20160093 Ver 1_Application_20160127

�'�
Transportatton
January 27, 2016
US Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Attn: Mr. David Bailey
3331 Heritage Trade Dr., Ste. 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
Attention: Mr. Dave Bailey and Mr. Dave Wauucha
PAT McCRORY
Governor
NICHOLAS J. TENNYSON
Seaetaty
NC Division of Water Resources
Winston-Salem Regional Office
Attn: NL•. Dave Wanucha
450 W. Hanes Mil] Rd, Ste. 103
Winston-Salem, NC 27105
Subject: Notification for the replacement of Bridge #77 over New Hope Creek on SR
1133 (Arthur Minnis Road) in Orange County. WBS # 17BP.7.R.86
Dear Mr. Bailey and Mr. Wanucha,
The North Carolina Department of Transportation is scheduled to replace Bridge #77 with a new
bridge at Uie same location. I have included the Attachments G& L with a project description and
a set of the project plans. A stormwater management plan is also attached. Please review this
project for compliance by your Division.
We plan to begin construction as soon as possible. If further information is required, please
contact Jerry Parker at [phone]. Your early review and consideration will be appreciated.
Sincerely,
i
�'l. ��(�P-�
. Mills, P.E.
Division Engineer, Division 7
Enclosures
cc: Tim Powers, NCDOT
Barry Harrington, Roadside Environmental Field Operations Engineer
Jeremy Warren, NCDOT
Chuck Edwards, District 1, District Engineer
�Nothing Compares��_
State of Nor�h Camlina � Deparhnent of Trensportation � Division ofHighways, Division 7 0ffice
1584 Yanceyville Stree�, Greensboro, NC 27405� P. O. Box 14996, Gmensborq NC 27415-4996
33G-487-0000

Transportation
PAT McCRORY
Gavernor
NICHOLASJ.TENNYSON
Secretary
Attachment L: Low Impact Bridge Replacement Process
Low Impact Bridge Project No.: B-N/A County: Oranqe
Bridge No.77 over New Hope Creek on SR 1133 (Arthur Minnis Rdl WBS
Element Number: 17PB.7.R.86
This project is subject to the Low Impact Bridge Process as agreed to on October
6, 2009. This project meets the documentation requirements and approval
procedures under NEPA, as defined by FHWA, for Low Impact Bridge
Replacements. This project meets the standards of NCDOT's Minimum Criteria
Rules.
Date: January 27. 2016
Applicant Name: NCDOT
Applicant Address: 1584 Yanceyville Street
Greensboro. NC 27415
Primary Contact for Project: Jerrv A. Parker
Phone No.: 336-256-2063
Is this an after-tl�e-fact application: Yes X No
River Basin: Neuse River Basin
Stream Classification: WS-V: NSW: 16-41-1-(0.5); 03-06-OS
Regulatory Authorization Options for this Activity
Federal; USACE Nationwide General Permit 3— Maintenance
State: General Water Quality Certification #3883 and/or Buffer Authorization
Local: None
Project Description — The project consists of replacing Bridge #77 over New Hope Creek on SR
1133 (Arthur Minnis Road) aud improving roadway approaches. The existing 36' long X 26'
wide, timber deck with timber joists, timber caps, posts and piles at end and interior bents and
concrete encased timber abutments, dual span bridge is structw�ally deficient and will be replaced
with a new, single span 55' L X 33' W, cored slab, single span bridge at the same location. An
off-site detour will be utilized during construction. The project involves no wetland impacts
(although there is a wetland within the project area; it will not be disturbed), 37 linear feet of
�Nothing Compares�,�_
StateofNorthCamlina � Deparhnen[oFTransponation � DivisionofHighways,Division70�ce
1584 Yanceyville Street, Greensboro, NC 27405� P. O. Box 14996, Greensborq NC 27415-0996
336-487-0000

7}-ansportation
PAT McCRORY
Governar
NICHOLAS J. TENNYSON
Secremry
stream impacts (associated with bank stabilization on the west side of the creek) and 5,546 square
feet of Jordan Lake Riparian buffer impact (3,661 sq. ft. Zone 1 and 1,885 sq. ft. Zone 2) and are
listed as "allowable" per the Jordan Lake Riparian Buffer Rules Table of Uses. There are no deck
drains on the bridge; instead, stormwater runoff will be captured at 2 proposed drop inlets and
discharged into existing roadside ditches and outlet at non-erosive velocities. Biologists from the
Biological Swveys Group surveyed the project site for the Dwarf Wedgemussel (Alasmidonta
heterodon) and determined that the mussel does not existing within the project vicinity and
therefore issued a"no effecY' determination (see attached letter). Habitat surveys for the Red
Cockaded Woodpecker, Micl�aux's Sumac and Smooth Coneflower determined that there is no
habitat for any of the named species, nor any specimens present, witl�in the project area. Tlie
Bald Eagle is protected iu every county in North Carolina under the Bald and Gold Eagle
Protection Act; however, no suitable feeding/water source is located within one mile of the
project study area to support Bald Eagle habitat. Also, Mr. Gary Jordan (USFWS) recently
released the Programmatic Conference Opinion (PCO) for the recently listed Northern Long
Eared Bat (NLEB). This opinion, states in part, that "... it is the Service's confe��ence opinion that
NCDOT activities i�a eastenv No��th Callolina (Divisions 1-8), as p��oposed, are not likely to
jeopardize the continued eaistence of the NLEB. "
Signature:
Print Name: J��� M i��, S
Title: �� �" i � � � � � V� o��-
�Nothing Compares'�.�,_
StateofNorthCarolina � DeputmentofTransporta�ion � DivisionofHigh�vays,Division7�ce
1584 Yancey��lle S�reet, Greensbom, NC 27405� P. O. Box 74996, Greensborq NC 27415-4996
336-487-0000

Low/Minimal Impact 9rltlga P�qeet Data Sheet
T�p yp emoon
gyg5 1]BP.].fi.Of,
��� Ororpo
Bfi6 BNUNIDN ��
FEPIACE 9ROGE M1V. �ION SR I11J
QpSO1PIfOO (AflTXUPMINNI5fl0)OVEFNEW
HOPE CREEI(
���p [apeFeer
Classificallon- wsv.e�sw
g�� ie-ai.i{os�
In�aM: Nm' Hopo Lree4 �SA� - Peremhl;
Streem .��e UiolNr.wNopaCmk�59��1n1>�mAlenl
Nex Hopa Creek�, &15 X vJe, �51 fn, fi:
$�� 5@ &B 11�WIe. �Olin.11
TmOertleck on Ie��Cerjdsls, IknEei
C3(K, p06�9, d�d W85 dl ¢M Mtl
Type Intenw benis, concrale encesetl
Exlsting SlrucWre �Imber�u�keheras, da�c�e span
$ii¢ 36 0. x 26 fl.
SuH. Ratln �<,�e
Proposed Strutlure
TypB Z1"CmeA5laDBntlg5mge5pan
Slze wmin�om�oan� Ssn.�33M
Slream U9ACE hn a�s 1N Y
IdOnE061m YIN N
WSACE ots V/N �
Wetlantls Nund6Almpacls YIN �
GAhM� Im as� VIN N
NC DWU Buf(ers Um acrs IM T�'bbe�)
BuHerA plicalionRe uired ad9 YM Y
NC OWq SmrmWa�¢t Permit Pemeil i�atl NJ �
Retl CacFetletl Wootice�Ner. No
Owarl Wed9amuzsel:No
N���M^r�' Mkluwi5un+ae.W
SmooNCvneMxvrNo
ReJ Co[Xeticl Wootlpaokec No
T8E 5 des Presene o.nnwaea�m�s��: xo
Pa M;�„Nss�,�.,<:w
_ smeomco�en��;rvo
qed CaIXetlN YI�Po�ke[ No ERen
GveR WMpemussel: No Effttl
BioCnndusfon Menawr,s���:rnEilwi
SmoaN Canalb.ec No ERe�i
Moralorium T e WA
Dates wn
Native/Natche N
Trouf Watere Trout 5 ecies Present N
Trout Condltions YIN N
WRC ftevlewer �ra�s wason
CAMA AECs �a
Essentlal Fish Nahi[af /N. N°
Nav. Cpenlog �rA
uscc vermie �
Histofit Pro erties N
Archaeolo Icel Resources N
Tri6al Lands N
4 RBSOufces N
6 LWCP Resources N
Wlld and Soenic Rlver ^°
ForestService Lands N
TVA Area N
FEMA Bu oul N
FEMAFIoadSWd N(NOSTUDV)
USTs Haz Ma4s p
Relocatees �'
Locatlon �Ai zs.aaeeie
LONG ae.izia�+
o�e wemro �wn� are ma:e�m: �Nav Hopa ca�w isn�ena se� wn s n a recaenwi �a�a: New Haoe c�o�x e�vo�aa.
wM1ie SB ml buRe�� (rol on Iapa o�wJj No TSE o� be�� oe91¢ owaem[os prssenhvAM1ln I 0 m�e(pet NHP roco�tlsg
PtltllBbM1illy,l�elebnolpb:Ulw/knlhP�NdyeRalofsmoOlM1mnellmverqlRkMw aobaceierrulFeenfrealWyare
eM1M1e� �m'�vd o�uiM1e�xiu reyua4rymanNFN a� biesivtll No zui�'enYµ51�N plw sWMs e�o ptesenl reNF NaslWyar
wM mvcholll�e e1W Y eree �N9 eMer miNUvwil or flwdPlan.OnlY a emell alirer ole pine>IaM b Mosenl inlM1a PSP, wiM1 e
ProJect Commenls uan�a �,.i.�n ��dm��.aom:.,9�u �� �wn ��a „�„�i'�. soma e�..<�oe�•.m� ite� ao w+�+, w� wa�e r«� e�n
Pr YM W�✓ger.mucM1tlemo�P�^ca:0inelo�enalar�ugornrslig
Imb1a1 psseM foi FC W. Suneye w�m mMualN lo� epeoiaeon Seplombee 9, tOU: No SUAahlu IovfvgAveler wurte e
IowLLd wiUF 1.13 mles ol Ne tlW y area (10 mtlo qw O601co1 rsaiw Imn� Ine Mqa u10e sWJymm) Ilutrnul0 palaMblly
Yippo�baldeogle. Sti[elhe�ewnanopolmfa�lo�pgi�gM1obiUlwMin�lie�aWxB�eB,C M1'eyol��epmjeUSNtlye�eoentl
IM1e eree wMln 9fi01eelolNe O�ojecllbnds x'9e nnl �W useJ; Nemfo�e.IM1ii pm�al rvll M1mo w impecl on IM1b spede
Nole 61va lexl added by TGS En 'neers,q� 01ack lexl provlded by NCDOT.
Complaled 6y: David B. PeIN PE 1/7/2016 i��ll �}— � _
eotl ngnv ��\� �1�
E lion n el � . .
1/]/t016

Carpenter,Kristi
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Follow Up Flag:
Flag Status:
Good afternoon!
Thomson, Nicole J
Wednesday, January 27, 2016 4:07 PM
[e-mail]; Wanucha, Dave
Carpenter,Kristi; Powers, Tim; Parker, Jerry A; Lancaster, Jamie J;
[e-mail]
Bridge 77 on SR 1133 (Arthur Minnis Rd) in Orange Co
Cover letter Att L Att G.pdf; Bridge 77 USGS.pdf; Bridge 77 soil map.pdf; SF-670077
_HYD_SMP_20160107.pdf; SF-670077_Permit Drawings_Stream_20160114.pdf;
SF-670077_Permit Drawings_Buffer_20160114.pdf; SF-670077 Buffer Impact Summary
Sheet.pdf; SF-670077 Wetland Impact Summary Sheet.pdf; B670077_Stream SB DWR
Form - Intermittent.pdf; Bridge 77 New Hope Creek.pdf; 670077
AR13-07-0036NoSitesPresent Archaeological 10-31-2013.pdf; 670077 Orange
NHPA.pdf; B670077 Upland Form.pdf; B670077 Wetland Form.pdf
Follow up
Flagged
Please find the attached submittal for the proposed replacement of Bridge No. 77 on SR 1133 (Arthur Minnis Rd) in
Orange Co.
Let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
Thanks!
Nik
Nicole J. Thomson
Division Environmental Supervisor Assistant
Division Environmental Office
919-754-7806 Mobile
PO Box 14996
Greensboro, NC 27415-4996
� 11 +� � � i
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.

Email correspondence to and from this sender is subject to the N.C. Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties.

Pr•oject Tracking No.:13-07-0036
13-07-0036
NO NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES
�a�`���� ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES ��-a���'�'•,
� ��r ��u a ' 3 � �
,� �,�� �;; PRESENT OR AFFECTED FORM �� � ;��
�' o�'� �' This form only pertains to ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES for this project. It is not � `}
8
¢�='�� valid for Historic Architecture and Landscapes. You inust consult separately with the ���-� ��v �
Historic ArchiYecture and Landscapes Group.
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project No: na
i-VBS No: 17BP.7.R.75
F.A. No: na
Federal Perinit Aeguired?
County: Orange
Document.• Attachment G
Funcling: � State ❑ Federal
� Yes ❑ No Per�nit Type: unknown
ProjectDescription: NCDOT Division 7 intends to replace Bridge No. 77 on SR 1113, llrthur Minnis
Road, over a tributary of New Hope Creek. The replacement bridge is assumed to be proposed at generally
the same location and alignment. For the purposes of the archaeological review the proposed project area is
listed as 633.6 feet long (slightly more than 193.12 meters) and extends right-of-way (RO� width from 60
feet to 100 feet (30.48 meteYs). Thus, the area of potential effects (APE) is esrimated at roughly 1.45 acYes
(nearl�� .5) hectares). A US Arm�� Corps of Engineers permit is anticipated but the exact type was unknown
at the time of the archaeological investigations.
SUMMARY OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL FINDINGS
The North Carolina Department of7"ransportatron (NCDOT) Archaeology Group revlewed the
subjectprojectand determined.•
� There are no National Register listed ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES within the project's area
of potential effects.
❑ No subsurface archaeological investigations are required for this project.
❑ Subsurface investigations did not reveal the presence of any archaeological resources.
� Subsurface investigations did not reveal the presence of any archaeological resources
considered eligible for the National Register.
� All identified archaeological sites located within the APE have been considered and all
compliance for archaeological resources with Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act and GS 121-12(a) has been completed for this project.
❑ There are no National Register Eligible or Listed lARCHAEOI.OGICAL SITES present or affected
by this project. (Attach any note.r or docu�nent.r a,r needec�
NO NATlONAL RF.GlSTFR ELIGLBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRF.SF.NT OR AFFF,CTED
�'orn2 for Minor Trans�orlatio�a Projects as Qualifed in Ihe 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
1 Of 6

Pr•oject Tracking No.:13-07-0036
Briefdescrrption ofreviewactivitres, results ofreview, and conclusions:
As noted on the Survey Required Form dated August 22, 2013, the current project APE contained no
previously recorded archaeological resources. Few archaeological sites have been identified in the general
area of Bridge No. 77, Uut the archaeological overview of Orange County prepared bv the Research
Laboratories of Archaeology at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill rates this portion of New
Hope Creek as highly likely to contain a high density of archaeological deposits (Daniel 19)4:95-96). A
reconnaissance examination of the APE to direct probable subsurface investigations was recommended.
The archaeological reconnaissance of the APE was undertaken on October 16, 2013 by NCDOT
archaeologists Shane Petersen and Brian Overton. A walkover investigation of the entire APE was
completed for the proposed bridge replacement project. The portions of the project area to the southwest of
Bridge No. 77 appeared to have been too modified by modern landscaping, including ditching for SR 1113
and modern utility lines for archaeological deposits to have retained their integrity. To the northeast of the
bridge, on the north side of SR 1113, the wide road easement, broad ditch-line, and angled utility lines
suggested disturbance from a previous alignment of Arthur Minnis Road. The elevated landform east of
Bridge No. 77 did appear to have a more promising potential for archaeological deposits, despite the cut-lines
through the landform as part of the highway easement. A single transect of shovel tests was placed parallel to
the road, 40 feet (a litrle more than 12 meters) from centerline on SR 1113. The ftrst shovel test was placed
roughly 200 feet (nearly 61 meters) from the edge of New Hope Creek to avoid the immediate stseam bank
and western slope of the landform. The second shovel test was placed 15 meters (nearly 50 feet) northeast of
Shovel Test Pit No. 1. Soils in this area were mapped on tihe Orange County soil maps as "Enon loam, 2-6
percent slopes". Based on the shovel test pit results, it appears that (at least) this portion of the ridgetoe
overlooking New Hope Creek has eroded down into the lower porYion of the Bt horizon. No cultural
materials were recovered. After the second shovel test pit it was determined that no further subsurface
investigations were necessary.
Shovel Test Pit Results:
Shovel Leve Depth Depth Soil
Quadrant Test Munsell Color Artifacts Notes
Pit 1 (top) (base) Texture
I 0 25 7.5YR4/6 b own ��oama� n°
Northeast 1
II 25 35 7.5YR5/6 strong clay loam no Saprolite in soIl
brown matrix.
Decaying
bedrock and
Northeast 2 i 0 18 7.5YR5/6 strong clav loam no saprolite
brown
observed in
soil matrix.
No further archaeological investigations are recommended for the replacement of Bridge No. 77 as proposed.
Should the project change further investigation may be necessary. The project as described should be
considered to be compliant with Section 106 and NCGS121-12a.
References:
Daniel, I. R., Jr.
1994 An Archaeological Survey of Portion.r of Orange County, Norih Carolina. Research Report No. 12,
Research I.aboratories of Archaeology, University of North CaYolina, Chapel Hill.
NO NATlONAL RF.GlSTFR ELIGLBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRF.SF.NT OR AFFF,CTED
�orn2 for Minor Trans�orlatio�a Projects as Qualifed in Ihe 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
20f6

SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
See attached: � Map(s) ❑ Previous Survey Info
� Other: Shovel Test Pit Excavation Results.
Signed:
Shane C. Petersen
NCDOT ARCHAEOLOGIST II
� Photos
Date
Pr•oject Tracking No.:13-07-0036
❑Correspondence
October 31, 2013
NO NATlONAL RF.GlSTFR ELIGLBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRF.SF.NT OR AFFF,CTED
�orn2 for Minor Trans�orlatio�a Projects as Qualifed in Ihe 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
3 of 6

.� � �
�,'_ _ L � �4
r .� �
�.
��
i� 's� ��`� �� 1 � — a '#'�'�� � +,I�,�.r�� .� `� '� "� ' �'�
p � l • � ti`
�,�C y � '!
� t�, - _ -� � ' � ��` ' � � S �t r t
� f � � �
tit i � .,i �� , + ,� '` s
"-�"� : - ��S, ��tCvi. y��� - f �. *t� � "�4 ��j � +' �'�` s•� -
'� � r'� ''�` '�►••� ci�;T• ~ � � �: � i � r�y, � k �.
� � � - � ����r � . ' �� � h ,� � .� �� .� �� y t y a�'�
� I ti
� .�' � � ' � ' �- ~ � � �� � � 'tt� � r� .,�I�
�,►:�' .. ,y,.. ,�, � �; •. . . , �, .
:- ♦ r �y , yz .
,�• � �����.` � . ;p t r - b. ( � ��;p � . � ' • d "'.Q � ; �.
�� i►�'����� i..� ��Ilr �'��,�' "�, t�'.. ' '� . .. � � �� � �' , �
¢�� ` ,, � � .R .��it-��.�� :�• �.�''�I ...� 1� ,r j rY+ ` .'
��,.I�� F �4 � Aa. F;�� � " �� Y .� � � •' ��J � � � : � L . �, �`�"y�/
1 'i% ' y�' j N i , �� r � �',�-g. ,Iy ' �/
' ` � i� '� `�. .��"
f� !�� `�1i�� � � .��1 .��.iiil �� ''!. 7 t � , �f7M 7, ��hapr4H' �iEl
�;%l���1. �,_� f �7�� .�...}��::F�i�Er'���� � ��� �, ��..I' _.�. '� � • f�'
'� , "� �t� � 4 � .
�� � � 1 F!� � � � •.� �:' ��� 1 � �
�� ' �
sl�
,�� y.
"� �
��
R
� �,��
�
�
'ti
. . �ti
• * �+ '• '� • 4 ' � � • 0 STP #�2
� - - ;� i a.' '.1 ti 3�i�i� ,�.'s"s � � � STP #1
• ��}w\�� � ;. �a
�� y v'r' S"( 3 �'i:^
P, � .
� � �� I ��
"` �� ��. ..' � :�►.' - �
, �
�, ' �. ��� �� . � t � � .. :t:
. , �v' .1�a�4�, � : !jl � r - � .
� r .
4.a r
� � +
� w��i I�j� � tiI� �
1 � � °�
� -��. � � �i
�
.. �'�'�•� . � 3, ,�,1 � �.
�
*�`„� � ,
.�•�f,I� . . y �, .� _
., �, �L
� �� r'''� ' �
,' �� :�,
z� � ,
. ��i,
� , ��`.
� ��� k `,
' �w '��#���
. �..�•� � , �4
, -,
.� �'� j����- - - 4 � ` f �i ' ' .� � 'l
Project Tracking No.:13-07-0036
�SQV
r. 1 -• _ � . �,re.iris �
��-w �
.�
�
�
Aerial photo�aph illustrating the appro�mate project APE (outlined in yellow) in relation to Bridge i�]o. 61.
"NO NATIONAL REGISTh.'R EL/GlBI E OR L/STED ARCHAF.OLOGICAL S7TF.S PRFSFNT OR AFFF.CTED
form� �or Manm� Transportation Projecu a.r QualiJied in the 2007 Progranamatic Agree�nent.
4 of 6
>>��

Pr•oject Tracking No.:13-07-0036
Photograph of the APE to the southwest of Bridge No. 77.
Photograph of the 11PE to the west-southwest of Bridge No. 77.
NO NATlONAL RF.GlSTFR ELIGLBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRF.SF.NT OR AFFF,CTED
�orn2 for Minor Trans�orlatio�a Projects as Qualifed in Ihe 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
SOfb

Pr•oject Tracking No.:13-07-0036
t a
� � �'� � :t _�
��
.� � � �'�'i- �. � s f "y� ,
k-
— µ
+0 ,
`r
i� is
<.
_ �:.
FA .
�
P�V ' .A , y, .
i^. . - i. ��-�:�� f� Y i�.%alitt � `�y.
_ j�� � ��
� ,� ..
� y ^ ` [a ,�, _
?��� ' ''�"` �,.�* '` ,` -, !t
. i . �• � R4 � � �� . .
. .-�,�2� ; � � - �
� L �
. ' ' /�' `. + .. . .
� � I�p^- . . n
iA f � l
�t,� '.s,v�r� . �>'�° r �� s+ � � � Y t .
Photo� aph of the /1PE to the northeast of Brid�e No. 77.
t . .� 'ww'y� �.:: `-��" • ; •, -
__ � �i" `' � ' `' � �
i 1 " r � �� ' �
��a;` t�"�;i�� ,rr
- �_ ��
r��.; z .
. ac � .
,,..�.,� s ;�- �_
� .- -L xx t . L , .
i
� � � •4 � �.�� i �.a-�� -�' ir �.�
. _ . . ' t:� iJ r � . {
'�"� e ; ?�, � �'�, � . : y.y +t 1 -.
�,�. ��,� ��,�.�,F :
��-- ,_� � -����� r:
�� .... ,�,�`�. z
�. � > ,"
+:� � . „ 4s . . . . ' � . .-_ � �_ +n � �=
. _ .. . • . � ,,,k�!i�^.
. _ . t.�. .. � . . ., .
4 t
h /� �! '� � m • . 1 �
�Y ,�^'�y-�-�.�/ � �� �-
_ � y A 'a t� . �r � Y ;_. � � � ,ti i. '� ���.. . . .
,�4: �. p a � * , .
y �-�. r . ��•,;}
� , i r
" � '_; � , 5r � . .
h . Y
�,.�� i :•� i\ ,F � a +i � t'� ,�� �°W Ab� � C , .. « ,; ,
� ``` r M � ',r v - 4 r , � c , �. `i 1 �.' : �r�a �...
r= +' � � 1, y. yk, . 4
�.
'- , � � , *
�� �f�i^�� .A�y., �� �� � -a� ��'��
Photograph of the APE to the east-northeast of Brid�e No. 77.
NO NATlONAL RF.GlSTFR ELIGLBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRF.SF.NT OR AFFF,CTED
�'orn2 for Minor Trans�orlatio�a Projects as Qualifed in Ihe 2007 Programmatic Agreement.
60f6

Project Trackirig No. (Ir7teinal U.ce)
13-07-0036
HISTORIC ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPES
NO HISTORIC PROPERTIES PRESENT OR AFFECTED FORM
This form only pertains to Historic Architecture and Landscapes for this project. It
is not valid for Archaeological Resources. You must consult separately with the
Archaeology Group.
PROJECT INFORMATION
ProjectNo: Counry: Orange
WBS No.: 17BP.7. R.75 Document
Type:
Fe�l Aid No: Fun�ling: X State ❑ Federal
Feclercrl X Yes ❑ No Permit Stated as'�not yet known" in
Permit(s): Type(s): review request, so assume
Federal
ProiectDescription: Replace Bridge No. 77 on SR 1113 (Arthur Minnis Road) over New Hope
Creek with off-site detour (no improvements planned).
SUMMARY OF HISTORIC ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPES REVIEW
There are no National Register-listed or Study Listed properties within the project's area of
potential effects.
There are no properties less than fifty years old which are considered to meet Criteria
Consideration G within the project's area of potential effects.
There are no properties within the project's area of potential effects.
There are properties over fifty years old within the area of potential effects, but they do not
meet the criteria for listing on the National Register.
There are no historic properties present or affected by this project. (Attach any notes or
documents as needed.)
Date of field visit: 13 August 2014
Description ofreview activities, results, an�l conclusions: HPOWeb reviewed on 26 August
2013 and 11 August 2014 and yielded no NR, SL, DOE, or LD properties and one SS property in
the Area of Potential Effects (APE). Orange County current GIS mapping, aerial photography,
and tax information indicated an APE of woodland, cultivated fields, and several residential
parcels with late-twentieth-century resources (viewed 26 August 2013). Immediately southwest
of the existing bridge is surveyed site OR0418, a circa-1900 Log House (on the east side of
James Minnis Lane, part of a larger parcel -#714 Arthur Minnis Road, PIN:9861474477).
Originally constructed in 1954 and rebuilt in 1984 on elements of the earlier substructure,
Bridge No. 77 is a 36-foot-Ing, two-span, timber, stringer/multi-beam bridge and is not eligible
for the National Register according to the NCDOT Historic Bridge Survey as it is not historically,
architecturally, or technologically significant. Available aerial photography and other imagery,
as well as project design details, proved insufficient to accurately identify and assess resources
present in the APE. Therefore, a field investigation and on-site rneeting with the division bridge
program manager was carried out on 13 August 2014.
Hislo�•ic Archilecrtu•e nnd Lmufscnpes NO H/STO/UC PROPERT/!3ti PRL:STNT OR A!l-ECTIiD for�u for hlinor "l��anapa•tcrtion Projecl.c n.r Ona7ified in !he 2007
l'rogrcmmmtic A�memeN.
Page 1 of 2

� ne ANt extenas :�uu reet to eitner ena or tne existing nriage �ivc-�vv� ana �uu reeL Lo e�tner
side of the SR 1113 (Arthur Minnis Road) centerline (SE-NW) to encompass all proposed
construction activities as currently defined. The Log House (OR0418) is the only critical
resource in the APE; a circa-1900 House (OR0419) to the northeast of the bridge stands well
outside the APE and only a small, undeveloped, discontiguous section of its parcel intersects the
APE. The current project design calls for work to be contained within fifry feet to either side of
the SR 1113 (Arthur Minnis Road) centerline; the Log House stands approximately 150 feet
from the road, so it is beyond likely project impact. There are no historically significant
landscape features in the APE; the drive leading from the road to the Log House will be
protected and preserved. A finding of "no historic properties affected" will satisfy both GS-121-
12(a) and Section 106 compliance requirements.
Should any design elements of the project change,
please notify NCDOT Historic Architecture as additional review may be necessary.
SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
X Map(s) ❑Previous Survey Info. X Photos ❑Correspondence ❑Design Plans
FINDING BY NCDOT ARCHITECTURAL HISTORIAN
Histo �c Architecture and Landscapes — NO HISTORIC PROPERTIES PRESENT OR AFFECTED
NCDOT Architectural Historian
Project Tracking No. 13-07-0036
Bridge No. 77, Orange County
WBS No. 17BP.7.R.75
HlslorTc Archtiec�tne m�d /,nndrenpes NO HISTOR(C NROPER'1'lGS NRLSGN7�OR AFF�ZY'TED for-m for iLlinor �ransporin�ion Projects as Ouu/ified in d�e 2007
Progrnmmnric Agreemenl.
Page 2 of 2

� ; Hill�borot�c�h �,
i ; i � � .
. � f ; � �r.
?ll i � . �f . �k
.lpiiry. f �� - -
'�r'r� �d q � I�� �_' t _ ti C
�-:Y'`�w y � y � � � � � -� J � .;j .' p
+`.~`3� �f �' � ��-�'l �- ���.' . � �p : � ._Y (!�� r �
�`' � ,/ ;._ � t'Uk} �;
��;�,,., �r _ �o -•, -
� - � � � - � � . :: li Jtrn �
1 E'�, r.��., _- Cf� �'�I ��t�_� �
J �y� Lk ��` �� �
N,R�� �j: -..:. U �
� . .. . " ' � - . L
Ci ��. � �. . i ..: I I ' r- . � , { . i. � -.
� , , j; s�,--� e�� A -
� a
W ti. � , . .� �
+. . o. ' � ; t�,- ,� _ : >` �. �
� � � I � � i •I �� -
ti:� � � -i � z � ., .'"-.,.
� iY t < < 1` �� U
� ; , 'i �s' : ` t' . ! �' C�. ...
a, � � y
.�,'�'. �:� t , ,t�1 . �' -j .Cr
' ss' ! t� ".:1 � � N� yl
� ' L !�i
. ;�� J. .i I ,� , ' i .
�
"' ._ ...__ : �� . ':
r �` 4 t
�
1 '� _,�.'.'�� y t _ _..._ - �� ,y\K
� . � � _ ' �� �� i �
( ' (; �5 ,• � ` ��'� � `` `., ti t �
. � � . - �'\� +y , �� t.. �_ -- � `�
�-_ ,,:
'� �
p4„� ��S � �� � Y �'= ��
• . �� ,�� . i i _ t i: � f t' n��.
.�� «,�o�e�ct Area /�p�h�j /� `�
� Q l�i
� � � t7 ,. F L/11rS1'� \7E � 11# � r, '
n it
.�
��
_ � Z �.� �I �
ily
.. Cj_ �, -� � i !
. •i�is � � ti � ��. Rf, '� ,
e tii d ' � '''i� � -y�
q m �''4 4' iPs
�Sc' ��� � s, , �r
.}
�"`�� ��; r; r�; <' f' � t,'1� �,�c
�t iy;iF p � "v
'!'' . ,�4���',` .
� �'�. i --
-r` �
Cf,�ry �-- �� � t i i
' �.: i i e�
!,. 3 _._ . . :..�:: - ' J� .';--T--I .
. '
.,
. _ '
,,, , _ .� � ' ` ' � '�` _ ' - — rn� s
% , =_a. - � �., -_ -
, �;' . ;
� � ������— � ',, � � ,
'��
k t N ,.� i_ �,_� :.� _.
iur Pdirlur: I<,� �
Sq
Tjjd
_�:
t; `'\�.�
I
Bridge No. 77
-1 �� l yi
fr � I I
� � � f �� � �
v i;��..:''4`: titi_�-- , � P.
a .,
,� � t �'�'' � � ,, � �` � _ � '�
�
L ,,�; � �,,ti - 1 :,
� � �(.:' � . . i +J
L x
' r„? . , �`2' ., . �5
�
WBS No. 17BP.7.R.75 Orange County
Base map: HPOWeb, nts
NCDOT - Historic Architecture
August 2013
Tracking No. 13-07-0036

Looking NE (above) and SW (below) towards Bridge
No. 77 along SR 1113 (Arthur Minnis Road).
NCDOT — Historic Architecture
August 2014
Tracking No. 13-07-0036

NC Division of Water Quality -Methodology for identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Oriains v. 4.11
NC DWQ� Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: Q Project/Site:
Evaluator: ryj � County: �
�,f i
Total Points: /�• � Stream Determ
Stream is at least intermittent Ephemeral �y
if z 19 or nerennial if z 30' I n_ -�i !" "'
- Latitude: �
Longitude:�t
rcle one) Other
Perennial e.g. Quad Name:
1
A. Geomor holo (Subtotal = ," ) Absent Weak Moderate Stron
1 a' Continuity of channel bed and bank 0 1 2 3'
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 0 1 2 3
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, � � 2 3
ri le- ool se uence
4. Particle size of stream substrate 1 2 3
5. Active/relict floodplain 0 "'� 2 3
6. Depositional bars or benches �Q. 1 2 3
7. Recent alluvial deposits 0 1 2 3
8. Headcuts �0 1 2 3
9. Grade control 0 0.5 1 1.5
10. Natural valley 0 ,.�-�•- 0.5 1 1.5
11. Second or greater order channel ° o= 0 Yes = 3
a _ �,t_,_� �.. ' - - `--` -' -- -'
B. H drolo Subtotai =
12. Presence of Baseflow 0 1
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria ` 0 1
14. Leaf litter .5 1
15. Sediment on plants or debris 0 .5
16. Organic debris lines or piles 0 0.5
17. Soil-based evidence of high water table? No = 0
C. Biolo Subtotal = ,.
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 3 2
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 3
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance) 0 1
21. Aquatic Mollusks 1
22. Fish 0.5
23. Crayfish . 0.5
24. Amphibians 0.5
25. Algae 0 0.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75;
'perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manuai.
Sketch:
41
1
=3
1
1
2
2
1
1
1
= 1.5 �Other = 0
3
3
0
1.5
1.5
0
0
3
3
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PAT MCCRORY
GOVF.RNOR
Memorandum to
From:
Subject:
ANTHONY J. TATA
SF,CRETARY
January 13, 2014
Pam Williams, Transportation Program Management Unit
Jerry Parker, Division 7 Environmental Supervisor
Jared Gray, Environmenta] Program Supervisor
Natural Environment Section, Biological Surveys Group
Protected species screening memo for the Dwarf Wedgemussel
(Alasmidonta heterodon) associated with the replacement of
Bridge No. 77 over New Hope Creek on SR 1113; Orange
County; Design Build Project; WBS 17BP.7.R.75.
Proposed Bridge Replacement Project
The proposed project calls for the replacement of Bridge No. 77 on SR 1113
(Borland Road) over New Hope Creek, in Orange County. The federally endangered
Dwarf Wedgemussel is listed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for Orange County.
New Hope Creek is located in the Cape Fear River Basin. From the project site, New
Hope Creek flows 23.4 mile before entering Jordan Lake. A map of the project site is
attached.
NCDOT Biologist Jared Gray from the Biological Surveys Group did a review of
the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NHP) database on December 31, 2013, to
determine if there were any records of listed mussels within the proposed project study
area or receiving waters. This review indicated that there are no known occurrences
of the federally protected Dwarf Wedgemussel within the project area.
Furthermore, there are no known records of Dwarf Wedgemussel for the Cape Fear
River Basin. Therefore the biological conclusion for the replacement of Bridge No. 77
over New Hope Creek is No Effect for Dwarf Wedgemussel.
File: 17BP.7.R.75
MAILING ADDRESS:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS UNIT
1598 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
Rn�eicH NC 27699-1548
TELEPHONE: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
WEBSITE: NCDOT. GOV
LOCATION:
CENTURYCENTER, BUILDING B
1020 BIRCH RIDGE DRNE
Rn�eicr+ NC 27610

BUFFER IMPACTS SUMMARY
IMPACT BUFFER
TYPE ALLOWABLE MITIGABLE REPLACEMENT
STRUCTURE SIZE / STATION ROAD PARALLEL ZONE 1 ZONE 2 TOTAL ZONE 1 ZONE 2 TOTAL ZONE 1 ZONE 2
SITE NO. TYPE (FROM/TO) CROSSING BRIDGE IMPACT (ft2) (ft2) (ft2) (ft2) (ft2) (ft2) (ft2) (ft2)
1 55' CSU 12+84/14+14 X 3661 1885 5546 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL: sss�.o 1885.0 5546.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

WETLAND PERMIT IMPACT SUMMARY
Hand Existing Existing
Permanent Temp. Excavation Mechanized Clearing Permanent Temp. Channel Channel Natural
Site Station Structure Fillln Fillln in Clearing in SW SW Impacts Impacts Stream
No. (From/To) Size / Type Wetlands Wetlands Wetlands in Wetlands Wetlands impacts impacts Permanent Temp. Design
(ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ft) (ft) (ft)
13+39/13+47 1@55' CSU 37
TOTALS*:
'Rounded totals are sum of actual impacts
NOTES:
�

Hi h�va North Carolina Department of Transportation ��,
gstormwater 1
,.,_.,, Highway Stormwater Program ��`��t
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN _�%
(Version 2.03; Released October 2015) FOR NCDOT PROJECTS
WBS Element: 17BP.7.R.86 TIP No.: SF-670077 County(ies): Orange Page 1 of 2
General Project Information
WBS Element: 17BP.7.R.86 TIP Number: SF-670077 Project Type: Bridge Replacement Date: 1/7/2016
NCDOT Contact: William G. Galen Cail, PE Contractor / Desi ner: TGS En ineers David B. Pett , PE
Address: 1590 Mail Service Center Address: 706 Hillsborough Street
Raleigh, 27699-1590 Suite 200
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone] Ext. 104
Email: [e-mail] Email: d etty@t sengineers.com
Cit /Town: Hillsborou h Count ies : Oran e
River Basin(s): Ca e Fear CAMA Count ? No
Wetlands within Project Limits? Yes
Pro'ect Descri tion
Pro'ect Length (lin. miles or feet): 370 feet Surroundin Land Use: Forest, cropland, rural residential
Pro osed Pro'ect Existin Site
Project Built-U on Area ac. 0.2 ac. 02 ac.
Typical Cross Section Description: Two 11' wide paved travel lanes with paved shoulders at guard rail locations, 3' wide Two 10' paved travel lanes with 4' wide grassed shoulders and grassed side slopes
grassed shoulders and grassed side slopes ranging from about 6(H):1(V) to 2(H):1(V). ranging from about 6(H):1(V) to 3(H):1(V).
Annual Avg Daily Traffic (veh/hr/day): Desi n/Future: 2500 Year: 2015 Existin : 2500 Year: 2015
General Project Narrative: Replacement of Bridge No. 670077 on SR 1113 (Arthur Minnis Road) over New Hope Creek in Orange County south of Hillsborough, NC. Proposed 55' long by 33' wide single-
(Description of Minimization of Water span bridge to replace existing 36' long by 26' wide double-span bridge. The proposed grade is about 0.5' above existing ground in the vicinity of the bridge and roughly matching
Quality Impacts) existing by about 80' left of stream and about 120' right of stream (looking downstream). The proposed bridge will have no direct discharge into the water or buffers. Stormwater
runoff on the existing bridge discharges directly into the water for the full length of the bridge. No deck drains will be installed. Stormwater runoff from the proposed bridge is to
flow to two (2) proposed drop inlets at the northeast approach. Stormwater runoff will be discharged at minimum practicable slopes, yielding maximum velocities. Discharge from
the pipe outlet (Q10=0.4 cfs) will be attenuated on a riprap pad (V10=0.8 ft/s) and diffused by the existing topographic conditions before flowing toward the buffer zones. All
proposed stormwater runoff is discharged as far away from the stream and at lowest velocities as practicable. There is a 0.005 acre wetland in the west quadrant which will not
be disturbed by the proposed project. The existing overhead powerline running along the northwest side of the road will be realigned slightly to the northwest due to increased
roadway widths which are required to satisfy minimum roadway design criteria. No additional travel lanes are proposed and the design calls for the minimum required roadway
typical section based on traffic and safety considerations. Telephone will also use realigned poles. Please note, Class II Rip Rap on geotextile is being proposed to re-establish
and stabilize the streambank under the southwest side of the bridge (also shown in profile).
Waterbod information
Surface Water Body (1): New Ho e Creek NCDWR Stream Index No.: 16-41-1-(0.5)
NCDWR Surface Water Classification for Water Body Primar Classification: Water Su I V WS-V)
Su lemental Classification: Nutrient Sensitive Waters (NSW)
Other Stream Classification: None
Impairments: None
Aquatic T&E Species? No Comments:
NRTR Stream ID: New Ho e Creek Buffer Rules in Effect: Jordan Lake
Project Includes Brid e S annin Water Bod ? Yes Deck Drains Dischar e Over Buffer? No Dissi ator Pads Provided in Buffer? No
Deck Drains Discharge Over Water Body? No (If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) (If yes, describe in the General Project Narrative; if no, justify in the
(If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) General Project Narrative)

Hi hw� North Carolina Department of Transportation ,- �
gStorttiWdTer Highway Stormwater Program ``;��
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN �"-"���
(Version 2.03; Released October 2015) FOR NCDOT PROJECTS
WBS Element: TIP No.: SF-670077 County(ies): Orange Page 2 of 2
Preformed Scour Holes and Energy Dissipators
tation oor inates rainage ipe/ tructure
Sheet (Road and Non Road Surface Energy Dissipator Area Conveyance Dimensions Q10 V10 Associated w/
No. Projects) Water Body T pe Riprap Type (ac) Structure (in) (cfs) (fps) Buffer Rules?
-L- 14+12 RT
1 2 (1)New Hope Riprap Apron / Pad Class 'B' 0.07 Pipe 15 0.4 0.8 N/A
35.99889°/ -79.12117° Creek
Additional Comments
e er to t e est anagement ractices o0 ox , tan ar s, t e e era ig way ministration y rau ic ngineering ircu ar o. - , ir ition, y rau ic esign o nergy
Dissipators for Culverts and Channels (July 2006), as applicable, for design guidance and criteria.

�
�o
0
V
� �
�
V
�
�
O
V
�
See Sheet 9-A For Index of Sheets
��1��� �ll' ����� �����Jl��� �
�� �Y ����� �� �1L�� V'V' � Il �
ORAI�GE CO U1�T Y
LOCATI011I: BRIDGE NO. 670077 OVER 1VEW HOPE CREEK
011t SR lll3 (ARTHUR MIIVIVIS RD)
TYPE OF WORK GRADI11lG, DRAIIVAGE, PAVI11lG, A111D STRUCTURE
� � � �
��I�����
-L- J I H. �� �� .� �
� � � ��
% `� -� �
TO SR 1179
(UNION G� CH. RD) - _
� —
—L— STA. 11 + 60.00
BEGIN PROJECT
17BP.7.R.86
THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN ANY MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES.
CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED
TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD II.
DESIGN EXCEPTION REQUIRED FOR VERTICAL
CURVATURE AND VERTICAL SSD.
,'
�
Wy y
�
W ��,��
o ��� ��
r � , � J,� oQ�
3 't�
W
Z
J� `
�
' —L— ', I ARTF
END BRIDGE
—L— STA. 13 + 78.63
0
0
�
�
IR MINNIS RD
BUFFER IMPACTS
Tp ��
(O(p NC � 6�
—L— STA. 15 + 30.00
END PROJECT
17BP.7.R.86
PiL��,INiIIVARY FL.�N�
DO NOT USE POR CONSTRUCTION
tVCDOT CONTACT: V I R G I1V I A M A B R Y HYDRAULICS ENGINEER 0r, owr,y c
GRAPHIC SCALES DESIGN DATA PROJECT LENGTH �
PLANS PREPARED BY: PLANS PREPARED FOR: ��,4 '�9�
ADT 2015 = 2500 �� � �
TGS ENGINEER$ NCDOT �
20 10 O 20 40 804—C N. LAFAYETTE ST PRIORIN PROJECTS UNIT � �
T= b %* LENGTH ROADWAY PROJECT 17BP.7.R.86 #670077 =0.059 MILES � SHELBY,NC 2st5o � �
LENGTH $TRUCTURE PROJECT 17BP.7.R.86 #670077 =0.011 MILES r� 7020 Birch Ridge Dr. A
P�iN$ V = rJ� MPH � PH [phone] Raleigh, NC 27610 P.e. ��P oF sQ°��
CORP. LICENSE NO.: C-0275 y @
* TTST —3% +DUAL =3% TOTAL LENGTH PROJECT 17BPJ.R.86 #670077 =0.070 MILES srcharuns: T�""
20 10 0 20 40
� � LEONARD G. FLETCHER PE ROADWAY DESIGN RIGHT OF WAY DATE:
� PROJECT ENGIhEER ENGINEER
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL) FUNC CLASS = RURAL — APRIL 21, 2015
LOCAL R.E. BURNS & soNs co
P. O. BOX T 168
4 Z O 4 $ S7ATESV�LLE. NC 28687 RIOJECT DESlGN ENG/NEER LETTING DATE:
PH fT04)92<-86C6
PROFILE (VERTICAL) SUB REGIONAL TIER PE APRIL 21, 2015
2012 STANDARD SPEC7FICATIONS S7GNAT[IRE:
6F-670077 PermitDrawiii� tsh buffer.den I/1 2/2016 2 34:44PM'IGS

BufFer Zone (BZ) Impacts
Area of Allowable Area of Allowable
Bridge Impact Bridge Impact
within BZl within BZ2
,
LEGEND � i ;��ii i i�
, �
� �iiii
SITE 3661 sq ft 1885 sq ft
EXISTING BRIDGE DIMENSIONS 36'X26' (DOUBLE-SPAN), 90 DEG. SKEW
PROPOSED BRIDGE DIMENSIONS 55'X33' (SINGLE-SPAN), 90 DEG. SKEW
TOTAL PROJECT LENGTH - 370'
PROPOSED OH POWER LINE
(APPROX. LOCATION)
EXISTING OH POWER LINE �
(APPROX. LOCATION)
PROPOSED POWER POLE GUY
WIRE (APPROX. LOCATION)
�' ' �
12" CMP CHARLOTTE HILL LE�yIS
. - i�raua-i - -
PRd,POS�D POWER POLE JOINT °
USE� (APPROX. LOCATION) �r—
i W
i �
0
—PROP 0/H POW LINES N PROP 0/H POW LINES
�
�
_ `
m
r
EXISTING R�W
-� — �
------ � _
--- � R C�
C5'�,� _� _ —
_, ,
__ -, �
--- _---{ _ --- �
, �
, `
-� - — _-- —
_� -
� � _ — _-- --
_--���
� EXIS IT NG R�
�— TO SR U79
(UNION GROVE CH,RD`1
BEGIN PROJECT
17BP.7.R.86
-L- STA. 11 + 60.00
NOTES:
1. NEW HOPE CREEK IS IN THE
CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN.
2. JORDAN LAKE BUFFER RULES IN EFFECT.
3. DO NOT INSTALL DECK DRAINS.
4. CLEARING SHALL BE PERFORMED PER
NCDOT METHOD II.
GRAPHIC SCALE
20 10 0 20 40
SF-670077_Pcrmit Drawing�sh_buffer impacts.dgn I/12/2016 1:19:59 PM TGS
BUFFER ZONE IMPACTS
� � � �
WETLANDS SHALL ��' `^ �� PROPOSED POWER POLE GUY
NOT BE DISTURBED. / WIRE (APPROX. LOCATION)
I
����,�
✓�///�
PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
P E RM I T D RAW I N G �78P.7.R.86 (SF -670077J
FOR BRIDGE #670077 TGS TG5 ENG/NEERS
ENc,iNiERS 706 H/LLSBOROUGH ST
� SU/TE 200
O RA N G E C O U N TY �� PHL�9/9J 77328887
,� :
ll PROPOSED POWER POLE JOINT 09
�� � �� USE (APPROX. LOCATION) GLEN A. & ANN B. BLUMNARDT
�
N
PROP OIH POW LINES ( y�
CLA55 II RIP RAP r�: ( �
(STRUCTURES ITEM) � / / /'
/ /
/ /
— — --- — -- — — _ _ . /
�DETO DRAIN __F _________ /
F -
) - �
SR Ill3 (ARTHUR MINNIS RDl ,
10
BETTY �yALSER MINNIS
� _ ��r-����_ - -� ,F� � ��
_ � �-�
� � , � ��
� TELE PED
y
� WOODS �,�i �
� Z
O
�
,
i � � �
; � � �
� H �, � /
v ��
/ �/ �
PROP. CLASS II RIP RAP TO ��' � ��
RESTORE NATURAL STREAM
CHANNEL � " � �
/ /
/ ,r J }r,l
��� / `��/
/� / /� /
/
� / /'/��/
��,��� s� �i
� �
/ f„
�
CLASS II RIP RAP
(STRUCTURES ITEM)
� � i/�- �t�DUE�
�
DUE-
—PROP 0/H POW �I�� �� ��
����� " � � — - ( �
/ ����.-. _ _ �. ' �, �����.J` F Pfl0 �FI`Pg�i),�J=
% a r I�I 1� � ---- ,
� �'�`— ��,\
I �- ---- - —� �
�'
c�
WOODS 'I
�PROPOSED W
TOP OF N
BANK �
WOODS
TB 2GI T8 2GI �
��� � N �-,_,-�`n ��, --------��r �
�� = '�
� , - �,---
Q2 - 0.3 CFS �
V2=OJ FTiS �
BM#� Q10=0.4 CFS j
V10 = 0.8 FTiS i��
011
KKARENHSSPOPOV CH
CLASS B RIP RAP
DISSIPATOR PAD
-�� T l �� �
� --\ �� �S'R /0�9 ��� �
�_ _ �- ��86� ��
--�_- �� \,
; _--
�� � -
- --
�_
-- - \��
\�- \ �� �
Ek N R�W \\
END PROJECT
17BP.7.R.86
—L— STA. 15 + 30.00
PERMIT DRAWING SHEET 1 OF 2

PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
EXISTING BRIDGE DIMENSIONS 36'X26' (DOUBLE-SPAN), 90 DEG. SKEW PERMIT DRAWING 178P.7.R.86 fSF-6700771
BufFer Zone (BZ) Impacts PROPOSED BRIDGE DIMENSIONS 55'X33' (SINGLE-SPAN), 90 DEG. SKEW TGS res ENG/NEERS
F O R B R I D G E# 6 7 0 0 7 7 �N��N-ERs �06 H/LLSBOROUGH ST
TOTAL PROJECT LENGTH - 370' � su�TE Zoo
Area of Allowable Area of Allowable RALE/GH, /VC zTeos
Bridge Impact Bridge Impact O RAN G E C O U N TY �� PH �9/9J 773-8887
within BZl within BZ2
LEGEND � �; ; � �� BUFFER ZONE IMPACTS
� %� ii��
SITE 3661 sq ft 1885 sq ft �
�: I e ��
WETLANDS SHALL ��^ "�I PROPOSED POWER POLE GUY
NOT BE DISTURBED. / � WIRE (APPROX. LOCATION)
PROPOSED OH POWER LINE ,� I
(APPROX. LOCATION) %� ,! PROPOSED POWER POLE JOINT 09 �°o ti�
EXISTING OH POWER LINE /W�B �--� J j l j USE (APPROX. LOCATION) GLEN A. & ANN B. BLUMHARDT �`'��P%
(APPROX. LOCATION) � � � / v2o
PROPOSED POWER POLE GUY � � � � �' � � - d �` � ��
WIRE (APPROX. LOCATION) � ,� ,� I`' �° �
� \ � � � \ \ , '� o��
\ \ � W � � �,
� � �� � � ��
I � V `� ���,, I s�� � � � m� � � %
12�" CMP CHARLOTTE HILL LE�yiS � � `1/ � I � � � � / p � � �
. � ;�Erai� - - � `f' / / o
� ' y
PRO�,POS�D POWER POLE JOINT ° � ou� '' ` �) m ��' � `'` �� ""ss "R'� �'" � � � �
USE� (APPROX. LOCATION) �—ouE °UE��� ��' ���� � � �STR��r�REs�rEMi
, w � X''ii'.' - � � uE� WOODS EXI TING T�ANS�ORT�ON
� 0 �/ �� � � i �� �/, DUE�DUE F/A L.�Tv � r irt.lin. n...�.� ;
� ', PaoP oiH Pow �iNes > % � -- - - � / �DUE `� i�P. �
PROP 0/H POW LINES PROP 0/H POW LINES CLA55 II RIP RAP ( ���
i
(STRUCTURES ITEM) �% / J "' \ N �PROP 0/H Pqyy �I ��5 / � ��
i � �
� � � S
_--- i � i
__-- �
i � i . / � � . �4 �s `n �. I � - - � - - - - - � � - � � -
i —__ — --_ -- — _ _ � _
� Ffl0 �
� � E —
i m i � . � -:. . � � �
� � - - - - _ _ - - - F
EXISTING R�W �E TO DRAIN F ��V -
i
/. _ �}����� /H ��.
_ i i -�- -� i � r r� i i i �- F, � �� s- �� � 11 E C.
___ _ , �
_ � ,
-------- --�
aAo L-�c- �i_�-r -t� �� � oiti �tir' �"�i� 0 1f �r0 ERY
� ---- — �
`\ . F — — — — — �'- , I . I I _ � \ . P POW LINFS "�i� � --�J'
r � � � �� - � •' , �. — - — -��
� ` ei � � � _ - - _ — ' ` - —
� �
R � -- -- - -- - � -- - ---
- - � 1,5'�,�, P - - -- _ ' __ - - - - - � � � i � � r � -` - - -- - -_ �- -, __\ 52�
),, � � � - - �
- -- -- -- -- - - � w
, — � SR Ill3 (ARTHUR MINNIS RDl ' .1j �� -L- �-- ___- —
_ _ _-
�
, { , - <P - -
-- = � _
�� _� — � zo� esr � ., ��� a �' �, � - �� � �� � _
i i i_i. _. �� �� O
� — �'� . � f I . I I I TB 2GI T8 2GI _ _ -_,___ _CD ��OOn
_ — _
--- —. ` 7
_ _ i -------- -- - ---- �86'� ��
- - -------�_ � - � - --- --- _ �-
-- — � -- - � �_
-- � - �
--- - - � � � — — ----- - - � ��
- . T � - ��x��r �-�� ��� - --- ----- � - - _ - _ ,
� - - � ,F� � - �r — - — ��
— ���_ - - � -_ -
_ __ _ _ �� i � '���
- Gr� - � � �-� -
_ �I �1
_ _--- — , - -
_ _ _
I' _
_ ��' , C�
I I � n � �'�
, � '�
��� � -
- - �i -
P
I' �--f�'
� � --- - . . � - — , _ . - - -�. -- - -
_ - -- _ , - , / ii I . � , 'i� I'1, � � -
� ��� .(�
—� _ .
�
��1�
� ' �
�c� 1 � T
- - - - ' ; Z'T�LE PED ,�; , _�� s ' °�� Q2=0.3 CFS �� _ - � �
---� � , ' _
— , � � , � E � '�� -- �
; ; � V2 =OJ FTiS % - ---� _ �-� ���
_— — ExisTi W ,
� � �,
� I, �� � WOODS �?�� z � I BM#I Q10=0.4 CFS ."`� � \
� TO S 9 , , � � � � I WOODS ' _ �- � ,�� i EkisTi � �\
- ----_ �
� � V10 - 0.8 FTiS R
RD,) ;'�,, � , NG'�w �zs
�UN�ON GROVE CH�BEGIN PROJECT /' �
, C PROPOSED , y / -_
� � , O TOP OF � _
� � �� �
� � � -_
�Q' �� I . � � Rl BANK P�. � . ' �
� ,
i �
u
�
� / in
� i
17BP.7.R.86 ° � �' � � / '� � � � �� � ' � .�`� � � � � -- - -
� c�re �� � tn nn , i !� �
NOTES:
1. NEW HOPE CREEK IS IN THE
CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN.
2. JORDAN LAKE BUFFER RULES IN EFFECT.
3. DO NOT INSTALL DECK DRAINS.
4. CLEARING SHALL BE PERFORMED PER
NCDOT METHOD II.
GRAPHIC SCALE
20 10 0 20 40
SF-670077_Pcrmit Drawing�sh_buffer impacts.dgn I/12/2016 1:14:13 PM TGS
1O RESTORE NATURAL �STREAM � � y�" � �— CLASS B RIP RAP
CHANNEL � � �� DISSIPATOR PAD �Z5
3ETTY �yALSER MINN�S /`�
,J
/`�� � � �- �
- �� �
� ���� o.
I <n / ' s
� S�� �
/ Sm� ���
,� � � �
�` S` // _\�..,;
��� �� ���� PERMIT DRAWING SHEET 2 OF 2
,-��
,

�
�o
0
V
� �
�
V
�
�
O
V
�
See Sheet 9-A For Index of Sheets
��1��� �ll' ����� �����Jl��� �
�� �Y ����� �� �1L�� V'V' � Il �
ORAI�GE CO U1�T Y
LOCATI011I: BRIDGE NO. 670077 OVER 1VEW HOPE CREEK
011t SR lll3 (ARTHUR MIIVIVIS RD)
TYPE OF WORK GRADI11lG, DRAIIVAGE, PAVI11lG, A1VD STRUCTURE
� � � �
��I�����
-L- J I H. �� �� .� �
� � � ��
% `� -� �
TO SR 1179
(UNION G� CH. RD) - _
� —
—L— STA. 11 + 60.00
BEGIN PROJECT
17BP.7.R.86
THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN ANY MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES.
CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED
TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD II.
DESIGN EXCEPTION REQUIRED FOR VERTICAL
CURVATURE AND VERTICAL SSD.
,'
�
Wy y
�
W ��,��
o ��� ��
r � , � J,� oQ�
3 't�
W
Z
J� `
�
' —L— ', I ARTF
END BRIDGE
—L— STA. 13 + 78.63
0
0
�
�
IR MINNIS RD
STREAM IMPACTS
Tp ��
(O(p NC � 6�
—L— STA. 15 + 30.00
END PROJECT
17BP.7.R.86
PiL��,INiIIVARY FL.�N�
DO NOT USE POR CONSTRUCTION
tVCDOT CONTACT: V I R G I1V I A M A B R Y HYDRAULICS ENGINEER 0r, owr,y c
GRAPHIC SCALES DESIGN DATA PROJECT LENGTH �
PLANS PREPARED BY: PLANS PREPARED FOR: ��,4 '�9�
ADT 2015 = 2500 �� � �
TGS ENGINEER$ NCDOT �
20 10 O 20 40 804—C N. LAFAYETTE ST PRIORIN PROJECTS UNIT � �
T= b %* LENGTH ROADWAY PROJECT 17BP.7.R.86 #670077 =0.059 MILES � SHELBY,NC 2st5o � �
LENGTH $TRUCTURE PROJECT 17BP.7.R.86 #670077 =0.011 MILES r� 7020 Birch Ridge Dr. A
P�iN$ V = rJ� MPH � PH [phone] Raleigh, NC 27610 P.e. ��P oF sQ°��
CORP. LICENSE NO.: C-0275 y @
* TTST —3% +DUAL =3% TOTAL LENGTH PROJECT 17BPJ.R.86 #670077 =0.070 MILES srcharuns: T�""
20 10 0 20 40
� � LEONARD G. FLETCHER PE ROADWAY DESIGN RIGHT OF WAY DATE:
� PROJECT ENGIhEER ENGINEER
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL) FUNC CLASS = RURAL — APRIL 21, 2015
LOCAL R.E. BURNS & soNs co
P. O. BOX T 168
4 Z O 4 $ S7ATESV�LLE. NC 28687 RIOJECT DESlGN ENG/NEER LETTING DATE:
PH fT04)92<-86C6
PROFILE (VERTICAL) SUB REGIONAL TIER PE APRIL 21, 2015
2012 STANDARD SPEC7FICATIONS S7GNAT[IRE:
6F-670077 Permit Drawiii� tsh stream.den 1/12/2016 235 3 9 PM TGS

NEW HOPE CREEK IMPACTS UT TO NEW HOPE CREEK IMPACTS
Length Type Description Length Type Description
'� Permanent 0 ft None No temporary impacts.
Temporary 0 ft None No temporary impacts. Temporary 0 ft None No temporary impacts.
PROPOSED OH POWER LINE
(APPROX. LOCATION)
EXISTING OH POWER LINE �
(APPROX. LOCATION)
PROPOSED POWER POLE GUY
WIRE (APPROX. LOCATION)
� �
12" CMP CHARLOTTE HILL LE�yIS
. - i�raua-i - -
PRd,POS�D POWER POLE JOINT °
USE� (APPROX. LOCATION) �r—
i W
i �
0
—PROP 0/H POW LINES N PROP 0/H POW LINES
�
�
rn
r
EXISTING R�W
------ � — �
-- � � R �,
--- � �
�� - ----_
� - -- -
'_�` �`
, -- ----- _
, � —
, ----
{ � --
, _— ��
� � __ - _- ---
_—_— T�-
--- � EXISTING R�
�— TO S H, RD,)
(UNION GROVE
BEGIN PROJECT
17BP.7.R.86
-L- STA. 11 + 60.00
NOTES:
1. NEW HOPE CREEK IS IN THE
CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN.
2. JORDAN LAKE BUFFER RULES IN EFFECT.
3. DO NOT INSTALL DECK DRAINS.
4. CLEARING SHALL BE PERFORMED PER
NCDOT METHOD II.
GRAPHIC SCALE
20 10 0 20 40
SF-670077_Pcrmit Drawing�sh_stream impacts.dgn I/12/2016 1:18:58 PM TGS
OIH POW LI
WETLANDS SHALL
NOT BE DISTURBED
N
��
,
W =�� ���
00 � y
� P�EDUE
\ �
1 oF ���,�.
--- ---
���ETp DRAIN __F -------_-- /
F- �� ---
���� - -- �
SR Ill3 (ARTHUR MINNIS RDl ,
10
BETTY �yALSER MINNIS
- �-�_�
� TELE PED
`�i-� i ' '' '
��1 �1�y.Z���
� PDE � m E
I� ~� �
WOODS �
� �
PROP. CLASS II RIP RAP TO � m
RESTORE NATURAL STREAM
CHANNEL ' �
I rn
� m
� �
I
;TJ/� �
� y y
iJ I 1,
� � /
J
� .�
/�J /
l � y �
/ J � / /; ,�
�j 7
� ���� ��� �.�
� S �
�� ����
„;`;' /: S
PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
P E RM I T D RAW I N G �78P.7.R.86 (SF -670077J
FOR BRIDGE #670077 TGS TG5 ENG/NEERS
ENc,iNiERS 706 H/LLSBOROUGH ST
� SU/TE 200
O RA N G E C O U N TY �� PHL�9/9J 77328887
STREAM IMPACTS
EXISTING BRIDGE DIMENSIONS 36'X26' (DOUBLE-SPAN), 90 DEG. SKEW
PROPOSED BRIDGE DIMENSIONS 55'X33' (SINGLE-SPAN), 90 DEG. SKEW
TOTAL PROJECT LENGTH - 370'
29a ��
�� C�
� 'o
v
�o
�,
- PROPOSED POWER POLE GUY
WIRE (APPROX. LOCATION)
PROPOSED POWER POLE JOINT 09
USE (APPROX. LOCATION) GLEN A. & ANN B. BLUMHARDT
—DUE��pUE�
DUE�
/— CLASS II RIP RAP DUE—
/ (STRUCTURES ITEM)
�/H p �
OW ,I'
_ - .� � � � ��a��� �-- Pfl0,�7/H %�
�� tiJ�� � `�J .�-- ��Ll�tve�'�J�
F
�
WOODS
2GI T8 2GI �
�-" ------ ---------��� -
%�—� r��_,�`�_�n,
� ---- � - =�� -- � -
PDE
BM#I
WOODs
Q2 = 0.3 CFS
V2 = 0.7 FTiS
Q10=0.4 CFS
V10 = 0.8 FTiS
CLASS B RIP RAP
DISSIPATOR PAD
011
KKARENHSSPOPOV CH
ANNE MONTGO�ERY
__EX��
— � T �NG
_� T l� \R�W
_ — � ���OSR �O�j `\\ �
�_ _ �- ��86� ��
--�_- �� \,
; _ �
_
� — ,
— —� _ _ _ _ \\\ _
\
- ��\ �_
EXis TiNG R � w � � �__
END PROJECT
17BP.7.R.86
-L- STA. 15 + 30.00
PERMIT DRAWING SHEET 1 OF 3

NEW HOPE CREEK IMPACTS UT TO NEW HOPE CREEK IMPACTS
Length Type Description Length Type Description
'� Permanent 0 ft None No temporary impacts.
Temporary 0 ft None No temporary impacts. Temporary 0 ft None No temporary impacts.
PROPOSED OH POWER LINE
(APPROX. LOCATION)
EXISTING OH POWER LINE �
(APPROX. LOCATION)
PROPOSED POWER POLE GUY
WIRE (APPROX. LOCATION)
� �
12�" CMP CHARLOTTE HILL LE�yiS
. � ;�Erai� - -
PRd,POS�D POWER POLE JOINT °
USE� (APPROX. LOCATION) �—
, w
� Q
—PROP 0/H POW LINES N PROP 0/H POW LINES
�
—__—_ �
�
m
r
EXISTING R�W
� __-,
--�_ � ,
C5" R�'P=- - — _
�c� � - - - - - --_ -
� ,
— ��__--�
_ - ��_ ,
� -
- _ --
_ __- �� --
: — � EXISTING R�W -
�— TO SR U79H,RD,)
(UNION GROVE
BEGIN PROJECT
17BP.7.R.86
—L— STA. 11 + 60.00
NOTES:
1. NEW HOPE CREEK IS IN THE
CAPE FEAR RIVER BASIN.
2. JORDAN LAKE BUFFER RULES IN EFFECT.
3. DO NOT INSTALL DECK DRAINS.
4. CLEARING SHALL BE PERFORMED PER
NCDOT METHOD II.
GRAPHIC SCALE
20 10 0 20 40
SF-670077_Pcrmit Drawing�sh_stream impacts.dgn I/12/2016 1:1821 PM TGS
s�s
OIH POW LI
WETLANDS SHALL
NOT BE DISTURBED
W ��m
�
�
3�
> >
i � �-: � ii
-- --
�DETO DRAIN __F __________
F_
st� ,�'�� - --
SR Ill3 (ARTHUR MINNIS RDl ,
10
BETTY �yALSER MINNIS
--�-��-�����=�' F�`_
_ �
� TELE PED
PDE
�
PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
P E RM I T D RAW I N G �78P.7.R.86 (SF -670077J
FOR BRIDGE #670077 TGS TG5 ENG/NEERS
ENc,iNiERS 706 H/LLSBOROUGH ST
� SU/TE 200
O RA N G E C O U N TY �� PHL�9/9J 77328887
STREAM IMPACTS
EXISTING BRIDGE DIMENSIONS 36'X26' (DOUBLE-SPAN), 90 DEG. SKEW
PROPOSED BRIDGE DIMENSIONS 55'X33' (SINGLE-SPAN), 90 DEG. SKEW
TOTAL PROJECT LENGTH - 370'
29a ��
8,,, c,�
� 'o
v
�o
�,
�, PROPOSED POWER POLE GUY
WIRE (APPROX. LOCATION)
�PROPOSED POWER POLE JOINT 09
USE (APPROX. LOCATION) GLEN A. & ANN B. BLUMHARDT
�����
�o c,`�
J� e�
�/ �O
mh ��
/�� � � �
!� g / I �
/ / _ �
� �- �'�'" ' ` � �NT��IMPACT
'.ARANIC CTARI�
_ ._. .. .. . _ .. ._
oseo ,�c UE��
oF "7.� � � DUE�pUE WOODS
—
�" /— CLASS II RIP RAP DUE—
- �' � Q' / (STRUCTURES ITEM) �UE— ^�
� ` v m PROP 0/H POW,/ �7
S�
S
� � WOODS `z��� m i�
� � 'I
�
PROP. CLASS II RIP RAP TO `� �
RESTORE NATURAL STREAM � s m
CHANNEL �n � �
.510�� _ � � �
, <
�� �� ;�/� /����
� �� � � i
y
� ;� � / ��
� �
� / ,-i
� y y �.
I � ���� s
� s� -,/
�m5 ' ,
`� S� � �
c -.
,� � �
- / i,�
�
c
PDE
WOODs
i�_� ��✓..,��a���-� F Ffl0 �H(u_ .) „`J�
�ruuv r r�E�
�------------�,,
—L— - —
2GI 18 2GI
� ---
_ ---
--- �-`
" ----
� �- ----------- ��I-
i�- r-n-�_s�_�'� �
--- � -
BM#I
�.
Q2 = 0.3 CFS � �
V2 = OJ FTiS � '� �
Q10 = 0.4 CFS ��^ CLASS B RIP RAP
V10=0.8 FTiS �,� DISSIPATOR PAD
011
KKARENHSSPOPOV CH
� �
EUG�NE C.
ANNE MONTGO�ERY
70��� �l � l'�J"� "U`�� ^. n� ; � .
oti�' \ END PROJECT
17BP.7.R.86
—L— STA. 15 + 30.00
�zs
PERMIT DRAWING SHEET 2 OF 3

520
510
500
BEGI GRADE
—L — ST e ll +60.
ELEV = 5/6e72
/_in �,-,.
EXISTING BRIDGE
TO BE REMOVED
Pl = l2 +26,00
EL = 5/5J4'
V C = ll0'
�K=53
DS = 35 MPH
LOW SIDE
LOW CHORD
PROP. GRADE
EX. GRADE
C�L —L— STA. 13 + 50.00
PROP. 1@55'
21" CSU W/4'-0" CAPS UTILIZED
PROP. GRADE = 514.76'
SKEW = 90° 100 YR. W.S. ELEV. = 515.32'
I �� 25 YR. W.S. ELEV. = 513.6'
�--- �------- �-- i —�'
RESTORED FLOODPLAIN FLOW L —T --�
AREA AT ABUTMENT 1= 6 SF i
i
i
i
i �
�� 1� �
i ri i
� � ,ii
�� �' ��
PROP. EXCAVATION TO ELEV. 509.3'
PROP. FILL TO ELEV. 508.0'
LINED/FILLED WITH CLASS II PROP. TOP OF BANK
RIP RAP ON GEOTEXTILE TO
RESTORE NATURAL STREAM REMOVE EXISTING —
CHANNEL CONCRETE SILL
1.5:1 NORMAL SLOPE W/—�
CL. II RIP RAP (TYP.)
ROCK ELEV. = 503.5'
12 + 00
ST RUCT URE HYDRAULIC DAT A
13 + 00
DESIGN DISCHARGE _ 1300 CFS
DESIGN FREQUENCY = 25 YRS
DESIGN HW ELEVATION = 5/3.6 FT
BASE DISCHARGE _ 1900 CFS
BASE FREQUENCY = l00 YRS
BASE HVy ELEVATION = 5/5.32 FT
OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE _ 1,900 CFS
OVERTOPPING FREQUENCY= f/– l00 YRS
OVER7"OPPIN� ELEVATION = 5/4.3Xx FT
xxOVERTOPPING ELEVATION REPRESENTS LOVyEST HIGH POINT ON DECK/ROADWAY,
W HICH OCCURS AT SAG @–L – ST A. 13+98.45 RT
SF-670077_Permit Urawing_pfl.dgn I/7/2016 I 1:04:13 AM TGS
�
I"�I'�(�>I���I 1.;I��:'
-L- Jl H,IJTJI
ELEV = 5/6062
Pl = l4 +4/°00
EL = 5/4.48' ,
VC = ll0'
�K=4/
DS = 30 MPH
_�— �� �
– `�`�r (+JCo4U=r�%
�=JOe3070%
� RESTORED FLOODPLAIN FLOW
AT ABUTMENT 2= 47 SF
- PROP. EXCAVATION TO ELEV. 509'
�
CLASS II RIP RAP
KEY–IN 3.5' (TYP.)
T
ROCK ELEV. = 502.7'
EXISTING CONCRETE SILL TO REMAIN
APPROX. W.S. ELEV. = 505'
ON DATE OF SITE VISIT (!�1 b2015)
14+00
PERMIT DRAWING
FOR BRIDGE #670077
ORANGE COUNTY
15+00
PERMIT DRAWING SHEET 3 OF 3

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site: B670077 (Br. 77 on SR 1113 fArthur Minnis Rdl) over New City/County: Oranqe Sampling Date: 12/3/2013
Hope Creek
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: NC Sampling Point: WA Upland
Investigator(s): J. Mason. A. James Section, Township, Range: _
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): 2=4
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P Lat: 35.998828 Long: -79.121374 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Enon loam (En6) NW I classification: N/A
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes � No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ❑, Soil ❑, or Hydrology ❑, significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � No ❑
Are Vegetation ❑, Soil ❑, or Hydrology ❑, naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes � No ❑
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No � �s the Sampled A?ea Yes ❑ No �
within a Wetland .
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No �
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑ Surtace Water (A1) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surtace (68)
❑ High Water Table (A2) ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ❑ Drainage Patterns (610)
❑ Saturation (A3) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (616)
❑ Water Marks (61) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Thin Muck Surtace (C7) ❑ Cra�sh Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (63) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (64) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
❑ Iron Deposits (B5) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Water-Stained Leaves (B9) ❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (613) ❑ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No � Depth (inches): N/A
Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No � Depth (inches): > 12in.
Saturation Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes � No �
(includes capillary fringe) Yes ❑ No � Depth (inches): > 12 in.
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont—Interim Version

vt�c i iai ivrv - use scienunc names or piants �ampung romt:
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size:30 ft) % Cover Species? Status Dominance Test Worksheet:
1. Pinus taeda 50 Yes FAC Number of Dominant Species
2. Liriodendron tulipifera 20 Yes FACU That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
3. Pinus virqiniana 10 NI Total Number of Dominant
4. Oxvdendrum arboreum 7 UPL Species Across All Strata:
5. Prunus serotina 5 FACU Percent of Dominant Species
6. Fraxinus americana 5 FACU That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
7. Prevalence Index worksheet:
8. Total % Cover of :
97 = Total Cover OBL species
50% of total cover: 48.5 20% of total cover: 19.4 FACW species
Saplinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:30 ft) FAC species
1. Liquidambarstvraciflua 25 Yes FAC FACU species
2. Juniperus virqiniana 7 FACU UPL species
2 (A)
3 (B)
67 (A/B)
Multiplv bv:
x1 = _
x2 = _
x3 = _
x4 = _
x5 =
3. Fagus grandifolia 5 FACU Column Totals: (A) (B)
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Herb Stratum (Plot size:30 ft)
1. Lonicera iaaonica
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
37 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 18.5 20% of total cover: 7.4
2
2
50°/ of total cover:
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size:30 ft)
1. -
2. -
3. -
4. -
5. -
= Total Cover
20% of total cover:
0 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 0 20% of total cover: 0
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
FAC
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
❑ 1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
� 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is <3.0'
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetationl (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in
diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.
SaplinglShrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH
and greater than 3.28 ft tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and
woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?
Yes � No ❑
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region -Interim Version

SOIL Sampling Point WA Upland
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) °/ Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-12+ 2.5YR 4/8 100 Clav
�Type: C= Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. ZLocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
❑ Histosol (A1) ❑ Dark Surface (S7) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) (MLRA 136, 147)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5) ❑ Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surtace (TF12)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surtace (A11) ❑ Depleted Dark Surtace (F7) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Thick Dark Surtace (Al2) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, MLRA Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA
� 147, 148) � 136)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if present):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soils Present? Yes ❑ No �
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont—Interim Version

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site: B670077 (Br. 77 on SR 1113 fArthur Minnis Rdl) over New City/County: Oranqe Sampling Date: 10/8/2013
Hope Creek
Applicant/Owner: NCDOT State: NC SamplingPoint: WAWetland
Investigator(s): J. Mason. A. James D. Riffey J. Dilday Section, Township, Range: -_
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): depression in residential vard Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 0=2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P Lat: 35.998828 Long: -79.121374 Datum: NAD83
Soil Map Unit Name: Chewacla loam (Ch), Georqeville silt loam (GeC) NW I classification: PEM
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes � No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation �, Soil ❑, or Hydrology ❑, significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes � No ❑
Are Vegetation ❑, Soil ❑, or Hydrology ❑, naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes � No ❑
Hydric Soil Present? Yes � No � �s the Sampled A?ea Yes � No ❑
within a Wetland .
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes � No ❑
Re"'arks: Wetland is in a residential yard and is occassionally mowed by homeowner (per conversation with him) when
it is drier. Wetland is connected to main creek via an ephemeral channel.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Secondarv Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) ❑ Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
❑ Surtace Water (A1) ❑ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) ❑ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surtace (68)
❑ High Water Table (A2) � Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) � Drainage Patterns (610)
� Saturation (A3) ❑ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) ❑ Moss Trim Lines (616)
❑ Water Marks (61) ❑ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) ❑ Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (B2) ❑ Thin Muck Surtace (C7) ❑ Cra�sh Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (63) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ❑ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (64) ❑ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
❑ Iron Deposits (B5) ❑ Geomorphic Position (D2)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67) ❑ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Water-Stained Leaves (B9) ❑ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
❑ Aquatic Fauna (613) � FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No � Depth (inches): N/A
Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No � Depth (inches): > 12 in.
Saturation Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes � No ❑
(includes capillary fringe) Yes � No ❑ Depth (inches): 0 in.
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont—Interim Version

vt�c i iai ivrv - use scienunc names or piants
Tree Stratum (Plot size:Within wetland)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
0 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 0 20% of total cover: 0
Saplinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:Within wetland)
1. Salix nipra 5 Yes OBL
2. Taxodium distichum 3 Yes OBL
3. Fraxinuspennsylvanica 2 FACW
4. Betula niqra 2 FACW
5.
6.
7.
8.
12 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 6 20% of total cover: 2.4
Herb Stratum (Plot size:Within wetland)
1. yperus sp. 90 Yes
2 Carex sp. 40 Yes
3. Eleocharis obtusa 40 Yes
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
170 = Total Cover
50°/ of total cover: 85 20°/ of total cover: 34
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size:Within wetland)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
0 = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 0 20% of total cover: 0
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below).
FACW
FACW
OBL
�ampung romt: wa wetiana
Dominance Test Worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species 5
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: -
Total Number of Dominant 5
Species Across All Strata: -
Percent of Dominant Species 100
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: -
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of : Multiplv bv:
OBL species x1 = _
FACW species x2 = _
FAC species x3 = _
FACU species x4 = _
UPL species x5 = _
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
❑ 1- Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
� 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
❑ 3 - Prevalence Index is <3.0'
❑ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetationl (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in
diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.
SaplinglShrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH
and greater than 3.28 ft tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and
woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation Yes � No ❑
Present?
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region -Interim Version

SOIL Sampling Point WA Wetland
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) °/ Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-12+ 10YR 4/1 80 10YR 5/6 20 C M PL SiCILo
�Type: C= Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. ZLocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
❑ Histosol (A1) ❑ Dark Surface (S7) ❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
❑ Histic Epipedon (A2) ❑ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147, 148)
❑ Black Histic (A3) ❑ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
❑ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) ❑ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) (MLRA 136, 147)
❑ Stratified Layers (A5) � Depleted Matrix (F3) ❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N) ❑ Redox Dark Surface (F6) ❑ Very Shallow Dark Surtace (TF12)
❑ Depleted Below Dark Surtace (A11) ❑ Depleted Dark Surtace (F7) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑ Thick Dark Surtace (Al2) ❑ Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N, MLRA Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA
� 147, 148) � 136)
❑ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) ❑ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
❑ Sandy Redox (S5) ❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑ Stripped Matrix (S6) wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if present):
Type:
Depth (inches): Hydric Soils Present? Yes � No ❑
Re"'arks: Homeowner stated that there was an underlying rock layer.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont—Interim Version