Geomorphic Position (02)
Shallow Aquitard (133)
_ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
_ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Yes No Depth (inches): T
Yes No Depth (inches):
Yes No Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present?
(stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available
US Army Corps of Engineers
Yes No
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

JC-w13
VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. sampling Point: t
-70 Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tre Strat m (Plot sjze: ) % CoveCoverr S e 'es7 atus
1. ° J r ., n( v/ 4-u � o� L 7 M�
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 3 (A)
2. fItlV�' ( "
-
Total Number of Dominant
3,
Species Across All Strata:_ (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
_�7
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, orFAC: (AB)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheets
7.
Total °h Cover of: Multiply by:
8. _
= Total Cover
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
50% of total cover: } 20-/. of total cover:
Saolina/Shrub Stratum (Plot
FAC species x 3 =
size:) /s���rrr
S[wCn.S� � i�
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
2
Column Totals: (A) (B)
3.
4•
prevalence Index = B/A =
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6. _
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophylic Vegetation
7.
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
8.
3 - Prevalence index is 53.0'
= Total Cover
_
_ problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
/
5wo of total cover: L 209/6 of total cover:
-M
Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) ,, J1
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
✓V7_ 5 irav4yy —I� —
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2, i-. y f ct 3 r i m-,11 i(/f W I1h KV=
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
, ` �.L7
3. 4 k' rs > _
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
4, _
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5
height.
6.
Sapling/Shrub —Woody plants, excluding vines, less
7
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
8.
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plahts, regardless
y
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10.
Woody vine —Ail woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11.
height.
12
Total Cover
50% ,Itotal cover:20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 1.
2.
3.
4.
t
Remarks: (If observed,
= Total Cover
2.5f 50% of total cover:20% of total cover:?
morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

Jc-W 13
Sampling Point: �3 1
SOIL
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.)
Depth Matrix
inched Color rmoist %
Redox Features Remarks
oc
Color +moist 0/0Type L' Texture
�•� ��7;.� 3 100
`517-
� 100
4-17 f ' ,.
�
V
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. _
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless':
otherwise noted.)
Polyvaiue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U) ._ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR 0)
Histosoi (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
—
— Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) — 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Black Histic (A3)
— Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) —
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
_
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
— Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) —
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
Organic Bodies (A6) ( LRR P T, U)
— Depleted Matrix (F3) _
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6) (M LRA 153B)
—
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
_, Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
_ Redox Depressions (F8) —
Other (Explain in Remarks)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
— Mari (F10) (LRR U) —
_
_ Depleted Below park Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151) 3Indicators of hydro hyt ve is elation and
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T) P g
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
_
Umbric Surface (F13) {LRR wetland hydrology must be present, P, T, U}
_
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
— unless disturbed or problematic.
_ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
_
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1506)
_
Sandy Redox (S5)
— Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
— Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
_ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Type:
Depth (inches):
R
(if observed):
US Army Carps of Engineers
Hydric Soil Present? yes No
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

Jc-W16
# v A*'Q 4off­,�
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: 4V r rr�✓vu� 1 _ City/County: /14w t-t.h I (f01040'*­ Sampling Date: /d 22'ZC
Applicant/Owner: K+ r pR State: /- Sampling Point. /fVr
Investigator(s): QA!2 a-j Section, Township, Range: l-y".n sk,02 ]
Landfonn (hillslope, terrace, etc.): .' �1-.n.., Local relief (concave, convex, none): off- Slope
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): _T - I Let: `l �= % i Long: • 0 9� Ir f _ Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: %n/M- fV) :. w. wA ✓A143 f1_ _ 1 , , NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes V No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transacts, important features, etc
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes `� No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes I% within a Wetland? Yes No
Remarks: ((J h �T
avL-e
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is reauired•
check all that apply)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ Aquatic Fauna (613)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
Saturation (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Water Marks (61)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Ling -moots (C3)
_ Sediment Deposits (82)
_ Presence of Red?i;g k ri (C4)
_ Drift Deposits (63)
_ Reeent Vw Reduction in Tiled Soils (C6)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (64)
_1~1Kn Muck Surface (C7)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ Sparsely Vegr-ta•ed Concave Surface (138)
_,,�age Patterns (610)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
_ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T. U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No r/ Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes
No "r Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present?
locludes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available
Remarks:
Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

Jc-W 16
VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
/,
(Plot size: T . % )
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Status
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
B.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: _� 20% of total cover:
r t (Plot size:
1. L•V
wn
2.
ALA rhfocK�n-
�� ✓ t� C--
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
a.
= Total Cover
5/00A of total cover:
'2fO 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
r
12.
= Total Cover
50% of total rover:
20% of total cover:
Woody
Vine Stratum (P ol size:
3.
4.
5.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations
below).
Sampling Point:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across Ali Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species ,1
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: _ �Od (A/3)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multinly by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = BJA =
Hydrophytic Vegetation indicators:
2rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
- Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater then 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

Jc-W16
SOIL
(Describe to the depth
Sampling Point: AW&'ci I'r
Indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix _ Redox Features
(inches) Colorr (moist) I % Color :moist % Type Loc- Texture`
Remarks
/" �
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pare Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Solle:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 2 cm Muck (Al0) (LRR S)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (172)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
_ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153B)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Muck Presence (AS) (LRR U)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Marl (1710) (LRR U)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Ochric (1711) (MLRA 151)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Coast Prairie Redox (Al 6) (MLRA 150A)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
_ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
_ Sandy Redox (S5) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_ Stripped Matrix (86) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
_ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, 3, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (If observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No 1'
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

Jc-W16 —
wAlIwc
�p WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region ,,,
IS
Project/Site: J► 1w , cr, Vie„ ,,,�i �.¢ :' _ City/county:- Al?w Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: _ -,. �- Sampling Point:'
Investigator(s): EADEEkI Section, Township, Range: •n5 • �✓
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): 6CmCAo-r— slope (ok): <2 y
Submgion (LRR or MLRA): j Let: S'� Long: -77 •0 S to ; r Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: i 5 1A - h1 A ' uN r In,�.lr. << h ,�.. 7 Ih9iek. L Sc,-d classification:
p
�- NW
dassp� •_
Are climatic I hydrologic ��1 qq'�'� � r"'���J�
yd logic conditidns qn the- site typical for this time of year? Yes No — (If no, explain in Remarks.) Z140
Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes
Are Vegetation" , Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site trap showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes .�,f No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓ Is the Sampled Area
Weiland Hydrology Present? Yes within a Wetland? Yes Z
Pr-1-1Z
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary indicators (minimum of one is required:
_ �9iirface Water (Al)
_ Aquatic Fauna (813)
Water Table (A2)
_ Marl Dr, ---.sits (615) (LRR U)
_ Saturation (A3)
rogen Suede Odor (C1)
_ Water Marks (131)
Oxidized Rhizoepheres along Living Roots (C3)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
— Drift Deposits (83)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tiled Soils (C6)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_ Thin Muck Surface (67)
_ Iron Deposits (65)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present?
Water Table Present?
Saturation Present?
Describe Recorded
_ Surface Soil Cracks (Be)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (158)
Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ Moss Trim Lines (816)
—, Season Water Table (C2)
— Crayfish Burrows (C8)
turation Visible on Aerial Imagerfm
Geomorphic Position (132)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
_ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Yes— No Depth (inches): .
Yes �No - Depth (inches):
Yes No Depth (inches): S Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes-z No
tswream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

Jc-W 16
VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point:
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree
Stratum (Plot size: r ) Cover �eTstatus
Number of Dominant Species
1 •
c T " (.A r vlti ' !
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
(ItA 4 t/ ��
2.
3.
�,-
_� _�
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
Species
Percent of Dominant /
S.
That Are OBL FACW, orFAC: ` (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7.
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
8.
S = Total Cover
OBL species x 1 = _ -
50% of totqt cover: E4_ 20% of total cover:
FACW species x 2 =
li r return (Plot size: AL)
FAC species x 3 =
1
{ t Y S r
FACU species x 4=
2.
—✓
c•�� -/f^-�
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
3.
4•
Prevalence Index = NA=
5
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6•
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
8•
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
Total Cover
_
problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
500of total cover: 75-- 20% of total cover:
_
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2•
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3•
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
4.
�
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5.
height.
6.
SaplinglShrub -Woody plants, excluding vines, less
7
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
8•
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
g•
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10.
- ----- —
Woody ulna -All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11.
height.
12.
�l
= Total Cover - - -
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
2.
3.
4.
5. Hydrophytic
= Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: ) 20% of total cover: I Present?
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Ye
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

Jc-w16
Pronle Description: (Describe to the aepth
Depth Matrix
(incheM _ Color (moolsb %
in
10
Sampling Pant: —"o K/i
Indicator or connrm the absence oT In®Cators.1
Redox Features
Color moist % Type' Loc
o v to L
Texturer Remarks A
. �Do 1�
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
kocatibn: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric So W:
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Pdyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Organic Bodies (AS) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 1538)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Muck Presence (AB) (LRR U)
_ Redoes Depressions (F8)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ 1 cm Muck (AS) (LRR P, T)
_ Marl (F10) (LRR U)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
_ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A,153C, 1530)
US Army Corps of Engineers
Hydric Soil Present?
Yes No
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

li-
JC-W18
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region �{
Project/Site: " ' W �4 r i �'o�k City/County: i ` k/ Sampling Date: �/
ApplicantlOwner. G' I = p� ��"`� State: PVC -Sampling Point: w �� Wth
Investigator(s): P R -(� r 1 d✓1/p Section, Township, Range: '�(9C-f.-. i, r
Landform (hilisiope, terrace, etc.): � ( (9 0 d d (Q­ r (-,, Local relief (concave, convex, noon): (�CQ U P Slope N: 0
2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): _ T 1 ��_ Let: 7 5, C) cfLong: 17`` 0444%1 Datum: U%
Soil Map Unit Name: I4 /� - N4d5dtA#wn. M(46V LC, t!o... 04,(1'((/ L NWi classification: Z
Are climatic f hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil IV , or Hydrology —AL significantly disturbed? Are 'Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation, Soil —9-1 or Hydrology --K— naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
[Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes i No within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present?„ Yes No
Remarks:(A J- L-- V9 U _ l iJ ` G r (q • _ ry .
f ` 5 rape
106)r v, a,- , ?Jv
HYDROLOGY
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is re❑aired•. check all that aiP_
i nches
Surface Water (Al) _
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
High Water Table (A2) T
Marl Deposits (615) (LRR U)
Saturation (A3) _
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
Water Marks (81) _
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
_ Sediment Deposits (B2) ,
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Drift Deposits (B3) —
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (84) _
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Iron Deposits (B5) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67)
Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes IL Na
Depth (inches):
W 1 T bl P t,� Y N
D th t�
ettgoa t qdr -4 )Q,-G,.,,7
_ Surface Soil Cracks (86)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (BB)
!Drainage Patterns (B10)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (132)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (133)
,/—FAC-Neutral Test (05)
_ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
a er a e resen
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): _S� Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes Y No
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
r
z�
US Army Corps of Engineers
J r ,
' ✓�' ��CG\ 'n' tJ rK �i�c
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Str (Plot size: �� ) %.Cover Spe
ci
es? -�t-us-
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8. -
_ �� = Total Cover
50% of total cover: .S 20-A of total cover:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 3y � ) ,o tAltl
2.
3.
4.
5. �-
6.
7.
V = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
JC-W18
s
Sampling Point:
Dominance Test worksheets \
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
Prevalence Index worksheet:
(A)
M (B)
(AB)
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A=
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: I 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1 44 (r . M ,, rt .� =J be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2 r t �, �►c q [' -,�' is t • yi'"t/ Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3. Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
4. more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5 height.
6. Sapling/Shrub -Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28ft (1 m) tall.
7
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
r� = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20-A of total cover:
Woody, Vine Stratum (Plot size: 3 d )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: _ 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
fvt KU t/U �, f -� C P
US Army Cops of Engineers
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

Jc-W18
w €
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
inches Color (moist) % Color fmoist'f % Type' Loc Texture Remarks
0- toy -
Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (Al) _
Pclyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2) _
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_ Black Histic (A3) _
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
_ Reduced Vertic (1`18) (outside MLRA 150A, B)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
_ Stratified Layers (A5) _
Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
_ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) _
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153B)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) _
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) _
Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) _
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
_ Other (Explain In Remarks)
_ Depleted Below park Surface (All) _
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
— Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) X
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) _
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 1506)
_ Sandy Redox (S5) _
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Stripped Matrix (S6) _
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (If observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

Y ` JC-W 18
WETLAND( DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic
and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: D t r 1'"'ll `l . ly�-�✓ k — City/County: Neli/i c-- / (/ !ti/
- — Sampling Date: _
ApplicanUOwner. Ct P-VV State: Sampling oint: �VP
Per', 'GP
Investigator(s): l �'�`/. v Section, Township, Range: 7)9t,�^-5
Landform (hilislope, terrace, etc.): Q• J a( , Local relief (concave, convex, none): GG.wv{ Slope (%): (�
Subregion (LRR or MLRAr):� T �� Let: 3 Sr 091 �` Long. -" %. ©q (1
Soil Map Unit Name:/� M-1"�UfDw�pWa� ra`.. - . �� 3t.• �r R — -f i Datum:
- - � �� P/ �.t WI classification:
Are climatic 1 hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are `Normal Circumstances" present? Yes A No
Are Vegetation Soil, or Hydrology naturally problematic? If ( needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes
=No
Is the Sam
Hydric Soil Present? YesPled Area
Wetland Hydrology Present? YesEwithin a Wetland? Yes No
Remarks, —
HYDROLOGY
Prima Indicators minimum of one! re uired: check all that a
_ Surface Water (AI)
_
_ Aquatic Fauna (13I3)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Marl Deposits (815) (LRR to
Saturation (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (CI)
_ Water Marks (BI)
— Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
— Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Drift Deposits (83)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (84)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_, Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
Surface Water Present?
Water Table Present?
Saturation Present?
includes caollary fringe
Describe Recorded Data
Remarks:
�nL
US Army Corps of Engineers
Yes No ! ` Depth (inches): _
Yes No A- Depth (inches):
Yes No __& Depth (inches):
gauge, monitoring well,
_ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88)
_ Drainage Patterns (BID)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
T Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Sphagnum moss (DO) (LRR T, U)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
ms), if available: —
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size: J )
1.
2.
3.
4.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
%.Cover S`pecies? Status
10 .4A
5.
6.
7.
8.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Saplina/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: !o )
1. r L v"
2.
JC-wis
Sampling Point:
Dominance lest WprKsneeL:
Number of Dominant Species 4
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: _
Total Number of Dominant
5
Species Across All Strata:
Percent of Dominant Species
>50
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A)
(A)
(B)
(AIS)
(B)
J.
4.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7.
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
8.
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
�= Total Cover
_
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size:'' )
X_. /
'Indicates of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
I�. yam_„ • r, : ,
W
-
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2.
L I ` �cjr u yr (ot o..4 G_
t
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3•
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
4
More in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5.
height.
6.
�-
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
thah 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
7
8.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
9
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11.
height.
12.
-?�-
d =Total Cover
50% of totayyl cover:
_- 20% of total cover:
Woody
Vine Stratum (Plot size: S FI
�'6-JY�avdS1^�c•• r�?.I�Y.S�,r
1. fd�t` / -t-
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
= Total Cover
Vegetation
�,
50% of total cover:-,
-
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
L _ - -
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

Jc-W 18
SOIL
Prattle Description:
_ _
(Describe to
Sampling Point: "f
the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.)
Depth
inches
Matrix
%
Redox Features
Color moist % Tvoe Loc Texture Remarks
Color (moist
1-
_JUG -2 a,
(a'
�L
'Tyre: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Sail Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs,
unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils%
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_ Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
T Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
_
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Solis (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
_ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
_
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
(MLRA 153B)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Marl (F10) (LRR U)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
_ Thick Dark Surface (At 2)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
_ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (84)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 15313)
_ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
—
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

f..
Jc-w21
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
ProjecHSite: i ►' S �''{�� _ _ City/County: J'/ Q _1_ 6r Sampling Date:
Applicantldwner: n G� ve ri 1 e-r, State: AlL,_ Sampling Point: p w4A
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range: o t y w 5 1. ` g
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.0-: �O I ~
�� `" �2 Local relief (concave, convex, none): �"� ^ a .f� Slope (%): �_
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): _ Ii- S Lat. J 5 , O `(( Long: 1 7. cl � ��)��-c,(
u�I `q /� Datum:---�--(/
Soil Map Unit Name: M r I oe—^ mw tow..- K 4 l,,. Z %44 (4,t-1 W(uk � 5C'- NWI classification: 1- 0 _
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (It no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation 'Soil V , or Hydrology 1; naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Hydric Solt Present? Yes — No Is the Sampled Area
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes _� No within a Wetland? Yes X No
RCllld rRS: ' -
Vetit?l��.J V'C(', C'r(U(-5 �r3 �5.1
HYDROLOGY
t Cl of 112'-e ar/f-as ►C.
Prima Indicators minimum of one is r
uired- check all that a
Surface Water (Al)
— Aquatic Fauna (B73)
High Water Table (A2)
— Marl Deposits (615) (LRR U)
Saturation (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
_ Water Marks (81)
— Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
— Sediment Deposits (82)
_ Presence of Reduced iron (C4)
Drift Deposits (B3)
_,_, Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
— Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Iron Deposits (65)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
— Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery
(B7)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
I/
No K Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes T
No D — •
— Surface Soil Cracks (58)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
Drainage Patterns (810)
_ Moss Trim Lines (816)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
__._ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
FAC-Neutral Test (DS)
phagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
ep (mches).
Saturation Present? Yes 4— Na Depth (inches): O Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes ca ilia frin e
Descrlbe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
-•r L.
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

Jc-w21
VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
1. Dom,
2.
3.
4.
5. -
6.
7.
8.
%Cover, Species? Status
Sampling Point: h1t
Dominance Test worksheets
Number of Dominant Species t�
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
J Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
(a)
- (AB)
Total % Cover of: Multiply bv:
OBL s eci
= Total Cover
p es x 1 =
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
FACW species x 2 =
S
li rub Stratum (Plot size: )
FAC species x 3 =
1.
L- c k • •��� (GvPwS
L �� ° e- W FACU species x 4 =
2.
-
UPL species x 5 =
3.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
4.
5.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
6.
HydrophyUc Vegetation Indicators:
7.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
B.
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
10 = Total Conner l
o'er
_
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum LPIot size: 3y
'Indicators
1.
�J � ��� _r r �) C ,/
`c
C
of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be disturbed
present, unless or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
rr,�+ dP� it
yl%t,- ^b
0
=
4.
D/3L
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
in diameter
more at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5.
height.
6.
Sapling/Shrub -Woody plants, excluding vines, less
7•
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
8.
9.
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and wooly plants less than 3.28 It tall.
10.
11.
Woody vine - Ali woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
12.
_'7 0 = Total Cover L
50% of total carer: 20% of total cover -
Woody
Vine 5tratum (Plat size: C% )
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
= Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes No
Remarks: (if observed, list morphological adaptations below)
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

SOIL Sampling Pant:
P�(9 d3
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color tmoist; % Color (moist) % Tme Loc- Texture Remarks
Jr r J __- { 77061
'1��
etion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hyddc Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (A1) _
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2) _
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_ Black Histic (A3) _
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
_ Stratified Layers (A5) _
Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
_ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U) _
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(M LRA 153B)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U) _
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U) _
Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF72)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T) _
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) _
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Iran -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
sindicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A) 2L
Umbdc Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S) _
Delta Ochdc (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
Sandy Redox (S5) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_ Stripped Matrix (86) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A,153C, 153D)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

Jc-w21
Project/Site.
ApplicantiOwner:
Investigator(s): _
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region �(
J t ",L' 4 ( 5 C-<A City/County: �?C�✓ �Q �-'� r v Sampling Date:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA):
Soil Map Unit Name: M 0 - VV
w . _ Pi 7� 4,�•••
LaL
�Y-o�uM IM tI (1'l� �1N
State: Sampling Point: /' �� , �, 0
Section, Township, Range: a u•--L'4 'If n - 5
Local relief (concave, convex, none): C G•✓✓tiff. Slope (%): Ll
loci
tf frLong: .37(% � Datum:
i1t ON) �'iQ (Wfi f PP 5w. 4, NWl classification: /1'14
Are climatic I hydrol is conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes -
Are Vegetation, Soil AL or Hydrology significantly disturbed?
Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology �� naturally problematic?
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS -
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
No ___&_ (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are 'Normal Circumstances' present? Yes T- No
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Yes _-r_ No Is the Sampled Area
Yes No k within a Wetland? Yes
Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators imnnimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Surface Water (Al)
_, Aquatic Fauna (813)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
— High Water Table (A2)
_ Marl Deposits (815) (LRR U)
Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ Saturation (A3)
i Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (CI)
` Moss Trim Lines (1316)
— Water Marks (Bi)
— Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
` Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (82)
^ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4
_Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_� Drift Deposits (183)
_ Recent f on in Tilled Soils (C6)
T Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (64)
in Muck Surface (C7)
` Geomorphic Position (D2)
— Iron Deposit
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67)
_ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Sphagnum moss (138) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
���[[[
Surface Water Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes
No -Y- Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
(stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
vjlL,
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

Jc-w21
�'
VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) r Cater s? s
Number or Dominant Species
1. —S
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
2.
Total Number of Dominant 2
3.
Species Across All Strata: (B)
A.
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (AB)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
$
= Total Cover
OBL species x 1 =
50% of total cover: JC_ 20% of total cover:
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
SaalinofShrub Stratum (Plot size: )
��
FACU species x 4 =
r�
UPL species x 5 =
2
Column Totals: (A) (B)
3.
Prevalence Index = BJA =
4.
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7.
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
8
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
50 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: _� 201A of total cover: _(
_
Herb Stratum (Plot size: ( )
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1. — A r/
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2,
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
4.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5
height.
i
6.
SaplingfShrub —Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
7
8.
Herb —Ali herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
g.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10.
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11.
height.
12.
V = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
"�
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: O )
2.
3.
4.
5•
Hydrophytic
= Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Present? Yes No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

JC-w21
SOIL Sampling Pant:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.)
Depth _ atrix Redox Features
inches Color moist % Color (moist % Type Loc Texture Remarks
Rd e-L W, Ze"ad
d'-D GI r1,
4inn RM=RprlurPd Matrix MS=Masked Sand Grains.
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Histosd (Al) _
Pdyvalue Below Surface (S$) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2) _
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Black Histic (A3) _
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A, B)
_
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
_ Stratified Layers (A5) _
Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
_ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153S)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
— Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Marl (F10) (LRR U)
— Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
_
— Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
— Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O S)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
— Sandy Gleyed Matrix (84) _ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
— Sandy Redox (S5) — Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A,153C, 1530)
_ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
,.. ,. C, .
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

P W F wx�_
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region JC-W22
Project/Site: ') t V-,V f L r-21 P( r / "ICity/County: Qt P'w l G.I/ �'✓ Sampling Date: (9
Applicant/Owner: � State: FJ L Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): ox— � Section, Township, Range: TCOW-04ka If
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): I'V ^r 1�
) �� � Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): - Lat: 3 S-77
`_ �� Long: ? f _ 105- w{15r
n 1 _ t Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: P t Al 4 im ttU y�yG,�. vr,crc(�C� � u,, y,J (��y _ I't'(k (A 1PP
NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No _ (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ,Soil _ ,%/ , or Hydrology W significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation A/ , Soil ►L , or Hydrology _ V,/ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area A
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes If No within a Wetland? Yes ,� No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: „_ _ _ _ , ,. .
❑ Surface Water (Al)
High Water Table (A2)
1❑-r
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
Marl Deposits (615) (LRR U)
4�Q
F'_ Saturation (A3)
1❑
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
0 Water Marks (131)
1L--JT
II
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
r❑ Sediment Deposits (62)
rJ Drift Deposits (63)
TL�J
IJ
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Algal Mat or Crust (64)
❑
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
I1__L
u Iron Deposits (135)
❑ Inundation
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
❑ Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
Field Observations:
\S
Surface Water Present? Yes
Water
No • ° Depth (inches):
Table Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
11Surface Soil Cracks (66)
gtarsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
a,nage Patterns (1310)
0 Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
C ayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
,aGeomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Saturation Present? Yes C No Depth (inches): Wetland
includes ca illa Erin e Hydrology Present? Yes No
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
�jrctvv� c
a
h -�'�;
0/4c C. veC
t %;,UjS 41b %, - P 'hus
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

Jc-w22
VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: W !
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Testworksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 3 ) % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species
1. D That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
2.
Total Number of Dominant
3. Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
2.
3.
4.
5.
i
6.
7.
8.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: % 20% of total cover:
Percent of Dominant Species C0
41/
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: V ) ♦ 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
yCX(U.l be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2. C s Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: c 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: U )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Sfiq,,d � (/C5.0 1"4. v
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 It (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes C No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

JC-w22
SOIL
Sampling Point: 'Pof� f J-r_�
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moistl % Color (moist) % Type Loc- Texture Remarks
'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
E] Histosol (Al)
0 Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
0 Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
HStratified Layers (A5)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
II Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
D Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
T❑
u 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
_E]
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
U Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 15313)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
T❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
nLJ
1I Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

JC-w23
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and
a/nd Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: ~ : m ✓►t tr �i C —C L ��� City/County: ►" e 4l/ Imo,_ r �C� d (,©
w G(/F"t✓ Sampling Date:
PP C -� `I d I/,et. ( P K/
A licant/Owner: ' State: N G Sampling Point:_
Investigator(s): ��� r [ w L_ Section, Township, Range: 7—d k,.A 4 t A
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): fBp� iCCt c� [ Local relief (concave, convex, none): w C k'Q-' Slope (%): o
Subregion (LRR or MLRA)�:: Lat: 3 7 _ O ci L Long: ` 7 < <% Datum: f i% Lf
l
Soil Map Unit Name: Y4 � _ s4,t5oh-f drevw vwett'C{ ttvC,r,,,.d 4 Ln(,(,,. NWI classification: tN
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No __�r_ (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation �, Soil _ lam, or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation , Soil V , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No
Remarks:
�V
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
❑ Surface Water (Al) El Aquatic Fauna (B13)
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
_❑ High Water Table (A2)
Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
❑ Drainage Patterns (1310)
❑ Saturation (A3)
1❑
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
❑ Water Marks (61)
1L--Jf
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (132)
1L�Jf
LJ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Crayfis.I�Zufrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (B3)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) uration Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Q Iron Deposits (135)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes
No A_ Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes
(includes capillary fringe)
No Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

Jc-w23
VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
C
}
�"�
Absolute Dominant
Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: %! )
% Cover Species?
Status
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
a- D = Total Cover
50% of total cover:
`U 20% of total cover:
Sanl ,Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
1-1
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
1CJ
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
-7r 7 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 3 u, )
1. arr R X J'�l
2. Gr r 4 V-fri nQ
3.
4.
5.
Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers
Sampling Point: A&I -07(4
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 = ,
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes -f- No
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

JC-w23
SOIL
Sampling Point: P W" q 4
vrotne uescrnption: (i7escribe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix _ Redox Features
inches] Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc2_ _ Texture Remarks
r� _ . i 7 i O �► "
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
U Histosol (Al)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
❑ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
D Depleted Below Dark Surface (All 1)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
II Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
D Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
2Location: PL=Pore Linimi, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
T❑-I
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
El Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
_U
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
ElAnomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted
(MLRA 153B)
❑
Dark Surface (F7)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
D Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1719) (MLRA 149A)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

JC-w23
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: J . �V1 wl '� (-�7 % City/County:. A19W t / r_1 r A- Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: c `�� 7 / pk/]j/
State: _Sampling Point: I � '��
Investigator(s): I f4%� QA nshtp-,Range- �siWv� S , - Cdi
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): l Cf [ c✓ Local relief (concave, convex, none): `O*t-CreLcP Slope
Subregion (LRR or MLRA))::3 c
� -) <i Lat: 5;0 ! 4_2 Long: `7 �. oqfi Datum: V&S
Soil Map Unit Name: M41 ',Tf�t /L f �� J [9J,,., ! V44f( ttf f(, Sw,iA-NWI classification: ELO
Are climatic / hydrolo ,c conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No _X_ (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation, Soil , or Hydrology At/' significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation �� , Soil �, or Hydrology Jv— naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Yes _
Yes
Yes
No Is the Sampled Area
No Na within a Wetland? Yes No
Remarks:
h vfcr s e�,,Cc✓e r�ti¢w� yIa LF��S
G a e-- �rt„/'i'C - r --( 4, P.54L . 4.4
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is reeuired: check all that a I
Secondary Indicators minimum of two re -uire�
❑Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
_� Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
Patterns (B10)
❑
S*Sigh
Surface Water (Al) 1❑-r Aquatic Fauna (1313)
Water Table (A2) L1Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
aturation (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
_2'Drainage
❑ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
❑
1I-J-T
Water Marks (B1) Ll Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
II Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑
Sediment Deposits (62) II Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑
Drift Deposits (133) _Q Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑� Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
II
Algal Mat or Crust (B❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
/Saturation
LJ4) Geomorphic Position (D2)
Q
Iron Deposits (65) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑
[
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Observations:
❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
II Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field
Surface Water Present? YesNo X Depth (inches):
T
Water Table Present? Yes A No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes _L_ No Depth (inches): _ (% Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ► No
(includes canillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

JC-w23
Point: `"
VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling -�0-
Dominance Test worksheet:
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1 • .S)%1 J�'
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
2.
Total Number of Dominant
3.
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7.
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
8
= Total Cover
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
-
FAC species _ x 3 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: a )
1 ,v $4,'1!E�°
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
2
Column Totals: (A) (B)
3.
4.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7.
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
8. - -
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is:53.0'
= Total Cover
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 3 0 )
�go
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
,I
1. ee.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2. L i �,.� t , Z �✓ �,d C.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
Tree -Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
4.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5
height.
6.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
7.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
8.
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
g.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11.
height.
12.
= Total Cover
_
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: C7 )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
= Total Cover
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

SOIL
JC W23 Sampling Point: r p 4/ "T
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
(inches) Color (moist) %
Redox Features
Color [moist % Type' Loc
'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Histosol(A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Texture Remarks
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
T
L.1 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (172)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted
(MLRA 153B)
❑
Dark Surface (F7)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
_E]
Redox Depressions (F8)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
]:] Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Reduced Vertic (1718) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Hydric Soil Present? Yes Y No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

JC-w23
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: ��'?wc�15 City/County:g) 1 vr,� �..eICr-Gtt/ (�✓ Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: CJ1 0 P• q P,I. 1/ State: ' G - Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): F17- Section, Township, Range: W-k(
12
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): lC(<jd .;� — Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): T-� IS 5 Lat: - 5- m I tP-7,1 Long: 1Z-(, 1! DD�atum V,/ &5
Soil Map Unit Name: M Vq _ M , Gvv M Le sa-Moct.-I 1414dfk �,v)Y Lfko? NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil N/, or Hydrology Iv significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � No
Are Vegetation �, Soil —AL, or Hydrology � naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No ' ! Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ---- No ' 1,
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No
1­v,..tfIt A')ove ct,/arc? jr do,, /jug. '-10 -tact-5
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Wimar•: Indicators minimum of one is require
❑ Surface Water (Al)
❑ High Water Table (A2)
❑ Saturation (A3)
❑ Water Marks (B1)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2)
❑ Drift Deposits (63)
I__L Algal Mat or Crust (134)
Q Iron Deposits (B5)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
all
LI Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑ Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
II Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
II Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
1II Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
I --I Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
El Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
❑ Drainage Patterns (1310)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
0 Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
II Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Saturation Present? Yes No _2�_ Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

JC-w23
VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: vir
-��
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree
Stratum (Pilot size: )
f!
% Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1.
✓ 6Z_ Cyr&A__ 7' U 111c. ^���
�
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: _ _ J (A)
2.
Total Number of Dominant
3.
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species 5 V�
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
6.
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
8
Total Cover
OBL species x 1 =
50% of total over: ��� 20% of total cover:
FACW species x 2 =
Sa lin /Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
,
FAC species x 3 =
1.
R7 C.,r'
,c a
FACU species x 4 =
2
UPL species x 5 =
3.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
4.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
5•
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7•
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
8.
3 - Prevalence Index is <-3.0'
a� = Total Cover
_
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
50% of total cover: ILI- 209/6 of total cover: /
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
✓�:� "^C C'E i�
V
/ `��
'indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be disturbed or
1.
2.
�/-�■
rv.'-
1 iSl
present, unless problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
Tree -Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
4.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5
height.
6.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
7.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
8.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
9.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11.
height.
12
Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) `( (�
2.Lv
�7"
3. t t. (
4.
5. Hydrophytic
r = Total Cover Vegetation
50% of total cover: �e� 20% of total cover: d� �P Present?
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

Jc-w23
SOIL
Sampling Point:
194q 7"�
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
inches Color (moist)
-�,
Redox Features
Color (moist) . % Type Loc
RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand G
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
U Histosol (Al)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
0 Stratified Layers (A5)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
n 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Texture Remarks
4; C, r me
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
-0
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
El Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
T�
u Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Redox Dark Surface (176)
(MLRA 153B)
❑
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Very Shallow Dark Surface
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
(TF12)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Hydric Soil Present?
Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

JC-w23
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
ProjectfSite: J ` 4, r 'p-`� City/County: !" {'r �'' F'-� �-�11� 1.✓Sampling Date: V V
Applicant/Owner. C, f 1' d A- ✓Ve .ti State: 0((— Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): _ - Qr" I t ��`7 e.^1 Section, Township, Range: To(NN-Ci Lt r r'y - �)
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): t�(@o J lotr., Local relief (concave, convex, none): ('el—Cce . Slope
Subregion (LRR or ML/R�A): ,A ( I �J3rl nLaf: t d�1�1� G Lang: . og3i � I Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: l ! t a ,✓� U p, ,ttt ( t ref u (d Y'luG ( fF C044 NWI classification:
Are climatic i hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No 4— (if no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes )� No
Are Vegetation , Soil _ or Hydrology _ _ naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS -
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Yes 1 No Is the Sampled Area
Yes No within a Wetland? Yes
Yes / No
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two wouiredl
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that anplyj
_ Surface Soil Cracks (BB)
— Surface Water (At)
_ Aquatic Fauna (813)
`tparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88)
High Water Table (A2)
_ Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
:=Jrainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (01)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
_^ Water Marks (81)
i Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (82)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
-,__ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (83)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
— Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (Cg)
— Algal Mat or Crust (134)
Thin Muck Surface (CY)
r—earomorphic Position (D2)
_ Iron Deposits (85)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
- _, Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
_ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
9 Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (inches): _
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes ca ilia fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
G'^ �(1 C�'Y' d��j K ! � �rg✓�p, N. id Cr
rSf! �' �,'/ 4,
�� 5eL r✓t�d"r,Cc�S�
_���, ad.ctc,�; 5C4Gr
.� �.. C, J Psi
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

Jc-w23
VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
2).�
Sampling Point: P I J
D
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheets
Tree
Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover s? Status
i
Number of Dominant Species n
1
� �
)
C_.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
2.
Total Number of Dominant L
3.
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
5'
Percent of Dominant Species f
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (AB)
6.
7.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
8.
_
Total % Cover of: MuItiDIV bV:
= Total Cover
OBL species x 1 =
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
FACW species x 2 =
Saolina/Shrub
Stratum (Plot size: )
FAC species x 3 =
1
_ "„i �{�
FACU species x 4 =
2
UPL species _ x 5 =
3.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
4'
Prevalence Index = B/A =
5_
Hydrophytic Vegetation tndicatnrs:
6.
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
= Total Cover
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: C/ )
C �
- Y&i �wJ
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1.
f " . i" ( ,1
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2.
19 `l r c or i— �u yr r a �ti a
_� �( V Ikk-
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
4
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5.
height.
S.
Sapling/Shrub —Woody plants, excluding vines, less
7.
_
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
B.
Herb —All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
g•
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 it tall.
10.
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11.
he ight.
12.
= Total Cover
50% of total cancer: _0 20% of total cover:
Woody
Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5'
Hydrophytic
= Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
yd(1
US Army Cops of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

JC-w23
SOIL
rrome uescripuon: tuescnoe to me aepm needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color mast % Color (moist) % Tvoe Loc- Texture
'Type: C=Concentration, D=De etion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Sampling Pant:
t. a
Remarks /
PL=Pore
Indicators for Problematic Hydrlc
Histosol (Al)
_ Pdyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
_ Organic Bodies (PS) (LRR P, T U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(M LRA 153B)
— 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Marl (F10) (LRR U)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (84) _ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
_ Sandy Redox (85) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A,153C, 15313)
_ Dark Surface (87) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (If observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
US Army Caps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

JC-w23
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
ProjectlSite: "` "' 5 PY ,,/ CitylCounty: IV P_ r�1/tj P-w l rr'R(CAL. Sampling Dater
Applicant/Owner: Cc � a• rx � N t?'tl 6 P^ rf' State: )VL Sampling Point: ��s � / �
Investigator(s): t9-P- (,(4- S Gw- )C -Fn Section; Township, Range: 1 [ l?f 8
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): tT e l o i r,,., Local relief (concave, convex, none): C 6�y de )L Slope (%): L Z
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Let: -55-0 p I fort i Long: _ 77. 03 j f Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: M r' t o1la44 Le1 r/f 10Q w mttirj PP �4-JY Glk " NWI classification: A/_ /I
Are climatic f hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No � (it no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation V , Soil [Q/, or Hydrology _AL significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances' present? Yes No
Are Vegetation IA/.Soil _W or Hydrology _A% naturally problematic? (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Hydric Soil Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Yes )�_ No
Yes No
Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland?
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required;
check all that aaorv)
— Surface Water (All)
_,., Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_ High Water Table (A2)
— Marl Deposits (615) (LRR U)
— Saturation (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
r Water Marks (B1)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
— Sediment Deposits (82)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
— Algal Mat or Crust (64)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
-,-,, Iron Deposits (135)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67)
i Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
t
Water Table Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
Surface Soil Cracks (156)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88)
Drainage Patterns (810)
_ Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_,.,_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Geomorphic Position (02)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Sphagnum moss (138) (LRR T, U)
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes
(stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if
Remarks:
No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

JC-w23
VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 3 o )
1. �f
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Sampling Point: ?
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheat:
% Cover. Somle52 us Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Sa iin
rub Stratum (Plot size: J )
2.
� C Kam / vEa" rk-y c2or
3.
4.
5_
6.
7.
B.
7 U = Total Cover
50% of total cover: �� 200A of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: '17 a )
1_
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: ' �� (AB)
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
8 Herb -A" herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
g, of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 It tall.
10. Woody vine - AJI woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11. height.
12.
X= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
(0
20% of total cover.
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size-.
)
2.
3.
4,
5.
10 = Total Cover
50% of total cover:
��
20% of total cover: _ o�
Remarks:
(If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

JC-w23
SOIL Sampling Point: A''^ r ��✓ -�"
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
[inches_ Color (moist),_ % 1 _Color {moist) % Tvoe Loc� Texture Remarks
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
Hydric Sal Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining. M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosd (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (SB) (LRR S, T, U) _
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U) _
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O) _
Reduced Vertic (FIB) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (172) _
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3) _
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153S)
_ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) _
Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Muck Presence (AB) (LRR U)
_ Redox Depressions (F8) _
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Marl (F10) (LRR U) _
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Ochric (F11) (M LRA 151)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (SI) (LRR O, 3)
_ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (84) _ Reduced Vertic (FIB) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
_ Sandy Redox (S5) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6) ` Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A,153C, 153D)
_ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Sall Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

JC-w24
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: `P City/County: �Sampling Date: Applicant/Owner: 6e-', _ state: 1 L Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): (( Section, Township, Range: I ' u< { t ) -
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): 9-ited )lkt-, Local relief (concave, convex, none): CG_.r_gdQi Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): T_-I S3 P Lat: J S Oct ( S Long:- 71 - C, Ll / �J Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: fA M" 0 1115 V✓ 1.11 ww K4 Q I (c ,f 4 wy,) tog wt (44i (<c l *Q NWI classification: J0 0
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions
/on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No � (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil W , or Hydrology_ significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes _�_11 — No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes _)�_ No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks: V ctil,( par?D+ Y AL-f- `f-t(. rl Z14- "v VOL
- Clpflfr"rs 6--p— 14ce.— Q Y_ CcIt (/ ae)
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (66)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
Primary Indicators [minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
Surface Water (Al) Aquatic Fauna (1313)
alligh
Water Table (A2)
T❑�
Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
❑ Drainage Patterns (1310)
saturation (A3)
T❑
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
❑
Water Marks (131)
i❑
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
❑ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑
Sediment Deposits (132)
1L�Jf
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑
Drift Deposits (133)
1I�Jf
LJ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑
Iron Deposits (135)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
[] Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑
Inundation Visible on Aerial
Imagery (137)
❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
❑
Water -Stained Leaves (69)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present?
Yes No Depth t
Water Table Present?
(inches):
Yes ?,t No Depth (inches):
0
Saturation Present?
Yes K No Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology
Present? Yes No
includes capillary frin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
I
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

Jc-w24
VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: 1 w C - we4-
-
Tree Stratum
Absolute
% Cover
Dominant Indicator
Species? Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
(Plot size: )
��
Number of Dominant Species
�
1 CA - w L 0-rdt�4f c/Ce,ic
rr e �-
f
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
2.
Total Number of Dominant
3.
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
' Ozf
Percent of Dominant Species l(//
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
6.
-
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7.
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
S.
4'
= Total Cover
OBL species x 1 =
50% of total cover:
a +� 20% of total cover:
FACW species x 2 =
Sapling/Shrub St(Plot size:
)
FAC species x 3 =
1 ¢1ratu .
FACU species x 4 =
UP species x 5 =
2
Column Totals: (A) (B)
3.
4•
Prevalence Index = B/A =
5•
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
_ 1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7.
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
8.
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
= Total Cover
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
50% of total cover:
20% of
total cover:
�L
Herb Stratum (Plot size: ^ ! 9 . )
r�
% U WVV
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1. j halt t y r .. 1 u ` r c+ or
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
l� = Total Cover
50% of total cover:
7• 20% of total cover:
Woody
Vine Stratum (Plot size:y )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
Tree -Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

Jc-w24
SOIL
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or
Sampling Point: PI —
the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) (IColor (moist) % _Color (moist) % Tvpe LocTexture _ Remarks
r lei' 7�
'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sa
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
❑ Histosol (Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
HStratified Layers (A5)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
❑ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
T❑
LJ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
U Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153B)
❑I
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions
Red Parent Material (TF2)
(F8)
u Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region —Version 2.0

JC-w24
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: t -4 A4 t -e (­ e e f , City/County: ,V -(ty 1'2,P V &�ty &. Sampling Date: ✓f ) � 0 0Applicant/Owner: C, C A/Cov �-fill State: AIC Samplingg�Point: (' f� V t.Z_, -10ZL 4�
Investigator(s): Pf-�:rw` Gw Section, Township, Range: PC) S �►�,r! - ( �
/
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): L� Ora [cis w Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): o
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): %- 1S_ & Lat: 3 5, arf i (P Long~_? 7- 01 d (41L1 Datum: IAJ&
,,^1 E
Soil Map Unit Name: - 049 wI �O,4ww 04t l r. K P S C l fl q wt a, 9mo- 41 NWI classification: i-il
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions
on the site typical for this time of year? Yes _
Are Vegetation __�V, Soil Al , or Hydrology significantly disturbed?
Are Vegetation W , Soil Al , or Hydrology N naturally problematic?
No /N (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X7 No
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes V_ No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No k
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No - "_ Within a Wetland? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (,minimum of two reouired)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (66)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
Primary Indicators [minimum of one is reouired: check all that apply?
❑
Surface Water (All) El Aquatic Fauna (B13)
High Water Table (A2)
0 Marl Deposits (B15) (LRR U)
❑ Drainage Patterns (1310)
pQ
LJ
Saturation (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
0 Moss Trim Lines (1316)
❑
Water Marks (B1)
111
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
0 Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑
Sediment Deposits (132)
1L�lf
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑
Drift Deposits (63)
1L--Jt
LJ Recent Iro �u o in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
II_�_II
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
❑ T ' uck Surface (C7)
❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
u
Iron Deposits (B5)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery
(137)
❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
❑.
Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes
Saturation Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
No I
V
Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology
Present? Yes No
includes capillary frin e
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

Jc-w24
VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: �V�
3
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% Cover Species?
Number of Dominant Species
1.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
2.
Total Number of Dominant61
3.
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7.
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
8
Total Cover
OBL species x 1 =
50% of total cover:
7� 20% of total cover:
FACW species x 2 =
Sapling/Shrub
Stratum (Plot size: CI
)
FAC species x 3 =
1
1 +-,D
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
2
Column Totals: (A) (B)
3.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
4.
5.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6•
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7.
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
8.
3 - Prevalence Index is 153.0'
1_ = Total Cover
_
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
50% of total cover:—
20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 62 )
��
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1.:'
r gyp✓! ,, �!
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2
° fig �� '-v, , +
Appr ` �4 L
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree -Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
4.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5
height.
6.
Sapling/Shrub -Woody plants, excluding vines, less
7
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
8.
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
g.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10.
Woody vine -All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11.
height.
12.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: _� 20% of total cover:
Woody VineStratum(Plot size:
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
= Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover: _�
Present? Yes No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

JC-w24
SOIL
Sampling Point: Pwr10aLf
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moistl % Type Loc Texture _.
p- i7J- It) -1e : /Z --),
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
❑ Histosol (Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
HStratified Layers (A5)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
❑ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
D Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
D Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Remarks
M
`Location: PL=Pore LiningM=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
T❑
LJ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
El Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
�❑-I
LJ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153B)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Redox Depressions (F8)
7❑1
LJ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
'El
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (1720) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

JC-W25
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: /t 1/ 5 C QQ L City/County: N/, ` 1 w (- ✓ ("�
r _ Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: N%State: Sampling Point: l�Q�
Investigator(s): y9P- k t vv' D I.-/ �'
Section, Township, Range: i< fi W--s 4 t I "
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): -t—� fy ei.t ✓v Local relief (concave, convex, none): f' Oct,, Slope
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): ! I s` A Lat: ,r oti Long 77, 0%yez? _ Datum: UA S
r I 7 d
Soil Map Unit Name: (d wtv rar/ r .: f>F S�, d�y 1d rh r N.(v { P NWI classification: ,
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No JC (If no, explain in Remarks.) `�
Are Vegetation Al , SoilY , or Hydrology � significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No
V ,
Are Vegetation W, Soil Yor Hydrology � naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)---""' ���"
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes_ No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ;f. No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No
KemarKs: -
�iw.tilt Cu�S (u C_Cf 04- P-S;;
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
❑ Surface Water (Al)
Q
�High Water Table (A2)
Of Saturation (A3)
❑ Water Marks (131)
❑ Sediment Deposits (62)
❑ Drift Deposits (133)
Q Algal Mat or Crust (64)
❑ Iron Deposits (65)
0 Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
[Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes _
Water Table Present? Yes tA
Aquatic Fauna (613)
Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
LJ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
QPresence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
0 Other (Explain in Remarks)
No _y__ Depth (inches):..
No Depth (inches): I L_
Saturation Present? Yes _Y No Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge. monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
❑ Drainage Patterns (1310)
0 Moss Trim Lines (1316)
III Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
,u Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

JC-W25
VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
pwgj pr �
Sampling Point:
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plo size: l ) % Cover Soecies? Status Number of Dominant Species
1 1-�k That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: �7y
I �raP,��
)
YG> r4C
�I1�
�
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
_ = Total Cover
50% of total cover:
.�- 20% of total cover: �
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 3� )
r^
(0 A�5 ��r, y
`V
4.
L_l tj /.f4r�_, � �_L t
� k/0 !K
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11..
12.
50% total
- = Total Cover
20% total �f
of cover:)�4
of cover:
Woody Vine Stratum Plot size: 3
(
1.
f
2.
3.
4.
5.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
3 (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species �(Q�
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A = _
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0'
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

JC-W25
SOIL
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the a
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color moist % Col o
Sampling Point:! T/ "✓_v3 i"J
of indicators.)
or moist /o TyaLoc Texture
e _ _ _ Remarks
to Yr zlI I. Iv`/r T -
9 tr Y/ 10 I o `''/ Z -7
Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Histosol (Al)
.❑
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
❑
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
T❑
TL�I 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
u
.❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox
T❑� Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
u Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
❑
❑
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface F7
( )
(MLRA 153B)
❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
❑
Redox Depressions (F8)
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Other
❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
❑
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
(Explain in Remarks)
❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
❑
❑
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
Umbric Surface
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
1]
(F13) (LRR P, T, U)
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
unless disturbed or problematic.
❑
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑
❑
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Anomalous
Dark Surface 1137 LRR P
Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A,
153C, 153D)
)( ,S,T,U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Hydric Soil Present? Yes _L No
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

Jc-w25
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: I`� f epQyJ City/County: ,'� �l i lrCLy�'�Sampling Date: -�_C)a�� J
Applicant/Owner: [:,nc`4`�Lr nt�✓ State: � Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): I' n �V '^ b.- Section, Township, Range: S 1. _
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): ��•� r �_ 2 Local relief (concave, convex, none): _ ����pt `_ Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): T Lat: J 45'_ 011+! 6 Long: R 7 7. 0q ;'d Datum: V%l5
Soil Map Unit Name: fX1 d &Wto 0.>4--O' W• % i CId U"t kc k NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation V , Soil or Hydrology U'-- significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation (/� , Soil fi­; or Hydrology tl— naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
within a Wetland. Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks: /
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology
Surface Water (A1)
High Water Table (A2)
Saturation (A3)
Water Marks (131)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Drift Deposits (133)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Q Iron Deposits (B5)
a Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
El Water -Stained Leaves (B9)
Field Observations: �(
No X Depth (inches):
No Depth (inches):
Surface Water Present? Yes
Water Table Present? Yes
❑ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
❑ Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
QPresence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
El Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
❑ Drainage Patterns (B10)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
II Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
II Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
II Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Saturation Present? Yes No __X,_ Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

JC-W25
VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point:- b, '
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ' )
-
t
% Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
n V ri P 0,
LX
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
2. f ,r t 0 , A, W v i +` t' ��
s �` $ Y% C
�—
3. �� I GI a M �� Y
�
Total Number of Dominant �
Species Across All Strata:
4. a/{in6)iA ,
'T
A
Percent of Dominant Species
5
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
_
7
8
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
=Total Cover
OBL species x 1 =
°
50 /° of cover:
as {320% of total cover:
FACW species x 2 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: / +� )
FAC species x 3 =
1�
FACU species x 4 = _
2
UPL species x 5 =
3.
Column Totals: (A) (B)
4.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
5•
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7•
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
8.
1
_ 3 -Prevalence Index is s3.0
= Total Cover
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1. I 'I- L--, , 4
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
3.
Tree —Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
4.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5
height.
6.
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
7.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
8.
Herb —All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
9.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
10.
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
11.
height.
12.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 0 )
1. wt
2.
3.
4.
5.
Hydrophytic
= Total Cover
Vegetation
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Present? Yes No
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

JC-W25
SOIL
Sampling Point: I VV B,
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Tvoe Lo Texture Remarks
10 It roe
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
❑ Histosol (Al)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑ Black Histic (A3)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
❑ 5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
❑ Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
❑ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
❑ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑ Sandy Redox (S5)
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
T❑I
u 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (1720)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153B)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
T❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
u Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
E]
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No .X1._
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

9
Jc-w26
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
('
Project/Site: J h (_ ..p rt ,City/County: r" �� i F' + k(/('r- Sampling Date: � C`oo Oro��//
Applicant/Owner: � '•>!f �� ��� l�: � - ttaate: Sam plin Point: frft; o2T U/0
1
Investigator(s): _ ��� �t•�✓`aGV,/ _ _ Section, Township, Range: 6W. '-!/7
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): _ u d�? ��CS w Local relief (concave, convex, none): � OW4{//41l Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA):
Lat: np 510 ot I g ( Long:17 7— O i o' D��atum: UA0
Soil Map Unit Name: M l �u5awkov., Vat (-I f P n NWI classification: K"f-
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No X (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil ry or Hydrology -AL significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ' \ No
Are Vegetation $- , Soil �, or Hydrology Al naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sa
Hydric Soil Present? Yes �K No
within a'
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes_ No
Remarks:
!'uK l�.t( tthdd¢ awl use
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Surface Water (Al)
High Water Table (A2)
Saturation (A3)
Water Marks (81)
Sediment Deposits (62)
Drift Deposits (63)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
U Iron Deposits (65)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present?
Water Table Present?
Saturation Present?
(includes caoillary frinoe
Describe Recorded Datz
Remarks:
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
Marl Deposits (615) (LRR U)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
r-J Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
QPresence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88)
❑ Drainage Patterns (1310)
in Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
❑ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Yes No Depth (inches):
Yes No _ Depth (inches):
Yes J No Depth (inches): 162 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
(stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Jc-w26
Sampling Point: f /S/A,
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 3 )
1. D r k �, `� 7�
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Absolute
% Cover
Dominant Indicator
Species? Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Spcies� Lf
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7.
-
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
= Total Cover
_
FACW species _ x 2 =
50% of total cover:
20% of
total cover:
( 3,9
Sapling/Shrub Stratum Plot size:
/
FAC species x 3 =
')
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
2
Column Totals: (A) (B)
3.
4.
Prevalence Index = B/A =
5•
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
6.
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
7.
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
8-
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
= Total Cover
_
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
50% of total cover:
( 20% of total cover:
_
d
_
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
?
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
1. .r r �, ,,
'2t
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
2. v1(A-) G, r,, s
-�!/�
Idp��
q j _
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
//
3. / or! r,rGi,y ( 1,, 44
fad
I/ ��
Tree -Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
4.
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
5
height.
6.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
7
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 1k, V 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: �0
1. Vd I �� J�.►�
2.
3.
4.
5.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: • 5� 20% of total cover:_
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes _)� No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

Jc-w26
SOIL
Sampling Point: w pC
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) _ Color (moist),
%
Color_smoist)% Type Loc'
Texture
©' Lb 'I/ 3/ I
l o o
<"
sc
!U--16F/
1e.l VY ( 0 G k-1
5L—
'T e: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Histosol (Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
HStratified Layers (A5)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
II Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
II 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All 1)
II Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
W Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Remarks
_.1 C.)
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
T❑7
LJ 2 cm Muck (At 0) (LRR S)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
_❑
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153B)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Redox Depressions (F8)
T❑
u Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Marl (1710) (LRR U)
D Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1719) (MLRA 149A)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Hydric Soil Present? Yes � No
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

JC-w26
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: -) t �"t Ifs C-(7.l ,City/County: I�(2"*" 6(-w1�C'`rrve�✓ Sampling Date: 0 D1" r
Applicant/Owner: C, f-� r N�QW ���"✓ State: A/C/ Samg ling Point: py✓ �� t p
Investigator(s): 0,9 r . c ti� G` ✓ Section, Township, Range: [L-t - v
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): ? (9oJ /)GI i Local relief (concave, convex, none): CG4o` (Cc -c Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): � '• 3fi Lat: �l Oct. a t Long: `7 `G 6 Datum: WG5 M
Soil Map Unit Name: 0401' MnG tcF(-w k.4 f.4rtHf_ � �V du 6 )t""roWl classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No X (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation VV , Soil -P—/ , or Hydrology w significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes No
Are Vegetation +{I� , Soil _ V or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area
H dric Soil Present? Yes No
y within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Hydrology Indicators:
Surface Water (A1)
High Water Table (A2)
Saturation (A3)
Water Marks (61)
Sediment Deposits (62)
Drift Deposits (63)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
LJ Aquatic Fauna (613)
❑ Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
Q Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Q Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
Q Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
uck Surface (C7)
L1 Iron Deposits (65) _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67)
❑ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes
Water Table Present? Yes
Saturation Present? Yes
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge,
❑ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
❑ Drainage Patterns (1310)
❑ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
II Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
No /S, Depth (inches):
No Depth (inches):
No Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
mitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

Jc-w26
VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
-30
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
% o r Species? Status
l
1. fv, S �... f rG ll r lti� V c_ t� �Gt
My
_
2. I/ �' •. Ate... (rr/, 1jj
NP�
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
5-0 = Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover: f!
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Total Cover
50% of total cover:
S 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
/l-V....dIwGi!G
1.
2. �Ur/ .s J -•r r l+i%i jlra $.
3.
4.
5.
6.
I
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
i
12.
= Total Cover Z
-7
50% of total cover:
1 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: U )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
_ = Total Cover
50% of total cover: d 20% of total cover:
list morphological adaptations below).
Sampling Point: fyvt
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant C,
Species Across All Strata: _ (B)
Percent of Dominant Species ^7
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: / (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

Jc-w26
SOIL
Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of
Depth
(inches)
Matrix
Color moist
%
!01!,/4/�
JEar
Redox Features
Color moist % Type' Loc
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix MS=Masked Sand Grains
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Histosol (Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
sincave Layer (n
Type:
Depth (inches):
MUHWKs:
Sampling Point: I�
Tee Remarks
- i L Y'
r
ZLocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
-0
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
T❑
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
TEl
u Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted
(MLRA 153B)
❑l
Dark Surface (177)
Redox Depressions
T Red Parent Material (TF2)
(F8)
u Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
3
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

JC-W40 (JC-W27 through JC-W45)
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Proiect/Site: �I"�/"7ES - ,� City/County: /" u— `f7^ r4 Sampling Date:
ApplicanVOwner: State: /4G SamplingPoint: J7Wziy� c✓
Investigator(s): an w � �l� Section, Township, Range: —7' 4 S` ,'lia
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc,): / /Z �� i' Local relief (concave, convex, none): Q�n/✓ Slope (%)
Subregion (LRR or MLRnnA): % �S3'� Lat: 3S n � �(a � L�Long: -77 0 /1-/ 2-- Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
:r
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No -0400e (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes _ No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes I,-,' No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks: //
aVITC I wE/S' �r�s f P4 Clog ot/tf`, .,cre,- f rmt
opws/ge- po'e-W
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primmory Indicators (minimum of one
is required:
check all that apply)
✓ Surface Water (All
_/Aquatic Fauna (613)
_High Water Table (A2)
_
Marl Deposits (815) (LRR U)
1Saturation (A3)
_
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
_ Water Marks (131)
_
Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
Sediment Deposits (132)
_
Presence of Reduced Iron IC4)
_ Drift Deposits (83)
_
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
Field Observations:
/
Surface Water Present? Yes
No
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes
No
Depth (inches):
Surface Soil Cracks (66)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ Drainage Patterns (1310)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
-;;�IFAC-Neutral Test (D5)
_ Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRR T, U)
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge,
Remarks:
%r° Ou"I
eNo'
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Sampling Point: 02�,)/ /-
Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet:
% Cover ecies? Status Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species 0-0
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (AB)
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Saplina/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3. /
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
2. l �Y�I��C_ ;'f Sri`
7-
3. fir, y r '(
/'� ACW-OOL
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
2 = Total Cover
50% of total cover:
r�
20% of total cover: 7
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: :• `` )
1.
2.
3. /
4.
5.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
(If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
Prevarence index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = EVA =
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less then 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation %
Present? Yes ✓ No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

SOIL
(Describe to the depth
Sampling Point:
or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks
'Type. C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
�=� (_ �y✓cry/
Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
_ Reduced Vertic (F16) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (1719) (LRR P, S, T)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
_ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (176)
(MLRA 153B)
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
.Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Marl (F10) (LRR U)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
_Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
,�ron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
r' Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O, S)
_ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
_ Sandy Redox (S5) _ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_ Stripped Matrix (36) _ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
_ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Restrictive Layer (If observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes / No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: �f"'"ief �-fnr City/County: 14 cct" � Sampling Date: /'/9,71
ApplicanttOwner. �(]�i r� 1'4 � /rT°` State: Sampling Point: W Z o
Investigators) /0-11-1 oi"+ - i f//�l✓7% Section, Township, Range: %J t r.✓fNV
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): j'11� uLocal relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%): 0-1
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): / S� Let: 5. Q / re75 �! y Long: - 77 0 7 %y -� Datum: wG SG'f
Sal Map Unit Name: 9A - 941"-�l /-�.k` f�ri L NWI classification:
Are climatic f hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (if no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes / No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes T No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes / No —T within a Wetland? Yes No /
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks: X4c°AACO Pt&-C, (-a/ 6 ,,
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reouired)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required
check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (66)
_ Surface Water(A1)
_ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
_ High Weter'Table`(A2)
_ Marl Deposits (1315) (LRR U)
_ Drainage Patterns (1370)
_ Saturation (A3) `
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
_ Water Marks (61)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (B2)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits,(83)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat cr Crust (B4)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Iron Deposits (65)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Inupdation Visible on Aerial Imagery
(87)
_ FAC-Neutral Test (135)
Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Sphagnum moss (138) (LRR T, U)
Field Observations:
/
Surface Water Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes
No Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2.0
,,r'

t➢
VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size:
)
% Cover Species? Status
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
/
7.
8.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Savlina/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
B.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover:
20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
1✓ 0,4
2. S /, ,14
0/3"L
3. AA+11_146a !."
5
i d(y
4. V-'1 -AIA /°a�s%/�
ie�^ j�S
2
5. G1`/Zdvl n1tr
i.
��
6. '�/rC✓s t S✓�
2
7.
8
9.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: r 20% of total cover: �� 2
Woody Vine Stratum (Plat size: ' )
1.
2.
3.
4. /
5.
= Total Cover
500A of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Sampling Point: /�� J; fd
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (AB)
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = EVA =
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub -Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb -All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 it tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic V/
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
>marks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
�yj,d( l.✓t�D /1 �,�ifr/�iG` - Luc S �'�ES6^�1 � ,� �E� eCt'..�1 �� a,-ret.: 6W5�(
VOZV U 1 vV
US Army Corps of Engineers
Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region -Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Pant: dZA Ql
Profile Descrlptlon: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.)
Depth Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Tvpe Loc
Texture Remarks
r X
'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.
21-ocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
_ Histosol (Al)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S, T, U)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P, S, T)
_ Stratified Layer§ (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
_ Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 1538)
_ 5 cm Mucky.Mineral (A7) (LRR P, T, U)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Muck Prbsence (A8) (LRR U)
_ Redox De6ressions'(F8)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P, T)
_ Marl (F10) (LRR U)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
_ Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O, P, T)
31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 150A)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P, T, U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Sandy Mucky Mineral (Si) (LRR O, S)
_ Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 15013)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C, 153D)
_ Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P, S, T, U)
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region — Version 2.0

Natural Resources Conservation Service Soils Data Extracted from C—, County SSURGO data a,ailalbl, at http://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov/.
a" ..' a..
Cmpm,,t G—mphi, D—ipticm
Arapahoe fire sandy loam
coas:al plains
nnnnf�ats'
Arapaho, I .. ... dy loam
dd.p—siors,
ats, epressions, coas al plains
.... .......
=
... .. . . . r . .. '
====Ioorlydrairecl
coastal plains, flood plains
..
M���MMMMIoorlydrair.d
NEEN
M���====�===Mflaason
broad r—r—am dwides,—ra—,
co sa' plams
M���====�===Mflotson
broad interstream dwides,terraces, c asta, plams
Lynchburg fine sandy loam
MMMM=MMMM,flatso"mari"eler,ces,depressio.so.mari.e
emaces, broad interstream dwides on marine
terraces, coasta p airs
Lynchburg fine sandy loam
MMMMMEMEN
E�..
: . ..
MMMMMEEEEcoastal
1p�air,flood plains
.....
c-stal plairs, flood plains
orfolk loamy fine sand, 2 to 6 percent
on marine terraces, depressions on marine
sl 0 pes
MMMMMENEEfials
erraces, broad interstream dwides on marine
terraces, coastal plains
lartego fine sandy loam
lartego fine sandy Loam
Rains fine sandy Loam
int rstream dwides on marine
termces,
cb.oad
t I ,t,l plains
Rains fine sandy Loam
E-rhurta
fine sandy loam
E-rhurta
fine sandy Loam
'Highlighted field, indicate dominant soil components.
'Component F1',,di,g/P,,di,g Duration: As defined by the NRCSwithin the SSURGO database and available from:http://websoilsu,ey.nres.usda.gov.
Brief 2 to 7 days, Long: 7 to 30 days, Very Long: more than 30 days
'Component Fl—ding/%nding Frequency: As defined by the NRCS and available from: https://—.nra.usda.g-/wps/PA NRCSCon su mption/down load ?cid=n seprdl 296628&e.=pdf
None (blank field): flooding is not probable. Flooding occurs less than once in 500 years. The chan:e of flooding is less
0 percent in any year.
I we n s
Very :rfare. flooding is very unlikely but possible under unusual weather is tothan 1 percent in any year.
00 s The :hh an ce of
5 p rcent in any year.
Rare: ding is unlikely but possible under unusual weather condition The of igi e Occasional: flooding occurs infrequently under normal weather conditions. The chance of flooding is 5 to 50 percent in any year.
Frequent. flooding is likely to occur often under normal weather conditions. The
:hhan:e of flooding is more
than
550 pe r:entt in all
y year but is less than 5. in all months in any year.
Very frequ ent: fl ..di is likely to occur very often under normal weather rend Rion s. Theoffl igi 0 pe i months of anyyear.

WETS Table data, available from: http://agacis.rcc-acis.org/?fips=37049 (accessed October 27, 2020)
AgACIS fur Craven Cnunty Precipitation statistics:
Fmnai Snr expnr[ Print
VJCTS Slalim NEW BERN-ASOS, NC -
Requewedyeara:1971-2000 1
Tempere[um ('fj
Preclplled- {Inches)
Mnn[h
R, 1
A. 1
Rr
309: r:M1......
Avg number
Rw�in gn
daily
daily
daill y
Arg
wit Iran'
de
07 f]Kh
is
In[al
nma
non
moan
Hss tlun
moo tlun
0.10 inch
nor .
sni �.Inll
.Ian
i41
3+1i
d46
477
351
6, "a
a
O4
h-h
68D
36?
411
311
2"
446
a
09
U.,
66t
421
h39
a53
366
672
+
D6
.lI,,
136
h03
Fz❑
35Y
z]B
4"
6
01
may
60z
593
W
dd£'
32z
i24
1
aD
.Inn
66z
669
I66
46e
3'7
iD
1
0D
JU
$9.2
71.5
80.3
627
M
7.36
9
0.0
Aug
87.7
70A
79.5
682
4.61
S.IS
6
0.0
Sep
63.6
65.;
74.4
543
3.17
W
6
0.0
Cc
7+.9
53.2
64.1
325
1.45
3%
5
0.0
Nov
66.9
►+.5
55.7
32D
1.99
387
5
D.0
Dec
56.1
37.0
47.5
386
2.37
4.67
6
D.5
Am [
61i3
WAG
A -go
73.2
523
62.9
-
-
-
-
-
Ual
-
-
-
54.10
B1
2.4
STATS TABLE
isbr a OngNll
Y.
Je
Foh
Wr
AW
Yry
$
.W
Aup
aF
pcl
Har
0-
Amd
,999
3+3
2%
264
331
zw
215
06
On
,}.Ds
7.n
215
070
sale
2DW
40D
172
441
036
305
1go
11.93
9.41
6.76
D.13
366
222
loll
200,
2i9
235
5la
177
l05
Se9
i66
770
4.Q7
DW
IlP
.2
4i 56
tom
377
7}o
a37
s'e
}63
ae9
eu
eye
eM
iDD
361
753
6e26
}00;
2}1
6]a
lea
Ile
loin
ea9
9+l
517
1.1
y+9
ID6
750
]270
}o44
12D
436
2.57
2.Q6
;w
44D
3.55
4a;
Q."
131
}.9[
2005
24D
20
M
2+3
5.99
721
6.76
119
510
U41
25a
30
5727
20a6
249
164
227
3.74
3,15
671
e.53
9.DI
as
IN
a16
+.9&
5610
3D47
352
244
311
3.95
261
416
7A1
137
3a
255
e6D
263
]906
200a
I0D
320
Ill
4.91
2.0D
324
4110
322
1.36
147
322
334
4102
eoo9
'a9
Z-
2M
}Di
637
3}6
Sea
avr
30
lee
ebe
6w
fr to
70m
sal
316
71a
067
1e7
ear
297
eta
[aW
1N
tpa
;Aa
576'
1011
2a5
]3]
2d1
1.3a
0+7
tea
3.64
15.04
;51
2.99
275
017
]9.0e
2012
2+3
222
315
2.52
2.36
250
1153
716
+.3]
397
091
+.9+
57 a2
Ml
103
431
117
226
171
021
371
6.ae
723
321
44S
230
R66
2D14
397
265
4."
4.03
1.912
3.e0
552
9.13
?$a
2.33
IM
4.16
Se ei
]v's
eeo
M3 as
3%
I.
153
fib
IE6
-e
eM
em
S9e
6+}
sill'
}01e
371
731
3;3
1U
aea
547
17 In
514
Ilia
aye
079
350
Eli
}017
d}a
147
+.p]
•ii
dE9
yea
67d
E.23
M32a
lie
0+7
4};
5177
7.22
B70
739
1&39
1.66
a20
6.59
TQ.17
21119
292
3.&1
10,
3."
1.61
61,
426
6.91
6"
1N
-1
2.10
+12+
2934
IDe
5.52
3.1'
2."
9'S
662
tee
!}6
6.65
6f3.6S
le on
Delineations for the Jimmies Creek drainage basin were conducted from August 6 through September 30, 2020 .
Precipitation in August was within the normal range: 7.75" with a normal range of 4.61" - 8.15".
Precipitation in September was above the normal range: 6.65" with a normal range of 3.17" - 6.60"
Precipitation for June, July, and August was above the normal range: 21.90" with a normal range of 12.35" - 20.83".
Precipitation July, August, and September was within the normal range: 21.88" with a normal range of 12.40" - 22.11".
Precipitation for the previous year (September through August) was above normal range: 61.82" with a normal range of 51.53" -
58.06".

CITY OF NEW BERN
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
City Representative: Matt Montanye, Director of Public Works
(mailing) P.O. Box 1129, New Bern, NC 28563
(shipping) 1004 S. Glenburnie Road, New Bern, NC 28562
montanyem(aD-newbernnc.gov
252-639-7501
The undersigned representative of the City of New Bern does hereby authorize:
Scott Davis and/or
Alexander P. (Sandy) Smith
of Axiom Environmental, Inc.
218 Snow Avenue, Raleigh, NC 27604
sdavis(aD_axiomenvironmental.org, 919-696-3045
ssmith axiomenvironmental.org, 919-270-9306
to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, issuance and
acceptance of jurisdictional determinations, permits, or certifications and any and all
associated standard and special conditions attached.
In addition, permission for access to city property and city -maintained or designated
easements is granted to the above contractors/agents and to agents of the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers, N.C. Division of Water Resources, and other natural resource
agencies for the purposes of jurisdictional area verifications, permitting coordination,
etc. pursuant to city-wide drainage feature repairs.
We hereby certify the above information submitted in this application is true and
accurate to the best of our knowledge.
Authorized Signature:
Date: G/9/Zv