410012_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20240617

Division of Water Resources
Facility Number - O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit: Q Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: "„ Arrival Time: Departure Time: `p County: --* '^ Region:
Farm Name: 'N.�L \'( ,i t��( �� (-.c11��k1 I Owner Email:
Owner Name: kt t \1�►11 "�A ( �i ,li t e Phone:
Mailing Address: 'lykC l F 1-To. 1Ct-'- '7!�r o\x,t r 1�.�_ �t2" 1*1
Physical Address: 1-1 �\� }-1 (�('�ya\I �� 'u �!i i.1 ��i., .; l VL 2 14'11
Facility Contact: t �'� () ^ !(1� ^c Title: �C��� , ���. {t�a \ Phone:
Onsite Representative: ( �F, �(� ����t S Integrator:
Certified Operator: , Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: 41„e`, �'� ,,�.� Certification Number:
Location of Farm: l Latitude: Longitude:
_�,..A-) a Lk-} LC� 3t". 7 I�l� .. , ^ — •� + ? , 1�
fit" C� 1a.\111 ��� '
uld P'lLco►"rieti i?a-v
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish L
ayer DairyCow
Wean to Feeder Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
X.Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other Other
Discharues and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes RNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes 5]�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: - I',I jDate of Inspection: te I '
Waste Collection&Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes3EfNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): a4l t b w
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes "No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes qNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes'Z No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes E]�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes E2rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 101bs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): Cl"JYCI 11Q��, ,Srnn 11 arftA halal
l
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes JQ�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes �Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes r;;�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes qNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ YesNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records &Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes 'E]�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes 'EjNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP [:]Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 5]�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
, aste Application eekly Freeboard �aste Analysis Moil Analysis ❑Waste—Transfers Weather Code
�Daanfall Stockin Cro Yield 20 Minute Ins ections �M onthl and 1" Rainfall Ins ections Sneprt urvey
2j724
� g� p � p �'`- y p ❑Sludge urvey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ANo ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No XNA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facili Number: ,`' - Date of inspection: Q j Z
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? Yes 3]<No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes J�JLNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes�10 ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes•�"�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues \
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ZT,,�4o ❑ NA ❑ N E
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? i rIneyLAe
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ N E
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [:] No ANA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes 34No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes aRrNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes_No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to.question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
• `ac�1S C�11y► 1i c ,ple�ed zq 12-6 c" C�_Q �Oa.(L
%�}• CCU\\bYC7. ? N tu4nV9ENed \V 0 2_312L`;-7 3�C�1�:.� C'�T t'ti�� ��-C2
15, Uka LbxP Avg 2-0 4
31u12-
j�Y.p_o5
Reviewer/Inspector Name: ��� `��.,.�ti�,ti Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: f Date:
Page 3 of 3 21412015