The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20151310 Ver 1_Application_20151216Low/Minimal Impact Bridge Project Data Sheet TIP NO es�ons WB$ 178P7.R.86 COUII Orange Brid e Number 13 REPLACE BRIDGE NO. 173 ON SR 1353 Description (COMPTON RD) OVER EAST FORK ENO RIVER LAKE ORAN6E BdSI fl Neuse Classification WS-II HQW NSW SIN z�-z-s Stream Inland: East Fork Eno River (SA) - Type Perennial; UT of East Fork Eno River (SB) - Perennial East Fork Eno River: 15-20 ft wide, 162 lin. SIZQ R.; S8: 2-5 ft wide, 65 lin. ft. Timber deck on I-beams, asphalt road Type surface, end bents wiih timber caps and Existing Structure iles and timber bulkheads SIZQ 4� ft. x 20 ft. Suff. Ratin 55.34 Proposed Structure T e Cored slab bridge - single span Size �w�am-o�c co o�c� so n X so a Stream USACE Im acts Y/N Y Non 404 Im acts Y/N N/A USACE Im acts Y/N N Wetlands Non 404 Im acts Y/N N/A CAMA Im acts Y/N N/A NC DWQ Buffers Im acts Y/N Y Buffer A lication Re uired >40 ft Y/N Yes NC DWQ StormWater Permit Permit Re uired Y/N N/A Red Cockaded Woodpecker: No Habitat (Y/N) Dwart Wedgemussel Yes Michaux's Sumac: Yes Smooth Coneflower: Yes Red Cockaded Woodpecker:No Species Present Dwart Wedgemussel No T$iE Michaux's Sumac: No Smooth Coneflowec No Red Cockaded Woodpecker: No Effect Dwart Wedgemussel: No Effect � Bio Conclusion Michaux's Sumac:No Effect Smooth Coneflower No Effect Moratorium T e "° Dates Nin Native/Hatche N� Trout Waters Trout S ecies Present N� Trout Conditions Y/N N� WRC Reviewer Travis Wlson CAMA AECS N� Essential Fish Habitat Y/N N� Nav. Opening N/A USCG Permit No Historic Pro erties N� Archaeolo ical Resources N� Tribal Lands N� 4 Resources N� 6 LWCF Resources N� Wild and Scenic River No Forest Service Lands No NA Area No FEMA Bu out No FEMA FIOOd Stud Yes (MOA) USTs Haz Mats N� Relocatees N� Location LAT 36.191432 LONG as.isoass No wetlands, 2 streams (SA and SB, both perennial); Both creeks buffered. No T&E or bald eagle occurrences present within 1.0 mile (per NHP records); Habitat is present within the study area for smooth coneflower and Michaux's sumac; however, no individuals were observed; No suffciently-sized pine stands are present within the study area, with much of the study area being either maintained or hardwood-dominant There is a treeline comprised of pianted evergreens; however it is very small, tightly grouped, and disjunct from any evergreen-dominant patches of forest, therefore no foraging or nesting habita present for RCW. Project Comments Surveys were conducted for species on September 9, 20�3; Several suitable feeding/water sources are located within t13 miles of the study area (LO mile pius 660 foot radius from the edge of the study area) that couid potentially support bald eagle. These include Lake Orange and serverel large agricultural ponds. Since there was potential foraging habitat within the review area, a survey of the project study area and the area within 660 feet of the project limits was completed on September 9, 2013. No nesting habitat or indivuduals were identifed within the review area; therefore, this project will have no impact on this species. _._ ___-__ _._ . -_.-- ------ - - ------ .__—__ . _.._-------... .... _ . . .. Completed by: David 8. Petty, PE 11/10/2015 (Red text added by TGS, 8/ack text provided by NCDOT) Lead Engineer Environmental Officer 11110/2015 � �o 0 V K70773 Rdv tsh.den 11/10/2015 12:57:1A PM TGS See Sheet 9-A For Index of Sheets ��1�� ll' �� Jl�� Y �� 1L�� V'V' � Il � ORAI�GE CO U1�T Y LOCATI011I: BRIDGE NO. 670173 OVER EAST FORK ENO RIVER 011t SR 1353 (COMPTON RD) TYPE OF WORK: GRADI11lG, DRAl11tAGE, PAVING, A111D STRUCTURE BEGIN BRIDGE —L— STA. 13 + 11.88 T� STORE RD) (CARR� _, ,, / i cTe i i��n nn �t�iN rrcv�tc. i 17BP.7.R.86 CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD II. F�,�s�. S� o .cs� � �,�� . � BRIDGE 'A.13+, 0 0 + � � TO NC 86 BUFFER IMPACTS _i _ cTe i � � �n nn civu rrcv�c�, i 17BP.7.R.86 IN��NiI�d.�TE ➢�LAN�4 DO NOT USE FOft RAW AC�L*ISiTION PiL��,INiIIVARY FL.�N� DO NOT USE POR CONSTRUCTION tVCDOT CONTACT: V I R G I1V I A M A B R Y HYDRAULICS 0r, owr,y c GRAPHIC SCALES DESIGN DATA PROJECT LENGTH P�NS PREPARED e,,: P�,Ns P�PA�o Fon: ENGIIVEER �e,� ,,�' ADT 2015 = 100 �� TGS ENGINEER$ NCDOT � 20 10 O 20 40 �� 804—C N. LAFAYETTE ST PRIORIN PROJECTS UNIT � � T= b %* LENGTH ROADWAY PROJECT 17BP.7.R.86 #670173 =0.060 MILES � SHELBY,NC 28750 1020 Birch Rid e Dr. '��, � LENGTH $TRUCTURE PROJECT 17BP.7.R.86 #670173 =0.012 MILES r� PH (704) 476-0003 Raleigh, t�C �Z7670 � �" PLANS V= 55 MPH r cORP. LICENSE NO.: C-0275 P�. �"P oF bQ°@` * TTST -3% +DUAL =3% TOTAL LENGTH PROJECT 17BPJ.R.86 #670173 =0.072 MILES srcharuns: T�"" 2o to 0 2o ao � � LEONARD G. FLETCHER PE ROADWAY DESIGN RIGHT OF WAY DATE: � PROJECT ENGIhEER ENGINEER PROFILE (HORIZONTAL) FUNC CLASS = RURAL - APRIL 21, 2015 LOCAL R.E. BURNS & soNs co P. O. BOX T 168 4 Z O 4 $ S7ATESV�LLE. NC 28687 RIOJECT DESlGN ENG/NEER LETTING DATE: PH fT04)92<-86C6 PROFILE (VERTICAL) SUB REGIONAL TIER PE APRIL 21, 2015 2012 STANDARD SPEC7FICATIONS S7GNAT[IRE: SF-670173_Pcrmit Drawing�sh_buffer impacts.dgn I I/23/2015 I I:40:18 AM TGS PROJECT REFERENCE NO. l7BP.7.R.86 (SF-670/73J EXISTING BRIDGE DIMENSIONS: 41' X 20' (SINGLE-SPAN), 90 DEG. SKEW TGS Tcs ENG/NEERS Buffer Zone (BZ) Impacts PROPOSED BRIDGE DIMENSIONS: 60' X 30' (SINGLE-SPAN), 90 DEG. SKEW PERMIT DRAWI NG tN��N:_ERs �os H/LLSBOROUGH sr � SU/TE 200 Area of Allowable Area of Allowable TOTAL PROJECT LENGTH - 380- FO R B RI D G E# 6 70173 r� RALE/GH, /VC 27603 Bridge Impact Bridge Impact PH �9/9J 773-8887 within BZl within BZ2 ORANGE COUNTY � � r � �ii iiir LEGEND ii�i�� ,� � i�� s�TE 6,z sa ft 3,° sq ft BUFFER ZONE IMPACTS , , � � , '� ��`' � �� 1 � �, ' . L� � \ ��. 6� Cj� � NAD �� Rip �5�, '\ � �. �P ��j APPROXIMATE �OCATION 83n,q o � S �� `� �� ,�� O�,�� / OF 30'x195a04' NCDOT PERMANENT 2 � �9 O� J � \ -� �� DRAINAGE EASEMENT � \ c �' 0�� S�/ o � � �� CLASS II RIP RAP � BEGIN PROJECT � V � \,-ti, �� np.� � UBP.7.R.86 � � �� '� ' —�— STA. 11 +50.00 BARBARA Ro GRUBB �� -� �� BARBARA Ra GRUBB � � �� , �� E- __ � � , � �� WOODS - -- m _ �' � �'� ; � � � � � - --- --�� , � i � r ,. � WOODS � ,, �w � � - — � � - � �;� -- �: � _, EXISTING R/W F �, � '� _ �,�-� - - - -- "'� - _� - -- — -, ` ` � - � - - , � �: , , � - - � - � r � � � - � ' � - - C�JJ � � - - — - — F - - J �,� � �J ��,� - _ � - _ � � - ----� - �� 'l 1 - - �F ------ - - �- �J`r-�J'� �1J � � C G �� -- - �--� �� - -- ,�.�i�iii. � , �� i j�j � - --__� _ L.� � �� . � �� _ , � � � � F n� � — - - � _-- ___ - . _ � �� i � � , �� __ _— �,,� _..__ . - -- _ - - — _ -- ____ __ , , — _ -- ---- -- F _— �' F - ._ —'-- ---- , �, _ - �--- - -- - --- - - _--' -�- --- — J- '• --- ��9_ --- ______-- — — — — — - - — _ _ —_ — - --- - -- -- __ -- —==_ _- __ —1 -- —L— ' ' SR 1353 (COMPTON RD ) 20' BST ,� � � _--_ -_ -- � i �' � c i — � �c -_�_-- \ � 15" RCP-IV �O NC 86 --- - _ - —��Gf _ - - --- - _ - -- -- " - - ----- - - � � - - - - - - --- - - - - - -- - -- - �� F _ _ c�� - -------------- � -- - ----------------- / � � �, , _ �' F — — 135 � F --_ �� _ ,-- _ _ � S R — _ _ , „ �� _:� , - -� ---- —i ' i ' — --- -- � � __ ------ — R� R � _ � �, � �; �� --- F .� F ,. , -- �CARR �T� ------ �� ' � F ��- �� EXISTING R/W �� j- — - � F - - ��' �42 0.3 CFS � V2 0.4 fTiS I _� �- �y /��y/�y� ,�� __ _ � .. � Q10 0.4 CFS pp _ l 1� 1 �........ V10 0.4 Ffi$ � �-R -_ - -- — w �' � 17BP.7.R.86 _ ��- -��'1 __ - — � , — �� i �1 ,� � � CLASS B RIP RAP � j.l .: °;, I�N -� � \� � _� N � DISSIPATOR PAD —L— STA. 15 + 30.00 EXISTIh�' ' „ _, , G � r � � m �.-� � . _ � � - _ - �� B M � # � � � - - ��9— - � F , � .,� �, _, , �; � � - � � �-�- - � � ��- I �� '� r".�� _` ' �� EXISTING OH UTILITY LINE ,� _M WOODS (APPROXIMATE LOCATION) ,;; ' . W i " (`- �� APPROXIMATE LOCATION NorEs: �� ,�� 4e � � � � OF 30'x195a0q' NCDOT PERMANENT 1. EAST FORK ENO RIVER IS IN � � DRAINAGE EASEMENT THE NEUSE RIVER BASIN. \ �� I I I I I r� � � � � � � % � � s 2. D NOT IN TALL DECK DRAIN . � �� l-� � � s> o s s ;� �,� �,. � � WOODS �, i �� v - 1� r� 1 3. CLEARING SHALL BE PERFORMED PER � �` L NCDOT METHOD IL � � ' 4. NO UTILITY RELOCATIONS ANTICIPATED \ \ \ ,1 . DUE TO rH�s PRo�ECT. -?, ��- � PHILLIP EUGENE DABBS � '�'1 � t� �� ` GRAPHIC SCALE BRADLEY DEAN DOKTER � --; �+ J 15 7.5 0 15 30 � j �� , � - — � PERMIT DRAWING SHEET 2 OF 3 �� SF-670173_Pcrmit Drawing�sh_buffer impacts.dgn I I/23/2015 I I:40:52 AM TGS • • � 650 .-� 630 L— LE �GE TO BE REMOVED BEGIN BRIDGE -L - ST A l3+//.88 Pl = 12+8/.00 EL = 650.83' VC = l40' K=50 DS = 35 tiiPH GL -L- STA. 13 + 43.00 PROP. 1 @60' 24" CSU W/4'-0" CAPS UTILIZED PROP. GRADE = 650.41' SKEW = 90° 100 YR W S ELEV - 25 YR. W.S. ELEV. _ LOW SIDE LOW END BRIDGE -L - ST A.13+74.13 ,� PROP. GRA 652.28' 650.6' CHORD � Pl = 14+60.00 EL = 649.60' VC = l40' K=9/ DS = 45 MPH —L— J/ H./�7 ELEV. 650.20 � 12 + 00 ST RUCTURE HYDRAULIC DAT A DESIGN DISCHARGE _ 1200 CFS DESIGN FREQUENCY = 25 YRS DESIGN HW ELEV AT lON = 650.6 FT BASE DISCHARGE _ l8/l CFS BASE FREQUENCY = l00 YRS BASE HW ELEV AT lON = 652.28 FT OVERTOPPING DISCHARGE _ �200 CFS OVERTOPPING FREQUENCY= 25+/- YRS OVERTOPPING ELEVATION = 649.87== FT xFOVERTOPPING ELEVATION REPRESENTS LOVyEST HIGH POINT ON DECK/ROADVyAY, VyHICH OCCURS AT SAG @-L- STA.14+52 SF-670173_Permit Urawing_pfl.dgn 10/14/2075 3:40:03 PM TGS 13+00 I�'`I'�C�)I" I I.,I":' 14+00 PERMIT DRAWING FOR BRIDGE #670173 ORANGE COUNTY 15+00 PERMIT DRAWING SHEET 3 OF 3 Pr•oject Tracking No.:13-07-0038 13-07-0038 NO NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES �a�`�� ELIGIBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES ��-a��'�'•, � ��r ��u a ' 3 � � ,� �,�� ;; PRESENT OR AFFECTED FORM �� ;�� ' o�'� �' This form only pertains to ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES for this project. It is not � `} 8 ¢�='�� valid for Historic Architecture and Landscapes. You inust consult separately with the ��-� ��v � Historic ArchiYecture and Landscapes Group. PROJECT INFORMATION Project No: na i-VBS No: 17BP.7.R.68 F.A. No: na Federal Perinit Aeguired? County: Orange Document.• Attachment G Funcling: � State ❑ Federal � Yes ❑ No Per�nit Type: unknown ProjectDescriptton: NCDOT Division 7 intends to replace Bridge No. 173 on SR 1353, Compton Road, over the East Fork of the Eno River. The replacement bridge is assumed to be proposed at generally the same locarion and alignment. For the purposes of the archaeological review the proposed project area is listed as 633.6 feet long (slightly more than 193.12 meters) and eXtends right-of-way (RO� width from 60 feet to 100 feet (30.48 meters). Thus, the area of potential effects (APE) is estimated at rou�hly 1.45 acres (nearly� .59 hectares). A US Arm�� Corps of Engineers permit is anticipated but the exact type was unknown at the time of the archaeological investigations. SUMMARY OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL FINDINGS The North Carolina Department of7"ransportatron (NCDOT) Archaeology Group revlewed the subjectprojectand determined.• � There are no National Register listed ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES within the project's area of potential effects. ❑ No subsurface archaeological investigations are required for this project. ❑ Subsurface investigations did not reveal the presence of any archaeological resources. � Subsurface investigations did not reveal the presence of any archaeological resources considered eligible for the National Register. � All identified archaeological sites located within the APE have been considered and all compliance for archaeological resources with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and GS 121-12(a) has been completed for this project. ❑ There are no National Register Eligible or Listed lARCHAEOI.OGICAL SITES present or affected by this project. (Attach any note.r or docu�nent.r a,r needec� NO NATlONAL RF.GlSTFR ELIGLBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRF.SF.NT OR AFFF,CTED �'orn2 for Minor Trans�orlatio�a Projects as Qualifted in Ihe 2007 Programmatic Agreement. 1 Of 5 Pr•oject Tracking No.:13-07-0038 Briefdescrrption ofreviewactivitres, results ofreview, and conclusions: As noted on the Survey Required Form dated August 26, 2013, the current project APE contained no previously recorded archaeological resources. While few archaeological sites have been identified along this stretch of the East Fork of the Eno River, one such example located roughly a mile and a half south of Bridge No. 173 is located in an alluvial setting similar to those near the project area. A reconnaissance examination of the APE to direct probable subsurface investigations was recommended. The archaeological reconnaissance of the APE was undertaken on October 17, 2013 by NCDOT archaeologists Shane Petersen and Brian Overton. A walkover investigation of the entire APE was completed for the proposed bridge replacement project. The portions of the APE to the south of Compton Road (on both sides of the East Fork of the Eno River) exhibited a wider easement and significant disturbance. The area to the west of Bridge No. 173 appeared to be dominated by wetland areas just outside e�sting ROW. None of rhese aYeas weYe consideYed to be good candidates for subsurface testing. The alluvial terrace to the northeast of Bridge No. 173 seemed to have the greatest potential for archaeological deposits within the APE beyond 200 feet from the bridge. Two shovel test pits were placed 15 meters (roughly 50 feet) apart in this area. These tests were placed appro�mately 12 meters (about 40 feet) from centerline of the e�sting alignment of SR 1353. Both subsurface tests exhibited very shallow soil profiles with subsoil appearing less than 20 c�ntimeters below the rootmat at the surface. No cultural mat�rials were recovered in either shovel test pit. Shovel Test Pit Results: Shovel Leve Depth Depth Soil Quadrant Test Munsell Color Artifacts Notes Pit 1 (top) (base) Texture I 0 15 2.5Y5/4 lig�ht�oli�ve sa �d mla� no Northeast 1 light II 15 20 2.5Y6/4 yello�vish clay loam no brown I 0 20 2.5Y5/4 �� bxo pve sa �d �la� no Northeast 2 light II 20 22 2.5Y6/4 vello�vish clav loam no brown No further archaeological investigations are recommended for the replacement of Bridge No. 173 as proposed. Should the project change further investigation may be necessary. The project as described should be considered to be compliant with Section 106 and NCGS121-12a. SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION See attached: � l�Zap(s) ❑ Previous Survey Info � Other: Shovel Test Pit Excavation Results. Signed: Shane C. Petersen NCDOT ARCHAEOLOGIST II � Photos Date ❑Correspondence October 31, 2013 NO NATlONAL RF.GlSTFR ELIGLBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRF.SF.NT OR AFFF,CTED �orn2 for Minor Trans�orlatio�a Projects as Qualifted in Ihe 2007 Programmatic Agreement. 20f5 �LI � '� �r'�• ,T l. � � �� , � �, 5� � �� M- • _ , �fi r � �,.��,' + , F. ,, ��. t`a . �- . � � #.. �'� ,�., i: ' :� _ �- �; ��.� � ,Y�/� �� L -• ..1 � -'`e L .. • . � ;` � � � i` . � - �r�q�Mp�'% 4 , I`!. . y� �� `' •� 1 Y'7G��,�t� j a,k� T a � . ' xi ,�;, ��.� � '�� 'p ti � �� 1 . .- ,a� � � �� • . � , - " ' � .ii�� _ . � �. .- �� ' . '. , �� ,�w, ' � � ' y �� .' ��, ��`��,. '�r- �� 1 z,�� `# J '�. �i'� X ` �` h i� !� , � 0 n a Project Tracking No.:13-07-0038 a�4�� at� '��%,��' �'i'��,��,,.:� �'S0V �!~+ �� ! t� � �� r �,` ' "� , �. �'� 7 � � � � - N� r "t� ��,� ? � ��,, _*� � �. � � ' _°� -� �� :��, �; . � ��'�� . � l • ;r ►.�� r, , ,� d . . � , rriy , � �, �' �, #� � '� � ' +�•TM�� ' , � ` . . /� r � � � � sTr #1 � � � � ��,�,�� _ . ''�+ STP #2 O � . t��: = O r:� if! �� , , . � 1 +' � � ~ 7 '� ' +��.. ,�� 'tl � j � y �n,. � : r ' �• 4.w �' ,''! $.!�1 ' �► o ', � '�; ' _ _ .,'�' .+._ ��`'- v�; 5 � • ,�'R , , �' ; j�- � ¢ � �z � , r�' ,�/' ,��tC��\` f� %r,r't� �i,.r , ��l � f � � ' � .' a+� ��3',. � � 'TM /�, ' . ��► .Y �� 1 �'�•I 't � - � I ' � , ��"�� / � � �..'!�` � �,1 s � i +�-- j. . ,. "� � _ � ��. '� I -� t ' �R' C� / r � . '� � , �, . r . f � r� �` � ,r �� 1 � • . , ' �' �: :` � +� . : �' r P j 4.. �/� � � 1 �� :d'�MQ�{i� ��_ it�ti" •�'� ��' ' � f �►�' j;�! � � � %� i� �� , � �,a, � � . ti ' �ii� i �� •� � � � , r � "�s.'� • � +� ��'• y • � ' �T , � �, '� Y �7r , '•� ~f f .� .� �r �.:Q �. ,` .y �. r ,�� y � ti • �' .�`�i� �(� � f ' ' - '�/ ,�`. ✓A � � � ,�R �•. �'' '�! � ' �: , , , � . . ,� , � � , .'f ,,! . ��,}�` ,�! �. �f' k' � �.� i . �� r . �S„ �' s !� ' ,;,� y �•• � ��' ' i''y s *' � , q�- : � k. • ` � � r ' j, , � / �� , f� , - � I e:' �. • _ � 5) , r � � � �i � - �. M �� ! �L � �� f �� ',� ! � � r 1 � ! y ��'�. I .. � . + ^'� �� , I t t � �.: o a �' �« !. j i � � A � k �. -'_ .»r�, ��. !'� ��! •r � � ?� f • �{� <'n •", 1�i• �3 r,r:: _ �u5: � . � llerial photograph illustrating the appro�mate project 11PE (outlined in yellow); areas mapped in the National Wedand Inventorp shaded in }31ue. "NO NATIONAL REGISTh.'R EL/GIBI,E OR L/STED ARCHAF.OLOGICAL S7TF.S PRFSFNT OR AFFF.CTED form� �or Manm� Transportation Projecu a.r QualiJied in the 2007 Progranamatic Ag��ee�nent. 3 of 5 � ! Pr•oject Tracking No.:13-07-0038 Photograph of the L1PE to the west of Bridge No. 173 (facing northeast). � . r�. r a �,,, � :� .k: �� _ �� r ,M I2�,� c �! `�' -::.j�T � � .. � 4KR ,_ r� �+'. .,� � � +� � j �+ .� � r� . � ' � �r,�i,S,�'s"' �� - ._ S�`� �t�ri u t ��``' 3�' � � �:. �i,�i 1 � � h�- ��.."k r,b �„�t,`.°ar�$: r�T ,.� '' x j'� . �� . S � F � w .t"� ..r �'� 7 .. t 4 µ�a�� d/� � ~ \F �'��w9�� i. �" � �` ' ' _.""`. . . <wic��'°$�� - _ - ;.r.:Vc.� =�t: - ; K_. _ � t � r, .-y Ai � � 3 � � � ` �-�.7kh�*, �3�t�s, S"' t .J'_f��..Yy � I � _;y t �sy'�,��..:�.�? 'sh.�� / L: ' � � �` ��i i�� W /y � ,�, �: .. , _. . , .^ �.t....... .'r�' .�.2,s."t'�" h�:i-� .ia. . .o. e,,'aH ....�,�:1. . . .. Photograph of the approach to Bridge No. 173 (facing southwest). NO NATlONAL RF.GlSTFR ELIGLBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRF.SF.NT OR AFFF,CTED �'orn2 for Minor Trans�orlatio�a Projects as Qualifted in Ihe 2007 Programmatic Agreement. 4of5 Pr•oject Tracking No.:13-07-0038 �y n � .,t�' ' -,�`'�.� �'.^ .._��. . . . � � 3 , :1L . . � �f r , �� ' .��Y � �'� ' ` ,� ,�- _�" . �3 - ,r ,� �r� ,� , `� t. 3 �( � Y� y /- } • �y�- !� y� � _ �'Ili J-'C '. d1p �_':r �i . �e' i ��. e - � . �.�,.� �� '�� '� r �.'''�' M' �� , "".Y i � ..- _ . ..�f �� . � �.. . �.� .ev� r ;.��i.y'tflt:"ii�',,:1�1 . �•"�-�', ' ��A. . - ..i'�` . . . . . . r^ � Q �a� � " .. _ ''�-�' . ' , 't. � � � b' h `w: ; ' C 1 ", t . �, x' .. . . . . _ t � i. R, _ : ' � .. . ` .' , a+ ti.� �..� '" � ..; ' _.�.�,�.�� . �. r ' - �, - ♦.:; - . ..; .,�` , . , .. �'��' li r .eF� . I -� � 4` . . a M o ,, i.�..� � . ✓� d ' � P r �' '� A!' , R; : �y � ,;�r ' , gi r .w� i �`±'� ,� "� lx' � ,, , � , d4 � ��, �i✓� x� „7" �J•.� S�YrJ� � �. ��< •.,y.Y *a.!�5� *'1� -. - - *q.;� � �I, 1 . � ;� - � . . •, Y � ' I r: . . � f g� x � . �� r f � . �'�! � � � �'.'�e '�r �y"�.. , � x v '�� x � ,a. �� 1 � .� f� � �'�� i i . �� . ��tfJL �� '� .. . .,.. . , .i r +�. .:Fr .�� .Y.. . v , ., � .af�l�i,.��.: . . ... . � �. .0 .. � �y r Photograph of the APE to the northeast of Bridge No. 173 (facing southwest). NO NATlONAL RF.GlSTFR ELIGLBLE OR LISTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES PRF.SF.NT OR AFFF,CTED �orn2 for Minor Trans�orlatio�a Projects as Qualifted in Ihe 2007 Programmatic Agreement. S Of 5 Project Tracking No. �biternal U.se� 13-07-0038 HISTORIC ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPES NO SURVEY REQUIRED FORM This form only pertains to Historic Architecture and Landscapes for this project. It is not valid for Archaeological Resources. You must consult separately with the Archaeology Group. PROJECT INFORMATION Project No: County: Orange WBS No.: 17BP.7.R.68 Document Type: Fed. Aid No: Funding: X State Federal Federal X Yes No Permit Stated as "not yet known" in Permit(s): Type(s): review request, so assume Federal Proiect Description: ReplaCe BI'Idge N0. 173 on SR 1353 (Compton Road) over prong of Eno River (off-site detour planned). SUMMARY OF HISTORIC ARCHITECTURE AND LANDSCAPES REVIEW Description of review activities, results, an�l conclusions: HPOWeb reviewed on 26 August 2013 and yielded no NR, SL, LD, DE, or SS properties in the Area of Potential EfFects (APE). Orange County current GIS mapping, aerial photography, and tax information indicated a mostly wooded APE with two late-twentieth-century resources located to the southeast and southwest of the existing bridge (viewed 26 August 2013). Constructed in 1962, Bridge No. 173 is neither included in the NCDOT Historic Bridge Survey, nor representative of any distinctive engineering or aesthetic type. Google Maps "Street View" confirmed the absence of critical historic structures and landscapes in the APE (viewed 26 August 2013). No architectural survey is required for the project as currently defined. Wliv tlze av�ilable information provi�les a reli�ble basis for reasonablv vredictin,� that tlzere are rto unidentiretl si�ni�cant historic architectural or l�n�lscnpe resources in t/ze proiect area: APE extends 300 feet from each end of the existing bridge (SW-NE) and 100 feet to either side of the SR 1353 (Compton Road) centerline (NW-SE) to encompass proposed construction activities. Comprehensive historic architecturat survey of Orange County (1993-4) and county GIS/tax materials and other visuals illustrate the absence of significant architectural resources in the APE. No National Register- listed or -eligible properties are located within the APE. Should any design elements of the project change, including improvements along the off-site detour route, please notify NCDOT Historic Architecture as additional review mav be necessarv. X Map(s) Archi SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION ❑Previous Survey Info. ❑Photos ❑Correspondence FINDING BY NCDOT ARCHITECTURAL HISTORIAN NCDOT Architectural Historian s -- NO SURVEY REQUIRED Date ❑Design Plans His�o�•ic A�rlri�ecrru e mrd l.nndsenpes NO SURVI�Y RfOUl2GD Jor�ii jor iLtinor '!'nnvspo��ntion Projec�s ns OuaGfied in !he 2007 Prograinn�nric Agreement. Bridge No. 173 WBS No. 17BP.7.R.68 Orange County Base map: HPOWeb, nts NCDOT — Historic Architecture August 2013 Tracking No. 13-07-0038 �':: Transportation December 15, 2015 US Army Corps of �ngineers Raleigli Regulatory Field Office Attn: Mi. David Bailey 3331 Heritage Trade Dr., Ste. ] OS Wake Forest, NC 27587 Attention: 1VU•. Dave Bailey and Mr. Dave Wanucha PAT McCRORY cavemor NICHOLASJ.TENNYSON Secretary NC Division of Water Resources Winston-Salem Regiona] Office Attn: Ivl��. Dave Wanucha 450 W. Hanes Mill Rd., Ste. 103 Winston-Salem, NC 27105 Subject: Notification for U�e replacement of Bridge #173 over East Fork �no River on SR 1353 (Compta� Road) in Orange County. WBS # 17BP.7.R.86 Dear Mr. Bailey and Mr. Wamicha, The North Carolina Department of Transportation is schedulecl to replace Bridge #173 with a new bridge at the same location. I have included the Attactunents G& L with a project description and a set of the project plaus. A stormwater management plan is also attached. Please review this project for compliance by your Division. We plan to begin construction as soon as possible. If furtlier information is required, please contact Jerry Parker at (336) 256-2063. Your early review and consideration will be appreciated. Sincerely, �. ,�. �.�./� J.M. Mills, P.E. Division Engineer, Division 7 Enclosures cc: Tim Powers, NCDOT Barry Harrington, Roadside Enviro�unental Field Operations Engineer Jeremy Warren, NCDOT Chuck Edwards, District 1, District Bngineer �Nothing Compares��. S�a�e oFNorth Camlina I Deparhnent ofTransportation � Division ofHighways, Division 7 Office 1584 Yanceyville Sheet, Greensboro, NC 27405I P. O. Hox 14996, Greensboro, NC 27415-4996 336-4R7-0000 Transportation PAT McCRORY Governor' NICHOLASJ.TENNYSON Secretaty Attachment L: Low Impact Bridge Replacement Process Low Impact Bridge Project No.: B-N/A County: Oranqe Bridge No.173 over East Fork Eno River on SR 1353 (Compton Rd) WBS Element Number: 17PB.7.R.86 This project is subject to the Low Impact Bridge Process as agreed to on October 6, 2009. This project meets the documentation requirements and approval procedures under NEPA, as defined by FHWA, for Low Impact Bridge Replacements. This project meets the standards of NCDOT's Minimum Criteria Rules. Date: December 15. 2015 Applicant Name: NCDOT Applicant Address: 1584 Yancewille Street Greensboro NC 27415 Primary Contact for Project: Jerrv A. Parker Phone No.: 336-256-2063 Is this an after-the-fact application: Yes X No River Basin: Neuse River Basin Streatn Classification: WS-II; HQW; NSW; 27-2-3; 03-04-01 Regulatory Authorization Options for this Activity Federal: USACE Nationwide General Permit 3— Maintenance State: General Water Quality Certification #3883 and/or Buffer Authorization Local: None Project Description — The project consists of replacing Bridge # 137 over East Fork Eno River on SR 1353 (Compton Road) and improving roadway approacl�es. The existing 41' long X 20' wide, timber deck on T-beams and timber abut�nents, single span bridge is structura]ly deficient and will be replaced with a new, single span 65' L X 30' W, cored slab bridge aYYhe same location. An off-site detour will be utilized during construction. The project involves no wetland impacts and no stream impacts; tl�e only impacts proposed are to the Neuse River Riparian buffers (612 sq. ft. Zone 1 and 310 sq. ft. Zone 2) aud are listed as "allowable" per the Neuse River Riparian Buffer �Nothing Compares�„ S�ateofNorthCamlina � Departnen�ofTmnspotlafian � DivisionofHighways,Division70ffroe I584 Yanceyvilie SUeel, Greensboro, NC 27-005� P. O. Hox I4996, Greensboro, NC 27415-0996 336-487-0000 i.� ' y`,} Transportation PAT McCRORY Governor NICHOLAS J. TENNYSON Secretary Rules Table of Uses. Tl�ere are no deck drains on Yhe bridge; instead, stormwater runofP will be captured and discUarged into existing roadside ditches and outlet at non-erosive velocities. Biologists fi om the Biologica] Suiveys Group surveyed the project site for the Dwarf Wedgemussel (Alasmidonta heterodon) and determined that the mussel does not existiug withiv the project vicinity and therefore issued a"no effecY' detennination (see attached letter). Habitat surveys for the Red Cockaded Woodpecker, Michaux's Sumac and Smooth Coneflower detennined that there is no habitat for any of the named species, nor any specimens present, withi� the project area. The Bald Eagle is protected iu eveiy county in North Carolina under the Bald a��d Gold Eagle Protection Act; l�owever, uo suitable feeding/water sow�ce is Iocated within one mile of the project study area to suppart Bald Eagle habitat. Also, Mr. Gaiy Jordan (USFWS) recently released Uie Progranzmatic Conference Opinion (PCO) for the recently fisted Northern Long Eared Bat (NLEB). This opinion, states in part, that "... ii is the Seri�ice's confere�tce opinion that NCDOT activitres in easter» Narth Ca�roli�aa (Divzsioi�s 1-8), as proposed, are not likely lo jeopardize dhe continued eziste»ce of the NLE13. " Signature: ��/� PrintName: J. �✓t. nn. „_� Title: �✓,s.o - �,...�ao�� Nothing Compares'�.��.. Slale ofNorth Carolinn � Departmem of Transportalion I Di��sion ofHighways, Division 7 Otiice 1584 Yumeyville S�ree�, Greens'boro, NC 27405� P. O. Box 7499fi, Greensborq NC 27415-4996 33G-487-0000 �� ie� � ��B � .� , �`. C tt - � Af�f� � J qP� �s �'�..' � !-ie�3 f � � �, , s°, .'�' ' H e�3 ! � ��` J�� tt� �n� � � Ne� � �p� . . . �-. ;.. ��-`�-�: �� f � r' � • H��3; '� :� . . � r� .�..,--� � `�' H�� , �, � ' � �'l"� Bridge 173 �� , I�i F9f1 Va � H e � - . �` ` �� : �EnB �/ , F�e�3 �� ` � t�e� � �� ev � ARC ' /a� V�B - T�� •,��. _ � _ �,�G .�� eC . . � �. �� - -NrC G�� T�D,/�• ,�r , J, . . - �� . . � '''-3. . . , s � � n B , r�,, T:� � � ; p , � �eB � �M�: �,, � Fi r � � C h s' � . . . h � . � Hr Map Location SOiI Map Figure 2 NC DOT Bridge 173 over East Fork Eno River :-oR�� --., CASWELL pERSON Compton Rd, CedarGrove, NC .,;�nEN¢. Cqq� Orange County " � Orange County Soil Survey, 1977 Soil Sheet 6 ALAMANCE ORANGE October 30, 2015 1 inch = 1 000 feet Low/Minimal Impac[ BriUge Project Data Shee[ " TIP NO B6]Ot]3 WBS ��oRZa.ae - CoUn orange � eritl e Num6er � ��3 � � - REPtqCE BRI�GE NO. 1]3 ON SR �353 � �escription (COMPTONRD) OVER EASTFORKENO RNEft LAKEORANGE B351O Neuse � Classifica[ion ws-unowesw SIN � z�-z-a � $flEdffl InlanJ: Easl Fork Eno ftiver (SA) - 7ype - aere�mai;urorEasiFo�kEnoa��er(se)- Perennlal East FoB Eno Pivec 1520 fl wide, 16211n. $�ZQ K; 58:2�5 ft antle, e51in.It. ilrnber qeck on Lheams. asopali matl Type s�rta�e,e��oems��anrmea«�,p:A�a Existing S[ructure aesa�,aumee�emnneaas Size ai n. x so n. Suff. Ratin 553^ -ProposedStructure T e - co�ea:izeonax30s�9iz:o�� Size (wimn.o�uo o�q Stream USACE Im acts Y/N - � Non 4041m acts Y/N "�A USACE Im acts Y/N N Wetlands Non4041m acts�.Y1N "�^ CAMA Im acts Y/N ��A NC DWQ Buffers Im acts YIN � Y Buffer A lication Re uired >40 R Y/N - rP5 NC DWQ StormWater Permit Permit Re uired Y/N ^'�^ aeacor_¢aaeewompecxec No Ha6itat(YIN) �artweagem�::eeves Michauxs Sumac Ves SmoolM1 Conellower Yes Retl Cockatletl WootlpeUte[ No S ecies Present °wamwea9em�ssecNo T&E P m��Lna�::s�ma�:No Smao1M1 Conenowec No � ftea Cocka�etl Wootlpeckec No Efled 0.vart Wetlgemussel: No EHect ! BIOCOOCIL51011 MichauYsSumacNoEHecl SmoaN Caneflo�vec No ERec! Moratorfum T e �o Dates NiA NativelHatche "° Trout Waters Trout S ecies Present rvo � Trout Conditions YIN �o WRCRevlewer *�av�s�niso�, CAMA AECs ^'� � Essential Ftsh Habitat IN �� - Nav. Openi�g N�A USCG Permit - "° Historic Pro erties No Archaeolo Ical Resources N0 Tribal Lantls rvO 4 Resources rvo 6 LWCF Resources "o Wild and Scenic Rivar No � ForestService Lantls "O NA Area �o FEMA Bu out no FEMA Flood Stud Yes<<�^�1 USTs Haz Mats "o Relocatees "o Locatfon LAT �8491432 LONG ��s.isoass No wellantls, 2 sVeems (SA antl SB, bolM1 pxrennial); Bolh creeks buf(ered. No T&E or baltl eagle occurtences ptesent wilhin 1 0 mile (pet NNP remrds); HaEital is presenl wiNin IM1e sNdy area fo� smoo�M1 coneFlo�ret antl MicM1auis sumac, however, no intliNCuals were obsened, No sulficlen�ly-9retl pine s�antls are presenl within IM1e slutly area, wilh much ot iM1e sW Oy area being elihe� maln�alnetl or ha�dwoodJominanl There is a Veeline comp�isetl of planletl evergreens; lroo�ever il is very small, Gghlly g�ouped, and dlsjvncl hom any erergreervtlominanl palches ol foresl', Nerelore no foraging or tresling hebila present lo� RCW. Project Commenls Surveys were conaucrea tor species on Sep�ember s. zms; Severei s�itabie teeaingiwaier sourws are iocaiea vdinin t?a miies of (�e sW�y atea (1,0 mile plus 6fi� fool �adius fmm Ne etlge o( Ne sludy area) IM1a� wultl polenGally suppod bald eagle. These ntlutle Lake Orange anJ aerveral la�ge ag�iml W�al ponGs. Since IM1ere was polentlal fotaging habital viitM1ln Ne review area, a survey ol IM1e project s�utly area antl Ihe a�ea vdlFin fi60 teel of IM1e p�ofect limils was rampleled on Seplemhe� 9, 2013. No nesGng M1a�i�al or intlivuduals were iden�ifed wiNin iha review area; lherefore, iMs pmject will hava no impact on Ihis species. 1 __— _ _ -- . _.. . ._.. _—"_—.. . "."—..__ � ............ _"_'_._— __._. __-_- Completedhy:�,DavidB.Petty,PE11/10/2075(RedfexfatldedbyTGS Black[extprowdedbyNCD01J � �'�LeatlEngineer ..""__ --_ _ _ . —__.._ _ __. _ .. ! ..____ .___ —'-.__ _ —__.........__"—'_ " �Emironmental Office� � 1tR012015 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PAT MCCRORY GOVF.RNOR Memorandum to From: Subject: ANTHONY J. TATA SF,CRETARY January 17, 2014 Pam Williams, Transportation Program Management Unit Jerry Parker, Division 7 Environmental Supervisor Jared Gray, Environmenta] Program Supervisor Natural Environment Section, Biological Surveys Group Protected species report for the Dwarf Wedgemussel (Alasmidonta heterodon) associated with the replacement of Bridge No. 173 over East Fork Eno River on SR 1353; Orange County; Design Build Project; WBS 17BP.7.R.68. Proposed Bridge Replacement Project The proposed project calls for the replacement of Bridge No. 173 on SR 1353 (Compton Road) over East Fark Eno River (Lake Orange), in Orange County. The federally endangered Dwarf Wedgemussel (DWM) is listed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for Orange County. East Fork Eno River is located in the Neuse River Basin. From the project site, East Fork Eno River flows 4.9 miles before entering the Eno River. A map of the project site is attached. Background In North Carolina, the DWM is known from the Neuse and Tar River drainages. The mussel inhabits creek and river areas with a slow to moderate current and sand, gravel, or firm silt bottoms. Water in these areas must be well oxygenated. Stream banks in these areas are generally stable with extensive root systems holding soils in place. Water pollution and impoundments are the primary causes of this species' decline, and persist as threats today. Poor land use practices, urbanization, and toxic effects from industrial, domestic and agricultural pollution are the leading causes of water pollution. In addition, the low density of individuals in many of the remaining populations is proving to be problematic for reproduction. Competition from the exotic Asiatic Clam (Co�bicula fluminea) continues to be a problem as this species expands its range. MAILING ADDRESS: NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PROJECT DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS UNIT 1598 MAIL SERVICE CENTER Rn�eicH NC 27699-1548 TELEPHONE: 919-707-6000 FAX: 919-212-5785 WEBSITE: NCDOT. GOV LOCATION: CENTURYCENTER, BUILDING B 1020 BIRCH RIDGE DRNE Rn�eicr+ NC 27610 NCDOT Biologist Jared Gray from the Biological Surveys Group did a review of the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NHP) database on December 31, 2013, to determine if there were any records of listed mussels within the proposed project study area or receiving waters. This review indicated that there are no known occurrences of the federally protected DWM within the project area. The closest record of DWM is over 6.3 miles downstream from the project in the Eno River. NPDES Dischargers A UT East Fork Eno River that comes in just north of the bridge has one minor discharger that is 0.9 mile upstream from the project crossing. Phelps Grocery Store NPDES Permit # NCG510012 is permitted to discharge groundwater remediation wastewater into UT East Fork Eno River. Chemicals from this discharger are likely to create an inhospitable environment for freshwater mussels. Survey Methods and Habitat A survey was performed by NCDOT staff inembers Neil Medlin (Permit No. 13- ES00030) and Jared Gray (Permit No. 13-ES00314) for East Fork Eno River on December 20, 2013. The survey was conducted using batiscopes from approximately 400 meters downstream and 100 meters upstream of the project crossing. NCDOT biologist's surveyed East Fork Eno River for 1.0 man-hour, with 3 live, 2 shells and 2 valve fragments of Elliptio complanata being found during the survey. Asiatic Clams (Corbicula fluminea) were rare with one shell being found in East Fork Eno River. The habitat where mussels were found was in areas that had deeper pools with root mats. No DWM were found during the survey. Within the project area, East Fork Eno River is roughly 2.5-4.0 meters wide and had some undercutting and erosion of the banks and other areas that were unstable. The stream banks were 0.5-1.0 meter high. On the day of the site visit, the overall water depth was moderate; with 85% of the stream reach less than 2 feet in depth. The creek contained long runs and pool areas with normal substrate compactness. Sand and gravel bars were common. The substrate above and below the bridge was generally dominated by sand, with trace amounts of cobble and gravel and a considerable amount of silt. The riparian buffer width was moderate and the stream had 70% cover. The surrounding land uses were rural with active crop and natural areas. Stream substrate was mostly shifting sands and the substrate was mostly unstable. Only patchy habitat for DWM existed in those deeper pool areas with root mats. Dwarf Wedgemussel As a result of this survey, as well as the review of GIS and NHP data, it appears that the DWM does not exist in the project vicinity. Only patchy habitat for the DWM occurs in East Fork Eno River at the project site. Also, the fact that East Fork Eno River just below the proposed crossing flows into Lake Orange, which could prevent recolonization of mussels. The upstream discharger on the UT East Fork Eno River that comes in north of the bridge could also be creating inhospitable conditions for the DWM. The closest record of DWM is in the Eno River 6.3 stream miles downstream. The replacement of Bridge No. 173 over East Fork Eno River with the current stream conditions will have No Effect on the DWM. References: NatureServe. 2007. NatureServe Explorer: An online encyclopedia of life [web application]. Version 6.2. NatureServe, Arlington, Virginia. Available http://www.natureserve.org/ex�lorer. (Accessed 12/31/2013) NCDWQ. 2010. North Carolina Division of Water Quality Assessment and Impaired waters 303 (d) list report http://portal.ncdenr.or�/c/document librar�,�et file?uuid=8ffObb29-62c2-4b33- 810c-2eee5afa75e9&�roupId=38364. (Accessed 12/31/2013) NC Natura] Heritage Program. 2011. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program database (Accessed 12/31/2013). Raleigh, N.C. [NCWRC] North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission. North Carolina Mussel Atlas: htt�://www.ncwildlife.or�/p�07_WildlifeS�eciesCon/�g7blal.htm. (Accessed 12/31 /2013) File: 17BP.7.R.68 .. N �. , � � � 4P . . -.... , _. . - . . . .. . . .... -. � �„� p ° �� . � . .� , .�-: : �,. , � '- • 'tlr 4+ . � ' � � � �' � � � � ." �q - .v- � c � 1 ;a � }� , . �l°' ` � ' � �p,y � � ..1 '� �w�� x�� ,� �� . ' . �.. � .. � F � �.,� �.. 1 ♦'l` t -�� '.♦ ��.: � �. �`K>'�` ' � „��. � � � / � ��.. � �� :� � h » �,.� f ` ` � � f �„ - ,Z' . 'Q',-" t �d4 � " t �. � .�' . , e�` .,N � � �� +T'«�' h a'kC��' '. � , � .. 1• � �� ' . e '� " ��a f y wT v� Y �i'.'i:; �i'�e„ r � 9R ; � � g ,� .� f i� ��` � ;} �,,, �yJt 'e,� ��,� { �{ � ,� 4�� m �'S��" �� < k- + ��' '. .�"I� a; �-« �i � � �"�F� � '' �� i -^- � � .}�,f �r.. � ,� , � ti .�,� � � � �:. � Wi .�a � ♦ . - i �p . ,� 1 •-t � �1 � �.y,�,� . � � Y �� , F / � R �i 1 i�, if� rr� '_ h � � Yr"� ��' �' ' �� 4 � � �� P � 4 r A# i, l � � 4v:r�� 4 '� �m i�.�1i � . ��YLh �� . �v �� y � T .-� r'��r - ; �.� . .S�,j " �� r , �" ' °." _ - •-_,m+n.rn.a< � ' +..• r` � �, r . r � i''� _ -� �� :�,, 7�,��''o� , �� :rAIM�L qy.' ..� � � ,sg:({�3 .p� � : 4r�, Ati � ',,j '� ' � ,?y,�,t�'W � �a � � � "• �dl' - o _ - ' , . ��. ( _ "., ' �sj.x � . :�„}�� % - " ,.'^ ' , `ie� . , jN � � r � . .' , � � � f �r �: ' . �f� v r�, � � r �, � � � "�e+ Y � ,�" �' ` 4 � �, -�c. � , �;" s �� . � w� � .. . - , . y '",�� 1j�,�. , ,.. ��° � ��,' _a� r;� �� . . . ,<' : � `' �� '� ,� • ° ��- _'.. � ` �� t � � ` �' � '�� ; I� r 'IY �� r �• � � � . � . E � . r✓'` - W }' ' � ^- .: r.� �, � - ^� ��c . . r ,�,.. �w` � r . �. _ . :,C � r �. � .y+:i c e � �` A 'y t � . F�� . - '' Il� i 1 . 'r�' � ^, h i � � ` � \.V��,� t?� 'v ��s 3g�+,�jE,�y��;`yia k r�. . . � *.1 L. . 1 ' -: '�� ,�E � �' � � � � , ' � "<:�M "W,. �. ��.,,� � . F c.t�;A`^ F ' �,y, � I ��./r� �t, y� nT'p1�'.� � y1 .F�r �: •, � � � �_T� •.�tl -� }�YR�,f '� � �..a..1�.. �,: �_�,Ayii 9 ��,� ",� }, v `� .'7r kk k,J k - _ � pdu�="� !„ �y '��+�'. "�Lr x. i � � - �� i �� t "�� ♦1 � A � � p � r • ��! — � 1 � , � � �°' ` �' �~ ' .'"W �� '' '� �- ,��,� J;,: �'� ;,,;s � �. Y. .�F � � ��i: a � - I �H : �i� � : � � � . ".. �'' . �,��}i:;, • �� !�f `- ^' ■i_ . �.: nl � . . :',d - �� '�'.�' yj � �i �" `Ap� ,,�'v. a �� is"+,i , �; "� •�'¢g"'�' � '�y�,. -.?y-f �� '_`-,� dn+., '<� �" �� ye ��• � . Jb�` � �F � � ' �.,.. ,�_ . : 1':% '�t� Yr,�+yp,�.�-S.�c:y�. '-�� ` ia-."r. , .. �• ��i �`� ,.;f"+ � �� . ...r � av� �� `Y '1 �a� i °� " � r - �Y` "1P� r : " aR'a��.i wy M � � ,[ i � . � S � �� ,}�1� � �, ^ ; w � � �. _ _ > � , •�r� er � �� .,; \ � f p - ti 4.4�r � ,� � � � � � �� ,g�� a �"� a . i,. t � a �¢ � � ' � ,� ..,{ ., ,�► Jh . . �. r .("r .. '+r"�� ;_,. � f`� � ��y, 6�` ��' � ••f ' � 1 '�5�4_.�;' � J'ai. 'A"' � •�� b � „� :� " � �� ,� ti e� +7 •,��''!� �� C� ��s�� `r ��•,'�/� r'. � � `'a' �� .� Y � � ��' � � ; �. ��,�� 5 .. ti. /'�y. *r �'��7 YP�h„��i✓ �l ,+� �. �'T '� J, ��4� . .;A� c i rh x- '� r,s�' " � . i,� ��,� ..t� ��..� � A`I?' . � txM, � Y+ � ,�,.e��k� ` �� "t�`'e . ` �'�'`� '; , ,... � � -�1 '4�7�, �, ` , ' � F. � � l�\� .t#,2�"r,�i.?Bi' ,d� k� .:�i a! � ' . � *'r�_:�.. � ,. a u�� j4{ a� h �� }/ �e+� n�� \ [g}�. # � ' � � � � �j �� W ... � � �. ti,�y� . ' 7 � ` i ¢ r f ..�a:•' A itP !f ��, d �.� � " .13 t.. � �-� �. .,�.� 153, r _.� �`�� r• � 1� ` � � � � µ �T � f�y' � 4 , , ' ' .s �r�',�, ,��„� ,�o� ,..s�-`" ;o-»Y c�'�L. �..� �'i . �" � ��*,� �:1 � p ,�k � k�` �ys�� +y�y, y .r�� R �1 �„ ��' �5 _ `�. .. . " . .. 1. �s-21 � k xa,'�''� '�-• i �, X ��q i� � j -�:a)" �r �� ah.�* _ A .?� .��.. �/�4. ,'gb� c i ! j . T 1�'.+�-'vt�..A. !� � ��kan � ��,sR'` �' � '',:s��, t � a". .. � � r " ��1 �;� e t � � �Af "r �� i''; - r .`,a � "r �� Y S" �t ��ti 4� .1... _ f ;:t Y�\Y y�+� '•• #' �,� r � �"'i'°� �f'' � � 4 �� , .� , -.. ��F' � �.� ,:�. 6�,dF�y � �^ �-�;" � � . `.�� , ` . , ` 1�� +• xT'�" ` •t� ; �� A' , ' , ..,� '�' f � "� .��p �1 . ,! �'#"i - �.'� �i�-ir �: d � . s,. ' .-i• i � `�'yE 'e, ' � - � _. ' . � 4 '' k F �!5 „� � � ! �' +�.�'"�„� ��`,r . � �' t{. �0'' i"i" . � . y�, ' � � a<< � ai,} „� h�''` , �'� ( �.1 .,,,.+.1... iA! r {,3 jF r � t � �'` ( �"� � m' � t '�,i �� : � ��' �� .�j� �;� � ?��_ .....p � j �+ � 1 � �k/�!y u 4A�y .� ,�j � °� '1M : " • � ,� ,f �,, 4y t �. '+I' : �, � � t F . . .. - � ' �_ � ,y .. , ,y, ! 1 f � i � 3; , . . �"� � � .','}��?A p �,�s.«'t�'• � r., '�� _ � ..�'-'"��MI! � M�.,J S .:.�, '..F .,---..'' .. .. � �r�`+, l ijti �� t' � � �' `,.�.. � � 2 t� ti ' � *�� i �l �� •�� F -t";" Y ''w `�.�."e,4 7 -;� , '�7+r '+��'f� �� .',. w..8��i; . ��^ s ':9 �,p?�.; � :.,': � .��"�`` ,�"�r.y� .,� ' �q -^� , .. ` '... . ' " , ��x ,s?"'��,nF?_h.. .,J'!r M ��'��:.... . �''��..a :. � '� . I � �,.: ��.rp. rr. �� .. „ . . , ' .. X�. 1 �t(..�p.PJ.� -Tf ,. • +s... _ . , ,� , i _...,, _ _ N C O n� �vi<� �= . 0 0.275 0.55 1.1 Miles N I i i i I i i � I Design Build Bridge 173 Orange County Replace Bridge No.173 on SR 1353 over East Fork Eno River (Lake Orange). BUFFER IMPACTS SUMMARY IMPACT BUFFER TYPE ALLOWABLE MITIGABLE REPLACEMENT STRUCTURE SIZE / STATION ROAD PARALLEL ZONE 1 ZONE 2 TOTAL ZONE 1 ZONE 2 TOTAL ZONE 1 ZONE 2 SITE NO. TYPE (FROM/TO) CROSSING BRIDGE IMPACT (ft2) (ft2) (ftZ) (ft2) (ft2) (ft2) (ft2) (ft2) 1@60' CSU 12+74/14+11 X 612 310 922 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL: s�z.o sio.o 922.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Hi�;hway North Carolina Department of Transportation � Stormw�ter M ,,,,,.,,�,,, Highway Stormwater Program �_� STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN - (Version 2.03; Released October 2015) FOR NCDOT PROJECTS WBS Element: 17BP.7.R.86 TIP No.: SF-670173 County(ies): Orange Page 1 of 2 General Project Information WBS Element: 17BP.7.R.86 TIP Number: SF-670173 Project Type: Bridge Replacement Date: 10/14/2015 NCDOT Contact: William G. (Galen) Cail, PE Contractor / Designer: TGS Engineers (David B. Petty, PE) Address: 1590 Mail Service Center Address: 706 Hillsborough Street Raleigh, NC 27699-1590 Suite 200 Ralei h, NC 27603 Phone: 919-707-6711 Phone: 919-773-8887 Ext. 104 Email: cail@ncdot. ov Email: d ett @t sen ineers.com Cit /Town: Cedar Grove Count (ies : Oran e River Basin(s): Neuse CAMA Count ? No Wetlands within Project Limits? No Pro'ect Descri tion Pro'ect Len th lin. miles or feet : 380' Surroundin Land Use: Forest with some cropland and rural residential/development Pro osed Pro'ect Existin Site Pro'ect Built-U on Area ac. 0.2 ac. 0.2 ac. Typical Cross Section Description: Two 10' wide paved travel lanes with shoulders paved to face of guardrails, 3' wide Two 10' wide paved travel lanes with 0' to 6' wide grassed shoulders and grassed side grassed shoulders behind guardrails and grassed side slopes ranging from 2(H):1(V) to slopes ranging from about 2(H):1(V) to 4(H):1(V). 4(H):1(V). Annual Avg Daily Traffic (veh/hr/day): Desi n/Future: 100 Year: 2015 Existin : 100 Year: 2015 General Project Narrative: Replacement of Bridge No. 670173 on SR 1353 (Compton Road) over East Fork Eno River in Orange County north of Cedar Grove, NC. Proposed 60' long by 30' wide single- (Description of Minimization of Water span bridge (cored slab unit) to replace existing 41' long by 20' wide single-span bridge (timber deck on I-beams with timber caps and piles). The proposed grade is about 0.5' Quality Impacts) above existing grade in the vicinity of the bridge and roughly matching existing by about 110' left of stream and about 110' right of stream (looking downstream). Bridge No. 670173 is within the Neuse River Drainage Basin and shall adhere to the Neuse River Riparian Buffer Rules. Proposed bridge to be located in same location as existing bridge. Stormwater runoff from the existing bridge discharges directly into the water. The proposed bridge will have no direct discharge into the water. No deck drains will be installed. Stormwater runoff from the proposed bridge is to flow to two proposed drop inlets at the east approach. Runoff will be discharged at minimum practicable slopes, yielding minimum velocities and diffused with a riprap pad at the pipe outlet(<0.4 cfs in 10-year event), which the existing drainage does not benefit from. All proposed stormwater runoff is discharged as far away from the stream and at the lowest velocities as practicable. Waterbod Information Surface Water Body (1): East Fork Eno River NCDWR Stream Index No.: 27-2-3 NCDWR Surface Water Classification for Water Body Primary Classification: Water Supply II (WS-II) Su iemental Classification: Hi h Quality Waters (HQW) (NSW) Other Stream Ciassification: None Impairments: None A uatic T&E S ecies? No Comments: NRTR Stream ID: East Fork Eno River Buffer Rules in Effect: Neuse Project Includes Bridge S anning Water Bod ? Yes Deck Drains Discharge Over Buffer? No Dissi ator Pads Provided in Buffer? No Deck Drains Discharge Over Water Body? No (If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) (If yes, describe in the General Project Narrative; if no, justify in the (If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) General Project Narrative) �i i �i /"u �i aq� Hi hwa North Carolina Department of Transportation �-`� � '"-\ gStc�rrYiwater ,,,,.,.�,,., Highway Stormwater Program �_, �� STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN �'�'"="�� (Version 2.03; Released October 2015) FOR NCDOT PROJECTS WBS Element: TIP No.: SF-670173 County(ies): Orange Page 2 of 2 Preformed Scour Holes and Energy Dissipators a ion oor ina es rainage ipe ruc ure Sheet (Road and Non Road Surface Energy Dissipator Area Conveyance Dimensions Q10 V10 Associated w/ No. Pro'ects) Water Bod T e Ri ra T e (ac) Structure (in) (cfs) (f s) Buffer Rules? � 2 -L- 14+13 RT (1)East Fork Riprap Apron / Pad Class'B' 0.1 Pipe 15 0.4 0.4 N/A 36.1914°, -79.1502° Eno River Additional Comments e er o t e est anagement ractices o0 ox , an ar s, e e era ig way ministra ion y rau ic ngineering ircu ar o. - , ir ition, y rau ic esign o nergy Dissipators for Culverts and Channels (July 2006), as applicable, for design guidance and criteria.