The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20151263 Ver 1_Application_20151207r Transportation December 7, 2015 U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Field Office 151 Patton Avenue, Room 208 Asheville, NC 28801-5006 ATTN: Ms. Loretta Beckwith NCDOT Coordinator PAT McCRORY Governor NICHOLAS j. TENNYSON Secretary Subject: Application for Section 404 Nationwide Permit 13 and 23 and Section 401 Water Quality Certification for the proposed replacement of Bridge No. 416 over Stony Fork Creek on SR 1103 in Buncombe County, Federal Aid Project No. BRZ-1103(24), Division 13, TIP No. B-5396, Debit $570 from WBS 46111.1.1. Dear Madam: The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace the single span, 40-foot long bridge with a single span 80-foot long bridge over Stony Fork Creek on SR 1103. Due to the absence of a viable off-site detour, the bridge will be built using staged construction, and therefore traffic will remain on-site. This replacement will result in 25 linear feet of permanent stream impacts due to bank stabilization at the outlet of a parallel stream to Stony Fork Creek. There is a wetland and stream parallel SR 1103 on the south side of the project. Due to the new roadway slopes necessary to accommodate the wider bridge, there will also be 245 feet of stream impacts, and 0.06 acre of wetland impacts to these resources. Widening to the opposite side of SR 1103 was reviewed in order to avoid the parallel stream impact and wetland impact. However, this avoidance would introduce a curve prior to a stop condition for SR 1103 and NC 151, as well as taking a house. In order to reduce the amount of impact to the wetland, the slopes have been tightened to 1.5:1, and the roadway design standard used will be the minimized "3-R" Subregional Tier Guidelines. �Nothing Compares� State of North Carolina � Department of Transportation � PDEA-Nahual Emironmen[ Section 1020 Birch Ridge Drive, 27610 � 1593 Mail Service Center � Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1598 919J07-6000 T 919-212-5785 F Please see enclosed copies of the Pre-Construction Notification (PCN), EEP acceptance letter, US Fish and Wildlife Concurrence letter, stormwater management plan, permit drawings and design plans for the above-referenced project. The Categorical Exclusion (CE) was completed in luly 2014 and distributed shortly thereafter. Additional copies are available upon request. This project is located in a trout county, therefore comments from the NCWRC will be required prior to authorization by the Corps of Engineers. By copy of this letter and attachment, NCDOT hereby requests NCWRC Review. NCDOT requests that NCWRC forward their comments to the Corps of Engineers and the NCDOT within 30 calendar days of receipt of this application. This project calls for a letting date of April 19, 2016 and a review date of March 1, 2016; however, the let date may advance as additional funding becomes available. A copy of this permit application and its distribution list will be posted on the NCDOT Website at: http://connect.ncdot.gov/resources/Environmental. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Michael Turchy at maturchy@ncdot.�ov or (919) 707-6157. Sincerely, �j�- Richard Hancock, P.E., Manager cc: NCDOT Permit Application Standard Distribution List Office Use Only: Corps action ID no. DWQ project no. Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008 Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form A. Applicant Information 1. Processing 1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: � Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit 1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 13 23 or General Permit (GP) number: 1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ❑ Yes � No 1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply): � 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit ❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization 1 e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ 401 For the record only for Corps Permit: because written approval is not required? Certification: ❑ Yes � No ❑ Yes � No 1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation � Yes ❑ No of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program. 1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h ❑ Yes � No below. 1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes � No 2. Project Information 2a. Name of project: Replacement of Bridge 416 over Stony Fork Creek on SR 1103. 2b. County: Buncombe 2c. Nearest municipality / town: Candler 2d. Subdivision name: not applicable 2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state g_5396 project no: 3. Owner Information 3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: North Carolina Department of Transportation 3b. Deed Book and Page No. not applicable 3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if not applicable applicable): 3d. Street address: 1598 Mail Service Center 3e. City, state, zip: Raleigh, NC 27699-1598 3f. Telephone no.: (919) 707-6157 3g. Fax no.: (919) 212-5785 3h. Email address: maturchy@ncdot.gov 4. Applicant Information (if different from owner) 4a. Applicant is: ❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify: 4b. Name: not applicable 4c. Business name (if applicable): 4d. Street address: 4e. City, state, zip: 4f. Telephone no.: 4g. Fax no.: 4h. Email address: 5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable) 5a. Name: not applicable 5b. Business name (if applicable): 5c. Street address: 5d. City, state, zip: 5e. Telephone no.: 5f. Fax no.: 5g. Email address: B. Project Information and Prior Project History 1. Property Identification 1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): not applicable 1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude:35.479596 Longitude: - 82.741375 (DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD) 1 c. Property size: 1.0 acre 2. Surface Waters 2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to Stony Fork Creek proposed project: 2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: C; Tr 2c. River basin: French Broad 3. Project Description 3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: The land use within the vicinity of the project consists of about 50% forested land, 40% cultivated land (agricultural fields and pastures), 10% residental structures. 3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.5 3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 600 3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: The purpose of this project is to replace a structurally deficient and functionally obsolete bridge. 3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The project involves replacing a 40-foot long single-span bridge with a 80-foot long bridge on the existing alignment, maintaining traffic on-site with one lane staged construction. Standard road buildin equi ment, such as trucks, dozers, and cranes will be used. 4. Jurisdictional Determinations 4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property / project (including all prior phases) in the past? ❑ Yes � No ❑ Unknown Comments: JD request submitted on June 16, 2011. 4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made? ❑ Preliminary ❑ Final 4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company: NCDOT Name (if known): Jennifer Harrod Other: 4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation. 5. Project History 5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for � Yes � No ❑ Unknown this project (including all prior phases) in the past? 5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions. 6. Future Project Plans 6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes � No 6b. If yes, explain. C. Proposed Impacts Inventory 1. Impacts Summary 1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply): � Wetlands � Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction 2. Wetland Impacts If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted. 2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f. Wetland impact Type ofjurisdiction number — Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ — non-404, other) (acres) Tem orar T Non Tidal Fresh ❑ Yes � Corps Site 1� P � T Excavation 0.06 Water Marsh � No ❑ DWQ Site 2❑ P � T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ Site 3❑ P � T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ Site 4❑ P � T ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ 2g. Total wetland impacts 0.06 Permanent 0 Temporary 2h. Comments: 3. Stream Impacts If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this question for all stream sites impacted. 3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g. Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of Average Impact number - (PER) or jurisdiction stream width length Permanent (P) or intermittent (Corps - 404, 10 (feet) (linear feet) Temporary (T) (INT)? DWQ — non-404, other) Site 1� P � T Bank Stony Fork Creek � PER � Corps 30 25 Stabilization ❑ INT ❑ DWQ Site 1� P � T Fill UT to Stony Fork � PER � Corps 1 245 Creek ❑ INT ❑ DWQ Site 2❑ P 0 T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ Site 3❑ P � T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ Site 4❑ P � T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ Site 5❑ P � T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ 3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 270 Permanent. 3i. Comments: 4. Open Water Impacts If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of the U.S. then individuall list all o en water im acts below. 4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e. Open water Name of impact number— waterbody Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres) Permanent (P) or (if applicable) Tem orary T) 01 ❑P❑T 02 ❑P❑T 03 ❑P❑T 04 ❑P❑T 4f. Total open water impacts 0 Permanent 0 Temporary 4g. Comments: No open water within construction limits. 5. Pond or Lake Construction If pond or lake construction roposed, then complete the chart below. 5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e. Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland Pond ID Proposed use or (acres) number purpose of pond Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded P1 P2 5f. Total 5g. Comments: 5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no: 5i. Expected pond surface area (acres): 5j. Size of pond watershed (acres): 5k. Method of construction: 6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ) If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form. 6a. ❑ Neuse ❑ Tar-Pamlico ❑ Other: Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman 6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g. Buffer impact number — Reason for impact Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact Permanent (P) or Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet) Temporar T re uired? B1 ❑P❑T ❑Yes ❑ No B2 ❑P❑T ❑Yes ❑ No B3 ❑P❑T ❑Yes ❑ No 6h. Total buffer impacts 6i. Comments: This project is not located within a protected buffer area. D. Impact Justification and Mitigation 1. Avoidance and Minimization 1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project. The new bridge will be twice as long as the existing structure. Stormwater will be attenuated and discharged farther away from Stony Fork Creek. Widening to the opposite side of SR 1103 was reviewed in order to avoid the parallel stream impact and wetland impact. However, this avoidance would introduce a curve prior to a stop condition for SR 1103 and NC 151, as well as taking a house. In order to reduce the amount of impact to the wetland, the slopes have been tightened to 1.5:1, and the roadway design standard used will be the minimized "3-R" Sub-regional Tier Guidelines. 1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques. Best Management Practices (BMPs) will be utilized during construction to attempt to reduce the stormwater impacts to the receiving stream due to erosion and runoff. Traffic will be maintained on-site during construction with one lane staged construction. Design Standards in Sensitive Watersheds will be implemented during construction. A trout moratorium from October 15 — A ril 15 will be adhered to in order to rotect re roducin trout. 2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State 2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for � Yes ❑ No impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? If no, ex lain: 2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): � DWQ � Corps ❑ Mitigation bank 2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project? � Payment to in-lieu fee program ❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation 3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank 3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: not applicable 3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity 3c. Comments: 4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program 4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. � Yes 4b. Stream mitigation requested: 245 linear feet 4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ❑ warm ❑ cool �cold 4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): 0 square feet 4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: 0.06 acre 4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: 0 acres 4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: 0 acres 4h. Comments: 5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan 5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan. 6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ 6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ❑ Yes � No buffer mitigation? 6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the amount of mitigation required. 6c. 6d. 6e. Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation (square feet) (square feet) Zone 1 3(2 for Catawba) Zone 2 1.5 6f. Total buffer mitigation required: 6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank, permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund). 6h. Comments: E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ) 1. Diffuse Flow Plan 1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ❑ Yes � No within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? 1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If not, explain why. ❑ Yes ❑ No Comments: If required from 1 a, see attached buffer permit drawings. 2. Stormwater Mana ement Plan 2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? N/A 2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? � Yes ❑ No 2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: 2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan: See attached permit drawings. ❑ Certified Local Government 2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ DWQ Stormwater Program � DWQ 401 Unit 3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review 3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? not applicable ❑ Phase II 3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ❑ NSW apply (check all that apply): ❑ USMP ❑ Water Supply Watershed ❑ Other: 3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑ Yes ❑ No attached? 4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review ❑ Coastal counties 4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply ❑ HQW (check all that apply): ❑ ORW ❑ Session Law 2006-246 ❑ Other: 4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been attached? ❑ Yes ❑ No N/A 5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review 5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ❑ Yes ❑ No N/A 5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ❑ Yes ❑ No N/A F. Supplementary Information 1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement) 1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the � Yes ❑ No use of public (federal/state) land? 1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State � Yes ❑ No (North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? 1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.) � Yes ❑ No Comments: Categorical Exclusion (CE) approved 7/2014 2. Violations (DWQ Requirement) 2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑ Yes � No or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? 2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ❑ Yes � No 2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): 3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement) 3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ❑ Yes additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? � No 3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description. Due to the minimal transportation impact resulting from this bridge replacement, this project will neither influence nearby land uses nor stimulate growth. Therefore, a detailed indirect or cumulative effects study will not be necessary. 4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement) 4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility. not applicable 10 5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement) 5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or � Yes ❑ No habitat? 5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act � Yes ❑ No impacts? ❑ Raleigh 5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. � Asheville 5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat? Of the eleven federally listed species for Buncombe County, Virginia spiraea is the only federally protected plant with habitat present. The project area was surveyed by NCDOT biologists on 5/24/2011 and 7/9/2015 for plant species. No individuals of Virginia spiraea were found during any of these surveys. Surveys for the northern long-eared bat were conducted and a biological conclusion of May Effect Not Likely to Adversely Affect was rendered. This biological conclusion received concurrence from the US Fish and Wildlife Service on October 1, 2015, so long as tree clearing is restricted to August 15 to April 15 of any year. This concurrence is attached to this application. 6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement) 6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes � No 6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat? NMFS County Index 7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement) 7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation � Yes � No status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in North Carolina history and archaeology)? 7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources? NEPA Documentation 8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement) 8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? � Yes ❑ No 8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: NCDOT Hydraulics Unit coordination with FEMA 8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA Maps 12-7'zOls �o� Richard Hancock, PE Date Applicant/AgenYs Printed Name Applicant/AgenYs Signature (AgenYs signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is rovided.) 11 E'nvironmental Qualiiy PAT MCCRORY covPr„ar DONALD R. VAN DER VAART Secretnrv November 10, 2015 Mr. Richard W. Hancock, P.E. Project Development and Environmental Analysis Unit North Carolina Department of Transportation 1548 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1548 Dear Mr. Hancock: Subject: Mitigation Acceptance Letter: B-5396, Replace Bridge 416 on SR 1103 over Stony Fork Creek, Buncombe County The pucpose of this letter is to notify you that the Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) will provide the compensatory stream and wedand mitigation for the subject project. Based on the information supplied by you on November 9, 2015, the impacts are located in CU 06010105 of the French Broad River basin in the Southern Mountains (SM) Eco-Region, and are as follows: French Broad 06010105 SM Impacts Stream Cold Cool 245.0 Q Wetlands Warm Riparian Non- Coastal Rinarian Marsh 0.01 Buffer (Sq. Ft.) Zone 1 1 Zone 2 G] *Some of the stream impacts may be proposed to be mitigated at a 1:1 mitigation ratio. See permit application details. This impact and associated mitigation need were under projected by the NCDOT in the 2015 impact data. DMS will cornrnit ta implement sufficient compensatory stream and wetland mitigation credits to offset the impacts associated with this project as determined by the regulatory agencies using the delivery timeline listed in Section F.3.c.iii of the In-Lieu Fee Instrument dated July 28, 2010. If the above referenced impact amounts are revised, then this mitigation acceptance letter will no longer be valid and a new mitigation acceptance letter will be required from DMS. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Beth Harmon at 919-707-8420. cc: Ms. Lori Beckwith, USACE — Asheville Ms. Amy Chapman, NCDWR File: B-5396 �� il��rv�C.S ��Y i�� B. Stanfill Management Supervisor Field Office - �`-`�Nothing Compares�=,�_ Sta[e oF North Carolina � Environmental Quality 1G01 MailService Center ; Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601 919-7D7-R600 United States Department of the Interior Mr. Richard W. Hancock FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Asheville Pield Office 160 'I_,illicoa Street Asheville, North Carolina 2880i October l, 2015 North Carolina Department of Transportation Project Development and Environmental Analysis Unit 1598 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1598 Subject: Endangered Species Concurrence for the Proposed Replacement of Bridge No. 416 on SR 1102 over Stony Fork, Buncombe County, North Carolina. TIP B-5396, WBS No. 46111.1.1, Federal Aid Project # BRZ-1103(24) Dear Mr. Hancock: We have reviewed your concurrence request and supporting documentation regarding impacts to the federally threatened northern long-eared bat (NLEB) (Myotis septentrionalis) and the federally endangered gray bat (GB) (Myotis grisescens) for the subject project. We provide the following comments in accordance with the provisions of section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531-1543) (Act). The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace Bridge No 416 over the Stony Fork. Some habitat for the NLEB and GB exists in the vicinity of the project and has been evaluated for potential impacts from project implementation. According to the information provided, a search for mines and caves was conducted in the project footprint and within a quarter mile of the project and none were found. The existing bridge was checked for bat use and none was observed. Potential summer roosting habitat clearing is estimated at 0.1 acres. Based on the absence of wintering habitat, no evidence of bat use on the existing structure, and NCDOT's commitment to restrict tree cutting to the time from August 15 to April 15 (of any year) we agree that implementation of this project is "not likely to adversely affect" NLEB in the project area. In view of this, we believe the requirements under Section 7(c) of the Act are fulfilled. However, obligations under Section 7 of the Act must be reconsidered i£ (1) new information reveals impacts of this identified action that may affect listed species or critical habitat in a manner not previously considered, (2) this action is subsequently modified in a manner that was not considered in this review, or (3) a new species is listed or critical habitat is determined that may be affected by the identified action. If you have questions about these comments, please contact Mr. Jason Mays of our staff at 828/258-3939, Ext. 226. In any future correspondence concerning this project, please reference our Log No. 4-2-15-557. Sincerely, �� Janet Mizzi Field Supervisor k 11�;11�� <14' North Carolina Department of Transportation SL[?1'llitYcl�PP � Highway Stormwater Program �. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN (Version 2.02; Released April 2015) FOR NCDOT PROJECTS WBS Element: 46111.1.1 TIP No.: B-5396 County(ies): Buncombe Page 1 of 2 General Project Information WBS Element: 46111.1.1 TIP Number: B-5396 Project Type: Bridge Replacement Date: 5/19/2015 NCDOT Contact: William S. Zerman, Jr. PE Contractor I Designer: Reid Robol, EI - Ecological Engineering Address: 1000 Birch Ridge Drive Address: 1151 SE Cary Parkway Suite 101 Ralei h, NC 27610 Car , NC 27518 Phone: 919-707-6755 Phone: 919-557-0929 Email: bzerman ncdot. ov Email: rrobol ecolo icalen .com Cit ITown: Asheville Count ies): Buncombe River Basin s: French Broad CAMA County? No Wetlands within Project Limits? Yes Pro'ect Description Pro'ect Len th lin. miles or feet : 0.116 Miles Surroundin Land Use: Rural area with forest and agricultural landuses Proposed Pro'ect Existin Site Pro'ect Buiit-Upon Area ac. 0.43 ac. 0.28 ac. Typical Cross Section Description: 2@ 10.0 ft lane with 5.4 ft shoulders and 1.1 ft guardrail with total bridge width of 33 ft 2@9 ft lane with 1.0 ft shoulders with total bridge width of 20.0 ft and total bridge and total bridge length of 80.0 ft length of 40.7 ft. Annual Avg Daily Traffic (veh/hr/day): Design/Future: 1370/1645 Year: 2016/2036 Existin : 1200 Year: 2010 General Project Narrative: State project B-5396 involves the replacement of the existing NCDOT Bridge #100416 on SR 1103 over Stony Fork Creek. Bridge #100416 consists of 1@40' —8" timber deck (Description of Minimization of Water on steel girder on timber caps and abutments. The proposed crossing is located in Zone AE of FIRM Map number 37200868500J and was studied by "Limited Detailed" Quality Impacts) methods. The proposed bridge will provide more hydraulic opening than the exising bridge. No deck drains are proposed. Two stormwater outfalls are proposed which will be placed at a distance to minimize disturbance. Rip Rap pads will be utilized to dissipate the energy. Waterbody Information Surface Water Body (1): Stony Fork Creek NCDWR Stream Index No.: 6-76-5-3 NCDWR Surface Water Classification for Water Body Primary Classification: Class C Supplemental Classification: Trout Waters (Tr) Other Stream Classification: None Impairments: None Aquatic T&E Species? Comments: NRTR Stream ID: SA Buffer Rules in Effect: N/A Project Includes Bridge Spanning Water Body? Yes Deck Drains Discharge Over Buffer? No Dissipator Pads Provided in Buffer? N/A Deck Drains Discharge Over Water Body? No (If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) (If yes, describe in the General Project Narrative; if no, justify in the (If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) General Project Narrative) 1 ll�;fl�t°tl�' North Carolina Department of Transportation SlCll"17]4Vci#f�'�' Highway Stormwater Program �.,;. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN (Version 2.02; Released April 2015) FOR NCDOT PROJECTS WBS Element: TIP No.: B-5396 Count ies : Buncombe Pa e 2 of 2 Preformed Scour Holes and Energy Dissipators Station & Coordinates Drainage Pipe/Structure BMP Sheet (Road and Non Road Surface Energy Dissipator Area Conveyance Dimensions Q10 V10 Associated w/ No. Pro'ects Water Bod Type Riprap T pe ac Structure (in) (cfs) (fps) Buffer Rules? 4 -L- 17+57 RT (1)Stony Fork Riprap Apron / Pad Class'B' <0.1 Pipe 15 0.2 1.1 N/A 39.5670959/-75.7860659 Creek 4 -L- 17+65 LT (1)Stony Fork Riprap Apron / Pad Class'B' <0.1 Pipe 15 0.2 1.1 N/A 39.5676753/-75.7861417 Creek Additional Comments � Refer to the NCDOT Best Management Practices Toolbox (2014), NCDOT Standards, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Hydraulic Engineering Circular No. 14 (HEC-14), Third Edition, Hydraulic Design of Energy Dissipators for Culverts and Channels (July 2006), as applicable, for design guidance and criteria. � � � •� � V � � O V See Sl�et 1-A For Index of Sheets See Si�et 1-B Fo� Conventional Symbols ��'��I�1I�; C�I�° �'C�1��C'1H� �C�� IIE�C�II��I1� �� B U1�lC�MBE CO U1�TY LOCATION: BRIDGE 1110. 416 OVER ST0111Y FORK CREEK 0111 SR II03 TYPE OF WORK: GRADING, DRAINAGE, PAVI11lG, A11tD STRUCTURE WETLAND AND SURFACE WATER IMPACTS PERMIT BEG/N SIATE TlP PROJECT 8�39�6 _/ _ GY� CT A /71/i'. M CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE TO LIMITS ESTABLISHED USING METHOD II THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN ANY MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES GRAPHIC SCALES DESIGN DATA 2016 ADT = 1370 50 25 0 50 100 2036 ADT = 1645 K = 11% PLANS D = 75% 50 25 0 50 100 T= 7% * V = 30 MPH PROFILE (HORIZONTAL) �k TTST 1% DUAL 6% 10 5 0 l0 2p FUNC. CLASS=RURAL LOC SUBREGIONAL TIER PROJECT LENGTH LENGTH ROADWAY STATE PROJECT B-5396 = 0.101 mi. LENGTH STRUCTURES STATE PROJECT B-5396 = 0.015 mi. TOTAL LENGTH STATE PROJECT B-5396 = 0.116 mi. END BR/QGE �— STA 17+4p �fY— r= t � �� .r' ��; � . • ,, BEG/N BA9I06E :' _ • ` '� tt �_� —L— STA; .+/=t' r ' _ =1 i + :' . _�,_.� : `" \ t a r � � s \` _-� {� T�} `�++f+�«�+� JI � `� ��=_;,� ��-= �i SITE 1 Prepared in ahe Office of.• � T E ��'`�,� � i_, 2012 ST9NDAXD SPFCIFICATIONS RIGHT OF WAY DATE: DOUG TAYLOR. PE PROJECT ENGMEER APRIL 17. 2015 MICHAEL BURNS, EI PROJECT DES7GN ENGINEER LETTING DATE: APRIL 19, 2016 RON E. McCOLLUM, PE NCDOT CONTACT s a�rs nawccr ovnc�ct po. �• 6-5396 R�1f P101.l10. R�.PlOLl1O. 46111.1.1 BRZ-1103 24 16111.2.FD1 BRZ-1103124 � � PERMIT DRAWING SHEET 1 OF 5 END STATE TlP PROJECT B 539i6 —L— POT STA /8+2492 HYDRAULICS ENGINEER ROADWAY DESIGN ENGINEER P.E. PRELIMINARY PLANS OO VOT I;SE I�ON CONSTRtiCTIOP� Z 0 w z i �� 1 �� 7 BM •I � -BL- STA 5+05.17 • s ` 74.69 LEFT ..,� � �] x " ELEV.2394.43' 25BKpp �� ;. m ;Q �� \ Z '� f: � : n � �1�T_ii!I�� J CLA55 II RIP RAP� EST 20 TONS EST 18 SY GEOTEXTILE — �fl P�EMEIVT BRIDGE RELATiqNSHIP SKETCH r "�o� � � Q N �2�� 2 <:� � � X� �X 3 B . �1E � �7E � � '�' at '� �t- / .y. ,1F / �.� ` � .7E '� Y� �E ,r. �F � 1 �E� � ,� �E�.. � �. �E � y, Y�. � � 1 �t aE 'Y' ,Y, .Ip � CLASS,� qIP RAP � I � �, �' � � � Y' � � EST� 7 S�� E � EXT�E . / � x. aF Y' i' � '� .� �E � / �t — 3„u— — -��t � � �+t .� / � / \ � � �� \ � x�� \ ,1E dE /i`� ` _ _ — / _ /i��°� —�.,_ C T � — �� iLT \ ��. �LF � _ � i- _ :_� +t � I b x. +F � �F �F Jt �F i i � � � � / r x + �� ,Y. ''� ` \ �k � �t/ i � i .� � �.� �. \ �� t,9 LATERAL BASE DITCH SEE DETAIL 1 � RIP RAP AT EMBAf}lCMENv' ' ClASS 6 RIP RAP—� SEE DETAIL 3/ f EST 2 TONS LCLASS II RIP RAP E5T 7 SY GEOTEXTILE EST 28 TONS EST 30 SY GEOTEXTILE �/ ��/ . r`ip . � O, . ��' `�T �lt�. �� ' � � � �5 �/ � / lL' � / .� �. F�rl�w � �SF. __ ��`� .<<>r`� / /�, � � � PROIECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO. 8-539i6 4 ROADWAY DESIGN . ENGINEER BM �2 HYDRAUUCS -L- STA 18+p9,09 ENGINEER 422.09' LT ELEV. 2373.9P . / �.hhe\ i� � PREL�IMINo RYST PLANS �� i � I� � / i � � ` „� � � � i�� , ��, �,�, / � � � �� ECOLOGIC � r �, JTEV�fAi I �iFNGINEERI y` ��j � \� PERMIT DRAWING s �� a SHEET 2 OF 5 � � cR �\�%�/x/r—_ /y`;if�. . ��. i' � +t / J � / � i `� 'x'� ,�/� f!?., �.�\t�' f.,� �� . �\i� ��/ s J �� / ,�-�— � .... :, i . ' � ! _ �id � ��yg �� a< � ' w000s - �a"avi� � "' — � �� s�.^ �. � � . �\P= AiE Fn ' � \�!' \ \�� \ ^\ � � .. C / —�y� \ ." . ��\ �; 'P \ \ ��\ � �I ;� ` ��o a o�n.�il�\ . �,�+5.. , � . �� ! 4i' HTp � � K =tp � �'.� BG G� . � � / RCP-111 .� Q , E o o � p •. � � e�� 1 �o � .. I _ �\��\\ � 0 � � � � � .. . S ITE 1 , �� DENOTES EXCAVATION IN WETLAND �DENOTES IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER DETAIL 1 LATERAL BASE DITCH � nor m s«i�� b .o�� a.v p ti? r�.�,_ F��i B Min.D--1.0 Ft. 8-3.0 Ft. b=S.0 Ft. FROM STA. 74+20 TO STA. 16+62 -L- RT DETAIL 3 RIP RAP AT EMBANKMENT �No��a s�aie� io � on�h i.o,m�,,. zo� Grade GEOTEXTILE CL II Rip-Rap F"� {� �� ' r s EST ]fi TONS EST 30 Sv GEOTEXTILE FROM STA.16+41 TO STA.16+62 -L- RT � �� 1� N I0 7 I r I � � �� , -I cb�o � �'� �� — ��' � � �� o� �z r � �, .. � , � �� ,� � � � �` % � � �' ' � �� — � � � I� I \ iX a B X lf '' i' ,� .� � l �� I ; ; �� ; / �� i � � � � � � r. ,� � .� / —� � �� ` �� ..�`� ,� '� '� 'r '� � x� / � H_ ` � � � �� _ �\ x�� y �r '� � � �r �' � �� '�' I y � �� Mr� �_, / / � � 1 �r �r '�' � � E�zs��s R�y��. � � „ULTF(ATE� A�A �' ../� I �ANOPY� ��/�� ' ` '�' � �' E57 7 SY GEOTEXT EI .,� BM r� � s \ X ,� . . , . 1 � x- �r �' � .� x� �� y �� -BL- STA 5+05.17 _ • 5 / " � " / .� �t z� .� 'i \ � 74.69 LEFT � ' � � � .-� � � � ---- � Y� � _ 3`'.�� "��'�' g � y. x' � '�' � ' � ..,,�.�,.�,L �� ELEV. 2394.43' / ' i� N Cu55 u eiP anP � � \ '�' g� i � , � s �� EST 20 TONS � , 1 �.� � ,,l 25BKF0: \� �i EST 18 SY \� � � % 9 �n I - �eorexTi�e �� _ _ _ _ i � a \ � \q �� --- ---- -- ° _,, ( Q� � � �� c � � ',✓' F% � .; , - � � .�x , . � �� ? \ , , i' � y � ��—c-- - ♦ � � -_.— AU 350 i�i',. � _ _ �-r- _ ��5 CR K Ii0/D'i _ _ F - a i � SF � � -�%� ��=`� �.. � -�� /.c . 15� . � � / � �` I 'r �' '� S� '�� : a a �' +r � � a � � \ �- B � y, y. .F � TB 2GI �� C e d a +t � i� � � � � � �� I � I / 7 D I� � \`t.9� / LATERAL BASE DITCH �y � 1 il � \ — � �� . . /' � �'� � SEE DETAIL 1 �� . .. �=� .. IS .. RIP RAP AT EMBA. MEN C1A55 6 RIP RAP � , \ \ . .... . EST 2 TONS � ( .— \ ��; I � 1 . .. TAI �.,y �//�,, � A��AW � �� . �� - �_ _-15 CLASS II RIP RAP SEE DE L 3 EST 7 5Y GEOTEXTILE /� �� 1 EST 2 TONS / \ -�L� j5 ESi 30 Y GEOiEXiILE " °0'�,1�5 :.. �y . 'iSF� . � �\S � �£ / �oQ.i' T� ; �� ,, �..,..�� . �� .,. . � 4 �1 J \ �l�qAt.D OAW 3 /4 , � � ' ' �LC � � \ � \ � ,�� - — � ' �\ 1 \ � � �� >/ r� \ � �..� � �� `,-, � o.r�ui�t�,F,C�ti._� ��, � �� , �,, � _ --_ � � /� , �, ��, � � � � �_ - �� ,_ ,� �=� �� ,� �� i;- . � P�EMEIVT BRIDGE RELATiqNSHIP SKETCH � PROIECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO. 8-539i6 4 ROADWAY DESIGN ��-- . ENGINEER BM "2 HYDRAUUCS -L- STA 18+p9,09 � ENGINEER 422.09' LT �� ELEV.2373.91' p /;hhe\ i � � PREL�IMINo RYST PLANS ��i � ��," � / i g' � � x / /,� � �� ,.,��/ , ,� � � � � '' � � � � HR7 '�'' �;�,z , , , � oo=a , � � � " ��ECOLOGIC � i �. �/� �° �� '� + � S �� . � �i�NGINEERI � � �� . ,� PERMIT DRAWING s �� a SHEET 3 OF 5 �\,� ��„� � ; �s �i `� r y� ,. i��/ at� // � �:�� ' '� / / ,+ � i•. .r/ ��' f`. . j\cf,',. % ,�yi �."� � � w / .� �:;�t 3� ; ( V�GA' �. ;! � � -� � `-- ' \ . � � W - ��C( �� . V 49N � %� _ e, �,'" "'" : - `;�' \ '�,�. - ,�j �- = � !� / P � � 4�� /I �/1 LfJF_� ' ��* _� �\ \� , ,, _ -� \'.. . I l� i HTft \ �� F I I � �K l , �� G-- 8R ��ii , ( �\ � \ /� � � — —15" RCP-III ( . /� �/ /��/ . � � \ �.\\ � � . �e �/ci ii ,�t�„ i � - ,� y) / p �� 1 � � �� / � ��/ � � �I / �I I / / / . � � — — � / � II IIII � �II /�/ / � / / Q ! A— . ��1� � - � � � �� . ( p I / �i � I// � �� , /// �� / � H7R �� DENOTES EXCAVATION :�� , 1I � ; i ') \ � IN WETLAND ) /5 c�, � �\ I �' � /� � ^ �jl� � � � DENOTES IMPACTS IN 1 ' I� I I � @./� SURFACE WATER � i � s � �� i�/'� , �,� i�r�' ��'� I ��a �� m � �� ._ .. . li�i �I .��' � ��b.:� �. S ITE 1 DETAIL 1 LATERAL BASE DITCH � nor m s«i�� b .o�� a.v p ti? r�.�,_ F��i B Min.D--1.0 Ft. 8-3.0 Ft. b=S.0 Ft. FROM STA. 74+20 TO STA. 16+62 -L- RT DETAIL 3 RIP RAP AT EMBANKMENT �No��a s�aie� io � on�h i.o,m�,,. zo� Grade GEOTEXTILE CL II Rip-Rap F"� {� �� ' r s EST ]fi TONS EST 30 Sv GEOTEXTILE FROM STA.16+41 TO STA.16+62 -L- RT 7;5 70 6;5 6;0 5;5 5;0 4;5 4;0 3;5 3;0 2;5 2;0 �� 1� �� lp p � 1,0 7� 2;0 2;5 3;0 3;5 4;0 4;5 5;0 5,5 6;0 6;5 7;0 75 - ' - --- ------ '- --- -=--- --- - --; - ----;----- ------ - -- _--- --�-- - -- i - - • �--- -- - ---- --- -- -- _- - -- --- ;-------i----- ;-- - -;--- -;-- --;--PERMIT�DRAWING---- - HEE7 4 OF S 5 �:..: ':..: ' .. I I I I III III I II II II I I I I I I I I I III III I I II I I � � - ----'---- ._ . . .- -- i, � � � � �� , , � � ,� , � , � ' ;" : • - - -_ �, I I ; ; ; _. , I , ; � -- � --- --. -- - , i I ----- � --.- , I � � _.- � � _. , --.� _� , � �, j i - -, �. - , - . - : , . _ - ; - --,- - - - - -- - - - -. __ - -' ' ' - -- -- _ _ - � - - - - . - � I- _ .. , .. — I,_ t_ iii� I_ __ � i�li _ i i li�� . 1 I_i i i L_ 1. �� .. ..�.i -- �i, — . . ...�. � � _ _ _ _. _ _ ' � _ __ _ _ -___- _____ _____. ` . i_i _-- - _ — - — _ _. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ � � i i ;__ _ _ -___- _ _____ __ _ __ _ _ i i i __ _ _ _ _, __. i i _i .: . . _ _. ..— . I._. . . � . . . . I _I . I . '. I I '... I I_ f '. �. ..L �. -'. ��. . . . . . . . . . � I 'I . . ��I II .. .�.II �. ... . ... .. . ..- _i , I , __ . . _ _ . . . _ _ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _.-- - — - — — ..� . . _ _ ... . ... . . . ... _ � . . ... ... ... . . .... .. .. ... .. .. I, . - .. . II r I � i 2�9D � -:- -- � - � , - _ r_ - - . � � .� -.. - -� , - — �_ - — --- ' . _ 2390 � j --- - -- -- ---- � --- ---- — -- ---- ----- - - . . � . . . � . . . � . �. . . � . � . . -. � . . . - . � �. .- . . .. . . ._ __ i - � ---- ---- � -- _. — __.— . __ .— .___ . ___ - . e. .�-..� .-.� ,� , � , i� . �_ .. . . .. . . .. . . . . .. , . ..- - - , i- -- - . . � . . . . � . . � . . . . �� . . . . . . . . . _ . . , . - -- -- — . , i ; � -- - o.o2a o.025 - WETLAND -- ' - � 2�ss_ _ � ; -. r-� � �- . - - - - - - . �OUNDARY- _ - � � � ' -- -- I - -2sss_ ; � - -. _ -- - � �� ; : � __� -- ' ; � .. ; � � � � � 2382. � .- -- -_ : � s�so , - - ;l�- --- - - -- - - - -- -- - -�� -- - ?� , -- -- :- 2ss�_- � �� _ � �.. ____,_ � - . _ --- --- - - �-- --- -_ , , --- - , � , � , , , , , _. _ . , /, � -I ', � � , , , , ; _ , :� : i , -,� -- , , ; ; � __,_ _i-� `_�_� _ _ �_� �-�_� -- �� ` -� � �_ � ��- �� ` �-;_� � � � � �-� � � � �;__ � � s��s , ��. _ - � / � - . _� _ - -- - - -_- . �� _� , —; �_— - , , ,— — , — '' -zs�s ; , , . ; �r ; ; , ; ; ; ; , , � -,-- -- - - - - - --- - --- , 2373.94, , ' , , , , � , , _ �� , , _�y ; , , .-- -- � ___ _ - ; - , , , ; , __ , , , � � � _�_, � � �_� , , 1 + - - ; , . ; � ��» - �� - - 5 � 0 . 00 . _ - - _ _ _ . z��o_ _ ; ; ; , ; ; , _ - - -� --- - -- _ '� �� --- . _ - : ; - , ; : : : ; : : : I II I , __ - - -- - � -_ � : : : _ - -- ; -- -_ _ - , � � , �, � , ; ; ; ; ; , ; - ,J_�, � , � . � � - - � � - _- � ,- - _--�- , , , , , - f - — - -- : : ; ; : ; - ��'�,[ , , _ _ �� _ 2�90 - - _ . � � � - � -- � - 2390 ; . ' . : ' µLL- � _ k - i ; - -- — " ` _- -- . 7.'287:1 0.025 0.025 = — — — — - - � WETLAND � , , , , , . _ , _ __ � 2�ss - - - — — - — — — - - - - ' - - - - - BOUNDARY _ __ - - _-- � , 2sas_- _ - - _ -- - : ✓ - - - \ - . - , - - _ -- -- " ; , , — _ I P . . .. . .. ... �... .. . . . .. . . .. .. . ... ... .. . - _—_ — �. _ , � . . �. - i , , _ . . , . _ . — . . i . . . . . . . . . . �. ; � . . . � . ; � ' . . _ _ . �. �. �. �. �. �. \ . �. �. . �. . �. �. �. . . . . .. � .- - __. . _ _ _ , � � ' 4 84 \` _ ; _ 238, \ _ � 2�so-' - . .,_ - / - - �,- � , I- ; L�-�_ ` _: _ _ _ - - ?.� '� � - �' 2sa_o_ _ � �� I � , . � � . � , -- -- ; / , - ' \ ; , , , f: , , , , _ � , , , , , - , , �, , ' ' , , _. _ \� , , , ��_�_ � , , , �� , , _ ; __ `, , � , . - -- - — ---- , , 2��s__�_ -�_�___:�v_�� / � , - - -- -- - - `�- � � -2a�s ; ' � �.. . .. .� / � � _ __ . .. .. .:i� ... .. ... ... -,- _ L i _ _ , _�_ T_ _ _� _ _�_ _�_ _�_ _ �_ Ir , , 2374.25 . � _ , _ _ , __ , �._ .__ / ' � �_ � - - - � � _ --- - �,- �� , _, !_ _, -, � � � �_� � � � � � � � �-� u d-- � --�-- ' , , , _� ; , - _ _, If- _ — — , ��--- • , ��» - - �� - - l_5 + (�O.QO - - - � -�, � � - _ - 23�0 � � , �, �, .. . _ _ -- - . , , , --- - ____ ___ ___. . . . . . . . . - , -� �, � � � � , � � � � _ �_� . , �'�� ,� � � �- - -- �� ' , , ,� � , , ; , ; _, , . - - , _ �_ � � � , -._ _ I , , , , _, _ � _ _- -- --_ , � � __ __-- - - _ , _ _ _ _-- - - -- __ . _ , : , ,� . , _ . ; - - . -__} ___ --�_ � - - -- - -- �- - - -_ .- - � -- - - _. _ _ ; - - __ .-- - -- - ; , � ' � , '�:' '� - ; __ __ - --__ ,_ -_ _-- - _ _ , ,, , ; ; ' ,� , , , , � � �� '� '� � '� � ', '� ,� '� � � � '� � ' �� , �� o - . ' - - - - - - - - - - , - - - - - - - - -- --- -- - - - � , 2s o 9 � , � � � - . � .., - _� � 9 ; ; ; ; ; ; ; . ; ; - - -� ; , ; . , , , _ , _ _ _ _� : a2j2:i o:025 0.025 _ ,WETLAND - - _ , . --- . ; 2�as - -� - - — - - - BOUND'ARY_ _ _ - � _ ' 2�ss , , , , , , � , , , � � , --�� - , - m� _ , 2386 OE} � , , — — �� , — — ¢ ,_ —. , — — . -- — . , �. . - , -: - , : ; : : : ; � 2��:�� ; ; ; ; ; ; _s�so--�------- ------- ------ --- -- - -,-- ---,------ -- - - - - - - - - - - -- - -- - -- __.. . -- - - '��- - - -, ---- -- -- , - , --- - -- -,- ---,------- ,-2sao- : ' ; ' ; ; ; _ _ _ - - _ _ �� ; --- ; , ; ; ; ; , , _ , , , , : �- , - ' ' - � � _ � ; ; ; ; ; ; ; - ( � �: — _ , , , , , , - - - - -- - - -- - - - -- � , ; ; ; ; ; , , , , , , , _ �i , , , � , , , . I I 2375 ' --- -' --- -' -- ---'---------- - -- - -- - _.w.� - a a � ---- --- - - --- _.� �,. -- - - � - - � - - 2375 �� + .��1�.�0 , 7 .bl , , , , , , �� 23 5 , , , , , ; ; ; ; ; ; ; -�— ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; y5 70 6;5 (z0 55 50 d5 4�0 3'5 3'A 2'S 2'A 1'S 10 5 0 5 1 b 15 2'A 2'5 3'A 3'S 40 d5 SO �a5 60 65 70 7'S WETLAND PERMIT IMPACT SUMMARY WETLANDIMPACTS SURFACE WATERIMPACTS Hand Existing Existing Permanent Temp. Excavation Mechanized Clearing Permanent Temp. Channel Channel Natural Site Station Structure Fillln Fillln in Clearing in SW SW Impacts Impacts Stream No. (From/To) Size / Type Wetlands Wetlands Wetlands in Wetlands Wetlands impacts impacts Permanent Temp. Design (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ft) (tt) (ft) 1 14+20 TO 16+43 -L- RT. CHANNEL RELOCATION 0.06 1 �4+20 TO 16+65 -L- RT. CHANNEL RELOCATION 245 1 16+65 -L- RT. BANK STABILIZATION <0.01 25 TOTALS': 0.06 <0.01 270 *Rounded totals are sum of actual impacts Excavation in Perm. Surtace ImpdCts: Wetlands Water Impacts (Sq. Ft.) (Sq. FL) NOTES: Site 1 2652 56 Total 2652 56 � � � � •, � V � � O V See Sheet 9-A Fo� Index of Sheets See Sheet 9-B For Conventionol Symbols �� 1I�� JF` �II�I�[��Y� B U1�lCOMBE CO U1�lTY LOCATION: BRIDGE 1110. 416 OVER STOIVY FORK CREEK 0111 SR 1103 TYPE OF WORK: GRADING, DRAINAGE, PAVIIVG, AND STRUCTURE BEGIN STATE T/P PROJECT 8-5396 -L - P� STA /2t15.� -- TO SR 1108 _� 7 —= —� �� 0 S GN� \ �c'in� � � 'L_ =c�— � \ .Ap�N � \ gr \\ � � i� i� i� i� i� i� i� i� CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE TO LIMITS ESTABLISHED USING METHOD II THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN ANY MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES GRAPHIC SCALES DESIGN DATA 2016 ADT = 1370 50 25 0 50 t00 2036 ADT = 1645 K = 11% PLANS D = 75% 50 25 0 50 t00 T= 7% * V = 30 MPH PROFILE (HORIZONTAL) * TTST 1°/a DUAL 6% l0 5 0 l0 2� FUNC. CLASS=RURAL LOC SUBREGIONAL TIER PROJECT LENGTH LENGTH ROADWAY STATE PROJECT B-5396 LEN GTH STRUCTURES STATE PROJECT B-5396 TOTAL LEN GTH STATE PROJECT B-5396 END BRIDGE -L- STA /7+4p t/- BEGIN BRIDGE -L- STA /6tsp t/- -�- � BT�TB BTATB VR018C1' REPEqBNC6 NQ 1�� B-5396 BTAT6 PROl.N0. P.A.PROl.NQ 46711.1.1 BRZ-7103 24 46111.2.FD1 BRZ-1103f24 END STATE TlP PROJECT B-5396 -L - POT ST A /8+2492 Prepared in the OjFice aj.• HYDRAULICS ENGINEER = O.101mi. ��STEWART = 0.015 mi. y,y��oa„� Paa�E�,�a.1�� = O. � � 6 Ill I. 2012 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS n. F RIGHT OF WAY DATE: DOUG TAYLOR, PE PROJECT ENGINEER APRIL 17, 2015 MICHAEL BURNS, EI PROJECT DES7GN ENGINEER LETTING DATE: APRIL 19, 2016 RON E. McCOLLUM, PE NCDOT CONTACT ROADWAY DESIGN ENGINEER P.E. sxE�T i TaT�� OPdCRIP110N PE F'RELIMINARY PLANS DO VOT USE FON CON5PRUCTiON Note: Not to Scale *S. U.E. = Subsurface Utility Engineering BOUNDARIES AND PROPERTY.• State Line ----• --•-- County Line ---- --- Township Line --- --- City Line -- -- Reservation Line — — — Property Line Existing Iron Pin � Property Corner —K ProperFy Monument � Parcel/Sequence Number �3 Existing Fence Line -x—x—x- Proposed Woven Wire Fence � Proposed Chain Link Fence � Proposed Barbed Wire Fence � Existing Wetland Boundary - - - -"�a- - - - Proposed Wetland Boundary w�a Existing Endangered Animal Boundary E^a Existing Endangered Plant Boundary EPa Existing Historic Property Boundary '�a Known $oil Contamination: Area or $ite � �' Potential Soil Contamination: Area or Site — �?� � BUILDINGS AND OTHER CULTURE.• Gas Pump Vent or U�G Tank Cap O Sign � Well ° Small Mine SZ' Foundation Q Area Outline 0 Cemetery 0 Building � School � Church � Dam HYDROLOGY.• Stream or Body of Water Hydro, Pool or Reservoir � � lurisdictional Stream —�S - Buffer Zone 1 sz i Buffer Zone 2 sz z Flow Arrow E — Disappearing Stream � — $pring O�- �_-� Wetland � Proposed Lateral, Tail, Head Ditch � � F� False Sump rs(`- ��`']l� �IF' �T��']I°IE�[ �C"�l[$�1L�[l� � ��1� �IF I�[��[�V�� CONVENTIONAL PLAN SHEET SYMBOLS RAILROADS.• Standard Gauge � csx raavsroRrarroN RR $ignal Milepost MILEPo T 35 Switch � SWITCH RR Abandoned -•- -- -�- -- RR Dismantled -------- RIGHT OF Wfl Y.• Baseline Control Point Existing Right of Way Marker � Existing Right of Way Line - Proposed Right of Way Line � Proposed Right of Way Line with � (ron Pin and Cap Marker Proposed Right of Way Line with � Concrete or Granite WW Marker Proposed Control of Access Line with � Concrete GA Marker Existing Control of Access —��— Proposed Control of Access �— Existing Easement Line --E-- Proposed Temporary Construction Easement e Proposed Temporary Drainage Easement TDE Proposed Permanent Drainage Easement PDE Proposed Permanent Drainage /Utility Easement Proposed Permanent Utility Easement Pue Proposed Temporary Utility Easement Tue Proposed Aerial Utility Easement a,ue Proposed Permanent Easement with O Iron Pin and Cap Marker � ROADS AND RELATED FEATURES.• Existing Edge of Pavement --- Existing Curb ----- Proposed Slope Stakes Cut --- G--- Proposed Slope Stakes Fill --- F--- Proposed Curb Ramp CR Existing Metal Guardrail Proposed Guardrail T '' ' T Existing Cable Guiderail n n � Proposed Cable G�iderail n n n n Equality Symbol 0 Pavement Removal � I�EGETfITION.• Single Tree Q Single Shrub o Hedge ^�""'�'� Woods Line �`"'- Orchard Vineyard EXISTING STRUCTURES.• MAJOR: Bridge, Tunnel or Box Culvert Bridge Wing Wall, Head Wall and End Wall MINOR: Head and End Wall Pipe Culvert Footbridge Drainage Box: Catch Basin, DI or JB Paved Ditch Gutter Storm Sewer Manhole Storm Sewer UTILITIES.• POWER: Existing Power Pole Proposed Power Pole Existing Joint Use Pole Proposed Joint Use Pole Power Manhole Power Line Tower Power Transformer WG Power Cable Hand Hole H-Frame Pole Recorded WG Power Line Designated U/G Power Line (S.U.E.*) TELEPHONE: �3 Q �3 Q ��eYa�d CONC — �CONC WW I � � CONC HW �---------< � CB OO 5 �� Existing Telephone Pole f Proposed Telephone Pole � Telephone Manhole O Telephone Booth ❑O Telephone Pedestal ❑O Telephone Cell Tower � WG Telephone Cable Hand Hole HH Recorded WG Telephone Cable T Designated U/G Telephone Cable (S.U.E.*) - - - - -*- - - - Recorded U/G Telephone Conduit *_ Designated U/G Telephone Conduit (S.U.E.*� - - - -T�- - - - Recorded WG Fiber Optics Cable *�a Designated U/G Fiber Optics Cable (S.U.E."`� ----= F�- -- WATER: Water Manhole OO Water Meter o Water Valve � Water Hydrant � Recorded U/G Water Line ' Designated WG Water Line (S.U.E.*� - - - -w- - - - Above Ground Water Line e�c wa+e� N: N Satellite Dish CC TV Pedestal ❑O TV Tower � U/G TV Cable Hand Hole HH Recorded U/G TV Cable �� Designated U/G TV Cable (S.U.E.*) - - - -*�- - - - Recorded U/G Fiber Optic Cable '°'� Designated U/G Fiber Optic Cable (S.U.E.*r ----�° F�- -- GAS: Gas Valve 0 Gas Meter � Recorded U/G Gas Line ° Designated U/G Gas Line (S.U.E.*) - - - -�- - - - Above Ground Gas Line A�c cos SANITARY SEWER: Sanitary Sewer Manhole OO Sanitary Sewer Cleanout 0+ U/G Sanitary Sewer Line 5s Above Ground $anitary Sewer A/G Sa�itpry Sewer Recorded SS Forced Main Line F�5 Designated SS Forced Main Line (S.U.E.*) - - - - -F55- - - - MISCELLANEOUS: Utility Pole � Utility Pole with Base � Utility Located Object p Utility Traffic Signal Box � Utility Unknown U/G Line ��*� U/G Tank; Water, Gas, Oil � Underground Storage Tank, Approx. Loc. osT A/G Tank; Water, Gas, Oil � Geoenvironmental Boring � U/G Test Hole (S.U.E.*) p Abandoned According to Utility Records — AATUR End of Information E.O.I. N Z O � � 6 � 0 CULTIVPTEO AREQ � ��r \ `� \BEG/N STATE TIP PROJECT 8-539b � � -L- PoT STA /2f15.00 � �+ X �O�pNEN a � \ \ppavEa °�' �0'�{/l/.W � � ZSOW x X � \ /� x MT� \ \\ \\/ /� -F��/O�QNOPv X X O 5 \ \ S \ \ �'y 3 \\ r!l S S c.�' `�_'G X E \ \ �.n £� w �� T PNK \ \ � 25BKFp SEP��F \ Is � �� \� � X \n� \'P� \ � \; � � � �� } � � \\ � -Bl-�= � \ � \ \ -Bn- � \ u ;r1 \ n�Hra��•eo=�lY� — — — — D/VIS CREEK RO.QD -- SR I103 _ -�� MPM �� \ 80 \1 I� �� i' i BEGIN CONSTRUCTiOI I I -L- POC STA 10+65,2. �� / / C�E�v � � `�/ � �. FPLLOW / � < 5 \ � s� o �\ \� \� \� \� \� �\ � �. pUE RhV � pUE — �oo 40' & EXIST RM/ L- PT Sto. � � � � �S � �� r PAVEMENT-BR/DGE RELATIONSH/P SKETCN -L- Cl/RVE DATA PI Sfo 10+50A9 Pl Slo 14+3876 p = 424'47.9'fLTJ p = l7'42'24.3'fRT1 D= 4"24' 265' D= 4'24' 265' L = lOOJ3' L = 40/75' T= 50A9' T= 202.49' � R = 1.300A0' R = 430U.OU' � �}� Se = OA25 FT/FT Rwarr = 50' O RONAlO DAViD SWANN DB �39 PG 666 CLA55 II RIP RAP EST 20 TONS EST 18 SY GEOTEXTILE pUE � ��} � �} � �X— �} PROIECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO. 8-5396 4 �' [ / � � k ROADWAY DESIGN a°�� / v �'an Nu W��\ � � '� � •/� i6�9qSi� \\ � / l ENGINEER HYDRAUUCS ./ � 2 ��q. �Y � // ENGINEER o k 0 0° '�. � p � I s��' ti. ^ _� � Y �r��.`' � i�� FidELIMIN RY PLANS ��O � I� NI y��'`'�oa �� DO NOT L'9F FO CONSTRL�CI`fON Q n�� _Y�_POT S►o.IO+00A0 / e �� +' � 2�� , f�Wo+ / /� i� �i 1 � ° � x� O / � � ` ��i �, � ` �� o �,��._i ECOLOGICAL a ��} �} '�s ro�N r. eM�ea, er.ux. � �'� STEWART �� I`�IErrcwHr;Rwc ..TE Tl� ROJECT 6-53 r� S�F BCy o°Be ¢�nc� s X oaeaNus e. '� �X 358w � /c,f � // NATTS, E�. U�t. � � - - Po� TA /8+24 � _ � � vc'��z , � � � � � � �� S � ; / /o oe me nc �sb� � , � � '� y� � S ca - � v � +� � 1 {(�'Y' �� SPECIAL CUTi DITCF� � � � � � � \ z� o� a\a �F,' � '� `,\n\ ' �� — — � // / \ "Y-� � y- '� � SEC�DE'i�AIL 2 y. I � a � �. 3o R �' 0 `S �y �v' / / > y- � ,� 1 CLASS ,� RdR I � ,�rym ¢�� MP / iq 9.07 P S ��GE 0 � W' � �/ +� / � � 1 � E5� 2 T� t,,;t� r�i o e ) / / . � � // � � � � �$� 7 SY�EOTEXTI� 4i' 2 \ \ / \� c�t / ,+1 F� / / � 1 � � Y- � � �e- a / � �� y/ Oi � ��v' �� 1ve6.E� 0�1 +� / � � � • � �}�1, SFa S . . /� GR I30' C1AP N 50.03' 6 �� l Y. Y- �-� % Y-" �c,f ` r'1 STq �c . •� CONC rRrvAiE PiW �y c!� I% (� � —wie— + +3 .03 / /_ 4r' 4 �' PA 4y `� � � � / / 46.45'&b ' � 60� �e � E%IST � } R ,.�(/ a R • / _ 5 64'95'S4' W 109.43 -- — _ IO'�R � \ �\ �- .F30 '�P� + �1� — � �+Y � y.Oti� � ^ / B'y�, N � WOODS � STqyoNi � N\�73•54 f \ �c� \� � /D c / Ei� 35' C . 35^,q k TC�1 e4SFMN \ P=rvaiE aiW '. N Z 3 O'• .B�\gS.T\ �,e � F _ (+66 + - e / N 99 6 N 9• �fl e o / 3� -�— �-"�_ � El(I� I q3pq :W —i�r� �. 5� IY 3g5S06'k. '�' \ S o /� — - 03 � � - l\�\ ,P. s. � _ }—JS �� / +45 I� Y � � � x- x ` / ' -- _'�9o,n�/4/+03P�5 _ 8 46.13' +45 .�J +� / � o TB ]Cil � ao• 'I' � � � � � =�� +38.03 Ss. c�� B b�� - Y� i 60' 75' . 040 �'S * >S�o � � * � \ �� %=L- PT Slo.16+38A ,- a.o9 �, � �� ,� a �5 vtie flo� O � � \ y � � ��Na / L4TERAL BASE DITCH �. ,�a,�^� S , SEE DETAIL 1 . 0� EST 340 CY EXCAV. �2 `�' � � CL45S 6 RIP RAP � � 15/ RIP RAP AT EMBA EN� � JS � SEE DETAIL 3 EST 7 SY� GEOTEXTILE \� CL455 II RIP RAP � / EST 28 TONS �5 i4 �36 � ' /\ "p ESi 30 SY GEOTEXTILE /��! � pF o S D � SPECIAL CUT DITCH Z�Y/�Q �� EiP k / S E E D E T A I L 2 � P� 1 Y Y i I� N B E R R �� p� O �� 4/ � f! OB �7 b5T -L- PC 5/0.12+3627 /y�°� ,titi � N • � RONALD DAVID SNANN n. �} 8s• � /�, oe 9T� ve a9 /,S,J/ _"�;� . S o,." / � _p� 'vs� �� i 1�CM�A� R. FA4wrF0/ SFO i3. 'p. /�� /�� EiP OB 2,79 PG 15� / . �v' � ry iy� � � a ,l � / ; �, / B9• 9 � � Y �� /535z � � l � �� / i� z ^ ��? i — �� : 60' ( �,�/ \� S fl SF� CR �WAi , � � � 6 —� � Q o �y/ � / / S ��S\ �a1/ // 6p�EPS C \\ � , � . / � : �� / � � � a ~ 3W4�0� / � S � �� / ;� • � � '� � � ° �}j �°��—i/� �SF � �c� � 0 Q 4B4 � _� Q ND ryrR // � / �5 � � p � // � � � °\rk�1�� o � �c' � 7� / �, 4Y so• fl O 1 �� wW k�.y 6 r� ia O � OS `k\�� l � N,zy9�5'f 6 g88 Q �� / Q Q � . � �b a� Q j�cwJ � Q I 35 .C�NC 40 / � EIP . � .O6 \ � . / � F � Q� H � I J. EYBLER� \\ s s�s �oC �f'� � OB �5D PG W6� �z' y `�.oC �F � o�, - � .{` �P-111 /N / y � WO ' � \\, y. fj / �// E/� o• W 65.43, ys�.�� HTa % � �� / , IS . . h B�K .�— , 4� F / E� i. y� EIP �� yp E i F o� ,�`� 06 �1, N \Ap. � 15,,. ��'/EL4 4i' z> a� . / ��I Ifl � � S � e 1 � i. ' � � � EI 2 � � j� ii - �� 992, / ' / oI s '^' ' EIP S" �F /°�'� /`" � � 1 m1 •'y p SMARON 4. LANCE� S �. ./ o I 5- R\ Eia 4 OB �79 PG tt� -. ��-°'. . M�^a a� Z I .' F �� . � n� - s a` � \�-� �.\ . � _ 9 � 3. J�'6 O O p . S� a�'"� � �� o ��> �. i� � Eip . m � � � s�� }�, 5'� y �ao �� - - 3 � �'\ r `✓ s E,P � � %9 4 ` o • `n ' �'d � \t\ 'lf�, p��9 � `+�„�� Hta � � �T r �EE eaowNiNl�' �� s\ \0 coN r �"�^ �703 PC !7� �," -Fj is ca 1 �, \.. % �`/y / .4��53 2 / � 1 ��S � ca � �y 3 �` / /�+� � � \ � \ o / N�ft k ��\\ \ EiP . /3� `S P k � \ F 9BBB d S' k / Q Q yc /�2S / k � OO � ' B •,p�, v c E�P , , Fk p DETAIL 1 . .�` LATERAL BASE DITCH �!�, � Nof fo Swle) $ l 41k b ,` k ` Not�rol // �'OJ,,I J�{. Graund 1.� p ry.1 �„/rt. Fill g � � �+ SIaPe �,; `, f,+ �% .Z� � e � Min. D-7.0 Ff. a I-r! � �Z. B=3.0 Fl. �T 6=5.0 Ff. � E _, ^� �y. \ FROM STA. 14+20 TO STA. 16+62 -L- RT Z f.0o' N 58°16'31 E Q � �Q /S` + DETAIL 2 �3 SPECIAL CUT DITCH ,Hm�o 5�oie, Fra�t � � Dnrh G.o��d 7.� p 1F\ �e� Slope Min.D=1.0 Ft. FROM STA. 12+39 TO STA. 13+50 -L- RT PROM STA. 17+50 TO STA. 18+00 -L- LT DETAIL 3 RIP RAP AT EMHANKMENT (No��o Scole� 10'min_ O RONALD DAVD SNMN o�n�h �.am�,,. s.a� DB 1276 PG 30T c�oae GEOTE%TILE CL II Rip-Rap FAR -L- PAIOfIlE.SfE SNEET 5 esr st roNs EST 30 SY GEOTEMILE fROM STA. 16 t 41 TO STA. 16 I� 62 -L- RT