The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20151179 Ver 1_Application_20151110:� � ;_:;. PAT McCRORY Covernor NICHOLAS J. TENNYSON Secretary TransportatPon November 10, 2015 N.C. Department of Environmental Quality Winston Salem Regional Office 450 West Hanes Mill Road, Suite 300 Winston Salem, NC 27105 ATTN: Mr. David Wanucha NCDOT Division 7 Project Coordinator SUBJECT: Application for Jordan Lake Watershed Riparian Buffer Authorization for the replacement of Bridge No. 208 over an Unnamed Tributary of Little Alamance Creek on SR 3051 (Knox Road), Guilford County, North Carolina. Federal Aid Project No. BRZ-3051 (1), TIP No. B-4961. Debit $240.00 from WBS Element No. 40152.1.1 Please find enclosed the Pre-Construction Notification, North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services Mitigation Acceptance Letter, Stormwater Management Plan, buffer permit drawings, utility buffer permit drawings, and roadway plans for the subject project. A Programmatic Categorical Exclusion (PCE) was completed for this project in March 2015. The proposed let date for this project is June 21, 2016, with a let review date of May 3, 2016. However, the let date may advance as additional funds become available. A copy of this permit application will be posted on the NCDOT Website at https://connect.ncdot.�ov/cesources/Environmental/Pa�es/default.aspx, under Quick Links > Permit Applications. A copy of the PCE is also available at the above website address under Quick Links > Environmental Documents. Thank you for your assistance with this project. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Jim Mason at either jsmason@ncdot.gov or (919) 707-6136. Sincerely, �e �� Richard W. Hancock, P.E., Manager Project Development and Environmental Analysis Unit cc: NCDOT Permit Application Standard Distribution List �Nothing Compares�._ State of North Carolina � Department of Transportation � PDEA — Nahiral Emironment Section ]020 Birch Ridge Drive, 27610 � 1598 Mail Service Center � Raleigh, NC 27699-1598 919-707-6000(T) 919-212-5785(F) ��oF w a r�9Q� � � 5 � P Y Office Use Only: Corps action ID no. DWQ project no. Form Version 1.4 January 2009 Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form A. Applicant Information 1. Processing 1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps: ❑ Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit 1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: or General Permit (GP) number: 1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? ❑ Yes ❑ No 1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply): ❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit ❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express � Riparian Buffer Authorization 1 e. Is this notification solely for the record For the record only for DWQ 401 For the record only for Corps Permit: because written approval is not required? Certification: ❑ Yes � No ❑ Yes ❑ No 1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation � Yes ❑ No of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program. 1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h ❑ Yes � No below. 1 h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ❑ Yes � No 2. Project Information 2a. Name of project: Replacement of Bridge No. 208 over an Unnamed Tributary of Little Alamance Creek on SR 3051 (Knox Road) 2b. County: Guilford 2c. Nearest municipality / town: Sedalia 2d. Subdivision name: not applicable 2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state g_4961 project no: 3. Owner Information 3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: North Carolina Department of Transportation 3b. Deed Book and Page No. not applicable 3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if not applicable applicable): 3d. Street address: 1598 Mail Service Center 3e. City, state, zip: Raleigh, NC 27699-1598 3f. Telephone no.: (919) 707-6136 3g. Fax no.: (919) 212-5785 3h. Email address: jsmason@ncdot.gov 4. Applicant Information (if different from owner) 4a. Applicant is: ❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify: 4b. Name: not applicable 4c. Business name (if applicable): 4d. Street address: 4e. City, state, zip: 4f. Telephone no.: 4g. Fax no.: 4h. Email address: 5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable) 5a. Name: not applicable 5b. Business name (if applicable): 5c. Street address: 5d. City, state, zip: 5e. Telephone no.: 5f. Fax no.: 5g. Email address: B. Project Information and Prior Project History 1. Property Identification 1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): not applicable 1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 36.0658 Longitude: - 79.6447 (DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD) 1 c. Property size: 1.5 acres 2. Surface Waters 2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to Little Alamance Creek proposed project: 2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: WS-IV NSW 2c. River basin: Cape Fear 3. Project Description 3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this application: SR 3051 (Knox Rd) is classified as a Minor Collector in the Statewide Functional Classification System and is not a National Highway System Route. Land use within the vicinity includes Forested Land, Agriculture, Commercial, and Residential. 3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.0 acres 3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 117 linear feet 3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project: To replace a functionally obsolete bridge. 3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: The project consists of replacing the existing three-span, 67-foot long bridge with a 100-foot long single-span bridge on the existing alignment. Traffic will be maintained via off-site detour. Standard road building equipment, such as trucks, dozers, and cranes will be used. 4. Jurisdictional Determinations 4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the Corps or State been requested or obtained fo�r this property / � Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown project (including all prior phases) in the past. Comments: Site visit 3/9/10 with USACE and DWR. 4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type of determination was made? ❑ Preliminary ❑ Final 4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company: Carolina Ecosystems, Inc. Name (if known): Principal Investigator:Phil May Other: 4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation. DWR determination received 3/10/10; No USACE JD received. 5. Project History 5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for � Yes � No ❑ Unknown this project (including all prior phases) in the past? 5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions. 6. Future Project Plans 6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes � No 6b. If yes, explain. C. Proposed Impacts Inventory 1. Impacts Summary 1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply): ❑ Wetlands ❑ Streams - tributaries � Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction 2. Wetland Impacts If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted. 2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f. Wetland impact number — Type of impact Type of wetland Forested Type of jurisdiction Area of impact Permanent (P) or (if known) (acres) Tem orar T Site ❑ P � T Choose One ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ Site ❑ P❑ T Choose One ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ Site ❑ P � T Choose One ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ Site ❑ P❑ T Choose One ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ Site ❑ P❑ T Choose One ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ Site ❑ P � T Choose One ❑ Yes ❑ Corps ❑ No ❑ DWQ 2g. Total wetland impacts 0 ac Permanent 0 ac Temporary 2h. Comments: 3. Stream Impacts If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this question for all stream sites impacted. 3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g. Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of Average �mpact length number - (PER) or jurisdiction stream (linear feet) Permanent (P) or intermitte (Corps - width Temporary (T) nt (INT)? 404, 10 (feet) DWQ— non-404, other) Site ❑ P � T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ Site ❑ P � T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ Site ❑ P � T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ Site ❑ P � T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ Site ❑ P❑ T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ Site ❑ P � T ❑ PER ❑ Corps ❑ INT ❑ DWQ 3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 0 Permanent 0 Temporary 3i. Comments: 4. Open Water Impacts If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of the U.S. then individuall list all o en water im acts below. 4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e. Open water Name of impact number— waterbody Type of impact Waterbody Area of impact (acres) Permanent (P) or (if applicable) type Tem orar T 01 ❑P❑T 02 ❑P❑T 03 ❑P❑T 04 ❑P❑T 4f. Total open water impacts 0 Permanent 0 Temporary 4g. Comments: 5. Pond or Lake Construction If pond or lake construction roposed, then complete the chart below. 5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e. Wetland Impacts (acres) Stream Impacts (feet) Upland Pond ID Proposed use or (acres) number purpose of pond Flo Flooded Filled Excavated ode Filled Excavated Flooded d P1 P2 Sf. Total 5g. Comments: 5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no: 5i. Expected pond surface area (acres): 5j. Size of pond watershed (acres): 5k. Method of construction: 6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ) If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form. 6a. ❑ Neuse ❑ Tar-Pamlico � Other: Jordan Project is in which protected basin? Lake Watershed ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman 6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g. Buffer impact number — Reason for impact Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact Permanent (P) or Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet) Temporar T re uired? UT of Little � Yes Site 1� P❑ T Bridge Alamance Creek � No 4,656 839 (Stream SC) UT of Little � Yes Site 1� P❑ T Road Crossing Alamance Creek � No 251 1,723 (Stream SC) UTs of Little Alamance Creek � Yes Site 2� P❑ T Road Crossing (Streams � No 896 1,050 SA/lower portion SB) Overhead Utility Line, Utility Site 1 Impacts Other than Pond PA � Yes 1,266 0 � P 0 T Perpendicular Crossings ❑ No Overhead Utility Line, Utility Site 1 Impacts Other than Pond PA � NoS 0 1,280 � P 0 T Perpendicular Crossings 6h. Total buffer impacts 7,069 4,892 6i. Comments: In addition to the utility buffer impacts listed above, which occur on Parcels 4 and 5, Duke Energy and their contractor(s) will also be performing work within the DUEs on Parcels 2 and 4, with some work occuring within the riparian buffer of Stream SC. However, this work within the DUEs/buffer and any potential buffer impact related to it is already covered within the Bridge and Road Crossing buffer impacts listed for Site 1 above. All utility work includes tree clearing and the construction of new poles and conductors required to relocate the overhead utility lines. D. Impact Justification and Mitigation 1. Avoidance and Minimization 1 a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project. The proposed bridge is 33 feet longer than the existing bridge; An off-site detour will be employed; Spread calculations indicate deck drains will not be required for the proposed bridge. Instead, runoff from the proposed bridge will collect via shoulder berm gutter into a storm drain system and flow along an existing rip-rap channel before reaching the waterbody. The proposed design eliminates surface water impacts by removing the need for the existing interior bents and the existing deck drains, which currently sends runoff from the bridge directly to the waterbody and riparian buffers; Roadway improvements are designed to minimize water quality impacts by promoting sheet flow and infiltration along grassed shoulders; Special Cut Ditches will be installed at -L- STA. 14+75 to STA. 16+48 LT and -Y- STA. 11+25 to STA. 11+66 LT. 1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques. NCDOT Best Management Practices for Construction and Maintenance Activities and Best Management Practices for the Protection of Surface Waters will be employed. 2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State ❑ Yes � No 2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? If no, explain: Mitigation is only required for riparian buffer impacts. No surface water or wetland impacts are antici ated. 2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ❑ DWQ ❑ Corps ❑ Mitigation bank 2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project? ❑ Payment to in-lieu fee program ❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation 3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank 3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: not applicable 3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity 3c. Comments: 4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program 4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. � Yes 4b. Stream mitigation requested: 0 linear feet 4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold 4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): 3,798 (1,266 square ft. Zone 1 x 3:1 ratio) square feet 4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: 0 acres 4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: 0 acres 4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: 0 acres 4h. Comments: Mitigation for Jordan Lake Watershed Riparian Buffer impacts will be provided by the N.C. Division of Mitigation Services (DMS). 5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan 5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan. 6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ 6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires � Yes ❑ No buffer mitigation? 6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the amount of mitigation required. 6c. 6d. 6e. Zone Reason for impact Total impact Multiplier Required mitigation (square feet) (square feet) Overhead Utility Line, Zone 1 Impacts Other than 1,266 3(2 for Catawba) 3,798 Perpendicular Crossings Zone 2 --- --- 1.5 0 6f. Total buffer mitigation required: 3,798 6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank, permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund). Mitigation for Jordan Lake Watershed Riparian Buffer impacts will be provided via payment to an in-lieu fee program (DMS). 6h. Comments: E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ) 1. Diffuse Flow Plan 1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified � Yes ❑ No within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? 1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If not, explain why. � Yes ❑ No Comments: See attached buffer permit drawings. 2. Stormwater Mana ement Plan 2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? N/A 2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? � Yes ❑ No 2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: 2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan: See attached permit drawings. ❑ Certified Local Government 2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ❑ DWQ Stormwater Program � DWQ 401 Unit 3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review 3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project? not applicable ❑ Phase II 3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ❑ NSW apply (check all that apply): ❑ USMP ❑ Water Supply Watershed ❑ Other: 3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ❑ Yes ❑ No attached? 4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review ❑ Coastal counties ❑ HQW 4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply � ORW (check all that apply): ❑ Session Law 2006-246 ❑ Other: 4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been attached? ❑ Yes ❑ No N/A 5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review 5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ❑ Yes ❑ No N/A 5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ❑ Yes ❑ No N/A F. Supplementary Information 1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement) 1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the � Yes ❑ No use of public (federal/state) land? 1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State � Yes ❑ No (North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)? 1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.) � Yes ❑ No Comments: 2. Violations (DWQ Requirement) 2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ❑ Yes � No or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)? 2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ❑ Yes � No 2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): 3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement) 3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ❑ Yes additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? � No 3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description. Due to the minimal transportation impact resulting from this bridge replacement, this project will neither influence nearby land uses nor stimulate growth. Therefore, a detailed indirect or cumulative effects study will not be necessary. 4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement) 4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility. not applicable 10 5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement) 5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or � Yes ❑ No habitat? 5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act � Yes � No i m pacts? ❑ Raleigh 5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. ❑ Asheville 5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical Habitat? NC Natural Heritage Program data, USFWS website, NCDOT field surveys (last on May 30, 2014). 6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement) 6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ❑ Yes � No 6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat? NMFS County Index 7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement) 7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation � Yes � No status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in North Carolina history and archaeology)? 7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources? NEPA Documentation 8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement) 8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? � Yes ❑ No 8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: NCDOT Hydraulics Unit coordination with FEMA 8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA Maps �oc Richard W. Hancock, P.E. --- _-- ��- �� - z�� Applicant/AgenYs Printed Name �� Date Applicant/AgenYs Signature (AgenYs signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is rovided.) Il Environm,en.ial Quality October 29, 2015 Mr. Richard W. Hancock, P.E. Project Development and Environmental Analysis Unit North Carolina Department of Transportation 1548 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1548 Dear Mr. Hancock: Subject: Mitigation Acceptance Letter: PA`T' MCCR�RY Gouernor DONALD R. VAN DER VAART Setaetary TIP B-4961, Replace Bridge 208 over UT to Little Alamance Creek on SR 3051 (Knox Road), Guilford County The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the NC Department of Environmental Quality — Division of Mitigation Services (NCDEQ DMS) will provide the buffer mitigation for the subjecf project. All buffer mitigation requests and approvals are administrated through the Riparian Restoration Buffer Fund. The NCDOT will be responsible to ensure that appropriate compensation for the buffer mitigation will be provided in the agreed upon method of fund transfer. Upon receipt of the NCDWR's Buffer Authorization Certification, NCDEQ DMS will transfer funds from the NCDOT 2984 Fund into the Riparian Restoration Buffer Fund. Upon completion of transfer payment, NCDOT will have completed its riparian bufFer mitigation responsibility for this project. Subsequently, DMS will conduct a review of current NCDOT ILF Program mitigation projects in the river basin to determine if available buffer mitigation credits exist. If there are buffer mitigation credits available, then the Riparian Restoration Buffer Fund will purchase the appropriate amount of buffer mitigation credits from NCDOT ILF Program. Based on information received from you on October 28, 2015, the buffer impacts for this project are: Buffer Impacts Buffer River Basin CU Eco-Region Zone 1 Zone 2 TOTAL Impacts Cape Fear 03030002 (Haw) CP 1,266.0 0.0 1,266.0 NCDEQ DMS commits to implementing sufficient buffer mitigation credits to offset the impacts associated with this project as deternuned by the regulatory agencies in accordance with the N.C. Department of Environxnent and Natural Resources' In-Lieu Fee Instrument dated July 28, 2010. If the above referenced impact amounts are revised, then this mitigation acceptance letter will no longer be valid and a new mitigation acceptance letter will be required from NCDEQ DMS. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Ms. Beth Harmon at 919-707-8420. Sincerely, James B Stanfill � Credi�Management Supervisor Cc: Mr. David Bailey, USACE — Raleigh Regulatory Field Office Ms. Amy Chapman, NC Division of Water Resources File: TIP B-4961 �Nothing Compares�,.�. SlateofNorlhCarolina � EnvironmentalQuality 1601 Mail Service Center � Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601 919-7(J7-8600 E��ti �ati, North Carolina Department of Transportation St[)a 1]1�vdtP!' Highway Stormwater Program �� STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN (Version 2.01; Released December 2014) FOR NCDOT PROJECTS WBS Element: 40152.1.1 TIP No.: B-4961 County ies): Guilford Page 1 of 2 General Project Information WBS Element: 40152.1.1 TIP Number: B-4961 Project T pe: Brid e Replacement Date: 10/1/2015 NCDOT Contact: Linda Johns Contractor / Designer: Binod Yadav Address: 1590 Mail Service Center Address: 1590 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1590 Raleigh, NC 27699-1590 Phone: 919 707-6728 Phone: 919 707-6758 Email: Imjohns ncdot. ov Email: bkyadav ncdot.gov Cit /Town: N/A Count ies : Guilford River Basin(s): Cape Fear CAMA County? No Wetlands within Project Limits? No Pro'ect Description Project Len th lin. miles or feet : 0.085 miles Surrounding Land Use: Primarily forested land, agriculture, and a few residences (NRTR) Proposed Pro'ect Existin Site Pro'ect Built-U on Area ac. 0.4 ac. 0.2 ac. Typical Cross Section Description: The typical section along the -L- alignment consists of eleven-foot lanes, four-foot paved The typical section along the -L- alignment consists of eleven-foot lanes and three-foot shoulders, and two-foot grassed shoulders; along the -Y- alignment, the typical section grassed shoulders; SR 3052 along the -Y- alignment is a fifteen-foot wide gravel road. consists of nine-foot lanes and three-foot grassed shoulders. Annual Avg Daily Traffic (veh/hrlday): Design/Future: 3,600 Year: 2035 Existing: 2,080 Year: 2016 General Project Narrative: This project proposes to replace bridge 208 over an unnamed tributary to Little Alamance Creek and install associated roadway grade and intersection improvements along SR (Description of Minimization of Water 3051, Knox Road, and SR 3052, Forbes Tate Road, in Guilford County. The existing structure is a 67-foot triple-span bridge (1@18'-3", 1@30'-0", 1@18'-3") constructed in Quality Impacts) 1950; the proposed replacement structure is a 100-foot single-span bridge at the existing location. Spread calculations indicate deck drains will not be required for the proposed bridge; instead, runoff from the proposed bridge will collect via shoulder berm gutter into a storm drain system and flow along an existing rip-rap channel before reaching the waterbody. The proposed design eliminates surface water impacts by removing the need for the existing interior bents and the existing deck drains which currently sends runoff from the bridge directly to the waterbody and riparian buffers. Roadway improvements are designed to minimize water quality impacts by promoting sheet flow and infiltration along grassed shoulders. The cumulative total area of allowable buffer impacts equals approximately 0.13 acres within zone one and 0.08 acres within zone two. According to the NRTR, only the portion of stream SB that is downstream of the confluence with stream SA is subject to the Jordan Lake riparian buffer rules; the upstream portion of stream SB is an old emergency spillway for the pond. No surface water impacts are anticipated. Waterbod Information Surface Water Body (1): UT Little Alamance Creek NCDWR Stream Index No.: 16-19-3-(0.5) NCDWR Surface Water Classification for Water Body Primary Classification: Water Su I IV WS-IV Supplemental Classification: Nutrient Sensitive Waters NSW Other Stream Classification: None Impairments: None ThreatenedlEndan ered S ecies? No Comments: NRTR Stream ID: SA Buffer Rules in Effect: Jordan Lake Pro'ect Includes Brid e S annin Water Bod ? No Deck Drains Dischar e Over Buffer? N/A Dissi ator Pads Provided in Buffer? N/A Deck Drains Discharge Over Water Bod ? N/A (If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) (If yes, describe in the General Project Narrative; if no, justify in the (If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) General Project Narrative) []i�;lxt� �1'�' North Carolina Department of Transportation Stcls ailkv'e3tP!' Highway Stormwater Program �. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN (Version 2.01; Released December 2014) FOR NCDOT PROJECTS WBS Element: 40152.1.1 TIP No.: B-4961 Count (ies): Guilford Page 2 of 2 Additional Waterbod Information Surtace Water Body 2: UT Little Alamance Creek NCDWR Stream Index No.: 16-19-3-(0.5) NCDWR Surface Water Classification for Water Body Prima Classification: Water Su I IV WS-IV Supplemental Classification: Nutrient Sensitive Waters (NSW) Other Stream Classification: None Impairments: None Threatened/Endan ered S ecies? No Comments: NRTR Stream ID: SB Buffer Rules in Effect: Jordan Lake Pro'ect Includes Brid e S annin Water Bod ? No Deck Drains Dischar e Over Buffer? N/A Dissi ator Pads Provided in Buffer? N/A Deck Drains Discharge Over Water Body? N/A (If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) (If yes, describe in the General Project Narrative; if no, justify in the (If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) General Project Narrative) Surface Water Body (3): UT Little Alamance Creek NCDWR Stream Index No.: 16-19-3-(0.5) NCDWR Surface Water Classification for Water Body Primary Classification: Water Suppl IV (WS-IV Su lemental Classification: Nutrient Sensitive Waters NSW Other Stream Classification: None Im airments: None ThreatenedlEndangered Species? No Comments: NRTR Stream ID: SC Buffer Rules in Effect: Jordan Lake Project Includes Bridge Spannin Water Bod ? Yes Deck Drains Dischar e Over Buffer? No Dissipator Pads Provided in Buffer? Yes Deck Drains Dischar e Over Water Bod ? No (If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) (If yes, describe in the General Project Narrative; if no, justify in the (If yes, provide justification in the General Project Narrative) General Project Narrative) v r �� s, � e' a v� r 2 � � `0 fR a � m � � � � � � �3 � o � o� � o �' � � m � e � � � o z c�° �� "'��,�,� � �� w � �� di-�a ��z >�� ; �� a r» ta v o �� r �. `Jj fff d� a 2 �3 � Uj S �(AKJ4£ �- �N � ESifi?�f+ � � � � � ., � V W � � � � l� •� � V � � O V See Sheet 9A F�or Index of Sheets See Sheet 1 B For Conventlonal Plon Sheet Symbols �c�� r�:t 9L 9 For Survey Control Sh��t OFFSITE DETOUR � �'o ti��cyT yo �'oqo �� BUFFER DRAWING ��' �� ' �� SHEET 1 OF 7 G UILFORD. CO U1�TY LOCATION: BRIDGE NO. 208 ON SR 3051 (K11lOX ROAD) OVER LITTLE ALAMA11lCE CREEK (TRIBUTARY 5) TYPE OF WORK GRADING, DRAINAGE, PAVIIVG, AND STRUCTURE ,, /� Y� // SR `?�sj�l � /,Yti �i O I \ I� I� �I I� I I� BUFFER IMPACTS PERMIT ,, �� ii / �� LITTLE ALAMANCE CREEK (TRIBUTARY 5) ��, : , S ITE 1 � �, �! � l" ,i � � � BEGIN BRIDGE - �� —L— STA. 16+55.88 � �'O� � � SITE 2 DESIGN EXCEPTION REQUIRED FOR SAG VERTICAL CURVES AND ASSOCIATED NIGHTTIME STOPPING SIGHT DISTANCES. THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN ANY MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES. CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PREPARED TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD II. GRAPHIC SCALES DESIGN DATA 50 25 0 50 l00 ADT 2016 = 2,080 `It1T�� ADT 2035 = 3,600 PLANS K = 14 % D = 55 °/a 50 25 0 50 100 T — 5�/a * V = 55 MPH PROFILE (HORIZONTAL) * TfST=1% DUAL=4% l0 5 0 l0 20 FUNC CLASS = COLLECTOR "SUBREGIONAL TIER" PROFILE (VERTICAL) , PROJECT LENGTH LENGTH ROADWAY TIP PROJECT B-4961 = 0.066 MILES LENGTH STRUCTURE TIP PROJECT B-4961 = 0.019 MILES TOTAL LENGTH OF TIP PROJECT B-4961 = 0.085 MILES .p � ♦ l � 6�F,�� LITTLE AMANCE CREEK J� 3'� RIBUTARY 5) 9>`�, �O / + I + T2 E PROIECT REFERENCE NO. �� B-4961 TwTE PROl.NO. F.w.PROl.NO. 40152.1.1 BRZ-3051(11 END CONSTRUCTION -L- STA. 20+75.00 / ' .. .. l.. ------ ___ _ _ ___-L— SR 3051 (KNOX RD.) s--_ __, �� /� � �— t�(� � \ u� �� . ,\ 5 END CONSTRUCTION �� -Y- STA. 11 + 66.46 � _ �� Prepared in /he Office of: DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS /000 Birch Ridge Dr., Raleigh NC, 27610 20/2 STANDARD SPECIFICAT70NS RIGHT OF WAY DATE: OCTOBER 16, 2015 LETTING DATE: JUNE 21. 2016 JAMES A. SPEER� PE_ PROJECT ENGINEER DANIEL W. GARDNER, JR., PE PROJECT DESIGN ENGlNEER � � NAD $� NSRS 2007 HYDRAULICS ENGINEER P.E. SIGNATURE: ROADWAY DESIGN ENGINEER P.E. TO BURLINGTON RD. (HWY 70) � � EscRIPT PE DOCUMENT NOT CONSIDERED FINAL UNLESS ALL SIGNATURES COMPLETED z 0 > � p cv ox' � v� � � � � � � � � z END APPR. SLAB -L- STA. 17 + 69. -L- STA. 17+58.73 2-BAR METAL RAIL MI _TYPE III ��Y TYPE I - o SBG � q� o�' b 2 / TYPE III � � TYPE III BEGIN APPR. SLAB� BEGIN BRIDGE �� 2_BAR METAL RAIL -L- STA. 16+44.88 -L- STA. 16+55.88 (NTS) PS - PAVED SHOULDER SBC - 'SHOULDER BERM CURB" SBG - "SHOULDER BERM GUTTER" SKETCH SHOWING BRIDGFiROADWAY RELATIONSHIP � � BURCH CREEK FARM,LLC � � ��/ �O� <,�/ i� �ii i . i , � � � �� x�� i�i � �i�i � �� i�� . ° i �sr, � X � �� '°�ti/P� � �X i i �� r�o �I� � �� A� ��, � iX � � � I II 9B � \\ I & /Se \ f � I I �XI IX THOMAS E. & VICK� C, SArTH ��+,�I � I RE7A�N 8 CLEAN OUT k x—v— . EX. 12" RCP I THOMAS E. b V�CKiE C. ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZONE 1 � ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZONE 2 100' 0' 100' �?00' GRAPIII�� SC/al l: — _ �� O WILLIAM 4. 6 ELLEN M. FIEFNER EXISTING DIocH, �\,' �\ LAND PORT iNVESTMENTS.LLC � / NA�3✓ SRS 2'. \ � I�/ � I � I � I � I IIII a I � �� I RM' SHEET NO. DWAY DESIGN HYDRAULIC ENGINEER ENGINEER BUFFER DRAWING SHEET 2 OF 7 ��'�, SITE2 II� _ \ �� I I�I >� I � �� RICHIRD L. 8 RUBY 5 BOSIEY � �� .r�,.;-��:Eksri�-Giw 'L, � _ � — —�+�-�sy.'- �-��ti'�� w00D5 -�r�-�s'�:_'r4�1^+r�-`vr�.rr�.� iz� RcP p p � a a �y � �— exisrwc Riw ��s � � O I AMANDA IEIGH VOSLOH �s -L- STA. 14+75 TO STA.16+48 lT -Y- STA.11+25 TO STA.11-66 LT NOTE: PAVED SHOULDER TRANSITION FROM -L- STA. 14+50.00 TO 15+00.00 AND -L- STA. 18+50.00 TO 19+00.00 BM2 � B2 ELEV= 644.82 O ��sEE SHEET ic-i \ STEVEN TROY SMITN e2 _ \� � \ ��S\ �� ze � \,S \ \ � � 1S \ \ � SEE SHEET 5 FOR -L- AND -Y- PROFILE SEE SHEETS 5-7 THRU S-? FOR STRUCTU � • �'- �— v- � PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO. �i � \ � ° -L- PT Sto.16+2025 �� _ / _ i ( B-496/ 4 � END APPR. SLAB � � / �� . - \ ` —Ex_ � ' " � � / I � � END BRIDGE -L- STA. 17+69.13 ��. � �� \. � � " �� - - � ' ww sHeer No. -L- STA. �7-F�JH.�3 \ .• � �.. � \ ` ,_ � / � � ^" � ^� Ji � — r� -� � -� 0 �� . ROADNGIN ERSIGN H�NGINEERS 2-BAR METAL RAIL �� '�� \ �. . _ � � _ � � � � ;� � � � -� _�—� -��-�� . / Mi � � �� , , , �� , ��11 �1 � < < �� _ - — =� — _ � _ � 1 � `,`� � � � � `� � , �� 4' PS TYPE III , . � � � � � � � �� .�, � l � 1 -�,� � - _ -- 1 .-� � �'1 /%� � o B � � � � � o o � � � � ._� ' l, I, � I � � �� ; �' � � � - _ � �— — � � �' � �� ,�_ � � � � _ — �-- TYPE III � � � � � . � _ i � o 0 0 � � ' � ` ��•�� i� N SBG � � � \ � � ^ N ^' i `r r o � � � �� / � � �� rvPe ui � M � rYPE iu � � � � ��`1 � � �llll� �� i;� ��i� �� ° � � � � _ _ - , �� "% �, o r . N _ _ , . _ � BEGIN BRIDGE \ v � � I � � � % ;i / � - � 2 � � ` � �� %��/// ,� -, � � � /' ,. ,� � I � � � � � �� =,_��i� � �� SRS� � � �- �' � ��,' � / 1 Np,�83✓ 2�007� ; BEGSTA. 16+44.88 � I r S �S �� /- , .._.�� _ �_ � � ��_��/ ��///�'�/ � � N APPR. SLAB / i � ' � / � PS,-�PAV�EDrSHOULDER ' �,��1�i ��I�I��`� j 1 �� i BUFFER DRAWING 2-BAR METAL RAIL � � � SBG "SHOULDER BERM UTTER" � � I 'S�5 �� I � SBC - 'SHOULDER BERM CURB' � � �. �I�� %/i� , � � � ' - � \ � � � -' � � "�-- � � ' ! ��j/ �/��// � SH EET 3 OF 7 G .. � ��/�� l/ i� �ir/.�. � . - ,� ...�� ' � ," - ✓ . � , /' �� // � �� . i SKETCH SHOWING BRIDGFiROADWAY RELATIONSHIP � �� I�� ° �;� �� , �� ' � �� /� � i � f� � r � �� /ii% �� j l � � �� ,�( � ( /� ( % � � , - � � / — , � � � i �� i � � � ��`, � � � � � � �� ;`V��l\I�� `� � �,�� '�. � �' i �� I � � ��/�' � ��i �i�/i�� / �� '��1� �'�!� � ' / � � i � � �'�� . � �� _ � � � � � � �� ,� �) � � � m � � � ��, � , v ; �, 11 �, I �, �v� � � . , �,� —_ �>, � �. �,, �t / i /�/�l l l� � �� ; � � � � � �� ;� ' � � � - � � � ., i � /� �� euRCH �c�eK anr+M. ��c� � � � � � � �( ��t �y�� --1 �' � � 1, � � � �� = � — =� � i �/� � � �/ � l�/ '� �/ ��r'°�/ � 1 / � � , . _ _ � � � � v / '� � ' � � -1 , � � 1 � �' �s�� r�r� � ' � � � _ — ,� ' %� � i � � 1 �i � � - � \, 1 ti �—;� —�-- %:r�= r %�fi �%��lJ / �i� J �l I _ I � � � , � ,� � �_ � � , � � � � � � � �� ; � � � � � � � �`�� , \ , '� �, l � � - I � — � � �_ � � - �j/� / � � � / / � / // / - � ; ; ` � � / � �� _ � � � n �� — �. �,% ,/ �"�� ' � \ \ � w��unua.a,E��E �'� ('� �';� l ��'/�.� �m �_ � = ��=—��i�/ � /% ��j///�i /(l l�f �j/� l/�1 � � � � � , A�, � i � ✓ � � � H �. N�vHEa � } ,� � � � �/ � �j _ —_ i � ; -- _ r� / � � � / /,� � � l`_ �., �•, �� \ � '� `, \ r � � , ��j��;) l�` li � �� ', T/�� ( � I �� m � " � — � �� _aE,�_ �� ; �� / � �/ � �// / � �;� J � � �� g , � , ' � , �. �� _ �� ( � �� . ,- EXISTI G DI CH; � � �� I � � � i� ,' � �� _ _� �� , l � � i . � � , r , � :�-� � zz,� s�a � �� - � � � � �� i � � , ; _ � ;' � �� T - �i � � - _ �� } �� S I T�E �� ' � � i , , �,,>>��' � � �� ` ; �� , , ��" – � E � � 2 ' � _�a �, � � � �� ,��,, � �� —,�,;,� �, � � I � �< i � I� � \ m � �_ � �� - /- --' 1, ,� � � J' � � � / \ �� _ � — � - � - ' J � 1, �� 1��{i, l�, �� ` ' _ \ �� = ti � �, � _ � , � — � � l �� , , . � � � � ��— � �=; � i � , ' � � � � � � 5� � � � _ � � � � � � � l � � � V � � m � \ � � � fPoCMARD L. 8 RUBY 5 BOSCEY � � � ' � � ° � � J. � -- - � ` ` � ; � � -�� \ i i r _��a,� � , � �`� p �-� � �� % �� ,�,�� A�� , � � �� I��.. �� V� ' � - / � � `�� / � � ' � J � � � . / V � � ` 1�� I ,1I�� E.D'5BG.. � .. . - � ' � . I � � .,. \ ��/ STA -L- 14+50 TO 16 I�00 LT �� "� Z � � � . � .. / d � �- - i � 5.13 iw+a � � '� 1 �..... �E�E BMI6 31 ��.. I '��,57 t7-ea -L�EDWARD W: & NARTNA �C. ALLRED � �� . � �'� �� ; / � �'� % i " � / . _ � ¢ �,.z � W _ � , �!:\ , ^ �. , � ,� on - z a nc p - I � '�I\ i ; rie rd H� �� I I'� � ` \/ 1 � f /�// � // / / /11 � � � � � I l `1 ` p l e,� � � � � ___ 6 00 Ff d 0.64 FT �. � \ �Z ". ,`. � = ; � I z ' i. : / � P � \ =/iJ.. � �/ p � - C GRASS � � = 0.035CF5 . ''. ` \ \ .� EXLUTI N j, , I ' `�. ` ,� \ �. . � . �. ` : , j . I �' 'p / ��/ // / l / I � I I \ � � —' / i,� ; I �-� I /. .�� ..��/0 ��"�.„.. FS 4�1 3 BS 21 5 'Ge 1.4 PsF � . ; F x�\ � � �STR. AY I�DMICH I ��. I \ \ �' I I I AREQ I� � q I� �� / � / / / I ` 1 - m n �. ~ CLA�S II RI� RAP �T P.� I�.. �.. � I i l ._ -- SEE DETAIL 1 r � ! Y ��. � �� ! � , � � i I �i i I I I / . \ � � .a .RETAIN — '_ � ; . � , I I I , iRUC ION� .. X \ H_0 ` � �� o �D,y � P � � � �Q __. __ _.� / . ,� � i .. � I '� II � I I I �ND R ONSII� I `�� I � � / / / / // / � I' � I � 1 1� \ / _ � � � � �A� -� �O � SPECk� CUT DIT Ff � .. . J �� — .. � � . . .n � 1 \,�. i . �; �., � , , �� ; . ' . WO DS � / 1 ._._ � � -- — � . -� I ' II � f / / / 1 \ I � \ \ m �� e+y. \ , / � �X n -___ ��: � .! �� __ I i ! 1 � �€X � � � y� ?' y.�.l ' _ ' _ _ _ .y . � - — . � � -�-� � . . \ � � � �f'E 8� � ��- E�E ^\ �'r�GS �` R W�n� � I \ � l 1 < I ` I � � i q A ' � -- � 7 w000s � � � -_ � a � � II/I l\ �_,\ �\ \ \��' �� I ��v� rt ' _� �� E ,N �.,� � � � � � ' �. � � �\ � �. � I/ 1 � j ". `t"'- � �Y - -- , _ il . -` � \ � � � 1 � � — .� � �� / � � _ � .- .�'� � � � -_ �x� � � �,— � - :, : 23�Sa�,� � �y . � \ S z �8 RC� ...�. . �- -: �WQODS � � � - � -- . ' � � � � __. �•. . . �� a„ .� i �. _ y �ti . _ � - f � . &, � . �/��. \\ 4.r Y � r F� �v�4T u 4i' `L.� �l�r�' �P3 >0/L � � -4c+ �L'i'-4Y `K� i�c.r� - - � � � I I % � "CP � .� L �_ � `� � � 1 .. . I � ��-�- � : �:�.12"RCP N OUT .,X�/ . \�.� _ .—._ — J" �~�GFI j3,T� '�. , . . �. . . .. . � — � ., — �� '� � � q✓ THOMAS -E. & VICKff C. SYTH � X � � X � ' � �. � - -. - -. - - — - - — -- . _ r � z I ` � sn'; so (xxoX nnl z� ezD . �_ �` ro suacrn�cr rcn. (xwr �,�ol--� � � . � . . � .. IX / � X X—� , - \ �o wi _ �� ; RiTAIN 8 CLEA � I, .. . `F . X—,•— EX � � '� _ C — r� �'S: , � k I F ��. � � 7 � � ��.,� \ �� ` � _ ��-- � > I I � qa� ww a isow x '� � � e--�— --F �— . , i i �. _ -�. �� --. ae-�� aw iz Rc�a C> � C5 €> � � ( � � � ( � I / x ol � � �� \ � � � ,� � � � � � . � � ' ' `\ � ex�s,�� R�w �. � � � ' � � f � W0 � �� UE � � � � , �� - . . _ II� � . , � � . . ` � � t.. _ / � xl . . � o'os ' I � r_'''n , D � � \, � woo�' pU6 �� eI � A - � � �� ^ � � � � �� k 1 � � W � dU A �' � �� , �:� l � � � � � �� , � m � � � �,�w�"� � � I 3'X3' C 5 B RIPRAP PAD � EST�..1 TO '� "� ` \ (1 1 ° j\ �` - ESj 3 SY GEpT TILF . ' , � . � N � N n IJ .,' � I . i . m . � 1 J� �:. �\ \ . � � �. � \ \ \ \ � \ � . \ � ,� m . •. \�..... \ \� • .,� �' ..,,� POND ,� � � �. � .- , /.� ._ ' \ CLASS P AP III �� I F ��`` 7 .� \ \ . W s \ . `� \\ � l � � � �� EST2 O � �- � � I � ` � - �-, � f t X � � ° � � � � � ` � � ` . . � � jc� � m� � a � � � � � � V � � � � , � � ,� � -�� \ V � � � � � � ��-et � � �` �, � �7 l % , � i � �� oie..� / � s _�. , \ esr � sv T�OMAS E. b V�CKiE � ` � � .. � � .' I 1 . � l � ' � � ��.. - � N�v '�, � \\ � � �B? � ELEV= 6�14.8� � \� . .. \ .. � ,X � � � . � . � "� _ ' _. . \ r � � �� ,'�� '_ � / � � �� 1��1'��' i ��,�; � �� ` � �a� - _�_-\,�� SEESEEr ��_ 5 � � � � )1,� /� � ��'� i � � <._� � � I ��!''; � � � ; � � , � �_�a � , `�� \ srEVerr r�or s�urN � � , � �� , � , _, , r ,�' � -� � v� , I '' ' . W O�S I . �yk�. �. � ' SPECIAL llT TCH ��. ' �� \ �` \\ � \ � � \ /,,,� � \ , LANp R6RT INVESTMENTY.LLC � � � J � i � � �,� �� l � � 1 .s � ' � � . .�,-,� � � � ; �� I � � � �,_ ": �' S��-e ,niN,�� .� �e i �,_ � � � � . .. ��A_ \�� \. �� .. �' i SEE D IL l _ c � . � b.� / � , . � j / ' .. / � - m� N � . 48" � : \ � � \ � i � ) �, ,° '- / '� , a, � � �q t ,� � / 4� �� \ � � � �Z � �, , , � � � � - �� , / / � '�� / �s �� . ��\\ �� f / � � ., � � s � � , I � � � � � � � � � � � N: �, � � Gn .. . _: � Z ' AMANDA�� CEIGH VOSLiOH � � � � 1 �� _ - i a . � 111 � � / � � .� ; , ^ , _ -o � � . � . � T � , . _ .. ' , , ' � / � / __ " / /� �I / � / ' � � N � , N I � / _ -_ � - __ � �S' J i f � �� N � � � � f 1 � � � �� o � _ , 1 � � �- � � � , � , ,. � � % , i � r . 9 - �� /'., _ � Bz �\ � � �� ' � �� . `� � � ��; .�� , � �� ,� � � �� . ez � � � � � � m � > , �o , E� �_ ' � � � i� � , � �� m, � Waoos� � �; = P � , . �- � ` � � , , ' — �' � ._. / �/ � i f ; � I -� ' 3 n� � � � i i � i � - � � � �� //� , � . A\ � �A� � ? r � � - � � ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZONE 1 � � � L J �' � � � ( �'i i "_ ,�j � ' .�`�. � � ia ��NOER �pNS�Rw�1iaN ;�� —�� % � '� � .� �� , � , -� � ' / l � i / �u� � � . ` \ � �- � ° — - � ! � `� � � ` � � .� - aE _ � / � . , � � � � � � � � —� i < � v�� \ � � � / � _ � . �� ! � / � i i � � � � � � � �� V �_ � � �� . ; � � ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZONE 2 . . \ �` , � � � � / ) � J _ - � 1 — �/ M+�NOA LE vo�sLOH .�.� � i , \ �'__ �,_ r1g � �v �� T ✓ / l �� `r \ _ / �" '` n � r �- � � � �� ' � � _ o � ` � V � �� r�// � � , � � � m g � � � � � — J / // �I� � D�T ul o � � � , � 1 , ,�� ' � _ - � � i / � � � Q � 100' 0' IUO' � 00, � 1 � � � __ � /yj ��,� ;A � � � �l, ,/ l �� '/ sP� �r�� _ � I� � I � ; �\ � , � � - � ~� � ��„o sa�e � — � � � � / '" f / _ ' �-�, f 1 i �/// � / �� // � � p �M1 - \ \4 � � / � � . � � �l � / �. �� /�/% �� , � '� � � . . . � �, � . .. _ . � �1 �% � � �� /�� , c�o�d z.� p .� �� . � — / " a sia a � / �� _ _ . _ . . _ . . . ... � � �- , � F� � i w r� �� _ _ +�� r� -� � � � ' � . _ � _ � �� °"�� / �� n� o �.o Fc � � � � �,�, � �R /� � �-I I L SCI� �_ � � �^ � � f��%' �/ �J �//� �// / � 1 �, A, � � � � ��_ � � �� %�,�, � � r�� , � , �_ � � , I I IJl�i�� , � �� -L-�STA 14+'75X0 S7A 16+y8 LT' � � �� z8 � �� S � � � %.� � � j--� , �.�"' ��!% � '-�. � �. ' � �� :�.. ��i L--s�,,- � �� A� I i �<» -- � ��.. . - J l . - �... � �7 - l " � , '� • ". Y- STA 11+25 TO STA. 11 66 L7 ... .. . � r � r� '� - i , '� � � � � j �� / ��//��/� / � � _ S r i'° � � .-, � � , ' '' . � o�� , �� —,_� -- �. -- � _---- ,� �,-1 � �—�; I' '�. �: il_, ��— � :�iir,,�G��S,; � � � � 1� `�� \ �� -�-1� %, °Sr�°�� NOTE: PAVED SHOULDER TRANSITION FROM -L- STA.14+50.00 TO 15+00.00 SEE SHEET 5 FOR -L- AND -Y- PROFILE ar�� AND -L- STA.18+50.00 TO 19+00.00 SEE SHEETS 5-7 THRU S-? FOR STRUCTURE PLA oSs a � (T U� PROIECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO. � BRIDG HYDR LlC DA A - s -5- � ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULICS �� nw DESI N DISCH E - LZ1[3�� CFS ENGINEER ENGINEER DESI N HW EL VATION =&L5,(... FT BAS DISCH E = 24Q8_ _ CFS BAS FREOUE CY = {QQ YRS OVER OPPING ISCHARGE = 3255# __ CFS OVER OPPING REOUEN = SQQ+ YRS OVE OPP�NG LEVATION = 624,L... FT oarE oF su Er =�a�.�- 4 B U F F E R D RAW I N G ws. EVATION S H E ET 6 O F 7 BEGIN RADE -L- TA. 14+50 00 ELEV. = 630.13' E D GRADE -L- STA. 7+00.00 �, Pl = l8+ 5.00 i ^ �� l= �5+3 AO EL = 62 J6' � �� C= OO' K= l7f 5= 20 PHJ i � = 36 ! 5> 25 d H7 � � � srn.n+m -�- � � 1@ 100'; " BOX BEAM, 0' SKEW GP ELEV.= 624.55' � r��5�3 S,L � �-�0.6i6 . +��385� r-� b�27%' � — � � BM2 ELEVATIO =644.82' LEV.=6 20' � L ST TION 22 45.00 110' RIGHT o --- RR S IKE IN R OT OF 36 POPLAR ELEV.=6/ �5' + � 1 I \ ABUT ENT EXCAVATI N ( TR. PAY ITEM) KEY IN excnvnrer e�.eis� � BMl ELEVA ION=614. 1' N 843535 E 1809312 LEFT Dl CH ----- DESIGN E CEPTION EQUIRED OR SAG ERTICAL C RVES AN ASSOCIA ED NIGH IME STOP ING SIGH DISTANC EXCAVATE T EL.612 L STATION 17+53.00 139' LEFT Nws e=eo9.s� wse eo�.r RR SPIKE I ROOT F 15" SWE T GUM �surs EY DATE 08-1 zoia� SEE SHEE 4 FOR P N VIEW 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Y BEG N GRADE -Y- STA. i+11.00 ELE\ . = 624.6 ' E = 6242 EL = 15J3' V = 40' VC = 0' K= 7 fD5 20 AlP K= 5!OS ! l5 PHl ' �_� � D GRAD -Y- STA. 1 +66.46 - EV. = 67 .26' � � %�.9 P T H i - E� / � � LEV.=6/4 f /0.60 % _ (-102 39% � � m � � o � - o` � - � � E � o � w,�� BRIDGE PROFILE =�� SITE 1 � �� LEFT Dl CH — - - — - a �� „ �,�, _`�� SEE SHEE 4 FOR P N VIEW o �� x .».» � Q � � e,.» � e�� BUFFER IMPACTS SUMMARY IMPACT BUFFER TYPE ALLOWABLE MITIGABLE REPLACEMENT SITE NO. STRUCTURE SIZE / STATION TYPE (FROM/TO) ROAD PARALLEL ZONE 1 ZONE 2 TOTAL ZONE 1 ZONE 2 TOTAL ZONE 1 ZONE 2 CROSSING BRIDGE IMPACT (ft2) (ft2) (ft2) (ft2) (ft2) (ft2) (ftZ) (ft2) 1 BRIDGE #208 -L- 16+15 / 17+80 X 4656 839 5496 X 251 1723 1973 2 48-I N C M P -Y- 10+80 / 11 +66.5 X 896 1050 1946 TOTAL: 5802 3612 9414 �� I �`I �� ., � V W � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � z �� O tfl �� ,�?<A 0 � VI C I N ITY MAP �� GRAPHIC SCALES 50 25 0 50 100 SHEET NO. PLANS UE-1 50 25 0 50 100 UE-2 PROFILE (HORIZONTAL) �� . �� PROFILE (VERTI ��v� ,n i» u� �� '� � � �� I �� I I ' '� I � �� I '� II? `, �� (�� (�> I I ; : I I '� � � �� UTILITIES PERMIT DRA WI11tG �'�o tiG�cyT yo �P0,90F G UILFORD CO U1�TY LOCATI0IV: BRIDGE 11t0.208 011t SR 3051 (K11tOX ROAD) O VER LITTLE ALAMAII tCE CREEK (TRIB UTAR Y S) TYPE OF WORK: POWER POLE RELOCATI0111 `!, S � `�OS. �' f� �� I �� i, INDEX OF SHEETS DESCRIPTION TITLE SHEET UTILITY PERMIT PLAN SHEETS UTILITY OWIVERS 0111 PROJECT (A) POWER ; DUKE ENERGY T.I.P. NQ SHEET NO. B-4961 U E-1 UTILITY PERMIT DRAWING SHEET 1 OF 3 OCTOBER 08, 2015 TO BURLINGTON RD. (HWY 70) � INCOMPLETE PLANS DO NM USB FOR R/ W ACOUI9ITION PRELIMINARY PLAN3 DO NOT U96 POR CONBTRVCTION PREPARED IN THE OFFICE OF: DIVISlON OF HIGHWAYS UTILITIES UNIT UTILITIES ENGINEERING I555 MAIL SERVlCES CF.NTER RALEIGH NC 27699-I555 PHONE (979) 707-6690 T FAX (979) Z50-075/ Ro¢er Worthin¢ton, P.E. UT7LITIES SECTION ENG/NEER Steve Mckee, P.E. UT/LITIES SQUAD LEADER PROJECT ENGINEER ,I.T. Yoon, P.E. UTILITIES PROJECT DESIGNER � c ti � i' � �z i 9 iE N yL a m: N �` � °? 0 NA�� SRS 2007 PROJECT REFERENCE N0. UTILITIES BY OTHERS NOTE: ALL PROPOSED UTILITY WORK SHOWN ON THIS SHEET WILL BE DONE BY OTHERS. NO PAYMENT WILL BE MADE TO THE CONTRACTOR FOR PROPOSED UTILITY WORK SHOWN ON THIS SHEET. UTILITY PERMIT DRAWING SHEET 2 OF 3 OCTOBER 08, 2015 pREp UNDER CONSTRUCT��^J � / / /� F ' "�"�'�'�"�"�"�. ��♦ i!i!� �%�� . ! � ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZONE 2 1� ZHO SQLF EXISTING POWER POLE CONFLICTS WITH PROPOSED FILL SLOPE. IT HAS TO BE RELOCATED TO THE EAST SIDE OF THE ROAD BUFFER IMPACTS SUMMARY IMPACT BUFFER TYPE ALLOWABLE MITIGABLE REPLACEMENT SITE NO. STRUCTURE SIZE / STATION TYPE (FROM/TO) ROAD PARALLEL ZONE 1 ZONE 2 TOTAL ZONE 1 ZONE 2 TOTAL ZONE 1 ZONE 2 CROSSING BRIDGE IMPACT (ft2) (ft2) (ft2) (ftZ) (ft2) (ft2) (ftZ) (ftZ) 1 Aerial line -L- 19+15 / 20+75 0 1280 1280 1266 0 1266 TOTAL: 0 1280 1280 1266 0 1266 � � � �- � 0 � T � � � m� ,� � o �r e� � o�� ,,a � oz 0 3� cv �,w o �' �� w �� 0 � � � � .. � V W O � � � `� � � � V � � O V See Sheet lA For Index of Sheets See Sheet 1B For Conventional Plan Sheet Symbols See Sheet iC- 1 For Survey Control Sheet OFFSITE DETOUR � To tiG�cyr yo �'�qO �� G UILFORD CO U1�TY LOCATION: BRIDGE NO. 208 011I SR 3051 (K11lOX ROAD) OVER LITTLE ALAMA11lCE CREEK (TRIBUTARY 5) TYPE OF WORK GRADING, DRAINAGE, PAVIIIIG, AND STRUCTURE // � ! // s� `?�S,�I . i,�ti ,, o �� ,� ��I I� �I� ,, „ �� /.� LITTLE ALAMANCE CREEK (TRIBUTARY 5) � � � � � � \�Z BEGIN BRIDGE ` i r�j5� � 1 s� -L- STA. 16 + 55.88 i � �'O � �\� �\ jii �.p�,p� ♦ I Ff�� LITTLE ALAMANCE CREEK T s� (TRIBUTARY 5) 9TF �� DESIGN EXCEPTION REQUIRED FOR SAG VERTICAL CURVES AND ASSOCIATED NIGHTTIME STOPPING SIGHT DISTANCES. THIS PROJECT IS NOT WITHIN ANY MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES. CLEARING ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PREPARED TO THE LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY METHOD II. + +� n � (KNOX RD.) � NA � NSRS 2007 TO BURLINGTON RD. (HWY 70) � INCOMPLETE PLANS DO NOT USE FOR R! W ACQUISITION PRELIMINARY PLANS DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION Prepared In Me 0/flce of: �'DRAULICS ENGINEER GRAPHIC SCALES DESIGN DATA PROJECT LENGTH ADT 2016 = 2,oso DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS 50 25 � 50 �0� /000 Birch Ridge Dr., Ra[eigh NC, 27610 r�O�P� ��J ADT 2035 = 3,600 LENGTH ROADWAY TIP PROJECT B-4961 = 0.066 MILES ��° �°�� K— 14 % 2072 STANDARD SP6C/FlCATIONS �9� p' PLANS LENGTH STRUCTURE TIP PROJECT B-4961 = 0.019 MILES � � D= 55 % TOTAL LENGTH OF TIP PROJECT B-4961 = 0.085 MILES sicxazunE: PE � � 50 25 0 50 100 T= 5��a * RIGHT OF WAY DATE: JAMES A. SPEER, PE � � V= 55 MPH OCTOBER 16. 2015 PRO�FCr Exc�NFEn ROADWAY DESIGN ° PROFILE (HORIZONTAL) * TTST=1% DUAL=4% ENGINEER ��. �� FUNC CLASS = COLLECTOR LETTING DATE: DANIEL W. GARDNER, JR., PE �� g�� 10 5 0 10 20 "SUBREGIONAL TIER" JUNE 21, 2016 PRO�ECr nESrcx ExcrNEEa PROFILE (VERTICAL) PE SIGNATURE: Lt) � � N � Note: Not to Scale *S. U.E. = Subsurface Utility Engineering BOUNDARIES AND PROPERTY.• State Line ----- °°- County Line Township Line City Line - - Reservation Line — — — Property Line Existing Iron Pin � Property Corner —K Property Monument � Parcel/Sequence Number i23 Existing Fence Line -x—x—x- Proposed Woven Wire Fence � Proposed Chain Link Fence � Proposed Barbed Wire Fence �� Existing Wetland Boundary - - - -•�a- - - - Proposed Wetland Boundary •�a Existing Endangered Animal Boundary E°a Existing Endangered Plant Boundary F'a Existing Historic Property Boundary '�a Known $oil Contamination: Area or $ite -a�'�' -- � Potential Soil Contamination: Area or Site --�-- � BUILDINGS AND OTHER CULTURE.• Gas Pump Vent or U�G Tank Cap O Sign � WB�� w Small Mine 'SZ� Foundation � Area Outline 0 Cemetery 0 Building � School � Church � Dam HYDROLOGY.• Stream or Body of Water Hydro, Pool or Reservoir Jurisdictional Stream Buffer Zone 1 BufFer Zone 2 Flow Arrow Disappearing Stream Spring Wetland Proposed Lateral, Tail, Head Ditch False Sump �----J �s — BZ 1 BZ 2 5�'�°]�]C �iF�° 1�C��°]�i�[ �C��$�]Ie�1�� 1[�� ]F �[��iE�I�� CONVENTIONAL PLAN SHEET SYMBOLS RAILROADS.• Standard Gauge RR Signal Milepost Switch RR Abandoned RR Dismantled RIGHT OF Wf1Y.• Baseline Control Point Existing Right of Way Marker Existing Right of Way Line Proposed Right of Way Line Proposed Right of Way Line with Iron Pin and Cap Marker Proposed Right of Way Line with Concrete or Granite WW Marker Proposed Control of Access Line with Concrete C1A Marker Existing Control of Access Proposed Control of Access Existing Easement Line Proposed Temporary Construction Easement - Proposed Temporary Drainage Easement Proposed Permanent Drainage Easement Proposed Permanent Drainage / Utility Easement Proposed Permanent Utility Easement Proposed Temporary Utility Easement Proposed Aerial Utility Easement � CSX TRANSPoRTATION MILEPo T 35 �0 � � 0 W W i� 0 W �� J J TDE PDE DUE PUE TUE AUE Proposed Permanent Easement with O Iron Pin and Cap Marker � ROADS AND RELATED FEATURES.• Existing Edge of Pavement Existing Curb ----- Proposed Slope Stakes Cut --- �--- Proposed $lope Stakes Fill - - - F - - - Proposed Curb Ramp CR Existing Metal Guardrail Proposed Guardrail T T T r Existing Cable Guiderail n n � P d C bl G'd 'I n n n n ropose a e ui erai E Equality $ymbol � Pavement Removal °� �" ^ i�EGET�ITION.• � Single Tree �� Single Shrub � Hedge '�" �� # Woods Line �""'-' Orchard Vineyard EXISTING STRUCTURES.• MAJOR: Bridge, Tunnel or Box Culvert Bridge Wing Wall, Head Wall and End Wall MINOR: Head and End Wall Pipe Culvert Footbridge Drainage Box: Catch Basin, DI or JB Paved Ditch Gutter Storm Sewer Manhole $torm $ewer UTILITIES.• POWER: Existing Power Pole Proposed Power Pole Existing Joint Use Pole Proposed Joint Use Pole Power Manhole Power Line Tower Power Transformer WG Power Cable Hand Hole H-Frame Pole Recorded WG Power Line Designated U/G Power Line (S.U.E.*) TELEPHONE: WATER: Water Manhole OO Water Meter o Water Valve � �? Q f? Q Water Hydrant � �,�eYO�a Recorded l!/G Water Line • Designated WG Water Line (S.U.E.*� - - - -•- - - - Above Ground Water Line A�c wa,a� CONC - J CONC WW I � CONC HW �--------� �CB OO s • • O /1 r �� Existing Telephone Pole � Proposed Telephone Pole � Telephone Manhole OO Telephone Booth ❑' Telephone Pedestal ❑T Telephone Cell Tower � U/G Telephone Cable Hand Hole HH Recorded U/G Telephone Cable � Designated U/G Telephone Cable (S.U.E.*) - - - - -'- - - - Recorded WG Telephone Conduit '� Designated U/G Telephone Conduit (S.U.E.*� - - - -T�- - - - Recorded U/G Fiber Optics Cable T�� Designated U/G Fiber Optics Cable (S.U.E.*� - - - -T °°- - - rv: N Satellite Dish CC TV Pedestal O TV Tower � WG N Cable Hand Hole HH Recorded U/G N Cable �° Designated U/G N Cable (S.U.E.*) - - - -*�- - - - Recorded U/G Fiber Optic Cable �° F� Designated U/G Fiber Optic Cable (S.U.E.*� ----T� F�- -- GAS: Gas Valve � Gas Meter � Recorded U/G Gas Line � Designated U/G Gas Line (S.U.E.*) - - - -°- - - - Above Ground Gas Line A�c co� SANITARY SEWER: Sanitary Sewer Manhole OO Sanitary Sewer Cleanout 0+ U/G Sanitary Sewer Line s� Above Ground Sanitary Sewer A�c sa�,+o�Y Sewer Recorded SS Forced Main Line Fss Designated SS Forced Main Line (S.U.E.*) — - - - -�ss- - - - MISCELLANEOUS: Utility Pole Utility Pole with Base Utility Located Object Utility Traffic $ignal Box Utility Unknown U/G Line U/G Tank; Water, Gas, Oil Underground Storage Tank, Approx. Loc. — A/G Tank; Water, Gas, Oil Geoenvironmental Boring U�G Test Hole (S.U.E.*) Abandoned According to Utility Records End of Information • O O ❑s ��.� � 0 � AATUR E.O.I. � � � � 0 B-4961 S UR VEY C01�TROL SHEET -L- BEGIN TIP PROJECT B-4961 STA. 14 + 50.00 T� cy�'�cT ti ti oA �p� F \ � �� \\ \\ � \\2o P� �FO�� NCDOT BASELINE � � � STATION BL-3' \ N = 843060.8095 \ E = 1809342.9731 1 J� �� ,, � NOTES 1. THE CONTROL DATA FOR THIS PROJECT CAN BE FOUND ELECTRONICALLY BY SELECTING PROJECT CONTROL DATA AT.• HTTPS.//CONNECT. NCDOT. GO U/RESO URCES20CATION/PAGES/DEFAULT.ASPX THE FILES TO BE FOUND ARE AS FOLLOWS: B4961_LS_CONTROL.TXT SITE CALIBRATION INFORMATION HAS NOT BEEN PROVIDED FOR THIS PROJECT.IF FURTHER INFORMATION IS NEEDED,PLEASE CONTACT THE LOCATION AND SURVEYS UNIT. � INDICATES GEODETIC CONTROL MONUMENTS USED OR SET FOR HORIZONTAL PROJECT CONTROL BY THE NCDOT LOCATION AND SURVEYS UNIT. PROJECT CONTROL ESTABLISHED USING GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM. LITTLE ALAMANCE CREEK \ �, � l� 1 BMI ELEV = 61431 m � � N I � y`. \_ \ N��ASELIN\I � STATION BL-4' I � N = 843518.4803 E = i809465.5372 � I I I � � � I y � � ( � I z D 0 °° z W� , Z �, �� o N O 0 J � � � � /f , / \ � -�--,--- -L- SR 3051 (KNOX RD.) � / \WLB� �� i � � / 'I \ \ ,S^ e�m_. �� I �✓51�� \ N \ \ � �5� �� 15/ � \ � '�J` \ � . i�' /.c� . \ �s �...� � 0 s �� y �6'�.� ",p � � ` � � I � `�, , • �2 ` PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO. B-4961 1C-1 Location and Survevs TO BURLINGTON RD. _ (HWY 70) -- �NCDOT�BASELINE STATION 'BL-S' N = 844051.4971 E = 1809530.3095 BM2 ELEV = 644.82 m -L- END TIP PROJECT B-4961 STA. 19 + 00.00 ��F � � END CONSTRUCTION �O/ -Y- STA. 11 + 66.46 pATUM pESCRIPTION THE LOCALIZEO COORDINATE SYSTEM DEVELOPED FOR THIS PROJECT IS BASED �N THE STATE PLANE COORDINATES ESTABLISHED BY NCDOT FOR MONUMENT "84961-2" WITH NAD 83/NSRS 2007 STATE PLANE GRID COOR�INATES OF NORTHING: 642650.93301ft) EASTING: 1808969.99401ft1 ELEVATION: 664.96'fftl THE AVERAGE COA�INED GRID FACTOR 11SED ON THIS PROJECT fGROUND TO GRID1 IS: 0.9999458801 THE N.C. LAMBERT GRID BEARING AND LOCALIZED HORIZONTAL GROUND DISTANCE FROM "B4961-2" TO -L- STATION 14+50.00 IS N 36°37'51" E 710.57' ALL LINEAR DIMENSIONS ARE LOCALIZED HORIZONTAL DISTANCES VERTICAL DATUM USED IS NAVD 88 BASELINE DATA E� PoiN1 oESC. NoRrh EASr E�EVArzoN � sTArioN oFFSET _ - - - - - -- - _ -.._. - l B4961-1 841940.547Q t808238.578� 695.42 OUTSIDE PROJECT LIMITS _ 84961-2 842558.9338 18�89E9.994� 664.9E OUTSIDE PROJECT LIMITS 3 BL-3 843068.8�95 18m9342.9731 639.15 12�85.86 24.69 R7 . BL-4 843518.48m3 1£?B94E5.5372 62B.2E ll�55.29 15.36 RT 5 BL-5 8�+A�51.�+971 18P�953P�.3P�95 653.08 52�92.23 13.7� RT BENCHMARK DATA BM1 ELEVATION - 614.31 N 843535 E 1809312 L STATION 17-53.m8 139 LEFT RR SPIKE IN ROOT OF t5" SWEET GUM ........................................ BM2 ELEVqTION - 644.g2 �� N 843993 E I8�9628 L STATION 22-45.m8 118 RSGHT RR SPIKE IN RODT OF 36" FOPLAR NOTE: DRAWING NOT TO SCALE � -o N � � 0 B-4961 S UR VEY C01�TROL SHEET TYPE �T�ITION NORTH ERST POT 1�aD�n�4 842857e3336 18�913Ee4896 PC 11�32a97 84295305414 18�922802712 PT 16t2�,25 343386,3743 18�9433e5934 POT 23��Oo0� 844�6�09�65 18�951706719 i TYPE ST�TION NOf�TH EqST _ POT 1��,0� 8�4359�,5164 18�i9459o5377 PC 1ID�16,�� 843592,5377 1809475,4121 PRC 1��66a96 843573,2911 18�9521,941P PT ll �53083 843556a3627 18�96�400911 POT 11�66,46 84355905374 18��7616,3211 -I_- PRE�IMINRRY NEW R/W MONUMENTS R(_IGN STRTION OFFSET NORTH ERST L 15�5�a�� -5�,�� 843327,8782 18�9372,8755 L 15T5�o0� -300�� 84332305925 18�93920411� L 16�2�a25 -5�e�� 8433�72e5588 18�9383e9773 L 18�1500� -5�oGJ0 84358508161 18�94�800663 L 18�15a�� -35e�� 843583e9647 18�9422e9511 -Y- PRE�IMINRRY NEW R/W MONUMEI�TS R�IGN STRTION OFFSET NORTH ERST Y 11t66,4F -��J,O� 843588,575� 18�96�8,7833 Y 11�53,83 -3�,�� 843585,40�3 18�9596,5534 Y 11�66,46 3�,�ID 84353J,4998 18�9623,8588 Y 11-53a83 3�oP� 843527,325� 18P9611,6288 Y 1ID�69,29 3�,�� 843547,75ID7 18�95D5,9782 Y 1��66,96 -3�,�� 843596,9831 18�954�,3446 Y 10�3�Jo5� -300�� 843E18o5152 18�94�707999 Y 11�66a46 8e�1 843551e779� 18�9618e3341 Y 11�66a46 -7a�2 84356603342 18�961405567 -�- PRE�IMINRRY NEW PERMRNENT UTI�ITY ERSEMENTS A�IGN STF�TION OFFSET NORTH ERST L 2�-5500� -350�� 84382201177 180945206367 L 2��55,�P -E��,�� 843825,21�8 18�9427,8287 L 2�t70o�� 6P�,�� 8438a�o�948 18�9429,684� L 2Pt7�,�i� -35,�J� 843837,ID�26 18�9454,4`�21 L 2��750�� 35a0� 843833,3�59 1809524,573� L 2ID�75,�i� 4�,�f� 843832,E�74 18�9529,5346 -�- rn��lrilivHni RL I GN STF�T I Of L 14�7�00� L 14�7�e�� MRNENT DRRINRGE UTI�ITY ERSEMEN FFSET NORTH E�1ST 3�a�� 84323006�54 18�942809854 5�e�� 843224e3�11 18�9447e9658 -Y- PRFI._IMIN�RY NEW PFRM�NFNT 17RRIN�GE UTTLITY EF�SEMENTS R-IGN �TF�TION I�FFSET NORTH ERST I � Y 1�-��,�P � 3�,�� 843534oQ�71� � 18�9529,49P�5 � - Y- �'RE� I M I NF�RY NEW P�I�M�I�ENT LIT 1� I I Y E�SEMENI��S R�IGN STRTION OFFSET NORTH EF�ST � Y � 1ID��55,�� -3C�,0� � �436�5,&'291 � 18�9527,�;444 PROJECT REFERENCE NO. B-4961 Location an u SHEET NO. 1C-2 pATUM pESCR[PT10N THE LOCALIZED CDORDINATE SYSTEM DEVELOPED FOR THIS PROJECT IS BASED ON THE STATE PLANE COORDINATES ESTABLISHED BY NCDOT FOR MONUA�NT "B4961-2" WITH NAD 83/NSRS 2007 STATE PLANE GRID COORDINATES OF NORTHING: 842650.9330fftl EASTING: 1808969.99401ft) ELEVATION: 664.96'(ftl THE AVERACE COIABINED GRID FACTOR USED ON THIS PROJECT IGROUND TO GRID1 IS: 0.9999458801 THE N.C. LAA�ERT GRID 9EARING AND LOCALIZED HORIZONTAL GROUND DISTANCE FROM "B4961-2" TO -L- STATION 14+50.00 IS N 36°37'51" E 710.57' ALL LINEAR DIA�NSIONS ARE LOCALIZED HORIZONTAL DISTANCES VERTICAL DAiUM USED IS NAVD 88 NOTE: DRAWING NOT TO SCALE � s ti � EXISTING GROUND�—� � � a `; � � m � �o. .., �2. ��, PAVEMENT SCHEDULE PROP. APPROX. 1�/q" ASPHALT CONCFETE $UFFACE COUFSE, TVPE SF9.5A, PFOP. APPFOX. 4" ASPHALT CONCRETE BASE COUFSE, TVPE 825.0B, C 1 AT AN AVEPAGE PATE OF 13�.5 LBS. PER sa. vo. E1 AT AN AVEFAGE RATE OF 456 LBS. PER S�. YD. PFOP. VAfl. �EPTH ASPHALT CONCRETE BASE COUFSE, TVPE B25.OB, PROP. APPROX. 2%p" ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACE COUFSE, TYPE SF9.SA, AT AN AVEFAGE RATE OF 114 LBS. PER S�. Y�. PER 1" DEPTH. TO C2 AT AN AVEPAGE RATE OF 13�.5 LBS. PER S�. V0. IN EACH OF TWO LAVERS. E 2 BE PLACED IN LAVERS NOT LESS THAN 3" IN �EPTH OR GFEATEp THAN 5%2" IN �EPTH. PROP. VAR. �EPTH ASPHALT CONCRETE SIIFFACE COIIF$E, TYPE $F9.SA, C'3 AT AN AVERAGE RATE OF 110 LBS. PER S�. YD. PER 1" DEPTH. TO T EARTH MATERIAL. BE PLACE� IN LAVEFS NOT TO E%CEED iL2" IN �EPTH. PROP. APPFOX. 2�" ASPHALT CONCRETE INTERMEDIATE COURSE, EXISTING PAVEMENT. �1 TYPE I19.06, AT AN AVEPAGE FATE OF 285 LBS. PEF S0. V0. U PROP. VAR. DEPTH ASPHALT CONCRETE INTERMEDIATE COURSE, TVPE I19.OB, AT AN AVEFAGE RATE OF 114 LBS. PER S�. VD. PEF 1" I�ii '_"" '_ _' " "_' ".. . ...___ .._' ' ___ '..... _.. �, _.. __".. __ W VAFSA9LF f]EPTH ASPHAI. T PAVFMFNT ISFF STAN[IAP� WFf]f,SNf, DFTATL 1 . � SURVEY PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO. B-496/ 2A—/ ROADWAY DESIGN PAVEMENT DESIGN ENGINEER ENGINEER INCOMPLE E PLANS DO NOT US6 FOR / W ACQO[SITiON PI3ELIMIN RY PLANS DO NOT USE FO CONSTRUCTION EXISTING_ GROUND ?'I TYPICAL SECTION NO. 1 C� —Y— � � i E *VAR. 24' TO 18' � i � W/G R 18' b' W/G GRADE POINT D1 C2 C2 D1 I 08 � .02 .02 .�I 3 �� 9" T E1 E1 T GRADE TO THIS LINE TYPICAL SECTION NO. 2 � —L— � 1'-3" 4'-3" � �� 3. ci 2—BAR METAL RAIL r1 11' 11' 7.25" @ CL BRG GRADE �� POI NT � � .02 � .02 � 4' I ODODDDDDDOC TYPICAL SECTION NO. 3 �� EXISTING GROUND USE TYPICAL SECTION NO. 2 *—Y— STA. 10+22.51 TO STA. 10+72.51 —Y— STA. 10 + 72.51 TO STA. 11 + 16.46 NOTE: TRANSITION FROM TYPICAL SECTION NO. 2 TO EXISTING —Y— STA. 11 + 16.46 TO STA. 11 + 66.46 1'-3" `1" 2—BAR METAL RAIL USE TYPICAL SECTION NO. 3 —L— STA. 16+55.88 (BEGIN BRIDGE) TO STA. 17+58.13 (END BRIDGE) NOTE: GREENSBORO MPO'S BICYCLE, PEDESTRIAN, AND GREENWAY'S MASTER PLAN IDENTIFIES SR 3051 (KNOX ROAD) AS A BICYCLE ROUTE. THE PLAN ALSO IDENTIFIES THE FUTURE SEDALIA GREENWAY (GREENWAY # 80) TO PASS BENEATH BRIDGE # 208 (NORTH SIDE). O z 6l O � Q � m a a -o � - rl ,�/O. /O*GVL7 END APPR. SLAB END BRIDGE -L- STA. 17+69.1 -L- STA. 17+58.73 2-BAR METAL RAIL M 4� PS TYPE III � TYPE III � o B i SBG • `�' ° SBG - TYPE III � TYPE III ' �IN APPR. SLAB BEGIN BRIDGE v STA. 16+44.88 -L- STA. 16+55.88 2-BAR METAL RAIL (NTS) PS - PAVED SHOULDER SBC - 'SHOULDER BERM CURB" SBG - "SHOULDER BERM GUTTER" � SKETCH SHOWING BRIDGFiROADWAY RELATIONSHIP �4 4vZ, 3 .bb:4Ze�0 -L - POT $t0.10+00.00 BUR H C3R3gE�K F3ARM,LLC � 8682 PGry55� � �^�o -L- PC S/o. 11+3297 �w� �� /�i`/ / / +�� \r\� �/o ,a ae� � w a sa� � � \�� s R� � [ �� p �/ � I � � �C? / � / ��Q ; �v / � p � � � � � I 4i �� Q / � I � \ \ \ � !�0� � � �AI� � � fird lo/ � �� a � RETAIN F°i �, `� � \/ � X sr�\ � Tp � � �z��f.� � � w � l�\�? '�p +50.0 O WILLIpM A. & ELLEN M. NEFI�R OB 3T65 PC 363 OB �6�6 PG 5�5 a8 95 PG H2 -c- ri �r� � � � k �r' ��p /+so.00 -�- 30.00' LT. �^.� /k 50.00' LT. SPECF�HL CUT DIT,CH„�, SEE DETAIL 1 / i.:�CS`�J r � � �� A \ � \30.00' LT. � ECA� �. \ � � IX � ,\\ Fcy��\ \ �iwv� 7 � ' & �\ ��,r-� �I � 's ,, �� x BL-3 e�o.ie,R�W � f ��'acp ; THOMAS E. B VI�K� C. SAYTHI �+,}�I � RETAIN 8 CLEAN OUT E�p � x-X_X_ ex. ir• ecP �/ �� o� OB 569� PG 395 �� I '`aa�� ww aXisew "- � �"` I ' ` I I . . . . . . . . . _ . . . ��., �-'_�� olJ � � � � air' Wpp�S TIP PROJECT B-4961 . 14+50.00 ✓i ,� t _�� =� T C- �R' NI° nl� � � 11 �. I . V � Vi-f�?lJ�. � - � 3'X3' CLASS B RIPRAP PAD Wpp U� EST 1 TON �� EST 3 SY GEOTE%TILE � CLASS RIP I ' +70.00 -L- EST 2 ONS �� I �' S0.00' RT. EST 7 Y GF/. m N �,-�, c I I . m REMOVE EXISTING BRIDGE m+e9. s-r- '. I� THOMAS E. 8 V�CKiE C. SM i I I� 30.0 ' RT. p8 �733 PC i666 + 4. -�- 74.9 ' RT. I PB 79 PG 109 � I� O 1� 90.00 -Y- I I o.oa r. ' LAND PORT MvESTMENTS.LLC 2 .00 -r- 0.00' T. pB 5�3i PG 2107 � -Y- PT S�o. l +5 3 I s +53.83 -Y-i 30.00' RT. � +66.46 -Y-�� 8.01',RT� �,ZT. � � - I I 5 02°02'32"WJ. _ � 5 02°02'32"= � - - 9 ll - 5 o2°Oi'42"- _ �42.27' BMI FL E - 61 SCE ,HEET -TIE TO � EXI TING DITC CLAS II RI RAP (STR. AY I M) ,�� g� q � -L- -Y- Pl Slo 13+8522 Pl Sto 10+42J1 Pl Sto llt1370 0= 3532'461fLT1 0= 30'44'03.9'fRTI p= 5223'292'fLTI D= 7' 30' OOA' D= 60' l8' 33T D= 60' l8' 33T L= 48728' L=`-��' L= 86.87' T= 25225' T= 26J1' T= 4674' R= 763.94' R= 95A0' R= 95A0' SE = SEE PLANS SE = SEE PLANS SE = SEE PLANS e�YN O 02\b \2 �" NA�y SRS 2' ee°56�N z LZ'L M" \8 Z6 M o��\Z.80 N %5 6�\ N b �.o I I \ M L5 I I I I � I II I I MH s I II � I II I�I�� I I�I�i � o I I1 �Ilm��a - \ - I I�3 \ �� _� o �, Ery D SBG III I I � srp. n+aa -�-EDYIARD Po� bfi�� . ALLRED � I �� +15.00 -L- �`�k:a uNDEa CoNSrRUCTioN 5 +55.00 - I� 50.00' LT. 35.00' LT -L- Sio.18+30A0= 6°.°° `T -Y- StO. /O+OO.OiO 50' TAPER i I T� rC`u-'h aa° N 7' 05' 18.4' E SR 3051 (KNOX RD) 20'P VED -._ _ _ -- __��.az _ N��I � 9� \ � F / �Hyi w000s �-� �o -wf � ARtp �NOER CONSTRUGTIONI ' �� 4 / / r � AMANOA LEMd1 VOSLOH i pB 732� PG 2i5T PUE � ��_�� PROIECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO. B-496/ 4 WW SHEET NO. :OADWAY DESIGN HYDR.4ULIC5 ENGINEER ENGINEER INCOMPLE E PLANS DO NOT USE FOR d W ACQU[SiTION PRELIMIN RY PLANS DO NOT U9E FO CON9'CRUCTION RiCHARD L. & RUBr S BOSIEY OB 52� PC 268 PB � PG 66 D TIPI PROJECT B-4961 STA. 9 + 00.00 + _ _ _ E�,�-R,w� � w000�s - - - =�-w �.:n-�T,,.,�;;,��. \°' S. � �. S2 �. \ � -L - PoT Sio. 23+00.00 �- Qa�� saw iz� RcP fJ €D � fJ fa��o -X- . Maar.ca -S TS°52'2 "� � �- � "l,�_ ExiSTwc aiw \ S 3j�J�rA� +]. f1 J- �� -BI - 5 }� \� ' iT- :� l�. �0'F�J.� - 8 �M oiR �' we = eza.ao �s � O oN-v. �� s 9�- BM2 � - + . Y . 990 �,✓ ELEV= 544.82 30.0 '�LT. SEE SHEFT 'C-I � � � �is �� ST pV�E 7362 PC y19ITF1 ICiAL CUT DITCH � ` � �� PC � '�. DETAIL 1 � � END NST CTION �, -- ST . 6.46 O j �� N � � c � AMANOA IEIGH VOSLOH � .. � . . �,L,�w DB 732� PC 2157 ;r w000 � �\ � !`r � ' \ \JS BZ 1 g2 ? �e �✓S \ S 3 , 9 2 \��Op �26., ?g � � ,�5.�\ DETAIL 1 �� SPECIAL CUT DITCH � �` �No��o s�aiel � � D'i�ct� � � W p�� Slape ! `r\ Gro�nd �:� p �� Min. D=1.0 Ft. B \ � 22 \ i \H -L- STA. 14+75 TO STA. 16+48 LT �g� �� '�' -Y- STA.11+25 TO STA.11+66 LT � �`��S PAVED SHOULDER TRANSITION FROM -L- STA. 14+50.00 TO 15+00.00 SEE ET 5 -L- AND -Y- OFIL -L- STA. 18+50.00 TO 19+00.00 SEE SHE S-1 T�IP�k1 S-? F STRU URE PLANS