NC0005363_App C UNCC Sorption Factors_20160201

Corrective Action Plan Part 2 February 2016
W.H. Weatherspoon Power Plant
APPENDIX C
UPDATED SORPTION FACTORS
SynTerra
P:\ Duke Energy Progress.1026 \ 109. Weatherspoon Ash Basin GW Assessment Plan \ 20.EG_CAP \ CAP Part
2\ Weatherspoon CAP Part 2 February 2016.docx

UNC CHARLOTTE
Addendum to Soil Sorption Evaluation
Weatherspoon Steam Station
Robeson County, NC
Prepared for:
Synterra
148 River Road Suite 220
Greenville SC 29601
Investigators:
William G. Langley, Ph.D., P.E.
Dongwook Kim, Ph.D.
UNC Charlotte / Lee College of Engineering
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
EPIC Building 3252
9201 University City Blvd.
Charlotte, NC 28223
January 26, 2016

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 Background.........................................................................................................................1
2 Results................................................................................................................................1
3 Comments and Recommendations..................................................................................... 1
4 References......................................................................................................................... 3

TABLES
Table 1. Arsenic
Table 2
Boron
Table 3
Cobalt
Table 4
Molybdenum
Table 5
Nickel
Table 6
Vanadium
FIGURES
(See Tables 1-6 for figure numbers)

Background
This addendum provides three sorption isotherm equations for batch data analyzed and initially
reported in the Soil Sorption Evaluation for Weatherspoon Steam Station (Langley and Oza
2015). The isotherm model equations are:
Linear: S = KdC
Linear with So > 0: S = KdC + So
Freundlich: S = KfC'm
where S is the constituent concentration on soil (ug/g), Kd is the linear sorption coefficient (ml/g),
C is the constituent concentration in water (ug/1), So is the soil concentration at C = 0, n is the
unitless Freundlich exponent, and Kf is the Freundlich constant (I'/nug('-'/n)/g). The parameters
Kd, So, Kf, and n are estimated using linear regressions on the sorption data. The parameter So
represents that portion of constituent concentration on the soil that is sorbed irreversibly.
2 Results
Results are provided in Tables 1 through 6 by constituent and sample. The results include
parameter estimates and indicators of the goodness -of -fit of the resulting model equations to the
sorption data.
3 Comments and Recommendations
In addition to the general comments and qualifiers offered in the original report, the following
comments and recommendations are provided.
For the fate and transport model, the range of sorption estimates (maximum and minimum)
should be used as the upper and lower limits for selecting a calibrated value that is consistent
with measured constituents.
For a specific constituent and sample, the isotherm model with the minimum chi-square value
best represents the lab data in its arithmetic form.
Linear isotherms with So < 0 are considered not applicable because they imply negative soil
concentrations (S) as constituent concentration (C) approaches zero.
For linear isotherms with So > 0, the y -intercept So is assumed to represent irreversible sorption
as opposed to previous exposure to the constituent in the field which is manifested as a
negative -sloping or irregular isotherm as would have been noted in the original report.

Freundlich isotherms with n < 1 are considered not applicable because they are not concave
downward (Freundlich 1924).
For constituents not considered for Weatherspoon, sorption values may be transferable from
other sites with similar geochemical settings, or may be estimated using site-specific data from
the Comprehensive Site Assessment in a geochemical model.

4 References
Freundlich H. 1924. The Elements of Colloidal Chemistry, translated by George Barger. Dutton
and Company Publishers: New York, NY, pp. 58-61.
Langley, W.G. and Oz, Shubhashini. Soil Sorption Evaluation for Weatherspoon Steam Station,
UNC -Charlotte, October 2015.
Ho, Yuh-Shan, Wen -Ta Chiu, and Chung -Chi Wang. "Regression analysis for the sorption
isotherms of basic dyes on sugarcane dust." Bioresource technology 96.11 (2005): 1285-1291.
Matott, L. Shawn, IsoFit Documentation and User's Guide Version 1.2, State University of New
York at Buffalo Department of Civil, Structural and Environmental Engineering Version 1.2,
updated 01 /18/07.
3

Table 1 Arsenic
Linear So=O
Kd
Linear So>O
Kd So
No.
data points
Maximum 0.611
Trial A
Linear Isotherm, So = 0
Trial B
0.042 0.308
0.090 0.553
Trial A
Linear isotherm, So > 0
Trial B
Trial A
Freundlich isotherm
Trial B
Well ID
Trial A Trial B
Kd
1/g
2
R
-
2
Kd
ug/g 1/g
2
R
-
2
Ng/g
Kd
1/g
2
Sa R
Ng/g -
2
Kd
ug/g 1/g
So
2
R
2
Kf
Ng/g (c)
2
1/n R
- -
2
Kf
Ng/g (c)
2
1/n R
- -
2 Fig. Nos.
Ng/g
ug/g
ABMW - 1
5 5
0.047
0.827
2.736 0.064
0.975
0.441
0.042
0.308 1 0.597
1.587
(d)
0.247
0.553 0.745
2.224 0.090
0.867 0.854
0.682 1,2
AW
- 1
5 5
0.195
0.952
0.777 0.182
0.976
0.406 1
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
3,4
AW
- 2
3 3
0.120
0.997
0.013 0.122
0.997
0.010
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
5,6
AW
- 3
5 5
0.035
0.638
5.045 0.043
0.759
2.987
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
7,8
BW
- 2 (2-7)
5 5
0.195
0.952
0.777 0.182
0.976
0.406
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
9,10
BW
- 2 (12-13.5)
5 5
0.092
0.831
2.436 0.090
0.858
2.093
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
11,12
BW
- 3
1 5 5
0.572
0.897
1.750 0.611
0.937 1
1.293
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
13,14
Linear So=O
Kd
Linear So>O
Kd So
Freundlich
Kf 1/n
Maximum 0.611
0.042 0.308
0.247 0.867
Minimum 0.035
0.042 0.308
0.090 0.553
Median 0.121
0.042 0.308
0.168 0.710
Notes
a. Coefficient of determination (R2) indicates goodness of fit of individual isotherm to its linear regression (Ho et al. 2005).
b. Minimum chi-square (X2) indicates best fit of three isotherms in arithmetic form (Ho et al. 2005).
c. units: l(1/n)pg(1-1M)/g
d. Not applicable for So<0 or Kd<0 from linear regression.
e. Not applicable for (1/n)>1 or Kf<0 from linear regression (Matott 2007).
f. For all C<MDL (method detection limit), estimate a minimum Kd using C = MDL at lowest soil -to -solution ratio.
g. Isotherm data not available.

Table 2 Boron
Linear So=O
Kd
Linear So>O
Kd So
No.
data points
Maximum 0.005
Trial A
Linear Isotherm, So = 0
Trial B
0.0008 0.042
0.001 0.703
Trial A
Linear isotherm, So > 0
Trial B
Trial A
Freundlich isotherm
Trial B
Well ID
Trial A Trial B
Kd
I/g
2
R
-
2
Kd
ug/g 1/g
2
R
-
2
Ng/g
Kd
1/g
Sa
2
R
2
Kd
So
2
R
2
Kf
1/n
2
R
2
Kf
1/n
2
R
2 Fig. Nos.
Ng/g
Ng/g
ug/g 1/g
ug/g
I -
Ng/g (c)
Ng/g (c)
ABMW - 1
5 5
0.005
0.952
0.329 0.005
0.965
0.262
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
15,16
AW
- 1
5 5
0.001
0.964
0.101 0.001
0.978
0.064
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
17,18
AW
- 2
4 5
0.0003
1 0.891
0.084 0.0003 1
0.607
0.598
(d)
(d)
(e)
0.002
0.703 1 0.001
0.868 19,20
AW
- 3
0 0
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
-
BW
- 2 (2-7)
5 5
0.001
0.964
0.104 0.001
0.978
0.065
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
21,22
BW
- 2 (12-13.5)
4 4
0.001
0.976
0.024 0.000
0.806
0.200
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
23,24
BW
3
5 5
0.001
0.931
0.149 0.001
0.970
0.064
0.001
0.042 0.111
0.149
(d)
0.001
0.932 0.161
0.155
(e)
25,26
Linear So=O
Kd
Linear So>O
Kd So
Freundlich
Kf 1/n
Maximum 0.005
0.001 0.042
0.002 0.932
Minimum 0.0003
0.0008 0.042
0.001 0.703
Median 0.001
0.001 0.042
0.002 0.817
Notes
a. Coefficient of determination (R2) indicates goodness of fit of individual isotherm to its linear regression (Ho et al. 2005).
b. Minimum chi-square (X2) indicates best fit of three isotherms in arithmetic form (Ho et al. 2005).
c. units: l(1/n)pg(1-1M)/g
d. Not applicable for So<0 or Kd<0 from linear regression.
e. Not applicable for (1/n)>1 or Kf<0 from linear regression (Matott 2007).
f. For all C<MDL (method detection limit), estimate a minimum Kd using C = MDL at lowest soil -to -solution ratio.
g. Isotherm data not available.

Table 3 Cobalt
Linear So=O
Kd
Linear So>O
Kd So
No.
data points
Maximum 0.466
Trial A
Linear Isotherm, So = 0
Trial B
0.0003 0.097
0.005 0.009
Median 0.003
Trial A
Linear isotherm, So > 0
Trial B
Trial A
Freundlich isotherm
Trial B
Well ID
Trial A
Trial B
Kd
1/g
R 2
z
Kd
R 2
z
Kd
S.
R 2
z
Kd
So
R z
2
Kf
1/n
R 2
2
N9/g
Kf
(c)
1/n
-
R 2
-
z
Ng/g
Fig. Nos.
ug/g 1/g - Ng/g 1/g
N9/g
ug/g 1/g ug/g - Ng/g (c)
ABMW 1
0
4
(g)
0.014
0.798
3.976
(g)
0.007
0.452
0.957
0.017
(g)
0.285
0.282
0.947
0.013
-,27
AW
- 1
4
4
0.003
0.867
0.205
0.003
0.908
0.137
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
28,29
AW
- 2
4
3
0.240
0.986
0.110
0.466
0.997
0.073
0.214
0.123
1 0.958
1 0.042
0.452
0.097 1
0.996
1 0.052
0.344
1 0.762 0.949
0.053
0.507
0.972
0.972
0.054
30,31
AW
- 3
4
5
0.013
0.740
1.469
0.004
0.490
4.242
(d)
(d)
(e)
0.488
0.009
0.0002
0.955
32,33
BW
- 2 (2-7)
4
4
0.003
0.867
0.205
0.003
0.908
0.138
(d)
0.001
0.146 1
0.492
1 0.012
(e)
0.005
0.955
0.029
0.241
34,35
BW
- 2 (12-13.5)
4
4
0.002
0.889
0.122
0.002
0.978
0.029
(d)
0.0009
0.15
0.49
0.04
(e)
0.03
0.47
0.45
0.01
36,37
BW
- 3
1 4
4 1
0.001
1 0.909
1 0.069
0.001
0.980
0.019
0.0004
1 0.134
1 0.020
1 0.066
0.0003
0.132 1
0.187
1 0.007 1
0.133
1 0.063 1 0.001
0.074
0.058
0.229
0.120 1
0.074
1 38,39
Linear So=O
Kd
Linear So>O
Kd So
Freundlich
Kf 1/n
Maximum 0.466
0.452 0.452
0.507 0.972
Minimum 0.001
0.0003 0.097
0.005 0.009
Median 0.003
0.001 0.134
0.209 0.376
Notes
a. Coefficient of determination (R2) indicates goodness of fit of individual isotherm to its linear regression (Ho et al. 2005).
b. Minimum chi-square (X2) indicates best fit of three isotherms in arithmetic form (Ho et al. 2005).
c. units: l(1/n)pg(1-1M)/g
d. Not applicable for So<0 or Kd<0 from linear regression.
e. Not applicable for (1/n)>1 or Kf<0 from linear regression (Matott 2007).
f. For all C<MDL (method detection limit), estimate a minimum Kd using C = MDL at lowest soil -to -solution ratio.
g. Isotherm data not available.

Table 4 Molybdenum
Linear So=O
Kd
Linear So>O
Kd So
No.
data points
Maximum 0.228
Trial A
Linear Isotherm, So = 0
Trial B
0.023 0.627
0.155 0.378
Trial A
0.038 1.557
Linear isotherm, So > 0
Trial B
Trial A
Freundlich isotherm
Trial B
Well ID
Trial A
Trial B
Kd
1/g
2
R
-
2
ug/g
Kd
1/g
2
R
-
2
Ng/g
Kd
I/g
Sa
2
R
2
Kd
So
2
R
2
Kt
1/n
2
R
2
Kf
1/n
2
R
2
Ng/g
Fig. Nos.
Ng/g
Ng/g 1/g
ug/g
Ng/g (c)
Ng/g (c)
ABMW - 1
4
4
0.002
0.438
5.444
0.002
0.240
30.612
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
40,41
AW
- 1
5
5
0.059
0.892
38.486
0.044
0.793
69.145
0.045
1.583
0.957
0.540
0.032
1.926
0.879
1.353
1.035
0.386
0.959
0.309
1.126
0.378
0.990
0.099
42,43
AW
- 2
3
3
0.054
0.934
0.759
0.058
0.935
0.822
0.028
0.815
1.000
0.000
0.031
0.811
0.998
0.001
0.418
0.414
0.985
0.004
0.451
0.401
0.969
0.010
44,45
AW
- 3
5
4
0.0281
0.971
2.783
0.0327
0.986
0.855
0.023
0.804
0.989
0.061
0.029
0.627
0.979
0.100
0.225
0.589
0.978
0.196
0.155
0.686
0.968
0.202
46,47
BW
- 2 (2-7)
5
5
0.0587
0.892
38.486
0.0441
0.793
69.145
0.045
1.583
0.957
0.540
0.032
1.926
0.879
1.353
1.035
0.386
0.959
0.309
1.126
0.378
0.990
0.099
48,49
BW
- 2 (12-13.5)
5
5
0.132
0.947
9.893
0.143
0.921
13.897
0.111
1.129
0.948
0.977
0.116
1.531
0.968
0.599
0.817
0.505
0.764
1.735
0.942
0.546
0.997
0.019
50,51
BW
- 3
1 4
4
0.222
0.940
9.686
0.228
0.939
8.469 1
0.178
1.705 1
0.984
1 0.249
0.182
1.706 1
0.981
1 0.297 1
1.240
0.533 1
0.996
1 0.025 1
1.164
0.561 1
1.000
0.002
1 52,53
Linear So=O
Kd
Linear So>O
Kd So
Freundlich
Kf 1/n
Maximum 0.228
0.182 1.926
1.240 0.686
Minimum 0.0021
0.023 0.627
0.155 0.378
Median 0.056
0.038 1.557
0.989 0.460
Notes
a. Coefficient of determination (R2) indicates goodness of fit of individual isotherm to its linear regression (Ho et al. 2005).
b. Minimum chi-square (X2) indicates best fit of three isotherms in arithmetic form (Ho et al. 2005).
c. units: l(1/n)pg(1-1M)/g
d. Not applicable for So<0 or Kd<0 from linear regression.
e. Not applicable for (1/n)>1 or Kf<0 from linear regression (Matott 2007).
f. For all C<MDL (method detection limit), estimate a minimum Kd using C = MDL at lowest soil -to -solution ratio.
g. Isotherm data not available.

Table 5 Nickel
Linear So=O
Kd
Linear So>O
Kd So
No.
data points
Maximum 0.064
Trial A
Linear Isotherm, So = 0
Trial B
0.016 0.074
0.028 0.498
Trial A
Linear isotherm, So > 0
Trial B
Trial A
Freundlich isotherm
Trial B
Well ID
Trial A Trial B
Kd
1/g
2
R
2
Kd
2
R
2
Kd
S.
2
R
2
Kd
So
2
R
2
Kt
1/n
2
R
2
Kf
1/n
2
R
2 Fig. Nos.
Ng/g
ug/g 1/g
Ng/g I/g
Ng/g
ug/g 1/g
ug/g
Ng/g (c)
N9/g (c)
ABMW - 1
0 0
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
AW
- 1
4 4
0.004
0.953
0.070 0.004
0.941
0.097 1
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
54,55
AW
- 2
4 0
0.064
0.835
7.528
(g)
0.045
0.785 1 0.882
1 0.450
(g)
0.469
0.498 1 0.882
0.296
(g)
56, -
AW
- 3
5 5
0.028
0.715
2.170 0.0173
0.863
1.249
(d)
0.016
0.074 1 0.539
1 1.162
(e)
0.028
1 0.845 1 0.270
1 1.426 57,58
BW
- 2 (2-7)
4 4
0.004
0.953
0.070 0.004
0.941
0.097
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
59,60
BW
- 2 (12-13.5)
5 5
0.007
0.991
0.040 0.007
0.990
0.041
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
61,62
BW
- 3
1 5 5 1
0.003
1 0.938
0.120 0.003
0.951
0.093
(d)
(d)
I
(e)
(e)
63,64
Linear So=O
Kd
Linear So>O
Kd So
Freundlich
Kf 1/n
Maximum 0.064
0.045 0.785
0.469 0.845
Minimum 0.0028
0.016 0.074
0.028 0.498
Median 0.004
0.031 0.429
0.248 0.672
Notes
a. Coefficient of determination (R2) indicates goodness of fit of individual isotherm to its linear regression (Ho et al. 2005).
b. Minimum chi-square (X2) indicates best fit of three isotherms in arithmetic form (Ho et al. 2005).
c. units: l(1/n)pg(1-1M)/g
d. Not applicable for So<0 or Kd<0 from linear regression.
e. Not applicable for (1/n)>1 or Kf<0 from linear regression (Matott 2007).
f. For all C<MDL (method detection limit), estimate a minimum Kd using C = MDL at lowest soil -to -solution ratio.
g. Isotherm data not available.

Table 6 Vanadium
Linear So=O
Kd
Linear So>0
Kd So
No.
data points
Maximum 0.234
Trial A
Linear Isotherm, So = 0
Trial B
0.031 0.050
0.133 0.538
Trial A
0.092 0.376
Linear isotherm, So > 0
Trial B
Trial A
Freundlich isotherm
Trial B
Well ID
Trial A
Trial B
Kd
1/g
R z
-
z
ug/g
Kd
1/g
R z
-
z
ug/g
Kd
1/g
So
R z
z
Kd
So
R z
z
K,
1/n
R z
z
Kr
1/n
R z
z
ug/g
Fig. Nos.
Ng/g
Ng/g 1/g
Ng/g
Pg/g (c)
Ng/g (c)
ABMW - 1
4
3
0.018
0.806
0.917
0.024
0.709
1.341
(d)
(d)
(e)
(e)
65,66
AW -
1
5
5
0.107
0.977
2.624
0.093
0.928
5.446 1
0.092
0.452
0.995
0.049
0.075
0.706
0.974
0.224
0.440
0.568
0.942
0.288
0.479
0.570
0.974
0.056
67,68
AW -
2
4
4
0.048
0.863
4.989
0.130
0.997
0.158
0.033
0.952
0.889
0.464
0.125
0.148
0.997
0.042
0.333
0.568
0.906
0.283 1
0.202
0.859
0.970
0.070
69,70
AW -
3
5
3
0.039
0.934
2.514
0.068
0.960
0.391
0.031
0.584
0.962
0.171
0.054
0.301
0.814
0.124
0.230
0.593
0.980
0.058
0.271
0.538
0.777
0.161
71,72
BW -
2 (2-7)
5
5
0.107
0.977
2.624
0.093
0.928
5.446
0.092
0.452
0.995
0.049
0.075
0.706
0.974
0.224
0.440
0.568
0.942
0.288
0.479
0.570
0.974
0.056
73,74
BW -
2 (12-13.5)
5
5
0.119
0.996
0.137
0.114
0.986
0.239
0.117
0.050
0.991
0.122
0.107
0.194
0.974
0.218
0.133
0.964
0.957
0.124
(e)
75,76
BW -
3
5
5
0.226
0.992
0.173
0.234
0.995 1
0.115
0.210
0.263 1
0.989
1 0.107
0.225
0.151 1
0.984
1 0.093 1
0.304
0.904 1
0.984
0.058
0.231
1.013 1
0.960
1 0.117
77,78
Linear So=O
Kd
Linear So>0
Kd So
Freundlich
Kf 1/n
Maximum 0.234
0.225 0.952
0.479 1.013
Minimum 0.018
0.031 0.050
0.133 0.538
Median 0.100
0.092 0.376
0.304 0.570
Notes
a. Coefficient of determination (R2) indicates goodness of fit of individual isotherm to its linear regression (Ho et al. 2005).
b. Minimum chi-square (X2) indicates best fit of three isotherms in arithmetic form (Ho et al. 2005).
c. units: 1("')Ng(1-'/")/g
d. Not applicable for So<0 or Kd<0 from linear regression.
e. Not applicable for (1/n)>1 or Kf<0 from linear regression (Matott 2007).
f. For all C<MDL (method detection limit), estimate a minimum Kd using C = MDL at lowest soil -to -solution ratio.
g. Isotherm data not available.

Figure 1. Arsenic Isotherms for ABMW - 1
5.0
4.5
4.0
3.5
3.0
S' 2.5
U) 2.0
1.5
1.0 •
0.5
0.0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear SO=0 linear SO>0 Freundlich

5.0
4.5
1511111
3.5
3.0
2.5
Cn 2.0
1.5
1.0
,1167
RM
Figure 2. Arsenic Isotherms for ABMW - 1
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear S0=0 Freundlich

6.0
5.0
4.0
0)
°' 3.0
2.0
Mgt
tile]
Figure 3. Arsenic Isotherms for AW - 1
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear S0=0

6.0
5.0
:1R
0)
�' 3.0
CO
2.0
1.0
1JS
Figure 4. Arsenic Isotherms for AW - 1
5 10 15 20 25 30
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear S0=0

1.4
1.2
1.0
60.8
U) 0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
Figure 5. Arsenic Isotherms for AW - 2
0 2 4 6 8 10
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear S0=0

1.4
1.2
1.0
0.8
Z
U) 0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
Figure 6. Arsenic Isotherms for AW - 2
0 2 4 6 8 10
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear S0=0

Figure 7. Arsenic Isotherms for AW - 3
5.0
•
4.5
4.0
3.5
3.0
2.5
U) 2.0
•
1.5
1.0 •
0.5 • •
0.0
0 20 40 60 80
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear S0=0

5.0
4.5
4.0
3.5
3.0
S' 2.5
U) 2.0
1.5
1.0
M
M
Figure 8. Arsenic Isotherms for AW - 3
•
20 40 60 80
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear S0=0

6.0
5.0
4.0
E' 3.0
Cn
2.0
1.0
0.0
Figure 9. Arsenic Isotherms for BW - 2 (2-7)
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear S0=0

6.0
5.0
4.0
E' 3.0
Cn
2.0
1.0
0.0
Figure 10. Arsenic Isotherms for BW - 2 (2-7)
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
C (ug/1)
MGMM:�MTSPS1M-liHl7

6.0
5.0
4.0
E' 3.0
U)
2.0
1.0
0.0
Figure 11. Arsenic Isotherms for BW - 2 (12-13.5)
0 10 20 30 40
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear S0=0

Figure 12. Arsenic Isotherms for BW - 2 (12-13.5)
5.0 •
4.0
S' 3.0
2.0 •
1.0
•
0. 0
0 10 20 30 40
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear S0=0

6.0
5.0
4.0
3.0
Cn
2.0
Mgt
NEWS
Figure 13. Arsenic Isotherms for BW - 3
•
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear S0=0

6.0
5.0
4.0
3.0
U)
2.0
=9
1jl
Figure 14. Arsenic Isotherms for BW - 3
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear S0=0

2.50
2.00
-61.50
10 1.00
0.50
0.00
Figure 15. Boron Isotherms for ABMW - 1
0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 360 400
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O

2.50
2.00
1.50
1.00
0.50
0.00
Figure 16. Boron Isotherms for ABMW - 1
•
0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 360 400
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O

1.0
0.8
0.6
U) 0.4
0.2
0.0
Figure 17. Boron Isotherms for AW - 1
Ll
100 200 300 400 500
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O

0.6
U) 0.4
0.2
0.0
Figure 18. Boron Isotherms for AW - 1
•
0 100 200 300 400 500
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O

0.5
0.4
0.3
U) 0.2
0.1
0.0
Figure 19. Boron Isotherms for AW - 2
• •
0 100 200 300 400 500
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O
•

0.5
0.4
0.3
U) 0.2
0.1
0.0
Figure 20. Boron Isotherms for AW - 2
100 200 300 400 500
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O Freundlich
•
•

1.0
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
CO 0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
Figure 21. Boron Isotherms for BW - 2 (2-7)
0 100 200 300 400 500
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O

1.0
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
U) 0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
Figure 22. Boron Isotherms for BW - 2 (2-7)
•
0 100 200 300 400 500
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O

0.3
0.3
11V:
0)
°' 0.2
U)
0.1
Mimi
oll
Figure 23. Boron Isotherms for BW - 2 (12-13.5)
0 100 200 300 400 500
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O

0.3
0.3
0)
E' 0.2
U)
0.1
t0>1il
NEW
Figure 24. Boron Isotherms for BW - 2 (12-13.5)
•
0 100 200 300 400 500
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O

0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
Figure 25. Boron Isotherms for BW - 3
•
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
Figure 26. Boron Isotherms for BW - 3
•
•
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500
C (ugh)
• Trial - B linear So=O

1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
Figure 27. Cobalt Isotherms for ABMW -
0 20 40 60 80
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

Figure 28. Cobalt Isotherms for AW - 1
0.6 •
0.5
0.4
0.3 •
cn •
0.2
•
0.1
M
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O

0.6
0.5
0.4
0' 0.3
0.2
t0II
OJI
Figure 29. Cobalt Isotherms for AW - 1
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O

Figure 30. Cobalt Isotherms for AW - 2
4.0
3.5
3.0
—2.5
rn
2.0
U) 1.5
1.0
•
0.5
0.0
0
2
4
6 8
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

4.0
3.5
3.0
—2.5
rn
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
Figure 31. Cobalt Isotherms for AW - 2
0 2 4 6 8
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

2.5
2.0
rn 1.5
0)
U) 1.0
AR
M
Figure 32. Cobalt Isotherms for AW - 3
50 100 150
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O
200

Figure 33. Cobalt Isotherms for AW - 3
2.5
KKII
1.5
U) 1.0
0.5
M
•
•
0 50 100 150 200
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O Freundlich

0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
Figure 34. Cobalt Isotherms for BW - 2 (2-7)
•
•
•
•
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O

0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0)
Cj) 0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
Figure 35. Cobalt Isotherms for BW - 2 (2-7)
•
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O Freundlich

Figure 36. Cobalt Isotherms for BW - 2 (12-13.5)
M
El

0.4
0.3
0.2
CO
t0111il
NEW
Figure 37. Cobalt Isotherms for BW - 2 (12-13.5)
0 50 100 150 200
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

0.30
0.25
0.20
0.15
U)
0.10
0.05
0.00
0
Figure 38. Cobalt Isotherms for BW - 3
50
•
100 150
C (ug/1)
•
• Trial - A linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich
200

0.30
0.25
0.15
U)
0.10
Wixom
Moll(IIII
Figure 39. Cobalt Isotherms for BW - 3
0 50 100 150 200
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

Figure 40. Molybdenum Isotherms for ABMW - 1
3.5
3.0
2.5
2.0
0) • •
U) 1.5
1.0
0.5
•
0 100 200 300 400 500
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O

3.5
3.0
2.5
2.0
U) 1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
Figure 41. Molybdenum Isotherms for ABMW - 1
•
•
•
•
0 100 200 300 400 500
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O

10.0
9.0
8.0
7.0
a, 6.0
5.0
U) 4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
Figure 42. Molybdenum Isotherms for AW - 1
0.0 50.0 100.0 150.0
C (ug/1)
Freundlich • Trial - A linear So=O linear So>O

10.0
9.0
8.0
7.0
6.0
5.0
U) 4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
Figure 43. Molybdenum Isotherms for AW - 1
0.0 50.0 100.0 150.0
C (ug/1)
Freundlich • Trial - B linear So=O linear So>O

2.5
2.0
a, 1.5
C/) 1.0
0.5
0.0
Figure 44. Molybdenum Isotherms for AW - 2
0 10 20 30 40
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

2.5
2.0
1.5
U) 1.0
0.5
0.0
Figure 45. Molybdenum Isotherms for AW - 2
0 10 20 30 40
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

7.0 �-
6.0
5.0
4.0
CO 3.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
Figure 46. Molybdenum Isotherms for AW - 3
0 50 100 150 200
C (ug/1)
Freundlich • Trial - A linear So=O linear So>O

7.0
6.0
5.0
4.0
U) 3.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
Figure 47. Molybdenum Isotherms for AW - 3
0 50 100 150 200
C (ug/1)
Freundlich • Trial - B linear So=O linear So>O

iII
6.0
CO
4.0
Figure 48. Molybdenum Isotherms for BW - 2 (2-7)
0 50 100 150
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

Figure 49. Molybdenum Isotherms for BW - 2 (2-7)
0) 6.0
4.0
2.0
0.0
0 50 100 150
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

10.0
9.0
8.0
7.0
6.0
5.0
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
Figure 50. Molybdenum Isotherms for BW - 2 (12-13.5)
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
C (ug/1)
• Trial -A linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

10.0
9.0
8.0
7.0
6.0
5.0
CO 4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
Figure 51. Molybdenum Isotherms for BW - 2 (12-13.5)
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

10.0
9.0
8.0
7.0
6.0
5.0
U) 4.0
ti
2.0
1.0
0.0
Figure 52. Molybdenum Isotherms for BW - 3
0 10 20 30 40
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

10.0
9.0
8.0
7.0
6.0
'S' 5.0
U) 4.0
0111
2.0
1.0
0.0
Figure 53. Molybdenum Isotherms for BW - 3
0 10 20 30 40
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

Figure 54. Nickel Isotherms for AW - 1
0.7
0.6 •
low
0.4
0.3 •
•
0.2
0.1
M
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O

0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
U) 0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
Figure 55. Nickel Isotherms forAW - 1
20 40 60 80 100 120
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O

3.0
2.5
- 2.0
CM
1.5
U)
1.0
0.5
0.0
Figure 56. Nickel Isotherms forAW - 2
10 20 30 40 50
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

3.0
2.5
Pat,
0)
�' 1.5
U)
1.0
WO
11M
Figure 57. Nickel Isotherms forAW - 3
20 40 60 80 100
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O

Figure 58. Nickel Isotherms for AW - 3
3.0
2.5
2.0
°' 1.5
CO •
1.0 -
0.5 •
•
0.0
0 20 40 60 80 100
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

Figure 59. Nickel Isotherms for BW - 2 (2-7)
[ON
0.6 •
0.5
0.4
U) 0.3 •
•
0.2
[IN]
M
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O

0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
Figure 60. Nickel Isotherms for BW - 2 (2-7)
•
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O

1.0
0.8
0.6
CO
0.4
0.2
1jl
Figure 61. Nickel Isotherms for BW - 2 (12-13.5)
20 40 60 80 100 120 140
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O

1.0
0.8
0.6
U)
0.4
0.2
Figure 62. Nickel Isotherms for BW - 2 (12-13.5)
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O

0.6
0.5
0.4
?' 0.3
U)
0.2
0.1
0.0
Figure 63. Nickel Isotherms for BW - 3
0 50 100 150
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O

0.4
0.3
U)
0.2
0.1
NEW
Figure 64. Nickel Isotherms for BW - 3
50 100 150
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O

2.0
1.5
0)
1.0
0.5
Figure 65. Vanadium Isotherms for ABMW - 1
0 20 40 60 80
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O

Figure 66. Vanadium Isotherms for ABMW - 1
0.5
M

5.0
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
wells]
Figure 67. Vanadium Isotherms for AW - 1
0 10 20 30 40 50
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

5.0
4.0
3.0
Z
U)
2.0
1.0
0.0
Figure 68. Vanadium Isotherms for AW - 1
0 10 20 30 40 50
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

6.0
5.0
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
Figure 69. Vanadium Isotherms for AW - 2
0.0 20.0 40.0 60.0 80.0
C (ug/1)
• Trial -A linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

12.0
10.0
�:Xf]
6.0
U)
4.0
2.0
0.0
Figure 70. Vanadium Isotherms for AW - 2
0.0 20.0 40.0 60.0 80.0
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

4.0
3.5
3.0
2.5
2.0
C/) 1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
Figure 71. Vanadium Isotherms for AW - 3
0 20 40 60 80 100
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

4.0
3.5
3.0
2.5
2.0
C/) 1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
Figure 72. Vanadium Isotherms for AW - 3
0 20 40 60 80 100
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O Freundlich linear So>0

5.0
4.0
3.0
Z
Cn
2.0
1.0
0.0
Figure 73. Vanadium Isotherms for BW - 2 (2-7)
0 10 20 30 40 50
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

5.0
4.0
3.0
U)
2.0
1.0
0.0
Figure 74. Vanadium Isotherms for BW - 2 (2-7)
0 10 20 30 40 50
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

5.0
4.0
3.0
Z
U)
2.0
1.0
0.0
Figure 75. Vanadium Isotherms for BW - 2 (12-13.5)
0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

5.0
4.0
3.0
Z
cn
2.0
1.0
0.0
Figure 76. Vanadium Isotherms for BW - 2 (12-13.5)
0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O linear So>O

5.0
4.0
3.0
U)
2.0
1.0
Figure 77. Vanadium Isotherms for BW - 3
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0
C (ug/1)
• Trial - A linear So=O linear So>0 Freundlich

5.0
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
Figure 78. Vanadium Isotherms for BW - 3
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0
C (ug/1)
• Trial - B linear So=O linear So>O
20.0