The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20151193 Ver 1_Application_20151113;, �;. PAT McCRORY Governor NICHOLAS J. TENNYSON SecreYary Transportation November 13, 2015 U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Field Office 151 Patton Avenue, Room 208 Asheville, NC 28801-5006 ATTN: Mr. Steven Kichefski NCDOT Coordinator Subject: Application for Section 404 Nationwide Permits 13, 23 & 33 and Section 401 Water Quality Certification for the proposed replacement of Bridge No. 203 over Stanley Creek on SR 1935 (Willowside Drive) in Gaston County; Federal Aid Project No. BRZ-1935(2); Division 12; TIP No. B-4751. $570 from WBS 38523.1.1 Dear Mr. Kichefski: The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) proposes to replace Bridge No. 203 (a 71-foot bridge) over Stanley Creek on SR 1935 with an 82-foot bridge that will span Stanley Creek. The bridge will be replaced in place, with an off-site detour. There will be a total of 178 linear feet (1� of permanent stream impacts, and 37 lf (0.01 ac) of temporary stream impacts on the project. The permanent stream impacts include 170 lf from the relocation of a portion of a tributary to Stanley Creek into an open ditch, and 8 linear feet from the placement of bank stabilization at the confluence of the proposed ditch and Stanley Creek. The temporary stream impacts include 27 lf (<0.01 ac) from the placement of a temporary causeway in Stanley Creek for piling removal, and 10 linear feet (<0.01 ac) to the tributary to Stanley Creek associated with the filling of a poc-tion of t11e tributary. Please see enclosed copies of the Pre-Construction Notification (PCN), NCDMS Mitigation Acceptance Letter, stormwater management plan, permit drawings and design plans for the above-referenced project. The Programmatic Categorical Exclusion (PCE) was completed in June 2014 and distributed on June 23, 2014. Additional copies are available upon request. This project calls for a letting date of March 15, 2016 and a review date of January 26, 2016; however, the let date may advance as additional funding becomes available. �Nothing Compares��__ State of North Carolina � Department of Transportation � PDEA-Natural Environment Section 1020 Birch Ridge Drive, 27610 � 1598 Mail Service Center � Raleigh, Nor1h Carolina 27699-1598 919-707-6000 T 919-213-5785 F A copy of this permit application and its distribution list wil] be posted on the NCDOT Website at: http://connect.ncdot.gov/resources/Environmental. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call Bill Barrett at (919) 707-6103. Sincerely, .,�yr Richard W. Hancock, P.E., Manager Project Development and Environmental Analysis Unit cc: NCDOT Permit Application Standard Distribution List Page 2 of 2 �oF,��,rFRQ Office Use Only: � � o c Corps action ID no. � y i ,, , � � � DWQ project no. ° �` Form Version 1.4 January 2009 Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form A. Applicant Information 1. Processing 1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: � Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit 1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 13 23 33 or General Permit (GP) number: 1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ❑ Yes � No 1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply): � 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit ❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization 1 e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ 401 For the record only for Corps Permit: because written approval is not required? Certification: ❑ Yes � No ❑ Yes � No 1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation � Yes ❑ No of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program. 1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h ❑ Yes � No below. 1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes � No 2. Project Information 2a. Name of project: Replacement of Bridge 203 over Stanley Creek on SR 1935. 2b. County: Gaston 2c. Nearest municipality / town: Stanley 2d. Subdivision name: not applicable 2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state g_4751 project no: 3. Owner Information 3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: North Carolina Department of Transportation 3b. Deed Book and Page No. not applicable 3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if not applicable applicable): 3d. Street address: 1598 Mail Service Center 3e. City, state, zip: Raleigh, NC 27699-1598 3f. Telephone no.: (919) 707-6103 3g. Fax no.: (919) 212-5785 3h. Email address: wabarrett@ncdot.gov 4. Applicant Information (if different from owner) 4a. Applicant is: ❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify: 4b. Name: not applicable 4c. Business name (if applicable): 4d. Street address: 4e. City, state, zip: 4f. Telephone no.: 4g. Fax no.: 4h. Email address: 5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable) 5a. Name: not applicable 5b. Business name (if applicable): 5c. Street address: 5d. City, state, zip: 5e. Telephone no.: 5f. Fax no.: 5g. Email address: B. Project Information and Prior Project History 1. Property Identification 1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): not applicable 1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.347905 Longitude: - 81.46607 (DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD) 1 c. Property size: 0.72 acres 2. Surface Waters 2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to Stanley Creek proposed project: 2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: WS-IV 2c. River basin: Catawba 3. Project Description 3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: Local rural. The Catawba Lands Conservancy owns property both north and south of Bridge No. 203. 3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0 within construction limits; 0.2 acre within NRTR study area. 3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 245 within construction limits; 750 LF within NRTR study area. 3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: To replace a structurally deficient and functionally obsolete bridge. 3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The project involves replacing a 71-foot bridge with a 82-foot, single-span bridge on the existing alignment with an off-site detour. Standard road building equipment, such as trucks, dozers, and cranes will be used. 4. Jurisdictional Determinations 4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property / ro ect includin all rior hases in the ast? ❑ Yes � No ❑ Unknown p 1 i� 9 P� p )� P Comments: 4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made? ❑ Preliminary ❑ Final 4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company: Name (if known): Other: 4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation. 5. Project History 5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for � Yes � No ❑ Unknown this project (including all prior phases) in the past? 5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions. 6. Future Project Plans 6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes � No 6b. If yes, explain. C. Proposed Impacts Inventory 1. Impacts Summary 1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply): ❑ Wetlands � Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction 2. Wetland Impacts If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted. 2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f. Wetland impact number — Type of impact Type of wetland Forested Type of jurisdiction Area of impact Permanent (P) or (if known) (acres) Temporar T Site 1❑ P❑ T Choose One ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ Site 2❑ P � T Choose One ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ 2g. Total wetland impacts X Permanent X Temporary 2h. Comments: 3. Stream Impacts If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this question for all stream sites impacted. 3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g. Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of Average Impact length number - (PER) or jurisdiction stream (linear feet) Permanent (P) or intermitte (Corps - width Temporary (T) nt (INT)? 404, 10 (feet) DWQ — non-404, other) Site 1❑ P� T temporary Stanley Creek � PER � Corps � 2 27 causeway ❑ INT ❑ DWQ (<0.01 ac) Site 1� P❑ T bank Stanley Creek � PER � Corps 12 8 stabilization ❑ INT ❑ DWQ (<0.01 ac) Site 2� P � T fill / stream UT to Stanley Creek � PER � Corps 3 170 relocation ❑ INT ❑ DWQ Site 2❑ P� T associated UT to Stanley Creek � PER � Corps 3 10 with fill ❑ INT ❑ DWQ (<0.01 ac) 178 Perm 3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 37 Temp (<0.01 ac) 3i. Comments: The loss of stream function from the filling of the tributary to Stanley Creek will be replaced by the proposed ditch to be constructed. 4. Open Water Impacts If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of the U.S. then individuall list all o en water impacts below. 4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e. Open water Name of impact number — waterbody Type of impact Waterbody Area of impact (acres) Permanent (P) or (if applicable) type Tempora T 01 ❑P❑T 02 ❑P❑T 03 ❑P❑T 04 ❑P❑T 4f. Total open water impacts X Permanent X Temporary 4g. Comments: 5. Pond or Lake Construction If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below. 5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e. Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland Pond ID Proposed use or (acres) number purpose of pond Flo Flooded Filled Excavated ode Filled Excavated Flooded d P1 P2 5f. Total 5g. Comments: 5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no: 5i. Expected pond surface area (acres): 5j. Size of pond watershed (acres): 5k. Method of construction: 6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ) If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts below. If an impacts require miti ation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form. 6a. ❑ Neuse ❑ Tar-Pamlico ❑ Other: Project is in which protected basin? ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman 6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g. Buffer impact number — Reason for impact Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact Permanent (P) or Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet) Tem ora T re uired? B1 ❑P❑T ❑Yes ❑ No B2 ❑P❑T ❑Yes ❑ No B3 ❑P❑T ❑Yes ❑ No 6h. Total buffer impacts 6i. Comments: D. Impact Justification and Mitigation 1. Avoidance and Minimization 1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project. The proposed bridge is 11 feet longer than the existing bridge; the proposed bridge will span Stanley Creek; the proposed bridge will be at approximately the same grade as the existing structure; an off site detour will be used; bank stabilization will be utilized where the proposed ditch discharges to Stanley Creek to reduce erosion and sedimentation; and 2:1 fill slopes will be used where practicable. 1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques. A temporary causeway will be placed in Stanley Creek and utilized for the removal of the pilings of the existing bridge. 2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State � Yes ❑ No If no, explain: In conversations with Steve Kichefski USACE, mitigation is not required for the filling of the UT to Stanley Creek (low quality stream), as iYs function will replaced by the proposed ditch. NCDOT does not propose mitigation for the 8 If of bank 2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for stabilization impact, as it does not require fill in the stream impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? bed and therefore, under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, does not constitute Loss of Waters of the U.S. and is not subject to compensatory mitigation. Furthermore, the proposed bank stabilization is necessary to prevent erosion and sedimentation by preventing bank destabilization and thereby minimizing impacts to the environment. Mitigation is required by NCDWR for stream impacts greater than 150 LF. Miitigation for 178 LF of stream impact at 1:1 ratio has been obtained from NCDMS. 2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): � DWQ ❑ Corps ❑ Mitigation bank 2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project? � Payment to in-lieu fee program ❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation 3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank 3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: not applicable 3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity 3c. Comments: 4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program 4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. � Yes 4b. Stream mitigation requested: 178 linear feet 4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: � warm ❑ cool ❑cold 4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): 0 square feet 4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: 0 acres 4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: 0 acres 4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: 0 acres 4h. Comments: Mitigation for 170 LF im stream impact at 1:1 ratio, for NCDWR. 5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan 5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan. 6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ 6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires ❑ Yes ❑ No buffer mitigation? 6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the amount of mitigation required. 6c. 6d. 6e. Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation (square feet) (square feet) Zone 1 3(2 for Catawba) Zone 2 1.5 6f. Total buffer mitigation required: 6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank, permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund). 6h. Comments: E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ) 1. Diffuse Flow Plan 1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ❑ Yes � No within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? 1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If not, explain why. ❑ Yes ❑ No Comments: If required from 1 a, see attached buffer permit drawings. 2. Stormwater Mana ement Plan 2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? N/A 2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? � Yes ❑ No 2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: 2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan: See attached permit drawings. ❑ Certified Local Government 2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ DWQ Stormwater Program � DWQ 401 Unit 3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review 3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? not applicable ❑ Phase II 3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ❑ NSW apply (check all that apply): ❑ USMP ❑ Water Supply Watershed ❑ Other: 3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑ Yes ❑ No attached? 4. DWQ Stormwater Pro ram Review ❑ Coastal counties 4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply ❑ HQW (check all that apply): ❑ ORW ❑ Session Law 2006-246 ❑ Other: 4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been attached? ❑ Yes ❑ No n/a 5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review 5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ❑ Yes ❑ No n/a 5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ❑ Yes ❑ No n/a F. Supplementary Information 1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement) 1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the � Yes ❑ No use of public (federal/state) land? 1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State � Yes ❑ No (North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? 1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.) � Yes ❑ No Comments: 2. Violations (DWQ Requirement) 2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑ Yes � No or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 26 .0200)? 2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ❑ Yes � No 2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): 3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement) 3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ❑ Yes additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? � No 3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description. Due to the minimal transportation impact resulting from this bridge replacement, this project will neither influence nearby land uses nor stimulate growth. Therefore, a detailed indirect or cumulative effects study will not be necessary. 4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement) 4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility. not applicable 10 5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement) 5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or � Yes ❑ No habitat? Habitat for Schweinitz's sunflower 5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act � Yes ❑ No impacts? ❑ Raleigh 5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. � Asheville 5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat? NHP, USFWS, and NCDOT field surveys An on-site field meeting was held on October 5, 2015, with Cheryl Gregory/NCDOT, Marella Buncick/USFWS, and Trish Beam/NCDOT Division 12 DEO to assess NLEB at the project site. There was no evidence of bats; poor bridge habitat. A handful of trees on the notheast side of the bridge will be cleared. Marella determined that because the trees are in a riparian area overhanging water, that they are not ideal maternity roost habitat for NLEB. Marella rendered a No Effect determination without a need for a tree-cutting moratorium. No Effect for Schweinitz's sunflower and dwart-flowered heartleaf. 6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement) 6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes � No 6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat? NMFS County Index 7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement) 7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation � Yes � No status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in North Carolina history and archaeology)? 7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources? NEPA Documentation 8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement) 8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? � Yes ❑ No 8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: NCDOT Hydraulics Unit coordination with FEMA 8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA Maps �� Richard W. Hancock, P.E. �i � - �� -�,3-2ors Applicant/AgenYs Printed Name Date Applicant/Agent's Signature (AgenYs signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is rovided. 11 r Environmenta! Quality PAT MCCRORY ��,�P,�:�- DONALD R. VAN DER VAART Serrercary November 6, 2015 Mr. Richard W. Hancock, P.E. Project Development and Environmental Analysis Unit North Carolina Department of Transportation 1548 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1548 Dear Mr. Hancock: Subject: Mitigation Acceptance Letter: B-4751, Replace Bridge 203 on SR 1935 over Stanley Creek, Gaston County The purpose of tlus letter is to notify you that the Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) will provide the compensatory stream mitigation for the subject project. Based on the information supplied by you on November 6, 2015, the impacts are located in CU 03050101 of the Catawba River basin in the Southern Piedmont (SP) Eco- Region, and are as follows: Catawba 03050101 gp Cold Impacts „ Stream Cool Wetlands Warm Riparian Non- n:__�__ 178.0 *Some of the stream impacts may be proposed to be details. C�] Buffer (Sq. Ft.) Marsh I Zone 1 I Zone 2 0 at a 1:1 mitigation ratio. See pemut application for This mitigation acceptance letter replaces the mitigation acceptance letter issued on October 27, 2015. This impact and associated mitigation need were under projected by the NCDOT in the 2015 impact data. DMS will commit to implement sufficient compensatory stream mitigation credits to offset the impacts associated with this project as detemuned by the regulatory agencies using the delivery timeline listed in Section F3.c.iii of the In-Lieu Fee Instrument dated July 28, 2010. If the above referenced impact amounts are revised, then this mitigation acceptance letter will no longer be valid and a new mitigation acceptance letter will be required from DMS. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Beth Hannon at 919-707-8420. Sincerely, . Jam B. Stanfill Credit Management Supervisor cc: Mr. Steve Kichefski, USACE — Asheville Regulatory Field O�ce Ms. Amy Chapman, NCDWR File: B-4751 -`=`-^Nothing Compares� State of North Carolina � Environmentel Qualily 1601 Mail Service Center � f�aleigh, Nnrth Carolina 27699-1601 919-iD7-8600 l ll¢;l l4�'zl4' North Carolina Department of Transportation Slc�rt�ikv��tf'r Highway Stormwater Program �.1 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN (Version 2.01; Released December 2014) FOR NCDOT PROJECTS WBS Element: 385232.1 TIP No.: B-4751 Count (ies : Gaston Pa e 1 of 1 General Project Information WBS Element: 38523.2.1 TIP Number: B-4751 Project T pe: Brid e Replacement Date: 4/21/2015 NCDOT Contact: Willam S. Zerman Contractor / Designer: Address: NC DOT Hydraulics Unit Address: 1590 Mail Service Center Ralei h, NC 27699 Phone: 919-707-6755 Phone: Email: bzerman ncdot. ov Email: CitylTown: Stanley County(ies): Gaston River Basin s: Catawba CAMA Count ? No Wetlands within Project Limits? No Pro'ect Description Project Length (lin. miles or feet): 0.079 mi Surrounding Land Use: Local Rural Proposed Pro'ect Existin Site Project Built-Upon Area (ac.) ac. ac. Typical Cross Section Description: 2 Lane Paved Roadway (Each lane varies in width from 8.8' to 11.2') with 6 ft. unpaved 2 Lane Paved Roadway (Each lane is 10' width) with grass shoulder. shoulder. Annual Avg Daily Traffic (veh/hr/day): Design/Future: 1400 Year: 2035 Existing: 600 Year: 2015 General Project Narrative: Proposed Bridge spans Jurisdictional stream. Bank Stabilization has been provided where SW ditch discharges in to Stanley Creek. (Description of Minimization of Water Quality Impacts) Waterbody Information Surface Water Bod 1: Stanle Creek NCDWR Stream Index No.: 11-119-3- 2 NCDWR Surface Water Classification for Water Body Primary Classification: Water Supply IV (WS-IV) Supplemental Classification: Other Stream Classification: Impairments: Threatened/Endangered Species? Comments: NRTR Stream ID: Buffer Rules in Effect: N/A Project Includes Bridge Spanning Water Body? Yes Deck Drains Discharge Over Buffer? No Dissipator Pads Provided in Buffer? No Deck Drains Dischar e Over Water Bod ? No (If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) (If yes, describe in the General Project Narrative; if no, justify in the (If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) General Project Narrative) � � � � 0 � � ffi � � � � � z �o �� , �� w �� a vi [fr z >�� v��w �� (A [A � � � � � .� � V W O � � � � � � � V •� � V � � O V . / See Sheet 1-A For Index of Sheets OFF—SITE DETO UR BEGIIV T.I.P. PROJECT B-4751 -L- STA.13 + �0.00 -� TO STAIIILEY GRAPHIC SCALES 50 25 0 50 100 �fT1T�1-1l1 ��i�i PLANS 50 25 0 50 100 PROFILE (HORIZONTAL) 10 5 0 10 20 PROFILE (VERTICAL) SR 1935 (WILLOWSIDE DR.) �� %�5��1� �IF ��I��Y� GAST�1�l COU1�lTY LOCATION: BRIDGE No.203 OVER STANLEY CREEK ON SR 1935 (WILLOWSIDE DR.) TYPE OF WORK GRADING, DRAINAGE, PAVIIIIG � STRUCTURE. WETLAND AND SURFACE WATER IMPACTS PERMIT BEGIN BRIDGE -L- STA.15+11.70 � � � ' ,� , ��z�:� . � P��'�� i 5, / �� , -L- ,��,� � ,� � � � � � � END BRIDGE � � � � -L- STA. I5+94.30 , �� , -� \ THIS IS NOT A CONTROL OF ACCESS PROJECT. �� THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN ANY MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES. CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD III. DESIGN DATA ADT 2015 = 600 ADT 2035 = 1400 K - �2 % D = 75 % T = 5 % * V = 50 MPH * TTST =1°/a DUAL 4°/a FUNC CLASS=LOCAL RURAL SUB-REGIONAL TIER � PROJECT LENGTH LENGTH ROADWAY T.I.P. PROJECT B-4751 = 0.063 MI LENGTH STRUCTURE T.I.P.PROJECT B-4751 = 0.016 MI TOTAL LENGTH OF T.I.P. PROJECT B-4751 = 0.079 MI TE E PROIECT REFERENCE NO. ��, B-4751 . . . w. PROI. NO. 38523,1,2_ BRZ-1935(3 38523.2.FD1 � BRZ-7935( � DESCRIPT1oN PERMIT DRAWING SHEET 1 OF 5 END T.I.P. PROJECT 8-4751 -L- STA.17 + 65.00 SR 1935 (WILL�wSIDE DR l HYDRAULICS ENGINEER l'repared ln the Offlee of: DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS /000 Birch Ridge Dr., Ra[eigh NC, 27610 2072 STANDARD SP6C/FlCATIONS RIGHT OF WAY DATE: JASON MOORE, PE MARCH 3� ��LO� rJ PROJECT ENG7NEER LETTING DATE: NYA K. BOAYUE, PE MARCH ��J, ZO�6 PROJECT DESIGN ENGINEER P.E. SIGNATURE: ROADWAY DESIGN ENGINEER SIGNATURE: P.E. �O � ��lLy� � llalE81C]Ld��NAlfb� 1�Il.a�N� DO NOT L�SE FOR CONSTRUCTION � � DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS STATE OF 1VORTH CAROLINA �� a�� e � g �A o ��,�p ��av� �°� 44iP�� P.E. STATE HIGHWAY DESIGN ENGINEER � z 0 � � � � � � � � � �j z TEMP IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER SITE 2 (TEMPORARY CAUSEWAY) , � , � �, , � , - ` o , - / , , �-� o , , - � `� ' . � . � ��/ � ' .•� � � � r � , ' J- , � • / ,J� . � . � , - - �� E , � ,�� , , � �_ , , _ -w - . , , , , , _�_ _ , , , _- , , , _�___ ,- - �- � , -- _ _ _� �-, -_ Ts �----,� � -__ - � _ , DETAIL B RIP RAP AT EMBANKMENT ( Not to Scale) 5'min. � Ditch � 1.0'min• 1 2� Grade �, � GEOTEXTILE � Type of Liner= 7 TONS,CL I Rip—Rap Geotextile= 17 sy STA. 15 + 05.00 —L— RT. �°o �, ��----�---- tiq�� 8� . ■ � �� w i� � � �� : , �� __ .. � RM' SHEET NO. ,DWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS ENGINEER ENGINEER 1[NC�AI[ff�ILIE ]E ]PII.A\ZV� DO NOT USE FOR / W ACQLI[SIT[ON 1P]f�lEII.d�1f�TN I8� 1PB,AN� DO NOT [ISE FO CONSTRUCTION PERMIT DRAWING SHEET 4 OF 5 �� , �y �. _______ \�:� _ _ Q ! y � SITE 1 PDE � IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER BANK STABILIZATION SEE DETAIL B IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER � DENOTES IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER TEMP IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER � DENOTES TEMPORARY EN LARG EME NT IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER 2�' 0' 25' 5✓L 7/2015 mshaikh R:\Hydraulics\PERMITS_Environmental\Drawings\B-4751_Hyd_prm_wet_enlargement.dgn GRAP�IC SCA�E ol� � � � � � � � � �j z TEMP IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER - SITE 2 (TEMPORARY CAUSEWAY) , , , � � , , � � , - - - / o � , -� � - ' �, - �� - , '-��/ � � ,� �r , , - - I - , J— , , , , / ,�� , � � � , � , E ��, , , ,- � � � �� ,.� , � , � , , -� _---� - --�� - � , ,-� - _�----�---�- � �� , , , _�_ _ - - � , , _— , - � , , � _ , _— , ,- - _ , , _ _ _ , . . ��, - - — _ � v TS __�>,�Q�� _ � -----� � _ _ _- � , - ---- -- �--� -�-- �c ---� _ � _ �- - - DETAIL B RIP RAP AT EMBANKMENT ( Not to Scale) 5'min. � Ditch � 1.0'min• 1 2� Grade �, � GEOTEXTILE � Type of Liner= 7 TONS,CL I Rip—Rap Geotextile= 17 sy O�/� \ C�--- - � tiq�� 8� � � � 0 r . �� =� ��.��- � =� e��. � �, �■ }v �� . RM' SHEET NO. ,DWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS ENGINEER ENGINEER 1[NC�AI[ff�ILIE ]E ]PII.A\ZV� DO NOT USE FOR / W ACQLI[SIT[ON 1P]f�lEII.d�1f�TN I8� 1PB,AN� DO NOT [ISE FO CONSTRUCTION PERMIT DRAWING SHEET 5 OF 5 ' _.� � ■..■■ � � ., . � � �,', � ,� � � , , �:� - - � ,� �, _---- , � � , Q � y SITE 1 PDE � IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER BANK STABILIZATION SEE DETAIL B IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER � DENOTES IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER TEMP IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER � DENOTES TEMPORARY EN LARG EME NT IMPACTS IN SURFACE WATER STA. 15 + 05.00 —L— RT. 2�' 0' 25' 5✓L 7/2015 mshaikh R:\Hydraulics\PERMITS_Environmental\Drawings\B-4751_Hyd_prm_wet_enlargement.dgn GRAP�IC SCA�E WETLAND PERMIT IMPACT SUMMARY WETLANDIMPACTS SURFACE WATERIMPACTS Hand Existing Existing Permanent Temp. Excavation Mechanized Clearing Permanent Temp. Channel Channel Natural Site Station Structure Fillln Fillln in Clearing in SW SW Impacts Impacts Stream No. (From/To) Size / Type Wetlands Wetlands Wetlands in Wetlands Wetlands impacts impacts Permanent Temp. Design (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ac) (ft) (ft) (ft) 1 15+00 TO 15+05-L-RT STREAMBANK 8 STABILIZATION 1 15+55 TO 15+69 -L- TEMPORARY < 0.01 27 CAUSEWAY 2 13+40 TO 15+02 -L- RT STREAM IMPACT 0.01 < 0.01 170 10 TOTALS*: 0.01 < 0.01 178 37 0 "Rounded totals are sum of actual impacts NOTES: 3ililL'Y'r � � � � � � � � � � � � � ., � � � � � � 0 N •, c � � � � � � � � � i � � � m� �� o� �� o�� >,a _ oz o �� N�W � C� �� o� Q�� oo� � � Ef} See Sheet �-A For Index of Sheets OFF-SITE DETO UR BEGIl� T.I.P. PROJECT 8-47�1 -L- S TA.13 + S0. 00 ----------� -------------------- - SR 1935 (WILLOWSIDE DR.) TO STAI�LEY ------------------------- �� LOCATI01�1: BRIDGE 1�0.203 OT�ER STA1�lLEY CREEl� 01� SR 193� ( WILLO WSIDE DR. ) TYPE OF WORI�: GRADI1�lG, DRAII�AGE, PA VI1�G � STR UCTURE. BEGI11l BRIDGE -L- STA.15 +11.70 � �� . . �" , -� -%---%- ---,,�-�---�,---- i� �" ,� , - i - ,� �' i � ,� �" ( i ► �, i � ; i �� , � ; � i .-� � �, ; , _� � -- ��. , i� . ;�� i / � / � ,� E1�ID T.I.P. PROJECT 8-4751 , ., THIS IS NOT A CONTROL OF ACCESS PROJECT. �� THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN ANY MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES. � .�, CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PERFORMED TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD III. -L- STA. I S + 94.30 _ l�]f�lE]L��INA�I�� ]�]L�N� II�� N�T US1E F�R C�NSTRUC'Il'I�N Prepared in tl� Office of: HYDRAULICS E1VGIIVEER DIVISI011t OF HIGHWAYS GRAPHIC SCALES DESIG11t DATA PROJECT LEI�GTH STATE OF 11�ORTH CAROLIIVA ADT 2 Ol 5= 600 DI VISI01� OF HIGHWA YS 50 25 0 50 100 ADT 2035 = 1400 LENGTH ROADWAY T.I.P. PR0.IECT B-4751 = 0.063 MI 1000 Birch Ridge Dr., Raleigh 1vc, 27610 �� ►��r�� K = � 2 % 2012 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS ��' ��Qo PLANS D = 75 % P.E. q � LENGTH STRUCTURE T.I.P.PROJECT B-4751 = 0.016 MI SIGNATURE: �� 50 25 0 50 l00 T— 5 ��o * RIGHT OF WAY DATE: JASON MOORE, PE V = 5O MPH MARCH 3� 2O15 I'ROJECT ENGINEER ROADWAY DESIG11t �� E11tGI11tEER �� p�� PROFILE (HORIZONTAL) * TTST =1% DUAL 4% TOTAL LENGTH OF T.I.P. PROJECT 6-4751 = 0.079 MI LETTI11lG DATE: NYA K. BOAYUE, PE � O rJ O � O 20 F U N C C LASS = LOCAL RU RAL PROJECT DESIGN ENGINEER MARCH 15, 2016 PROFILE (VERTICAL) SUB—REGIONAL TIER I'•E. P.E. SIGNATURE: STATE HIGHWAY DESIGIII ENGINEER . :: � 0 N C� �� a �� , � � , � 1 �ote: Not to Scale *S. U.E. = Subsurface Utility Engineering BOUNDARIES AND PROPERTY.• State Line ----- ----- County Line ---- Township Line --- City Line -- Reservation Line - - Property Line Existing Iron Pin Property Corner Property Monument Parcel/Sequence Number Existing Fence Line -X Proposed Woven Wire Fence Proposed Chain Link Fence Proposed Barbed Wire Fence 0 EIP � 0 ECM 123 x x— Existing Wetland Boundary - - - -W�B— — — - Proposed Wetland Boundary Existing Endangered Animal Boundary Existing Endangered Plant Boundary Known Soil Contamination: Area or Site �' Potential Soil Contamination: Area or Site � BUILDINGS AND OTHER CULTURE.• WLB EAB EPB :• ? Gas Pump Vent or U/G Tank Cap O Sign � Well ° Small Mine �' Foundation 0 Area Outline Cemetery fi Building School � Church � Dam HYDROLOGY.• Stream or Body of Water Hydro, Pool or Reservoir Jurisdictional Stream BufFer Zone 1 BufFer Zone 2 F I ow Arrow Disappearing Stream Spring Wetland Proposed Lateral, Tail, Head Ditch False Sump �----� �----� JS — BZ 1 BZ 2 �--- --- �—... --- ,,,�_,,. � � � FLOW � �"I' ,��,'I'I��' (�)I��' :� (�I" "I I I .,�� I'� �)I.,I � .��. Iil)�I �'I�I(�)�\ ��I.�� I I I ��I I`�'.�� "� � � � � � i � RAILROADS: Standard Gauge RR Signal Milepost $WItCi1 RR Abandoned RR Dismantled RIGHT OF WAY.• Baseline Control Point Existing Right of Way Marker Existing Right of Way Line Proposed Right of Way Line Proposed Right of Way Line with Iron Pin and Cap Marker Proposed Right of Way Line with Concrete or Granite R1W Marker Proposed Control of Access Line with Concrete C�A Marker Existing Control of Access Proposed Control of Access Existing Easement Line Proposed Temporary Construction Easement - Proposed Temporary Drainage Easement Proposed Permanent Drainage Easement Proposed Permanent Drainage / Utility Easement Proposed Permanent Utility Easement Proposed Temporary Utility Easement Proposed Aerial Utility Easement CSX TRANSPORTATION 0 MILEPOST 35 � SWITCH �� Proposed Permanent Easement with Iron Pin and Cap Marker ROADS AND RELATED FEATURES: Existing Edge of Pavement — Existing Curb — 0 0 W . W i� 0 � W �^� 0 '. _. �� — �c �, f--, �A, E E TDE PDE DUE PUE TUE AUE 0 Proposed Slope Stakes Cut --- C--- Proposed Slope Stakes Fill --- F--- Proposed Curb Ramp cR Existing Metal Guardrail T T T Proposed Guardrail T T T T Existing Cable Guiderail n n � Proposed Cable Guiderail n n n n Equality Symbol $ Pavement Removal I�EGETATION.• Single Tree Single Shrub � � Hedge Woods Line � � � � Orchard Vi neya rd EXISTING STRUCTURES.• MAJ O R: Bridge, Tunnel or Box Culvert Bridge Wing Wall, Head Wall and End Wall - MINOR: Head and End Wall Pipe Culvert Footbridge Drainage Box: Catch Basin, DI or JB Paved Ditch Gutter Storm Sewer Manhole Storm Sewer UTILITIES: POWER: Existing Power Pole Proposed Power Pole Existing Joint Use Pole Proposed Joint Use Pole Power Manhole Power Line Tower Power Transformer U/G Power Cable Hand Hole H-Frame Pole Recorded U/G Power Line Designated U/G Power Line (S.U.E.*) TELEPHONE: €� €� €� €� Vineyard CONC � ��N� WW I ` CONC HW �--------� ■� O -s� • • O ►1 n ._� P P Existing Telephone Pole -� Proposed Telephone Pole -O- Telephone Manhole O Telephone Booth ❑� Telephone Pedestal ❑T Telephone Cell Tower � U/G Telephone Cable Hand Hole HH Recorded U/G Telephone Cable T Designated U/G Telephone Cable (S.U.E.*) — - - - -T- - - - Recorded U/G Telephone Conduit T� Designated U/G Telephone Conduit (S.U.E.*� - - - -T�- - - - Recorded U/G Fiber Optics Cable T FO Designated U/G Fiber Optics Cable (S.U.E.''`� - - - -T F�- - - � WATER: Water Manhole Water Meter Water Valve Water Hydrant Recorded U/G Water Line Designated U/G Water Line (S.U.E.* - - Above Ground Water Line O 0 � � -W- -W---- A/G Water TV: TV Satellite Dish � TV Pedestal 0 TV Towe r � U/G TV Cable Hand Hole HH Recorded U/G TV Cable T� Designated U/G TV Cable (S.U.E.*) - - - -T�- - - - Recorded U/G Fiber Optic Cable T� F° Designated U/G Fiber Optic Cable (S.U.E.*� ----TV FO- -- GAS : Gas Valve Gas Meter Recorded U/G Gas Line Designated U/G Gas Line (S.U.E.*) Above Ground Gas Line ♦ . ,., - — — — —G— — — - A/G Gas SANITARY SEWER: Sanitary Sewer Manhole OO Sanitary Sewer Cleanout 0 U/G Sanitary Sewer Line SS Above Ground Sanitary Sewer A/G Sanitary Sewer Recorded SS Forced Main Line FSS Designated SS Forced Main Line (S.U.E.*) — - - - -F55- - - - MISCELLANEOUS: Utility Pole Utility Pole with Base Utility Located Object Utility Traffic Signal Box Utility Unknown U/G Line U/G Tank; Water, Gas, Oil Underground Storage Tank, Approx. Loc. A�G Tank; Water, Gas, Oil Geoenvironmental Boring U/G Test Hole (S.U.E.*) Abandoned According to Utility Records End of Information • 0 O a - 7UTL - 0 UST 0 � m AATU R E.O.I. . :: • � 0 N- � �� Q �� . :: • � 0 N- � �� a �� c � c � � a � . :: � 0 N C� �� a �� . :: � 0 N C� �� a ��