Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNC0005363_Table 2-1 Potential Vertical Gradients Between Hydrostratigraphic Units_20160201TABLE 2-1 POTENTIAL VERTICAL GRADIENTS BETWEEN HYDROSTRATIGRAPHIC UNITS DECEMBER 2015 W. H. WEATHERSPOON POWER PLANT DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS, LLC, LUMBERTON, NC Well ID Date Depth to Water (TOC) Water Level Elevation (feet MSL) Center of Screen Elevation) (Feet MSL) Vertical z Gradient (foot per foot) Directionz BW -01 12/14/2015 6.93 135.89 127.00 - - CW -01 12/14/2015 4.11 112.73 104.70 - - CW -02 12/14/2015 4.73 108.68 100.70 - - CW -03 12/14/2015 4.58 114.50 106 - - MW -01 12/14/2015 12.72 136.47 165.50 - - MW -02 12/14/2015 2.37 112.85 88.00 0.0222 Downward MW -03 12/14/2015 3.01 112.51 103.30 - - MW -04 12/14/2015 4.38 109.52 86.00 0.0039 Downward MW -05 12/14/2015 3.74 109.58 101.40 - - MW -06 12/14/2015 3.59 108.43 102.70 - - MW -07 12/14/2015 2.74 109.87 77.85 0.0579 Downward MW -08S 12/15/2015 Dry <137 142.40 MW -08I 12/14/2015 29.18 132.12 102.94 - - MW -08D 12/14/2015 51.91 109.74 68.20 0.6442 Downward MW -33S 12/14/2015 - NM 119.90 - - MW -33I 12/14/2015 - NM 84.30 - - MW -33D 12/14/2015 - NM 58.70 - - MW -44S 12/14/2015 Dry <130 135.50 - - MW -41I 12/15/2015 6.41 119.92 97.30 - MW -41D 12/16/2015 18.16 108.18 48.30 0.2396 Downward ABMW-01 12/14/2015 19.68 134.93 119.73 - - MW-44SA 12/14/2015 23.49 131.08 111.81 0.4861 - MW -44I 12/14/2015 23.43 130.97 100.50 0.0097 - MW -44D 12/14/2015 47.08 106.86 69.30 0.7728 Downward MW -49I 12/14/2015 22.99 122.58 95.98 - - MW -49D 12/14/2015 37.20 108.20 63.80 0.4469 Downward MW -52 12/14/2015 - NM 92.20 - - MW -53I 12/14/2015 3.96 113.06 87.77 - - MW -53D 12/14/2015 9.39 107.63 62.00 0.2107 Downward MW -54D 12/14/2015 11.56 102.15 46.60 - - MW -55I 12/14/2015 2.83 109.05 90.88 - - MW -55D 12/14/2015 8.76 103.10 44.36 0.1279 Downward PZ -01 12/14/2015 - NM 123.10 - - PZ -02 12/14/2015 - NM 118.90 - - PZ -03 12/14/2015 - NM 115.00 - - AW -01S 12/14/2015 12.11 119.53 111.80 - - AW -01I 12/14/2015 14.94 116.67 85.08 0.1070 Downward AW -01D 12/14/2015 22.21 109.36 62.32 0.3212 Downward AW -02S 12/14/2015 11.57 116.96 106.37 - - AW -02I 12/14/2015 17.35 110.91 84.71 0.2793 Downward AW -02D 12/14/2015 20.96 107.36 69.77 0.2376 Downward AW -03S 12/14/2015 4.09 108.78 101.42 - - AW -03I 12/14/2015 4.42 108.78 94.66 0.0000 Neither AW -03D 12/14/2015 6.44 106.62 65.90 0.0751 Downward BW -02S 12/14/2015 8.18 132.15 119.43 - - BW -02I 12/14/2015 9.13 130.71 83.34 0.0399 Downward BW -02D 12/14/2015 28.97 111.03 67.80 1.2664 Downward BW -03S 12/14/2015 4.53 105.74 98.66 - - BW -03I 12/14/2015 4.21 105.83 92.59 0.0148 Downward BW -03D 12/14/2015 1.18 108.72 64.19 0.1018 Downward OW -01 12/14/2015 Dry <134.7 139.20 - - OW -03 12/14/2015 Dry <135.2 140.20 - - OW -08 12/14/2015 Dry <137.9 142.90 - - OW -09 12/14/2015 - 124.50 - - OB -01 12/14/2015 - NM 94.50 - - OB -02 12/14/2015 - NM 94.60 - - 11 Prepared by: KDB Checked by: TCP 'Middle of screen 2Vertical gradients calculated for Lower Yorktown and Pee Dee wells only NM: Not Measured P:\Duke Energy Progress. 1026\109. Weatherspoon Ash Basin GW Assessment Plan\20.EG_CAP\CAP Part 2\Tables\Table 2-1 Potential Vertical Gradients Between Hydrostratigraphic Units Page 1 of 1