Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout310325_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20230714vision of Water Resources Facility Number EZD - '3:�5 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation 0 Other Agency Type of Visit: E)-Cbmpliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance Reason for Visit: C—�l/toutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access Date of Visit: W �/ Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: D ��%/Region: Farm Name: f��7 S �C(�.M Owner Email: f " — Owner Name: 94 �Qt�}Q Phone: Mailing Address: Physical Address: Facility Contact: �.�/�_ Title: Onsite Representative: `�5/t GI C111//���G� Certified Operator: S4QoO, m Back-up Operator: Location of Farm: Swine to Feeder rto Finish v to Wean to Finish Other Latitude: Phone: Integrator: )p Certification Number: Certification Number: Design Current Design Current Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Lam_ I Non -La er Design Current Dry Poultry Capacity Pon. Layers Non -Layers Pullets Turkeys Turkey Poults Other Discharees and Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: a. Was the conveyance man-made? Longitude: Design Current Cattle Capacity Pop. Dairy Cow Dairy Calf Dairy Heifer Dry Cow Non -Dairy Beef Stocker Beef Feeder Beef Brood Cow ❑ Yes LJ^ 0 ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE of the State other than from a discharge? Page I of.? 511212020 Continued Facility Number: $— Date of Ins ection: •7 / Waste Collection & Treatment 4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? [:]Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? [:]Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: Spillway?: Designed Freeboard (in): Observed Freeboard (in): 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ENo ❑ NA ❑ NE (i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.) / 6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a [—]Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE waste management or closure plan? If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes 2 No ❑ NA ❑ NE 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE (not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes C]-ITo ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes [D Nom ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Ne, ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.) ❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil ❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area 12. Crop Type(s): 13. Soil Type(s): 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes�No ❑ NA ❑ NE acres determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes a ❑ NA ❑ NE 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE Required Records & Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑ Yes E],M ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes EDI o ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑Other: 21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis [:]Waste Transfers ❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1 " Rainfall Inspections 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes [� ido ❑ Yes r' No �ia ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Weather Code ❑ Sludge Survey ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ NA ❑ NE Page 2 of 3 511212020 Continued Facilit Number: Date of Ins ection: 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [g- ❑ NA ❑ NE 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes [� E] NA ❑ NE the appropriate box(es) below. ❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey []Failure to develop a PDA for sludge levels ❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? Other Issues 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application) 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other: 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes E],Ne- ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NE ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE [:]Yes No [DNA ❑ NE ❑ Yes 021<o ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes [] N ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes � No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE (Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments. I Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary). Reviewer/Inspector Name: Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Page 3 of 3 Phone: rlles�r L9 0(p 19 Date: Z"/� 511212020