NC0026123_Permit Issuance_20120627

98ENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Charles Wakild, P.E.
Governor Director
June 27, 2012
Michael D. Rhoney, P.E.
Water Resources Director
City of Asheboro
P. O. Box 1106
Asheboro, NC 27204-1106
Natural Resources
')3C
C
�/ I'D (
af(I
Subject: Issuance ofNPDES Permit
Permit NC0026123
Asheboro Wastewater Treatment Plant
Randolph County
Class W
Dear Mr. Rhoney:
Dee Freeman
Secretary
Division personnel have reviewed and approved your application for renewal of the subject permit.
Accordingly, we are forwarding the attached NPDES permit. This permit is issued pursuant to the requirements
of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and the Memorandum of Agreement between North Carolina and
the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency dated October 15, 2007 (or as subsequently amended).
Please note that the receiving stream is listed as an impaired waterbody on the North Carolina 303(d)
Impaired Waters List. Addressing impaired waters is a high priority with the Division, and instream data will
continue to be evaluated. If there is noncompliance with permitted effluent limits and stream impairment can be
attributed to your facility, then mitigative measures may be required.
The Division reviewed your comments on the draft permit and responded May 3, 2012. Additional
comments were submitted by US EPA on the draft pen -nit and were addressed. Technical corrections were made
to the final permit to comply with the Upper Cape Fear Nutrient Strategy and were included in the summary.
Summary of Changes in Final Permit from Existing Permit
1) Chloride, Total Copper, Total Zinc monitoring was reduced to quarterly to be measured in conjunction
with the toxicity test.
2) Total Chromium limits were added with monthly monitoring.
3) Total Mercury .limit was revised to apply a monthly average limit and daily limit with monitoring
reduced to monthly.
Page 1 of 2
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Location: 512 N. Salisbury St Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 One
Phone: [phone] FAX: 9IM07-64921 Customer Service: "77-623-6748 NortflCarohna
IntemeL www.nnwaterqualil
AnveAc Naturallly Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer

4) Effluent Pollutant Scan monitoring was reduced to three (3) seasonal annual scans in designated ye'itrs.
A. (3) narrative was revised to list designated years and compliance dates. '
5) Narrative corrections were made to the Supplement To Cover Page component list, A. (1) TRC footnote,
and A. (2) Chronic Toxicity.
Technical corrections for Upper Cape Fear Nutrient Strategy
6) Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen and Nitrate/Nitrite Nitrogen monthly monitoring were added. All treatment
facilities of your capacity and in this segment of the Cape Fear River Basin are required to monitor Total
Nitrogen, Total Kjeldahl, and Nitrate/Nitrite Nitrogen on monthly basis.
7) Existing A. (3) Permit Reopener: Supplementary Monitoring special condition was replaced by new A. (5)
Nutrient Reopener special condition. All treatment facilities of your capacity and in this segment of the
Cape Fear River Basin are requiredto have a new nutrient reopener special condition that replaces the
existing reopener condition.
If any parts, measurement frequencies or sampling requirements contained in this permit are unacceptable to
you, you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing upon written request within thirty (30) days following receipt
of this letter. This request must be in the form of a written petition, conforming to Chapter 150B of the North
Carolina General Statutes, and filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings (6714 Mail Service Center,
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-6714). Unless such demand is made, this decision shall be final and binding.
Please note that this permit is not transferable except after notice to the Division. The Division may
require modification or revocation and reissuance of the permit. This permit does not affect the legal
requirements to obtain other permits which may be required by the Division of Water Quality or permits
required by the Division of Land Resources, the Coastal Area Management Act or any other federal or local
governmental permits that may be required.
If you have any questions concerning this permit, please contact Ron Berry at telephone number (919)
807-6396 or at email [e-mail].
Wakild, P.E.
Attachments
Cc: ' Winston-Salem Regional Office/Surface Water Protection Section (email Fact Sheet addendum)
EPA Region IV/Pamala Myers (email with Fact Sheet addendum)
Environmental Sciences Section/Aquatic Toxicology Unit/Susan Meadows (email)
Environmental Sciences Section/Ecosystems Unit/Steve Kroeger (email)
Environmental Sciences Section/Ecosystems Unit/Carrie Rulhman (email)
Central Files
NPDES File
Page 2 of 2

Permit N00026123
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
PERMIT
TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER UNDER THE
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
(NPDES)
In compliance with the provisions of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful standards
and regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management
Commission, and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended,
City of Asheboro
is hereby authorized to discharge wastewater from a facility located at
Asheboro Wastewater. Treatment Plant
1032 Bonkemeyer Drive
Asheboro
Randolph County
to receiving waters designated as the Haskett Creek in the Cape Fear River Basin in accordance with
effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth in Parts I, II, III and IV
hereof.
This permit shall become effective August 1, 2012.
This permit and authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight on September 30, 2016.
Signed this day June 27, 2012.
arles Wakild, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

Permit NC0026123
SUPPLEMENT TO PERMIT COVER SHEET
All previous NPDES Permits issued to this facility, whether for operation or discharge are hereby
revoked, and as of this issuance, any previously issuedpermit bearing this number is no longer effective.
Therefore, the exclusive authority to operate and discharge from this facility arises under the permit
conditions, requirements, terms, and provisions described herein.
The City of Asheboro
is hereby authorized to:
1. Continue to operate a wastewater treatment facility consisting of:
o Influent pump station with automatic bar screens and grit removal
o Influent ultrasonic flow meter
o Influent composite sampler
o Flow splitter box # 1
o Seven (7) primary clarifiers; one (1) circular rated for 3.0 MGD, six (6) rectangular rated 1.0
MGD each
o Trickling filter mixing/transfer pump basin
o Three (3) trickling filters, 140 feet diameter
o Recirculation box/value vault and circulation pump basin # 1
o Four (4) secondary clarifiers; 27,024 cu. ft. each
o Recirculation pump basin #2
o Nitrification mixing/transfer pump basin
o Flow splitter box #2
o Two (2) nitrification basins with mixing basin and blowers; 2,000,000 gallons each
o Flow splitter box #3
o Magnesium hydroxide chemical addition system
o Three (3) final clarifiers; 70,333 cu. ft. each
o Polymer chemical addition system
o One (1) Parkson Dynasand continuous flow tertiary filter
o Chlorine contact chamber with sodium hypochlorite addition for disinfection
o Sodium bisulfite addition for dechlorination
o Effluent flow meter
o Effluent composite sampler
o Cascade aeration basin
o Two (2) sludge digesters; 401,900 gallons each
o Drying beds, 105 ft x 450 ft total
o Sludge dewatering presses, thickener tanks, lime stabilization system, and solids storage
o Standby power generation
Located at Asheboro Wastewater Treatment Plant, 1032 Bonkemeyer Drive, northeast of Asheboro in
Randolph County.
2. Discharge from said treatment works through Outfall 001 at the location specified on the attached map,
into Haskett Creek, a Class C waterbody located in the Cape Fear River Basin.

USGS Quad: D19SE Randleman, NC
Outfall Facili
Latitude: 35' 46' 0.4" N 350 45' 54" N
Longitude: 790 47' S.8" W 790 47' 12" W
Stream Class: C North Facility Location
Subbasin: 03-06-09 HUC: 03030003 Asheboro WWTPNC0026123
Receiving Stream: Haskett Creek Randolph County

Permit NCO026123
A. (1) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Beginning on the effective date of this permit lasting until expiration, the Permittee is authorized to
discharge from Outfall 001. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the Permittee as specified
below:
EFFLUENT
LIMITS
MONITORING
REQUIREMENTS
Monthly
Weekly
Daily
Measurement
Sample
Sample
CHARACTERISTICS
Average
Average
Maximum
Frequency
Type
Location 1
Flow
9.0 MGD
Continuous
Recording
Influent or
-Effluent
BOD, 5 day,20 C
April 1 - October 31) -a
5.0 mg/L
7.5 mg/L
Daily
Composite
Influent &
Effluent
BOD, 5 day, 20°C
a
10.0 mg/L
15.0 mg/L
Daily
Composite
Influent &
(November 1 - March 31
Effluent
Total Suspended Solids 2
30.0 mg/L
45.0 mg/L
Daily
Composite
Influent &
Effluent
NH3 as N
2.0 mg/L
6.0 mg/L
Daily
Composite
Effluent
(April 1 -October 31)
NH3 as N
4.0 mg/L
12.0 mg/L
Daily
Composite
Effluent
(November 1 -March 31 )
Dissolved Oxygen
Not less than 6.0 mg/L, Daily
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Average
Dissolved Oxygen, mg/L
3/Week
Grab
U, D15 D2
June 1— September 30)
Dissolved Oxygen, mg/L
Weekly
Grab
U, D15, D2
(October 1— May 31)
pH
Not less than 6.0 S.U. nor greater
Daily
Grab
Effluent
than 9.0 S.U.
Fecal Coliform
200/ 100
400/100
Daily
Grab
Effluent
(geometric mean)
ml
nil
Total Residual Chlorine (TRC)
17 g/L
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Temperature,, °C
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Temperature, °C
3/Week
Grab
U, D 1, D2
(June 1— September 30)
Temperature, °C
Weekly
Grab
U, D 1, D2
(October 1— May 31
Conductivity, µmho.cm
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Total Chromium, µg/L
50 µg/L
1033 g/L
Monthly
Composite
Effluent
Total Mercury
12 ng/L
36 ng/L
Monthly
Grab
Effluent
(EPA Test Method 1631 E)
Total Nitrogen, m (
Monthl
Composite
Effluent
Total K' eldahl Nitrogen
Monthly
Composite
Effluent
Nitrate/Nitrite Nitrogen
Monthly
Composite
Effluent
Total Phosphorus, mg/L TP)
Monthly
Composite
Effluent
Dibromochloromethane, µ
Quarterly
Grab
Effluent
Bromodichloromethane, µg/L
Quarterly
Grab
Effluent
Chloride, mg/L 5
Quarterly
Composite
Effluent
Total Copper, µg/L 5
Quarterly
Composite
Effluent
Total Zinc, µg/L
Quarterly
Composite
I Effluent

Permit NCO026123
s
(Continued A. (1) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS)
LIMITS
MONITORING
REQUIREMENTS
EFFLUENT
Monthly
Weekly
Daily
Measurement
Sample
Sample
CHARACTERISTICS
Average
Average .
Maximum
Frequency
Type
Location 1
Chronic Toxicity6
1
Quarterly
Composite
Effluent
Effluent Pollutant Analyses
Monitor & Report
Footnote 7
Footnote 7
Effluent
Footnotes:
1. U = approximately 800 feet upstream from discharge. D 1 = NCSR 2128 and D2 = the Deep River at
NCSR 2261. The Permittee's instream monitoring requirements are provisionally waived by its
membership in the Upper Cape Fear River Basin Association. See A. (4).
2. The monthly average effluent BOD5 and Total Suspended Solids (TSS) concentrations shall not
exceed 15% of the respective influent value (i.e., 85% removal is required).
3. The Division shall consider all effluent TRC values reported below 50 µg/L to be in compliance with
the permit. However, the Permittee shall continue to record and submit all values reported by a North
Carolina certified laboratory (including field certified), even if these values fall below 50 µg/L.
4. TN = TKN + (NO2 N + NO3 I), where TN is Total Nitrogen, TKN is Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen,
(NO3-N + NO2-N) is Nitrate/Nitrite Nitrogen.
5. Chloride, Total Copper, and Total Zinc to be measured in conjunction with quarterly Chronic
Toxicity test.
6. Chronic Toxicity (Ceriodaphnia) P/F at 90%; during March, June, September and December. See A.
(2).
7. The permittee shall perform three Effluent Pollutant Scans during the term of this permit. See A. (3).
THERE SHALL BE NO DISCHARGE OF FLOATING SOLIDS OR VISIBLE FOAM IN OTHER
THAN TRACE AMOUNTS.
A. (2) CHROMIC TOXICITY PERMIT LIMIT (QUARTERLY)
The effluent discharge shall at no time exhibit observable inhibition of reproduction or significant
mortality to Ceriodaphnia dubia at an effluent concentration of 90 %.
The permit holder shall perform at a minimum, quarterly monitoring using test procedures outlined in the
"North Carolina Ceriodaphnia Chronic Effluent Bioassay Procedure," Revised February 1998, or
subsequent versions or "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure"
(Revised -February 1998) or subsequent versions. The tests will be performed during the months of
March, June, September, and December. Effluent sampling for this testing shall be performed at the
NPDES permitted final effluent discharge below all treatment processes.
If the test procedure performed as the first test of any single quarter results in a failure or ChV below the
permit limit, then multiple -concentration testing shall be performed at a minimum, in each of the two
following months as described in "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test
Procedure" (Revised -February 1998) or subsequent versions.
The chronic value for multiple concentration tests will be determined using the geometric mean of the
highest concentration having no detectable impairment of reproduction or survival and the lowest
concentration that does have a detectable impairment of reproduction or survival. The definition of
"detectable impairment," collection methods, exposure regimes, and further statistical methods are
specified in the "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised -
February 1998) or subsequent versions.

Permit NC0026 t23
(Continued A. (2) CHRONIC TOXICITY PERMIT LIMIT (QUARTERLY))
All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent
Discharge Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the months in which tests were performed. If reporting pass/fail
results using the parameter code TGP3B, DWQ Form AT-1 (original) is sent to the below address. If
reporting Chronic Value results using the parameter code THP3B, DWQ Form AT-3 (original) is to be
sent to the following address:
Attention: Environmental Sciences Section
North Carolina Division of
Water Quality
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
Completed Aquatic Toxicity Test Forms shall be filed with the Environmental Sciences Section no later
than 30 days after the end of the reporting period for which the report is made. Test data shall be
complete, accurate, include all supporting chemical/physical measurements and all concentration/response
data, and be certified by laboratory supervisor and ORC or approved designate signature. Total residual
chlorine of the effluent toxicity sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed to disinfect
the waste stream.
Should there be no discharge of flow from the facility during a month in which toxicity monitoring is
required, the Permittee will complete the information located at the top of the aquatic toxicity (AT) test
form indicating the facility name, permit number, pipe number, county, and the month/year of the report
with the notation of "No Flow" in the comment area of the form. The report shall be ' submitted to the
Environmental Sciences Section at the address cited above.
Should the Permittee fail to monitor during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required, monitoring
will be required'during the following month.
Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests performed by the North Carolina Division
of Water Quality indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re -opened and
modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
If the Permittee monitors any pollutant more frequently then required by this permit, the results of such
monitoring shall be included in the calculation and reporting of the data submitted on the DMR and AT
Forms.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control
organism survival, minimum control organism reproduction, and appropriate environmental controls,
shall constitute an invalid test and will require immediate follow-up testing to be completed no later than
the last day of the month following the month of the initial monitoring.

Permit NCO026123
,
A. (3) EFFLUENT POLLUTANT SCAN
The Permittee shall perform a total of three (3) Effluent Pollutant Scans for all parameters listed below. One scan
must be performed in each of the following years: 2013, 2014, and 2015. Analytical methods shall be in
accordance with 40 CFR Part 136 and shall be sufficiently sensitive to determine whether parameters are present in
concentrations greater than applicable standards and criteria. Samples should be collected with one quarterly
toxicity test each year, and must represent seasonal variation [i.e., do not sample in the same quarter every year].
Unless otherwise indicated, metals shall be analyzed as "total recoverable."
Ammonia (as N)
Trans-1,2-dichloroethylene
Bis (2-chloroethyl) ether
Chlorine, total residual (TRC)
1,1-dichloroethylene
Bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether
Dissolved oxygen
1,2-dichloropropane
Bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
Nitrate/Nitrite
1,3-dichloropropylene
4-bromophenyl phenyl ether
Kjeldahl nitrogen
Ethylbenzene
Butyl benzyl phthalate
Oil and grease
Methyl bromide
2-chloronaphthalene
Phosphorus
Methyl chloride
4-chlorophenyl phenyl ether
Total dissolved solids
Methylene chloride
Chrysene
Hardness
1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Antimony
Tetrachloroethylene
Di-n-octyl phthalate'
Arsenic
Toluene
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene
Beryllium
1,1,1-trichloroethane
1,2-dichlorobenzene
Cadmium
1,1,2-trichloroethane
1,3-dichlorobenzene
Chromium
Trichloroethylene
1,4-dichlorobenzene
Copper
Vinyl chloride
3,3-dichlorobenzidine
Lead
Acid -extractable Compounds
Diethyl phthalate
Mercury (Method 1631E)
P-chloro-m-cresol
Dimethyl phthalate
Nickel
2-chlorophenol
2,4-dinitrotoluene
Selenium
2,4-dichlorophenol
2,6-dinitrotoluene
Silver
2,4-dimethylphenol
1,2-diphenylhydrazine
Thallium
4,6-dinitro-o-cresol
Fluoranthene
Zinc
2,4-dinitrophenol
Fluorene
Cyanide
2-nitrophenol
Hexachlorobenzene
Total phenolic compounds
4-nitrophenol
Hexachlorobutadiene
Acid -extractable Compounds
Pentachlorophenol
Hexachlorocyclo-pentadiene
Acrolein
Phenol
Hexachloroethane
Acrylonitrile
2,4,6-trichlorophenol
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
Benzene
Base -neutral Compounds
Isophorone
Bromoform
Acenaphthene
Naphthalene
Carbon tetrachloride
Acenaphthylene
Nitrobenzene
Chlorobenzene
Anthracene
N-nitrosodi-n-propylamine
Chlorodibromomethane
Benzidine
N-nitrosodimethylamine
Chloroethane
Benzo(a)anthracene
N-nitrosodiphenylamine
2-chloroethylvinyl ether
Benzo(a)pyrene
Phenanthrene
Chloroform
3,4 benzofluoranthene
Pyrene
Dichlorobromomethane
Benzo(ghi)perylene
1,2,4-trichlorobenzene
1,1-dichloroethane
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
1,2-dichloroethane
Bis (2-chloroethoxy) methane
Test results shall be reported on DWQ Form -A MR PPA 1 (or in a form approved by the Director) by December
3 1 " of each designated sampling year. The report shall be submitted to the following address:
NC DENR / DWQ / Central Files
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617

Permit NCO026123
A. (4) PROVISIONAL WAIVER OF INSTREAM MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Instream monitoring requirements in this NPDES permit shall be provisionally waived so long as the
Permittee remains a member of the Upper Cape Fear River Basin Association and the Association
continues to function as approved by the Division and Environmental Management Commission. If the
Permittee does not participate in the Association or if the Association ceases to function, the instream
monitoring requirements in this permit become effective immediately; and the Division may reopen this
permit by administrative letter to establish additional instream monitoring requirements, it deems
necessary to adequately characterize the effects of the discharges on water quality in the receiving stream.
A. (5) NUTRIENT RE -OPENER
Pursuant to N.C. General Statutes Section 143=215.1 and the implementing rules found in the North
Carolina Administrative Code at 15A NCAC 2H.0112 (b) (1) and 211.0114 (a) and Part II sections B-12
and B-13 of this permit, the Director of DWQ may reopen this permit to require supplemental nutrient
monitoring of the discharge. The purpose of the additional monitoring will be to support water quality
modeling efforts within the Cape Fear River Basin and shall be consistent with a monitoring plan
developed jointly by the Division and affected stakeholders. In addition, the results of water quality
modeling may require that limits for total nitrogen and total phosphorus be imposed in this permit upon
renewal.

DENR/DWQ
ADDENDUM - FACT SHEET FOR NPDES PERMIT ISSUED
NPDES PERMIT NC0026123
Asheboro WWTP
SUMMARY OF CHANGES TO FINAL PERMIT — June 7, 2012
Several technical corrections were made to the final permit as follows:
1) Per upper Cape Fear River nutrient strategy for this size permitted flow, the permittee is
required to monitor monthly Total Nitrogen, Nitrate/Nitrite Nitrogen, and Kjeldahl
Nitrogen. Total Nitrogen monthly monitoring is already in the current permit.
Nitrate/Nitrite Nitrogen and Kjeldahl Nitrogen monthly monitoring were added to the
final permit.
2) Per upper Cape Fear River nutrient strategy this permit is required to incorporate a newly
defined nutrient re -opener special condition. This replaces the previous Deep River
supplementary monitoring re -opener condition in the draft permit. This revision was
made in the final permit.
Review/Response to Permittee Comments — May 3, 2012
• As noted by the Permittee, the approved pretreatment LTMP total chromium monitoring
frequency is not strictly monthly monitoring every year. Any reference to alignment with
the LTMP monitoring frequency could mean monitoring at varying frequency. For
clarification the permit new total chromium monthly monitoring frequency is correct and
the Division concurs it does not align with the LTMP monitoring frequency so any
reference as such would be incorrect.
• The Permittee requested removal of the new dibromochloromethane and
bromodichloromethane quarterly monitoring based no detects. However, based on the
four PPA provided with the application there were detects, and the RPA strategy was
correctly applied. Dibromochloromethane and bromodichloromethane quarterly
monitoring will remain in the permit. Sufficient data (more than 12 data points) will be
reported by the next renewal to re -valuate the reasonable potential for these pollutants.
• The Permittee requested reduction of the existing effluent conductivity daily monitoring
frequency to monthly. The Permittee also asked for justification of the daily conductivity
monitoring requirement. The conductivity requirement is required because of the facility
acceptance of industrial wastewater and is consistent with Division strategy. Daily
effluent conductivity monitoring will remain in the permit.
EPA Comments —April 19, 2012
The EPA commented on the draft permit monitoring frequency changes. Additional
correspondence was exchanged to address the comments.
NPDES DIVISION CONTACT
If you have questions regarding any of the above information or on the final permit, please
contact Ron Berry at [phone] or email ron.berryga.ncdenr.uov.
NAME: DATE:
Addendum Fact Sheet
NPDES NC0026123
Page 1 of 1

Berry, Ron
From: Pamala Myers [[e-mail]
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2012 12:21 PM
To: Berry, Ron
Subject: Re: Follow up to Asheboro WWTP NCO026123
06
If you adjusted the monitoring based on RP data and your July 15, 2010 Memo, the EPA will have no further comments at
this time.
Thank you for the continued follow ups on this matter.
Pamala Myers
404.562.9421
myers. pamala Pega.gov
Environmental Engineer and Technical Advisor I Pollution Control and Implementation Branch
Water Protection Division I Municipal and Industrial NPDES Section
U.S. EPA, Region 4 161 Forsyth St. SW I Atlanta, GA 30303
"Berry, Ron"--06/28/2012 12:03:54 PM ---Pam, WE are in the process of issuing a final permit for Asheboro WWTP
NC0026123. Your April comment
From: "Berry. Ron" <ron.berrvro)ncdencgov>
To: Pamala Myers/R4/USEPA/US@EPA
Date: 06/28/2012 12:03 PM
Subject: Follow up to Asheboro WWfP NCO026123
Pam,
WE are in the process of issuing a final permit for Asheboro W WTP NC0026123. Your April comments questioned our justification for
reduction in monitoring frequency and/or how we justified it in the fact sheet. The Division still supports the monitoring reduction
but not sure what you wanted in the fact sheet. Please advise, or if no additional comments let me know.
Thanks, Ron
Ron Berry [e-mail]
Engineer
DWQ/Point Source/NPDES Complex Permitting Unit
NCDENR
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Office: Archdale Building Room 925Y
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third
parties unless the content is exempt by statute or other regulation.

Citp of Z[5beboro
146 -Oortb Cburrry 6treet
V (a J30x 1106
0le;beboro, -Q. C. 27204-1106
April 30, 2012
Mr. Ron Berry
Division of Water Quality
NPDES Complex Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Re: Comments for Draft Permit # NCO026123
Dear Mr. Berry:
Met: 336 -626 -1201
lax: 336 -626 -1218
Thank you for the work you have done preparing the above referenced permit. City of Asheboro
Wastewater Treatment personnel feel the draft permit is thorough. We do have some questions and
concerns regarding contaminants and monitoring frequencies. Please consider the following notes before
issuing a final permit for the Asheboro facility.
Item 2 under Summary of Changes should state that that our LTMP requires quarterly monitoring for
chromium- not monthly. The LTMP does require monthly monitoring for chromium for the year before
headworks analysis is due. Therefore, we should only be doing monthly monitoring once every five years.
The remaining four years should only require quarterly monitoring.
What is the basis for requiring quarterly monitoring for Dibromochloromethane and
Bromodichloromethane? We do not feel this monitoring is necessary due to historical data illustrating non -
detects for these parameters. They should be removed from our monitoring requirements. Also, please
justify daily monitoring requirements for conductivity. Is this required as an input for other pollutants? If
so, which ones? We request monitoring be reduced to monthly.
Please consider these comments before issuing a final permit. I will be glad to discuss any of these concerns
with you and appreciate your time in looking into this matter.
Sincerely, p
L
Michael D. Rhoney, PE
Water Resources Director
MAY -1 2012
Home of N (J Zvolrrgirui JJark

DENR/DWQ
FACT SHEET FOR NPDES PERMIT DEVELOPMENT
NPDES ;PERMIT'.N.00026123 '
.� { :•.`�?� swl% ,.{� tf � by R#� 1. !\�
A'pIa1 Gan
�
Ci of Asheboro/Asheboro W WTP
Lia.i. 7 �` is
A . `' ",`; ` °`��.
P. O.. Box 1106;: Asheboxo,.NC 27203
" ....
1032 Eonme er.Dr,;. Aseboro,;N 27203
MGD
93% domesti.e/7%:industrial
Class. IV/Active; Renewal
�/" Randolph Cy,ouh-'
+��,� •D;l`F F� `t ' ,. _� I, nay 1 t n., {
',(.�, n
_'/` l•� ,
11 -T`~ 1] i'3.y � � r \4 A..,yY *r y�S` i �.�'\� y r 7'ti �Y i�rlw`TL- 4f���~ � „� � �'�S" �• fS, L -..
�
'������. t�i �.�L•4.
5��.��.I([,���
y.SMIY'j. '-'iA of �.l%
l � � 42t� 1. � 4�,T. y�
..
•�
�teMce lri 'Steam } �
Haskett Creek
'`S a ;" a .:.'�
-i r i1
,, F
C
03 -09
;f o : �� ,� ! t : �y Y
17-12
zl .-�> . t
`11
03030003
y` i v<�
Yes, 'in 2008
•-f'4�1.. ^J�- ♦ Y /
- -
%fir �S'
'Winston-Salem
<�
0.2
1)19
2,
Randleman, NC
.
12RQO
�.
Ron Be rry
"-4'
3/26/12
BACKGROUND
The City' of Asheboro, operates a 9.0 MGD wastewater treatment facility that serves the
surrounding Asheboro community, population 25,504; and a total of 14 industries, 7 categorical
and 7 non -categorical. The facility discharges treated- 93%domestic/7% industrial wastewater to
Haskett Creek, a class C water in the Cape Fear River Basin. The current approved pre-treatment
plan includes an active LIMP.
HISTORY
2006 - Current permit issued, total chromium limits added with March 1, 2008 compliance date
and petition condition, mercury limit added, :fluoride monitoring removed, and instream
fecal coliform monitoring removed.;
2007 - Permittee petitioned for removal of total chromium, reduction in mercury monitoring to
monthly, and reduction in conductivity to monthly.;'Based on RPA total chromium
requirements were removed from NPDES permit 'but LTMP requirement continued.
Mercury and conductivity petition was denied.
2008 - Haskett Creek listed on 303(d) list for copper, turbidity, and biological integrity.
2009 - A to C issued for installation of a 600 KW back up generator.
2011 - Permittee confirmed renewal application did not include 2od species testing. Set up plan
to complete 2nd species testing and submit results by February' 2012.
2012 - Requested clarification of effluent meter and composite samplers' locations.
TREATMENT PROCESS
The combined wastewater influent flows through a bar screen, grit removal chamber, Parshall ,
flume meter, and enters a sputter box. An influent composite sampler collects samples adjacent
to the influent meter. The splitter box diverts flows to 7 primary clarifiers, one circular unit rated
for 3 MGD and 6 rectangle units rated 1 MGD each. The recombined clarified wastewater
collects in the trickling filter recirculation pump basin. Wastewater is circulated through 3
Fact Sheet
NPDES NCO026123
Page 1 of 3

in
tricking filters with a portion diverted to 4 secondary clarifiers. Effluent from the 'secondary
clarifiers collects in the nitrification pump basin, mixes with returning sludge, and distributes via
a splitter box to 2 nitrification treatment trains. Each; train consists of an aeration tank utilizing
Schreiber process, mixing section, and take -off clarifier., Manganese hydroxide is added for
alkalinity control as needed.
Treated effluent from the nitrification trains. collects in a. distribution box feeding 3 final
clarifiers, where a polymer can be added to the clarifiers' effluent. A continuous tertiary filter
system receives the combined clarifiers' effluent. Filtered wastewater flows to a chlorine contact
chamber with sodium hypochlorite addition, Jo - a, dechlorination step with sodium bisulfate -
addition, to an effluent meter, and to a cascade aeration before being discharged into Haskett
Creek. -An effluent composite sampler collects samples adjacent -to the effluent meter.
Treatment sludge is further processed to generate various grades of land application materials via
digestion, thickening, dewatering, drying beds, and/or line stabilization. Storage is available to
allow for seasonal impacts on land application.
COMPLIANCE
During this permit cycle there were 6 limit violations; 2 mercury, 1 BOD, 1 TSS,1 NH37N, and 1
failed toxicity. The Division determined after; investigation no assessment was warranted. In
general this facility is considered to have an acceptable compliance record.
PERMITTING STRATEGY
Reasonable Potential Analysis (RPA)
The Division conducted EPA -recommended - : analyses for detected toxicants of chloride,
chromium, copper, mercury, molybdenum, nickel,_ zinc, chloroform, bromodichloromethane, and
dibromochloromethane to determine the reasonable potential for these toxicants to be discharged
above WQS. Results indicate reasonable potential of chloride, chromium, copper, mercury, zinc,
bromodichloromethane, and, dibromochloromethane to be discharge above WQS.
As action level parameters quarterly monitoring for chloride, copper, and zinc will be applied in
conjunction with the toxicity test.
The continued historical variation is causing swings in the determination of reasonable potential
for chromium Reporting of the existing LTMP monthly chromium value will be added to the
NPDES permit.and include compliance with monthly and daily limits..
Bromodichloromethane and dibromochloromethane data was limited and there were no reported
values exceeding the WQS. Per current strategy .quarterly monitoring will be added.
Current Permit has a weekly average permit limit of 12 ng/L. Per current strategy for mercury
compliance, dual limits of a 12 ng/L monthly average and a 36 ng/L daily with monthly
monitoring will be applied.
Data review
Table I: August 2008 to Jul 2011 DMRs
*Flow
*BOD
*TSS
C *Fecal Coliform
pH
*NH3-N
TRC
DO
Temperature
(MOD)
(mg/L)
(mg/L)
#//100 ml
(S.U.)
(mF/-)
(µme)
(mom)
(°C)
Average
3.67
2.96
5.83
23.8
6.70
0.49
15.8
8.19
20.18
Maximum 1
5.3
6.3
11.2
150
7.8
3.8 1
50
1 12.2
29.7
Minimum 1
2.8
1.9
2A
2
6.0
< 0.1 1
< 15 1
6.1
9.9
`based on monthly averages
Percent Removal: Based on BOD 97.2%-99.5%, Based on TSS 96.7% - 99.4%
Fact Sheet
NPDES NCO026123
Page 2 of 3

Conductivity Range: 268 —1935 µmhos/cm
Whole Effluent Toxicity
The permit requires quarterly chronic toxicity testing using ceriodaphnia dubia, at 90% effluent
concentration. The facility passed 18 out the 19 toxicity tests submitted since December 2006,
the failed test occurred'in June 2007. The required 2"d species toxicity tests were not performed
prior to submitting the renewal application. A scheduled was established to complete the toxicity
tests. Results were received March 7, 2012 for fathead minnow 2nd species tests and all four
ChV results were above 90% concentration.
Priority Pollutant Analysis (PPA)
The results of 4 effluent pollutant seasonal scans were submitted with the renewal application.
See RPA section above for evaluation of data. Per current strategy will amend scan requirement
and narrative to required only 3 seasonal/annual scans at designated dates prior to this permit
expiration.
Instream Data Impact
As a member of the Upper Cape Fear Basin Association this facility is allowed to waive its
instream monitoring. A review of latest summaries for the 2 ambient stations upstream and
downstream from this facility did not reveal any impacts.
Stream Impairment
The source of impairment is suspected to be non -point source. The permit requirements are
protective of WQS and consistent with impairment strategy. The impairment narrative will be
included in all cover letters.
SUMMARY OF PROPOSED CHANGES
In keeping with Division strategies the following will be incorporated into the permit:
- Chloride, copper, and zinc monitoring will be reduced to quarterly and be measured in
conjunction with chronic toxicity test.
- LTMP monthly chromium value reporting, monthly and daily limit will be added:
- Bromodichloromethane and dibromochloromethane quarterly monitoring will be added.
- Mercury monitoring will be reduced to monthly and limits redefined for monthly and
daily.
- Effluent pollutant scan will be reduced to 3 seasonal scans at designated years. Special
condition narrative will be amended.
- Chronic toxicity special condition, supplement page equipment, and TRC footnote
narratives will be updated.
- Impairment n9rrative will be included in cover letter.
PROPOSED SCHEDULE FOR PERMIT ISSUANCE
Draft Permit to Public Notice: March 2012
Permit Scheduled to Issue: June 2012
NPDES DIVISION CONTACT
If you have questions regarding any of the above information or on the attached permit, please
contact Ron at ( ) 807-6396 or email ron.berry©ncdenr.g v.
NAME: DATE: IZ
REGIONAL OFFICE COMMENTS
NAME: DATE:
SUPERvism DATE: 11 Zo i L
Fact Sheet
NPDES NCO026123
Page 3 of 3

�% �lr
THE; ✓
COURIER -
Affidavit of Publication
State of North Carolina,
Randolph County
To Whom It May Concern:
This is to certify the
advertisement attached
hereto has been published
in -
The Courier -Tribune
on the following dates:
L41(Z
Swo 0 on this day
of ; ( 2012
Courier -Tribune Representative
Sworn to and Subsgnbed
Beforg me this ' I day
of 2012
T/ Notary Public
LYDIA B. SHIVER
Notary Public, North Carolina
Randolph County
My Commi Sion Expires
7v
Public Notice
North Carolina Environmental
Management Commission/NPDES
Unit 1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Notice of Intent to Issue a NPDES Wastewater Permit
The North Carolina Environmental Management Commission
proposes to issue a NPDES wastewater discharge permit to the
person(s) listed below.
Written comments regarding the proposed permit will be
accepted until 30 days after the publish date of this notice. The
Director of the NC Division of Water Quality (DWQ) may hold a
public hearing should there be a significant degree of public
interest. Please mail comments and/or information requests to
DWQ at the above address. Interested persons may visit the
DWQ at 512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, NC to review
information on file. Additional information on NPDES permits
and this notice may be found on our website:
http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/Swp/ps/npdes/calendar, or by
calling [phone].
City of Asheboro requested renewal of permit NCO026123 for
Asheboro WWTP in Randolph County; this permitted discharge
is for treated wastewater to Haskett Creek, Cape Fear River
Basin.
1 t- 4/4/2012

City of *Asheboro WWTP REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS Outfap 001
NCO026123 Qw = 9 MGD
Qw (MGD) = 9.00 WWTP/WTP Class: IV
IQ I OS (cfs) = 0.00 IWC @ l Q I OS = 100.00%
7QIOS (cfs) = 0.00 IWC tad 7QIOS = 100.00%
7QIOW (cfs) = 0.00 IWC ® 7Q10W = 100.00%
30Q2 (cfs) = 0.20 1WC @ 30Q2 = 98.69%
Avg. Stream Flow, QA (cfs) = 12.00 IWC ® QA = 53.76%
Receiving Stream: Haskett Creek Stream Class: C CHRONIC TEST CONCENTRATION DEFAULT %
=90%
PARAMETER
STANDARDS S CRITERIA (2)
m
REASONABLE POTENTIAL RESULTS
RECOMMENDED ACTION
TYPE
(1)
a
z
NC WQS / Applied V2 FAV /
n # Det. Max �� Allowable Cw
Chronic Standard Acute
Cw
Acute: NO WQS
Arsenic
C
50 FW(7Q I Os)
ug/L
0 0
N/A
Chronic: 50.0
No detects, In LTMP
Arsenic
C
10 HH/WS(Qavg)
ug/L
0 0
N/A
Chronic: 18.6
No detects, In LTMP
Acute: NO WQS
Beryllium
NC
6.5 FW(7Q10s)
ug/L
0 0
N/A
Chronic: 6.S
No detects, In`PPA—
Acute: 15.0
No detects, In LTMP
Cadmium
NC
2 FW(7Q1Os) 15
ug/L
0 0
N/A
Chronic: 2.0
No detects, inLTMPoo
Acute: NO WQS
Chlorides (AL)
NC
230 FW(7Q I Os)
mg/L
68 68
625
Chronic: 230
RP for' (Cu,Zn,Ag,Fe,CI) -apply Quarterly
25 values > Allowable Cw
.
Monitoring In conjunction with TOX Test
Acute: 1,022.0
RP for non -AL apply Monthly Monitoring with Limit
Chromium
NC
50 FW(7Q10s) 1022
ug/L
21 20
62.1
Chronic: 50.0
RP for non -AL apply Monthly Monitoring with Limit
No value > Allowable Cw
;
Acute: 7.3
RP: for AL(Cu;Zn;Ag,Fe,CI} -apply Quarterly "
Copper (AL)
NC
7 FW(7Q 1 Os) 7
ug/L,
72 72
23
Monttonng to conjunction with TOX Test
Chronic: 7.0
RP for AL(Cu,Zn,Ag,Fe,CI) - apply Quarterly'
65 values > Allowable Cw
Monitoring In conjuhction with TOX Test
Acute: 22.0
No detects, In LTMP
Cyanide
NC
5 FW(7Q10s) 22
10
ug/L
0 0
N/A
_ _ _ _ _ _
— — ---
Chronic; 5.0
No detects, in LTMP �-- -
Acute: 33.8
No detects, In LTMP
Lead
NC
25 FW(7Q 1 Os) 33.8
ug/L
0 0
N/A
— _ — _ _ _ _
Chronic: 2S.0
No detects, to LTMP — —
2011 RPA-Freshwater, rpa
Page 1 of 2 4/11/2012

City of`Asheboro WWTP REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS Outfatl 001
NCO026123 Qw = 9 MGD
Acute: NO WQS
`•
Mercury
NC
12 FW(7Q 1 Os)
0.5
ng/L
156 103
42.0
_ — _ _ _ _ _ _
Chronic: 12.0
RP for non -AL apply Monthly Monitoring with Limit
4 values > Allowable Cw
Acute: NO WQS
Molybdenum
NC
2000 HH(7QI Os)
ug/L
18 1
126.0
_ _
_ _ _ " _`
Chronic 2,000.6
No RP; Predicted Max < 50°/ of Allowable Cw -
No value > Allowable Cw
Remains as Monttortng for PERCS
Acute: 261.0
No RP, Predicted Max < 50oA of Allowable'Cw -
Nickel
NC
88 FW(7Q10s) 261
ug/L
21 1
9.1
Remains as Monitorin for PERCS
s- _. 9 - I
_ _ __ _ __
- _ - _ - _
Chronic 88.0
No. RP, Predicted Max < 50% of Allowable Cw
No value > Allowable Cw
Remains:as;Mont(Ong for PERCS .
Acute: 56.0
No detects, In LTMP ;
Selenium
NC
5 FW(7Q10s) 56
ug/L
0 0
N/A
_- - - __-
Chronic: 5.0
_ __ _
No detects; In LTMP
Acute: 1.230
No detects, In LTMP
Silver (AL)
NC
0.06 FW(7Q 1 Os) 1.23
ug/L
0 0
N/A
Chronic: 0.060
_
No detects, In LTMP
Acute: 67.0
RP for AL( Cu,Zn,AgFe,CI) - apply Quarterly
Zinc (AL)
NC
50 F W(7Q 1 Os) 67
ug/L
72 63
324.0
_ - - — - — - _ _
Monitoring In conjunction with TOX Test
Chronic: 50.0
RP for AL(Cu,Zn,Ag,Fe,CI) -' apply Quarterly
5 value(s) > Allowable Cw
Monitoring In 00junction with TOX Test
Acute: NO WQS
Chloroform
C
170 HH(Qavg)
µg/l
4 4
94.80000
Note: n <_ 9
Default C.V.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Chronic 316.22024
_
No RP, 'Predlcted Max < 50% of Allowable Cw = No '
Limited data set
No value > Allowable Cw
Monitoring regutred
Acute: NO WQS
Bromodichloromethane
C
17 HH(Qavg)
µg/l
4 4
106.17600
Note: n <_ 9
Default C.V.
Chronic: 31.62202
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
RP.forLimited.Dataset (n<8 samples) - apply
Limited data set
No value > Allowable Cw
Quarterly Monitoring',
Acute: NO WQS
Dibromochloromethane
C
13 HH(Qavg)
µM
4 1
49.29600
Note: n <_ 9
Default C.V.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _
Chronic: 24. 18155
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
RP for Limited .Dataset (n<S samples); apply,
Limited data set
No value > Allowable Cw
Quarfe'rly_Monitoring
Acute: NO WQS
Thallium
NC
0.47 HH(7Q I Os)
µg/l
0 0
N/A
Chronic: 0.47000
No detects, In PPA.
2011 RPA-Freshwater, rpa
Page 2 of 2 4/11/2012

REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
5
8
Chlorides (AL)
Chromium
Mo
Date
Data
BDL=1/2DL
Results
• s
Data Data
BDL=112DL
Results
1
817/2008
77
189
189
Std Dev.
98.0818
1
6152007 "
10
10
Std Dev.
7.2898
2
821/2008
156
156
Mean
209.4
2
911012WB
29
29
Mean
13.2143
3
9/10/2008
146
146
C.V.
0.46S4
3
12/8/2009
10
10
C.V.
0.5520
4
9/25/2008
190
190
n
68
4
2/17/2010
7
7
n
21
5
10/812008
120
120
5
3/2/2010
8
8
6
10/21/2008
47
47
Mult Factor =
1.4
6
4/13/2010
18
18
Mull Factor =
2.14
7
11/13/2008
100
100
Max. Value
434.0 mg/L
7
525/2010
8
8
Max. Value
29.0 ug/L
8
1125/2008
84
84
Max. Pred Cw
625.0 mg/L
8
6/8/2010
12
12
Max. Pred Cw
62.1 ug1L
9
12/2/2008
155
155
9
7113/2010
9
9
10
12/16/2008
130
130
10
8/31/2010
29
29
11
1/8/2009
150
150
11
9/14/2010
19
19
12
1/21/2009
80
80
12
10/7/2010
22
22
13
2122009
132
132
13
11/16/2010
15
15
14
2/18/2009
116
116
14
12/7/2010
18
18
15
3/10/2009
108
108
15
1/18/2011
16
16
16
417/2009
174
174
16
2/17/2011
14
14
17
4/21/2009
140
140
17
3WO11
10
10
18
5/5/2009
181
181
18
4/19/2011
5
5
19
520/2009
118
118
19
5/11/2011
5
5
20
62/2009
127
127
20
6/7/2011 <•
5
2.5
21
6/18/2009
117
117
21
7/14/2011
11
11
22
7/14/2009
161
161
22
-
23
7=12009
140
140
23
24
8/5/2009
130
130
24
25
820/2009
180
180
25
26
9/2/2009
180
180
26
27
9/15/2009
93
93
27
28
10/7/2009
115
115
28
29
1027/2009
140
140
29
30
11/12/2009
100
100
30
31
11/24/2009
..
220
220
31
32
12/8/2009
140
140
32
33
12/22/2009
150
150
33
34
1/14/2010
167
167
34
35
128/2010
145
145
35
36
2/1/2010
79
79
36
37
2117/2010
130
130
37
-
38
322010
231
231
38
39
T16/2010
175
175
39
40
4/13/2010
190
190
40
41
412912010
160
160
41
42
515/2010
240
240
42
43
5/25/2010
205
205
43
44
6182010
300
300
44
45
6/212010
328
328
45
46
7/13/2010
294
294
46
47
729/2010
-.-
395
395
47
48
8/6/2010
'1
357
357
48
49
81812010
340
340
49
50
9/142010
260
260
50
51
M712010
315
315
51
52
10/72010
380
380
52
53
10/19/2010
255
255
53
54
11/2/2010
410
410
54
55
11/16/2010
340
340
55
56
121712010
420
420
56
57
12/20/2010
300
300
57
58
1/18/2011
320
320
58
59
127/2011
255
255
59
60
2/4/2011
270
270
60
61
2M712011
210
210
61
62
3/3/2011
210
210
62
63
3/17/2011
350
350
63
64
4/5/2011
434
434
64
65
4/192011
315
315
65
66
5/112011
335
335
66
67
5/27/2011
295
295
67
68
W2011
320
320
68
69
623/2011
69
70
7/14/2011
70
71
725/2011
71
72
j
72
73
w
73
2011 RPA-Freshwater. data
1 - 4/11/2012

REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
Date Data
BDL=112DL
6/5/2007
12
12
8/7/2008
16
16
8/212008
13
13
9/102ODS
9
9
9/252008
13
13
10/812008
,:
14
14
10/21/20DB
10
10
11113/20DB
13
13
11/25/20DB
15
15
1222008
11
11
12/182008
-14
14
1/82009
9
9
1/212009
13
13
222009
15
15
2/18/20D9
9
9
3/102009
9
9
3/2712DD9
8
e
4/72009
8
8
4212009
6
6
5/5/2009
10
10
5/20/2009
9
9
6122009
11
11
6/182009
12
12
7/14/2009
15
15
7/30/2009
"..
11
11
8/5/2009
11
11
8/202009
13
13.
9/152009
12
12
10/7/2009
11
11
10/2712009
.
11
11
11/12/2009
11
11
1 W42009
15
15
12/82009
9
9
12/222009
=
10
10
1/142010
'-.
14
14
1/282010
14
14
2112010
13
13
2/17/2010
8
8
3/212010
8
8
3262010
6
6
41132D10
7
7
4292010
8
8
5152010.
7
7
5/25/2010
9
9
6/8/2010
14
14
6/212010
11
11
7/132010
-
11
11
729/2DiD
r
15
15
8/62010
-
14
14
8312010
13
13
9/142010
10
10
927/2010
12
12
10/7/2010
C'
10
10
10/192010
7
7
111=010
9
9
11/162010
10
10
12/72010
9
9
122012010
9
9
1/182011
14
14
1272011
19
19
2312011
16
16
2/172011
'
- 15
15
3/3/2011
11
11
31172011
10
10
4152011
7
7
4/1912DI1
7
7
5/112011
8
8
5/272011
10
10
6172011
16
16
6202011
11
11
7/142011
16
16
7/25/2011
'
'15
15
Results
Sid Dev. 2.9021
Mean 11.2639
C.V. 0.2576
n 72
Mult Factor = 1.22
Max. Value 19.0 ug/L
Max. Pred Cw 23.2 ug/L
Date Data
BDL=112DL
Results
1
8/7/2008
1.4
1.4
Sid Dev.
3.4433
2
8/14/2008 <
1
0.5
Mean
2.8904
3
8/212008 : <1
1
0.6
C.V.
1.1913
4
8/28/2008 <
1
0.5
n
156
5
9/4/2008
4.8
4.8
6
9/1112008 :
1.2
1.2
Mu6 Factor =
1.50
7
9/1812008
2.1
2.1
Max. Value
28.0 ngd.
8
9/25/2008 <
1
0.5
Max Pred Cw
42.0 ng/L
9
10/22008
2.2
2.2
10
10/92008 <
1
0.5
11
10/162008
2.4
2.4
12
10/232008 :
3.4
3.4
13
10/302008
3.3
3.3
14
11/62008 <
1
0.5
15
11/132008
3.9
3.9
16
11/20/2008
6.4
6.4
17
1124/2008
3.3
3.3
18
12/42008
1.4
1.4
19
12/11/2008 <
1
0.5
20
12/18/2008 f.
3
3
21
12/22J2008 <
1
0.5
22
12/29/2008
2.1
2.1
23
1/82009 <
1
0.5
24
1/152009
6.5
6.5
25
1122/2009
1.9
1.9
26
129/2009 '.
5.6
5.6
27
2/5/2009
1.4
1.4
28
2/12/2009
1.9
1.9
29
2/19/2009 i<
1
0.5
30
2/26/2009
1.3
1.3
31
3/5/2009
1.9
1.9
32
3/12/2009
2.5
2.5
33
3119/2009 ::
2.2
2.2
34
326/2009
1.2
1.2
35
4/212009 !I<t
1
0.5
36
4/9/2009
4
4
37
4/162009 <
1
0.6
38
42312009 ..
1.9
1.9
39
4/30/2009 r.
1
0.5
40
5/7/2009 '.<
1
0.5
41
5114/2009
1
0.5
42
52112009 ,.: <
1
0.5
43
528/2009 Pq:
1
0.5
44
614/2009
1.8
1.8
45
6/11/2009 I'
2.4
2.4
46
6/182009
4.3
4.3
47
625/2009 :I
1.3
1.3
48
7/2/2009
1.9
1.9
49
7/9/2009 is
1
0.5
50
7/16/2009 ::`<'.
1
0.5
51
7/232009 '-
1.2
1.2
52
7/30/2009 II
1.9
1.9
53
8/6/2009 <`
1
0.5
54
8/132009 :<
1
0.5
55
820/2009 '.: <
1
0.5
56
8272009 :<
1
0.5
57
902009 <
1
0.5
58
9/10/2009
1.2
1.2
59
9/17/2009 "'
3.4
3A
60
9242009
1.7
1.7
61
10/1/2009 c
1
0.5
62
10/8/2009
1.3
1.3
63
10/15/2009 !""
1.2
1.2
64
10222D09
7.8
7.8
65
10292009 <
1
0.5
66
11/5/2009
1.3
1.3
67
11/1212009 ;;;
1
0.5
68
11/19/2009 `i..
1
0.5
69
11232009
1.3
1.3
70
12WO09 <.
1
0.5
71
12/102009 ;.<.
1
0.5
72
12/17/2009
6.8
6.8
73
12IM009 "<.
1
0.5
74
12312009
8.9
8.9
75
1112010 !
28
28
76
1/142010
11
11
77
1/2112010
7.2
7.2
78
1282010 '
11
11
2011 RPA-Freshwater, data
- 1 - 4/112012

REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
79 2/4/2010
80 21j 1/2010 '.
81 21 812010
82 2/25/2010
83 3/4/2010
84 3/11/2010
85 3/182010
86 3t252010
87 4/1/2010
88 4/8/2010
89 4/15/2010
90 4/22/2010 <
91 4/29/2010 :.s
92 5/6/2010 ,
93 5/13/2010 <
94 W2012010 "<
95 527/2010 -P<
96 6/32olo
97 6/102010 <
98 6/172010 `<
99 61242010 "<
100 711/2010. s
101 7/8/2010
102 7/152010
103 7222010
104 7292010 <
105 8/52010 <
106 8/112010 C
107 8/192010 !,
108 8/2612010
109 9/212010-:
110 9/9/2010
111 9/16/2010
112 9/2312010
113 9/30/2010
114 10/72010 t.
115 10/142010
116 10/212010
117 10/282010
118 11/4/2010
119 11/11/2010 G<
120 11/1812010 ='e.
121 11/22/2010
122 1212/2010
123 1219/2010 fi
124 12/162010
125 12/ molo
126 120=010 �<
127 1WO11 (<
128 1/13/2011
129 1/20/2011
130 1127/2011 !:
131 2/3/2011 '.
132 2/10/2011
133 2/17/2011
134 2/242011
135 3/3I2011
136 3110/2011
137 3/17/2011
138 324/2011
139 3/3120ll
140 4172011
141 4/1412011 ^<�'
142 4/21/2011
143 4/2a2011
144 5142011
145 5/122011 '.
146 5/192011
147 526/2011
148 6212011
149 61912011
150 6/16/2011
151 6/23/2011
152 6/30/2011 �.. .
153 7/7/2011
154 7/142011
155 7212011
156 7282011
157
158
2011 RPA-Freshwater, Cate
2 - 4/11/2012

REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
14
'
1s
Molybdenum
Nickel
Date
Data
BDL=112DL
Results
• •
Date
Data
BDL=112DL
Results
1
2/17/2010
<1
50
25
Std Dev.
10.6066
1
6/5/2007
<
5
2.5
Std Dev.
0.7638
2
3/2/2010
<
50
25
Mean
27.5000
2
9/10/2005
<
5
2.5
Mean
2.6667
3
4113/2010
<
50
25
C.V.
0.3857
3
12/8/2009
<
5
2.5
C.V.
0.2864
4
5/25/2010
<
50
25
n
18
4
2/17/2010
<
5
2.5
n
21
5
6/82010
<
50
25
5
3/2/2010
<.
5
2.5
6
7/13/2010
<
50
25
Mutt Factor =
1.80
6
4/13/2010
<
5
2.5
Mutt Factor =
1.51
7
8/31/2010
<
50
25
Max. Value
70.0 ug/L
7
525/2010
<
5
2.5
Max. Value
6.0 ug/L
8
9/14/2010
<
50
25
Max. Pred Cw
126.0 ug/L
8
618/2010
5
2.5
Max. Pred Cw
9.1 uglL
9
10/7/2010
<
50
25
9
7/13/2010
<
5
2.5
10
11116/2010
<
50
25
10
8/31/2010
<
5
2.5
11
12/7/2010
<
50
25
11
9/14/2010
<
5
2.6
12
1/18/2011
<
50
25
-
12
10/7/2010
<
5
2.5
13
2/17/2011
50
25
13
11/16/2010
<
5
2.5
14
3/312011
50
25
14
12/7/2010
<
5
2.5
15
4/192011
70
70
15
1/18/2011
<
5
2.5
16
5/11/2011
50
25
16
2/17/2011
<
5
2.5
17
62/2011
''<{
50
25
17
3/312011
<,
5
2.5
18
7/14/2011
<;
s0
25
18
4/19/2011
<
5
2.5
19
19
5/11/2011
<
5
2.5
20
20
6/7/2011
<
5
2.5
21
`
21
7/14/2011
6
6
22
22
ua
2011 RPA-Freshwater, data
- i - 4/11/2012

REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
18
19
Zinc (AL)
Chloroform
Date
Data
BDL=IMDL
Results
• •
Date Data
BDL=1/2DL
Results
1
6/52007
18
18
Sid Dev.
23.2185
1
615/2007
20 20
Sol Dev.
6.1549
2
8/7/2008
62
62
Mean
27.4861
2
9/1O12008
16.5 16.5
Mean
13.1750
3
8/21/2008
30
30
C.V.
0.8447
3
12/82009
6.6 6.6
C.V. (default)
0.6000
4
9/10/2008
11
11
n
72
4
6182010
9.6 9.6
n
4
5
9/25/2008
26
26
5
6
10/812D08
26
26
Mutt Factor =
1.78
6
Mult Factor =
4.74
7
10M12008
24
24
Max. Value
182.0 uglL
7
Max. Value
20.000000 Pge
8
11/13/2008
25
25
Max. Pred Cw
324.0 ug1L
8
Max. Pred Cw
94.800000 Pg8
9
1125/2008
41
41
9
10
12/2/2008
27
27
10
11
12MB12D0S
47
47
11
12
1182009
19
19
12
13
121/2009
40
40
13
14
2212009
33
33
14
15
2/18/2009
31
31
15
16
3/10/2009
51
51
16
17
3/27/2009
<
10
5
17
18
4172009
23
23
18
19
4/21/2009
15
15
19
20
5/512009
32
32
20..
21
5/20/2009
22
22
21 "
22
6/2/2009
28
28
22
23
6/18/2009
22
22
23
24
7/14/2009
21
21
24
25
7/30/2009
27
27
25
26
8/512009
27
27
26
27
8/20/2009
30
30
27.
28
9/15/2009
30
30
28
29
10/72009
35
35
29
30
1027/2009
26
26
30
31
11/12/2009
-
14
14
31
32
11/24/2009
36
36
32
33
12/8/2009
26
26
33
34
12/22/2009
34
34
34
35
1/14/2010
36
36
35
36
1/28/2010
41
41
36
37
2/112010
26
26
37
38
2/17/2010
15
15
38
39
3122010
25
25
39
40
326/2010
<'
10
5
40
41
4/13/2010
23
23
41
42
4/29/2010
10
10
42
43
5/5/2010
Z.'
10
5
43
44
51252010
10
5
44
45
6/82010
26
26
45
46
6/21/2010
59
59
46
47
7/13/2010
16
16
47
48
7/29/2010
35
35
48
49
8/6/2010
22
22
49
50
8/31/2010
14
14
50
51
9/14/2010
<
10
5
51
52
92712010
<
10
5
52
53
10/7/2010
14
14
53
54
10/1912010
10
10
54
55
11/2/2010
11
11
55
56
11/1612010
14
14
56
57
12f72010
<
10
5
57
58
12/20/2010
<
10
5
58
59
1/18/2011
50
50
59
-
60
127/2011
1
62
62
60
61
2/3/2011
1
39
39
61
62
2/172011
43
43
62
63
3/32011
33
33
63
64
3117/2011
14
14
64
65
4/5/2011
20
20
65
66
4/19/2011
18
18
66
67
6/11/2011
36
36
67
68
5127/2011
24
24
68
69
6/7/2011
46
46
69
70
6120/2011
<
10
5
70
71
7/14/2011
182
182
71
72
7/2512011
11
11
72
73
73
2011 RPA-Freshwater, data
-1- 4/11/2012

REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
20
• •
21
Bromodichloromethane
Dibromochloromethane
Dale
Data
BDL=112DL
Results
• •
Date
Data
BDL=112DL
Results
1
6/5/2007
22.4.
22.4
Std Dev.
7.7164
1
6/5/2007
10A
10.4
Sul Dev.
3.9500
2
9110/2008
12.2
12.2
Mean
11.6750
2
9/10/2008'-'
5
2.5
Mean
4.4750
3
1202009
5.9
5.9
C.V.(default)
0.6000
3
12/8/2009f
' S
2.5
C.V.(default)
0.6000
4
6/8/2010
6.2
6.2
n
4
4
6/8/2010
5
2.5
n
4
5
5
6
Mult Faclw=
4.74
6
Mull Factor =
4.74
7
Max. Value
22.400D00 Y9/I
7
-
Max. Value
10.400000 pgn
8
Max. Pred Cw
106.176D00 pg/I
8
Max. Pred Cw
49.2%000 pg8
9
9
10
10
11
11
12
12
2011 RPA.FmsMreter, data
- 1 - 4/11/2012

INPDES/Aquifer Protection Permittinq Unit Pretreatment Information Request Form
WRITER COMPLETES THIS PART:
�PI"y
- Notify PERCS if LTMP/STMP data we said should
be on DMRs is not really there, so we can get it for
you (or NOV POTW).
- Notify PERCS if you want us to keep a specific
POC in LTMP/STMP so you will have data for next
permit renewal.
- Email PERCS draft permit, fact sheet, RPA.
- Send PERCS paper copy of permit (w/o NPDES
boilerplate), cover letter, final fact sheet. Email RPA
if changes.
licipal renewal
X
new industries
riP expansion
eculative limits
stream reGass.
-am relocation
7Q10 change
.. h—
BRD, CPF, CTB, FRB, TAR
CHO, HIW, LTN, LUM, NEU, NEW, ROA, YAD
PRETREATMENT STAFF COMPLETES THIS PART:
tus of Pretreatment Program (check all that apply)
dX1) facility has no SIU's, does have Division approved Pretreatment Program that is INACTIVE
2) facility has no SIU's, does not have Division approved Pretreatment Program
X 3) facility has SIUs and DWQ approved Pretreatment Program (list "DEV" if program still under development)
3a) Full Program with LTMP
3b) Modified Program with STMP
4) additional conditions regarding Pretreatment attached or listed below STMP time frame:
Most recent
Flow, MGD1 Permitted Actual ITime period for Actual Next Cycle:
Industriall 1.0675 1 0.6613 1 Jan 2006-Dec 2006 C-W:
Uncontrollable Na 1 3.1437 1 Jan 2006-Dec 2006 YK
POC in
LTMP/
STMP
Parameter of
Concern (POC)
Check List
Poo due to
NPDES/ Non-
Disch Permit
Limit
Raqulmd
bV EPA-
Required
by 503
Sludge—
POC due
to SIU—
POTVv POc
(Explain
below "—
STMP
Effluent
Frea
LTMP
E n
Fre
X
BOD
L
X
4
Q M
X
TSS
L
X
4
Q M
X
NH3
L
X
4
Q M
X
Arsenic
X
X
4
Q M
Cadmium
X
I X
1
4
Q M
Chromium
X
4
Q M
Capper
M
X
X
4
Q M
X
Cyanide
X
4
Q M
Lead
X
X
4
Q M
X
Mercury
L
X
X
4
Q M
X
Molybdenum
X
4
Q M
Nickel
X
X
4
Q M
X
ISilver
I
X
4
Q M
X
Selenium
X
4
Q M
Zinc
M4
X
X
4
Q M
Total Nitrogen
4
Q M
Phosphorus
4
Q M
X
Mn
X
IWt�liW�2� �/a/aLl
��5J24 IL j�u1,�5
kvW
Q = Quarterly
i'��%t.�S ll'I�lQLf51f d
'Always in the LTMP/STMP " Only in LTMP/STMP if sludge land app or composte (dif POCs for incinerators)
*** Only in LTMP/STMP while SIU still discharges to POTW — Only in LTMP/STMP when pollutant is still of concern to POTW
It h
WDEa PmVeament_mquest_form Asheboro_eug2011
Rwsed: My 24. 2007

3-2-12 Asheboro NPDES permit basin mpact impairment
From: Deamer, Nora
Sent: Friday, March 02, 2012 12:57 PM
To: Berry, Ron
Subject: Asheboro NPDES permit
Hi Ron,
It appears as if the turbidity impairment is most likely caused by stormwater flows
issue in this
watershed. I appears that the effluent from the WWTP is like diluting the effects
of the instream
turbidity concentration. Haskett Creek has a summer and winter 7Q10 of 0 so it
appears like the
majority of the flow in the lower portion of this stream is effluent.
There was a DWQ special study done in 2003 which found a decline in the biology
between the
upstream and downstream WWTP stations, which the biologist indicated that this
decline was "likely
the result of influences of the WwTP" which was further supported by the high
conductivity values at
the downstream station.
Haskett creek is also impaired for Copper. This impairment is due to data collected
at the ambient
monitoring station (B4890000) downstream of the WWTP. Collection of metals was
stopped a while
back so there is no new data available.
IT is important to note that the Deep River EAU# 17-(10.5)dl from Haskett creek to
Gabriels creek is
impaired for Chlorophyll a violations at station B4920000. The coalition no longer
monitors for
Chlorophyll a at this station. They were informed that this impairment would remain
until data was
collected that indicated that this segment was no longer impaired. They chose to
discontinue chl a
monitoring here. The Cape Fear River above Buckhorn dam is also impaired for
chlorophyll a.
The high nutrient load coming from this plant is contributing to these chlorophyll a
impairments. The
2006-2010 median nitrate concentration at station B4890000 below the wwTP is 15 mg/L
which is a
very high instream concentration.
Please let me know if you need any additional information.
Have a great weekend.
Nora
Nora Deamer
Basinwide Planner
DENR-Division of water Quality
Planning Section
1617 MSC, Raleigh, Nc 27699-1617
919-807-6431
[e-mail]
http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ps/bpu
Email correspondence to and from this address is subject to the North Carolina
Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties unless the content is exempt by statute or other
Page 1

NC 2010 Integrated Report Categories 4 and 5 Impaired Waters
All 13,123 Waters in NC are in Category S-303(d) List for Mercury due to statewide fish consumption advice for several fish species
AU -Number AU -Name AU_Description LengthArea AU_Units Classification
Category Parameter
Reason for Rating Use Category
Collection Year
303(d)yenr
Cape
Fear River Basin
Headwaters Deep River Watershed 0303000301
Cape Fear River Basin
Deep River 5ubbasin
03030003
Cape Fear River Basin
Headwaters Deep River Watershed 0303000301
Q
17-(10.5)dl DEEP RIVER
From Haskett Creek to Gabriels Creek
2.7 FW Miles
C
5 Chlorophyll a
Standard Violation Aquatic Life
2008
2008
17-(4)a DEEP RIVER
From dam at Oakdale Cotton Mills, Inc. to
2.0 FW Miles
WS-IV;CA:*
SR 1113
5 Low Dissolved Oxygen
Standard Violation Aquatic Life
2008
2010
17-(1) DEEP RIVER(including
From source in backwaters of High Point 263.3 FW Acres
WS-IV;CA:*
High Point Lake at
Lake to dam at High Point Lake(City of High
Vr
normal pool
Point water supply intake)
elevation)
5 Chlorophyll a
Standard Violation Aquatic Life
2008
2006
J
V1
4
Q
17-2-(0.3)a East Fork Deep River
From source to Thatcher Road
1.9 FW Miles
WS-IV:*
4t Fecal Coliform (recreation)
Standard Violation Recreation
2008
1998
Z
I—
3
4t Turbidity
Standard Violation Aquatic Life
2008
1998
Q
17-2-(0.3)b East Fork Deep River
From Thatcher Road to a point 0.4 mile
4.8 FW Miles
WS-IV:*
C
downstream of Guilford County SR 1541
l"
4t Fecal Coliform (recreation)
Standard Violation Recreation
2008
1998
Sl
4t Turbidity
Standard Violation Aquatic Life
2008
1998
Q
17-2-(0.7) East Fork Deep River
From a point 0.4 mile downstream of
0.8 FW Miles
WS-IV;CA:*
Guilford County SR 1541 to High Point Lake,
Deep River
4t Fecal Coliform (recreation)
Standard Violation Recreation
2008
1998
4t Turbidity
Standard Violation Aquatic Life
2008
1998
Z
Q
17-12a Haskett Creek
From source to SR 2149
6.3 FW Miles
C
4s Ecological/biological Integrity Benthos
Fair Bioclassification Aquatic Life
2003
1998
5 Low Dissolved Oxygen
Standard Violation Aquatic Life
2008
2010
Q
17-12b Haskett Creek
From SR 2149 to Deep River
1.3 FW Miles
C
5 Copper
Standard Violation Aquatic Life
2008
2008
4s Ecological/biological IntegrityBenthos
Poor Bioclassification Aquatic Life
2003
2008
5 Turbidity
Standard Violation Aquatic Life
2008
2008
Q
17-8-2 Jenny Branch
From source to Reddicks Creek
3.2 FW Miles
WS-IV:*
5 Ecological/biological Integrity Benthos
Fair Bioclassification Aquatic Life
2003
2010
NC 2010 Integrated Report Category 4 and 5 303(d) List EPA Approved Aug 31, 201 9/20/2010 Page 10 of 145

Ambient Monitoring System Station
NCDENR, Division of Water Quality
Basinwide Assessment
Location: HASKETT
CRK AT ASHEBORO WWTP BRIDGE NR ASHEBORO
Station #: B4870000
Hydrologic Unit
Code:
03030003
Latitude: 35.76490
Longitude:-79.78640
Stream
class:
C
Agency: UCFRBA
NC stream index:
17-12
Time period: 10/18/2006
to 12/03/2010
#
#
Results not meeting EL
Percentiles
results ND
EL
# %
%Conf Min
10th
25th
50th
75th
90th
Max
Field
D.Q. (mg/L)
51
0
<4
0 0
5.9
6.8
7.7
8.8
10.5
12.2
14.9
51
0
<5
0 0
5.9
6.8
7.7
8.8
10.5
12.2
14.9
pH (SU)
51
0
<6
1 2
5.3
6.3
6.6
6.9
7.1
7.7
9.1
51
0
>9
1 2
5.3
6.3
6.6
6.9
7.1
7.7
9.1
Spec. conductance
51
0
N/A
54
71
91
111
133
152
221
(umhos/cm at 25°C)
Water Temperature (°C)
51
0
>32
0 0
2
6.6
9.8
15.2
22.4
26.5
30.7
Other
TSS (mg/L)
51
2
N/A
1
2
4
7
19
46
243
Turbidity (NTU)
51
0
>50
8 15.7
93.6 3.9
6.9
8.6
19.8
38.8
95
148
Nutrients (mg/L)
NH3 as N
51
27
N/A
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.03
0.08
0.13
NO2 + NO3 as N
51
6
N/A
0.02
0.02
0.05
0.16
0.27
0.36
0.54
TKN as N
51
5
N/A
0.2
0.2
0.29
0.41
0.67
0.86
1.49
Total Phosphorus
42
3
N/A
0.02
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.09
0.2
0.52
Metals (ug/L)
Aluminum, total (At)
3
0
N/A
344
344
344
477
1300
1300
1300
Arsenic, total (As)
3
3
>10
0 0
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
Cadmium, total (Cd)
3
3
>2
0 0
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Chromium, total (Cr)
3
3
>50
0 0
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
Copper, total (Cu)
3
0
>7
0 0
3
3
3
3
6
6
6
Iron, total (Fe)
3
0
> 1000
2 66.7
615
615
615
1340
2340
2340
2340
Lead, total (Pb)
3
3
>25
0 0
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
Nickel, total (Ni)
3
3
>88
0 0
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
Zinc, total (Zn)
3
1
>50
0 0
10
10
10
16
28
28
28
Fecal Coliform Screening(#/100mL)
# results: Geomean
# > 400: % >
400: %Conf:
51 290
18
35.3 99.7
Key:
# result: number of observations
# ND: number of observations reported to be below detection level (non -detect)
EL: Evaluation Level; applicable numeric or narrative water quality standard or action level
Results not meeting EL: number and percentages of observations not meeting evaluation level
%Conf : States the percent statistical confidence that the actual percentage of exceedances is at least 10% (20% for Fecal Coliform)
Stations with less than 10 results for a given parameter were not evaluated for statistical confidence

Ambient Monitoring System Station
NCDENR, Division of Water Quality
Basinwide Assessment
1 a
Location: DEEP RIV AT SR 2261 OLD LIBERTY RD NR CENTRAL FALLS
Station #: B4920000 Hydrologic Unit Code: 03030003
Latitude: 35.76350 Longitude:-79.77213 Stream class: C
Agency: UCFRBA NC stream index: 17-(10.5)
Time period: 01/10/2006 to 12/03/2010
# # Results not meeting EL Percentiles
results ND EL # % %Conf Min loth 25th 50th 75th 90th Max
Field
D.O. (mg/L)
85
0
<4
0
0
85
0
<5
0
0
pH (SU)
85
0
<6
0
0
85
0
>9
1
1.2
Spec. conductance
85
0
N/A
(umhos/cm at 25°C)
Water Temperature (°C)
85
0
>32
0
0
Other
TSS (mg/L)
60
2
N/A
Turbidity (NTU)
60
0
>50
3
5
Nutrients (mg/L)
NH3 as N
60
6
N/A
NO2 + NO3 as N
60
0
N/A
TKN as N
60
2
N/A
Total Phosphorus
51
1
NIA
Metals (ug/L)
Aluminum, total (At)
6
1
N/A
Arsenic, total (As)
6
6
>10
0
0
Cadmium, total (Cd)
6
6
>2
0
0
Chromium, total (Cr)
6
6
>50
0
0
Copper, total (Cu)
6
2
>7
0
0
Iron, total (Fe)
6
0
> 1000
2
33.3
Lead, total (Pb)
6
6
>25
0
0
Mercury, total (Hg)
6
0
>0.012
0
0
Nickel, total (Ni)
6
6
>88
0
0
Zinc, total (Zn)
6
2
>50
0
0
Fecal Coliform Screening(#/100mL)
# results: Geomean
# > 400:
% > 400:
%Conf-
60 172.3
11
18.3
5.5
6.9
7.5
8.5
9.7
11.1
13
5.5
6.9
7.5
8.5
9.7
11.1
13
6.1
6.7
6.9
7.2
7.5
7.7
10.4
6.1
6.7
6.9
7.2
7.5
7.7
10.4
95
146
174
209
298
410
639
4.1
8.8
12A
20
25
26.7
29.7
1
3
6
8
11.8
16.7
128
4.4
5.1
6
9.5
14.4
23
97.7
0.02
0.02
0.04
0.08
0.16
0.25
0.47
0.02
0.33
0.57
1.03
1.98
5.04
8.89
0.2
0.3
0.42
0.64
0.86
1.01
1.51
0.02
0.06
0.11
0.14
0.21
0.33
0.8
50
50
242
420
625
914
914
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
2
2
2
4
5
7
7
741
741
767
919
1308
1420
1420
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
0.003
0.003
0.003
0.005
0.006
0.007
0.007
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
13
18
22
22
Key:
# result: number of observations
# ND: number of observations reported to be below detection level (non -detect)
EL: Evaluation Level; applicable numeric or narrative water quality standard or action level
Results not meeting EL: number and percentages of observations not meeting evaluation level
%Conf : States the percent statistical confidence that the actual percentage of exceedances is at least 10% (20% for Fecal Coliform)
Stations with less than 10 results for a given parameter were not evaluated for statistical confidence

cc: Central Files
WSRO
NPDES STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
To: Attention: Ron Berry
NPDES Permitting Unit
Permit No. NCO026123
Date: April 18, 2011
County: Randolph
PART I -GENERAL INFORMATION
1. Permiee Address:
Facility Address:
Mr. Michael D. Rhoney, PE
Water Resources Director
City of Asheboro
P.O. Box 1106
Asheboro, NC 27204-1106
Asheboro POTW
1032 Bonkemeyer Drive
Asheboro, NC 27203
2. Date of Investigation: April 18, 2011
3. Report Prepared by: Mike Mickey, Environmental Specialist
APR 2 5 2011
4. Persons Contacted and Telephone Number: Mike Wiseman, ORC, [phone]
5. Directions to Site: Take the Pineview Street exit off Hwy 220. Turn east and proceed to US
Bus. Hwy 220. Turn right onto Bus. 220 and then take an immediate left onto Hub Morris
Road. Continue on Hub Morris and then turn left onto Bonkemeyer Drive. The POTW is
located at the end of Bonkemmyer Drive.
6. Discharge Point: Latitude: 35' 45' 58" Longitude: 79° 47' 08"
U.S.G.S. Ouad Name: Randleman, NC
7. Receiving stream or affected surface waters: Haskett Creek
a. Classification: C
b. River Basin and Subbasin No.: 03-06-09
C. Describe receiving stream features and pertinent downstream uses: The facility
discharges into Haskett Creek. The confluence with the Deep River is
approximately 0.8 miles downstream of the outfall.

Part II - DESCRIPTION OF DISCHARGE AND TREATMENT WORKS
1. a. Current permitted/design capacity of the POTW? 9.0 MGD
b. Date(s) of construction activities allowed by previous Authorizations to Construct
issued in the previous two years. AtC issued 11 /24/09 for installation of a 600 kW
generator for standby power.
C. Please provide a description of existing or substantially constructed wastewater
treatment facilities: The 9.0 MGD facility consists of the following: influent pump
station with two screw pumps, mechanical bar screens, grit removal, six rectangular
primary clarifiers (plus circular primary # 7 used for hydraulic surges and belt press
filtrate), three trickling filters, four rectangular intermediate (a.k.a. secondary)
settling tanks, two nitrification/aeration basins, three circular final clarifiers, tertiary
filter, disinfection by liquid sodium hypochlorite, contact chamber, dechlorination by
liquid sodium bisulfate, ultrasonic flow meter and cascade aeration. Solids handling
consists of sludge return pumps, one DAF thickener, two anaerobic digesters and two
belt filter presses and covered and uncovered storage areas. The dried sludge is
disposed under land application permit # WQ0001684.
d. Please provide a description of proposed wastewater treatment facilities. N/A
e. Possible toxic impacts to surface waters: None known. The Asheboro POTW was
compliant will all effluent NPDES permit limits in 2010 except for three weekly total
mercury violations that occurred the weeks of 1 /4-1 /8, 2/1-2/5, 3/28-4/3 . These
violations were satisfactorily addressed through the town's pretreatment program.
f. Pretreatment Program (POTWs only): Asheboro has an active pretreatment program
with seven non -categorical significant industrial users (SIU's) and seven categorical
Industrial Users (CIU's).
2. Residuals handling and utilization/disposal scheme: Residuals from the two anerobic
digesters are routed to two belt filter presses prior to land application on approved fields
under non -discharge permit No. WQ0001684.
PART III - OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION
1. Is this facility being constructed with Construction Grant Funds (municipals only? NA.
2. Special monitoring or limitations (including toxicity) requests: NA.
NPDES Permit Staff Report
Version 10/92
Page 2

3. Important SOC, JOC or Compliance Schedule dates: NA.
4. Alternative Analysis Evaluation: NA / Existing POTW.
5. Other Special Items: None.
PART IV - EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
WSRO recommends renewal of the City of Asheboro NPDES permit.
Report Preparer & Dat
ZOO
SWP Regi nal Super4isor & Date
NPDES Permit Staff Report
Version 10/92
Page 3

^ � � �K • ��%Jew`: Y \( f Imo.
1
r
i
750
1 r
Asheboro POTW
%'d \ NCO026123
Discharge Location
r.
r
1 r
•/: �') --- - \ l entral h%ails
Ir
'( Nor"si�o& --
• I
ASHEBORO
^.Ra.
North As b_ cl':
_ ore fipo
x,
C.
Y
CoDw,ant(C)2009 MVT000

Cttp of ZWbe boro
Water Resources Division
1312 N Fayetteville Street
PO Box iio6
Asheboro, NC 27204-1106
March 17, 2011
Mr. Charles H. Weaver, Jr.
Division of Water Quality
Surface Water Protection Section - NPDES
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Re: Permit Renewal Application
Dear Mr. Weaver:
Tel: [phone] Ext. 2210
Fax: [phone]
Please accept this letter requesting permit renewal for the City of Asheboro Wastewater
Treatment Plant — Permit #NC0026123. No major changes to the facility or treatment processes
have occurred since the issuance of the last permit. The facility added a 600 KW standby
generator in 2010. This generator is capable of running the entire plant in the event of a power
outage.
This facility has not experienced any change in flow over the last five years due to the stagnant
economy. Therefore, no major improvements or upgrades are necessary excluding maintenance
and replacement of existing equipment and facilities. This facility continues to see spikes in
flow during rain events due to inflow and infiltration. An ongoing study is in progress to locate
and repair major sources of inflow.
Sincerely, /
"a'" &am /
Michael D. Rhoney, PE
Water Resources Director
Enclosures
MAR 21 2011
Home of the NC Zoological Park

JB1 Preliminary J132
Spiral Lift 2 Auto Bar Sreens
1 Pista Grit
1 Parshall Flume
Influent
Flow Cap 9 MGD
Actual 3.9422
Construction Dates
Start
1962 3 MGD
Upgrade
1975
Upgrade
1986 6 MGD
Upgrade
1996 9 MGD
Sludge Handling System
3 RSP Pumps 200 gpm
4 TSP Pumps 200 gpm
2 DSP Pumps 200 gpm
2 SFP Pumps 400 GPM
1 DAF 600 sf
2 Digesters 400,000 gal
1 Piston Pump 300 gpm
2 Ashebrook 1.5 Meter
Presses
16 Drying Beds
1 Covered Storage Bldg
1 Uncovered Storage
Land Application Permitt
1200 Dry Tons / Year
CITY OF ASHEBORO WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
PROCESS FLOW SCHEMATIC
PART B-3
Primary 1-6 Nitrification
I Tric Fil SecondaryAeration
FPU,,M7PS
1�_
Trickling
I Rec #1
Primary #7
Filter Pumps
6 Rectangle
1 Round
4 Pumps
6 Mgd Each
3 TF Tanks
140 ft Dia
Based on 9MGD
2.40 Hrs DT
756 gpd/sf overflow
Primary Sludge Secondary Sludge
Sludge
Blending
Digesters Gallons In 803800
RSP DAF Thickner Digesters
Pumps
RAS
Final L.J
Sand
Clarifiers
1
PLANT DATA
Cascade
Rec #2
2 Nit Basins 3 Final Clar. 32 Top Feed
4 Sec Tanks 10 hr DT
4 Nit Pumps 5 Hr DT Deep Bed
2.5 hrs DT 7 MGD Each 6 40 hp Blowers 400 gpd/sf Sand Filters
500 gpd/sf 2 300 hp Blowers Overfow
Overflow 185 hp Blower
Eff Flow 3685267`
ec SS 59.13333 MLSS 2241.364 Eff SS 4.726667
ec BOD 51.90909 MLVSS 1462.273 Eff BOD 2.040909
ec COD 34.13333 RAS 8107273 Eff Nh3 0.181667
SA 40.94627
MCRT 259.0353
F/M Bod 0.037799
F/M Cod 0.024536
WAS
DT 30.68038 Avg Temp 101.3746 % Vol Re 56.59474
Drvina Beds i
Thick
b-( Tank Press liz
Thickenin ing
Gallons 0 Gallons 717730
% Poly 1.36 %Poly 1.36
% Thick 22.93 % Cake 22.93
"A" Cake Holding Lime Stb. �►
!-B�-Cake Holding F Land Application
TRUCKLOADS
71.5
TOTAL CUBIC YARDS PRESS= 908.05
MASTER LOG SHEETS

CITY OF ASHEBORO WASTEWATER TREATMENT
PROCESS FLOW NARRATIVE
PART B-3
Wastewater enters the Asheboro Treatment Plant through two main collection lines. The
36-inch sewer line flows into the plant by gravity and the 24-inch gravity sewer is pumped
through the spiral lift station into the plant. The two flows combine at Junction Box #1.
PRELIMINARY TREATMENT
Influent from Junction Box 1 sewer system enters the preliminary treatment structure
through a 42-inch ductile iron pipe. The wastewater passes through a 3/8 inch automatically
cleaned bar screen; then 15 MG Vortex Pitas Grit System, with both screenings and grit from the
units removed by a single belt conveyor. The wastewater flows by gravity through a 20 MG
rated parshall flume where the influent flow is measured by an ultrasonic flow meter.
The wastewater from the preliminary treatment then flows into the primary splitter box,
where the flow is split, going to a 3 MGD rated Circular Primary Clarifier, and 6 Rectangular
Primary Clarifiers rated 1 MGD each. The settled wastewater flows into the trickling filter
recirculation pump station.
PRIMARY TREATMENT
Settled primary sludge is collected by scrapper collection equipment into a sludge hopper
located at the inlet end of the rectangular tanks and the center of the circular tank.
Primary sludge is pumped out of the circular tank automatically set by timers, and
removed from the rectangular tanks automatically by air, which is controlled by a PLC.
Scum is removed from the surface of all tanks, removal pipe on rectangular tank
manually, and by scrapper into a hopper on the circular tank.
SECONDARY TREATMENT
Secondary biological treatment consists of a recirculation pump station, trickling filters,
recirculation junction box and secondary clarifiers. The primary settling tank effluent flows into
the recirculation pump station. The recirculation pump station consists of 4 centrifugal pumps
rated at 6 MGD. These pumps are utilized to pump the primary clarifier effluent and the
recirculated trickling filter effluent to the trickling filters.
There are three (3) trickling filters, which are operated in parallel. Rotating distributor
arms are used to distribute the flow evenly over the surface of the filters. As the flow trickles
through the stone media, the biological growth on the stone surface absorbs the organic material
in the wastewater, thus reducing the BOD in the wastewater. The filter drainage is collected in
an under drain and flows to the recirculation junction box and filter recirculation valve vault.
The recirculated flow goes to the recirculation pumping station while the remainder of the flow
discharges into the secondary clarifiers.

Page 2
Process Flow Narrative
There are two trickling filter recirculation patterns, one with trickling filter effluent back
to filter influent with primary effluent and one with secondary effluent back to filter influent with
primary effluent.
There are four secondary clarifiers, which are utilized to settle the trickling filter humus.
In general, 0.3 to 0.5 pounds of humus are produced for every pound of BOD removal in the
trickling filter. The sludge is removed by air on set timers. Scum is removed to the scum pipe
by the returning collector flights, and then rotating the scum pipe. Total volume of all four tanks
is 108,066 cu. Ft. The total linear footage of the weir is 816.
TERTIARY NITRIFICATION TREATMENT
Secondary clarifier effluent flows to two single -stage nitrification activated sludge trains.
The nitrification trains consist of a circular aeration tank and a circular center feed, peripheral
take -off final clarifier. Return sludge from the final clarifiers mixes with the secondary clarifier
effluent in the wet well of the nitrification pump station and is pumped to the nitrification splitter
box through a 30-inch DIP. The splitter evenly divides flow into the two nitrification basins with
subsequent flow to the clarifier splitter box through a 36-inch DIP.
The nitrification pump station consists of four variable speed pumps with 7 MGD
capacity.
Aeration and mixing in the nitrification basins are accomplished by the patented
Schreiber process, whereby air is introduced at the bottom of the aeration tank by a series of
diffusers, which are suspended from a rotating arm. "Counter -current aeration" is achieved by
providing the air through the rotating diffusers. In this manner, the manufacturer claims that the
air is in contact with the wastewater longer and, consequently, more efficient oxygen transfer is
achieved.
The Asheboro activated sludge system is operated under conditions to foster growth of
specific types of bacteria, which will convert ammonia -nitrogen (NH4-N) to nitrate -nitrogen
(NO3-N). Nitrification is needed at the WTF because the conversion of NH4-N to NO3-N requires
a lot of oxygen, which would be taken from Haskett's Creek if bacteria in the creek were to
perform the nitrification.
The two nitrification aeration basins have a capacity of 2 MG each, with air provided by
three variable speed centrifugal blowers, one up to 1,200 cfin, and two up to 5,000 cfin each, and
six positive displacement blowers 760 cfin each.
Mixed liquor exits each aeration basin through a mixing chamber. The mixing chamber
is provided to allow chemical addition, if required.
Magnesium Hydroxide may be added to the nitrification splitter box, if needed, due to
alkalinity depletion by nitrification reactions.
The mixed liquor then flows to the clarifier splitter box. The clarifier splitter box splits
the flow to the three clarifiers. Polymer may be added to the discharge of the clarifier splitter

Page 3
Process Flow Narrative
box to assist in precipitation in the clarifier, if needed. The discharge from the splitter box then
flows to the center inlet well of the clarifiers. Settled sludge is continuously removed from the
clarifier bottom through hydraulic suction -type collectors to the center sludge well. From there
the sludge flows by gravity to the return sludge valve vault. The sludge then can be recirculated
to the nitrification pump station through the return sludge valve vault. Sludge is wasted through
a 6-inch gravity flow line from the return sludge valve vault to the sludge conditioning building.
The waste sludge is metered utilizing an ultrasonic flow meter. An ultrasonic flow meter is
installed in each return sludge line within the return sludge valve vault. Return sludge flow rates
are adjusted by hydraulically activated plug valves within the return sludge valve vault.
Skimmers remove floating solids from the surface of the water in the clarifiers. Skimmings flow
by gravity from a common sump for all clarifiers to the secondary clarifiers. The three final
clarifiers have a total volume of 211,000 cubic feet with a total of 754 weir linear feet. Each
final clarifier is equipped with a Drexelbrook Clarifier Control System, which monitors sludge
blanket levels.
TERTIARY SAND FILTERS
The final clarifier effluent then flows by gravity to the tertiary sand filters. The Parkson
Dynasand Filter provides a unique filtration system since it continuously cleans the sand bed
while filtering liquid suspensions to the designed effluent quality. Feed water is passed upward
through the sand bed, exiting from the top of the filters as clean water. At the same time, sand is
continuously removed from the bottom, cleaned and returned to the top. A small portion of the
filtered water is used to wash the sand and leaves the filter as reject water flowing into a wet well
where it is pumped to the primary splitter box. The feed is introduced into the filter through the
feed pipe. The feed then passes down through the feed pipe to the distribution radials where it is
introduced into the sand bed. The distribution radials serve to distribute the feed water flow
evenly across the sand bed. From there, feed water passes upwards through the sand bed, being
cleaned in the process. The clean water (filtrate) passes over the filtrate weir at the top and
leaves the unit. The unit consists of four units of eight cells each with a maximum filtration rate
of 8 gallons per minute/square foot.
The effluent from the sand filters flows by gravity to the chlorine contact chamber where
Sodium Hypochlorite and Sodium Biosulfite is added.
During normal operating procedures, Sodium Hypochlorite is fed to the weirs of the
3 final clarifiers for algae control and added contact time. It can also be fed to the chlorine
contact chamber, trickling filter influent for control of filter flies (Phychoda) and the sand filter
influent. Sodium Biosulfite is fed only at the chlorine contact chamber before the effluent exits
to the Cascade Aeration system where the effluent is reaerated before discharging into Haskett's
Creek.
Michael R. Wiseman, ORC
Plant Manager
City of Asheboro Wastewater Treatment Plant
February 8, 2011

March 18, 2011
Mr. Charles H. Weaver, Jr.
Division of Water Quality
Surface Water Protection Section - NPDES
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Re: Permit Renewal Application
Dear Mr. Weaver:
Please accept this letter requesting permit renewal for the City of Asheboro Wastewater
Treatment Plant — Permit #NC0026123. No major changes to the facility or treatment processes
have occurred since the issuance of the last permit. The facility added a 600 KW standby
generator in 2010. This generator is capable of running the entire plant in the event of a power
outage.
This facility has not experienced any change in flow over the last five years due to the stagnant
economy. Therefore, no major improvements or upgrades are necessary excluding maintenance
and replacement of existing equipment and facilities. This facility continues to see spikes in
flow during rain events due to inflow and infiltration. An ongoing study is in progress to locate
and repair major sources of inflow.
Sincerely,
Michael D. Rhoney
Water Resources Director
Enclosures

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Form Approved 1114199
City of Asheboro
OMB Number 2040-0086
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART F. INDUSTRIAL USER DISCHARGES AND RCRA/CERCLA WASTES
All treatment works receiving discharges from significant industrial users or which receive RCRA, CERCLA, or other remedial wastes must
complete Part F. "
GENERAL INFORMATION:
F.I. Pretreatment Program. Does the treatment works have, or is it subject to, an approved pretreatment program?
✓ Yes No
F.2. Number of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs) and Categorical Industrial Users (CIUs). Provide the number of each of the following types
of industrial users that discharge to the treatment works.
a. Number of non -categorical SIUs. 7.00
b. Number of CIUs. 7.00
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
Supply the followIng information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges to the treatment works, copy questions F.3 through F.8
and provide the information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional
pages as necessary.
Name: Acme McCrary
Mailing Address: PO Rnx 12R7
Asheboro, NC 27204
FA. Industrial Processes. Describe all of the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Knitting of synthetic yarn, dye, sew, package, shipping, and floor cleaning
F.5. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): Ladies hosiery, stretch sport wear, and intimate apparel
Raw material(s): Synthetic yarn and dye stuffs, surfactants, peroxide, caustic, and acetic acid
F.6. Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharged into the collection system in gallons
per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
\
125,000.00 gpd (_continuous or intermittent)
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged into the collection
system in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
15,000.00 gpd ( continuous or intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits ✓ Yes No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards Yes ✓ No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
N/A
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 18 of 21

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
.. Form Approved 1114199 -
OMB Number 2040-0086
City of Asheboro
F.8. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharged by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three ears?
_Yes ✓ No If yes, describe each episode.
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE RECEIVED BY TRUCK, RAIL, OR DEDICATED PIPELINE:
F.9. RCRA Waste. Does the treatment works receive or has it in the past three years received RCRA hazardous waste by truck, rail, or dedicated
pipe? _Yes ✓ No (go to F.12.)
F.10. Waste Transport. Method by which RCRA waste is received (check all that apply):
Truck Rail Dedicated Pipe
F.11. Waste Description. Give EPA hazardous waste number and amount (volume or mass, specify units).
EPA Hazardous Waste Number Amount Units
CERCLA (SUPERFUND) WASTEWATER, RCRA REMEDIATION/CORRECTIVE
ACTION WASTEWATER, AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER:
F.12. Remedlation Waste. Does the treatment works currently (or has it been notified that it will) receive waste from remedial activities?
_Yes (complete F.13 through F.15.) ✓ No
Provide a list of sites and the requested information (F.13 - F.15.) for each current and future site.
F.13. Waste Origin. Describe the site and type of facility at which the CERCLA/RCRA/or other remedial waste originates (or is expected to originate
in the next five years).
F.14. Pollutants. List the hazardous constituents that are received (or are expected to be received). Include data on volume and concentration, if
known. (Attach additional sheets if necessary).
F.15. Waste Treatment.
a. Is this waste treated (or will it be treated) prior to entering the treatment works?
_Yes _No
If yes, describe the treatment (provide information about the removal efficiency):
b. Is the discharge (or will the discharge be) continuous or intermittent?
Continuous Intermittent If intermittent, describe discharge schedule.
END OF PART F.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS OF FORM
2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 19 of 21

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Form Approved 1114199
City of Asheboro
OMB Number 2040-0086
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART F. INDUSTRIAL USER DISCHARGES AND RCRA/CERCLA WASTES
All treatment works receiving discharges from significant Industrial users or which receive RCRA, CERCLA, or other remedial wastes must
complete Part F.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
F.I. Pretreatment Program. Does the treatment works have, or is it subject to, an approved pretreatment program?
YesNo
F.2. Number of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs) and Categorical Industrial Users (CIUs). Provide the number of each of the following types
of industrial users that discharge to the treatment works.
a. Number of non -categorical SIUs. 7.00
b. Number of CIUs. 7.00
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
Supply the following information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges to the treatment works, copy questions F.3 through F.8
and provide the information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional
pages as necessary.
Name: Bossong Hosiery
Mailing Address: R40 W Salisbuty ST
Asheboro, NC 27203
FA. Industrial Processes. Describe all of the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Knit synthetic yarn dye sew, package shipping air washer and floor cleaning
F.5. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): Ladies hosiery
Raw material(s): Synthetic yam & dye stuffs surfactants sodium chloride, peroxide, caustic, acetic acid
F.6. Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharged into the collection system in gallons
per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
49,000.00 gpd (_continuous or intermittent)
b. Non -process wastewater now rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged into the collection
system in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
7,000.00 gpd (_continuous or _Intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits Yes _No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards _Yes ✓ No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
N/A
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22, Page 18 of 21

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Form Approved 1114199
OMB Number 2040-0086
City of Asheboro
F.8. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharged by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works In the past three ears?
_Yes ✓ No If yes, describe each episode.
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE RECEIVED BY TRUCK, RAIL, OR DEDICATED PIPELINE:
F.9. RCRA Waste. Does the treatment works receive or has it in the past three years received RCRA hazardous waste by truck, rail, or dedicated
pipe? _Yes ✓ No (go to FA2.)
F.10. Waste Transport. Method by which RCRA waste is received (check all that apply):
_Truck _Rail _Dedicated Pipe
F.11. Waste Description. Give EPA hazardous waste number and amount (volume or mass, specify units).
EPA Hazardous Waste Number Amount Units
CERCLA (SUPERFUND) WASTEWATER, RCRA REMEDIATION/CORRECTIVE
ACTION WASTEWATER, AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER:
F.12. Remediation Waste. Does the treatment works currently (or has it been notified that it will) receive waste from remedial activities?
_Yes (complete F.13 through F.15.) ✓ No
Provides list of sites and the requested information (F.13- F.15.) for each current and future site.
F.13. Waste Origin. Describe the site and type of facility at which the CERCLA/RCRA/or other remedial waste originates (or is expected to originate
in the next five years).
F.14. Pollutants. List the hazardous constituents that are received (or are expected to be received). Include data on volume and concentration, if
known. (Attach additional sheets if necessary).
F.15. Waste Treatment.
a. is this waste treated (or will it be treated) prior to entering the treatment works?
_Yes No
If yes, describe the treatment (provide information about the removal efficiency):
b. Is the discharge (or will the discharge be) continuous or intermittent?
_Continuous _Intermittent If intermittent, describe discharge schedule.
END OF PART F.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS OF FORM
2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 19 of 21

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Form Approved 1114199
City of Asheboro
OMB Number 2040-0086
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART F. INDUSTRIAL USER DISCHARGES AND RCRA/CERCLA WASTES
All treatment works receiving discharges from significant Industrial users or which receive RCRA, CERCLA, or other remedial wastes must
complete Part F.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
F.I. Pretreatment Program. Does the treatment works have, or is it subject to, an approved pretreatment program?
YesNo
F.2. Number of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs) and Categorical Industrial Users (CIUs). Provide the number of each of the following types
of industrial users that discharge to the treatment works.
a. Number of non -categorical SIUs. 7.00
b. Number of CIUs. 7.00
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
Supply the following information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges to the treatment works, copy questions F.3 through F.8
and provide the information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional
pages as necessary.
Name: Energizer Batter Manufacturing Plant 1
Mailing Address: Ron Alhemnrlw rd
Asheboro, NC 27203
FA. Industrial Processes. Describe all of the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Press battery parts from rolled steel and wash the parts and package dry cell alkaline batteries from other sites
F.5. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): Battery parts
Raw materal(s): Rolled steel and parts cleaner
F.6. Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharged into the collection system in gallons
per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
5,000.00 gpd (_continuous or ✓ intermittent)
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged into the collection
system in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
3,000.00 gpd (_continuous or ✓ intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Loral limits ✓ Yes _No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ✓ Yes No
if subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
40 CFR 461 - fits no subcategory
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 18 of 21

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Form Approved 1114199 -
OMB Number 2040-0086
City of Asheboro
F.8. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharged by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three ears?
_Yes ✓ No If yes, describe each episode.
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE RECEIVED BY TRUCK, RAIL, OR DEDICATED PIPELINE:
F.9. RCRA Waste. Does the treatment works receive or has it in the past three years received RCRA hazardous waste by truck, rail, or dedicated
pipe? _Yes ✓ No (go to F.12.)
F.10. Waste Transport. Method by which RCRA waste is received (check all that apply):
Truck Rail _Dedicated Pipe
F.11. Waste Description. Give EPA hazardous waste number and amount (volume or mass, specify units).
EPA Hazardous Waste Number Amount Units
CERCLA (SUPERFUND) WASTEWATER, RCRA REMEDIATION/CORRECTIVE
ACTION WASTEWATER, AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER:
F.12. Remedtation Waste. Does the treatment works currently (or has it been notified that it will) receive waste from remedial activities?
_Yes (complete F.13 through F.15.) ✓ No
Provide a list of sites and the requested information (F.13 - F.15.) for each current and future site.
F.13. Waste Origin. Describe the site and type of facility at which the CERCLA/RCRA/or other remedial waste originates (or is expected to originate
in the next five years).
F.14. Pollutants. List the hazardous constituents that are received (or are expected to be received). Include data on volume and concentration, if
known. (Attach additional sheets if necessary).
F.15. Waste Treatment.
a. Is this waste treated (or will it be treated) prior to entering the treatment works?
_Yes _No
If yes, describe the treatment (provide information about the removal efficiency):
b. Is the discharge (or will the discharge be) continuous or intermittent?
_Continuous _Intermittent If intermittent, describe discharge schedule.
END OF PART F.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS OF FORM
2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 19 of 21

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Form Appmved 1114199
City of Asheboro
OMB Number 2040-0086
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART F. INDUSTRIAL USER DISCHARGES AND RCRA/CERCLA WASTES
All treatment works receiving discharges from significant industrial users or which receive RCRA, CERCLA, or other remedial wastes must
complete Part F.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
F.1. Pretreatment Program. Does the treatment works have, or is it subject to, an approved pretreatment program?
Yes —No
F.2. Number of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs) and Categorical Industrial Users (CIUs). Provide the number of each of the following types
of industrial users that discharge to the treatment works.
a. Number of non -categorical SIUs. 7.00
b. Numberof ClUs. 7.00
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
Supply the following information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges to the treatment works, copy questions F.3 through F.8
and provide the information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional
pages as necessary.
Name: Energizer Batter Manufacturing Plant 2
Mailing Address: 419 Art R Tan Dr
Asheboro, NC 27203
FA. Industrial Processes. Describe all of the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Battery can wash cathode & anode mix nail cleaning, Battery assembly, air washers, equipment and floor cleani
F.5. Principal Product(s) and Raw Materlal(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): Standard dry cell alkaline for D AA, AAA 9V and 1 /2 AA NCell
Raw material(s): Manganese dioxide zinc powder, graphite potassium hydroxide
F.6. Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharged into the collection system in gallons
per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
30,000.00 gpd ( continuousor ✓ intermittent)
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged into the collection
system in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
10,000.00 gpd (_continuous or ✓ intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits ✓ Yes No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ✓ Yes _No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
40 CFR 461 - Subcategory G
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 18 of 21

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Form Approved 1114199
OMB Number 2040-0086
City of Asheboro
F.8. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharged by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three ears?
_Yes ✓ No If yes, describe each episode.
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE RECEIVED BY TRUCK, RAIL, OR DEDICATED PIPELINE:
F.9. RCRA Waste. Does the treatment works receive or has it in the past three years received RCRA hazardous waste by truck, rail, or dedicated
pipe? _Yes ✓ No (go to F.12.)
F.10. Waste Transport. Method by which RCRA waste is received (check all that apply):
Truck Rail Dedicated Pipe
F.11. Waste Description. Give EPA hazardous waste number and amount (volume or mass, specify units).
EPA Hazardous Waste Number Amount Units
CERCLA (SUPERFUND) WASTEWATER, RCRA REMEDIATION/CORRECTIVE
ACTION WASTEWATER, AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER:
F.12. Remediation Waste. Does the treatment works currently (or has it been notified that it will) receive waste from remedial activities?
_Yes (complete F.13 through F.15.) ✓ No
Provide a list of sites and the requested information (F.13 - F.15.) for each current and future site.
F.13. Waste Origin. Describe the site and type of facility at which the CERCLA/RCRA/or other remedial waste originates (or is expected to originate
in the next five years).
F.14. Pollutants. List the hazardous constituents that are received (or are expected to be received). Include data on volume and concentration, if
known. (Attach additional sheets if necessary).
F.15. Waste Treatment.
a. Is this waste treated (or will it be treated) prior to entering the treatment works?
_Yes _No
If yes, describe the treatment (provide information about the removal efficiency):
b. Is the discharge (or will the discharge be) continuous or intermittent?
Continuous Intermittent If intermittent, describe discharge schedule.
END OF PART F.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS OF FORM
2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 19 of 21

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Form Approved 1114199
City of Asheboro
OMB Number 2040-0086
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART F. INDUSTRIAL USER DISCHARGES AND RCRA/CERCLA WASTES
All treatment works receiving discharges from significant Industrial users or which receive RCRA, CERCLA, or other remedial wastes must
complete Part F.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
F.1. Pretreatment Program. Does the treatment works have, or is it subject to, an approved pretreatment program?
YesNo
F.2. Number of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs) and Categorical Industrial Users (CIUs). Provide the number of each of the following types
of industrial users that discharge to the treatment works.
a. Number of non -categorical SIUs. 7.00
b. Number of CIUs. 7.00
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
Supply the following information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges to the treatment works, copy questions F.3 through F.8
and provide the information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional
pages as necessary.
Name: GARCO, Inc
Mailing Address: PO Box 1 q07
Asheboro, NC 27204
FA. Industrial Processes. Describe all of the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Centralized Waste Treatment
F.S. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): Oily, metal bearing and organic wastewater
Raw material(s): None
F.6. Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharged into the collection system in gallons
per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
10,000.00 gpd (_continuous or ✓ intermittent)
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged into the collection
system in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
500.00 gpd (_continuous or ✓ intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits ✓ Yes _No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ✓ Yes No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
40 CFR 437 - Subcategory D
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 18 of 21

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Form Approved 1/14199
City of Asheboro
OMB Number 2040-0086
F.B. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharged by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three ears?
_Yes ✓ No If yes, describe each episode.
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE RECEIVED BY TRUCK, RAIL, OR DEDICATED PIPELINE:
F.9. RCRA Waste. Does the treatment works receive or has it in the past three years received RCRA hazardous waste by truck, rail, or dedicated
pipe? _Yes ✓ No (go to F..12.)
F.10. Waste Transport. Method by which RCRA waste is received (check all that apply):
Truck _Rail Dedicated Pipe
F.11. Waste Description. Give EPA hazardous waste number and amount (volume or mass, specify units).
EPA Hazardous Waste Number Amount Units
CERCLA (SUPERFUND) WASTEWATER, RCRA REMEDIATION/CORRECTIVE
ACTION WASTEWATER, AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER:
F.12. Remediation Waste. Does the treatment works currently (or has it been notified that it will) receive waste from remedial activities?
_Yes (complete F.13 through F.15.) ✓ No
Provide a list of sites and the requested information (F.13 - F.15.) for each current and future site.
F.13. Waste Origin. Describe the site and type of facility at which the CERCLA/RCRA/or other remedial waste originates (or is expected to originate
in the next five years).
F.14. Pollutants. List the hazardous constituents that are received (or are expected to be received). Include data on volume and concentration, if
known. (Attach additional sheets if necessary).
F.15. Waste Treatment.
a. Is this waste treated (or will it be treated) prior to entering the treatment works?
_Yes No
If yes, describe the treatment (provide information about the removal efficiency):
b. Is the discharge (or will the discharge be) continuous or intermittent?
_Continuous _Intermittent If intermittent, describe discharge schedule.
END OF PART F.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS OF FORM
2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 19 of 21

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Form Approved 1114199
City of Asheboro 7
OMB Number 2040-0086
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART F. INDUSTRIAL USER DISCHARGES AND RCRA/CERCLA WASTES
All treatmentworks receiving discharges from significant Industrial users orwhich receive RCRA, CERCLA, or other remedial wastes must
complete Part F.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
F.1. Pretreatment Program. Does the treatment works have, or is it subject to, an approved pretreatment program?
Yes —No
F.2. Number of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs) and Categorical Industrial Users (CIUs). Provide the number of each of the following types
of industrial users that discharge to the treatment works.
a. Number of non -categorical SIUs. 7.00
b. Number of CIUs. 7.00
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
Supply the following information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges to the treatment works, copy questions F.3 through F.8
and provide the information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional
pages as necessary.
Name: Georgia Pacific
Mailing Address: 900 Mcdowwll Rd
Asheboro, NC 27205
FA. Industrial Processes. Describe all of the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Converts paper into corrugated sheets and boxes; prints and cuts boxes
F.5. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal products): Corrugated sheets and boxes
Raw materal(s): Paper, corn starch, 25% caustic borax resin, glue ink
F.6. Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharged into the collection system in gallons
per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
4,000.00 gpd (_continuous or ✓ intermittent)
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged into the collection
system in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
2,000.00 gpd (_continuous or ✓ intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits ✓ Yes No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards _Yes ✓ No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
4
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 18 of 21

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Form Approved 111499
OMB Number 2040-0086
City of Asheboro
F.8. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharged by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three ears?
_Yes ✓ No If yes, describe each episode.
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE RECEIVED BY TRUCK, RAIL, OR DEDICATED PIPELINE:
F.9. RCRA Waste. Does the treatment works receive or has it in the past three years received RCRA hazardous waste by truck, rail, or dedicated
pipe? _Yes ✓ No (go to FA2.)
F.10. Waste Transport. Method by which RCRA waste is received (check all that apply):
_Truck _Rail _Dedicated Pipe
F.11. Waste Description. Give EPA hazardous waste number and amount (volume or mass, specify units).
EPA Hazardous Waste Number Amount Units
CERCLA (SUPERFUND) WASTEWATER, RCRA REMEDIATION/CORRECTIVE
ACTION WASTEWATER, AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER:
F.12. Remediation Waste. Does the treatment works currently (or has it been notified that it will) receive waste from remedial activities?
_Yes (complete F.13 through F.15.) ✓ No
Provide a list of sites and the requested information (F.13 - F.15.) for each current and future site.
F.13. Waste Origin. Describe the site and type of facility at which the CERCLA/RCRA/or other remedial waste originates (or is expected to originate
in the next five years).
F.14. Pollutants. List the hazardous constituents that are received (or are expected to be received). Include data on volume and concentration, if
known. (Attach additional sheets if necessary).
F.15. Waste Treatment.
a. Is this waste treated (or will it be treated) prior to entering the treatment works?
_Yes No
If yes, describe the treatment (provide information about the removal efficiency):
b. Is the discharge (or will the discharge be) continuous or intermittent?
_Continuous _Intermittent If intermittent, describe discharge schedule.
END OF PART F.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS OF FORM
2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 19 of 21

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Form Approved 1/14r99
City of Asheboro
OMB Number 2040-0086
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART F. INDUSTRIAL USER DISCHARGES AND RCRA/CERCLA WASTES
All treatment works receiving discharges from significant industrial users or which receive RCRA,. CERCLA, or other remedial wastes must
complete Part F.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
F.I. Pretreatment Program. Does the treatment works have, or is it subject to, an approved pretreatment program?
YesNo
F.2. Number of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs) and Categorical Industrial Users (CIUs). Provide the number of each of the following types
of industrial users that discharge to the treatment works.
a. Number of non -categorical SIUs. 7.00
b. Number of CIUs. 7.00
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
Supply the following information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges to the treatment works, copy questions F.3 through F.8
and provide the information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional
pages as necessary.
Name: Goodyear Tire & Rubber
Mailing Address: Agfl Pinaviww Rd
Asheboro, NC 27203
FA. Industrial Processes. Describe all of the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Drawing patenting & electroplatihnq (copper & zinc) of steel wire
F.S. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): Steel tire cord for medium radial truck tires and hoses
Raw material(s): Steel rod, hydrochloric acid, sulfuric acid, phosphoric acid, copper nuggets zinc bars, co
F.6. Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharged into the collection system in gallons
per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
55,000.00 gpd ( ✓ continuousor intermittent)
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged into the collection
system in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
10,000.00 gpd (_continuous or ✓ intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits ✓ Yes _No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ✓ Yes _No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
40 CFR 433 - Subcategory A
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550.6 & 7550-22. Page 18 of 21

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Form Approved
OMB Number 2040-00040-0086
City of Asheboro
-
F.8. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharged by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three ears?
Yes ✓ No If yes, describe each episode.
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE RECEIVED BY TRUCK, RAIL, OR DEDICATED PIPELINE:
F.9. RCRA Waste. Does the treatment works receive or has it in the past three years received RCRA hazardous waste by truck, rail, or dedicated
pipe? _Yes ✓ No (go to F.12.)
F.10. Waste Transport. Method by which RCRA waste is received (check all that apply):
_Truck _Rail _Dedicated Pipe
F.11. Waste Description. Give EPA hazardous waste number and amount (volume or mass, specify units).
EPA Hazardous Waste Number Amount Units
CERCLA (SUPERFUND) WASTEWATER, RCRA REMEDIATION/CORRECTIVE
ACTION WASTEWATER, AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER:
F.12. Remedlation Waste. Does the treatment works currently (or has it been notified that it will) receive waste from remedial activities?
_Yes (complete F.13 through F.15.) ✓ No
Provide a list of sites and the requested information (F.13- FA5.) for each current and future site.
F.13. Waste Origin. Describe the site and type of facility at which the CERCLA/RCRA/or other remedial waste originates (or is expected to originate
in the next five years).
F.14. Pollutants. List the hazardous constituents that are received (or are expected to be received). Include data on volume and concentration, if
known. (Attach additional sheets if necessary).
FA 5. Waste Treatment.
a. Is this waste treated (or will it be treated) prior to entering the treatment works?
_Yes No
If yes, describe the treatment (provide information about the removal efficiency):
b. Is the discharge (or will the discharge be) continuous or intermittent?
Continuous Intermittent If intermittent, describe discharge schedule.
END OF PART F.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS OF FORM
2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 19 of 21

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Form Approved 1114199
City of Asheboro
OMB Number 2040-0086
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART F. INDUSTRIAL USER DISCHARGES AND RCRA/CERCLA WASTES
All treatment works receiving discharges from significant industrial users or which receive RCRA, CERCLA, or other remedial wastes must
complete Part F.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
F.1. Pretreatment Program. Does the treatment works have, or is it subject to, an approved pretreatment program?
YesNo
F.2. Number of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs) and Categorical Industrial Users (CIUs). Provide the number of each of the following types
of industrial users that discharge to the treatment works.
a. Number of non -categorical SIUs. 7.00
b. NumberofCIUs. 7.00
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
Supply the following information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges to the treatment works, copy questions F.3 through F.8
and provide the information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional
pages as necessary.
Name: Kayser Roth
Mailing Address: 515 W Ralfour Ave
Asheboro, NC 27203
FA. Industrial Processes. Describe all of the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Knit synthetic and natural yarn sew, dye board, and package socks and floor cleaning
F.S. Principal Product(s) and Raw Materlal(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): Socks
Raw matedal(s): natural & synthetic yarn, dyes stuffs sodium hypochlorite peroxide, surfactants, sodiu
F.6. Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharged into the collection system in gallons
per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is confinuous or intermittent.
105,000.00 gpd (__continuous or ✓ intermittent)
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged into the collection
system in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
10,000.00 gpd (_continuous or ✓ intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits ✓ Yes No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards _Yes ✓ No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
N/A
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 18 of 21

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Form Approved 1114199 '
OMB Number 2040.0086
City of Asheboro
F.8. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharged by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three ears?
_Yes ✓ No If yes, describe each episode.
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE RECEIVED BY TRUCK, RAIL, OR DEDICATED PIPELINE:
F.9. RCRA Waste. Does the treatment works receive or has it in the past three years received RCRA hazardous waste by truck, rail, or dedicated
pipe? _Yes ✓ No (go to F.12.)
F.10. Waste Transport. Method by which RCRA waste is received (check all that apply):
Truck _Rail _Dedicated Pipe
F.11. Waste Description. Give EPA hazardous waste number and amount (volume or mass, specify units).
EPA Hazardous Waste Number Amount Units
CERCLA (SUPERFUND) WASTEWATER, RCRA REMEDIATION/CORRECTIVE
ACTION WASTEWATER, AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER:
F.12. Remediation Waste. Does the treatment works currently (or has it been notified that it will) receive waste from remedial activities?
_Yes (complete F.13 through F.15.) ✓ No
Provide a list of sites and the requested information (F.13 - F.15.) for each current and future site.
F.13. Waste Origin. Describe the site and type of facility at which the CERCLA/RCRA/or other remedial waste originates (or is expected to originate
in the next five years).
F.14. Pollutants. List the hazardous constituents that are received (or are expected to be received). Include data on volume and concentration, if
known. (Attach additional sheets if necessary).
F.15. Waste Treatment.
a. Is this waste treated (or will it be treated) prior to entering the treatment works?
_Yes No
If yes, describe the treatment (provide information about the removal efficiency):
b. Is the discharge (or will the discharge be) continuous or intermittent?
_Continuous _Intermittent If intermittent, describe discharge schedule.
END OF PART F.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS OF FORM
2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 19 of 21

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Form Approved 1114199
City of Asheboro
OMB Number 2040-0086
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART F. INDUSTRIAL USER DISCHARGES AND RCRA/CERCLA WASTES
All treatment works receiving discharges from significant industrial users or which receive RCRA, CERCLA, or other remedial wastes must
complete Part F.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
F.1. Pretreatment Program. Does the treatment works have, or is it subject to, an approved pretreatment program?
YesNo
F.2. Number of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs) and Categorical Industrial Users (CIUs). Provide the number of each of the following types
of industrial users that discharge to the treatment works.
a. Number of non -categorical SIUs. 7.00
b. Number of CIUs. 7.00
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
Supply the following information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges to the treatment works, copy questions F.3 through F.8
and provide the Information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional
pages as necessary.
Name: Malt-O-Meal Company
Mailing Address: 9Fi96 Rank St
Asheboro, NC 27203
FA. Industrial Processes. Describe all of the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Cook oats/ press cooked corn process sugar oats add vitamins & flavoring, package
F.5. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): Frosted Flake Cereal, Frosted Shredded Wheat, Dry Oatmeal
Rawmaterial(s): Wheat oats corn flour, starch sugar, vitamins vegetable oil color flavoring
F.6. Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharged into the collection system in gallons
per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
73,000.00 gpd (_continuous or ✓ intermittent)
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged into the collection
system in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent-
6,000.00 gpd (_continuous or ✓ intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits ✓ Yes No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards _Yes ✓ No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
N/A
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 18 of 21

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Form Approved 1174199 „
OMB Number 2040-0086
City of Asheboro
F.B. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharged by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three ears?
_Yes ✓ No If yes, describe each episode.
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE RECEIVED BY TRUCK, RAIL, OR DEDICATED PIPELINE:
F.9. RCRA Waste. Does the treatment works receive or has it in the past three years received RCRA hazardous waste by truck, rail, or dedicated
pipe? _Yes ✓ No (go to F.12.)
F.10. Waste Transport. Method by which RCRA waste is received (check all that apply):
_Truck Rail Dedicated Pipe
F.11. Waste Description. Give EPA hazardous waste number and amount (volume or mass, specify units).
EPA Hazardous Waste Number Amount Units
CERCLA (SUPERFUND) WASTEWATER, RCRA REMEDIATION/CORRECTIVE
ACTION WASTEWATER, AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER:
F.12. Remediatlon Waste. Does the treatment works currently (or has it been notified that it will) receive waste from remedial activities?
_Yes (complete F.13 through F.15.) ✓ No
Provide a list of sites and the requested information (F.13- F.15.) for each current and future site.
F.13. Waste Origin. Describe the site and type of facility at which the CERCLA/RCRA/or other remedial waste originates (or is expected to originate
in the next five years).
F.14. Pollutants. List the hazardous constituents that are received (or are expected to be received). Include data on volume and concentration, if
known. (Attach additional sheets if necessary).
F.15. Waste Treatment.
a. Is this waste treated (or will it be treated) prior to entering the treatment works?
_Yes No
If yes, describe the treatment (provide information about the removal efficiency):
b. Is the discharge (or will the discharge be) continuous or intermittent?
_Continuous _Intermittent If Intermittent, describe discharge schedule.
END OF PART F.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS OF FORM
2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 19 of 21

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Form Approved 111"9
City of Asheboro
OMB Number 2040-0086
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART F. INDUSTRIAL USER DISCHARGES AND RCRAICERCLA WASTES
All treatment works receiving discharges from significant Industrial users or which receive RCRA, CERCLA, or other remedial wastes must
complete Part F.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
F.1. Pretreatment Program. Does the treatment works have, or is it subject to, an approved pretreatment program?
YesNo
F.2. Number of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs) and Categorical Industrial Users (CIUs). Provide the number of each of the following types
of industrial users that discharge to the treatment works.
a. Number of non -categorical SIUs. 7.00
b. Number of CIUs. 7.00
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
Supply the following information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges to the treatment works, copy questions F.3 through Re
and provide the Information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional
pages as necessary.
Name: Matlab, Inc
Mailing Address: Pr] Rox 2046
Asheboro, NC 27204
F.4. Industrial Processes. Describe all of the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Metal Cleaning with phosphoric acid solution
F.S. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): "Job shop" powder coated metal parts
Raw materal(s): metal parts, phosphoric acid solution, powder coatings
F.6. Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharged into the collection system in gallons
per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
2,500.00 gpd (_continuous or ✓ intermittent)
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged into the collection
system in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
500.00 gpd (_continuous or ✓ intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits ✓ Yes _No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ✓ Yes No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
40 CFR 433 - Subcategory A
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 18 of 21

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
.�
Form Approved 1114199 - ,
City of Asheboro
OMB Number 2040-0086
F.8. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharged by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three ears?
_Yes ✓ No If yes, describe each episode.
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE RECEIVED BY TRUCK, RAIL, OR DEDICATED PIPELINE:
F.9. RCRA Waste. Does the treatment works receive or has it in the past three years received RCRA hazardous waste by truck, rail, or dedicated
pipe? _Yes ✓ No (go to F.12.)
F.10. Waste Transport. Method by which RCRA waste is received (check all that apply):
_Truck Rall Dedicated Pipe
F.11. Waste Description. Give EPA hazardous waste number and amount (volume or mass, specify units).
EPA Hazardous Waste Number Amount Units
CERCLA (SUPERFUND) WASTEWATER, RCRA REMEDIATION/CORRECTIVE
ACTION WASTEWATER, AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER:
F.12. Remediatlon Waste. Does the treatment works currently (or has it been notified that it will) receive waste from remedial activities?
_Yes (complete F.13 through F.15.) ✓ No
Provide a list of sites and the requested information (F.13 - F.15.) for each current and future site.
F.13. Waste Origin. Describe the site and type of facility at which the CERCLA/RCRA/or other remedial waste originates (or is expected to originate
in the next five years).
F.14. Pollutants. List the hazardous constituents that are received (or are expected to be received). Include data on volume and concentration, if
known. (Attach additional sheets if necessary).
F.15. Waste Treatment.
a. Is this waste treated (or will it be treated) prior to entering the treatment works?
_Yes _No
If yes, describe the treatment (provide information about the removal efficiency):
b. Is the discharge (or will the discharge be) continuous or intermittent?
_Continuous Intermittent If intermittent, describe discharge schedule.
END OF PART F.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS OF FORM
2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 19 of 21

FACILITY NAME AND PER NUMBER:
Form Approved 1114199
City of Asheboro
OMB Number 2040-0086
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART F. INDUSTRIAL USER DISCHARGES AND RCRA/CERCLA WASTES
All treatment works receiving discharges from significant Industrial users or which receive RCRA, CERCLA, or other remedial wastes must
complete Part F.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
F.1. Pretreatment Program. Does the treatment works have, or is it subject to, an approved pretreatment program?
YesNo
F.2. Number of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs) and Categorical Industrial Users (CIUs). Provide the number of each of the following types
of industrial users that discharge to the treatment works.
a. Number of non -categorical SIUs. 7.00
b. Number of CIUs. 7.00
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
Supply the following information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges to the treatment works, copy questions F.3 through F.8
and provide the information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional
pages as necessary.
Name: Permier Powder Coating
Mailing Address: lQ48 N Faypttpville St
Asheboro, NC 27203
FA. Industrial Processes. Describe all of the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Washing of metal parts with phosphoric acid solution and powder coating
F.5. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): "Job Shop" powder coated metal parts
Raw material(s): metal parts, phosphoric acid solution powder coatings
F.6. Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharged into the collection system in gallons
per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
350.00 gpd ( ✓ continuous or intermittent)
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged into the collection
system in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
150.00 gpd ( ✓ continuous or intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits ✓ Yes No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ✓ Yes No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
40 CFR 433 - Subcategory A
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 18 of 21

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
City of Asheboro
Form Approved 1114199.
OMB Number 2040-0086
F.8. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharged by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three ears?
_Yes ✓ No If yes, describe each episode.
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE RECEIVED BY TRUCK, RAIL, OR DEDICATED PIPELINE:
F.9. RCRA Waste. Does the treatment works receive or has it in the past three years received RCRA hazardous waste by truck, rail, or dedicated
pipe? _Yes ✓ No (go to F.12.) -
FAIL Waste Transport. Method by which RCRA waste is received (check all that apply):
_Truck Rail Dedicated Pipe
F.11. Waste Description. Give EPA hazardous waste number and amount (volume or mass, specify units).
EPA Hazardous Waste Number Amount Units
CERCLA (SUPERFUND) WASTEWATER, RCRA REMEDIATION/CORRECTIVE
ACTION WASTEWATER, AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER:
F.12. Remediation Waste. Does the treatment works currently (or has it been notified that it will) receive waste from remedial activities?
_Yes (complete F.13 through F.15.) ✓ No
Provide a list of sites and the requested information (F.13 - F.15.) for each current and future site.
F.13. Waste Origin. Describe the site and type of facility at which the CERCLA/RCRA/or other remedial waste originates (or is expected to originate
in the next five years).
F.14. Pollutants. List the hazardous constituents that are received (or are expected to be received). Include data on volume and concentration, if
known. (Attach additional sheets if necessary).
F.15. Waste Treatment.
a. Is this waste treated (or will it be treated) prior to entering the treatment works?
_Yes _No
If yes, describe the treatment (provide information about the removal efficiency):
b. Is the discharge (or will the discharge be) continuous or intermittent?
_Continuous _Intermittent If intermittent, describe discharge schedule.
END OF PART F.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS OF FORM
2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 19 of 21

F,t4CILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Form Approved 1114199
City of Asheboro
OMB Number 2040-0086
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART F. INDUSTRIAL USER DISCHARGES AND RCRA/CERCLA WASTES
All treatment works receiving discharges from significant industrial users or which receive RCRA, CERCLA, or other remedial wastes must
complete Part F.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
F.I. Pretreatment Program. Does the treatment works have, or is it subject to, an approved pretreatment program?
YesNo
F.2. Number of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs) and Categorical Industrial Users (CIUs). Provide the number of each of the following types
of industrial users that discharge to the treatment works.
a. Number of non -categorical SIUs. 7.00
b. Number of CIUs. 7.00
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
Supply the following information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges to the treatment works, copy questions F.3 through F.8
and provide the information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional
pages as necessary.
Name: Randolph Packing
Mailing Address: 4n3 W Ralfour Ave
Asheboro, NC 27203
FA. Industrial Processes. Describe all of the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Live beef slaughter, cutting treating freezing shipping hide salting equipment and floor cleaning
F.5. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): Boneless beef, beef by-products, hides
Raw materal(s): live cattle, lactic acid, salt, ammonia, and sodium hypochlorite
F.6. Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharged into the collection system in gallons
per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
25,000.00 gpd ( continuous or ✓ intermittent)
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged into the collection
system in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
3,000.00 gpd (_continuous or ✓ intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits ✓ Yes No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards _Yes ✓ No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
N/A
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA fortes 7550-6 R 7550-22. Page 18 of 21

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
City of Asheboro
Form Approved 1114199
OMS Number 2040-0086
-
F.B. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharged by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three ears?
_Yes ✓ No If yes, describe each episode.
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE RECEIVED BY TRUCK, RAIL, OR DEDICATED PIPELINE:
F.9. RCRA Waste. Does the treatment works receive or has it in the past three years received RCRA hazardous waste by truck, rail, or dedicated
pipe? _Yes ✓ No (go to F.12.)
F.10. Waste Transport. Method by which RCRA waste is received (check all that apply):
Truck Rail Dedicated Pipe
F.11. Waste Description. Give EPA hazardous waste number and amount (volume or mass, specify units).
EPA Hazardous Waste Number Amount Units
CERCLA (SUPERFUND) WASTEWATER, RCRA REMEDIATION/CORRECTIVE
ACTION WASTEWATER, AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER:
F.12. Remediation Waste. Does the treatment works currently (or has it been notified that it will) receive waste from remedial activities?
_Yes (complete F.13 through F.15.) ✓ No
Provide a list of sites and the requested information (F.13 - F.15.) for each current and future site.
F.13. Waste Origin. Describe the site and type of facility at which the CERCLA/RCRA/or other remedial waste originates (or is expected to originate
in the next five years).
F.14. Pollutants. List the hazardous constituents that are received (or are expected to be received). Include data on volume and concentration, if
known. (Attach additional sheets if necessary).
F.15. Waste Treatment.
a. Is this waste treated (or will it be treated) prior to entering the treatment works?
_Yes _No
If yes, describe the treatment (provide information about the removal efficiency):
b. Is the discharge (or will the discharge be) continuous or intermittent?
_Continuous _Intermittent If intermittent, describe discharge schedule.
END OF PART F.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS OF FORM
2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 6 7550-22. Page 19 of 21

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Form Approved 1114199
City of Asheboro
OMB Number 2040-0086
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART F. INDUSTRIAL USER DISCHARGES AND RCRA/CERCLA WASTES
All treatment works receiving discharges from significant industrial users or which receive RCRA, CERCLA, or other remedial wastes must
complete Part F.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
F.I. Pretreatment Program. Does the treatment works have, or is it subject to, an approved pretreatment program?
YesNo
F.2. Number of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs) and Categorical Industrial Users (CIUs). Provide the number of each of the following types
of industrial users that discharge to the treatment works.
a. Number of non -categorical SIUs. 7.00
b. Number of CIUs. 7.00
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
Supply the following information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges to the treatment works, copy questions F.3 through F.8
and provide the information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional
pages as necessary.
Name: Starpet
Mailing Address: Rn1 Pineview Rd
Asheboro, NC 27203
F.4. Industrial Processes. Describe all of the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
polymerization of polyethylene terephthalate resin and air stripper
F.S. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): Food grade polyethylene terephthalate resin (PET) (plastic chips)
Raw material(s): ethylene glycol, terephthalic acid, isophthalic acid, phosphoric acid & nitrogen gas
F.6. Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharged into the collection system in gallons
per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
48,000.00 gpd L ✓ continuous or intermittent)
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged into the collection
system in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
3,000.00 gpd (_continuous or ✓ intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits ✓ Yes _No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards ✓ Yes _No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
40 CFR 414 - Subcategory K
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22. Page 18 of 21

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
City of Asheboro
Form Approved 1114199"
OMB Number 2040-0086 '
a
F.8. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharged by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works In the past three ears?
_Yes ✓ No If yes, describe each episode.
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE RECEIVED BY TRUCK, RAIL, OR DEDICATED PIPELINE:
F.9. RCRA Waste. Does the treatment works receive or has it in the past three years received RCRA hazardous waste by truck, rail, or dedicated
pipe? _Yes ✓ No (go to F.12.)
F.10. Waste Transport. Method by which RCRA waste is received (check all that apply):
Truck _Rail _Dedicated Pipe
F.11. Waste Description. Give EPA hazardous waste number and amount (volume or mass, specify units).
EPA Hazardous Waste Number Amount Units
CERCLA (SUPERFUND) WASTEWATER, RCRA REMEDIATION/CORRECTIVE
ACTION WASTEWATER, AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER:
F.12. Remediation Waste. Does the treatment works currently (or has it been notified that it will) receive waste from remedial activities?
_Yes (complete F.13 through F.15.) ✓ No
Provide a list of sites and the requested information (F.13 - F.15.) for each current and future site.
F.13. Waste Origin. Describe the site and type of facility at which the CERCLAIRCRAtor other remedial waste originates (or is expected to originate
in the next five years).
F.14. Pollutants. List the hazardous constituents that are received (or are expected to be received). Include data on volume and concentration, if
known. (Attach additional sheets if necessary).
F.15. Waste Treatment.
a. Is this waste treated (or will it be treated) prior to entering the treatment works?
_Yes No
If yes, describe the treatment (provide information about the removal efficiency):
b. Is the discharge (or will the discharge be) continuous or intermittent?
_Continuous _Intermittent If intermittent, describe discharge schedule.
END OF PART F.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS OF FORM
2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 6 7550-22. Page 19 of 21

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
Form Approved 1/1"9
City Of Asheboro
OMB Number 2040-0086
SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION
PART F. INDUSTRIAL USER DISCHARGES AND RCRA/CERCLA WASTES
All treatment works receiving discharges from significant industrial users or which receive RCRA, CERCLA, or other remedial wastes must
complete Part F.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
F.I. Pretreatment Program. Does the treatment works have, or is it subject to, an approved pretreatment program?
✓ Yes —No
F.2. Number of Significant Industrial Users (SIUs) and Categorical Industrial Users (CIUs). Provide the number of each of the following types
of industrial users that discharge to the treatment works.
a. Number of non-categodcal SIUs. 7.00
b. Number of CIUs. 7.00
SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USER INFORMATION:
Supply the following information for each SIU. If more than one SIU discharges to the treatment works, copy questions F.3 through F.8
and provide the information requested for each SIU.
F.3. Significant Industrial User Information. Provide the name and address of each SIU discharging to the treatment works. Submit additional
pages as necessary.
Name: Wells Hosiery
Mailing Address: PO Rox 1506
Asheboro, NC 27204
FA. Industrial Processes. Describe all of the industrial processes that affect or contribute to the SIU's discharge.
Knit nylon, sew, dye, board, package shipping and cleanup
F.S. Principal Product(s) and Raw Material(s). Describe all of the principal processes and raw materials that affect or contribute to the SIU's
discharge.
Principal product(s): Ladies hosiery and stretch apparel
Raw material(s): sodium hydrosulfite, surfactants, ethozylated compounds, sodium chloride, peroxide, dy
F.6. Flow Rate.
a. Process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of process wastewater discharged into the collection system in gallons
per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
46,000.00 gpd ( confinuous or ✓ intermittent)
b. Non -process wastewater flow rate. Indicate the average daily volume of non -process wastewater flow discharged into the collection
system in gallons per day (gpd) and whether the discharge is continuous or intermittent.
9,000.00 gpd (_continuous or ✓ intermittent)
F.7. Pretreatment Standards. Indicate whether the SIU is subject to the following:
a. Local limits ✓ Yes No
b. Categorical pretreatment standards _Yes ✓ No
If subject to categorical pretreatment standards, which category and subcategory?
N/A
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 & 7550-22.
Page 18 of 21

FACILITY NAME AND PERMIT NUMBER:
City of Asheboro
Form Approved 9 6
OMB Number 2040-00440086 �
F.8. Problems at the Treatment Works Attributed to Waste Discharged by the SIU. Has the SIU caused or contributed to any problems (e.g.,
upsets, interference) at the treatment works in the past three ears?
_Yes ✓ No If yes, describe each episode.
RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE RECEIVED BY TRUCK, RAIL, OR DEDICATED PIPELINE:
F.9. RCRA Waste. Does the treatment works receive or has it in the past three years received RCRA hazardous waste by truck, rail, or dedicated
pipe? _Yes ✓ No (go to F.12.)
F.10. Waste Transport. Method by which RCRA waste is received (check all that apply):
Truck Rail _Dedicated Pipe
FA 1. Waste Description. Give EPA hazardous waste number and amount (volume or mass, specify units).
EPA Hazardous Waste Number Amount Units
CERCLA (SUPERFUND) WASTEWATER, RCRA REMEDIATION/CORRECTIVE
ACTION WASTEWATER, AND OTHER REMEDIAL ACTIVITY WASTEWATER:
F.12. Remediation Waste. Does the treatment works currently (or has it been notified that it will) receive waste from remedial activities?
_Yes (complete F.13 through F.15.) ✓ No
Provide a list of sites and the requested information (F.13 - F.15.) for each current and future site.
F.13. Waste Origin. Describe the site and type of facility at which the CERCLA/RCRA/or other remedial waste originates (or is expected to originate
in the next five years).
F.14. Pollutants. List the hazardous constituents that are received (or are expected to be received). Include data on volume and concentration, if
known. (Attach additional sheets if necessary).
F.15. Waste Treatment.
a. Is this waste treated (or will it be treated) prior to entering the treatment works?
_Yes _No
If yes, describe the treatment (provide information about the removal efficiency):
b. Is the discharge (or will the discharge be) continuous or intermittent?
_Continuous Intermittent If intermittent, describe discharge schedule.
END OF PART F.
REFER TO THE APPLICATION OVERVIEW TO DETERMINE WHICH OTHER PARTS OF FORM
2A YOU MUST COMPLETE
EPA Form 3510-2A (Rev. 1-99). Replaces EPA forms 7550-6 8 7550-22, Page 19 of 21