The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20151332 Ver 1_Application_20151218TCCIJ'! S f7 OiiQ tlC71Z December 18, 2015 N.C. Dept of Environmental Quality Division of Water Resources 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh NC, 27699-1617 ATTN Dear Sir: Mr. Rob Ridings NCDOT Coordinator PAT McGR�RY Gavernar NICHOLAS J. TENNYSQN SecreFary Subject: Application for a Section 401 Water Quality Certification and Tar-Pamlico Riparian Buffer Authorization, and Notice of Use of Section 404 Nationwide 3 and for the proposed replacement of Bridge No. 109 over Town Creek on SR 1002. TIP No. B-5313; Federal Aid Project No. BRZ-1002(40); Debit $240 from WBS No. 46027.1.1 The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace Bridge No. 109, a 91-foot, 5-span Bridge with a 137-foot, 2-span bridge on the existing alignment. This bridge will be replaced on the existing alignment while traffic will be shifted to an off-site detour. Permanent impacts to riparian wetlands include <0.01 acre due to fill and excavation. Please see enclosed copies of the Pre-Construction Notification (PCI�, stormwater management plan, permit drawings, buffer drawings, and design plans for the above referenced project. The Programmatic Categorical Exclusion (PCE) was completed in June 2015 and distributed shortly thereafter. This project calls for a letting date of June 21, 2016 and a review date of May 3, 2016. The project schedule may be advanced if funding becomes available. Regulatory Approvals Section 404 Permit: The NCDOT anticipates that the project be authorized by NW 3 for bridge construction and will adhere to the general conditions. Section 401 Permit: NCDOT is requesting written concurrence from the North Carolina Department of Environmental and Natural Resources, Division of Water Resources. Tar-Pamlico Riparian Buffer Authorization: NCDOT requests that the NC Division of Water Resources review this application and issue a written approval for a Tar-Pamlico Riparian Buffer Authorization. �N�athimg Compares�_. State of North Carolina I Depanment of Transportation � PDEA-Natural Environment Section ] 020 Birch Ridge Drive, 27610 I 1598 Mail Service Center � Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1598 919-707-6000 T 919-212-5785 F A copy of this permit application will be posted on the NCDOT Website at l�t�s:i�`connect.ncc�o�.��o4%z•esources%E;n�iro�lrrlent�al%Pa �es;aefault.aspx, under Quick Links > Permit Applications. A copy of the PCE is also available at the above website address under Quick Links > Environmental Documents. Thank you for your assistance with this project. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact John Merritt at jsmerritt@ncdot.gov or (919) 707-6140. Sincerely, � �� Richard W. Hancock, P.E., Manager Project Development and Environmental Analysis Unit cc: NCDOT Permit Application Standard Distribution List Office Use Only: Corps action ID no. DWQ project no. Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008 Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form A. Applicant Information 1. Processing 1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: ❑ Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit 1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 3 or General Permit (GP) number: 1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ❑ Yes � No 1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply): � 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit ❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization 1 e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ 401 For the record only for Corps Permit: because written approval is not required? Certification: ❑ Yes � No � Yes ❑ No 1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation � Yes � No of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program. 1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h � Yes ❑ No below. 1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? � Yes ❑ No 2. Project Information 2a. Name of project: Replace Bridge No. 109 on SR 1002 (Town Creek Road) over Town Creek 2b. County: Wilson 2c. Nearest municipality / town: Macclesfield 2d. Subdivision name: not applicable 2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state g_5313 project no: 3. Owner Information 3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: North Carolina Department of Transportation 3b. Deed Book and Page No. not applicable 3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if not applicable applicable): 3d. Street address: 1598 Mail Service Center 3e. City, state, zip: Raleigh, NC 27699-1598 3f. Telephone no.: (919) 707-6140 3g. Fax no.: (919) 250-4224 3h. Email address: jsmerritt@ncdot.gov 4. Applicant Information (if different from owner) 4a. Applicant is: ❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify: 4b. Name: not applicable 4c. Business name (if applicable): 4d. Street address: 4e. City, state, zip: 4f. Telephone no.: 4g. Fax no.: 4h. Email address: 5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable) 5a. Name: not applicable 5b. Business name (if applicable): 5c. Street address: 5d. City, state, zip: 5e. Telephone no.: 5f. Fax no.: 5g. Email address: B. Project Information and Prior Project History 1. Property Identification 1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): not applicable 1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.786312 Longitude: - 77.772912 (DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD) 1 c. Property size: 6.80 acres 2. Surface Waters 2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to Town Creek proposed project: 2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: C;NSW 2c. River basin: Tar-Pamlico 3. Project Description 3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: Existing conditions at the site include maintained/disturbed roadside shoulder and forested areas. Land use in the project vicinity is predominantly forested or agriculture. 3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 2.15 3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 200 3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: To replace a structurally deficient and functionally obsolete bridge 3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The project involves replacing the 91-foot, 5-span Bridge No. 109 with a 137-foot, 2-span bridge on the existing alignment. Traffic will follow an off-site detour during construction. Standard road building equipment, such as trucks, dozers, and cranes will be used. 4. Jurisdictional Determinations 4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the Corps or State been requested or obtained fo�r this property / � Yes � No ❑ Unknown project (including all prior phases) in the past. Comments: 4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made? ❑ Preliminary ❑ Final 4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company: Name (if known): Chris Underwood Other: 4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation. 5. Project History 5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for � Yes � No ❑ Unknown this project (including all prior phases) in the past? 5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions. 6. Future Project Plans 6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes � No 6b. If yes, explain. C. Proposed Impacts Inventory 1. Impacts Summary 1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply): � Wetlands � Streams - tributaries � Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction 2. Wetland Impacts If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted. 2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f. Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction number — Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ — non-404, other) (acres) Tem orar T Site 1� P � T Fill Riverine � Yes � Corps <0.01 ❑ No ❑ DWQ Site 1� P � T Excavation Riverine � Yes � Corps <0.01 ❑ No ❑ DWQ Site 1❑ P� T Fill Riverine � Yes � Corps <0.01 ❑ No ❑ DWQ Site 4❑ P � T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ Site 5❑ P � T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ Site 6❑ P � T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ <0.01 Perm 2g. Total wetland impacts �0.01 Temp 2h. Comments: 3. Stream Impacts If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this question for all stream sites impacted. 3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g. Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of Average Impact length number - (PER) or jurisdiction stream (linear feet) Permanent (P) or intermittent (Corps - 404, 10 width Temporary (T) (INT)? DWQ — non-404, (feet) other) Site 1� P � T Fill Town Creek � PER � Corps 60 0.04 ❑ INT ❑ DWQ Site 2❑ P 0 T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ Site 3❑ P � T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ Site 4❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ 3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 0 Perm 0.04 Temp 3i. Comments: 4. Open Water Impacts If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of the U.S. then individuall list all o en water im acts below. 4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e. Open water Name of impact number— waterbody Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres) Permanent (P) or (if applicable) Temporary T 01 ❑P�T 01 ❑POT 02 ❑P�T 03 ❑P�T 4f. Total open water impacts X Permanent X Temporary 4g. Comments: 5. Pond or Lake Construction If pond or lake construction roposed, then complete the chart below. 5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e. Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland Pond ID Proposed use or (acres) number purpose of pond Excavat Flooded Filled ed Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded P1 P2 5f. Total 5g. Comments: 5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no: 5i. Expected pond surface area (acres): 5j. Size of pond watershed (acres): 5k. Method of construction: 6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ) If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form. 6a. ❑ Neuse � Tar-Pamlico ❑ Other: Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman 6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g. Buffer impact number — Reason for impact Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact Permanent (P) or Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet) Temporar T re uired? B1 � P❑ T Bridge Town Creek � Nos 2,772 1,360 B2 ❑P❑T ❑Yes ❑ No B3 ❑P❑T ❑Yes ❑ No 6h. Total buffer impacts 2,772 1,360 6i. Comments: D. Impact Justification and Mitigation 1. Avoidance and Minimization 1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project. The proposed bridge is 46 feet longer than the existing bridge. The removal of existing road fill for longer bridge and increasing bridge openings will improve hydrological conveyance and wildlife passage, and reduce bridge opening velocities. 1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques. Construction will be top-down. Best Management Practices for the Protection of Surface Waters, as well as, Best Management Practices for Construction and Maintenance Activities will be implemented. 2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State 2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for ❑ Yes � No impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? If no, explain: Compensatory mitigation is not proposed due to minimal im acts. 2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ❑ DWQ ❑ Corps ❑ Mitigation bank 2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project? ❑ Payment to in-lieu fee program ❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation 3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank 3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: not applicable 3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity 3c. Comments: 4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program 4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ❑ Yes 4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet 4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold 4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet 4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres 4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres 4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres 4h. Comments: EEP acceptance letter forthcoming (request letter attached) 5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan 5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan. 6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ 6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ❑ Yes � No buffer mitigation? 6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the amount of mitigation required. 6c. 6d. 6e. Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation (square feet) (square feet) Zone 1 3(2 for Catawba) Zone 2 1.5 6f. Total buffer mitigation required: 6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank, permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund). 6h. Comments: E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ) 1. Diffuse Flow Plan 1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified � Yes ❑ No within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? 1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If not, explain why. � Yes ❑ No Comments: 2. Stormwater Mana ement Plan 2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? N/A 2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? � Yes ❑ No 2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: 2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan: See attached permit drawings and stormwater management plan. ❑ Certified Local Government 2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ DWQ Stormwater Program � DWQ 401 Unit 3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review 3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? not applicable ❑ Phase II 3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ❑ NSW apply (check all that apply): ❑ USMP ❑ Water Supply Watershed ❑ Other: 3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑ Yes ❑ No attached? 4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review ❑ Coastal counties 4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply ❑ HQW (check all that apply): ❑ ORW ❑ Session Law 2006-246 ❑ Other: 4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been attached? ❑ Yes ❑ No N/A 5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review 5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? � Yes ❑ No N/A 5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? � Yes ❑ No N/A F. Supplementary Information 1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement) 1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the � Yes ❑ No use of public (federal/state) land? 1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State � Yes ❑ No (North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? 1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.) � Yes ❑ No Comments: 2. Violations (DWQ Requirement) 2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑ Yes � No or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? 2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ❑ Yes � No 2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): 3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement) 3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ❑ Yes additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? � No 3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description. Due to the minimal transportation impact resulting from this bridge replacement, this project will neither influence nearby land uses nor stimulate growth. Therefore, a detailed indirect or cumulative effects study will not be necessary. 4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement) 4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility. not applicable 10 5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement) 5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or � Yes � No habitat? 5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act � Yes � No impacts? ❑ Raleigh 5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field O�ce you have contacted. ❑ Asheville 5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat? NCNHP, USFWS website, field surveys 6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement) 6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes � No 6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat? NMFS County Index 7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement) 7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation � Yes � No status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in North Carolina history and archaeology)? 7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources? NEPA Documentation 8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement) 8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? � Yes ❑ No 8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: NCDOT Hydraulics Unit coordination with FEMA 8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA Maps ��*� Richard W. Hancock, P.E. /�-.=�� _� �2� � � ��`S ApplicanUAgent's Printed Name ApplicanbAgent's Signature Date (AgenYs signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is rovided.) 11 k 11�;11�� <14' North Carolina Department of Transportation SL[?1'llitYcl�PP � Highway Stormwater Program �. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN (Version 2.02; Released April 2015) FOR NCDOT PROJECTS WBS Element: 46027.1.1 TIP No.: B-5313 County(ies): Wilson Page 1 of 1 General Project Information WBS Element: 46027.1.1 TIP Number: B-5313 Project Type: Bridge Replacement Date: 9/15/2015 NCDOT Contact: Jonathan L. Moore, PE Contractor I Designer: Address: 1020 Birch Ridge Dr. Address: Raleigh, NC 27610 Phone: 919-707-6700 Phone: Email: 'Imoore6 ncdot. ov Email: Cit ITown: Town Creek Count ies): Wilson River Basin s: Tar-Pamlico CAMA County? No Wetlands within Project Limits? Yes Pro'ect Description Pro'ect Len th lin. miles or feet : 0.145 miles Surrounding Land Use: �Nooded/Agricultural Proposed Pro'ect Existin Site Pro'ect Buiit-Upon Area ac. 0.5 ac. 0.4 ac. Typical Cross Section Description: Two 11' lanes with 6' shoulders. Two 10' lanes with grassed shoulders. Annual Avg Daily Traffic (veh/hr/day): Desi n/Future: 913 Year: 2036 Existin : 653 Year: 2016 General Project Narrative: The existing roadway consists of 2-10' lanes and grassed shouders. Existing bridge #109 is 91.5' long with a clear roadway of 23'. The existing bridge has deck drains on 6'-8' (Description of Minimization of Water centers on both sides along the entire length of the structure. The proposed roadway typical consists of 2-11' lanes and 6' grassed shoulders. Proposed structure #109 is a 135' Quality Impacts) long bridge with 11' lanes and variable shoulders. There will be no direct discharge into the stream. Runoff along the roadway is to be treated by grass shoulders. 0.13 acres of runoff that is to be collected from the bridge will be discharged onto a rip rapped pad 20' outside of Buffer Zone 2 in the southwest quadrant. Another 0.09 acres of runoff from the bridge will be discharged onto a rip rapped pad 14' outside of Buffer Zone 2 in the northwest quadrant. Waterbody Information Surface Water Body (1): Town Creek NCDWR Stream Index No.: 28-83b NCDWR Surface Water Classification for Water Body Primary Classification: Class C Supplemental Classification: Nutrient Sensitive Waters (NSW) Other Stream Classification: Impairments: None Aquatic T&E Species? Yes Comments: No Drwarf Wedgemussels were found during a survey conducted on June 12, 2012. (biological conclusion is "No EffecY') NRTR Stream ID: Buffer Rules in Effect: Tar-Pamlico Project Includes Bridge Spanning Water Body? Yes Deck Drains Discharge Over Buffer? No Dissipator Pads Provided in Buffer? No Deck Drains Discharge Over Water Body? No (If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) (If yes, describe in the General Project Narrative; if no, justify in the (If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) General Project Narrative) � a� � 1 � �I �` ^ _� � � � � � N � i .3 � L 0 a � c a� � 0 L . ; W v� � H � w � / V � � �o a � � L O L � � C °o = � .� � •� ��e � heet �-%1 For T ndex ot � heef� BEGIN TIP PROJECT B-5313 —L— STA. 12 + 60.00 ��`�� '�� \,�`�� I�� LOCA TI01�: BRIDGE 1�0.109 O VER TO W1� CREEI� 011 t SR 1002 ( TO W1� CREEI� R OAD) T YPE OF WORI�: GRADII�G, PA VI1�G, DRAII�A GE, A1�D S TR UCT URE TO PEIUDERS CROSSROADS - - s�ioo2 -�- � (TOWN C EEK RDAD) BEGIN BRIDGE —L— STA. 14 + 76.75 • � �_ s� � � / � \ THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN ANY MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES. CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD II . � �o N i/ ,, ,,, N END BRIGDE PE RMIT D RAWI N G SHEET 1 OF 6 NA� � 8�NSR S 2�07 —L— STA. 16 + 14.24 END TIP PROJECT —L— STA. 20 + 25.00 6-5313 _-- SR-1002 ITOWN �REEK TOWN �REEK TO -L- ROAD� II��I��'1��E°1I°]� 1�I[��'� �� N�°Il° U�]E 1F�lEd I8 % W AC��T��71"d�N �� N HYDRA ULICS E111GI11tEER GRAPHIC SCALES DESIGI� DATA PROJECT LEIVGTH Prepored In the Offlce of: ADT 2016 = 653 DIVISI01� OF HIGHWAYS 50 25 � 50 �0� 1000 Birch Ridge Dr. Ralei h NC 276I0 �� OQ�G�y ADT 2036 = 913 ' g ' �,�� K = � � p�o 2012 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS �Q �0� PLANS LENGTH ROADWAY TIP PROJECT B-5313 = 0.119 MILE P.E. " � D = 65 % o � 50 25 0 50 100 T= 10 %* LENGTH STRUCTURE TIP PROJECT B-5313 = 0.026 MILE RIGHT OF WAY DATE: SIGNATURE: � � REKHA PATEL, PE � o PROJECT ENGINEER ROAD WA Y DESIGIV � � V= 60 MPH NOVEMBER 20 2015 �' � TOTAL LENGTH TIP PROJECT 6-5313 = 0.145 MILE � E1VGI11tEER �^ � PROFILE (HORIZONTAL) * TTST = 2% DUAL 8% \� �� Q�� o� � 10 5 0 10 2p FUNC CLASS = LETTIIIIG DATE: SAMUEL L. ST.CLAIR —_ MINOR COLLECTOR JUNE 21, ZO�6 PROJECT DESIGN ENGINEER PROFILE (VERTICAL) SUBREGIONAL TIER P.E. SIGNATURE: tn z 0 > W � � _ N d I � � S I M M � m � C �3 a 0 � � N .' � � a c � E _ 0 .; � W � N F-- � w a u .� `� •o a O � L � �o= �— �._� � � BRID�E/ROADW AY RELAT l0/V SHIP NOT T 0 SCALE BEGIN APPRo SLAB —L — PC Sto. l5 +25.58 � END APPRo SLAB —L — ST A, l4 +65e75 —1 — ST A_ l� +� 5_� 0 GRAU 350 TL-3 TYPE-III �n � � C � O 8' � rAPER GRAU 350 TL-3 TYPE-III ih —L — ST Ao l4 +76,75 TYPE-III � �:� ��. TYPE-III GRAU 350 TL-3 � SEE ST RUCT URE � END BRIDGE PLANS —L — ST Ae l6 +14024 � 2 �� EARNEST R. WEBB� � � � � � � 1 � � � � � \ \ � �> � IF � � — � � � � � wCe� � � � � � \ � � � � � i � �OODS� � � � � � l� lF � � � � SHOULDER BERM GUTTER FR0�f1 STA. 1�+80 LT. TO BEGIN � � � APPROACH SLAB & FROM FND APPROACH S�AB TO'� STA. � �--" F � � � � 16 + 80 LT. � � � E - _ �E - - � � �xisTiNc Riw � � � ,� � IF � —��— � — �� — , — — — — — -- �-� r � �-� ��-��W—k�� v-��i�� - ��r�� r��v-Tc— _ —B�M— o — o � GRAU 350 TL- - � � N �s TB 2 I sR iooz rrowN cRE�K Roe� 2oe5� esr X �� ------- F ___F_ s� FxiSTiNc Riw ! - ��- --- -----W��-- —� �� , �-,� �,_, ,� ��,�s��-,_�� - r"�'—� � � � ,� ,� � � � \ WOODS � i k K- i � � � �� EDWW � VICK ioo� o� ioo� 1 ,. � � � � ��p,��ic scA�E �� / � 50 /2 — /3 — /4 — � � � � STANDARD 'V' DITCH GRASS LINED K SEE DETAIL '!� l� APPROX 2 CY DDE CL 'B' RIP RAP EST 2 TONS EST�7 SY GEOTEXT E � ti� ti � ti� � � � o / � �`� � --�*=r'��PE-III /5 — 0 NA� 8�i SRS 20�7 N �� ; '"r /,, � y,, o�- V � �, % � 4 � IKATHERINE M. BRYANT '� r � � ,�- ,�_ �; �, - ,� � I BF,�IDGE � I09 STAN�DARD 'V' DITCH � � �e; �� S�AN CONCo & TREATED TIMBER BRIDGE IF GRASS LINED � � � � � � W/CONCa WINGWA��S SEE DETAIL 'A' � � I�� APPROX 2 CY DDE ,� � � '� � � � � � F� . \ i � � � r � �, I� � F< _-------- IF �/ � � i � � �_— ��Q�S __ � _ �/ `�` \ IF � CL 'B' RIP RAP �e�`M� �� i� � � � EST 2 TONS � �� EST 7 SY_ _ __ ; � �k� � �- -- —e ° - - -- GEOTEXTILE E _ �-��` _ — — — — _ �� — � s_� � T F — — �� ,_ ;�� —� _ _ N I lI1 s , �. F_�__ l�--- - _ . _—�_,--_.,�. ��`� `�``- �` � � TYP�Iff-S,—, R _�V � — —��..� ._ ., � tv � _ � � _ O � � — — TB 2G1 � _ -�— — _ — — �' � � SR 1002 (TOWN CREEK RDJ �� X � — �isTiNc Riw I --- — — — — —_—_ �_ � ��,-,s�`�-r^�L -�'Y-�E111 GR,4U 35� IL � �— � E �� ,-r�-, �`_`�. �� E � ��-,��'n ,�� -s"-�'-s-� ,�'� Lr�'� ,—�_�,— — - �,-�=��,,,�,— \ � �___-, '� � / � � � —L — CHARLES A. ROSE/ woo�s /�/ St0 /7+3/.2Q � ,� � p= 6° ll' 39.9" l LT l � � �"' D = l° 30' 28.0" N � ' L = 4/0.83' - T = 205.6/' �= � , �; � /6 — /7 /8 0 /9 R = 3,800.00 RO = SEE PLANS SE = 0.25 l50 MPHJ 20 DETAIL 'A' STANDARD 'V' DITCH ( Not to Scale) Natural ! Natural Ground 3.� ,�.1 Ground D Min. D= VAR. -L- STA. 13 + 80 LT -L- STA. 16 + 80 LT � PROJECT REFERENCE NO. B —53/3 R�W SHEET NO. ROADWAY DESIGN ENGINEER SHEET NO. 4 HYDRAULICS ENGINEER �� I + �� dD� N�7C �7�1E �� ff3 % W A��gTI�I°1[°I�I� �� II�� N�°l[° g7�]E �1E8 ��N�°Il°IB�J�°Jf'I�N PERMIT DRAWI NG SHEET 2 OF 6 � DENOTES EXCAVATION IN WETLAND F F DENOTES FILL IN WETLAND DENOTES TEMPORARY FILL IN WETLAND �DENOTES TEMPORARY IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER BRIDGE APPROACH SLAB FOR STRUCTURE PLANS, SEE SHEET S-? THRU S-?? 2/ �� 1� 50 N Z O > w � C � � N L 2 N d I � � _ � M M � m � C �3 a � � m N .; � � 0 c � E _ 0 .; � W � N !-- � W d U .' `� •o a o � ` v �o= �— �._� I t � ' BRIDGE/RC�ADW AY RELAT l0�lV SHIP l�l NOT T 0 SCALE � � BE�II� APPRe SLAB � —L — PC Sto. l5`+25.58 —L — ST A, l� �65075 � � 1 � � \ GRAU 350 TL-3 _ �_ J _ _ _ �rpE-I II � '� � � TY�?E-III O ,� , , ,—�'i ,i i � N� 1 ~ t I _ _ �� , i 8�1 rAPER GRAU 350 TL-3 �PE-III ' � \ 1 oc�ini ooin�c fL — ST Ae l4 +76,75 i _ �- J � SEE STRUCTURE PLANS � END APPRo SLAB —L — ST Ao l6 +25023 �'' r�.� � , � � :-III ,GRAU 350 TL-3 � ; �' �ND BRIDGE —L — ST Aa l6 +14e24 � PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO. � , � � ., .� -� -- - , _-, � � � � _ � ,;� � B-53/3 4 � � � � _°` (� �- _ � � �'`� ' DETAIL 'A'�� \ � � � �� / �,� � --`,`� � � I / � _,� � � � ✓ , R�W SHEET NO. � � � � � � � � � ��,. � / � � ST�ANDARU 'V' DITCH �� F /^ �� to Scale) ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS '� � ` � � / � � -' � _ _ _ � � ; � �� ENGINEER ENGINEER � Nor � � � I�q� , � _, ` \ � —\� � �� `� � � � � � � \ / / Natural � ! Natural SN � d Ground � �� — — — r�— � i � �. <J � _ � � � l� ; l IF , IF - � _ _ . ��' ��`'`� '-- �� '� � � �� r,. � � STANDAitD 'V' DITCH- �� j � � � - - � \ � f '� \ ' GRASS LINED � �- � � � �. � ; IF SEE DETAIL '�`- % � lF � / �� — — � � � � , �EARNEST ��R. WE�BB ._� —� � -- qpPROx 2 �Y _�DE � ,�� / � I � � \ � - CL 'B' RIP RAP �" �\ I � ��/ � �' ��,,�� -- -- FST2 TONS � �� /� \ 1 � � _ _,6- _ �_ _ � � � �, � � � \ \ � � ��A � EST�7 SY GEOTEXT �i / \ �- � � _ __�- e-� - - _ �,., � I� �� \ \�� . � � / � \ � � � � � � � � �_ ��I � � � \ � l� \ l � i / -�{�flD� - _ _ A ,, � �� \ I � � ,' �, _ � � � _ ? � � � � � � ,� '�� IF � �� ' �� SHOU4DEa BERM GU7TER FRO,I�h �TA. 1�+80 LT�. TO BEGIN � � �� `� �� , �� __ APPROAC�i SLAB & FROM F�1D APP�OACH S�AB�� TO'�-STA,�` �� - � �, � , R �� I� J � � � � ` ''�� 16 + 80 LT. � � � � � � - � E-� �E ' �� l� �'� � ExisTiNc R�w _ _= - - - �, _ _ � � ' � ' .� _ � -- � _-��, _ _ - - - - � =��t�,��°��i` 1 � � '�� - ----- __ ' � _ - _-. --- `_-_ _ - --_-- -=�� _ � � � ,� � T - � � � �, (� �� i -_ r� IML--�J`� , ,_"til"- �-� - �- _ . - � -�. _ _ _.. - . . ._ _." _.. _ _ . _ _ — �_" N `o.�/��1�'� �"`7""�(:>'�J��--. . � � - - ` - - � - — -_��"`�(P�-III � �� o -- - - =_- GRAU 350 TL- - ��7' -' - G -- - - -_� � � �s TB 2 I TB 2GN � _ SR 1002 �TOWN CREEK RDJ 20e5' BST X � � � O -� �' - - �:\ - - _ --:_ — — - - -- F----- F---__--- ��Q��-IYPE-III) - �� ExisTiNc Riw — � —� —y — —_ =_��-� _ — —' � - — — � F� � F�,� � — — —WLB-- "� i l �1 / -� — — � � � � � � � �� ' �. � �_�� - ��' � 20 � � � Groun 3. ,�.;� �� \ � i� � % � � � �l� ' � _ ,�_ � � — — — �_ ' � �. l 7 p � �� ,� / �� A / - ` � — \ � � � � � � � �� — s � �, �� IID� _N�°Il° �J�IE 1F� ff� % VV A��TI�I°1[°I�N � _ �� Min. D=, "VAR. I� � � \ � � \ � � -L- STA.'13+80 LT �� ' �� i I � � � I � � �-L- STA. l�b + 80 LT �� N��° �� N��°��°�r�zv - � � � \ � � I � �� . �� ` � � � �s� � � � � � l / �� 1 � � � / - ` �� \� A � � \ ��— � � i��, �� `� �---��, -�� I � � � � � � � o ; , � , --� � , � PER IT DRA I .,, ,� ,�J , �` _ ,_�6 ��,� `� �� M WNG ,' ,' � _ ; - � ` � �� ` ` SHEET OF � ,� , � � , � �, �� 3 6 i � ,� � � r— �—� � � � �� - � � ,� � i � � � i � � � �� - i � � � � r 4 �, � � � �i � �� KATHERINE M. BRYANT � �) � � �I� � I� �� I � � � �� ,.—� � s � �\ � I � � � � � � �� 1 � � �� f � BI�IDGE # 109 STA�DARD 'V' DITCH IF "' � t� --`� ` � � � � 1) DENOTES EXCAVATION � � � , SPAN CONCo & TREATED TIMBER� BRIDGE lF � '� '� -_�-�'� � I �, � � � � IN WETLAND � � � � � '� W/CONCe W�NGWA��s GRASS LINED I � � l SEE DETAIL 'A' � � � � ''>" � � � m� � � � � �� APPROX 2 CY DDE � - ;� � � � � � � �� ' � �� DENOTES FILL IN � � � � �, / � �� I � �� , � � � ' - - � �/ � � � � � l� �.� � i �- - -' / / � F -�F WETLAND � �. �� V � �� /� - - �- - - � � _ � _ - _-- _ _ ��DS� � I � - \ i � - , � �� DENOTES TEMPORARY ,� � � �� _� � �� I � IF / � � - �M- _'_-� � � ' / � � � __ FILL IN WETLAND � ( � / i\ IF ' EST 2 TION P/ �� M_ � '�xisTi� �� I _� _� ; _ _ - ��`� � � � � � � ST 7�i<�- -_ � �"� � �`-�� - : - � � � DENOTES TEMPORARY � ' -�^ -- - -- - EOTfz TILE �, - - ___ � � _� `� `�- �- b w� - � __ � ( � IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATEIZ � � - - � E � �,� � ! � � �� — ��— _ _ i � �a��, . � - � � __ � - �— �� , �� - �� = � F � �� --_ — — � ` � � � �""� _ --- -- �; �� -�k�� N � � � - � �� `��._ U .� N)��( - - - \ _ � __. ....�- .. --. � , =__ I � �� .... __- / ...,. I J -- �- v �r� �' � ��tC1�^3'�d �L' � '� N X r � ,� � � � '' � TYP�I IT 5„ R -IV- , � _ _ � :- o , ', � k � � � � �i � � � - � O -_ - � o � . �- � -- � � , _ � o � � ` � � � �- � � � � �S I, � TB 2G1 � - � SR 1002 ITOWN CREEK RDJ � � - � � _ _ - - � iNc Riw � �. -6L- - -- � � _ _ �. C � \ � � �' / ` - - _ _ � � xisl �, ' / �`I $ ' _ — _ __ _ ___---- � ____ � , � / -p_ _ , _ --- / \ - _ ___ _ — _ — / — \ / / I� � ` , , , _ ; -�'Y-�E =1Lf _� RAU 3 5� I1 �-- — �— � � E �r�-,s�� - �, �a� � �i �__ E - � - ` � � �-- _� _ , _ -� -� _ -� �-,��,, ,��`� — . _ �. �_ �= � i ��''� _ �� - - - � l � - � �ti,�-"-,�� - --� : �j � `�� / / , � I I . � � _ _ 1 _ — / , � � \ � �_ , � , � _ _ � — ,, � � � , �� 1 , � �, I � � / i ` 1 - d / / � � , �'� � � � �1 ,� �,� �� 7 � � ,� � � �l � � � �'� � � � � �� I � _ — � � � — , ,\ ' �� —__ � � � � �� / � � �''ll %, ,�� _ � � I�-�� ` � -L- ,��--_� � 1 ' � � � � �,�� WOO�DS �� ', - � � �� .��__ � -, � ' �� e � � � � �� '�� I I " � �� -� I ��✓� � � � . , � �� `+ CHARLES A ROSE� woo�s � Pl Sf0 /7f.3/.ZO ,1 � \ �� I � � � ��, � I � �� , �� 1 � �/ l 1 � � � � 6� � r' ` ` � � � �, � ( � � ,, �� I � � � � �� i � / , � � — \ � ��, , � � EDWW � VICK � � � � � , ,A � � � ; � - � - � � � I � �` '�' '� � I / � � �� \ 1 (�. ioo� � � ; �_ c� � �oo� � � � , ��, � _ � , �� ', �� GIAH�`��1� ��l�H�� i A l . / 70 50 u /2 — k-- , � � li I � � ,� �Ij,� I I'' , I I �1 � � � � �� _, I ' , I I I , �- � ��,,��I� i� � I� /3 — /4 — /5 — O /6 — � �� = 6° //' 39.9" l LT l � � ��- � � � � p = l° 30' 28.0„ N � � �� -- N � � L = 4/0.83' � T = 205.6/' � � ►� � R = 3,800.00' � RO = SEE PLANS � SE = 0.25 l50 MPHJ /7 /8 0 /9 20 BRIDGE APPROACH SLAB FOR STRUCTURE PLANS, SEE SHEET S-? THRU S-?? 2/ I I 70 1 I 50 �■■■■■■■■��= �=�=s===i■■■ ■�■■■■■■■■■■ A�■■■■■■■■■■ �■■■■■■■■■■■ �■■■■■■■■■■■ ��!!��!��i A�■■■■■■■■■■ ■�■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■� iii■i�a ■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■� ■■■■■■� ■■■■■■� i�C!!!� ■■■■■■A ■■■■■■■ + � �� :• 70 14+50 (+)0.5000% t+11.146� PI STA.14+00.00 EL. = 78.13 VC = 140' FILL FACE C� END BENT 1 STA.14+76.75 -L- GRADE PT. EL. 79.01 BEGIN FRONT SLOPE STA.14+70.04 -L- Q10 WSEL. (OT) GRADE PT. EL. 78.93 EL.77.6' ---� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � ■� EL.77.0 ± CLASS II RIP RAP W/ GEOTEXTILE TO PENDER CROSSROADS (SR 1418) 15+00 SPAN A 15+50 (+)1.1467% �(-)0.9710% PI STA.15+50.00 EL. = 79.85' VC = 160' GRADE DATA 16+00 SPAN C 1'-6" TO LIMITS 1'-0" MIN. EARTH Q100 OF UNCLASSIFIED BERM (TYP ) EL.79.36' EXCAVATION (TYP.) NORMAL TO CAP EXISTING SUBSTRUCTURE FIX. FIX. FIX. (TYP.) FIX. FIX. � � � � i"Y ...�. � � I I �i � � I I NWS 72.3' ,� � I I � I I I I 10-6-2014 i I I EL.71 ± . -- ----- --- II II i �i' -----� i L�t��` � � — II � I I i—I EL.73± —� i �__� i II II i EL.72± i ELo72± L�'�� _�_ _II ___ !__�� I I �� EL.74± � � � LI EXCAVATE TO EL.68 ± EL.68.0 ± 1.5:1 SLOPE EL.73.0 EL.67± NORMAL TO CAP (TYP.) END BENT 1 1'-7" BERM EL.73.43 FILL FACE C� END BENT 1 I W.P. #1 STA.14+76.75 -L- BEGIN / APPROACH SLAB #1 STA.14+65.75 -L- BEGIN FRONT SLOPE STA.14+70.04 -L- � ALONG TANGENT AND EXTENDED TANGENT 1'-7" BERM EL.74.40 o" �O� oU , o0 BENT 1 BENT 2 SECTION ALONG -L- . , . , EXISTING SUBSTRUCTURE �' (TYP.) BENT 1 I _ � CONTROL LINE II ', I I ' I I I I I I I I I I t -� � .� � 90 ° -00'-00" (TYP.) �46,_2i�q„ 07-APR-2015 08:26 R:\Structures\Correspondence�6-5313\B-5313_SD_PGD.dgn gdickey i� � w w � U z 0 �- � �` �`' � �` ' i i � �--- i i i i II . �I II �� . II �" �I II II N I I '�, � I I I � � '�, I I '—' � � I I r' II � •I II �� I � � W.P. #2 I I BRIDGE I.D. � � � STA. 15+22.94 -L- � � STA. 15+45.50 -L- �� LC') M � � � � I I �� I I W' P' # 3 � � PC STA. � � STA. 15+68.06 -L- I I ; 15+25.58 -L- I I RADIAL 7„ � � : � � � �� OFFSET=2 /8 � � Q I I � I 190 °-00'-00" I I I I � � � � � �TO EXTENDED � � � � ~ �-� TANGENT � � (TYP.) ` �22'-6%4" � 22'-6%4„ � 45,_1i�2„ � 137'-6" TOTAL LENGTH OF BRIDGE (FILL FACE TO FILL FACE) � PL AN (PILES NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY) � BENT 2 CONTROL LINE ; ,' , ,' � 46,_2i�4„ EXCAVATE TO EL. 73.0 � DO� �o >o U (� }o 16+50 FILL FACE C� END BENT 2 STA.16+14.24 -L- GRADE PT. EL. 79.24 � � � � END BENT 2 U oo, BEGIN FRONT SLOPE STA.16+20.99 -L- GRADE PT. EL. 79.16 qPPROXIMATE EXISTING GROUND LINE � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � !��' . �� ♦�� ►��i��i��i��i��i . � . . . , � PILES (TYP.) 1'-7" BERM EL.73.68 100 �� :� � HORIZONTAL CURVE DATA PI STA.17+31.20 0= 6° 11' 39.9"(LT) D=1 ° 30' 28.0" L = 410.83' T = 205.61' RO = SEE PLANS R = 3,800.00' CLASS II RIP RAP W/ GEOTEXTILE FILL FACE (� END BENT 2 � W.P. #4 STA.16+14.24 -L- RADIAL iOFFSET=1'-0%6" END � APPROACH SLAB #2 STA.16+25.23 -L- RADIAL OFFSET=1'-3��/16" \BEGIN FRONT SLOPE STA.16+20.99 -L- 1'-7" BERM EL.74.66 PG�C�dO�il�bQG��I PdQb� �O b04 NJ�G f�OG� GOb�4G�NJC�4�O�n TO TOWN CREEK (SR 1414) � -�- � EXTENDED TANGENT PROJEC T No. B- 5 313 W I L SON CouNTY STATION: 15+45�50 -L- SHEET 1 OF 2 REPLACE BRIDGE N0.109 + � B�Me#1 = RR SPIKE IN BASE OF 38" GUM; STAo 14+17a56 —L—, 19088' LEFT, ELEVa78o82 , ; ; , ; , ; � `',. J S , ., , , WOODS � �'� � , WOODS : ti � , , , , , , , , , . �,, , 1„ � 1,_0„ .-� .-� . I ♦ I � i � i 3'-0" (TYPe� LOCATION SKETCH 33'-0" 30'-10" (CLEAR ROADWAY) 16'-10" PROPOSED VERTICAL CONCRETE BARRIER RAIL (TYP.) 23/4"" C� � BRG. _ 0.025 C'��I�i�l ► ,� _, ,� _, �. _ � �. -, �• -, ,- -, ,- -, ,- . ♦ I ♦ I � �� ,� �� ,� �' ,� �' � i � i 0.6" QS L.R. TRANSVERSE POST-TENSIONING STRAND IN 2�/2" Qs HOLE 17'-11" 14'-0" -L- & EXTENDED TANGENT i-2%4" (� � BRG. ASPHALT WEARING SURFACE 2%q" C� � BRG. .''� �� .. � i SHEAR KEYS TO BE FILLED WITH GROUT AFTER ALL ERECTION HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND AFTER FINAL TENSIONING OF TRANSVERSE STRANDS 11 PRESTRESSED CONCRETE CORED SLAB UNITS = 33'-0" HALF SECTION AT INTERMEDIATE DIAPHRAGMS TYPICAL SECTION 15'-1" HALF SECTION THROUGH VOIDS THE MAXIMUM BARRIER RAIL HEIGHT AND ASPHALT WEARING SURFACE THICKNESS IS SHOWN.THE HEIGHT OF THE BARRIER RAIL AND ASPHALT WEARING SURFACE THICKNESS VARIES WHILE THE TOP OF THE BARRIER RAIL FOLLOWS THE PROFILE OF THE GUTTERLINE. 07-APR-2015 08:26 R:\Structures\Correspondence�6-5313\B-5313_SD_PGD.dgn gdickey CONST. JT. (TYP.) L- �� NOTES� ASSUMED LIVE LOAD = HL-93 OR ALTERNATE LOADING. THIS BRIDGE HAS BEEN DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RE�UIREMENTS OF THE AASHTO LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS. THIS BRIDGE IS LOCATED IN SESMIC ZONE 1. HYDRAULIC DATA DESIGN DISCHARGE FREQUENCY OF DESIGN FLOOD DESIGN HIGH WATER ELEVATION DRAINAGE AREA BASE DISCHARGE tC1100) BASE HIGH WATER ELEVATION = 2191 CFS = 10 YRS = 77.60 = 52.9 SCI. MI. = 4485 CFS = 79.36 OVERTOPPING FLOOD DATA OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE = 2191 CFS FRECIUENCY OF OVERTOPPING FLOOD = 10± YRS OVERTOPPING FLOOD ELEVATION = 77.5 (APPROX. STA. 12+90.0 -L-) PROJEC T No. B- 5 313 W I L SON CouNTY STATION: SHEET 2 OF 2 15+45050 -L- WETLAND PERMIT IMPACT SUMMARY D Hand Existing Existing Permanent Temp. Excavation Mechanized Clearing Permanent Temp. Channel Channel Natural Site Station Structure Fillln Fillln in Clearing in SW SW Impacts Impacts Stream No. (From/To) Size / Type Wetlands Wetlands Wetlands in Wetlands Wetlands impacts impacts Permanent Temp. Design (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ft) (ft) (ft) 1 13+75 to 16+00 -L- Bridge and Roadway Fill < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 0.04 TOTALS*: < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01 0.04 0 0 0 *Rounded totals are sum of actual impacts NOTES: There will be approximately 21.78 sq. ft. of piles in the water. Revised 2013 10 24 c rn � v � � m x � i � xi M M � � 3 0 0 6 � v c O w I � z v �� n ,o a o °1 -o � °o x' a.E 'z' v,«,N See Sheet 1-A For Zndex of Sheets �� ll' L`� �� ei1��1�' ei1 �� Y ��AV' �� llll�� WV' fi�� WILS01� COUIVTY LOCATIOIV: BRIDGE N0.109 OVER TOWN CREEK O1V SR 1002 (TOW1V CREEK ROAD) TYPE OF WORK GRADIIVG, PAVING, DRAIIVAGE, AND STRUCTURE BUFFER IMPACTS � PERMIT DRAWING SHEET 1 OF 4 NA _"/ SRS 2pp7 � U � � O U BEGIN TII -L— STA. T TO PFNDERS CROSSROADS � THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN ANY M CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD II . GRAPHIC SCALES 50 25 0 50 100 �� PLANS sa 25 0 so t0a PROFILE (HORIZONTAL) io s o io so PROFILE (VERTICAL) J DESIGN DATA ADT 2016 = 653 ADT 2036 = 913 K = 11 % D = 65 % T = 10 % * V = 60 MPH * TTST =2% DUAL 8% FUNC CLASS = MINOR COLLECTOR SUBREGIONAL TIE PROJECT LENGTH LENGTH ROADWAY TIP PROJECT B-5313 = 0.719 MILE LENGTH STRUQURE TIP PROJECT B-5313 = OA26 MILE TOTAL LENGTH TIP PROJECT �5373 = 0.145 MILE Pre�red In ths OfTlce of: DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS 1�00 Birch Hidge Ur., Nu(eigA NC, 21610 R/GHT OF WAY DATE: REKHA PATEL. PE , NOVEMBER 20,,,2015 Pxo�ccra.vc.,�cEx - LETTING DATE: SAMUEL L. ST.CLAIR JUNE 21 2016 PRo�ecrnas�cxa,u�rnEsn ROADWAY DES7GN ENGINEER TO T�WN CRELK -�- �� ROAD1 dCDMPH,£TE PLANS IELIMINAEtYw @�LANS tn Z � � w � C � � _ N � I � � m I � � S I M M � m � C �3 a 0 � � N .' � � a c � E _ 0 .; � W � N F-- � w a u .� `� •o a O � L � �o= �— �._� � � BRID�E/ROADW AY RELAT l0/V SHIP NOT T 0 SCALE BEGIN APPRo SLAB —L — PC Sto. l5 +25.58 � END APPRo SLAB —L — ST A, l4 +65e75 —1 — ST A_ l� +� 5_� O GRAU 350 TL-3 TYPE-III �n � � C � O 8' � rAPER GRAU 350 TL-3 TYPE—III ih —L — ST Ao l4 +76,75 TYPE—III � �:� ��. TYPE-III GRAU 350 TL-3 � SEE ST RUCT URE � END BRIDGE PLANS —L — ST Ae l6 +14024 � 2 �� EARNEST R. WEBB� � � � � � � � � 1 � � � � � � �> � IF � � — � � � � � wCe� � � � � � \ � � � � � i � �OODS� � � � � � l� lF � � � � SHOULDER BERM GUTTER FR0�f1 STA. 1�+80 LT. TO BEGIN � � � APPROACH SLAB & FROM FND APPROACH S�AB TO'� STA. � �--" F � � 16 + 80 LT. � � � E - _ E - - � � �xisTiNc Riw � � '� IF � �� — � / — � —��— � �� -- -- 'a-, M - r�r� � o —�v-�� _r�-'—c-�r��v-�� v-'—��'�� ,�r��,s= � �r � � �c— � o GRAU 350 TL- � - TI sR iooz rrowN cRE�K Roe� 2oe5� esr _ ioo� � � � � STANDARD 'V' DITCH GRASS LINED K SEE DETAIL '!� l� APPROX 2 CY DDE CL 'B' RIP RAP EST 2 TONS EST�7 SY GEOTEXT E � ti� �ti � ti� � � � R � �� ,� , � _ /, ,� � ,� � ;�i� -- ---------- SzJ '�� -- F F ---- FxiSTiNc Riw ! - - - � ��- - - - - - - -----w�a-- /- ��Y' - �s'��.��s�-�_rn-��" `� - r�'-r \ /F � /F /F \ l� IF \ WOODS � i k K- i � � � �� EDWW � VICK o� ioo� 1 ,. � � � � ��p,��ic scA�E �� / � 50 /2 — /3 — /4 — /5 — 0 NA� 8�i SRS 20�7 N �� ; '"r /,, � y,, o�- V � �, % � 4 � KATHERINE M. BRYANT '� � �� r�_ �, �_� �� I � � � � BF,'DGE � I09 STAN�DARD 'V' DITCH � � ,� �d; �S�AN CONCo & TREATED TIMBER BRIDGE IF GRASS LINED � � �� W/CONCa WINGWA��S SEE DETAIL 'A' � - � APPROX 2 CY DDE ,� � � '� � \ � � � � �� \ � �� IF __-- --_ _ IF �, � � i � � �_- -�Q�S __ � _ �/ ,`�` \ IF � CL 'B' RIP RAP �e�`M� �� i� � � � EST 2 TONS � �� EST 7 SY_ _ __ ; � �k� �- - -e �-_ - -- GEOTEXTILE E _ �-��` _ - — - - _ I - � _ �_� � F ��;� �- ;� � —_ _ � —�_ — — ��y =—� � — � � �� __ ,---.,�. �� '�- , �» � . � �� L —� � - _� ,...� . _ „ � � TYP�I ff- 5 R -IV - � - — o TB 2G1 SR 1002 (TOWN CREEK RDJ � ___�� X � — �isTiNc Riw � _ — — — -- � � �,-,�`-,s�`�—�'�L -�'Y�E111 GR,4U 35� IL � �— � E �� ,-r�-, � — � E `�, �—� �'�. ��.,�,� ,�-,��-,'�-s"-� ,� ! ` Lt� � ,—� ,_�,— - ��,-��--�"' ��' � � �_-_-, '� k / � � � -L - CHARLES A. ROSE/ woo�s /�/ St0 /7+3/.2Q � ,� � p= 6° ll' 39.9" l LT l � � �"' D = l° 30' 28.0" N � ' L = 4/0.83' - T = 205.6/' �= � , �; � /6 — /7 /8 0 /9 R = 3,800.00 RO = SEE PLANS SE = 0.25 l50 MPHJ 20 DETAIL 'A' STANDARD 'V' DITCH ( Not to Scale) Natural ! Natural Ground 3.� ,�.1 Ground D Min. D= VAR. -L- STA. 13 + 80 LT -L- STA. 16 + 80 LT � PROJECT REFERENCE NO. B —53/3 R�W SHEET NO. ROADWAY DESIGN ENGINEER SHEET NO. 4 HYDRAULICS ENGINEER �� I + �� dD� N�7C �7�1E �� ff3 % W A��gTI�I°1[°I�I� �� II�� N�°l[° g7�]E �1E8 ��N�°Il°IB�J�°Jf'I�N PERMIT DRAWI NG SHEET 2 OF 4 �� ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZONE 1 �\\\\\\ ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZONE 2 BRIDGE APPROACH SLAB FOR STRUCTURE PLANS, SEE SHEET S-? THRU S-?? 2/ �� 1� 50 BUFFER IMPACTS SUMMARY IMPACT BUFFER TYPE ALLOWABLE MITIGABLE REPLACEMENT STRUCTURE SIZE / STATION ROAD PARALLEL ZONE 1 ZONE 2 TOTAL ZONE 1 ZONE 2 TOTAL ZONE 1 ZONE 2 SITE NO. TYPE (FROM/TO) CROSSING BRIDGE IMPACT (ft2) (ft2) (ftz) (ftz) (ft2) (ft2) (ftZ) (ft2) 1 Brid e 14+00 to 16+70 -L- X 2771.9 1359.5 4131.4 TOTAL: 2771.9 1359.5 4131.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 Rev. May 2006 Rev.Jan 2009 o, � � � See Sheet lA For Index of Sheets + TO PENDERS CROSSROADS � � SR l002 �� `� �� '�� (��'� �� 1�� WILS01� CD U1�TY LOCATI0111: BRIDGE 11t0.109 OVER TOWAI CREEK 01V SR 1002 (TOW1V CREEK ROAD) TYPE OF WORK: GRADI11lG, PAVIIIIG, DRAI11tAGE, A11ID STRUCTURE BEGIN BRIDGE —L— STA. 14+76J5 Q� THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN ANY MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES. CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD II . END BRIGDE —L— STA. 16 + 14. Nq "yN� SRS 2�. END TIP PROJECT B-5313 —L— STA. 20 + 25.00 DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL UNLESSALLSIGNATURESCOMPLETED TO TOWN CREEK = SR o� K ROM1 GRAPHIC SCALES DESIGN DATA PROJECT LENGTH P�epored !n the OtfJce of: H1'DRAULICS ENGINEER ADT 2016 = 653 DIVISI0111 OF HIGHWAYS $� 2$ 0 $� 1�0 ]000 Birch Ridge Dr., Raleigh NC, 27610 ��P ADT 2036 = 913 �r� °� °� c,� K= 11 % zorz sraNnaxn srEciFrcnzioxs ,�a �� PLANS D= 65 % LENGTH ROADWAY TIP PROJECT B-5313 = 0.119 MILE P.E. �° � SlGNAT(IRE: va 50 25 0 50 100 T= 10 %* LENGTH STRUCTURE TIP PROJECT B-5313 = 0.026 MILE RIGHT OF WAY DATE: REKHA PATEL, PE � � V= 60 MPH NOVEMBER 20. 2015 PRo�Fcr FNc„vFFn ROADWAY DESIGN � PROFILE HORIZONTAL * o o TOTAL LENGTH TIP PROJECT B-5313 = 0.145 MILE ENGIlYEER �� < ( ) TTST=2/o + DUAL=8/o r� �o t0 5 0 l0 20 FUNC CLASS = LETTING DATE: SAMUEL L. ST.CLAIR �`� �� MINOR COLLECTOR JUNE 21, 2016 rxo�Ecz DEsrcx excrxEen PROFILE (VERTICAL) SUBREGIONAL TIER ''E SIGNAT(IRF.: BOUNDARIES AND PROPERTY.• State Line —•-•- -•-•- County Line Township Line City Line Reservation Line Property Line Existing Iron Pin � Property Corner —� Property Monument 0 Parcel/Sequence Number 23 Existing Fence Line -x—x—x- Proposed Woven Wire Fence � Proposed Chain Link Fence � Proposed Barbed Wire Fence $ Existing Wetland Boundary - - - -•�a- - - - Proposed Wetland Boundary •�a Existing Endangered Animal Boundary E•a Existing Endangered Plant Boundary E"a Existing Historic Property Boundary �'a Known Contamination Area:Soil -�� Potential Contamination Area: Soil -5�.�, � Known Contamination Area: Water � � Potential Contamination Area: Water -� � Contaminated $ite: Known or Potential Y�'% BUILDINGS AND OTHER CULTURE.• Gas Pump Vent or WG Tank Cap O Sign � Well ° Small Mine 'SZ' Foundation 0 Area Outline 0 Cemetery 0 Building � School � Church � Dam HYDROLOGY.• Stream or Body of Water Hydro, Poo) or Reservoir �_ ___ J Jurisdictional Stream —J5 — Buffer Zone 1 sz , BufFer Zone 2 sz z Flow Arrow � — Disappearing Stream � — Spring p�- � Wetland � Proposed Lateral, Tail, Head Ditch � � ,�. False Sump � ��.��i^ �]I� 1��I[��]�I ��]L�1��, ��5�� CQ]� �][��]E-�� CONVENTIONAL PLAN SHEET SYMBOLS Note: Not to Scale *S. U.E. = Subsurface Utility Engineering RAILROADS.• Standard Gauge RR $ignal Milepost Switch RR Abandoned RR Dismantled RIGHT OF Wf1Y.• Baseline Control Point Existing Right of Way Marker Existing Right of Way Line Proposed Right of Way Line Proposed Right of Way Line with Iron Pin and Cap Marker Proposed Right of Way Line with Concrete or Granite WW Marker Proposed Control of Access Line with Concrete CJA Marker Existing Control of Access Proposed Control of Access Existing Easement Line Proposed Temporary Construction Easement - Proposed Temporary Drainage Easement Proposed Permanent Drainage Easement Proposed Permanent Drainage /Utility Easement Proposed Permanent Utility Easement Proposed Temporary Utility Easement Proposed Aerial Utility Easement � CSX 7RM'SPoRTATION AI�LEPo T 35 O SWITCH � 0 �a �✓ ia w -E TDE PDE DUE PUE TUE AUE Proposed Permanent Easement with Iron Pin and Cap Marker �� ROADS AND RELATED FEATURES.• Existing Edge of Pavement --- Existing Curb --- Orchard Vineyard EXISTING STRUCTURES.• MAJOR: Bridge, Tunnel or Box Culvert Bridge Wing Wall, Head Wall and End Wall - MINOR: Head and End Wall Pipe Culvert Footbridge Drainage Box: Catch Basin, DI or JB Paved Ditch Gutter Storm Sewer Manhole Storm Sewer UTILITIES.• POWER: Existing Power Pole Proposed Power Pole Existing Joint Use Pole Proposed Joint Use Pole Power Manhole Power Line Tower Power Transformer U/G Power Cable Hand Hole — H-Frame Pole U/G Power Line LOS B(S.U.E.*) U/G Power Line LOS C(S.U.E.*) U/G Power Line LOS D(S.U.E.*) — TELEPHONE: Proposed Slope Stakes Cut --- �--- Proposed Slope Stakes Fill --- F--- Proposed Curb Ramp CR Existing Metal Guardrail Proposed Guardrail � � � � Existing Cable Guiderail n n � Proposed Cable Guiderail n n n n Eq�ality Symbol Pavement Removal I�EGETfITION.• Single Tree $ingle Shrub Hedge "'�^ ��' �* Woods Line �`'-' Existing Telephone Pole Proposed Telephone Pole Telephone Manhole Telephone Pedestal Telephone Cell Tower U/G Telephone Cable Hand Hole U/G Telephone Cable LOS B(S.U.E.*) U/G Telephone Cable LOS C(S.U.E.*) U/G Telephone Cable LOS D(S.U.E.*) U/G Telephone Conduit LOS B(S.U.E.*) U/G Telephone Conduit LOS C(S.U.E.*) U/G Telephone Conduit LOS D(S.U.E.*) U/G Fiber Optics Cable LOS B(S.U.E.*) U/G Fiber Optics Cable LOS C(S.U.E.*) U/G Fiber Optics Cable LOS D(S.U.E.*) a Q a Q vineyaro CONC �CONC WW I 1 � WATER: Water Manhole Water Meter Water Valve Water Hydrant U/G Water Line LOS B(S.U.E*) U/G Water Line LOS C(S.U.E*) U/G Water Line LOS D(S.U.E*) Above Ground Water Line N: coNc Hw TV Pedestal N Tower �--------� U/G N Cable Hand Hole �cB U/G N Cable LOS B(S.U.E.*) U/G N Cable LOS C(S.U.E.*) � U/G N Cable LOS D(S.U.E.*) U/G Fiber Optic Cable LOS B(S.U.E.*) s U/G Fiber Optic Cable LOS C(S.U.E.*) U/G Fiber Optic Cable LOS D(S.U.E.*) • • O �� r �� f � O O � HH GAS: Gas Valve Gas Meter U/G Gas Line LOS B(S.U.E.*) U/G Gas Line LOS C(S.U.E.*) U/G Gas Line LOS D(S.U.E.*) Above Ground Gas Line SANITARY SEWER: Sanitary Sewer Manhole Sanitary Sewer Cleanout U/G Sanitary Sewer Line Above Ground Sanitary Sewer SS Forced Main Line LOS B(S.U.E.*) SS Forced Main Line LOS C(S.U.E.*) SS Forced Main Line LOS D(S.U.E.*) MISCELLANEOUS: Utility Pole Utility Pole with Base Utility Located Object Utility Traffic Signal Box Utility Unknown U/G Line LOS B(S.U.E.*) WG Tank; Water, Gas, Oil Underground $torage Tank, Approx. Loc. - A/G Tank; Water, Gas, Oil Geoenvironmental Boring U/G Test Hole LOS A(S.U.E.*) Abandoned According to Utility Records - End of Information O 0 A/G Water 0 ��1 0 ---r�--- ----..Fo--- — — —rv vo— — .� �a 0 � ----�---- ---�--- c a/G GOS OO O 55 aiG Sanitory Sewer — — — — F 55 — — — - ---Fss--- �ss • 0 � 0 z�.� 0 usT 0 � m AATU R E.O.I. PAVEMENT SCHEDULE FINAL PAVEMENT DESIGN C1 PROP. APPROX. 21/p" ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE, TYPE SF9.5A, AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 137.5 LBS. PER SQ. YD. IN EACH OF TWO LAYERS. PROP. VAR. DEPTH ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACE COUPSE, TYPE SF9.5A, (�"Z AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 110 LBS. PER SQ. YD. PER 1" DEPTH. TO BE PLACED IN LAYERS NOT TO EXCEED t%2" IN DEPTH. E1 PROP. APPROX. 4" ASPHALT CONCRETE BASE COURSE, TYPE 625.0B, AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 456 LBS. PER SQ. YD. PROP. VAR. DEPTH ASPHALT CONCRETE BASE COURSE, TYPE 625.06, ErZ AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 114 LBS. PER SQ. YD. PER 1" DEPTH. TO BE PLACED IN LAYERS NOT LESS THAN 3" IN DEPTH OR GREATER THAN 5%2° IN DEPTH. R SHOULDER BERM GUTTER. (SEE SPECIAL DETAIL 2C-?) T EARTH MATERIAL. U EXISTING PAVEMENT. W VARIABLE DEPTH ASPHALT PAVEMEMT (SEE WEDGING DETAIL). NOTE: PAVEMENT EDGE SLOPES ARE 1:1 UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE. ORIGINAL GROUND �� ' GRADE TO THIS LINE DETAIL SHOWING SHOULDER BERM GUTTER (SBG) -L- STA. 13+80.00 (LT) TO "BEGIN APPROACH SLAB" (LT) "END APPROACH SLAB° (LT) TO -L- STA. 16+80.00 (LT) � -1,- DETAIL SHOWING METHOD OF WEDGING > i. -I.- 6' VAR. EXIST. I_ VAR. EXIST. 6' TO ll' TT O Il' 1�AR. I VAR. 0.06 MAX. � � pROFILE � 0.06 MAX. ROLL VO ER C� I pOINT C� ROLLOVER VAR. EX. SE EX. SE v� � � O% / �� 6z„ 6Z„ �� '�.Js 15.�, j � El � El T �T�l�� j� EXIST. PAVEMENT ��' / GRADE TO THIS LINE GRADE TO THIS LINE � TYPICAL SECTION NO. 1 FROM -L- STA. 12+60.00 TO -L- STA. 13+20.00 � -1,- 6� I1' IP 6� 9' W/GR 9' W/GR � I GRADE � �o �. C7 025 POINT 02$ C' 04 1 � L61„ � 3' GRADE TO THIS LINE Ej Z El ORIGINAL GROUND TYPICAL SECTION NO. 2 FROM -L- STA. 13+20.00 TO -L- STA. 14+76.75 (BEGIN BRIDGE) FROM -L- STA. 16+14.24 (END BRIDGE) TO -L- STA. 17+80.00 VPEti2� SE ls �� ORIGINAL GROUND � -L- 6� IP � IY 6� 9' W/GR 9' W/GR � � � GRADE � T �� W POINT C1 T 08 02 02 08 �� 6z„ � �„ �. El GRADE TO THIS LINE El TYPICAL SECTION NO. 3 FROM -L- STA. 17+80.00 TO -L- STA. 20+25.00 � � 30'-10" (CLEAR ROADWAY) P-1" S'-10" II' � ll' 3' P-Y' 1 ; t ASPHAL7 WEARING GRADE SURFACE VE� POINT � Bq� n�s 025 MIN. � CL SPAN � 33'-0" (O(IT-O(IT) BRIDGE TYPICAL SECTION (SEE STRUCTURE PLANS) FROM -L- STA. 14 + 76.75 TO -L- STA. 16 + 14.24 ORIGINAL GROUND Tp =�'C� �,61 � �� ORIGINAL GROUND CONCRETE RAIL lTYPJ PROIECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO. B-53/3 2A-1 ROADWAY DESIGN PAVEMENT DESIGN ENGINEER ENGINEER DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL I UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED