WQ0044888_Staff Report_20240411

DocuSign Envelope ID:98BD094C-E35C-4FOB-BE50-CFA799F9D9B3
State of North Carolina
Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Environmental Staff Report
Quality
To: ❑NPDES Unit®Non-Discharged Application No.: WQ0044888
Attn: Central Office Facility Name: Lot 57-Peninsula
@ Hyco Lake
County: Person County
From: Dorothy Robson
Raleigh Regional Office
I. GENERAL AND SITE VISIT INFORMATION
1. Was a site visit conducted? ❑ Yes or®No
a. Date of site visit:
b. Site visit conducted by:
c. Inspection report attached? ❑ Yes or❑No
d. Person contacted: and their contact information: xxx ext.
e. Driving directions: N/A
2. Receiving stream or affected surface waters: N/A
Classification:
River Basin and Sub-basin No.
Describe receiving stream features and pertinent downstream uses:
II. PROPOSED FACILITIES: NEW APPLICATIONS
1. Facility Classification: SFR Description: 1,000-gallon septic tank, effluent filter, 600 gpd model EZ treat
filter unit, 1,000-gallon recirculation tank with %2 HP pump,UV disinfection,rain sensor, 3,500-gallon
storage/pump tank with%HP pump, fenced, drip irrigation area of 19.06 in/yr on 0.191 acres.
Proposed flow: 270 gpd
Current permitted flow:NA
2. Are the new treatment facilities adequate for the type of waste and disposal system? ® Yes or❑No
If no, explain:
3. Are site conditions(soils, depth to water table, etc.)consistent with the submitted reports? ❑ Yes ❑No ®N/A
If no,please explain: A site visit has yet to be completed
4. Do the plans and site map represent the actual site(property lines,wells, etc.)? ®Yes ❑No ❑N/A
If no,please explain:
5. Is the proposed residuals management plan adequate? ® Yes ❑No ❑N/A
If no,please explain:
6. Are the proposed application rates(e.g.,hydraulic,nutrient) acceptable? ❑Yes ®No ❑N/A
If no,please explain: To be determined
7. Are there any setback conflicts for proposed treatment, storage and disposal sites? ® Yes or❑No
If yes, attach a map showing conflict areas.Waivers have been submitted for the conflicts.
8. Is the proposed or existing groundwater monitoring program adequate? ❑ Yes ❑No ®N/A
If no, explain and recommend any changes to the groundwater monitoring program:
FORM: WQROSSR 04-14 Page I of 2

DocuSign Envelope ID:98BD094C-E35C-4FOB-BE50-CFA799F9D9B3
9. For residuals,will seasonal or other restrictions be required? ❑ Yes ®No ❑N/A
If yes, attach list of sites with restrictions(Certification B)
Describe the residuals handling and utilization scheme:
10. Possible toxic impacts to surface waters: NA
11. Pretreatment Program(POTWs only): NA
III.REGIONAL OFFICE RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Do you foresee any problems with issuance/renewal of this permit? ❑ Yes or❑ No
If yes,please explain:
2. List any items that you would like the NPDES Unit or Non-Discharge Unit Central Office to obtain through an
additional information request:
Item Reason
See below
3. List specific permit conditions recommended to be removed from the permit when issued:
Condition Reason
4. List specific special conditions or compliance schedules recommended to be included in the permit when issued:
Condition Reason
5. Recommendation: ® Hold,pending receipt and review of additional information by regional office
❑ Hold,pending review of draft permit by regional office
❑ Issue upon receipt of needed additional information
❑ Issue
❑ Deny(Please state reasons: )
6. Signature of report preparer:
Docu Signed by:
Signature of regional supervisor: AEG � B
� g P �eec�s}E�ana
Date: 4/11/2024
IV. ADDITIONAL REGIONAL STAFF REVIEW ITEMS
1. Drainage coefficient is 57%. This is significantly different to the adjacent lots that are also under review. Please
reduce this to be within the range of the surrounding area. Please provide data as to why this should exceed 10%.
FORM: WQROSSR 04-14 Page 2 of 2