20231196 Ver 2_Ashby Village_NW PERMIT PACKET_20240424

Print Form
DMS ILF Mitigation Request Statement of Compliance with §143-214.11 & 143-214.20
(link to G.S. 143-214.111
Prior to accessing the Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) In -Lieu Fee (ILF) program, all applicants
must demonstrate compliance with G.S. §143-214.11 and 143-214.20. All requests MUST include this
form signed and dated by the permit applicant or an authorized agent.
Compliance Statement:
I have read and understand G.S. § 143-214.11 and 143-214.20 and have, to the best of my
knowledge, complied with the requirements. I understand that participation in the DMS is
voluntary and subject to approval by permitting agencies.
Please check all that apply:
❑ Applicant is a Federal or State Government Entity or a unit of local
government meeting the requirements set forth in G.S. 143-214.11 and is not
required to purchase credits from a mitigation bank.
✓❑ Mitigation bank(s) in the hydrologic unit where the impacts will occur have
been contacted and credits are not currently available. (link to DWR list)
❑ There are no listed mitigation banks located in the hydrologic unit where
this impact will take place that offer the credit type I need
❑ The DWR or the Corps of Engineers did not approve of the use of a
mitigation bank for the required compensatory mitigation for this project.
❑ This is a renewal request and the permit application is under review. Bank
credits were not available at the time the application was submitted.
Enter date permit application was submitted for review:
I have read and understand the DMS refund policies (attached)
initial here
Signature of Applicant or Agent
4/3/2024
Date
Ashby Village
Project Name
Samuel Adam Carter
Printed Name
Sanford, NC
Location

DIVISION OF MITIGATION SERVICES (DMS)
IN -LIEU FEE REQUEST FORM Revised Dec2022
Complete requested information, sign and date, email to kelly.williams(�ncdenr.gov . Attachments are acceptable for clarification
purposes (location map, address or lat long is required). Information submitted is subject to NC Public Records Law and may be
requested by third parties --------------------------------------------------
CONTACT INFORMATION APPLICANT'S AGENT APPLICANT
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------t--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Business/Company Name
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DR Horton Inc Wetland Solutions, LLC
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Contact Person
!-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------!--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Charles Persons Adam Carter
3. Street Address or P O Box 2000
!-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------!--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Aerial Center Parkway P.O. Box 244
4. City, State, Zip Morrisville, NC 27560 Bunnlevel, NC 28323
!-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------!--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5. Telephone Number
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------'--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------!
443-307-3386 910-890-2779
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6. E-Mail Address [e-mail] [e-mail]
PROJECT INFORMATION
7. Project Name
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ASheby Village
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------a
8. Project Location (nearest town, city)
Sanford
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
9. Lat-Long Coordinates or attach a map
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
35.449754,-79.129587
10. County
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------a
Lee
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
11. River Basin & Cataloging Unit (8-digit)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------a
Cape Fear
(See Note 1)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
12. Project Type **indicate owner type and
Owner Type: ® Government Private
write in project type (e.g. school, church, retail,
residential, apartments, road, utilities, military,
Project Type:
etc.)**
-!--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------!
13. Riparian Wetland Impact (ac.) (e.g., 0.13)
.12
14. Non -Riparian Wetland Impact (ac.)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------a
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
15. Coastal Marsh Impact (ac.)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
16. Stream Impact (ft.) (e.g. 1,234)
Warm - - - -----------------------Cool------------------------------------------------Cold----------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
17. Riparian Buffer Impact (sq. ft.)
------------------------------------------------------------------'-----------------------------------------------------------------=-----------------------------------------------------------------
Include subwatershed if Jordan or Falls Lake:
Zone 1: Zone 2:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
18. Regulatory Agency Staff Contacts
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------a
NCDWR: Zach
USACE: Capito, Rachel A
I Other:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check (�) below if this request is fora:
-
By signing below, the applicant is confirming they have
revision to a current acceptance
read and understand the DMS refund policy attached to this;
form.
renewal of an expired acceptance
Signature of Applicant or Authorized Agent:
�'Gu.AG��cm C _�G"yLt�QJ2�
extension of unexpired acceptance
3/4/2024
Date:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------=
Note 1: For help determining the Cataloging Unit, visit "Find Your HUC" and use the search box to find your impact location.
For questions contact Kelly Williams at 919-707-8915 or
kelly.williams(c)_ncdenr.gov or the main phone at 919-707-8976.
[Save Form Print Form

Refund Policy for Fees Paid to DMS In -Lieu Fee Programs
Purpose: The purpose of this policy is to make clear the circumstances and process under which a
permittee can obtain a refund while simultaneously balancing customer service and responsible
business practices. This policy applies to all refund requests.
Policy Statement: The policy of DMS is to allow for refunds under certain conditions.
1. All refund requests must be made in writing to the DMS In -Lieu Fee Program Coordinator at
kelly.williams(a)-ncdenr.gov.
2. All refund requests are subject to fund availability. DMS does not guarantee fund availability for
any request.
3. The request must either come from the entity that made the payment or from an authorized agent.
Third parties requesting refunds must provide written authorization from the entity that made the
payment specifying the name and address of the authorized refund recipient.
4. Refund requests related to unintended overpayments, typographical errors or incorrect invoices
should be brought the attention of the In -Lieu Fee Program Coordinator as soon as possible. Such
requests are typically approved without delay.
5. Payments made under the incremental payment procedure are not eligible for refunds.
6. Refund requests made within nine months of payment to DMS will only be considered for requests
associated with projects that have been terminated or modified where the permittee's mitigation
requirements have been reduced. Such requests must be accompanied by written verification from the
permitting agency that the project has been cancelled, the permits have been rescinded or have been
modified, or the mitigation requirements have been reduced.
7. Refund requests made more than nine months from the payment date will only be considered for
permits that were terminated or modified to not require any mitigation. Such requests must be
accompanied by written verification from the permitting agency that the project has been cancelled, the
permits have been rescinded and/or mitigation is no longer required.
8. Refund requests not meeting the criteria specified above are not eligible for a refund.
9. Refund requests that meet the criteria above will be elevated to DMS Senior Management for
review. The following considerations apply to all refund requests:
a. availability of funds after consideration of all existing project and regulatory obligations
b. the date the payment was made
c. the likelihood DMS can use the mitigation procured using the payment to meet other
mitigation requirements
10. Once a refund has been approved, the refund recipient must provide a completed W-9 form to the
DMS In -Lieu fee Program Coordinator within two weeks in order to process the refund though the
State Controller's Office.
11. All decisions shall be final.

DWR
GNIM.n of Ware, Resources
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
For Nationwide Permits and Regional General Permits
(along with corresponding Water Quality Certifications)
April 13, 2022 Ver 4.3
Please note: fields marked with a red asterisk below are required. You will not be able to submit the form until all mandatory questions are answered.
Also, if at any point you wish to print a copy of the E-PCN, all you need to do is right -click on the document and you can print a copy of the form.
Below is a link to the online help file.
https://edocs.deq.nc.govfWaterResources/0/edoc/624704/PCN / 2OHelp/ 2OFile / 202018-1-30.pdf
A. Processing Information O
Pre -Filing Meeting Date Request was submitted on:
7/19/2023
If this is a courtesy copy, please fill in this with the submission date.
Is this project connected with ARPA funding?"
O Yes No
County (or Counties) where the project is located:"
Lee
Is this a NCDMS Project"
O Yes OQ No
Click Yes, only if NCD MS is the applicant or co -applicant.
DO NOT CHECK YES, UNLESS YOU ARE DMS OR CO -APPLICANT
Is this project a public transportation project?"
Q Yes OQ No
This is any publicly funded by municipal,state or federal funds road, rail, airport transportation project.
la. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:"
0 Section 404 Permit (wetlands, streams and waters, Clean Water Act)
❑ Section 10 Permit (navigable waters, tidal waters, Rivers and Harbors Act)
Has this PCN previously been submitted?"
Q Yes
OQ No
1 b. What type(s) of permit(s) do you wish to seek authorization?"
Q Nationwide Permit (NWP)
❑ Regional General Permit (RGP)
❑ Standard (IP)
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?"
Yes ' No
Nationwide Permit (NWP) Number:
NWP Numbers (for multiple NWPS):
List all NW numbers you are applying for not on the drop down list.
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWR:
check all that apply
0 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular
0 Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ Individual 401 Water Quality Certification
29 - Residential Developments
le. Is this notification solely for the record because written approval is not required?
401 Water Quality Certification - Express
❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
For the record only for DWR 401 Certification: OQ Yes 0 No

For the record only for Corps Permit: * Yes Q No
1f. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?"
Q Yes (§) No
1g. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation of impacts?
If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program.
Q Yes QQ No
Acceptance Letter Attachment
Click the upload button or drag and drop files hereto attach document
Agent Authorization Letter. pdf 323.75KB
FILE TYPE MUST BE PDF
1 h. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties?"
Yes No
1j. Is the project located in a designated trout watershed?"
" Yes V No
Linkto trout information: http://www.saw.usace.army.miI/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-Program/Agency-Coordination/Trout.aspx
B. Applicant Information
la. Who is the Primary Contact?"
Samuel Adam Carter
1c. Primary Contact Phone:"
1 b. Primary Contact Email" (xxx)xxx-xxxx
[e-mail] [phone]
1d. Who is applying for the permit?"
Owner ( Applicant (other than owner)
(Check all that apply)
1e. Is there an AgentlConsultant for this project?"
U Yes V No
2. Owner Information
2a. Name(s) on recorded deed:"
D.R. HORTON INC
2b. Deed book and page no.:
1676 909
2c. Contact Person:
(for Corporations)
Charles Person
2d.Address*
Street Address
2000 AERIAL CENTER PKWY STE 110
Address Line 2
City
State / Province / Region
MORRISVILLE
NC
Postal /Zip Code
Country
27560
USA
2e. Telephone Number:"
(xxx)xxx-xxxx
[phone]
2f. Fax Number:
2g. Email Address:"
[e-mail]
4. Agent/Consultant (if applicable)
4a. Name:"
Samuel Adam Carter
4b. Business Name:
inapplicable)
Wetland Solutions, LLC
u

4c. Address"
Street Address
P.O. Box 244
Address Line 2
City
Bunnlevel
Postal /Zip Code
28323
4d. Telephone Number:"
[phone]
4f. Email Address:"
[e-mail]
C. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Project Information
1a. Name of project:"
Ashby Village
1b. Subdivision name:
(if appropriate)
Ashby Apartments
1c. Nearest municipality/town:"
Sanford
2. Proiect Identification
State / Province / Region
NC
Country
USA
4e. Fax Number:
(xxx)xxx-xxxx
2a. Property Identification Number:
2b. Property size:
(tax PIN or parcel ID)
(in acres)
966128053800
14.4
2c. Project Address
Street Address
0 S HORNER BLVD
Address Line 2
City
State / Province / Region
Sanford
NC
Postal /Zip Code
Country
27332
USA
2d. Site coordinates in decimal degrees
Please collect site coordinates in decimal degrees. Use between 4-6 digits (unless you are using a survey -grade GPS device) after the decimal place as appropriate, based on how the location was
determined. (For example, most mobile phones with GPS provide locational precision in decimal degrees to map coordinates to 5 or 6 digits after the decimal place.)
Latitude:" Longitude:"
35.449621-79.129211
-77.796371
3. Surface Waters
3a. Name of the nearest body of water to proposed project:"
Carrs Creek
3b. Water Resources Classification of nearest receiving water:"
C
Surface Water Lookup
3c. What river basin(s) is your project located in?"
Cape Fear
3d. Please provide the 12-digit HUC in which the project is located."
030300040202
River Basin Lookup
U
lJ
l^J
4. Project Description and History

4a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application:"
Impact area is a made swell that has naturalized through stormwater intrussion. The project area is in the City of Sanford surrounding by residential and commericial development.
4b. Have Corps permits or DWR certifications been obtained for this project (including all prior phases) in the past?"
O Yes O No OO Unknown
4f. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
.86ac
4g. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams on the property:
(intermittent and perennial)
1000ft
4h. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:"
The purppose of this project is to construct a residential road to provide access and interconnectivey for the entrance of the residential development to Ashby Road.
4i. Describe the overall project in detail, including indirect impacts and the type of equipment to be used:"
The over all project will consist of constructing Stormwater BMPs and bring in fill material and constructing roadway. Bulldozers backhoes and graders will be utilized during construction.
5. Jurisdictional Determinations
5a. Have the wetlands or streams been delineated on the property or proposed impact areas?"
Yes No O Unknown
Comments:
5b. If the Corps made a jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made?"
O Preliminary OO Approved O Not Verified O Unknown O N/A
Corps AID Number:
Example: SAW-2017-99999
SAW-2021-00602
5c. If 5a is yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Samuel Adam Carter
Agency/Consultant Company: Wetland Solutions, LLC
Other:
5d. List the dates of the Corp jurisdiction determination or State determination if a determination was made by the Corps or DWR.
July 2021 James Lastinger
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?"
O Yes No
Are any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permits(s) used, or intended to be used, to authorize any part of the proposed project or related activity? This includes other
separate and distant crossing for linear projects that require Department of the Army authorization but don't require pre -construction notification.
D. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Where are the impacts associated with your project? (check all that apply):
Wetlands ❑ Streams -tributaries Buffers
Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
"W." will be used in the table below to represent the word "wetland".
u
2a1 Reason"(?)
Road access
2b. Impact type" M
P
pe of W.*
r�y
Headwater Forest
2d. W. name"
W5
2e. Forested" ��2f.
Yes
Type of Jurisdicitio
Corps I
2g. Impact
area"
.060
acres)
Grading
T
Headwater Forest
W5
Yes
Corps Jacres)
020
2g. Total Temporary Wetland Impact
0.020

2g. Total Permanent Wetland Impact
0.060
2g. Total Wetland Impact
0.080
2i. Comments:
E. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
la. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing the project:"
We have have desided to impact the head of the drain because it has been impacted by past farming and dwelling
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques:"
We will set up BMPs to help consolidate all surface water to low point on siltfence with outlet 57 rock outlet to help defuss flow from creating
sedimentation transport from impact.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
Yes No
2b. If this project DOES NOT require Compensatory Mitigation, explain why:
NC Stream Temperature Classification Maps can be found under the Mitigation Concepts tab on the Wilmington District's RIBITS website.
F. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWR)
*** Recent changes to the stormwater rules have required updates to this section .***
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
C Yes No
For a list of options to meet the diffuse flow requirements, click here.
If no, explain why:
No State regulated buffer in Cape Fear Area but Sanford has 50ft buffer utilizewd in UDO to help with deterrent of stream impacts
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. Is this a NCDOT project subject to compliance with NCDOT's Individual NPDES permit NCS000250?"
Yes ^ No
2b. Does this project meet the requirements for low density projects as defined in 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2)?"
OO Yes J No
To look up low density requirement click here 15A NCAC 02H .1003(2).
Comments:
G. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds orthe use of public (federal/state) land?"
Yes No
2. Violations (DWR Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWR Water Quality Certification Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), or DWR Surface Water or Wetland Standards or
Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?"
Yes No
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWR Requirement)
v
u

3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?"
. Yes No
3b. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
DOT surface water intrustion to wetland will be better managed once project is complete.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWR Requirement)
4a. Is sewage disposal required by DWR for this project?"
OO Yes O No O N/A
4b. Describe, in detail, the treatment methods and dispositions (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project. If the wastewater will be treated at a
treatment plant, list the capacity available at that plant.
City of Sanford Waster Water treatment plant will treat onsite waste water.
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or habitat?"
Yes J No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act impacts?"
Yes O No
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Raleigh
5d. Is another Federal agency involved?"
v Yes No
5e. Is this a DOT project located within Division's 1-8?"
OQ Yes O No
Unknown
5j. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat?"
USFWS IPAC and Natural Heritage Program
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as an Essential Fish Habitat?"
�_ Yes OQ No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact an Essential Fish Habitat?"
NOAA's Essential Fish Habitat Mapper
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
Linkto the State Historic Preservation Office Historic Properties Map (does not include archaeological data: http://gis.ncdcr.gov/h/hpoweb/
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation status (e.g., National Historic Trust
designation or properties significant in North Carolina history and archaeology)?"
O Yes OO No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?"
http://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
Link to the FEMA Floodplain Maps: https:Hmsc.fema.gov/portal/search
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-yearfloodplain?"
Yes No
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the flood plain determination?"
https://msc.fema.gov/portal/search
Miscellaneous
Comments
Please see attached request for NW29 permit. Let me know if you have any questions.
The impact of .06ac falls below treshold for mitigation, but we are needing some form of writen concurrrence. Thank
Thank you for your time.

Please use the space below to attach all required documentation or any additional information you feel is helpful for application review. Documents should be combined into one file when
possible, with a Cover Letter, Table of Contents, and a Cover Sheet for each Section preferred.
Click the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
Ashby Village Apartments - Concept Site Plan.pdf
6.47MB
Ashby Village_IPAC Report.pdf
263.07KB
Broadway Road Ashby Village Parcel 1 details.pdf
188.08KB
Broadway Road Ashby Village Parcel 2 details. pdf
765.79KB
Civil 3D 2017 Template. pdf
510.32KB
Ashby Village_SHPO map.pdf
351.56KB
20230317 Ashby Apartments Access Road Grading.pdf
518.42KB
Agent Authorization Letter. pdf
323.75KB
Signed AJD_PJD.pdf
1.71 MB
File must be PDF or KMZ
Signature
Q By checking the box and signing below, I certify that:
• The project proponent hereby certifies that all information contained herein is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief', and
• The project proponent hereby requests that the certifying authority review and take action on this CWA 401 certification request within the applicable reasonable period of time.
• have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• agree that submission of this PCN form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act'),
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act"),
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written signature, AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the PCN form.
Full Name:"
Samuel Adam Carter
Signature"
Date
8/25/2023
O

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: #CURRENT DATE TRADITIONAL#
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Adam Carter, Wetland Solutions, LLC PO Box 244
Bunnlevel, NC 28323
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Wilmington, #FOLDER NAME#,
#FOLDER DA NUMBER#
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: 3107 S Horner Blvd.
E. #FOLDER LOCATION DIRECTIONS#
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Lee City: Sanford
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Lat.: 35.4531790 Long.:-79.130840
Universal Transverse Mercator: 17N
Name of nearest waterbody: Carrs Creek
F. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES INREVIEWAREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site
Number
Latitude (decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal degrees)
Estimated amount of
aquatic resources in
review area (acreage
and linear feet, if
applicable
Type of aquatic
resources (i.e.,
wetland vs. non-
wetland waters)
Geographic authority to
which the aquatic resource
"may be" subject (i.e.,
Section 404 or Section
10/404
W4
35.451059
-79.126916
0.05 acre
Wetland
Section 404
W5
35.450025
-79.128716
0.86 acre
Wetland
Section 404
W7
35.451454
-79.126113
0.30 acre
Wetland
Section 404
Total:
1.21 acres
NA
Open water
Section 10/404
S7
35.451075
-79.126954
268 If
Non -wetland
Section 10/404
S8
35.450399
-79.127675
358 If
Non -wetland
Section 10/404
S9
35.451395
-79.12641
158 If
Non -wetland
Section 10/404
S10
35.451483
-79.12605
617If
Non -wetland
Section 10/404
Total:
1,401 If

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the
review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option to request
and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an informed decision after
having discussed the various types of JDs and their characteristics and circumstances when
they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide
General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre- construction
notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or other general permit,
and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the activity, the permit applicant is
hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit authorization
based on a PJD, which does not make an official determination of jurisdictional aquatic
resources; (2) the applicant has the option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and
conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could
possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions;
(3) the applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can accept
a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that
permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary;
(5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without
requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a
permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking any activity in
reliance on any form of Corps permit authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that
all aquatic resources in the review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as
jurisdictional, and waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial
compliance or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court;
and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms and
conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively appealed
pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it becomes appropriate to
make an official determination whether geographic jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources
in the review area, or to provide an official delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, the Corps will provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is
practicable. This PJD finds that there "may be" waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be"
navigable waters of the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in
the review area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources below where
indicated for all checked items:
❑ Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map:
® Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
® U. S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: 24K, Sanford Quad
® Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: SSURGO 9/21/2021
® National wetlands inventory map(s). Citename: USFWS 20230526
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
® FEMA/FIRM maps: FIRM Panels: 3710966100
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: (National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
® Photographs: ®Aerial (Name & Date): Maxar 11/12/2018
or ❑Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been
verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later Jurisdictional
determinations.
Signature and date of Regulatory
staff member completing PJD
Signature and date of person
requesting PJD (REQUIRED,
unless obtaining the signature
is impracticable) t
1 Districts may establish timeframes for requester to return signed PJD forms. If the requester does not respond within the
established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is necessary prior to finalizing
an action.

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW-2021-00602 County: Lee U.S.G.S. Quad: NC -Sanford
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Requestor:
Wetland Solutions, LLC
Adam Carter
Address:
PO Box 244
Bunnlevel, NC 28323
Telephone Number:
910-890-2779
E-mail:
adam(a)wetlandnc.com
Size (acres) 159 Nearest Town Sanford
Nearest Waterway Carrs Creek River Basin Cape Fear
USGS HUC 03030004 Coordinates Latitude: 35.4531
Longitude:-79.1308
Location description: The project site is approximately 159 acres located adiacent to Ashby Road, near the town of Sanford,
Lee County, North Carolina. The approved portion of this determination only applies to waters P3 and W3 as depicted within
the anoroved JD area on the attached delineation man. The nreliminary nortion of this determination annlies to all other
waters referenced herein.
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
® There appear to be waters, including wetlands on the above described project area/property, that may be subject to Section 404
of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). The
waters, including wetlands have been delineated, and the delineation has been verified by the Corps to be sufficiently accurate
and reliable. The approximate boundaries of these waters are shown on the enclosed delineation map dated 6/18/2021. Therefore
this preliminary jurisdiction determination may be used in the permit evaluation process, including determining compensatory
mitigation. For purposes of computation of impacts, compensatory mitigation requirements, and other resource protection
measures, a permit decision made on the basis of a preliminary JD will treat all waters and wetlands that would be affected in any
way by the permitted activity on the site as if they are jurisdictional waters of the U.S. This preliminary determination is not an
appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part 331). However, you may
request an approved JD, which is an appealable action, by contacting the Corps district for further instruction.
❑ There appear to be waters, including wetlands on the above described project area/property, that may be subject to Section 404
of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403).
However, since the waters, including wetlands have not been properly delineated, this preliminary jurisdiction determination
may not be used in the permit evaluation process. Without a verified wetland delineation, this preliminary determination is
merely an effective presumption of CWA/RHA jurisdiction over all of the waters, including wetlands at the project area, which
is not sufficiently accurate and reliable to support an enforceable permit decision. We recommend that you have the waters,
including wetlands on your project area/property delineated. As the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland
delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that can be verified by the Corps.
B. Approved Determination
❑ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area/property subject to the permit
requirements of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403) and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
(CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for
a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ There are waters, including wetlandson the above described project area/property subject to the permit requirements of Section
404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) (33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this
determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ We recommend you have the waters, including wetlands on your project area/property delineated. As the Corps may not be
able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that
can be verified by the Corps.

SAW-2021-00602
❑ The waters, including wetlands on your project area/property have been delineated and the delineation has been verified by
the Corps. The approximate boundaries of these waters are shown on the enclosed delineation map dated DATE. We strongly
suggest you have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be reviewed and verified by the Corps. Once
verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA jurisdiction on your property which, provided
there is no change in the law or our published regulations, may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years.
❑ The waters, including wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat signed by the
Corps Regulatory Official identified below onDATE. Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this
determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
© There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described project area/property which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA).
You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Morehead City, NC, at [phone] to determine their
requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US, including wetlands, without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). Placement of dredged or fill material, construction or
placement of structures, or work within navigable waters of the United States without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Sections 9 and/or 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (33 USC § 401 and/or 403). If you have any questions
regarding this determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact James Lastint!er at 919-554-4884 ext 32 or
James.C.Lastinl!er(&usace.army.mil.
C. Basis For Determination: Basis For Determination: See the preliminary and approved iurisdictional
determination forms dated 08/05/2021.
D. Remarks:
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the particular site
identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security
Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you should request
a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in B.
above)
If you object to this determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. Enclosed
you will find a Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and Request for Appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this
determination you must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Mr. Philip A. Shannin
Administrative Appeal Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Floor M9
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8803
AND
PHIL,IP.A. SHANNIN(&USACE.ARMY.MIL,
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for appeal
under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP. Should you
decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by Not applicable.
**It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Divisi n Office if you do not object to the determination in this correspondence.
Corps Regulatory Official:
Date of PJD: 08/05/2021 - Expiration Date of PJD: Not applicable
Date of AID: 08/05/2021 Expiration Date of AID: 08/05/2026

SAW-2021-00602
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so, please complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at
http://corpsmapu.usace.anny.mil/cm_apex/Vp=136:4:0
Copy furnished:
Property Owner:
Force Investment Group LLC
Mark Lvczkowski
Address:
3107 S Horner Blvd
Sanford, NC 27332
Telephone Number:
919-842-0334
E-mail:
markOr4!.11c

NOTIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OPTIONS AND PROCESS AND
REQUEST FOR APPEAL
Applicant: Wetland Solutions, LLC, Adam Carter File Number: SAW-2021-00602
Date: 08/05/2021
Attached is:
See Section below
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
A
PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
B
PERMIT DENIAL
C
©
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
D
©
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
E
SECTION I - The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above decision.
Additional information may be found at or http://www.usace.annv.mil/Missions/CivilWorks/Res4ulatorvPros4ramandPennits.asbx
or the Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request
that the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district
engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will
forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your
objections and may: (a) modify the permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your
objections, or (c) not modify the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After
evaluating your objections, the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in
Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein,
you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of
this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days
of the date of this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section 11 of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division
engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new
information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the
date of this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers
Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section 11 of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.

E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the
preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed),
by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new information for further consideration by the
Corps to reevaluate the JD.
SECTION II - REQOST FOR APP L or OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your objections to an initial
proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to this form to clarify where your reasons or
objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps memorandum for the
record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the review officer has determined is needed to
clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps may add new information or analyses to the record.
However, you may provide additional information to clarify the location of information that is already in the administrative
record.
POINT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION:
If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the
If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may
appeal process you may contact:
also contact:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division
MR. PHILIP A. SHANNIN
Attn: James Lastinger
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL REVIEW OFFICER
Raleigh Regulatory Office
CESAD-PDS-O
U.S Army Corps of Engineers
60 FORSYTH STREET SOUTHWEST, FLOOR M9
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-8803
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
PHONE: [phone]; FAX [phone]
EMAIL: PHILIP.A.SHANNIN(&USACE.ARMY.MIL,
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government
consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15-day
notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportuni to participate in all site investi ations.
Date:
Telephone number:
Signature of appellant or agent.
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Attn: James Lastinger, , 69 Darlington Avenue, Wilmington, North
Carolina 28403
For Permit denials, Proffered Permits and Approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:
Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Philip Shannin, Administrative
Appeal Officer, CESAD-PDO, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 1OM15, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
REGULATORY PROGRAM
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM (INTERIM)
NAVIGABLE WATERS PROTECTION RULE
I. ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION
Completion Date of Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD): 08/05/2021
ORM Number: SAW-2021-00602
Associated JDs: N/A
Review Area Location': State/Territory: NC City: Sanford County/Parish/Borough:
Center Coordinates of Review Area: Latitude 35.4531 Longitude
II. FINDINGS
A. Summary: Check all that apply. At least one box from the following list MUST be selected. Complete the
corresponding sections/tables and summarize data sources.
❑ The review area is comprised entirely of dry land (i.e., there are no waters or water features, including
wetlands, of any kind in the entire review area). Rationale: N/A or describe rationale.
❑ There are "navigable waters of the United States" within Rivers and Harbors Act jurisdiction within the
review area (complete table in Section II.B).
There are "waters of the United States" within Clean Water Act jurisdiction within the review area
(complete appropriate tables in Section II.C).
0 There are waters or water features excluded from Clean Water Act jurisdiction within the review area
(complete table in Section II.D).
B. Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 Section 10 (§ 10)2
10 Name
§ 10 Size
§ 10 Criteria
Rationale for § 10 Determination
N/A.
N/A I
N/A.
N/A.
C. Clean Water Act Section 404
Territorial Seas and Traditional Navigable Waters a 1 waters :3
a 1 Name
a 1 Size
a 1 Criteria
Rationale fora 1 Determination
N/A.
N/A I
N/A.
Tributaries ((a)(2) waters):
(a)(2) Name
(a)(2) Size
(a)(2) Criteria
Rationale for (a)(2) Determination
N/A
N/A I
I N/A.
N/A.
Lakes and ponds, and impoundments of jurisdictional waters ((a)(3 waters):
a 3 Name
a 3 Size
a 3 Criteria
Rationale fora 3 Determination
N/A.
N/A I
N/A.
Adjacent wetlands a 4 waters):
a 4 Name
a 4 Size
a 4 Criteria
Rationale fora 4 Determination
N/A.
N/A I
N/A.
N/A.
' Map(s)/figure(s) are attached to the AJD provided to the requestor
z If the navigable water is not subject to the ebb and flow of the tide or included on the District's list of Rivers and Harbors Act Section 10 navigable waters list, do
NOT use this document to make the determination. The District must continue to follow the procedure outlined in 33 CFR part 329.14 to make a Rivers and Harbors
Act Section 10 navigability determination.
s A stand-alone TNW determination is completed independently of a request for an AJD. A stand-alone TNW determination is conducted for a specific segment of river
or stream or other type of waterbody, such as a lake, where upstream or downstream limits or lake borders are established. A stand-alone TNW determination should be
completed following applicable guidance and should NOT be documented on the AJD Form.
Page 2 of 2 Form Version 10 June 2020_updated

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
REGULATORY PROGRAM
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM (INTERIM)
NAVIGABLE WATERS PROTECTION RULE
D. Excluded Waters or Features
Excluded waters b)(1) — b 12 :4
Exclusion Name
Exclusion Size
Exclusions
Rationale for Exclusion Determination
acre(s)
(b)(8) Artificial
Pond P3 is entirely surround by uplands and
lake/pond
excavated wholly within uplands on site.
constructed or
excavated in
upland or a non -
jurisdictional
water, so long as
the artificial lake
or pond is not an
impoundment of
a jurisdictional
water that meets
c 6.
W3
0.99
acre(s)
(b)(1) Non-
Wetland W3 is entirely surrounded by uplands
adjacent wetland.
III. SUPPORTING INFORMATION
A. Select/enter all resources that were used to aid in this determination and attach data/maps to this
document and/or references/citations in the administrative record, as appropriate.
❑x Information submitted by, or on behalf of, the applicant/consultant: JD request received on 3/19/2021
This information sufficient for purposes of this AJD.
Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps: Title(s) and/or date(s).
❑x Photographs: Aerial: 2018
❑x Corps site visit(s) conducted on: April 16, 2021
❑ Previous Jurisdictional Determinations (AJDs or PJDs): ORM Number(s) and date(s).
❑ Antecedent Precipitation Tool: provide detailed discussion in Section 111.B.
❑x USDA NRCS Soil Survey: SSURGO 2021
❑x USFWS NWI maps: USFWS NWI Oct 2020
❑x USGS topographic maps: Sanford Quad
Other data sources used to aid in this determination:
Data Source select
Name and/or date and other relevant information
USGS Sources
N/A.
USDA Sources
N/A.
NOAA Sources
N/A.
USACE Sources
N/A.
State/Local/Tribal Sources
N/A.
Other Sources
N/A.
' Some excluded waters, such as (b)(2) and (b)(4), may not be specifically identified on the AJD form unless a requestor specifically asks a Corps district to do so.
Corps districts may, in case -by -case instances, choose to identify some or all of these waters within the review area.
s Because of the broad nature of the (b)(1) exclusion and in an effort to collect data on specific types of waters that would be covered by the (b)(1) exclusion, four sub-
categories of (b)(1) exclusions were administratively created for the purposes of the AJD Form. These four sub -categories are not new exclusions, but are simply
administrative distinctions and remain (b)(1) exclusions as defined by the NWPR.
Page 2 of 2 Form Version 10 June 2020_updated

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
REGULATORY PROGRAM
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM (INTERIM)
NAVIGABLE WATERS PROTECTION RULE
B. Typical year assessment(s):
C. Additional comments to support AJD: N/A
Page 2 of 2 Form Version 10 June 2020_updated

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: 08/05/2021
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Wetland Solutions, LLC, Adam Carter, PO
Box 244, Bunnlevel, NC 28323
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Wilmington District, Ashby Village, SAW-2021-
00602
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The project site is approximately
159 acres located adjacent to Ashby Road, near the town of Sanford, Lee County, North Carolina. The
approved portion of this determination only applies to waters P3 and W3 as depicted within the approved JD
area on the attached delineation map. The preliminary portion of this determination applies to all other waters
referenced herein.
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES
AND/OR AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County: Lee City: Sanford
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Latitude: 35.4531 Longitude:-79.1308
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Carrs Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
®Field Determination. Date(s): April 16, 2021
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES INREVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO
REGULATORY JURISDICTION
Click here to enter text.
Site
Number
Latitude (decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal degrees)
Estimated amount of
aquatic resources in
review area (acreage
and linear feet, if
applicable
Type of aquatic
resources (i.e.,
wetland vs. non-
wetland waters)
Geographic authority to
which the aquatic resource
"may be" subject (i.e.,
Section 404 or Section
10/404
W1
35.455536
-79.131292
12.46 acres
Wetland
Section 404
W4
35.451059
-79.126916
0.05 acre
Wetland
Section 404
W5
35.450026
-79.128714
0.86 acre
Wetland
Section 404
W6
35.455554
-79.132936
0.8 acre
Wetland
Section 404
P1
35.451529
-79.132083
0.42 acre
Open water
Section 404
P2
35.455507
-79.132273
0.5 acre
Open water
Section 404
S1
35.455234
-79.130533
2,7701f
Non -wetland
Section 404
S2
35.457004
-79.131146
649 If
Non -wetland
Section 404
S3
35.455468
-79.131341
313 If
Non -wetland
Section 404
S4
35.454556
-79.131876
785 If
Non -wetland
Section 404
S5
35.454742
-79.128795
258 If
Non -wetland
Section 404

S6
35.453825
-79.127435
427 if
Non -wetland
Section 404
S7
35.451075
-79.126954
268 if
Non -wetland
Section 404
S8
35.4503
-79.1276
358 if
Non -wetland
Section 404
1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the
review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option to request
and obtain an approved 7D (AID) for that review area based on an informed decision after
having discussed the various types of 7Ds and their characteristics and circumstances when
they may be appropriate.
2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide
General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre- construction
notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or other general
permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AID for the activity, the permit
applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit
authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an official determination of
jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the option to request an AID before
accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit
authorization on an AID could possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being
required or different special conditions; (3) the applicant has the right to request an
individual permit rather than accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or other
general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can accept a permit authorization and
thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including
whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5)
undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without
requesting an AID constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the PJD; (6)
accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking
any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit authorization based on a PJD
constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the review area affected in any way by
that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and waives any challenge to such jurisdiction
in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement action, or in any administrative
appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an AID or
a PJD, the 7D will be processed as soon as practicable. Further, an AID, a proffered
individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual permit
denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an
administrative appeal, it becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether
geographic jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an
official delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AID to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds that
there "may be"waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be" navigable waters of the U.S.
on the subj ect review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review area that could
be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply) Checked items are included in the administrative
record and are appropriately cited:
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map: attached
®Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor. Datasheets:
® Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concurwith data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
El Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑Corps navigable waters' study:
0U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
®USGS NHD data:
❑USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps:
® U. S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: Sanford Quad
®Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: SSURGO 2021
® National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: USFWS NWI Oct. 2020
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
® FEMA/FI RM maps: NC FIRM
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is:
®Photographs: ® Aerial (Name & Date): 2018
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been verified by the Corps
and should not be relied upon for later Jurisdictional determinations.
"'Signature and date of Regulatory
staff member completing PJD
08/05/2021
Signature and date of person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining the signature is
impracticable) t
1 Districts may establish timeframes for requester to return signed PJD forms. If the requester does not respond within the established
time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is necessary prior to finalizing an action.

"•, use •
e •
•
ee • e ��♦
e � i • •
a
i
Project Boundary — 159.15 acres O 11-19 Delineation Flags Updated
Preliminary WOUS — 5,828 ft O J1-J71 O H1-H27
Approved JD Area — 5.58 acres O K1-K7 O F1-F18
Delineation Flags o S1-S29 Wetland Type
o Al-A26 O T1-T6 ' Section 404 — 15.11 acres
o B1-B23 O stake Open Water — 1.93 acres
o Cl-C34 • well
o El-E299 tar Geographics, C ES/ ir.ru DS, USDA,
l9S'GS, At:r Gi i1D IGN h GIS lJ r C rnuni
Project Name -Ashby Village N Figure. 2
-�-, Location. Sanford, Lee County, NC w E
9Pi lf�w3Np LkG
s 1 inch = 500 feet
P.O. Box 244 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 Feet 18 June 2021
Bunnlevel, NC 28323 1 1 1 1 1

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Action Id. SAW-2021-00602 County: Lee U.S.G.S. Quad: NC -Sanford
NOTIFICATION OF JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
Requestor:
Wetland Solutions, LLC
Adam Carter
Address:
PO Box 244
Bunnlevel, NC 28323
Telephone Number:
910-890-2779
E-mail:
[e-mail]
Size (acres) 159 Nearest Town Sanford
Nearest Waterway Carrs Creek River Basin Cape Fear
USGS HUC 03030004 Coordinates Latitude: 35.4531
Longitude:-79.1308
Location description: The project site is approximately 159 acres located adjacent to Ashby Road, near the town of Sanford,
Lee County, North Carolina. The approved portion of this determination only applies to waters P3 and W3 as depicted within
the approved _1D area on the attached delineation man. The preliminary portion of this determination applies to all other
waters referenced herein.
Indicate Which of the Following Apply:
A. Preliminary Determination
® There appear to be waters, including wetlands on the above described project area/property, that may be subject to Section 404
of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403). The
waters, including wetlands have been delineated, and the delineation has been verified by the Corps to be sufficiently accurate
and reliable. The approximate boundaries of these waters are shown on the enclosed delineation map dated 6/18/2021. Therefore
this preliminary jurisdiction determination may be used in the permit evaluation process, including determining compensatory
mitigation. For purposes of computation of impacts, compensatory mitigation requirements, and other resource protection
measures, a permit decision made on the basis of a preliminary JD will treat all waters and wetlands that would be affected in any
way by the permitted activity on the site as if they are jurisdictional waters of the U.S. This preliminary determination is not an
appealable action under the Regulatory Program Administrative Appeal Process (Reference 33 CFR Part 331). However, you may
request an approved JD, which is an appealable action, by contacting the Corps district for further instruction.
❑ There appear to be waters, including wetlands on the above described project area/property, that may be subject to Section 404
of the Clean Water Act (CWA)(33 USC § 1344) and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403).
However, since the waters, including wetlands have not been properly delineated, this preliminary jurisdiction determination
may not be used in the permit evaluation process. Without a verified wetland delineation, this preliminary determination is
merely an effective presumption of CWA/RHA jurisdiction over all of the waters, including wetlands at the project area, which
is not sufficiently accurate and reliable to support an enforceable permit decision. We recommend that you have the waters,
including wetlands on your project area/property delineated. As the Corps may not be able to accomplish this wetland
delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that can be verified by the Corps.
B. Approved Determination
❑ There are Navigable Waters of the United States within the above described project area/property subject to the permit
requirements of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) (33 USC § 403) and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
(CWA)(33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for
a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ There are waters, including wetlandson the above described project area/property subject to the permit requirements of Section
404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) (33 USC § 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this
determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ We recommend you have the waters, including wetlands on your project area/property delineated. As the Corps may not be
able to accomplish this wetland delineation in a timely manner, you may wish to obtain a consultant to conduct a delineation that
can be verified by the Corps.

SAW-2021-00602
❑ The waters, including wetlands on your project area/property have been delineated and the delineation has been verified by
the Corps. The approximate boundaries of these waters are shown on the enclosed delineation map dated DATE. We strongly
suggest you have this delineation surveyed. Upon completion, this survey should be reviewed and verified by the Corps. Once
verified, this survey will provide an accurate depiction of all areas subject to CWA jurisdiction on your property which, provided
there is no change in the law or our published regulations, may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years.
❑ The waters, including wetlands have been delineated and surveyed and are accurately depicted on the plat signed by the
Corps Regulatory Official identified below onDATE. Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this
determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
© There are no waters of the U.S., to include wetlands, present on the above described project area/property which are subject to the
permit requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law or our published
regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed five years from the date of this notification.
❑ The property is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties subject to regulation under the Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA).
You should contact the Division of Coastal Management in Morehead City, NC, at [phone] to determine their
requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material within waters of the US, including wetlands, without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC § 1311). Placement of dredged or fill material, construction or
placement of structures, or work within navigable waters of the United States without a Department of the Army permit may
constitute a violation of Sections 9 and/or 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act (33 USC § 401 and/or 403). If you have any questions
regarding this determination and/or the Corps regulatory program, please contact James Lasting at 919-554-4884 ext 32 or
[e-mail].
C. Basis For Determination: Basis For Determination: See the preliminary, approved jurisdictional
determination forms dated 08/05/2021.
D. Remarks:
E. Attention USDA Program Participants
This delineation/determination has been conducted to identify the limits of Corps' Clean Water Act jurisdiction for the particular site
identified in this request. The delineation/determination may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security
Act of 1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in USDA programs, you should request
a certified wetland determination from the local office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
F. Appeals Information (This information applies only to approved jurisdictional determinations as indicated in B.
above)
If you object to this determination, you may request an administrative appeal under Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331. Enclosed
you will find a Notification of Appeal Process (NAP) fact sheet and Request for Appeal (RFA) form. If you request to appeal this
determination you must submit a completed RFA form to the following address:
US Army Corps of Engineers
South Atlantic Division
Attn: Mr. Philip A. Shannin
Administrative Appeal Review Officer
60 Forsyth Street SW, Floor M9
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8803
AND
PHIL,IP.A. SHANNIN(&USACE.ARMY.MIL,
In order for an RFA to be accepted by the Corps, the Corps must determine that it is complete, that it meets the criteria for appeal
under 33 CFR part 331.5, and that it has been received by the Division Office within 60 days of the date of the NAP. Should you
decide to submit an RFA form, it must be received at the above address by Not applicable.
**It is not necessary to submit an RFA form to the Divisi n Office if you do not object to the determination in this correspondence.
Corps Regulatory Official:
Date of PJD: 08/05/2021 Expiration Date of PJD: Not applicable
Date of AID: 08/05/2021 Expiration Date of AID: 08/05/2026

SAW-2021-00602
The Wilmington District is committed to providing the highest level of support to the public. To help us ensure we
continue to do so, please complete the Customer Satisfaction Survey located at
http://corpsmapu.usace.anny.mil/cm_apex/Vp=136:4:0
Copy furnished:
Property Owner:
Forge Investment Group LLC
Mark Lyczkowski
Address:
3107 S Horner Blvd
Sanford, NC 27332
Telephone Number:
919-842-0334
E-mail:
mark@fib

NOTIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL OPTIONS AND PROCESS AND
REQUEST FOR APPEAL
Applicant: Wetland Solutions, LLC, Adam Carter File Number: SAW-2021-00602 Date: 08/05/2021
Attached is:
See Section below
INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
A
PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission)
B
PERMIT DENIAL
C
©
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
D
©
PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION
E
SECTION I - The following identifies your rights and options regarding an administrative appeal of the above decision.
Additional information may be found at
or the Corps regulations at 33 CFR Part 331.
A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit.
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request
that the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district
engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will
forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your
objections and may: (a) modify the permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your
objections, or (c) not modify the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After
evaluating your objections, the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in
Section B below.
B: PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit
• ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final
authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your
signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all
rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the
permit.
• APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein,
you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of
this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days
of the date of this notice.
C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by
completing Section 11 of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division
engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.
D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new
information.
• ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the
date of this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD.
• APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers
Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section 11 of this form and sending the form to the district engineer. This form
must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice.

E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the
preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed),
by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new information for further consideration by the
Corps to reevaluate the JD.
SECTION II - REQOST FOR APP L or OBJECTIONS TO AN INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT
REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your objections to an initial
proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to this form to clarify where your reasons or
objections are addressed in the administrative record.)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps memorandum for the
record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the review officer has determined is needed to
clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps may add new information or analyses to the record.
However, you may provide additional information to clarify the location of information that is already in the administrative
record.
POINT OF CONTACT FOR QUESTIONS OR INFORMATION:
If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the
If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may
appeal process you may contact:
also contact:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division
MR. PHILIP A. SHANNIN
Attn: James Lastinger
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL REVIEW OFFICER
Raleigh Regulatory Office
CESAD-PDS-O
U.S Army Corps of Engineers
60 FORSYTH STREET SOUTHWEST, FLOOR M9
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-8803
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
PHONE: [phone]; FAX [phone]
EMAIL: PHILIP.A.SHANNIN(&USACE.ARMY.MIL,
RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government
consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15-day
notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportuni to participate in all site investi ations.
Date:
Telephone number:
Signature of appellant or agent.
For appeals on Initial Proffered Permits send this form to:
District Engineer, Wilmington Regulatory Division, Attn: James Lastinger, , 69 Darlington Avenue, Wilmington, North
Carolina 28403
For Permit denials, Proffered Permits and Approved Jurisdictional Determinations send this form to:
Division Engineer, Commander, U.S. Army Engineer Division, South Atlantic, Attn: Mr. Philip Shannin, Administrative
Appeal Officer, CESAD-PDO, 60 Forsyth Street, Room 1OM15, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8801
Phone: [phone]

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
REGULATORY PROGRAM
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM (INTERIM)
NAVIGABLE WATERS PROTECTION RULE
I. ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION
Completion Date of Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD): 08/05/2021
ORM Number: SAW-2021-00602
Associated JDs: N/A
Review Area Location': State/Territory: NC City: Sanford County/Parish/Borough:
Center Coordinates of Review Area: Latitude 35.4531 Longitude
II. FINDINGS
A. Summary: Check all that apply. At least one box from the following list MUST be selected. Complete the
corresponding sections/tables and summarize data sources.
❑ The review area is comprised entirely of dry land (i.e., there are no waters or water features, including
wetlands, of any kind in the entire review area). Rationale: N/A or describe rationale.
❑ There are "navigable waters of the United States" within Rivers and Harbors Act jurisdiction within the
review area (complete table in Section II.B).
There are "waters of the United States" within Clean Water Act jurisdiction within the review area
(complete appropriate tables in Section II.C).
0 There are waters or water features excluded from Clean Water Act jurisdiction within the review area
(complete table in Section II.D).
B. Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 Section 10 (§ 10)2
10 Name
§ 10 Size
§ 10 Criteria
Rationale for § 10 Determination
N/A.
N/A I
N/A.
N/A.
C. Clean Water Act Section 404
Territorial Seas and Traditional Navigable Waters a 1 waters :3
a 1 Name
a 1 Size
a 1 Criteria
Rationale fora 1 Determination
N/A.
N/A I
N/A.
Tributaries ((a)(2) waters):
(a)(2) Name
(a)(2) Size
(a)(2) Criteria
Rationale for (a)(2) Determination
N/A
N/A I
I N/A.
N/A.
Lakes and ponds, and impoundments of jurisdictional waters ((a)(3 waters):
a 3 Name
a 3 Size
a 3 Criteria
Rationale fora 3 Determination
N/A.
N/A I
N/A.
Adjacent wetlands a 4 waters):
a 4 Name
a 4 Size
a 4 Criteria
Rationale fora 4 Determination
N/A.
N/A I
N/A.
N/A.
' Map(s)/figure(s) are attached to the AJD provided to the requestor
z If the navigable water is not subject to the ebb and flow of the tide or included on the District's list of Rivers and Harbors Act Section 10 navigable waters list, do
NOT use this document to make the determination. The District must continue to follow the procedure outlined in 33 CFR part 329.14 to make a Rivers and Harbors
Act Section 10 navigability determination.
s A stand-alone TNW determination is completed independently of a request for an AJD. A stand-alone TNW determination is conducted for a specific segment of river
or stream or other type of waterbody, such as a lake, where upstream or downstream limits or lake borders are established. A stand-alone TNW determination should be
completed following applicable guidance and should NOT be documented on the AJD Form.
Page 2 of 2 Form Version 10 June 2020_updated

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
REGULATORY PROGRAM
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM (INTERIM)
NAVIGABLE WATERS PROTECTION RULE
D. Excluded Waters or Features
Excluded waters b)(1) — b 12 :4
Exclusion Name
Exclusion Size
Exclusions
Rationale for Exclusion Determination
acre(s)
(b)(8) Artificial
Pond P3 is entirely surround by uplands and
lake/pond
excavated wholly within uplands on site.
constructed or
excavated in
upland or a non -
jurisdictional
water, so long as
the artificial lake
or pond is not an
impoundment of
a jurisdictional
water that meets
c 6.
W3
0.99
acre(s)
(b)(1) Non-
Wetland W3 is entirely surrounded by uplands
adjacent wetland.
III. SUPPORTING INFORMATION
A. Select/enter all resources that were used to aid in this determination and attach data/maps to this
document and/or references/citations in the administrative record, as appropriate.
❑x Information submitted by, or on behalf of, the applicant/consultant: JD request received on 3/19/2021
This information sufficient for purposes of this AJD.
Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps: Title(s) and/or date(s).
❑x Photographs: Aerial: 2018
❑x Corps site visit(s) conducted on: April 16, 2021
❑ Previous Jurisdictional Determinations (AJDs or PJDs): ORM Number(s) and date(s).
❑ Antecedent Precipitation Tool: provide detailed discussion in Section 111.B.
❑x USDA NRCS Soil Survey: SSURGO 2021
❑x USFWS NWI maps: USFWS NWI Oct 2020
❑x USGS topographic maps: Sanford Quad
Other data sources used to aid in this determination:
Data Source select
Name and/or date and other relevant information
USGS Sources
N/A.
USDA Sources
N/A.
NOAA Sources
N/A.
USACE Sources
N/A.
State/Local/Tribal Sources
N/A.
Other Sources
N/A.
' Some excluded waters, such as (b)(2) and (b)(4), may not be specifically identified on the AJD form unless a requestor specifically asks a Corps district to do so.
Corps districts may, in case -by -case instances, choose to identify some or all of these waters within the review area.
s Because of the broad nature of the (b)(1) exclusion and in an effort to collect data on specific types of waters that would be covered by the (b)(1) exclusion, four sub-
categories of (b)(1) exclusions were administratively created for the purposes of the AJD Form. These four sub -categories are not new exclusions, but are simply
administrative distinctions and remain (b)(1) exclusions as defined by the NWPR.
Page 2 of 2 Form Version 10 June 2020_updated

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
REGULATORY PROGRAM
APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM (INTERIM)
NAVIGABLE WATERS PROTECTION RULE
B. Typical year assessment(s):
C. Additional comments to support AJD: N/A
Page 2 of 2 Form Version 10 June 2020_updated

PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD: 08/05/2021
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Wetland Solutions, LLC, Adam Carter, PO
Box 244, Bunnlevel, NC 28323
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER: Wilmington District, Ashby Village, SAW-2021-
00602
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The project site is approximately
159 acres located adjacent to Ashby Road, near the town of Sanford, Lee County, North Carolina. The
approved portion of this determination only applies to waters P3 and W3 as depicted within the approved JD
area on the attached delineation map. The preliminary portion of this determination applies to all other waters
referenced herein.
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES
AND/OR AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County: Lee City: Sanford
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format): Latitude: 35.4531 Longitude:-79.1308
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Carrs Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
®Field Determination. Date(s): April 16, 2021
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO
REGULATORY JURISDICTION
Click here to enter text.
Site
Number
Latitude (decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal degrees)
Estimated amount of
aquatic resources in
review area (acreage
and linear feet, if
applicable
Type of aquatic
resources (i.e.,
wetland vs. non-
wetland waters)
Geographic authority to
which the aquatic resource
"may be" subject (i.e.,
Section 404 or Section
10/404
W1
35.455536
-79.131292
12.46 acres
Wetland
Section 404
W4
35.451059
-79.126916
0.05 acre
Wetland
Section 404
W5
35.450026
-79.128714
0.86 acre
Wetland
Section 404
W6
35.455554
-79.132936
0.8 acre
Wetland
Section 404
P1
35.451529
-79.132083
0.42 acre
Open water
Section 404
P2
35.455507
-79.132273
0.5 acre
Open water
Section 404
S1
35.455234
-79.130533
2,7701f
Non -wetland
Section 404
S2
35.457004
-79.131146
649 If
Non -wetland
Section 404
S3
35.455468
-79.131341
313 If
Non -wetland
Section 404
S4
35.454556
-79.131876
785 If
Non -wetland
Section 404
S5
35.454742
-79.128795
258 If
Non -wetland
Section 404

S6
35.453825
-79.127435
427 if
Non -wetland
Section 404
S7
35.451075
-79.126954
268 if
Non -wetland
Section 404
S8
35.4503
-79.1276
358 if
Non -wetland
Section 404
1. The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in the
review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option to request
and obtain an approved 7D (AID) for that review area based on an informed decision after
having discussed the various types of 7Ds and their characteristics and circumstances when
they may be appropriate.
2. In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a Nationwide
General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre- construction
notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or other general
permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AID for the activity, the permit
applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has elected to seek a permit
authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an official determination of
jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the option to request an AID before
accepting the terms and conditions of the permit authorization, and that basing a permit
authorization on an AID could possibly result in less compensatory mitigation being
required or different special conditions; (3) the applicant has the right to request an
individual permit rather than accepting the terms and conditions of the NWP or other
general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can accept a permit authorization and
thereby agree to comply with all the terms and conditions of that permit, including
whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has determined to be necessary; (5)
undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject permit authorization without
requesting an AID constitutes the applicant's acceptance of the use of the PJD; (6)
accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered individual permit) or undertaking
any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit authorization based on a PJD
constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the review area affected in any way by
that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and waives any challenge to such jurisdiction
in any administrative or judicial compliance or enforcement action, or in any administrative
appeal or in any Federal court; and (7) whether the applicant elects to use either an AID or
a PJD, the 7D will be processed as soon as practicable. Further, an AID, a proffered
individual permit (and all terms and conditions contained therein), or individual permit
denial can be administratively appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an
administrative appeal, it becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether
geographic jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an
official delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AID to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds that
there 'may be "waters of the U. S. and/or that there 'may be " navigable waters of the U. S.
on the subj ect review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review area that could
be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply) Checked items are included in the administrative
record and are appropriately cited:
® Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map: attached
®Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor. Datasheets:
®Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concurwith data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
El Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑Corps navigable waters' study:
0U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
®USGS NHD data:
❑USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps:
® U. S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: Sanford Quad
®Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: SSURGO 2021
® National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: USFWS NWI Oct. 2020
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
®FEMAIFI RM maps: NC FIRM
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is:
®Photographs: ® Aerial (Name & Date): 2018
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily been verified by the Corns
and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional determinations.
"'Signature and date of Regulatory
staff member completing PJD
08/05/2021
Signature and date of person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining the signature is
impracticable) t
1 Districts may establish timeframes for requester to return signed PJD forms. If the requester does not respond within the established
time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is necessary prior to finalizing an action.

"•, use •
e •
•
ee • e ��♦
e � i • •
a
i
Project Boundary — 159.15 acres O 11-19 Delineation Flags Updated
Preliminary WOUS — 5,828 ft O J1-J71 O H1-H27
Approved JD Area — 5.58 acres O K1-K7 O F1-F18
Delineation Flags o S1-S29 Wetland Type
o Al-A26 O T1-T6 ' Section 404 — 15.11 acres
o B1-B23 O stake Open Water — 1.93 acres
o Cl-C34 • well
o El-E299 tar Geographics, C ES/ ir.ru DS, USDA,
l9S'GS, At:r Gi i1D IGN h GIS lJ r C rnuni
Project Name -Ashby Village N Figure. 2
-�-, Location. Sanford, Lee County, NC w E
9Pi lf�w3Np LkG
s 1 inch = 500 feet
P.O. Box 244 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 Feet 18 June 2021
Bunnlevel, NC 28323 1 1 1 1 1

Agent A nthark-arlon Utter
January 16, 2023
Owner Information
Owner Name : D R- Horton Irtc ,
(c/o Charles Persons, VP D I Communities I1, LLC)
Mailing Address: 2000 Aerial Center Parkway
Cite, State, trip. Morrisville NC 27560
Phone#: [phone]
Property Description
PIN: 9661-28-0538-00
Project: ,Ashby Village
Address; 0 S Horner Blvd, Satiford SIC 27332
County: Lee % --Xy e- -1 as own&US&tt of the above referenced
property, authoriac the U5 Army Corps ofEngirteers and NCDWR to enter the subject property
for the purpose of a jurisdictional determination.
i
i also authorize Mr, Adam Carter of Wetland Solutions, LLC to act in my behalf as my agent in
processin application�,for wetland certification and/or permits,
I
Signature Title 5a,te
Wetland Solutions, L LC PO Bax 244 Sunnlevel, NC 28323
[phone]
Adanl@Wet i a r7 dNC . corn
ww . etlaridNC.corn

,..o.o.
#VIIOIHX3eEAICIV219
a
CIVO2leSS3VSSt15NO
Cx
m w
dNnoadoH—N —noo ao
SJ-N]WJ-'dVdV l9HSV
ois—If
�����oo=
`
a�
ZS9T-D ON 3SNDDIl VNIl0'VD H-LION
�o���ob��Na����
•. • -- d o om J s N o w w I l
o
a�da�d .M�os.
-�o
j�
_
=e
o =-
o
j
(Lu
7LU
log
�w
01
i
i
i
i
16,z.<<=d Nd
II
ICI
=soya
01
/
/
N-111 -sNII—IinI
d i
El— m--------

NVId 91IS'��y�x�.w„�„�w
n 5 VNI�011V]-0N '1-01.130 N.0 9
T
S1N�WI'dVdV A9HSV
�s���O ascren ZS9T-O 'ON 3SN30Il VNIIO2JVD H1ilON
tiIIHI orrs�� o���oti���,3I No,�,tin •. •• d �1 O �I J S N O W W I 1
IHIa3ura3u, N,,.,�a IIHI •��
� o
a �
m O
U in
n
U z
N
NNYM -
3415
-
Q
0
`
U
ems`
cn
w
OO
_
pgLL
U
d
`
p Q
o a
0
3015
LL
� I
m I

ROY COOPER
Governor
ELIZABETH S. BISER
Secretary
MARC RECKTENWALD
Director
Charles Persons
DR Horton, Inc. Communities
2000 Aerial Center Parkway, Suite 110
Morrisville, NC 27560
Project: Ashby Village
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
April 4, 2024
Expiration of Acceptance: 10/4/2024
County: Lee
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the NCDEQ Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) is willing to
accept payment for compensatory mitigation for impacts associated with the above referenced project as
indicated in the table below. Please note that this decision does not assure that participation in the DMS in -
lieu fee mitigation program will be approved by the permit issuing agencies as mitigation for project impacts.
It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact permitting agencies to determine if payment to the DMS will
be approved. You must also comply with all other state, federal or local government permits, regulations or
authorizations associated with the proposed activity including G.S. § 143-214.11.
This acceptance is valid for six months from the date of this letter and is not transferable. If we have not
received a copy of the applicable 404 Permit/401 Certification/Buffer Approval within this time frame,
this acceptance will expire. It is the applicant's responsibility to send copies of the permits to DMS. Once
DMS receives a copy of the permit(s) an invoice will be issued based on the required mitigation in that permit
and payment must be made prior to conducting the authorized work. The amount of the in -lieu fee to be paid
by an applicant is calculated based upon the Fee Schedule and policies listed on the DMS website.
Based on the information supplied by you in your request to use the DMS, the impacts for which you are
requesting compensatory mitigation credit are summarized in the following table. The amount of mitigation
required and assigned to DMS for this impact is determined by permitting agencies and may exceed the
impact amounts shown below.
River Basin
Impact Location
8-di it HUC
Impact Type
Impact Quantity
Cape Fear
03030004
Riparian Wetland
0.12
Upon receipt of payment, DMS will take responsibility for providing the compensatory mitigation. The
mitigation will be performed in accordance with the In -Lieu Fee Program instrument dated July 28, 2010.
Thank you for your interest in the DMS in -lieu fee mitigation program. If you have any questions or need
additional information, please contact [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Kelly B. Williams
In -Lieu Fee Program Coordinator
cc: Adam Carter, agent
North Caraltna Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Mitigation Services �Aw
217 West Jones Street l 1652 Mail Service Center I Raleigh. North Carolina 27699-1652
oeoaiunentmEmsrommeri re 919,707.8976

United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
In Reply Refer To:
Project Code: 2023-0032764
Project Name: Ashby Village Apartments
e x
hSai k 4YYFJiYJft
+cfln7i�
i�
July 10, 2023
Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project
location or may be affected by your proposed project
To Whom It May Concern:
The enclosed species list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, as
well as proposed and final designated critical habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your
proposed project and/or may be affected by your proposed project. The species list fulfills the
requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the
Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). If your project area
contains suitable habitat for any of the federally -listed species on this species list, the proposed
action has the potential to adversely affect those species. If suitable habitat is present, surveys
should be conducted to determine the species' presence or absence within the project area. The
use of this species list and/or North Carolina Natural Heritage program data should not be
substituted for actual field surveys.
New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of
species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to
contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to
federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical
habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the
Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be
completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be
completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and
implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested
through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list.
The purpose of the Act is to provide a means whereby threatened and endangered species and the
ecosystems upon which they depend may be conserved. Under sections 7(a)(1) and 7(a)(2) of the
Act and its implementing regulations (50 CFR 402 et seq.), Federal agencies are required to
utilize their authorities to carry out programs for the conservation of threatened and endangered

07/10/2023
species and to determine whether projects may affect threatened and endangered species and/or
designated critical habitat.
A Biological Assessment is required for construction projects (or other undertakings having
similar physical impacts) that are major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the
human environment as defined in the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)
(c)). For projects other than major construction activities, the Service suggests that a biological
evaluation similar to a Biological Assessment be prepared to determine whether the project may
affect listed or proposed species and/or designated or proposed critical habitat. Recommended
contents of a Biological Assessment are described at 50 CFR 402.12.
If a Federal agency determines, based on the Biological Assessment or biological evaluation, that
listed species and/or designated critical habitat may be affected by the proposed project, the
agency is required to consult with the Service pursuant to 50 CFR 402. In addition, the Service
recommends that candidate species, proposed species and proposed critical habitat be addressed
within the consultation. More information on the regulations and procedures for section 7
consultation, including the role of permit or license applicants, can be found in the "Endangered
Species Consultation Handbook" at:
http://www.fws.gov/endangered/esa-library/pdf/TOC-GLOS.PDF
Migratory Birds: In addition to responsibilities to protect threatened and endangered species
under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), there are additional responsibilities under the
Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGEPA) to
protect native birds from project -related impacts. Any activity, intentional or unintentional,
resulting in take of migratory birds, including eagles, is prohibited unless otherwise permitted by
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)). For more
information regarding these Acts see https://www.fws.gov/birds/policies-and-regulations.php.
The MBTA has no provision for allowing take of migratory birds that may be unintentionally
killed or injured by otherwise lawful activities. It is the responsibility of the project proponent to
comply with these Acts by identifying potential impacts to migratory birds and eagles within
applicable NEPA documents (when there is a federal nexus) or a Bird/Eagle Conservation Plan
(when there is no federal nexus). Proponents should implement conservation measures to avoid
or minimize the production of project -related stressors or minimize the exposure of birds and
their resources to the project -related stressors. For more information on avian stressors and
recommended conservation measures see https://www.fws.gov/birds/bird-enthusiasts/threats-to-
birds.php.
In addition to MBTA and BGEPA, Executive Order 13186: Responsibilities of Federal Agencies
to Protect Migratory Birds, obligates all Federal agencies that engage in or authorize activities
that might affect migratory birds, to minimize those effects and encourage conservation measures
that will improve bird populations. Executive Order 13186 provides for the protection of both
migratory birds and migratory bird habitat. For information regarding the implementation of
Executive Order 13186, please visit https://www.fws.gov/birds/policies-and-regulations/
executive-orders/e0-13186. php.

07/10/2023
3
We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages
Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project
planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Code in the header of
this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project that you submit
to our office.
Attachment(s):
• Official Species List
• Migratory Birds

07/10/2023
OFFICIAL SPECIES LIST
This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the
requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether
any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed
action".
This species list is provided by:
Raleigh Ecological Services Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, NC 27636-3726
[phone]

07/10/2023
PROJECT SUMMARY
Project Code: 2023-0032764
Project Name: Ashby Village Apartments
Project Type: Residential Construction
Project Description: Residential development
Project Location:
The approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https:
www. google.com/maps/(a)35.4495971,-79.12778882949516,14z
P.1 J
Counties: Lee County, North Carolina

07/10/2023 3
ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT SPECIES
There is a total of 4 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list.
Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include
species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species
list because a project could affect downstream species.
IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA
Fisheriesi, as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the
Department of Commerce.
See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially
within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office
if you have questions.
1. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an
office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of
Commerce.
MAMMALS
NAME
Tricolored Bat Perimyotis subflavus
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/10515
FISHES
NAME
STATUS
Proposed
Endangered
STATUS
Cape Fear Shiner Notropis mekistocholas Endangered
There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6063
INSECTS
NAME
STATUS
Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus
Candidate
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743
FLOWERING PLANTS
NAME
STATUS
Harperella Ptilimnium nodosum
Endangered
No critical habitat has been designated for this species.
Species profile: https:Hecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/3739

07/10/2023
CRITICAL HABITATS
THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S
JURISDICTION.
YOU ARE STILL REQUIRED TO DETERMINE IF YOUR PROJECT(S) MAY HAVE EFFECTS ON ALL
ABOVE LISTED SPECIES.

07/10/2023
MIGRATORY BIRDS
Certain birds are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act! and the Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Actz.
Any person or organization who plans or conducts activities that may result in impacts to
migratory birds, eagles, and their habitats should follow appropriate regulations and consider
implementing appropriate conservation measures, as described below.
1. The Migratory Birds Treat. Act of 1918.
2. The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940.
3. 50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)
The birds listed below are birds of particular concern either because they occur on the
USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) list or warrant special attention in your
project location. To learn more about the levels of concern for birds on your list and how this
list is generated, see the FAQ below. This is not a list of every bird you may find in this location,
nor a guarantee that every bird on this list will be found in your project area. To see exact
locations of where birders and the general public have sighted birds in and around your project
area, visit the E-bird data mapping tool (Tip: enter your location, desired date range and a species
on your list). For projects that occur off the Atlantic Coast, additional maps and models detailing
the relative occurrence and abundance of bird species on your list are available. Links to
additional information about Atlantic Coast birds, and other important information about your
migratory bird list, including how to properly interpret and use your migratory bird report, can be
found below.
For guidance on when to schedule activities or implement avoidance and minimization measures
to reduce impacts to migratory birds on your list, click on the PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE
SUMMARY at the top of your list to see when these birds are most likely to be present and
breeding in your project area.
BREEDING
NAME SEASON
Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus Breeds Sep 1 to
This is not a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) in this area, but warrants attention Jul 31
because of the Eagle Act or for potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types
of development or activities.
Brown -headed Nuthatch Sitta pusilla Breeds Mar 1
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) only in particular Bird Conservation Regions to Jul 15
(BCRs) in the continental USA
Chimney Swift Chaetura pelagica Breeds Mar 15
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA to Aug 25
and Alaska.

07/10/2023
BREEDING
NAME
SEASON
Prairie Warbler Dendroica discolor
Breeds May 1
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
to Jul 31
and Alaska.
Prothonotary Warbler Protonotaria citrea
Breeds Apr 1 to
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA
Jul 31
and Alaska.
Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus Breeds May 10
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA to Sep 10
and Alaska.
Wood Thrush Hylocichla mustelina Breeds May 10
This is a Bird of Conservation Concern (BCC) throughout its range in the continental USA to Aug 31
and Alaska.
PROBABILITY OF PRESENCE SUMMARY
The graphs below provide our best understanding of when birds of concern are most likely to be
present in your project area. This information can be used to tailor and schedule your project
activities to avoid or minimize impacts to birds. Please make sure you read and understand the
FAQ "Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report" before using or attempting
to interpret this report.
Probability of Presence (■)
Each green bar represents the bird's relative probability of presence in the 10km grid cell(s) your
project overlaps during a particular week of the year. (A year is represented as 12 4-week
months.) A taller bar indicates a higher probability of species presence. The survey effort (see
below) can be used to establish a level of confidence in the presence score. One can have higher
confidence in the presence score if the corresponding survey effort is also high.
How is the probability of presence score calculated? The calculation is done in three steps:
The probability of presence for each week is calculated as the number of survey events in
the week where the species was detected divided by the total number of survey events for
that week. For example, if in week 12 there were 20 survey events and the Spotted Towhee
was found in 5 of them, the probability of presence of the Spotted Towhee in week 12 is
0.25.
2. To properly present the pattern of presence across the year, the relative probability of
presence is calculated. This is the probability of presence divided by the maximum
probability of presence across all weeks. For example, imagine the probability of presence
in week 20 for the Spotted Towhee is 0.05, and that the probability of presence at week 12
(0.25) is the maximum of any week of the year. The relative probability of presence on
week 12 is 0.25/0.25 = 1; at week 20 it is 0.05/0.25 = 0.2.

07/10/2023 3
3. The relative probability of presence calculated in the previous step undergoes a statistical
conversion so that all possible values fall between 0 and 10, inclusive. This is the
probability of presence score.
Breeding Season( )
Yellow bars denote a very liberal estimate of the time -frame inside which the bird breeds across
its entire range. If there are no yellow bars shown for a bird, it does not breed in your project
area.
Survey Effort (1)
Vertical black lines superimposed on probability of presence bars indicate the number of surveys
performed for that species in the 10km grid cell(s) your project area overlaps. The number of
surveys is expressed as a range, for example, 33 to 64 surveys.
No Data (—)
A week is marked as having no data if there were no survey events for that week.
Survey Timeframe
Surveys from only the last 10 years are used in order to ensure delivery of currently relevant
information. The exception to this is areas off the Atlantic coast, where bird returns are based on
all years of available data, since data in these areas is currently much more sparse.
probability of presence breeding season I survey effort — no data
SPECIES JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Bald Eagle
Jill Jill Jill Jill Jill Jill Jill ---+ ji1111ll Fr.11.dil
Vulnerable
Nuthatheaded OF Jill Jill Jill Jill ---�
BCC -BCR
Chimney Swift —+—+ + ��'� Jill
"""""' 1111
�'—� —+—+ —+++ ++—+
BCC Rangewide ++ +
(CON)
Prairie Warbler ' JillJillJill---,
BCC Rangewide —+—+ ++++ ���— + +— +-- —+�+ —+++ ++�+
(CON)
Prothonotary rt+—+ ++++ Jill Jill
Jill
Jill
---+ —+-- —+�+ —+++ ++—+
Warbler
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Red-headed III
Woodpecker ' "' mill 1&
+—+ ++++ ���— +++— + +-- —+—+ —+++ ++—+
BCC Rangewide
(CON)

07/10/2023
4
Wood Thrush +—+ ++—+ '-4- ---+ -+-- -+-+ -+++ 4-4-4-
BCC Rangewide
(CON)
Additional information can be found using the following links:
• Birds of Conservation Concern https://www.fws.gov/program/migratory-birds/species
• Measures for avoiding and minimizing impacts to birds https://www.fws.gov/library
collections/avoiding-and-minimizing-incidental-take-migratory-birds
• Nationwide conservation measures for birds https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/
documents/nationwide-standard-conservation-measures.Ddf
MIGRATORY BIRDS FAQ
Tell me more about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts
to migratory birds.
Nationwide Conservation Measures describes measures that can help avoid and minimize
impacts to all birds at any location year round. Implementation of these measures is particularly
important when birds are most likely to occur in the project area. When birds may be breeding in
the area, identifying the locations of any active nests and avoiding their destruction is a very
helpful impact minimization measure. To see when birds are most likely to occur and be breeding
in your project area, view the Probability of Presence Summary. Additional measures or permits
may be advisable depending on the type of activity you are conducting and the type of
infrastructure or bird species present on your project site.
What does IPaC use to generate the list of migratory birds that potentially occur in my
specified location?
The Migratory Bird Resource List is comprised of USFWS Birds of Conservation Concern
(BCQ and other species that may warrant special attention in your project location.
The migratory bird list generated for your project is derived from data provided by the Avian
Knowledge Network (AKN). The AKN data is based on a growing collection of survey, bandim
and citizen science datasets and is queried and filtered to return a list of those birds reported as
occurring in the 10km grid cell(s) which your project intersects, and that have been identified as
warranting special attention because they are a BCC species in that area, an eagle (Eagle Act
requirements may apply), or a species that has a particular vulnerability to offshore activities or
development.
Again, the Migratory Bird Resource list includes only a subset of birds that may occur in your
project area. It is not representative of all birds that may occur in your project area. To get a list
of all birds potentially present in your project area, please visit the Rapid Avian Information
Locator (RAIL) Tool.
What does IPaC use to generate the probability of presence graphs for the migratory birds
potentially occurring in my specified location?

07/10/2023 5
The probability of presence graphs associated with your migratory bird list are based on data
provided by the Avian Knowledge Network (AKN). This data is derived from a growing
collection of survey, banding, and citizen science datasets.
Probability of presence data is continuously being updated as new and better information
becomes available. To learn more about how the probability of presence graphs are produced and
how to interpret them, go the Probability of Presence Summary and then click on the "Tell me
about these graphs" link.
How do I know if a bird is breeding, wintering or migrating in my area?
To see what part of a particular bird's range your project area falls within (i.e. breeding,
wintering, migrating or year-round), you may query your location using the RAIL Tool and look
at the range maps provided for birds in your area at the bottom of the profiles provided for each
bird in your results. If a bird on your migratory bird species list has a breeding season associated
with it, if that bird does occur in your project area, there may be nests present at some point
within the timeframe specified. If "Breeds elsewhere" is indicated, then the bird likely does not
breed in your project area.
What are the levels of concern for migratory birds?
Migratory birds delivered through IPaC fall into the following distinct categories of concern:
1. "BCC Rangewide" birds are Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC) that are of concern
throughout their range anywhere within the USA (including Hawaii, the Pacific Islands,
Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands);
2. "BCC - BCR" birds are BCCs that are of concern only in particular Bird Conservation
Regions (BCRs) in the continental USA; and
3. "Non -BCC - Vulnerable" birds are not BCC species in your project area, but appear on
your list either because of the Eagle Act requirements (for eagles) or (for non -eagles)
potential susceptibilities in offshore areas from certain types of development or activities
(e.g. offshore energy development or longline fishing).
Although it is important to try to avoid and minimize impacts to all birds, efforts should be made,
in particular, to avoid and minimize impacts to the birds on this list, especially eagles and BCC
species of rangewide concern. For more information on conservation measures you can
implement to help avoid and minimize migratory bird impacts and requirements for eagles,
please see the FAQs for these topics.
Details about birds that are potentially affected by offshore projects
For additional details about the relative occurrence and abundance of both individual bird species
and groups of bird species within your project area off the Atlantic Coast, please visit the
Northeast Ocean Data Portal. The Portal also offers data and information about other taxa besides
birds that may be helpful to you in your project review. Alternately, you may download the bird
model results files underlying the portal maps through the NOAA NCCOS Integrative Statistical
Modeling and Predictive Mapping of Marine Bird Distributions and Abundance on the Atlantic
Outer Continental Shelf project webpage.

07/10/2023 6
Bird tracking data can also provide additional details about occurrence and habitat use
throughout the year, including migration. Models relying on survey data may not include this
information. For additional information on marine bird tracking data, see the Diving Bird Study
and the nanotag studies or contact Caleb Spiegel or Pam Lorin.
What if I have eagles on my list?
If your project has the potential to disturb or kill eagles, you may need to obtain a permit to avoid
violating the Eagle Act should such impacts occur.
Proper Interpretation and Use of Your Migratory Bird Report
The migratory bird list generated is not a list of all birds in your project area, only a subset of
birds of priority concern. To learn more about how your list is generated, and see options for
identifying what other birds may be in your project area, please see the FAQ "What does IPaC
use to generate the migratory birds potentially occurring in my specified location". Please be
aware this report provides the "probability of presence" of birds within the 10 km grid cell(s) that
overlap your project; not your exact project footprint. On the graphs provided, please also look
carefully at the survey effort (indicated by the black vertical bar) and for the existence of the "no
data" indicator (a red horizontal bar). A high survey effort is the key component. If the survey
effort is high, then the probability of presence score can be viewed as more dependable. In
contrast, a low survey effort bar or no data bar means a lack of data and, therefore, a lack of
certainty about presence of the species. This list is not perfect; it is simply a starting point for
identifying what birds of concern have the potential to be in your project area, when they might
be there, and if they might be breeding (which means nests might be present). The list helps you
know what to look for to confirm presence, and helps guide you in knowing when to implement
conservation measures to avoid or minimize potential impacts from your project activities,
should presence be confirmed. To learn more about conservation measures, visit the FAQ "Tell
me about conservation measures I can implement to avoid or minimize impacts to migratory
birds" at the bottom of your migratory bird trust resources page.

07/10/2023
IPAC USER CONTACT INFORMATION
Agency:
Wetland Solutions LLC
Name:
Wesley Johnson
Address:
816 Merry Street
City:
Dunn
State:
NC
Zip:
28334
Email
[e-mail]
Phone:
9197560411
LEAD AGENCY CONTACT INFORMATION
Lead Agency: Army Corps of Engineers

x°
I�
c
i
y s
1
U
d�a��iaaA
fr
i,�•
w
t
°.a
A�
I�
V
'1
rQ App
�'�'Jo
�.
yd
Gp+
•
/1
x �
ry o $ o`
`
Tlrosr �
¢
oslcryr
3
m
r 'IY/Ilrl
� J v
y
`moo `) �IHarrre{� V�lo
rr�n
�
m
[ � n es ❑
T 4 - - - -
n�
W-----
LLI
-- -
s
Ad'
Alder Ln P7j aynr
� � o �
�C
rs ,t
ifr
N
75 anafa n�1
a
MLy 1+I.'j
4 Q]
�nrPpoorvrill Ln �' I
,
Get a
4°
a
c
1 J
s
�osser Rd
tgl O
N
'E J5
f S•o�v
Lec Ave �
llOt f S+p 3
�s Rrp�
k- o
a
y
�5t{�
n
1`s��
�
NA � S pCP ¢
�5
�
rq ��lh Or st'�°n❑s m �
n Ga
b
Vb fiats '„05S -f
T
Q �
■
a�
D
'
= d J'
_ �
� � N S~ N
a 4 Pvradrse
E e 'C
=i
uy N r d
e,aN
EE
Y.endake Dr
S10
x

USDA United States
Department of
Agriculture
N RCS
Natural
Resources
Conservation
Service
A product of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey,
a joint effort of the United
States Department of
Agriculture and other
Federal agencies, State
agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment
Stations, and local
participants
Custom Soil Resource
Report for
Lee County,
North Carolina
Broadway Road - Ashby Village
October 11, 2023

Preface
Soil surveys contain information that affects land use planning in survey areas.
They highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide information
about the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed for
many different users, including farmers, ranchers, foresters, agronomists, urban
planners, community officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers.
Also, conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, waste
disposal, and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand,
protect, or enhance the environment.
Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may impose
special restrictions on land use or land treatment. Soil surveys identify soil
properties that are used in making various land use or land treatment decisions.
The information is intended to help the land users identify and reduce the effects of
soil limitations on various land uses. The landowner or user is responsible for
identifying and complying with existing laws and regulations.
Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and wider area
planning, onsite investigation is needed to supplement this information in some
cases. Examples include soil quality assessments (http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/
portal/nres/main/soils/health/) and certain conservation and engineering
applications. For more detailed information, contact your local USDA Service Center
(https:Hoffices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/app?agency=nres) or your NRCS State Soil
Scientist (http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/soils/contactus/?
cid=nres142p2_053951).
Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils are
seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as a
foundation for buildings or roads. Clayey or wet soils are poorly suited to use as
septic tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to
basements or underground installations.
The National Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United States
Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS) has leadership for the Federal part of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey.
Information about soils is updated periodically. Updated information is available
through the NRCS Web Soil Survey, the site for official soil survey information.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its
programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability,
and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion,
sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a
part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not
all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require

alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print,
audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at [phone] (voice
and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of
Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or
call [phone] (voice) or [phone] (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity
provider and employer.

Contents
Preface....................................................................................................................
2
How Soil Surveys Are Made..................................................................................5
SoilMap..................................................................................................................
8
SoilMap................................................................................................................9
Legend................................................................................................................10
MapUnit Legend................................................................................................
11
MapUnit Descriptions.........................................................................................11
Lee County, North Carolina.............................................................................13
DoB—Dothan loamy sand, 2 to 8 percent slopes .......................................
13
PaF—Pacolet fine sandy loam, 15 to 40 percent slopes .............................14
References............................................................................................................16

How Soil Surveys Are Made
Soil surveys are made to provide information about the soils and miscellaneous
areas in a specific area. They include a description of the soils and miscellaneous
areas and their location on the landscape and tables that show soil properties and
limitations affecting various uses. Soil scientists observed the steepness, length,
and shape of the slopes; the general pattern of drainage; the kinds of crops and
native plants; and the kinds of bedrock. They observed and described many soil
profiles. A soil profile is the sequence of natural layers, or horizons, in a soil. The
profile extends from the surface down into the unconsolidated material in which the
soil formed or from the surface down to bedrock. The unconsolidated material is
devoid of roots and other living organisms and has not been changed by other
biological activity.
Currently, soils are mapped according to the boundaries of major land resource
areas (MLRAs). MLRAs are geographically associated land resource units that
share common characteristics related to physiography, geology, climate, water
resources, soils, biological resources, and land uses (USDA, 2006). Soil survey
areas typically consist of parts of one or more MLRA.
The soils and miscellaneous areas in a survey area occur in an orderly pattern that
is related to the geology, landforms, relief, climate, and natural vegetation of the
area. Each kind of soil and miscellaneous area is associated with a particular kind
of landform or with a segment of the landform. By observing the soils and
miscellaneous areas in the survey area and relating their position to specific
segments of the landform, a soil scientist develops a concept, or model, of how they
were formed. Thus, during mapping, this model enables the soil scientist to predict
with a considerable degree of accuracy the kind of soil or miscellaneous area at a
specific location on the landscape.
Commonly, individual soils on the landscape merge into one another as their
characteristics gradually change. To construct an accurate soil map, however, soil
scientists must determine the boundaries between the soils. They can observe only
a limited number of soil profiles. Nevertheless, these observations, supplemented
by an understanding of the soil -vegetation -landscape relationship, are sufficient to
verify predictions of the kinds of soil in an area and to determine the boundaries.
Soil scientists recorded the characteristics of the soil profiles that they studied. They
noted soil color, texture, size and shape of soil aggregates, kind and amount of rock
fragments, distribution of plant roots, reaction, and other features that enable them
to identify soils. After describing the soils in the survey area and determining their
properties, the soil scientists assigned the soils to taxonomic classes (units).
Taxonomic classes are concepts. Each taxonomic class has a set of soil
characteristics with precisely defined limits. The classes are used as a basis for
comparison to classify soils systematically. Soil taxonomy, the system of taxonomic
classification used in the United States, is based mainly on the kind and character
of soil properties and the arrangement of horizons within the profile. After the soil

Custom Soil Resource Report
scientists classified and named the soils in the survey area, they compared the
individual soils with similar soils in the same taxonomic class in other areas so that
they could confirm data and assemble additional data based on experience and
research.
The objective of soil mapping is not to delineate pure map unit components; the
objective is to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that
have similar use and management requirements. Each map unit is defined by a
unique combination of soil components and/or miscellaneous areas in predictable
proportions. Some components may be highly contrasting to the other components
of the map unit. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way
diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The delineation of such
landforms and landform segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, onsite
investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas.
Soil scientists make many field observations in the process of producing a soil map.
The frequency of observation is dependent upon several factors, including scale of
mapping, intensity of mapping, design of map units, complexity of the landscape,
and experience of the soil scientist. Observations are made to test and refine the
soil -landscape model and predictions and to verify the classification of the soils at
specific locations. Once the soil -landscape model is refined, a significantly smaller
number of measurements of individual soil properties are made and recorded.
These measurements may include field measurements, such as those for color,
depth to bedrock, and texture, and laboratory measurements, such as those for
content of sand, silt, clay, salt, and other components. Properties of each soil
typically vary from one point to another across the landscape.
Observations for map unit components are aggregated to develop ranges of
characteristics for the components. The aggregated values are presented. Direct
measurements do not exist for every property presented for every map unit
component. Values for some properties are estimated from combinations of other
properties.
While a soil survey is in progress, samples of some of the soils in the area generally
are collected for laboratory analyses and for engineering tests. Soil scientists
interpret the data from these analyses and tests as well as the field -observed
characteristics and the soil properties to determine the expected behavior of the
soils under different uses. Interpretations for all of the soils are field tested through
observation of the soils in different uses and under different levels of management.
Some interpretations are modified to fit local conditions, and some new
interpretations are developed to meet local needs. Data are assembled from other
sources, such as research information, production records, and field experience of
specialists. For example, data on crop yields under defined levels of management
are assembled from farm records and from field or plot experiments on the same
kinds of soil.
Predictions about soil behavior are based not only on soil properties but also on
such variables as climate and biological activity. Soil conditions are predictable over
long periods of time, but they are not predictable from year to year. For example,
soil scientists can predict with a fairly high degree of accuracy that a given soil will
have a high water table within certain depths in most years, but they cannot predict
that a high water table will always be at a specific level in the soil on a specific date.
After soil scientists located and identified the significant natural bodies of soil in the
survey area, they drew the boundaries of these bodies on aerial photographs and

Custom Soil Resource Report
identified each as a specific map unit. Aerial photographs show trees, buildings,
fields, roads, and rivers, all of which help in locating boundaries accurately.

Soil Map
The soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list of
soil map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols
displayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used to
produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit.

ozzt,36c _a _a 0�9v3sc _a ortta
,=za
§
E
q
E
)
/
t
E
J
§
= E
0 co
3/
q
E
)
/
o
ƒ 0
.
% ®
)
®
)
\
E
0
§
\
O
.
�
\
)
@
/
§
\
.
)
\
�)
_
@/
. k°
°�
z-iiirl
Maze
ozzt,36c _a _a 0�9v3sc _a
OZ"a 09CV3K

a).0 L
a)
m
m
Q
a)
(n(n
U
0yU)
m
N
m
U O O _0
O
O
U 0
m
N
a) 7
C
O
a)
m 0
E
a)
-a Ln E
a) 'O U) 6
��—
U)O
N
C E
U
N
O
C
Z
m
E
a)
O
O
O if
N `) N a
m
(n
E
N
N-0 O
y
O
Q� `°
`° Co)
Q=�
U
m
o
�
U)
E
U)
N
Z
ON
O>.
U)
uO)
V`
6N
-a)==
EN
O C)
CL
m
O
70 O
a)
Q
U(
O
Q U)
�,
E
O
U W
O N
L
Q
i
m
c U)�O
CL
N
U)
O NQ
00
y E
O
a
zm
N my
CL
>a
O
�
O U
0
U)
O
E m
N
Z
N
0 L
N O
O
a)
a) 2
L '� m m
O-0
7 C
N
Q
N m E a)
m
'0
—
a)
2i
00
Q
0
m
.E.- V
Q
-0
J>
N O_'— O
C
>
J
a)
O
(6
E
Q
m D a)
a)
m
Z E
Q Q U
a) Q O
a) Utl)
a)
m
a)
a)
0 N 0
U)
m
E C y
>+ )
m
a) a) jp
aci
O) (6
m
m a)
E
O O N
a)
0 -0
O y
O_ N >+
a) U N (6 7
,U) '6
N
U)
.—
T
O 'O m O_
O
U)
C m N y
a) N E o)
O a)
3
U) °?
.J 3 C m m
U .O
U)
Q m
'C
O
cu
L C to E
Q m
U)
.30
C
E a) .c
N '6 y
N E
0= m
O C
E m U
O a
O p U 0
'6
O>
aa)
m CL 0
a)
m
N
O '6
2 L,
y O
m
2) O N
Q
a) 7
rn y
m U) 'O
y U O N m
Q a)
7 >+
U) a)
E O
O
� O)
o 'Q a) C
L N
E
a)
O '(n C U
a) a)
O a) O
m O n �_ U
L 46
0 7
O N
m
m
L
O
W E— U y
a E
(n > U
Q 'O Q m
H O
(n (n
(n
N
O t
H U .'= U)
Q
y
d y
R O
Li U
R
L
L
Q
>.
0
0
L
d )
Q
0
0 J N
CL E
U)CL
a) .0. O
m o M
O
� a
0 O
U) cn
Z
>
N L_ y
O cn cn
�
O
°
a)
S Z) :E
R m
U
3 a Q
0
R
N
R
0
O
C
p
O
Z
WR
a
fVn
4
�
R
F
5 R
m
W
J
y
a
a
0CL
y
o
o
)
w
o
a
o
a
N
y
Q
E
R
y
Q
a
o
a
U
C
>
C C a)
> >
Q Q
w
3 R
3 y
O >
>
°
w o
O`
0 W
Q
_
o
o
a R
R
R R y
LL 3
3
o U)w
a
> >
= o
a R w o
E
coi
O
o `o
Y o
U)
a
y
Q
o
cn
0 0 o
cn cn p m
o R
m U
o
U (7 (7
R
J J
y
a
o m
m U)
R >
U) U)
a
in U)
o
U)
w
a
R
R
■ a V®
<>
0 �
pq
0
+
o o
q
p
y
Q
y
0
r

Custom Soil Resource Report
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol
Map Unit Name
Acres in AOI
Percent of AOI
DoB
Dothan loamy sand, 2 to 8
percent slopes
13.4
93.9%
PaF
Pacolet fine sandy loam, 15 to
40 percent slopes
0.9
6.1 %
Totals for Area of Interest
14.3
100.0%
Map Unit Descriptions
The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the
soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along
with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit.
A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more
major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named
according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic
class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the
landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the
characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some
observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class.
Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without
including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made
up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor
components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils.
Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the
map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called
noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a
particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties
and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different
management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They
generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the
scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas
are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a
given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit
descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor
components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not
mentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that it
was impractical to make enough observations to identify all the soils and
miscellaneous areas on the landscape.
The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the
usefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate
pure taxonomic classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or
landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. The
delineation of such segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, however,
11

Custom Soil Resource Report
onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous
areas.
An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions.
Each description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil
properties and qualities.
Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for
differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major
horizons that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement.
Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness,
salinity, degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the
basis of such differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas
shown on the detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase
commonly indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha
silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series.
Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas.
These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups.
A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate
pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps.
The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar
in all areas. Alpha -Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example.
An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or
miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present
or anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered
practical or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The
pattern and relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat
similar. Alpha -Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas
that could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar
interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion
of the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can
be made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made
up of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil
material and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example.
12

Custom Soil Resource Report
Lee County, North Carolina
DoB—Dothan loamy sand, 2 to 8 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol: 3t5z
Elevation: 160 to 660 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 38 to 52 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 61 to 70 degrees F
Frost -free period: 210 to 245 days
Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Dothan and similar soils: 85 percent
Minor components: 3 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Dothan
Setting
Landform: Low hills
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit
Landform position (three-dimensional): Crest
Down -slope shape: Convex
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Loamy marine deposits
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 10 inches: loamy sand
E - 10 to 12 inches: loamy sand
Bt - 12 to 40 inches: sandy clay loam
Btv1 - 40 to 60 inches: sandy clay loam
Btv2 - 60 to 80 inches: sandy clay loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 2 to 6 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: 24 to 60 inches to plinthite
Drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: Low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately low to
moderately high (0.06 to 0.57 in/hr)
Depth to water table: About 36 to 60 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Low (about 4.9 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2e
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Bibb, undrained
Percent of map unit. 3 percent
13

Custom Soil Resource Report
Landform: Flood plains
Landform position (two-dimensional): Toeslope
Down -slope shape: Concave
Across -slope shape: Linear
Hydric soil rating: Yes
PaF—Pacolet fine sandy loam, 15 to 40 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National map unit symbol. 3t6b
Elevation: 200 to 1,400 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 37 to 60 inches
Mean annual air temperature: 59 to 66 degrees F
Frost -free period: 200 to 240 days
Farmland classification: Not prime farmland
Map Unit Composition
Pacolet and similar soils: 85 percent
Minor components: 15 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Pacolet
Setting
Landform: Hillslopes on ridges
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Side slope
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Convex
Parent material: Saprolite derived from granite and gneiss and/or schist
Typical profile
Ap - 0 to 5 inches: sandy loam
E - 5 to 8 inches: sandy loam
Bt - 8 to 29 inches: clay
BC - 29 to 38 inches: sandy clay loam
C - 38 to 80 inches: sandy loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 15 to 45 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: High
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 1.98 in/hr)
Depth to water table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 7.4 inches)
14

Custom Soil Resource Report
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 6e
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Ecological site: F136XY820GA - Acidic upland forest, moist
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Madison
Percent of map unit: 6 percent
Landform: Hillslopes on ridges
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Side slope
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Convex
Hydric soil rating: No
Bethlehem
Percent of map unit: 5 percent
Landform: Hillslopes on ridges
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Side slope
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Convex
Hydric soil rating: No
Wateree
Percent of map unit: 4 percent
Landform: Hillslopes on ridges
Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Side slope
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Convex
Hydric soil rating: No
15

References
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO).
2004. Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling
and testing. 24th edition.
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2005. Standard classification of
soils for engineering purposes. ASTM Standard D2487-00.
Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of
wetlands and deep -water habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service FWS/OBS-79/31.
Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States.
Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States.
Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric
soils in the United States.
National Research Council. 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and boundaries.
Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service.
U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/
n res/d eta i I/n ati o n a I/s o i Is/?cid = n res 142 p2_0 54262
Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for
making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. http://
www. nres. usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres142p2_053577
Soil Survey Staff. 2010. Keys to soil taxonomy. 11th edition. U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. http://
www. nres. usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres142p2_053580
Tiner, R.W., Jr. 1985. Wetlands of Delaware. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and
Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Wetlands
Section.
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of
Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Waterways Experiment Station Technical
Report Y-87-1.
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National forestry manual. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/soils/
home/?cid=nres142p2_053374
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National range and pasture handbook. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/
detail/national/landuse/rangepastu re/?cid=stelprdb1043084
it.

Custom Soil Resource Report
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National soil survey handbook, title 430-VI. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/
n res/d eta i I/so i Is/scie ntists/?cid=n res 142 p2_054242
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
2006. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States,
the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook
296. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?
cid = n res 142 p2_05 3624
United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1961. Land
capability classification. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 210. http:H
www.nrcs.usda.gov/lnternet/FSE—DOCUMENTS/nrcsl 42p2_052290. pdf
17

,l r
•I
6b1 ,'r
•ei .
aai ddi
75S S--
al !
r � r
- •'� 20 �
S7W4 ,_
F 1
r�
l
C
r
■ 58
d20 ..
K •• .1f/, .. Ak
c2O
x2 ��
xi
r h
:s
f �
r
0 AshhyS EParcel - 14.3 acres •_ /�+, _
Delineation Flags f
a Al-A26
■ 31 - B23 9
B1 �r �^
❑ B23
0 C1-054 _ e. 4
O CCS-CC19
A DD7-DDS P `JIM
- - -
� E1-E4
Man ifalecwer �• -�... { �•- � '+'f _
Stake r•r_ -�,-
Op Weil -
�'• Preliminary WCUS-- 1,401 tt-
Q Preliminary Wetlands - 1.21 acres
Wetland Impact e.' - -• _ _- • _
1 m
Permanent - 0.06 acre } fl 100 200 300 400 500 Feet
© Temporary - 0.02 acre
Project Name: Broadway Road (Ashby Village) N
Location: 3107 S Horner Blvd. Sanford, Lee County, NC
PIN: 9661-28-0538-00 NV-
V Figure . 2
P a" Box 244 Wetland Delineation' Oct 11, 2023
Bunnlevel, NC 28323

•.
I w
_.
PO
MOM,
` . • 4 7 _ I i
• +-anfor�d �� j • Bra dway ti
y421,
Alt- 2;it�n
400
R q%c_ w _ —
• d
AshbySEParcel - 14.3 acres V. � � - �
0 24k Quad Grid p 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000
2.500 Feet ,
Project Name: Broadway Road (Ashby Village) N
Location: 3167 S Horner Blvd. Sanford, Lee County, NC
"�"$"� PIN: 9661-28-6538-60
'F' Figure. 3
P.Q. Box 244 USGS 7.5-Minute Topo; Sanford Quadrangle Oct 11, 2023
Bunnlevel, NC 28323

Aiii aLL A
de
W . I
40 "MOM
Ilk
*- f� , %L - J.; '.1:1 !#. t
ol 4P 0, - I
r
AshbySEParcel - 143 arres
NC DEQ 24K Hydrology
Soil Map Units
I Do B—D othan loamy sand, 2 to 8 percent slopes . . ......
r--J Pa F—Pacclet fine sandy loam, 15 to 40 percent slopes L
0 250 500 750 1,000 Feet
7 J I J
M
Project Name: Broadway Road (Ashby Village) N
ONS LLG Location: 3107 S Horner Blvd. Sanford, Lee County, NC PIN: 9661-28-0538-00 IV -I Figure: 4
RO. Box 244 NRCS Soil Survey Geographic Oct 11, 2023
Bunnievel, INC 28323

i
' = _ —
of
1- - `3710965200 �--
371096j
AshbySEParcel — 14.3 acres
J FIRM Panel
Flood Zone
AE {100-year}
X (Low risk)
'Ailed.i—
37149662�0
A -
s4, r, Fart fl 500 11000 1,500 2,000 2,500 Feet
I I I .�
t y RTi
Project Name: Broadway Road (Ashby Village) N
i'mom Location: 3107 S Horner Blvd. Sanford, Lee County, NC
PIN: 9661-28-0538-00 "' Figure
P.Q. Box 244 NC Flood Risk information System Oct 11, 2023
Bunnlevel, NC 28323

8/25/23, 10:12 AM
PARID:966128053800
D.R. HORTON INC
Lee County Tax Administration
0 S HORNER BLVD VACANT
To print a property record card or export search results into a CSV format that can be used with Excel please follow these steps:
Select the desired report option from the right menu (e.g. CSV Export, Residential PRC) and hit GO
Click Open when prompted for an export. Property record cards will open as a PDF.
Parcel
ParlD / PIN:
Tax Year:
Tax Jurisdiction:
Neighborhood:
Valuation
Appraised Land:
Appraised Building:
Appraised Total:
Deferred:
Exempts/Excluded:
Assessed Real:
Total Assessed:
Owner
Account Number
Name:
Name 2:
Own %
Mailing Address:
Linked Sale
Legal
Physical Address:
Legal Description 1:
Plat Cabinet/Slide:
Description
NBHD Code / Name:
Class:
Land Use:
Zoning:
Living Units:
Deeded Acres:
Calculated Acres:
Recorded Transaction
Date Book
07-MAR-22 1676
29-DEC-21 1668
21-DEC-21 1666
Summary Totals
Total Value:
$RO/TOTAL_LAND_VALUE
$RO/TOTAL_LAND_VALUE
966128053800/
2024
CSF : CITY OF SANFORD
813 : Nash Street
154,000
0
154,000
0
0
154,000
154,000
171943
D.R. HORTON INC
100
2000 AERIAL CENTER PKWY STE 110
MORRISVILLE NC 27560
1676/909
0 S HORNER BLVD
TRACT 5
2021 /222
813 : Nash Street
R1 : RESIDENTIAL
110 : SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE(S)
CZ
14.4
14.4
Instrument
Page
Sale Price
Validity Code
909
GW - GENERAL WARRANTY
3,000,000
0
28
GW - GENERAL WARRANTY
10,500,000
1
683
GW - GENERAL WARRANTY
S
Total Acres $ / Acre $ / Unit Deeded Acres
$RO/TOTAL_ACRES $RO/DSQFT $RO/DACRE $RO/DUNIT $RO/LEGDAT_ACRES
$RO/TOTAL_ACRES $RO/DSQFT $RO/DACRE $RO/DUNIT $RO/LEGDAT_ACRES
Real Values
Land Value: 154,000
Building Value: 0
Appraised Real Value: 154,000
Total Appraised Value 154,000
Property Class: R1 : RESIDENTIAL
Reason Code: Z : MISCELLANEOUS REASONS
https://taxaccess.leecountync.gov/PT/Datalets/PrintDatalet.aspx?pin=966128053800&gsp=P ROFI LEALL&taxyear=2024&jur=000&ownseq=0&card=1
1/2

8/25/23, 10:12 AM
LUC:
Lee County Tax Administration
110 : SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE(S)
Exemptions and Exclusions
Deferred Value:
Senior / Disabled:
Veteran:
Historic:
100% E Class Ex:
Partial E Class Ex:
Total Exempt/Excluded/Deferred:
Assessed Valuation
Total Appraised Value (Real and Personal):
Total Exempt/Excluded/Deferred:
Total Assessed (Taxable):
Real Estate Value History
Tax Year Cost/Ovr Appr Land Appr Bld
2024 COST 154,000 0
2023 COST 154,000 0
2022 COST 144,000 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
154,000
0
154,000
Appraised Total Deferred Land Historic Exempt SR Exclusion Vet Exclusion Taxable Total
154,000 0 0 0 0 154,000
154,000 0 0 0 0 154,000
144,000 0 0 0 0 144,000
■
■
Sorry, no sketch available
for this record
Item Area
https://taxaccess.leecountync.gov/PT/Datalets/PrintDatalet.aspx?pin=9661280538O0&gsp=P ROFI LEALL&taxyear=2024&jur=000&ownseq=0&card=1 ... 2/2

8/25/23, 10:13 AM
PARID:966129827100
PINE VILLAGE MHC LLC
Lee County Tax Administration
1 168 FIRETHORN LN MHP
To print a property record card or export search results into a CSV format that can be used with Excel please follow these steps:
Select the desired report option from the right menu (e.g. CSV Export, Residential PRC) and hit GO
Click Open when prompted for an export. Property record cards will open as a PDF.
Parcel
ParlD / PIN:
Tax Year:
Tax Jurisdiction:
Neighborhood:
Permits
966129827100/
2024
CSF : CITY OF SANFORD
838 : Sanford Southeast
Permit Date
Permit #
Purpose
Open/Closed
21-AUG-23
20690-2023
SVVMH
O
21-AUG-23
20689-2023
SVVMH
O
21-AUG-23
20688-2023
SVVMH
O
21-AUG-23
20692-2023
SVVMH
O
02-JU N-23
19396-2023
SVVMH
O
02-JU N-23
19395-2023
SVVMH
O
02-JU N-23
19394-2023
SVVMH
O
02-JU N-23
19393-2023
SVVMH
O
02-JU N-23
19397-2023
SVVMH
O
19-S E P-22
15869-2022
SVVMH
C
19-S E P-22
15868-2022
SVVMH
C
19-S E P-22
15870-2022
SVVMH
C
19-S E P-22
015871-2022
SVVMH
C
08-JUL-22
15000-2022
SVVMH
C
08-JUL-22
14999-2022
SVVMH
C
08-JUL-22
14996-2022
SVVMH
C
08-JUL-22
14995-2022
SVVMH
C
08-JUL-22
14993-2022
SVVMH
C
08-JUL-22
14998-2022
SVVMH
C
23-NOV-21
MH PERMIT_112321
SVVMH
C
20-AUG-21
10733-2021
DECK
C
24-S E P-20
6945-2020
SVVMH
C
24-S E P-20
B RES-6957-2020
SVVMH
C
24-S E P-20
B RES-6954-2020
SVVMH
C
24-S E P-20
B RES-6950-2020
SVVMH
C
24-S E P-20
B RES-6945-2020
SVVMH
C
24-S E P-20
B RES-6959-2020
SVVMH
C
04-AUG-20
6284-2020
SVVMH
C
04-AUG-20
6280-2020
SVVMH
C
04-AUG-20
62 77-2020
SVVMH
C
04-AUG-20
62 75-2020
SVVMH
C
03-AUG-20
6282-2020
SVVMH
C
03-JU N-19
B RES-001940-2019
SVVMH
C
03-JU N-19
B RES-001938-2019
SVVMH
C
03-JU N-19
B RES-001936-2019
SVVMH
C
03-JU N-19
B RES-001934-2019
SVVMH
C
03-JU N-19
B RES-001942-2019
SVVMH
C
28-MAR-19
B RES-001235-2019
SVVMH
C
28-MAR-19
B RES-001234-2019
SVVMH
C
28-MAR-19
B RES-001233-2019
SVVMH
C
28-MAR-19
B RES-001232-2019
SVVMH
C
28-MAR-19
B RES-001236-2019
SVVMH
C
30-OCT-18
B RES-33-2018
SVVMH
C
30-OCT-18
B RES-40-2018
SVVMH
C
29-OCT-18
B RES-26-2018
SVVMH
C
29-OCT-18
B RES-28-2018
SVVMH
C
29-OCT-18
BRES-10-2018
SVVMH
C
29-OCT-18
P LM R-24-2018
SVVMH
C
26-S E P-18
32360
SVVMH
C
26-S E P-18
32362
SVVMH
C
26-S E P-18
32365
SVVMH
C
26-S E P-18
32367
SVVMH
C
26-S E P-18
32375
SVVMH
C
https://taxaccess.leecountync.gov/PT/DataIets/PrintDataIet.aspx?pin=966129827100&gsp=PROFILEALL&taxyear=2024&jur=000&ownseq=0&card=1 ... 1 /6

8/25/23, 10:13 AM Lee County Tax Administration
23-AUG-18
31804
SVVM H C
16-AUG-18
32065
SVVM H C
16-AUG-18
32074
SVVM H C
16-AUG-18
32071
SVVM H C
16-AUG-18
32069
SVVM H C
16-AUG-18
32067
SVVM H C
23-JUL-18
31808
SVVM H C
23-JUL-18
31805
SVVM H C
11-JUL-18
31707
SVVMH C
11-JUL-18
31705
SVVMH C
29-JUN-18
31613
SVVMH C
29-JUN-18
31610
SVVMH C
30-MAY-18
31299
SVVM H C
30-MAY-18
31301
SVVM H C
30-MAY-18
31300
SVVM H C
07-MAY-18
30875
SVVM H C
06-APR-18
30880
SVVM H C
06-APR-18
20882
SVVM H C
06-APR-18
30877
SVVM H C
06-APR-18
30884
SVVM H C
17-NOV-17
29758
SVVM H C
17-NOV-17
29763
SVVM H C
16-NOV-17
29732
SVVM H C
03-NOV-17
29431
SVVM H C
03-NOV-17
29412
SVVM H C
03-NOV-17
29411
SVVM H C
03-NOV-17
29409
SVVM H C
01-S E P-17
29004
SVVM H C
01-SEP-17
29014
SVVMH C
01-SEP-17
29012
SVVMH C
01-SEP-17
29010
SVVMH C
01-S E P-17
29006
SVVM H C
01-S E P-17
29002
SVVM H C
01-S E P-17
29000
SVVM H C
17-JUL-17
28566
SVVM H C
17-JUL-17
28571
SVVM H C
17-JUL-17
28568
SVVM H C
06-JUN-17
28191
DEMO C
19-MAY-17
28030
SVVM H C
19-MAY-17
28029
SVVM H C
2 7-MAR-17
27522
SVVM H C
16-S E P-16
MAN U-9-16-25992
SVVM H C
16-S E P-16
MAN U-9-16-25993
SVVM H C
16-S E P-16
MAN U-9-16-25994
SVVM H C
16-S E P-16
MAN U-9-16-25996
SVVM H C
16-S E P-16
MAN U-9-16-25991
SVVM H C
16-S E P-16
MAN U-9-16-25995
SVVM H C
11-AUG-16
MAN U-8-16-25646
SVVM H C
11-AUG-16
MAN U-8-16-25645
SVVM H C
02-AUG-16
MAN U-7-16-25516
SVVM H C
02-AUG-16
MAN U-7-16-25517
SVVM H C
02-AUG-16
MAN U-7-16-25518
SVVM H C
02-AUG-16
MAN U-7-16-25520
SVVM H C
02-AUG-16
MAN U-7-16-25519
SVVM H C
19-JUL-16
MAN U-7-16-25330
SVVM H C
19-JUL-16
MAN U-7-16-25326
SVVM H C
19-JUL-16
MAN U-7-16-25332
SVVM H C
22-JUN-16
MAN U-6-16-25159
SVVM H C
22-JUN-16
MAN U-6-16-25158
SVVM H C
01-JUN-16
MAN U-6-16-24953
SVVM H C
01-JUN-16
MAN U-6-16-24955
SVVM H C
01-JUN-16
MAN U-6-16-24954
SVVM H C
01-JUN-16
MAN U-6-16-24952
SVVM H C
04-MAY-16
MAN U-5-16-24735
SVVM H C
04-MAY-16
MAN U-5-16-24733
SVVM H C
04-MAY-16
MAN U-5-16-24734
SVVM H C
28-APR-16
MAN U-4-16-24595
SVVM H C
12-APR-16
MAN U-4-16-24507
SVVM H C
12-APR-16
MAN U-4-16-24506
SVVM H C
12-APR-16
MAN U-4-16-24505
SVVM H C
31-MAR-16
MAN U-3-16-24380
SVVM H C
https://taxaccess.leecountync.gov/PT/DataIets/PrintDataIet.aspx?pin=966129827100&gsp=P ROFI LEALL&taxyear=2024&jur=000&ownseq=0&card=1 ... 2/6

8/25/23, 10:13 AM Lee County Tax Administration
31-MAR-16
MAN U-3-16-24381
S WM H C
31-MAR-16
MAN U-3-16-24382
S WM H C
31-MAR-16
MAN U-3-16-24379
S WM H C
18-FEB-16
MAN U-2-16-24053
S WM H C
18-FEB-16
MAN U-2-16-24052
S WM H C
18-FEB-16
MAN U-2-16-24054
S WM H C
05-FE B-16
MAN U-2-16-23959
S WM H C
05-FE B-16
MAN U-2-16-23958
S WM H C
05-FE B-16
MAN U-2-16-23952
S WM H C
11-JAN-16
MAN U-1-16-23756
S WM H C
11-JAN-16
MAN U-1-16-23755
S WM H C
15-DEC-15
MAN U-12-15-23612
S WM H C
10-DEC-15
MAN U-12-15-23587
S WM H C
10-DEC-15
MAN U-12-15-23586
S WM H C
23-NOV-15
5256
MOVING C
29-OCT-15
MAN U-10-15-23238
MOVING C
14-AU G-15
5246
MOVING C
04-AU G-15
MAN U-8-15-22525
SWMH C
04-AU G-15
MAN U-8-15-22526
SWMH C
04-AU G-15
MAN U-8-15-22524
SWMH C
04-AU G-15
MAN U-8-15-22523
SWMH C
24-JUL-15
5245
MOVING C
23-JUL-15
MAN U-7-15-22430
SWMH C
08-JUN-15
COMM-6-15-21930
MISC OBY C
29-MAY-14
MAN U-5-14-19203
SWMH C
26-MAR-13
MH-5107 MOVED
SWMH C
19-FEB-13
MH-5006- MOVED
SWMH C
01-DEC-10
MH-5065
BLD MOVED C
02-S E P-10
RE S-9-10-8067
REHAB C
20-MAY-10
RE S-5-10-7133
REHAB C
22-S E P-09
MAN U-9-09-5282
SWMH C
03-OCT-08
MAN U-10-08-2548
SWMH C
29-MAY-08
MP-5014
BLD MOVED C
25-JAN-08
MP-5012
BLD MOVED C
29-APR-03
S T03-125
SWMH C
18-APR-02
S T02-104
SWMH C
Valuatio.
Appraised Land:
2,159,500
Appraised Building:
1,900,000
Appraised Total:
4,059,500
Deferred:
0
Exempts/Excluded:
0
Assessed Real:
4,059,500
Total Assessed:
4,059,500
Account Number:
147343
Name:
PINE VILLAGE MHC LLC
Name 2:
Own %
100
Mailing Address:
2 W DRY CREEK CIR STE 200
C/O ASCENTIA ATTN:AP
LITTLETON CO 80120
Linked Sale 1305/457
Legal
Physical Address: 1 168 FIRETHORN LN
Legal Description 1: 1 168 FIRETHORN LN
Plat Cabinet/Slide: /
uescnpnon
NBHD Code / Name:
838 : Sanford Southeast
Class:
R1 : RESIDENTIAL
Land Use:
MHP1 : MOBILE HOME PARKS
Zoning:
R-20/M H
Living Units:
Deeded Acres:
39.99
Calculated Acres:
39.99
https://taxaccess.leecountync.gov/PT/DataIets/PrintDataIet.aspx?pin=966129827100&gsp=P ROFI LEALL&taxyear=2024&jur=000&ownseq=0&card=1 ... 3/6

8/25/23, 10:13 AM
Field Notes
Lee County Tax Administration
Note:
ACREAGE CHNG FOR 2014
PINE VILLAGE MHP
Recorded Transaction
Date Book
Page Ins,+---.
27-DEC-12 1305
457 GW - GENERAL WARRANTY
01-JUL-96 584
17
Summary Totals
Number:
2
1
Sale Price Validity Code
1,800,000 7
0 8
Total Value: Total Acres $ / Acre $ / Unit Deeded Acres
$RO/TOTAL_LAND_VALUE $RO/TOTAL_ACRES $RO/DSQFT $RO/DACRE $RO/DUNIT $RO/LEGDAT_ACRES
O BY
Card
Line
Code
1
1
MH2:
M.H. PARK SPACES-GD
1
3
RS1 :UTILITY
SHED FRAME
1
4
AP6:
FOUR SIDE OPEN WD POLE BLDG
1
5
AP6:
FOUR SIDE OPEN WD POLE BLDG
1
6
RS4:
UTILITY SHED FIRM NO FOUNDATION
1
8
RS4:
UTILITY SHED FIRM NO FOUNDATION
OBY Details
Year Built
Sq. Ft.
ADJRCNLD
1986
C
1
1896000
1980
C
75
400
1980
C
75
100
1980
C
40
0
1980
C
288
1000
2015
C
336
2500
Card #: 1
Line #: 1
Code: MH2: M.H. PARK SPACES-GD
Year Built: 1986
Effective Year:
Width:
Length:
Area: 1
Height:
Cubic Ft:
Units: 158
Grade: C : C
Condition: A : AVERAGE
Function: A: AVERAGE (NORMAL)
• Complete: 100%
• Good: %
Functional:
Economic:
Mod Codes:
Loc Mult: 1
Cur Mult: 1
Rate:
15,000
Override Rate:
RCN:
2,370,000
(Tble):
80
Adjusted Factor:
1
RCNLD:
1,896,000
Override RCNLD:
Adjusted RCNLD:
1,896,000
Location/Notes:
Real Values
Land Value: 2,159,500
Building Value: 1,900,000
Appraised Real Value: 4,059,500
Total Appraised Value 4,059,500
When
SSHIELDS
21-AUG-23
SSHIELDS
21-AUG-23
SSHIELDS
21-AUG-23
SSHIELDS
21-AUG-23
SSHIELDS
21-AUG-23
SSHIELDS
21-AUG-23
Property Class: R1 : RESIDENTIAL
https://taxaccess.leecountync.gov/PT/DataIets/PrintDataIet.aspx?pin=966129827100&gsp=P ROFI LEALL&taxyear=2024&jur=000&ownseq=0&card=1 ... 4/6

8/25/23, 10:13 AM Lee County Tax Administration
Reason Code:
Z : MISCELLANEOUS REASONS
LUC:
MHP1 : MOBILE HOME PARKS
Exemptions and Exclusions
Deferred Value:
0
Senior / Disabled:
0
Veteran:
0
Historic:
0
100% E Class Ex:
0
Partial E Class Ex:
0
Total Exempt/Excluded/Deferred:
0
Assessed Valuation
Total Appraised Value (Real and Personal):
Total Exempt/Excluded/Deferred:
Total Assessed (Taxable):
Real Estate Value History
4,059,500
0
4,059,500
Tax Year Cost/Ovr
Appr Land
Appr Bldg
Appraised Total
Deferred Land
Historic Exempt
SR Exclusion
Vet Exclusion
Taxable Total
2024 COST
2,159,500
1,900,000
4,059,500
0
0
0
0
4,059,500
2023 COST
2,159,500
1,900,000
4,059,500
0
0
0
0
4,059,500
2022 COST
309,500
536,000
845,500
0
0
0
0
845,500
2021 COST
309,500
542,800
852,300
0
0
0
0
852,300
2020 COST
309,500
546,100
855,600
0
0
0
0
855,600
2019 COST
309,500
536,000
845,500
0
0
0
0
845,500
2018 COST
343,900
520,600
864,500
0
0
0
0
864,500
2017 COST
343,900
368,400
712,300
0
0
0
0
712,300
2016 COST
343,900
387,200
731,100
0
0
0
0
731,100
2015 COST
343,900
629,800
973,700
0
0
0
0
973,700
2014 COST
343,900
625,900
969,800
0
0
0
0
969,800
2013 COST
343,400
625,900
969,300
0
0
969,300
2012 COST
267,500
798,900
1,066,400
0
0
1,066,400
2011 COST
267,500
798,900
1,066,400
0
0
1,066,400
2010 COST
267,500
798,900
1,066,400
0
0
1,066,400
2009 COST
267,500
798,900
1,066,400
0
0
1,066,400
2008 COST
267,500
798,900
1,066,400
0
0
1,066,400
2007 COST
267,500
798,900
1,066,400
0
0
1,066,400
2006 COST
133,400
571,100
704,500
0
0
704,500
2005 COST
133,400
571,100
704,500
0
0
704,500
2004 COST
133,400
571,100
704,500
0
0
704,500
2003 COST
133,400
571,100
704,500
0
0
704,500
2002 OVR
103,500
397,500
501,000
0
0
501,000
2001 OVR
103,500
397,500
501,000
0
0
501,000
https://taxaccess.leecoui
I I
Sorry, na sketch available
for this record
Item
Area
M.H. GOOD - MH2:M.H. PARK SPACES-GD
1
FRAME SHED - RS1:UTILITY SHED FRAME
75
POLE BLDG-AP6:FOUR SIDE OPEN WD POLE BLDG
75
POLE BLDG-AP6:FOUR SIDE OPEN WD POLE BLDG
40
FRAME SHED - RS4:UTILITY SHED FIRM NO FOUNDATION
288
itync.gov/PT/Datalets/PrintDatalet.aspx?pin=966129827100&gsp=P ROFI LEALL&taxyea
r=2024&ju r=000&ownseq=0&card=1
5/6

8/25/23, 10:13 AM
Lee County Tax Administration
FRAME SHED - RS4:UTILITY SHED FIRM NO FOUNDATION 336
https://taxaccess.leecountync.gov/PT/DataIets/PrintDataIet.aspx?pin=966129827100&gsp=P ROFI LEALL&taxyear=2024&jur=000&ownseq=0&card=1 ... 6/6

Ntf-ld 31IS
C dNP—H—N A Nnoo— a-OANds do
w N
SINDW-LdVdV AgHSV m
1, S-1 o a
cos e�N ez o` "b99 fi ` .11
ZS9T-O ON 3SN30Il VNI O0 JV0 Hi'dON
oy us�a���'do ��o�o= �3�3,��y�o6,��� •. • •- d o Ob J S N O W W I 1
a�nald ,Ma=, •��
w W
-W�oa
<a w
� a�a
?�ewo
o ®&
g d Po
m 30
som
s
a a
a
o�
a
9
a
=
p
� lWi ` a y z
�aw�a�rn `-i awe
Lu
�o
0LU
1
®4a l
LL
�o w
n=
i6,A�
W���
U ges
.��co €
4a Z
z
so o O
z
dal J 0
oe z
o Y
- d
Coo c
0
z
m�
z
w Y
N U
Coo
ais 1 Z
oQ
w°
CO
Co w
U)U)
00
J 0
�Qa
aGU�
N O
LL
3015
l �Z
Q W
muo W W
a W
co
p Ir
w
W W
d W
� m
s

a
Nt»d IDVdS N3d0����
%NIA— H—N A1Nf oo — OVtl A—lO ALIO
N
S1NDW12if/df/ l9HSf/
ZS9T-O ON 3SN30Il VNIlO2JV0 Hi'dON
m
o` "b99
oy
cos e�N ez fi `
us�a���'do ��o�o=
�3�3,��y�o6,���
•. • •-
d o Ob J S N O W W I 1
a�nald .M�a=.
.....
-=o
■
O wz
Z �o
Q dam
H U a LU !
Z (� Lu LL
a � I
�=a y z
wawa QLu
Lu �zz
� ou)
<o
1
a Nn `NG
I � l
jea®
LU
' O Lu LLB
—
;/ ^ n I
I
LU
r
CO
—_J It
1
r —
3
LL _
m
1 I Z m
Q Lu
O W LL,
O d LL
1 � I
�w
LU
0-
�:co
0 LU
W LL
d LL
H CO

Nt»d Aii-iiif
dNnObvo HibON ;.iN�Oo a� avao�Nds AO
� p
� �� SJ-N]W-L'dVdV l9HSV m
1, sNo1 o a
` o` "b99 fi ` ZS9T-O ON 3SN30Il VNIIO2i11 HJ-ION
oy us�a��=o o�o= �o ���oa�� �3�3,��y �06,��� •. ••- d f l O b J S N O W W I 1
a�na�d ,Ma=, •��

za mIIN
zP-H- ,A Nn _ _�- A- z .,\
-- s wgw-L'd d v Hs `! `
9 !_e m!SND m mm� ,� w
~ ,_:\`^ : I N _. e .-' d nOUD |
/
§. ..
)
|
§
\,!\(
;
|
!
)[|!)
�z.z.
�Kjp
.
§§4|
§u•!|
§
_
�§§.1,.
:! |
lo
-
„ „ „
,
,
„ „ „
!
-
„ „ „
R
;|",[°,[!'!
!
;|`![|•,[|_!
!
[!,!!|;,l�!
!
)-
§
\
E
-
`�-
\
|
!
!
]
/)
!!r
\\
|
!§
(
�); [)\_
«
-5
\R2 2
|&|)|§|!!|§}E<§!;||;|§[!!;§
--
. = a
>\)).§)(:§)(
!
,
\�!;lr�
--
a; ., ,
-
(
,
=
2§�})=_!
`•
F
k
2§(\\|;(!|()
§§ i�
|��!§�^l���
�e.|�
-
::
-}\§()�(
_
;||!!§|;|§!)\)�(�
( .
\
/�

N m a Nt»d JNIINV-ld
m
dNnoavo uiaoN ;.iNnoo a� avaoANds do S1NDWJ-'dVdV l9HSV m
1, SNOIS .11
o a
o` "b99 fi ` ZS9T-O ON 3SN30Il VNIIO'11 H-LION
oy us�a��=o o�o= �o ���oa�� �3�3,��y No6,��� •. • • - d f l O b J SNOW W I 1
a�na�d N,Ma=, •��
LU
�o
w j� a
�p-
p y Iz
Hai /�
909 m of 2 Z
00
--
w
� s
,aa _
psa -
Sri Eaz ��� V A n
I11111
111111111111111111101
III
IN
IIIII

,..o.o.
#VIIOIHX3eEAICIV219
a
CIVO2leSS3VSSt15NO
Cx
m w
dNnoadoH—N —noo ao
SJ-N]WJ-'dVdV l9HSV
ois—If
�����oo=
`
a�
ZS9T-D ON 3SNDDIl VNIl0'VD H-LION
�o���ob��Na����
•. • -- d o om J s N o w w I l
o
a�da�d .M�os.
-�o
j�
_
=e
o =-
o
j
(Lu
7LU
log
�w
01
i
i
i
i
16,z.<<=d Nd
II
ICI
=soya
01
/
/
N-111 -sNII—IinI
d i
El— m--------

Print Form
DMS ILF Mitigation Request Statement of Compliance with §143-214.11 & 143-214.20
(link to G.S. 143-214.111
Prior to accessing the Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) In -Lieu Fee (ILF) program, all applicants
must demonstrate compliance with G.S. §143-214.11 and 143-214.20. All requests MUST include this
form signed and dated by the permit applicant or an authorized agent.
Compliance Statement:
I have read and understand G.S. § 143-214.11 and 143-214.20 and have, to the best of my
knowledge, complied with the requirements. I understand that participation in the DMS is
voluntary and subject to approval by permitting agencies.
Please check all that apply:
❑ Applicant is a Federal or State Government Entity or a unit of local
government meeting the requirements set forth in G.S. 143-214.11 and is not
required to purchase credits from a mitigation bank.
❑✓ Mitigation bank(s) in the hydrologic unit where the impacts will occur have
been contacted and credits are not currently available. (link to DWR list)
❑ There are no listed mitigation banks located in the hydrologic unit where
this impact will take place that offer the credit type I need (link to Ribits)
❑ The DWR or the Corps of Engineers did not approve of the use of a
mitigation bank for the required compensatory mitigation for this project.
❑ This is a renewal request and the permit application is under review. Bank
credits were not available at the time the application was submitted.
Enter date permit application was submitted for review:
I have read and understand the DMS refund policies (attached)
initial here
Signature of Applicant or Agent
4/3/2024
Date
Ashby Village
Project Name
Samuel Adam Carter
Printed Name
Sanford NC
Location

rS—ave Form Print Form

Refund Policy for Fees Paid to DMS In -Lieu Fee Programs
Purpose: The purpose of this policy is to make clear the circumstances and process under which a
permittee can obtain a refund while simultaneously balancing customer service and responsible
business practices. This policy applies to all refund requests.
Policy Statement: The policy of DMS is to allow for refunds under certain conditions.
1. All refund requests must be made in writing to the DMS In -Lieu Fee Program Coordinator at
kelly.williams(adeq.nc.gov.
2. All refund requests are subject to fund availability. DMS does not guarantee fund availability for
any request.
3. The request must either come from the entity that made the payment or from an authorized agent.
Third parties requesting refunds must provide written authorization from the entity that made the
payment specifying the name and address of the authorized refund recipient.
4. Refund requests related to unintended over -payments, typographical errors or incorrect invoices
should be brought the attention of the In -Lieu Fee Program Coordinator as soon as possible. Such
requests are typically approved without delay.
5. Payments made under the incremental payment procedure are not eligible for refunds.
6. Refund requests made within nine months of payment to DMS will only be considered for requests
associated with projects that have been terminated or modified where the permittee's mitigation
requirements have been reduced. Such requests must be accompanied by written verification from the
permitting agency that the project has been canceled, the permits have been rescinded or have been
modified, or the mitigation requirements have been reduced.
7. Refund requests made more than nine months from the payment date will only be considered for
permits that were terminated or modified to not require any mitigation. Such requests must be
accompanied by written verification from the permitting agency that the project has been cancelled, the
permits have been rescinded and/or mitigation is no longer required.
8. Refund requests not meeting the criteria specified above are not eligible for a refund.
9. Refund requests that meet the criteria above will be elevated to DMS Senior Management for
review. The following considerations apply to all refund requests:
a. availability of funds after consideration of all existing project and regulatory obligations
b. the date the payment was made
c. the likelihood DMS can use the mitigation procured using the payment to meet other
mitigation requirements
10. Once a refund has been approved, the refund recipient must provide a completed W-9 form to the
DMS In -Lieu fee Program Coordinator within two weeks in order to process the refund though the
State Controller's Office.
11. All decisions shall be final.