20151238 Ver 1_401 Application_20151115

1 t��
2®151238
kOffice" Use Only:
Corps.action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: I ❑ Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 13 or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? I ❑ Yes ❑X No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑X Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ
because written approval is not required? 401 Certification:
❑ Yes ❑X No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: Cardinal Streambank Stabilization
2b. County: Wilson
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Wilson
2d. Subdivision name: Brookside Manor
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: David & Teresa Barefoot
3b. Deed Book and Page No. 1750,47
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d. Street address: 11210 Brookside Drive
3e. City, state, zip: ( Wilson, NC 27896
Ij 3f. Telephone no.: 1252-315-7425
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address:
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑X Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes X❑ No
❑ Yes ❑X No
❑ Yes ❑X No
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner) I
4a. Applicant is: ❑ Agent ❑X Other, specify: Local Municipality
4b. Name:
City of Wilson
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
City of Wilson
4d. Street address:
1800 Herring Avenue
4e. City, state, zip:
I Wilson, NC 27894
4f. Telephone no.:
1252-296-3305
4g. Fax no.:
1252-399-2453
4h. Email address:
I [e-mail]
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Daryl Norris, Stormwater Specialist
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
City of Wilson
5c. Street address:
1800 Herring Avenue
5d. City, state, zip:
Wilson, NC 27894
5e. Telephone no.:
1252-296-3305
5f. Fax no.:
1252-399-2453
5g. Email address:
I [e-mail]
Page 2 of 10

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): 13712-47-2331.000
1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): I Latitude: 35.744 Longitude: -77.941
1c. Property size: 1.06 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water to proposed project: Hominy Swamp
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: C, NSW
2c. River basin: Neuse
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
Streambank erosion causing heavy sediment deposition in the stream resulting in a loss of habitat and flow. The land use is low density residential
and the drainage area is 95% built out.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 170
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
Stabilize the stream banks to prevent further erosion and remove deposited sediment
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Following the natural flow line of the stream channel, the banks will be sloped back, matted, and heavily vegetated to prevent further erosion. In places
+,
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the ❑ Yes ❑X No ❑ Unknown
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past? Comments:
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made? El Preliminary El Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company:
Name (if known): Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for I ❑ Yes ❑X No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? I ❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
3b.
3c. 3d. 3e. 3f.
3g.
Stream impact
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your
project (check all that
apply):
number
❑ Wetlands ❑X Streams — tributaries
Q Buffers
❑ Open Waters
❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
(linear
Temporary (T)
(feet)
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland
area impacted.
Stabilization
2a. 2b. 2c.
I 120
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
Type of jurisdiction
Area of
number
Choose one
Corps (404,10) or
impact
Permanent (P) or
-
DWQ (401, other)
(acres)
Temporary (T)
W1 Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
-
W2 Choose one
Choose one
I Yes/No
W3 - Choose one
Choose one
I Yes/No
W4 - Choose one I
Choose one
I Yes/No
W5 - Choose one I
Choose one
I Yes/No
W6 - Choose one I
Choose one
I Yes/No
2g. Total
Wetland Impacts:
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c. 3d. 3e. 3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name Perennial (PER) or Type of Average
Impact
number
intermittent (INT)? jurisdiction stream
length
Permanent (P) or
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(feet)
feet)
S1 T
Stabilization
Hominy Swamp PER I Corps 10
I 120
S2
Choose one
S3
Choose one
S4
Choose one
S5
Choose one
-
S6
Choose one
-
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts I 120
3i. Comments:
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
4b.
4c.
4d. 4e.
Open water
Name of waterbody
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
impact number
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Buffer Impact Reason for impact
Stream name Buffer Zone 1
type
Temporary (T)
mitigation impact
impact
Permanent (P) or
01
(square
Choose one
Choose
O2
B1 T Bank Stabilization
Choose one
Choose
O3
I Yes/No
Choose one
Choose
O4
Choose one
Choose
B5 I
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
B6 I
I I Yes/No
5. Pond or Lake
Construction
0
6i. Comments: Impacts will be limited to only those areas required for sloping back, filling, and stabilizing the stream banks.
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete
the chart below.
5a.
5b.
5c.
5d. 5e.
Pond ID number
Proposed use or
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet) Upland
purpose of pond
(acres)
Flooded Filled Excavated
Flooded Filled Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2 I
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer
impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑X Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b. 6c.
6d. 6e. 6f.
6g.
Buffer Impact Reason for impact
Stream name Buffer Zone 1
Zone 2
number—
mitigation impact
impact
Permanent (P) or
required? (square
(square
Temporary (T)
feet)
feet)
B1 T Bank Stabilization
I Hominy Swamp No 2,400
0
B2 I
I Yes/No
B3 I
I I Yes/No
B4 - I
I I Yes/No
B5 I
I I Yes/No
B6 I
I I Yes/No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts: 2,400
0
6i. Comments: Impacts will be limited to only those areas required for sloping back, filling, and stabilizing the stream banks.
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Impacts will be limited to only those areas required for sloping back and stabilizing the stream banks.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
A pump around bypass system will be used during construction to minimize any additional impacts from the construction process. The banks will be
matted to provide additional stabilization until vegetation establishes. The use of coir logs and live stakes avoids the need for hard armoring.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for ❑ Yes ❑X No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this ❑ Payment to in -lieu fee program
project?
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
Type: Choose one Quantity:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type: Choose one Quantity:
Type: Choose one Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached. ❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: Choose one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form —Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires I Yes EJ No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c. 6d. 6e.
Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation
(square feet) (square feet)
Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
No. The flow of the stream will be pumped around during construction. No other discharges are included
in this project. ❑ YesX❑ No
12. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? 0%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ Yes ❑X No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
It is only a bank stabilzation project under Nationwide 13.
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
3b. Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
apply (check all that apply):
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
4a. Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
(check all that apply):
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
City of Wilson
❑ Phase II
❑D NSW
❑ USMP
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
El Yes ❑ No
❑Coastal counties
❑HQW
❑ORW
❑Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the ❑X Yes ❑ No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered 'yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State El Yes ❑X No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered 'yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) ❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑ Yes ❑X No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application? ❑ Yes 0 No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in I E] Yes 0 No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered 'yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ❑ Yes ❑X No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ❑ Yes X❑ No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. -
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
City of Wilson GIS layers
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? I ❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
City of Wilson GIS layers
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ❑ Yes ❑X No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
City of Wilson GIS layers
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA -designated 100 -year floodplain?
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
Project includes a No Rise Certification and a Floodplain Development Permit.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
City of Wilson GIS layers
Daryl Norris - City of Wilson
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
❑X Yes
pplicant/Agent'siggnature
( nt's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 10 of 10
❑ No
11-18-2015
Date

k>rfa.
,AEAn `�iA1P'i"aia"ic «""i,r`m xwu nds
ssnetal Ama
�rurs xc v_
�� cvnn"c sEan .,."oe
Aaws
.vc"mi sn , r�r �aA�co>a Stu Iola
IN
tu",\ti'104 BARTL_EMG, P PROJECT
ENGINEERING Ac SURVEYING, PC
SHEET R .14 TEFF.(252)PLAN VIEW
t:",MESON, MC. 2J10.3 -1J2! I'AL (2S2) SYp-010..lkmp Na L-1551 w OnNxtwam,
CUT AREA
FILL AREA
^wJ..s•. ,�.> '\ ' , ` `�\ \ ! `.tea �`"°,�"«�`,a«,«o,
GRAPHIC SCALE
I
une )
STREAMBANK RESTORATION
907 CARDINAL DR., WILSON, NC
I LATE AUdIST 2015
(scAfc(noRz�,
5cxE(vERi7 NAL
(REVISIONS
WILSON TONNSHIP N9LSON COUNTY
NORTH CAROLINAZONE
PIN / 3712-47-1382 SHEET t OF 3

BE
aso
I I I TT'—I
7` 1
1F1
12. —dj-1
UL'
-LH+ 44
e -l! 77
4L
------------ TI -07 M+j-
I 4l,
1 7-'
i -u 4' 1-
.......... .......
7.
-T 1-- I
ri I T11TT 11 1--+1�14-: l� I I L -!4 1
loo E 20
wss
NOTE MAX SLOPE IN, FILL SECTIONS IS 1 1
MAX SLOPE CUT SECTIONS is 21
TO . SH WLs
"c IP ON COUNTY
STREAMBANK RESTORA11ON S—E(VERT
I, R"l NORTH CAROUI,IA ZONE
907 CARDINAL DR., WILSON, NC
PIN 13712-47-1582 SHEET 2 OF 6
9113o -20 . . . 10. 010.
BARTLETT
ENGINEERING & SURVEYING, PC
. . . . . . . .
SECTIONS
STREET N.THIEIE '2U
N C 27 9�17211 ( 252�
N.
(0+40 -0+60)
BE
aso
I I I TT'—I
7` 1
1F1
12. —dj-1
UL'
-LH+ 44
e -l! 77
4L
------------ TI -07 M+j-
I 4l,
1 7-'
i -u 4' 1-
.......... .......
7.
-T 1-- I
ri I T11TT 11 1--+1�14-: l� I I L -!4 1
loo E 20
wss
NOTE MAX SLOPE IN, FILL SECTIONS IS 1 1
MAX SLOPE CUT SECTIONS is 21
TO . SH WLs
"c IP ON COUNTY
STREAMBANK RESTORA11ON S—E(VERT
I, R"l NORTH CAROUI,IA ZONE
907 CARDINAL DR., WILSON, NC
PIN 13712-47-1582 SHEET 2 OF 6

IID
1.
90
Oros
BARTLETT SECTIONS
ENGINEERING h SURVEYING, PC
3TNEE'r NMTH TOLD. (='
J99 -0>w (0+65-0+80)
*-s
WISpI, N.C. x769-,TS6 IAt:6x) 599-6601
-
-1 1 {- I—-� - -
12.
moo-
Ila
oo Ito L•�'rl,rf 1�1 l—'- f I-
_-
T -I 1 1-
-iaJs I-1- -1 -T -1 1 f -I- T'� •-I -- rl --
-250
T�+
000
i Fill" 4
L - -- --- f
t1 -_FT_
,0 y20 a0
Of60
_ L
--
Ixo j
_680
-
�,� fam
T -
4-
t00 I -I- - T t +LLi_ _
7TT_ 11+
L -14d
90 a0 -20 -Hol 1 1 I io io ao
wTs
NOTE MAX SLOPE IN FILL SECTIONS IS 1 1
kW SLOPE IN CUT SECTIONS IS 21
H OnrE 9EPTE161ER xots a o c.
STREAMBANK RESTORATION IMLSON TO -SHIP LSON °OAJN Y
SGLLE(NENr) t Kr e. we w NORTH CAROLINA ZONE
907 CARDINAL OR., WILSON, NC I9ev-- I J PIN 13712-47-1 SHEET 3 OF 6

BARTLETT
SECTIONS
sEu ENGINEERING & SURVEYING, PC
F-(352) SBB—O7M
(0+85-1+00)
ir
�mullill, HIM
m.il■iii 0101101=20
.. . ...... ....... .
10
-ItIll.
20O
ar -1
- -T
T T-;
j
-4;-C
r
12D — — — — —
4-d
4W
— — — — — — — — — — —
----- ------- -
jQLjz
i F:
J-
. r
1 -T7 -t-
4-
20
TTr
NOTENucSLOPE
IN FILL SECTIONS IS I I
KW SLOPE IN CUT SECTIONS IS 21
STREAMBANK RESTORATION
sl(—)
WILSON TOWNSHIP WLSON COUNTY
907 CARDINAL DR., WILSON, NC
I".,
NORTH CAROLINA ZONE
PIN /3712—t7-1382 SHEET 4 OF 6

I
_t;-.Trl- :L�I _Li -_i 1 -- •-r_
i--;.
I
- r-
-
46 r�
B
f _{ _ 1 {
41,
r _ jj .-
I,6
I
-:, ; - -iT
�7
-- - -
1
-
_ I _
t-i-�",Tf'
H
_ • -
1 �
00 zo
faSO 1426
IOfI! -T-1-444 _-- I-i=�—. _.' i.i i'
11 JI
- }-k
J
r
T
+ ' a { 1 iI}--r-- --- —I
Mr
-87
_�T.._ --- " .. _ ,zee-- fr _L . � t•_' i -t l- ^I ' Li T,i-.L
n6
i !
,
-,o - ,0 40 w -aa -m -.o , 10 io so
tats
taws
NOTE MAX SLOPE INFILL SECTIONS IS I.t
°4X SLOPE IN CUT SECTIONS IS 2.1 3
t
..•' �µe (p4TE SEPtEMBEB 4015
BARTLE I I" SECTIONS STREAMBANK RESTORATION Iz � �« � I NTS TONNSHIP ZONE'
ENGINEERING
COUNTY
ENdNEERINC h SURVEYING, PC SG�Eara °i 9P NORTH CAROUNn 20Ne
WSW � lm W (M) (1+05 -1+20) 907 CARDINAL DR., WILSON, NC p
REVISIONS PIN } SJ72-47-TSB2 SHEET 5 OF @ s
}*n�! i B?..e' Ltr,n Na C -155t mbW{ttw.mn

m
I�
V
STREAMBANK RESTORAMON
907 CARDINAL DR., WILSON, NC
CUT VOLUME = 15.39t CY
FILL VOLUME - 1537} CY
—E SEPTEMBER 2.111_,_
SGIE(... Z)
S
:.LE(
, 5
—1—
NOTE MAX SLOPE IN FILL SECTIONS IS 1,1
MAX SLOPE N CUT SECTIONS IS 2 1
WILSON TOWNSHIP WILSON COUNTY
NORTH CAROUNA ZONE.
PIN 0 3712-47-1562 SHEET 6 OF 6
zx; BARTLETT
sE ai ENGINEERING & SURVEYING, PC
SECTIONS
,��
RABN B FEET NOR H E E (> �oP o2a
—B 1728 FAX (252) ]uu-oeoa
(1+25 -1+30)
STREAMBANK RESTORAMON
907 CARDINAL DR., WILSON, NC
CUT VOLUME = 15.39t CY
FILL VOLUME - 1537} CY
—E SEPTEMBER 2.111_,_
SGIE(... Z)
S
:.LE(
, 5
—1—
NOTE MAX SLOPE IN FILL SECTIONS IS 1,1
MAX SLOPE N CUT SECTIONS IS 2 1
WILSON TOWNSHIP WILSON COUNTY
NORTH CAROUNA ZONE.
PIN 0 3712-47-1562 SHEET 6 OF 6

NORTH CAROLINA
City ®f Wits®n
FLOODPLAIN DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
Permit Number: 15-00000249 Issuance Date: November 19, 2015 PIN 3712-47-2331.000
In accordance with the City of Wilson Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance, a Floodplain Development Permit is hereby
granted to: David and Teresa barefoot (t)rovertv owners) Daryl Norris. City of Wilson. (agent) to conduct development
activities within the area of special flood hazard on property located at: 1210 BROOKSIDE DR NW
This Permit is issued to the aforementioned individual, firm, partnership, etc. for the purpose noted above and in accordance
with the City of Wilson Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance, Floodplain Development Permit No 15-00000249 and
attachments thereto; and is subject to the following modifications and/or performance reservations:
1. Pennit issued for the following development only.
Excavation ® Fill ® Grading ® Utility Construction ❑
Road Construction ❑ Residential Construction ❑ Nonresidential Construction ❑
Addition ❑ Renovation :❑ Other (specify) ® Streambank stabilization project.
2. This Floodplain Development Permit is for the streambank stabilization project only. Any changes/revisions to the
scope of work of the project will need to be approved by the administrator prior to the additional work being done.
Failure to comply with the City of Wilson Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance, including any modifications and!or
performance reservations, could result in assessment of civil penalties or initiation of civil or criminal court actions as per
Chapter 16 of the Unified Development Ordinance.
Issued this 18" day of November, 2015.
Josh Jurius, CFM
Planner, City of Wilson, NC

CITY OF WILSON
FLOODPLAIN DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION
Date: Il//O//S PIN#: 3 712 -+7 Z.3 31.o oa
Owner:n 4„d; f� d. Teee SQ &a re- Pod f
Address of Property: 12.1 O &e atm r
Type Development: Excavation: Fill: ✓ Grading: ✓�
Residential Construction: Nonresidential Construction:
Other (describe): 64' eo wt6gq.t k Src�i /•`�gP��di1
FIRM Map #: 3 720 3 712 CO S FIRM Flood Zone: A
Location in Floodplain: (check all that apply)
a. ✓ Inside floodway
b. Outside flo6dway
C. Inside floodplain — no floodway established
d. Inside Special Flood Hazard Conservation Area
Development Standards Data:
1. Ifany of a, c, or d, above, is checked, attach engineering certification and supporting data as required.
2. Ground elevation of building site in relation to mean sea level (MSL): j /Q It
3. Base flood elevation at building site: 1/7-6
4. Elevation in relation to mean sea level (MSL) at which the bottom floor (including
basement) will be constructed: IMA (NGVD)
5. Will garage (if applicable) be used for any purpose other than parking vehicles,
building access, or household storage? %Y/A
If yes, then the garage must be used in determining the bottom floor elevation.
6. Elevation in relation to mean sea level (MSL) above which all utilities (including heating,
air conditioning, and electrical equipment) will be installed: WIA (NGVD)
7. Proposed method of elevating the structure: /x(/14
a. If foundation wall is used, provide minimum of 2 openings.
b. Total area of openings required (1 square inch per square foot of enclosed floor area)

Will any watercourse be altered or relocated as a result of the proposed development? ,� D
If yes, attach a description of the extent of the alteration or relocation.
9. Floodproofing information (if applicable):
Method of floodproofing: Al
Elevation in relation to mean sea level (MSL) to which structure shall be
floodproofed: (NGDV)
A plot plan, prepared by, or under the direct supervision of, a registered land, surveyor or
professional engineer, and certified by the same, must be submitted with the application,
drawn to scale, which shall include, but is not limited to, the following specific details of
the proposed floodplain development:
(a) the nature, location, dimensions, and elevations of:
✓
the area of the development
IVIA
existing and proposed structures
a
existing and proposed infrastructure
the location.of utility systems
✓
proposed grading/pavement areas
fill 'materials
AI4
storage areas
)[/A
drainage facilities
N//4
other proposed development;
(b) the boundary of the Special Flood Hazard Area, or a statement that the entire lot is
within the Special Flood Hazard Area;
(c) flood zone(s) designation of the proposed development area;
(d) the boundary of the floodway(s) or non -encroachment areas;
(e) the boundary of the Special Flood Hazard Conservation Area, as delineated on the
official Special Flood Hazard Conservation Area Boundary Map, when such
boundary crosses the subject property; or a statement that the entire property is entirely
within, or outside, as appropriate, the Special Flood Hazard Conservation Area;
(f) the Base Flood Elevation, where provided;
(g) the old and new locations of any watercourse that will be altered or relocated as a
result of proposed development;
(h) if floodproofing, back-up plans and an operation/maintenance plan.

A foundation plan must also be submitted with the application, drawn to scale, which
shall include details of the proposed foundation system, including, but are not limited to:
(a) proposed method of elevation, if applicable (i.e., fill, solid foundation perimeter
wall, solid backfilled foundation, open foundation on columns/piers, etc.);
(b) if using solid foundation perimeter walls, details of required openings;
(c) the area (in square feet) of the portion of the foundation below the Base Flood Elevation; and
(d) proposed use(s) of any enclosed space below the Base Flood Elevation.
Also include the following:
(a) plans and/or details for the protection of public utilities and facilities, such as sewer,
gas, electrical, and water systems, located and constructed so as to minimize flood damage;
(b) copies of all other local, State, and Fedeal pernids required prior to Floodplain Development Permit
issuance (i.e. Wetlands, Erosion and Sedimentation Control, Riparian Bufeis, Mining, etc.); and
(c) if a watercourse is proposed to be altered and/or relocated, a description of the extent of
watercourse alteration or relocation; an engineering report on the effects of the proposed
project on the flood -carrying capacity of the watercourse and the effects to properties
located both upstream and downstream; and a map (if not shown on the plot plan)
showing the location of the proposed watercourse alteration of relocation.
Applicant acknowledgment: I, the undersigned, understand that the issuance of a
Floodplain Development Permit is contingent upon the above information being correct,
and upon the correct plans and supporting data being provided as required. I also
understand that a preliminary elevation certification, signed by a registered land surveyor
or professional engineer, will be required within seven (7) days of the establishment of
the lowest floor, and that a final elevation certification must be submitted to the
Development Services Department prior to the Certificate of Occupancy being issued.
Print/type name, address, & phone # of agent:
NVII A%cY: 3
/gOO Were -4 t Ave
V, (so^ 9C 2-7914-
Signature
7'944
Signature of agent and date
Print/type name, address, & phone # of owner:
-boa-d + 7'eeESq do -q6-A v+
1240 grooki.6le-Dr
L -I,' ei 2.7 tU
Signature of owner and date

t
1906 Nash Street North Wilson, NC 2 7893-1 726
Phone [phone] ext 224 Fax -[phone]
Cell: 252-205-1852
robert(q-tartletteng.com
September 4, 2015
Daryl Norris
Stormwater Environmental Specialist
PO Box 10
Wilson, NC 27893
REFERENCE: Streambank Restoration No -Rise Certification
907 Cardinal Drive
Wilson, NC
Mr. Norris:
As requested, we evaluated the proposed streambank restoration project at 907
Cardinal Drive. It is our understanding that efforts to repair previous and reduce future
streambank erosion will include filling in the eroded area and reducing the slope of the
steeper downstream bank on one side of a 100LF+/- section of creek. The slopes will be
stabilized with properly secured coir logs and planted by means of "live -staking".
According to FEMA standards, a "No -Rise" certification involves performing
hydraulic analyses that includes obtaining the current effective model, duplicating the
effective model, correcting the effective model, running a pre -project conditions model
that reflects any changes since the date of the effective model, and a post -project
conditions model. In addition to the models, other supporting data is typically supplied.
We have not run any models for this project. Nonetheless, I Robert S. Bartlett, PE certify
that this proposed streambank restoration will not impact the 100 -year flood elevations,
floodway elevations and floodway width.
This no -rise certification is based on the combined factors of personal experience
with hydraulic analyses and no -rise certifications, the extremely small size of the project
relative to the floodway and watershed, personal knowledge of the history of the creek,
and the nature of the project. Specific to the project nature, the grading on the
downstream portion of the project will remove material, flattening the slope of the bank
and therefore increasing the volume of the floodway. The upstream portion of the project

places some fill material in the floodway, but is only restoring the banks to more closely
match previous cross-sections prior to recent erosion.
We performed a topographic survey of the project area and generated cross-
sections to determine cut and fill slopes that will result in no net fill. The proposed cross-
sections illustrate the proposed project conditions. No grading, excavation or filling, is
proposed below the normal water level. The downstream portion proposes cutting the
bank to a slope of 2: 1. The upstream portion proposes filling the eroded area matching
the slope of the bank nearest the water, but not to exceed 1:1. As previously stated, these
proposed conditions will result in a "no -rise' to the flood elevations.
If additional information is needed, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Bartlett Engineering & Surveying, PC
Robert S. Bartlett, PE