The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20130456 Ver 1_Year 0 Monitoring Report_2015_20150929 Baseline Monitoring Report FINAL Bear Basin Wetland Restoration Site Onslow County, North Carolina DMS Contract 004741 DMS Project Number 95362 Submitted to: NCDENR Division of Mitigation Services NCDMS, 1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1652 Monitoring Data Collected: May 2015 Date Submitted: July 2015 Bear Basin Wetland Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA DMS Contract # 004741 Final Baseline Monitoring Document Monitoring and Design Firm Prepared by: KCI Associates of North Carolina, PC 4601 Six Forks Rd, Suite 220 Raleigh, NC 27609 (919) 783-9214 Project Contact: Adam Spiller Email: adam.spiller@kci.com KCI Project No: 20122265 July 2015 Bear Basin Wetland Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA DMS Contract # 004741 Final Baseline Monitoring Document TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 PROJECT GOALS, BACKGROUND, AND ATTRIBUTES ................................................ 1 1.1 Location and Setting ................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Project Goals and Objectives ..................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Project Structure, Restoration Type and Approach ................................................................ 1 1.3.1 Project Structure ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.3.2 Project Restoration Type and Approach .................................................................................. 2 1.4 Project History, Contacts and Attribute Data .......................................................................... 2 2.0 SUCCESS CRITERIA ...................................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Wetland Hydrology ..................................................................................................................... 3 2.2 Wetland Vegetation .................................................................................................................... 3 3.0 MONITORING PLAN ..................................................................................................................... 3 3.1 Wetland Hydrology ..................................................................................................................... 4 3.2 Wetland Vegetation .................................................................................................................... 4 3.3 Digital Photos .............................................................................................................................. 4 3.4 Watershed Conditions ................................................................................................................ 4 3.5 Monitoring Guidelines ................................................................................................................ 5 3.6 Maintenance and Contingency .................................................................................................. 5 4.0 BASELINE CONDITIONS .............................................................................................................. 6 5.0 REFERENCES .................................................................................................................................. 6 Appendix A – General Tables and Figures Figure 1. Project Site Vicinity Map Figure 2. Mitigation Plan View Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits Figure 3. Monitoring Plan View Figure 4. Project Site Reference Wetland Table 2. Project Activity and Reporting History Table 3. Project Contacts Table 4. Project Information Appendix B – Baseline Data Table 5. CVS Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot and Species Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos Photo Reference Points Appendix C – As-Built Plan Sheets As-Built Plan Sheets Bear Basin Wetland Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA DMS Contract # 004741 i Final Baseline Monitoring Report EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Bear Basin Wetland Restoration Site, (BBWRS) completed in February 2015, restored 8.6 acres of non-riparian wetland along with 1.9 acre of upland preservation. The BBWRS is non-riparian wetland system in the White Oak River Basin (03030001 8-digit HUC) in northern Onslow County, North Carolina that had been substantially modified to maximize agricultural production. The completed project offers the chance to restore impacted agricultural lands to non-riparian wetland habitat. The project is located in the 14-digit HUC 03030001010010 (Upper New River), which the DMS has identified as a Targeted Local Watershed (TLW) (NCDENR, EEP 2010). The project site is protected by an 11.9-acre permanent conservation easement held by the State of North Carolina. BBWRS is located on a single parcel located off of Jesse Williams Road approximately five miles west of Richlands, North Carolina. The site’s 32.7-acre watershed is characterized by 44% agriculture, and 51% forest. The project site is bounded by Jesse Williams Road to the north, a ditch along the property line to the west and south, and agricultural land to the east. Prior to construction, the site was actively used for row-crop farming. The White Oak River Basin Restoration Priorities identified poor riparian zones and fragmented forests as major stressors within the BBWRS’s 14-digit HUC (NCDENR EEP, 2010). The project goals for BBWRS are in line with the basin priorities and include the following: - Protect and improve water quality by reducing sediment and nutrient inputs - Protect watersheds draining into shellfish harvesting waters - Provide habitat for aquatic flora and fauna by improving physical structure and vegetative composition - Increase the local hydroperiod by encouraging both surface and subsurface storage and retention - Restore and establish a functional wetland community The project goals will be addressed through the following objectives: - Fill field ditches to restore surface flow retention and elevate local groundwater levels - Redevelop longer wetland flow patterns to increase surface flow retention time - Restore a wetland vegetation community through maintenance and germination of existing wetland seed stores, planting of wetland trees and shrubs, and incorporation of a custom wetland seed mix Project construction was completed in February 2015. The wetland was constructed as designed with no deviation from the design plan during construction. The monitoring components were installed in March and April 2015. Twenty groundwater monitoring gauges were installed to evaluate the attainment of jurisdictional wetland hydrology. To determine the success of the planted mitigation area, seven permanent vegetation monitoring plots were established according to the CVS-EEP Level 1 protocol. Six permanent photo points have been established to be taken annually. The site will be monitored for seven years or until the success criteria are achieved. Reports will be submitted to the DMS each year. The first year of monitoring will take place in 2015. The planted wetland must meet the success criteria of a site average of 320 stems/acre after three years, 288 stems/acre after four years, 260 stems/acre after five years, and 210 stems/acre after seven years to be considered successful. The baseline monitoring counted an average of 763 stems/acre in the 7 vegetation monitoring plots Bear Basin Wetland Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA DMS Contract # 004741 ii Final Baseline Monitoring Report Wetland hydrology will be monitored with a series of automatic gauges that record water table depth. To meet the success criterion, the upper 12 inches of the soil profile must have continuously saturated or inundated conditions for at least 8% of the growing season with a 50% probability of reoccurrence during normal weather conditions. Due to the inherent variability in the site’s soils and associated drainage characteristics, it is unlikely that the project will exhibit uniform hydrologic conditions across the site, making a single hydrologic performance criterion unrepresentative of the site’s performance. As such, the gauge data can be evaluated and presented as a spatial average with each gauge representing the area half the distance to adjacent gauges. The spatial average will be the calculated value for comparison with the performance standard for credit validation. Gauges representing areas not achieving a minimum of 6.5% saturation will be considered non-attaining even if the spatial average exceeds the credit validation performance standard. Bear Basin Wetland Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA DMS Contract # 004741 1 Final Baseline Monitoring Report 1.0 PROJECT GOALS, BACKGROUND, AND ATTRIBUTES 1.1 Location and Setting The North Carolina Division of Mitigation Services (DMS) has completed restoration of 8.6 acres of non- riparian wetlands at the Bear Basin Wetland Restoration Site (BBWRS) to assist in fulfilling wetland mitigation goals in the area. The project site, which is protected by an 11.9-acre permanent conservation easement held by the State of North Carolina, is situated in Onslow County in the Carolina Flatwoods (Level IV 63h) ecoregion of the Coastal Plain physiographic province. The site is located on a single parcel located off of Jesse Williams Road, approximately five miles west of Richlands, North Carolina (Figure 1, Appendix A). The Site is within the 03030001 White Oak River Watershed Cataloging Unit (8-digit HUC) and the 03030001010010 Upper New River Local Watershed Unit (14-digit HUC) which has been identified as a Targeted Local Watershed (NCDENR, EEP 2010). The White Oak River Basin is experiencing increased habitat alteration due to population growth from Jacksonville and its surrounding metropolitan area. The BBWRS Project was identified as a wetland opportunity to improve habitat within the TLW. 1.2 Project Goals and Objectives The project goals address stressors identified in the TLW and include the following: - Protect and improve water quality by reducing sediment and nutrient inputs - Protect watersheds draining into shellfish harvesting waters - Provide habitat for aquatic flora and fauna by improving physical structure and vegetative composition - Increase the local hydroperiod by encouraging both surface and subsurface storage and retention - Restore and establish a functional wetland community The project goals will be addressed through the following project objectives: - Fill field ditches to restore surface flow retention and elevate local groundwater levels - Redevelop longer wetland flow patterns to increase surface flow retention time - Restore a wetland vegetation community through maintenance and germination of existing wetland seed stores, planting of wetland trees and shrubs, and incorporation of a custom wetland seed mix 1.3 Project Structure, Restoration Type and Approach 1.3.1 Project Structure The mitigation work included approximately 8.6 acres of non-riparian wetland restoration and 1.9 acres of upland preservation for a total of 8.6 Wetland Mitigation Units as shown in Figure 2 and described in Table 1 in Appendix A. Planting occurred within the 11.9-acre conservation easement. The target natural community consists of Hardwood Flats Community (NCWAM, v. 4.1 2010). A portion of the site, along the boundary ditches that are to remain open is not credit bearing, but will be monitored to determine if it attains the wetland hydrology criteria. This area is described later in this document and depicted in the site maps. Bear Basin Wetland Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA DMS Contract # 004741 2 Final Baseline Monitoring Report 1.3.2 Project Restoration Type and Approach Prior to construction, the site had a long history of hydrologic modification in order to allow for farming to take place on the property. The site is located on a generally flat piece of land that is not within a geomorphic floodplain or topographic crenulation or contiguous to a body of water. Two interior ditches existed on the BBWRS that drained the site in a southeastern direction and discharged into a perimeter ditch that carried water in a northeasterly direction and eventually discharged into an unnamed tributary to the New River. The ditch networks were originally installed at the site to quickly remove surface inputs and to lower the water table during the growing season. The modifications at the BBWRS focused on restoring an integrated wetland ecosystem that will buffer and support the Upper New River basin. Restoration actions focused on reestablishing an appropriate wetland hydroperiod by filling ditches, surface roughening, and planting the site with appropriate vegetation. A detailed topographic survey was used to design slight grading modifications to redirect and lengthen overland flow paths in order to retain and treat surface hydrology longer. Surface roughness variations were installed throughout the BBWRS to alleviate soil compaction and to enhance surface water storage. A suitable reference wetland was found approximately 0.15 mile northeast of the BBWRS. The reference wetland is comprised of deciduous hardwoods over a shrub layer with broad -leaved evergreens and is consistent with the Hardwood Flats Community that will be the primary wetland type at the project site. A groundwater monitoring well has been installed to document the reference wetland hydrology during the course of monitoring. 1.4 Project History, Contacts and Attribute Data The project was first identified for restoration by KCI Associates of NC as a full-delivery mitigation project for DMS. The planning for this project began in 2012 with the final mitigation plan completed in July 2014. Construction began in November 2014 and site construction was completed in December 2014. BBWRS was planted in late February 2015. Completed project activities, reporting history, completion dates, project contacts, and background information are summarized in Tables 2-4 (Appendix A). Bear Basin Wetland Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA DMS Contract # 004741 3 Final Baseline Monitoring Report 2.0 SUCCESS CRITERIA The BBWRS will be monitored to determine if the project is on-track to meeting jurisdictional wetland status. The wetland restoration area will be deemed successful once hydrology is established and vegetation success criteria are met. 2.1 Wetland Vegetation The site must demonstrate the re-establishment of targeted vegetative community based on the survival and growth of planted species and volunteer colonization, with an average stem density of 320 stems/acre required after three years, 288 stems/acre after four years, 260 stems/acre after five years, and 210 stems/acre after 7 years. Permanent monitoring plots (10 by 10 meters) have been established in the wetland restoration area at a density that statistically represents the total mitigation acreage. The average density of these plots will determine whether the site meets success criterion. 2.2 Wetland Hydrology The site must present continuous saturated or inundated hydrologic conditions for at least 8% of the growing season with a 50% probability of reoccurrence during normal weather conditions. A “normal” year is based on NRCS climatological data for Onslow County using the 30th to 70th percentile thresholds as the range of normal as documented in the USACE Technical Report “Accessing and Using Meteorological Data to Evaluate Wetland Hydrology, April 2000.” According to the Natural Resources Conservation Service, the growing season for Onslow County is considered to extend from March 18th to November 16th (243 days). The water table of the restored wetlands must be within 12” of the soils surface continuously for at least 8% (19 days) of the 243-day growing season. KCI will monitor soil temperature to verify that the local growing season is consistent with the NRCS published data and reserves the right to present this information as a modifier to the number of days of saturation that are required to achieve jurisdictional status. Wetland hydrology will be monitored with twenty automatic gauges that record water table depth. Due to the inherent variability in the site’s soils and associated drainage characteristics, it is unlikely that the project will exhibit uniform hydrologic conditions across the site, making a single hydrologic performance criterion unrepresentative of the site’s performance. As such, the gauge data can be evaluated and presented as a spatial average with each gauge representing the area half the distance to adjacent gauges. The spatial average will be the calculated value for comparison with the performance standard for credit validation. Gauges representing areas not achieving a minimum of 6.5% saturation will be considered non- attaining even if the spatial average exceeds the credit validation performance standard. 3.0 MONITORING PLAN Annual monitoring will be conducted during the first full growing season following project completion. Monitoring of BBWRS efforts will be performed for vegetation and wetland hydrology components of the site until the success criteria are fulfilled. The establishment, collection, and summarization of monitoring data shall be conducted in accordance with the DMS document entitled Procedural Guidance and Content Requirements for EEP Monitoring Reports (version 1.5) or a more current standard. Permanent monuments, marking monitoring feature locations, were established on-site in March/April 2015. The locations of these monitoring features are marked in Figure 3 (See Appendix A). Bear Basin Wetland Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA DMS Contract # 004741 4 Final Baseline Monitoring Report 3.1 Wetland Hydrology Twenty groundwater monitoring gauges were set up and assessed for the baseline monitoring to evaluate the attainment of jurisdictional wetland hydrology. Verification of wetland hydrology will be determined by automatic recording well data collected within the project area and reference wetland. The wetland gauges will be checked and/or downloaded every other month. Daily data will be collected from the automatic gauges over the 7-year monitoring period following wetland construction. The nearby reference wetland will also be monitored using the same procedures for comparative analysis (See Figure 4 in Appendix A). The southern and westernmost ditches, located adjacent to project easement, were left open and not filled. It is anticipated that leaving these ditches open will have minimal impacts to the overall hydrologic performance of the site. The hydrologic influence of these ditches was modeled using Lateral Effect, a software program that determines the lateral effect of a drainage ditch or borrow pit on adjacent wetland hydrology (NCSU BAE, 2011). This analysis determined that the potential horizontal drainage influence averages 85’. Due to the fact that the southern ditch cannot be filled because of the potential for hydrologic trespass, the area immediately adjacent to the ditch will not be a credit generating part of the site. It is assumed that with the onsite modifications, such as filling ditches and surface roughening, the entire site will have more surface and groundwater, which may decrease the effect of the ditch. For this reason , the non-credit generating portion of the site is assumed to be half of the zone of influence for the ditch. Additionally, to monitor the effect of the unfilled ditch described above, four sets of coupled gauges were installed perpendicular to the unfilled ditch. Each set includes a well that is 50’ from the open ditch and one that is 80’ from the ditch. An additional 4 gauges were installed between the coupled gauges to monitor hydrology less than 42.5’ from the open ditch (See GA9-GA20 on Figure 3 in Appendix A). 3.2 Wetland Vegetation Seven vegetation plots were set up and assessed for the baseline vegetation monitoring. The plots were installed with flagged metal conduit at each corner and a flagged PVC pipe was installed at the photo corner. Vegetation data collection will follow the CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation (Lee et al. 2008). The baseline vegetation monitoring was conducted as Level 1: Inventory of Planted Stems, as will the first- year monitoring. Beginning in Year Two and continuing throughout the rest of the monitoring period, the BBWRS will be monitored using the Level 2 protocol. Vegetation monitoring will occur in monitoring years 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7. Baseline vegetation plot information can be found in Appendix B. 3.3 Digital Photos Six photograph reference points (PRPs) have been established as part of the baseline monitoring to assist in characterizing the BBWRS and to allow qualitative evaluation of site conditions. Starting in the first monitoring year, these photos will be taken in late summer, so that vegetative conditions are similar between monitoring years. 3.4 Watershed Conditions Yearly monitoring will document any evident changes in the watershed. Any large hydrologic events in the watershed, such as tropical storms or hurricanes, will also be documented in the yearly monitoring reports. Bear Basin Wetland Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA DMS Contract # 004741 5 Final Baseline Monitoring Report 3.5 Monitoring Guidelines The first scheduled monitoring will be conducted during the first full growing season following project completion. Monitoring shall subsequently be conducted annually for a total period of seven years or until the project meets its success criteria. Annual monitoring reports will be prepared and submitted after all monitoring tasks for each year are completed. The report will document the monitored components and include all collected data, analyses, and photographs. Each report will provide the new monitoring data and compare the most recent results against previous findings. 3.6 Maintenance and Contingency KCI will monitor the BBWRS on a regular basis and conduct a physical inspection of the site a minimum of once per year throughout the post-construction monitoring period until performance standards are met. These site inspections may identify site components and features that require routine maintenance. Routine maintenance should be expected most often in the first two years following site construction and may include repairing constructed outlets and flow dispersement from seepage areas. Any maintenance activities will be documented in the yearly monitoring reports. Bear Basin Wetland Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA DMS Contract # 004741 6 Final Baseline Monitoring Report 4.0 BASELINE CONDITIONS Baseline monitoring data were collected in April and May 2015. The wetland was constructed as designed with no deviation from the design plan during construction. BBWRS was planted with a total of ten different species of bare root trees in February 2015. Baseline vegetation monitoring data were collected in May 2015. The Level 1 CVS-EEP protocol was used to collect vegetation data. Plot photos from all the vegetation plots can be found in Appendix B. The results of the vegetation baseline monitoring show an average of 763 stems per acre in the planted restoration area (Table 5. Appendix B). Additionally, stem counts within each individual plot were well- above the required 320 stems per acre. 5.0 REFERENCES Lee, Michael T., R.K. Peet, S.D. Roberts, and T.R. Wentworth. 2008. CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation, Version 4.2 (http://cvs.bio.unc.edu/methods.htm) NCDENR, Ecosystem Enhancement Program. 6/8/2012. Procedural Guidance and Content Requirements for EEP Monitoring Reports. NCEEP Monitoring Report Template, Version 1.5. http://portal.ncdenr.org/c/document_library/get_file?p_l_id=1169848&folderId=7135626 &name=DLFE-53021.pdf NCDENR, Ecosystem Enhancement Program. 2010. White Oak River Basin Restoration Priorities 2010. Raleigh, NC. Last accessed 4/2015 at: http://portal.ncdenr.org/c/document_library/get_file?uuid=1c0b7e5a-9617-4a44-a5f8- df017873496b&groupId=60329 NCSU BAE. North Carolina State University, Biological and Agricultural Engineering. 2011. Method to Determine Lateral Effect of a Drainage Ditch on Adjacent Wetland Hydrology. Last accessed 11/2012 at: http://www.bae.ncsu.edu/soil_water/projects/lateral_effect.html NC Wetland Functional Assessment Team. 2010. NC Wetland Assessment Method (NC WAM) User Manual, version 4.1. Last accessed 11/2012 at: http://portal.ncdenr.org/c/document_ library/get_file?uuid=76f3c58b-dab8-4960-ba43-45b7faf06f4c&groupId=38364 Bear Basin Wetland Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA DMS Contract # 004741 7 Final Baseline Monitoring Report APPENDIX A General Tables and Figures ÊÚ o 41 24 £¤258 24 £¤258 41 State Highway 41 Ki n s t o n H w y Cedar Fork R d Hu f f m a n t o w n R d State Highway 2 4 Co s t o n R d B a r b e e R d Sh i v a r L n Fountain t o w n R d Mary Tate Rd W a t e r i n g P o n d R d Foy S t Fow l e r M a n n i n g R d Potters Hill Rd Core R d Petersburg Rd Battle Ln Brock Rd C a v a n a u g h t o w n R d A l p h i n R d Jes s e W i l l i a m s R d Duffy Field Rd R a i l r o a d S t HELL AND PURGATORY RICHLANDS N e w R iver B ackSwamp T r e n t Riv e r ONSLOW COUNTY JONES COUNTY DUPLIN COUNTY ´ 8,000 0 8,0004,000 Feet 1:96,0001 inch = 8,000 feet Figure 1. Vicinity Map ÊÚ Project Site Location Major Rivers and Streams Cities and Towns o Airports within 5 miles Major Roads Other Roads ÊÚ ONSLOW PENDER DUPLIN JONES CRAVEN CARTERET ÊÊ ÊÊ ÊÊ ÊÊ ÊÊ ÊÊ ÊÊ ÊÊ ÊÊ ÊÊ ÊÊ ÊÊ ÊÊ ÊÊ ÊÊ ÊÊ ÊÊ ÊÊ ÊÊ ÊÊ ÊÊ ÊÊ ÊÊ ÊÊ ÊÊ ÊÊ ÊÊ ÊÊ ÊÊ ÊÊ ÊÊ ÊÊ ÊÊ ÊÊ ÊÊ ÊÊ ÊÊ ÊÊ ÊÊ ÊÊ ÊÊ ÊÊ ÊÊ ÊÊ ÊÊ ÊÊ ÊÊ ÊÊ ÊÊ ÊÊ ÊÊ ÊÊ ÊÊ ÊÊ ÊÊ ÊÊ ÊÊ NC OneMap, NC Center for Geographic Information and Analysis, NC 911Board 160 0 16080Feet Easement Area (11.9 ac) Non-riparian Wetland Restoration (8.6 ac) Upland Inclusion (1.9 ac) Non_credit Bearing Zone ÊÊ ÊÊÊÊ Filled Ditches Utility Easement Image Source: North Carolina Statewide Orthoimagery, 2010.FIGURE 2: PROJECT SITE PROPOSED MITIGATION PLAN VIEWBEAR BASIN RESTORATION SITEONSLOW COUNTY, NC ¯ Bear Basin Wetland Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA DMS Contract # 004741 10 Final Baseline Monitoring Report There were no BMP elements included in this project. Table 1. Project Components and Mitigation Credits Bear Basin Wetland Restoration Site, DMS Project # 95362 Mitigation Credits Stream Riparian Wetland Non-riparian Wetland Buffer Nitrogen Nutrient Offset Phosphorous Nutrient Offset Type R RE R RE R RE Acres 8.6 Credits 8.6 TOTAL CREDITS 8.6 Project Components Project Component -or- Reach ID Stationing/ Location Existing Footage/ Acreage Approach (PI, PII etc.) Restoration -or- Restoration Equivalent Restoration Footage or Acreage Mitigation Ratio Wetland Area - 8.6 acres - Restoration 8.6 acres 1:1 Component Summation Restoration Level Stream (linear feet) Riparian Wetland (acres) Non-riparian Wetland (acres) Buffer (square feet) Upland (acres) Riverine Non- Riverine Restoration 8.6 acres Enhancement Enhancement I Enhancement II Creation Preservation 1.9 acre High Quality Preservation TOTAL - - - 8.6 acres - 1.9 acre TOTAL WMU - - - 8.6 - - LEGEND - �:; 3 f� -"h4 .... , r Q _h f CONSERVATION EASEMENT ■ VEGETATION PLOT (VP) Q PHOTO POINT (PP)qce '✓ '`�J y„ r f t` '� ?�,8'� Jf.3yfj y v .: y'�Fr.. >j �•;. .-� ,way.. i1.•( WATER GAUGE LOCATION (GA) r J t SOIL TEMPERATURE GAUGE t h �,'" 4 i { • �. " . � r.. - FILLED DITCHES"a /MAGESOURCE NC 0R7h'011WAGZ7RY • ;o,.,-f � �.r GA18 GA15 �� . j PP6 ' VP7 GA19 GA16 } GA20 GA17 � / • SOIL TEMPERATURE i / +k. GAUGE / /� / i��/ / ter, • co 0 ` ppi CO F— NON-CREDIT BEARING ZONE • • - � r +,tom � __ trr • ��i+�i� t �4¢ t�•`-„�` � MONITORING PLAN VIEW � �`` tr - - - ` .- ��~- .� s.•4s�, -ia�.- '�,• }!. ;a, 7,�� •.Iflrri.Ti - - , i 1 I • F e1 } ^�! ' .' s Ci o i' .P� a � No z hL GA18 GA15 �� . j PP6 ' VP7 GA19 GA16 } GA20 GA17 � / • SOIL TEMPERATURE i / +k. GAUGE / /� / i��/ / ter, • co 0 ` ppi CO F— NON-CREDIT BEARING ZONE • • - � r +,tom � __ trr • ��i+�i� t �4¢ t�•`-„�` � MONITORING PLAN VIEW � �`` tr - - - ` .- ��~- .� s.•4s�, -ia�.- '�,• }!. ;a, 7,�� •.Iflrri.Ti - - , i 1 I • F e1 } ^�! ' .' s !( NC OneMap, NC Center for Geographic Information and Analysis, NC 911Board 200 0 200100Feet !(Reference Wetland Gauge Project Easement FIGURE 4: PROJECT SITE REFERENCE WETLANDBEAR BASIN RESTORATION SITEONSLOW COUNTY, NC ¯Image Source: North Carolina Statewide Orthoimagery, 2010. Bear Basin Wetland Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA DMS Contract # 004741 13 Final Baseline Monitoring Report Table 2. Project Activity & Reporting History Bear Basin Wetland Restoration Site, DMS Project# 95362 Activity or Report Data Collection Complete Actual Completion or Delivery Mitigation Plan July 14 Final Design – Construction Plans July 14 Construction Dec 14 Planting March 15 Baseline Monitoring/Report April/May 15 June 15 Table 3. Project Contacts Bear Basin Wetland Restoration Site, DMS Project # 95362 Design Firm KCI Associates of North Carolina, PC Landmark Center II, Suite 220 4601 Six Forks Rd. Raleigh, NC 27609 Contact: Mr. Tim Morris Phone: (919) 278-2512 Fax: (919) 783-9266 Construction Contractor KCI Environmental Technologies and Construction, Inc. Landmark Center II, Suite 220 4601 Six Forks Rd. Raleigh, NC 27609 Contact: Mr. Tim Morris Phone: (919) 278-2512 Fax: (919) 783- 9266 Planting Contractor Forestree Management Co. 1280 Maudis Road Bailey, NC 27807 Contact: Mr. Tony Cortez Phone: (252) 243-2513 Monitoring Performers MY-00 KCI Associates of North Carolina, PC Landmark Center II, Suite 220 4601 Six Forks Rd. Raleigh, NC 27609 Contact: Mr. Adam Spiller Phone: (919) 278-2514 Fax: (919) 783-9266 Bear Basin Wetland Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA DMS Contract # 004741 14 Final Baseline Monitoring Report Table 4. Project Information Bear Basin Wetland Restoration Site, DMS Project # 95362 Project Name Bear Basin Wetland Restoration Site County Onslow County Project Area (acres) 11.9 acres Project Coordinates (lat. and long.) 34.925365 N , -77.607461 W Project Watershed Summary Information Physiographic Province Coastal Plain River Basin White Oak USGS Hydrologic Unit 8-digit 03030001 USGS Hydrologic Unit 14-digit 03030001010010 DWQ Sub-basin 03-05-02b Project Drainage Area (acres) 32.7 acres Project Drainage Area Percentage of Impervious Area 2% CGIA Land Use Classification 44% Cultivated, 4% Managed Herbaceous Cover, 50% Southern Yellow Pine and 2% High-Intensity Development Wetland Summary Information (Post-Restoration) Parameters Wetland Area Size of Wetland (acres) 8.6 acres Wetland Type (non-riparian, riparian riverine or riparian non-riverine) Non-riparian Mapped Soil Series Rains and Stallings (Pantego and Lynchburg by detailed soil investigation) Drainage class Poorly drained Soil Hydric Status Drained Hydric Source of Hydrology Precipitation Hydrologic Impairment Ditching and Crops Native vegetation community Crops Percent composition of exotic invasive vegetation 0% Regulatory Considerations Regulation Applicable? Resolved? Supporting Documentation Waters of the United States – Section 404 Yes Yes, received 404 permit Jurisdictional Determination Waters of the United States – Section 401 Yes Yes, received 401 permit Jurisdictional Determination Endangered Species Act No N/A N/A Historic Preservation Act No N/A N/A Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA)/ Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) No N/A N/A FEMA Floodplain Compliance No N/A FEMA Floodplain Checklist Essential Fisheries Habitat No N/A N/A Bear Basin Wetland Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA DMS Contract # 004741 15 Final Baseline Monitoring Report APPENDIX B Baseline Data Bear Basin Wetland Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA DMS Contract # 004741 Final Baseline Monitoring Report Table 5. CVS Stem Count Total and Planted by Plot and Species Bear Basin Wetland Restoration Site (DMS Project Code 95362) Current Plot Data (MY0 2015) Annual Means Scientific Name Common Name Species Type 95362-01-0001 95362-01-0002 95362-01-0003 95362-01-0004 95362-01-0005 95362-01-0006 95362-01-0007 MY0 (2015) PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T PnoLS P-all T Aronia arbutifolia Red Chokeberry Shrub 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 4 4 Betula nigra River birch Tree 1 1 1 4 4 4 1 1 1 6 6 6 Cephalanthus occidentalis Common buttonbush Shrub 1 1 1 1 1 1 Diospyros virginiana Common persimmon Tree 3 3 3 3 3 3 1 1 1 7 7 7 Fraxinus pennsylvanica Green ash Tree 5 5 5 3 3 3 8 8 8 Liriodendron tulipifera Tuliptree Tree 5 5 5 7 7 7 3 3 3 15 15 15 Magnolia virginiana Sweetbay Tree 2 2 2 3 3 3 5 5 5 Quercus Oak Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 Quercus nigra Water oak Tree 1 1 1 1 1 1 Quercus pagoda Cherrybark oak Tree 6 6 6 13 13 13 8 8 8 21 21 21 1 1 1 6 6 6 10 10 10 65 65 65 Quercus phellos Willow oak Tree 2 2 2 3 3 3 7 7 7 4 4 4 16 16 16 Vaccinium corymbosum Highbush blueberry Shrub 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 Stem count 19 19 19 18 18 18 31 31 31 28 28 28 11 11 11 14 14 14 11 11 11 132 132 132 size (ares) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 size (ACRES) 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.17 Species count 6 6 6 4 4 4 10 10 10 2 2 2 3 3 3 5 5 5 2 2 2 12 12 12 Stems per ACRE 769 769 769 728 728 728 1255 1255 1255 1133 1133 1133 445 445 445 567 567 567 445 445 445 763 763 763 Bear Basin Wetland Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA DMS Contract # 004741 Final Baseline Monitoring Report Vegetation Monitoring Plot Photos Vegetation Plot 1 – MY-00 – 5/19/15 Vegetation Plot 2 – MY-00 – 5/19/15 Vegetation Plot 3 – MY-00 – 5/19/15 Vegetation Plot 4 – MY-00 – 5/19/15 Vegetation Plot 5 – MY-00 – 5/19/15 Vegetation Plot 6 – MY-00 – 5/19/15 Bear Basin Wetland Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA DMS Contract # 004741 Final Baseline Monitoring Report Vegetation Plot 7 – MY-00 – 5/19/15 Bear Basin Wetland Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA DMS Contract # 004741 Final Baseline Monitoring Report Photo Reference Points PP1 – MY-00 – 5/26/15 PP2– MY-00 – 5/26/15 PP3 – MY-00 – 5/26/15 PP4 – MY-00 – 5/26/15 PP5 – MY-00 – 5/26/15 PP6 – MY-00 – 5/26/15 Bear Basin Wetland Restoration Site KCI Associates of NC, PA DMS Contract # 004741 Final Baseline Monitoring Report APPENDIX C As-Built Plan Sheet 4 U O U PROJECT LOCATION VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE DIRECTIONS FROM RALEIGH: PROCEED EAST ON 140 FOR APPROXIMATELY 74 MILES. THEN TAKE EXIT 373 FOR NC -24 E/ NC -903 TOWARDS KENANSVILLE. TAKE A LEFT OFF 140 ONTO NC -24 El NC -903. AFTER 6 MILES TAKE A RIGHT TO STAY ONTO NC -24 E. IN 19 MILES TAKE A LEFT ONTO JESSE WILLIAMS RD. THE SITE WILL BE ON THE RIGHT APPROXIMATELY 0.8 MILES UP THE ROAD. INDEX OF SHEETS I AS -BUILT R]ZE SHEET T ASBUILTSITE PLAN 3 AS -BUILT PLANTING PLAN GRAPHIC SCALES -50 -25 0 50 100 ilil SITE AND PLANTING PLANS NCD ENR DIVISION OF MITIGATION SERVICES BEAR BASIN RESTORATION SITE PROJECT DATA ONSLOW COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA WHITE OAK RIVER BASIN UPPER NEW RIVER WATERSHED 03030001010010 SHEETS 2 8 3 UPLAND PRESERVATION FSS 1 �yS �O 90 � NONRIPARIAN RESETLAND TORATION NON-CREDIT 1 BEARING ZONE NONRIPARIAN WETLAND RESTORATION = 8.6 ACRES Prepared in the Office of.. KCI Associates of North Carolina, P.A. SOME 220 LANDMARK CENTER N. 4601SIX FORMS RO.. PALEIOH, NC 27609 ENGINEERS . PLANNERS • ECOLOGISTS GARY M. MRYNCZA, P.E. PROJECT FNGMEFR TIM MORRIS RETUNO DESIGN i �� AS BUILT PLAN PROJECT ENGINEER SEAL 32733 07. t7 IS Prepared for. NCDENR DIVISION OF MITIGATION SERVICES JEFFJUREK CONTRACT ADAHNISTRATOR 53ff .C. 95362 1 AS BUILT PLAN PROJECT ENGINEER SEAL 32733 07. t7 IS Prepared for. NCDENR DIVISION OF MITIGATION SERVICES JEFFJUREK CONTRACT ADAHNISTRATOR SITE PLAN LEGEND EASEMENT LINE PRE -RESTORATION CONTOUR LINES DESIGNED CONTOUR LINES —OHW— EXISTING OVERHEAD WIRE ® ROCK STABILIZED OUTLET FILLED DITCH Hqp 'B�0 -50 -25 0 50 100 GRAPHIC SCALE NOTE: SURFACE ROUGHENING WAS INSTALLED THROUGHOUT THE EASEMENT TO ALLEVIATE SOIL COMPACTION AND TO ENHANCE SURFACE WATER STORAGE. 07.17.1 rABILIZED DMIMGE UWAU INSTALLED YP.) AS -BUILT: SITE PLAN A``1111111 yy41 vA WETLAND PLANTING ZONE `SO\ AF?Oz�''�� NON -RIPARIAN WETLAND RESTORATION HARDWOOD FLATS VEGETATIVE COMMUNITY _ _ ,Q t ARDV �O ei° cC. 18" - 24" BARE ROOT MATERIAL SEAI. WI STEMS/ACRE, RANDOM SPECIES PLACEMENT 5Q 25 0 50 100 33 COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME WETLAND INDICATOR %OF TOTAL COF PLANTS .7 •, CHERRYSARKOAK QUERCUSPAGODA FAC 22 2200• $ BALD CYPRESS TAXODIUM DISTICHUM DEL 15 1500 GRAPHIC SCALE INE•• $2? RIVER BIRCH BETULA NIGRA FACW 11 1100 TULIP POPLAR LIRIODENDRON TULIPIFERA FACW 11 1100 1 WATER OAK QUERCUS NIGRA FAC 10 1000 , WILLOW OAK QUERCUS PHELLOS FACW- 7 700 1T1j 111111111•• 07 17-1 ` GREEN ASH FRAXINUS PENNSYLVANICA FACW 6 800 BUTTON BUSH CEPHALANTHUS OCCIDENTALIS OBL 5 500 SWEETBAY MAGNOLIA MAGNOLIA VIRGINIANA FACW 5 SW RED CHOKEBERRY ARONIAARBUTIFOLIA FACW 2 250 HIGHBUSH BLUEBERRY VACCINIUM CORYMBOSUM FACW 2 250 SWAMP CHESTNUT OAK QUERCUS MICHAUXII PACVC 2 2W PERSIMMON DIOSPYROS VIRGINIANA FAC 2 200 100 10,100 1 1 � 1 o EAS - " OV CONON EMENT SERVATI , oa PQ 1 A A C z e oo ZX - - a ` `✓ .\ � � H N.la tCss � n e 9� /� a aha \ z `d 0 ' \ a< O H- Og rUj O ,- o co0 3: c a\`' LU H `ore. SFRVATIp m Uj o GP A D PLANTING ZONE �oaa N EASEM �1a II z I W - 2W BARE ROOT MATERIAL 1000 STEMS/ACRE. RANDOM SPECIES PLACEMENT COMMONNAME SCIENTIFIC NAME WETLAND INDICATOR % TOTAL #OF PLANTS _ CHERRYBARK OAK QUERCUS PAGODA FAC 38 600 \��\ K TULIP POPLAR LIRIODENDRON TULIPIFERA FACW 25 400 SHUMARD OAK QUERCUS SHUMARDII FACU 18 300 PERSIMMON DIOSPYROS VIRGINIANA FAC 19 300 Mtk JUNE4015 100 1800 erne GRAPHC AS -BUILT PLANTING PLAN SHEE 3 OF 9