20100898 Ver 2_Year 4 Monitoring Report_2015_20151203

Candiff Creek Restoration Project, DMS Project No. 92767
November 2015, Monitoring Year 4 FINAL i
CANDIFF CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT
ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT FOR 2015 (YEAR 4)

NCDEQ-DMS Project Number: 92767

Submitted to: NCDEQ – Division of Mitigation Services
2728 Capital Blvd, Suite 1H 103
Raleigh, NC 27604

Submitted by: Surry Soil and Water Conservation District
220 Cooper Street
P.O. Box 218
Dobson, NC 27017

Prepared by: Michael Baker Engineering, Inc.

November 2015
FINAL
Candiff Creek Restoration Project, DMS Project No. 92767
November 2015, Monitoring Year 4 FINAL ii

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................... 1 
2.0 PROJECT BACKGROUND............................................................................................. 3 
2.1 Project Objectives ............................................................................................................ 3  
2.2 Project Structure, Restoration Type and Approach .......................................................... 3 
2.3 Location and Setting......................................................................................................... 6 
2.4 Project History and Background ...................................................................................... 6 
2.5 Project Plan ...................................................................................................................... 6 
3.0 PROJECT CONDITION AND MONITORING RESULTS ....................................... 10 
3.1 Vegetation Assessment .................................................................................................. 10 
3.1.1 Description of Vegetative Monitoring .................................................................... 10 
3.1.2 Vegetative Success Criteria .................................................................................... 10 
3.1.3 Vegetative Observations and Results...................................................................... 12 
3.1.4 Vegetative Problem Areas ...................................................................................... 12 
3.1.5 Vegetation Photographs .......................................................................................... 12 
3.2 Stream Assessment ......................................................................................................... 13 
3.2.1 Morphometric Success Criteria ............................................................................... 13 
3.2.2 Morphometric Results ............................................................................................. 14 
3.2.3 Hydrologic Criteria ................................................................................................. 15 
3.2.4 Hydrologic Monitoring Results .............................................................................. 15 
3.2.5 Stream Problem Areas ............................................................................................ 16 
3.2.6 Stream Photographs ................................................................................................ 16 
3.2.7 Stream Stability Assessment ................................................................................... 17 
3.2.8 Quantitative Measures Summary Tables ................................................................ 17 
4.0 OVERALL CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .................................... 18 
5.0 WILDLIFE OBSERVATIONS ...................................................................................... 19 
6.0 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................. 20 

APPENDICES

APPENDIX A - Vegetation Data
APPENDIX B - Geomorphic Data

Attached CD – Photographs

Candiff Creek Restoration Project, DMS Project No. 92767
November 2015, Monitoring Year 4 FINAL iii

LIST OF TABLES

Table 1. Design Approach for the Candiff Restoration Project
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Table 3. Project Contacts
Table 4. Project Background
Table 5. Vegetation Species Planted Across the Restoration Project
Table 6. Verification of Bankfull Events

Table A.1. Vegetation Metadata
Table A.2. Vegetation Vigor by Species
Table A.3. Vegetation Damage by Species
Table A.4. Vegetation Damage by Plot
Table A.5. Planted Stems by Plot and Species
Table A.6. Plot Species and Densities
Table B.1. Categorical Stream Feature Visual Stability Assessment
Table B.2. Baseline Stream Summary
Table B.3. Morphology and Hydraulic Monitoring Summary

Candiff Creek Restoration Project, DMS Project No. 92767
November 2015, Monitoring Year 4 FINAL iv
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1. Vicinity Map of Candiff Creek Restoration Project.
Figure 2. Summary Map of Candiff Creek Restoration Project.
Figure 3A. As-built Plan Sheet 1 for the Candiff Creek Restoration Project.
Figure 3B. As-built Plan Sheet 5 for the Candiff Creek Restoration Project.
Figure 3C. As-built Plan Sheet 5A for the Candiff Creek Restoration Project.
Figure 3D. As-built Plan Sheet 5B for the Candiff Creek Restoration Project.
Figure 3E. As-built Plan Sheet 5C for the Candiff Creek Restoration Project.
Figure 3F. As-built Plan Sheet 5D for the Candiff Creek Restoration Project.
Figure 3G. As-built Plan Sheet 5E for the Candiff Creek Restoration Project.
Figure 4. Current Condition Plan View Figure Index
Figure 4A. Current Condition Plan View Figure 4A
Figure 4B. Current Condition Plan View Figure 4B
Figure 4C. Current Condition Plan View Figure 4C
Candiff Creek Restoration Project, DMS Project No. 92767
November 2015, Monitoring Year 4 FINAL 1
1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This Annual Monitoring Report details the monitoring activities during 2015 (Monitoring Year 4)
for the Candiff Creek Restoration Project (“Site”). As per the approved Mitigation Plan for the
Site, this Annual Monitoring Report presents stream geometry data, stem count data from
vegetation monitoring stations, and discusses any observed tendencies relating to stream stability
and vegetation survival success.
Prior land use on the Site consisted primarily of pasture and forest. Candiff Creek had been
channelized and riparian vegetation was cleared in the lower half of the site. The upstream reaches
of the project had a narrow, early successional buffer that included several exotic vegetation
species. Prior to restoration, Candiff Creek was incised and lacked bedform diversity. As a result,
channel degradation was widespread throughout the Site.
A total of 13 monitoring plots, 100 square meters (m2) (10m x 10m) in size, are used to predict
survivability of the woody vegetation planted on the Site. Data from Year 4 monitoring for the 13
vegetation plots exhibited a survivability range of 40 to 931 stems per acre. The data showed that
the Site had an average survivability of 735 stems per acre following Year 4 monitoring.
During Year 4 monitoring, kudzu (Pueraria montana) was present on the Site in the vicinity of
vegetation plot 13 and in the general vicinity. This concentration of kudzu was previously treated
during construction and remnants are still present within the easement. The kudzu is located on
the upstream portion of Reach M1, downstream of River-Siloam Road. This area was treated once
in early August 2015 and once in late August 2015 by use of the herbicides Glyphosate and
Triclopyr. Any remaining kudzu in this area will be treated again during the early growing season
2016.
Vegetation Plots 1 through 12 on reach M2 and M3 did not exhibit any invasive or aggressive
species occurring on the Site.
Also, additional stream enhancement work along M1 and UT1 was completed in September 2015.
Bankfull benches were excavated and vertical stream banks were sloped to stable angles. In
addition, vane structures and toe wood were installed along meander bends to protect the stream
banks, provide additional habitat, and to provide long-term stream bank stabilization. No
additional credit is being requested as a result of this work. During this time, the existing kudzu
plants and roots were cleared within a large portion of the easement area. Per the permit conditions
for the enhancement work, monitoring along M1 and UT1 will be conducted for a minimum of
one additional year beyond the monitoring required in the mitigation plan. This monitoring will
include visual assessments conducted twice per year and the installation and annual monitoring of
two bank pin arrays installed in the outside of meander bends.
Property boundary fencing in the M1 vicinity was installed during the summer of 2015. This fence
allows the landowner to graze cattle outside of the fenced conservation easement which will
prevent kudzu re-establishment.
Additional bare-root trees will be planted during the winter of 2015 in the riparian buffer areas
along M1 and UT1 to increase density and to offset mortality from treating kudzu.
Cross-sectional monitoring data for stream stability were collected during Year 4 monitoring. A
longitudinal profile survey was completed during Year 4 monitoring for approximately 3,542
linear feet (LF) of stream on the Site. The longitudinal profile was completed for Reach M3 only.
Candiff Creek Restoration Project, DMS Project No. 92767
November 2015, Monitoring Year 4 FINAL 2
The cross-sectional data and the longitudinal profile indicate that Reach M3 is stable and
functioning as designed.
Two pools located at stations 46+50 and 55+50 have exhibited areas of erosion during Year 4
monitoring. The erosional areas observed are occurring on the outer bend below the root wads
and are approximately 10 feet or less in length.
According to the on-site crest gauge, the Site experienced at least two significant bankfull flow
events during Year 4 monitoring. The largest on-site bankfull flow event documented at the M3
crest gauge occurred on April 20, 2015. It is estimated that the height of highest flow at the M3
crest gauge observed in Year 4 was approximately 2.85 feet above bankfull stage.
In summary, after remedial activities planned in winter 2015 and summer 2016, to control kudzu
and improve tree density along M1, the Site is on track to meet the hydrologic, vegetative, and
stream success criteria as specified in the Site Restoration Plan in all areas.
Candiff Creek Restoration Project, DMS Project No. 92767
November 2015, Monitoring Year 4 FINAL 3
2.0 PROJECT BACKGROUND
The project involved the restoration of 4,081 linear feet (LF) of stream, 1,757 of stream Enhancement
(265 LF of Enhancement I and 1,492 LF of Enhancement II) and 1,200 LF of stream preservation.
The final stream lengths for all reaches are shown in Table 1 and Figure 2 and summarizes the
restoration zones on the Site. A total of 27.54 acres of stream and riparian buffer are protected through
a permanent conservation easement.
2.1 Project Objectives
The specific goals for the Candiff Creek Restoration Project were as follows:
 Create geomorphically stable conditions along Candiff Creek through the project area
 Prevent cattle from accessing the project reaches, reducing excessive bank erosion,
 Improve habitat quality in a riffle dominated stream by adding pool/riffle sequences and
expanding the floodplain, while improving overall ecosystem functionality
 Improve water quality within the Candiff Creek Restoration Project area through reduction of
bank erosion and reductions in nutrient and sediment loads
 Stabilize streambanks through installation of in-stream structures and establishing a riparian
buffer consisting of native plant species
 Improve aquatic and terrestrial habitat through increased substrate and in-stream cover,
additional woody debris, and reduced water temperature by increasing stream shading, and
restored terrestrial habitat.
2.2 Project Structure, Restoration Type and Approach
For analysis and design purposes, Michael Baker International (Baker) divided on-site streams into
reaches. The reaches were numbered sequentially from upstream to downstream, with a “M”
designation for the “mainstem” and a “UT” designation for unnamed tributaries. Two UTs are located
on the Site (labeled UT1 and UT2). The on-site streams are described as follows: M1 begins on the
upstream section of the Site at the River-Siloam Road culvert, and then flows southward to the
confluence with UT2. M2 begins at the M1/UT2 confluence and flows south 265 feet to the beginning
of the restored portion of the mainstem. M3 begins at the restored channel and then flows
southeastward for 4,123 feet and terminates at the property line adjacent to the Yakin Valley Railroad
right-of-way located at the downstream end of the Site. UT1 flows onto the Site from the southern
Wall property line and flows southward for 885 feet to the confluence with M1. UT2 flows onto the
Site from the eastern Aztar Group, LLC property line and flows eastward for 1,162 feet and terminates
at the M1/M2 transition. The reaches described above are presented in the plan sheets located in
Figures 3A through Figure 3J.
The restoration design allows stream flows greater than the bankfull discharge, to spread onto the
floodplain, dissipating flow energies and reducing stress on streambanks. In-stream structures were
used to control streambed grade, reduce streambank stress, and promote bedform sequences and
habitat diversity. The in-stream structures installed consist of constructed riffles, cover logs, log/rock
vanes, log/rock j-hook vanes, rock cross vanes, vegetated geolifts, vegetated brush mattresses and root
wads. These structures promote a diversity of habitat features in the restored channel. Where grade
control was a consideration, constructed riffles, grade control rock j-hook vanes, and rock cross vanes
were installed to provide long-term stability. Streambanks were stabilized using a combination of
Candiff Creek Restoration Project, DMS Project No. 92767
November 2015, Monitoring Year 4 FINAL 4
erosion control matting, temporary and permanent seeding, live stakes, transplants, brush mattresses
and geolifts. Transplants provide areas for living root mass to increase streambank stability and also
to create holding areas for fish and aquatic biota.
The purpose of the project is to restore stream functions to the impaired reaches the Site. Native
species vegetation was planted across the Site and the entire project area is protected through a
permanent conservation easement.

Ca
n
d
i
f
f

C
r
e
e
k

R
e
s
t
o
r
a
t
i
o
n

P
r
oj
e
c
t
,

D
M
S

P
r
o
j
e
c
t

N
o
.

9
2
7
6
7

No
v
e
m
b
e
r

2
0
1
5
,

M
o
n
i
t
o
r
i
n
g

Y
e
a
r

4

F
I
N
A
L

5
Ta
b
l
e

1
.

D
e
s
i
g
n

A
p
p
r
o
a
c
h

f
o
r

t
h
e

C
a
n
d
i
f
f

C
r
e
e
k

R
e
s
t
o
r
a
t
i
o
n

P
r
o
j
e
c
t

Ca
n
d
i
f
f

C
r
e
e
k

R
e
s
t
o
r
a
t
i
o
n

P
r
o
j
e
c
t
:

D
M
S

P
r
o
j
e
c
t

N
o
.

9
2
7
6
7

Pr
o
j
e
c
t

Se
g
m
e
n
t

o
r

Re
a
c
h

I
D

Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g

Fe
e
t
/
A
c
r
e
s

Mi
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n

Ty
p
e

*

Ap
p
r
o
a
c
h
*
*

Li
n
e
a
r

Fo
o
t
a
g
e

Mi
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n

Ra
t
i
o

Mi
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n

Un
i
t
s

St
a
t
i
o
n
i
n
g

C
o
m
m
e
n
t

M1

6
9
0

E

E
I
I

6
9
0

2
.
5
:
1

2
7
6

10
+
0
0

-

17
+
3
5

Invasive species vegetation removal and buffer planting; 45 LF of stream length removed for one stream crossing.
M2

2
6
5

E

E
I

2
6
5

1
.
5
:
1

1
7
7

17
+
3
5

-

20
+
0
0

Installed in-stream structures to control grade and reduce bank erosion
M3

3
,
8
2
8

R

P
1
,

P
2

4
,
0
8
1

1
:
1

4
,
0
8
1

20
+
0
0

-

61
+
2
3

Invasive species removal and buffer planting; 42 linear feet of stream length removed for two stream crossings
UT
1

(
L
o
w
e
r

Re
a
c
h
)

88
5

E
E
I
I

4
8
5

2
.
5
:
1

1
9
4

14
+
0
0

-

18
+
8
5

Invasive species vegetation removal, buffer planting, and livestock exclusion fencing.
UT
1

(
U
p
p
e
r

Re
a
c
h
)

P
N
/
A

4
0
0

5
:
1

8
0

10
+
0
0

-

14
+
0
0

Preservation area - no construction activities in this area
UT
2

(
L
o
w
e
r

Re
a
c
h
)

1,
1
1
7

E
E
I
I

3
1
7

2
.
5
:
1

1
2
7

18
+
0
0

-

21
+
6
2

Invasive species vegetation removal, buffer planting, and livestock exclusion fencing. 45 LF of stream length removed for one stream crossing.
UT
2

(
U
p
p
e
r

Re
a
c
h
)

P
N
/
A

8
0
0

5
:
1

1
6
0

10
+
0
0

-

18
+
0
0

Preservation area - no construction activities in this area
Mi
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n

U
n
i
t

S
u
m
m
a
t
i
o
n
s

St
r
e
a
m

(S
M
U
)

Ri
p
a
r
i
a
n

W
e
t
l
a
n
d

(
A
c
)

N
o
n
-
r
i
p
a
r
i
a
n
W
e
t
l
a
n
d

(
A
c
)

T
o
t
a
l

W
e
t
l
a
n
d

(
A
c
)

Pl
a
n
t
e
d

Ri
p
a
r
i
a
n

Bu
f
f
e
r

(
A
c
)

Permanent Conservation Easement (Ac)
5,
0
9
5

0

0

0

1
7
.
3
1

2
7
.
5
4

*

R
=

R
e
s
t
o
r
a
t
i
o
n

**

P1

=

P
r
i
o
r
i
t
y

I

E
=

E
n
h
a
n
c
e
m
e
n
t

P2

=

P
r
i
o
r
i
t
y

I
I

P
=

P
r
e
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n

EI
I

=

E
n
h
a
n
c
e
m
e
n
t

I
I

Candiff Creek Restoration Project, DMS Project No. 92767
November 2015, Monitoring Year 4 FINAL 6
2.3 Location and Setting
The Site is located in Surry County in western North Carolina, approximately 1.75 miles west of
Siloam Township, and just north of the Surry-Yadkin County line, as shown in Figure 1. The Site lies
in the Yadkin Pee-Dee River Basin, within the US Geological Survey (USGS) and North Carolina
Department of Environmental Quality Division of Mitigation Services (NCDEQ DMS) subbasin
03040101 (previously categorized as subbasin 03-07-02) and Targeted Local Watershed (TLW)
03040101-110060 of the Yadkin Pee Dee River Basin.
2.4 Project History and Background
Land use at the Site consists primarily of pasture and forest. Candiff Creek had been channelized and
riparian vegetation had been cleared at the lower half of the Site. The upstream end of the Site had a
narrow, early successional buffer that included several exotic vegetation species. Prior to restoration,
Candiff Creek was incised and lacked bedform diversity. As a result, channel degradation was
widespread throughout the Site.
The chronology of the Candiff Creek Restoration Project is presented in Table 2. The contact
information for the designers, contractors, and relevant suppliers is presented in Table 3. Relevant
project background information is provided in Table 4.
2.5 Project Plan
Plans illustrating the as-built conditions of the major project elements, locations of permanent
monitoring cross-sections, and locations of permanent vegetation monitoring plots are presented in
Figures 3A through 3G of this report. In addition to the as-built plans, a Current Condition Plan View
Map (Figure 4 through 4c) set is included in the Figures section in this report.

Candiff Creek Restoration Project, DMS Project No. 92767
November 2015, Monitoring Year 4 FINAL 7
Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History
Candiff Creek Restoration Project: DMS Project No. 92767
Activity or Report Scheduled
Completion
Data
Collection
Complete
Actual
Completion or
Delivery
Restoration Plan Prepared Jul-10 N/A Jul-10
Restoration Plan Amended Aug-10 N/A Aug-10
Restoration Plan Approved Aug-10 N/A Aug-10
Final Design – (at least 90% complete) Jul-10 N/A Jun-11
Construction Begins N/A N/A Sep-11
Temporary S&E mix applied to entire project area N/A N/A Apr-12
Permanent seed mix applied to entire project area N/A N/A Apr-12
Planting of live stakes N/A N/A Apr-12
Planting of bare root trees N/A N/A Apr-12
End of Construction NA N/A Mar-12
Survey of As-built conditions (Year 0 Monitoring-
baseline) N/A Mar-12 Mar-12

Year 1 Monitoring Oct-12 Oct-12 Dec-12
Year 2 Monitoring Oct-13 Nov-13 Dec-13
Year 3 Monitoring Oct-14 Nov-14 Nov-14
Year 4 Monitoring Oct-15 Oct-15 Oct-15
Year 5 Monitoring Oct-16 Oct-16 Oct-16
Year 6 Monitoring1 Oct-17 Oct-17 Oct-17
1 Year 6 monitoring will be limited to the visual assessment of M1 and UT1, and bank pin measurements along M1 as
described in the executive summary.

Candiff Creek Restoration Project, DMS Project No. 92767
November 2015, Monitoring Year 4 FINAL 8
Table 3. Project Contacts
Candiff Creek Restoration Project: DMS Project No. 92767
Designer
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc. 797 Haywood Road, Suite 201
Asheville, NC 28806
Contact:
Jake Byers, P.E., Telephone: [phone]
Construction Contractor
River Works, Inc. 6105 Chapel Hill Road
Raleigh, NC 27607
Contact:
Bill Wright, Telephone: [phone]
Planting Contractor
River Works, Inc. 6105 Chapel Hill Road
Raleigh, NC 27607
Contact:
Bill Wright, Telephone: [phone]
Seeding Contractor
River Works, Inc. 6105 Chapel Hill Road
Raleigh, NC 27607
Contact:
Bill Wright, Telephone: [phone]
Seed Mix Sources Green Resources, 336-855-6363
Nursery Stock Suppliers ArborGen, Inc., 843-528-3204
Monitoring Performers
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc. 797 Haywood Road, Suite 201
Asheville, NC 28806
Stream Monitoring Point of Contact: Jake Byers, P.E., Telephone: [phone]
Vegetation Monitoring Point of Contact: Jake Byers, P.E., Telephone: [phone]

Candiff Creek Restoration Project, DMS Project No. 92767
November 2015, Monitoring Year 4 FINAL 9
Table 4. Project Background Table
Candiff Creek Restoration Project: DMS Project No. 92767
Project County: Surry County, NC
Drainage Area:
Reach: square miles (mi²):
M1 2.35
M2 2.53
M3 2.74
UT1 0.06
UT2 0.14
Estimated Drainage % Impervious Cover:
M1, M2, M3, UT1, UT2 <5%
Stream Order:
UT1 1
UT2 2
M1, M2, M3 3
Physiographic Region Piedmont
Ecoregion Northern Inner Piedmont
Rosgen Classification* of
As-built:
M1, M2, M3 C
UT1 (Lower Reach) N/A
UT1 (Upper Reach) N/A
UT2 (Lower Reach) N/A
UT2 (Upper Reach) N/A
Cowardin Classification*:
M1, M2, M3, UT2 Riverine, Upper Perennial, Cobble-Gravel
UT1 Riverine, Intermittent, Cobble-Gravel
Dominant Soil Types*:

M1, M2, M3, UT1 (Lower Reach),
UT2 (Lower Reach) CsA

UT1 (Upper Reach), UT2 (Upper
Reach) FsE
UT1 (Upper Reach) FeC2
Reference site ID On-site
USGS HUC for Project 03040101
NCDWQ Sub-basin 03-07-02
NCDWQ classification for Project and Reference:
M1, M2, M3, UT1, UT2 C
Any portion of any project segment 303d listed? No
Any portion of any project segment upstream of a 303d listed
segment? No
Reasons for 303d listing or stressor? N/A
% of project easement fenced 100%
*Rosgen, 1994; *Cowardin;*-USDA, 2007
Candiff Creek Restoration Project, DMS Project No. 92767
November 2015, Monitoring Year 4 FINAL 10
3.0 PROJECT CONDITION AND MONITORING RESULTS
3.1 Vegetation Assessment
3.1.1 Description of Vegetative Monitoring
As a final stage of construction, the stream margins and riparian areas of the Site were planted
with bare root trees, live stakes, and a seed mixture of temporary and permanent herbaceous
vegetation to establish ground cover. The woody vegetation was planted randomly from the
top of the stream banks to the outer edge of the project’s re-vegetation limits. In general, bare-
root vegetation was planted at a target density of 680 stems per acre, in an 8-foot by 8-foot grid
pattern. Live stakes were installed two to three feet apart in meander bends and six to eight
feet apart in the riffle cross-sections. The live stakes were set up using triangular spacing along
the stream banks between the toe of the stream bank and bankfull elevation. The tree species
planted at the Site are shown in Table 5. The temporary seed planted following construction
was rye grain. The permanent seed mix of herbaceous species planted in the project’s riparian
area included: redtop (Agrostis alba), big bluestem (Andropogon gerardii), beggartick (Bidens
frondosa), lanceleaf tickseed (Coreopsis lanceolata), deertongue (Pancium clandestinum),
Virginia wildrye (Elymus virginicus), soft rush (Juncus effusus), switchgrass (Panicum
virgatum), smartweed (Polygonum pennsylvanicum), little bluestem (Schizachyrium
scoparium), Indian grass (Sorghastrum nutan), and eastern gamma grass (Tripsacum
dactyloides). This seed mixture was broadcast on the Site at a rate of 15 pounds per acre. All
planting was completed in April 2012.
At the time of planting, 13 vegetation plots – labeled 1 through 13 - were established on-site
to monitor survival of the planted woody vegetation. Each vegetation plot is 0.025 acre in size,
or 10 meters x 10 meters. All of the planted stems inside the plots were flagged to distinguish
them from any colonizing individuals and to facilitate locating them in the future. The trees
also were marked and labeled with aluminum metal tags to ensure that the correct identification
is made during future monitoring of the vegetation plots. In addition to flagging and tags, the
locations of planted stems and vegetation plot corners were recorded by use of survey
equipment.
3.1.2 Vegetative Success Criteria
To characterize vegetation success criteria objectively, specific goals for woody vegetation
density have been defined. Data from vegetation monitoring plots should display a surviving
tree density of at least 320 trees per acre at the end of the third year of monitoring, and a
surviving tree density of at least 260 five-year-old trees per acre at the end of the five-year
monitoring period.

Candiff Creek Restoration Project, DMS Project No. 92767
November 2015, Monitoring Year 4 FINAL 11

Table 5. Vegetation Species Planted Across the Restoration Project
Candiff Creek Restoration Project: DMS Project No. 92767
Scientific Name Common Name Percent Planted by
Species Total Number of Stems
Bare Root Trees Species
Betula nigra river birch 23.3% 1,800
Diospyros virginiana persimmon 7.8% 600
Fraxinus pennsylvanica green ash 15.6% 1,200
Liriodendron tulipfera tulip poplar 7.8% 600
Platanus occidentalis sycamore 22.1% 1,700
Quercus michauxii swamp chestnut oak 15.6% 1,200
Quercus phellos willow oak 7.8% 600
Bare Root Shrub Species
Asimina triloba paw paw 9.5% 400
Carpinus caroliniana ironwood 12% 500
Cercus canadensis redbud 14% 600
Cornus amomum silky dogwood 19% 800
Lindera benzoin spicebush 9.5% 400
Sambucus canadensis elderberry 19% 800
Viburnum dentatum arrowwood 17% 700
Native Herbaceous Species
Agrostis alba redtop 10% NA
Andropogon gerardii big bluestem 5% NA
Bidens frondosa devil’s beggartick 5% NA
Coreopsis lanceolata lanceleaf tickseed 10% NA
Dichanthelium clandestinum deertongue 15% NA
Elymus virginicus Virginia wild rye 15% NA
Juncus effusus soft rush 5% NA
Panicum virgatum switchgrass 15% NA
Polygonum pennsylvanicum Pennsylvania smartweed 5% NA
Schizachyrium scoparium little bluestem 5% NA
Sorghastrum nutans Indiangrass 5% NA
Tripsacum dactyloides eastern gamagrass 5% NA
Woody Vegetation for Live Stakes
Cornus amomum silky dogwood 30% 2,100
Salix sericia silky willow 30% 2,100
Salix nigra black willow 10% 700
Sambucus canadensis elderberry 30% 2,100

Candiff Creek Restoration Project, DMS Project No. 92767
November 2015, Monitoring Year 4 FINAL 12
3.1.3 Vegetative Observations and Results
Permanent ground cover has been successfully established through the planting of the
permanent seed mixture planted at the Site, as observed during Year 4 monitoring of the Site.
Tables A.1 through A.6 in Appendix A presents vegetation metadata, vegetation vigor,
vegetation damage and stem count data for the monitoring plots at the end of Year 4
monitoring. Data from Year 4 monitoring for the 13 vegetation plots exhibited a range of 40
to 931 stems per acre. The data show that the Site had an average survivability of 735 stems
per acre following Year 4 monitoring. In comparison, following as-built conditions, the Site
demonstrated an average survivability of 915 stems per acre.
Trees within each monitoring plot are re-flagged regularly to prevent planted trees from losing
their identifying marks due to flag degradation. It is important for trees within the monitoring
plots to remain marked to ensure they are all accounted for during the annual stem counts and
calculation of tree survivability. Labeled aluminum tags with wire hangers are used on
surviving stems to aid in relocation during future counts. The aluminum tags are moved to a
single branch instead of the main stem once the tree becomes established. Flags are also used
to mark trees because they do not interfere with the growth of the tree.
During Year 4 monitoring, volunteer species including tulip poplar (Liriodendron tulipfera)
and redbud (Cercus canadensis) were noted in plots 8 and 4, respectively. All plots will
continue to be assessed during Year 5 monitoring for occurrence of volunteer species.
3.1.4 Vegetative Problem Areas
During Year 4 monitoring, kudzu (Pueraria montana) was present on the Site in the vicinity
of vegetation plot 13 and in the general vicinity. This concentration of kudzu was previously
treated during construction in the spring of 2012, August 2014, October 2014, early August
2015, and late August 2015. The kudzu is located on the upstream portion of Reach M1,
downstream of River-Siloam Road. This area was treated by use of the herbicides Glyphosate
and Triclopyr. Any remaining kudzu in this area will be treated again during the early growing
season 2016.
Also, additional stream enhancement work along M1 and UT1 was completed in September
2015. During this time, the existing kudzu plants and roots were cleared within a large portion
of the easement area. Property boundary fencing in the M1 vicinity was installed during the
summer of 2015. This fence allows the landowner to graze cattle outside of the fenced
conservation easement which will prevent kudzu re-establishment.
Additional bare-root trees will be planted during the winter of 2015 in the riparian buffer areas
along M1 and UT1 to increase density and to offset mortality from treating kudzu.
Vegetation Plots 1 through 12 on reach M2 and M3 did not exhibit any invasive or aggressive
species occurring on the Site.
3.1.5 Vegetation Photographs
Photographs are used to visually document vegetation plot success. A total of 13 reference
stations were established to document tree conditions at each vegetation plot across the Site.
Reference photos of tree plots are taken at least once per year. Photos of the tree plots for Year
4 monitoring that show the on-site planted stems are included in Appendix A of this report.
Candiff Creek Restoration Project, DMS Project No. 92767
November 2015, Monitoring Year 4 FINAL 13
3.2 Stream Assessment
3.2.1 Morphometric Success Criteria
To document the stated success criteria, the following monitoring program was instituted
following construction completion on the Site:
Cross-sections: Two permanent cross-sections were installed per 1,000 LF of stream
restoration work, with one of the locations being a riffle cross-section and one location being
a pool cross-section in each series. A total of 10 permanent cross-sections were established
across the Site. Each cross-section was marked on both banks with permanent pins to establish
the exact transect used. The permanent cross-section pins are surveyed and located relative to
a common benchmark to facilitate easy comparison of year-to-year data. The annual cross-
section surveys include points measured at all breaks in slope, including top of bank, bankfull,
inner berm, edge of water, and thalweg.
The approved Mitigation Plan requires the following criteria be met to achieve stream
restoration success:
 There should be little change in as-built cross-sections
 If changes do take place, they will be evaluated to determine if they represent a
movement toward a more unstable condition (e.g., down-cutting or erosion) or a
movement toward increased stability (e.g., settling, vegetative changes, deposition
along the banks, or decrease in width/depth ratio)
 Cross-sections will be classified using the Rosgen Stream Classification System
(Rosgen, 1994), and all monitored cross-sections should fall within the quantitative
parameters defined for channels of the design stream type.
Longitudinal Profiles: A complete longitudinal profile was surveyed following construction
completion to record as-built conditions and to establish a baseline profile. The profile was
conducted for the entire length of each restored channel for all reaches. Measurements
included thalweg, water surface, inner berm, bankfull, and top of low bank. Each of these
measurements was taken at the head of each feature (e.g., riffle, pool, and glide). In addition,
maximum pool depth was recorded. All surveys were tied to a single, permanent benchmark.
The approved Mitigation Plan requires the following criteria be met to achieve stream
restoration success:
 A longitudinal profile will be completed annually for the five-year monitoring period
 The profile will be conducted for 3,000 LF of restored Candiff Creek channel
 The longitudinal profiles should show that the bedform features are remaining stable;
i.e., they are not aggrading or degrading
 Pools should remain deep, with flat water surface slopes, and the riffles should remain
steeper and shallower than the pools
 Bedforms observed should be consistent with those observed for channels of the
designed stream type.
Candiff Creek Restoration Project, DMS Project No. 92767
November 2015, Monitoring Year 4 FINAL 14
3.2.2 Morphometric Results
Year 4 cross-section monitoring data for stream stability was completed during September
2015. The 10 permanent cross-sections along the restored channels (5 located across riffles
and 5 located across pools) were re-surveyed to document stream dimension at the end of
Monitoring Year 4. Data from each of these cross-sections are presented in Appendix B.
Tables B.1 through B.3 in Appendix B present visual stability assessment data, the baseline
stream summary and the morphologic and hydraulic monitoring summary.
Cross-sections 1, 4, 6, 8 and 10 are situated across riffles that are located between pools.
Monitored cross-sections 1, 4, 6 and 8 are located on the upstream portion of M3 and based on
the survey data, these cross-sections demonstrated minor fluctuations in riffle dimension
during Year 4 of monitoring and currently remain stable. Additionally, cross-section 10 is
located on the downstream portion of M3 and remains stable as well.
Cross-sections 2, 3, 5, 7 and 9 are situated across pools, which are located at the apex of
meander bends. Based on the Year 4 survey data, all five pool Cross-sections 2, 3, 5, 7 and 9
have demonstrated minor fluctuations in pool dimensions since as-built conditions. Based on
the Year 4 monitoring survey data, all pool cross-sections show the development of point bar
features on the inside banks of the meander bends.
According to the Year 4 cross-section data, all cross-sections are currently meeting the success-
criteria as stated in the Site Mitigation Plan.
The longitudinal profile for Year 4 monitoring was also completed in September 2015. The
Year 4 longitudinal profile monitoring data were compared to the data collected during the as-
built condition survey completed in April 2012. During Year 4 monitoring, the longitudinal
profile survey was completed for Reach M3. A total stream length of 3,150LF was surveyed
for M3. The longitudinal profiles for M3 is presented in Appendix B.
Year 4 monitoring data for the M3 longitudinal profile indicate that the riffles in this reach
have essentially maintained the same bed elevations since as-built conditions. It was observed
in most years including Year 4 that many pools in M3 have continued to increase in depth since
as-built conditions. It is noted that increased pool depths were observed throughout most of
M3. The deeper pools noted in M3 are benefiting the overall functionality of the Site by
providing increased channel stability and also providing an area for energy dissipation while
promoting greater habitat diversity. While the pools remain deep, the survey data indicate that
the M3 riffles are stable. Additionally, the longitudinal profile for M3 demonstrates that the
in-stream structures within the reach are stable and functioning as designed.
According to the Year 4 longitudinal profile data, the restored stream thalweg is stable and
currently meeting the success-criteria as stated in the Site Mitigation Plan.
In-stream structures installed within the restored stream included constructed riffles, log vanes,
rock j-hooks, log j-hooks, rock cross vanes, root wads and stream ford crossings. Visual
observations of these structures throughout Year 4 monitoring indicate that all structures are
functioning as designed and holding their post-construction grade. Structures that were
installed to develop deeper pools, such as cross vanes and j-hooks, are performing their
designed functions. Log vanes placed in meander areas have provided scour in pools to provide
cover for aquatic wildlife. J-hooks placed in the lower end of the riffle areas have maintained
riffle elevations and have provided downstream scour holes that provides aquatic habitat.
Candiff Creek Restoration Project, DMS Project No. 92767
November 2015, Monitoring Year 4 FINAL 15
Additionally, bioengineered structures placed on the outside of meander bends have provided
bank stability and in-stream cover for fish and other aquatic organisms.
However, two minor pool problem areas were observed during Year 4 monitoring. These two
areas are described in Section 3.2.5.
3.2.3 Hydrologic Criteria
One crest gauge was installed on the Site to document bankfull events. The gauge is checked
during each site visit and records the stage of the highest out-of-bank flow between site visits.
The gauge is located on the left bank on the downstream portion of M3 at station 55+50.
The approved Mitigation Plan requires the following criteria be met to achieve stream
restoration success: Two bankfull flow events must be documented within the five-year
monitoring period. The two bankfull events must occur in separate years, otherwise, the stream
monitoring will continue until two bankfull events have been documented in separate years.
3.2.4 Hydrologic Monitoring Results
According to the on-site crest gauge, the Site experienced at least two significant bankfull flow
events during Year 4 monitoring. The largest on-site bankfull flow event documented at the
M3 crest gauge occurred on April 20, 2015. It is estimated that the height of highest flow at
the M3 crest gauge observed in Year 4 was approximately 2.85 feet above bankfull stage. A
photograph depicting a large stump that washed up along M3 on October 4, 2015 is included
in Appendix B.
Since As-built conditions, seven documented bankfull events have been recorded as shown in
Table 6. The approved Mitigation Plan requires that two bankfull flow events must be
documented within the five-year monitoring period.
Each of the four years of monitoring has documented at least one bankfull event within the
restored channel. As such, the hydrologic success criteria for the Site has been met.
Crest gauge readings are presented in Table 6 and photos of the crest gauges and out-of-bank
evidence are presented in Appendix B.

Table 6. Verification of Bankfull Events
Candiff Creek Restoration Project: DMS Project No. 92767
Date of Data
Collection
Estimated Occurrence of
Bankfull Event
Method of Data
Collection
M3 Crest
(feet)
5/22/2012 4/2012 - 5/2012 storms Crest Gauge 1.60
2/7/2013 1/18/2013 Crest Gauge 2.49
9/23/2013 7/5/2013 Crest Gauge 1.21
4/9/2014 1/11/2014 Crest Gauge 0.82
7/23/2014 4/29/2014 Crest Gauge 0.23
4/30/2015 4/20/2015 Crest Gauge 2.85
10/19/2015 10/4/2015 Crest Gauge 1.60
Candiff Creek Restoration Project, DMS Project No. 92767
November 2015, Monitoring Year 4 FINAL 16

3.2.5 Stream Problem Areas
Additional stream enhancement work along M1 and UT1 was completed in September 2015.
Bankfull benches were excavated and vertical stream banks were sloped to stable angles. In
addition, vane structures and toe wood were installed along meander bends to protect the
stream banks, provide additional habitat, and to provide long-term stream bank stabilization.
No additional credit is being requested as a result of this work. During this time, the existing
kudzu plants and roots were cleared within a large portion of the easement area. Per the permit
conditions for the enhancement work, monitoring along M1 and UT1 will be conducted for a
minimum of one additional year beyond the monitoring required in the mitigation plan. This
monitoring will include visual assessments conducted twice per year and the installation and
annual monitoring of two bank pin arrays installed in the outside of meander bends.
Two pools located at stations 46+50 and 55+50 have exhibited areas of erosion during Year 4
monitoring. The erosional areas observed are occurring on the outer bend below the root wads
and are approximately 10 feet or less in length. These two minor problem areas make up
approximately 0.2% of the total as-built stream length of 5,095 feet. Photos of these two areas
are included in the Appendix. These areas are isolated and do not suggest a trend towards
long-term instability.
3.2.6 Stream Photographs
Photographs are used to document restoration success visually. A total of 59 reference stations
were installed and photographed after construction. Photographs of these reference stations
will be collected for at least five years following construction. Reference photos are taken at
least twice per year, and are taken in enough locations to document the condition of the restored
system. Permanent markers were established to ensure that the same locations (and view
directions) on the Site are documented in each monitoring period.
The stream systems are photographed longitudinally, beginning at the downstream portion of
the restoration reaches, and moving upstream to the beginning of the reaches. Photographs are
taken looking upstream at designated locations. Reference photo locations are marked and
described for future reference. Points are spaced sufficiently close to provide an overall view
of the reach. The angle of the photograph depends on which direction provides the best view
and is noted and will be continued for future photos. When modifications to photo position
and/or direction are made due to obstructions or other reasons, the modified photo position
and/or direction is noted, along with any landmarks. The modified position is used in all future
photographs of that site.
Additional photographs are taken to document any observed evidence of flooding patterns such
as debris, wrack lines, water marks, channel features, etc.
Also, both stream banks are photographed at all permanent cross-section photo stations. For
each stream bank photo, the photo view line follows a survey tape placed across the channel,
perpendicular to flow (representing the cross-section line). The photograph is framed so that
the survey tape is centered in the photo (appears as a vertical line at the center of the
photograph), keeping the channel water surface line horizontal and near the lower edge of the
frame. In each cross-section photo showing the left bank, flow is moving to the right.
Conversely, in each cross-section photo showing the right bank, flowing is moving to the left.
Candiff Creek Restoration Project, DMS Project No. 92767
November 2015, Monitoring Year 4 FINAL 17
A photo log of the restored channel is presented in the attached CD of this report. Photos for
each of the 10 permanent cross-sections are included in Appendix B.
Photographs of the restored channel were taken in October 2015 to document the evolution of
the stream geometry. Herbaceous vegetation and shrubs were dense along the banks of M2
and M3, making the photography of some of the stream channel areas difficult. Additionally,
photographs of the enhancement work performed along M1 and UT1 are provided in Appendix
B.
3.2.7 Stream Stability Assessment
Table B.1 provides a summary of the results obtained from the visual inspection of in-stream
structures performed during Year 4 monitoring. The percentages noted are a general, overall
field evaluation of the how the features were performing at the time of the photo point survey.
According to the visual stability assessment following Year 4 monitoring, and after a visual
evaluation throughout 2015, it was determined that all features at the Site along M2, M3, and
UT2 are currently performing as designed. With the recent enhancement activities, kudzu
treatment, and planned re-planting, the features along M1 and UT1 will meet performance
standards.
3.2.8 Quantitative Measures Summary Tables
The quantitative pre-construction, reference reach, and design data used to determine
restoration approach, as well as the as-built baseline data used during the project’s post
construction monitoring period are summarized in Appendix B.

Candiff Creek Restoration Project, DMS Project No. 92767
November 2015, Monitoring Year 4 FINAL 18
4.0 OVERALL CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Stream Monitoring - The total length of stream channel restored, enhanced and/or preserved on
the Site was 7,038 LF. The project involved the restoration of 4,081 linear feet (LF) of stream
along M3. Additionally 1,757 of stream Enhancement (265 LF of Enhancement I along M2 and
1,492 LF of Enhancement II along M1, UT1 and UT2) and 1,200 LF of stream preservation along
UT1 and UT2. This entire length was inspected during Year 4 monitoring to assess stream
performance. Excluding M1 and UT1 which have been discussed above with issues that are
actively being addressed, the Year 4 monitoring did not reveal any significant problem areas within
the boundaries of the Site.
Cross-section monitoring data for stream stability were collected during Year 4 monitoring.
Additionally, a longitudinal profile survey was also completed during Year 4 monitoring for
approximately 3,150 LF of stream on the Site. The longitudinal profile was completed for Reach
M3 only. Year 4 monitoring data for the M3 longitudinal profile show that the riffles in this reach
have maintained relatively the same bed elevations since as-built conditions. The longitudinal
profile demonstrates that the in-stream structures within M3 are stable and functioning as designed.
The Year 4 cross-sectional data also indicate that Reach M3 is stable and functioning as designed.
According to the on-site crest gauge, the Site experienced at least two significant bankfull flow
events during Year 4 monitoring. The largest on-site bankfull flow event documented at the M3
crest gauge occurred on April 20, 2015. It is estimated that the height of highest flow at the M3
crest gauge observed in Year 4 was approximately 2.85 feet above bankfull stage.
Since As-built conditions, seven documented bankfull events have been recorded as shown in
Table 6. The approved Mitigation Plan requires that two bankfull flow events must be documented
within the five-year monitoring period.
Given that each of the four years of monitoring has documented a bankfull event within the
restored channel, it is noted that the hydrologic success criteria for the Site has been met.
Two pools located at stations 46+50 and 55+50 have exhibited areas of erosion during Year 4
monitoring. The erosional areas observed are occurring on the outer bend below the root wads
and are approximately 10 feet or less in length. These areas are isolated and do not suggest a trend
towards long-term instability.
Additional stream enhancement work along M1 and UT1 was completed in September 2015.
Bankfull benches were excavated and vertical stream banks were sloped to stable angles. In
addition, vane structures and toe wood were installed along meander bends to protect the stream
banks, provide additional habitat, and to provide long-term stream bank stabilization. No
additional credit is being requested as a result of this work.
Vegetation Monitoring - Data from Year 4 monitoring for the 13 vegetation plots exhibited a range
of 40 to 931 stems per acre. The data showed that the Site had an average of survivability of 735
stems per acre.
During Year 4 monitoring, kudzu (Pueraria montana) was present on the Site in the vicinity of
vegetation plot 13 and in the general vicinity. This concentration of kudzu was previously treated
during construction and remnants are still present within the easement. The kudzu is located on
the upstream portion of Reach M1, downstream of River-Siloam Road. This area was treated once
in early August 2015 and once in late August 2015 by use of the herbicides Glyphosate and

Candiff Creek Restoration Project, DMS Project No. 92767
November 2015, Monitoring Year 4 FINAL 19
Triclopyr. Any remaining kudzu in this area will be treated again during the early growing season
2016.
Also, additional stream enhancement work along M1 and UT1 was completed in September 2015.
Bankfull benches were excavated and vertical stream banks were sloped to stable angles. In
addition, vane structures and toe wood were installed along meander bends to protect the stream
banks, provide additional habitat, and to provide long-term stream bank stabilization. No
additional credit is being requested as a result of this work. During this time, the existing kudzu
plants and roots were cleared within a large portion of the easement area. Vegetation Plots 1
through 12 on reach M2 and M3 did not exhibit any invasive or aggressive species occurring on
the Site.
Property boundary fencing in the M1 vicinity was installed during the summer of 2015. This fence
allows the landowner to graze cattle outside of the fenced conservation easement which will
prevent kudzu re-establishment.
Additional bare-root trees will be planted during the winter of 2015 in the riparian buffer areas
along M1 and UT1 to increase density and to offset mortality from treating kudzu.

5.0 WILDLIFE OBSERVATIONS
Observations of deer and raccoon tracks are common at the Site. During Year 4 monitoring, small
animals such frogs, rodents, snakes, and fish were periodically observed. Various songbirds and
birds of prey were observed on the Site throughout Year 4 monitoring.

Candiff Creek Restoration Project, DMS Project No. 92767
November 2015, Monitoring Year 4 FINAL 20
6.0 REFERENCES
Rosgen, D. L. 1994. A Classification of Natural Rivers. Catena 22: 169-199.
Cowardin, L. M., V. Carter, F. C. Golet, E. T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of wetlands and
habitats of the United States. U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service,
Washington, D.C
USDA, Natural Resource Conservation Service, Soil Survey of Surry County, North Carolina,
2007.

FIGURES

Figure 1. Vicinity Map of Candiff Creek Restoration Project.

Figure 2. Restoration Summary Map of Candiff Creek Restoration Project.

w
U
DATUM DESCRIPTION:
NORTH CAROLINA GRID COORDINATES (NAD83) FOR PRIMARY
GPS DERIVED CONTROL POINTS WERE ESTABLISHED FOR
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING INC. CARY, NC.
SUPPLEMENT CONTROL POINTS (NAD83) UTILIZED FOR THIS
SURVEY WERE ESTABLISHED BY MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING
USING CONVENTIONAL METHODS.
NORTH CAROLINA
ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM
S URR Y COUNTY
LOCATION: ON THE JOHNSON PROPERTY NEAR SILOAM, NC
OFF RIVER—SILOAM ROAD
TYPE OF WORK: AS BUILT PLANS FOR STREAM RESTORATION,
ENHANCEMENT, AND PRESERVATION
9_OP9
a
ffA1[ I "K lROIRf.T RRIMI M GHPX.'
NC 118335 1 1 1 i
FIGURE 3A
GRAPHIC SCALES
INDEX OF SHEETS
1 ...
TITLE SHEET
1-A - .
. STREAM CONVENTIONAL SYMBOLS
GENERALNOTES
THE OFFICE OF:
STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
R -a 600
VEGETATION SELECTION
1-B - .
. NCDOT CONVENTIONAL SYMBOLS
2 - 2E - .
. STRUCTURE DETAILS
3-3A-..
REVEGETATION
4-4E ...
PLAN OF PROPOSED AND EXISTING
r_�l
STREAM DESIGN
5-5E - .
. PLAN OF AS -BUILT
5-6E ...
PLAN OF AS -BUILT AND DESIGN
7-8 - .
. PROFILES
DATUM DESCRIPTION:
NORTH CAROLINA GRID COORDINATES (NAD83) FOR PRIMARY
GPS DERIVED CONTROL POINTS WERE ESTABLISHED FOR
MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING INC. CARY, NC.
SUPPLEMENT CONTROL POINTS (NAD83) UTILIZED FOR THIS
SURVEY WERE ESTABLISHED BY MICHAEL BAKER ENGINEERING
USING CONVENTIONAL METHODS.
NORTH CAROLINA
ECOSYSTEM ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM
S URR Y COUNTY
LOCATION: ON THE JOHNSON PROPERTY NEAR SILOAM, NC
OFF RIVER—SILOAM ROAD
TYPE OF WORK: AS BUILT PLANS FOR STREAM RESTORATION,
ENHANCEMENT, AND PRESERVATION
9_OP9
a
ffA1[ I "K lROIRf.T RRIMI M GHPX.'
NC 118335 1 1 1 i
FIGURE 3A
GRAPHIC SCALES
PROJECT LENGTH
PREPARED FOR
SUBMITTED BY
PREPARED IN THE OFFICE OF:
PROJECT ENGINEER
THE OFFICE OF:
THE OFFICE OF:8000
R -a 600
CANDIFF UTI UT2
Cary, NORTH CAROLINA 27518
= • — 919463�88av
40 20 0 40 80
EXISTING REACH LENGTH = 4,783 885 1,117
DESIGN REACH LENGTH = 5,064 885 1,117
r_�l
�y�O''nea
10
919463.5490
"IF -'664
THIS DOCUMENT
ORIGINALLY ISSUED AND
SEALED BY:
11111-
PLANS
50 25 0 50 t00
AS—BUILT REACH LENGTH = 5,078 885 1,117
WILLIAM SCOTT HUNT III, PE
WILLIAM KENT
��� a
�,� `
JAL la �LIZl� l i..'o,
mac`'
PROJECT ENGINEER
APRIL 2012
L-3708
JUNE 5, 2012
THIS MEDIA SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED
PROFILE (HORIZONTAL)
pgpgp,K�
SeaelO3©+�
COMPLETION DATE:
A CERTIFIED DOCUMENT
C �+
JOSHUA A
JE
�IGEOMOR
5 0 5 t 0
JULIE CAHILL
TONY DAVIS
PROJECTMANAGER HOLOGIST
PROJECT MANAGER
PROJECT MANAGER
P.E.
PROFILE (VERTICAL)
SIGNATURE:

PROJECT ENGINEER
THIS DOCUMENT
ORIGINALLY ISSUED AND
SEALED
WILLIAM KENT
JUNE 5, 2012
THIS MEDIA SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED
A CERTIFIED DOCUMENT
�II
N UCTON d I N CANDIFF CREEK � I / / Nlnael aakeEsNeerms Inc.
T 10 00 0 = B (pIN CONSTRUCTION M1 / / / / - so9oaORTHGaRvav,s2l7518
Cary, NORTH C-ly, S2 6
II%� / // // / - • Faxna;a e314.
�� cense# F 108
FIGURE 313
vv��v� �vvv�vvvvvvvv�=///ii/ l/l ��i I III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII�IIIIIII\III I I III ��/// � /
—
�\
ERET�E M)
KE
EV� .KE
JOH�YsDy
TA.
�—
I
Bcp 16,/
/!7r < Y=1326124.381
/
"099
:�aea�
dOF�NNbI//
=-S_
moos051
e-
e-
NAD 83
NOTE:
CONTOURS SHOWN ARE PRE -RESTORATION CONTOURS.
AS -BUILT
PLAN VIEW
40 20 0 40 80
SCALE (FT)

630 ` 635 —
/-8308
/
/ /
/ 025/
/� Dry/
END CONSTRUCTION M1 =
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION M2 /
STA. 17+34.94
\ X 1530718.46
Y, 9258587.86 � END CONSTRUCTION M2 = /
r Z=821.24 BEGIN CONSTRUCTION M3 /
cE STA. 20+00.00 /
m I
x0000/ W CE ----- 1 / / GE
O
x�
—
5 !� � XTX — /1 VE PLOT CE
E
16+00 x X \ k rFENCE G CE /
PROJECT ENGINEER
THIS DOCUMENT
ORIGINALLY ISSUED AND
SEALED BY:
WILLIAM KENT
L-3708
JUNE 5, 2012
THIS MEDIA SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED
A CERTIFIED DOCUMENT
Michael Baker Engineering Inc.
- 8000 Regency Parkway, Suile 600
Cary, NORTH CAROLINA 27518
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
License #'. F-1084
FIGURE 3C
41 Ir��59 k\k / \/ P / PP x/ /
�'- —_,,P GPS 2 J I PP &
\/ X=1530791.18 VEGPLOT �R
ze\mak X—x Z=818.880.81 X .�@�X X 1— \ _ �r�x
/ O + PP T8 X01
7 \_ h�
END`CONSTRUCTION UT2 \ J �\ \\ 27 0p
—7 STA. 21+61.79_
\ \ \ VE#11
l I \ i \\\ \ \ \
19#00 °ci \\ \\\\ \ O \ \
\\\
BRUSH MATTRESS_—
S f //
PP #57 — —
T97e / / // /iEVVE5FTTE—& MlfE\
JOHNSON
- — — — °vee —
NOTES:
CONTOURS SHOWN ARE PRE -RESTORATION CONTOURS.
PLUGGED DITCH
FILLED EXISTING DITCH
AS -BUILT
PLAN VIEW
40 20 0 40 80
SCALE (FT)

PROJECT ENGINEER
/ —
\ —/ / / THIS DOCUMENT
ORIGINALLY / / ISSUED AND
SEALED BY:
WILLIAM KENT
JUNE 5, 2012
/ �ers-- / THIS MEDIA SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED
A CERTIFIED DOCUMENT
Michael Baker Engineering Inc.
Cary, NORTH CAROLI NA 27518
-a20 �� Fax^Bt94 F-1084 Ba
"a License #'. F-1084
�—
��_____---_�__ Me
FIGURE 3D
'
EXISTING
FENCE —
/-EMERGENCY LIVESTOCK ACCESSCE
-20—
C E
E
CE G X Ir PP #41 I / / / a
PP #42 / / �X PP #40 (\ PP 4
35 r`'J
EXISTING \ 1
FENCE / e ¢
� PP #39 PP 76 F-
/ %X x PP X 6 X—X VEG BLOT a �PP #43 /3.Zx0 +00 \ 37 U
GE CE / /+ PP #47 W
co
1 /LU
/ BRUSH MATTRESS XI--,' �/ / - �,, o X04 Ile
/ Y. --� / VEGPLOT / \ - _ LU
PP 451 (�03� _ t
/ / ¢
_ xoz _
+00 g
/ �
X04
PP
4 00 O PP #48
VE #BLOT / 0— 5°ee \\ \ \\ I II \ 1 \\\\ //�/ /O % �\ \
%
PP 5 /// \\ PPI#9 %���/�
X02 PP #53 All //
_
� llllllllllllWlllllll�lm //i�/i���i��//iir���_ _
/////�/
�/////�
\1
///�/�%%// /i IIII l/lllll�lll VIII I J II 1\\� \\\\\\\\ \� \� 1
°e_//�//%�//i�/
RTE MI /// / /�//� /
/�/!l/�/i /� &X
J�HI�SOI� �///
\ \ V /� N /����//
fill,
\ \ \ ,/�,/�///�� � II IIIIIIII
NOTE:
CONTOURS SHOWN ARE PRE -RESTORATION CONTOURS.
-° PLUGGED DITCH
AS -BUILT
PLAN VIEW
FILLED EXISTING DITCH
40 20 0 40 $o
SCALE (FT)

� 1 �
c? VEGPLOT \
#6
AQ e^ PP #32-
m
Z=8 T
FORDCRIISSfNG'MOVEq 7O STA. 57+00
E DURING CONSTW
.Pj#26
XO,St VEGPLOT —� /
PP 031 PP #28�44+ 0
X05 /
\ X06
GEGUET—"
X06 �\
\\ J
\
\� ��,
\
lN111llllG/0
f
1 �
l�
SPP #25y7
#22 Co
I "
uj
I w
/ xoo CO)
OD
c, U
ti
SPR #24
PP #23-
PROJECT ENGINEER
THIS DOCUMENT
ORIGINALLY ISSUED AND
SEALED BY:
WILLIAM KENT
L-3708
JUNE 5, 2012
THIS MEDIA SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED
A CERTIFIED DOCUMENT
Michael Baker Engineering Inc.
50o0 Regency Parkway, Suile Boo
Cary, NORTH CAROLINA 27518
Ph... 91946354 5
Fax: [phone]
Ll— #'. F-1084
FIGURE 3E
PLUGGED DITCH
FILLED EXISTING DITCH
NOTE:
CONTOURS SHOWN ARE PRE -RESTORATION CONTOURS.
'/. AS—BUILT
PLAN VIEW
40 20 0 40 80
■ttf im J
SCALE (FT)
EVERET --- MIKE,��
JOHNSON
— �Bts
FILLEDING DITCH WITH MATERIAL FROM NENJLY_E-X AVATED-C ANNE --
-BLENDED THE NORTHERN SLOPE INTO THE LANDSCAPE PER'DIRE\ION OF- IN EEFi�
/
_ — — — — — — —
/
EXISTING CE
X_X_X—X�
ir
CE �B1o�
GPS 4
X=1531925.69
/ \
� 1 �
c? VEGPLOT \
#6
AQ e^ PP #32-
m
Z=8 T
FORDCRIISSfNG'MOVEq 7O STA. 57+00
E DURING CONSTW
.Pj#26
XO,St VEGPLOT —� /
PP 031 PP #28�44+ 0
X05 /
\ X06
GEGUET—"
X06 �\
\\ J
\
\� ��,
\
lN111llllG/0
f
1 �
l�
SPP #25y7
#22 Co
I "
uj
I w
/ xoo CO)
OD
c, U
ti
SPR #24
PP #23-
PROJECT ENGINEER
THIS DOCUMENT
ORIGINALLY ISSUED AND
SEALED BY:
WILLIAM KENT
L-3708
JUNE 5, 2012
THIS MEDIA SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED
A CERTIFIED DOCUMENT
Michael Baker Engineering Inc.
50o0 Regency Parkway, Suile Boo
Cary, NORTH CAROLINA 27518
Ph... 91946354 5
Fax: [phone]
Ll— #'. F-1084
FIGURE 3E
PLUGGED DITCH
FILLED EXISTING DITCH
NOTE:
CONTOURS SHOWN ARE PRE -RESTORATION CONTOURS.
'/. AS—BUILT
PLAN VIEW
40 20 0 40 80
■ttf im J
SCALE (FT)

PROJECT ENGINEER
THIS DOCUMENT
ORIGINALLY ISSUED AND
SEALED BY:
WILLIAM KENT
a L-3708 JUNE 5, 2012
THIS MEDIA SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED
A CERTIFIED DOCUMENT
\ ` ` 8°Io0 Ral
e9Bake, EaginacTiin 8Inc.
oo
Cary, NORTH CAROLINA 27518
v \Phone919310c89
\ \ d d'` X825- -825- /825/ EVE�ETTE $l MIKE / i j / / F�cen=e tF';oaa°
\\ — _ _ / / JOHNSON / —
\ FIGURE 3F
\\\ \ \ \ x-821` ---
\ \ \\ —a, PICLED—EXIST/
\\\\� G AITCH WITH
MATERIAL CHANNL.—
\B\ DED_THE=ORT=ERR-BL9F�.IDeTisO`E= GAGE=\ DIRE6Tl0N_0ENGINE
R.
ZEE
��lBCP 32 //€ND NI(�N C D1fF CREEK M3
Z=81101 i ��
O �X 7\ EXISTJNG� \ \ /� _ G� \, PP #2
PP #2y CF FENC /
PP #3
0
W
WPP #17 Z
= CX10 4 x
j PP #18 VEGPLOT OPS 6
1 #3 X=1532508.71
W Y=923713.58
S7x F z -802.x6 �` \
X07
AI \ O� \ \ VEG#2PLOT PP #5 PLUGGED DITCH
EMERGENCY LIVESTOCK ACCESS
�OxO PP 413 �
/ I R
PP #14 \ CF \ FILLED EXISTING DITCH
t
\ \ PP #6
+oo CF
\ PP #20
X08 ®�
y
PP #8 m
\ \ \\\ \ \ O
PP #30
X09
CREST GAUGE
P P #
9
PP #10ul
/m
\P #16#16 se\ � � xo ® y�X GEOLIFT � +
_IA,PP #15
#12
tpp #7
\\\� ExISTNG + /
\ \ oo s s \\\\\ \ / / NOTE:
47u,
\� \"\\\ \� \ FENC X09 G// �/ // / CONTOURS SHOWN ARE PRE -RESTORATION CONTOURS.
\\\�� PERMANENT FORD �+ / // // _S 1
\ \ \ \\\\\�\ one \ �_oea� \\\\\\\\ \\ \ \\ \ ��as� / /�•e
AS—BUILT
PLAN VIEW
40 20 0 40 80
SCALE (FT)

PROJECT ENGINEER
THIS DOCUMENT
ORIGINALLY ISSUED AND
SEALED BY:
\\ \\\\ _1I WILLIAM KENT
\\ \ \ III I I �I"Y/ L-3708
JUNE 5, 2012
\��\ \ 111111 VIII I INI IIII I I I I
Q4 \ \\ \ 4 THIS MEDIA SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED
— / A CERTIFIED DOCUMENT
ERETT\\ \\11111111 III IIII I I m inA Michael Baker En9ineerin9 Inc.
_ 8000 Regency Parkway, Su 600
/ / Nps p
Y' \ \\\ \ \\\\I I 'yy Dp P-91NORTH346354 LINA2]518
\\\IIIIIII 7 I Phoee. sts as4.
Fax: [phone]
F-1084
�-0 I I III\\IIII�"11111111111111�111 I FIGURE 3G
-170_— _ -- ��I II�IIIIIIII�IIII IIII114�IIII �I /
X865 �
AZTAIR _R -11P- L� CI
L
� 1 _
- / _
\ ,x=ts3oos4ss 77+00 ro
I\ \ �� /// Y_13
Q
�8—
\\ BCP 23j
Y-92996468/
Z=
845
2.66
LU
Lu
g\ CIO
\ \
\�\
\\���\��==sem\\��\\ \\\\
x��_=���\\��—��\\\ \ \
Ax
°�
I
vvv v v
\ \ \\ \ I VIIIIIIIIII \ \\ \ 'EVE
► /I I \
� \°s \\ \\\\ \ III //o /
\ / /1\���1vr wi
vvv / I
\ I I\ I
/////
\\\1\ \III \ $\\\\
\\\ �\
\\\\
1 I\��I\1\�\\\
\ \\\II 111 \ \ \ V\\ NOTE:
\\\\\\ \\\�\\\�\\\\\\\\\\�\
CONTOURS SHOWN ARE PRE -RESTORATION CONTOURS.
AS BUILT
PLAN VIEW
40 20 0 40 80
SCALE (Fl)

!(
M
3
U
T
1
UT2 M
1
M
2
M
3
RIVER SILOAM
R
D
LO
N
G

D
U
S
T
Y

L
N
4A
4B
4C
Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus
DS, USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and
the GIS User Community
Current Condition
Plan View Figure Index
Candiff Creek - Surry County, NC
0 500 1,000250
Feet±
Legend
Photo Points
!(Crest Gauge
Cross Section
Conservation Easement
In-Stream Structures
Top of Bank
Emergency Livestock Access
Vegetation Plot: (Year 3 Density/Planted Density)
Stream Crossing
As-Built Streams by Mitigation Type
Enhancement I
Enhancement II
Preservation
Restoration
Stream Problem Areas
Vegetation Problem Area (VPA) ~1.6 acres
DMS Project
# 92767
DEQ -
Division of
Mitigation
Services
!(
U
T
1
UT2
M
1
M
2
Veg Plot 13: 40/1012
Veg Plot 12: 890/1012
Veg Plot 11: 890/1012
VPA - Kudzu (Pueraria montana)
Treated in August and October 2014.
59
58
Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus
DS, USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and
the GIS User Community
Current Condition
Plan View Figure
Candiff Creek - Surry County, NC
0 175 35087.5
Feet
4A±DMS Project
# 92767
Legend
Photo Points
!(Crest Gauge
Cross Section
Conservation Easement
In-Stream Structures
Top of Bank
Emergency Livestock Access
Vegetation Plot: (Year 4 Density/Planted Density)
Stream Crossing
As-Built Streams by Mitigation Type
Enhancement I
Enhancement II
Preservation
Restoration
Stream Problem Areas
Vegetation Problem Area (VPA) ~1.6 acres
DEQ -
Division of
Mitigation
Services
!(
M
3
Veg Plot 10: 688/890
Veg Plot 9: 688/769
Veg Plot 8: 728/850
Veg Plot 7: 809/890
Veg Plot 6: 688/728
Stream Problem
Area #1 (<10 ft)
X02X01
X03
X04
X05
X06
58
57
56
30
33
34 32
3637
38
39
40
41
43
4647
4849
50
52 51
53
54
55
31
35
4244
45
Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, i-cubed, Earthstar Geographics,
CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP,
swisstopo, and the GIS User Community
Current Condition
Plan View Figure
Candiff Creek - Surry County, NC
0 175 35087.5
Feet
4B±DMS Project
# 92767
Legend
Photo Points
!(Crest Gauge
Cross Section
Conservation Easement
In-Stream Structures
Top of Bank
Emergency Livestock Access
Vegetation Plot: (Year 4 Density/Planted Density)
Stream Crossing
As-Built Streams by Mitigation Type
Enhancement I
Enhancement II
Preservation
Restoration
Stream Problem Areas
Vegetation Problem Area (VPA) ~1.6 acres
DEQ -
Division of
Mitigation
Services
!(
M
3
Veg Plot 6: 688/728
Veg Plot 5: 769/809
Veg Plot 4: 809/931
Veg Plot 3: 850/1012
Veg Plot 2: 769/931
Veg Plot 1: 931/1052
Stream Problem
Area #1 (<10 ft)
Stream Problem
Area #2 (<10 ft)
X05
X07
X10
X08
X06
X09
1
234
6
7
9
23
1011
12
14
15
16
17
18
20
21
22
24
25
28
29
30
5
8
13
19
26
27
3132
Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus
DS, USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and
the GIS User Community
Current Condition
Plan View Figure
Candiff Creek - Surry County, NC
0 175 35087.5
Feet
4C±DMS Project
# 92767
Legend
Photo Points
!(Crest Gauge
Cross Section
Conservation Easement
In-Stream Structures
Top of Bank
Emergency Livestock Access
Vegetation Plot: (Year 4 Density/Planted Density)
Stream Crossing
As-Built Streams by Mitigation Type
Enhancement I
Enhancement II
Preservation
Restoration
Stream Problem Areas
Vegetation Problem Area (VPA) ~1.6 acres
DEQ -
Division of
Mitigation
Services

APPENDIX A

VEGETATION DATA

VEGETATION TABLES

Ta
b
l
e

A
.
1
.

V
e
g
e
t
a
t
i
o
n

M
e
t
a
d
a
t
a
Re
p
o
r
t
 Pr
e
p
a
r
e
d
 By
Dw
a
y
n
e

H
u
n
e
y
c
u
t
t
Da
t
e
 Pr
e
p
a
r
e
d
10
/
2
0
/
2
0
1
5

1
6
:
0
1
da
t
a
b
a
s
e
 na
m
e
Mi
c
h
a
e
l
B
a
k
e
r
-
2
0
1
4
-
B
-
C
a
n
d
i
f
f
_
U
T
M
i
l
l
S
w
a
m
p
.
m
d
b
da
t
a
b
a
s
e
 lo
c
a
t
i
o
n
L:
\
M
o
n
i
t
o
r
i
n
g
\
V
e
g

P
l
o
t

I
n
f
o
\
C
V
S

D
a
t
a

T
o
o
l
\
C
a
n
d
i
f
f
_
U
T

t
o

M
i
l
l

S
w
a
m
p
co
m
p
u
t
e
r
 na
m
e
CA
R
Y
L
D
H
U
N
E
Y
C
U
T
T
fi
l
e
 si
z
e
54
5
6
2
8
1
6
DE
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
 OF
 WO
R
K
S
H
E
E
T
S
 IN
 TH
I
S
 DO
C
U
M
E
N
T
‐‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
Me
t
a
d
a
t
a
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n

o
f

d
a
t
a
b
a
s
e

f
i
l
e
,

t
h
e

r
e
p
o
r
t

w
o
r
k
s
h
e
e
t
s
,

a
n
d

a

s
u
m
m
a
r
y

o
f

p
r
o
j
e
c
t
(
s
)

a
n
d

p
r
o
j
e
c
t

d
a
t
a
.
Pr
o
j
,
 pl
a
n
t
e
d
Ea
c
h

p
r
o
j
e
c
t

i
s

l
i
s
t
e
d

w
i
t
h

i
t
s

P
L
A
N
T
E
D

s
t
e
m
s

p
e
r

a
c
r
e
,

f
o
r

e
a
c
h

y
e
a
r
.

T
h
i
s

e
x
c
l
u
d
e
s

l
i
v
e

s
t
a
k
e
s
.
Pr
o
j
,
 to
t
a
l
 st
e
m
s
Ea
c
h

p
r
o
j
e
c
t

i
s

l
i
s
t
e
d

w
i
t
h

i
t
s

T
O
T
A
L

s
t
e
m
s

p
e
r

a
c
r
e
,

f
o
r

e
a
c
h

y
e
a
r
.

T
h
i
s

i
n
c
l
u
d
e
s

l
i
v
e

s
t
a
k
e
s
,

a
l
l

p
l
a
n
t
e
d

s
t
e
m
s
,

a
n
d

a
l
l

n
a
t
u
r
a
l
/
v
o
l
u
n
t
e
e
r

s
t
e
m
s
.
Pl
o
t
s
Li
s
t

o
f

p
l
o
t
s

s
u
r
v
e
y
e
d

w
i
t
h

l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n

a
n
d

s
u
m
m
a
r
y

d
a
t
a

(
l
i
v
e

s
t
e
m
s
,

d
e
a
d

s
t
e
m
s
,

m
i
s
s
i
n
g
,

e
t
c
.
)
.
Vi
g
o
r
Fr
e
q
u
e
n
c
y

d
i
s
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
o
n

o
f

v
i
g
o
r

c
l
a
s
s
e
s

f
o
r

s
t
e
m
s

f
o
r

a
l
l

p
l
o
t
s
.
Vi
g
o
r
 by
 Sp
p
Fr
e
q
u
e
n
c
y

d
i
s
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
o
n

o
f

v
i
g
o
r

c
l
a
s
s
e
s

l
i
s
t
e
d

b
y

s
p
e
c
i
e
s
.
Da
m
a
g
e
Li
s
t

o
f

m
o
s
t

f
r
e
q
u
e
n
t

d
a
m
a
g
e

c
l
a
s
s
e
s

w
i
t
h

n
u
m
b
e
r

o
f

o
c
c
u
r
r
e
n
c
e
s

a
n
d

p
e
r
c
e
n
t

o
f

t
o
t
a
l

s
t
e
m
s

i
m
p
a
c
t
e
d

b
y

e
a
c
h
.
Da
m
a
g
e
 by
 Sp
p
Da
m
a
g
e

v
a
l
u
e
s

t
a
l
l
i
e
d

b
y

t
y
p
e

f
o
r

e
a
c
h

s
p
e
c
i
e
s
.
Da
m
a
g
e
 by
 Pl
o
t
Da
m
a
g
e

v
a
l
u
e
s

t
a
l
l
i
e
d

b
y

t
y
p
e

f
o
r

e
a
c
h

p
l
o
t
.
Pl
a
n
t
e
d
 St
e
m
s
 by
 Pl
o
t
 an
d
 Sp
p
A
m
a
t
r
i
x

o
f

t
h
e

c
o
u
n
t

o
f

P
L
A
N
T
E
D

l
i
v
i
n
g

s
t
e
m
s

o
f

e
a
c
h

s
p
e
c
i
e
s

f
o
r

e
a
c
h

p
l
o
t
;

d
e
a
d

a
n
d

m
i
s
s
i
n
g

s
t
e
m
s

a
r
e

e
x
c
l
u
d
e
d
.
PR
O
J
E
C
T
 SU
M
M
A
R
Y
‐‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
‐
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
 Co
d
e
92
7
6
7
pr
o
j
e
c
t
 Na
m
e
Ca
n
d
i
f
f
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
St
r
e
a
m

a
n
d

B
u
f
f
e
r

R
e
s
t
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
Ri
v
e
r
 Ba
s
i
n
Ya
d
k
i
n
-
P
e
e

D
e
e
le
n
g
t
h
(
f
t
)
st
r
e
a
m
‐to
‐ed
g
e
 wi
d
t
h
 (f
t
)
ar
e
a
 (s
q
 m)
Re
q
u
i
r
e
d
 Pl
o
t
s
 (c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
)
Sa
m
p
l
e
d
 Pl
o
t
s
13
Ca
n
d
i
f
f

C
r
e
e
k

R
e
s
t
o
r
a
t
i
o
n

P
r
o
j
e
c
t
:

P
r
o
j
e
c
t

N
o
.

9
2
7
6
7
Ta
b
l
e

A
.
2
.

V
e
g
e
t
a
t
i
o
n

V
i
g
o
r

b
y

S
p
e
c
i
e
s
Sp
e
c
i
e
s
C
o
m
m
o
n
 Na
m
e
4
32
1
0
MissingUnknown
Asi
m
i
n
a
 tr
i
l
o
b
a
pa
w
p
a
w
1
Be
t
u
l
a
 ni
g
r
a
ri
v
e
r

b
i
r
c
h
44
6
3
3
Co
r
n
u
s
 am
o
m
u
m
si
l
k
y

d
o
g
w
o
o
d
7
12
6
Di
o
s
p
y
r
o
s
 vi
r
g
i
n
i
a
n
a
co
m
m
o
n

p
e
r
s
i
m
m
o
n
16
6
4
1
Fr
a
x
i
n
u
s
 pe
n
n
s
y
l
v
a
n
i
c
a
gr
e
e
n

a
s
h
32
1
2
1
Qu
e
r
c
u
s
 mi
c
h
a
u
x
i
i
sw
a
m
p

c
h
e
s
t
n
u
t

o
a
k
7
12
9
1
Qu
e
r
c
u
s
 ph
e
l
l
o
s
wi
l
l
o
w

o
a
k
3
5
2
Sa
m
b
u
c
u
s
 ca
n
a
d
e
n
s
i
s
Co
m
m
o
n

E
l
d
e
r
b
e
r
r
y
3
Vi
b
u
r
n
u
m
 de
n
t
a
t
u
m
so
u
t
h
e
r
n

a
r
r
o
w
w
o
o
d
1
Ca
r
p
i
n
u
s
 ca
r
o
l
i
n
i
a
n
a
Am
e
r
i
c
a
n

h
o
r
n
b
e
a
m
4
3
1
Ce
r
c
i
s
 ca
n
a
d
e
n
s
i
s
ea
s
t
e
r
n

r
e
d
b
u
d
4
6
2
Qu
e
r
c
u
s
 ru
b
r
a
no
r
t
h
e
r
n

r
e
d

o
a
k
1
2
Li
r
i
o
d
e
n
d
r
o
n
 tu
l
i
p
i
f
e
r
a
tu
l
i
p
t
r
e
e
3
3
Pl
a
t
a
n
u
s
 oc
c
i
d
e
n
t
a
l
i
s
Am
e
r
i
c
a
n

s
y
c
a
m
o
r
e
41
9
4
3
TO
T
A
L
14
1
4
12
3
57
46
10
11
Ca
n
d
i
f
f

C
r
e
e
k

R
e
s
t
o
r
a
t
i
o
n

P
r
o
j
e
c
t
:

P
r
o
j
e
c
t

N
o
.

9
2
7
6
7
Ta
b
l
e

A
.
3
.

V
e
g
e
t
a
t
i
o
n

D
a
m
a
g
e

b
y

S
p
e
c
i
e
s
Ca
n
d
i
f
f

C
r
e
e
k

R
e
s
t
o
r
a
t
i
o
n

P
r
o
j
e
c
t
:

P
r
o
j
e
c
t

N
o
.

9
2
7
6
7
Species
Com
mon Nam
e
Count of Dam
ag
e Categories
No Damag
e
Vine Strangulation
As
i
m
i
n
a
 tr
i
l
o
b
a
pa
w
p
a
w
0
1
Be
t
u
l
a
 ni
g
r
a
ri
v
e
r

b
i
r
c
h
0
5
6
Ca
r
p
i
n
u
s
 ca
r
o
l
i
n
i
a
n
a
Am
e
r
i
c
a
n

h
o
r
n
b
e
a
m
0
8
Ce
r
c
i
s
 ca
n
a
d
e
n
s
i
s
ea
s
t
e
r
n

r
e
d
b
u
d
0
1
2
Co
r
n
u
s
 am
o
m
u
m
si
l
k
y

d
o
g
w
o
o
d
0
2
5
Di
o
s
p
y
r
o
s
 vi
r
g
i
n
i
a
n
a
co
m
m
o
n

p
e
r
s
i
m
m
o
n
0
2
7
Fr
a
x
i
n
u
s
 pe
n
n
s
y
l
v
a
n
i
c
a
gr
e
e
n

a
s
h
1
8
1
Li
r
i
o
d
e
n
d
r
o
n
 tu
l
i
p
i
f
e
r
a
tu
l
i
p
t
r
e
e
0
6
Pl
a
t
a
n
u
s
 oc
c
i
d
e
n
t
a
l
i
s
Am
e
r
i
c
a
n

s
y
c
a
m
o
r
e
2
5
5
2
Qu
e
r
c
u
s
 mi
c
h
a
u
x
i
i
sw
a
m
p

c
h
e
s
t
n
u
t

o
a
k
0
2
9
Qu
e
r
c
u
s
 ph
e
l
l
o
s
wi
l
l
o
w

o
a
k
0
1
0
Qu
e
r
c
u
s
 ru
b
r
a
no
r
t
h
e
r
n

r
e
d

o
a
k
3
3
Sa
m
b
u
c
u
s
 ca
n
a
d
e
n
s
i
s
Co
m
m
o
n

E
l
d
e
r
b
e
r
r
y
0
3
Vi
b
u
r
n
u
m
 de
n
t
a
t
u
m
so
u
t
h
e
r
n

a
r
r
o
w
w
o
o
d
0
1
TO
T
A
L
14
14
6
2
4
1
6
Ca
n
d
i
f
f

C
r
e
e
k

R
e
s
t
o
r
a
t
i
o
n

P
r
o
j
e
c
t
:

P
r
o
j
e
c
t

N
o
.

9
2
7
6
7
Ta
b
l
e

A
.
4
.

V
e
g
e
t
a
t
i
o
n

D
a
m
a
g
e

b
y

P
l
o
t
Plot
Count of Damage Categories
(no damage)
Vine Strangulation
92
7
6
7
-
0
1
-
0
0
0
1
-
y
e
a
r
:
4
0
2
6
92
7
6
7
-
0
1
-
0
0
0
2
-
y
e
a
r
:
4
0
1
9
92
7
6
7
-
0
1
-
0
0
0
3
-
y
e
a
r
:
4
0
2
1
92
7
6
7
-
0
1
-
0
0
0
4
-
y
e
a
r
:
4
0
2
2
92
7
6
7
-
0
1
-
0
0
0
5
-
y
e
a
r
:
4
0
1
9
92
7
6
7
-
0
1
-
0
0
0
6
-
y
e
a
r
:
4
0
1
7
92
7
6
7
-
0
1
-
0
0
0
7
-
y
e
a
r
:
4
0
2
0
92
7
6
7
-
0
1
-
0
0
0
8
-
y
e
a
r
:
4
0
1
8
92
7
6
7
-
0
1
-
0
0
0
9
-
y
e
a
r
:
4
0
1
7
92
7
6
7
-
0
1
-
0
0
1
0
-
y
e
a
r
:
4
0
1
8
92
7
6
7
-
0
1
-
0
0
1
1
-
y
e
a
r
:
4
0
2
2
92
7
6
7
-
0
1
-
0
0
1
2
-
y
e
a
r
:
4
0
2
2
92
7
6
7
-
0
1
-
0
0
1
3
-
y
e
a
r
:
4
6
6
TO
T
A
L
13
6
2
4
1
6
Ta
b
l
e

A
.
5
.

P
l
a
n
t
e
d

S
t
e
m
s

b
y

P
l
o
t

a
n
d

S
p
e
c
i
e
s
Ca
n
d
i
f
f

C
r
e
e
k

R
e
s
t
o
r
a
t
i
o
n

P
r
o
j
e
c
t
:

P
r
o
j
e
c
t

N
o
.

9
2
7
6
7
Com
ment
Species
SpType
Com
monName
Total Planted Stems
# of Plots
Average # of Stems
Plot 92767‐01‐0001
Plot 92767‐01‐0002
Plot 92767‐01‐0003
Plot 92767‐01‐0004
Plot 92767‐01‐0005
Plot 92767‐01‐0006
Plot 92767‐01‐0007
Plot 92767‐01‐0008
Plot 92767‐01‐0009 Plot 92767‐01‐0010 Plot 92767‐01‐0011 Plot 92767‐01‐0012 Plot 92767‐01‐0013
As
i
m
i
n
a

t
r
i
l
o
b
a
Sh
r
u
b

T
r
e
e
p
a
w
p
a
w
1
1
1
1
Be
t
u
l
a

n
i
g
r
a
Tr
e
e
ri
v
e
r

b
i
r
c
h
53
1
0
5
.
3
1
0
35
4
5
3
6
1
0
6
1
Ca
r
p
i
n
u
s

c
a
r
o
l
i
n
i
a
n
a
S
h
r
u
b

T
r
e
e
A
m
e
r
i
c
a
n

h
o
r
n
b
e
a
m
84
2
2
1
32
Ce
r
c
i
s

c
a
n
a
d
e
n
s
i
s
S
h
r
u
b

T
r
e
e
e
a
s
t
e
r
n

r
e
d
b
u
d
10
4
2
.
5
62
1
1
Co
r
n
u
s

a
m
o
m
u
m
S
h
r
u
b
s
i
l
k
y

d
o
g
w
o
o
d
25
6
4
.
1
7
1
4
6
4
7
3
Di
o
s
p
y
r
o
s

v
i
r
g
i
n
i
a
n
a
T
r
e
e
co
m
m
o
n

p
e
r
s
i
m
m
o
n
2
7
9
3
1
2
3
35
1
1
7
4
Fr
a
x
i
n
u
s

p
e
n
n
s
y
l
v
a
n
i
c
a
T
r
e
e
gr
e
e
n

a
s
h
8
7
1
.
1
4
1
11
2
1
1
1
Li
r
i
o
d
e
n
d
r
o
n

t
u
l
i
p
i
f
e
r
a
T
r
e
e
tu
l
i
p
t
r
e
e
6
2
3
1
5
Pl
a
t
a
n
u
s

o
c
c
i
d
e
n
t
a
l
i
s
T
r
e
e
Am
e
r
i
c
a
n

s
y
c
a
m
o
r
e
5
4
1
0
5
.
4
91
5
5
7
6
1
4
1
0
6
Qu
e
r
c
u
s

m
i
c
h
a
u
x
i
i
T
r
e
e
sw
a
m
p

c
h
e
s
t
n
u
t

o
a
k
2
9
9
3
.
2
2
32
3
2
3
3
5
5
3
Qu
e
r
c
u
s

p
h
e
l
l
o
s
Tr
e
e
wi
l
l
o
w

o
a
k
10
4
2
.
5
7
1
1
1
Qu
e
r
c
u
s

r
u
b
r
a
Tr
e
e
no
r
t
h
e
r
n

r
e
d

o
a
k
1
1
1
1
Sa
m
b
u
c
u
s

c
a
n
a
d
e
n
s
i
s
S
h
r
u
b

T
r
e
e
C
o
m
m
o
n

E
l
d
e
r
b
e
r
r
y
33
1
1
1
1
Vi
b
u
r
n
u
m

d
e
n
t
a
t
u
m
S
h
r
u
b

T
r
e
e
s
o
u
t
h
e
r
n

a
r
r
o
w
w
o
o
d
1
1
1
1
TO
T
A
L
0
14
14
14
2
3
6
1
4
2
3
1
9
2
1
2
0
1
9
1
7
2
0
1
8
1
7
1
7
2
2
2
2
1
12
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1
0
1
1
1
2
1
3
Be
t
u
l
a

n
i
g
r
a
10
3
5
4
5
3
6
1
0
6
1
5
3
Di
o
s
p
y
r
o
s

v
i
r
g
i
n
i
a
n
a
12
3
3
5
1
1
7
4
2
7
Fr
a
x
i
n
u
s

P
e
n
n
s
y
l
v
a
n
i
c
a
11
1
2
1
1
1
8
Li
r
i
o
d
e
n
d
r
o
n

t
u
l
i
p
i
f
e
r
a
15
6
Pl
a
t
a
n
u
s

o
c
c
i
d
e
n
t
a
l
i
s
91
5
5
7
6
1
4
1
0
6
5
4
Qu
e
r
c
u
s

m
i
c
h
a
u
x
i
i
32
3
2
3
3
5
5
3
29
Qu
e
r
c
u
s

p
h
e
l
l
o
s
71
1
1
10
Qu
e
r
c
u
s

r
u
b
r
a
11
Sh
r
u
b

S
p
e
c
i
e
s
As
i
m
i
n
a

t
r
i
l
o
b
a
11
Ca
r
p
i
n
u
s

c
a
r
o
l
i
n
i
a
n
a
21
3
28
Ce
r
c
i
s

c
a
n
a
d
e
n
s
i
s
62
1
1
10
Co
r
n
u
s

a
m
o
m
u
m
14
6
4
7
3
2
5
Li
n
d
e
r
a

b
e
n
z
o
i
n
0
Sa
m
b
u
c
u
s

c
a
n
a
d
e
n
s
i
s
11
1
3
Vi
b
u
r
n
u
m

d
e
n
t
a
t
u
m
11
Nu
m
b
e
r

o
f

v
o
l
u
n
t
e
e
r

s
t
e
m
s
/
p
l
o
t
00
0
7
0
0
0
6
0
0
0
0
0
1
3
Nu
m
b
e
r

o
f

p
l
a
n
t
e
d

s
t
e
m
s
/
p
l
o
t
23
1
9
2
1
2
0
1
9
1
7
2
0
1
8
1
7
1
7
2
2
2
2
1
2
3
6
T
o
t
a
l

S
t
e
m
s
/
a
c
r
e

Y
e
a
r

4
93
1
7
6
9
8
5
0
8
0
9
7
6
9
6
8
8
8
0
9
7
2
8
6
8
8
6
8
8
8
9
0
8
9
0
4
0
T
o
t
a
l

S
t
e
m
s
/
a
c
r
e

Y
e
a
r

3
10
5
2
7
6
9
8
5
0
8
9
0
7
6
9
6
4
8
8
0
9
7
2
8
6
8
8
7
2
8
8
9
0
8
9
0
2
4
3
T
o
t
a
l

S
t
e
m
s
/
a
c
r
e

Y
e
a
r

2
10
5
2
8
0
9
8
5
0
8
9
0
7
6
9
6
4
8
8
9
0
7
2
8
7
2
8
7
6
9
9
3
1
8
9
0
6
8
8
T
o
t
a
l

S
t
e
m
s
/
a
c
r
e

Y
e
a
r

1
10
5
2
9
7
1
8
5
0
9
3
1
8
5
0
7
2
8
8
9
0
7
6
9
7
6
9
8
0
9
9
7
1
9
3
1
8
9
0
T
o
t
a
l

S
t
e
m
s
/
a
c
r
e

I
n
i
t
i
a
l
10
5
2
9
3
1
1
0
1
2
9
3
1
8
0
9
7
2
8
8
9
0
8
5
0
7
6
9
8
9
0
1
0
1
2
1
0
1
2
1
0
1
2
915
Ta
b
l
e

A
.
6
.

P
l
o
t

S
p
e
c
i
e
s

a
n
d

D
e
n
s
i
t
i
e
s
Ca
n
d
i
f
f

C
r
e
e
k

R
e
s
t
o
r
a
t
i
o
n

P
r
o
j
e
c
t
:

D
M
S

P
r
o
j
e
c
t

N
o
.

9
2
7
6
7
Tr
e
e

S
p
e
c
i
e
s
Ye
a
r

4

To
t
a
l
s
Pl
o
t
s
Yearly Average Stems/acre 735 819766 878

VEGETATION PHOTOS

Vegetation Plot 1 Vegetation Plot 2
Vegetation Plot 3 Vegetation Plot 4
Vegetation Plot 5 Vegetation Plot 6

Vegetation Plot 7 Vegetation Plot 8
Vegetation Plot 9 Vegetation Plot 10
Vegetation Plot 11 Vegetation Plot 12

Vegetation Plot 13

APPENDIX B

GEOMORPHIC DATA

STREAM TABLES

Table B.1. Categorical Stream Feature Visual Stability Assessment
FeatureInitialMY-01MY-02MY-03MY-04MY-05
A. Riffles 100%100%100%100%100%
B. Pools 100%96%96%96%99%
C. Thalweg 100%100%100%100%100%
D. Meanders 100%100%100%100%100%
E. Bed General 100%100%100%100%100%
F. Bank Condition 100%100%100%100%99%
G. Wads 100%100%100%100%99%
Candiff Creek Restoration Project: DMS Project No. 92767
Performance Percentage
Di
m
e
n
s
i
o
n

-

R
i
f
f
l
e
LL
U
L
E
q
.
M
i
n
M
e
a
n
M
a
x
M
i
n
M
e
a
n
M
a
x
Mi
n
M
e
d
M
a
x
M
i
n
M
e
a
n
M
a
x
BF

W
i
d
t
h

(
f
t
)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
9
.
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
1
9
.
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Fl
o
o
d
p
r
o
n
e

W
i
d
t
h

(
f
t
)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
3
.
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
27
.
7
-
-
-
-
-
3
0
.
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
BF

M
e
a
n

D
e
p
t
h

(
f
t
)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
.
4
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
1
.
4
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
BF

M
a
x

D
e
p
t
h

(
f
t
)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
.
8
5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
BF

C
r
o
s
s
-
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
a
l

A
r
e
a

(
f
t
²
)
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
8
.
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
2
9
.
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Wi
d
t
h
/
D
e
p
t
h

R
a
t
i
o
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
3
.
9
-
-
-
-
-
1
1
-
-
-
-
-
14
--
-
-
-
1
3
.
9
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
En
t
r
e
n
c
h
m
e
n
t

R
a
t
i
o
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
.
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
1.
4
-
-
-
-
-
1
.
5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Ba
n
k

H
e
i
g
h
t

R
a
t
i
o
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
.
6
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
-
-
1.
1
1
-
-
-
-
-
1
.
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
BF

V
e
l
o
c
i
t
y

(
f
p
s
)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
.
7
-
-
-
-
-
3
.
5
-
-
-
-
-
5
--
-
-
-
3
.
6
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Pa
t
t
e
r
n
Ch
a
n
n
e
l

B
e
l
t
w
i
d
t
h

(
f
t
)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Ra
d
i
u
s

o
f

C
u
r
v
a
t
u
r
e

(
f
t
)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Me
a
n
d
e
r

W
a
v
e
l
e
n
g
t
h

(
f
t
)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Me
a
n
d
e
r

W
i
d
t
h

R
a
t
i
o
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Pr
o
f
i
l
e
Ri
f
f
l
e

L
e
n
g
t
h

(
f
t
)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Ri
f
f
l
e

S
l
o
p
e

(
f
t
/
f
t
)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
0
.
0
0
5
-
-
-
-
-
0
.
0
0
8
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Po
o
l

L
e
n
g
t
h

(
f
t
)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Po
o
l

S
p
a
c
i
n
g

(
f
t
)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
29
.
7
-
-
-
-
-
9
9
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Su
b
s
t
r
a
t
e

a
n
d

T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t

P
a
r
a
m
e
t
e
r
s
d1
6

/

d
3
5

/

d
5
0

/

d
8
4

/

d
9
5

-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
---------------
Re
a
c
h

S
h
e
a
r

S
t
r
e
s
s

(
c
o
m
p
e
t
e
n
c
y
)

l
b
/
f
²
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0
.
3
5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
0
.
3
6
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
St
r
e
a
m

P
o
w
e
r

(
t
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t

c
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
)

W
/
m
²
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
1
.
7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
2
1
.
7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Ad
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l

R
e
a
c
h

P
a
r
a
m
e
t
e
r
s
Ch
a
n
n
e
l

l
e
n
g
t
h

(
f
t
)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
6
5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
2
6
5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
6
5
-
-
-
-
-
Dr
a
i
n
a
g
e

A
r
e
a

(
S
M
)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
.
5
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
2
.
5
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
.
5
3
-
-
-
-
-
Ro
s
g
e
n

C
l
a
s
s
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
F
4
/
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
B
4
c
/
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
B
4
c
/
1
-
-
-
-
-
BF

D
i
s
c
h
a
r
g
e

(
c
f
s
)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
0
5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
1
0
5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Si
n
u
o
s
i
t
y
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
.
0
0
-
-
-
-
-
1
.
2
-
-
-
-
-
1.
4
--
-
-
-
1
.
0
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
.
0
0
-
-
-
-
-
BF

s
l
o
p
e

(
f
t
/
f
t
)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0
.
0
0
4
5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
0
.
0
0
4
5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0
.
0
0
4
5
-
-
-
-
-
Di
m
e
n
s
i
o
n

-

R
i
f
f
l
e
LL
U
L
E
q
.
M
i
n
M
e
a
n
M
a
x
M
i
n
M
e
a
n
M
a
x
Mi
n
M
e
a
n
M
a
x
M
i
n
M
e
a
n
M
a
x
BF

W
i
d
t
h

(
f
t
)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
0
.
7
-
-
-
-
-
3
2
.
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
2
0
.
4
-
-
-
-
-
1
9
.
8
2
5
.
6
2
1
.
6
Fl
o
o
d
p
r
o
n
e

W
i
d
t
h

(
f
t
)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
5
.
5
-
-
-
-
-
9
4
.
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
60
.
0
-
-
-
-
-
1
2
0
.
0
1
0
8
.
0
1
3
9
.
9
1
2
0
.
2
BF

M
e
a
n

D
e
p
t
h

(
f
t
)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0
.
9
-
-
-
-
-
1
.
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
1
.
6
-
-
-
-
-
1
.
2
4
1
.
5
8
1
.
4
4
BF

M
a
x

D
e
p
t
h

(
f
t
)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
.
0
-
-
-
-
-
2
.
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
1.
9
-
-
-
-
-
2
.
2
1
.
9
6
2
.
4
3
2
.
1
5
BF

C
r
o
s
s
-
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
a
l

A
r
e
a

(
f
t
²
)
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
9
.
2
-
-
-
-
-
3
2
.
6
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
3
2
.
0
-
-
-
-
-
2
8
.
6
2
3
2
.
4
4
3
0
.
7
7
Wi
d
t
h
/
D
e
p
t
h

R
a
t
i
o
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
4
.
6
-
-
-
-
-
3
4
.
6
1
1
-
-
-
-
-
14
--
-
-
-
1
3
.
0
-
-
-
-
-
1
2
.
6
2
0
.
7
1
5
.
4
En
t
r
e
n
c
h
m
e
n
t

R
a
t
i
o
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
.
7
-
-
-
-
-
2
.
9
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
2.
9
-
-
-
-
-
5
.
9
4
.
2
7
.
0
5
.
6
Ba
n
k

H
e
i
g
h
t

R
a
t
i
o
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
.
0
-
-
-
-
-
2
.
5
1
-
-
-
-
-
1.
1
1
-
-
-
-
-
1
.
1
1
.
0
1
.
1
1
.
0
BF

V
e
l
o
c
i
t
y

(
f
p
s
)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
.
5
-
-
-
-
-
3
.
9
3
.
5
-
-
-
-
-
5
3.
5
-
-
-
-
-
5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Pa
t
t
e
r
n
Ch
a
n
n
e
l

B
e
l
t
w
i
d
t
h

(
f
t
)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Ra
d
i
u
s

o
f

C
u
r
v
a
t
u
r
e

(
f
t
)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Me
a
n
d
e
r

W
a
v
e
l
e
n
g
t
h

(
f
t
)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Me
a
n
d
e
r

W
i
d
t
h

R
a
t
i
o
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
3.
5
-
-
-
-
-
7
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Pr
o
f
i
l
e
Ri
f
f
l
e

L
e
n
g
t
h

(
f
t
)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Ri
f
f
l
e

S
l
o
p
e

(
f
t
/
f
t
)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
0
.
0
0
7
8
-
-
-
-
-
0
.
0
1
0
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Po
o
l

L
e
n
g
t
h

(
f
t
)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Po
o
l

S
p
a
c
i
n
g

(
f
t
)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
81
.
6
-
-
-
-
-
1
4
2
.
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Su
b
s
t
r
a
t
e

a
n
d

T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t

P
a
r
a
m
e
t
e
r
s
d1
6

/

d
3
5

/

d
5
0

/

d
8
4

/

d
9
5

-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
---------------
Re
a
c
h

S
h
e
a
r

S
t
r
e
s
s

(
c
o
m
p
e
t
e
n
c
y
)

l
b
/
f
²
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0
.
3
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
0
.
4
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
St
r
e
a
m

P
o
w
e
r

(
t
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t

c
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
)

W
/
m
²
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
2
.
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
2
6
.
6
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Ad
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l

R
e
a
c
h

P
a
r
a
m
e
t
e
r
s
Ch
a
n
n
e
l

l
e
n
g
t
h

(
f
t
)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
,
8
2
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
4
,
1
0
9
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4
,
1
2
3
-
-
-
-
-
Dr
a
i
n
a
g
e

A
r
e
a

(
S
M
)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
.
7
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
2
.
7
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
.
7
4
-
-
-
-
-
Ro
s
g
e
n

C
l
a
s
s
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C
4
/
1
,

F
4
/
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
C
4
/
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C
4
/
1
-
-
-
-
-
BF

D
i
s
c
h
a
r
g
e

(
c
f
s
)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
1
5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
1
1
5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Si
n
u
o
s
i
t
y
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
.
2
9
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
1
.
3
3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
.
4
1
-
-
-
-
-
BF

s
l
o
p
e

(
f
t
/
f
t
)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0
.
0
0
5
5
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
0
.
0
0
5
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0
.
0
0
5
2
-
-
-
-
-
Ta
b
l
e

B
.
2
.

B
a
s
e
l
i
n
e

S
t
r
e
a
m

S
u
m
m
a
r
y
As-built
De
s
i
g
n
Re
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

R
e
a
c
h
(
e
s
)

D
a
t
a
Pr
e
-
E
x
i
s
t
i
n
g

C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
Ca
n
d
i
f
f

C
r
e
e
k

R
e
s
t
o
r
a
t
i
o
n

P
r
o
j
e
c
t
:

D
M
S

P
r
o
j
e
c
t

N
o
.

9
2
7
6
7
Ca
n
d
i
f
f

C
r
e
e
k

-

M
2
Pa
r
a
m
e
t
e
r
8.
3
/
2
4
.
4
/
3
6
.
7
/
8
2
.
0
/
1
1
9
.
3
8.
3
/
2
4
.
4
/
3
6
.
7
/
8
2
.
0
/
1
1
9
.
3
--
-
-
-
Ca
n
d
i
f
f

C
r
e
e
k

-

M
3
Pa
r
a
m
e
t
e
r
US
G
S

G
a
u
g
e
Re
g
i
o
n
a
l

C
u
r
v
e

I
n
t
e
r
v
a
l
P
r
e
-
E
x
i
s
t
i
n
g

C
o
n
d
i
t
i
o
n
R
e
f
e
r
e
n
c
e

R
e
a
c
h
(
e
s
)

D
a
t
a
D
e
s
i
g
n
A
s
-
b
u
i
l
t
8.
3
/
2
4
.
4
/
3
6
.
7
/
8
2
.
0
/
1
1
9
.
3
8.
3
/
2
4
.
4
/
3
6
.
7
/
8
2
.
0
/
1
1
9
.
3
Re
g
i
o
n
a
l

C
u
r
v
e

I
n
t
e
r
v
a
l
--
-
-
-
US
G
S

G
a
u
g
e
Re
a
c
h
:

M
3
MY
1
M
Y
2
M
Y
3
M
Y
4
M
Y
5
M
Y
1
M
Y
2
M
Y
3
M
Y
4
M
Y
5
M
Y
1
M
Y
2
M
Y
3
M
Y
4
M
Y
5
M
Y
1
M
Y
2
M
Y
3
M
Y
4
M
Y
5
Di
m
e
n
s
i
o
n
BF

W
i
d
t
h

(
f
t
)
19
.
4
9
1
9
.
9
2
2
3
.
3
0
1
6
.
8
0
30
.
6
0
1
9
.
2
4
1
3
.
4
9
1
2
.
3
8
33
.
0
8
17
.
9
6
1
8
.
0
3
1
7
.
4
2
18
.
1
7
19.3325.6219.95
BF

M
e
a
n

D
e
p
t
h

(
f
t
)
1.
0
9
1
.
2
4
1
.
2
3
1
.
0
9
1.
1
4
1
.
8
2
2
.
3
7
2
.
4
8
1.
8
1
3.
0
2
2
.
7
8
2
.
8
2
1.
4
1
1.611.181.47
Wi
d
t
h
/
D
e
p
t
h

R
a
t
i
o
17
.
8
2
1
6
.
0
0
1
5
.
4
2
1
5
.
4
3
26
.
9
6
1
0
.
5
5
5
.
7
0
4
.
9
9
18
.
3
1
5.
9
5
6
.
4
8
6
.
1
9
12
.
8
6
12.0321.7713.55
BF

C
r
o
s
s
-
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
a
l

A
r
e
a

(
f
t
²
)
21
.
3
1
6
.
1
2
3
.
3
1
8
.
3
34
.
7
3
5
.
1
3
1
.
9
3
0
.
7
59
.
8
54
.
2
5
0
.
1
4
9
.
1
25
.
7
31.130.229.4
BF

M
a
x

D
e
p
t
h

(
f
t
)
1.
5
6
1
.
8
3
1
.
2
3
1
.
6
1
3.
3
8
3
.
9
9
3
.
6
3
3
.
6
8
4.
3
5
4.
2
7
4
.
4
2
4
.
4
4
2.
0
3
2.302.212.17
Wi
d
t
h

o
f

F
l
o
o
d
p
r
o
n
e

A
r
e
a

(
f
t
)
73
.
6
4
7
7
.
5
8
7
3
.
5
2
7
3
.
0
2
1
5
3
.
8
8
1
5
3
.
8
5
1
5
3
.
9
5
1
5
3
.
8
8
1
2
4
.
6
7
12
4
.
7
0
1
2
4
.
6
6
1
2
4
.
6
9
12
0
.
7
2
120.78120.8120.71
En
t
r
e
n
c
h
m
e
n
t

R
a
t
i
o
3.
8
3
.
9
3
.
9
4
.
3
5.
0
8
.
0
1
1
.
4
1
2
.
4
3.
8
6.
9
6
.
9
7
.
2
6.
6
6.24.76.1
Ba
n
k

H
e
i
g
h
t

R
a
t
i
o
1.
1
1
.
1
1
.
1
0
.
9
1.
0
1
.
0
1
.
1
1
.
1
1.
0
1.
1
1
.
0
1
.
0
1.
1
1.01.00.9
We
t
t
e
d

P
e
r
i
m
e
t
e
r

(
f
t
)
21
.
6
7
2
2
.
4
0
2
5
.
7
6
1
8
.
9
8
32
.
8
8
2
2
.
8
8
1
8
.
2
3
1
7
.
3
4
36
.
7
0
2
4
.
0
0
2
3
.
5
9
2
3
.
0
6
20
.
9
9
2
2
.
5
5
2
7
.
9
8
2
2
.
8
9
Hy
d
r
a
u
l
i
c

R
a
d
i
u
s

(
f
t
)
0.
9
8
0
.
7
2
0
.
9
0
0
.
9
6
1.
0
6
1
.
5
3
1
.
7
5
1
.
7
7
1.
6
3
2
.
2
6
2
.
1
2
2
.
1
3
1.
2
2
1
.
3
8
1
.
0
8
1
.
2
8
Su
b
s
t
r
a
t
e
d5
0

(
m
m
)
d8
4

(
m
m
)
Mi
n

M
a
x
M
e
d
M
i
n

M
a
x
M
e
d
M
i
n

M
a
x
M
e
d
M
i
n

M
a
x
M
e
d
M
i
n

M
a
x
M
e
d
Pa
t
t
e
r
n
Ch
a
n
n
e
l

B
e
l
t
w
i
d
t
h

(
f
t
)
Ra
d
i
u
s

o
f

C
u
r
v
a
t
u
r
e

(
f
t
)
Me
a
n
d
e
r

W
a
v
e
l
e
n
g
t
h

(
f
t
)
Me
a
n
d
e
r

W
i
d
t
h

R
a
t
i
o
Pr
o
f
i
l
e
Ri
f
f
l
e

l
e
n
g
t
h

(
f
t
)
Ri
f
f
l
e

S
l
o
p
e

(
f
t
/
f
t
)
Po
o
l

L
e
n
g
t
h

(
f
t
)
Po
o
l

S
p
a
c
i
n
g

(
f
t
)
Ad
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l

R
e
a
c
h

P
a
r
a
m
e
t
e
r
s
Va
l
l
e
y

L
e
n
g
t
h

(
f
t
)
Ch
a
n
n
e
l

L
e
n
g
t
h

(
f
t
)
Si
n
u
o
s
i
t
y
Wa
t
e
r

S
u
r
f
a
c
e

S
l
o
p
e

(
f
t
/
f
t
)
BF

S
l
o
p
e

(
f
t
/
f
t
)
Ro
s
g
e
n

C
l
a
s
s
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
MY
-
1

(
2
0
1
2
)
Pa
r
a
m
e
t
e
r
MY
-
2

(
2
0
1
3
)
0.
0
0
7
3
48
2
7
1.
4
1
0.
0
0
5
2
0.
0
0
7
3
47
9
4
34
1
5
0.
0
0
5
1
31
4
5
34
0
6
0.
0
0
5
2
0.
0
0
7
1
1.
4
1
1.
4
1
48
2
7
1.
4
1
0.
0
0
5
1
0.
0
0
7
2
25
0
8
35
4
2
Cr
o
s
s
-
s
e
c
t
i
o
n

2
Cr
o
s
s
-
s
e
c
t
i
o
n

3
Cross-section 4
Ri
f
f
l
e
Po
o
l
Po
o
l
Ca
n
d
i
f
f

C
r
e
e
k

R
e
s
t
o
r
a
t
i
o
n

P
r
o
j
e
c
t
:

D
M
S

P
r
o
j
e
c
t

N
o
.

9
2
7
6
7
Riffle
Pa
r
a
m
e
t
e
r
Cr
o
s
s
-
s
e
c
t
i
o
n

1
MY
-
3

(
2
0
1
4
)
MY
-
4

(
2
0
1
5
)
MY-5 (2016)
CC
C
C
Ta
b
l
e

B
.
3
.

M
o
r
p
h
o
l
o
g
y

a
n
d

H
y
d
r
a
u
l
i
c

M
o
n
i
t
o
r
i
n
g

S
u
m
m
a
r
y

Re
a
c
h
:

M
3
MY
1
M
Y
2
M
Y
3
M
Y
4
M
Y
5
M
Y
1
M
Y
2
M
Y
3
M
Y
4
M
Y
5
M
Y
1
M
Y
2
M
Y
3
M
Y
4
M
Y
5
M
Y
1
M
Y
2
M
Y
3
M
Y
4
M
Y
5
Di
m
e
n
s
i
o
n
BF

W
i
d
t
h

(
f
t
)
35
.
0
8
3
4
.
9
3
3
2
.
7
8
3
6
.
7
7
19
.
5
7
2
2
.
5
6
2
1
.
1
2
2
2
.
4
9
41
.
1
1
2
7
.
7
8
2
1
.
2
3
1
9
.
0
3
19
.
3
5
19.6619.5519.15
BF

M
e
a
n

D
e
p
t
h

(
f
t
)
1.
6
1
1
.
6
8
1
.
6
3
1
.
4
1
1.
4
1
1
.
3
4
1
.
2
4
1
.
1
5
1.
0
6
1
.
7
0
2
.
1
9
2
.
0
4
1.
4
5
1.381.361.32
Wi
d
t
h
/
D
e
p
t
h

R
a
t
i
o
21
.
7
8
2
0
.
8
1
2
0
.
1
6
2
6
.
0
0
13
.
7
8
1
6
.
8
6
1
7
.
0
5
1
9
.
5
1
38
.
8
4
1
6
.
3
6
9
.
6
9
9
.
3
1
13
.
3
6
14.2314.4214.47
BF

C
r
o
s
s
-
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
a
l

A
r
e
a

(
f
t
²
)
56
.
5
5
8
.
6
5
3
.
3
5
2
.
0
27
.
8
3
0
.
2
2
6
.
2
2
5
.
9
43
.
5
4
7
.
2
4
6
.
5
3
8
.
9
28
.
0
27.126.525.4
BF

M
a
x

D
e
p
t
h

(
f
t
)
4.
0
4
4
.
3
7
4
.
2
7
4
.
0
4
2.
0
1
2
.
4
5
2
.
1
0
2
.
0
9
2.
5
7
4
.
0
8
4
.
1
6
3
.
5
8
2.
0
9
2.172.162.00
Wi
d
t
h

o
f

F
l
o
o
d
p
r
o
n
e

A
r
e
a

(
f
t
)
11
9
.
0
0
1
1
9
.
0
6
1
1
9
.
0
6
1
1
9
.
0
3
1
0
8
.
0
3
1
0
8
.
0
3
1
0
8
.
1
3
1
0
8
.
0
0
1
1
8
.
5
8
1
1
8
.
6
3
1
1
8
.
5
6
1
1
8
.
6
5
1
1
5
.
2
3
115.12115.21115.20
En
t
r
e
n
c
h
m
e
n
t

R
a
t
i
o
3.
4
3
.
4
3
.
6
3
.
2
5.
5
4
.
8
5
.
1
4
.
8
2.
9
4
.
3
5
.
6
6
.
2
6.
0
5.95.96.0
Ba
n
k

H
e
i
g
h
t

R
a
t
i
o
1.
0
0
.
9
1
.
0
0
.
9
1.
0
1
.
0
1
.
0
1
.
0
1.
0
1
.
0
1
.
0
0
.
9
1.
1
1.11.11.1
We
t
t
e
d

P
e
r
i
m
e
t
e
r

(
f
t
)
38
.
3
0
3
8
.
2
9
3
6
.
0
4
3
9
.
5
9
22
.
3
9
2
5
.
2
4
2
3
.
6
0
2
4
.
7
9
43
.
2
3
3
1
.
1
8
2
5
.
6
1
2
3
.
1
1
22
.
2
5
2
2
.
4
2
2
2
.
2
7
2
1
.
7
9
Hy
d
r
a
u
l
i
c

R
a
d
i
u
s

(
f
t
)
1.
4
8
1
.
5
3
1
.
4
8
1
.
3
1
1.
2
4
1
.
2
0
1
.
1
1
1
.
0
4
1.
0
1
1
.
5
1
1
.
8
2
1
.
6
8
1.
2
6
1
.
2
1
1
.
1
9
1
.
1
7
Su
b
s
t
r
a
t
e
d5
0

(
m
m
)
d8
4

(
m
m
)
Mi
n

M
a
x
M
e
d
M
i
n

M
a
x
M
e
d
M
i
n

M
a
x
M
e
d
M
i
n

M
a
x
M
e
d
M
i
n

M
a
x
M
e
d
Pa
t
t
e
r
n
Ch
a
n
n
e
l

B
e
l
t
w
i
d
t
h

(
f
t
)
Ra
d
i
u
s

o
f

C
u
r
v
a
t
u
r
e

(
f
t
)
Me
a
n
d
e
r

W
a
v
e
l
e
n
g
t
h

(
f
t
)
Me
a
n
d
e
r

W
i
d
t
h

R
a
t
i
o
Pr
o
f
i
l
e
Ri
f
f
l
e

l
e
n
g
t
h

(
f
t
)
Ri
f
f
l
e

S
l
o
p
e

(
f
t
/
f
t
)
Po
o
l

L
e
n
g
t
h

(
f
t
)
Po
o
l

S
p
a
c
i
n
g

(
f
t
)
Ad
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l

R
e
a
c
h

P
a
r
a
m
e
t
e
r
s
Va
l
l
e
y

L
e
n
g
t
h

(
f
t
)
Ch
a
n
n
e
l

L
e
n
g
t
h

(
f
t
)
Si
n
u
o
s
i
t
y
Wa
t
e
r

S
u
r
f
a
c
e

S
l
o
p
e

(
f
t
/
f
t
)
BF

S
l
o
p
e

(
f
t
/
f
t
)
Ro
s
g
e
n

C
l
a
s
s
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
Cr
o
s
s
-
s
e
c
t
i
o
n

5
Cr
o
s
s
-
s
e
c
t
i
o
n

6
Cr
o
s
s
-
s
e
c
t
i
o
n

7
34
1
5
31
4
5
34
0
6
25
0
8
1.
4
1
1.
4
1
1.
4
1
1.
4
1
48
2
7
48
2
7
47
9
4
35
4
2
0.
0
0
5
1
0.
0
0
5
2
0.
0
0
5
2
0.
0
0
5
1
Ri
f
f
l
e
Po
o
l
Cross-section 8
0.
0
0
7
2
Riffle
Pa
r
a
m
e
t
e
r
MY
-
1

(
2
0
1
2
)
MY
-
2

(
2
0
1
3
)
MY
-
3

(
2
0
1
4
)
MY
-
4

(
2
0
1
5
)
MY-5 (2016)
Pa
r
a
m
e
t
e
r
Po
o
l
CC
C
C
0.
0
0
7
3
0.
0
0
7
3
0.
0
0
7
1
Re
a
c
h
:

M
3
MY
1
M
Y
2
M
Y
3
M
Y
4
M
Y
5
M
Y
1
M
Y
2
M
Y
3
M
Y
4
M
Y
5
Di
m
e
n
s
i
o
n
BF

W
i
d
t
h

(
f
t
)
24
.
2
5
2
2
.
7
2
1
6
.
7
4
1
1
.
5
1
24
.
4
0
1
9
.
0
4
1
8
.
2
3
1
7
.
2
5
BF

M
e
a
n

D
e
p
t
h

(
f
t
)
1.
3
0
1
.
6
2
1
.
4
2
1
.
9
3
1.
3
0
1
.
3
0
1
.
1
2
1
.
2
7
Wi
d
t
h
/
D
e
p
t
h

R
a
t
i
o
18
.
6
7
1
4
.
0
5
1
1
.
7
5
5
.
9
7
14
.
3
7
1
4
.
5
9
1
6
.
3
1
1
3
.
6
2
BF

C
r
o
s
s
-
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
a
l

A
r
e
a

(
f
t
²
)
31
.
5
0
3
6
.
8
0
2
3
.
8
0
2
2
.
2
0
24
.
4
0
2
4
.
8
0
2
0
.
4
0
2
1
.
9
0
BF

M
a
x

D
e
p
t
h

(
f
t
)
3.
2
4
3
.
9
8
2
.
9
8
2
.
8
9
1.
8
3
2
.
2
1
1
.
7
4
1
.
9
2
Wi
d
t
h

o
f

F
l
o
o
d
p
r
o
n
e

A
r
e
a

(
f
t
)
88
.
1
4
9
4
.
1
5
8
2
.
9
2
8
2
.
4
3
1
1
7
.
3
2
1
1
7
.
3
0
1
1
7
.
3
1
1
1
7
.
2
9
En
t
r
e
n
c
h
m
e
n
t

R
a
t
i
o
3.
6
4
.
1
5
.
0
7
.
2
6.
3
6
.
2
6
.
4
6
.
8
Ba
n
k

H
e
i
g
h
t

R
a
t
i
o
1.
0
1
.
0
1
.
0
1
.
0
1.
0
1
.
1
1
.
2
1
.
0
We
t
t
e
d

P
e
r
i
m
e
t
e
r

(
f
t
)
26
.
8
5
2
5
.
9
6
1
9
.
5
8
1
5
.
3
7
27
.
0
0
2
1
.
6
4
2
0
.
4
7
1
9
.
7
9
Hy
d
r
a
u
l
i
c

R
a
d
i
u
s

(
f
t
)
1.
1
7
1
.
4
2
1
.
2
2
1
.
4
4
0.
9
0
1
.
1
5
1
.
0
0
1
.
1
1
Su
b
s
t
r
a
t
e
d5
0

(
m
m
)
d8
4

(
m
m
)
Mi
n

M
a
x
M
e
d
M
i
n

M
a
x
M
e
d
M
i
n

M
a
x
M
e
d
M
i
n

M
a
x
M
e
d
M
i
n

M
a
x
M
e
d
Pa
t
t
e
r
n
Ch
a
n
n
e
l

B
e
l
t
w
i
d
t
h

(
f
t
)
Ra
d
i
u
s

o
f

C
u
r
v
a
t
u
r
e

(
f
t
)
Me
a
n
d
e
r

W
a
v
e
l
e
n
g
t
h

(
f
t
)
Me
a
n
d
e
r

W
i
d
t
h

R
a
t
i
o
Pr
o
f
i
l
e
Ri
f
f
l
e

l
e
n
g
t
h

(
f
t
)
Ri
f
f
l
e

S
l
o
p
e

(
f
t
/
f
t
)
Po
o
l

L
e
n
g
t
h

(
f
t
)
Po
o
l

S
p
a
c
i
n
g

(
f
t
)
Ad
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l

R
e
a
c
h

P
a
r
a
m
e
t
e
r
s
Va
l
l
e
y

L
e
n
g
t
h

(
f
t
)
Ch
a
n
n
e
l

L
e
n
g
t
h

(
f
t
)
Si
n
u
o
s
i
t
y
Wa
t
e
r

S
u
r
f
a
c
e

S
l
o
p
e

(
f
t
/
f
t
)
BF

S
l
o
p
e

(
f
t
/
f
t
)
Ro
s
g
e
n

C
l
a
s
s
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
CC
C
C
0.
0
0
7
3
0.
0
0
7
3
0.
0
0
7
1
0.
0
0
7
2
0.
0
0
5
1
0.
0
0
5
2
0.
0
0
5
2
0.
0
0
5
1
1.
4
1
1.
4
1
1.
4
1
1.
4
1
48
2
7
48
2
7
47
9
4
35
4
2
34
1
5
31
4
5
34
0
6
25
0
8
MY
-
4

(
2
0
1
5
)
MY-5 (2016)
Pa
r
a
m
e
t
e
r
MY
-
1

(
2
0
1
2
)
MY
-
2

(
2
0
1
3
)
MY
-
3

(
2
0
1
4
)
Pa
r
a
m
e
t
e
r
Cr
o
s
s
-
s
e
c
t
i
o
n

9
Cr
o
s
s
-
s
e
c
t
i
o
n

1
0
Po
o
l
Ri
f
f
l
e

STREAM DATA

79
0
79
5
80
0
80
5
81
0
81
5
82
0
82
5
20
5
0
2
3
0
0
2
5
5
0
2
8
0
0
3
0
5
0
3
3
0
0
3
5
5
0
3
8
0
0
4
0
5
0
4
3
0
0
4
5
5
0
4
8
0
0
5
0
5
0
Elevation (ft)
St
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
M2

a
n
d

M
3

-
Y
e
a
r

4

-
S
t
a
t
i
o
n

2
0
+
5
0

t
o

5
2
+
0
0
(D
a
t
a

c
o
l
l
e
c
t
e
d

S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r

2
0
1
5
)
As-Built Thalweg Year 1 Thalweg Year 2 Thalweg Year 3 Thalweg Year 4 Thalweg Water Surface Low bank
80
5
80
7
80
9
81
1
81
3
81
5
81
7
81
9
82
1
82
3
82
5
20
5
0
2
3
0
0
2
5
5
0
2
8
0
0
3
0
5
0
3
3
0
0
Elevation (ft)
St
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
M2

a
n
d

M
3

-
Y
e
a
r

4

-
S
t
a
t
i
o
n

2
0
+
5
0

t
o

3
5
+
0
0
(D
a
t
a

c
o
l
l
e
c
t
e
d

S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r

2
0
1
5
)
As-Built Thalweg Year 1 Thalweg Year 2 Thalweg Year 3 Thalweg Year 4 Thalweg Water Surface Low bank
79
5
79
7
79
9
80
1
80
3
80
5
80
7
80
9
81
1
81
3
81
5
35
0
0
37
5
0
40
0
0
42
5
0
45
0
0
47
5
0
5000
Elevation (ft)
St
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
M3

-
Y
e
a
r

4

-
S
t
a
t
i
o
n

3
5
+
0
0

t
o

5
2
+
0
0
(D
a
t
a

c
o
l
l
e
c
t
e
d

S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r

2
0
1
5
)
As-Built Thalweg Year 1 Thalweg Year 2 Thalweg Year 3 Thalweg Year 4 Thalweg Water Surface Low bank
Feature
Stream
Type BKF Area
BKF
Width
BKF
Depth
Max BKF
DepthW/D BH RatioER BKF ElevTOB Elev
RiffleC18.316.81.091.6115.430.94.3817.07816.87
Permanent Cross-section 1
(Year 4 Data - Collected September 2015)
Looking at the Left Bank Looking at the Right Bank
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Station (ft)
Candiff Cross-section 1
As-Built Year 1
Year 2 Year 3
Year 4 Bankfull
Floodprone
Feature
Stream
Type BKF Area
BKF
Width
BKF
Depth
Max BKF
DepthW/D BH RatioER BKF ElevTOB Elev
Pool 30.712.382.483.684.991.112.4816.08816.42
Permanent Cross-section 2
(Year 4 Data - Collected September 2015)
Looking at the Left Bank Looking at the Right Bank
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Station (ft)
Candiff Cross-section 2
As-Built Year 1
Year 2 Year 3
Year 4 Bankfull
Floodprone
Feature
Stream
Type BKF Area
BKF
Width
BKF
Depth
Max BKF
DepthW/D BH RatioER BKF ElevTOB Elev
Pool 49.117.422.824.446.1917.2813.37813.44
Permanent Cross-section 3
(Year 4 Data - Collected September 2015)
Looking at the Left Bank Looking at the Right Bank
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Station (ft)
Candiff Cross-section 3
As-Built Year 1
Year 2 Year 3
Year 4 Bankfull
Floodprone
Feature
Stream
Type BKF Area
BKF
Width
BKF
Depth
Max BKF
DepthW/D BH RatioER BKF ElevTOB Elev
RiffleC29.419.951.472.1713.550.96.1810.53810.3
Permanent Cross-section 4
(Year 4 Data - Collected September 2015)
Looking at the Left Bank Looking at the Right Bank
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Station (ft)
Candiff Cross-section 4
As-Built Year 1
Year 2 Year 3
Year 4 Bankfull
Floodprone
Feature
Stream
Type BKF Area
BKF
Width
BKF
Depth
Max BKF
DepthW/D BH RatioER BKF ElevTOB Elev
Pool 52.036.771.414.04260.93.2808.2807.7
Permanent Cross-section 5
(Year 4 Data - Collected September 2015)
Looking at the Left Bank Looking at the Right Bank
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Station (ft)
Candiff Cross-section 5
As-Built Year 1
Year 2 Year 3
Year 4 Bankfull
Floodprone
Feature
Stream
Type BKF Area
BKF
Width
BKF
Depth
Max BKF
DepthW/D BH RatioER BKF ElevTOB Elev
RiffleC25.922.491.152.0919.5114.8807.57807.52
Permanent Cross-section 6
(Year 4 Data - Collected September 2015)
Looking at the Left Bank Looking at the Right Bank
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Station (ft)
Candiff Cross-section 6
As-Built Year 1
Year 2 Year 3
Year 4 Bankfull
Floodprone
Feature
Stream
Type BKF Area
BKF
Width
BKF
Depth
Max BKF
DepthW/D BH RatioER BKF ElevTOB Elev
Pool 38.919.032.043.589.310.96.2803.7803.32
Permanent Cross-section 7
(Year 4 Data - Collected September 2015)
Looking at the Left Bank Looking at the Right Bank
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Station (ft)
Candiff Cross-section 7
As-Built Year 1
Year 2 Year 3
Year 4 Bankfull
Floodprone
Feature
Stream
Type BKF Area
BKF
Width
BKF
Depth
Max BKF
DepthW/D BH RatioER BKF ElevTOB Elev
RiffleC25.419.151.32214.471.16801.85802.1
Permanent Cross-section 8
(Year 4 Data - Collected September 2015)
Looking at the Left Bank Looking at the Right Bank
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Station (ft)
Candiff Cross-section 8
As-Built Year 1
Year 2 Year 3
Year 4 Bankfull
Floodprone
Feature
Stream
Type BKF Area
BKF
Width
BKF
Depth
Max BKF
DepthW/D BH RatioER BKF ElevTOB Elev
Pool 22.211.511.932.895.971.27.2797.85798.48
Permanent Cross-section 9
(Year 4 Data - Collected September 2015)
Looking at the Left BankLooking at the Right Bank
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Station (ft)
Candiff Cross-section 9
As-Built Year 1
Year 2 Year 3
Year 4 Bankfull
Floodprone
Feature
Stream
Type BKF Area
BKF
Width
BKF
Depth
Max BKF
DepthW/D BH RatioER BKF ElevTOB Elev
RiffleC21.917.251.271.9213.6216.8797.85797.81
Looking at the Left Bank Looking at the Right Bank
(Year 4 Data - Collected September 2015)
Permanent Cross-section 10
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160
El
e
v
a
t
i
o
n

(
f
t
)
Station (ft)
Candiff Cross-section 10
As-Built Year 1
Year 2 Year 3
Year 4 Bankfull
Floodprone
PP1 STA 61+60, Constructed Riffle PP 2 61+25, Constructed Riffle
PP 3 STA 60+25, Rock J-Hook PP 4 STA 60+10, Constructed Riffle
PP 5 STA 59+10, Log J-Hook

PP 6 STA 58+85, Constructed Riffle

PP 7 STA 57+65, Log J-Hook

PP 8 STA 57+50, Stream Crossing
PP 9 STA 56+70, Log J-Hook PP 10 STA 56+50, Constructed Riffle
PP 11 STA 55+40, Log J-Hook PP 12 STA 55+15, Constructed Riffle

PP 13 STA 53+95, Rock J-Hook

PP 14 STA 53+75, Constructed Riffle
PP 15 STA 52+35, Log J-Hook PP 16 STA 52+05, Constructed Riffle
PP 17 STA 50+75, Log J-Hook PP 18 STA 50+40, Constructed Riffle

PP 19 STA 49+15, Log J-Hook

PP 20 STA 48+75, Constructed Riffle
PP 21 STA 47+50, Log J-Hook PP 22 STA 47+25, Constructed Riffle
PP 23 STA 46+15, Log J-Hook PP 24 STA 46+00, Constructed Riffle

PP 25 STA 45+25, Rock J-Hook

PP 26 STA 44+90, Constructed Riffle
PP 27 STA 43+50, Log J-Hook PP 28 STA 43+25, Constructed Riffle
PP 29 STA 42+10, Log J-Hook PP 30 STA 41+80, Constructed Riffle

PP 31 STA 40+25, Log J-Hook

PP 32 STA 40+00, Constructed Riffle
PP 33 STA 38+50, Rock J-Hook PP 34 STA 38+25, Constructed Riffle
PP 35 STA 36+75, Rock J-Hook PP 36 STA 36+45, Constructed Riffle

PP 37 STA 35+05, Log J-Hook

PP 38 STA 34+80, Constructed Riffle
PP 39 STA 33+90, Rock J-Hook PP 40 STA 33+60, Constructed Riffle
P 41 STA 33+00, Stream Crossing PP 42 STA 32+10, Log J-Hook

PP 43 STA 32+75, Constructed Riffle

PP 44 STA 30+55, Log J-Hook
PP 45 STA 30+20, Constructed Riffle PP 46 STA 28+80, Log J-Hook
PP 47 STA 28+65, Constructed Riffle PP 48 STA 27+75, Log Vein/Pool

PP 49 STA 27+10, Log J-Hook

PP 50 STA 26+75, Constructed Riffle
PP 51 STA 25+65, Rock J-Hook PP 52 STA 25+45, Constructed Riffle
PP 53 STA 24+25, Log J-Hook PP 54 STA 24+00, Constructed Riffle

PP 55 STA 22+90, Log J-Hook

PP 56 STA 22+70, Constructed Riffle
PP 57 STA 21+65, Log J-Hook PP 58 STA 19+75, Rock Cross Vane
PP 59 STA 17+75, Rock Cross Vane M3 crest gauge STA 55+50, April 30, 2015. Crest
gauge reading of 2.85 feet.

M3 crest gauge STA 55+50, April 30, 2015. Crest
gauge reading of 2.85 feet.
M3 crest gauge bankfull evidence. April 30, 2015.
M3 crest gauge STA 55+50, October 19, 2015.
Crest gauge reading of 1.60 feet.
M3 crest gauge bankfull evidence.
October 19, 2015.
Stream Problem Area 1 - STA 46+50. M3 bank
erosion on outer portion of meander bend.

Stream Problem Area 2 - STA 55+50. M3 bank
erosion on outer portion of meander bend.

M1 before enhancement activities, April 2015. M1 before enhancement activities, April 2015.
UT1 before enhancement activities, April 2015. M1 after enhancement activities, September 2015.
M1 after enhancement activities, September 2015.M1 after enhancement activities, September 2015.