WQ0037574_2016 Annual Report_20170222

F
Dunbar Foods Corporation
P.O. Box 519 -Dunn, -NC 28335 Phone [phone] Fax [phone]
February 22"d, 2017
NCDENR
Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Permitting Section
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
WQ Permit #: WQ0037574
Dunbar Foods Corp. Class A Land Application Annual Report 2016
Permittee:
Dunbar Foods
1000 S Fayetteville Ave
Dunn, NC 28334
910-892-3175 - ;
Preparer:
Michael Muller
1000 S Fayetteville Ave
Dunn, NC 28334
910-892-3175
RECEIVED
MAR 0 12017
Information Processing Unit
DWR Section
In 2016 Dunbar Foods did not do any Land Application under their Class A Land
Application Permit. All Land Application activities were recorded under Dunbar Foods Corp.
Land Application Class B Permit #WQ0012662.
Attached is the Annual Land Application Certification Form
Thank you,
f
Michael Mulier

ANNUAL LAND APPLICATION CERTIFICATION FORM
WQ Permit#: WQ0037574 County: Harnett Year:
Facility Name (as shown on permit): Dunbar Foods Coro.
2016
Land Application Operator:
Phone: [phone],
Land application of residuals as allowed by the permit occurred during the past calendar year?
❑ Yes R1 No - If No, skip Part A, and Part B and proceed to Part C. Also, If residuals were
generated but not land applied, please attach an explanation on how the residuals were handled.
Part A - Residuals Apulication Summa
Michael Mulier
Total number of application fields in thepermit:
Total number of fields utilized for land application during the year:
Total amount of dry tons applied during the year for all application sites:
Total number of acres utilizes for land application during the year:
rart is - Annual lAmptance Statement:
Facility was compliant during calendar year with all conditions of the land application permit
(including but not limited to items 1-13 below) issued by the Division of Water Resources.. ❑ Yes ❑ No
If no please, provide a written description why the facility was not compliant, the dates, and explain corrective action
taken.
1) Only residuals approved for this permit were applied to the permitted sites.
2) Soil pH was adjusted as specified in the permit and lime was applied (if needed) to achieve a soil pH of at least 6.0 or
the limit specified in the permit.
3) Annual soils analysis were performed on each site receiving residuals during the past calendar year and three (3) copies
of laboratory results are attached.
4) Annual TCLP analysis (if required) was performed and three (3) copies of certified laboratory results are attached.
5) All other monitoring was performed in accordance with the permit and reported during the year as required and three (3)
copies of certified laboratory results are attached.
6) The facility did not exceed any of the Pollutant Concentration Limits in 15A NCAC 02T .I 105(a) or the Pollutant
Loading Rates in 15A NCAC 02T .I 105(b) (applicable to 40 CFR Part 503 regulated facilities).
7) All general requirements in as specified in the Land Application Permit were complied with (applicable to 40 CFR Part
503 regulated facilities).
8) All monitoring and reporting requirements in 15A NCAC 02T .I 1 I 1 were complied with (applicable to 40 CFR Part
503 regulated facilities).
9) All operations and maintenance requirements in the permit were complied with or, in the case of a deviation, prior
authorization was received from the Division of Water Resources.
10) No contravention of Ground Water Quality Standards occurred at a monitoring well or explanations of violations are
attached to include appropriate actions and remediations.
11) Vegetative cover was maintained and proper crop management was performed on each site receing residuals, as
specified in the permit.
12) No runoff of residuals from the application sites onto adjacent property or nearby surface waters has occurred.
13) All buffer requirements as specified on the permit were maintained during each application of residuals.
Part C - Certification:
"I certify, under penalty of law, that the above information is, to the best of my knowledge a d belief, true, accurate,
and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submit 'ng f e informati ,including the
possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
Michael Mulier, AG. Rep. pl. 00- /7
Permittee Name and Title (type or print) Signature of Permittee Date
Signature of Preparer*
Date Signature of Land Applier
Date
(if different from Permittee) (if different from Permittee and Preparer)
* Preparer is defined in 40 CFR Part 503.9 (r) and 15A NCAC 02T .l 102 (26) DENR FORM ACF (12/2006)

4
Dunbar Foods Corporation
P.O. Box 519 -Dunn, NC 28335 Phone [phone] Fax [phone]
February 22"d, 2017
NCDENR
Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Permitting Section
Non -Discharge Permitting Unit
WQ Permit #: WQ0012662
Dunbar Foods Corp. Class B Land Application Annual Report 2016
Permittee: Preparer: _
Dunbar Foods Michael Mulier
1000 S Fayetteville Ave 1000 S Fayetteville Ave
Dunn,. NC 28334 Dunn, NC 28334
910-892-3175 910-892-3175
RECEIVED
MAIL 0 12017
Information Processing Unit
DWR Section
In 2016 Dunbar Foods land applied 260.61 dry tons of sweet potato residual over 71
acres in Field 1-2, between September and November.
Attachments:
DENR FORM ACF
DENR FORM RSSF
DENR FORM RSSF-B
DENR FORM MFLSF
DENR FORM FSF
ESC Sciences Lab Results -Residuals
NCDA&CS Agronomic Division Soil Report
Thank you,
Michael Muller

ANNUAL LAND APPLICATION CERTIFICATION FORM
WQ Permit#: W00012662 County:
Facility Name (as shown on permit):
Land Application Operator:
Harnett
Michael Muller
Dunbar Foods
Year: 2016
Phone: [phone]
Land application of residuals as allowed by the permit occurred during the past calendar year?
0 Yes ❑ No - If No, skip Part A, and Part B and proceed to Part C. Also, If residuals were
generated but not land applied, please attach an explanation on how the residuals were handled.
Part A - Residuals Application Summary:
Total number of application fields in thepermit: 5
Total number of fields utilized for land application during the year: 1
Total amount of dry tons applied during the year for all application sites: 260.61
Total number of acres utilizes for land application during the year: 71
Part B - Annual Compiance Statement:
Facility was compliant during calendar year 2016 with all conditions of the land application permit
(including but not limited to items 1-13 below) issued by the Division of Water Resources. 0 Yes ❑ No
If no please, provide a written description why the facility was not compliant, the dates, and explain corrective action
taken.
I ) Only residuals approved for this permit were applied to the permitted sites.
2) Soil pH was adjusted as specified in the permit and lime was applied (if needed) to achieve a soil pH of at least 6.0 or
the limit specified in the permit.
3) Annual soils analysis were performed on each site receiving residuals during the past calendar year and three (3) copies
of laboratory results are attached.
4) Annual TCLP analysis (if required) was performed and three (3) copies of certified laboratory results are attached.
5) All other monitoring was performed in accordance with the permit and reported during the year as required and three (3)
copies of certified laboratory results are attached.
6) The facility did not exceed any of the Pollutant Concentration Limits in 15A NCAC 02T .I 105(a) or the Pollutant
Loading Rates in 15A NCAC 02T .I 105(b) (applicable to 40 CFR Part 503 regulated facilities).
7) All general requirements in as specified in the Land Application Permit were complied with (applicable to 40 CFR Part
503 regulated facilities).
8) All monitoring and reporting requirements in 15A NCAC 02T .I I I I were complied with (applicable to 40 CFR Part
503 regulated facilities).
9) All operations and maintenance requirements in the permit were complied with or, in the case of a deviation, prior
authorization was received from the Division of Water Resources.
10) No contravention of Ground Water Quality Standards occurred at a monitoring well or explanations of violations are
attached to include appropriate actions and remediations.
11) Vegetative cover was maintained and proper crop management was performed on each site receing residuals, as
specified in the permit.
12) No runoff of residuals from the application sites onto adjacent property or nearby surface waters has occurred.
13) All buffer requirements as specified on the permit were maintained during each application of residuals.
Part C - Certification:
"I certify, under penalty of law, that the above information is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate,
and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submi ing Ise info r ation, including the
possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations." r
Michael Muller, AG. Rep. �� �1i1 v -zo - r;
Permittee Name and Title (type or print) 'Signature of Permittee Date
Signature of Preparer* Date Signature of Land Applier Date
(if different from Permittee) (if different from Permittee and Preparer)
* Preparer is defined in 40 CFR Part 503.9 (r) and 15A NCAC 02T .1102 (26) DENR FORM ACF (12/2006)

ANNUAL RESIDUAL SAMPLING SUMMARY FORM
Please note that your permit may contain additional parameters to be analyzed. The parameters can be reported in FORM RSSF - B
WQ Permit Number: W00012662 Laboratory: 1)
Facility Name: Dunbar Foods Corp. 2)
Residual Source WQ # or 3)
NPDES #: 4)
WWTP Name: 5)
Residual Analysis Data
ESC
Parameter
Sample or Composite Date
of �11
Nitrate and Nitrite
a For surface disposal facilities the ceiling concentration limits listed in this form are not applicable. Reference the individual permit for metals limits.
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document was prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed
to ass lr that qualifi d pepsonnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. I am aware that there are significant
h�lt'e for sl/Ylb►r�itting lse information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
Preparer *
Date
*Preparer is defined in 40 CFR Part 503.9(r) and 15A NCAC 2T .1102 (26) DENR FORM RSSF (12/2006)

ANNUAL RESIDUAL SAMPLING SUMMARY FORM - B
Report all sampling analysis results for parameters not listed in FORM RSSF that are part of the WQ permit or were analyzed for over the past
calendar year. Use additional forms as needed.
WQ Permit Number: W00012662 Laboratory: 1)
Facility Name: Dunbar Foods Corp. 2)
Residual Source 3)
NPD) S # or WQ#: 4)
WWTP.Name: 5)
Residual Analysis Data
ESC
• . . . �.
Parameter
Phosphate as P
1 1
-----------
AmmoniaNitrogen
I certify, under penalty of law, that this document was prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system
designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. I am aware that there are
signiftcaft peo, ltiej for supruitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
Signature of Preparer * Date
*Preparer is defined in 40 CFR Part 503.9(r) and 15A NCAC 2T .1102 (26)
DENR FORM RSSF - B (12/2006)

ANNUAL METALS FIELD LOADING SUMMARY FORM*
Attach this form to the corresponding Field Loading Summary Form to be submitted in Annual Report
Facility Name: Dunbar Foods Corp. Total Dry Tons Applied (Annual): 26061
Permit #: WQ0012662 Cation Exchange Capacity (non 503 only): 6.54
Operator: Michael Mulier Owner: R. Dewayne Weeks Predominant Soil Series: Goldsboro
Acres Used: 71 Acres Permitted: 112.6 Site #: 1 Field #: 2
Residual Analysis Data (Heavy Metals and Total Phosphorus use mg/kg, % Solids use Raw Percent 9):
Annual Heavy Metal Field Loadings (Calculated in lbs/acre):
...�
► 11►
► ►►0
► ►►►
► ►►►
► ►►►
► ►►►
a ►►o
► ►►o
a ►►►
► ►►►
► ►►►
......
••�
► ►►►
► ►►►
► ►►►
► ►►►
► ►►►
► ►►►
► ►►►
a ►►►
► ►►►
► ►►►
► ►►►
► ►►►
► ►►►
��
► ►►►
► ►►o
► ►►►
► ►►►
► o►►
► ►►►
a ►►►
► ►►►
► ►►►
► ►►o
► 110
► 11e
° ►►►
► 1e►
► o►►
► ►►o
► eee
► ►e►
► ►oo
► ►►►
► ►oe
► eeo
► ►►►
o ►►►
'
► ►►►
► ►►►
► ►►►
► ►►►
► ►►►
► ►►►
► ►►►
► ►►►
► ►►e
► ►►e
► ►►►
► ►►►
a ►►►
��
► 11e
► ►►►
► ee►
a ►ee
► ee►
► ►►►
► 1e►
► ►►►
► ►►►
► 101
► ►e►
► ►oo
► ►►►
, •►
► ►►►
► ►►►
► ►►►
► ►►►
a ►►►
► ►►►
► ►►►
a ►►►
► e►►
o ►►e
► ►►►
- �►
",.
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document was prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance
with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted.
I am aw�ft that there are signifi nt penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and
i priso went f kn ing viol ions".
Signature of Land Applier Date
DENR FORM MFLSF (12/2006)

ANNUAL LAND APPLICATION FIELD SUMMARY FORM
PLEASE MAKE A COPY OF THIS BLANK FORM TO BE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED FOR EACH FIELD APPLIED ON
PLACE A "N/A" IN A BLANK OR BOX WHEN NOT APPLICABLE.
Facility Name: Dunbar Foods Corp.
Land Owner: R. Dewayne Weeks
Operator: Michael Muller
Crop 1 Name: Wheat
WQ Permit #: WQ0012662 Field #: 1
Annual Dry Tons Applied: 243.4290 Site #: 2
Predominant Soil Series: Goldsboro
Crop 1 Max. PAN:
Acres Utilized: 71
Acres Permitted: 112.6
Cation Exchange Capacity (non 503): 6.54
160 Crop 2 Name: Soybeans Crop 2 Max. PAN: 200
0 0
OLiquid
Volume applied
(enter one) Solids/
Cu. Yds Gallons
%
Solids
Volume
Applied per
Acre
(Dry Tons/ne)
Residual Sources
(NPDES #, WQ#,
Fert., Animal
Waste, etc)
Sod
Cond.
(Drys.
Wet
Moist)
Precip.
Past 24
Hrs.
inches
D
4 v
"
0 c
°
o
?:
m^
* N
a
CO P,
} »:
0
TKN
mg/kg
z >
4' S
o B
w
,� 'w'
mg/kg
Nitrate
and
Nitrite
mg/kg
PAN Applied
( Ibs/acre)
Name of Crop Type
Receiving Residual
Application
Crop 1
Crop 2
Crop I
Crop 2
9-21-16
521216.6
11.2
3.429
Sweet Potatoes
moist
No
INC
1
0.4
12600
119
645
Na
NA
Wheat
Soybeans
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
1 0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
Residuals Applications totals on FORM FSF supp ( attach FORM FSF supp to this form):
TOTALS:
01
521216.61
As
Cd
Cu
Cr
Pb
'Hg
Mo
Ni
Se
Zn
P
0.000
0.000
Lime A lied
Annual lbs/acre
0.000
#######
#######
0.000
#######
0.000
0.000
#######
0.000
#######
14.903
Date
lbs/ac
Prior Years Cumulative Ibs/ac
0.000
36
#######
34
#######
1338
0.000
0
#######
267
0.000
IS
0.000
0
#######
374
0.000
89
#######
2498
Current Cumulative Ibs/ac
Permitted C. P. L. R.****
Permit PAN Limit 1 st/2nd Crop
160 200
"I certify, under penalty of law, that this document was prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that
qualified personnel properly galbered and evaluated the information submitted. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false
in ng the pos bility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
*Application Method: S - Surface, IN - Injection, INC - Incorporation
**Volatilization Rate: Surface - 0.5, Injection/Incorporation - 1.0
Signature of Land Applier Date *** Mineralization Rates: Compost -0.1, anaerobially digested -0.2,
aerobically digested -0.3, raw sludge -0.4
****C.P.L.R.: Cumulative Pollutant Loading Rate
DENR FORM FSF (12/2006)

'NCDA&CS; �nomlc Division `[phone]•: Website wwuv.l
�r;gov/agronoinll '`
"� ^''Y Repprt No' x:Fl �L020782 ya
..,. „, ,"+., ., by ♦:.,-.. i,;;,„,Phorie-
r',;, •*. -:•.. ••,• ...:....
. •
; -
y t'..
Chris. Weeks
Page 9 of 47
Sample ID: 91
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop
(tons/acre)
N P205
K20
Mg
S
Mn
Zn
Cu
B
Information
Lime History:
1 -Corn, grain
0.4
120 -160 50
30
0
20
0
0
0
0
Note:
2-SG/Soybean(DC)
0.0
80-100 70
40
0
20
0
0
0
0
Note.3
Test Results [units - WN in
g/cm3; CEC and Na In meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mgldm3]:
Soil Class:
Mineral
HM% WN CEC BS% Ac pH
P-1 K-1
Ca% Mg%
S-1
Mn-I
Mn-All
Mn-Al2
Zn4
Zn-AI
Cu4
Na
ESP
SS-1 NO3-N
0.51 1.28 5.2
71 1.5 5.8
37 58
57 9
21
57
51
44
80
80
101
0.0
Sample ID: 92
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop
(tons/acre)
N P205
K20
Mg
S
Mn
Zn
Cu
B
Information
Lime History:
1 -Corn, grain
0.7
120 -160 110
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Note: 3
2 -SG/Soybean (DC)
0.0
80-100 140
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Note: 3
Test Results [units - WN in g/cm3; CEC and Na In meq/100 cm3; NO3-N In mg/dm3]:
Soil Class:
Mineral
HM% WN CEC BS% Ac pH
P4 K-1
Ca% Mg%
S-1
Mn-1
Mn-All
Mn-Al2
Zn-1
Zn-AI
Cu-I
Na
ESP
SS-1 NO3-N
0.32 1.19 6.0
70 1.8 5.6
15 83
53 11
27
39
40
33
46
46
85
0.1
2
Sample ID: 93
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop
(tons/acre)
N P205
K20
Mg
S
Mn
Zn
Cu
B
Information
Lime History:
1 -Corn, grain
0.0
120 -160 40
10
25
0
0
0
0
0
Note: 3
2 _SG/Soybean (DC)
0.0
80-100 60
0
$
0
0
0
0
0
Note: 3 Note:
Test Results [units - WN in
g/cm3; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N In mg/dm3]:
Soil Class:
Mineral
HM% WN CEC BS% Ac pH
P4 K-1
Ca% Mg%
S-1
Mn-I
Mn-All
Mn-Al2 'Zn-I
Zn-Al
Cu-I
Na
ESP
SS -I NO3-N
0.71 1.33 5.9
78 1.3 6.0
41 78
64 7
26
80
54
57
86
86
91
0.1
2
Sample ID: 94
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop
(tons/acre)
N P206
K20
Mg
S
Mn
Zn
Cu
8
Information
Lime History:
1 -Corn, grain
0.4
120 -160 0
30
25
0
0
0
0
0
Note:_3
2 -SG/Soybean (DC)
0.0
80-100 0
40
$
0
0
0
0
0
Note: 3 Note:
Test Results [units - WN in
g/cm3; CEC and Na In meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dm3]:
Soil Class:
Mineral
HM% MIN CEC BS% Ac pH
P-1 K-1
Ca% Mg%
S-1
Mn-I
Mn-All
Mn-Al2
Zn4
Zn-AI
Cu-1
Na
ESP
SS-1 NO3-N
0.51 1.39 5.2
71 1.5 5.8
123 58
59 6
26
76
63
56
112
112
123
0.1
2

..NdDA - I 6 Divisl6W'�-� Phoneart
fi,
'T­ �,:R N 6.
M;�
e,
Chris Weeks
Page 10 of 47
Sample ID: 95
Recommendations:
Lima
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop
(tons/acre)
N P206
K2O
Mg S
Mn
Zn
Cu
B
Information
Lime History:
1 -Corn, grain
0.5
120-160 90
0
0 0
0
0
0
0
Note: 3
2-SG/Soybean (DC)
0.0
80-100 120
.0
0 0
0
0
0
0
Note 3
Test Results [units -WIV In g1cmR; CEC and Na In meq/100 cm3,, NO3-N
In mg/dn73]:
Soil Class:
Mineral
HM% WfV
CEC BS% Ac PH
P-1 K-1
Ca% Mg% ,
S4
Mn-I
Mn-All Mn-Al2
Zn-1
Zn-AI
Cu-I
Na
ESP
SS-1 NO3-N
0.41 1.23
5.7 77 1.3 5.6
20 89
57 12
27
38
40 33
55
55
97
0.1
2
Sample ID: 96
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop
(tonslacre)
N P205
K2O
Mg S
Mn
Zn
Cu
B
Information
Lime History:
I -Corn, grain
0.3
120-160 100
0
0 0
0
0
0
0
Note: 3
2-SG/Soybean(DC)
0.0
80-100 140
0
0 0
0
0
0
0
Note: 3
Test Results [units - VVIV In g1cm3; CEC and Na In meqflOO cm3; NW-N In mg1dn3]*
soil class:
Mineral
'HM% W/V
CEC BS% Ac PH
P-1 K-1
Ca% Mg%
S-1
Mn-I
Mn-All Mn-Al2
Zn4
Zn-Al
Cu-I
Na
ESP
SS-1 NO3-N
0.60 1.28
6.4 , 80 1.31 5.8
16 ill
61 10
26
45
44 37
56
56.
96
0.1
2
Sample ID: 97
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop
(tons/acre)
N P205
K2O
Mg S
Mn
Zn
Cu
B
Information
Lime History:
I -Corn, grain
0.0
120-160 60
0
0 25
a
0
0
0
Note: 3
2 -SG/Soybean (DC)
0.0
80-100 80
0
0 25
0
0
0
0
Note: 3
Test Results [units- WN in g/cO; CEC and Na In meq/1 00 cm3; NO3-M in mg/drrP]:
Soil Class:
Mineral
HM% WfV
CEC SS% Ac PH
P4 K-1
Ca% Mg%
S-1
Mn4
Mn-All Mn-Al2
Zn-1
Zn-Al
Cu4
Na
ESP
S54 NO3-N
1.02 1.32
6.1 78 1.3 5.9
33 80
64 7
25
79
64 57
75
75
88
0.1
2
Sample ID: 98
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop
(tons/acre)
N P205
K2O
Mg S
Mn
Zn
Cu
IS
Information
Lime History:
1 -Corn. grain
0.3
120-160 60
30
25 0
0
0
0
0
Note: 3
2-SG/Soybean(DC)
0.0
80-100 80
40
$ 0
0
0
0
0
Note: 3 Note:
Test Results [units -VVIV In g/crrP; CEC and Na In meq/100 cm3,* NO3-N In mg/dnT']:
Soil Class:
Mineral
HM% WIV
CEC BS% Ac PH
P-1 K-1
Ca% Mg%
S4
Mn-I
Mn-All Mn-Al2
Zn-I
Zn-Al
Cu-1
Na
ESP
SS-1 NO3-N
1.14 1.24
6.5 80 1.3 5.8
35 57
70 6
35
113
85 78
57
57
96
0.1
2

NCDA&C.9. 0�
sl '.Web
gr6riom
Chris Weeks
Page 11 of 47
Sample ID: 99
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Lime History:
,Crop
1 -Corn,
, grain
2-SG/Soybean (DC)
(tons/acre)
019
0.0
N P205
120-160 10
80-100 20
K20
30
30
Mg
0
0
S
0
0
Mn
0
0
Zn
0
0
Cu
0
-0
B
1
0
Inforniation
Note: 3
Note: 3
Test Results [units - VVIV In
g1cmP; CEC and Na In meq/100 cm3; NO3-N In mgldm3]:
Soil Class:
Mineral
HM% WN CEC BS% Ac PH
P-1 K-1
Ca% Mg%
S-1
Mn-1
Mn-All
Mn-AI2
Zn4
Zn-Al
Cu-1
Na ESP
SS-1 NO3-N
2.15 1.11 9.1
76 2.2 5.6
* 69 61
61 12
39
54
49
42
44
44
60
0.1
1
Sample ID: 100
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop
(tons/acre)
N P20S
K20
MO
S
Mn
Zn
Cu
B
Information
Lime History:
I -Corn, grain
2 -SG/Soybean (DC)
0.3
0.0
120 1 -160 50
80-100 70
40
60
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-
0
Note: 3
Note: 3
Test Results [units -WIV In
g1cmP; CEC and Na In meqMOO cR13, NO3-N In mg/dO]:
Soil Class;
Mineral
HM% WN CEC 85% Ac PH
P-1 K-1
Ca% Mg%
S4
Mn-I
Mn-All
Mn-Al2
Zn-I
Zn-Al
Cu-1
Na ESP
SS4 NO3-N
2.01 1.16 8.4
77 1.9 5.9
37 54
62 12
33
44
43
36
39
39
63
0.1
1
Sample ID: 101
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
I
More
Crop
(tons/acre)
N P205
K20
Mg
S
Mn
Zn
Cu
B
Information
Lime History:
1 Corn, grain
2-SG/Soybean(DC)
0.4
0.0
120-160 10
80-100 20
60
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Note: 3
Note* 3
Test Results [units -WIV In
g1cm3; CEC and Na In meqMOO cml,, NO3-N In mg/dRip]:
Sol] Class:
Mineral
HM% WN CEC BS% Ac PH
P4 K-I
Ca% Mg%
S-1
Mn.I
Mn-All
Mn-Al2
Zn-I
Zn-AI
Cu4
Na ESP
SS-1 NO3-N
1.87 1.19 8.7
so 1.7 5.8
59 39
67 11
31
31
36
29
42
42
75
0.1
1
Sample ID: 102
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop
(tons/acre)
N P205
K20
Mg
S
Mn
Zn
Cu
a
Information
Lime History:
1 Corn, grain
2 -SG/Soybean (DC)
0.4
0.0
120-160 60
80-100 90
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
a
0
0
0
0
0
0
Note: 3
Note: 3
Test Results [units -VjN in
9/cO; CEC and Na in meq/100 cm3; NO3-N in mg/dn73]:
Soil Class!
Mineral
HM% WN CEC BS% Ac PH
P4 K-1
Ca% Mg%
S-1
Mn4
Mn-All
Mn-Al2
Zn-I
Zn-Al
Cu-1
Na ESP
SS -I NO3-N
0.92 1.30 6.1
76 1.4 5.8
31 83
61 9
27
71
60
53
5B
58
97
0.1
2

:NCDA&CSIinoffil6DIvIslori Phone ;(919) 733 -2665. Webs Its- 'vi"A
r.jj6%i1i6ninbfni1 R epo rt
7
Chris Weeks
Page 12 of 47
Sample ID: 103
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (Iblacre)
More
Crop
(tons/acre)
N P206
K20
Mg
S
Mn
Zn
Cu
B
Information
Lime History:
1 -Corn, grain
0.6
120-160 70
10
25
20
0
0
0
0
Note: 3
2-SG/Soybean(DC)
0.0
80-100 100
0
$
20
0
0
0
0
Note: 3 Note:j
Test Results [units -WIV In g1cm3; CEC and Na In meq/10o crn3; NO3-N In mg/dO]:
Soil Class:
Mineral
HM% WIV CEC
BS% Ac PH
P-1 K-I
Ca% Mg% S-1
Mn-1
Mn-All
Mn.Al2
Zn-I
Zn-AI
Cu4 Na
ESP
S.9-1 NO3-N
0.92 1.28 5.2
72 1.4 5.6
28 72
57 8 25
91
72
65
52
52
77 0.1
2
Sample ID: 104
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop
(tons/acre)
N P205
K20
Mg
S
Mn
Zn
Cu
B
Information
Lime History:
1 -Corn, grain
0.5
120-160 80
0
0
20
0
0
0
0
Note: 3
2 -SG/Soybean (DC)
0.0
80-100 110
0
0
20
0
D
0
0
Note: 3
Test Results [units -WIV In g1cffr3; CEC and Na In meq/100 cm3, NO3-N in mg/dO]:
Soil Class:
Mineral
HM% W/V CEC
BS% Ac PH
P-1 K-1
Ca% Mg% S4
Mn-1
Mn-All
Mn-Al2
Zn-I
Zn-Al
Cu-I Na
ESP
SS -I NO3-N
0.81 1.28 4.9
71 1.4 5.7
24 82
53 9 23
73
61
54
53
53
97 0.1
2
,Sample ID: 105
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop
(tons/acre)
N P206
K20
Mg
S
Mn
Zn
Cu
B
Information
Lime History:
1 -Corn, grain
0.4
120-160 30
30
0
0
0
0
0
0
Note: 3
2-SG/Soybean(DC)
0.0
80-100 50
so
0
0
0
0
0
0
Note: 3
Test Results [units -W/V In g/cm3; CEC and Na In meq/100 cm3,, NO3-N In mgfflmrr]:
Sol[ Class:
Mineral
HM% W/V CEC
BS% Ac PH
P-1 K-1
Ca% Mg% S-1
Mn-I
Mn-All
Mn-Al2
Zn-1
Zn-AI
Cu4 Na
ESP
SS-1 NO3-N
1.67 1.25 7.9
81 1.5 5.8
45 55
66 11 28
78
64.
57
69
69
85 0.1
1
Sample ID: 106
Recommendations:
Lime
Nutrients (lb/acre)
More
Crop
(tons/acre)
N P205
K20
Mg
S
Mn
Zn
Cu
B
Information
Lime History:
1 -Corn, grain
0.0
120-160 0
10
0
25
0
0
0
0
Note: 3
2 -SG/Soybean (DC)
0.0
80-100 0
10
0
25
0
0
0
0
hlote, 3
Test Results [units -WN In g/cO; CEC and Na In meq/100 cm3; NO3-N In mg/dni3]:
Soil Class:
Mineral
HM% WIV CEC
BS% Ac PH
P4 K-I
Ca% Mg% S-1
Mn4
Mn-All
Mn-Al2
Zn-I
Zn-Al
Cu-1 Na
ESP
SS-1 NO3-N
0.86 1.32 7.3
80 1.5 6.0
ill 71
68 7 25
157
111
104
656
656
206 0.1
1

Billing information:
Analysis/Container/Preservative
Chain of Custody Pace _of_
x
� z
Inc.
ESC
PO Box 902
PO Bo
'
Y
'
Red Springs, NC28377
,
-
��.a.A SC•iEN•UE•5
E
i
F
,X329311119My��C•
112065 tehanan Rd
r+�i
Report to:
Email To: [e-mail]
Mr. Thomas Ammons
t
�q
`
\faun Miet, TN 3712Z
I Fncna 615 ]5a 5959
\
Pn 9t1(F2G)Sa59 O
fa 615 )Sad859
Project
City/State
Collected: 604 �c�
Description: Dunbar Foods
y
,'y
C1 ,,
Z •:
ui
rt5rt.
rlx
4iiZ
r',
w�
LO J.p [[% t,3y, i
.�.'�"
Client Project It
Lab Project
Phone:[phone]$6
15-MI0107-3
ENVHYD-I2-MI0702-3
'._
'�
1
,f.CD,D`7
�2Y7 .
Fax: [phone]
N
Z
x,
n .
r
' � A'.
`
l3 arr
Collected by (Prin
Site/Facility ID d
P.O. a
'/i)
xv aS�(a/ 71:.,tC
�✓�IY�IYI
Nt):
H
6
ut�.
Aai9m''ENVHYD'�L Fe
Nrtnwi 1 sr r, J
�r/ J
y
'.n •.
p
v
tf0
t~�
v
y,
,v„r+
>i,;
-.
Ternplat �T8032n,* xc
Collected by
Date Results Needed
(signature):
Rush? (Lab MUST Be Notified)
^ a
..
R
o•
: t
t e +.
.t
Z
O
,r U
o
tl"
f t
PrelCBin'PSS21ziw ?9
`•
Same Day...........................200%
Z
N
�'�tl
Z
z,
Email? _No X_Yes
/yj
'x r
_next Day..... ... t00%
=tY r'�
ry
r
`
_
-
ITSR 350t llmmyNuntId
ImmedlalPp'
Two Day ......................... 50%
Day
FNQ_No
No
Zr!
µro
0r
Z
—
0
{„)
Y +
I
- + E
Pa[ked on ICe N_ Y
_Three ............. .25%
_Yes
of
+'t.7 +" t
`{
^>
Y`'
>�
v
�{,'
ShippedwVie FedEY�iGFOUrtd„
Sample ID
Comp/Grab
Matrix'
Depth
Date
Time
ntrs
=
F'++i;'
to
Rem/Cnntaminint
- SamPie 0(4b miyl
e-Qr:
Z.
RESIDUALS
�d
SS
Zlt
IbZO
5X,
X
X
Zk
�-
:dylatrix: SS: Sail GW-Groundwater WW-WasteWater DW- Drinking Water OT - Other tt { 1
nn•t ,,
emarks: pH Temp___
Flow Other
t t" Y t4 •` + i.,i C `t.i 1..t
Relinquished b : (Signature)
Date:
Time:
Received by: (Signatu e)
Samples returned Via: ❑ UPS
Condition a r# k r4(1ab use only)M i it,�
❑FedEx ❑Courier ❑_
rr, u
Relinquished by: (Stgnaturee))
Date:
Time:
Received by: (Signatd e) ?
a*
Te Bottles Received.
Pi" t C
-'`
`k
.C;w
d,.!'?Iit;t` :�7 .r.. 1 •�
COC SeaI,Intact xY N`t fNA `,:.
Relinquished by.'(Sign4t0_1 °'s t
Date:
Time:
Rece forlab dre
-"
)
' l Th
F rwr+r� yS ' to
ll1
;*
9H,sChed..k.Sre
7 e1
_
.i.5f✓fi.t_!F
6d

CoolerReceipt •
Client: F/VV 00 SDG# L'n 6,�Z3s
Cooler Received/Opened On: .aa- I IemperlltUre Upon Receipt: a°c
Received Ay: Michael Witherspoon
Signature: t l
Receipt Check List Yes No N/
Were custody seals on outside of cooler and intact?
Were custody papers properly filled out?
Did all bottles arrive in good condition?
Were correct bottles used for the analyses requested?
Was sufficient amount of sample sent in each bottle?
Were.all"applicable sample, containerscorrectly:preserved and
checked'#or preservation? (Any not n'accepted'range noted.on COC)
If applicable, was an observable VOA headspace present?
^Nop,ConformanceGen'erated; (if yess'ee:attacfied NCF) ,

EM
REAL TIAfE bATF ACCESS
f
9
ANALYTICAL REPORT
September 30, 2016
EHC, Inc.
Sample Delivery Group:
Samples Received:
Project Number:
Description:
Site:
Report To:
L861235
09/22/2016
15-MI0107-3
Dunbar Foods
MAXTON,NC
Mr. Thomas Ammons
PO Box 902
Red Springs, NC 28377
Entire Report Reviewed By: f LVIL
Jimmy Hunt
Technical Service Representative
Results relate only to the Items tested or calbrated and are reported as rounded values. This test report shall not be
reproduced, except In full, Wthoutmiten approval of the laboratory. Where applicable, sampling conducted by ESL is
performed per guidance provided in laboratory standard operating procedures: 060302. 060303. and 060304.
"s-

TABLE OF CONTENTS ONE LAB. NATIONWIDE.
Page
2Tc: Table of Contents
'Ss: Sample Summary
4Cn: Case Narrative
5Sr: Sample Results
RESIDUALS L861235-01
SQc: Quality Control Summary
Total Solids by Method 2540 G-2011
Wet Chemistry by Method 350.1
Wet Chemistry by Method 4500NOrg C-2011
Wet Chemistry by Method 9045D
Wet Chemistry by Method 9056A
Metals (ICP) by Method 6010C
7G1: Glossary of Terms
eAl: Accreditations & Locations
9Sc: Chain of Custody
2
3
4
5
5
6
6
7
8
9
10
12
13
14
15
ACCOUNT: PROJECT: SDG:. DATEMME: PAGE:
EHC, Inc 1S-MI0107-3 L861235 09/30A609:44 2of16

SAMPLE SUMMARY ONE LAS. NATIONWIDE.
Collected by Collected dateRime Received date/Unne
RESIDUALS L861235-01 Solid Joshua Bass 09,R1,1610:20 09/22A609:00
Method
Batch
Dilution
Preparation
Analysis
date/time
datellime
Metals POP) by Method 6010C
_
WG911918
1
0927A619:17
09129A6 03:02
Total Solids by Method 2540 G-2G11
WG910678
1
09/23/1614:48
0912311614:59
Wet Chemistry by Method 350.1
WG911675
1
09128/1612:17
09/2811616:18
Wet Chemistry by Method 4500NOrg C-2G11
WG911280
5
09/2711613:07
0912811610:25
Wet Chemistry by Method 9045D
WG912134
1
0912811614:14
09M/1614:14
Wet Chemistry by Method 9056A
WG910777
1
09/2411610:33
09/2411618:20
Wet Chemistry by Method 9056A
WG911418
5
09/2711616:01
091281161914
Analyst
CCE
KDW
JER
JER
JJL
CM
SAM
ACCOUNT: PROJECT: SDG: DATE/TIME PAGE'
EHC. Inc. 15-MI0107;3 L861235 09/3OA6 09A4 3 6f16

CASE NARRATIVE ONE LAB. NATIONWIDE.
pAll MDL (LOD) and RDL (LOQ) values reported for environmental samples have been corrected for the �J
dilution factor used in the analysis. All Method and Batch Quality Control are within established criteria
except where addressed in this case narrative, a non-conformance form or properly qualified within the Tc
sample results. By my digital signature below, I affirm to the best of my knowledge, all
problems/anomalies observed by the laboratory as having the potential to affect the quality of the data
have been Identified by the laboratory, and no Information or data have been knowingly withheld that aSs
would affect the quality of the data.
SSr
fi
QC]
7G1
Jimmy Hunt aAl
Technical Service Representative
Sample Handling. and Receiving
aSc
The following samples were prepared and/or analyzed past recommended holding.time. Concentrations should be
considered minimum values.
ESC Sample ID Project Sample to Method
L861235-01 RESIDUALS 9045D
ACCOUNT: PROJECT: SDG: DATEMME .PAGE:
EHC, Inc. 15-M10107-3 L861235 09/30/16'09:44 4of16`

Ht51U.UALS
Wlectdd dateltime: 091211161ot20
Total Solids by Method 2540 G-2011
Result Qualifier
Analyte %
Total Solids 11.2
Wet Chemistry by Method 350.1
Result (dry) Qualifier
Analyte mg/kg
Ammonia Nitrogen 119
Wet Chemistry by Method 4500NOrg C-2011
Result (dry) Qualk
Analyte mg/kg
Kjeldahl Nitrogen, TKN 12600
Wet Chemistry by Method 9045D
Result
Analyte su
pH 4.58
Sample Narrative:
9045D LE61235-01 WG912134:4-58 at 20.7c
Wet Chemistry by Method 9056A
SAMPLE -RESULTS - 01
L861235
Dilution Analysis Batch
date I time
1 0923/201614:59 WG910678
RDL (dry) Dilution Analysis Batch
mg/kg date ltime
44.6 - 1 09/28/20161618 WG911675
RDL (dry) Dilution Analysis Batch
mglkg date ltime
892 5 09128/201610:25. WG911280
Qualifier Dilution Analysis Batch
dale / time
1 09/28/201614:14 WG912134 _
ONE. LAB. NATIONWIDE.,
Cu
TC
3S$
4Cn
aQC
7GI
Result (dry)
Qualifier RDL (dry)
Dilution
Analysis
Batch
Analyte
mg/kg
mg/kg
date/lime
Nitrate -Nitrite
645
17.8
1
09/24201618:20
WG910777
Phosphate as
2030
44.6
5
09/28/201619:14
WG911418
Metals (ICP) by Method 6010C
'
Result (dry)
Qualifier RDL (dry)
Dilution
Analysis
Batch
Analyte
Mgt kg
mglkg
date/time
Aluminum
447
89.2
1
09129201603:02
WG911918
Cadmium
ND
4A6•
1
09129/201603:02
WG911918
Copper
ND
17.8
1
09/291201603:02
WG911918
Lead
ND
4A6
1
09129201603:02.
WG911918
Nickel
ND
17.8
1
09129/201603:02
WG911918
Potassium
30900
892
1
09291201603:02
WG911918
Zinc
ND
44.6
1
09129/201603:02
WG911918
ACCOUNT: PROJECT: SDG: DATEIIIMS PAGE:
EHC. Inc. 15-MI0107-3 L861235 09f30/1609:44 5oft6

WG910678 QUALITY CONTROL SUMMARY ONE I AS. NATIONwioE.
Total Solids by Method 2540 G-2011 L861235-01
Method Blank (MB)
(MB) R3165830-1 09/23/1614:59
MB Result MB Qualifier MB MDL MB RDL
Analyte % % % -1C
Total Solids 0.000900
L861196-01 Original' Sample (OS) • Duplicate (DUP)
(OS) L861196-01 09/23/16 14:59 • (DUP) R3165830-3 09/23/1614:59
Original Result DUP Result Dilution DUP RPD DUP Qualifier DUP RIPS Limits
Analyte % % % %
Total Solids 79.4 80.0 1 0.692 - 5
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS)
(LCS) R3165830-2 09/23/1614:59
Spike Amount LCS Result LCS Rec. Rec. Limits LCS Qualifier
Analyte % % % %
Total Solids 50.0 50.0 100 85.0-115
ACCOUNT: '1 PROJECT: SDGE
' EHC, Inc:' " 154MI0107-3 , 'L861235
'DATE/TIME:
09/30/16 09:44
PAGE::
6pr16

W'G911575 QUALITY CONTROL
SUMMARY
ONE LAB. NATIONWIDE.
Wet Chemistry by Method 350.1 L861235-01
"
Method Blank (MB)
(ME) R31667714 09/28/1616:14
MB Result MB Qualifier MB MDL MB RDL
Analyte mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg
TC
Ammonia Nitrogen U 1.57 5.00
a$5
L861446-01 Original Sample (OS) • Duplicate (DUP)
4Cn
(OS) L861446-01 09/28/1616:19 - (DUP) R3166771-4 09/28/1616:21
Original Result DUP Result (dry) Dilution DUP RPD DUP Qualifier DUP RPD Limits
(dry)aSr
Analyte mg/kg mg/kg % %
Ammonia Nitrogen U ND 1 0.000 20
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) • Laboratory Control Sample Duplicate(LCSD)
7GI
(LCS) R3166771-2 09128/1616:15 - (LCSD) R3166771-3 09/2811616:16
Spike Amount LCS Result LCSD Result LCS Rea LCSD Rec. Rea Llmlts LCS Qualifier LCSD Qualifier RPD
RPD Limits
JAI
Analyte mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg % % %
%
%
Ammonia Nitrogen 2760 2130 2190 77.1 79.4 58.0-114 J4
J4 3.01
20
eSC
L861508-01 Original Sample (OS) • Matrix Spike (MS) • Matrix Spike DLplicate (MSD)
(OS) L861508-01 09/28/1616:24 - (MS) R3166771-5 09128/1616:27 • (MSD) R3166771-6 09/2811616:28
Spike Amount Original Result MS Result MSD Result MS Rec. MSD Rec. Dilution Rec. Limits MS Qualifier
M5D Qualifier RPD
RPD Limits
Analyte mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg % %
%
%
%
Ammonia Nitrogen 500 65.5 575 585 102 104 1
80.0-120
2.00
20
ACCOUNT PROJECT: - SDG:' DATEMME:. PAGE:
` EHC, Inc. 15-MI6107-3 L861235 - 69/30/16 09:44 - 7 of 16

WG9112'80' QUALITY C'ONTROL-SUM MA_RY ONE LAB. NATIONWIDE.
Wet Chemistry by rAethod 4500NOrg C-2011 L861235-01
Method Blank (MB)
(MB) R3166621.2 09/28/16 09:16
MB Result
Analyte mg/kg
Kjeldahl Nitrogen, TKN U
MB Qualifier MB MDL MB RDL
mglkg mg/kg
4.48 20.0
L861169-02 Original Sample (OS) • Duplicate (DUP)
(05) L861169-02 09/28/16 09:22 • (DUP) R3166621-5 09/28/16 09:23
Original Result DUP Result Dilution DUP RPD DUP Qualifier DUP RPD. Limits
Analyte mg/kg mg/kg - % %
Kjeldahl Nitrogen, TKN 23.0 41.6 1 , 58.0 PI 20
L8615O8-01 Original Sample (OS) • Duplicate (DUP)
(OS) L861508-01 09/28/1610:13 - (DUP) R3166621-9 09/28/1610:15
Original Result DUP Result Dilution DUP RPD DUP Qualifier DUP RPD Limits
Analyte mg/kg mg/kg % %
Kjeldahl Nitrogen, TKN 3600 4400 50 20.0 "20
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) • Laboratory Control Sample Duplicate (LCSD)
(LCS) R3166621-3 09/28/16 09:17 • (LCSD) R3166621-4 09/28/16 09:18
Spike Amount LCS Result LCSD Result LCS Rea LCSD Rec. Rec. Limits LCS Qualifier LCSD Qualifier RPD RPD Limits
Analyte mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg % % % % %
Kjeldahl Nitrogen, TKN 3170 2480 2740 78.0 86.0 50.0-150 10.0 20
L861169-08 Original Sample (OS) • Matrix Spike (MS) • Matrix Spike Duplicate (MSD)
(OS) L861169-08 09/28/16 09:33 • (MS) R3166621-6 09/28/16 09:34 • (MSD) R3166621-7 09/26/16 09:35
Spike Amount Original Result MS Result MSD Result MS Rec. MSD Rec. Dilution Rec. Limits MS Qualifier MSD Qualifier RPD RPD Limits
Analyte mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg % % % % %
Kjeldahl Nitrogen, TKN 400 118 304 303 46.0 46.0 1 90.0-110 J6 J6 0.000 20
L861169-11 Original Sample (OS) • Matrix Spike (MS)
(OS) L861169-11 09/28/16 09:39 • (MS) R3166621-8 09/28/16 09:40
Spike Amount Original Result MS Result MS Rec. Dilution Rec. Limits MS Qualifier
Analyte mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg % %
Kjeldahl Nitrogen, TKN 400 440 704 66.0 1 90.0410 J6
ACCOUNT:
EHC. Inc.
PROJECT:.
15-MI0107-3
:SDG: - DATE/TIME
L861235 09/30/16 09:44
"PAGE
8 of16

WG9112134 QUALITY CONTROL SUMMARY ONE LAB.'NATIONWIDE.
Wet Chemistry by Method 9045D L861235-01
L860399-18 Oricginal'Sample (OS) • Duplicate (DUP)
(OS) L860399-18 09/28/1614:14 • (DUP) WG912134-3 09/28/1614:14
Original Result DUP Result Dilution DUP RPD
DUP Qualifier
DUP RPD Limits
Analyte su Su %
%
ITC
PH 5.98 5.95 1 0.503
1
3Ss
L861334-01 Original Sample (OS) • Duplicate (DUP)
4Cn
(OS) L861334-01 09/28/1614:14 • (DUP) WG912134-4 09128/1614:14
Original Result DUP Result Dilution DUP RPD
Analyte su su %
DUP Qualifier
DUP RPD Limits
%
s
Sr
PH 9.29 9.29 1 0.000
1
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) •Laboratory Control Sample Duplicate (LCSD)
,
(LCS) WG912134-1 09/28/1614:14 • (LCSD) WG912134-2 09/28/1614:14
GI
Spike Amount LCS Result LCSD Result LCS Rec.
LCSD Rec.
Rec. Limits LCS Qualifier LCSD Oualifler RPD RPD Limits
Anayte su su su %
%
% % %
pH 6.11 6.08 6.09 99.5
99.7
98.4-102 0.164 1
aSc
AC000NT: , 'PROJECT;` 60G: - - DATE/TIME: 'PA GEi
EHC, Inc. 15-M10107-3 L861235' - 09/30/16 09:44 9 of 16

WG91'0777 QUALITY CONTROL SUMMARY ONE LAB. NATIONWIDE
Wet Chemistry 6y Method 9056A L861235-01
Method Blank (MB)
(MB) R3166057-2 09/24/1611:24
MB Result
MB Qualifier MB MOIL MB RDL
Analyte mg/kg
mg/kg mg/kg
Nitrate -Nitrite U
0.667 2.00
L861479-02 Original Sample (OS) • Duplicate (DUP)
(OS) L861479-02 09/24/16 22:32 • (DUP) R3166057-8 09/24/16 22:55
Original Result DUP Result (dry) Dilution DUP RPD DUP Qualifier DUP RPD Limits
(dry)
Analyte mg/kg mg/kg % %
Nitmte-Nitrite 0.882 0 1 200 P1 15
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) • Laboratory Control Sample Duplicate (LCSD)
(LCS) R3166057-3 09/24/1611:47 • (LCSD) R3166057-4 09/24/1612:10
Spike Amount LCS Result LCSD Result LCS Rea LCSD Rec. Rec. Limits LCS Qualifier LCSD Qualifier RPD RPD Limits
Analyte mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg % % % % %
Nitrate -Nitrite 40.0 38.4 38.5 96 96 80420 0 15
L861235-01 Original Sample (OS) • Matrix Spike (MS) • Matrix Spike Duplicate (MSD)
(05) L861235-01 09/24/1618:20 • (MS) R3166057-6 09/24/1618:43 • (MSD) R3166057.7 0912411619:06
Spike Amount
Original Result
MS Result (dry)
MSD Result MS Rec. MSD Rec. Dilution Rec. Limits MS Qualifier MSD Qualifier RPD RPD Limits
(dry)
(dry)
(dry)
Analyte mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg
mg/kg % % % % %
Nitrate -Nitrite 892
645
1460
1490 91 94 1 80-120 E E 2 15
ACCOUNT:
'EHC. Inc.
`PROJECT:
'15-MI0107-3'-
' SDG: DATEMME:
L8612351 09/30/16.09:44
PAGE:
10 of 16

WG911418 QUALITY CONTROL SUMMARY ONELAB.NATIONWIDE.
Wet Chemistry 6y Method 9056A 1.861235-01
Method Blank (MB)
(MB) R3167085-1 09/28/1616:56
MB Result MB Qualifier MBMDL MB RDL
Analyte mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg
Phosphate as U 0.0769 1.00
L861720-03 Original Sample (OS) • Duplicate (DUP)
(OS) L861720-03 09/28/16 20:40 • (DUP) R3167085-4 09/28/16 20:57
Original Result DUP Result Dilution DUP RPD DUP Qualifier DUP RPD Limits
Analyte mg/kg mg/kg % - % -
Phosphate as P 0.915 0.911 1 0 J 15
L861720-16 Original Sample (OS) • Duplicate (DUP)
(OS) L861720-16 09/29/16 01:48 - (DUP) R3167085-7 09/29/16 02:40
Original Result DUP Result Dilution DUP RPD DUP Qualifier DUP RPD Limits
Analyte mg/kg mg/kg % %
Phosphate as P U 0.000 1 0 15
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) • Laboratory Control Sample Duplicate (LOSD)
(LCS) R3167085-2 09/28/1617:14 • (LCSD) R3167085-3 09/28/16 17:31
Spike Amount LCS Result LCSD Result LCS Rec. LCSD Rec. Rec. Limits LCS Qualifier LCSD Qualifier RPD RPD Limits
Analyte mg/kg mg/kg mglkg % % % % %
Phosphate as P 20.0 19.2 19.2 96 96 80-120 0 15
L861720-07 Original Sample (OS) • Matrix Spike (MS) • Matrix Spike Duplicate (MSD)
(OS) L861720-07 09/28/16 22:05 • (MS) R3167085-5 09/28/16 22:22 • (MSD) R3167085-6 09/28/16 22:40
Spike Amount Original Result MS Result MSD Result MS Rec. MSD Rec. Dilution Rec. Limits MS Qualifier MSD Qualifier RPD RPD Limits
Analyte mg/kg mglkg mg/kg mg/kg % % % % %
Phosphate as 50.0 U 36.6 36.6 73 73 1 80-120 J6 J6 0 15
ACCOUNT:
EHC, In6.
;PROJECT: SDG:'
1540107-3 'L861235
'DATEMME:
09/30/16 09:44
PAGE.
11 of 16

WG911918 QUALITY CONTROL SUMMARY.
ONE LAB. NATIONWIDE; -
Metals (ICP1 by Method 6010C L861235-01
Method Blank (MB)
(MB) R3166869-1 09/29/16 02:41
MB Result MB Qualifier MB MDL MB RDL
Analyte mglkg mglkg mglkg
TC
Aluminum U 3.5 10.0
Cadmium U 0.07 0.500
a
$S
Copper. U 0.53 2.00
Lead U 0.19 0.500
4Cn
Nickel U 0.49 2.00
Potassium U 10.2 100
Zinc U 0.59 5.00
SSr
Laboratory Control Sample (LCS) • Laboratory Control Sample
Duplicate (LCSD)
�.
(LCS) R3166869-2 09/29/16 02:43 • (LCSD) R3166869-3 09/29/16 02:45
2Gl
Spike Amount LCS Result LCSD Result LCS Rec.
LCSD Rec.
Rec. Limits
LCS Qualifier LCSD Qualifier RPD
RPD Limits
Analyze mg/kg mglkg mglkg %
%
%
%
%
Aluminum 1000 1080 1020 108
102
80-120
5
20
oAl
Cadmium 100 105 101 105
101
80-120
4
20
Copper 100 106 101 106
101
80-120
5
20
e
Lead 100 107 102 107
102
80-120
- 4
20
SC
Nickel 100 107 103 107
103
80-120
5
20
Potassium 1000 1000 956 100
96
80-120
5
20
Zinc 100 105 100 105
100
80-120
5
20
L861938-01 Original Sample (OS) • Matrix Spike (MS) • Matrix Spike Duplicate (MSD)
(OS) L861938-01 09/29/16 02:48 • (MS) R3166869-6 09/29/l6 02:56 • (MSD) R3166869-7 09/29/16 02:59
Spike Amount
Original Result
MS Result
MSD Result
MS Rec.
MSD Rec.
Dilution
Rec. Limits
MS Qualifier MSD Qualifier RPD
RPD Limits
Analyte
mglkg
mglkg
mg/kg
mglkg
%
%
%
%
%
Aluminum
1000
13500
18900
18900
544
540
1
75-125
V V 0
20
Cadmium
100
U
102
102
102
102
1
75-125
0
20
Copper
100
14.3
121
122
107
107
1
75425
1
20
Lead
100
12.2
118
117
105
105
1
75-125
0
20
Nickel
100
5.17
115
116
110
ill
1
75-125
1
20
Potassium
1000
179
1250
1260
107
107
1
75-125
0
20
Zinc
100
29.8
130
132
100
102
1
75-125
2
20
ACCOUNT: PROJECT: I SDG: ,
EHC, Inc '15-MI0107-3 1.861235
DATE/TIME: -
09/30/16 09:44
PAGE:
12 of 16

GLOSSARY OF TERMS ONE LAB. NATIONWIDE.
Abbreviations and Definitions
SDG
Sample Delivery Group.
t p
MDL
RDL
Method Detection Limit.
Reported Detection Limit.
Tc
ND
Notdetected atthe Reporting Limit (or MDLwhere applicable).
U
NotdetectedattheReporting Limit(orMDLwhereapplicable).
3Ss
RPD
'Relative Percent Difference. -
(dry)
Results are reported based on the dry weight of the sample. [this will only be present on a dry
report basis for soils].
Cn
Original Sample
The non -spiked sample in the ,prep batch used to determine the Relative Percent Difference (RPD)
from a quality control sample. The Original Sample may not be included within the reported SDG.
6
Rec.
Recovery.
Sr
5Qc
Qualifier
Description
E
The analyte concentration exceeds the upper limit of the calibration range of the instrument
established by the Initial calibration (ICAL).
J '
The Identification of the analyte Is acceptable; the reported value Is an estimate.
J4
The associated batch QC was outside the established quality control range for accuracy.
°AI
J6
The sample matrix Interfered with the ability to make any accurate determination; spike value is
Pi
low.
RPD value not applicable for sample concentrations less than 5 times the reporting limit.
9Sc
V
The sample concentration is too high to evaluate accurate spike recoveries.
ACCOUNT: PROJECT. SDG: DATEMME: PAGE
EHC. Inc. 15-MI0107-3 L861235 09/30tl609:44 13 of 16

ACCREDITATIONS & LOCATIONS ONE LAB. NATIONWIDE.
ESC Lab Sciences Is the only environmental laboratoryscuedited/ceNfied w support yourwpu -atione de from one location. One phone call. one par of comacl. one laboratory. No oe:er
lab is as accessible or prepared to handle your needs throughout the country. Our capacity and cepabllityfrom our single location laboratory is comparable to the collective totals of the
network laboratories in our industry. The most significant benefit to ourmorelocation" design is the design of our labomloycampus. The yodel is conducive to accelerated productivity
decreasing tumarcund time, and preventing cross contamination, thus protecting sample integrity. Our focus an premium quality and piomptservice allows us to be YOUR LAB OF CHOICE,
' Not all cerifications held by the laboratory are appricable to the results reported in the attached report.
State Accreditations
c
- Alabama
40660
Nevada
TN-03-2002-34
aSs
Alaska
UST-080
New Hampshire
2975
Arizona
AZ0612
- New Jersey—NELAP
TNO02
-.'Arkansas
88-0469
New Mexico
TN00003
4
California
01157CA
New York
11742
Cn
- Colorado
TN00003
North Carolina
Env375
Conneticut
PH-0197
North Carolina
DW21704
'E87487
North Carolina a
41
Fr
Georgia
NELAP
North Dakota
R-140
Georgia'
923
Ohio—VAP
CLOO69
aQC
Idaho
TN60003
Oklahoma
9915
Illinois
200008
Oregon
TN200002
Indiana
C TN-01
Pennsylvania
68-02979
7G1
Iowa
364
Rhode Island
221
Kansas
Kentucky'
E-10277
90010
South Carolina
South Dakota
84004
nla
.®
Kentucky'
%
Tennessee"
2006
Louisiana
A130792
Texas
T104704245-07-TX
9SC
Maine
TN0002
Texas'
LA80152
Maryland
324
Utah
6157585858
Massachusetts
M-TNO03
Vermont
VT2006
Michigan
9958
Virginia
109
Minnesota
047-999-395
Washington
C1915
Mississippi
TN00003
West Virginia
233
Missouri
340
Wisconsin
9980939910
Montana
CERT0086
Wyoming
A2LA
Nebraska
NE-05-15-05
Third Party & Federal Accreditations
.A2LA—ISO 17025 1461.01 AIHA 100789
A2LA—ISO 17025' 1461.02 DOD 1461.01
Canada 1461.01 USDA S-67674
EPA—Crypto TN00003
`Drinking Water L Underground Storage Tanks I Acoustic Toxicity ` Chemical1ticmbiological' Mold Accreditation not applicable
Our Locations
ESC Lab Sciences has sixty-four client support centers that provide sample pickup and/or the delivery of sa-pling supplies. Ifyou would like assistance from oce of our support offices. please
correct our main office. ESC Lab Sciences performs all testing at our central laboratory
r
c� VIA
p \
S i MT ND
T IU ! SE, • ' % " NY d
4 / ® T 1 _ o �T
i
• '.` r.:., �-- • __• tv a .. J� "' —. T' r :ram
1 �®
T T o .6 �T`
A f S VAT
TR"
9 �
J T
T
\,
IL
ACCOUNT: PROJECT: SDG: DATEMME.
EHC, Inc. f 15-MI0107-3- L861235 09130A609:44
PAGE:
14 of 16

Billing lnforrgation:
Analysis/Container/Preservative
Chain of Custody Page of
t HC, Inc.
F
S
PO Box 902
Red Springs, NC 28377
•�,.ti�
1
_
,.,�
-
i i•A•Ea $-U i•E-.N•C•E•5
4
,K
4h
x
f
: -•
`*'4, ?
i
.
I1]ossteeaeon as
Reportto:
Email To: [e-mail]
Mr. Thomas Ammons
, '
\taunt lullel, TN aA3t�.,-
Pnb 6ss ne sese c
a �'
yk'`
f
on a fl0I4)61666Y O�'
� Fa 612 ]Se SBS9 a
Project
city/state
^
Descriptiom Dunbar Foods
Collected:
LN •.�,���G'J' %�' ,. r';),`
Z+..�
N
•'s
,`
.i'
Client Proiecttt
Lab Project
Phone: [phone]
15-MI0107-3
EWHYD-12-N0702-3
f>;:
�247
Fax: [phone]
H
z
i,,y -'
1
f M1 ;:'
`'
1 ;'.
Collected by (print):
SiteJFadlity ID tl
P.O. If
u"
k+o
_
Skii I r(S
:
O
i
Acctnum ENVfiYD .,�`
`
�
s y
M
Z
,�
o-
`�- '
o.
,.. r
Template T80324' ... y
Collected by (sl nature}:
Rush? (Lab MUST Be Notified)
Date Results Needed
Day 2009
Z
1
�°
P55117..Z
/W
_Same .........
Day...... 100%
r•J
O
Z
Z
y
IPrelosmi
ITSR 350M JImmY Hunt
Email? No X Yes
Immediately'
!/
_Next
....
Two Day. 50.6
FAX? No
No
❑g°.
U
Z
O
ZL'
-
U
U
H
•� t
k j M14 '
Packetl onlce N_ Y_
Day ...... ....... ........ JS%
— _Yes
y�
N
Off':
Ff
";
Yam'
Shlppea:Vla FedEX:Ground.
_Three
of
u
_
t" i
`°
v°
r
`
n[rs
Sample ID
Comp/Grab
Matrix •
Depth
Date
Time
,
a
Zi,.F-
F%x`3
trt
=.••
+
RESIDUALS
Cd
Ss
Z!/ %
i620
5
Xt„
X
X;x
X
Y
t
a
T.
r.
k.
z
s
e
•t,
;Jsgatrix: SS -Soil GW-Groundwater WW-Waste Water DW-Drinking Water OT-Other
{
r,'-1
jRemarks: pH Temp___
dF
r+�f" j`Y,•,pt�+�A,xrF,�3„
Flow other FYoId+F eav
Relinquished b :ISlgnature)
Date: Time::
Received by (Signatu e)
Samples returned via: ❑ UPS
Copdrtian z't x t+r')7',(lah use&gly)�'��
9 7 I
r
Kf q( u
+a reyi }u
I "i i
L U
d1s75_:ty-
❑ FedEx ❑ Courier ❑
Relinquished hy:(SignatuDate;
Time:
Received by (Agnatuhe)t£-" '
�•a`i)rs;q
Te P C z.Bottles Reaelved
-•ti
.^ Al-. yf`
t-3C ::
, k,,a..t, 'sr rn',t,•a �2� �fi i+ ,rum
.Ysa-ems: s
ti s 7 u
COC Senl'jn[att �f y N NAB.
Relinquished by t(5(gnature}jJ '•:,
Date: Time:
Rece fdriab egnatu o} rc
D'tte r Time
i Ti aTM+ p i r
PH Checked ,yVW44
NCR 1155Fr..
V'.' ..rY S .3._ .-:.in _ i¢
_ - Y
i .s.r-:v1 :4- 5y..•!..v
+ T'3•."V. :til

}} Y
ReceiptCooler
Client: FNU 00 SDGn
Z 6 Z3 -
Cooler Received/Opened On: a a- ((� 'Temperature Upon Reccipl:
Received By: Michael Witherspoon
Signature:
Receipt Check List
Yes No N/
Were custody seals on outside of cooler and intact?
Were custody papers properly filled out?
Did all bottles arrive in good condition?
Were correct bottles used for the analyses requested?
Was sufficient amount of sample sent In each bottle?
17,
Were ali:'a'ppIlea ble samole.containers corredly,preserved and
checked;for,peeser'vation?„(Anynot,in accepted range noted on COC)
If applicable, was an observable VOA headspace present?
NonCorform'Ac Generate)
(ifye'siAe, ttach`edNGF.)'