20010550 Ver 1_Application_20011004

.~~
~ ~
~,~~~_
OCT ,
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
MICHAEL F. EASLEY
GOVERNOR
October 3, 2001
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
6508 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 120
Raleigh, North Carolina 24615
Attention: Eric Alsmeyer
Regulatory Specialist
LYNDO TIPPETT
SECRETARY
O/I~ss~
Dear Sir:
Subject: Amendment to Individual Permit application for NC 98, Wake Forest Bypass from west
of SR 1923 (Thompson Mill Road) to east of SR 2053 (Jones Dairy Road), Wake
County, State Project No. 8.1402501, Federal Aid No. STP-98(1), TIP R-2809.
Reference: 1) Individual Permit Application, dated March 23, 2001, COE Action ID. 199601836.
2) DWQ Request for design clarification, dated May 16, 2001
3) WRP Mitigation Commitment letter, dated May 23, 2001 to Mr. Eric Alsmeyer
(cc. Mr. John Hennessy, DWQ)
Per our conversation, please find attached the amended permit drawings for Sections B and C of
the abovementioned project. Revised Section B drawings and summary sheet exclude 206 feet of stream
impacts at Site 4 which were mistakenly calculated as jurisdictional. Revised Section C drawings include
an additional tributary to Dunn Creek at Site 6 east of the proposed NC 98 crossing of Dunn Creek, as
well as an additional wetland/stream complex at Site 7 between Jones Dairy Road (SR 2053) and existing
NC 98. Additional wetland, stream, and buffer impacts are 0.28 acres (0.11 ha), 738 feet (225 meters),
and 0.5 acres (0.2 ha), respectively. These revised Section C drawings also address questions from DWQ
in their May 23, 2001 correspondence (see attached correspondence with comments noted directly
thereon).
This letter describes these amendments and impacts resulting from construction of the proposed
project. It also serves to update previously unresolved protected species issues, as well as the mitigation
strategy for the proposed project. This correspondence replaces the previous amendment submitted on
July 30, 2001. In light of the above additions, the Let Date for R-2809 Section C has been extended from
August until December 2001.
MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: [phone] LOCATION:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FAX: [phone] TRANSPORTATION BUILDING
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTALANALYSIS 1 SOUTH WILMINGTON STREET
1548 MAIL SERVICE CENTER WEBSITE: WWbV.DOH.DOT.STATE.NC.US RALEIGH NC
RALEIGH NC 27699-1548

Jurisdictional Status
Section A
Descriptions in the original permit application are still valid.
Section B
During the November 9, 2000 verification, USACE field representative Eric Alsmeyer verified that the
Richland Creek UT at Site 4 is non-jurisdictional. However, permit drawings for Section B (dated
February 8, 2001), which were submitted with the original permit application, included stream impacts
for this stream. Confusion may have resulted from the fact that this UT is not a jurisdictional stream, but
is subject to the Neuse Buffer Rules.
Section C
The additional wetland in Section C was delineated on May 15, 2001 by NCDOT biologist Elizabeth
Lusk. Mr. Alsmeyer conducted a field review of this wetland on June 14, 2001. Stream classifications of
the Smith Creek UT originating in this wetland, as well as the additional Dunn Creek UT were conducted
on June 19, 2001,-~by NCDOT biologists Elizabeth Lusk and Hal Bain and verified by Mr. Alsmeyer.
Although these tributaries are jurisdictional, they do not require mitigation. The Dunn Creek UT is also
subject to the Neuse River Buffer Rules, since it appears on the Wake County soil survey. However,
because the Smith Creek UT does not appear on either the soil survey or the topographic quadrangle map,
it is not subject to the Buffer Rules.
Impacts to Waters of the U.S.
The R-2809 project is in the Neuse River Basin, Hydrologic Unit 030020201, Richland Creek and
Smith Creek subbasins. With these two additional impact sites, there will be a total of 6 wetland sites, 12
jurisdictional streams, and 14 stream buffers (subject to the Neuse Buffer Rules) impacted throughout the
entire R-2809 project.
Impacts to jurisdictional areas (all not requiring mitigation) within the entire project consist of
approximately 1.06 acres (0.43 ha) of permanent fill in wetlands, 0.03 acres (0.01 ha) of excavation in
wetlands, 0.70 acres (0.28 ha) of fill in surface water (stream), and 3,708 feet (1,130 meters) of existing
channel impacted. Buffer impacts total 3.96 acre (1.60 ha) in Zone 1 and 2.59 ac (1.05 ha) in Zone 2.
Onsite_ relocation of streams total 872 feet (266 meters), of which 384 feet (117 meters) will be
naturalized allowing for onsite stream mitigation at a 1:1 ratio. Table 1 summarizes revised total impacts
for R-2809 by Section. As mentioned in the original permit application, project design in Sections A and
B are preliminary, therefore impacts may vary slightly when designs are finalized.
Table I .Total impacts to Waters of the U.S. for Sections A, B, and C of R-2809 (2°d revision)
Existing Channel Impacts Buffer Impacts
FilUClearing Fill in (ft) (ac)
Section in Wetlands Surface Naturalized
(ac) Waters Impacts Relocated Zone I Zone 2
(ac) (Onsite Mitigation)
R-2809 A 0.01 0.01 62 0 0.21 0.25
R-2809 B 0.75 0.28 1,386 384 1.88 1.25
R-2809 C 0.33 0.41 2,260 0 1.87 1.10
Totals 1.09 0.70 3,708 384 3.96 2.60
2

Table 2 tabulates all impacts in Section C by impact and Waters of the U.S. type. Descriptions of
previously reviewed impact sites are detailed in the original permit application. The following
information details the two additional sites:
Site 6
This intermittent unnamed tributary to Dunn Creek originates from a spring in the side of a steep
slope southeast of the alignment. The channel is deeply incised, varying between 1 foot and 8 feet
deep. Water depth is 6 to 10 inches and channel width at water surface is approximately 1 foot.
Channel substrate consists of silty sand and channel sinuosity is moderate. There is evidence that a
small floodplain is forming within the deepest sections of the channel via bank sloughing and
siltation. In order to maintain flow after the new NC 98 is constructed, a 750 reinforced concrete pipe
will be installed. Details are available on Sheet 11 of 15 in the attached permit drawings.
Site 7
The wetland at this site is the result of several hillside seeps originating just east of Jones Dairy
Road. Hydric indicators include low chroma soils (10YR 2/1 muck in the wettest portion) drainage
patterns, water within 12 inches of the ground surface, and hydrophytic vegetation. The boundaries
of the wetland are determined primarily by steep topography. This area will be contained within the
fill slope for the proposed NC 98. Water will be directed into lateral ditches on either side of the new
NC 98. Details are depicted on Sheet 12 of 15 of the attached permit drawings.
A small intermittent UT to Smiths Creek originates and forms in the wetland at Site 7. Within the
majority of the wetland the stream is very unorganized with difficult to define channels. The poorly
defined channels anastomose into one defined channel near the southeastern corner of the wetland
and flow southeasterly into Smiths Creek. This UT is similar to the UT at Site 6, except not as deeply
incised. There is ample vegetation (rush and jewelweed) within the channel. Bed substrate is mucky
sand. During the site visit, flow was moderate to slow.
Per DWQ's inquiry, additional water quality information for Site 4 in Section C is as follows:
Where the new NC 98 intersects with Smith Creek, the creek will be enclosed within 2 RCBCs.
According to NCDENR's Basinwide Information Management System (last updated September 20,
2001), this section of Smith Creek [27-23-(2)] has a DEM Rating of C NSW from the dam at the
reservoir south to the Neuse River. North from the dam to the Franklin-Wake County line, the DEM
rating for Smith Creek is WS-II HQW NSW CA.
Endangered Species
In the original permit application a Biological Conclusion of Unresolved was given for Michaux'
sumac (Rhus michauxii) pending a plant by plant survey. NCDOT biologists Logan Williams and
Elizabeth Lusk surveyed Sections C and B of the subject project on June 22, 2001 and August 9, 2001,
respectively. No plants were found, resulting in a Biological Conclusion of No Effect for Sections B
and C. Section A should be surveyed no sooner than 2006 because of the 2008 Let Date.

T~hlo 7 Imn~r•tc to UVatarc of tha 1 I R fnr Cectinn ~' of Fz-28119 (2°d r@vlSlOrl~
_..~.- -• ----r---- -- ----
Cliannel distances
Buffer Area (ac)
' Fill in (feet) (Zone 1/Zone 2)
Fill in Surface Naturalized Streams Naturalized Buffers
Site_ Station Type Wetlands Waters Relocated Requiring Relocated °Requiring
(ac) lac) Impacts (On-site Offsite Impacts (Un-site Offsiite
.Mitigation) .Mitigation Mitigation) Mitigation
1 62+95 -L- Medium Quality 0.01 - - - - - - -
RT Wetland
2 66+40 -L- Spring Branch _ 0.12 361 0 361 0.46/0.28 0 0.46/0.28
2@9ftx6ftRCBC
UT Dunn Creek
3A 74+46 to Redirected via lateral - 0.01 99 0 99 0.1210.04 0 0.05/0.04
74+73 -L- base ditch
3B 74+20 to Dunn Creek _ 0.17 564 0 564 0.58/0.39 0 0.77/0.39
76+20 -L- 2@ 9 ft x 8 ft RCBC
4 84+60-L- Smith Creek _ 0.07 295 0 295 0.32/0.17 0 0.41/0.17
2@9ftx8ftRCBC
Medium Quality
Wetland and
5 85+20 -L LT UT Smith Creek 0.04 0.01 203 0 203 0.07/0.02 0 0.16/0.03
Redirected via lateral
base ditch
6 77+80 -L- UT Dunn Creek _ 0.01 285 0 0 0.31 /0.19 0 0.31 /0.19
750 RCP
Medium Quality
7 82+70 to Wetland and 0 28 0.02 453 0 0 -- -- --
83+80 -L- UT Smiths Creek
900 RCP
Totals* 0.33 0.41 2,260 0 1,522 1.87/1.10 0 2.16/1.10
*Note: Rounding ditterences may cause totals [o outer sugnny.

Compensation Required
The NCDOT concurs with DWQ's requirement of 1:1 onsite mitigation and 2:1 offsite mitigation
ratios for stream impacts. Wetland mitigation will be conducted at the 2:1 ratio required by the USACE.
In Sections A, B, and C, compensatory mitigation will be required for 2,970 of permanent stream impacts,
1.1 acres of non-riverine wetland impacts, and buffer impacts of 3.96 acre (1.60 ha) in Zone 1 and 2.60 ac
(1.05 ha) in Zone 2. The following summarizes total impacts by type within each Section of the project
and mitigation required.
Sections A:
Impact summaries for these Section A are detailed in the original permit application.
Section R'
Compensatory mitigation will be required for Section B impacts to Waters of the US. With the
exclusion of the aforementioned stream impacts, the NCDOT anticipates total impacts to be as follows:
Wetland impacts total 0.75 acres. At the required 2:1 ratio, offsite wetland mitigation required totals
1.5 acres.
Stream impacts total 1,386 feet. Onsite mitigation totals 384 feet. At the required 2:1 offsite stream
mitigation required totals 2,004 feet.
Stream buffer impacts total 1.88 acres in Zone 1 and 1.25 acres in Zone 2. At the required 3:1 ratio for
Zone 1 impacts and 1.5:1 for Zone 2 impacts, offsite buffer mitigation required for the proposed
project totals 7.5 acres.
Section C:
Compensatory mitigation will be required for Section C impacts to Waters of the US. With the
addition of the aforementioned impacts, the NCDOT anticipates total impacts requiring miti ag tion to be
as follows:
Wetland impacts total 0.33 acres. At the required 2:1 ratio, offsite wetland mitigation required totals
0.7 acres.
Stream impacts total 1,522 feet. At the required 2:1 ratio, offsite stream mitigation required for the
proposed project totals 3,044 feet.
Stream buffer impacts total 1.87 acres in Zone 1 and 1.10 acres in Zone 2. At the required 3: ] ratio
for Zone 1 impacts and 1.5:1 for Zone 2 impacts, offsite buffer mitigation required for the proposed
project totals 7.3 acres.
Mitigation
On-site Miti a~ tion
As proposed in the original permit application, 384 feet of on-site stream mitigation will be
conducted in Section B at Site 1. The potential for onsite buffer mitigation at this Site will be investigated
further as design plans are finalized.
Off-site Miti ag tion
For all three Sections, a total of 1.1 acres of non-riverine wetland impacts, 2,586 feet of stream
loss impacts, and 3.96/2.59 acres of Zonel/Zone2 buffer impacts will require off-site compensatory
mitigation. At the required mitigation ratio of 2:1, offsite wetland and stream mitigation required totals
2.2 acres and 5,172 feet, respectively. At the 3:1/1.5:1 ratio for Buffer Zone 1/Zone 2, buffer mitigation
required totals 11.9 acres for Zone 1 and 3.9 acres for Zone 2.
6

In a May 23, 2001 letter from Mr. Ron Ferrell, WRP Program Manager, the WRP committed to
providing the NCDOT mitigation for 0.12 acres of wetland impacts (Section C only), 3,721 feet of stream
impacts, and 5.1 I acres and 3.06 acres of Zone 1 and 2 buffer impacts. On August 7, 2001, the NCDOT
submitted a revised request to WRP to include the additional wetland impacts not covered by the May 23,
2001 commitment letter. NCDOT proposes to pay WRP the following for compensatory mitigation in
Section C before construction begins:
• $8,400 for non-riverine wetland impacts (at $12,000 per acre of wetland mitigation required at a 2:1
ratio),
• $380,500 for stream impacts (at $125 per foot of stream mitigation requirements at a 2:1 ratio), and
• $303,863 for stream buffer impacts (at $41,625 per acre of stream buffer mitigation required) for.
SUMMARY
Amendment is hereby made to the original application for a Department of the Army Section 404
Individual Permit as required for the above-described activities for the proposed TIP project R-2809,
Sections A, B, and C. The NCDOT understands that permit modifications will be required when designs
are finalized for Sections A and B. We anticipate an Individual Section 401 Water Quality Certification
will apply to this project, and are providing seven copies of the application to the North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Water Quality. In addition, in compliance
with Section 143-215.3D(e) of the North Carolina Administrative Action (NCAA) a check for $475.00
was enclosed with the original application package to act as payment for processing the Section 401
Certification application.
Construction of Sections A, B, and C of the proposed TIP Project No.R-2809 will result in 1.06
acres of permanent fill in wetlands, 0.03 acres of excavation in wetlands, 0.70 acres of fill in surface
water (stream), 3,708 feet of existing channel impacted (2,970 feet requiring mitigation), and 872 feet of
relocated channel. On-site mitigation will be implemented through a 384-foot naturalized segment of
relocated channel. The remaining 2,586 feet of stream impacts will be mitigated for via the WRP
program. Payment will be made by the NCDOT at the current rate for stream and buffer impacts in
Section C before construction begins. For final stream and buffer impacts in Sections A and B, payment
will be made at the new rate established by the renewed MOU and mitigation plans will be approved
before construction begins in these Sections.
Thank you for you assistance with this project. If you have any questions or need any additional
information about this project, please contact Elizabeth L. Lusk at [phone], extension 335. If
further clarification is need regarding the proposed design, please contact Galen Cail, Hydraulics
Engineer at 919-250-4100.
Sincerely,
~. L.
,~d~ William Gilmore, P.E., Branch Manager
v Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
WG/el l
Attachments
cc: Mr. David Franklin, COE, Wilmington
Mr. John Dorney, DWQ (7 copies)
Mr. David Cox, NCWRC
7

Ms. Kathy Matthews, EPA
Mr. Tom McCartney, USFWS
Mr. N. L. Graf, P.E., FHWA
Mr. John Alford, P.E., Roadway Design
Mr. Calvin Leggett, P.E., Program Development
Mr. Debbie Barbour, P.E., Design Services
Mr. D.R. Henderson, P.E., Hydraulics
Mr. Tim Rountree, P.E., Structure Design
Mr. Byron Moore, P.E., Roadside Environmental
Mr. J.G. Nance, P.E., Division 5 Engineer
Mr. Ron Ferrell, WRP DOT Coordinator

~ ~ 1 ~~
_~4 \
cl
i~
~ I
~i~ ~ I
~ ll~
1929 >
C
~ /T NAKE fpREST Gir LNIIiS, T
~..
98 ~~~
-,
~~ ~t _ ~~ / / I N E~ sa+. t
~/ t
v:\ t
BEGIN PROJECT i ~~
i ~~ t
~ R-28096 ~ t
~~ SITE ~ ~ i j
~ I
~ ~~~ I ,~ H
~ \ `G ~. ~ I
SITE ~~ Y ~~ BYPASS t -
• ~~ y
NC qg ~ --- =' I
~~- fi ~--
SITE 1 ( ~ Forestville
~ ;' SITE 5 t~
`_~ ~ ,~.
`~~y
SITE 3 ~ ~~
l
i
n
'WAKE /
FOREST /
/---G"
~~(
J
END PROJECT
R-28096
~
~ _ J ~
\ ,y
j
1 V
r CITY lWTS
~
/~ I
I...
~~ \\ /
~:
(~ N
t ~
~~.
i<~ ~
,. lA ~ ~ .
2049
(
\
~. 1 ~ IW
1= ~
v / i
I
r
~/ _~
1 ~ I I / t 1

\ i I
1 (
\
Noks Foreet N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
RO~asvllle 410Oie
S"'~ DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
SCALE
.5 0 1 K/v1
WAKE COUNTY
PROJECT: 8.102501 (R-2809B)
NC 98 WAKE FOREST BYPASS
~Q~ ~(i~tc~ 3/Z~/ol
SHEET ' OF 15L 2 / 8 / Ol

LEGEND
--~WLB---- WETLAND BOUNDARY
~yll,8 -~
~ ~ \i WETLAND
i ~ - !WiL~-B~'
L~L/111-~ DENOTES FILL IN
WETLAND
1~11~LL11J DENOTES FILL IN
SURFACE WATER
~~/11~f,~j DENOTES FILL IN
~f~'~ SURFACE WATER
(POND)
® DENOTES TEMPORARY
FILL IN WETLAND
® DENOTES EXCAVATION
IN WETLAND
DENOTES TEMPORARY
FILL IN SURFACE WATER
~~'-' DENOTES MECHANIZED
CLEARING
~- F- FLOW DIRECTION
TB
~~ TOP OF BANK
- WE_- - EDGE OF WATER
-- ~-- PROP. LIMIT OF CUT
-- F-- PROP. LIMIT OF FILL
-~- PROP. RIGHT OF WAY
-- NG---NATURAL GROUND
- - PL - PROPERTY LINE
- TDE - TEMP. DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
- PDE - PERMANENT DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
- EAB-- EXIST. ENDANGERED
ANIMAL BOUNDARY
- EPB-- EXIST. ENDANGERED
PLANT BOUNDARY
- - ~ ~- -~ - WATER SURFACE
N.C. DEPT.OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
WAKE COUNTY
XXXXX
LIVE STAKES
BOULDER
- - - COIR FIBER ROLLS
O ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER
OR PARCEL NUMBER
~~
PROPOSED BRIDGE
PROPOSED BOX CULVERT
PROPOSED PIPE CULVERT
(GASHED LINES DENOTE
EXISTNG STRUCTURES)
SINGLE TREE
`~` `~-~`'-`r`1-~`L`f'L W O O O S L I N E
^ DRAINAGE INLET
ROOTWAD
VANE
RIP RAP
1
RIP RAP ENERGY
DISSIPATOR BASIN
PROJECT: 8.1,02501 (R-2809B>
NC-98 WAKE FOREST BYPASS
SHEET OF ~~ Y/8/Ol

U.T. TO ~
RICHLANO ~ ~~
CREEK ~ m I I m 6
,/~
~ FEP.. __~
E __ Y.
_

I .I a ~
~ I ~' S
r

`~ ~
~%
i
~ a~,~ i / i~ i ~ 'i
.
,
U.T. TO ~ ' ~ _~ ~ ~°.~
H .r ~ ~I
RICHLAND
`
II ~ ~
~
'
~ ' 'I
,
CREEK ` r
,
( ii ~ ~ ~;~

`
;
~
' i O

~ ,
, ~ .
~
~'
NATURAL STREAM DESIGN
`` SEE DETAIL SHEET ~~ QF la
~~ 1
~~
~
' ~~
~~ ~
~ ~?
\`
~
~
AND SUMMARY SHEET
_ OF
~ . ~ I
~
~~ ,
~

PROP.
e ~
~, I ~
I
'
/
~. RIPARIAN
BUFFER ti
r
i
" l~~ `, ~~
I
` _-
O t W
N ~ N \'/ 1.
~ i
fV
.

I
i}y II i
i
}
Q
i
t
~ S, __-
,' --
I
~ ~ 0.60m
~ ~ ' ,~~,' / 3
- F
~F~= CONC.
SILL _-
- ~ I ~
_
_ _
- - ~ ''~ --
^ 0
-
o II ~
op ~ ' ~ ~ !
v V / ,' /
I II i~ ~ j~ S~ /
II 2 GI ~ / /
y: / /:
~'.~5 ; f ~ ' i % i i , 'NC 48 WAKE FOREST
3 + 00 ~ ~~ ~ ~' ~' % ' ~ • BYPASS WESTBOUND 33 00
='===a=°°'~1 - ~
,JJ / /
\ ~ ~ ~ ~ '~ S ' / ' _- NC 98 WAKE FOREST
~ ---' ~• i' ~ ( ; BYPASS EESTBOUND
p% i
l 6~0
i
i
i~
~':
` I
t
~'f
0
r
..1
~ `" i2 GI ,
~~ ? ~ ~
y~~ ~I ~-- - ------- -+-`}-}~-
r.~l--= -- - - - _ ,,5
~ ~
\ r;I S W A F T
` ~ ~ ! ~ ~ I ~ F TDE
~ ~ ~ ~ I I E TDE \
~,F;, I TDE- \
~_ i ~ i ~ ~ O
i ~ ~ % m • _ -
~~ ; - ~~ ; ToF ~/ ~m ~:~~Q N.C. DEPT. OF T.
~ j DIVISION C
;~~ ]]LAN V~IE~V
RICHLANO~~ ~ ~1f~1G~ g WAKE
CREEK ~ I 1l 1Li
' I DENOTES MECHANIZED '.~,~,',' PROJECT: 8.1
10 0 20 CLEARING NC 98 WAKE
DENOTES FILL IN
SURFACE WATERS S S SHEET 3 OF ,I g
-- -RPBB-
- a---"r-
Z
----c--

PROFILE GRADE LINE +1.37497
90
\~ 32+75 -L- PVT
~ ~
~ ~
~ ~
85 ~ ~
~~~ D. A. = 1.53 kmz /
~ /
~ ~ AVG. DAILY FLOW= 0.029 m'/s / /
~ /
\~ /
80 NATURAL GROUND ~ ~
~ /
~ ~
~, ~o,o° ~Oso ~
~ - ~
75 ORDINARY H 1 GHWATER ~~~ ~~
ELEV.= 74.64
-~
600mm CONC. SILL PROPOSED CHANNEL
PROPOSED 2 @ 2.1m x 1.8m RCBC INVERT ELEV. 73.708
70 ~__ ~ i i
+ao +60 +ao 32 fOd +20 +ao +60 +so 33 +00 +20
~~®~~~
~~~~
5 0 10
HORIZONTAL SCALE
+40
90
85
80
75
70
2.5 0 5
VERTICAL SCALE

u.r. To
RICHLA
CREEK
O -
\ 3 ~ ~' ~
~I
U.T. TO I ~
_ RICHLAN0~1
CREEK
-__ _ ~ ~ II r,\
4' ~• I1l ~
I ~
`I \\ i
'I ~
~ ~ 1\ `?
I \\ .-
~ ~~ .
,~ ~ ~~
NATURAL STREAM DESIGN ~
~` SEE DETAIL SHEET __ OF __ ~ _ '•
ANO SUMMARY SHEET __ OF _ •' ~~~•
- I' _ ,\
`\ I \\ ~~
i 1 - ~~
~ ~ ~
\ \ I _.`,
\ f ~. \-
\ =-
\ PROP. •
RIPARIAN n,
\ ~ BUFFER +~ _
O \ I = ' ~ .
•\ ~'o ti
~ ~ J
.- f~ CONC.
_ _ SILL
NO ~ I I m i
m • I ~I ~/~
9uFf ~P / ^ i O/
~ h ., ,i,/~I ~ // -
a ~i ~
a
~ W ~ - i I C I v ~ c-
O oII Z ~~ i/I ~i
a ^' I "' " / ~', I
I~ ~i ~ I ~ ~I
J• I~ ~ 'iI ~ I I I ,,.
~! i
i
J ~ ~
/~ ~ I I I I I i
/ II ~
• I ~ ~ ~I I I
~,
II ~~ ~ ;5 i I~ ;
,I
~~ ~.' i t_ 1°~
~,1 ~ ) I I
',~ .. .. / J~0 ,'
~_ /
~! ~: I
'i i ! _ i" /
~ ,'d ~ ~
l~ ~ ~ I I I I
~ \\ I~ I , ~
tY , ~~,~ /~ I ~ I Q
--- -~ "
i
i~
i /0
sOo
_ -_
I
~'f ~
O
. ~ u - , ._. ____ - ~ , ~ ,.~
_- !/ i i,;
ice/ ~ j ~t i~ /:7
II 2 GI
-------r~-~---
~~ X15 ~~ ~ j ij ~ ~'NC 98 WAKE FOREST
~f 3 +.OO ~' ~/~ // ,/~ ~ I BYPASS WESTBOUND
j
=~~s=.».=~ a~ ~TeaT~=gym i.
~:'
_ - ,,
--- s ,' , ~ i i' --
~ ~ !~~ NC 98 WAKE FOREST
j . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~ ~ _~~ i~ ~ ,~ f_- BYPASS EASTBOUND
~ - _ ___
~ i _ /2 GI`i - -
~ - ~ ,~~ ~~~ i I 'I
X15 r
\ I~t~r l l~ rl ~~ W q F ~~
~ ~ ~ I jI ~ i ~ ~ P TOE
~~!~ ~ r ~ I ~ F TDE \
~~a ~ ~ ~~ I TDE- \
~ ' ~' F ; ~ 4 \~ -
;~/~ - _ O
.; ~ m;
W , ,
~ ~ i ~ TAE ~ ~~ `- o`` ~ N.C. DEPT. OF T
~ `~ •' ti
~ DIVISION C
,'~%~ l~lL~ N V ~ IE~V
RICHLAND ~/ / ~~~~ ~ WAKE
CREEK i I
' I DENOTES MECHANIZED PROJECT: 8.1
10 0 20 CLEARING NC 98 WAKE
DENOTES FILL IN
SURFACE WATERS S S SHEET 5 OF ~~
-- -R~_ I
Z
___--C--
33 00
-L- '~

' \ ~ ~`\~'~ Te \~ ~\j -~Z `~''•. O EXCAVATION IN WETLAND TDE-
p\~- \ ~ ~ ,\ <~,~ \l~~ iaN \ ~ TDE~lT~ - - -
•
IB~--
~~ 4' o ~~ _~_ - F-
• _ _ ~-
... F
•' A
`\~ '
7 ", . "~~
.,, ,
~~~~
~. '~. _ __ __ ___ --~ F._.
~. .,,~ ~ r .------p._ --- - _ ---
__ ~
__z_ - ~_
_.
~-~
,<< ~' _ _-
_:~ _ _.
_ -. -
SOU UND
__.
_ - _ - 19+00
~. \\\\~
• ~~
_ ~ US I ~
- - \ \ \ \t 00 NORTHBOUND _ -
_~ ,~ - - _
_ ~ \ ~•
,_:.._
.._ ~ ,. , .
:, - ~
_ .....
:.. -.- \
r
,, ~- 2 CI` ~~ 5 _ `k~ ~ N CI
r+ x - - F
F~ ~ ~ .. Tr~ T~ V
7
F __ HW \\
__
_ -T
~ i _
_ ~~ ~ ~ '~
-, ,.. ... ~ ~ ~.. rbo, ~ q
If~]L~ N ~g lE W
~~"]C]E ~
~~ 0 20
DENOTES MECHANIZED •~••••••
CLEARING •
DENOTES FILL IN S S
SURFACE WATERS

MATCHLINE -RPDD- STA. 10+60 MATCHLINE -Y3- STA. 10+70
r
.~;.c,., U.T. TO i'' X•
\ ~:,` ('~ RICHLAND d I D ~
~ ~ I CREEK ~O . • I ~~ .~~~
I \ d '~ ! \
I ~f ~ ~ ~ ~
~`~ •d \
900 +~
~F-----l-F-. T
~ DO A '---F ~ , ~ ~. F I ~~ a o
1 M / cy'~
..... ~ ~f ~' t0
IN `RAQQ~ \ 2GI 3T5 2GI 375 C ~// F F / 2 G ' M
l~r J ^/ :QFi.CD~bdD N
~- NC 98 WAKE FOREST ~- i /~ / °.dp~bo~•o'o;•~ ~
f- BYPASS WEST80UND 3 7 -}- 00 t ~ ~ ~F : 'oAt•d ~~ib Y J
~~ NC 98 WAKE FOREST -? ~ f /~~ ~i b o o .~: ' _
~• --- BYPASS EASTBOUND i \~ ~ C F/ F d •i r iaCp~bo oaoge;~~,~~~P,4yd F
° a•
~'~~••! ~ 2GI; r,f ~( 7°adp.aeYiaes.a° ~~' ~
...
°
F •• ° ; D,~
., .CAP ~~~ ~` =%~'~~ ~ .• :° ° a pe- ~
• \ ~ ~\y) I F /~' •ibdpibdPia°• Qe /
,..r (-
RICHLAND • !'~ .~ ~' / i~v/
lO /~~ ~' ~ ~+, CREEK ~0 \ 0:'4 1 / i L
u fq~ ~.
~-' \ . °p N
F~__i~ ----F-`~ __ i °b°•obo•' oF~o.,:opv'e~ib/ ~ 'l0'~~~;~Q•_.~
~• P _ _
:`TVA i
-F- ti / i .ti
~T N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
~~~lr ~~~~ DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
10 0 20
DENOTES FILL IN
WETLANDS /F /%

~
~
' r% ~P ~ 0'r ~ i
44 ti
/
i ~,~ r /
0J /
l-
I
p~ / / ~
~
~
~ ti
e-~
/ / '
_
V
`-~/ i
i~~'~ / /
~r /
T
TO ~ ~
U
~ .
.
RICNLANO ~
// ~~ i
CREEK / /O r
% a., 2 / ,

tD ' • ,~ o to~i4' ~ i / Ddb d' ° W
%°v i Pt °• o o; t'

~

N , d ~.CY
`

d`••o or ,
dY1tid° °do.r.
°:.
_ • • -
.d9~b ~
~ _
Z ~ / . / %d
~ ~, ~, ,. ~'a,
U °
~ >~e .dpi
2CI
f
40+00
-L-
175 375
CB -~ CB ~ -~ CB
~1~
-~-
Q z~ ~. .~
•'
/"
,/ ~ y` ~f~
. 1 / 'L 0J ;~: ,tom'/ %~ t hod Pt °
~'• /,.,
10 0 20
CB
DENOTES MECHANIZED
CLEARING
DENOTES FILL IN $ S
SURFACE WATERS
~~
F -~ Ef-
•-F~\F E __C _~~
~~_~~ .-~
/~ m 2GI
.:. ;: .
NC 9B WAKE FOREST ~ ~ 41 + 0
BYPASS WESTBOUND
CB 375
600 ~
~ ~ ~
CB NC 9B WAKE FOREST ~
BYPASS EASTBOUND
m Zc'
~~ ~~ =--c___
E-_ E~--- E-----
E
~0
l~IL~N ~YIEyV
~~~~ ~
,~,
•• O
/ /
~ ~
i i
J
~
/ t
,
/ ~ ~ ~ r
t / \
iv
~
•
/
ti ~'~'b
f
i •~
i
,p /~/ T \ o
/' ~

YPE 'A' BASIN /'/ ~

/
/

/ ~ 'r ~ / ~~
/ / ~
_ / i ~ W
i (1
~ ~~ / 1-

_ ~~
;
~F`
N
m
uJ
L
O W
O ~y
~D ~

\ ~ \ \ \pO~ \I I i
~~ ~~ ~ I~~ ~ y Y
z~cl ~ ~ ~
s ~,
I \ r 1~ \\ ' p~A
,I 7 III \ \ \ ~ "'~~` `,,, ~ % ~ \' • . j H~ Rlo ei4
I O '~ ~ ~a BG
I ~ F
I ~ I ~ ~ ~\ ~ ~~~
0 I ' ~ '~ \
o U.T. TO
' ` TB \ ~ ~ ~ •~t Q RICHLAND CREEK
I ~ ~ . ` --\
,, ~ \ ~ y
{ * ^
~ i. ~~ 1 ~
I ~ ~~ * ~ EX1S7.
I - aso I ~ ~ ~ R~PgR~ p,
F
D ~ i ~ .~ RICHLAND \ ~ /O R \ \ ~ ~ \ ~ ~~
j ~ ~ CREEK ~ ~ ~ ~ -a ~ ~lo,~
i
~ r \ t
t ~~ ~ r ~'
,, ~ is ,o ~ ~P~ B . ~
~,
\ f ~ loy
If~ ~ ~ P r
Yso\~ ~ ~ 1
-.
ASP S z cl y ~-~~_~ ~.~ ~ ~
•~
_.__ _._ ,
~\`, ~~;,;~, ~ ,q ~~ \ ~1 w z Era ~ ~ ;Y, a \
~ F
MATCHLINE -RPCL- STA. ~0+60 MATCHL~NE -Y3- STA. 10+70
~-7~ N.C. DEPT. OF 'T'RANSPORTATION
1t"~~~ ~1' ~~ V`Y DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
~~~~ ~ WAKE COUNTY
DENOTES MECHANIZED *,«~+~~,~ PROJECT: 8.1402501 (R-2809B)
iQ 0 20 CLEARING NC 98 WAKE FOREST BYPASS
I
` SHEET q OF(a 3~27/Ol

~~ w ,,, I
` ~. `~ 11
// RiCHLAND ~~ \ 1 ~ O I
:. CREEK \ l\ ~~ \ `: ! I
,~
--~ E--_.~ Ems- E- /Pp J \ ~ 1 pE~~ t t i
0 • ~, -'- -• ~PDE I
y ~ ,i ~. ___ -L, __ _
-~ r ~ • ~`~ ~` ` _ _ - _ I E_-PDE-
;.
~ /~ ~F~
:;
/L} 7 '~" O V ~ 3751 ~ ~ ~ ~; t,~; • ., +.+
375 N\ 1 + •- 40 "'~' ~~
~;.
I
.,
400 CSP Wi ... ,
2 ELBOWS ~- - _ ~ ~" t ; ',
~~ F 3 ~;
., :..,....,.. -~ ~ I
~ ~ ` ~~ ~
E- i ,, E ,.~ ~• E E I
~ ~ y~ ~ + U.T. RICHLAND ;''
v `\ ~~ ~ CREEK _ I
~ ~ \C..~ ~ n, //
N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
~~~lr ~~~ ~"~' DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
~~~~
~~ ~ 2~
DENOTES MECHANIZED ;•:•~•~••
CLEARING
DENOTES FILL IN S S
SURFACE WATERS

Project No. 8.1402501 (R-28098)
Property Owner List
For
Each Wetland Site
Site Station Parcel Name Address
N0. N0. DB and Pg
to
-L- 31+97 Rt N C D 0 T p.0. Box 25201
. O/ DB 6392 Pg 113 Raleigh, N.C. 27611
-L- 32+49 Lt. BM 1990 Pg 1192
Norma E. Adkins &
-L- 31+90 Lt. to Heba G. Adkins 1522 Deerberry Lane
-L- 32+17 Lt O DB 6352 Pg 489 Wake Forest, N.C. 27587-8207
. DB 1990 Pg 1192

-L- 32+16 Lt
to Town Of Wake Forest 401 E. Elm St.
. O DB 4831 P 319
g
Wake Forest, N.C. 27587-9166
1 -L- 32+50 Lt. BM 1990 Pg 1192
-L- 31+96 Rt
to North Hills Properties 4224 Six Forks Rd.
. O4 DB 3021 Pg 304 Raleigh, N.C. 27609-5716
-L- 32+36 Rt. BM 1994 Pg 1621

-L- 32+45 Rt
to William N. Jones 8~
5604 Castlebrook Dr.
. O Betty K. Jones Raleigh, N.C. 27604
-Y2- 11+29 Lt. DB 2445 Pg 191
Beatrice B. Jones &
-Y2- 11+18 Lt. to
O Madeline C. Ray .
Not Available
DB 5948 Pg 544
-Y2- 11+38 Lt. DB 1962 Pg 227
-Y2- 10+50 Lt
to Town Of Wake Forest 401 E. Elm St.
. O3 DB 4831 Pg 319 Wake Forest, N.C. 27587-9166
-Y2- 10+89 Lt. BM 1990 Pg 1192

2

-Y2- 10+42 Lt
to William N. Jones &
5604 Castlebrook Dr.
. 5 Betty K. Jones Raleigh, N.C. 27604
-Y2- 10+84 Lt. DB 2445 Pg 191
-Y1- 16+88 Lt. to O N C D O T P.O. Box 25201
-RPB- 10+51 Rt. Raleigh, N.C. 27611
KF US-1, LLC c/o Drucker & Falk
3 -L- 36+65 Rt. to O8 DB 6184 Pg 801 7200 Stonehenge Dr.
-RPC- 10+07 Rt. BM 1994 Pg 881 Raleigh, N.C. 27613
-RPB- 10+21 Lt
to Park Associates, Ltd. 4224 Six Forks Rd.
. O 6 Raleigh, N.C. 27609-5716
-RPB- 10+38 Lt. 994 Pg 1621
BM
N.C. DEPT.OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
WAKE COUNTY
PROJECT: 8.102501 (R-2809B)
NC-98 WAKE FOREST BYPASS
SHEET ~, OF 8/ YI / 00

Project No. 8.1402501 (R- 28096)
Property Owner List
For
Each Wetland Site
Site Station Parcel Name Address
N0. N0. DB and Pg
-L- 37+14 Rt. to
/0 Jones Heirs
DB 2785 Pg 941
Not Available
-L- 39+59 Lt. BM 1962 Pg 227

4

-Y3-
10+81 Rt. to
~~ Jones Heirs
DB 2785 Pg 941
Not Available
-Y3- 10+84 Rt. BM 1962 Pg 227
-L- to
47+09 Lt Mary Forbes 335 Forbes Rd.
5 . ~~ DB 1107 Pg 15 Wake Forest, N.C. 27587
-L- 47+70 Rt. BM 1935 Pg 12
I
N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
WAKE COUNTY
PROJECT: 8.102501 (R-2809B>
N C-98 WAKE FOREST BYPASS
SHEET ~Z' OF ~~ 8/41/00

IMPACT SUMMARY
WETLAND IMPACTS SURFACE WATER IMPACTS BUFFER IMPACTS

Site
No
Station

FromlTo
Structure
Size
Fill In
Wetlands
ha
Temp. Fill
In Wetlands
ha
Excavation
In Wetlands
ha
Isolated
Wetland
(ha Mechanized
Clearing
(Method III)
ha
Fill In SW
(Natural)
ha)
Fill In SW
(Pond)
ha
Temp. Fill
In SW
ha Existing
Channel
Impacted
m
Relocated
Channel
m
Enclosed
Channel
m
Zone
1
ha
Zone
2
ha Mechanized
Clearing
(Method III)
ha)

1 -L- 31+96 RT!
v2. 1~.3e LT
2 ~ 2.1 x 1.8 RCBC
-
-
-
-
-
0.075
-
-
240.8
117.0
101.9
0.404
0.263
0.026

2 •Y2- 70.42 LT /
•vz- 1o.e9 LT
-
-
-
-
-
0.004
-
-
40.3
-
-
0.023
0.018
0.015

3 •Y 1. 16+98 LT /
-RPB- ~+.01 LT
4 ~ 3.2 x 3.2 RCBC
0.024
-
0.012
-
-
0.019
-
-
67.6
-
26.8
0.063
0.034
0.042

4 -L 37.74 LT /
-L- 38.34 LT
0.268
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

-Y3. 10.84 RT I
~v3- ~is~ RT
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.140
0.076
0.030

-L- 38.92 LT !
-L- 39+59 LT
BRIDGE
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.003
0.034
0.031

5 -L- 47+09 LT /
L- a7.7o RT
1 ~ 3.0 x 1.8 RCBC
-
-
-
-
0.015
-
-
73.7
-
65.2
0.128
0.079
0.028

PROJECT TOTALS: 0.292 0.000 0.012 0.000 0.000 0.113 0.000 0.000 422.6 117.0 193.9 0.761 0.504 0.172

R-2809B
Riparian Buffer Impacts
2/ 13/01
Wetland Im acts Mechanized Clearin
Site No. Zone 1
(ha) Zone 2
(ha) Zone 1
(ha) Zone 2
(ha)
1 - - 0.017 0.009

2 - - 0.008 0.007

3 - - 0.034 0.008

4 - - 0.031 0.030

5 - - 0.020 0.008

Totals 0.000 0.000 0.110 0.062
R-28096
Sheet 13A of 18
2/13/01

NCDOT Project I.D. R-2809B
Wake County, NC
NC 98 (Wake Forest Bypass) from West of US 1 to West of US IA (South Main Street)
Prepared by: TranSite Consulting Engineers, Inc.
1300 Paddock Dr.
Raleigh, NC 27609
NATURAL STREAM DESIGN
UNNAMED TRIBUTARY TO RICHLAND CREEK
Left of -Y2-Project Station I 1+25
Shcct ~ ~,f ~~

The construction of NC 98 (Wake Forest Bypass) from West of US 1 to West of US 1 A
(South Main Street) will require that a portion of an unnamed tributary to Richland Creek
be relocated left of -Y2-. The proposed channel will be 117 meters in length starting left
of -Y2-Station 10+40 at the inlet of the proposed 2 @ 2.1m x 1.8m RCBC and continue
upstream to left -Y2- Station 11+25. The proposed channel is designed according to
"natural channel" design principles proposed by Dave Rosgen.
This unnamed tributary to Richland Creek drains 85 hectares in northern Wake County.
Existing and future land uses within the drainage basin are low to medium density
residential with commercial along the major roadways.
There is no hydraulic data available on this stream. Discharges were estimated using
procedures outlined in USGS Water-Resources Report 96-4084, Estimation of Flood-
Frequency Characteristics of Small Urban Watersheds in North Carolina.
EXISTING CHANNEL
A 65 meter section of the existing channel was surveyed in detail and used as a reference
stream. This section of stream was chosen because it will be the portion lost due to the
construction of -Y2-. Analysis of the existing channel led to a classification of BSc. This
portion of the channel was found to have flowing water and shallow pools with a bed
composed of sand, gravel and cobbles.
si,~~~ 15 ~,r~ ib

PROPOSED CHANNEL
The relocated channel is designed to have a BS classification. The design data for the
existing, reference and proposed channels is shown on the attached design data table.
The natural tie upstream and the proposed RCBC invert downstream set the channel
gradient. The sinuosity of the proposed channel is lower than the reference stream
because of a longer meandering length. The proposed channel has a lower entrenchment
ratio than the existing channel due to a reduced flood prone width and greater bankful
width. The proposed channel width /depth ratio is greater due to increased backful
width.
Proposed channel stabilization is shown on the attached detail sheet. It is anticipated that
the channel banks will be planted with native trees and shrubs above bankful depth. In
addition, low water rock dams will be placed in the channel and coir fiber mat will be
placed along the outside of the channel bends. The channel bottom will match the
characteristics of the existing channel.
Shrcl ~ cif _~

NAL~["~JI[~~IL ~'][°lE$IE~A~[ ~]E~~~N ~lC~]~~~A~]L5
LOW STAGE CHECK DAM
1 No+ +a Sc ole I
_ BDrv.
.S~ Rip ROD
• r• Ifb.
lOP VFW C°n+°r O.Sm mD.
RID ROp ~ ODO V. R.S.L.
wAk' OJm Lerel
s+.eom n°a-m'Cnoh° aronas I
D nu.Dlas
rEPSTRE AY V(^
f 10F• ;ono °sls p1
llir°` lODrlc s a+a oa Dllel
S+reDm BaOVSI n ro fl°'
n22"'I 2n
CROSS SECTON
TYPICAL FLOOD PLAIN SECTION
( Not to Scale 1
Flood Plain
J../
VAR. VAR. Natural
Ground
Natural
Ground 4.6
SEE CHANNEL DETAILS
CHANNEL DETAIL
PROPOSED TYPICAL SECTION
1 nor rD Scas I
BANItl TILL DEPin
fl P+oln ~ floo0 PI In
v AR'. v O..m 1d vAR.
~a~--~M~
irw[Al SE[i+On I BE1REEn BE rQS
CHANNEL DETAIL
PROPOSED TYPICAL SECTION
o BEND (MEANDER)
tnor ra SCOw I
p( OEEP(n cnANnEI
PANT BElO. ORAp( POWs
a.im .! e(w
BAMAl ULI DEPin
Om
f bOO PIOIn flood P. In
VAR. O.Am ~~ fI~~R '
1 p01ER COL 0.]m p sn \ANCRf ORi ROCItS
IPIhmF 0.6 Du. 8EC 0. WvERt+ GI ~ 4hp
+rPICAI SEC 1lON Z Al BE n05
NOTES:
MIAIBER Of ROO1RA05 wS1All E0 f0 BE OE IfRwnEO On biF
NU4BfR Of lOS STALE CnECS GAMS 70 BE Of ICRwNCD ON SiIE
.ADS i0 BE SPACCD .. DuY(1ER DE 8001 BASF
ER LOL ANCHOR ROCK 10 BE PlACEO On inE OORNS1 RCAU FNO
A[n lOO7ER lOL 50 INAI It IS CCANwL ALAwSi irf lOL JN
SIpE Ar•r lR04 lr{ CnAnNEL.
BACSf ICL WL OVER AW AROUND f001ER COLS, 8001°AO IOLS
ANCHOR ROCSS fWYLT SCCLWE ACL COAIPOnENIS wCCWwL
'S, CONNECTIONS AND LAPS.
iwLS Sn0UL0 BC PLACED ABOVE BAnslull [IEPiN
PT
~°1~ If$ IL Al Iy]I ~ ~, ~ N ~ l[ lE'~

ITE~~I E%ISTING
STREAM REI:ERENCE
STREAM PROPOSED
REL®CATI®N
STREAM NAME UNNAMED UNNAMED UNNAMED
DRAINAGE AREA (DA) 85 ha 85 ha 85 ha
CHANNEL SLOPE (S) 1.66% 1.66% 1.91%
BANKFUL WIDTH (Wbkf) 3.1 m 3.1 m 3.7 m
MEAN DEPTH (d bkF) 0.4 m 0.4 m 0.4 m
BANKFUL X-SECTION ARE
r 1.04 m2 1.04 mZ 1.16 m2
WIDTH/DEPTH RATIO
kF 7.75 7.75 9.25
Maximum DEPTH (d mbkf) 0.6 m 0.6 m 0.4 m
IDTH FLOOD-PRONE AREA
ra 6.6 m 6.6 m 6.2 m
ENTRENCHMENT RATIO 2.13 2.13 1.68
CHANNEL MATERIALS: D50 3 mm 3 mm 3 mm
SINUOSITY (K) 1.17 1.17 1.06
MEANDERS:
AVG. LENGTH 27.5 m 27.5 m 34 m
AVG. AMPLITUDE 7.5 m 7.5 m 8.0 m
AVG. RADIUS 9.0 m 9.0 m 8.0 m
DISCHARGES:
0 BANKFULL 1.34 cros 1.34 cros 1.59 cros
02 5,80 cros 5.80 cros 5.80 cros
010 12.80 cros 12.80 cros 12.80 cros
VELOCITY:
V BANKFULL 1.29 m/s 1.29 m/s 1.37 m/s
V2 1.56 m/s 1.56 m/s 1.45 m/s
VIO 2.09 m/s 2.09 m/s 1.68 m/s
CLASSIFICATION BSc B5c BS
S')I° IZ E.=~ 1Vi[ D ~5~ I3I1~'~° I ~ N
N.C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
.~N~

WAKE COUNTY
PROJECT: 8.102501 (R-2809B)
NC-98 WAKE FOREST BYPASS
SHEET ~ OF ~~
2/8/01

( ~ ~"
~ 48~
_ ~~ 9`~ ~ '~ END PR /
- _ ~ 0 9,
~ wak ~ e , ~.~~ 2.95 ~ R-2~ /
Elem Bch •~ ~r~ ~ _ ~~
~is~ ~~ _/
I A ~ ,l _J
~ _ ~~ ~~~~~c ~
5 •~ '~ 2.08
`-~ \~ ee'~~ ~ 2053 `~ ~~~ ~;
---~-' ~~ ~ ~ ~- ~ 2053
-,
Fore ~ le _ BE - RO'~ ECT ~ ~'
L ~ '~9
~ I Austin _- ~ ~ ;L~
~ i~ 2920
2049 y~ ~ 2054
~~~~~~~~
~~~~
N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
WASE COUNTY
PROJECT:8.1~0250~ Qt-2809C)
NC 98. WAgE FOREST BYPASS
FROM WEST OF US lA
TO EAST OF SR 2053
SHEET ~ OF ~ S REVISED 7 / 11 / Ol

~ITE 2
SITE 1
A
~1
N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
~I~I~ 1~I[.~1~ ~.
~ WAgE COUNTY
PROJECT:81~0250~ QZ~22809C)
NC 98, WAgE FOREST BYPASS
FROM WEST OF US lA
TO EAST OF SR 2053
;ET Z OF i s REVISED 7/ ll/ Ol
BEGIN F.A. PROJECT STP-9811)
BEGIN CONST.

a
N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS

WAgE COUNTY
PROJECT:81~0250~ (R-28090)
NC 98, WAgE FOREST BYPASS
FROM WEST OF US lA
TO EAST OF SR 2053
SHEET 3 OF ~ S REVISED 7/ ll/

LEGEND
-WLB--- WETLAND BOUNDARY
L
~~ WETLAND
L
® DENOTES FILL IN
WETLAND
® DENOTES FILL IN
SURFACE WATER
® DENOTES FILL IN
SURFACE WATER
(POND)
®DENOTES TEMPORARY
FILL IN WETLAND
®DENOTES EXCAVATION
IN WETLAND
DENOTES TEMPORARY
FILL IN SURFACE WATER
LIVE STAKES
BOULDER
--- COIR FIBER ROLLS
5 ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER
OR PARCEL NUMBER
~~~
PROPOSED BRIDGE
PROPOSED BOX CULVERT
PROPOSED PIPE CULVERT
(DASHED LINES DENOTE
EXISTNG STRUCTURES)
• • • • DENOTES MECHANIZED
•• •• • • • CLEARING (~'~
~ SINGLE TREE
-~--- -~-- FLOW DIRECTION
TB
~-- TOP OF BANK
---WE --- EDGE OF WATER
- ~ -- PROP. LIMIT OF CUT
- ~- - PROP. LIMIT OF FILL
--~- PROP. RIGHT OF WAY
- - NG- -NATURAL GROUND
- --e~-- - PROPERTY LINE
-TDE- TEMP. DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
-PDE- PERMANENT DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
-EAB- EXIST. ENDANGERED
ANIMAL BOUNDARY
-EPB- EXIST. ENDANGERED
PLANT BOUNDARY
-------- --- WATER SURFACE
N. C. DEPT.OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
WAgE COUNTY
PROJECT: 8.1~0250~ (R-2809C)
NC 98, WAgE FOREST BYPASS
FROM WEST OF US lA
TO EAST OF SR 8053
SHEET `~' OF ~'S REVISED 7 / ll /
WOODS LINE
^ DRAINAGE INLET
ROOTWAD
VANE
RIP RAP
RIP RAP ENERGY
DISSIPATOR BASIN

uLL~ o.~ e+-s£ ara
rxxa~~
.~ooo awn
GIDY CONSTRUCTION CO.
xFAO~~u--\
1
I 5I(p 5111C~G000 s
I CAPITAL LATOS. LLC
DE~pDE- '
PDE pD
I
E
D E~ppE
~~
_
~.. ~ ~-
E
m
E
.i ~nao ~
~6LALLALOI -
a'' -
J
~ I
~
n
_
r

N _
Z
m
F' D
W ~~ P
f..i
P
O

~ ~

TCE P'NO'fECIIOM
r --
_` ~'_'~a`"
PDE~"P ~P
-PDE-PDE-P E-POE- PDE-PD
~_._._
uLSU- na. e~ amp
r/ CLASS ! IFRAP
+~SDOO wwot sra ia. eaoz
s7mo [~s~o'~
a.u~TII N.IIOLO~+c
~~1 111 \ V ~~ 1 ~
~g~~ ~
N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
WAgE COUNTY
PROJECT:8.1~(O250~( ~-28090)
lOm 0 2 m
SCALE
® DENOTES PII.L IId WBTLANDS
NC 98, WAgE FOREST BYPASS
FROM WEST OF US lA
TO EAST OF SR 2053
SHEET S OF ~ s REVISED 7/ ll/ Ol

\ / / ~ ~ \
\ ~g I TFIOYAS & DAIERdi • I ' 120' TONN OF HAKE FOREST
NANCY !~ DAAER011 ~ ~ ~~ EASEAEI(T O
g
- ;
/ / 4 l ;
'~(~ ~
I I ~ i
. ~ l
~
I
I ~ ~ \
~
" ~ \
~ \ i
I raE rrotBtmr
~~
E
\
~ .'
~
\
~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ aASS a epn~r
~ Knot sm
ra ecaoz _-ES
~E
E
\ ~~ .
~
E
SE EJ~ ~ \y ~
~ \
`~
, ~\ ~\ ~/ ~
i \
/
E
. ~ ~
~~ E
`
~
~i
o tTF
oe

~
~ ~
~
~ Q
~
~ \ ` /
--

F - ~- - - -
- -~ -~ .__-

ra

u ~ . --
_ --
- ~ +

~ \ ~ \ o / '
-- --f-~ ~ r~ 1W s,,~~~•y -~~S
E E E E-~E - - -~ - \ ~ <v/
~ E E E----E.~~E .~ ~ ~ OE~
~ \ ~ ~ V =o•z3~s
~ ~~s~„ ~`Pf"r r~
\ • ass a ~n~r I ~ I ; , ~; :; ~r 1.
\ ~ ~`_~ \ MmQT STD. MD. K6A2 ~ _ ~, p ~n
\ _ \ \ ~\ ~ ~1 = O . G C
~ O \ ~ `` ~
J["~~1V ~~~~T ~ ~ N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORT
TIKIYAS e. DA1E7i0N rk \
NANCY tLDAiQtON DIVISION OF HIGHWA'
~~~~ ~ m A YL` !~/IiTRTTV
IOm 0 2 m
SCALE
® DENOTES FII.L IN SURFACE WATERS

wE~ ,1 ,~ ~ ~~ 9
' ~•_~11, wE ~ .~~9 ~` 7HOMA5 B. DAUERON b, ~ ROOTwADS
~} 1 ~1 \ ~ ~ \ ~,~~ j ~ \4{a.~~\ ~Q NANCY H• DAUERON ROOTwADS ~/ /
P \ ~o,~\ ~~~ `~ \\~~ ~ ~ TOE PROTECTION ~F ~ E-PDE OD'E`- ~~PDE,
\ ~
_ \ _ / ~
NCDOT S•Tp 968.02 1 ` ~~ \ UrfRU O.An BASF DITCN i _ -~ ~ .~ ~ ~ q,~fER tC~ t Qp / /
`f \E~ ~ \~ \ ~ / :-POEM-PDE-POD .P..D,=--"FDE--~~ ~ o
~ f ~ \\ ~ \ ~ POE ~ _. ~ . e~fEa tom ~ a
~ \ ~ gINN CREEK , ~ - ~ /_
_~ c '
\ ~ ~ ~ \ gtffER LONE ~ f' ~ I
~ ~
~ ~ - \
~ ~ ~ /
201 ~ I 1 ~ - / \ /
. _ _ _ _ _ _ l
-o
Q ~ / ~~~---N --------------- ----- -
~ ~ J` ~ ----- -------------------
i ~ ~ ~
~ / ~0 ~ ~ ~ X50
i ' ti° / /
/ / / F - - -
/
0 0
pE , / __~-~ I -~
~PpE/P _ / ~ ~ ~ ~ DE~,PISE-PDE- -PDE PDE-PDE-PDE-E E E E E-~ - -.C_ .._ _ ,_ ~ ~ -- -"
.o ,~ DEiPD _ _ ~ E/EROr arSlF~raa THOMAS B. DAMERON & E`~E`_E_~F- -E-~EJ
~~. - , _ ~ iPD ~p , i ~" ' ` ~~SS IRP 8M-0ITCH NANCY H. DAMERON
\ 'PDE' PDE / ~ / TOE vaoTECTnu
/ ~~~l~l ~Y ~~~ vo' 1.52 'n/s
s : o .y o% N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATIO
`" ° "° I~ DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
~~~~ ~~ ~ ~~ V°b.ZQ ~s
y,o,,, R;P P°P Br~E. WAgE COUNTY
Z ~ I ; ~ :I Side Slots
s ~ °'~ ~~° PROJECT: 8.102504 (R-2809C)
® n=o.o~
DENOTES TEMPORARY NC 98, WAgE FOREST BYPASS
lOm 0 20m FILL IN SURFACE WATERS
FROM WEST OF US lA
SCALE ® DENOTES FILL IN SURFACE WATERS T® EAST OF SR 2053
~v

TOE PROTECTKNI~ ~~
CLASS B RPRAP -~
NCOOT 5T0. N0. 86Q.02
ANDREM L ANIOlIS,
.~AtET'TE F. A1Y0!!5 !~
_ JAIES A. WCAS. Ji.
ab : o.o8Ycw,5 O
V, : 3.9 3 'Ys s4s
s=93'/.
n=o.oZy
~V =0.50
I.S m Q~ kaP ~a&a.
i.5 :/ ~ ISr ~ S~d.~ Sl.~
s=~f~l.
,~, = 0.06
lOm 0 2 m
SCALE
\ ~
~ ~
i
® DENOTES FII.L IN SURFACE WATERS
~~~~ ~~~~
~~~~
N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
WAgE COUNTY
PROJECT:8.1~(0250~( QZ-2809C)
NC 98, WAgE FOREST BYPASS
FROM WEST OF US lA
TO EAST OF SR 2053
SHEET 8 OF ~ S REVISED 7 / 18 / Ol
TONN OF HAKE FOREST O
'1' RPRAP ~ / ~
~ ,eN
i
~f ~
`f ~-E E E E E-~
h~
/e
/ VARY BOWS NERS
~~ ~ ~ TOE PROTECTK)N

PERMANENT ~~ ~
IMPACTS ~ , ,~~~__~~, ,~ ~
ToE ~to7ECnor+ ~/ wR'~ pus ~s / ~ ~~E~ pNE 2 ~ ~ ,~' ~ /
/ ~,,,
'\, E E ~ J ~ BUFFER ZONE I ,o'~oNE ~ ~ /Z,
/Q E~E-~ - ~ E ~ E'-~.c~,~°_'~ = _ ~' ~~~y 1- ~ ,gyp j ~
~- ~:,
\ E E E-~E~E_ ~ ~ I / ~ ~ / /- ~ -P~~/
i ~
~ __._.
Q
v~ _ . -- -._ _- O
~ 1 N
~ ~~_~ ~O
J ~ ~ r"__; ~ ~ ~
~~ .
v _ - d
,. , _ ~
`\` J \`~~ \1 ~g F AWES t ~ W
~ -- J
w .~~ i~ ESE E E E E V
a -~ / /' ~~ E_-E E`E\ aj~}I H. BIN ~ Fs-
U ~ E-~ Q 2
F
~j ~ N. C. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
cuss ~- raaaiw ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ WAgE COUNTY
PROJECT:8.U0250~ (R-2809C)
~ DENOTES FII,L IN NC 98, WAgE FOREST BYPASS
/Om 0 2 m ® gvRFACB WATERS FROM WEST OF US lA
SCALE TO EAST OF SR 2053
® DENOTES FII.L IN WETLANDS
SHEET 9 OF l ~ REVISED 7 / 18 / Ol

TEMP 0 R A R Y ~ TEMPORARY LATERAL 0.6m BASE DITCk
W/ C ~ MARY BOLUS HEIRS

IMPACTS LASS B RIP RAP 01 ,

TEMP. ROCK SEDIMENT CLASS 8 RIPRAP ! TEMP. ROCK SILT CHECK ~ B F ER ZONE 2 , ~ / ~ ~ ~
NCD07 STD. 868 a2 TYPE A STD. 1633.OI / ~ ~ _ _ /
f

DAM TYPE B STD.1634.02
~ ~ \ /
~~ TEMP. 40o csP
/ - -J i BUFFER Z / /

ONE I
E ~ / ti/
: ~ /
,
E
_
N

C ~- ~ _ ~
...~- - -~

/
~ -
_ (V
Z ~ ~ 85+Ob - _ ~

H
\ ANDREW L. AIAfaONS. / i, N
,~ANETTE F. AlA1A0NS ~
1ES A. LUCAS, JR.
1
` W
Z
~
.
JA
~ J
w -~ Ems--E E E E E _
~ --~ - - ___ _ -F--- - - -- ~E~'E ~ CLARENCE H. gUNN b
v RUTH H. BlR~1
~~ ~
PD Q\
_E'
E
~ ~
~ ~ if ~ laY ~' Y T~ TGa ~
1Ls 1
~! ~1' ~L1Li N. C. DEPT. ®F TRANSP®RTATI®N
. DIVISI®N ®F HIGHWAYS
~~~~ ~ WAgE COUNTY
CLASS 'I' RIPRAP
PROJECT:8.1~0250~ (R-2809C)

/Om 0 20m DENOTES TEMPORARY
FILL NC 98, WAKE FOREST BYPASS
IN SURFACE WATERS FROM WEST OF US lA
SCALE P/?~?////1/ /I DENOTES TEMPORARI' TO EAST OF SR 2053
-~/~1~ FILL IN WETLANDS
~ S~
SHEET ~ ~
OF
REVISED 9 // Ol

THOUAS a.oAUERON ~
NANCY H,DAUERON
V
V
-{-
~et.ss a per
for sro. eseoz
u..r
~~~~ ~~~~
~~~~
Quo = 0.24 ems
s=2G%
h=o•o24
v = o ,z3
3,5 m RiP RoP Bast
2:I ' IZ:( Stdc SloPns
S°0~3'/e
h=o~o'1
IOm 0 20m
SCALE
THOUAS B. Da-1ERON ~
NANCY H, pAUERON
ANDREW L. Aur~ONS,
r~ecTTC c suuANS b
m Z
ro m
TRIBUTARY TO DUNN CREEK
DENOTES FILL IN SURFACE WATERS

s ~
~~ ~~ ~/ ~r
~r~ ~~-~~
~ ~
~ ~
~ ~~
\~\ ~\\
\ ~
~ ~
~,
F ~ SPf2Q1G BOX-
JABS ti LaICAS.
~ ~ ~~
~~ `~ ~f~
u~ °~" e~sE °rta' I ~
j I ~ j' i
~; o,-ss e
~ ~~,e,~~SS
~ ~ ~ \ ~ ~ O bN000T~5TDp8 .02 I I ~~ !
~~ ~
~ u0 A+n
~ ~ f
__ =~ `~ ~
-~-
~ ~' ~~-
~ i~ °rO1 ~ ~-ureu~ w~ra

~ QO~c-c t t
Q0~/ L AM1~~
QOE/ F. AW ~w
PDE-PDE-PDE- 0~/ 'WES A. Ltl~~
PDE--Q ~
~~
i
` ~ ~ ~1
~~ ~ I
~_ ~
~ N
~ ~ +
~ ~
F
N
W
'~ Z
-~
V
., ~
~L- AIC AAIDMfd~
N. C. DEPT.OF TRANSPORTATION
~~~lr ~~~~ DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
~.- 164
~~~~ ~ WAGE COUNTY
PROJECT:8.1~(02504 (R-28090)
® DBNOTS3 FILL IN sURFeCS w~'I'BRS NC 98, WASE FOREST BYPASS
lOm 0 2 m
SCALE FROM WEST OF US lA
® DBNOTBS FILL IN WBTLANDS TO EAST OF SR 2053
SHEET ~ Z OF ~ 5~ REVISED 9 / 1(101

PREFORMED SCOUR HOLE WITH
LEVEL SPREADER APRON
(Not t0 Sco19)
Spreader Boulders should be
approximately 0.6m x 0.6m x 0.6m
In size with 0.3m between rocks.
A o A
O
Preformed
Scour Hole IPSH)
(RIp RoD In basin
not ahown for clor)ty) Q
3m of Permanent Sotl
Reinforcement matt)nq tPSR>
around Derlmeter of scour hole:
Shall be 9roded level,
Section A-A
raw w.w+~' PSR
0.3 m Natural
2~ ~ m d - ~round-
I-+-- 3.Om
Liner: Class IRIp Rap ~.-g.1.5m--~ Spreader Boulder
with Filter Fabric 0.3m tuck Dury 0.3m
NOTE: 'B'denotas size of Dasin) NOTE: The Permanent Soil Reinforcement
For example: I.Smx I.Sm PSH, B= 1,5 matting (PSR) aholt be seeded with native
grosses of Installation.
ENERGY DISSIf'ATOR
NOT TO SCALE
6m DISSIPATOR POOL 2m
PRON
-#' PROPOSED DITCH ~
2~i 0.6m ~'
O.Am 0.6m
0.9m ~ 0.6m
CLASS IRIPRAP
FILTER FABRIC
PR01=1LE
NOT TO SCALE
2: I
~~ PROPOSED DITCH ~VPOOL- APRON
2:1 OR FLATTER
FRONT DITCH SLOPE
PLAN VIEW
NOT TO SCALE
NEUSE BUFFER
CLASS I RIP RAP ~

IMPACT SUMMARY
WET LAND IMPAC TS
M
h
i
d SURFACE WATER IMP ACTS BUFFER IMPACTS

Site
No.

1
Station

From/To
62+95 -L- RT
Structure
Size

N/A
Fill In
Wetlands
ha
0.0037
Temp. Fill
In Wetlands
ha
Excavation
In Wetlands
ha ec
an
ze
Clearing
(Method III)
ha
Fill In SW
(Natural)
ha
Fill In SW
(Pond)
ha
Temp. Fill
In SW
ha Existing
Channel
Impacted
m
Relocated
Channel
m
Enclosed
Channel
m
Zone
1
ha
Zone
2
ha
2
3A 66+40 -L-
74+46/74+73
Trib. Dunn Cr. 2 2.7m X 1.8m RCBC 0.0505
0.0030 110
30
27 110
0 0.185
0.050 0.114
0.017
3B 74+20/76+20 L
Dunn Creek 2 2.7m X 2.4m RCBC 0.0673 0.0057 172 62 78 0.235 0.159
4
5
6
7 84+60 -L-
85+20 -L- LT
77+80 -L-
82+70/83+80 L 2 2.4m X 2.4m RCBC
N/A
750 RCP
900 RCP
0.0161

0.1132
0.0508 0.0275
0.0037
0.0054
0.0083
0.0047 90
62
87
138
60 65

71 0.130
0.030
0.124 0.068
0.010
0.076

TOTALS : 0.133 0.0508 0 0 0.1657 0 0.0104 689 149 324 0.754 0.444
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
WAKE COUNTY
PROJECT: 8.1402504 (R-2809C)
SHEET ! 4 OF
Revised 9/14/2001

]~~$®~EI$~Y ®~N]ER~
NAMES AND ADDRESSES
PARCEL NO.
NAMES ADDRESSES
CADY CONSTRUCTION CO 7020 SIX FORKS RD
RALEIGH NC 27615
ELIZABETH H. HOLDING 12630 WAKE UNION CHURCH RD
WAKE FOREST NC 27588
THOMAS DAMERON 414 SCOTLAND ST
NANCY DAMERON RALEIGH, NC 27609
TOWN OF WAKE FOREST 401 E. ELM ST
WAKE FOREST NC 27587
MARY BOLUS HEIRS C/0 ELIZABETH B. NASSIF~
115 E. ELM ST
WAKE FOREST NC 27587
ANDREW L. AMMONS 7412 CHAPEL HILL RD
JEANETTE AMMONS RALEIGH NC 27607
JAMES LUCAS, JR.
N. C. DEPT.OF TRANSPORTATION
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
WAgE COUNTY
PROJECT: &1(02501. (R-28090)
NC 98, WAgE FOREST BYPASS
FROM WEST OF US lA
TO EAST OF SR 2053
[EET ~ s OF ~~~ REVISED 7 / 11 / Ol

rd~..lllJ I iNBi= I;KHNC:H F ax ~ 919-153-9794
a
. r.
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
~~'
~'~~~~`\
May 25 'O1 1109 P. 02
~~~~
NCDENR
May 16, 2001
Mr. Bill Gilmore, P.E., Manager /~~r.~
Planning and Environmental Branch ~p ~ ?O~
North Carolina Department of Transportation
1548 Mail Servicc Center ~ ~ ,~~,~B~t
Raleigh, North Carolina. 27699-1548 ~~'~oHR}~U~
S'I'T F~~l 0 Pl~ti~c
Rc: Permit Application for proposed NC 98. Bypass of:~'ake Forest from west of SR 1923 (Th fD11LYe~S
Mill Road) to cast of SR 2053 (Jones Daily Road) in Wal:cCounty
DWQ No. 010550, TIP No. R=2809 -
Dear Mr. Gilmore:
The Division of Water Quality has rcviewrd your submittal: fora 441 Water Quality Ccrtificetion.for the
aforementioned project. Review of your. applicatign icvca(od ielaeking necessary information required for
m.3king an informed permit decision. The pernut application was deficient in the following areas:
Segment C
Site 2
011- •
t~S~~ ~t\~'toA~
JC~o o-{ ~-r~~ T
~~~rs,~~
(S~F ~fn~s'~ol~
C-~tz1'-

Drawings do not show any flow spreader. device at stormwater discharge outlets. L~(xZ iL1PRgP S-s`(~tNO . ~~~°o'
No discussion or analysis presented Thal demtiiutrates the proposed sizing and design of the tlow ~~~ ~~P >~~~ pt ~~~~
s readers. The information resented should indicate the antici sled flows reader desi exit ANa SPl>`~ S
velocities (to demonstrate non-erosive velociues), and the hydi•eulic design infarntntion.
The legend for the drawings is ineomplefe, an'd d~cs not provide enough informauon to allow for full
undrsstanding of what is proposed. ~d~- {L~'P 'RAA ; P'~
Site 3
• Review of the drawings Hnd table of proposed. impacts do not appear to be con; istent. More
specifically, the proposed Neuse~Buffer impacts presented in the table appear too low when compared
to [he drawings. _
Review of the stormwater design indicates that a direcCdischarge into Zone 2 of the Neuse Riparian ~'~~ ~L~ ~ ~~~~t
Duffers is proposed.. An explanation as to the: necessity for,the proposed discharge in required. The t~'F ~~~ ~~~~
outlet, if possible, should be redesigned to discharge outside the Neuse Riparian Buffer at non-uosivc
velocities. The flow spreader design, should be presented in the permit drawings and an analysis of the
design criteria and the exit velocities: should be presented. t ~~
Drawings do not show any flow sprcad~r devices at stormwater dischar e outlets ~A~L ~p ~~~ STD' ~~' t3„@ `
~~- .
]nsrr~ ENtt~C,y ~.
-A.iSSS PRTbIL
(sEF ro,hps.)
~~~ .
_. g
No discussion er analysis presented that demonstrates theproposed sizing ttnd design of the flow
spreaders. The information presented should indicate the anticipated flow spreader design, exit
velocities (to demonstrate non-erosive velociues), and the hydraulic design infonn:rcion.
The legend for the drawings is incomplete, t,r~d dots net pruvid~ enough ir_forrnauon to allew~ for full
understanding of what is proposed. ~A~CL }~IQ ~~~' ~ Nt ~.S
Wetlonds/40i lri: 1621 bl:ul Servicc Cen!cr Ralcigh.:~orth Caroling 27Gy9-1621
Te!erra:e 919-7;3-1.86 PA?~ 7J?-9961
Au bcu.~; Op~~rttaty AtF,;autivc A_tion ~:nployrr SUS. tc.YClcJIO~:c pool Wa amt; piptr

.~
ivLllu i ~ r ac nRhiv~n r dx ~ y 1 y- X55-y ~y4 May 25 ' Ol 11 ~ 09 P. 03
Site 4
• Review of the drawings and table of proposed impacts do not appear to be consistent. More
C~zC~ specifically, the proposed Meuse ;Buffer impacts presented in the table appear too low when compared
to the drawings. _
p~ • Drawings do not show any flow spreader devices at stormwater discharge outlets. ~'~~- 'RIp ~~ 'S~~N~'. R~9,oa,
i~5cb Y~PI~n~~ No discussion or analysis presented that demonstrates the proposed suing and design of the flow
NC'~T ~"~~'~ spreaders, 1'he information presented should indicate the anticipated flow spreader design, exit
PRd~~~ON velocities (to demonstrate non-erosive velocities). and the hydraulic design information.
0~, • The legend for the drawings is incomplete, and does no prov a enough information to allow for full
understanding of what is proposed. 1-RY~ 'P-t'P ~~ ~ PI ~S
• The design as proposed placed a straight culvert in place of a stream meander. Based on review of the
proposed design the expected stream velocities through: thie reach will increase dramatically.
Therefore, we request a hydraulic analysis to dcmQnstrate that no destabilization ot'the stream wild
occur. ~1~~'(~St~ b -t1~ s 1~- of -TF~. ~~ eV.,~.-r FRor. a tr a~1 ~a ~\ -r~ atd, a,4 ~~,4
JiU- ~~`~ ~~Rr"`~~o~~ f~'r -~ ouit.Z't' ~ ~lP PRP 1S (~~ R'T ou'f~-"C -to
Stte s ~~„l ~R ,
~~~-~- •
Review of the drawings and table of proposed. impec[a do not appear to be consistent. More
specifically, the proposed Meuse Buffer impactspresented in.thc table appear too low when compared
to the. drawings. ~ .~
Drawings do not show any flow spreader devices at stormwater discharge outlets. LRbZ 1Z~P ~~~
No disctusion or analysis presented that demonstrates the propostd sizing and design of the flow
spreaders. The information presented should itididate the anticipated flow Spreader design, exit
velocities (to demonstrate non-erosive velocines);'and the hydraulic design information.
The legend for the drawings is incomplete, and does not provide enough information to allow for full
understanding of what is proposed. Lf~-(.~Z 'RIP ~A'P,'Pl~'~
The design as proposed placed a Straight culvertinplace of a su•eam meander. F3ased on review of the
proposed design the expected stream velocities through this roach will increase drarrkltically.
Therefore, we request a hydraulic analysis to demonstrate that no destabilization of the stream will
occur.
S't'fo ~ ~JO . $lo~ t
b~ •
us ~ RsP R.RP •
iN ~x i c ~ =N
''pN7uNCTson1 w~ ~
;cLsMENr ~~}M'
stc,T ~H e~ K5 o1c.
SEA it~~~
~~ y~~-
Therefore, pursuant to 15A NCAC 2h :0507(a)(5.),, we will have to place the permit application on bold
until we are supplied the necessary information.: Eurtlicimore; until the information is received by the NC
Division of Water Quality, we request (by copy o€ this letter) that the US ~rniy Corps of Engineers place
the permit application on hold.
Hopefully, we can work together to expedite. the processing cif your permit application. If you have any
questions or require additional information; please eoritact7ohn'I-lennessy at 919-733-5694.
~; r
n R. loo ey
ter Quality C fi lion Program
cc: DWQ Raleigh Regional Ottice
US Army Corps of Engineers
File Copy
C:~c d oe~F-2309~;etres>ocd cncc~01055Otild. doe