410016_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20240528

Division of Water Resources
Facility Number 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: ®Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: C)Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: "`4'; Arrival Time:JL�.'!�Oqwij Departure Time: i® County: I �( Region: VQO
Farm Name: Owner Email: hl, nl��r� �C.�'aYr�►�a�Q�1 ,(-,;,wl
Owner Name: j .(`f � ) Phone:
Mailing Address: V.-ye„Tel , As f Z"12�� •
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: a t,; \11��t o l,l. Title: a �9_:+� Phone: ii;
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: Certification Number: °;.1 'C•
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: :`)-4' fj}% Longitude:
fij,I,Aj �z 7� '+c1wy I.Q/ I t x i, °,✓;a`r -- ` 11,;�-�,w:ii �il
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer DairyCow
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder Dry Poultry Capacity Pop. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish I Layers 113eef Stocker
Gilts i 1;G `I Non-Layers Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets 113eef Brood Cow
Turkeys
Other Turkey Poults
Other HOther
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes _qNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes R�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes 'NNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

Facili Number: -,it - Date of Inspection: 1-j'2,0,
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes �ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes gNo ❑ NA 0 NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes A No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? l nit y"aAve
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes -ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No �NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes �Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes EF�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations(use additional pages as necessary).
&xA 2b2-4
�-�n o sli d cLcaft cn oA--h ruse,cf ,o%X- on
S1neer uWed �D Oean up Uecfeio,w) on 5 Ur`n1�(�,r11LYlnevl'�S.
V? ho t%WeS W N'_V1- � k-- .y .e aF
U> S a � wi Mtn ,rrv�,+ vie�,t
2 13/Z4
a- i1 2. Tp
Reviewer/Inspector Name: LY�SAeA\r;,,n/b�C' Phone: ►✓'��a
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: r' Date:
Page 3 of 3 21412015

Facili Number: ` - I L.Z I Date of Inspection: -
Waste Collection &Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes,is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes T❑1No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in): 2" r%
Observed Freeboard(in): Z"
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes�allo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion,seepage,etc.) /
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes>No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement? /�
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes�qNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): � G1Vf3�S�
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes-0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA 0 NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes `&a'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ANo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records &Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes ANo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement?if yes, eek
c93 ❑ Yes'o No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Waste Application Weekly Freeboard Waste Analysis Soil Analysis ❑��.. ors orsJ71rWeather Code
'EZRainfall tocking` Crop Yield ' I ly
N Minute Inspections Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑s =y` l
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes );�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No 'aNA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued