SW8890922_HISTORICAL FILE_19891004

STORMWATER DIVISION CODING SHEET
POST-CONSTRUCTION PERMITS
PERMIT NO. SW8 gc(0gd�a
DOC TYPE ❑ CURRENT PERMIT
❑ APPROVED PLANS
Ft,MHISTORICAL FILE
❑ COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION
DOC DATE 'qrl 1U Oy
YYYYMMDD

State of North Carolina
Department of Natural Resources and Community Development
Division of Environmental Management
512 North Salisbury Street • Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
James G. Martin, Governor R. Paul Wilms
William W. Cobey, Jr., Secretary Director
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
October 4, 1989
Patten Carolina Land Inc.
P.O. Box 478
Wrightsville Beach, North Carolina 28480
Subject: Certification of Compliance
with Stormwater Regulations
Project No. 890922
Joniquins Landing Subdivision
Carteret County
Dear Sirs:
The Wilmington Regional Office received the Stormwater
submittal for Joniquins Landing Subdivision on September 20,
1989 . Based on our review of the project plans and
specifications, we have determined that the project complies with
the Stormwater Regulations set forth in Title 15 NCAC 2H.
1003 (a) (2) . This certification shall be effective from the date
of issuance until rescinded and the project shall be constructed
in accordance with the plans and specifications subsequently
filed with the Wilmington Regional Office.
In the Deed Restrictions and Protective Covenants portion of
the submittal form for the subject project the following
statement was included 11 Deed restrictions are not written at
this time but will limit impervious cover to 7800 square feet per
lot. " Upon completion of said covenants and no less than ten
(10) days prior to the construction of any structure at this site
this office must obtain a copy of said covenants. Failure to
submit the necessary restrictive covenants will result in the
revocation of this certification and may result in enforcement
actions by the Environmental Management Commission.
P.O. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611-7687 Telephone [phone]
A.. r....11 ll......------- n¢._-_...._ ._.. .- .

Patten Carolina Land Inc.
October 4 , 1989
Page -2-
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please
call Paul E. Rawls or me at (919) 256-4161.
Sin y,
A. Preston Howa Jr. , P.E.
Regional supervisor
PER: 890922 .00T
Attachment
cc: Thomas Engineering Consultants, P.A.
Canal Wood Corporation
David L. Dickey
Bi1b Mills
WiROJ-, CF

- - vi v.. v� a.0 r yLwnrla.a�1AL C1M1'1MV GC1GIV 1
Submittal Form for Projects Using Density Limits for Stormwater
Control
PROJECT DATA v9�1��
Name of Project: JONIOUINS LANDING SUBDIVISION
- Location (Count Townshi /Municipality, Address) : CART FR T �OuNTe
MORRIMON TOWNS��(IP, SR MOO
Applicant Name: PATTEN CAPOITNA 1AND , TNr. .
Mailing Address: p -n . BOX 478 , WRIGESVIIIE BEADN N C
. 28480
Phone No. : ( 919) �Sf-8818
Submittal Date: 9-19-89
Brief Description ( include map and appropriate drawings ) :
182 ACRES CONSISTING OF 76 LOTS
Water Body Receiving Stormwater Runoff:
Name of water Body: JON-IOUINS CREEK
Classification of water Body: SA
Total Area of Proposed Project (acres) : 182 ACRES
State/Federal Permits and Approvals Required:
( Check Appropriate Blanks)
CAbIA Major X Sedimendation and Erosion Control X '
404 Permit DEM/DHS Sewage Disposal
Other ( specify) :
CALCULATION OF BUILT-UPON AREA
(Built-upon area means that portion of an individual development
that is covered by impervious or partially pervious cover
including buildings , pavement, recreation facilities, etc . but
not including decking. )
a) Built-upon area: 8 . 8
b) Total project area: 182 acres
% built-upon = built-upon / total project area * 100
% built-upon area = 4. 8 %
If the water body receiving stormwater runoff is classified as
SA, is the % built-upon area < 25%? Yes X No
If the water body receiving stormwater runoff is classified other
than SA, is the % built-upon area < 30%? Yes No
STORMWATER COLLECTION SYSTEM
Is the only kind of stormwater collection system grass swales?
Yes X No
(Grassed-line swales should have a side slope of 3 :1 (H:V) or
less. )

cLleu cescription.
BUFFER AREA
Is the built-upon area at least 30 feet from mean high water of
all surface waters? Yes No X
If no, please provide a detailed desc �8��
BOAT RAMP AND ACCESS ' RAMP
(Note: Only boat ramps, public roads, public bridges and
walkways . to water related facilities are allowed within feet
of mean high water if the project is intended to meet stormwater
control requirements through density limits. )
DEED RESTRICTIONS AND PROTECTIVE COVENANTS
i Do the deed restrictions and protective covenants ensure that
subdivisions maintain the development consistent with the plans
and specifications approved by the division and include thh $as a beneficiary of the restrictions? Ye No X llEEDB WS_TRICT-
ions are not written at this time but wilf�� (�R v r to
( Include a copy of the restrictions anfl tbd� ma�t�� � DST .
form. )
CERTIFICATION
T DAV ID L . DICKEY
included on this su- i certify that the information
tta_ form is correct, that the project will
be constructed in conformance with this information, and that to
the best of my knowledge, the proposed project complies with the
reauriement of 15 NCAC 2H. 1003 (b) .
Signature-Owner or Ag ..t Dare iox6'
P . O. BOX 478, WRIGHTSVILLE BEACH, N . C . 28480
Address
If agent, please list owner' s name and address below:
CANAL WOOD CORP.
N810 WASHINGTON POST ROAD
DIVISIOiV`C1F'" IRUNI�EN�RI� 6RANAGEMENT SIGN-OFF
Regional Office
vidual Eva uating Fo ms/Pla t
Date Regional Wate Qua t ervisor
CC: Applicant/Region/Mills/CF

PF,i-Pt 5 t 5 S9s 24421 THOt1g5 lNG 1NEEF5 OG'i.oci .F 9 : 1 e 34 wt I P.liC12'
TRA^;S;'l I T I AL.
r -c
THQiv AS EN ': iNE1 KING CONSULTANTS, P. A.
P.C. BOOM 1309 1916 S. CMNIBURNIF RD. • 5 - '`NI-BV(' BEEN, NC 29MO (919) 63 .'727
----- ` O3- -------------------- -
pQr,JE CT
--X _ENCL0SED H E R E W I TH rsSAS RFLUESTED ViA _--
_ _._UNDERN SEPARATE COVER .--___FOR REVIEW AND CGi`i�EP;T
JR YUUR ri( E =CR APPROVAL
t't:irS 5ti`i ( . 0`: COP T tS L{1',
CU MElti'T S:
?aPs� ';7 _.1+...rt�•a7�TYr";t. FOK� _.
--�4'aCCL.-_ .r r� � �Lttib__(���:_.-_-E f�<_.t L ir<:.!..CUS•_-_.._..___-.-------•---.r-- - ----
BY:� i = � DAT E —
r/�

FF=J I 91=i F136 --44:�1 THE lay F'15:-rEF''- Cjrr.04.F'= 1 1 :34 r t l F-M t
iTC"
� 310MAS ENGy1NEERINC C0NSUL 'lA. ie 'IS, °. A.
P.t7. BO3 1309 • 1,.16 S. C;LEIN''BURINT_`F 10. 5 NEW BEP-N, NC 2 500 (9-9) 6-3;-2727
SAY f"'lU BEI; (? '
�y
!-KOJECi N tIE-11fiCoNiENIS OF FAA : OF
itJCi.UDII�G T ;a PAut

519 63E -�468 THDI! S FHG J'IEERS 01=T.Cel.8= 1 1 -.- F.Ok,3
•!7iT' 5EC!?!Nf, h. iA};�,f"•tl1R: SIMI . SC PAOvMto OCtwq" CUCC Or OCSC k CLUMM 10mi
f �
zv !'nvrr�trr
�—�--- �._�.;1 iv 3 II
Si VA - i/1.. Mn >!�
�.. Y 1. '='+9�R237.+..•b _1 �s�....1g.�C�y_
51j r C : 1 71 up(
!_ V.,. CPC
1-2 PCs(.
SE_t�
A,,,.
�cc: �

LOW DENSITY EVALUATION SHEET
PROJECT ## : iOQ�a
PROJECT NAME : n„ tA1S
REVIEWER-
DATE :Wl( oID ?
SITE DATA
ALLOWABLE DENSITY: g
PROJECT SITE AREA: (�ja7.eC� (CALCULATED)
PROJECT SITE AREA: (g`� ,p0 ( FROM SUBMITTAL)
DIFFERENCE :
SITE AREA USED :
BUILT UPON AREA
ROADS:
BUILDINGS :
TOTAL:
FOR SUBDIVSIONS
AREA OF RIGHT OF WAY: ) t .a S
NUMBER OF LOTS : ,(en _
AVERAGE LOT SIZE = SITE AREA - AREA OF R.O.W.
## OF LOTS
AVERAGE LOT SIZE (ALS) : Q. Ps- L - /LOT
IF ALS > 1/3 ACRE ( 14 , 520 S . F. ) THEN BUILT UPON AREA PER LOT IS
ALS* (DENSITYIF ALS ALS < 1/3 ACRE ( 14 , 520 S . F. ) THEN ALLOWABLE BULIT UPON AREA
PER LOT IS
SITE AREA x (DENSITY ) - BUILT UPON AREAS
## LOTS
BUILT UPON AREA PER LOT: /LOT

LOW DENSITY EVALUATION FORN \
PROJECT DENSITY = TOTAL BULIT UPON AREA x 100%
SITE AREA
PROJECT DENSITY = x 100%
PROJECT DENSITY:
NOTE-
LO �S 0.re 6a aProK 2. 25'Ac . C'ac�t .
N \e. �few

sRil
RECEIVED
SEP 1989
SEDIMENTATION AND EROSION Wilmington Regional Office
DEM
CONTROL PLAN
FOR
JONIQUINS .LANDING SUBDIVISION
89087
CARTERET COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
OWNER: PATTEN CAROLINA LAND INCORPORATED
P.O. BOX 478
WRIGHTSVILLE BEACH, NORTH CAROLINA 28480
CONSULTING ENGINEER: THOMAS ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, P.A.
1916 SOUTH GLENBURNIE ROAD — #5
COLLEGE PARK CENTER
P.O. BOX 1309
NEW BERN, NORTH CAROLINA 28560
(9t4� G37 2.72 7
SEPTEMBER 19 , 1989
ING
Wa
�PORq
EA
o ' C-438
r••'Lp
qT CPR.
# 4LCU 1vG
•., NN .•
,1993 '�h,nuna�"

NARRATIVE
JONIQUINS LANDING IS A PROPOSED SUBDIVISION IN CARTERET COUNTY, NORTH
CAROLINA. IT CONSISTS OF APPROXIMATELY 76 LOTS ON 182 ACRES. THE MINIMUM
LOT SIZE IS 0.70 ACRES. THE PARCEL IS TOTAL WOODED. SOILS ARE
PREDOMINATELY SANDY. TOPOGRAPHY IS RELATIVELY FLAT.
THE EXISTING STREAM AT PIPE "A" IS SUFFICIENT TO CARRY ADDITIONAL WATER.
CLEARING WILL BE CONFINED TO THE ROAD RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND THE COMMUNITY
AREA. LOTS WILL BE CLEARED ON AN AS-BUILT BASIS BY HOUSING CONTRACTORS.
DRAINAGE FROM A PORTION OF THE LOTS WILL CONTINUE IN EXISTING PATTERNS.
THE REMAINDER WILL BE DIRECTED AS SHOWN AND ROUTED TO CREEKS.
ALL DISTURBED AREAS WILL BE SEEDED AND MULCHED PER ENCLOSED
SPECIFICATIONS. CALCULATIONS FOR PIPE DISCHARGES ARE ENCLOSED.

CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE
1. OBTAIN PLAN APPROVAL
2. INSTALL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
3 . INSTALL TEMPORARY MEASURES
4. CLEAR ROADWAYS
5 . INSTALL ROADS
6 . SEED AND MULCH

� aca�
. �2CSiat`Nri„ � l3 � IZ c�t�s c • O� SU
0. V° c4C-3
13, d � A<,?C3
700
� 13 , 1z o.z
C. I A
0 0, 3
I
0
r - O. a04
l FL cLL
a� aa ,0
I
<r vp! 1.%EtiC 4

A�-FRS
r D , 2 t S
4, 20 curt
I
A
CFS
� . os c�>
< < pg
USC 7"PE Z EN �•Y p ss4 Arb2

iz rn s F�.yyn
2Csl ���i1A • V I G E /'G = 3� y�
, /
CA)
0 . 2
I
�Jsiv; n C� , Z�r n - o• 0 CD�
S O, pow
ce
- 1 , 03 x 4,2 = 4, 3? r�<

ii
1 AA
7! /1 V Ejv tNT D
II
I �
-
= CIA _
G=5
I I
� I
i
I
U.SINC A ::�4„
s - O b04 \��JJJ..JJJ
77
I
U'i, A

� 0
1
it
I 00f r`� —I ' I - IS MIU ? tir G
Q,
_ I
I I
L1s , u
� I
s = 0 , 004
-Id c.L
FPS

Table 3-3 Recommended Runoff Coefficients (7)
Description of Area Runoff Coefficients
Business
Downtown . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.70 to 0.95
Neighborhood . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.50 to 0.70
Residential
Single-family . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .•. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.30 to 0.50
Multi-units, detached . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.40 to 0.60
Multi-units, attached . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.60 to 0.75
Residential (suburban) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.25 to 0.40
Apartment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . 0.50 to 0.70
Industrial
Light . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.50 to 0.80
Heavy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.60 to 0.90
Parks, cemeteries . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0-10 to 0.25
Playgrounds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.20 to 0.35
Railroad yard . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.20 to 0.35
Unimproved . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.10 to 0.30
It often is desirable to develop a composite runoff based on the percentage of different types of.sur-
face in the drainage area. This procedure often is applied to typical "sample" blocks as a guide to selec-
ton of reasonable values of the coefficient for an entire area. Coefficients with respect to surface type
currently in use are:
Character of Surface Runoff Coefficients
Pavement
Asphalt and Concrete . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.70 to 0.95
Brick . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.70 to 0.85
Roofs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.75 to 0.95
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Lawns, sandy soil
Flat, 2 percent . . . . ... . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.13 to 0.17
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Average, 2 to 7 percent . . . . . . . , .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.18 to 0.22
Steep, 7 percent . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.25 to 0.35

H (FT.)
500
400 Ta (M IN.) .
200
300 EXAMPLE
Height = 100 Ft. 150
200 Length = 3,000Ft.
t~il Time of concentration =14Min. 100
J 150
~ .80
L (FT.)
100
w \ 10,000 60
O \ \ Ex 50
an \ \P�F z 40
Fa— 50 ` \ 5,000 0 30
40
z \ �w c 25 30
G � 0 20
w Note: . \ z
~0 20 Use nomograph Tr for natural 2,000 .W 15
basins with well defined channels, p . 1,500 z
for overland flow on bare z O
� v earth,ond for mowed grass road- 1,000 10
c~n 10 side channels . z O 8
CFor overland flow, grassed sur- � w
w faces, multiply Tc by 2. 6
O 5 For overland flow, concrete or iE 500 5
4 asphalt surfaces , multiply Ta ' 4
c� by 0.4. x 300
3 For concrete channels, multiply '
Tc by 0.2 . 200
2 150 2
100
1
l
Based on study by P.Z. Kirpich,
Civil Engineering, Vol.10, No.6, June 1940, p. 362

�� 71 /Tl.__. , r r r t -r_
/ N
11
� Y" — - - — —
l �
'O _ •
O r .li ♦
P / T N •
�nOA v11 tJu7H1 hr AJrt HJI Hr 11�JHr�M

108 3. STORM DRAINAGE
Table 3-12 Effective Absolute Roughness and Friction Formula
Coefficients (7) .
Conduit Material Manningn (ft'/6)
Closed conduits
Asbestos-cement pipe Brick 0.011-0.015 Cast iron pipe 0.013-0.017
Uncoated (new)
Asphalt dipped (new) —_
Cement-lined & seal coated 0.011.0.015
Concrete (monolithic)
Smooth forms 0
Rough forms .012-0.014
Concrete pipe 0.015.0.017
Plastic pipe (smooth) 0.011.0.015
Vitrified clay 0.011.0.015
Pipes 0.011.0.015
Liner plates
Open channels 0.013-0.017
Lined channels
a. Asphalt 0.013-0.017
b. Brick 0.0- 18
0.012
c. Concrete 0.012
d. Rubble or riprap 0.011 0.018
-0.020
e. Vegetal 0.030-0.40
35
Excavated or dredged ,
Earth, straight and uniform 0.020-0.030
Earth, winding, fairly uniform Rock 0.025-0.040 Unmaintained 0.030.0.0450.050-0.14
Natural Channels (minor streams, top width at flood stage < 100 ft.)
Fairly regular section 0.03 -0.07
Irregular section with pools 0.04 -0.10
Table 3-13 Values of Coefficient of Roughness (n) for
Standard Corrugated Steel Pipe (Manning's Formula)*
Helical
Annular 11/2x'/4 in
2
Corrugations 2/3 z 1/2 in (11,12) 2% x 1/2 in (13)
All 8" 10" 12" 18" 24" 36" 48"
Diameters 60" and Larger
Unpaved .024 .012 .014 .011 .014 .016 .019 .020 .021
25% Paved .021 .015 .017 .020 .021
Fully Paved 012 19
.012 .012 .012 .012
Annular Helical — 3 x 1 in
3 x 1 in 48" 54" 60" 66" 72" 1 78" and Larger

HYDRA ULIC DESIGN 105.
1.500 -r 2.400 0.004-C 0.5 0.4
_ -Z.000 0-30.005
1.000 1,500 1 0.6 0.2
0.006
800 0.007 i
6u^0 i 1'000 0.008-L 0.7
500 300 0.009 0.1
�F 0.01 f 0.8 0.C8
400 z jpp 0.9
300
Z-400 1.0 _ .0.04
Z0 -` a.a3
200 300 0.02 _
r`
200 IS v a 0.02
Y
100 Z 0.03,
0.01
80 10-u 0.04- r 0.008
6 100 9
0 n a "
96 a a
0.10 0.05 ;. 0.006
50 r 80 84 7 O.Ci m 0.005
�., d0 J_-- 60 72 5 1 •0.06 0 J-2 W r 0.004
cp 72 0 .
.05'
0003
30 �-r c 60 = 5 0.040.W
c } N u 54 N0.030.C9 ix .3.002
'42 -1 a�i 0.02 r c
c �a
r20 = cj_Y3` mF/5 _r3 N 0.001
S jo r }$
s 30 Q. D\` / N a.ato a p.000a
E to 7 0 27, ?� o.00a u3- Z
u 0.0006
a t c _ 2Q_ I \ 0.006
0.0005
V 5 a _ n IS 03 r\ 0.0003
3 Y T .o 2
6 'p 15 0.4 5 0.0002
3 { 12 0.5t
4
2 j 3 10 0.5 6 0.0001
0.7- 0.00008
{ 8 0.8{ 7 0.00006
- 2 0.�-Z 8 0.00005
1.0$. 6 - - 0.00004
0.3 m r 9 0.00003 .
{
0.6 "o 4 c 10 0.00002
_
0.5 � 0.8
r 2�
0.4 0.6 d
03 0.5 ,u 0.00001
0.4 2 3 0.00000a -
15 0.000006
0.2 _ 03 4- 0.000005 -
_ 0.000004
0.13= 0.2 518
Alignment chart for energy loss in pipes, for Manning's formula.
Note: Use chart for flow computations, HL=S

OPEN CHANNEL FLOW 5-25
Appendix C: Circular Channel Ratios
Experiments have shown that n varies slightly with depth. This fig-
ure gives velocity and flow rate ratios for varying n (solid line) and
constant n (broken line) assumptions.
N
r
r \
I
O
m
a
m \
\ m
� \ O
\ ^ CI
c
z \
a \ c
t A`__..
\ O >
m C \ O >
\
c m
o ` 1=
U
C5 U
\
I \ C
I \ O
I \
I m `
t `♦
� ♦ O
C � N
O
C
_ M C
w C
N ` .�-
O O
m \
J
m _ _
>
O m M n O U0 Q M N 17O
O O O O O O O O O
ratio of depth to diameter d/D
PROFESSIONAL PUBLICATIONS INC. •P.O. Box 199,San Carlos,CA 94070

FINANCIAL RESPONSIB:LIT./Cler ERSH7I FORM
SEEDIPENTATION POLLUTION CONTROL ACT
No person may initiate any land-disturbing activity covered by the
Act before this form has been completed and filed with the Land Quality
Section, N. C. Department of Natural Resources and Community Development.
(Please type or print and, if question is not applicable, place N/A in the
blank. )
Part A.
1. Location of land-distur`-inc acti•:ity? Count., CARTERET
C , Ca
ar Township _ MORRIMON and =ichway/Street SR 1300
2. Aporoximate date land-disturbing activity will be commenced? 10-15-89
3 . Purpose of develcoment ( residential, commercial, industrial,
etc. )? RESIDENTIAL
4. Approximate acreage of land to be disturbed or uncovered? 9 . 5
r
5: Has an erosion and sedimentation control plan been filed?
Yes X No
6. Land owner(s) of Record (Use blank pace to list additional
owners. ) :
CANAL WOOD CORP _
Name Name
810 WASHINGTON POST ROAD
Current Mailing Address Current Mailing Address
NEW BERN, N , C . 28560
City State Zip Ci t-Y State Zip
( 919) 637-6799
Telephone Number Telephone Nu:ber
7. Indicate County, Book, and Page where deed or instrument is
filed (Use blank page to list additional deeds or instruments) :
County CARTERET Book 132 Page 298
County - Book Page

Part B.
1. ?erscn(s) or f_=,(s) w;.o is financially responsible for this
land-C:____.._nc cc=_. _
PATTEN CAROLINA LAND, INC .
Same of ?error. cr . __... Naze of Person or Firm
P .O . BOX 478
Mailing Address Mailing Address
WRIGHTSVILLE BEACH, N . C . 28480
Cite State zip City State Zip
(919) 256-8818
__zphcnz Telephcne
Register__ agent, if an:, for the person or firm _s ling.. _seer
responsible:.
DAVID DICKEY- WRIGHTSVILLE BEACH, N . C . 28480
Name City state Zip
P .O . BOX 478 (919) 256-8818
Nailing Address Telephone
3. The above information is true and correct to the best of m_v knowledge
and belief and was provided by me while under oath. (This form must
be signed by the financially responsible person if an individual and
by an officer, director, partner, attorney-in-fact, or other person
with authority to execute instruments for the financially responsible
rscn = not an individual. )
DAVID L . DICKEY
;,ate Type cr ?ri nt, Name
GENERAL MANAGER
Title or Authority
X oz
Signature
1, NITA JOHNSON , a Notary ?ublic of the county of CRAVEN
State of North Carolina, hereby certify that personally
before me thIS da_ and under oath acknowledged tha= the above f_= was
executed by him.
witness my hand and notarial seal, this 19th d- c:
SEPTEMBER , 19 89
Notary
N Itit/tflq��
My Commission expire_ MAY 20, 1991 . a�9�'p-V"0/ ��4y
NOTARY
y
s 9 PUBLI
cou