NC0003468_6. DRSS CAP Part 2_Appx C_FINAL_20160210

This page intentionally left blank

UNC CHARLOTTE
Addendum to Soil Sorption Evaluation
Dan River Steam Station
Rockingham County, NC
Prepared for:
HDR Engineering, Inc.
Hydropower Services
440 S. Church St, Suite 1000
Charlotte, NC 28202
Investigators:
William G. Langley, Ph.D., P.E.
Dongwook Kim, Ph.D.
UNC Charlotte / Lee College of Engineering
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
EPIC Building 3252
9201 University City Blvd.
Charlotte, NC 28223
February 2, 2016

This page intentionally left blank

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 Background.........................................................................................................................1
2 Results................................................................................................................................1
3 Comments and Recommendations..................................................................................... 1
4 References......................................................................................................................... 3

TABLES
Table 1.
Antimony
Table 2.
Arsenic
Table 3
Boron
Table 4
Cadmium
Table 5
Cobalt
Table 6
Molybdenum
Table 7
Selenium
Table 8
Thallium
Table 9
Vanadium
FIGURES
(See Tables 1-9 for figure numbers)

Background
This addendum provides three sorption isotherm equations for batch data analyzed and initially
reported in the Soil Sorption Evaluation for Dan River Steam Station (Langley and Oza 2015).
The isotherm model equations are:
Linear: S = KdC
Linear with So > 0: S = KdC + So
Freundlich: S = KfC'm
where S is the constituent concentration on soil (ug/g), Kd is the linear sorption coefficient (ml/g),
C is the constituent concentration in water (ug/1), So is the soil concentration at C = 0, n is the
unitless Freundlich exponent, and Kf is the Freundlich constant (I'/nug('-'/n)/g). The parameters
Kd, So, Kf, and n are estimated using linear regressions on the sorption data. The parameter So
represents that portion of constituent concentration on the soil that is sorbed irreversibly.
2 Results
Results are provided in Tables 1 through 8 by constituent and sample. The results include
parameter estimates and indicators of the goodness -of -fit of the resulting model equations to the
sorption data.
3 Comments and Recommendations
In addition to the general comments and qualifiers offered in the Results and Table 16 of the
original report, the following comments and recommendations are provided.
For the fate and transport model, the range of sorption estimates (maximum and minimum)
should be used as the upper and lower limits for selecting a calibrated value that is consistent
with measured constituents.
For a specific constituent and sample, the isotherm model with the minimum chi-square value
best represents the lab data in its arithmetic form.
Linear isotherms with So < 0 are considered not applicable because they imply negative soil
concentrations (S) as constituent concentration (C) approaches zero.
For linear isotherms with So > 0, the y-intercept So is assumed to represent irreversible sorption
as opposed to previous exposure to the constituent in the field which is manifested as a
negative -sloping or irregular isotherm as would have been noted in the original report.

Freundlich isotherms with n < 1 are considered not applicable because they are not concave
downward (Freundlich 1924).
For constituents not considered for Dan River, sorption values may be transferable from other
sites with similar geochemical settings, or may be estimated using site -specific data from the
Comprehensive Site Assessment in a geochemical model.
2

4 References
Freundlich H. 1924. The Elements of Colloidal Chemistry, translated by George Barger. Dutton
and Company Publishers: New York, NY, pp. 58-61.
Langley, W.G. and Oz, Shubhashini. Soil Sorption Evaluation for Dan River Steam Station,
UNC-Charlotte, October 2015.
Ho, Yuh-Shan, Wen-Ta Chiu, and Chung -Chi Wang. "Regression analysis for the sorption
isotherms of basic dyes on sugarcane dust." Bioresource technology 96.11 (2005): 1285-1291.
Matott, L. Shawn, IsoFit Documentation and User's Guide Version 1.2, State University of New
York at Buffalo Department of Civil, Structural and Environmental Engineering Version 1.2,
updated 01 /18/07.
3

Table 1 Antimony
Well ID
No.
data points
Linear Isotherm, S,, = 0
Linear isotherm, So > 0
Freundlich isotherm
Fig. Nos.
Trial A
Trial B
Trial A
Trial B
Trial A
Trial B
Trial A
Trial B
Kd
2
R
2
Kd
2
R
2
Kd
So
2
R
2
Kd
Sa
2
R
2
K,
1/n
2
R
2
K,
1/n
2
R
2
1/g
-
Ng/g
1/g
-
Ng/g
1/g
Ng/g
-
ug/g
1/g
Ng/g
-
Ng/g
(c)
-
-
Ng/g
(c)
-
Ng/g
AB - 30 BR (32-34)
3
3
0.940
0.961
1.597
1.140
0.958
1.822
0.754
1.133
0.968
0.251
0.917
1.110
0.950
0.389
1.672
0.716
0.934
0.199
1.870
0.719
0.857
0.397
1,2
AB - 30 BR (43-44)
5
5
0.210
0.977
2.257
0.195
0.960
3.566
0.183
0.619
0.997
0.036
0.165
0.767
0.989
0.146
0.625
0.647
0.987
0.088
0.667
0.630
0.999
0.006
3,4
AB - 105 L
5
5
0.072
1 0.997
0.084
0.068
0.996
0.057
0.072
1 0.001
0.992
1 0.084
(d)
0.081
0.964
0.977
0.089
(e)
5,6
AS - 2D
5
5
0.028
0.989
0.138
0.038
0.907
1 1.122
(d)
(d)
0.034
1 0.943
0.960
0.176
(e)
7,8
AS - 1 OD
5
5
0.031
0.971
0.631
0.037
0.977
0.685
0.029 0.227 1 0.926 1 0.261
0.032 0.430 1 0.977 1 0.124
0.107
0.715
0.936
0.382
0.118 0.740 0.961 0.118
9,10
GWA-10
5
5
0.014
0.973
0.195
0.015
0.970
0.212
(d)
(d)
0.014
0.979
0.935
0.214
(e)
11,12
GWA - 5BR
5
5
0.046
0.988
0.302
0.045
0.992
0.381
1 0.045
0.074
0.969
0.209
0.041
0.237
0.988
0.063
0.103
0.796
0.959
0.292
0.119
0.763
0.980
0.141
13,14
GWA -4D
5
5
0.187
0.937
4.355
0.190
0.938
4.568
0.155
0.865
0.962
0.483
0.157
0.876
0.968
0.399
0.652
0.643
0.979
0.140
0.678
0.637
0.992
0.060
15,16
GWA - 11 D
5
5
0.136
1 0.948
1 5.709
0.123
0.934
5.689
0.113
0.839
0.987
0.160
0.101
0.895
0.973
0.306
0.652
0.568
1 0.998
1 0.017
0.586
0.595
0.999
0.009
17,18
GWA - 12D
5
5
0.024
0.997
0.107
0.025
1 0.996
0.083
0.023
0.078
0.992
0.057
0.025
0.061
0.987
0.054
1 0.048
1 0.843
1 0.971
0.092
0.044
0.873
0.984
0.075
19,20
GWA - 1 S
5
5
0.772
0.990
0.279
0.824
0.994
0.224
0.734
0.235
0.984
0.250
0.805
0.104
0.988
0.218
1 (e)
(e)
21,22
GWA - 3S
1 5
5
0.117
0.973
1.616
0.103
0.968
1 1.962
0.101
0.607
1 0.988
0.115
1 0.088
1 0.647
0.987
0.129
1 0.359 1 0.698 1 0.990 0.048
0.357 0.675 1 0.989 0.046
1 23,24
Linear So=O
Linear SpO
Freundlich
Kd
Kd
So
K,
1/n
Maximum
1.140
0.917
1.133
1.870
0.979
Minimum
0.014
0.023
0.001
0.014
0.568
Median
0.087
0.101
0.607
0.357
0.716
Notes
a. Coefficient of determination (R2)indicates goodness of fit of individual isotherm to its linear regression (Ho et al. 2005).
b. Minimum chi-square (X2) indicates best fit of three isotherms in arithmetic form (Ho et al. 2005, Ng et al. 2002).
c. units: llvn)pg(1-1m)/g
d. Not applicable for So<0 or Kd<0 from linear regression.
e. Not applicable for (1/n)>1 or Kf<0 from Freundlich regression (Matott 2007).
f. For all C<MDL (method detection limit), estimate a minimum Kd using C = MDL at lowest soil -to -solution ratio.
g. Isotherm data not available.

Table 2 Arsenic
No.
data points
Linear Isotherm, So = 0
Linear isotherm, So > 0
Freundlich isotherm
Trial A
Trial B
Trial A
Trial B
Trial A
Trial B
Well ID
Trial A
Trial B
Kd
z
R
z
Kd
z
R
z
Kd
So
z
R
z
Kd
So
z
R
z
Kr
1 /n
2
R
z
Kr
1 /n
z
R
z
Fig. Nos.
1/g
-
Ng/g
1/g
-
Ng/g
1/g
ug/9
ug/g
1/g
ug/g
ug/g
(c)
Ng/g
(c)
ug/g
AB - 30 BR (32-34)
3
3
2.919
0.973
0.649
2.778
0.981
0.496
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
25,26
AB - 30 BR (43-44)
3
3
2.031
0.997
0.096
2.088
0.997
0.109
1 (d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
27,28
AB - 105 L
3
3
1.957
0.999
0.058
1.853
0.998
0.050
(d)
(d)
(e)
I (e)
29,30
AS - 2D
5
5
0.478
0.995
0.240
0.527
0.996
0.353
0.448 0.349 0.997 0.049
0.498
0.302
0.998
0.063
0.640
0.895
0.999
0.011
0.738 0.853 0.976 0.097
31,32
AS - 1 OD
5
5
0.539
0.999
0.058
0.570
0.998
0.071
0.529
0.101
0.999
0.020
0.549
0.200
0.999
0.021
0.630
0.924
0.994
0.040
0.662 0.943 0.999 0.008
33,34
GWA - 10
5
5
0.082
0.976
0.878
0.084
0.979
0.840
0.072
0.599
0.982
0.209
0.073
0.584
0.986
0.066
0.179
0.828
0.989
0.089
0.184 0.823 0.990 0.066
35,36
GWA - 5BR
5
5
0.548
0.993
0.265
0.522
0.979
1 0.933
0.515
0.331
0.993
0.122
0.468
0.599
0.982
0.295
0.689
0.917
0.986
0.079
0.811 0.848 1 0.987 0.145
37,38
GWA -4D
5
5
1.007
0.966
1.161
1.062
0.957
1 1.342
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
39,40
GWA - 11 D
3
3
1.817
0.999
1 0.039
1.701
0.996
0.107
1.813
0.014
0.996
0.040
1.614
0.313
0.990
0.088
(e)
1.792
0.980
0.978
0.085
41,42
GWA - 12D
4
5
0.724
0.982
0.866
0.669
0.961
1.711
0.635
0.752
0.991
0.129
0.624
0.377
0.905
1.203
1.170 0.802 0.994 0.039
0.973
0.762
0.617
1.542
43,44
GWA - 1 S
3
3
1.810
0.999
0.863
1.775
1.000
0.798
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
45,46
GWA - 3S
5
4
1.339
0.993
0.348
1.513
0.997
0.132
1 (d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
47,48
Linear So=O
Linear So>O
Freundlich
Kd
Kd
So
Kf
1/n
Maximum
2.919
1.813
0.752
1.792
0.980
Minimum
0.082
0.072
0.014
0.179
0.762
Median
1.200
0.522
0.340
0.689
0.853
Notes
a. Coefficient of determination (R2) indicates goodness of fit of individual isotherm to its linear regression (Ho et al. 2005).
b. Minimum chi-square (X2) indicates best fit of three isotherms in arithmetic form (Ho et al. 2005).
c. units: h'/")Ng('-'/")/g
d. Not applicable for So<0 or Kd<0 from linear regression.
e. Not applicable for (1/n)>1 or Kf<0 from Freundlich regression (Matott 2007).
f. For all C<MDL (method detection limit), estimate a minimum Kd using C = MDL at lowest soil -to -solution ratio.
ci. Isotherm data not available.

Table 3 Boron
No.
data points
Linear Isotherm, So = 0
Linear isotherm, So > 0
Freundlich isotherm
Trial A
Trial B
Trial A
Trial B
Trial A
Trial B
Well ID
Trial A
Trial B
Kd
z
R
z
Kd
z
R
z
Kd
So
z
R
z
Kd
So
z
R
z
K,
1 /n
2
R
z
Kr
1 /n
z
R
z
Fig. Nos.
1/g
-
Ng/g
1/g
-
Ng/g
1/g
ug/g
ug/g
1/g
ug/g
I -
ug/g
(c)
Ng/g
(c)
ug/g
AB - 30 BR (32-34)
5
5
0.002
0.920
0.281
0.002
0.982
0.062
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
49,50
AB - 30 BR (43-44)
5
5
0.001
0.949
0.117
0.002
0.943
0.172
1 (d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
51,52
AB - 105 L
5
4
0.000
0.971
3.592
0.001
0.714
0.598
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
53,54
AS - 2D
5
5
0.001
0.986
0.550
0.002
0.773
0.885
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
55,56
AS - 1 OD
5
5
0.002
0.633
2.472
0.002
0.808
0.945
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
57,58
GWA - 10
5
5
0.004
0.990
0.061
0.004
0.993
0.034
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
59,60
GWA - 5BR
5
5
0.002
0.885
0.393
0.001
0.928
1 0.168
(d)
0.001 0.271 1 0.053 0.160
(e)
0.030 0.458 1 0.081 0.164
61,62
GWA-4D
5
5
0.0004
0.843
0.166
0.0004
1.000
1 1.164
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
63,64
GWA - 11 D
5
5
0.001
1 1.000
0.301
0.001
0.999
0.635
(d)
0.000
0.225
1.000
0.463
(e)
0.034
0.423
1.000
0.450
65,66
GWA-12D
5
3
0.003
0.995
1 0.025
0.003
0.999
0.002
0.002 0.201 1 0.981 0.003
0.002
0.075
0.993
0.001
0.011 0.745 1 0.985 0.003
0.005
0.881
0.992
0.001
67,68
GWA - 1 S
5
5
0.002
0.962
0.156
0.002
0.983
0.064
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
69,70
GWA - 3S
1 5
5
0.002
0.995
0.024
0.003
0.918
0.405
1 (d)
(d)
1 0.003 0.993 1 0.904 0.024
(e)
71,72
Linear So=O
Linear So>O
Freundlich
Kd
Kd
So
Kf
1/n
Maximum
0.004
0.002
0.271
0.034
0.993
Minimum
0.0004
0.0005
0.075
0.003
0.423
Median
0.002
0.001
0.213
0.011
0.745
Notes
a. Coefficient of determination (R2) indicates goodness of fit of individual isotherm to its linear regression (Ho et al. 2005).
b. Minimum chi-square (X2) indicates best fit of three isotherms in arithmetic form (Ho et al. 2005).
c. units: h'/")Ng('-'/")/g
d. Not applicable for So<0 or Kd<0 from linear regression.
e. Not applicable for (1/n)>1 or Kf<0 from Freundlich regression (Matott 2007).
f. For all C<MDL (method detection limit), estimate a minimum Kd using C = MDL at lowest soil -to -solution ratio.
ci. Isotherm data not available.

Table 4 Cadium
No.
data points
Linear Isotherm, So = 0
Linear isotherm, So > 0
Freundlich isotherm
Trial A
Trial B
Trial A
Trial B
Trial A
Trial B
Well ID
Trial A
Trial B
Kd
z
R
z
Kd
z
R
z
Kd
So
z
R
z
Kd
So
z
R
z
Kr
1 /n
2
R
z
Kr
1 /n
z
R
z
Fig. Nos.
1/g
-
Ng/g
1/g
ug/g
1/g
ug/9
ug/g
1/g
ug/g
ug/g
(c)
Ng/g
(c)
ug/g
AB - 30 BR (32-34)
5
5
0.209
0.998
0.064
0.201
(f)
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
73,74
AB - 30 BR (43-44)
5
5
0.505
0.934
1.057
0.537
0.988 0.319
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
75,76
AB - 105 L
1
1
5.869
(f)
5.869
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
77,78
5
5
1.049
0.832
2.3
0.970
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)AS-2D
79,80
AS-1OD
5
5
0.456
0.842
1 1.986
0.539
0.911
1 1.038
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
81,82
GWA - 10
1
1
5.869
(f)
5.869
(f)
(f)
(f)
M
(f)
83,84
GWA-5BR
5
5
0.747
0.960
0.778
0.870
0.988
0.367
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
85,86
GWA-4D
5
5
0.206
0.963
0.687
0.216
0.965
0.727
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
87,88
GWA - 11 D
5
5
0.317
0.969
0.634
0.310
0.983
0.421
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
89,90
GWA-12D
1
1
5.869
(f)
5.869
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
91,92
GWA - 1 S
5
5
0.167
0.958
0.789
0.171
0.958
0.693
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
93,94
GWA - 3S
1 5
5
0.560
0.991
1 0.242
0.583
0.980
1 0.434
1 (d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
95,96
Linear So=O
Linear So>O
Freundlich
Kd
Kd
So
Kf
1/n
Maximum
5.869
Minimum
0.167
Median
0.549
Notes
a. Coefficient of determination (R2) indicates goodness of fit of individual isotherm to its linear regression (Ho et al. 2005).
b. Minimum chi-square (X2) indicates best fit of three isotherms in arithmetic form (Ho et al. 2005).
c. units: h'/")Ng('-'/n)/g
d. Not applicable for So<0 or Kd<0 from linear regression.
e. Not applicable for (1/n)>1 or Kf<0 from Freundlich regression (Matott 2007).
f. For all C<MDL (method detection limit), estimate a minimum Kd using C = MDL at lowest soil -to -solution ratio.
ci. Isotherm data not available.

Table 5 Cobalt
No.
data points
Linear Isotherm, So = 0
Linear isotherm, So > 0
Freundlich isotherm
Trial A
Trial B
Trial A
Trial B
Trial A
Trial B
Well ID
Trial A
Trial B
Kd
z
R
z
Kd
z
R
z
Kd
So
z
R
z
Kd
So
z
R
z
Kr
1 /n
2
R
z
Kr
1 /n
z
R
z
Fig. Nos.
1/g
-
Ng/g
1/g
-
ug/g
1/g
ug/9
ug/g
1/g
ug/g
ug/g
(c)
Ng/g
(c)
ug/g
AB - 30 BR (32-34)
5
5
0.365
0.937
4.774
0.430
0.892
2.816
(f)
(d)
(e)
(e)
97,98
AB - 30 BR (43-44)
5
5
0.592
0.561
11.380
0.706
0.604
9.631
0.496 0.510 1 0.029 11.350
(d)
(e)
(e)
99,100
AB- 105 L
2
2
4.666
0.971
0.452
4.965
0.954
0.684
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
101,102
AS - 2D
2
3
3.325
1.000
0.0004
3.271
0.939
1.228
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
103,104
AS-1OD
5
5
1.262
0.892
6.509
1.368
0.702
10.363
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
105,106
GWA - 10
2
2
3.415
1.000
0.001
3.568
0.999
0.013
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
107,108
GWA-5BR
4
5
2.613
0.872
2.710
2.378
0.728
6.107
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
109,110
GWA-4D
5
5
0.268
0.476
15.999
0.285
0.518
13.270
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
111,112
GWA - 11 D
5
5
0.748
0.932
1 1.981
0.717
0.908
2.501
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
113,114
GWA-12D
1
1
8.396
(f)
8.396
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
115,116
GWA - 1 S
1 5
5
0.558
0.711
6.463
0.496
0.569
11.455
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
117,118
GWA - 3S
1 5
5
1.370
0.926
1.647
1.334
0.969
0.993
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
119,120
Linear So=O
Linear So>O
Freundlich
Kd
Kd
So
Kf
1/n
Maximum
8.396
Minimum
0.268
Median
1.351
Notes
a. Coefficient of determination (R2)indicates goodness of fit of individual isotherm to its linear regression (Ho et al. 2005).
b. Minimum chi-square (X2) indicates best fit of three isotherms in arithmetic form (Ho et al. 2005).
c. units: h'/")Ng('-'/")/g
d. Not applicable for So<0 or Kd<0 from linear regression.
e. Not applicable for (1/n)>1 or Kf<0 from Freundlich regression (Matott 2007).
f. For all C<MDL (method detection limit), estimate a minimum Kd using C = MDL at lowest soil -to -solution ratio.
ci. Isotherm data not available.

Table 6 Molybdenum
No.
data points
Linear Isotherm, So = 0
Linear isotherm, So > 0
Freundlich isotherm
Trial A
Trial B
Trial A
Trial B
Trial A
Trial B
Well ID
Trial A
Trial B
Kd
z
R
z
Kd
z
R
z
Kd
So
z
R
z
Kd
So
z
R
z
Kr
1 /n
2
R
z
Kr
1 /n
z
R
z
Fig. Nos.
1/g
Ng/g
I/g
Ng/g
1/g
ug/9
ug/g
1/g
hg/g
I -
ug/g
(c)
I -
Ng/g
(c)
I -
ug/g
AB - 30 BR (32-34)
1
1
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
121,122
AB - 30 BR (43-44)
4
4
0.352
0.937
5.329
0.384
0.923
7.234
1 0.293
1.132
0.967
0.385
0.316
1.215
0.955
0.557
1.064
0.662
0.978
0.130
1.169
0.661
0.947
0.309
123,124
AB - 105 L
5
5
0.009
0.914
1.553
0.009
0.903
1.654
0.006
0.754
0.916
0.103
0.005
0.777
0.887
0.136
0.116
0.540
0.982
0.032
0.114
0.535
0.933
0.071
125,126
AS - 2D
5
5
0.007
0.809
3.940
0.009
0.925
1.819
0.003
0.941
0.731
0.167
0.006
0.738
0.975
0.038
0.251
0.357
0.909
0.073
0.139
0.508
0.999
0.002
127,128
AS-1OD
5
5
0.057
0.896
11.748
0.056
0.878
14.479
0.044
1.218
0.946
0.533
0.043
1.293
0.936
0.644
0.564
0.505
0.986
0.075
0.601
0.498
0.993
0.059
129,130
GWA - 10
0
0
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
GWA-5BR
5
5
0.013
0.886
4.384
0.012
0.871
5.636
0.008
0.926
0.936
0.131
0.007
0.952
0.948
0.116
0.232
0.465
0.994
0.015
0.267
0.424
0.984
0.025
131,132
GWA-4D
3
3
1.510
0.997
0.090
1.551
0.980
0.807
1.407
0.456
0.999
0.013
1.329
0.991
1 0.972
0.275
1.777
0.902
0.999
0.003
2.094
0.832
0.935
0.247
133,134
GWA - 11 D
2
2
2.467
0.987
0.444
2.465
0.987
0.446
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
135,136
GWA - 12D
5
4
0.004
0.825
2.164
0.004
0.822
1.872
0.001 0.812 0.611 0.056
0.001 0.860 0.325 0.084
0.306 0.237 0.806 0.033
0.354 0.205 0.598 0.059
137,138
GWA-1S
2
2
5.106
0.958
0.651
5.368
0.940
0.896
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
139,140
GWA-3S
3
3
0.442
0.927
8.645
0.531
0.933
6.702
0.329 1.903 1 0.978 1.538
0.400 1.847 1 0.977 1.570
1.814 1 0.519 1 0.996 0.733
1 1.849 0.551 1 0.991 0.802
141,142
Linear So=O
Linear So>O
Freundlich
Kd
Kd
So
Kf
1/n
Maximum
5.368
1.407
1.903
2.094
0.902
Minimum
0.004
0.001
0.456
0.114
0.205
Median
0.204
0.026
0.946
0.459
0.514
Notes
a. Coefficient of determination (R2)indicates goodness of fit of individual isotherm to its linear regression (Ho et al. 2005).
b. Minimum chi-square (X2) indicates best fit of three isotherms in arithmetic form (Ho et al. 2005).
c. units: h11")N9(1-'/")/g
d. Not applicable for So<0 or Kd<0 from linear regression.
e. Not applicable for (1/n)>1 or Kf<0 from Freundlich regression (Matott 2007).
f. For all C<MDL (method detection limit), estimate a minimum Kd using C = MDL at lowest soil -to -solution ratio.
ci. Isotherm data not available.

Table 7 Selenium
No.
data points
Linear Isotherm, So = 0
Linear isotherm, So > 0
Freundlich isotherm
Trial A
Trial B
Trial A
Trial B
Trial A
Trial B
Well ID
Trial A
Trial B
Kd
z
R
z
Kd
z
R
z
Kd
So
z
R
z
Kd
So
z
R
z
Kr
1 /n
2
R
z
Kr
1 /n
z
R
z
Fig. Nos.
1/g
-
Ng/g
1/g
-
ug/g
1/g
ug/9
ug/g
1/g
ug/g
ug/g
(c)
Ng/g
(c)
ug/g
AB - 30 BR (32-34)
2
2
7.981
0.871
2.474
7.348
0.928
1.411
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
143,144
AB - 30 BR (43-44)
5
5
1.239
0.976
1.132
1.324
0.985
0.932
1 (d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
145,146
AB - 105 L
5
5
0.180
0.999
0.049
0.176
0.999
0.056
(d)
0.175
0.030
0.998
0.060
(e)
I (e)
147,148
AS - 2D
5
5
0.115
0.983
1.274
0.125
0.986
1.256
0.102
0.827
0.993
0.148
0.111
0.776
0.996
0.093
0.282
0.797
0.997
0.025
0.312
0.782
0.990
0.043
149,150
AS-1OD
5
5
0.260
0.991
0.548
0.268
0.988
0.604
0.243
0.512
0.988
0.217
0.247
0.614
0.988
0.247
0.410
0.869
0.981
0.173
0.406
0.893
0.991
0.135
151,152
GWA - 10
5
5
0.058
0.960
1.803
0.060
0.966
1.577
0.049
0.964
0.956
0.610
0.051
0.903
0.964
0.375
0.137
0.838
0.954
0.420
0.136
0.844
0.951
0.375
153,154
GWA-5BR
5
5
0.135
0.985
0.881
0.121
0.976
1.847
0.121
0.722
0.989
0.215
0.106
0.945
0.989
0.231
0.265
0.843
0.988
0.093
0.325
0.775
0.993
0.061
155,156
GWA-4D
5
5
1.067
0.806
6.164
1.165
0.820
5.797
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
157,158
GWA-11D
3
3
3.042
0.993
1 2.223
2.838
0.986
2.241
3.030
0.035
0.975
2.260
2.635
0.635
0.960
2.781
(e)
3.033
0.959
0.881
2.437
159,160
GWA-12D
5
5
0.055
0.973
1.935
0.050
0.952
2.811
0.047
0.941
0.990
0.130
0.043
0.741
0.906
1.133
0.215 0.722 0.999 0.005
0.226
0.661
0.742
1.442
161,162
GWA-1S
2
2
4.753
1.000
0.002
5.436
0.995
0.120
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
163,164
GWA - 3S
1 5
4
1.313
0.990
0.559
1.553
0.998
1 0.052
1.234 0.485 1 0.985 0.404
1.550 0.014 1 0.996 0.048
1.469 0.978 1 0.962 0.392
(e)
165,166
Linear So=O
Linear So>O
Freundlich
Kd
Kd
So
Kf
1/n
Maximum
7.981
3.030
0.964
3.033
0.978
Minimum
0.050
0.043
0.014
0.136
0.661
Median
0.668
0.121
0.722
0.297
0.840
Notes
a. Coefficient of determination (R2)indicates goodness of fit of individual isotherm to its linear regression (Ho et al. 2005).
b. Minimum chi-square (X2) indicates best fit of three isotherms in arithmetic form (Ho et al. 2005).
c. units: h'/")Ng('-'/")/g
d. Not applicable for So<0 or Kd<0 from linear regression.
e. Not applicable for (1/n)>1 or Kf<0 from Freundlich regression (Matott 2007).
f. For all C<MDL (method detection limit), estimate a minimum Kd using C = MDL at lowest soil -to -solution ratio.
ci. Isotherm data not available.

Table 8 Thallium
Well ID
No.
data points
Linear Isotherm, S,, = 0
Linear isotherm, So > 0
Freundlich isotherm
Fig. Nos.
Trial A
Trial B
Trial A
Trial B
Trial A
Trial B
Trial A
Trial B
Kd
2
R
2
Kd
2
R
2
Kd
So
2
R
2
Kd
Sa
2
R
2
K,
1/n
2
R
2
K,
1/n
2
R
2
1/g
-
Ng/g
1/g
-
Ng/g
1/g
Ng/g
-
ug/g
1/g
Ng/g
-
Ng/g
(c)
-
-
Ng/g
(c)
-
-
Ng/g
AB - 30 BR (32-34)
5
5
0.576
0.990
0.639
0.585
0.988
1.062
0.531
0.643
0.992
0.174
0.530
0.778
0.995
0.128
0.849
0.870
0.995
0.068
0.980
0.823
0.997
0.020
167,168
AB - 30 BR (43-44)
3
3
3.391
0.961
1.021
3.554
0.986
0.518
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
169,170
AB- 105 L
3
3
4.383
0.922
2.051
4.581
0.944
1.615
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
171,172
AS - 2D
2
2
7.783
0.905
1.861
7.232
0.943
1.163
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
173,174
AS - 1 OD
3
2
1.534
0.743
6.189
1.809
0.945
4.802
0.945 2.806 1 0.218 5.397
1.221 3.531 1 1.000 0.000
2.598 0.627 1 0.536 5.404
4.752 0.475 1 1.000 0.000
175,176
GWA - 10
5
5
0.718
0.939
2.351
0.726
0.938
2.461
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
177,178
GWA - 5BR
2
2
7.756
0.907
1.818
7.603
0.919
1.596
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
179,180
GWA -4D
5
5
0.379
0.989
0.431
0.382
0.996
0.281
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
181,182
GWA - 11 D
4
4
1.100
0.986
1 0.902
1.069
0.978
1.602
0.979 0.972 1 0.990 0.186
0.930 1.184 1 0.988 0.247
1.641 0.834 1 0.994 0.068
1.784 0.791 1 0.987 0.098
183,184
GWA - 12D
2
2
5.038
0.999
0.018
4.960
1.000
0.009
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
185,186
GWA - 1 S
5
5
0.547
1.000
0.063
0.551
0.998
0.179
0.534
0.177
1.000
0.003
0.527
0.346
0.999
0.015
0.656
0.929
0.999
0.019
0.722 0.901 1 0.997 0.015
187,188
GWA - 3S
1 3
3
2.183
0.968
2.053
2.908
0.990
0.479
1 1.818
1.595
0.954
0.627
2.764
0.443
0.969
0.425
1 3.147
0.779
0.866
0.642
(e)
189,190
Linear So=O
Linear SpO
Freundlich
Kd
Kd
So
K,
1/n
Maximum
7.783
2.764
3.531
4.752
0.929
Minimum
0.379
0.527
0.177
0.656
0.475
Median
1.996
0.937
0.875
1.641
0.823
Notes
a. Coefficient of determination (R2)indicates goodness of fit of individual isotherm to its linear regression (Ho et al. 2005).
b. Minimum chi-square (X2) indicates best fit of three isotherms in arithmetic form (Ho et al. 2005).
c. units: llvn)pg(1-1m)/g
d. Not applicable for So<0 or Kd<0 from linear regression.
e. Not applicable for (1/n)>1 or Kf<0 from Freundlich regression (Matott 2007).
f. For all C<MDL (method detection limit), estimate a minimum Kd using C = MDL at lowest soil -to -solution ratio.
g. Isotherm data not available.

Table 9 Vanadium
Well ID
No.
data points
Linear Isotherm, S,, = 0
Linear isotherm, So > 0
Freundlich isotherm
Fig. Nos.
Trial A
Trial B
Trial A
Trial B
Trial A
Trial B
Trial A
Trial B
Ka
2
R
2
Kd
2
R
2
Kd
So
2
R
2
Kd
S.
2
R
2
K,
1/n
2
R
2
K,
1/n
2
R
2
1/g
Ng/g
1/g
Ng/g
1/g
Ng/g
ug/g
1/g
Ng/g
Ng/g
(c)
Ng/g
(c)
Ng/g
AB - 30 BR (32-34)
1
1
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
191,192
AB - 30 BR (43-44)
2
2
2.301
0.929
0.437
2.189
0.950
0.319
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
193,194
AB - 105 L
5
5
0.583
0.971
0.559
0.546
0.972
0.528
0.561
0.089
1
0.938
1 0.527
0.518
0.126
0.943
0.476
(e)
(e)
195,196
AS - 2D
5
4
0.409
0.999
0.014
0.437
0.997
0.043
(d)
0.420
0.100
0.994
0.032
(e)
(e)
197,198
AS - 1 OD
5
5
0.467
0.994
0.126
0.463
0.969
0.526
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
199,200
GWA - 10
5
5
0.065
0.974
0.441
0.067
0.977
0.420
0.056
0.279
0.981
0.083
0.058
0.271
0.987
0.022
0.141
0.797
0.993
0.027
0.142
1 0.799 1 0.991
0.022
201,202
GWA - 5BR
5
5
0.429
1 0.972
0.565
0.383
0.979
0.349
0.409
0.111
0.941
0.468
0.359
0.151
0.960
0.303
0.465
0.934
0.786
0.519
(e)
203,204
GWA -4D
1
1
3.664
(f)
3.664
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
205,206
GWA - 11 D
1
1
3.664
(f)
3.664
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
207,208
GWA - 12D
5
5
0.425
0.997
1 0.045
0.342
0.866
1 1.185
0.414
0.060
1
0.994
0.048
(d)
1
0.390
1 0.777 1 0.514
1.868
209,210
GWA - 1 S
1
1
3.664
(f)
3.664
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
(f)
211,212
2
2
1.979
0.977
0.1
2.295
0.930
213,214GWA-3S
Linear So=O
Linear So>0
Freundlich
Kd
Kd
So
K,
1/n
Maximum
3.664
0.561
0.279
0.465
0.934
Minimum
0.065
0.056
0.060
0.141
0.777
Median
0.565
0.411
0.118
0.266
0.798
Notes
a. Coefficient of determination (R2)indicates goodness of fit of individual isotherm to its linear regression (Ho et al. 2005).
b. Minimum chi-square (X2) indicates best fit of three isotherms in arithmetic form (Ho et al. 2005).
c. units: llvn)pg(1-1m)/g
d. Not applicable for So<0 or Kd<0 from linear regression.
e. Not applicable for (1/n)>1 or Kf<0 from Freundlich regression (Matott 2007).
f. For all C<MDL (method detection limit), estimate a minimum Kd using C = MDL at lowest soil -to -solution ratio.
g. Isotherm data not available.

8
7
6
—5
0)
°' 4
U) 3
2
1
0
Figure 1 Antimony Isotherms for AB — 30 BR (32-34)
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich
i
0

10
9
8
7
6
5
U) 4
3
2
1
0
Figure 2 Antimony Isotherms for AB — 30 BR (32-34)
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich
!3

s
6
—5
0)
0' 4
CO 3
2
1
0
Figure 3 Antimony Isotherms for AB — 30 BR (43-44)
T
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

—5
0)
0' 4
CO 3
fir:
Figure 4 Antimony Isotherms for AB — 30 BR (43-44)
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

7
6
5
�4
Cj) 3
2
1
0
Figure 5 Antimony Isotherms for AB — 105 L
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

4
0)
F 3
U)
2
1
Figure 6 Antimony Isotherms for AB — 105 L
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O

5
4
�3
U) 2
1
0
Figure 7 Antimony Isotherms for AS — 2D
•
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O Freundlich

4
0)
°' 3
U)
2
1
M
Figure 8 Antimony Isotherms for AS — 2D
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O

5
4
�3
U) 2
1
0
Figure 9 Antimony Isotherms for AS — 1 OD
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140
C (ug/1)
• Trial -A linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

5
4
�3
U) 2
1
0
Figure 10 Antimony Isotherms for AS — 1 OD
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

Figure 11 Antimony Isotherms for GWA— 10
4
3 9
°' 2
U
1 / •
0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O Freundlich

4
3
0)
°' 2
U)
1
Figure 12 Antimony Isotherms for GWA— 10
•
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O

5
4
�3
U) 2
1
0
Figure 13 Antimony Isotherms for GWA— 5BR
•
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

5
4
�3
CO 2
1
0
Figure 14 Antimony Isotherms for GWA— 5BR
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

7
6
5
�4
U 3
2
1
0
Figure 15 Antimony Isotherms for GWA— 4D
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

7
6
5
�4
U 3
2
1
0
Figure 16 Antimony Isotherms for GWA— 4D
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

7
6
5
�4
3
2
1
0
Figure 17 Antimony Isotherms for GWA— 11 D
0 10 20 30 40 50
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

Figure 18 Antimony Isotherms for GWA— 11 D

4
3
_0)
°' 2
U)
1
Mul
Figure 19 Antimony Isotherms for GWA— 12D
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

3
0)
0' 2
U)
1
Figure 20 Antimony Isotherms for GWA— 12D
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

8
7
6
—5
0)
°' 4
U) 3
2
1
0
Figure 21 Antimony Isotherms for GWA — 1 S
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
C (ug/1)
7 8 9 10
• Trial - A linear So=O linear So>O

8
7
6
—5
_0)
°' 4
U) 3
2
1
0
Figure 22 Antimony Isotherms for GWA — 1 S
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O linear So>O

7
6
5
�4
U) 3
2
1
0
Figure 23 Antimony Isotherms for GWA— 3S
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

7
6
5
�4
U) 3
2
1
0
Figure 24 Antimony Isotherms for GWA— 3S
10 20 30 40 50 60
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

9
8
7
6
°' 5
U 4
3
2
0
Figure 25 Arsenic Isotherms for AB — 30 BR (32-34)
0 1 2 3
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear SO=O

9
8
7
6
°' 5
C 4
3
2
0
Figure 26 Arsenic Isotherms for AB — 30 BR (32-34)
0 1 2
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear SO=O

9
8
7
6
5
0)
U 4
3
2
X
Figure 27 Arsenic Isotherms for AB — 30 BR (43-44)
0 1 2 3
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear SO=O
E

9
8
7
6
°' 5
CO4
3
2
0
Figure 28 Arsenic Isotherms for AB — 30 BR (43-44)
1 2 3
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear SO=O
IH

9
8
7
6
°' 5
U 4
3
2
0
Figure 29 Arsenic Isotherms for AB — 105 L
1 2 3 4
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear SO=O
5

9
8
7
6
°' 5
0)
­ 4
3
2
0
Figure 30 Arsenic Isotherms for AB — 105 L
0 1 2 3 4
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear SO=O
5

Figure 31 Arsenic Isotherms for AS — 2D

8
7
6
—5
_0)
0' 4
U) 3
2
1
0
Figure 32 Arsenic Isotherms for AS — 2D
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear SO=O linear SO>0 Freundlich

8
7
6
—5
0)
°' 4
3
2
1
0
0
Figure 33 Arsenic Isotherms for AS — 1 OD
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear SO=O linear SO>0 Freundlich

8
7
6
—5
0)
°' 4
U) 3
2
1
0
0
Figure 34 Arsenic Isotherms for AS — 1 OD
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear SO=O linear SO>0 Freundlich

7
6
5
�4
U) 3
2
1
0
Figure 35 Arsenic Isotherms for GWA— 10
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear SO=O linear SO>0 Freundlich
.11

7
6
5
�4
U 3
2
1
0
Figure 36 Arsenic Isotherms for GWA— 10
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear SO=O linear SO>0 Freundlich

9
8
7
6
0' 5
U 4
3
2
1
0
Figure 37 Arsenic Isotherms for GWA— 5BR
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear SO=O linear SO>0 Freundlich

9
8
7
6
a' 5
0)
U 4
3
2
1
0
Figure 38 Arsenic Isotherms for GWA— 5BR
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear SO=O linear SO>0 Freundlich

�1
E:3
�A
0' 5
4
3
2
1
0
Figure 39 Arsenic Isotherms for GWA— 4D
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear SO=O
E

9
8
7
6
°' 5
0)
U 4
3
2
1
0
Figure 40 Arsenic Isotherms for GWA — 4D
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear SO=O
0

Figure 41 Arsenic Isotherms for GWA — 11 D
�1
1:1
•
7
6
a' 5
0)
� 4
3 •
2
•
1
0
0 1 2 3 4 5
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear SO=O linear SO>O

9
8
7
6
°' 5
4
3
2
0
Figure 42 Arsenic Isotherms for GWA— 11 D
0 1 2 3 4
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear SO=O linear SO>0 Freundlich
5

9
8
7
6
°' 5
0)
U 4
3
2
1
0
Figure 43 Arsenic Isotherms for GWA— 12D
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear SO=O linear SO>0 Freundlich

8
7
6
—5
0)
°' 4
U) 3
2
1
0
Figure 44 Arsenic Isotherms for GWA— 12D
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear SO=O linear SO>0 Freundlich

9
8
7
6
0' 5
0)
U 4
3
2
0
Figure 45 Arsenic Isotherms for GWA — 1 S
3 4 5
C (ug/1)
s Trial - A linear SO=O

9
8
7
6
4
3
2
0
Figure 46 Arsenic Isotherms for GWA— 1S
0 1 2 3 4
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear SO=O
5

Figure 47 Arsenic Isotherms for GWA— 3S
7

9
8
7
6
°' S
CO4
3
2
0
Figure 48 Arsenic Isotherms for GWA— 3S
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear SO=O
7

1.2
1.0
11
0)
°' 0.6
U)
0.4
=IV
Figure 49 Boron Isotherms for AB — 30 BR (32-34)
•
0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 360 400 440 480
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O

Figure 50 Boron Isotherms for AB — 30 BR (32-34)
1.2
1.0
111:
0)
�' 0.6
o
WO

Figure 51 Boron Isotherms for AB — 30 BR (43-44)
1.0
M
-& 0.6
CO 0.4 • •
WIA
Ml
•
0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 360 400 440 480
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O

0.6
0)
U) 0.4
0.2
0.0
Figure 52 Boron Isotherms for AB — 30 BR (43-44)
0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 360 400 440 480
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O

Figure 53 Boron Isotherms for AB — 105 L
1.0 0
0.6
t1>VA
ols
0 80 160 240 320 400 480
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O

Figure 54 Boron Isotherms for AB — 105 L
1.0
M:
•
0.6
0.4
0.2 •
•
•
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O

0.6
U) 0.4
0.2
0.0
Figure 55 Boron Isotherms for AS — 2D
•
•
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O

0.5
0.0
Figure 56 Boron Isotherms for AS — 2D
•
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O

2.5
2.0
1.5
U) 1.0
0.5
0.0
Figure 57 Boron Isotherms for AS — 1 OD
0 50 100 150 200 250
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O
•
•
300 350 400

Figure 58 Boron Isotherms for AS — 1 OD
2.5
2.0
1.5 •
0)
CO
1.0
•
0.5
•
•
•
0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 360 400 440
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O

2.0
1.5
1.0
CO
mew
1js
Figure 59 Boron Isotherms for GWA— 10
•
0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 360 400 440
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O

2.0
1.5
1.0
U)
mew
1js
Figure 60 Boron Isotherms for GWA— 10
•
0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 360 400 440
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O

Figure 61 Boron Isotherms for GWA— 5BR
1.2
le,
0.6
CO
WN]
•
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O

0.4
0.2
Figure 62 Boron Isotherms for GWA— 5BR
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500
C (ug/l)
• Trial - B linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

Figure 63 Boron Isotherms for GWA— 4D
0.5
0.4
0.3
0)
U) 0.2
0.1 00
;SAC
•
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O

0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
Figure 64 Boron Isotherms for GWA— 4D
•
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O

Figure 65 Boron Isotherms for GWA— 11 D
0.5
0.4
a, 0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0

0.5
0.4
0.3
U) 0.2
0.1
0.0
Figure 66 Boron Isotherms for GWA— 11 D
0 100 200 300 400 500
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

1.2
1.0
1)�:
0)
°' 0.6
n1 �
MOO
Figure 67 Boron Isotherms for GWA— 12D
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

0.6
0)
U) 0.4
0.2
0.0
Figure 68 Boron Isotherms for GWA— 12D
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

U)
0.5
0.0
Figure 69 Boron Isotherms for GWA — 1 S
•
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O

U)
0.5
0.0
Figure 70 Boron Isotherms for GWA— 1S
Ll
ll�W�tlll1 Wi�lzlll �W$=18I8=xll j11I1=Wi]
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O

1.2
1.0
0.6
U)
0.4
M11K
Effelue
Figure 71 Boron Isotherms for GWA— 3S
0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

2.0
1.8
1.6
1.4
1.2
1311.0
U) 0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
Figure 72 Boron Isotherms for GWA— 3S
0 70 140 210 280 350 420
C (ug/1)
s Trial - B linear So=O

Figure 73 Cadmium Isotherms for AB — 30 BR (32-34)
6 � -
5
4
°' 3
CO
2
1
0

0)
0' 3
2
1
0
Figure 74 Cadmium Isotherms for AB — 30 BR (32-34)
0 4 8 12 16 20 24
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O
28

4
0)
033
W
1
we]
Figure 75 Cadmium Isotherms for AB — 30 BR (43-44)
•
0 2 4 6 8 10
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O

n
0)
0' 3
2
1
0
Figure 76 Cadmium Isotherms for AB — 30 BR (43-44)
•
0 2 4 6 8 10
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O

Figure 77 Cadmium Isotherms for AB — 105 L

4
0)
:03' 3
U)
2
1
Figure 78 Cadmium Isotherms for AB — 105 L
0.0 0.5 1.0
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O

Figure 79 Cadmium Isotherms for AS — 2D
6
5
4
R 3
2
0
•
• 0
2 3 4
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O

Figure 80 Cadmium Isotherms for AS — 2D

Figure 81 Cadmium Isotherms for AS — 1 OD
6
•
5
4
°' 3
cf) •
2
1 / •
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O

Figure 82 Cadmium Isotherms for AS — 1 OD
[1

4
0)
F 3
2
1
MM
Figure 83 Cadmium Isotherms for GWA— 10
0.0 0.5 1.0
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O

4
3
CO
2
1
Mul
Figure 84 Cadmium Isotherms for GWA— 10
0.0 0.5 1.0
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O

6
5
4
0)
0' 3
U)
2
1
mug
Figure 85 Cadmium Isotherms for GWA— 5BR
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O

6
5
4
0' 3
CO
2
1
Figure 86 Cadmium Isotherms for GWA— 5BR
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O

Figure 87 Cadmium Isotherms for GWA— 4D
12 16
C (ug/1)
-A --linear So=O
20 24

0)
°' 3
CO
2
1
Mul
Figure 88 Cadmium Isotherms for GWA— 4D
•
0 4 8 12 16 20 24
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O

6
5
�4
0)
U) 3
2
1
0
Figure 89 Cadmium Isotherms for GWA— 11 D
0 3 6 9 12 15 18
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O

7
6
5
�4
U) 3
2
1
0
Figure 90 Cadmium Isotherms for GWA— 11 D
3 6 9 12 15 18
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O

6
5
4
0)
°' 3
U)
2
1
ED
Figure 91 Cadmium Isotherms for GWA— 12D
0.0 0.5 1.0
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O

In
0)
R 3
U)
2
1
MH
Figure 92 Cadmium Isotherms for GWA— 12D
0.0 0.5 1.0
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O

4
0)
°' 3
2
1
Figure 93 Cadmium Isotherms for GWA— 1S
•
4 8 12 16 20 24 28
C (ug/1)
s Trial - A linear So=O

6
5
4
_0)
°' 3
U)
2
1
Mul
Figure 94 Cadmium Isotherms for GWA— 1S
C]
4 8 12 16 20 24 28
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O

i-"
4
0)
°' 3
U)
2
1
mug
Figure 95 Cadmium Isotherms for GWA— 3S
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O

6
5
4
0)
EM' 3
U)
2
0
Figure 96 Cadmium Isotherms for GWA— 3S
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O

9
8
7
6
a' 5
0)
U 4
3
2
1
O
Figure 97 Cobalt Isotherms for AB — 30 BR (32-34)
•
0 4 8 12 16 20
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O

9
8
7
6
�' 5
0)
4
3
2
1
0
Figure 98 Cobalt Isotherms for AB — 30 BR (32-34)
11
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O

01
8
7
6
a' 5
0)
1
W 4
3
2
1
11]
Figure 99 Cobalt Isotherms for AB — 30 BR (43-44)
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich
rA

Figure 100 Cobalt Isotherms for AB — 30 BR (43-44)
9
8 •
7
6
5
� 4
3 •
2
•
1 • •
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O

Figure 101 Cobalt Isotherms for AB — 105 L
9
8
7
6
0' 5
U 4
3
2
1
0

Figure 102 Cobalt Isotherms for AB — 105 L
9
8
7
6
0' 5
0)
U 4
3
2
1
0
•

9
8
7
6
5
U 4
3
2
1
0
Figure 103 Cobalt Isotherms for AS — 2D
2 3
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O linear So>O

9
8
7
6
°' 5
0)
M
U 4
3
2
0
Figure 104 Cobalt Isotherms for AS — 2D
2 3
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O

9
8
7
6
°' S
0)
M
U 4
3
2
1
0
Figure 105 Cobalt Isotherms for AS — 1 OD
•
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O

9
8
7
6
4
3
2
0
Figure 106 Cobalt Isotherms for AS — 1 OD
0 1 2 3 4
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O

9
8
7
6
a' 5
0)
U 4
3
2
0
Figure 107 Cobalt Isotherms for GWA— 10
0 1 2
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O
3

9
8
7
6
C 4
3
2
0
Figure 108 Cobalt Isotherms for GWA— 10
0 1 2
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O
3

9
8
7
6
5
U 4
3
2
1
0
Figure 109 Cobalt Isotherms for GWA— 5BR
•
2 3
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O

9
8
7
°' 5
0)
M
U 4
3
2
0
Figure 110 Cobalt Isotherms for GWA— 5BR
2 3
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O

Figure 111 Cobalt Isotherms for GWA— 4D
9
8 •
7
6
0' 5
4
3 •
2
•
1 • •
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O

Figure 112 Cobalt Isotherms for GWA— 4D
9
8 •
7
6
°' 5
0)
� 4
3 •
i;
•
1 • •
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O

9
8
7
6
4
3
2
1
0
Figure 113 Cobalt Isotherms for GWA— 11 D
0 2 4 6 8
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O
I
10

9
8
7
6
°' 5
U 4
3
2
1
0
Figure 114 Cobalt Isotherms for GWA— 11 D
2 4 6 8
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O
•
10

9
8
7
6
4
3
2
1
0
Figure 115 Cobalt Isotherms for GWA— 12D
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O

9
8
7
6
0' 5
U 4
3
2
1
0
Figure 116 Cobalt Isotherms for GWA— 12D
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O

Figure 117 Cobalt Isotherms for GWA— 1S
�11
E:1
7
6
°' 5
0)
M
U 4
3
2
1 • •
0
•
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O

Figure 118 Cobalt Isotherms for GWA— 1 S
9
8 •
7
6
0' 5
0)
U 4
3 •
2
•
1 • •
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O

9
8
7
6
�' 5
0)
U 4
3
2
0
Figure 119 Cobalt Isotherms for GWA— 3S
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O

9
8
7
6
0' 5
�
4
3
2
1
0
Figure 120 Cobalt Isotherms for GWA— 3S
•
1 2 3 4 5 6
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O

Figure 121 Molybdenum Isotherms for AB - 30 BR (32-34)
9
8
7
6
0' 5
c 4
3
2

9
8
7
6
a' 5
0)
U 4
3
A
Figure 122 Molybdenum Isotherms for AB - 30 BR (32-34)
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O

9
8
7
6
5
0)
�
4
3
2
X
Figure 123 Molybdenum Isotherms for AB — 30 BR (43-44)
0 5 10 15 20 25
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

9
8
7
6
0' 5
U 4
3
2
0
Figure 124 Molybdenum Isotherms for AB — 30 BR (43-44)
0 5 10 15 20 25
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

0)
0)
3
2
1
0
Figure 125 Molybdenum Isotherms for AB — 105 L
0 60 120 180 240 300
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

0)
3
2
1
0
Figure 126 Molybdenum Isotherms for AB — 105 L
60 120 180 240 300
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

Figure 127 Molybdenum Isotherms for AS — 2D
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

3.0
2.5
%A
1.5
1.0
tilp
M
Figure 128 Molybdenum Isotherms for AS — 2D
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

7
6
5
�4
U 3
2
1
0
Figure 129 Molybdenum Isotherms for AS — 1 OD
0 25 50 75 100 125
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

7
6
5
�4
3
2
1
0
Figure 130 Molybdenum Isotherms for AS — 1 OD
0 25 50 75 100 125
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

3
0)
0' 2
1
NEI
Figure 131 Molybdenum Isotherms for GWA— 5BR
0 60 120 180 240 300
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

3
2
0)
0)
U)
1
0
Figure 132 Molybdenum Isotherms for GWA— 5BR
60 120 180 240 300
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

9
8
7
6
°' 5
U 4
3
2
1
0
Figure 133 Molybdenum Isotherms for GWA— 4D
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

9
8
7
6
°' 5
0)
U 4
3
2
1
0
Figure 134 Molybdenum Isotherms for GWA— 4D
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

9
8
7
6
°' 5
0)
U 4
3
2
0
Figure 135 Molybdenum Isotherms for GWA— 11 D
1 2 3
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O
4

9
8
7
6
°' 5
0)
U 4
3
2
0
Figure 136 Molybdenum Isotherms for GWA— 11 D
1 2 3
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O
4

CO
0.5
0.0
Figure 137 Molybdenum Isotherms for GWA— 12D
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

0)
0.5
0.0
Figure 138 Molybdenum Isotherms for GWA— 12D
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

9
8
7
6
°' 5
U 4
3
2
1
0
Figure 139 Molybdenum Isotherms for GWA — 1 S
0.0 0.4 0.8 1.2
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O
•
1.6

9
8
7
6
0' 5
U 4
3
2
1
0
Figure 140 Molybdenum Isotherms for GWA — 1 S
•
0 1 1 2
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O

9
8
7
6
4
3
2
1
0
Figure 141 Molybdenum Isotherms for GWA — 3S
0 5 10 15 20
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

9
8
7
6
°' 5
0)
4
3
2
0
Figure 142 Molybdenum Isotherms for GWA— 3S
5 10 15
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich
20

Figure 143 Selenium Isotherms for AB — 30 BR (32-34)
^1)
5

Figure 144 Selenium Isotherms for AB — 30 BR (32-34)
12
6
4
2
0
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O

12
10
6
4
Figure 145 Selenium Isotherms for AB — 30 BR (43-44)
•
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O

12
10
a' 6
4
Figure 146 Selenium Isotherms for AB — 30 BR (43-44)
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O

11
10
9
8
7
6
U)
5
4
3
2
1
0
Figure 147 Selenium Isotherms for AB — 105 L
0 8 16 24 32 40 48 56
C (ug/1)
• Trial -A linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich
64

11
10
9
8
7
6
U)
5
4
3
2
1
0
Figure 148 Selenium Isotherms for AB — 105 L
0 8 16 24 32 40 48 56
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich
64

12
10
8
6
U)
4
2
0
0
Figure 149 Selenium Isotherms for AS — 2D
7 14 21 28 35 42 49 56 63 70 77 84 91
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

12
10
8
6
4
2
0
0
Figure 150 Selenium Isotherms for AS — 2D
7 14 21 28 35 42 49 56 63 70 77 84 91
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

11
10
9
8
7
6
U)
5
4
3
2
1
0
Figure 151 Selenium Isotherms for AS — 1 OD
0 11 22 33 44
C (ug/1)
• Trial -A linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

11
10
9
8
7
a' 6
0)
U)
5
4
3
2
1
0
Figure 152 Selenium Isotherms for AS — 1 OD
0 11 22 33
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich
•
44

8
7
6
0' 5
U 4
3
2
1
0
Figure 153 Selenium Isotherms for GWA— 10
•
0 16 32 48 64 80 96 112 128 144 160
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

9
8
7
6
0' 5
U 4
3
2
1
0
0
Figure 154 Selenium Isotherms for GWA— 10
16 32 48 64 80 96 112 128 144 160
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

11
10
9
8
7
6
U)
5
4
3
2
1
0
Figure 155 Selenium Isotherms for GWA— 5BR
0 8 16 24 32 40 48 56 64 72 80 88
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

11
10
9
8
7
6
U)
5
4
3
2
1
0
Figure 156 Selenium Isotherms for GWA— 5BR
0 8 16 24 32 40 48 56 64 72 80 88
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

12
10
r,
6
U)
4
2
0
Figure 157 Selenium Isotherms for GWA— 4D
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O

Figure 158 Selenium Isotherms for GWA— 4D
47

Figure 159 Selenium Isotherms for GWA— 11 D
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
•
•
0 1 2 3 4 5
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O linear So>O

12
10
8
0)
U 6
4
2
0
Figure 160 Selenium Isotherms for GWA— 11D
0 1 2 3 4
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich
5

�01
8
7
6
0' 5
U 4
3
2
1
0
Figure 161 Selenium Isotherms for GWA— 12D
0 17 34 51 68 85 102 119 136 153 170
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

�1
E:3
N
A
°' 5
0)
4
3
2
1
0
Figure 162 Selenium Isotherms for GWA— 12D
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

Figure 163 Selenium Isotherms for GWA— 1S
12
10
8
6
4
2
0

12
10
0)
6
CO
4
2
0
Figure 164 Selenium Isotherms for GWA— 1S
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O
2.5

12
10
r.
6
CO
4
2
0
Figure 165 Selenium Isotherms for GWA— 3S
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
C (ug/1)
9 10
• Trial - A linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

Figure 166 Selenium Isotherms for GWA— 3S
12
10
8
6
U)
•
4
•
2
•
0
0 1
2
3
4 5
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O
U
6 7 8
linear So>O

12
10
6
U)
4
2
0
Figure 167 Thallium Isotherms for AB — 30 BR (32-34)
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

12
10
8
6
U)
4
f►i
Figure 168 Thallium Isotherms for AB — 30 BR (32-34)
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

Figure 169 Thallium Isotherms for AB — 30 BR (43-44)
12
10
8
6
U)
4
2
W
C (ug/1)
s. Trial - A - linear So=O
3

12
10
8
0)
0' 6
U)
4
2
0
Figure 170 Thallium Isotherms for AB — 30 BR (43-44)
1 2 3
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O
•

12
10
6
CO
4
2
0
Figure 171 Thallium Isotherms for AB — 105 L
0 1 2
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O
3

12
10
0)
6
CO
4
2
0
Figure 172 Thallium Isotherms for AB — 105 L
1 2 3
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O

12
10
6
U)
4
2
0
Figure 173 Thallium Isotherms for AS — 2D
n
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O

Figure 174 Thallium Isotherms for AS — 2D
47

12
10
_0)
:' 6
U)
4
2
0
Figure 175 Thallium Isotherms for AS — 10D
0 1 1 2 3 4 4 5 6 6 7
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

12
10
_0)
0' 6
U)
4
2
0
Figure 176 Thallium Isotherms for AS — 1 OD
0 1 1 2 3 4 4 5 6 6 7
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

12
10
8
6
4
2
0
0
Figure 177 Thallium Isotherms for GWA— 10
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O
•

12
11
10
9
8
a, 7
6
c) 5
4
3
2
1
0
Figure 178 Thallium Isotherms for GWA— 10
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O

12
10
6
U)
4
2
0
Figure 179 Thallium Isotherms for GWA— 5BR
n
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O

Figure 180 Thallium Isotherms for GWA— 5BR
12 F---- •

12 F-
10
8
6
U)
4
2
0
Figure 181 Thallium Isotherms for GWA— 4D
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O

12
10
6
CO
4
2
0
Figure 182 Thallium Isotherms for GWA— 4D
5 10 15 20 25 30
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O

12
10
6
U)
4
2
0
Figure 183 Thallium Isotherms for GWA— 11 D
0 2 4 6 8 10
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich
0
12

12
10
8
6
U)
4
2
0
Figure 184 Thallium Isotherms for GWA— 11 D
0 2 4 6 8 10
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich
C]
12

12
10
8
6
U)
4
2
0
Figure 185 Thallium Isotherms for GWA— 12D
0 1 2
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O
3

Figure 186 Thallium Isotherms for GWA— 12D

12
10
6
CO
4
2
0
Figure 187 Thallium Isotherms for GWA— 1S
6 12 18
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich
24

12
10
6
CO
4
2
0
Figure 188 Thallium Isotherms for GWA— 1S
6 12 18
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich
24

12
10
6
CO
4
2
0
Figure 189 Thallium Isotherms for GWA— 3S
0 1 2 3 4 5
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich
0

12
10
E:a
_0)
°' 6
U)
4
2
0
Figure 190 Thallium Isotherms for GWA— 3S
1 2 3 4
C (ug/1)
5 6
• Trial - B linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

4
=' 2
U)
Figure 191 Vanadium Isotherms for AB — 30 BR (32-34)
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O

n
3
°' 2
1
I
Figure 192 Vanadium Isotherms for AB — 30 BR (32-34)
0 0
C (ug/1)

4.0
3.5
3.0
2.5
2.0
C/) 1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
Figure 193 Vanadium Isotherms for AB — 30 BR (43-44)
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O

Figure 194 Vanadium Isotherms for AB — 30 BR (43-44)
4.0
3.5
3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
•

4
Figure 195 Vanadium Isotherms for AB — 105 L
4 5 6 7
linear So>0

Figure 196 Vanadium Isotherms for AB — 105 L
4
•
3
°' 2
0
0 1 2 3 4
C (ug/1)
5 6 7
• Trial - B linear So=O linear So>O

3
0)
0' 2
1
Figure 197 Vanadium Isotherms for AS — 2D
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O
0

4
3
0)
°' 2
U)
1
Nut
Figure 198 Vanadium Isotherms for AS — 2D
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O linear So>O

Figure 199 Vanadium Isotherms for AS — 1 OD

4
3
0)
°' 2
U)
1
MH
Figure 200 Vanadium Isotherms for AS — 10D
2 4 6 8
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O

3
2
U)
1
0
Figure 201 Vanadium Isotherms for GWA— 10
8 16 24 32 40
C (ug/1)
• Trial -A linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

3
2
0)
0)
U)
1
0
Figure 202 Vanadium Isotherms for GWA— 10
8 16 24 32 40 48
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

4
3
0)
2
CO
1
MUS
Figure 203 Vanadium Isotherms for GWA — 5BR
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich
10

Figure 204 Vanadium Isotherms for GWA — 5BR
Cl

4
3
0)
°' 2
1
Mul
Figure 205 Vanadium Isotherms for GWA— 4D
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O

3
0)
0' 2
1
Figure 206 Vanadium Isotherms for GWA— 4D
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O

4
3
0)
°' 2
U)
1
Nut
Figure 207 Vanadium Isotherms for GWA— 11D
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O

Figure 208 Vanadium Isotherms for GWA— 11 D
E

4
3
2
U)
1
Mul
Figure 209 Vanadium Isotherms for GWA— 12D
3 6 9
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O linear So>O

4
3
0)
°' 2
U)
1
M
Figure 210 Vanadium Isotherms for GWA— 12D
•
3 6 9
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O Freundlich

Figure 211 Vanadium Isotherms for GWA — 1 S
3
rn
0' 2
U)
1
MC

4
3
0)
°' 2
U)
1
Figure 212 Vanadium Isotherms for GWA— 1S
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O

4
3
0)
°' 2
U)
1
MC
Figure 213 Vanadium Isotherms for GWA— 3S
•
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O

4
3
0)
°' 2
U)
1
Nut
Figure 214 Vanadium Isotherms for GWA— 3S
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O